[Bug 174021] Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Aug 10 18:59:53 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174021


gemi at bluewin.ch changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|CLOSED                      |NEW
           Keywords|                            |Reopened
         Resolution|NEXTRELEASE                 |




------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch  2006-08-10 14:50 EST -------
(In reply to comment #25)
> The release has the following problems:
> - aplus.el contains /usr/local/bin/a+ instead of /usr/bin/a+
This is not fixed.

> - on startup of a+
>   /usr/lib/idap.+: No such file or directory
>   somethere a path /usr/lib must be changed to /usr/lib/a+
Fixed.

As to fonts:
file /usr/share/fonts/apl is not owned by any package

the x11 fonts should remain in /usr/share/X11/fonts, only the
truetype fonts need to go to /usr/share/fonts.

I propose the following:

fonts-truetype-apl (is it really necessary to include this in the X11 font
path?):
/usr/share/fonts/apl
/usr/share/fonts/apl/KAPL.TTF

fonts-x11-apl:
/usr/share/X11/fonts/apl
/usr/share/X11/fonts/apl/fonts.alias
/usr/share/X11/fonts/apl/fonts.dir
/usr/share/X11/fonts/apl/Kaplcour-14.pcf.gz
/usr/share/X11/fonts/apl/Kaplgallant-19.pcf.gz
/usr/share/X11/fonts/apl/Kaplscreen-11.pcf.gz
/usr/share/X11/fonts/apl/Kaplscreen-Bold-14.pcf.gz

Please make sure that the correct files and also the directories
are included in the files list.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list