[Bug 203039] Review Request: perl-Sys-Virt - Represent and manage a libvirt hypervisor connection

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Aug 18 04:23:28 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-Sys-Virt - Represent and manage a libvirt hypervisor connection


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203039





------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu  2006-08-18 00:13 EST -------
The full test suite requires perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) and
perl(Test::Pod) to run; these should be buildrequires'ed.  Add these two and
I'll approve.

+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license field matches the actual license.
+ license is open source-compatible.  License text included in package.
+ source files match upstream:
 63b776d65213df313685fc93b808b3bf  Sys-Virt-0.1.1.tar.gz
 63b776d65213df313685fc93b808b3bf  Sys-Virt-0.1.1.tar.gz.srpm
+ latest version is being packaged.
X BuildRequires are proper.
+ package builds in mock (5/x86_64).
+ rpmlint is silent.
+ final provides and requires are sane:
** perl-Sys-Virt-0.1.1-2.fc5.x86_64.rpm
== rpmlint
== provides
Virt.so()(64bit)
perl(Sys::Virt) = 0.1.1
perl(Sys::Virt::Domain)
perl(Sys::Virt::Error)
perl-Sys-Virt = 0.1.1-2.fc5
== requires
libvirt.so.0()(64bit)
libxenstore.so()(64bit)
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8)
perl(Sys::Virt::Domain)
perl(Sys::Virt::Error)
perl(XSLoader)
perl(overload)
perl(strict)
perl(warnings)
** perl-Sys-Virt-debuginfo-0.1.1-2.fc5.x86_64.rpm
== rpmlint
== provides
Virt.so.debug()(64bit)
perl-Sys-Virt-debuginfo = 0.1.1-2.fc5
== requires
+ no shared libraries in the system paths are present.
+ package is not relocatable.
+ owns the directories it creates.
+ doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ %clean is present.
X %check is present and all tests pass:
 All tests successful.
 Files=3, Tests=7,  1 wallclock secs ( 0.28 cusr +  0.06 csys =  0.34 CPU)
+ no scriptlets present.
+ code, not content.
+ documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
+ %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
+ no headers.
+ no pkgconfig files.
+ no libtool .la droppings.
+ not a GUI app.
+ not a web app.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list