[Bug 202439] Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Aug 16 06:24:03 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202439





------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org  2006-08-16 02:14 EST -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > * The perl autoprovider in rpm adds some automatic provides since this package
> >   installs files into %{perl_vendorarch}.  If these files are only going
> >   to be used by frozen-bubble, wouldn't it be better to put them somewhere
> >   in %{_datadir}/frozen-bubble instead?
> 
> Erm, there are .so files installed to %{perl_vendorarch}, hence the package is
> not noarch.

Yes, my bad.  The main point was that if these aren't perl modules that can be
used by other applications then they should live in an application-specific
directory instead of the system-wide perl tree.

> I could try dropping them in %{_libdir}/frozen-bubble instead, but
> I've got no clue howto make perl find them there (first perl package ever for me).
> 
> Or we could just leave them there :) (in which case I could add a provides
> filter to make it stop providing this if you want).

I've seen python programs work with python libraries that don't live in
%{python_sitearch} and figured that perl could work the same way.  But if that's
a problem, then a Provides: filter should be fine.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list