[Bug 199021] Review Request: zynaddsubfx - Real-time software synthesizer

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: zynaddsubfx - Real-time software synthesizer


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199021





------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2006-08-30 01:30 EST -------
Somehow I managed to miss your reply.  Sorry about that; too much bugzilla mail,
I guess.

About the unowned directory: here is the set of packages in FC5 (core+extras)
which own /usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps:

HelixPlayer-1:1.0.6-1.2.2.i386
hicolor-icon-theme-0:0.9-2.noarch
sound-juicer-0:2.14.4-1.fc5.1.i386
gdm-1:2.14.9-1.i386
fedora-logos-0:1.1.42-1.fc5.1.noarch
k3b-0:0.12.15-0.FC5.1.i386
openoffice.org-core-1:2.0.2-5.17.2.i386
rssowl-0:1.2.1-1.fc5.i386
pikdev-0:0.9.1-1.fc5.i386
banshee-0:0.10.8-1.i386
rssowl-0:1.2.1-2.fc5.i386
banshee-0:0.10.9-1..fc5.i386
koffice-core-0:1.5.1-1.fc5.i386
taskjuggler-0:2.2.0-1.fc5.i386
kdirstat-0:2.5.3-3.fc5.i386
amarok-0:1.4.1-2.fc5.i386
amarok-0:1.4.1-3.fc5.i386
koffice-core-0:1.5.2-1.fc5.i386
pikdev-0:0.9.1-2.fc5.i386
sound-juicer-0:2.14.4-1.fc5.1.i386
fedora-logos-0:1.1.42-1.fc5.1.noarch
gdm-1:2.14.9-1.i386
k3b-0:0.12.15-0.FC5.1.i386
openoffice.org-core-1:2.0.2-5.16.2.i386
openoffice.org-core-1:2.0.2-5.17.2.i386

Does this package depend, directly or indirectly, on any of those?  It doesn't
look like it to me.  And thus you could install this package and its
dependencies and /usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps would be unowned, and
that's problematic according to the guidelines.

I honestly don't know what the proper solution is.  Many packages own those
directories, but I guess it might also be reasonable to depend on
hicolor-icon-theme.

Everything else looks good.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.