[Bug 200139] Review Request: luma - A graphical tool for managing LDAP servers

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: luma - A graphical tool for managing LDAP servers


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200139





------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com  2006-08-08 10:56 EST -------
Sorry for the delay, been swamped with work... Finally poked at the -3 version a
bit, and got the following out of rpmlint:

$ rpmlint -i /build/RPMS/noarch/luma-2.3-3.fc5.noarch.rpm
E: luma only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share.

This would appear to require some hacking of install.py, and I'm actually
wondering if maybe these bits should go in
/usr/lib/python2.x/site-packages/luma/ instead of /usr/lib/luma,
/usr/share/luma/ or /usr/share/luma/lib. But python packaging definitely isn't
my area of expertise, so that could be a bad idea. :) rpmlint seems to think
somewhere under /usr/share is the place to put things.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.