[Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Aug 8 09:31:33 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108
------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-08-08 05:22 EST -------
The question is: are these files docs or are they data? I don't know in this
specific instance because I don't know the package, but many apps with GUI front
ends have built-in ways to access their docs, which are expected to be in the
place they're configured with. Marking them as %doc and/or moving them elsewhere
could cause this built-in means of accessing the docs to fail, which would
violate the rule:
MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime
of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run
properly if it is not present.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list