[Bug 201674] Review Request: codeblocks

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: codeblocks


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201674





------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz  2006-08-15 16:02 EST -------
(In reply to comment #10)
> Seems to be some 64-bit problems:
> 
> RPM build errors:
>     File not found by glob:
> /var/tmp/codeblocks-1.0-0.2.20060812svn2840.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/*.so.*
>     File not found:
>
/var/tmp/codeblocks-1.0-0.2.20060812svn2840.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/codeblocks/plugins
>     File not found:
>
/var/tmp/codeblocks-1.0-0.2.20060812svn2840.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/codeblocks/plugins/libastyle.so
> (and so on for many files).
> 
> Looks like the upstream source wants to install into /usr/lib regardless of what
>  configure is told.
> 

Should be a libtool issue I think as the Makefile.am files are very clean and
all are used on the build system to create the "executable" files. Can you check
how is defined libdir in Makefile.in and Makefile in some src/plugins/ subdir? I
have

libdir = @libdir@/@PACKAGE@/plugins in Makefile.in and
libdir = ${exec_prefix}/lib/codeblocks/plugins in Makefile

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.