[Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Aug 18 06:22:32 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221
------- Additional Comments From drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx 2006-08-18 02:12 EST -------
(In reply to comment #39)
> MUSTFIX: lib-devel contains pkgconfig file(s), so it ought to:
> Requires: pkgconfig
Hmm... is this to get the correct directory structure? Because a owner of .pc
files has no need for the pkgconfig command (the users of the .pc files are the
ones that need the command).
>
> Can you explain/justify the existence of *both* a pulseaudio-devel and a
> pulseaudio-libs-devel pkg?
>
Of course. :)
pulseaudio-devel is the headers and libraries for building modules for the
server. pulseaudio-libs-devel is the headers and libraries for building
PulseAudio clients.
> I'm also inclined to say that there's needless complexity splitting out separate
> packages for module-alsa, lib-glib2, lib-zeroconf subpkgs. These are pretty
> low-level, core libraries that will (should?!) be present on any
> audio-capable/desktop-config machine.
I couldn't find any reasonable list of libraries that are "always present", so I
went with the approach of least dependencies.
Note though that a machine running pulseaudio server/clients isn't necesariliy a
desktop machine. You could have a machine hooked up to output sound on your
living room stereo, or you could have a dedicated mp3 player (HTPC perhaps) that
you want to stream data somewhere.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list