[Bug 192310] Review Request: PySyck

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: PySyck


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192310





------- Additional Comments From mdehaan at redhat.com  2006-08-21 11:30 EST -------
My mail filter must have missed the earlier two replies -- my apologies.

Following the traffic on yaml-core for PyYAML (which is picking up
considerably), I don't think packaging this is neccessary.   I personally don't
like the way YaML is growing in complexity, but it appears there is much more
active development there in the 1.1 stuff after all -- and given that, I don't
think we really want a bunch of users piling on a dead-end codebase.

The application that needed this as a prereq has moved on to other serializing
options.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.