[Bug 202529] Review Request: rt2500-(kmod-common)

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Aug 14 22:48:57 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: rt2500-(kmod-common)


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202529





------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk  2006-08-14 18:39 EST -------
BuildRequires:  qt-devel >= 3.2.1

If you're only packing this for FC5/6/rawhide, you won't need this.

You will need to include desktop-file-utils

ExclusiveArch:	i686 x86_64

Needs a note explaining why also needs a note why smp_mflags are not used on the
make line

%install
cd Utilitys

No.

If the file is in Utilitys from the BUILD directory, it should be

install Utilitys/foo $RPM_BUILD_DIR%{_bindir}/foo

You don't need to use cd

mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/doc/rt2500
install -D -p -m 0644 THANKS CHANGELOG FAQ LICENSE
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/doc/rt2500

These should be done in the %files section using %doc
ie.

%doc THANKS CHANGELOG FAQ etc. If the mode is not already correct, %prep is the
correct place to fix it.

cat > %{name}.desktop <<EOF

No Version tag

desktop-file-install --vendor livna 

livna?

gtk-update-icon-cache -qf %{_datadir}/pixmaps/rt2500 &>/dev/null || :
update-desktop-database &>/dev/null || :

Have a look at

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ScriptletSnippets#head-fc74f078205565f961f6d836b77c3428619c689d

for advice on this. You can't just assume gtk-update-icon-cache or
update-desktop-database exist, they have to be checked and the package they come
from included in the BRs

%{_datadir}/pixmaps/rt2500/RaConfig2500.xpm
%{_datadir}/pixmaps/rt2500/adapter.xpm

No.

%{_datadir}/pixmaps/%{name}/

is all that is required

%doc %{_datadir}/doc/rt2500/*

See above



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list