[Bug 204525] Review Request: eclipse-gef - Eclipse Graphical Editing Framework

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: eclipse-gef - Eclipse Graphical Editing Framework


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204525





------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com  2006-08-29 16:26 EST -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> Also, spelling error: "demostrates".

Oops.  Fixed.

> [root at berkeley ~]# rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/eclipse-gef-3.2.0-2.src.rpm
> W: eclipse-gef non-standard-group Text Editors/Integrated Development
> Environments (IDE)
> W: eclipse-gef invalid-license Eclipse Public License - v 1.0 (EPL)
> <http://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-v10.html>

These are obviously not errors.  The groups thing is wrong AFAIK since nothing's
been standardized and that's what we're using for Eclipse itself and Subclipse
just got approved with it.

> W: eclipse-gef macro-in-%changelog java_home
> W: eclipse-gef mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs

Fixed.

> W: eclipse-gef no-documentation

Hmm.  I don't know what to do about this one.  The doc plugins are in the -sdk
sub-package.

> W: eclipse-gef one-line-command-in-%post /usr/bin/rebuild-gcj-db
> W: eclipse-gef one-line-command-in-%postun /usr/bin/rebuild-gcj-db

Fixed.

Updated spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/~overholt/eclipse-gef.spec
Updated SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/~overholt/eclipse-gef-3.2.0-2.src.rpm


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.