[Bug 202032] Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202032





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2006-08-10 16:54 EST -------
Well,

A: %Requires(post) requires xorg-x11-font-utils, /usr/sbin/chkfontpath,
fontconfig. Then, the check for existence of binary is already done by this,
I think?

B. The usage of "umask 133" was borrowed from fonts-japanese.
This is because mkfontdir creates fonts.dir in the directory in which
fonts are installed (in this case, /usr/share/fonts/japanese/misc ).
This is to ensure that fonts.dir should be 0644 permission.

(There may be the case that a people like me install rpm as a normal user
by sudo, whose umask has 0077. In this case, fonts.dir cannot be read
by another normal user.)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.