[Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Aug 23 14:36:02 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337
------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-08-23 10:26 EST -------
(In reply to comment #41)
> Created an attachment (id=134711)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134711&action=view) [edit]
> Build log of gcin-1.2.2-8 on fc6-devel with fedora undefined
>
> Hello.
>
> So I cannot sponsor formally for this package (because
> I am not a member), who will be the sponsor for this package?
It is the submitter that is sponsored, not the package.
> I think that this package leaves "little" problem, so
> it would be better that this package can be released ASAP.
>
> The reason I mentioned "little" is because
> * I can rebuild this package with mock.
> * however, I canNOT rebuild this package without mock even
> with proper BR rpms installed
> because usually %{fedora} is undefined and so Patch5 is applied
> when rebuilt withOUT mock, this is not right for FC5 and above.
>
> Now, FC4 and below FC4 are marked as regacy, so this package
> can be released only for FE5 and FE6-devel. So, Patch5 is
> not needed, perhaps?
You can define the macro manyually if you wish:
$ rpmbuild -ba --define 'fedora 5' --define 'dist .fc5' packagename.spec
I think it would be better though if the default (i.e. with the fedora macro
undefined) was appropriate for the current release (FC5/FC6) and the extra
defines were only needed for the legacy distros,
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list