[Bug 201779] Review Request: xfsdump

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: xfsdump


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201779


tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |tibbs at math.uh.edu
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2006-08-18 17:41 EST -------
OK, I'll go ahead and review this.  The links at the top are the only ones I
could find for the package; is that actually the current version?

First off, it doesn't build due to a lack of ncurses-devel.

Once I add that it does build.  Here's what rpmlint says:

W: xfsdump symlink-should-be-relative /usr/sbin/xfsrestore /sbin/xfsrestore
W: xfsdump symlink-should-be-relative /usr/sbin/xfsdump /sbin/xfsdump
  Indeed, these should be relative symlinks.

Plus there are tons of these in the debuginfo package:
W: xfsdump-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/src/debug/xfsdump-2.2.38/dump/inv_stobj.c ../inventory/inv_stobj.c

It seems that rpmbuild doesn't include the "common" directory in the package for
whatever reason.  I don't know how to convince it to do so.  I guess that if it
were a big deal you could flatten the links.  Unfortunately I don't know whether
it's a big deal or not so I'll have to ask around.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.