[Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Aug 23 14:36:02 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337





------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org  2006-08-23 10:26 EST -------
(In reply to comment #41)
> Created an attachment (id=134711)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134711&action=view) [edit]
> Build log of gcin-1.2.2-8 on fc6-devel with fedora undefined
> 
> Hello.
> 
> So I cannot sponsor formally for this package (because
> I am not a member), who will be the sponsor for this package?

It is the submitter that is sponsored, not the package.

> I think that this package leaves "little" problem, so
> it would be better that this package can be released ASAP.
> 
> The reason I mentioned "little" is because 
> * I can rebuild this package with mock.
> * however, I canNOT rebuild this package without mock even
>   with proper BR rpms installed
> because usually %{fedora} is undefined and so Patch5 is applied
> when rebuilt withOUT mock, this is not right for FC5 and above.
> 
> Now, FC4 and below FC4 are marked as regacy, so this package
> can be released only for FE5 and FE6-devel. So, Patch5 is
> not needed, perhaps?

You can define the macro manyually if you wish:

$ rpmbuild -ba --define 'fedora 5' --define 'dist .fc5' packagename.spec

I think it would be better though if the default (i.e. with the fedora macro
undefined) was appropriate for the current release (FC5/FC6) and the extra
defines were only needed for the legacy distros,

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list