[Bug 192049] Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Aug 25 10:35:58 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049





------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr  2006-08-25 06:26 EST -------
(In reply to comment #40)

> Quite possible.  Perhaps better would be to update the gnash source to cvs head?

That would be bad idea, since the cvs head is moving very fast. In
my case what fixed the X crash issues was not a change in gnash, but 
switching to the rawhide Mesa/xorg (but not to the latest drv-i810...)


> Updated package:
> http://people.redhat.com/petersen/extras/gnash.spec
> http://people.redhat.com/petersen/extras/gnash-0.7.1-5.src.rpm
> 
> For the record I don't really like the "flooding" of tmpdirs behaviour very
> much, but it seems like the simplest secure implementation possible.  I guess
> X uses something similar for its /tmp/xses-$USER.XXXXXX session log files.
> A better implementation would probably save the .swf files in a directory like
> "/tmp/gnash-$USER/" owned by USER having permission 0700.
> It should also take account of TMPDIR I suppose.  But I'm lazy... ;)

It also seems the best compromise to me. It won't be a problem in next
release anyway, with streaming, and personal directory.

All the issues have been solved, so I am ready to approve. One
last thing I would like is that somewhere it is marked that gnash is
usable, but also that it won't work for many flash sites and that
it is known to crash often and even trigger bugs that crash the
graphical system (or something along those lines), either in the 
README.fedora or, maybe better, in the description.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list