[Bug 202398] Review Request: python-musicbrainz2
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Aug 16 20:52:12 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: python-musicbrainz2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202398
mr.ecik at gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-08-16 16:42 EST -------
Okay, I'll give you a review.
MUST ITEMS:
* rpmlint doesn't show anything
* package is named good
* ! improper spec file name, change it to python-musicbrainz2.spec
* package meets Packaging Guidelines
* package is licensed with open-source compatible license (BSD)
* license file is included in %doc
* spec file is written in American English
* spec file is legible
* upstream md5sum matches md5sum of the source used to build the
package (2ff59193f357c84e9e7b2f89356c0939)
* BR is listed properly
* there is no locales
* there is no need to ldconfig
* package is not designed to be relocatable
* package own directories correctly
* permissions are set correctly
* package has a good %clean section
* package handles macros properly
* there is no need to -doc subpackage
* %doc doesn't affect runtime
* there is no need to -devel subpackage
* package doesn't contain any .la files
* no gui
WHAT TO DO:
* correct spec file name, only to show that it is correct ;)
* package owns test command, so you should add %check section
to spec file and run %{__python} setup.py test in it
If you do what I mention above, I'll approve this package.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list