[Bug 204525] Review Request: eclipse-gef - Eclipse Graphical Editing Framework

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: eclipse-gef - Eclipse Graphical Editing Framework


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204525





------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com  2006-08-29 22:45 EST -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > (In reply to comment #1)
> > > [root at berkeley ~]# rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/eclipse-gef-3.2.0-2.src.rpm
> > > W: eclipse-gef non-standard-group Text Editors/Integrated Development
> > > Environments (IDE)
> > > W: eclipse-gef invalid-license Eclipse Public License - v 1.0 (EPL)
> > > <http://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-v10.html>
> > 
> > These are obviously not errors.  The groups thing is wrong AFAIK since nothing's
> > been standardized and that's what we're using for Eclipse itself and Subclipse
> > just got approved with it.
> 
> Do you have a reference to the subclipse review bugzilla?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191017

> > Updated spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/~overholt/eclipse-gef.spec
> > Updated SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/~overholt/eclipse-gef-3.2.0-2.src.rpm
> 
> Build error...
> /usr/share/eclipse/readme/readme_gef.html is installed but unpackaged.

Gah, I'm an idiot.  Fixed.

Updated spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/~overholt/eclipse-gef.spec
Updated SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/~overholt/eclipse-gef-3.2.0-2.src.rpm


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.