[Bug 200662] Review Request: lostirc
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Aug 13 19:46:08 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: lostirc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200662
tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu
OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-13 15:36 EST -------
I'm getting a build failure in development:
g++ -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector
--param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -Wall -o lostirc main.o
MainWindow.o MainNotebook.o Tab.o Prefs.o ServerWindow.o GuiCommands.o Entry.o
StatusBar.o TextWidget.o NickList.o DCCList.o ../libirc/libirc.a -L/lib64
-lgtkmm-2.4 -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdkmm-2.4 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lm
-lpangocairo-1.0 -lcairo -latkmm-1.6 -latk-1.0 -lpangomm-1.4 -lglibmm-2.4
-lpango-1.0 -lsigc-2.0 -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lglib-2.0
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.1/../../../../lib64/libgdk-x11-2.0.so:
undefined reference to `cairo_xlib_surface_create_for_bitmap'
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.1/../../../../lib64/libgdk-x11-2.0.so:
undefined reference to `cairo_xlib_surface_create'
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.1/../../../../lib64/libgdk-x11-2.0.so:
undefined reference to `cairo_xlib_surface_set_size'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
This is the second build failure I've had like this today; I think my tree is
busted. It builds fine on FC5.
I'm seeing two .desktop files installed: fedora-listirc.desktop and
lostirc.desktop. It looks like the package installs its own desktop file and
then the second one gets installed when you call desktop-file-install. I guess
you'll need to delete lostirc.desktop.
* source files match upstream:
501cd56bc0740d599540fb415718b939 lostirc-0.4.6.tar.gz
* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is correct.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible. License text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (FC5, x86_64).
* debuginfo package looks complete.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
lostirc = 0.4.6-2.fc5
=
/bin/sh
libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
libatkmm-1.6.so.1()(64bit)
libcairo.so.2()(64bit)
libdl.so.2()(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libgdkmm-2.4.so.1()(64bit)
libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libglibmm-2.4.so.1()(64bit)
libgmodule-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libgtkmm-2.4.so.1()(64bit)
libm.so.6()(64bit)
libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
libpangomm-1.4.so.1()(64bit)
libsigc-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
* %check is not present; no test suite upstream. Manual testing shows that the
package runs fine.
* no shared libraries are present.
* package is not relocatable.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* scriptlets present are OK (gtk-update-icon-cache
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no libtool .la droppings.
X problems with desktop file installation.
* locale files installed; %find_lang called properly.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list