[Bug 201674] Review Request: codeblocks

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: codeblocks


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201674





------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net  2006-08-13 06:41 EST -------
> I think that for SVN repos there should be possible to use
> revision number. With CVS there is no such possibility so the
> dates must be used.

Not true. Surely you could check out from CVS using a branch tag
or revision.

Please use the date for SVN checks, too, and optionally put the
revision number at the right. Like:

  codeblocks-1.0-0.1.20060731svn.src.rpm
or:
  codeblocks-1.0-0.1.20060731svn2824.src.rpm
or:
  codeblocks-1.0-0.1.20060803cvs.src.rpm

There is no necessity to squeeze SVN revision numbers or CVS tags/revs
into the package Release. Instead, add a comment in your spec on how
to check out the included source code.

The most interesting information about pre-releases is the date, which
is independent from whether the source is maintained in SVN or CVS or
a different VCS.

Further info:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-d97a3f40b6dd9d2288206ac9bd8f1bf9b791b22a

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.