[Bug 202529] Review Request: rt2500-(kmod-common)
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Aug 14 22:48:57 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: rt2500-(kmod-common)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202529
------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-14 18:39 EST -------
BuildRequires: qt-devel >= 3.2.1
If you're only packing this for FC5/6/rawhide, you won't need this.
You will need to include desktop-file-utils
ExclusiveArch: i686 x86_64
Needs a note explaining why also needs a note why smp_mflags are not used on the
make line
%install
cd Utilitys
No.
If the file is in Utilitys from the BUILD directory, it should be
install Utilitys/foo $RPM_BUILD_DIR%{_bindir}/foo
You don't need to use cd
mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/doc/rt2500
install -D -p -m 0644 THANKS CHANGELOG FAQ LICENSE
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/doc/rt2500
These should be done in the %files section using %doc
ie.
%doc THANKS CHANGELOG FAQ etc. If the mode is not already correct, %prep is the
correct place to fix it.
cat > %{name}.desktop <<EOF
No Version tag
desktop-file-install --vendor livna
livna?
gtk-update-icon-cache -qf %{_datadir}/pixmaps/rt2500 &>/dev/null || :
update-desktop-database &>/dev/null || :
Have a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ScriptletSnippets#head-fc74f078205565f961f6d836b77c3428619c689d
for advice on this. You can't just assume gtk-update-icon-cache or
update-desktop-database exist, they have to be checked and the package they come
from included in the BRs
%{_datadir}/pixmaps/rt2500/RaConfig2500.xpm
%{_datadir}/pixmaps/rt2500/adapter.xpm
No.
%{_datadir}/pixmaps/%{name}/
is all that is required
%doc %{_datadir}/doc/rt2500/*
See above
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list