From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 00:53:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 19:53:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217980] New: Pup (package updater) crashes safely Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217980 Summary: Pup (package updater) crashes safely Product: Fedora Core Version: fc6 Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lsatenstein at yahoo.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Description of problem: Had messages about 19 new updates. As normal user, entered password and had the list presented on the screen, with all check boxes set. I clicked on display, to open the lower portion of the split window. Starting at the top, I clicked on the entry, read what it was about, then used the mouse scroll wheel to move down one. After reading the details of the last entry, I accidently used the scroll wheel again, and the full screen message appeared that pup have no updates. The update button on the lower right was ineffective. Second test was to do the above, but ignoring all but the last two entries. Same problem occurs. System message PUP not responding) works fine on a restart Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 01:02:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 20:02:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612010102.kB1126qA031643@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-11-30 20:02 EST ------- Spec URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/mono-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/mono-tools-1.2.1-2.src.rpm Lots of changes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 01:15:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 20:15:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210287] Review Request: Qt# - A set of qt bindings for mono In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612010115.kB11Ftwh032403@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Qt# - A set of qt bindings for mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210287 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-11-30 20:15 EST ------- Sorry for the delay... 1. The warnings from rpmlint (with the exception of the error) can be ignored Not sure about the buildroot one - I'll look at it Requires. Not a problem - I can wipe them. I'll check on the compilation flags, but from this end, it seems okay (it's not using make, but qmake, so normal rules don't apply!). As for the parallel make, I need to comment it. 3. I'll need to check. The devel should be a real .so file http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/qtsharp-0.7.1-2.src.rpm http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/qtsharp.spec Contains most of the fixes needed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 01:56:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 20:56:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217980] Pup (package updater) crashes safely In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612010156.kB11u0jX002047@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Pup (package updater) crashes safely https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217980 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Package Review |pirut AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |katzj at redhat.com QAContact|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org | CC|notting at redhat.com, fedora- | |package-review at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 02:14:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 21:14:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216734] Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612010214.kB12EVEs003207@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216734 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-30 21:14 EST ------- I think i should move away from this review as i am not getting results. Better let Gianluca Review your package. I request Gianluca or any other watchers kindly Remove me from ASSIGNED and those who want to review ASSIGN this Review to himself and Review this package. Sorry for leaving this Review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 03:19:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 22:19:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216734] Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612010319.kB13JBU2005181@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216734 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|panemade at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 04:13:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 23:13:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 180092] Review Request: NRPE - Monitoring agent for Nagios In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612010413.kB14DPPc010537@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NRPE - Monitoring agent for Nagios https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180092 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 04:17:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 23:17:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217990] New: Review Request: perl-Gnome2-VFS - Perl interface to the 2.x series of the GNOME VFS library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217990 Summary: Review Request: perl-Gnome2-VFS - Perl interface to the 2.x series of the GNOME VFS library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Gnome2-VFS/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Gnome2-VFS-1.061-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Gnome2-VFS.spec Description: This module allows you to interface with the GNOME Virtual File System library. It provides the means to transparently access files on all kinds of filesystems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 04:18:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 23:18:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217990] Review Request: perl-Gnome2-VFS - Perl interface to the 2.x series of the GNOME VFS library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612010418.kB14IG5f011265@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gnome2-VFS - Perl interface to the 2.x series of the GNOME VFS library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217990 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 04:19:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 23:19:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217991] New: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-Simple-List - Simple interface to Gtk2's complex MVC list widget Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217991 Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-Simple-List - Simple interface to Gtk2's complex MVC list widget Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Gtk2-Ex-Simple-List/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Gtk2-Ex-Simple-List-0.50-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Gtk2-Ex-Simple-List.spec Description: Gtk2 has a powerful, but complex MVC (Model, View, Controller) system used to implement list and tree widgets. Gtk2::Ex::Simple::List automates the complex setup work and allows you to treat the list model as a more natural list of lists structure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 04:19:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 23:19:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217991] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-Simple-List - Simple interface to Gtk2's complex MVC list widget In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612010419.kB14Jd9X011490@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-Simple-List - Simple interface to Gtk2's complex MVC list widget https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217991 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 04:33:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 23:33:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 193157] Review Request: system-config-selinux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612010433.kB14XvcW013271@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-selinux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193157 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-11-30 23:33 EST ------- ping on this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 05:51:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 00:51:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217998] New: Review Request: alfont - Font rendering library for the Allegro game library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217998 Summary: Review Request: alfont - Font rendering library for the Allegro game library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/alfont.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/alfont-2.0.6-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: alfont also known as AllegroFont or AlFont is a wrapper around the freetype2 library for use with the Allegro game library. Thus allowing the display of text using freetype fonts on Allegro bitmaps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 08:14:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 03:14:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216526] Review Request: perl-String-Approx Perl extension for approximate matching (fuzzy matching) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612010814.kB18E7El024596@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-String-Approx Perl extension for approximate matching (fuzzy matching) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216526 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-12-01 03:14 EST ------- Sorry, didn't see that I didn't said: APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 08:14:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 03:14:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210287] Review Request: Qt# - A set of qt bindings for mono In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612010814.kB18En90024624@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Qt# - A set of qt bindings for mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210287 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-01 03:14 EST ------- Well, I have not checked 0.7.1-2 in detail, however, A. For compilation flags of libqtsharp.so (as I noted in comment #3): (In reply to comment #5) > 1. I'll check on the compilation > flags, but from this end, it seems okay (it's not using make, but qmake, so > normal rules don't apply!). For libqtsharp.so, qmake is only used against libqtsharp.pro to create normal Makefile and then libqtsharp.so is created from normal C++ program(s), so passing fedora-specific compilation flags is necessary. For this, it seems that you have to modify libqtsharp/libqtsharp.pro . I don't know about the rules of qmake and pro files, however, when I removed 'debug' from 'CONFIG +=' line (line 3), it seems to pass fedora flags(, however I don't know if I am doing the right way). B. for libqtsharp.so itself: libqtsharp.so contains undefined non-weak symbol: --------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost i386]$ ldd -r /usr/lib/libqtsharp.so.0.0.0 > /dev/null undefined symbol: qt_QObject_registerEventDelegate (/usr/lib/libqtsharp.so.0.0.0) --------------------------------------------- and I cannot find where qt_QObject_registerEventDelegate is defined... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 08:54:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 03:54:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217990] Review Request: perl-Gnome2-VFS - Perl interface to the 2.x series of the GNOME VFS library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612010854.kB18sTZw026845@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gnome2-VFS - Perl interface to the 2.x series of the GNOME VFS library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217990 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-01 03:54 EST ------- Will review this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 08:55:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 03:55:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217991] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-Simple-List - Simple interface to Gtk2's complex MVC list widget In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612010855.kB18t6BT026942@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-Simple-List - Simple interface to Gtk2's complex MVC list widget https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217991 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-01 03:55 EST ------- will take this for review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 08:56:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 03:56:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217991] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-Simple-List - Simple interface to Gtk2's complex MVC list widget In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612010856.kB18uTAH027097@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-Simple-List - Simple interface to Gtk2's complex MVC list widget https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217991 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 10:54:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 05:54:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218018] New: Review Request: spampd - Transparent SMTP/LMTP proxy filter using spamassassin Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218018 Summary: Review Request: spampd - Transparent SMTP/LMTP proxy filter using spamassassin Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: matthias at rpmforge.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/spampd.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/spampd-2.30-2.src.rpm Description: Spampd is a program used within an e-mail delivery system to scan messages for possible Unsolicited Commercial E-mail (UCE, aka spam) content. It uses SpamAssassin (SA) to do the actual message scanning. Spampd acts as a transparent SMTP/LMTP proxy between two mail servers, and during the transaction it passes the mail through SA. If SA decides the mail could be spam, then spampd will ask SA to add some headers and a report to the message indicating it's spam and why. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 11:00:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 06:00:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218019] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218019 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: matthias at rpmforge.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/postgrey.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/postgrey-1.27-2.src.rpm Description: Postgrey is a Postfix policy server implementing greylisting. When a request for delivery of a mail is received by Postfix via SMTP, the triplet CLIENT_IP / SENDER / RECIPIENT is built. If it is the first time that this triplet is seen, or if the triplet was first seen less than 5 minutes, then the mail gets rejected with a temporary error. Hopefully spammers or viruses will not try again later, as it is however required per RFC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 11:01:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 06:01:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218020] New: Review Request: postgrey - Postfix Greylisting Policy Server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218020 Summary: Review Request: postgrey - Postfix Greylisting Policy Server Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: matthias at rpmforge.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/postgrey.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/postgrey-1.27-2.src.rpm Description: Postgrey is a Postfix policy server implementing greylisting. When a request for delivery of a mail is received by Postfix via SMTP, the triplet CLIENT_IP / SENDER / RECIPIENT is built. If it is the first time that this triplet is seen, or if the triplet was first seen less than 5 minutes, then the mail gets rejected with a temporary error. Hopefully spammers or viruses will not try again later, as it is however required per RFC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 11:04:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 06:04:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218019] Review Request:
- In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612011104.kB1B4E7m005193@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218019 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- - |summary here> Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2006-12-01 06:04 EST ------- Sorry for the incomplete dupe of bug #218020. Browser weirdness... got confused... and it was too late. Closing as NOTABUG. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 11:07:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 06:07:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218022] New: Review Request: clamsmtp - SMTP filter daemon for anti-virus checking using ClamAV Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218022 Summary: Review Request: clamsmtp - SMTP filter daemon for anti- virus checking using ClamAV Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: matthias at rpmforge.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/clamsmtp.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/clamsmtp-1.8-1.src.rpm Description: ClamSMTP is an SMTP filter that allows you to check for viruses using the ClamAV anti-virus software. It accepts SMTP connections and forwards the SMTP commands and responses to another SMTP server. The 'DATA' email body is intercepted and scanned before forwarding. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 11:09:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 06:09:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218023] New: Review Request: alphabet-soup - Guide your worm through the soup to spell words Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218023 Summary: Review Request: alphabet-soup - Guide your worm through the soup to spell words Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/alphabet-soup.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/alphabet-soup-1.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Guide your worm through the soup to spell words and earn points. Play the way you like with several game mode selections. Words are chosen from one of three included dictionaries, or import your own. --- Note this requires alfont whose review is bug 217998 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 11:11:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 06:11:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218023] Review Request: alphabet-soup - Guide your worm through the soup to spell words In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612011111.kB1BBRS0005587@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alphabet-soup - Guide your worm through the soup to spell words https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218023 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |217998 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 11:11:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 06:11:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217998] Review Request: alfont - Font rendering library for the Allegro game library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612011111.kB1BBSZr005595@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alfont - Font rendering library for the Allegro game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217998 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |218023 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 13:14:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 08:14:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 206238] Review Request: qdbm - Quick Database Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612011314.kB1DEL6R012981@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qdbm - Quick Database Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206238 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-01 08:14 EST ------- I wait another one day before marking this as CLOSED FE-DEADREVIEW. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 13:33:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 08:33:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 206238] Review Request: qdbm - Quick Database Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612011333.kB1DXCbA013843@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qdbm - Quick Database Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206238 tagoh at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(tagoh at redhat.com) | ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2006-12-01 08:33 EST ------- Sorry for not getting back to you earlier. I'm being busy now. so I don't think I can continue to work on this so far. if it would be appropriate, I don't mind to close this. when I get a time and someone doesn't work on yet, I'll reopen this then. Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 13:44:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 08:44:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 206238] Review Request: qdbm - Quick Database Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612011344.kB1DiMM8014616@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qdbm - Quick Database Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206238 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |201449 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-01 08:44 EST ------- Thank you for reply. Now I once close this bug. Please feel free to reopen this bug when you are willing to do so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 13:47:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 08:47:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 206238] Review Request: qdbm - Quick Database Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612011347.kB1Dlt6I015155@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qdbm - Quick Database Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206238 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 14:35:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 09:35:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215883] Review Request: idioskopos - C++ Introspection Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612011435.kB1EZZhm020295@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: idioskopos - C++ Introspection Library Alias: idioskopos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215883 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-01 09:35 EST ------- Well, first review for this: A. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * Licensing - Well, /usr/lib/pkgconfig/idioskopos-1.0.pc reads: ------------------------------------------------------ ## This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify ## ## it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as ## ## published by the Free Software Foundation version 2.1 ## ------------------------------------------------------ So this package is licensed under GPL, not LGPL because GPL is more strict than LGPL... * BuildRequires: - Is m4 required? Mockbuild succeeds without m4 and rpmdiff shows no difference. * Timestamps - Well, -devel package contains a lot of header files so keeping timestamps is highly preferable as * it shows if vendor (like you) have modified the original files * it shows when the files are created So keep timestamps, at least for header files. Usually, -------------------------------------------------------- make INSTALL="install -p" install -------------------------------------------------------- plays the trick. B. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines (okay.) C. Other things I have noticed: * Spec file description ---------------------------------------------------------- %install ........ %{__cp} -ar docs/reference . ........ %doc ChangeLog reference ---------------------------------------------------------- This should be okay with --------------------------------------------------------- %install ........ ....... %doc ChangeLog docs/reference --------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 14:55:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 09:55:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217990] Review Request: perl-Gnome2-VFS - Perl interface to the 2.x series of the GNOME VFS library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612011455.kB1EtURe021788@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gnome2-VFS - Perl interface to the 2.x series of the GNOME VFS library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217990 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-01 09:55 EST ------- Tried building package. Got I: perl-Gnome2-VFS checking W: perl-Gnome2-VFS devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/Gnome2/VFS/Install/vfs2perl-version.h A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. W: perl-Gnome2-VFS devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/Gnome2/VFS/Install/vfs2perl.h A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. W: perl-Gnome2-VFS devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/Gnome2/VFS/Install/vfs2perl-gtypes.h A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. W: perl-Gnome2-VFS devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/Gnome2/VFS/Install/vfs2perl-autogen.h A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. All above are ignored as its perl package. Unrecognized argument in LIBS ignored: '-pthread' Which again here can be ignored as per https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166252 Got many cpio: Gnome2-VFS-1.061/GnomeVFS.c: No such file or directory cpio: Gnome2-VFS-1.061/GnomeVFS.xs: No such file or directory cpio: Gnome2-VFS-1.061/GnomeVFSAddress.c: No such file or directory ... I think they can also be ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 15:07:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 10:07:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218020] Review Request: postgrey - Postfix Greylisting Policy Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612011507.kB1F722x022984@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgrey - Postfix Greylisting Policy Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218020 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-12-01 10:07 EST ------- This already seems to be under review in #182027 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 15:58:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 10:58:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211807] Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612011558.kB1Fwaq9027454@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211807 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2006-12-01 10:58 EST ------- No go for me. Still getting the ld error. (FC6/x86_64) /usr/bin/ld: ../../dist/lib/libgkconcvs_s.a(nsCanvasRenderingContext2D.o): relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against `cairo_xlib_surface_create_with_xrender_format' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC /usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Bad value - Gilboa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 16:10:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 11:10:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 182027] Review Request: postgrey In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612011610.kB1GAEsu028461@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgrey https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182027 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |matthias at rpmforge.net ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2006-12-01 11:10 EST ------- I somehow managed to miss this review (note for myself : think about not only looking in CVS but also in Bugzilla), and submitted my own postgrey package for review in bug #218020. From here, either : - Have someone review my package, and have this request closed. - Have someone take over this request, someone else review it, and mine closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 16:12:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 11:12:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218022] Review Request: clamsmtp - SMTP filter daemon for anti-virus checking using ClamAV In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612011612.kB1GC0d8028592@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clamsmtp - SMTP filter daemon for anti-virus checking using ClamAV https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218022 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2006-12-01 11:11 EST ------- Not an official review since I am just contributor. First sight observations: - the package is named clamsmtp but almost everywhere in config and script files it behaves as being named clamd.smtp. However it looks that this comes from upstream. - BuildRoot has a sane value, but not the one recommended at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-f196e7b2477c2f5dd97ef64e8eacddfb517f1aa1 - rpmlint on the src.rpm gives two warnings 1)W: clamsmtp strange-permission clamsmtpd.init 0744 A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. Since the file is a startup script, this should be ignored 2)W: clamsmtp setup-not-quiet You should use -q to have a quiet extraction of the source tarball, as this generate useless lines of log ( for buildbot, for example setup -q should be used if possible - rpmlint on the binary gives a lot of errors about usage of non-standard UID/GID. Since the daemon runs under its own freshly created user, all these can be ignored. W: clamsmtp conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/clamd.d/smtp.conf This might be edited by the user, so I think that marking it as noreplace could be useful. E: clamsmtp non-standard-uid /var/lib/clamsmtp/tmp clamsmtp E: clamsmtp non-standard-gid /var/lib/clamsmtp/tmp clamsmtp E: clamsmtp non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/clamsmtp/tmp 0750 This directory should not exist. At least not for pid, socket etc which should not be placed here. W: clamsmtp dangling-relative-symlink /usr/sbin/clamd.smtp clamd Symlink to clamd, provided by the (required) clamav-server package E: clamsmtp non-standard-uid /etc/clamsmtpd.conf clamsmtp E: clamsmtp non-standard-gid /etc/clamsmtpd.conf clamsmtp E: clamsmtp non-readable /etc/clamsmtpd.conf 0640 E: clamsmtp non-standard-uid /var/lib/clamsmtp clamsmtp E: clamsmtp non-standard-gid /var/lib/clamsmtp clamsmtp E: clamsmtp non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/clamsmtp 0750 All these can be ignored due to daemon running as a new user which owns the above E: clamsmtp incoherent-logrotate-file /etc/logrotate.d/clamd.smtp logrotate file should be named clamsmtp E: clamsmtp init-script-name-with-dot /etc/rc.d/init.d/clamd.smtp recommended name is clamsmtp E: clamsmtp no-status-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/clamd.smtp W: clamsmtp no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/clamd.smtp E: clamsmtp subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/clamd.smtp The init.d/clamd.smtp script just starts clamd.wrapper from the clamav package. If possible, adding a couple of lines to verify the status would be nice, but I guess that it can be ignored. How ever,I would say that a stop entry should exist W: clamsmtp no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/clamsmtpd init.d/clamsmtpd claims it can do start, stop, restart, status, condrestart. However only start, stop and restart are implemented W: clamsmtp incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/clamsmtpd $prog the package is named clamsmtp so the script should be called clamsmtp too, not clamsmtpd - the %install stage makes use of the non-recommended %makeinstall macro (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-fcaf3e6fcbd51194a5d0dbcfbdd2fcb7791dd002) - configuration files are created as here documents at install time. I have not seen any comments about this in the wiki, but I think that using standard files included as %source would be saner and less error prone - a bunch of files are created in non-standard places (/var/lib/clamsmtp/clamd.smtp.log instead of /var/log/clamsmtp; /var/lib/clamsmtp/clamd.smtp.pid instead of /var/run/clamsmtp; I would also recommend something in the line of /var/run/clamav/clamd.smtp rather then /var/lib/clamsmtp/clamd.smtp.sock) Now, the review list: -OK: named according to packaging guidelines -OK: program licensed as GPL, original tar.gz includes the license, license filed in spec matches the actual license -OK: spec is written in AE but includes configurations files and startup scripts as here documents which make it hard to follow -OK: source matchs upstream (04da6aab94934641fcf9e7a7598346fb clamsmtp-1.8.tar.gz for both files) -OK: builds succesfully in mock/i386 -OK: no build dependency -OK: no locale -OK: no shared libraries, so no need for calling ldconfig -OK: not relocatable -OK: the package owns the files/directories it creates but does not respect FHS (see above my comments about this) -OK: does not include duplicates -OK: permissions are very sane -OK: includes a %clean section -OK: consistent usage of macros -OK: all content is permissable -OK: no large documents, so no need for separate -doc package -OK: %doc really includes just docs, runtime functionality not affected by them -OK: No header/static/.la/.pc files -OK: Not a GUI so no need for .desktop -OK: owns only its files -OK: scriptlets are sane; the daemons are added bit not started by default, conditionally restarted at upgrade, -SHOULD: works as advertised (at least does not segfault..) Bottom line: - I think all those here documents should be placed in independent SOURCE files - the startup scripts NEEDWORK (either implementing the missing advertised functions or removing those functions from the help line) - %makeinstall should be avoided - maybe something can be done about the inconsistent name usage ? clamsmtp (package name) is almost not used at all... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 16:34:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 11:34:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215883] Review Request: idioskopos - C++ Introspection Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612011634.kB1GYmW1030546@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: idioskopos - C++ Introspection Library Alias: idioskopos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215883 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2006-12-01 11:34 EST ------- > A. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : > * Licensing Got that fixed. I copied the .pc.in from another project (that I have under the GPL), and missed changing that one. > * BuildRequires: > - Is m4 required? Yes. My configure script needs m4 (it's used to autobuild the Fedora and SuSE .spec files from spec.m4), and m4 isn't on the exceptions list: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/FullExceptionList > * Timestamps I hadn't even noticed that. I agree, preserving the timestamps is nice! Changed: %{__make} DESTDIR=%{buildroot} install To: %{__make} DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="%{__install} -p" install > C. Other things I have noticed: Yes, that is much better. Thanks for all your help. A new spec and release are at: Spec URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/idioskopos.spec SRPM URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/idioskopos-0.3.2-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 16:38:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 11:38:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218022] Review Request: clamsmtp - SMTP filter daemon for anti-virus checking using ClamAV In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612011638.kB1Gc4TT030800@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clamsmtp - SMTP filter daemon for anti-virus checking using ClamAV https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218022 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2006-12-01 11:38 EST ------- Thanks a lot for all these comments. Although you can't currently do any formal review or approval, this does help a lot the process ;-) New spec file : http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/clamsmtp.spec New srpm : http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/clamsmtp-1.8-2.src.rpm - I've externalized all of the clamd integration files. - I've added -q to %setup. - I've replaced %makeinstall with the DESTDIR method (and it works) > W: clamsmtp no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/clamsmtpd > init.d/clamsmtpd claims it can do start, stop, restart, status, condrestart. > However only start, stop and restart are implemented The script can't do "reload" indeed, but all advertised functions are there. About the inconsisten naming, I don't think it is. There are two quite different things in this package : The clamsmtpd daemon itself, which if from the upstream clamsmtp project (I would have named the project "clamsmtpd", myself...), and then all the "glue" I add in order to not have to configure anything manually. This "glue" is what is called "clamd.smtp" since this is how Enrico packaged ClamAV : You can run your own instance called "clamd.whatever", and here it's really useful since clamsmtp can run its own instance, thus be completely standalone and working out of the box. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 16:47:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 11:47:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216526] Review Request: perl-String-Approx Perl extension for approximate matching (fuzzy matching) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612011647.kB1GlDlw031373@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-String-Approx Perl extension for approximate matching (fuzzy matching) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216526 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-12-01 11:47 EST ------- Thanks. Checked in. Added to owners.list. Building... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 16:47:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 11:47:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216536] Review Request: FuzzyOcr - Checks for specific keywords in image attachments, using gocr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612011647.kB1GlNMi031379@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FuzzyOcr - Checks for specific keywords in image attachments, using gocr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216536 Bug 216536 depends on bug 216526, which changed state. Bug 216526 Summary: Review Request: perl-String-Approx Perl extension for approximate matching (fuzzy matching) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216526 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 16:48:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 11:48:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 193157] Review Request: system-config-selinux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612011648.kB1GmjO7031506@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-selinux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193157 dwalsh at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From dwalsh at redhat.com 2006-12-01 11:48 EST ------- This should be removed, since rather than make this a new package, I added it to policycoreutils. policycoreutils-gui to be precise. It was using all of the underlying python code for semanage, and getting translations to work was going to be a hassle. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 16:59:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 11:59:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 198836] Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612011659.kB1GxHYK032228@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198836 besfahbo at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tonyyoung at lineone.net OtherBugsDependingO| |217479 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From besfahbo at redhat.com 2006-12-01 11:59 EST ------- *** Bug 217479 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 17:02:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 12:02:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217998] Review Request: alfont - Font rendering library for the Allegro game library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612011702.kB1H29D2032469@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alfont - Font rendering library for the Allegro game library Alias: alfont https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217998 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chris.stone at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | Alias| |alfont ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-12-01 12:01 EST ------- ==== REVIEW CHECKLIST ==== O rpmlint output: PRE-INSTALL: W: alfont-devel no-documentation POST-INSTALL: W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 ugetc W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 ugetxc W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 getg W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 uvszprintf W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 getb W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 destroy_bitmap W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 getr W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 set_uformat W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 set_trans_blender W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 get_uformat W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 masked_blit W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 create_bitmap_ex W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 solid_mode W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 need_uconvert W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 makecol W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 drawing_mode W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 ustrlen post-install rpmlint warnings must be investigated - package named according to package naming guideliens - spec file name matches %{name} - meets packaging guidelines - licensed with open source compatible license - license matches actual license - license included in %doc - spec written in American english - spec legible - sources match upstream (unrared upstream and untarred sources and ran diff on output: diff -ubBr alfont-2.0.6 AlFont (no output) - package successfully compiles and builds on FC6 x86_64 - all dependencies listed in BR - no locales - proper %post/un sections - package is not relocatable - package owns all directories it creates - file permissions set properly - contains proper %clean section - macro usage consistent - contains code - no large documentation - %doc does not affect runtime O header files in devel package devel package contains strange header file which looks like a windows version - no pkgconfig files - libs w/o suffix in devel - devel package requires main package - no .la files - not a GUI app needing a .desktop file - does not own files or directories owned by other packages ==== MUST FIX ==== - Investigate rpmlint warnings - Why is /usr/include/alfont.h.linux in devel package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 17:07:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 12:07:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218023] Review Request: alphabet-soup - Guide your worm through the soup to spell words In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612011707.kB1H7CPD000371@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alphabet-soup - Guide your worm through the soup to spell words Alias: alphabet-soup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218023 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chris.stone at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | Alias| |alphabet-soup ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-12-01 12:07 EST ------- Build fails with: ncds.c:8:20: error: aldumb.h: No such file or directory Review blocked due to build failure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 17:18:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 12:18:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218022] Review Request: clamsmtp - SMTP filter daemon for anti-virus checking using ClamAV In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612011718.kB1HIgUd001278@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clamsmtp - SMTP filter daemon for anti-virus checking using ClamAV https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218022 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2006-12-01 12:18 EST ------- First of all, I must appologize, you are right. The restart/status/condrestart were there, I have not noticed them. Unofficial review of the 2nd release: - spec file is indeed much cleaner, all previous here documents are available as independent entities - only remaining warning on the src.rpm is W: clamsmtp strange-permission clamsmtpd.init 0755 which can be ignored - rpmlint warnings on the binary: W: clamsmtp conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/clamd.d/smtp.conf E: clamsmtp non-standard-uid /var/lib/clamsmtp/tmp clamsmtp E: clamsmtp non-standard-gid /var/lib/clamsmtp/tmp clamsmtp E: clamsmtp non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/clamsmtp/tmp 0750 W: clamsmtp dangling-relative-symlink /usr/sbin/clamd.smtp clamd E: clamsmtp non-standard-uid /etc/clamsmtpd.conf clamsmtp E: clamsmtp non-standard-gid /etc/clamsmtpd.conf clamsmtp E: clamsmtp non-readable /etc/clamsmtpd.conf 0640 E: clamsmtp non-standard-uid /var/lib/clamsmtp clamsmtp E: clamsmtp non-standard-gid /var/lib/clamsmtp clamsmtp E: clamsmtp non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/clamsmtp 0750 E: clamsmtp incoherent-logrotate-file /etc/logrotate.d/clamd.smtp E: clamsmtp init-script-name-with-dot /etc/rc.d/init.d/clamd.smtp E: clamsmtp no-status-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/clamd.smtp W: clamsmtp no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/clamd.smtp E: clamsmtp subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/clamd.smtp W: clamsmtp no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/clamsmtpd W: clamsmtp incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/clamsmtpd $prog All of them have been commented before (comment #1): - UID/GID ones can be safely ignored; - those regarding permissions can be ignored, being due to running as a different (new) user; - the warning dangling relative link is false, being solved by the required clamav-server package; - per comment #2, the messages which mention inconsistent naming init-script-name-with-dot,no-status-entry, no-reload-entry for clamd.smtp should also be ignored; I am not sure about the subsys-not-used one, but I think it also can be ignored because clamd.smtp is just a wrapper - missing reload entries are not blockers - the logrotate file could be named clamsmtp thus avoiding the warning; same goes for /etc/rc.d/init.d/clamsmtpd. On the other hand since clamsmtpd is used everywhere but in the name of the project, I guess we should ignore these warnings. I still believe that log/pid/socket should not be placed in /var/lib/clamsmtp but under /var/log/ (or /var/log/clamsmtp) and /var/run, thus respecting FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#VARLOGLOGFILESANDDIRECTORIES for instance), as specified by http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-e1c5548cbbe551c7a43d375c524ab2ea0188557e -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 17:20:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 12:20:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218022] Review Request: clamsmtp - SMTP filter daemon for anti-virus checking using ClamAV In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612011720.kB1HKWV6001471@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clamsmtp - SMTP filter daemon for anti-virus checking using ClamAV https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218022 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2006-12-01 12:20 EST ------- Oh, I forgot to mention: it also builds without problems on x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 17:23:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 12:23:51 -0500 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_217350=5D_Review_Request=3A_ipw2100-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_2100_net?= =?iso-8859-1?q?work_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612011723.kB1HNpZx001751@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ipw2100-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 2100 network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217350 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2006-12-01 12:23 EST ------- How does this %decription seem : This package contains the firmware files required by the Intel? PRO/Wireless 2100 (ipw2100) driver for Linux. IMPORTANT NOTICE : This package is covered by the Intel? license found in the /lib/firmware/LICENSE.ipw2100 file. Usage of this package requires agreeing to the terms of the Intel? license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 17:26:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 12:26:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218023] Review Request: alphabet-soup - Guide your worm through the soup to spell words In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612011726.kB1HQauj002011@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alphabet-soup - Guide your worm through the soup to spell words Alias: alphabet-soup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218023 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-12-01 12:26 EST ------- ==== REVIEW CHECKLIST ==== - rpmlint output clean - package named according to package naming guidelines - spec file name matches %{name} - meets packaging guidelines - licensed with open source compatible license - license field matches actual license - license file included in %doc - spec written in American english - spec legible - sources match upstream: 364fe30c53a86217db37f53308604f74 as11src.zip - successfully compiles and builds on FC6 x86_64 X missing BR: dumb-devel - no locales - no shared libraries - package is not relocatable - package owns all directories it creates X package uses directory not pulled in through Requires must require hicolor-icons - no duplicates in %files - file permissions set properly - contains proper %clean - macro usage consistent - contains code - no large documentation - %doc does not affect runtime - no header files or static libraries - no pkgconfig files - no need for devel subpackage - no .la files - contains proper .desktop file - does not own files or directories owned by other packages ==== MUST FIX ==== - Add dumb-devel to BR - requires hicolor-icon-theme package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 17:34:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 12:34:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218022] Review Request: clamsmtp - SMTP filter daemon for anti-virus checking using ClamAV In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612011734.kB1HY6BZ002422@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clamsmtp - SMTP filter daemon for anti-virus checking using ClamAV https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218022 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2006-12-01 12:34 EST ------- So you suggest : - Log file as /var/log/clamsmtpd.log (should be possible without being in a sub-dir if the daemon drops privileges after opening the log file) - Socket file as /var/run/clamsmtpd/clamd.smtp.socket - PID file as /var/run/clamsmtpd/clamsmtpd.pid - What about the temp dir? /var/spool/clamsmtpd/ ? And once we have all of these... which one would you suggest be the new home directory for the clamsmtp user? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 18:25:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 13:25:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208396] Review Request: v4l2-tool - Tool to get webcam usage Information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612011825.kB1IPiZJ006122@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: v4l2-tool - Tool to get webcam usage Information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208396 ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-12-01 13:25 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=142599) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=142599&action=view) Updated spec file Reformatted the spec file, using Emacs M-x untabify to convert tabs->spaces and Escape-q to line up the description text. Changed desktop file to use v4l2-tool-logo.png, it's larger than v4l2-tool.png. Added back AudioVideo category (see http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html : an application is either Audio or Video (or both), but must also include AudioVideo) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 18:26:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 13:26:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218020] Review Request: postgrey - Postfix Greylisting Policy Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612011826.kB1IQbFf006204@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgrey - Postfix Greylisting Policy Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218020 mjw at woogie.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mjw at woogie.net ------- Additional Comments From mjw at woogie.net 2006-12-01 13:26 EST ------- I created the second rpm in #182027. I am not currently an extras maintainer, so if Matthias is, I think that clearly trumps me. I'd be more than happy to maintain the package, but I haven't even had time to figure out the process of getting the proper access (I'm still migrating all of my boxes to FC5 from another distro). The one thing I do sort of like in my spec file is the following, which builds a man page: %build %{_bindir}/pod2man --center="Postgrey Policy Server for Postfix" --section="8" postgrey > postgrey.8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 18:27:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 13:27:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218022] Review Request: clamsmtp - SMTP filter daemon for anti-virus checking using ClamAV In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612011827.kB1IRNO5006256@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clamsmtp - SMTP filter daemon for anti-virus checking using ClamAV https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218022 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2006-12-01 13:27 EST ------- Log file: yes. Or even /var/log/clamsmtpd Socket: yes. Pid file: yes. temp dir: /tmp or better yet /tmp/clamsmtp or even its very own home, wherever it is. There is no recommendation in the wiki AFAIK. As a matter of taste, I always have a separate partition for /tmp so of course I prefer temp files to get created there; it definitely simplifies management and keeps things consistent. Not to mention that /tmp is mounted noexec,nosuid homedir: dhcpd and rpm and the clamav package maintained by Enrico have there homes under /var/lib; The clamav and amavis versions I use (dag) have homes directly under /var. I guess /var/lib/clamsmtp (or clamsmtpd for consistence sake) would be a safe bet -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 18:36:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 13:36:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218018] Review Request: spampd - Transparent SMTP/LMTP proxy filter using spamassassin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612011836.kB1Iai4I007160@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spampd - Transparent SMTP/LMTP proxy filter using spamassassin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218018 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2006-12-01 13:36 EST ------- Unofficial review as I am just a contributor. rpmlint gives two warnings on the src.rpm W: spampd strange-permission spampd.init 0744 W: spampd setup-not-quiet First one can be ignored, second one can be silenced adding -q to %setup rpmlint gives the following on the binary: E: spampd non-standard-uid /var/spool/spampd spampd E: spampd non-standard-gid /var/spool/spampd spampd E: spampd non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/spampd 0750 These can be safely ignored, the daemon runs as (newly created) user spamd W: spampd no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/spampd Can be ignored W: spampd incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/spampd $prog This one can be ignored, it is triggered by usage of the shell variable $prog for "spampd" in the script Not a blocker: BuildRoot is not the one recommended at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-f196e7b2477c2f5dd97ef64e8eacddfb517f1aa1 Good - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license is GPL, as mentioned on the upstream project page. However it is not included in the tar.gz, so upstream SHOULD be bugged to included it; for the time being, the license is (correctly) not included in %doc - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream (742c6f2cb75db54e59d044a8ee40445f spampd-2.30.tar.gz) - package compiles in mock on i386 and x86_64 architectures - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all files and directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - not a GUI so no need for .desktop file - not a devel package, no header / static libraries / .la / .pc files - no need for post/postun ldconfig - service is added to list of services but not started by default and also removed at uninstallation time - all pre/post scripts are sane I guess that someone with more power then me should APPROVE it, especially if you silence the %setup stage. As a personal question: why is the initial rpm release labeled -2 ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 20:05:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 15:05:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218022] Review Request: clamsmtp - SMTP filter daemon for anti-virus checking using ClamAV In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612012005.kB1K5eqH016303@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clamsmtp - SMTP filter daemon for anti-virus checking using ClamAV https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218022 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rpm at greysector.net ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-12-01 15:05 EST ------- I'm not sure if you are aware of this, but clamsmtp has already been submitted by me in bug 177401. Well, since I was too busy to finish that, maybe I'll review yours instead. What do you think, Matthias? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 1 20:22:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 15:22:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 203288] Review Request: devilspie In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612012022.kB1KMVqm018145@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: devilspie https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203288 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2006-12-01 15:22 EST ------- New upstream version: 0.19 Builds again in fc5. SPEC: http://www.deadbabylon.de/fedora/extras/devilspie/devilspie.spec SRPM: http://www.deadbabylon.de/fedora/extras/devilspie/devilspie-0.19-1.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 2 00:04:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 19:04:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215258] Review Request: clucene - A C++ port of Lucene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612020004.kB204Tm7001246@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clucene - A C++ port of Lucene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215258 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2006-12-01 19:04 EST ------- Hi Jochen, Any reason why we're not moving forward on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 2 01:38:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 20:38:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 203288] Review Request: devilspie In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612020138.kB21cwAW003481@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: devilspie https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203288 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-12-01 20:38 EST ------- REVIEW for 6c989b45ab19ff212d5a7d55d624543d devilspie-0.19-1.fc6.src.rpm MUST Items: OK - rpmlint quite on all packages OK - package meets naming guidelines OK - spec file meets naming guidelines OK - package meets package guidelines OK - license open-source compatible (GPL) OK - license in specfile matches actual license OK - license included in %doc OK - spec file in American English OK - spec file is legible OK - source in SRPM matches upstream source (md5 35f555000b426e21384ab282c64c6975) OK - package builds on i386 OK - all build dependencies listed BuildRequires FIX - BuildRequires: gob2 is not needed AFAICS. Maybe it was needed in previous versions, but this source contains no gob files. MINOR - you better use "perl(XML::Parser)" instead of "perl-XML-Parser" for the BuildRequires:. OK - none of the exceptions of packaging guidelines in BuildRequires OK - locales handled correctly with %find_lang OK - no shared libs to worry about OK - package is not relocatable OK - package owns all directories that it creates OK - no duplicate files in %files section OK - permissions and %defattr correct OK - clean section with "rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" present OK - macro usage consistent OK - code, not content OK - no large docs OK - docs don't affect runtime FIX - ChangeLog is not in the package, please add it to %doc. OK - no headers or static libs OK - no pkgconfig files OK - no libtool archives OK - no need for a devilspie.desktop OK - package doesn't own files/directories owned by other packages SHOULD items: OK - package builds in mock (Core 5, 6 and devel on i386) OK - package functions as described OK - package uses disttag This package is APPROVED but you need to fix the issues mentioned above before you build it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 2 02:21:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 21:21:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 203205] Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612020221.kB22L4qI004495@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203205 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |201449 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-12-01 21:20 EST ------- Marking as bug #201449 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 2 02:23:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 21:23:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175168] Review Request: gideon - GUI designer for GTK/C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612020223.kB22N7QS004600@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gideon - GUI designer for GTK/C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175168 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |201449 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-12-01 21:22 EST ------- Marking as bug #201449 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 2 02:24:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 21:24:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 206492] Review Request: ssss - Shamir's secret sharing scheme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612020224.kB22OKd2004666@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ssss - Shamir's secret sharing scheme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206492 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |201449 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-12-01 21:24 EST ------- Marking as bug #201449 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 2 03:49:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 22:49:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208396] Review Request: v4l2-tool - Tool to get webcam usage Information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612020349.kB23ng60007874@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: v4l2-tool - Tool to get webcam usage Information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208396 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-01 22:49 EST ------- Oops i did changes but looks like i forgot to upload proper SPEC file but updated SPEC was included in SRPM. Anyway keeping release same -2 and using your changes, i uploaded new SRPM and SPEC. Kindly review them. Updated links Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/v4l2-tool/v4l2-tool.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/v4l2-tool/v4l2-tool-1.0.2-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 2 03:59:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 22:59:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215883] Review Request: idioskopos - C++ Introspection Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612020359.kB23xUr0008689@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: idioskopos - C++ Introspection Library Alias: idioskopos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215883 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-01 22:59 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=142656) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=142656&action=view) Mock build log of idioskopos 0.3.2-1 (In reply to comment #4) > > * BuildRequires: > > - Is m4 required? > > Yes. My configure script needs m4 (it's used to autobuild the Fedora and SuSE > .spec files from spec.m4), and m4 isn't on the exceptions list: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/FullExceptionList This is true for people who have to create spec file from spec.m4, however, srpm should include spec file (not spec.m4) and there is no need to create spec file again from spec.m4. So m4 should not needed for this reason. By the way I cannot rebuild 0.3.2-1 by mockbuild under FC-devel i386. Please check the build log attached. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 2 04:00:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 23:00:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217991] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-Simple-List - Simple interface to Gtk2's complex MVC list widget In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612020400.kB240VaW008800@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-Simple-List - Simple interface to Gtk2's complex MVC list widget https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217991 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-01 23:00 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPMS. + source files match upstream. f66c71bbb794b699f0c3e8ca7cebc35b Gtk2-Ex-Simple-List-0.50.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists + no .la files. + no translations are available + Dose owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Followed perl packaging guidelines. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 2 08:06:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 03:06:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217275] Review Request: ocsinventory-client - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612020806.kB286YKs017329@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocsinventory-client - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217275 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 2 14:01:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 09:01:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612021401.kB2E178J030793@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-02 09:01 EST ------- Still packaging needs to be improved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 2 14:03:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 09:03:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211336] Review Request: adesklets - A simple architecture for desktop applets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612021403.kB2E3oha031015@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adesklets - A simple architecture for desktop applets Alias: adeskets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211336 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-02 09:03 EST ------- Again ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 2 14:05:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 09:05:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210424] Review Request: fail2ban - scan log files and ban IPs with too many password failures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612021405.kB2E56Qc031125@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fail2ban - scan log files and ban IPs with too many password failures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210424 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-02 09:05 EST ------- Again ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 2 14:06:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 09:06:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211834] Review Request: gaim-libnotify - libnotify notification plugin for gaim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612021406.kB2E6sxm031239@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-libnotify - libnotify notification plugin for gaim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211834 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-02 09:06 EST ------- Well, when you come back, please let me know on this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 2 14:08:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 09:08:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612021408.kB2E8YZt031368@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-02 09:08 EST ------- Got build error install: cannot stat `etc/mybashburnrc.fedora': No such file or directory -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 2 14:12:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 09:12:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612021412.kB2ECYjp031577@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-02 09:12 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=142661) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=142661&action=view) rpmlint error free SPEC file Use this script bump release adding changelog as fixed SPEC file Version,added build section and removed dot from summary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 2 15:29:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 10:29:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218172] New: Review Request: gnome-chemistry-utils - A set of chemical utilities Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218172 Summary: Review Request: gnome-chemistry-utils - A set of chemical utilities Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: belegdol at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.republika.pl/belegdol/rpmstuff/gnome-chemistry-utils.spec SRPM URL: http://www.republika.pl/belegdol/rpmstuff/gnome-chemistry-utils-0.6.3-1.src.rpm Description: This package is a set of chemical utils. Three programs are avaible: * A 3D molecular structure viewer (GChem3Viewer). * A Chemical calculator (GChemCalc). * A periodic table of the elements application (GChemTable). Package builds fine inside mock, and the only warnings that rpmlint returns are lacks of documentation for devel and mozplugin packages. This is my first package (apart from museek+ that still waits for review), so it looks like I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 2 15:32:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 10:32:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218172] Review Request: gnome-chemistry-utils - A set of chemical utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612021532.kB2FWBBX000925@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-chemistry-utils - A set of chemical utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218172 belegdol at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177747 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 2 15:32:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 10:32:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 177747] Review Request: glade3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612021532.kB2FWMX4000936@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glade3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 belegdol at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |218172 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 2 15:33:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 10:33:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218172] Review Request: gnome-chemistry-utils - A set of chemical utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612021533.kB2FXpIk001009@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-chemistry-utils - A set of chemical utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218172 belegdol at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177747 |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 2 15:34:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 10:34:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 177747] Review Request: glade3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612021534.kB2FY2Td001025@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glade3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 belegdol at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|218172 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 2 15:57:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 10:57:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211729] Review Request: museek+ - Soulseek network filesharing client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612021557.kB2FvX8k001612@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: museek+ - Soulseek network filesharing client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211729 belegdol at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 2 17:17:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 12:17:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218176] New: Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218176 Summary: Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: belegdol at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.republika.pl/belegdol/rpmstuff/gchempaint.spec SRPM URL: http://www.republika.pl/belegdol/rpmstuff/gchempaint-0.6.6-1.src.rpm Description: GChemPaint is a 2D chemical structures editor for the Gnome-2 desktop. GChemPaint is a multi document application and is a bonobo server so that some chemistry can be embedded in other Gnome applications. Package builds fine inside mock, but keep in mind it requires gnome-chemistry-utils, which I have submitted for review separately. The only warnings rpmlint outputs say about no documentation in devel package and non-config file in /etc (gconf schema). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 2 17:20:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 12:20:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218176] Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612021720.kB2HKNsX003220@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218176 belegdol at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 2 18:08:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 13:08:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218176] Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612021808.kB2I88uX004358@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218176 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |218172 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 2 18:08:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 13:08:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218172] Review Request: gnome-chemistry-utils - A set of chemical utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612021808.kB2I8Krx004368@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-chemistry-utils - A set of chemical utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218172 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |218176 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 2 18:17:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 13:17:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218172] Review Request: gnome-chemistry-utils - A set of chemical utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612021817.kB2IH5dA004524@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-chemistry-utils - A set of chemical utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218172 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-02 13:17 EST ------- Well, interesting package. >From a quick view: A. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * Requires: - for -mozplugin package: Why does this require pkgconfig? - for -devel package: Please check /usr/lib/pkgconfig/gcu.pc ---------------------------------------------------------- Requires: libglade-2.0 libgnomeui-2.0 libgnomeprintui-2.2 gtkglext-1.0 openbabel-2.0 ---------------------------------------------------------- This means that this (-devel) package requires: --------------------------------------------------------- (libglade2-devel : required by libgnomeui-devel so this is redundant). libgnomeui-devel libgnomeprintui22-devel gtkglext-devel openbabel-devel --------------------------------------------------------- Otherwise we get a error like: --------------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ pkg-config --cflags gcu Package openbabel-2.0 was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing `openbabel-2.0.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable Package 'openbabel-2.0', required by 'Gnome Chemistry Utils', not found --------------------------------------------------------- * Documentation - Files under docs/reference/html are rather large in total and most (or all?) files are automatically generated by doxygen. I think these files should be in -devel package. * Desktop files - Please use 'desktop-file-install' and add 'fedora' as vendor tag (then add 'desktop-file-utils' to BuildRequires) - Would you ask upstream to include icons for GUI desktop? * Timestamps - Well, -devel package contains a lot of header files so keeping timestamps is highly preferable as * it shows if vendor (like you) have modified the original files * it shows when the files are created So keep timestamps, at least for header files. Usually, -------------------------------------------------------- make INSTALL="install -p" install -------------------------------------------------------- plays the trick. - /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 Use "%{__install} -c -p -m 644" to keep timestamps, use macros. B. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : (Okay) C. Other things I have noticed: * test -z $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/mime/packages || - This is redundant because it is apparently not zero length. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 2 18:25:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 13:25:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218172] Review Request: gnome-chemistry-utils - A set of chemical utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612021825.kB2IPBnm004727@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-chemistry-utils - A set of chemical utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218172 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-02 13:25 EST ------- Parag, if you don't mind, I want to assign this bug to myself as a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 2 18:30:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 13:30:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218176] Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612021830.kB2IUc8T004808@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218176 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 2 18:32:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 13:32:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218176] Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612021832.kB2IWf01004851@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218176 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-12-02 13:32 EST ------- gnome-chemistry-utils? I don't recall seeing them in extras -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 2 18:38:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 13:38:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217991] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-Simple-List - Simple interface to Gtk2's complex MVC list widget In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612021838.kB2IcALb004985@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-Simple-List - Simple interface to Gtk2's complex MVC list widget https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217991 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-12-02 13:38 EST ------- Imported and building for devel; branches requested for FC-[56]. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 2 18:43:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 13:43:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218172] Review Request: gnome-chemistry-utils - A set of chemical utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612021843.kB2IhJvZ005138@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-chemistry-utils - A set of chemical utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218172 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-02 13:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Parag, if you don't mind, I want to assign this bug to myself > as a sponsor. Sure Go Ahead. You are always welcome for aa long as its a review for FE-NEEDSPONSOR. Becuase i don't have sponsor status. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 2 18:45:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 13:45:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218172] Review Request: gnome-chemistry-utils - A set of chemical utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612021845.kB2IjdT6005239@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-chemistry-utils - A set of chemical utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218172 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-02 13:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Sure Go Ahead. You are always welcome for aa long as its a review for > FE-NEEDSPONSOR. Becuase i don't have sponsor status. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 2 18:46:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 13:46:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218172] Review Request: gnome-chemistry-utils - A set of chemical utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612021846.kB2IkREk005267@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-chemistry-utils - A set of chemical utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218172 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 2 18:48:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 13:48:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218176] Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612021848.kB2ImCOK005387@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218176 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-02 13:48 EST ------- Look like you forgot to check that dependent bug 218172 is first to go in FE and which (may be) under REVIEW now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 2 19:07:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 14:07:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217990] Review Request: perl-Gnome2-VFS - Perl interface to the 2.x series of the GNOME VFS library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612021907.kB2J761w005804@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gnome2-VFS - Perl interface to the 2.x series of the GNOME VFS library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217990 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-02 14:07 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and but NOT for RPMS. But those are ignorable. + source files match upstream. 2a9b4f0f380873265bd87754e5f17719 Gnome2-VFS-1.061.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Followed perl packaging guidelines. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 2 19:12:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 14:12:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217836] Review Request: vimoutliner - set of vim macros for editing outlines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612021912.kB2JCcSI005987@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vimoutliner - set of vim macros for editing outlines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217836 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-02 14:12 EST ------- Got rpmlint errors W: vimoutliner macro-in-%changelog doc Macros are expanded in %changelog too, which can in unfortunate cases lead to the package not building at all, or other subtle unexpected conditions that affect the build. Even when that doesn't happen, the expansion results in possibly "rewriting history" on subsequent package revisions and generally odd entries eg. in source rpms, which is rarely wanted. Avoid use of macros in %changelog altogether, or use two '%'s to escape them, like '%%foo'. W: vimoutliner mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 14) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 2 19:20:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 14:20:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212924] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-Array - DataSource driver using arrays In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612021920.kB2JK4uc006218@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-Array - DataSource driver using arrays Alias: pear-DG-Array https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212924 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 2 19:42:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 14:42:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217990] Review Request: perl-Gnome2-VFS - Perl interface to the 2.x series of the GNOME VFS library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612021942.kB2JgK5w006916@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gnome2-VFS - Perl interface to the 2.x series of the GNOME VFS library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217990 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-12-02 14:42 EST ------- Imported and building for devel; branches requested for FC-[56]. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 2 19:45:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 14:45:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212924] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-Array - DataSource driver using arrays In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612021945.kB2Jjj0D006981@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-Array - DataSource driver using arrays Alias: pear-DG-Array https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212924 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-12-02 14:45 EST ------- The by now standard rpmlint complaints: W: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-Array no-documentation W: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-Array filename-too-long-for-joliet php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-Array-0.1.0-1.fc7.noarch.rpm There's really just a single 4K file here; not much to review, really. * source files match upstream: 9f9a76d291ee8d99134c71173bb84bdb Structures_DataGrid_DataSource_Array-0.1.0.tgz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: php-pear(Structures_DataGrid_DataSource_Array) = 0.1.0 php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-Array = 0.1.0-1.fc7 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/pear php-pear(PEAR) php-pear(Structures_DataGrid) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets OK (pear module installation) * code, not content. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 2 19:47:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 14:47:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212925] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-RSS - DataSource driver using RSS files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612021947.kB2JlAoH007039@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-RSS - DataSource driver using RSS files Alias: pear-DG-RSS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212925 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 2 20:16:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 15:16:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212924] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-Array - DataSource driver using arrays In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612022016.kB2KGJUo007822@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-Array - DataSource driver using arrays Alias: pear-DG-Array https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212924 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-12-02 15:15 EST ------- I must be slipping. Of course I meant O rpmlint output is OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 2 20:18:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 15:18:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214818] Review Request: audacious - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612022018.kB2KIEQA007856@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214818 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-12-02 15:18 EST ------- Hi that massive memory leak still exists on the FC6 version, any chance you can update FC6 to 1.2.1? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 2 20:22:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 15:22:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212925] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-RSS - DataSource driver using RSS files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612022022.kB2KMoZ2007949@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-RSS - DataSource driver using RSS files Alias: pear-DG-RSS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212925 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-12-02 15:22 EST ------- Another single file PHP package, with the standard rpmlint warnings: W: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-RSS no-documentation W: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-RSS filename-too-long-for-joliet php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-RSS-0.1.0-1.fc7.noarch.rpm I note that all of these DataSource-* packages have ended up owning /usr/share/pear/Structures/DataGrid/DataSource Have you condidered the possibility of php-pear-Structures-DataGrid owning that directory? * source files match upstream: cdde39675c40e059281b5a727df23d8a Structures_DataGrid_DataSource_RSS-0.1.0.tgz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly O rpmlint output is OK. * final provides and requires are sane: php-pear(Structures_DataGrid_DataSource_RSS) = 0.1.0 php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-RSS = 0.1.0-1.fc7 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/pear php-pear(PEAR) php-pear(Structures_DataGrid_DataSource_Array) php-pear(XML_RSS) * %check is not present; no test suite is upstream. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 2 20:31:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 15:31:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215792] Review Request: wgrib - Manipulate, inventory and decode GRIB files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612022031.kB2KVBgJ008108@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wgrib - Manipulate, inventory and decode GRIB files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215792 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-12-02 15:31 EST ------- Why isn't it built now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 2 20:31:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 15:31:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214818] Review Request: audacious - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612022031.kB2KVbS0008125@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214818 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at camperquake.de 2006-12-02 15:31 EST ------- Nope. FC6 will get 1.2.2. I'm currently waiting for someone with the appropriate privileges to branch the plugins for FC6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 2 20:58:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 15:58:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212924] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-Array - DataSource driver using arrays In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612022058.kB2Kwln6008599@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-Array - DataSource driver using arrays Alias: pear-DG-Array https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212924 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-12-02 15:58 EST ------- Thanks for the review. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 2 21:02:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 16:02:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214818] Review Request: audacious - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612022102.kB2L2HJr008751@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214818 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-12-02 16:01 EST ------- hehehe fooled me there for a second! Thx. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 2 21:05:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 16:05:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218183] New: Review Request: offlineimap - sync local and remote mail repositories via imap Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218183 Summary: Review Request: offlineimap - sync local and remote mail repositories via imap Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: opensource at till.name QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www-users.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de/~tmaas/fedora/offlineimap.spec SRPM URL: http://www-users.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de/~tmaas/fedora/repo/offlineimap-4.0.15-1.src.rpm Description: OfflineIMAP is a tool to simplify your e-mail reading. With OfflineIMAP, you can read the same mailbox from multiple computers. You get a current copy of your messages on each computer, and changes you make one place will be visible on all other systems. For instance, you can delete a message on your home computer, and it will appear deleted on your work computer as well. OfflineIMAP is also useful if you want to use a mail reader that does not have IMAP support, has poor IMAP support, or does not provide disconnected operation. URL: http://software.complete.org/offlineimap/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 2 21:07:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 16:07:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218183] Review Request: offlineimap - sync local and remote mail repositories via imap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612022107.kB2L7Dn4008907@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: offlineimap - sync local and remote mail repositories via imap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218183 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://software.complete.org | |/offlineimap/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 2 21:31:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 16:31:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212925] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-RSS - DataSource driver using RSS files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612022131.kB2LVVvg009302@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-RSS - DataSource driver using RSS files Alias: pear-DG-RSS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212925 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-12-02 16:31 EST ------- Ya probably makes sense to go ahead and do that. Will update all the datagrid packages once this is branched. Thx for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 2 23:52:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 18:52:41 -0500 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_217350=5D_Review_Request=3A_ipw2100-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_2100_net?= =?iso-8859-1?q?work_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612022352.kB2Nqfsm011710@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ipw2100-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 2100 network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217350 ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2006-12-02 18:52 EST ------- Yes, this revised description seems to fulfill the license requirements. What else should we do before we can accept this for inclusion? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 00:13:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 19:13:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217557] Review Request: keurocalc - KEuroCalc is a universal currency converter and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612030013.kB30DBAs012103@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: keurocalc - KEuroCalc is a universal currency converter and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217557 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-12-02 19:13 EST ------- ## File lists # locale's %find_lang %{name} || touch %{name}.lang # HTML (1.0) HTML_DIR=$(kde-config --expandvars --install html) if [ -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT$HTML_DIR ]; then for lang_dir in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT$HTML_DIR/* ; do if [ -d $lang_dir ]; then lang=$(basename $lang_dir) echo "%lang($lang) $HTML_DIR/$lang/*" >> %{name}.lang # replace absolute symlinks with relative ones pushd $lang_dir for i in *; do [ -d $i -a -L $i/common ] && rm -f $i/common && ln -sf ../common $i/common done popd fi done fi Will make them relative -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 00:40:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 19:40:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212889] Review Request: php-pear-Testing-Selenium - PHP Client for Selenium RC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612030040.kB30eGNl012443@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Testing-Selenium - PHP Client for Selenium RC Alias: pear-Test-Selenium https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212889 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-12-02 19:40 EST ------- Don't bother. The only reason I packaged this was because phpunit3 optionally supported it. The selenium php package is pretty much useless without selenium installed and I don't want to bother maintaining this package since it's useless. Marking as WONTFIX. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 00:40:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 19:40:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196837] Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit3 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612030040.kB30ed94012475@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit3 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests Alias: pear-PHPUnit3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196837 Bug 196837 depends on bug 212889, which changed state. Bug 212889 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Testing-Selenium - PHP Client for Selenium RC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212889 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |WONTFIX Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 00:41:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 19:41:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212889] Review Request: php-pear-Testing-Selenium - PHP Client for Selenium RC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612030041.kB30ftel012507@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Testing-Selenium - PHP Client for Selenium RC Alias: pear-Test-Selenium https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212889 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 196837 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 00:42:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 19:42:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196837] Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit3 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612030042.kB30gS4u012536@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit3 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests Alias: pear-PHPUnit3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196837 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|212889 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 02:28:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 21:28:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218195] New: Review Request: scipy - array processing for numbers, strings, records, and objects. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218195 Summary: Review Request: scipy - array processing for numbers, strings, records, and objects. Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jspaleta at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/scipy/scipy.spec SRPM URL: http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/scipy/scipy-0.5.1-2.src.rpm Description: Scipy is a general-purpose array-processing package designed to efficiently manipulate large multi-dimensional arrays of arbitrary records without sacrificing too much speed for small multi-dimensional arrays. Scipy is built on the Numeric code base and adds features introduced by numarray as well as an extended C-API and the ability to create arrays of arbitrary type. There are also basic facilities for discrete fourier transform, basic linear algebra and random number generation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 02:56:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 21:56:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 191218] Review Request: PyScript - Postscript graphics with Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612030256.kB32udmo014868@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyScript - Postscript graphics with Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191218 jspaleta at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jspaleta at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2006-12-02 21:56 EST ------- I might be interested in being the primary maintainer of this package. I believe that I can list you as co-maintainer so that you get bugzilla tickets. As things move forward, until there are more fine-grained access controls i can be the gatekeeper for any fedora extras cvs commits you want to make to the package. You can build a public track-record of 'right action' by communicating with me through bugzilla and make it easier to gain contributor status. What is the most recent spec and srpm that I should look at. And most importantly, has there been a previous review that would have counted as a full review if you hadn't needed sponsorship. I want to see if I can contact a reviewer who is already looked at this so when I re submit it, we can streamline the timetable and get this in quickly. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 02:57:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 21:57:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207685] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-farsight - GStreamer plug-ins for farsight protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612030257.kB32vX65014912@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-farsight - GStreamer plug-ins for farsight protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207685 jspaleta at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jspaleta at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2006-12-02 21:57 EST ------- The above urls don't seem to work. Can you give me updated url info for these? -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 03:00:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 22:00:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 177747] Review Request: glade3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612030300.kB33063q014959@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glade3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 ------- Additional Comments From braden at endoframe.com 2006-12-02 22:00 EST ------- Is there a persistent need to change the package name with each major glade release? The package "glade" hasn't appeared in Fedora Core since 2. Do there continue to be reasons someone might want to have packages for glade 0.6.x and glade 3.x installed concurrently? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 03:05:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 22:05:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 206478] Review Request: Yumdiff - Compares RPMS installed on local and remote systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612030305.kB335pXR015091@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Yumdiff - Compares RPMS installed on local and remote systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206478 jspaleta at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jspaleta at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2006-12-02 22:05 EST ------- A suggestion, Considering that most of the discussion so far concerns the basic functionality and not packaging issues, I think it would be worthwhile for you to open up a discussion on fedora-extras-list or on the upstream yum development list and get feedback from the community as to the underlying design and functionality aims, before continuing with a submission request. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 03:13:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 22:13:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207685] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-farsight - GStreamer plug-ins for farsight protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612030313.kB33DOTr015251@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-farsight - GStreamer plug-ins for farsight protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207685 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-12-02 22:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > The above urls don't seem to work. Can you give me updated url info for these? I just retired my web server this week, and haven't got around to obtaining any new space to host this at. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 03:21:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 22:21:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207685] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-farsight - GStreamer plug-ins for farsight protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612030321.kB33LU1P015365@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-farsight - GStreamer plug-ins for farsight protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207685 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2006-12-02 22:21 EST ------- email them to me and I can put them up for you. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 03:48:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 22:48:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217066] Review Request: python-gpod - A python module to access iPod content In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612030348.kB33m0a0015973@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-gpod - A python module to access iPod content Alias: python-gpod-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217066 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-02 22:47 EST ------- Hey Todd. After reading through all this saga it all sounds reasonable to me... I am going to do some quick builds and make sure I don't see any last minute gotchas, but barring that I will be willing to sponsor you to get this moving forward. I will add another comment in a while here if everything looks good. Thanks to Jef for pushing this all forward... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 03:58:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 22:58:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217557] Review Request: keurocalc - KEuroCalc is a universal currency converter and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612030358.kB33wZXV016410@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: keurocalc - KEuroCalc is a universal currency converter and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217557 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-02 22:58 EST ------- Thanks Denis -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 04:09:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 23:09:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217066] Review Request: python-gpod - A python module to access iPod content In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612030409.kB349xHi017006@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-gpod - A python module to access iPod content Alias: python-gpod-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217066 ------- Additional Comments From tmz at pobox.com 2006-12-02 23:09 EST ------- Thanks Kevin. If you have any thoughts on changing the package name to libgpod-python and whether that'd be a good thing in case we manage to merge this into the main libgpod package if/when core and extras merge, please let me know. Of the packages I can find that have python modules as sub packages, nearly all of them use the -python naming convention. (And thanks again to Jef too for the prodding on many fronts.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 04:47:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 23:47:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217066] Review Request: python-gpod - A python module to access iPod content In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612030447.kB34lYht019209@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-gpod - A python module to access iPod content Alias: python-gpod-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217066 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-02 23:47 EST ------- I think the python-gpod name matches up with all the other python bindings in extras. I would leave it at that for now... I am running into a build issue on x86_64 however... it's installing the _gpod.so library under /usr/lib and not /usr/lib64... /usr/bin/install -c _gpod.so /var/tmp/python-gpod-0.4.0-2.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/gpod/_gpod.so I'd be happy to provide access to my x86_64 test machine if you like, just email me your ssh key in private email. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 05:22:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 00:22:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218183] Review Request: offlineimap - sync local and remote mail repositories via imap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612030522.kB35MaJJ020366@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: offlineimap - sync local and remote mail repositories via imap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218183 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 05:59:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 00:59:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211336] Review Request: adesklets - A simple architecture for desktop applets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612030559.kB35xT8S020950@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adesklets - A simple architecture for desktop applets Alias: adeskets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211336 ------- Additional Comments From luya_tfz at thefinalzone.com 2006-12-03 00:59 EST ------- Back. One of problem is the lack of familiarity with the perl module used on adesklets. Currently reading http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingTips/Perl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 06:04:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 01:04:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207685] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-farsight - GStreamer plug-ins for farsight protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612030604.kB364Km6021080@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-farsight - GStreamer plug-ins for farsight protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207685 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2006-12-03 01:04 EST ------- Here we go. SRPM: http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/gstreamer-plugins-farsight/gstreamer-plugins-farsight-0.10.2-1.src.rpm SPEC: http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/gstreamer-plugins-farsight/gstreamer-plugins-farsight.spec Let me grab a beer and I'll start a mock build and if that passes I'll start a formal review. One thing, is there any way to test the functionality of this plugin currently? -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 06:13:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 01:13:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217066] Review Request: python-gpod - A python module to access iPod content In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612030613.kB36DEsb021210@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-gpod - A python module to access iPod content Alias: python-gpod-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217066 ------- Additional Comments From tmz at pobox.com 2006-12-03 01:13 EST ------- A key is on its way. Thanks for the offer and the testing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 06:19:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 01:19:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207685] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-farsight - GStreamer plug-ins for farsight protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612030619.kB36JkrF021318@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-farsight - GStreamer plug-ins for farsight protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207685 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2006-12-03 01:19 EST ------- One minor quibble. Would it make sense to use the majorminor define in the version tag, like you do later in the file location strings? It reduces the potential for out of sync strings if/when upstream moves to 0.11 -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 06:38:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 01:38:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207685] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-farsight - GStreamer plug-ins for farsight protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612030638.kB36crfa021817@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-farsight - GStreamer plug-ins for farsight protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207685 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2006-12-03 01:38 EST ------- A couple of questions with regard to the configure options --disable-jasper jasper is in Extras currently. Is there a specific problem associated with enabling it? --with-plugins=rtpdemux,rtpjitterbuffer Are there other optional plugins to explore? -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 08:46:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 03:46:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218172] Review Request: gnome-chemistry-utils - A set of chemical utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612030846.kB38kjFq024169@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-chemistry-utils - A set of chemical utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218172 ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2006-12-03 03:46 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.republika.pl/belegdol/rpmstuff/gnome-chemistry-utils.spec SRPM URL: http://www.republika.pl/belegdol/rpmstuff/gnome-chemistry-utils-0.6.3-2.src.rpm New release: - Fixed Requires for -devel and -mozplugin packages - Moved files in docs/reference/html to the devel package - Install .desktop files using desktop-file-install - Removed redundant stuff - Preserve timestamps I'll ask upstream for icons. BTW, why some .desktop files need to be installed using desktop-file-install and some do not (or are all these packages wrong)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 09:01:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 04:01:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217066] Review Request: python-gpod - A python module to access iPod content In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612030901.kB391aiX025360@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-gpod - A python module to access iPod content Alias: python-gpod-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217066 ------- Additional Comments From tmz at pobox.com 2006-12-03 04:01 EST ------- Okay, after poking a little it seems that $(pythondir) should be $(pyexecdir) in bindings/python/Makefile.{ac,in}. I get double blame for missing that since I submitted the broken auto-stuff in Makefile.am upstream. I've put a new source and spec file up that adds a patch to correct this. I'll submit this upstream for inclusion in the next release as well. (I'm surpised no one noticed this before on any of the libgpod lists.) Spec URL: http://pobox.com/~tmz/fedora/python-gpod.spec SRPM URL: http://pobox.com/~tmz/fedora/python-gpod-0.4.0-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 09:08:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 04:08:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218172] Review Request: gnome-chemistry-utils - A set of chemical utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612030908.kB398j5q026026@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-chemistry-utils - A set of chemical utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218172 ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2006-12-03 04:08 EST ------- The icons enquiry has been filed: https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/index.php?18443 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 09:16:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 04:16:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218183] Review Request: offlineimap - sync local and remote mail repositories via imap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612030916.kB39G2Ra026600@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: offlineimap - sync local and remote mail repositories via imap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218183 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-03 04:15 EST ------- I will review this certainly later.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 09:17:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 04:17:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218176] Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612030917.kB39HHhQ026695@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218176 ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2006-12-03 04:17 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.republika.pl/belegdol/rpmstuff/gchempaint.spec SRPM URL: http://www.republika.pl/belegdol/rpmstuff/gchempaint-0.6.6-2.src.rpm New release: - Removed packages pulled by gnome-chemistry-utils-devel from BuildRequires - Install desktop files using desktop-file-install - Fixed Requires for -devel package - Preserve timestamps -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 09:20:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 04:20:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218172] Review Request: gnome-chemistry-utils - A set of chemical utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612030920.kB39KDYf026890@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-chemistry-utils - A set of chemical utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218172 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-03 04:20 EST ------- Well, before checking 0.6.3-2: (I am currently taking dinner and I will check it later) (In reply to comment #5) > BTW, why some .desktop files need to be installed > using desktop-file-install and some do not (or are all these packages wrong)? My recognition is that all packages in Fedora Core/Extras are required to use desktop-file-utils when installing desktop files. At least all packages I reviewed are modified to use desktop-file-utils when it tries to install desktop files without it. So under my recognition packages installing desktop files without desktop-file-utils are all wrong. NOTE: there are some desktop-*like* files which are installed without desktop-file-utils (e.g. in xscreensaver-extras-gss) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 09:20:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 04:20:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 201418] Review Request: widelands - GPL Settlers II clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612030920.kB39KUCd026935@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: widelands - GPL Settlers II clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201418 ------- Additional Comments From brkamikaze at gmail.com 2006-12-03 04:20 EST ------- Something is wrong with my RPM. When I try to install the new build so I can test it, I get the following error: sudo rpm -ivh widelands-1824-2.i386.rpm rpmdb: PANIC: fatal region error detected; run recovery error: db4 error(-30977) from dbenv->open: DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery error: cannot open Packages index using db3 - (-30977) error: cannot open Packages database in /var/lib/rpm How can I fix it? Anyway, I'm uploading the SRPM now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 11:04:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 06:04:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218172] Review Request: gnome-chemistry-utils - A set of chemical utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612031104.kB3B4X6S016306@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-chemistry-utils - A set of chemical utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218172 ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2006-12-03 06:04 EST ------- This software supports chemical-mime-data, so I'll try to wrap up a package. Feel free to continue the review in the meantime. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 12:42:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 07:42:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218210] New: Review Request: chemical-mime-data - Support for chemical/* MIME types Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218210 Summary: Review Request: chemical-mime-data - Support for chemical/* MIME types Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: belegdol at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.republika.pl/belegdol/rpmstuff/chemical-mime-data.spec SRPM URL: http://www.republika.pl/belegdol/rpmstuff/chemical-mime-data-0.1.93-1.src.rpm Description: A collection of data files which tries to give support for various chemical MIME types (chemical/*) on Linux/UNIX desktops. Chemical MIME's have been proposed in 1995, though it seems they have never been registered with IANA. Package builds fine inside mock. Rpmlint is silent for source rpm, but outputs the following for binary one: E: chemical-mime-data no-binary W: chemical-mime-data devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/pkgconfig/chemical-mime-data.pc I think that it is harmless, and similar to gnome-mime-data package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 12:44:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 07:44:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218210] Review Request: chemical-mime-data - Support for chemical/* MIME types In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612031244.kB3CiVpw018675@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chemical-mime-data - Support for chemical/* MIME types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218210 belegdol at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 12:47:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 07:47:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218172] Review Request: gnome-chemistry-utils - A set of chemical utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612031247.kB3Cl4Or018862@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-chemistry-utils - A set of chemical utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218172 belegdol at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |218210 ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2006-12-03 07:47 EST ------- It was not that hard. Spec URL: http://www.republika.pl/belegdol/rpmstuff/gnome-chemistry-utils.spec SRPM URL: http://www.republika.pl/belegdol/rpmstuff/gnome-chemistry-utils-0.6.3-1.src.rpm New release: - Added doxygen to BuildRequires - Added support for chemical-mime-data Now it is blocked by bug #218210 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 12:47:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 07:47:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218210] Review Request: chemical-mime-data - Support for chemical/* MIME types In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612031247.kB3ClGX5018885@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chemical-mime-data - Support for chemical/* MIME types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218210 belegdol at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |218172 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 12:47:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 07:47:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218172] Review Request: gnome-chemistry-utils - A set of chemical utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612031247.kB3Cljqd018913@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-chemistry-utils - A set of chemical utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218172 ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2006-12-03 07:47 EST ------- Oops... SRPM URL: http://www.republika.pl/belegdol/rpmstuff/gnome-chemistry-utils-0.6.3-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 13:02:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 08:02:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218210] Review Request: chemical-mime-data - Support for chemical/* MIME types In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612031302.kB3D2Cr7019534@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chemical-mime-data - Support for chemical/* MIME types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218210 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 13:10:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 08:10:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218210] Review Request: chemical-mime-data - Support for chemical/* MIME types In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612031310.kB3DAwlZ019790@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chemical-mime-data - Support for chemical/* MIME types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218210 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-12-03 08:10 EST ------- Nice to see another Pole's trying to put his package into Extras :) Good luck! As for rpmlint output, you can simple shut it up by adding "BuildArch: noarch" in preamble. Also, there are some missing dependencies. This package owns files in some directories owned by other packages. Probably, you have to remove crystalsvg icons and mimelnk as they're owned by kdelibs package so they make unneeded kde dependency. %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor creates hicolor-icon-theme dep; {_datadir}/mime/packages - shared-mime-info. These are all things need to be fixed I found at first sight :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 13:23:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 08:23:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218210] Review Request: chemical-mime-data - Support for chemical/* MIME types In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612031323.kB3DNgTq020040@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chemical-mime-data - Support for chemical/* MIME types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218210 ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2006-12-03 08:23 EST ------- Well, I have checked gnome-mime-data package and the comment form the spec says: ### WE ARE NOT NOARCH, /usr/lib/pkgconfig is not noarch. ### don't change this and don't file a bug. ;-) As for dependencies, I don't think that I understand a problem. We want chemical MIME support for KDE as well, don't we? So shall I add kdelibs, hicolor-icon-theme and shared-mime-info to Requires? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 13:35:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 08:35:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218210] Review Request: chemical-mime-data - Support for chemical/* MIME types In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612031335.kB3DZHcl020279@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chemical-mime-data - Support for chemical/* MIME types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218210 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-03 08:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Well, I have checked gnome-mime-data package and the comment form the spec says: > ### WE ARE NOT NOARCH, /usr/lib/pkgconfig is not noarch. > ### don't change this and don't file a bug. ;-) Yes. .pc file is arch-dependent and if this package requires this file this package canNOT be noarch. However.... * Is this file needed? * Anyway the directory is wrong. Currently pc file is under %{_datadir}/pkgconfig, which should be %{_libdir}/pkgconfig > As for dependencies, I don't think that I understand a problem. We want chemical > MIME support for KDE as well, don't we? So shall I add kdelibs, > hicolor-icon-theme and shared-mime-info to Requires? Owning the directory: * which is owned by other packages * however, all the packages which own the directory is not needed for the package is _NOT_ prohibited, and in that case it is the package which should also own the directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 13:37:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 08:37:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218210] Review Request: chemical-mime-data - Support for chemical/* MIME types In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612031337.kB3DbMkj020352@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chemical-mime-data - Support for chemical/* MIME types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218210 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-03 08:37 EST ------- By the way I have not yet checked this package... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 13:43:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 08:43:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218210] Review Request: chemical-mime-data - Support for chemical/* MIME types In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612031343.kB3Dh7c1020499@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chemical-mime-data - Support for chemical/* MIME types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218210 ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2006-12-03 08:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Well, I have checked gnome-mime-data package and the comment form the spec says: > > ### WE ARE NOT NOARCH, /usr/lib/pkgconfig is not noarch. > > ### don't change this and don't file a bug. ;-) > Yes. .pc file is arch-dependent and if this package requires > this file this package canNOT be noarch. > However.... > * Is this file needed? > * Anyway the directory is wrong. Currently pc file is under > %{_datadir}/pkgconfig, which should be %{_libdir}/pkgconfig > Strange, but that's where it got installed by default. I have some files in %{_datadir}/pkgconfig here: xml2po.pc, gnome, icon-theme.pc and a few others. I can probably fix it to install pkgconfig file into %{_libdir}, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 13:52:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 08:52:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218210] Review Request: chemical-mime-data - Support for chemical/* MIME types In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612031352.kB3DqfmR020964@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chemical-mime-data - Support for chemical/* MIME types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218210 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-12-03 08:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Owning the directory: > * which is owned by other packages > * however, all the packages which own the directory is not needed > for the package > is _NOT_ prohibited, and in that case it is the package which > should also own the directory. Thus chemical-mime-data should also own a %{_datadir}/mimelnk dir. If it doesn't then removing it will leave empty %{_datadir}/mimelnk dir unowned. I believe that hicolor-icon-theme and shared-mime-info should be required by this package nevertheless. A lot of packages own hicolor-icon-theme and it isn't a problem. Also, shared-mime-info looks like a package related with chemical-mime-data so requiring it may be necessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 14:04:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 09:04:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211729] Review Request: museek+ - Soulseek network filesharing client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612031404.kB3E4kqD021829@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: museek+ - Soulseek network filesharing client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211729 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rpm at greysector.net ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-12-03 09:04 EST ------- I will review this after you've been sponsored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 14:46:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 09:46:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218183] Review Request: offlineimap - sync local and remote mail repositories via imap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612031446.kB3Ek3Um023234@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: offlineimap - sync local and remote mail repositories via imap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218183 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-03 09:46 EST ------- Well, would you check the dependency for this package? For example: -------------------------------------- /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/offlineimap/ui/Tk.py:import tkFont -------------------------------------- This means this package requires tkinter. For me tkinter is required only by python-imaging and comix (both in Extras). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 15:06:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 10:06:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218210] Review Request: chemical-mime-data - Support for chemical/* MIME types In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612031506.kB3F6lJ0023982@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chemical-mime-data - Support for chemical/* MIME types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218210 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-03 10:06 EST ------- Well, for directory ownership issue: /usr/share/icons/crystalsvg/ - (Under my envoronment) only owned by kdelibs. I think this package should own this (The subdirectories should also) - /usr/share/icons/hicolor/ For this directory, adding hicolor-icon-theme to Requires is a simplest solution as Micha? commented (sorry, however the last character of your first name is corrupted in my browser) - /usr/share/mime Requiring shared-mime-info should be the simplest. - /usr/share/mimelnk/ Only owned by kdelibs and Ooo related packages. This directory should be owned by this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 15:16:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 10:16:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207685] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-farsight - GStreamer plug-ins for farsight protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612031516.kB3FGA0L024170@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-farsight - GStreamer plug-ins for farsight protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207685 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-12-03 10:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > A couple of questions with regard to the configure options > > --disable-jasper > jasper is in Extras currently. Is there a specific problem associated with > enabling it? > > --with-plugins=rtpdemux,rtpjitterbuffer > Are there other optional plugins to explore? Most of the other plugins are still fairly experimental, and probably not stable enought to build currently. The best way to test this is with Stream Engine, which I haven't yet submitted to FE (September was fairly busy, and it slipped my mind). I'll send you the spec & SRPM for it once I update it to the latest version. Once you have gstreamer-plugins-farsight & Stream Engine installed you can test it by running 'STREAM_ENGINE_PERSIST=1 telepathy-stream-engine' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 15:46:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 10:46:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218172] Review Request: gnome-chemistry-utils - A set of chemical utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612031546.kB3FkQ4p024723@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-chemistry-utils - A set of chemical utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218172 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-03 10:46 EST ------- Well: * BuildRequires: chemical-mime-data Should this be 'BuildRequires' or 'Requires'? * By the way, please remove unnecessary comments like: ------------------------------------------------ #mkdir -p -- $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/mime/packages ------------------------------------------------ which are no longer used to make spec file more legible. Note: --add-category=X-Fedora Well, FE packaging committee made a semi(?)-conclusion that this should be removed because * desktop-file-utils 0.11 does _NOT_ allow this so * anyway this is deprecated and of no use However, now rawhide is desktop-file-utils 0.12 and this again _ALLOWS_ --add-category=X-Fedora ...... I think that '--add-category=X-Fedora' should be removed until the argument that "--add-category=X-Fedora should be revived" arises, however, it seems that this (--add-category=X-Fedora) is okay for now?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 16:01:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 11:01:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218183] Review Request: offlineimap - sync local and remote mail repositories via imap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612031601.kB3G1DpA025064@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: offlineimap - sync local and remote mail repositories via imap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218183 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2006-12-03 11:01 EST ------- tkinter is only required when someone wants to use the tkinter user interface of offlineimap, but there are five other user interfaces that work well. So it is more an optional requirement, which is not supported by rpm afaik. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 16:16:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 11:16:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218183] Review Request: offlineimap - sync local and remote mail repositories via imap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612031616.kB3GGMX5025344@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: offlineimap - sync local and remote mail repositories via imap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218183 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-03 11:16 EST ------- Well, then other dependencies are okay? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 16:21:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 11:21:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218183] Review Request: offlineimap - sync local and remote mail repositories via imap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612031621.kB3GLfs4025454@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: offlineimap - sync local and remote mail repositories via imap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218183 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-03 11:21 EST ------- P.S. 'other' means that: ------------------------------------------------------ [tasaka1 at localhost SPECS]$ ( for f in /usr/bin/offlineimap `rpm -ql offlineimap | grep py$` ; do grep 'import ' $f ; done ) | sed -e 's|^[ \t]*||' | sort | uniq from Base import BaseFolder from Base import BaseRepository from Blinkenlights import BlinkenBase from ConfigParser import ConfigParser from IMAP import IMAPFolder from Queue import Queue from ScrolledText import ScrolledText from StringIO import StringIO from Tkinter import * from UIBase import UIBase from __future__ import nested_scopes from copy import copy from getopt import getopt from getpass import getpass from mailbox import Maildir from offlineimap import CustomConfig from offlineimap import folder from offlineimap import folder, imaputil from offlineimap import folder, imaputil, imapserver from offlineimap import imaplib, imapserver, repository, folder, mbnames, threadutil, version from offlineimap import imaplib, imapserver, repository, folder, mbnames, threadutil, version, syncmaster, accounts from offlineimap import imaplib, imaputil, threadutil from offlineimap import imaputil from offlineimap import imaputil, imaplib from offlineimap import init from offlineimap import threadutil from offlineimap import threadutil, mbnames, CustomConfig from offlineimap import threadutil, version from offlineimap import version, threadutil from offlineimap.CustomConfig import CustomConfigParser from offlineimap.accounts import SyncableAccount from offlineimap.folder.UIDMaps import MappedIMAPFolder from offlineimap.localeval import LocalEval from offlineimap.repository.IMAP import IMAPRepository, MappedIMAPRepository from offlineimap.repository.Maildir import MaildirRepository from offlineimap.threadutil import ExitNotifyThread from offlineimap.threadutil import InstanceLimitedThread from offlineimap.threadutil import InstanceLimitedThread, ExitNotifyThread from offlineimap.threadutil import MultiLock from offlineimap.ui import UIBase from offlineimap.ui import UIBase # for getglobalui() from offlineimap.ui.Blinkenlights import BlinkenBase from offlineimap.ui.UIBase import UIBase from offlineimap.version import versionstr from stat import * from threading import * from threading import Event from threading import Lock import Base, IMAP, Maildir, LocalStatus import Curses import Noninteractive import TTY import Tk import Tkinter import UIBase, Blinkenlights import binascii, re, socket, time, random, sys, os import curses import curses, curses.panel, curses.textpad, curses.wrapper import detector import errno import fcntl import getopt, getpass import imp import offlineimap.accounts import offlineimap.repository.Base, offlineimap.repository.LocalStatus import offlineimap.ui import offlineimap.version import os import os, re import os, threading import os.path import os.path, os, re, time, socket, md5 import os.path, re import profile import re # for folderfilter import re, os, os.path, offlineimap, sys import re, string, types import re, time, sys, traceback, threading, thread import re, types, os import rfc822, time, string, random, binascii, re import select, sys import sys import sys, time import sys, traceback, thread import thread import thread, hmac, os import thread, time, sys, os, signal, time import thread, traceback, time, threading import threading import time import tkFont import traceback ------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 16:25:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 11:25:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217836] Review Request: vimoutliner - set of vim macros for editing outlines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612031625.kB3GPjZN025535@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vimoutliner - set of vim macros for editing outlines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217836 ------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com 2006-12-03 11:25 EST ------- Thank you very much. Oh well, only now I found that I have run rpmlint against _binary_ packages. Oh well, oh well. Fixed package is available on http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/progs/rpms/vimoutliner-0.3.4-5.src.rpm and spec file is still in the same location http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/progs/rpms/vimoutliner.spec Any more comments? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 16:41:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 11:41:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217836] Review Request: vimoutliner - set of vim macros for editing outlines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612031641.kB3GfAOf025854@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vimoutliner - set of vim macros for editing outlines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217836 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-03 11:41 EST ------- Unable to view SPEC and SPRM You don't have permission to access /matej/progs/rpms/vimoutliner.spec on this server. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 16:41:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 11:41:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 204493] Review Request: perl-Mozilla-DOM - Perl interface to Mozilla DOM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612031641.kB3GfWOb025867@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mozilla-DOM - Perl interface to Mozilla DOM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204493 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-03 11:41 EST ------- Chris, Any progress? PING Would like to review this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 16:56:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 11:56:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218183] Review Request: offlineimap - sync local and remote mail repositories via imap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612031656.kB3GuM9Z026160@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: offlineimap - sync local and remote mail repositories via imap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218183 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2006-12-03 11:56 EST ------- The other imports except Tk which is needed for the user interface are either from offlineimap modules or modules in the python package which is requirement is added by rpm. Btw. is there any tool that can help one with this dependency checking? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 17:02:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 12:02:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 204493] Review Request: perl-Mozilla-DOM - Perl interface to Mozilla DOM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612031702.kB3H2Fpr026313@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mozilla-DOM - Perl interface to Mozilla DOM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204493 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-12-03 12:02 EST ------- Perhaps you could work on getting it to build with firefox-devel, then. I had no luck. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 17:16:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 12:16:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218217] New: Review Request: telepathy-stream-engine - Telepathy client to handle media streaming Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218217 Summary: Review Request: telepathy-stream-engine - Telepathy client to handle media streaming Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bdpepple at ameritech.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/telepathy/telepathy-stream-engine.spec SRPM URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/telepathy/telepathy-stream-engine-0.3.16-1.src.rpm Description: A Telepathy client that uses Farsight and GStreamer to handle media streaming for channels with the IceSignalling interface. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 17:21:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 12:21:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207685] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-farsight - GStreamer plug-ins for farsight protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612031721.kB3HLCPG026944@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-farsight - GStreamer plug-ins for farsight protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207685 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-12-03 12:21 EST ------- Here's my review request for telepathy-stream-engine: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218217 BTW, I've brought my server back online for now for these packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 17:22:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 12:22:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218183] Review Request: offlineimap - sync local and remote mail repositories via imap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612031722.kB3HMRc6026985@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: offlineimap - sync local and remote mail repositories via imap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218183 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-03 12:22 EST ------- Well, then this package meets http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines ---------------------------------------------- This package (offlineimap) is APPROVED by me. ---------------------------------------------- By the way, it seems that 4.0.16 is released. (In reply to comment #6) > Btw. is there any tool that can help one with this dependency > checking? I have several applications packaged which uses python, at which time I always had to check python-related dependency manually... In fact I really want that tool. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 17:31:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 12:31:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: Aqsis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612031731.kB3HV4FX027262@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Aqsis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com cgtobi at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX | Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 17:42:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 12:42:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 201418] Review Request: widelands - GPL Settlers II clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612031742.kB3Hgd53027557@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: widelands - GPL Settlers II clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201418 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-12-03 12:42 EST ------- That is most likely not a problem with your RPM, but with your local RPM database, to fix it remove rpm's database cache files: rm /var/lib/rpm/__db.* And the try again. I'm currently really really busy (moving from one home to another), so don't expect a review of the SRPM soon, I will take a look as time permits. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 17:45:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 12:45:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217066] Review Request: python-gpod - A python module to access iPod content In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612031745.kB3HjOG6027625@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-gpod - A python module to access iPod content Alias: python-gpod-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217066 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 177841 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-03 12:45 EST ------- The packages from Comment #13 seem to work fine on x86_64 now... so I think your fix is correct. Everything looks good now from what I can see... so this package is APPROVED. You can continue the process from: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors#head-a89c07b5b8abe7748b6b39f0f89768d595234907 I'd be happy to sponsor you. Please let me know if I can answer any questions or assist with the process any from here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 17:57:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 12:57:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215883] Review Request: idioskopos - C++ Introspection Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612031757.kB3Hv732027892@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: idioskopos - C++ Introspection Library Alias: idioskopos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215883 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2006-12-03 12:57 EST ------- > This is true for people who have to create spec file from > spec.m4, however, srpm should include spec file (not spec.m4) > and there is no need to create spec file again from spec.m4. > So m4 should not needed for this reason. But, the specs are built by autoconf when configure is run. I know it's not the best, but I just haven't had time to modify configure.in to take an option of whether to build the specs or not. Right now, they're always built when configure is run. > By the way I cannot rebuild 0.3.2-1 by mockbuild under > FC-devel i386. Please check the build log attached. Looks like it was an overload issue with size_t and unsigned int on i386. It's fixed in the 0.3.3 release. Spec URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/idioskopos.spec SRPM URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/idioskopos-0.3.3-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 18:22:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 13:22:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218183] Review Request: offlineimap - sync local and remote mail repositories via imap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612031822.kB3IM7Dh028461@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: offlineimap - sync local and remote mail repositories via imap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218183 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2006-12-03 13:22 EST ------- imported and successfully built as 22865 for devel - version bump - added one more %%{version} to Source0 - added FAQ.html, todo to %%doc - added debian/changelog as ChangeLog to %%doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 18:22:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 13:22:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218195] Review Request: scipy - array processing for numbers, strings, records, and objects. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612031822.kB3IMgCR028512@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scipy - array processing for numbers, strings, records, and objects. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218195 jamatos at fc.up.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jamatos at fc.up.pt OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2006-12-03 13:22 EST ------- As stated in the mailing list I will take the review. Some small questions, why do you do BuildRequires libstdc++? This should work without it, no? I think also the Requires fftw2 is redundant, since rpm will peek the right dependency. The same should apply to blas and lapack. Am I missing something here? BTW, %install must have rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT at its beginning. Otherwise the spec looks really clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 18:25:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 13:25:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 191218] Review Request: PyScript - Postscript graphics with Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612031825.kB3IPe7Y028682@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyScript - Postscript graphics with Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191218 ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2006-12-03 13:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > And most importantly, has there been a previous review that would have counted > as a full review if you hadn't needed sponsorship. I want to see if I can > contact a reviewer who is already looked at this so when I re submit it, we can > streamline the timetable and get this in quickly. If wants to take the package with the original submiter as co-maintainer I will proceed with the (official) review. > -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 18:30:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 13:30:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218183] Review Request: offlineimap - sync local and remote mail repositories via imap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612031830.kB3IU5oL028909@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: offlineimap - sync local and remote mail repositories via imap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218183 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2006-12-03 13:30 EST ------- Forgot to thank you for this fast review :-) And I just noticed that the Tk Interface probably will be removed in 4.1.0 so even this optional dependency will go away soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 19:11:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 14:11:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 177747] Review Request: glade3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612031911.kB3JBxv7030171@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glade3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 ------- Additional Comments From bbbush.yuan at gmail.com 2006-12-03 14:11 EST ------- spec updated according to your advice, thank you! please have a look: ftp://ftp.fedora.cn/pub/fedora-cn/fe-review/glade3/glade3.spec ftp://ftp.fedora.cn/pub/fedora-cn/fe-review/glade3/glade3-3.0.2-0.6.src.rpm changes: * split to 3 packages: glade3, libgladeui, libgladeui-devel glade3 is the binary, the desktop related files including a proposed icon from tango project libgladeui is the library and shared resource files (pixmaps and catalog xml) libgladeui-devel is the headers and development documentation * changed requires and buildrequires * update description from the website. Still looking for a better description for libgladeui * incorporate various things from Martin's sample file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 19:17:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 14:17:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216352] Review Request: vdr-sudoku - Sudoku plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612031917.kB3JHe2u030398@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-sudoku - Sudoku plugin for VDR Alias: vdr-sudoku https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216352 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chris.stone at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | Alias| |vdr-sudoku -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 19:33:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 14:33:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216352] Review Request: vdr-sudoku - Sudoku plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612031933.kB3JXk8r031198@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-sudoku - Sudoku plugin for VDR Alias: vdr-sudoku https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216352 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-12-03 14:33 EST ------- ==== REVIEW CHECKLIST ==== - rpmlint output clean - package named according to package naming guidelines - spec file name matches %{name} - package meets packaging guidelines - licensed with open source compatible license - license matches actual license - license included in %doc - spec written in American english - spec legible - source match upstream a32cc677477349823469542896ad389d vdr-sudoku-0.1.2.tgz - successfully compiles and builds on FC6 x86_64 - all build dependencies listed in BR - no locales - no shared libraries - not relocatable - package owns all directories it creates - directories it does not own are owned by Requires packages - no duplicates in %files - file permissions set properly - contains proper %clean - macro usage is consistent - contains code - no large documentation - %doc does not affect runtime - no header files or static libraries - no pkgconfig files - devel subpackage not required - no .la files - not a GUI application needing a .desktop file - does not own files or directories owned by other packages APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 19:36:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 14:36:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218210] Review Request: chemical-mime-data - Support for chemical/* MIME types In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612031936.kB3JaTS8031318@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chemical-mime-data - Support for chemical/* MIME types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218210 ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2006-12-03 14:36 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.republika.pl/belegdol/rpmstuff/chemical-mime-data.spec SRPM URL: http://www.republika.pl/belegdol/rpmstuff/chemical-mime-data-0.1.93-2.src.rpm New release: - Fixed ownership - Fixed .pc file location I'm not sure I've fixed the ownership issues correctly, please advise. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 19:43:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 14:43:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218172] Review Request: gnome-chemistry-utils - A set of chemical utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612031943.kB3JhxiG031555@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-chemistry-utils - A set of chemical utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218172 ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2006-12-03 14:43 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.republika.pl/belegdol/rpmstuff/gnome-chemistry-utils.spec SRPM URL: http://www.republika.pl/belegdol/rpmstuff/gnome-chemistry-utils-0.6.3-4.src.rpm New release: - Removed obsolete stuff - Fixed support for chemical-mime-data - Removed --add-category X-Fedora from desktop-file-install command I think that chemical-mime-data should be present both in BuildRequires and in Requires, as it is checked for presence by configure (and probably should be installed for this whole operation to make sense). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 19:46:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 14:46:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218176] Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612031946.kB3Jkw2L031624@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218176 ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2006-12-03 14:46 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.republika.pl/belegdol/rpmstuff/gchempaint.spec SRPM URL: http://www.republika.pl/belegdol/rpmstuff/gchempaint-0.6.6-3.src.rpm New release: - Removed --add-category X-Fedora from desktop-file-install command - Added some wildcards to make %files section shorter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 19:49:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 14:49:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217998] Review Request: alfont - Font rendering library for the Allegro game library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612031949.kB3Jn8xJ031691@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alfont - Font rendering library for the Allegro game library Alias: alfont https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217998 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-12-03 14:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > ==== MUST FIX ==== > - Investigate rpmlint warnings This is because I forgot to link the library with allegro, fixed. Now it gives: [hans at shalem alfont]$ rpmlint alfont W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 _i_cx_r W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 _i_cx_w W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 _i_get_cpuid_info W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 _i_is_486 W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 _i_is_cpuid_supported W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 _i_is_cyrix W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 _i_is_fpu This is normal, as allegro consists of a dynamiclinked .so and a statically linked .a filoe which contains some non PIC and thus non sharable asm functions. Also see the "allegro-config --libs" output. > - Why is /usr/include/alfont.h.linux in devel package? patch backup file installed by bad wildcard install, wildcard fixed. Here is a new version with these both fixed: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/alfont.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/alfont-2.0.6-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 20:06:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 15:06:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215258] Review Request: clucene - A C++ port of Lucene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612032006.kB3K6IxW032180@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clucene - A C++ port of Lucene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215258 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-12-03 15:06 EST ------- I think, it better to have a %check stanza which conatins the 'make check' statement. This may be halpful to get a minimum QA during any update of the package on the differents plattforms. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 20:08:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 15:08:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217998] Review Request: alfont - Font rendering library for the Allegro game library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612032008.kB3K8qtx032271@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alfont - Font rendering library for the Allegro game library Alias: alfont https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217998 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-12-03 15:08 EST ------- All MUST items fixed. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 20:26:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 15:26:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218023] Review Request: alphabet-soup - Guide your worm through the soup to spell words In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612032026.kB3KQ3fZ032664@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alphabet-soup - Guide your worm through the soup to spell words Alias: alphabet-soup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218023 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-12-03 15:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > ==== MUST FIX ==== > - Add dumb-devel to BR Good catch! > - requires hicolor-icon-theme package Will I ever learn? :( Both fixed, new version is here: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/alphabet-soup.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/alphabet-soup-1.1-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 20:28:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 15:28:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217998] Review Request: alfont - Font rendering library for the Allegro game library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612032028.kB3KSLKK000347@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alfont - Font rendering library for the Allegro game library Alias: alfont https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217998 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-12-03 15:28 EST ------- Thanks! Imported and build requested, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 20:28:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 15:28:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218023] Review Request: alphabet-soup - Guide your worm through the soup to spell words In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612032028.kB3KSX9S000376@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alphabet-soup - Guide your worm through the soup to spell words Alias: alphabet-soup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218023 Bug 218023 depends on bug 217998, which changed state. Bug 217998 Summary: Review Request: alfont - Font rendering library for the Allegro game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217998 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 20:33:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 15:33:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218195] Review Request: scipy - array processing for numbers, strings, records, and objects. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612032033.kB3KXpQK000532@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scipy - array processing for numbers, strings, records, and objects. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218195 ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2006-12-03 15:33 EST ------- Review for release 2: * RPM name is OK * Source scipy-0.5.1.tar.gz is the same as upstream * Builds fine in mock * File list looks OK * License is correct and acceptable (BSD) * Spec file is written in American English Needs work: * The BuildRoot must be cleaned at the beginning of %install * rpmlint: W: scipy summary-ended-with-dot Scipy: array processing for numbers, strings, records, and objects. Please remove the final dot from Summary There are lots of devel-file-in-non-devel-package warnings, why not to put this into a subpackage -devel? OTHO since numpy does not have this separation this is not a blocker, I think that this issue should be tackled in both packages at the same time. One other question: Why do you use fftw2 and not fftw version 3? Just curious. Summary, if you fix the cleaning of %install this package is approved. No need to submit a new version I trust you to fix this before importing. APPROVED (with due conditions met, this not is here just for an easier reference) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 21:04:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 16:04:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218023] Review Request: alphabet-soup - Guide your worm through the soup to spell words In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612032104.kB3L4RoU001093@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alphabet-soup - Guide your worm through the soup to spell words Alias: alphabet-soup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218023 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-12-03 16:04 EST ------- All MUST items fixed. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 21:33:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 16:33:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218225] New: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysql - MySQL MDB2 Driver Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218225 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysql - MySQL MDB2 Driver Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chris.stone at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysql.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysql-1.3.0-1.src.rpm Description: This is the MySQL MDB2 driver. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 21:34:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 16:34:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218225] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysql - MySQL MDB2 Driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612032134.kB3LYgpo001815@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysql - MySQL MDB2 Driver Alias: pear-MDB2-mysql https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218225 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |pear-MDB2-mysql -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 21:43:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 16:43:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218226] New: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-MDB2 - DataSource driver using PEAR::MDB2 and an SQL query Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218226 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource- MDB2 - DataSource driver using PEAR::MDB2 and an SQL query Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chris.stone at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-MDB2.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-MDB2-0.1.2-1.src.rpm Description: This is a DataSource driver for Structures_DataGrid using PEAR::MDB2 and an SQL query. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 21:44:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 16:44:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218226] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-MDB2 - DataSource driver using PEAR::MDB2 and an SQL query In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612032144.kB3LiXBP002062@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-MDB2 - DataSource driver using PEAR::MDB2 and an SQL query Alias: pear-DG-MDB2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218226 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |pear-DG-MDB2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 22:12:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 17:12:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216352] Review Request: vdr-sudoku - Sudoku plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612032212.kB3MCc1B002719@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-sudoku - Sudoku plugin for VDR Alias: vdr-sudoku https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216352 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-12-03 17:12 EST ------- Thanks! 22892 (vdr-sudoku): Build on target fedora-development-extras succeeded. owners.list updated, FC-6 branch requested, comps updates forthcoming. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 22:13:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 17:13:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218195] Review Request: scipy - array processing for numbers, strings, records, and objects. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612032213.kB3MDQQr002745@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scipy - array processing for numbers, strings, records, and objects. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218195 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2006-12-03 17:13 EST ------- The rpmlint warnings concerning the .h files down in the python site-packages tree are a matter of interpretation I think. Since these files are not in /usr/include/python2.4/ I'm not sure there is an expectation that they are to be built against. There are many python packages which continue to place .h files down in the site-packages tree without splitting into a -devel. The only python module packages that I am aware of that uses a devel subpackage install their .h files into the /usr/include/python2.4/ tree. python-ogg-devel for example. But even that isn't consistently done, python-numarry doesn't make the effort. I don't have a problem splitting this stuff off, I just don't want to set a new packaging policy precedent in the process. If you could point me to a python module package (ie not a graphical end-user application) which has .h files down in site-packages and splits out a -devel subpackage I'd like to look over its spec as a reference. I fixed the %install section issue and the silly dot at the end of the summar. Can you tell I'm a couple of months out of practise. I'm going to play with the requires and buildrequires a little to see if I can answer the questions. For example, I don't know if this will work with fftw version 3....yet. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 22:16:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 17:16:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218229] New: Review Request: php-pear-Image-Color - Manage and handles color data and conversions Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218229 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Image-Color - Manage and handles color data and conversions Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chris.stone at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-Image-Color.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-Image-Color-1.0.2-1.src.rpm Description: Manage and handles color data and conversions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 22:16:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 17:16:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218229] Review Request: php-pear-Image-Color - Manage and handles color data and conversions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612032216.kB3MGrvF002868@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Image-Color - Manage and handles color data and conversions Alias: pear-Image-Color https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218229 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |pear-Image-Color -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 22:32:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 17:32:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218230] New: Review Request: php-pear-Image-Canvas - Common interface to image drawing Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218230 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Image-Canvas - Common interface to image drawing Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chris.stone at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-Image-Canvas.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-Image-Canvas-0.3.0-1.src.rpm Description: A package providing a common interface to image drawing, making image source code independent on the library used. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 22:33:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 17:33:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218230] Review Request: php-pear-Image-Canvas - Common interface to image drawing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612032233.kB3MXoqB003216@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Image-Canvas - Common interface to image drawing Alias: pear-Image-Canvas https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218230 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |pear-Image-Canvas -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 22:39:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 17:39:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 202946] Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612032239.kB3MdfYC003405@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202946 denis at poolshark.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |DUPLICATE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2006-12-03 17:39 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 167147 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 22:58:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 17:58:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218232] New: Review Request: php-pear-Math-Stats - Classes to calculate statistical parameters Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218232 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Math-Stats - Classes to calculate statistical parameters Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chris.stone at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-Math-Stats.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-Math-Stats-0.9.0-0.1.beta3.src.rpm Description: Package to calculate statistical parameters of numerical arrays of data. The data can be in a simple numerical array, or in a cummulative numerical array. A cummulative array, has the value as the index and the number of repeats as the value for the array item, e.g. $data = array(3=>4, 2.3=>5, 1.25=>6, 0.5=>3). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 22:59:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 17:59:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218232] Review Request: php-pear-Math-Stats - Classes to calculate statistical parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612032259.kB3Mx7JI004275@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Math-Stats - Classes to calculate statistical parameters Alias: pear-Math-Stats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218232 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |pear-Math-Stats -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 23:01:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 18:01:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189188] Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612032301.kB3N1JSO004377@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189188 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-03 18:01 EST ------- Hey Steven. Any news on an updated version to review here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 23:03:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 18:03:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 195645] Review Request: rasqal - RDF query library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612032303.kB3N3pUB004479@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rasqal - RDF query library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195645 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-03 18:03 EST ------- Hey Thomas. Have you had any chance to look at the issues from comment #17? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 23:06:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 18:06:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199679] Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612032306.kB3N6v7A004574@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199679 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-03 18:06 EST ------- Hey Devrim. Did comment #22 make sense? Or did I miss something? If you like I can try and test and see what it does with no config file available... I think we should do whatever option gives the most info to a user that installs the package and tries to use it out of the box. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 23:09:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 18:09:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218195] Review Request: scipy - array processing for numbers, strings, records, and objects. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612032309.kB3N9W2V004670@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scipy - array processing for numbers, strings, records, and objects. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218195 jamatos at fc.up.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2006-12-03 18:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > The rpmlint warnings concerning the .h files down in the python site-packages > tree are a matter of interpretation I think. Since these files are not in > /usr/include/python2.4/ I'm not sure there is an expectation that they are to be > built against. There are many python packages which continue to place .h files > down in the site-packages tree without splitting into a -devel. > > The only python module packages that I am aware of that uses a devel subpackage > install their .h files into the /usr/include/python2.4/ tree. python-ogg-devel > for example. But even that isn't consistently done, python-numarry doesn't > make the effort. I don't have a problem splitting this stuff off, I just don't > want to set a new packaging policy precedent in the process. > > If you could point me to a python module package (ie not a graphical end-user > application) which has .h files down in site-packages and splits out a -devel > subpackage I'd like to look over its spec as a reference. You are right. This is not blocking, more like a wish. :-) > I fixed the %install section issue and the silly dot at the end of the summar. Good, I changed the status of this review to approved. > Can you tell I'm a couple of months out of practise. I'm going to play with the > requires and buildrequires a little to see if I can answer the questions. For > example, I don't know if this will work with fftw version 3....yet. From the build log: fft_opt_info: fftw3_info: libraries fftw3 not found in /usr/local/lib libraries fftw3 not found in /usr/lib fftw3 not found NOT AVAILABLE fftw2_info: FOUND: libraries = ['rfftw', 'fftw'] library_dirs = ['/usr/lib64'] define_macros = [('SCIPY_FFTW_H', None)] include_dirs = ['/usr/include'] This was why I asked. :-) > -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 23:11:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 18:11:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208737] Review Request: ivman - Generic handler for HAL events In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612032311.kB3NBNAl004741@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivman - Generic handler for HAL events https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208737 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-03 18:11 EST ------- Still no word from upstream? Would be good to get this imported and built... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 23:23:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 18:23:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217311] Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612032323.kB3NNUdJ005539@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217311 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-03 18:23 EST ------- Hey Patrice. Are you going to review this package? If not, I would be happy to do so, but it looks like you have already looked it over quite a bit... ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 23:32:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 18:32:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 190345] Review Request: vdr-femon - DVB frontend status monitor plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612032332.kB3NW358006375@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-femon - DVB frontend status monitor plugin for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190345 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-03 18:31 EST ------- I'd be happy to review this package. Look for a detailed review in a bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 3 23:44:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 18:44:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 190345] Review Request: vdr-femon - DVB frontend status monitor plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612032344.kB3Ni5Pt007439@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-femon - DVB frontend status monitor plugin for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190345 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-03 18:44 EST ------- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPL) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 845886d484d998e79f997320f53bbf6d vdr-femon-1.1.0.tgz 845886d484d998e79f997320f53bbf6d vdr-femon-1.1.0.tgz.1 OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane: SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. i386/x86_64 - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: I don't see any blockers here, so this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this review request NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported and built. Also consider doing a review of another waiting package in the review queue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 00:05:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 19:05:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216912] Review Request: rtpproxy - A symmetric RTP proxy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612040005.kB405VlT009439@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rtpproxy - A symmetric RTP proxy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216912 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-03 19:05 EST ------- OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (BSD) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 2a316f4854da4e8c8d358c623e5ffdb6 rtpproxy-0.3.tar.gz 2a316f4854da4e8c8d358c623e5ffdb6 rtpproxy-0.3.tar.gz.1 OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane: SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. i386/x86_64 - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. Is there anything aside from the including COPYING file to indicate the license? I guess including that COPYING file might be enough, but there is no mention anywhere in the code, web page or other files what the license is. Perhaps you could report to upstream that they could be more explicit about the license moving forward? Otherwise I don't see any issues... this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this report NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported and built. Also, do consider reviewing another waiting package to try and spread out the reviewer load. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 00:14:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 19:14:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208737] Review Request: ivman - Generic handler for HAL events In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612040014.kB40EjDm010405@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivman - Generic handler for HAL events https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208737 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-12-03 19:14 EST ------- I asked again, but no decision yet -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 00:22:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 19:22:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218195] Review Request: scipy - array processing for numbers, strings, records, and objects. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612040022.kB40Mrr1011143@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scipy - array processing for numbers, strings, records, and objects. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218195 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2006-12-03 19:22 EST ------- I take it you did your mock builds on 64bit hardware and had no weird problems associated /usr/lib/ versus /usr/lib64 ? -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 00:23:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 19:23:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217311] Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612040023.kB40NTs5011200@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217311 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-12-03 19:23 EST ------- I am indeed reviewing it, but I don't assign it to me until I am ready to approve, because there is a disagreament about the mimetypes, so if somebody disagrees with me on that subject, I don't want to stop him from reviewing the package. To summarize my position * I don't want to accept the package with the mimetypes for lha and rar without further discussion * the segfault with the .a is not a blocker to me for devel, but it is for other branches (it may open a security risk). * otherwise the package is right. #comment 10 is not blocking, it is more like suggestions for upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 00:58:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 19:58:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 201502] Review Request: php-pear-PhpDocumentor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612040058.kB40wXba011956@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PhpDocumentor Alias: phpDocumentor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201502 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-12-03 19:58 EST ------- sorry this took so long. I totally spaced :( Anyways. Building from the new spec, looks like the issues talked about previously have been addressed. rpmlint does complain a bit: [build at zeus php-pear-PhpDocumentor]$ rpmlint php-pear-PhpDocumentor-1.3.0-0.3.fc5.src.rpm W: php-pear-PhpDocumentor no-%build-section Easily rectifyable by including an empty %build section... ** phpdoc-1.3.0-0.3.fc5.noarch.rpm == rpmlint E: phpdoc subdir-in-bin /usr/bin/scripts/makedoc.sh == provides phpdoc = 1.3.0-0.3.fc5 == requires /bin/bash /usr/bin/php php-pear(PhpDocumentor) = 1.3.0 provides/requires looks sane. The error is well taken however; on examination it would appear that /usr/bin/scripts is better placed in %doc. ** php-pear-PhpDocumentor-1.3.0-0.3.fc5.noarch.rpm == rpmlint == provides php-pear(PhpDocumentor) = 1.3.0 php-pear-PhpDocumentor = 1.3.0-0.3.fc5 == requires /bin/sh /bin/sh /usr/bin/pear /usr/bin/pear php-pear(PEAR) ** php-pear-PhpDocumentor-docs-1.3.0-0.3.fc5.noarch.rpm == rpmlint W: php-pear-PhpDocumentor-docs wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/php-pear-PhpDocumentor-docs-1.3.0/Documentation/Release-old/Release-0.3.0 == provides php-pear-PhpDocumentor-docs = 1.3.0-0.3.fc5 == requires php-pear-PhpDocumentor = 1.3.0-0.3.fc5 Again, requires/provides look sane for both packages; the rpmlint warning is well taken. I note the release is still in the "0.x" format... Fine for now, but I trust it'll be corrected before check-in. So, address the rpmlint warnings/errors and the odd placement of scripts/, and I'll approve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 00:58:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 19:58:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218195] Review Request: scipy - array processing for numbers, strings, records, and objects. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612040058.kB40wtcr011976@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scipy - array processing for numbers, strings, records, and objects. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218195 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2006-12-03 19:58 EST ------- http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/scipy/scipy-0.5.1-4.fc6.i386.rpm http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/scipy/scipy-0.5.1-4.fc6.src.rpm http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/scipy/scipy.spec These should address all the comments concerning the unnecessary explicit requires, and builds against fftw instead of fftw2. looking more closely at the rpmlint output, I'm getting errors mixed in with the warnings of the form: E: scipy non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/scipy/signal/setup.py 0644 There are a number of these and its all due to the existance of #!/usr/bin/env python at the top of each file. Should I take the time to patch this out to be correct for fedora and to adjust permissions on these files accordingly. The real problem is, is that many times included python files are never meant to be run as executables even though they have the /usr/bin/whatever header string. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 01:07:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 20:07:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218195] Review Request: scipy - array processing for numbers, strings, records, and objects. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612040107.kB417OgM012237@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scipy - array processing for numbers, strings, records, and objects. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218195 ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2006-12-03 20:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > I take it you did your mock builds on 64bit hardware and had no weird problems > associated /usr/lib/ versus /usr/lib64 ? I always use mock on 64 bits for that reason, and the fact that sitelib != sitearch (for python packages) as well. > -jef (In reply to comment #6) > > These should address all the comments concerning the unnecessary explicit > requires, and builds against fftw instead of fftw2. > > looking more closely at the rpmlint output, I'm getting errors mixed in with the > warnings of the form: > E: scipy non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/scipy/signal/setup.py 0644 > > There are a number of these and its all due to the existance of > #!/usr/bin/env python > > at the top of each file. > > Should I take the time to patch this out to be correct for fedora and to adjust > permissions on these files accordingly. The real problem is, is that many times > included python files are never meant to be run as executables even though they > have the /usr/bin/whatever header string. To me those warnings are bogus since I agree with your analysis. I noticed them before, while doing the review, but I have ignored them on purpose. > -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 02:11:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 21:11:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216912] Review Request: rtpproxy - A symmetric RTP proxy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612040211.kB42BOkn013585@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rtpproxy - A symmetric RTP proxy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216912 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-12-03 21:11 EST ------- Thanks for the review... imported and build for development kicked off... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 02:15:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 21:15:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217066] Review Request: python-gpod - A python module to access iPod content In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612040215.kB42FblH013697@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-gpod - A python module to access iPod content Alias: python-gpod-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217066 ------- Additional Comments From tmz at pobox.com 2006-12-03 21:15 EST ------- Thank you Kevin, for the review and sponsorship. I'll move on to the next step in the contributors guide and request membership in the cvsextras group. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 05:36:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 00:36:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218023] Review Request: alphabet-soup - Guide your worm through the soup to spell words In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612040536.kB45aK3r023381@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alphabet-soup - Guide your worm through the soup to spell words Alias: alphabet-soup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218023 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-12-04 00:36 EST ------- Thanks! Imported and build requested, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 07:12:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 02:12:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218210] Review Request: chemical-mime-data - Support for chemical/* MIME types In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612040712.kB47CSMC026408@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chemical-mime-data - Support for chemical/* MIME types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218210 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-04 02:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > - /usr/share/mime > Requiring shared-mime-info should be the simplest. Oh, requiring shared-mime-info is _mandatory_ as .pc file requires it. (In reply to comment #8) > I'm not sure I've fixed the ownership issues correctly, please advise. 0.1.93-2 is okay. Well, then * %doc INSTALL - This is not necessary because it is required for installing this package by himself. Other things are okay. ----------------------------------------------------- This package (chemical-mime-data) is APPROVED by me. ----------------------------------------------------- Please go forward according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors to import this package to Fedora Extras. I will sponsor you when you have taken steps partway written in the page above (then I should receive the mail that you need a sponsor) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 07:34:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 02:34:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218256] New: Review Request: - Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218256 Summary: Review Request: - Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: yufanyufan at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: SRPM URL: Description: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 07:37:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 02:37:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218210] Review Request: chemical-mime-data - Support for chemical/* MIME types In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612040737.kB47bhQG027500@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chemical-mime-data - Support for chemical/* MIME types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218210 ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2006-12-04 02:37 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.republika.pl/belegdol/rpmstuff/chemical-mime-data.spec SRPM URL: http://www.republika.pl/belegdol/rpmstuff/chemical-mime-data-0.1.93-3.src.rpm New release: - Removed INSTALL from %doc Thank you for sponsorship. I'll create the account now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 07:44:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 02:44:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218172] Review Request: gnome-chemistry-utils - A set of chemical utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612040744.kB47iVoj027718@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-chemistry-utils - A set of chemical utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218172 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-04 02:44 EST ------- Okay. --------------------------------------------- This package (gnome-chemistry-utils) is APPROVED by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 07:54:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 02:54:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 191218] Review Request: PyScript - Postscript graphics with Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612040754.kB47sZEw028155@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyScript - Postscript graphics with Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191218 ------- Additional Comments From paultcochrane at gmail.com 2006-12-04 02:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > I might be interested in being the primary maintainer of this package. I > believe that I can list you as co-maintainer so that you get bugzilla tickets. > As things move forward, until there are more fine-grained access controls i can > be the gatekeeper for any fedora extras cvs commits you want to make to the > package. You can build a public track-record of 'right action' by communicating > with me through bugzilla and make it easier to gain contributor status. That would be great! > What is the most recent spec and srpm that I should look at. See comment #7 for links to the current spec and srpm. > And most importantly, has there been a previous review that would have counted > as a full review if you hadn't needed sponsorship. I want to see if I can > contact a reviewer who is already looked at this so when I re submit it, we can > streamline the timetable and get this in quickly. The review is as documented in the early comments of this bug ticket. The person who helped me was Sander Hoentjen, and we ironed out all the problems with the spec. Everything seemed to be fine after that much review. Thank you very much for your offer, and being co-maintainer would be a very good way to get any required changes into the package so that it can be included in Fedora Extras. Paul -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 07:57:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 02:57:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218258] New: Review Request: - Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218258 Summary: Review Request: - Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: yufanyufan at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: SRPM URL: Description: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 09:45:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 04:45:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612040945.kB49je1L003269@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 09:57:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 04:57:48 -0500 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_217350=5D_Review_Request=3A_ipw2100-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_2100_net?= =?iso-8859-1?q?work_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612040957.kB49vm8E004264@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ipw2100-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 2100 network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217350 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |notting at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2006-12-04 04:57 EST ------- Maybe wait for a further comment from Bill? I initially thought he meant that the Intel license was unacceptable, but now I think he might have meant that the current package was unacceptable (probably because the %description didn't indicate that accepting the license was mandatory). Bill, would you care to comment quickly? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 10:05:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 05:05:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612041005.kB4A5MKA004851@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 ------- Additional Comments From cgtobi at gmail.com 2006-12-04 05:05 EST ------- About the "No URL for Source0": The URL will be provided as soon as aqsis 1.1.0 is released. (we're allmost there) Can you elaborate the "Drop shipping static libs" comment, please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 10:28:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 05:28:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187318] Review Request: mondo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612041028.kB4ASlJL006970@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mondo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187318 hlemaitr at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hlemaitr at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From hlemaitr at redhat.com 2006-12-04 05:28 EST ------- hello No activity logged since August 2006. What's is the status of inclusion of Mondo rescue into Fedora Extras ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 10:35:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 05:35:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612041035.kB4AZ6KY007515@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-12-04 05:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > About the "No URL for Source0": The URL will be provided as soon as aqsis 1.1.0 > is released. (we're allmost there) I am not going to review a package based on non-released sources. Either upstream will have to release their source first, or you will have to implement a set of patches, based on older released version. > Can you elaborate the "Drop shipping static libs" comment, please? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/StaticLinkage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 10:41:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 05:41:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218258] Review Request: - In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612041041.kB4Af6Ws007906@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218258 rreddy at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: - - |for Audacious> ------- Additional Comments From rreddy at redhat.com 2006-12-04 05:41 EST ------- First time submitted package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 10:56:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 05:56:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612041056.kB4AuQuA008926@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 ------- Additional Comments From pgregory at aqsis.org 2006-12-04 05:56 EST ------- > I am not going to review a package based on non-released sources. > > Either upstream will have to release their source first, or you will have to > implement a set of patches, based on older released version. This is a big of a quandary, the build and packaging is part of our source, so either we... 1. Release the source with the RPM packaging not working, then modify it to pass RPM compliance requirements, resulting in the released source and the RPM valid source being out of sync. Not nice, especially as to fit all the RPM requirements it seems will result in changes to the build system, i.e. significant changes from the released source. or 2. Don't release the source until the RPM compliance is met, resulting in the RPM version being in release step with the non-RPM version, which is much more preferable from a management point of view. But the reviewer has stated that they are not prepared to review RPM compliance until the source is released. Chicken and egg. It seems that this policy makes it very difficult to release in a clean and manageable way if your release platforms include FC RPM. Any suggestions welcome. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 11:33:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 06:33:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612041133.kB4BXf9c010689@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-12-04 06:33 EST ------- I believe option 2 should be followed in this case, because, as you said, 1.1.0 is about to be released. Still, you should provide a prerelease snapshot source on your site, even if only for the purpose of this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 11:39:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 06:39:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218020] Review Request: postgrey - Postfix Greylisting Policy Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612041139.kB4Bdlw6010919@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgrey - Postfix Greylisting Policy Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218020 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2006-12-04 06:39 EST ------- Spec URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/postgrey.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/postgrey-1.27-3.src.rpm Updated package with the man page now included. It seems to me that the easiest to get postgrey included in Extras would be if someone reviews this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 11:42:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 06:42:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218022] Review Request: clamsmtp - SMTP filter daemon for anti-virus checking using ClamAV In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612041142.kB4BgGTP011019@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clamsmtp - SMTP filter daemon for anti-virus checking using ClamAV https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218022 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2006-12-04 06:42 EST ------- Oh, no, I had missed it too (like for postgrey), sorry. I've looked at the selinux issue, and it seems that my package will be suffering from the same inet port problem. I'd be more than happy to have you review my package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 12:52:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 07:52:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187317] Review Request: mindi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612041252.kB4CqVnB014985@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mindi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187317 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |187318 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-12-04 07:52 EST ------- we have guidelines that need to be followed. the busybox binary has to be removed from the tarball. and you need to use the one provided by Fedora. how is 2.2.0 coming along? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 12:52:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 07:52:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187318] Review Request: mondo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612041252.kB4CqjrJ015013@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mondo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187318 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |187317 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 12:58:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 07:58:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187318] Review Request: mondo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612041258.kB4CwrfA015477@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mondo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187318 ------- Additional Comments From bruno_cornec at hp.com 2006-12-04 07:58 EST ------- the latest status on my side is available at ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/fedora/5/mondo-2.2.0-2.fc5.src.rpm Not all the previous remarks made on this bug report have been integrated :-( That's why I haven't given feedback till now. Version 2.2.1 should arrive soon (tests running now), and I hope to be able to fix most remaining problems with it. A snapshot is available at ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/fedora/5/mondo-stable-1.fc5.src.rpm I hope that at that point inclusion will be easier. BTW as noted, first point is to fix mindi for inclusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 13:03:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 08:03:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187317] Review Request: mindi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612041303.kB4D3bJv015797@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mindi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187317 ------- Additional Comments From bruno_cornec at hp.com 2006-12-04 08:03 EST ------- mindi 1.2.0 (version available at ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/fedora/5/mindi-1.2.0-2.fc5.src.rpm) is now delivered without a binary busybox in it. Instead an additional package has been made (Cf: ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/fedora/5/mindi-busybox-1.2.1-2.fc5.src.rpm) I've not checked that all your remarks have been taken in account, even if I tried to. As 1.2.1 is planned to be delivered as soon as my current test are finished, I did not work on that in parallel. Now if you think the current status would allow for easier inclusion, let me know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 13:23:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 08:23:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215883] Review Request: idioskopos - C++ Introspection Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612041323.kB4DNNTx016534@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: idioskopos - C++ Introspection Library Alias: idioskopos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215883 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-04 08:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > But, the specs are built by autoconf when configure is run. It seems not. ------------------------------------------------- checking for tr1/boost_shared_ptr.h... yes checking tr1/array usability... yes checking tr1/array presence... yes checking for tr1/array... yes checking for i686-redhat-linux-gnu-pkg-config... no checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes checking for PROJECT... yes ./configure: line 22376: suse-10.1/idioskopos.spec.in: No such file or directory configure: creating ./config.status config.status: creating fedora-5/idioskopos.spec config.status: creating fedora-6/idioskopos.spec config.status: creating idioskopos-1.0.pc config.status: creating docs/www/site.php config.status: creating Makefile config.status: creating idioskopos/Makefile config.status: creating examples/Makefile ------------------------------------------------- and ... suse-10.1/idioskopos.spec.in is never used. Actually I successfully rebuild this packge without m4 by mockbuild. Anyway, if running configure requires autoconf, it is not correct and should be fixed if so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 13:43:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 08:43:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217836] Review Request: vimoutliner - set of vim macros for editing outlines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612041343.kB4DhvaS017787@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vimoutliner - set of vim macros for editing outlines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217836 ------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com 2006-12-04 08:43 EST ------- SPEC (http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/progs/rpms/vimoutliner.spec) should be all right, tested just now. SRPM was updated to new release and it is here http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/progs/rpms/vimoutliner-0.3.4-6.src.rpm (and yes, I can download it through webbrowser as well). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 13:47:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 08:47:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: - In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612041347.kB4Dl1Kj017954@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 ------- Additional Comments From Nadia.Derbey at bull.net 2006-12-04 08:47 EST ------- While waiting for Dave's answer, here are the new links after your last review (sorry for not reacting fast these days: I'm often out my office): SPEC URL: http://libtune.sourceforge.net/specfiles/FE/FE-11-1/libtune.spec SRPM URL: http://libtune.sourceforge.net/srpms/FE/libtune-0.11-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 15:21:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 10:21:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215569] Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612041521.kB4FLE2G024617@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215569 tom at dbservice.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tom at dbservice.com ------- Additional Comments From tom at dbservice.com 2006-12-04 10:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > On the license front... I see a #define _GNU_SOURCE, but yeah, the license block > is a little vague. I'll prod upstream for clarification. Do you mean the files in seom or the plugin itself? capture.c has a standard header just like any other file in beryl-plugins, and the seom files have no header, just a LICENSE file in the root directory. If you require that every file needs to have a GPL header, I can add it, no problem. I would also suggest, if somehow possible, to specify ARCH when building seom, see http://www.neopsis.com/projects/yukon/wiki/YukonCompile - "Architecture Optimizations" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 16:06:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 11:06:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612041606.kB4G6GOS028017@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2006-12-04 11:06 EST ------- Same here, I would recommend to submit an SRPM based on a CVS snapshot, if only for the goal of going through the review process. After the package is approved, you can update it with the official 1.1.0 release. The reason is we can't review a package whose source cannot be verified upstream. I would recommend using a version such as "1.1.0-0.cvsYYYYMMDD.1.fc6". The leading '0.' in front of the snapshot date ensures that the version will always be inferior to "1.1.0-1" used when 1.1.0 is officially released. I'm having some problems making this aqsis package with k3d on my system: aqsis doesn't find the correct shaders no matter which one i try, which results in a white object rendered (ERROR: Shader "k3d_plank" not found), even though this works with my aqsis 1.0.1 package. I'm not sure if this is a k3d problem or not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 16:23:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 11:23:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612041623.kB4GNhJA029491@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 ------- Additional Comments From pgregory at aqsis.org 2006-12-04 11:23 EST ------- > The reason is we can't review > a package whose source cannot be verified upstream. What exactly do you mean by 'verified upstream'??? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 16:27:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 11:27:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612041627.kB4GRuY9029976@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-12-04 11:27 EST ------- Just a note that the version/release strings to use for snapshots are mandated by the Naming Guidelines and differ from the example above: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#SnapshotPackages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 16:31:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 11:31:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612041631.kB4GVP6D030268@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-12-04 11:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > > The reason is we can't review > > a package whose source cannot be verified upstream. > > What exactly do you mean by 'verified upstream'??? We need to use a globally available source for a source tarball, which we can compare the tarball inside of Fedora's buildsystem against. Otherwise arbrary "jerks" could tar up some files and put them into Fedora, claiming they were yours. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 16:36:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 11:36:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612041636.kB4GaIBb030793@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 ------- Additional Comments From pgregory at aqsis.org 2006-12-04 11:36 EST ------- I see, that makes sense, sort of. I'll have to take a look at our build current system and see what we can do. Maybe if we sort out the outstanding issues mentioned above, then freeze for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 18:21:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 13:21:09 -0500 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_217350=5D_Review_Request=3A_ipw2100-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_2100_net?= =?iso-8859-1?q?work_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612041821.kB4IL9Q6006323@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ipw2100-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 2100 network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217350 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-12-04 13:21 EST ------- Sure, make all the commentary in the bug I'm *not* originally CC'd on. :P Warning, I'm not fedora-legal, but: 1 - End-users aren't explicitly given distribution or redistribution rights (they aren't disallowed them, either.) As adherence to that is required for ISVs (which Fedora is), that's a problem. 2 - The contractors provision is just weird. There may have been something else I missed. Basically, we don't doubt that the *intent* of Intel is for it to be redistributable. However, the license *text* isn't quite usable in that regards - what we want is a release of the firmware under a clarified license, or under something similar to the ipw3945 license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 18:49:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 13:49:41 -0500 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_217350=5D_Review_Request=3A_ipw2100-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_2100_net?= =?iso-8859-1?q?work_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612041849.kB4Infsx009034@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ipw2100-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 2100 network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217350 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-12-04 13:49 EST ------- What do you propose then? That someone should ask Intel to clarify the license text inside the tarballs (same applies to ipw2200-firmware, too - bug #217351). Who should that be? Matthias or someone from fedora-legal? Should I block FE-Legal here until then? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 19:27:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 14:27:39 -0500 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_217350=5D_Review_Request=3A_ipw2100-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_2100_net?= =?iso-8859-1?q?work_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612041927.kB4JRd47012988@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ipw2100-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 2100 network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217350 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-12-04 14:27 EST ------- Probably FE-Legal, yes. We'd like a clarified license text inside the tarballs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 19:35:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 14:35:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218342] New: Review Request: tibetan-machine-uni-fonts - Tibetan Machine Uni font for Tibetan, Dzongkha and Ladakhi Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218342 Summary: Review Request: tibetan-machine-uni-fonts - Tibetan Machine Uni font for Tibetan, Dzongkha and Ladakhi Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mgarski at post.pl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://manta.univ.gda.pl/~mgarski/fe/tibetan-machine-uni-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://manta.univ.gda.pl/~mgarski/fe/tibetan-machine-uni-fonts-0.0.20040806-1.src.rpm Description: Tibetan Machine Uni is an OpenType, Unicode font released by THDL project. The font support Tibetan, Dzongkha and Ladakhi in dbu can script with full support for the Sanskrit combinations found in chos skad texts. I'm not sure about version number. Archive and web site doesn't provide it, only in file you can find 001.000 version, in this case I've done the same as Debian's packager (date is taken from font file inside archive). For more licensing info see comments from bug #167536 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 19:53:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 14:53:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 193898] Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612041953.kB4JrPO9015235@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-12-04 14:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > I've taken this over from Igor. I made a few changes and updated to 2.2a1. > I've also fixed the mock error you were seeing, Anthony, and added a script to > fetch the tarball and explain how to do it. Sorry I missed the update on this. I'm rerunning it in mock and will go through the formal review assuming there are no problems. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 20:28:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 15:28:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 206478] Review Request: Yumdiff - Compares RPMS installed on local and remote systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612042028.kB4KSpPV018121@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Yumdiff - Compares RPMS installed on local and remote systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206478 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2006-12-04 15:28 EST ------- Good idea. I'll write something up and run it up the flagpole. Thanks. (In reply to comment #17) > A suggestion, > Considering that most of the discussion so far concerns the basic functionality > and not packaging issues, I think it would be worthwhile for you to open up a > discussion on fedora-extras-list or on the upstream yum development list and get > feedback from the community as to the underlying design and functionality aims, > before continuing with a submission request. > > -jef > -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 20:45:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 15:45:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218360] New: Review Request: evolution-plugin-remove-duplicates - Evolution plugin for removing duplicate mails Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218360 Summary: Review Request: evolution-plugin-remove-duplicates - Evolution plugin for removing duplicate mails Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michel.salim at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://hircus.org/fedora/evolution-plugin-remove-duplicates/evolution-plugin-remove-duplicates.spec SRPM URL: http://hircus.org/fedora/evolution-plugin-remove-duplicates/evolution-plugin-remove-duplicates-0.0.2-1.src.rpm Description: A plugin that checks selected e-mails for duplicates and remove them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 20:55:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 15:55:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215792] Review Request: wgrib - Manipulate, inventory and decode GRIB files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612042055.kB4KttmG020423@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wgrib - Manipulate, inventory and decode GRIB files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215792 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-12-04 15:55 EST ------- cvs troubles then I got busy. Checked in and added to owners.list. Building on devel. Will ask for FC-6 and FC-5 branches, but won't build until you rebuilt grads. Let me know... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 20:56:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 15:56:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208396] Review Request: v4l2-tool - Tool to get webcam usage Information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612042056.kB4KudQr020500@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: v4l2-tool - Tool to get webcam usage Information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208396 michel.salim at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-12-04 15:56 EST ------- Everything looks good. I'm a bit hesitant about listing %{_datadir}/* instead of the specific subdirectories, but rpm -qf /usr/share/ shows that other packages are doing that as well anyway. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 20:59:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 15:59:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 193898] Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612042059.kB4KxSvP020639@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-12-04 15:59 EST ------- Andrew - the package naming goes against current package naming rules... http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/JavaPackageNaming I've simply been removing the "jpp" part from my packages (see itext, for instance). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 21:24:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 16:24:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218367] New: Review Request: compat-guile - Guile compatibility package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218367 Summary: Review Request: compat-guile - Guile compatibility package Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gemi at bluewin.ch QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/spec/compat-guile.spec SRPM URL: http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/6/i386/SRPMS.gemi/compat-guile-1.6.7-1.src.rpm Description: The is a compatibility package for guile 1.6 needed to compile TeXmacs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 21:30:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 16:30:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215792] Review Request: wgrib - Manipulate, inventory and decode GRIB files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612042130.kB4LUT5f023199@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wgrib - Manipulate, inventory and decode GRIB files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215792 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-12-04 16:30 EST ------- I have rebuilt grads without wgrib. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 22:54:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 17:54:33 -0500 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_217350=5D_Review_Request=3A_ipw2100-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_2100_net?= =?iso-8859-1?q?work_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612042254.kB4MsXcA030997@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ipw2100-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 2100 network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217350 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 22:56:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 17:56:32 -0500 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_217351=5D_Review_Request=3A_ipw2200-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_2200_net?= =?iso-8859-1?q?work_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612042256.kB4MuWBH031130@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ipw2200-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 2200 network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217351 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-12-04 17:56 EST ------- Blocking FE-Legal, see bug #217350 for the discussion leading up to this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 4 23:06:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 18:06:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612042306.kB4N6nZi031933@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 ------- Additional Comments From wilmer at fedoraproject.org 2006-12-04 18:06 EST ------- Thx again, also i fix the location of man file in the SPEC file, added /usr/lib/debug for build section and you was include in the global changelog file. Please, check it out new updates: Spec URL: http://www.fedora-ve.org/mybashburn/downloads/mybashburn.spec SRPM URL: http://www.fedora-ve.org/mybashburn/downloads/mybashburn-1.0-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 5 01:37:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 20:37:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215883] Review Request: idioskopos - C++ Introspection Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612050137.kB51besD005999@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: idioskopos - C++ Introspection Library Alias: idioskopos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215883 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2006-12-04 20:37 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > But, the specs are built by autoconf when configure is run. > Sorry about that. I meant to say, the specs are built by m4 when configure is run. This is the section in configure that requires m4: ######################################################################### # build spec.in files ######################################################################### for distro in "fedora-5 FEDORA 5" "fedora-6 FEDORA 6"; do original_params=("$@") set -- $distro mkdir ${1} m4 -D DISTRO=${2} \ -D DISTRO_LIB_GROUP="${2}_${3}_LIB_GROUP" \ -D DISTRO_BUILD_REQUIRES="${2}_${3}_BUILD_REQUIRES" \ -D DISTRO_DEVEL_GROUP="${2}_${3}_DEVEL_GROUP" \ -D DISTRO_DEVEL_REQUIRES="${2}_${3}_DEVEL_REQUIRES" \ spec.m4 >${1}/${PACKAGE_NAME}.spec.in set -- $original_params done And then, later on in configure.in I have the spec.in that was built above in AC_OUTPUT(). > ./configure: line 22376: suse-10.1/idioskopos.spec.in: No such file or directory I thought I removed the suse-10.1 directories for the 0.3.3 release, but I must have done it after I pushed the release. That's the m4 command failing because the 0.3.3 release didn't have the 'mkdir ${1}'. > Actually I successfully rebuild this packge without m4 > by mockbuild. Now that I think about it, the m4 command will probably silently fail without m4 installed. I don't have a problem removing the m4 build-requires. I just want to make sure it's right. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 5 01:44:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 20:44:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217066] Review Request: python-gpod - A python module to access iPod content In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612050144.kB51i5Bk006249@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-gpod - A python module to access iPod content Alias: python-gpod-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217066 tmz at pobox.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 5 01:55:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 20:55:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218210] Review Request: chemical-mime-data - Support for chemical/* MIME types In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612050155.kB51t6dc006853@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chemical-mime-data - Support for chemical/* MIME types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218210 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-04 20:55 EST ------- Removing FE-NEEDSPONSOR, now I am sponsoring. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 5 01:55:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 20:55:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218172] Review Request: gnome-chemistry-utils - A set of chemical utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612050155.kB51tjiQ006933@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-chemistry-utils - A set of chemical utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218172 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-04 20:55 EST ------- Removing FE-NEEDSPONSOR (bug 218210) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 5 01:57:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 20:57:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218176] Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612050157.kB51vDYb007013@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218176 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-04 20:57 EST ------- Removing FE-NEEDSPONSOR (bug 218210) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 5 01:58:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 20:58:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211729] Review Request: museek+ - Soulseek network filesharing client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612050158.kB51w1jI007062@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: museek+ - Soulseek network filesharing client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211729 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-04 20:58 EST ------- Removing FE-NEEDSPONSOR (bug 218210) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 5 01:58:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 20:58:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211729] Review Request: museek+ - Soulseek network filesharing client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612050158.kB51waIM007093@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: museek+ - Soulseek network filesharing client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211729 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 5 02:05:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 21:05:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211729] Review Request: museek+ - Soulseek network filesharing client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612050205.kB525fj1007456@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: museek+ - Soulseek network filesharing client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211729 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rpm at greysector.net CC|rpm at greysector.net | ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-12-04 21:05 EST ------- Good. I'll review this in a few days then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 5 02:06:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 21:06:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211729] Review Request: museek+ - Soulseek network filesharing client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612050206.kB526qhS007515@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: museek+ - Soulseek network filesharing client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211729 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-12-04 21:06 EST ------- Julian: is there any reason why this bug is filed agains fc6 and not devel? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 5 02:07:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 21:07:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218342] Review Request: tibetan-machine-uni-fonts - Tibetan Machine Uni font for Tibetan, Dzongkha and Ladakhi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612050207.kB527lse007596@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tibetan-machine-uni-fonts - Tibetan Machine Uni font for Tibetan, Dzongkha and Ladakhi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218342 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 5 04:12:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 23:12:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217232] Review Request: keyTouch In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612050412.kB54CkiC014332@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: keyTouch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217232 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(denisl78 at gmail.com | |) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-04 23:12 EST ------- Switching to NEEDINFO from reporter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 5 04:24:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 23:24:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612050424.kB54O8fN015614@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-04 23:24 EST ------- Kindly remove my name from changelog its at all not necessary. If you got from somebody modified SPEC then you write your own name in Chnagelog. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 5 04:43:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 23:43:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208396] Review Request: v4l2-tool - Tool to get webcam usage Information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612050443.kB54hebt017650@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: v4l2-tool - Tool to get webcam usage Information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208396 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-04 23:43 EST ------- Thanks built for devel only successfully. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 5 04:52:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 23:52:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208398] Review Request: luvcview - Webcam Viewer Application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612050452.kB54qT6S018657@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: luvcview - Webcam Viewer Application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208398 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-04 23:52 EST ------- Ping for any watchers. Do we really need kmod as BR for this package. I don't think becuase even if user installed it and he don't have webcam then he will get only errors as uvcview version 0.1.7 Video driver: x11 A window manager is available video /dev/video0 ERROR opening V4L interface : No such file or directory So i don't think gspca kmod should be blocker for this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 5 04:59:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 23:59:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218360] Review Request: evolution-plugin-remove-duplicates - Evolution plugin for removing duplicate mails In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612050459.kB54xtfl019508@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-plugin-remove-duplicates - Evolution plugin for removing duplicate mails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218360 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-04 23:59 EST ------- You need to Add perl-XML-Parser as BR in SPEC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 5 05:35:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 00:35:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215883] Review Request: idioskopos - C++ Introspection Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612050535.kB55ZZ3L021688@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: idioskopos - C++ Introspection Library Alias: idioskopos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215883 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-05 00:35 EST ------- Well, for m4 issue, I will leave it as you say. I will check if there is any rest issue in this package later (mockbuild of 0.3.3-1 is okay) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 5 05:36:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 00:36:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218408] New: Review Request: xl2tpd - replacement of l2tpd Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218408 Summary: Review Request: xl2tpd - replacement of l2tpd Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: paul at xelerance.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/xl2tpd/xl2tpd.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/xl2tpd/xl2tpd-1.1.06-1.src.rpm Description: xl2tpd is an implementation of the Layer 2 Tunnelling Protocol (RFC 2661). L2TP allows you to tunnel PPP over UDP. Some ISPs use L2TP to tunnel user sessions from dial-in servers (modem banks, ADSL DSLAMs) to back-end PPP servers. Another important application is Virtual Private Networks where the IPsec protocol is used to secure the L2TP connection (L2TP/IPsec, RFC 3193). The L2TP/IPsec protocol is mainly used by Windows and Mac OS X clients. On Linux, xl2tpd can be used in combination with IPsec implementations such as Openswan. Example configuration files for such a setup are included in this RPM. xl2tpd works by opening a pseudo-tty for communicating with pppd. It runs completely in userspace. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 5 05:37:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 00:37:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218408] Review Request: xl2tpd - replacement of l2tpd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612050537.kB55blCB021783@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xl2tpd - replacement of l2tpd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218408 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-05 00:37 EST ------- I will review this after I go back from shopping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 5 05:49:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 00:49:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218408] Review Request: xl2tpd - replacement of l2tpd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612050549.kB55n7NQ022175@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xl2tpd - replacement of l2tpd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218408 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-05 00:49 EST ------- Well, before I go out for shopping: I tried to rebuild in mockbuild and rpmlint complains about: --------------------------------------- E: xl2tpd tag-not-utf8 %changelog E: xl2tpd obsolete-not-provided l2tpd E: xl2tpd non-readable /etc/xl2tpd/l2tp-secrets 0600 E: xl2tpd non-readable /etc/ppp/chap-secrets.sample 0600 W: xl2tpd dangerous-command-in-%post mv E: xl2tpd no-chkconfig-line /etc/rc.d/init.d/xl2tpd E: xl2tpd tag-not-utf8 %changelog E: xl2tpd non-utf8-spec-file xl2tpd.spec W: xl2tpd unversioned-explicit-obsoletes l2tpd W: xl2tpd mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 65, tab: line 52) E: xl2tpd-debuginfo tag-not-utf8 %changelog ------------------------------------------------------------ Please fix these or explain the reason when these rpmlint message can be ignored. Also, please add %?dist tag (I have not yet checked this package, I only rebuilt this) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 5 06:09:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 01:09:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218408] Review Request: xl2tpd - replacement of l2tpd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612050609.kB569pNV022814@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xl2tpd - replacement of l2tpd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218408 paul at xelerance.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163776 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at xelerance.com 2006-12-05 01:09 EST ------- * Tue Dec 5 2006 Paul Wouters 1.1.06-2 - Changed Mr. Karlsen's name to not be a utf8 problem - Fixed Obosoletes/Provides to be more specific wrt l2tpd. Spec URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/xl2tpd/xl2tpd.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/xl2tpd/xl2tpd-1.1.06-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 5 06:53:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 01:53:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218408] Review Request: xl2tpd - replacement of l2tpd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612050653.kB56rT6r024098@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xl2tpd - replacement of l2tpd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218408 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 5 07:11:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 02:11:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218408] Review Request: xl2tpd - replacement of l2tpd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612050711.kB57BP2p024663@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xl2tpd - replacement of l2tpd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218408 paul at xelerance.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163776 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at xelerance.com 2006-12-05 02:11 EST ------- two comments of me got lost, and i think two of you :( I aded the dist tag. fixes the spaces, and the obsolete/provides issue in the above srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 5 07:15:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 02:15:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211729] Review Request: museek+ - Soulseek network filesharing client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612050715.kB57FoY1024813@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: museek+ - Soulseek network filesharing client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211729 belegdol at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|fc6 |devel ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2006-12-05 02:15 EST ------- Well, only the one I'm running fc6 here and not rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 5 08:19:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 03:19:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218210] Review Request: chemical-mime-data - Support for chemical/* MIME types In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612050819.kB58JLVa027029@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chemical-mime-data - Support for chemical/* MIME types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218210 ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2006-12-05 03:19 EST ------- Package imported, FC-5 and FC-6 branches requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 5 08:19:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 03:19:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218172] Review Request: gnome-chemistry-utils - A set of chemical utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612050819.kB58JFcw027021@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-chemistry-utils - A set of chemical utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218172 ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2006-12-05 03:19 EST ------- Thanks very much for sponsorship. Package imported, FC-5 and FC-6 branches requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 5 11:35:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 06:35:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218210] Review Request: chemical-mime-data - Support for chemical/* MIME types In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612051135.kB5BZriW009512@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chemical-mime-data - Support for chemical/* MIME types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218210 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-05 06:35 EST ------- You can close this bug as CLOSED NEXTRELEASE when you succeeds in rebuilding this on FE-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 5 11:50:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 06:50:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217497] Review Request: dbmail - The DBMail mail storage system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612051150.kB5BoKrV010320@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbmail - The DBMail mail storage system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217497 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2006-12-05 06:50 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/Fedora-Extras/dbmail.spec SRPM URL: http://www.symetrix.com/~bj/projects/Fedora-Extras/dbmail-2.2.1-3.fc6.src.rpm Was a little too agressive at getting rid of .so files. Allow the ones that are modules loaded at runtime. Index: dbmail.spec =================================================================== --- dbmail.spec (revision 123) +++ dbmail.spec (working copy) @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ Name: dbmail Version: 2.2.1 -Release: 2%{?dist}%{?repotag:.%{repotag}} +Release: 3%{?dist}%{?repotag:.%{repotag}} Summary: The DBMail mail storage system Group: System Environment/Daemons @@ -64,8 +64,9 @@ install man/*1 %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1/ install man/*5 %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man5/ install man/*8 %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man8/ -# remove libtool archives and -devel type stuff -find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name \*\.la -print -o -name \*\.so -print | xargs rm -f +# remove libtool archives and -devel type stuff (but leave loadable modules) +find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name \*\.la -print -o -name \*\.so -print | \ + egrep -v "libauth.*so|libmysql.*so|libpgsql.*so|libsqlite.*so" | xargs rm -f # create dynamic linker/loader configuration file echo "/usr/lib/dbmail" > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_sysconfdir}/ld.so.conf.d/dbmail-`uname -i`.conf @@ -125,6 +126,9 @@ %changelog +* Tue Dec 05 2006 Bernard Johnson 2.2.1-3 +- leave the right .so files for modules + * Mon Nov 27 2006 Bernard Johnson 2.2.1-2 - update with Fedora Extras style spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 5 12:09:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 07:09:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218408] Review Request: xl2tpd - replacement of l2tpd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612051209.kB5C9ONJ011235@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xl2tpd - replacement of l2tpd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218408 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-05 07:09 EST ------- Well, again full review of this package. A. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * rpmlint: - rpmlint output is not silent. ----------------------------------------------------- 1. E: xl2tpd non-readable /etc/xl2tpd/l2tp-secrets 0600 2. E: xl2tpd non-readable /etc/ppp/chap-secrets.sample 0600 3. W: xl2tpd dangerous-command-in-%post mv 4. E: xl2tpd no-chkconfig-line /etc/rc.d/init.d/xl2tpd ----------------------------------------------------- 1. 2. : I don't know well about this package, however, please check if the permisson of these files are correct. 3. : I think that this warnings may ignorable, however: * By the way which is done first, doing %post scriptlet of xl2tpd, or obsoleting (i.e. deleting) xl2tpd? I vaguely remember several case (by yum) that obsoleting a package is done _before_ installing a substitute rpm. I think moving or copying should be done by %triggerun 4. : This error can be suppressed by replacing tab with space in '# chkconfig: - 80 30' line. * Timestamps - Use 'install -p' to keep timestamps. And I recommend that Makefile should be also fixed to use 'install -p'. B. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets : * Initscripts Conventions - Please add the appropriate requirement in Requires(post), etc. C. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : (Okay). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 5 13:11:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 08:11:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199679] Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612051311.kB5DBCva014969@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199679 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-12-05 08:10 EST ------- Hi, (In reply to comment #23) > Did comment #22 make sense? Or did I miss something? Ok, I think we made it: New spec: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/pgpool/postgresql-pgpool.spec New SRPM: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/pgpool/postgresql-pgpool-3.1.1-7.src.rpm What is left for approval? Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 5 14:16:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 09:16:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215883] Review Request: idioskopos - C++ Introspection Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612051416.kB5EGVaP019545@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: idioskopos - C++ Introspection Library Alias: idioskopos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215883 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-05 09:16 EST ------- Okay. ------------------------------------------- This package (idioskopos) is APPROVED by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 5 15:20:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 10:20:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 188477] Review Request: maildrop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612051520.kB5FKVHv025325@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maildrop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188477 ------- Additional Comments From johan-fedora at deds.nl 2006-12-05 10:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > Mike, are you going to pursue submitting this to fedora-extras? FYI: A courier-authlib RPM is the review process now #208064 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 5 16:58:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 11:58:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174377] Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612051658.kB5Gw2B5002395@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174377 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-12-05 11:58 EST ------- Now here the RPMs for the new final 2.3 release of gnu-smalltalk: SRPM: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/gnu-smalltalk/gnu-smalltalk-2.3-1.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/gnu-smalltalk/gnu-smalltalk.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 5 17:45:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 12:45:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218176] Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612051745.kB5Hj9fV006135@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218176 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-05 12:44 EST ------- Some comments from me. >From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * Use rpmlint ------------------------------------------------------ W: gchempaint non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/gchempaint-arrows.schemas W: gchempaint macro-in-%changelog files W: gchempaint-devel no-documentation W: gchempaint undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libgchempaint.so.0.6.6 g_printable_get_type W: gchempaint undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libgchempaint.so.0.6.6 gnome_canvas_rich_text_ext_get_type W: gchempaint undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libgchempaint.so.0.6.6 gnome_canvas_rich_text_ext_set_buffer W: gchempaint undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libgchempaint.so.0.6.6 gnome_canvas_rich_text_ext_get_iter_location W: gchempaint undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libgchempaint.so.0.6.6 gnome_canvas_rich_text_ext_get_buffer W: gchempaint undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libgchempaint.so.0.6.6 gnome_canvas_text_ext_get_type W: gchempaint undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libgchempaint.so.0.6.6 gnome_canvas_ellipse_ext_get_type W: gchempaint undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libgchempaint.so.0.6.6 gnome_canvas_bpath_ext_get_type W: gchempaint undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libgchempaint.so.0.6.6 gnome_canvas_rich_text_ext_get_pango_layout W: gchempaint undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libgchempaint.so.0.6.6 g_printable_export_svg W: gchempaint undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libgchempaint.so.0.6.6 gnome_canvas_rich_text_ext_get_iter_at_location W: gchempaint undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libgchempaint.so.0.6.6 gnome_canvas_group_ext_get_type W: gchempaint undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libgchempaint.so.0.6.6 gnome_canvas_rect_ext_get_type W: gchempaint undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libgchempaint.so.0.6.6 gnome_canvas_line_ext_get_type ------------------------------------------------------ - non-conffile-in-etc warning can be ignored. gconf schemas files are not config file. - When you want to use percent in %changelog, please use %%. - Well, for undefined non-weak symbols issue: Some reviewers say this can be ignorable for Review, while some reviewers say they should be fixed before approving the package. For this package, libgchempaint.so is included in -devel package so leaving these undefined symbols causes failure for linking to libgchempaint.so, so this should be fixed before this package is approved. Then: 1. for g_printable_get_type and g_printable_export_svg: This is defined in ./libgcpcanvas/gprintable.c, however gprintable.o is not used in libgchempaint.so.0.6.6 so this is actually wrong (this should cause failure linkage). 2. for gnome_canvas_... : Perhaps linking libgchempaint.so to libgnomecanvas-2.so (in libgnomecanvas-devel) will fix these complaint. * Requires pkgconfig (in -devel) - It seems that -devel package does not includes pkgconfig .pc file. * File and Directory Ownership - /usr/share/omf/gchempaint/ is not owned by any package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 5 18:05:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 13:05:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612051805.kB5I5359007526@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 paul.horos at ifax.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul.horos at ifax.com ------- Additional Comments From paul.horos at ifax.com 2006-12-05 13:05 EST ------- Can you please clarify whether this package is HylaFAX or HylaFAX+? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 5 18:16:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 13:16:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199679] Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612051816.kB5IGpLh008809@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199679 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-05 13:16 EST ------- Everything looks great with the version in comment #24. This package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this review request NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported and built. Also, consider reviewing another waiting package to help spread out the reviewing load. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 5 18:26:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 13:26:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218360] Review Request: evolution-plugin-remove-duplicates - Evolution plugin for removing duplicate mails In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612051826.kB5IQN1c009596@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-plugin-remove-duplicates - Evolution plugin for removing duplicate mails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218360 ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-12-05 13:26 EST ------- Thanks. Here are the updated files: Spec URL: http://hircus.org/fedora/evolution-plugin-remove-duplicates/evolution-plugin-remove-duplicates.spec SRPM URL: http://hircus.org/fedora/evolution-plugin-remove-duplicates/evolution-plugin-remove-duplicates-0.0.2-2.src.rpm I normally test them using mock, but sometimes (like now) mock fails. Here on x86_64 it's saying it could not find evolution-plugin-2.8 (despite me manually setting PKG_CONFIG_PATH). Normally the package builds fine on the build server, though. Testing now with a 32-bit mock buildroot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 5 18:37:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 13:37:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612051837.kB5Ib4QY010680@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From faxguy at howardsilvan.com 2006-12-05 13:36 EST ------- Paul/Darren, Lest we require ourselves to say that x.org and XFree86 are not both X, let us not try to define that HylaFAX+ and even your own company's "HylaFAX Professional Edition" are not both HylaFAX also. Indeed, as we all (including you) already know, the software being promoted here is the sourceforge flavour of HylaFAX, also known as HylaFAX+. Lee. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 5 18:44:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 13:44:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 177134] Review Request: mkvtoolnix - Matroska container utilites In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612051844.kB5IipAO011430@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mkvtoolnix - Matroska container utilites https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177134 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|182235 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-12-05 13:44 EST ------- Lifting FE-Legal, after discussion with Max. I was unable to find any patents around the process of muxing/demuxing (not the hardware implementations of muxing/demuxing). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 5 18:50:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 13:50:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 191036] Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612051850.kB5IolJu011984@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191036 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|182235 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-12-05 13:50 EST ------- Lifted FE-Legal here, after discussion with Max. I cannot find any patents on multiplexing/demuxing in software. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 5 19:03:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 14:03:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612051903.kB5J35JM013069@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 ------- Additional Comments From wilmer at fedoraproject.org 2006-12-05 14:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > Kindly remove my name from changelog its at all not necessary. If you got from > somebody modified SPEC then you write your own name in Chnagelog. How you want, now, there are some more for check on review? when should the package be approved? Greetings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 5 19:34:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 14:34:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612051934.kB5JYt1E015701@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-12-05 14:34 EST ------- Sorry for the long delay. Howard, the new package doesn't work at all, the permissions are completely screwed up. Have you tested the package yourself before you submitted it? $ rpmlint hylafax-5.0.0-1.fc6.i386.rpm | sort E: hylafax executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/cron.daily/hylafax E: hylafax executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/cron.hourly/hylafax E: hylafax executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/hylafax E: hylafax invalid-soname /usr/lib/libfaxserver.so.5.0.0 libfaxserver.so E: hylafax invalid-soname /usr/lib/libfaxutil.so.5.0.0 libfaxutil.so E: hylafax non-executable-script /usr/sbin/edit-faxcover 0444 E: hylafax non-executable-script /usr/sbin/faxaddmodem 0444 E: hylafax non-executable-script /usr/sbin/faxcron 0444 E: hylafax non-executable-script /usr/sbin/faxsetup 0444 E: hylafax non-executable-script /usr/sbin/faxsetup.linux 0644 E: hylafax non-executable-script /usr/sbin/hylafax 0444 E: hylafax non-executable-script /usr/sbin/probemodem 0444 E: hylafax non-executable-script /usr/sbin/recvstats 0444 E: hylafax non-executable-script /usr/sbin/xferfaxstats 0444 E: hylafax non-executable-script /var/spool/hylafax/bin/archive 0444 E: hylafax non-executable-script /var/spool/hylafax/bin/common-functions 0444 E: hylafax non-executable-script /var/spool/hylafax/bin/dictionary 0444 E: hylafax non-executable-script /var/spool/hylafax/bin/faxrcvd 0444 E: hylafax non-executable-script /var/spool/hylafax/bin/mkcover 0444 E: hylafax non-executable-script /var/spool/hylafax/bin/notify 0444 E: hylafax non-executable-script /var/spool/hylafax/bin/pcl2fax 0444 E: hylafax non-executable-script /var/spool/hylafax/bin/pdf2fax.gs 0444 E: hylafax non-executable-script /var/spool/hylafax/bin/pollrcvd 0444 E: hylafax non-executable-script /var/spool/hylafax/bin/ps2fax.gs 0444 E: hylafax non-executable-script /var/spool/hylafax/bin/tiff2fax 0444 E: hylafax non-executable-script /var/spool/hylafax/bin/tiff2pdf 0444 E: hylafax non-executable-script /var/spool/hylafax/bin/wedged 0444 E: hylafax script-without-shebang /usr/sbin/faxsetup.linux W: hylafax devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libfaxserver.so W: hylafax devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libfaxutil.so W: hylafax incoherent-version-in-changelog 5.0.0 5.0.0-1.fc6 W: hylafax non-conffile-in-etc /etc/hylafax/faxcover_example_sgi.ps W: hylafax non-executable-in-bin /usr/sbin/edit-faxcover 0444 W: hylafax non-executable-in-bin /usr/sbin/faxaddmodem 0444 W: hylafax non-executable-in-bin /usr/sbin/faxcron 0444 W: hylafax non-executable-in-bin /usr/sbin/faxsetup 0444 W: hylafax non-executable-in-bin /usr/sbin/faxsetup.linux 0644 W: hylafax non-executable-in-bin /usr/sbin/hylafax 0444 W: hylafax non-executable-in-bin /usr/sbin/probemodem 0444 W: hylafax non-executable-in-bin /usr/sbin/recvstats 0444 W: hylafax non-executable-in-bin /usr/sbin/xferfaxstats 0444 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 5 19:43:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 14:43:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612051943.kB5JhGRg016362@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From paul.horos at ifax.com 2006-12-05 14:43 EST ------- Christoph, As the proposed package is HylaFAX+, I'd request that it be renamed such. Thanks, Paul -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 5 19:58:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 14:58:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612051958.kB5Jw8V4017761@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From faxguy at howardsilvan.com 2006-12-05 14:58 EST ------- > Have you tested the package yourself before you submitted it? Yes, I've been using it repeatedly. Here's what I see when I run rpmlint on the built RPM: [root at dhcp031 i386]# rpmlint hylafax-5.0.1-1.i386.rpm W: hylafax incoherent-version-in-changelog 5.0.0 5.0.1-1 E: hylafax invalid-soname /usr/lib/libfaxutil.so.5.0.1 libfaxutil.so E: hylafax invalid-soname /usr/lib/libfaxserver.so.5.0.1 libfaxserver.so E: hylafax non-readable /var/spool/hylafax/etc/hosts.hfaxd 0600 E: hylafax executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/cron.hourly/hylafax E: hylafax script-without-shebang /usr/sbin/faxsetup.linux E: hylafax executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/cron.daily/hylafax E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/archive 0700 W: hylafax devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libfaxutil.so E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/doneq 0700 E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/sendq 0700 E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/tmp 0700 E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/docq 0700 W: hylafax non-conffile-in-etc /etc/hylafax/faxcover_example_sgi.ps W: hylafax devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libfaxserver.so E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/pollq 0700 E: hylafax executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/hylafax -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 5 20:08:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 15:08:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199679] Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612052008.kB5K8aWt018700@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199679 devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 5 21:22:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 16:22:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 177134] Review Request: mkvtoolnix - Matroska container utilites In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612052122.kB5LMDgZ025201@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mkvtoolnix - Matroska container utilites https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177134 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-12-05 16:22 EST ------- http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/mkvtoolnix-1.8.1-1.src.rpm http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/mkvtoolnix.spec Updated to 1.8.1 + some fixes by Ville and myself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 5 22:04:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 17:04:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612052204.kB5M4El4028884@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-12-05 17:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #35) > Christoph, > > As the proposed package is HylaFAX+, I'd request that it be renamed such. I agree. I think the source should be named hylafax+.tar.gz, too. (In reply to comment #36) > > Have you tested the package yourself before you submitted it? > > Yes, I've been using it repeatedly. How have you been using this package if /usr/sbin/hylafax is not executable? >Here's what I see when I run rpmlint on the built RPM: > > [root at dhcp031 i386]# rpmlint hylafax-5.0.1-1.i386.rpm This is obviously not the same package, not the same release. It's not even the same version as the package you have submitted in comment #31. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 5 22:31:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 17:31:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215792] Review Request: wgrib - Manipulate, inventory and decode GRIB files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612052231.kB5MVKtH031226@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wgrib - Manipulate, inventory and decode GRIB files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215792 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-12-05 17:31 EST ------- FC-5 and FC-6 builds submitted. Closing.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 5 22:38:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 17:38:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612052238.kB5Mct8X032018@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From faxguy at howardsilvan.com 2006-12-05 17:38 EST ------- > This is obviously not the same package, not the same release. It's not even > the same version as the package you have submitted in comment #31. The software development is moving much faster than progress on this review request. I apologize for giving you rpmlint output for an RPM that was more conveniently at my disposal. For your benefit, I have downloaded the SRPM given in comment #31, rebuilt it on FC6, and here is the rpmlint output: [root at dhcp031 i386]# rpmlint hylafax-5.0.0-1.i386.rpm W: hylafax incoherent-version-in-changelog 5.0.0 5.0.0-1 E: hylafax invalid-soname /usr/lib/libfaxutil.so.5.0.0 libfaxutil.so E: hylafax invalid-soname /usr/lib/libfaxserver.so.5.0.0 libfaxserver.so W: hylafax devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libfaxserver.so E: hylafax non-readable /var/spool/hylafax/etc/hosts.hfaxd 0600 E: hylafax executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/cron.hourly/hylafax E: hylafax script-without-shebang /usr/sbin/faxsetup.linux E: hylafax executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/cron.daily/hylafax E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/archive 0700 W: hylafax devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libfaxutil.so E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/doneq 0700 E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/sendq 0700 E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/tmp 0700 E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/docq 0700 W: hylafax non-conffile-in-etc /etc/hylafax/faxcover_example_sgi.ps E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/pollq 0700 E: hylafax executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/hylafax [root at dhcp031 i386]# > I agree. I think the source should be named hylafax+.tar.gz, too. Apache distributes its webserver in a source repository named httpd-2.2.3.tar.gz. Following the suggestions here, we should petition them to change their package name to something more specific to their version, like "apache-httpd". Apache's naming convention makes complete sense to me, and undoubtedly I am not alone in this understanding as they have had it named that way for a very long time. Fedora uses the repository name as the source for the httpd package name. Thus Apache's webserver is found in a package named "httpd". However, other distributions of Apache's webserver are found in packages named differently, such as "apache-httpd". This also makes complete sense to me because it provides the distribution a means to differentiate between different http servers that it may provide. I do not know if Fedora provides webservers other than Apache's, but assuming it does not, then using the package name of "httpd" for Fedora makes complete sense as well, since it is the only http server being provided. The upstream repository will remain named as it is. As for the package name, it matters not to me if it is called "hylafax" or "hylafax+". However, my suggestion would follow what I've said above about the Apache http server. The distinction of the "+" will mean very little to Fedora users (and in-fact may make the package more-difficult to identify) unless there is more than one HylaFAX package being distributed by Fedora (say, for example, separate "hylafax+" and "hylafax.org" packages). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 5 22:51:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 17:51:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612052251.kB5MpsVp000850@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-12-05 17:51 EST ------- > %post > ln -s %{_datadir}/%{name}/MyBashBurn.sh %{_bindir}/mybashburn > /dev/null 2>&1 > ln -s %{_datadir}/%{name}/MyBashBurn.sh %{_bindir}/bashburn > /dev/null 2>&1 > > %postun > rm -f %{_bindir}/bashburn > rm -f %{_bindir}/mybashburn Why? This is extremely ugly. The files are not even %ghosted. They are not tracked in the RPM database. Why not simply create these links at build-time and include them in the package? That is the way it ought to be. > %files > %defattr(-,root,root,0755) > %{_datadir}/%{name}/* Directory %{_datadir}/%{name} is not included. Correct would be: %{_datadir}/%{name}/ Find one brief explanation in bug 165616 comment 8. > %doc COPYING CREDITS ChangeLog FAQ FILES HOWTO INSTALL README TODO Is the "INSTALL" file the typical NLS documentation which is irrelevant to users of your RPM package? If so, don't include it. It is confusing. > install -d %{buildroot}/usr/lib/debug What's this? Further, prefer "install" with option -p (or "cp" with option -p) to preserve timestamps wherever it is possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 5 23:28:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 18:28:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218556] New: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218556 Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mhalcrow at us.ibm.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/ecryptfs/ecryptfs-utils.spec?use_mirror=osdn SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/ecryptfs/ecryptfs-utils-5-0.src.rpm?use_mirror=osdn Description: eCryptfs is a stacked cryptographic filesystem that ships in Linux kernel versions 2.6.19 and later. This package provides userspace utilities necessary to manage eCryptfs mounts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 5 23:38:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 18:38:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612052338.kB5NcnYN004836@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-12-05 18:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #38) > The software development is moving much faster than progress on this review > request. I am very sorry about that. Please try to see it from my point of view: One reason for this review proceeding so slow is that it's so confusing: Packages don't match the spec file, there was hardly any changelog information at the beginning, lots of rpmlint errors, ... > I apologize for giving you rpmlint output for an RPM that was more > conveniently at my disposal. For your benefit, I have downloaded the SRPM given > in comment #31, rebuilt it on FC6, and here is the rpmlint output: > > [root at dhcp031 i386]# rpmlint hylafax-5.0.0-1.i386.rpm > W: hylafax incoherent-version-in-changelog 5.0.0 5.0.0-1 This is an easy one. Why not fix it _before_ submitting the package? As I already said: Keeping the changelog up to date makes it easier for me to follow the changes. > E: hylafax invalid-soname /usr/lib/libfaxutil.so.5.0.0 libfaxutil.so > E: hylafax invalid-soname /usr/lib/libfaxserver.so.5.0.0 libfaxserver.so > W: hylafax devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libfaxserver.so > E: hylafax non-readable /var/spool/hylafax/etc/hosts.hfaxd 0600 > E: hylafax executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/cron.hourly/hylafax > E: hylafax script-without-shebang /usr/sbin/faxsetup.linux > E: hylafax executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/cron.daily/hylafax > E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/archive 0700 > W: hylafax devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libfaxutil.so > E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/doneq 0700 > E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/sendq 0700 > E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/tmp 0700 > E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/docq 0700 > W: hylafax non-conffile-in-etc /etc/hylafax/faxcover_example_sgi.ps > E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/pollq 0700 > E: hylafax executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/hylafax > [root at dhcp031 i386]# Strange. Mine looks different, see comment #34. I have been building this package several times locally and in mock, always with the same results: Files under /usr/sbin are not executable. Can you upload your binaries somewhere? > > I agree. I think the source should be named hylafax+.tar.gz, too. > > Apache distributes its webserver in a source repository named > httpd-2.2.3.tar.gz. Following the suggestions here, we should petition them to > change their package name to something more specific to their version, like > "apache-httpd". Apache's naming convention makes complete sense to me, and > undoubtedly I am not alone in this understanding as they have had it named that > way for a very long time. > > Fedora uses the repository name as the source for the httpd package name. This is Core, not Extras. Packages in Core don't necessarily follow the FE Packaging and Naming Guidelines and haven't got through a review. The apache package doesn't follow the naming guidelines. It not on me to judge if it makes sense or doesn't, but picking out an exception from the rule is not a good reason for making more exceptions from that rule. > The upstream repository will remain named as it is. I don't have to judge on this too, but IMO this is bad: Having two source archives with the same name and potentially even the same version, but with different content inside is confusing. Once downloaded it is very hard for people to distinguish which version they have. > As for the package name, it > matters not to me if it is called "hylafax" or "hylafax+". However, my > suggestion would follow what I've said above about the Apache http server. The > distinction of the "+" will mean very little to Fedora users (and in-fact may > make the package more-difficult to identify) unless there is more than one > HylaFAX package being distributed by Fedora (say, for example, separate > "hylafax+" and "hylafax.org" packages). Maybe someone else one day will submit another review for hylafax(.org). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 00:23:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 19:23:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612060023.kB60Ngm6006576@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From faxguy at howardsilvan.com 2006-12-05 19:23 EST ------- Christoph, I understand the confusion on this review. I am truly sorry for it, and I wish that I could have somehow known ahead of time how to prevent the confusion... because I certainly would have. The mismatches between packages and specs and such has to do with the development pace and my focus on software development rather than RPM packaging, so I guess it's a chicken-and-egg kind of problem. I've uploaded the hylafax-5.0.0-1.i386.rpm file that I was using to here: http://superb-east.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/hylafax/hylafax-5.0.0-1test.i386.rpm Yes, I know the filename is different - that could not be avoided. But the file data is the same. As far as package/repository naming goes... I understand the httpd naming manner, and I completely understand why it is named that way. Certainly it may not meet the Extras criteria naming rules - neverless, it still makes sense to me and is not confusing, and in fact I probably would have followed the same naming convention in their shoes. I do not see it as an exception to common-sense - although, yes, it may be an exception according to Extras naming rules. Certainly the Extras rules can be a subset of common-sense. For other examples - not of package naming, specifically - but for naming in general... postfix and sendmail both have "sendmail" executables (among other competing executable names). Similarly, mgetty-sendfax has a "sendfax" executable that competes with an identically named executable from HylaFAX (which is why HylaFAX isn't in Core in the first place, as the RedHat 5.2/6.0 maintainers decided to favor mgetty-sendfax and do away with HylaFAX rather than implement a "switching" mechanism as they have done for sendmail/postfix). All of this makes sense to me - and indeed I can see why it would confuse some - but if one understands that, realistically, the purpose in the naming conflicts is a perfect manner of clue-sticking the user that they're looking at conflicting packages, just the same as if they were looking at two packages from the same repository but of different versions. The HylaFAX+ repository is aptly named "hylafax" because it is, after all, HylaFAX. HylaFAX+ version numbers have always been different from the version numbers at HylaFAX.org. Certainly it is not the only HylaFAX repository, but realize that the hylafax.org repository is, itself, a fork - there almost always have been different repositories (even among the earliest contributors). To say that HylaFAX+ is not HylaFAX is to say that when Alan Cox patches the Linux kernel for RedHat that it no longer is Linux. The sourceforge HylaFAX project is known as HylaFAX+ for those people that have a tough time understanding the issues that I am discussing, and certainly it makes it easier than always saying "Sourceforge HylaFAX project". That said, you really won't find anyone out there desireous to run both HylaFAX+ and HylaFAX.org for practical reasons. Realize that Darren's (Paul's) purpose here isn't really to assist the users who will be using HylaFAX (in that they may become upset to find themselves using HylaFAX+ instead of HylaFAX.org software). Rather, his purpose here is to take measures to prevent users from seeing, as I do, that HylaFAX+ is as much HylaFAX as the software found at HylaFAX.org or SGI-HylaFAX or his own commercial "HylaFAX Enterprise Edition". If he really, truly, believed what he is trying to say here then he wouldn't have named his own product with "HylaFAX". My suggestion, Christoph, would be to see the HylaFAX+ vs. HylaFAX.org thing for what it is, the usual forking arguments, and move past it so that we can get this into Extras ... whether the ultimate package name be "hylafax" or "hylafax+". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 03:12:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 22:12:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215256] Review Request: firefox-32 - Alternate Launcher for 32bit Firefox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612060312.kB63CoTI011581@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox-32 - Alternate Launcher for 32bit Firefox Alias: firefox-32 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215256 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-05 22:12 EST ------- It seems this package was added incorrectly to owners.list... Fedora Extras|firefox|firefox browser|wtogami at redhat.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| Should be 'firefox-32' ? Although there is a (very old) firefox module available for some reason. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 03:14:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 22:14:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207676] Review Request: SDL_Pango - Rendering of internationalized text for SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612060314.kB63ELks011710@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SDL_Pango - Rendering of internationalized text for SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207676 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-05 22:14 EST ------- I think the summary was fine (with the capital P in Pango), what you need to fix is the owners.list file... it has SDL_pango, but the package is SDL_Pango... I think both the owners.list and this review summary should use "SDL_Pango" since thats the module in CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 03:24:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 22:24:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212045] Review Request: eclipse-emf - Eclipse Modeling Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612060324.kB63O3dL012376@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-emf - Eclipse Modeling Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212045 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-05 22:23 EST ------- Hey Andrew... any news on getting this built? I see that it hasn't been added to the owners.list... can you do that please? See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors#head-f6f080b4c48fe519c98a29364a740953f90179e7 (Without that step, there is no bugzilla component for the package and people can't report bugs... ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 03:27:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 22:27:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207676] Review Request: SDL_Pango - Rendering of internationalized text for SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612060327.kB63REX1012736@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SDL_Pango - Rendering of internationalized text for SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207676 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-05 22:27 EST ------- Matthias, I fixed owners.list of SDL_'p'ango to SDL_'P'ango. If you meet some trouble by this change, please let me know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 03:27:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 22:27:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612060327.kB63RIpk012755@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-05 22:27 EST ------- Hey Paul. I don't see gtk-sharp in the owners.list. Can you please add it? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors#head-f6f080b4c48fe519c98a29364a740953f90179e7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 03:30:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 22:30:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 206398] Review Request: php-pecl-Fileinfo - libmagic bindings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612060330.kB63UJoQ013063@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-Fileinfo - libmagic bindings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206398 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-05 22:29 EST ------- Brandon: I don't see this package in owners.list, can you please add it? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors#head-f6f080b4c48fe519c98a29364a740953f90179e7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 03:33:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 22:33:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210217] Review Request: pygpgme - Python module for working with OpenPGP messages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612060333.kB63XoRO013337@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pygpgme - Python module for working with OpenPGP messages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210217 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-05 22:33 EST ------- Toshio: I don't see this package in owners.list. Can you please add it? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors#head-f6f080b4c48fe519c98a29364a740953f90179e7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 03:36:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 22:36:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214730] Review Request: pungi - Distribution compose tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612060336.kB63a83c013497@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pungi - Distribution compose tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214730 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-05 22:35 EST ------- Jesse: I don't see this package in owners.list. Can you please add it? See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors#head-f6f080b4c48fe519c98a29364a740953f90179e7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 03:38:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 22:38:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207782] Review Request: itpp - C++ library for math, signal/speech processing, and communications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612060338.kB63cZRC013612@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: itpp - C++ library for math, signal/speech processing, and communications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207782 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-05 22:38 EST ------- Hey Ed: I don't see this package in owners.list. Can you please add it? See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors#head-f6f080b4c48fe519c98a29364a740953f90179e7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 03:40:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 22:40:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 180092] Review Request: NRPE - Monitoring agent for Nagios In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612060340.kB63eoK0013749@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NRPE - Monitoring agent for Nagios https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180092 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-05 22:40 EST ------- Hey Mike. I don't see this package in owners.list. Can you please add it? See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors#head-f6f080b4c48fe519c98a29364a740953f90179e7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 03:47:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 22:47:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 182678] Review Request: libopts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612060347.kB63lgbm014202@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182678 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-05 22:47 EST ------- Paul: I still don't see the package in owners.list... did you forget to check it back in? Please re-add it... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 03:51:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 22:51:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215256] Review Request: firefox-32 - Alternate Launcher for 32bit Firefox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612060351.kB63pIAQ014410@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox-32 - Alternate Launcher for 32bit Firefox Alias: firefox-32 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215256 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-12-05 22:51 EST ------- Oops, good catch. I forgot to add firefox-32 to owners.list. The firefox there is the *OLD* firefox that was in fedora.us, before firefox became part of Fedora Core. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 03:58:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 22:58:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612060358.kB63wIfZ014945@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218556 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-05 22:58 EST ------- Hey Michael. >From a quick look, it looks like this is your first package, so you will need a sponsor. I am going to add the FE-NEEDSPONSOR blocker here so sponsors can see your package. You may want to take a look at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/HowToGetSponsored -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 03:58:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 22:58:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218408] Review Request: xl2tpd - replacement of l2tpd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612060358.kB63wmeh015030@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xl2tpd - replacement of l2tpd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218408 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xelerance.com 2006-12-05 22:58 EST ------- spec URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/xl2tpd/xl2tpd.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/xl2tpd/xl2tpd-1.1.06-3.src.rpm * Tue Dec 5 2006 Paul Wouters 1.1.06-3 - Added Requires(post) / Requires(preun) - changed init file to create /var/run/xl2tpd, fixed a tab/space - changed control file to be within /var/run/xl2tpd/ 1/2 is correct. The secrets should only be readable by root 3 I've tested migration and the order is correct. the orignally installed xl2tpd configs are kept as rmpsave files, the ones from /etc/l2tpd/ are migrated into /etc/xl2tpd/, and then l2tpd gets uninstalled, and creates its own rpmsave files if needed. 4 done Timestamps: I am not sure why we don't want to show the timestamps of the package build? B: done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 04:02:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 23:02:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 202334] Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612060402.kB642O3T015355@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202334 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-05 23:02 EST ------- Hey Anthony. Any further word on a jetty5 package without jpp tags? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 04:12:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 23:12:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167525] Review Request: cpptasks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612060412.kB64CgFE016150@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cpptasks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167525 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-05 23:12 EST ------- FYI, it seems that at least currently, the "jpp" tag isn't allowed in the Release tag in extras packages. Can you remove the jpp and update? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 04:23:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 23:23:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 180092] Review Request: NRPE - Monitoring agent for Nagios In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612060423.kB64Nkp1017079@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NRPE - Monitoring agent for Nagios https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180092 imlinux at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2006-12-05 23:23 EST ------- I'm terrible about that, its added now. Also imported and build. Closing bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 04:38:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 23:38:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218574] New: Review Request: perl-Net-SNPP - Perl modules for the Simple Network Pager Protocol Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218574 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SNPP - Perl modules for the Simple Network Pager Protocol Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jeff at ocjtech.us QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/perl-Net-SNPP-1.17-1.fc6.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/perl-Net-SNPP-1.17-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: Perl client and server modules for the Simple Network Pager Protocol, as described in RFC 1861. (Annoyed Grunt) Misspelled modules in the summary - will fix upon import or the next package rev, whichever comes first... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 04:46:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 23:46:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212045] Review Request: eclipse-emf - Eclipse Modeling Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612060446.kB64k0Oa018973@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-emf - Eclipse Modeling Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212045 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2006-12-05 23:45 EST ------- I've got a build going now. When that finishes, I'll add to the owners list. Sorry for the delay - I was working on the Eclipse SDK update a bit and wanted that to get out first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 04:48:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 23:48:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208678] Review Request: SimGear - Simulation library components In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612060448.kB64m0gi019189@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SimGear - Simulation library components https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208678 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-05 23:47 EST ------- Hey Tom. I was going to take a look at reviewing vamos (bug #208679), but it requires this package and I don't see it in yet. Is there anything holding back this package from being imported and built? It looks accepted to me... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 04:58:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 23:58:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210217] Review Request: pygpgme - Python module for working with OpenPGP messages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612060458.kB64wLCm020379@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pygpgme - Python module for working with OpenPGP messages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210217 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-12-05 23:58 EST ------- Oops. Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 05:36:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 00:36:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218577] New: Review Request: glump - A small web application to glue files from multiple sources Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218577 Summary: Review Request: glump - A small web application to glue files from multiple sources Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jeff at ocjtech.us QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/glump-0.9.11-1.fc6.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/glump-0.9.11-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: Glump is a simple web application that glues files from various pieces, based on the hostname that makes the request. This is useful for large installations that want to send different files to different hosts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 06:18:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 01:18:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 200600] Review Request: phpPgAdmin - web based PostgreSQL administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612060618.kB66Ip8C024235@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpPgAdmin - web based PostgreSQL administration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200600 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-12-06 01:18 EST ------- What is left for the approval of this package? Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 06:20:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 01:20:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 200630] Review Request: postgresql_autodoc - PostgreSQL AutoDoc Utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612060620.kB66KtdC024331@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql_autodoc - PostgreSQL AutoDoc Utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200630 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-12-06 01:20 EST ------- (Hi Toshio, In reply to comment #9) > As communicated on IRC, this looks good except for having to specify the > password on the commandline. Can you poke upstream to see if they can provide a > way to prompt for the password interactively? I will poke upstream, but if we call this as a "feature", not a bug, what else is needed for approval? Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 06:42:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 01:42:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612060642.kB66gvsR025379@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 ------- Additional Comments From wilmer at fedoraproject.org 2006-12-06 01:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > > %post > > ln -s %{_datadir}/%{name}/MyBashBurn.sh %{_bindir}/mybashburn > /dev/null 2>&1 > > ln -s %{_datadir}/%{name}/MyBashBurn.sh %{_bindir}/bashburn > /dev/null 2>&1 > > > > %postun > > rm -f %{_bindir}/bashburn > > rm -f %{_bindir}/mybashburn > > Why? This is extremely ugly. The files are not even %ghosted. They > are not tracked in the RPM database. Why not simply create these links > at build-time and include them in the package? That is the way it ought > to be. yeah, It sound kickass, better and more appropriate, I've added it in build-time. > > %files > > %defattr(-,root,root,0755) > > %{_datadir}/%{name}/* > > Directory %{_datadir}/%{name} is not included. Correct would be: > > %{_datadir}/%{name}/ > Unknown that the contents would be recursive, now the directory trailing use is fixed. > > %doc COPYING CREDITS ChangeLog FAQ FILES HOWTO INSTALL README TODO > > Is the "INSTALL" file the typical NLS documentation which is irrelevant > to users of your RPM package? If so, don't include it. It is confusing. Exactly. INSTALL file not is appropiate for users except for possible developers of MyBashBurn only, it content "troubleshooting" section and installation's instruction for tar file, neverthless, just i exclude the INSTALL file. Fixed. > > install -d %{buildroot}/usr/lib/debug > > What's this? Really i don't know, i think that may be strictly needed for %build section, if ommited it to get the next error: find: /var/tmp/mybashburn-1.0-1-root-k0k/usr/lib/debug: No such file or directory If create the directory %{buildroot}/usr/lib/debug issue fixed. Please, remember that this package is a couple of ShellScripts written to make cd burning in the console easier, just not is a program written in C/C++ or some similar, for this i can't see why must be include %build section for this package?. > Further, prefer "install" with option -p (or "cp" with option -p) > to preserve timestamps wherever it is possible. Okay. I should adjusted the install -p for which components: files or directories or both? Please let me know what more i need to do, Thanks in advance for your response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 07:51:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 02:51:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612060751.kB67pOHN028307@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 ------- Additional Comments From wilmer at fedoraproject.org 2006-12-06 02:51 EST ------- New package ready, the same URL, please check this time and report any problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 07:54:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 02:54:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218210] Review Request: chemical-mime-data - Support for chemical/* MIME types In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612060754.kB67sJDJ028373@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chemical-mime-data - Support for chemical/* MIME types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218210 belegdol at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 07:54:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 02:54:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218172] Review Request: gnome-chemistry-utils - A set of chemical utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612060754.kB67sMTt028398@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-chemistry-utils - A set of chemical utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218172 Bug 218172 depends on bug 218210, which changed state. Bug 218210 Summary: Review Request: chemical-mime-data - Support for chemical/* MIME types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218210 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 08:05:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 03:05:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612060805.kB685TEZ028780@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 wilmer at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|panemade at gmail.com |bugs.michael at gmx.net ------- Additional Comments From wilmer at fedoraproject.org 2006-12-06 03:05 EST ------- I believe that all items was fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 08:12:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 03:12:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218176] Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612060812.kB68CH9h029018@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218176 ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2006-12-06 03:12 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.republika.pl/belegdol/rpmstuff/gchempaint.spec SRPM URL: http://www.republika.pl/belegdol/rpmstuff/gchempaint-0.6.6-4.src.rpm New release: - Fixed %%changelog section - Fixed directory ownership - Removed pkgconfig from -devel package Requires I can't reproduce the undefined-non-weak-symbol problem on fc6. Maybe I should add libgnomecanvas-devel to BuildRequires? I'll attach my mock build log. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 08:13:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 03:13:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218176] Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612060813.kB68D3rB029067@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218176 ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2006-12-06 03:13 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=142928) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=142928&action=view) Mock build log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 09:02:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 04:02:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 188477] Review Request: maildrop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612060902.kB692v3i032296@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maildrop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188477 ------- Additional Comments From mfleming+rpm at enlartenment.com 2006-12-06 04:02 EST ------- Yeah, I'll finish the review when I get a spare half hour (there's not much left to do IIRC). I've been quite busy at work so spare time is a premium :-). I might submit my courier-imap package once that's done, but getting it to play nice with rpmlint could be challenging (the existing spec and upgrade methods are... *interesting* as I try and keep Sam's way of doing things as best possible) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 09:33:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 04:33:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612060933.kB69XZOn002833@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-06 04:33 EST ------- Wilmer, Remember CC list is not a list that the person in CC list is surely going to REVIEW your package. Also, there can be as many as persons be sited in CC list. When your package is under review your package status will be changes accordingly. Also, Being a newbie you still have to go a lot for improving a packaging. So i will wonder if someone will take this under review immediately. You need to start reviewing other packages waiting for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 09:46:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 04:46:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 177134] Review Request: mkvtoolnix - Matroska container utilites In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612060946.kB69ke2J003627@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mkvtoolnix - Matroska container utilites https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177134 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|scop at fedoraproject.org |ville.skytta at iki.fi OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-12-06 04:46 EST ------- Nothing to add, approved. Even if "base64tool" is a genericish name for a tool, all references to it I could find from some searching referred to this particular one, so I'm fine with dealing with it later if there's ever need to do so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 10:07:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 05:07:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210061] Review Request: msyslog - A daemon for the syslog system log interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612061007.kB6A7b5w004951@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: msyslog - A daemon for the syslog system log interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210061 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2006-12-06 05:07 EST ------- I am closing this because I neither have the time to edit the sources in order to clean /remove the dlopen stuff not the interest to use this software any more, as I have switched to syslog-ng. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 12:24:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 07:24:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210061] Review Request: msyslog - A daemon for the syslog system log interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612061224.kB6COaYJ013071@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: msyslog - A daemon for the syslog system log interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210061 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |201449 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 12:46:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 07:46:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218599] New: Review Request: klibido - NNTP (Usenet) file grabber for KDE Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218599 Summary: Review Request: klibido - NNTP (Usenet) file grabber for KDE Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: faucamp at csir.co.za QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.snoekie.com/rpm/klibido.spec SRPM URL: http://www.snoekie.com/rpm/klibido-0.2.5-2.src.rpm Description: KLibido (KDE LInux BInaries DOwnloader) is a KDE program to download encoded articles from the usenet news service, using the nntp protocol. It supports multiple servers, multiple download threads per server, newzbin (.nzb) files, automatic joining and decoding of articles. Notes: rpmlint gives: W: klibido dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/klibido/common ../common - That symlink does not dangle, it points to /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common, which is owned by kdelibs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 12:48:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 07:48:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 190345] Review Request: vdr-femon - DVB frontend status monitor plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612061248.kB6CmgbZ014094@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-femon - DVB frontend status monitor plugin for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190345 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-12-06 07:48 EST ------- Built for FC5+, owners.list and comps updated. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 12:55:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 07:55:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 177134] Review Request: mkvtoolnix - Matroska container utilites In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612061255.kB6CtLhs014421@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mkvtoolnix - Matroska container utilites https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177134 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-12-06 07:55 EST ------- Imported and built for devel, FC-5 and FC-6 branches requested. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 13:00:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 08:00:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218600] New: Review Request: resapplet - Resolution Switching Applet Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218600 Summary: Review Request: resapplet - Resolution Switching Applet Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rvokal at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/rvokal/resapplet/resapplet.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/rvokal/resapplet/resapplet-0.1.1-1.src.rpm Description: Resapplet is a simple utility that sits in the system notification area and allows switching the resolution and refresh rate. It uses the xrandr extensions to switch the resolution on-the-fly and user resolution preferences to save the resolution. It works in both GNOME and KDE, because it uses the system notification area. Additional info: This package is taken from SuSE created by Ximian guys. There's no upstream but the package is part of OpenSuSE core. Also I would like to hear some comments about icons the applet is using and where to place them. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 13:10:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 08:10:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 198644] new package suggestion: keepass In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612061310.kB6DAxXf015271@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: new package suggestion: keepass https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198644 ------- Additional Comments From pb at bieringer.de 2006-12-06 08:10 EST ------- I'm not planning to be the maintainer. The spec file is an adapted one of the original delivered by the keepass author. It's sure not very good, but a starting point. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 13:14:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 08:14:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218599] Review Request: klibido - NNTP (Usenet) file grabber for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612061314.kB6DEKjs015485@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: klibido - NNTP (Usenet) file grabber for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218599 ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2006-12-06 08:14 EST ------- Hmm... It seems the domain name records (snoekie.com) have not finished propagating across the Internet, so please give it some time if at first the links don't work. :-/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 13:22:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 08:22:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207782] Review Request: itpp - C++ library for math, signal/speech processing, and communications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612061322.kB6DMR7M015968@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: itpp - C++ library for math, signal/speech processing, and communications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207782 ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2006-12-06 08:22 EST ------- Hi Kevin, thank you for pointing out the omission! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 14:32:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 09:32:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218613] New: Review Request: - Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218613 Summary: Review Request: - Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wrebel at terra.com.br QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Description: when the progam starts, the screen is not fully. Same times it is. The image is not centralized, the Fedora, at the right boton, is not complete, it first appers, Fedora with the half of the a, after appers, Fedor and at the end only Fe. I have a SIS graphical card and a Philips 105 E monitor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 14:34:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 09:34:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174377] Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612061434.kB6EYsYf021129@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174377 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-06 09:34 EST ------- Well, again reviewing this package: >From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * Requires: - automake requirement Well, that I wrote that 'automake' is needed for Requires is for -devel package, not -emacs package, because -devel package includes .m4 files, while -emacs packages does not. - pkgconfig requirement This is also for -devel package. * Timestamps - Keeping timestamps is not treated completely. -------------------------------------------------------------- make install-data-hook make[3]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/smalltalk-2.3' rm -f /var/tmp/gnu-smalltalk-2.3-root-mockbuild/usr/share/gnu-smalltalk/packages.xml ./gst-package --srcdir="." --no-load --destdir="/var/tmp/gnu-smalltalk-2.3-root-mockbuild" packages.xml Merging packages.xml into /var/tmp/gnu-smalltalk-2.3-root-mockbuild/usr/share/gnu-smalltalk/packages.xml... mkdir /var/tmp/gnu-smalltalk-2.3-root-mockbuild/usr/share/gnu-smalltalk/browser /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 browser/test.st /var/tmp/gnu-smalltalk-2.3-root-mockbuild/usr/share/gnu-smalltalk/browser/test.st /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 browser/ChangeLog /var/tmp/gnu-smalltalk-2.3-root-mockbuild/usr/share/gnu-smalltalk/browser/Chang eLog mkdir /var/tmp/gnu-smalltalk-2.3-root-mockbuild/usr/share/gnu-smalltalk/gtk /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 gtk/Structs.st /var/tmp/gnu-smalltalk-2.3-root-mockbuild/usr/share/gnu-smalltalk/gtk/Structs.st /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 gtk/Enums.st /var/tmp/gnu-smalltalk-2.3-root-mockbuild/usr/share/gnu-smalltalk/gtk/Enums.st /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 gtk/Funcs.st /var/tmp/gnu-smalltalk-2.3-root-mockbuild/usr/share/gnu-smalltalk/gtk/Funcs.st ...... -------------------------------------------------------------- Here 'install -c' is used, not 'install -c -p'. This is due to './gst-package' content. Fix this file so that timestamps are correctly kept. Umm.. I think that this file is a bit strange and somewhat incorrect. Why does this file echo: ----------------------------------------------------------------- echo "/usr/bin/install -c -m 755 $file $dest" ----------------------------------------------------------------- which prints out 'install' but actually do: ----------------------------------------------------------------- $dry_run || (rm -f "$dest" && cp "$file" "$dest" && chmod 755 "$dest") ----------------------------------------------------------------- not using install but using cp? This script is wrong when when we set @INSTALL@ environment to others such as 'install -p' (which I strongly recommend) by --------------------------------------------------------------- export INSTALL='install -p' %configure .... --------------------------------------------------------------- This case gst-package prints out the message as if this script keep timestamps (by 'install -p') , while the actual behaviour of this file is not to keep timestamps (by executing 'cp'). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 14:39:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 09:39:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 198644] new package suggestion: keepass In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612061439.kB6EdiEd021491@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: new package suggestion: keepass https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198644 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-12-06 09:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > I'm not planning to be the maintainer. ... closing. May somebody feeling more interested pick it up again or resubmit it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 14:41:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 09:41:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218613] Review Request: - In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612061441.kB6Efd6w021734@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218613 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: -|Review Request: - | | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-12-06 09:41 EST ------- This is more likely a problem with your monitor autodetecting the position that the video should be displayed in. There's probably a button on your monitor to automatically adjust the screen position. If there isn't, or it doesn't work try some of the other buttons. In any case, I don't think that this is a bug in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 14:42:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 09:42:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 203288] Review Request: devilspie In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612061442.kB6EgDwh021762@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: devilspie https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203288 fedora at deadbabylon.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 14:54:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 09:54:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218408] Review Request: xl2tpd - replacement of l2tpd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612061454.kB6EsFmn022655@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xl2tpd - replacement of l2tpd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218408 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-06 09:54 EST ------- Before checking 1.1.06-3: (In reply to comment #6) > Timestamps: I am not sure why we don't want to show the timestamps of the > package build? I always strongly recommend to keep timestamps as: - They show if vendor (like you) have added some modifications against the original sources. - They show when the files are actually created. These are especially important when binary rpms contain a lot of header files, image files, documentations, etc.... Setting the timestamps of these files to build time, not the time when the contents of the files are actually changed confuses people when they want to check how those files are changed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 15:00:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 10:00:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218600] Review Request: resapplet - Resolution Switching Applet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612061500.kB6F0Y92023113@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: resapplet - Resolution Switching Applet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218600 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 15:17:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 10:17:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218574] Review Request: perl-Net-SNPP - Perl modules for the Simple Network Pager Protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612061517.kB6FHSQT024449@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SNPP - Perl modules for the Simple Network Pager Protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218574 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 15:17:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 10:17:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218600] Review Request: resapplet - Resolution Switching Applet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612061517.kB6FHdna024470@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: resapplet - Resolution Switching Applet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218600 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-06 10:17 EST ------- Preliminary review reveals that rpmlint is not silent on RPM W: resapplet no-version-in-last-changelog The last changelog entry doesn't contain a version. Please insert the version that is coherent with the version of the package and rebuild it. ==>Add Changelog as * Wed Dec 6 2006 Radek Vok?l - 0.1.1-1 W: resapplet no-url-tag The URL tag is missing. ==> As no upstream so no URL is appearing here. /tmp/resapplet-0.1.1-1.i386.rpm.7539/usr/share/applications/resapplet.desktop: error: required key "Encoding" not found E: resapplet invalid-desktopfile /tmp/resapplet-0.1.1-1.i386.rpm.7539/usr/share/applications/resapplet.desktop .desktop file is not valid, check with desktop-file-validate ==> You need to add following line to your desktop file Encoding=UTF-8 SHOULD: buildroot must be %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 15:29:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 10:29:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218600] Review Request: resapplet - Resolution Switching Applet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612061529.kB6FTCcf025790@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: resapplet - Resolution Switching Applet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218600 ------- Additional Comments From rvokal at redhat.com 2006-12-06 10:29 EST ------- http://people.redhat.com/rvokal/resapplet/resapplet.spec http://people.redhat.com/rvokal/resapplet/resapplet-0.1.1-2.src.rpm Buildroot, Changelog and Encoding fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 15:33:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 10:33:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218574] Review Request: perl-Net-SNPP - Perl modules for the Simple Network Pager Protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612061533.kB6FXs1i026391@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SNPP - Perl modules for the Simple Network Pager Protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218574 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-06 10:33 EST ------- preliminary review rpmlint is silent ok summary can be changed at time of importing a package. will do Full review tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 15:38:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 10:38:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213121] Review Request: fast-user-switch-applet - a panel applet for switching users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612061538.kB6FcApv026921@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fast-user-switch-applet - a panel applet for switching users https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213121 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2006-12-06 10:37 EST ------- I've put updated srpm and spec at the same location. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 15:42:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 10:42:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218599] Review Request: klibido - NNTP (Usenet) file grabber for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612061542.kB6FgguH027328@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: klibido - NNTP (Usenet) file grabber for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218599 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-06 10:42 EST ------- still not able to download SRPM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 15:42:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 10:42:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 166871] Review Request: ATLAS - fast linear algebra libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612061542.kB6Fgu28027361@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ATLAS - fast linear algebra libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166871 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com jamatos at fc.up.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 16:15:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 11:15:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612061615.kB6GFVlf030343@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From paul.horos at ifax.com 2006-12-06 11:15 EST ------- > As for the package name, it matters not to me if it is called "hylafax" or "hylafax+". There does not seem to be any objection to renaming the package to be included in Fedora Extras "hylafax+", so that has answered my question and addressed my concern. Not only would it help prevent possible confusion between different software projects, it would be consistent with Lee's own sourceforge website and mailing lists. I agree that it's important to distinguish this package from the hylafax software that has been available from http://www.hylafax.org since 1997, especially in the event of it's submission to Fedora Extras. Whether hylafax+ is a fork has been discussed ad nauseum on the hylafax mailing list; if Lee would like to discuss it further that seems to be a more appropriate place than this ticket. Paul -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 16:52:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 11:52:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218408] Review Request: xl2tpd - replacement of l2tpd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612061652.kB6Gq7rP001467@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xl2tpd - replacement of l2tpd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218408 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-06 11:52 EST ------- Well, * Please keep timestamps, as I said in comment #7 and the section 'timestamps' in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines Please use 'install -p'. Timestamps should be changed when the contents of the files are actually changed, this should be especially for text files. (In reply to comment #5) * I still get the rpmlint complaint: ------------------------------------------ E: xl2tpd no-chkconfig-line /etc/rc.d/init.d/xl2tpd ------------------------------------------ > 4. : This error can be suppressed by replacing tab with space > in '# chkconfig: - 80 30' line. Well, what I wanted to say by this is: "please use space in '#chkconfig: - 80 30' line, not tab. > B. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets : > * Initscripts Conventions > - Please add the appropriate requirement in > Requires(post), etc. Well, requirement for /sbin/service is still missing (In reply to comment #6) > 3 I've tested migration and the order is correct. the orignally installed > xl2tpd configs are kept as rmpsave files, the ones from /etc/l2tpd/ are > migrated into /etc/xl2tpd/, and then l2tpd gets uninstalled, and creates > its own rpmsave files if needed. I still have a concern about the case in which some people may customize original l2tpd rpm and reinstall it with release number incremented by themself. In this case, l2tpd is not uninstalled, which is correct that customizing by themself means that they don't want to have l2tpd automatically removed by xl2tpd. However, current %post scripts anyway 'moves' files in l2tpd, then l2tpd is installed with some files missing. And... I don't know about l2tpd, however, if removing l2tpd is done after installing x12tpd, then there arises a moment anyway when l2tpd is installed while some files in l2tpd is missing. In the case uninstalling l2tpd exits with non-zeron status and it won't be completed. This state is critical when these files are 'required' for uninstalling l2tpd. Even if not, removing files in l2tpd should be done when l2tpd is exactly about being removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 17:16:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 12:16:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174377] Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612061716.kB6HGgsK003711@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174377 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-12-06 12:16 EST ------- The above complaints should be fixed: SRPM: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/gnu-smalltalk/gnu-smalltalk-2.3-2.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/gnu-smalltalk/gnu-smalltalk.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 19:18:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 14:18:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218678] New: Review Request: pybluez - python API for the bluez bluetooth stack Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218678 Summary: Review Request: pybluez - python API for the bluez bluetooth stack Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wwoods at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://homepage.mac.com/wgwoods/fedora/pybluez.spec SRPM URL: http://homepage.mac.com/wgwoods/fedora/pybluez-0.9.1-1.src.rpm Description: PyBluez is an effort to create python wrappers around system bluetooth resources to allow Python developers to easily and quickly create Bluetooth applications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 19:20:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 14:20:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218172] Review Request: gnome-chemistry-utils - A set of chemical utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612061920.kB6JKSBq014433@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-chemistry-utils - A set of chemical utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218172 belegdol at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 19:21:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 14:21:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218176] Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612061921.kB6JL4an014490@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218176 Bug 218176 depends on bug 218172, which changed state. Bug 218172 Summary: Review Request: gnome-chemistry-utils - A set of chemical utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218172 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 19:49:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 14:49:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218678] Review Request: pybluez - python API for the bluez bluetooth stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612061949.kB6Jnbta017023@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pybluez - python API for the bluez bluetooth stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218678 wwoods at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wwoods at redhat.com 2006-12-06 14:49 EST ------- Should have mentioned - this is my first package. Be gentle! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 20:25:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 15:25:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218360] Review Request: evolution-plugin-remove-duplicates - Evolution plugin for removing duplicate mails In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612062025.kB6KPOhZ020374@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-plugin-remove-duplicates - Evolution plugin for removing duplicate mails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218360 ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-12-06 15:25 EST ------- Same problem with 32-bit mock, it's probably a mock-specific problem that can be ignored (evolution-devel and pkgconfig is installed, so that test should *not* fail) Incidentally, I'm going to rename this to evolution-remove-duplicates, since the other evolution plugin I'm aware of, that adds bogofilter support, is just called evolution-bogofilter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 20:30:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 15:30:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218342] Review Request: tibetan-machine-uni-fonts - Tibetan Machine Uni font for Tibetan, Dzongkha and Ladakhi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612062030.kB6KUo5D020813@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tibetan-machine-uni-fonts - Tibetan Machine Uni font for Tibetan, Dzongkha and Ladakhi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218342 mgarski at post.pl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |167536 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 21:00:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 16:00:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218408] Review Request: xl2tpd - replacement of l2tpd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612062100.kB6L07Sw022714@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xl2tpd - replacement of l2tpd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218408 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xelerance.com 2006-12-06 15:59 EST ------- spec URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/xl2tpd/xl2tpd.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/xl2tpd/xl2tpd-1.1.06-4.src.rpm - I still prefer to see the build timestamps compared to the original tar ball timestampts. But I added -p, beacause I just want to get over this. - the space vs tab issue was still there because that error is in the original tarball. I dont want to release the usptream version just for this, so I added a temp sed line to the install process. writing a patch to just cover a week before that release seems a bit overkill. - Added /sbin/service requirement. - as for the "mv". Please give me another method to distinguish between an upgrade from l2tpd->xl2tpd and one from xl2tpd->xl2tpd. AFAIK, I cannot tell in any scriplets. If I use "mv", the migration will not happen more then once. If I use "cp", it will be possible to happen more then once. Alternatively, if you are that worried I can leave out the entire migration and let users do it manually, but then it will surely need human intervention after installing the upgrade. AS for your last notes, as I told before, there are NO errors when doing an l2tpd -> xl2tpd upgrade. l2tpd uninstalls fine. xl2tpd installs fine. Please test if you do not believe me. What's left now is: [root at bofh devel]# rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/x86_64/xl2tpd-1.1.06-4.x86_64.rpm E: xl2tpd non-readable /etc/xl2tpd/l2tp-secrets 0600 E: xl2tpd non-readable /etc/ppp/chap-secrets.sample 0600 W: xl2tpd dangerous-command-in-%post mv [root at bofh devel]# rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/xl2tpd-1.1.06-4.src.rpm the secrets are supposed to be root-only readable. the "mv" is discussed above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 21:36:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 16:36:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208420] Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612062136.kB6LaaRh025705@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208420 ------- Additional Comments From miker5slow at grandecom.net 2006-12-06 16:36 EST ------- http://errr.fluxbox-wiki.org/fedora_stuff/conky/conky-1.4.4-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 22:34:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 17:34:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196393] Review Request: svrcore-devel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612062234.kB6MYCc6031264@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: svrcore-devel Alias: svrcore-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196393 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wtogami at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-12-06 17:33 EST ------- Upstream has decided to make svrcore into a proper dynamic so in future versions, which should satisfy this requirement. Unfortunately, they don't have time to prioritize to this at the moment. If we want FDS in directly in Fedora sooner, then volunteers need to step up and help the Fedora Directory Server project. http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 22:43:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 17:43:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212045] Review Request: eclipse-emf - Eclipse Modeling Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612062243.kB6MhRk7032372@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-emf - Eclipse Modeling Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212045 overholt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |2.2.1-9.fc6 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2006-12-06 17:43 EST ------- Okay, the builds in both FC-6 and devel are finished and I've committed owners. Changing to CURRENTRELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 22:46:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 17:46:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208420] Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612062246.kB6MknrU032647@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208420 pkovacs at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pkovacs at users.sourceforge.ne | |t ------- Additional Comments From pkovacs at users.sourceforge.net 2006-12-06 17:46 EST ------- The audacious header /usr/lib/audacious/beepctrl.h does expose glib to clients such as conky that use this interface for audacious status. I don't disagree that audacious.pc exposes too much, but I would also characterize this issue as something for the audacious devs to address. Meantime, building conky with: AUDACIOUS_CFLAGS="`pkg-config --cflags glib-2.0`" \ AUDACIOUS_LIBS="-laudacious `pkg-config --cflags glib-2.0`" \ ./configure --enable-audacious ... can be used to override the "pkg-config --cflags --libs audacious" excess and will yield a trimmer set of "true" deps for the conky binary (w.r.t. audacious) Phil (drphibes, conky dev) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 6 22:52:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 17:52:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208420] Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612062252.kB6MqWSJ000704@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208420 ------- Additional Comments From pkovacs at users.sourceforge.net 2006-12-06 17:52 EST ------- typo sry: /usr/include/audacious/beepctrl.h -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 00:05:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 19:05:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218721] New: Review Request: perl-Test-Distribution - Perform tests on all modules of a distribution Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218721 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Distribution - Perform tests on all modules of a distribution Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-Distribution/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Test-Distribution-1.26-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Test-Distribution.spec Description: When using this module in a test script, it goes through all the modules in your distribution, checks their POD, checks that they compile ok and checks that they all define a $VERSION. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 00:06:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 19:06:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218721] Review Request: perl-Test-Distribution - Perform tests on all modules of a distribution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612070006.kB706EP3004051@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Distribution - Perform tests on all modules of a distribution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218721 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 00:07:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 19:07:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218722] New: Review Request: perl-File-ExtAttr - Perl extension for accessing extended attributes of files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218722 Summary: Review Request: perl-File-ExtAttr - Perl extension for accessing extended attributes of files Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/File-ExtAttr/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-File-ExtAttr-1.01-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-File-ExtAttr.spec Description: File::ExtAttr is a Perl module providing access to the extended attributes of files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 00:08:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 19:08:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218722] Review Request: perl-File-ExtAttr - Perl extension for accessing extended attributes of files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612070008.kB708CV9004100@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-ExtAttr - Perl extension for accessing extended attributes of files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218722 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |218721 OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 00:08:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 19:08:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218721] Review Request: perl-Test-Distribution - Perform tests on all modules of a distribution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612070008.kB708D9W004104@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Distribution - Perform tests on all modules of a distribution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218721 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |218722 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 01:22:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 20:22:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 197445] Review Request: fuse-convmvfs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612070122.kB71M13B006760@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-convmvfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197445 ------- Additional Comments From jon.nettleton at gmail.com 2006-12-06 20:21 EST ------- == Not an official review as I'm not yet sponsored == Release: should use the %{?dist} macro instead of have fc5 hard coded. Everything else seems fine. Next thing to do is follow the notes from Comment #4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 01:26:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 20:26:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218721] Review Request: perl-Test-Distribution - Perform tests on all modules of a distribution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612070126.kB71Qxwe006945@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Distribution - Perform tests on all modules of a distribution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218721 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 01:33:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 20:33:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211834] Review Request: gaim-libnotify - libnotify notification plugin for gaim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612070133.kB71XN8B007191@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-libnotify - libnotify notification plugin for gaim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211834 ------- Additional Comments From jon.nettleton at gmail.com 2006-12-06 20:33 EST ------- Well I spent the last half hour going through almost every bug under 203520. Unfortunately it looks like almost every one has many reviews. I only found 1 quick comment for bug 197445. I will keep my eyes open and update this bug if I make any more comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 02:02:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 21:02:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218721] Review Request: perl-Test-Distribution - Perform tests on all modules of a distribution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612070202.kB722FLg008476@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Distribution - Perform tests on all modules of a distribution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218721 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-12-06 21:02 EST ------- * source files match upstream: 64dc13f51f60f6022bb8e628f1297957 Test-Distribution-1.26.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Test::Distribution) = 1.26 perl(Test::Distribution::base) perl(Test::Distribution::description) perl(Test::Distribution::exports) perl(Test::Distribution::manifest) perl(Test::Distribution::pod) perl(Test::Distribution::podcover) perl(Test::Distribution::prereq) perl(Test::Distribution::sig) perl(Test::Distribution::use) perl(Test::Distribution::versions) perl-Test-Distribution = 1.26-1.fc7 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(ExtUtils::Manifest) perl(File::Find::Rule) >= 0.03 perl(Module::CoreList) >= 1.93 perl(Module::Signature) perl(Pod::Coverage) >= 0.17 perl(Test::More) perl(Test::Pod) >= 0.95 perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful, 6 subtests skipped. Files=9, Tests=46, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.89 cusr + 0.24 csys = 1.13 CPU) The skipped checks are due to either gpg failures due to missing keys (would probably require network access) or due to unimplemented tests. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 02:20:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 21:20:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218195] Review Request: scipy - array processing for numbers, strings, records, and objects. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612070220.kB72KIJK009137@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scipy - array processing for numbers, strings, records, and objects. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218195 jspaleta at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2006-12-06 21:20 EST ------- Okay its now in extras-development. I'll test it from there and then request a fc6 branching. I'll be working on enabling some of the sandbox modules as a sandbox subpackage in the devel tree next. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 02:30:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 21:30:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218195] Review Request: scipy - array processing for numbers, strings, records, and objects. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612070230.kB72UlbO009397@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scipy - array processing for numbers, strings, records, and objects. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218195 ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2006-12-06 21:30 EST ------- Although I have not said that above I have been testing this module in FC6 (and so does my wife in FC5) and it works as it is supposed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 02:42:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 21:42:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211834] Review Request: gaim-libnotify - libnotify notification plugin for gaim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612070242.kB72gtq2009850@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-libnotify - libnotify notification plugin for gaim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211834 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-06 21:42 EST ------- Sorry, however perhaps I don't understand what you want to say. As I said in comment #5, you have to either * submit a new review request * or do a "pre-"review of other package's review request (which is blocking FE-NEW) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/showdependencytree.cgi?id=FE-NEW&hide_resolved=1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 02:43:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 21:43:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218721] Review Request: perl-Test-Distribution - Perform tests on all modules of a distribution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612070243.kB72heol009898@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Distribution - Perform tests on all modules of a distribution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218721 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-12-06 21:43 EST ------- Imported and building for devel; branches requested for FC-[56]. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 02:43:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 21:43:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218722] Review Request: perl-File-ExtAttr - Perl extension for accessing extended attributes of files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612070243.kB72hpV1009908@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-ExtAttr - Perl extension for accessing extended attributes of files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218722 Bug 218722 depends on bug 218721, which changed state. Bug 218721 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Distribution - Perform tests on all modules of a distribution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218721 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 02:53:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 21:53:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211834] Review Request: gaim-libnotify - libnotify notification plugin for gaim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612070253.kB72rrOL010232@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-libnotify - libnotify notification plugin for gaim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211834 jon.nettleton at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED ------- Additional Comments From jon.nettleton at gmail.com 2006-12-06 21:53 EST ------- I am sorry this entire process is just a bit much for me. I will close this bug and go back to working with 3rd party repositories. Sorry for the bother. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 02:57:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 21:57:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211834] Review Request: gaim-libnotify - libnotify notification plugin for gaim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612070257.kB72v32g010377@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-libnotify - libnotify notification plugin for gaim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211834 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 177841 |201449 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 04:12:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 23:12:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218722] Review Request: perl-File-ExtAttr - Perl extension for accessing extended attributes of files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612070412.kB74CcZH015365@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-ExtAttr - Perl extension for accessing extended attributes of files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218722 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 07:08:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 02:08:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174377] Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612070708.kB778ZEQ025547@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174377 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-07 02:08 EST ------- Moving to final check. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 07:23:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 02:23:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218574] Review Request: perl-Net-SNPP - Perl modules for the Simple Network Pager Protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612070723.kB77N6HP026077@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SNPP - Perl modules for the Simple Network Pager Protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218574 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-07 02:23 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPMS. + source files match upstream. 18f61a774906cd27ca14dcbf311e6bf0 Net-SNPP-1.17.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + %check used and its result in mock build is All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=16, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.12 cusr + 0.03 csys = 0.15 CPU) + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Dose owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Followed perl packaging guidelines. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 07:24:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 02:24:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218722] Review Request: perl-File-ExtAttr - Perl extension for accessing extended attributes of files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612070724.kB77O3kZ026148@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-ExtAttr - Perl extension for accessing extended attributes of files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218722 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-07 02:24 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPMS. + source files match upstream. 340734da69677861b80e52c41297ec8e File-ExtAttr-1.01.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + %check used and its failed in mock build is + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Dose owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Followed perl packaging guidelines. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 07:30:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 02:30:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218600] Review Request: resapplet - Resolution Switching Applet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612070730.kB77UAPu026340@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: resapplet - Resolution Switching Applet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218600 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-07 02:29 EST ------- Still needs some Fixes rpmlint on SRPM reports W: resapplet mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 51, tab: line 1) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. Also you need to install Desktop files as given below http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-254ddf07aae20a23ced8cecc219d8f73926e9755 Change SPEC file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 07:44:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 02:44:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174377] Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612070744.kB77iBYR026798@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174377 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-07 02:44 EST ------- For 2.3-2: * gst-config - "gst-config --libs" returns a wrong result (I should have noticed this...) -------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ gst-config --libs -L/usr/lib /usr/lib/gnu-smalltalk -lnsl -lm -lgst -------------------------------------------- This should be: -L/usr/lib -L/usr/lib/gnu-smalltalk ..... Fix the issue above. I will approve this package after that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 07:44:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 02:44:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218599] Review Request: klibido - NNTP (Usenet) file grabber for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612070744.kB77ivGi026837@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: klibido - NNTP (Usenet) file grabber for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218599 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-07 02:44 EST ------- Can you check this package in mock build? its not building and asking X error: Can't find X includes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 07:46:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 02:46:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218360] Review Request: evolution-plugin-remove-duplicates - Evolution plugin for removing duplicate mails In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612070746.kB77kVkp026897@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-plugin-remove-duplicates - Evolution plugin for removing duplicate mails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218360 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-07 02:46 EST ------- waiting for new modications. Yes package is not building in mock. It should build in mock to proceed Review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 08:36:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 03:36:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218744] New: Review Request: sofia-sip - SIP user agent library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218744 Summary: Review Request: sofia-sip - SIP user agent library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ppessi at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://sofia-sip.org/~ppessi/fedora/sofia-sip.spec SRPM URL: http://sofia-sip.org/~ppessi/fedora/sofia-sip-1.12.4-0.src.rpm Description: This is my first package, so I need a sponsor. Package compiles on mock with i386, but I'd like to hear about PPC results. -->8-->8-->8-->8-->8-->8-->8-->8-->8-->8-->8-->8-->8-->8-->8-->8-- Sofia-SIP is an open-source SIP User-Agent library, compliant with the IETF RFC3261 specification. It can be used as a building block for SIP client software for uses such as VoIP, IM, and many other real-time and person-to-person communication services. The primary target platform for Sofia-SIP is GNU/Linux. Sofia-SIP is based on a SIP stack developed at the Nokia Research Center. Sofia-SIP is licensed under the LGPL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 08:39:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 03:39:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218744] Review Request: sofia-sip - SIP user agent library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612070839.kB78dtMA028617@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sofia-sip - SIP user agent library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218744 ppessi at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 08:47:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 03:47:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218367] Review Request: compat-guile - Guile compatibility package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612070847.kB78lL2K029038@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-guile - Guile compatibility package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218367 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-12-07 03:47 EST ------- I'll review this. Btw, I need it too for geda packages. Good job G?rard :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 08:53:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 03:53:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208420] Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612070853.kB78rRKM029522@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208420 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-12-07 03:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > The audacious header /usr/lib/audacious/beepctrl.h does expose glib to clients > such as conky that use this interface for audacious status. I don't disagree > that audacious.pc exposes too much, but I would also characterize this issue as > something for the audacious devs to address. Indeed. But it is something which annoys the conky packager ;-) > Meantime, building conky with: > > AUDACIOUS_CFLAGS="`pkg-config --cflags glib-2.0`" \ > AUDACIOUS_LIBS="-laudacious `pkg-config --cflags glib-2.0`" \ > ./configure --enable-audacious ... > > can be used to override the "pkg-config --cflags --libs audacious" excess and > will yield a trimmer set of "true" deps for the conky binary (w.r.t. audacious) I don't think this is the proper way to handle that issue, the right fix is to fix what is broken (the audacious pkgconfig file). It is not such a problematic issue that it needs a workaround. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 09:01:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 04:01:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208420] Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612070901.kB791Sbn030360@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208420 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-12-07 04:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > The audacious header /usr/lib/audacious/beepctrl.h does expose glib to clients Does conky uses directly the glib functions? If not, it is better to have glib-devel as an indirect dependency through audacious-devel. Thus if audacious stops using the glib, conky wouldn't need to be modified. If glib-devel is a direct dependency of conky it would be better to list it in buildrequires, but it doesn't seems to be the case since conky itself don't include the glib headers (unless I am missing something). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 09:12:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 04:12:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218744] Review Request: sofia-sip - SIP user agent library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612070912.kB79C8Rn031607@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sofia-sip - SIP user agent library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218744 lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2006-12-07 04:12 EST ------- I can provide you info about owerpc-builds. First of all, it doesn't builds at all [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ LANG=C rpmbuild -ba sofia-sip.spec error: parse error in expression error: /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/sofia-sip.spec:25: parseExpressionBoolean returns -1 error: Package has no %description: sofia-sip [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ Please add description. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 09:22:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 04:22:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 191218] Review Request: PyScript - Postscript graphics with Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612070922.kB79MRrX032269@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyScript - Postscript graphics with Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191218 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2006-12-07 04:22 EST ------- Okay I have the srpm from comment 8 now. I'll have time to look over it Friday. If I don't have any problems with it, I'll open a new request ticket and close this bug out with a note as a duplicate to my ticket. We should be able to get this done over the weekend. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 09:38:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 04:38:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208420] Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612070938.kB79cRFe000695@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208420 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-12-07 04:38 EST ------- * rpmlint is silent * follow guidelines * sane provides * buildrequires seem right * match upstream c856556d4372226f99cf7e9a888e9118 conky-1.4.4.tar.bz2 * doc not content A remark (not a blocker, may be changed later, the group is not used for anything currently), but Applications/System seems wrong to me, something like 'User Interface/X' would be better in my opinion. A blocker: the COPYING is a BSD like license, while the whole is under the GPL. First of all (especially if upstream authors listen that report ;-) the GPL notice should also be in the tarball, along with the BSD license, named, for example COPYING.GPL. But it is not an obligation for you as a packager to add the license if it isn't done upstream. However, in cases like conky, where there are more than one license covering parts of code, and especially in that case, with a COPYING which doesn't match the package license, some clarification is required. I see 2 way to do that clarification: * add a file with the appropriate name, stating something along Most of the conky code is covered by the BSD license in COPYING, some files are GPL, and other files lack attribution and seem to be in the public domain. * do an audit of the code and add file with the summary, with something like (you can also have a look at what I did for grads, in /usr/share/doc/grads-1.9b4/grads-copyright_summary) Files under the GPL: libtcp-portmon.h libtcp-portmon.c audacious.h .... Files covered by the BSD license in COPYING: conky.h conky.c remoted.c .... Files covered by a BSD license (from http://www.musicpd.org): libmpdclient.c libmpdclient.h No clear license, GPL compatible? * Besed on code published in _Mastering Algorithms in C_ * by Kyle Loudon (O'Reilly 1999). * Modified by Philip Kovacs hash.h hash.c No clear license, seems to be public domain: * $Id: ftp.h 130 2005-08-21 22:10:54Z brenden1 $ ftp.c ftp.h * $Id: mpd.c 598 2006-03-16 18:29:23Z jasper_la $ mpd.c * $Id: linux.c 738 2006-11-08 03:06:42Z pkovacs $ linux.c No license, no author, certainly public domain xmms2.c netbsd.c .... Doing a full audit of the source takes more time, but it allows to find problematic files. In that case, we have hash.h hash.c which have clearly 2 authors, but no license. No license (since the Bern convention) means a restrictive license (no right to redistribute or modify). So it needs clarification from Philip. For ftp.c, ftp.h, mpd.c and linux.c, I am not sure that a rcs Id acts as an author identification, but if it is the case, then there is the same issue than for hash.c, otherwise they may be considered public domain. (as a side note, if I recall well interfaces cannot have their copyright enforced, so if I am not wrong so the .h licenses are not really problematic). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 09:39:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 04:39:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208420] Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612070939.kB79dKja000770@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208420 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 09:39:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 04:39:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218744] Review Request: sofia-sip - SIP user agent library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612070939.kB79dtLb000849@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sofia-sip - SIP user agent library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218744 ------- Additional Comments From ppessi at gmail.com 2006-12-07 04:39 EST ------- Now SPEC file has a default value for %fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 09:55:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 04:55:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218599] Review Request: klibido - NNTP (Usenet) file grabber for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612070955.kB79t8cW001546@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: klibido - NNTP (Usenet) file grabber for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218599 ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2006-12-07 04:55 EST ------- Oops. Silly mistake, actually had the necessary BR's in there, but for some strange reason removed it just before I uploaded the -2 release... :-? That's what you get for being hasty... Anyhow, here's the new build: Spec URL: http://www.snoekie.com/rpm/klibido.spec SRPM URL: http://www.snoekie.com/rpm/klibido-0.2.5-3.src.rpm Changes: - Added missing BuildRequires: kdelibs-devel db4-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 10:01:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 05:01:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218744] Review Request: sofia-sip - SIP user agent library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612071001.kB7A104Y001807@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sofia-sip - SIP user agent library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218744 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2006-12-07 05:00 EST ------- Now all builds fine at my powerpc-box. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 11:13:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 06:13:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218600] Review Request: resapplet - Resolution Switching Applet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612071113.kB7BDevX007350@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: resapplet - Resolution Switching Applet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218600 ------- Additional Comments From rvokal at redhat.com 2006-12-07 06:13 EST ------- http://people.redhat.com/rvokal/resapplet/resapplet.spec http://people.redhat.com/rvokal/resapplet/resapplet-0.1.1-3.src.rpm Changed location of desktop file, added Buildrequires desktop-file-utils, cleaned tabs and spaces. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 12:04:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 07:04:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218600] Review Request: resapplet - Resolution Switching Applet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612071204.kB7C4oBn009368@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: resapplet - Resolution Switching Applet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218600 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-07 07:04 EST ------- forgot to mention you need to add scriptlets also. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets?highlight=%28scriptlets%29#head-7103f6c38d1b5735e8477bdd569ad73ea2c49bda -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 12:07:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 07:07:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218600] Review Request: resapplet - Resolution Switching Applet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612071207.kB7C7MdL009455@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: resapplet - Resolution Switching Applet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218600 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-07 07:07 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPMS. + source files md5sum. No upstream is available. 0f1d30b02182ff1ec463b3bc37e9326c resapplet-0.1.1.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + COPYING included in %doc. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel or any subpackages exists + no .la files. + translations are available + Dose owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Desktop files are handled in usual way. - Not Used gtk-update-icon-cache scriptlet Add scriptlet update package. Cool applet tested successfully on FC6 i386 system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 12:10:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 07:10:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218600] Review Request: resapplet - Resolution Switching Applet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612071210.kB7CA3pQ009545@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: resapplet - Resolution Switching Applet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218600 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-07 07:10 EST ------- oops rpmlint is NOT silent but taking it as silent as only remaining warning is of no-url-tag and which can be considerable as there is no upstream (here i am aussming that packages in Fedora Core are existing without URL tag, so does can be allowed in FE) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 12:18:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 07:18:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218600] Review Request: resapplet - Resolution Switching Applet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612071218.kB7CI3wp009961@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: resapplet - Resolution Switching Applet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218600 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-07 07:17 EST ------- Got one reference for no-url-tag (bug 200422) where Tim put tarball on somw web space. Can you also do that? I think you can use people.redhat.com also. So Update url tag in SPEC also. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 13:20:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 08:20:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218574] Review Request: perl-Net-SNPP - Perl modules for the Simple Network Pager Protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612071320.kB7DKErq012882@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SNPP - Perl modules for the Simple Network Pager Protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218574 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-12-07 08:20 EST ------- Thanks for the review! Fixed the summary, imported and built for development. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 13:20:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 08:20:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218600] Review Request: resapplet - Resolution Switching Applet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612071320.kB7DKtjF012939@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: resapplet - Resolution Switching Applet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218600 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2006-12-07 08:20 EST ------- I don't think a empty URL tag is a problem. I'd say put a comment before the Source0 line in the spec that points to the srpms from Opensuse where you obtained the sources. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 14:14:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 09:14:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218768] New: Review Request: poppler-extras - PDF rendering library extras (qt/qt4) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218768 Summary: Review Request: poppler-extras - PDF rendering library extras (qt/qt4) Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rdieter at math.unl.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/poppler-extras.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/poppler-extras-0.5.4-1.src.rpm Description: PDF rendering library extras, including qt and qt4 wrappers. This is my first quick-n-dirty attempt at building the qt/qt4 poppler wrappers. I've done some minimal testing of the -qt wrapper with kdegraphics' kpdf, and it *seems* to work. (: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 14:16:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 09:16:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218769] New: Review Request: hunspell-en - english dictionaries for hunspell Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218769 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-en - english dictionaries for hunspell Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-en.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-en-0.20040623-1.src.rpm Description: Move English dictionaries for hunspell out of openoffice.org and into a separate package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 14:17:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 09:17:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218600] Review Request: resapplet - Resolution Switching Applet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612071417.kB7EH6Wh017314@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: resapplet - Resolution Switching Applet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218600 ------- Additional Comments From rvokal at redhat.com 2006-12-07 09:17 EST ------- I'm still not sure about the correct placement of pixmap files. Can you please review the spec file and help me with it. The place should be consistent but now there are two directories where icons are stored. I've updated the spec file with the scripplet (just for one location) and comment above the Source0. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 14:20:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 09:20:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218769] Review Request: hunspell-en - english dictionaries for hunspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612071420.kB7EK4Pf017655@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-en - english dictionaries for hunspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218769 caolanm at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |207571 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From caolanm at redhat.com 2006-12-07 09:20 EST ------- The side effect of this is that if firefox (etc) use the patch of bug 218762 and firefox and thunderbird link their dictionary dir to /usr/share/myspell then we can drop the duplicated english OOo dictionaries, the firefox english dictionaries and the thunderbird english dictionaries in one fell swoop. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 14:24:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 09:24:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218769] Review Request: hunspell-en - english dictionaries for hunspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612071424.kB7EOLan018190@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-en - english dictionaries for hunspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218769 ------- Additional Comments From caolanm at redhat.com 2006-12-07 09:24 EST ------- rpmlint output -> none -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 15:29:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 10:29:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218787] New: Review Request: python-pycurl - A Python interface to libcurl Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218787 Summary: Review Request: python-pycurl - A Python interface to libcurl Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jeff at ocjtech.us QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/python-pycurl-7.15.5.1-1.fc6.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/python-pycurl-7.15.5.1-1.fc6.spec Description: PycURL is a Python interface to libcurl. PycURL can be used to fetch objects identified by a URL from a Python program, similar to the urllib Python module. PycURL is mature, very fast, and supports a lot of features. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 15:38:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 10:38:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218176] Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612071538.kB7FclJ1023625@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218176 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-07 10:38 EST ------- Oops.. I didn't aware that I have received your mail. Well, rpmlint complaint about undefined non-weak symbol can be gained when you execute rpmlint agaist "installed" rpm (not against rpm package), i.e. ------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ rpmlint gchempaint W: gchempaint undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libgchempaint.so.0.6.6 g_printable_get_type W: gchempaint undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libgchempaint.so.0.6.6 gnome_canvas_rich_text_ext_get_type W: gchempaint undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libgchempaint.so.0.6.6 gnome_canvas_rich_text_ext_set_buffer W: gchempaint undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libgchempaint.so.0.6.6 gnome_canvas_rich_text_ext_get_iter_location W: gchempaint undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libgchempaint.so.0.6.6 gnome_canvas_rich_text_ext_get_buffer W: gchempaint undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libgchempaint.so.0.6.6 gnome_canvas_text_ext_get_type W: gchempaint undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libgchempaint.so.0.6.6 gnome_canvas_ellipse_ext_get_type W: gchempaint undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libgchempaint.so.0.6.6 gnome_canvas_bpath_ext_get_type W: gchempaint undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libgchempaint.so.0.6.6 gnome_canvas_rich_text_ext_get_pango_layout W: gchempaint undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libgchempaint.so.0.6.6 g_printable_export_svg W: gchempaint undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libgchempaint.so.0.6.6 gnome_canvas_rich_text_ext_get_iter_at_location W: gchempaint undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libgchempaint.so.0.6.6 gnome_canvas_group_ext_get_type W: gchempaint undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libgchempaint.so.0.6.6 gnome_canvas_rect_ext_get_type W: gchempaint undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libgchempaint.so.0.6.6 gnome_canvas_line_ext_get_type W: gchempaint non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/gchempaint-arrows.schemas ------------------------------------------------- Well, gnome_canvas_???are also defined in sources under libgcpcanvas, however, those files are not included in libgchempaint.so. Perhaps it is not expected that this problem will be fixed in 0.6.X version because fixing this requires entire reconstruction of source. A. It may be possible that this has been already fixed in development version. Would you package 0.7.5 version of gchempaint? Then I can check if upgrading to 0.7.5 solves this problem B. If 0.7.5 still has this problem, would you ask upstream? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 15:57:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 10:57:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218787] Review Request: python-pycurl - A Python interface to libcurl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612071557.kB7FvAlD025064@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pycurl - A Python interface to libcurl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218787 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mr.ecik at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-12-07 10:56 EST ------- According to Packaging Naming it would be better, if a package's name were pycurl, wouldn't it? There is no need to use 'python-' because first 'py' letters suggest that it is a python package. Nevertheless, there is a more serious problem namely package build fails on x86_64. To fix it you have to change %files section to make it looks like that: %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc COPYING ChangeLog README TODO examples doc tests %{python_sitearch}/curl %{python_sitearch}/pycurl.so I have also removed INSTALL file as it isn't needed when package's already installed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 16:03:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 11:03:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215258] Review Request: clucene - A C++ port of Lucene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612071603.kB7G3Bht025526@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clucene - A C++ port of Lucene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215258 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2006-12-07 11:02 EST ------- Ok, I've updated to the latest stable release and added a make check in the build. Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/clucene/clucene.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/clucene/clucene-0.9.16a-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 16:20:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 11:20:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218722] Review Request: perl-File-ExtAttr - Perl extension for accessing extended attributes of files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612071620.kB7GKT97026934@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-ExtAttr - Perl extension for accessing extended attributes of files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218722 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-12-07 11:20 EST ------- Imported and building for devel; branches requested for FC-[56]. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 17:38:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 12:38:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218408] Review Request: xl2tpd - replacement of l2tpd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612071738.kB7Hc8DF000864@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xl2tpd - replacement of l2tpd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218408 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-07 12:37 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=143068) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=143068&action=view) Diff to xl2tpd.spec (In reply to comment #9) > - the space vs tab issue was still there because that error is in the original > tarball. I dont want to release the usptream version just for this, so I > added a temp sed line to the install process. For this purpose, applying the patch attached will be more smart. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 17:47:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 12:47:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218408] Review Request: xl2tpd - replacement of l2tpd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612071747.kB7Hlk0C001817@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xl2tpd - replacement of l2tpd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218408 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-07 12:47 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=143071) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=143071&action=view) l2tpd -> xl2tpd log > > What's left now is: > [root at bofh devel]# rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/x86_64/xl2tpd-1.1.06-4.x86_64.rpm > E: xl2tpd non-readable /etc/xl2tpd/l2tp-secrets 0600 > E: xl2tpd non-readable /etc/ppp/chap-secrets.sample 0600 > W: xl2tpd dangerous-command-in-%post mv > [root at bofh devel]# rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/xl2tpd-1.1.06-4.src.rpm > > the secrets are supposed to be root-only readable. > the "mv" is discussed above. I checked this for to make sure that your script works, and it is okay (at least it seems okay for me). Please check if the log attached is what you expect. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 17:51:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 12:51:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218408] Review Request: xl2tpd - replacement of l2tpd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612071751.kB7HpS4S002377@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xl2tpd - replacement of l2tpd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218408 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-07 12:51 EST ------- Now I approve this package ------------------------------------------------------- This package (xl2tpd) is APPROVED by me. ------------------------------------------------------- Please consider the patch for dealing with init file tab issue attached on comment #9 . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 17:53:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 12:53:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218408] Review Request: xl2tpd - replacement of l2tpd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612071753.kB7HrjVo002750@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xl2tpd - replacement of l2tpd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218408 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xelerance.com 2006-12-07 12:53 EST ------- looks good to me. I used your sed command spec URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/xl2tpd/xl2tpd.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/xl2tpd/xl2tpd-1.1.06-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 17:55:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 12:55:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218408] Review Request: xl2tpd - replacement of l2tpd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612071755.kB7HtlkU002875@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xl2tpd - replacement of l2tpd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218408 paul at xelerance.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RELEASE_PENDING -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 18:07:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 13:07:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218229] Review Request: php-pear-Image-Color - Manage and handles color data and conversions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612071807.kB7I7hFU003728@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Image-Color - Manage and handles color data and conversions Alias: pear-Image-Color https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218229 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |Fedora at FamilleCollet.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 18:09:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 13:09:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218408] Review Request: xl2tpd - replacement of l2tpd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612071809.kB7I9V5j003948@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xl2tpd - replacement of l2tpd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218408 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-07 13:09 EST ------- Please change the status to CLOSED NEXTRELEASE when rebuilding for FE-devel is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 18:12:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 13:12:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218408] Review Request: xl2tpd - replacement of l2tpd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612071812.kB7ICqVh004346@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xl2tpd - replacement of l2tpd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218408 paul at xelerance.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RELEASE_PENDING |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 18:13:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 13:13:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174377] Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612071813.kB7IDlKF004460@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174377 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-12-07 13:13 EST ------- Should be fixed: SRPM: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/gnu-smalltalk/gnu-smalltalk-2.3-3.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/gnu-smalltalk/gnu-smalltalk.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 18:28:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 13:28:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218787] Review Request: python-pycurl - A Python interface to libcurl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612071828.kB7ISK6D005959@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pycurl - A Python interface to libcurl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218787 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-12-07 13:28 EST ------- Spec URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/python-pycurl-7.15.5.1-2.fc6.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/python-pycurl-7.15.5.1-2.fc6.spec %changelog * Thu Dec 7 2006 Jeffrey C. Ollie - 7.15.5.1-2 - Remove INSTALL from the list of documentation - Use python_sitearch for all of the files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 18:38:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 13:38:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218230] Review Request: php-pear-Image-Canvas - Common interface to image drawing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612071838.kB7Ictga007042@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Image-Canvas - Common interface to image drawing Alias: pear-Image-Canvas https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218230 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |Fedora at FamilleCollet.com ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-12-07 13:38 EST ------- Image/Canvas/PDF.php requires php-pecl-pdflib. I provide php-pecl-pdflib and pdflib-lite on my repo (for a long time) but i dont have submit them to review (yet) because i'm not certain that License is OK. With pdflib present, test doesn't work because of Font used ("Courier New" defined as default one in Image/Canvas.php not available). A temporary solution could be to disable Image/PDF.php I will investigate on this... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 18:46:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 13:46:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218787] Review Request: python-pycurl - A Python interface to libcurl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612071846.kB7Ik04i007673@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pycurl - A Python interface to libcurl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218787 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-12-07 13:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > According to Packaging Naming it would be better, if a package's name were > pycurl, wouldn't it? There is no need to use 'python-' because first 'py' > letters suggest that it is a python package. The way that I read the naming guidelines pycurl would be allowed since there was a "py" in the name, but python-pycurl was preferred. In any case, there's a "Provide: pycurl" so that "yum install pycurl" should work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 18:50:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 13:50:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218229] Review Request: php-pear-Image-Color - Manage and handles color data and conversions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612071850.kB7IoJLE008342@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Image-Color - Manage and handles color data and conversions Alias: pear-Image-Color https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218229 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-12-07 13:50 EST ------- This package is used by php-pear-Image-Canvas in which tests works (so this package works). REVIEW * source files match upstream: a4a1a6f5c0f72d235930902cc1ee2e94 /tmp/Image_Color-1.0.2.tgz a4a1a6f5c0f72d235930902cc1ee2e94 SOURCES/Image_Color-1.0.2.tgz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible (PHP). * latest version is being packaged (1.0.2) * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides are sane: php-pear(Image_Color) = 1.0.2 php-pear-Image-Color = 1.0.2-1.fc7 * %check is not present; no test suite provide. * owns the directories it creates (see comment) * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (pear install) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. Should : remplace in %file %{pear_phpdir}/* by %{pear_phpdir}/Image More explicit and allow detection of new directory in next release (testdir p.e.) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 18:50:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 13:50:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218229] Review Request: php-pear-Image-Color - Manage and handles color data and conversions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612071850.kB7IofYA008368@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Image-Color - Manage and handles color data and conversions Alias: pear-Image-Color https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218229 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 18:52:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 13:52:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174377] Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612071852.kB7IqIxA008462@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174377 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-07 13:52 EST ------- Okay!! ------------------------------------------------ This package (gnu-smalltalk) is APPROVED by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 18:52:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 13:52:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218831] New: Review Request: python-urljr - A common interface to urllib2 and curl for making HTTP requests Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218831 Summary: Review Request: python-urljr - A common interface to urllib2 and curl for making HTTP requests Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jeff at ocjtech.us QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/python-urljr-1.0.1-1.fc6.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/python-urljr-1.0.1-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: URL-related utilities from JanRain, Inc. This package contains the "fetchers" module, which provides a common interface to urllib2 and curl for making HTTP requests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 18:56:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 13:56:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218831] Review Request: python-urljr - A common interface to urllib2 and curl for making HTTP requests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612071856.kB7Iu1mh008824@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-urljr - A common interface to urllib2 and curl for making HTTP requests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218831 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |218787 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 18:56:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 13:56:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218787] Review Request: python-pycurl - A Python interface to libcurl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612071856.kB7Iu2p2008833@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pycurl - A Python interface to libcurl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218787 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |218831 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 19:09:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 14:09:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218787] Review Request: python-pycurl - A Python interface to libcurl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612071909.kB7J9fXJ009909@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pycurl - A Python interface to libcurl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218787 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-12-07 14:09 EST ------- MUST items: * rpmlint is quiet ?* is the package named well? ?* is spec file name good? * package meets Packaging Guidelines * package is licensed with an LGPL open-source compatible license * License field in spec file matches actual license * license file is included in %doc * md5sums are matching (464cfbeba150d99d92a407c7c8b751de) * package successfully compiles on x86_64 * BuildRequires listed well * no locales * no need to %post and %postun sections * not relocatable * package owns directories well * no duplicates in %files * %files section includes %defattr * proper %clean section * macros used well (In reply to comment #3) > In any case, there's a > "Provide: pycurl" so that "yum install pycurl" should work. I can't see it anywhere so add "Provides: pycurl" into the spec file and I'll be happy to approve this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 19:14:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 14:14:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215258] Review Request: clucene - A C++ port of Lucene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612071914.kB7JEB4M010453@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clucene - A C++ port of Lucene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215258 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-12-07 14:14 EST ------- God: + Tarball match with upstream version. Bad: - You shuld but INSTALL='%{_bindir}/install -c -p' into the make install line to prevents the timestamps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 19:30:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 14:30:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218787] Review Request: python-pycurl - A Python interface to libcurl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612071930.kB7JUOPA012326@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pycurl - A Python interface to libcurl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218787 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-12-07 14:30 EST ------- (Annoyed Grunt!) I coulda swore that I had it in there... It should be there now though: Spec: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/python-pycurl-7.15.5.1-3.fc6.spec SRPM: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/python-pycurl-7.15.5.1-3.fc6.src.rpm %changelog * Thu Dec 7 2006 Jeffrey C. Ollie - 7.15.5.1-3 - Don't forget to Provide: pycurl!!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 19:30:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 14:30:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218367] Review Request: compat-guile - Guile compatibility package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612071930.kB7JUfWe012394@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-guile - Guile compatibility package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218367 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-12-07 14:30 EST ------- #001 Parallel builds %{?_smp_mflags} missing on make #002 typo Line 83 # Ouch! guile forgets to set it's onw shared lib path to use shared uninstalled >>>> own #003 cleanups ? [ "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" != "/" ] && rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT $RPM_BUILD_ROOT isn't defined up in the spec file ? Is it useful ? #004: missing url tag #005: macro-in-%changelog W: compat-guile macro-in-%changelog files W: compat-guile macro-in-%changelog file W: compat-guile macro-in-%changelog files W: compat-guile macro-in-%changelog post W: compat-guile macro-in-%changelog postun W: compat-guile macro-in-%changelog attr W: compat-guile macro-in-%changelog post W: compat-guile macro-in-%changelog description W: compat-guile macro-in-%changelog files W: compat-guile macro-in-%changelog postun W: compat-guile macro-in-%changelog PACKAGE_VERSION W: compat-guile macro-in-%changelog attr add a % more in front for those macros #007 mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs W: compat-guile mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 4, tab: line 86) Other Rpmlints issues: $rpmlint /home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/compat-libguile-1.6.7-1.i386.rpm dangling-relative-symlink W: compat-libguile dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/guile/slib ../../share/slib E: compat-libguile non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/guile/1.6/scripts/c2x 0555 E: compat-libguile non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/guile/1.6/scripts/scan-md-module 0555 E: compat-libguile non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/guile/1.6/scripts/slurp 0555 E: compat-libguile non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/guile/1.6/scripts/make-module-catalog 0555 E: compat-libguile non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/guile/1.6/scripts/PROGRAM2 0555 $rpmlint /home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/compat-libguile-devel-1.6.7-1.i386.rpm W: compat-libguile-devel no-dependency-on compat-libguile Fix those, I'll approve it, However it builds successfully under mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 19:43:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 14:43:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218839] New: Review Request: pyflakes - A Lint-like tool for Python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218839 Summary: Review Request: pyflakes - A Lint-like tool for Python Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jeff at ocjtech.us QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/pyflakes-0.0-0.1.10526.fc6.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/pyflakes-0.0-0.1.10526.fc6.src.rpm Description: PyFlakes is a Lint-like tool for Python, like PyChecker. It is focused on identifying common errors quickly without executing Python code. Its primary advantage over PyChecker is that it is fast. You don't have to sit around for minutes waiting for the checker to run; it runs on most large projects in only a few seconds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 20:00:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 15:00:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218229] Review Request: php-pear-Image-Color - Manage and handles color data and conversions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612072000.kB7K04Gt015378@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Image-Color - Manage and handles color data and conversions Alias: pear-Image-Color https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218229 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-12-07 15:00 EST ------- Added Image dir. Built successfully on devel. Requested CVS sync with FC5/6. Added entry to owners.list. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 20:02:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 15:02:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215258] Review Request: clucene - A C++ port of Lucene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612072002.kB7K2MGB015574@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clucene - A C++ port of Lucene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215258 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2006-12-07 15:02 EST ------- > Bad: > - You shuld but INSTALL='%{_bindir}/install -c -p' into the make install line to > prevents the timestamps. Is this a new packaging requirement? I've never seen anywhere in the guildelines where it says this should be done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 20:10:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 15:10:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215258] Review Request: clucene - A C++ port of Lucene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612072010.kB7KA0uG016074@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clucene - A C++ port of Lucene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215258 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-12-07 15:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > Is this a new packaging requirement? I've never seen anywhere in the guildelines > where it says this should be done. No, this is not an official requirement, but it may helpfule to preserve the timestamps of the files which will be go unmodified into a package. Please see B/ #174377. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 20:25:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 15:25:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218844] New: Review Request: python-yadis - Relying party support for the Yadis service discovery protocol Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218844 Summary: Review Request: python-yadis - Relying party support for the Yadis service discovery protocol Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jeff at ocjtech.us QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/python-yadis-1.0.1-1.fc6.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/python-yadis-1.0.1-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: This code implements relying party support for the Yadis[1] service discovery protocol. The protocol was developed for use by decentralized URL-based identity systems, but is useful for advertising services provided by or on behalf of a certain URL. To learn more about Yadis, see http://www.openidenabled.com/yadis The JanRain Python OpenID library[2] uses this library for discovery of OpenID service endpoints. See that library for an example of library usage. 1. http://yadis.org/ 2. http://www.openidenabled.com/openid/libraries/python/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 20:26:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 15:26:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218844] Review Request: python-yadis - Relying party support for the Yadis service discovery protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612072026.kB7KQP7w016763@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-yadis - Relying party support for the Yadis service discovery protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218844 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |218831, 218839 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 20:26:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 15:26:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218839] Review Request: pyflakes - A Lint-like tool for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612072026.kB7KQQTO016767@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyflakes - A Lint-like tool for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218839 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |218844 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 20:26:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 15:26:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218831] Review Request: python-urljr - A common interface to urllib2 and curl for making HTTP requests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612072026.kB7KQatS016772@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-urljr - A common interface to urllib2 and curl for making HTTP requests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218831 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |218844 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 20:28:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 15:28:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215258] Review Request: clucene - A C++ port of Lucene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612072028.kB7KSNi8016854@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clucene - A C++ port of Lucene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215258 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2006-12-07 15:28 EST ------- Since this is not official, I don't think it should block this being accepted. I've seen the bug you pointed to, but it isn't clear why/how helpful doing that is. Besides, I've rarely seen this INSTALL option purposefully used in the Fedora sphere. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 20:36:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 15:36:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218176] Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612072036.kB7KaY3X017495@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218176 ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2006-12-07 15:36 EST ------- Well, the problem with development version is the following: it requires development version of gnome-chemistry-utils, which requires goffice >= 0.3 (also an unstable development version, shipped neither by fc6 nor by rawhide). So no matter if the problem was fixed in unstable branch, shipping it for fedora would be a bit problematic. I can ask upstream for fix anyway, but IMO it is very unlikely that someone would want to link to libgchempaint.so -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 20:45:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 15:45:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218176] Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612072045.kB7KjFxR018472@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218176 ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2006-12-07 15:45 EST ------- Upstream bug report: https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/index.php?18480 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 20:48:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 15:48:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218852] New: Review Request: python-openid - Python OpenID libraries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218852 Summary: Review Request: python-openid - Python OpenID libraries Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jeff at ocjtech.us QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/python-openid-1.1.1-1.fc6.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/python-openid-1.1.1-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: The OpenID library with batteries included. Features: * Refined and easy-to-use API. * Extensive documentation. * Many storage implemetations including file-based, SQL, and memcached. * Simple examples to help you get started. * Licensed under the LGPL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 20:51:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 15:51:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218852] Review Request: python-openid - Python OpenID libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612072051.kB7KprR5019090@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-openid - Python OpenID libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218852 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |218831, 218844 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 20:51:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 15:51:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218844] Review Request: python-yadis - Relying party support for the Yadis service discovery protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612072051.kB7Kpshi019096@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-yadis - Relying party support for the Yadis service discovery protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218844 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |218852 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 20:51:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 15:51:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218831] Review Request: python-urljr - A common interface to urllib2 and curl for making HTTP requests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612072051.kB7Kptuw019101@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-urljr - A common interface to urllib2 and curl for making HTTP requests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218831 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |218852 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 21:49:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 16:49:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218787] Review Request: python-pycurl - A Python interface to libcurl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612072149.kB7LnmLk024033@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pycurl - A Python interface to libcurl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218787 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-12-07 16:49 EST ------- Now it looks really good :) Approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 21:50:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 16:50:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218230] Review Request: php-pear-Image-Canvas - Common interface to image drawing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612072150.kB7LoHjN024133@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Image-Canvas - Common interface to image drawing Alias: pear-Image-Canvas https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218230 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-12-07 16:50 EST ------- I have updated the spec to remove this file, however I think it would be better to add a php-pecl-pdflib package to Extras. I think the license should be okay. If you want to put it up for review I can review it for you. Once it's in I can also patch this package to not use Courier New font in the tests. Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-Image-Canvas.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-Image-Canvas-0.3.0-2.src.rpm %changelog * Thu Dec 07 2006 Christopher Stone 0.3.0-2 - Remove PDF.php until php-pecl-pdflib is added to Extras -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 22:04:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 17:04:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218787] Review Request: python-pycurl - A Python interface to libcurl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612072204.kB7M4Qan025107@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pycurl - A Python interface to libcurl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218787 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-12-07 17:04 EST ------- Thanks for the review! Imported and built for devel, branches for FC-5 and FC-6 requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 22:04:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 17:04:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218831] Review Request: python-urljr - A common interface to urllib2 and curl for making HTTP requests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612072204.kB7M4ddR025157@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-urljr - A common interface to urllib2 and curl for making HTTP requests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218831 Bug 218831 depends on bug 218787, which changed state. Bug 218787 Summary: Review Request: python-pycurl - A Python interface to libcurl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218787 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 22:19:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 17:19:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218577] Review Request: glump - A small web application to glue files from multiple sources In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612072219.kB7MJshd026160@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glump - A small web application to glue files from multiple sources https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218577 ------- Additional Comments From yaneti at declera.com 2006-12-07 17:19 EST ------- Forbidden You don't have permission to access /misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/glump-0.9.11-1.fc6.spec on this server. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 22:24:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 17:24:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218577] Review Request: glump - A small web application to glue files from multiple sources In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612072224.kB7MOlJA026414@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glump - A small web application to glue files from multiple sources https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218577 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-12-07 17:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > > You don't have permission to access /misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/glump-0.9.11-1.fc6.spec > on this server. Whoops! Fixed... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 7 23:47:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 18:47:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218887] New: Review Request: fxload - Firmware loader Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218887 Summary: Review Request: fxload - Firmware loader Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bart.vanbrabant at zoeloelip.be QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://bart.ulyssis.org/fedora/fxload/fxload.spec SRPM URL: http://bart.ulyssis.org/fedora/fxload/fxload-2002_04_11-2.fc6.src.rpm Description: This program is conveniently able to download firmware into FX and FX2 EZ-USB devices, as well as the original AnchorChips EZ-USB. It is intended to be invoked by udev scripts when the unprogrammed device appears on the bus. This was part of the hotplug package which was removed in favor of udev. Some drivers like the wis-go7007 driver still use it to make udev load the initial firmware. #178679 contains some more information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 00:53:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 19:53:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208420] Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612080053.kB80rcSl005003@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208420 ------- Additional Comments From pkovacs at users.sourceforge.net 2006-12-07 19:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #22) > (In reply to comment #19) > Does conky uses directly the glib functions? If not, it is better > to have glib-devel as an indirect dependency through audacious-devel. > Thus if audacious stops using the glib, conky wouldn't need to be modified. > If glib-devel is a direct dependency of conky it would be better to > list it in buildrequires, but it doesn't seems to be the case since > conky itself don't include the glib headers (unless I am missing > something). Yes, conky uses glib directly in audacious.c, i.e. #include . The audacious status interface allocates gchar * strings that must be freed by the client with g_free() -- song titles, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 01:09:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 20:09:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612080109.kB819FOJ005620@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ndbecker2 at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ndbecker2 at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2006-12-07 20:09 EST ------- rpmbuild --rebuild PyQt4-4.1-1.src.rpm [ ... chug ...] ERROR 0001: file '/usr/bin/pylupdate4' contains a standard rpath '/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64] ERROR 0001: file '/usr/bin/pyrcc4' contains a standard rpath '/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 01:51:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 20:51:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208420] Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612080151.kB81pX8i007859@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208420 ------- Additional Comments From pkovacs at users.sourceforge.net 2006-12-07 20:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #23) > Doing a full audit of the source takes more time, but it allows > to find problematic files. In that case, we have > > hash.h > hash.c > which have clearly 2 authors, but no license. No license (since the > Bern convention) means a restrictive license (no right to redistribute > or modify). So it needs clarification from Philip. That code originates from here: http://www.kyleloudon.com/books, specifically the "Read a sample" link: http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/masteralgoc/chapter/ch08.pdf I believe the licensing falls under the O'Reilly policy stated here: http://www.oreilly.com/pub/a/oreilly/ask_tim/2001/codepolicy.html I have emailed the author for clarification in any event. Phil -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 02:32:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 21:32:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215883] Review Request: idioskopos - C++ Introspection Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612080232.kB82Wrcc010785@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: idioskopos - C++ Introspection Library Alias: idioskopos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215883 rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 02:50:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 21:50:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174377] Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612080250.kB82odo8011302@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174377 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-07 21:50 EST ------- Paolo, Jochen tried to rebuild 2.3-3, however, it failed with x86_64. Testing intmath.st fails with segv. Would you check this problem? Reference: http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/23119-gnu-smalltalk-2.3-3.fc7/x86_64/build.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 03:51:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 22:51:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218360] Review Request: evolution-plugin-remove-duplicates - Evolution plugin for removing duplicate mails In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612080351.kB83pxbH014274@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-plugin-remove-duplicates - Evolution plugin for removing duplicate mails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218360 ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-12-07 22:51 EST ------- http://hircus.org/fedora/evolution-plugin-remove-duplicates/evolution-remove-duplicates.spec http://hircus.org/fedora/evolution-plugin-remove-duplicates/evolution-remove-duplicates-0.0.2-3.src.rpm Rex Dieter pointed out that the evolution-plugin-2.8.pc in turn depends on another .pc whose package was not required by evolution-devel . I've added a temporary BR on e-d-s-devel for now, that can be removed once that packaging bug is fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 05:41:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 00:41:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196393] Review Request: svrcore-devel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612080541.kB85fSkG023009@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: svrcore-devel Alias: svrcore-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196393 toshio at tiki-lounge.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |toshio at tiki-lounge.com ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-12-08 00:41 EST ------- I'm looking into autotooling this. It's not impossible but I'm going to have to look into the coreconf stuff more closely to make sure I'm not missing something in my initial pass. Some questions: * Why is this package called srvcore-devel? The library looks like it's called libsrvcore so the -devel extension looks extraneous. (This will also cause you packaging headaches as there's usually a main package with the shared libs and a subpackage named %{name}-devel for static libraries and headers. If you did that in this case you'd have svrcore-devel-devel. So you can either rename at the upstream level or the packaging level.) * Is it okay if I change the directory structure or are you still committed to building this in a mozilla tree where the directory structure is important? * Does anyone understand coreconf and want to walk me through it on IRC -- if not, I'll figure it out on my own. It's just a question of speed and assurance that I'm not taking a false start. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 06:50:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 01:50:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218176] Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612080650.kB86oKT4026274@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218176 ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2006-12-08 01:50 EST ------- Comment from Jean Brefort: Hmm, not easily fixed. libgchempaint was not intended to be used by other programs (it should be possible with 0.8.0 but this one is not released yet). At the moment, libgcpcanvas is only used as a static library, so adding -lgcpcanvas to LIBS for libgchempaint just makes libtool fail. If fixing this bug is a requirement for you, the solution is to build a shared version of libgcpcanvas. Tell me if you need it. Also, please apply patch for #18159 before releasing. So, is fixing this bug a requirement? Al for the patch, I'll add it later today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 08:08:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 03:08:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196393] Review Request: svrcore-devel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612080808.kB888M7P028586@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: svrcore-devel Alias: svrcore-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196393 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-12-08 03:08 EST ------- http://www.tiki-lounge.com/~toshio/fedora/svrcore-4.0.2.01-0.src.rpm Initial work to port this to autotools. There's a tarball and x86_64 rpms in that directory as well. Please be warned that I am pretty good with autotools but I don't know svrcore or the netscape build system at all. I have no programs to test this against. Therefore, this could be totally borked (most likely, borked on certain archs but not other as replacing the buildsystem usually hits portability hacks). That said, here's the status as I currently see it: * New layout. The tarball contains two directories. svrcore-VERSION/ with supporting files (README, LICENSE, etc) and svrcore-VERSION/src with the source code. * Autotools configures and builds shared and static libraries on linux-x86_64. * Autotools take care of generating the pkgconfig file as well. * Running make distcheck passes and creates distribution tarballs. * Cleaned up the rpm spec file a bit for the new build system. Commented a bunch of the env variable defining as I've only done an initial read through to figure out if it was necessary. * Documentation needs to be updated: NEWS, AUTHORS, and ChangeLog are new files that can be filled with useful information :-) INSTALL needs to be updated with the new install proceedures. * configure.ac has an email address for bug reports in one of its macros. Just need to replace what's there with the proper address. * I don't have a Windows box so I don't know how autotools works on Windows (or if this is something you place a high priority on.) * I need to run ifnames on the source files and figure out where all the cpp variables get set. Most of them looked Windows specific so there's a high probablility things work on *nix boxes but not Windows. We need to figure out hy these defines are set and implement tests in configure.ac to set them instead. This is where talkign with someone who understands svrcore/coreconf would be helpful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 08:18:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 03:18:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218907] New: Review Request: search4files - A handy file search tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218907 Summary: Review Request: search4files - A handy file search tool Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/search4files.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/search4files-0.1c-1.src.rpm Description: A handy file search tool using different backends which is configurable via the command line. This program acts as a frontend for different file search engines. The interface is intentionally lightweight and simple. But it takes configuration options from the command line. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 08:37:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 03:37:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218176] Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612080837.kB88bJSB029956@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218176 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-08 03:37 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > Comment from Jean Brefort: > Hmm, not easily fixed. > > So, is fixing this bug a requirement? Al for the patch, I'll add it later today. Yes, I know fixing this issue is not a easy work. My opinion is: * If providing *-devel package* is necessary, this issue should be fixed * If not (i.e. providing -devel package is not neccesary *for now*, which means that the library included in gchempaint rpm are only needed by binaries in gchempaint rpm), just dropping -devel package and leaving this issue as it is can be allowed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 09:15:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 04:15:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218768] Review Request: poppler-extras - PDF rendering library extras (qt/qt4) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612080915.kB89FZJL001026@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poppler-extras - PDF rendering library extras (qt/qt4) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218768 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bjohnson at symetrix.com ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2006-12-08 04:15 EST ------- Rex- > # yes, this file is owned by 2 packages, deal. -- Rex http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines?highlight=%28Packaging%29#head-a5931a7372c4a00065713430984fa5875513e6d4 Packages must not own files already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. I think this is meant more to address having entirely different packages owning the same file, rather than a collection of related packages sharing a file, but I thought I'd get your take on it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 09:28:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 04:28:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208420] Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612080928.kB89S7X0001880@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208420 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-12-08 04:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #24) > Yes, conky uses glib directly in audacious.c, i.e. #include . > The audacious status interface allocates gchar * strings that must be > freed by the client with g_free() -- song titles, etc. Oops, I missed it. A Buildrequires on glib2-devel would be appropriate (but not mandatory, since audacious-devel also brings it in). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 09:34:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 04:34:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208420] Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612080934.kB89Yj5d002551@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208420 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-12-08 04:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #25) > (In reply to comment #23) > > hash.h > > hash.c > http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/masteralgoc/chapter/ch08.pdf The amount of code is such that it doesn't fall in the fair use case. > I believe the licensing falls under the O'Reilly policy stated here: > > http://www.oreilly.com/pub/a/oreilly/ask_tim/2001/codepolicy.html It is clearly not GPL compatible due to the restrictions on commercial use. Maybe the author could accept to relicense it under a GPL compatible license? You could also consider adding the isbn to the license notice. Seems to be 1565924533. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 10:18:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 05:18:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 202528] Review Request: rt2x00-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612081018.kB8AIGZQ004606@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rt2x00-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202528 danny at anatomy.usyd.edu.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |danny at anatomy.usyd.edu.au ------- Additional Comments From danny at anatomy.usyd.edu.au 2006-12-08 05:18 EST ------- I would love to have a solid rt2x00 package for Fedora Core 6. I'm currently running FC 6 with an FC 5 kernel, because I haven't been able to get a stable system using either the older rt61 driver (which is what I use under FC5) or the rt2x00 driver. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 10:19:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 05:19:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612081019.kB8AJ4in004667@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218556 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bjohnson at symetrix.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2006-12-08 05:19 EST ------- I will provide you a review. It is not an official review as you need a sponsor. rpmlint -i ecryptfs-utils-5-0.src.rpm W: ecryptfs-utils summary-not-capitalized eCryptfs mount helper and support libraries Summary doesn't begin with a capital letter. - This can be ignored. W: ecryptfs-utils no-url-tag The URL tag is missing. -add: URL: http://ecryptfs.sourceforge.net W: ecryptfs-utils setup-not-quiet You should use -q to have a quiet extraction of the source tarball, as this generate useless lines of log ( for buildbot, for example ) - add "-q" flag to %setup W: ecryptfs-utils rpm-buildroot-usage %build ./configure --prefix=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be touched during %build or %prep stage, as it will break short circuiting. - change to "%{_configure} E: ecryptfs-utils configure-without-libdir-spec A configure script is run without specifying the libdir. configure options must be augmented with something like --libdir=%{_libdir}. E: ecryptfs-utils hardcoded-library-path in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/lib/ecryptfs A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. - change: /usr/bin to %{_bindir} /usr/lib to %{_libdir} E: ecryptfs-utils hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/libecryptfs.so.0.0.0 A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. - ditto E: ecryptfs-utils hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/libecryptfs.so.0 A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. - ditto E: ecryptfs-utils hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/libecryptfs.so A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. - ditto E: ecryptfs-utils hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/ecryptfs/libecryptfs_pki_passphrase.so A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. - ditto E: ecryptfs-utils hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/ecryptfs/libecryptfs_pki_openssl.so A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. - ditto E: ecryptfs-utils no-buildroot-tag The BuildRoot tag isn't used in your spec. It must be used in order to allow building the package as non root on some systems. - add: BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) You might consider installing rpmdevtools and running fedora-newrpmspec to get a nice template spec file to work from. Templated spec files make it faster for reviewers to review. Additionally: make does not use smp flags (see template spec file) make install does not use DESTDIR (see template spec file) %defattr has missing param (see template spec file) Question for submitter: Is ecryptfs already in the kernel? If it's not, this would be a blocker until it is. Once these changes are made, here is the probably output from rpmlint on the binary rpms: rpmlint -i mock-results/ecryptfs-utils-5-0.i386.rpm E: ecryptfs-utils explicit-lib-dependency libgcrypt You must let rpm find the library dependencies by itself. Do not put unneeded explicit Requires: tags. - remove dependency on libgcrypt W: ecryptfs-utils summary-not-capitalized eCryptfs mount helper and support libraries Summary doesn't begin with a capital letter. - ignore W: ecryptfs-utils no-version-in-last-changelog The last changelog entry doesn't contain a version. Please insert the version that is coherent with the version of the package and rebuild it. - please add a version to the changelog entry: * Mon Dec 04 2006 Mike Halcrow - 5-0 W: ecryptfs-utils unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/ecryptfs/libecryptfs_pki_passphrase.so W: ecryptfs-utils unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/ecryptfs/libecryptfs_pki_openssl.so - I believe the problem here is that they were not chmod a+x so they are not stripped... however, see below first. E: ecryptfs-utils library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib/libecryptfs.so.0.0.0 This package contains a library and provides no %post scriptlet containing a call to ldconfig. - add %post -p /sbin/ldconfig E: ecryptfs-utils library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/libecryptfs.so.0.0.0 This package contains a library and provides no %postun scriptlet containing a call to ldconfig. - add %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig W: ecryptfs-utils devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libecryptfs.so A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. - If these are development libraries, they should be removed entirely, or put in a -devel package. If they are loadable modules, I believe this can be ignored, but I'll have to look it up. E: ecryptfs-utils zero-length /usr/share/doc/ecryptfs-utils-5/ChangeLog - if changelog is 0 length, remove it from the installation Please fix these issues and repost a new srpm and spec file and I'll continue your review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 11:25:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 06:25:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207202] Review Request: bes - Back-end server software framework for OPeNDAP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612081125.kB8BPeNK009441@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bes - Back-end server software framework for OPeNDAP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207202 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | CC| |bjohnson at symetrix.com ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2006-12-08 06:25 EST ------- I will provide you a review. As I understand it, since you already have packages in FE, you do not need a sponsor. rpmlint on the srpm is clean. When I try to mock-build the package (FC6), the build terminates with: checking for a readline compatible library... no configure: error: I could not find the readline library! error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.14834 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.14834 (%build) Please correct this an repost your spec and srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 11:53:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 06:53:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209511] Review Request: gnbd - global network block device In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612081153.kB8BrYB2010552@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnbd - global network block device https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209511 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bjohnson at symetrix.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778, 177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2006-12-08 06:53 EST ------- I don't see you in the owners list, so I can only provide you an unofficial review. I'm flipping the FE-NEEDSPONSOR blocker on for you too, since you will have to have a sponsor do an official review. rpmlint on all packages is silent. mock-build on FC6 is successful Must items: - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. Include COPYING file in %doc - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. I have not been able to verify this - Source0 should be a URL that points to the donwloadable file. - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. (Extras Only) The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: [WWW] FE-ExcludeArch-x86, [WWW] FE-ExcludeArch-x64, [WWW] FE-ExcludeArch-ppc Document why ExclusiveArch is used. - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. Your macro use is consistent. However, I would suggest replacing "./configure --mandir=%{_mandir} --libdir=%{_libdir}" with "%{configure}" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 12:08:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 07:08:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218839] Review Request: pyflakes - A Lint-like tool for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612081208.kB8C8TeE010972@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyflakes - A Lint-like tool for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218839 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bjohnson at symetrix.com ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2006-12-08 07:08 EST ------- Jeffrey, I'll try to do a review of this package and the ones it blocking, however, the first thing I noticed that the versioning for the package is not correct. Please take a look at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-e104844825856d7c45f2f0241586985c0495966b -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 12:50:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 07:50:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612081250.kB8Coorp012274@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2006-12-08 07:50 EST ------- I'm trying /usr/share/doc/PyQt4-devel-4.1/examples/tools/qtdemo/qtdemo.py. Don't know who's causing this, but view an example, (say, main window), and click on "Show Documentation" doesn't work. Shows raw xml and complains about not being able to find stuff under PyQt3-something. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 12:59:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 07:59:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218768] Review Request: poppler-extras - PDF rendering library extras (qt/qt4) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612081259.kB8CxDs6012580@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poppler-extras - PDF rendering library extras (qt/qt4) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218768 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-12-08 07:59 EST ------- Yes, I'm aware of the guideline. This is a reasonable exception, which is why I added the pithy comment. (: Hold off on reviewing this... the poppler maintainer seems agreeable to adding -qt to Core (see bug #158941 comment #11), so I'll probably be modifying this (soon) to include only the -qt4 wrapper. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 13:50:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 08:50:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 202528] Review Request: rt2x00-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612081350.kB8DofoC015633@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rt2x00-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202528 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2006-12-08 08:50 EST ------- @Danny Yee rt2x00 is in development and sould be considered stable when d80211 stack will be in the kernel tree.. (not until 2.6.21 kernel and rt2x00 should certainly be integrated with it). You can try my testing repository here : http://kwizart.free.fr/blog/index.php?17 http://kwizart.free.fr/blog/index.php?10 You can try both rt61 and rt2x00 kmod for fc6, try the rt2x00 first and then rt61.Don't forget the rt61-firmware for it (rt2x00 only!) (it 's in french but i can provide you support in english!) In fine it will help the review... @John W. Linville I've took theses files to build the d80211 kmod: http://people.redhat.com/linville/kernels/fc6/patches/jwltest-d80211-backport.patch http://people.redhat.com/linville/kernels/fc6/patches/jwltest-d80211-backport-fixup.patch http://people.redhat.com/linville/kernels/fc6/patches/jwltest-cfg80211-fixup.patch I spent few time upon this question but last time i've found that rt2x00 from serial monkey do not works with the patches you provides or needs some tweaks. So the direction i'm involved is to take rt2x00 version from the patches you provides which is not the same package thought... (but certainly a better stable... less support?) wip... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 14:04:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 09:04:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207202] Review Request: bes - Back-end server software framework for OPeNDAP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612081404.kB8E496T017082@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bes - Back-end server software framework for OPeNDAP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207202 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-12-08 09:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > I will provide you a review. As I understand it, since you already have > packages in FE, you do not need a sponsor. Yes, I own some packages ;-) > rpmlint on the srpm is clean. It is also clean on the binary rpms, isn't it? > When I try to mock-build the package (FC6), the build terminates with: > checking for a readline compatible library... no > configure: error: I could not find the readline library! > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.14834 (%build) Yep, missing BR on readline-devel. I also added one on openssl-devel since bes depends on openssl-devel, even though there is already an indirect dependency (through libdap-devel -> curl-devel -> openssl-devel). http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/bes-3.2.0-2.src.rpm - add BuildRequires for readline-devel and openssl-devel I had a look at configure.ac, and there is a (broken) macro to look for kerberos, but after a look in the code, it doesn't seems to be used. kerberos is also pulled in as indirect dependency anyway. The autoconf macros related with kerberos and openssl are broken, but the libs/headers are in the standard places, and kerberos is unneeded so everything is right. I'll try to work that out with upstream. I know that there are many unneeded dependencies on sonames, as ldd -u -r says, most of them come from libdap flags, I am also working that out with upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 14:05:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 09:05:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207202] Review Request: bes - Back-end server software framework for OPeNDAP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612081405.kB8E551g017188@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bes - Back-end server software framework for OPeNDAP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207202 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-12-08 09:05 EST ------- If you review the package, you should set its state to ASSIGNED, and add yourself in the 'Rassign bug to' box. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 14:22:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 09:22:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196393] Review Request: svrcore-devel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612081422.kB8EMQ2n019004@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: svrcore-devel Alias: svrcore-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196393 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-12-08 09:22 EST ------- svrcore-devel was the old name, only because this was a static only library in the past. svrcore should be the new .src.rpm name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 14:31:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 09:31:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196393] Review Request: svrcore-devel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612081431.kB8EVxZ5019578@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: svrcore-devel Alias: svrcore-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196393 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-12-08 09:31 EST ------- I tested the build of Toshio's new tarball/spec on FC6 for i386/x86_64/ppc and all have a o clean rpmlint output (aside from missing doc warnings in the devel subppackage) o sane buildlogs, e.g. both confugure and make output looks fine for all archs o mozldap builds against it I didn't test any runtime behaviour, but I think it's already worthwhile to submit Toshio's changes upstream. I think that's also the only place where Windows builds could be tested, if that's a requirement. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 14:37:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 09:37:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217836] Review Request: vimoutliner - set of vim macros for editing outlines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612081437.kB8EbiKa020081@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vimoutliner - set of vim macros for editing outlines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217836 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-08 09:37 EST ------- A quick glance at your spec file and.... * Please specify all sources. * cp -f %{SOURCE5} README.Fedora - Use 'cp -p -f' to keep timestamp. * Why does this package call "update-desktop-database" though no desktop file is included? * helpztags %{_datadir}/vim/vimfiles/doc - What does this do? = If this script creates some files, the files (created by helpztags) should be included in this package with marked as %ghost %verify(not md5 size mtime), for example. = If this script changes some files included in this package, the files to be modified should marked with %verify(...) = If this script changes some files included in other packages, it shouldn't unless the files are marked with %verify(not ...) or %config or so. * %preun helpztags %{_datadir}/vim/vimfiles/doc - What does this do? At %preun stage, all files in this package still exist, so I think this does nothing (though I don't know what helpztags actually does......) By the way, does any sponsor watching this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 14:41:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 09:41:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217836] Review Request: vimoutliner - set of vim macros for editing outlines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612081441.kB8EfOPZ020346@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vimoutliner - set of vim macros for editing outlines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217836 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-08 09:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > * Please specify all sources. I meant "Please specify URLs of all sources" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 14:46:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 09:46:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196401] Review Request: mozldap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612081446.kB8EkwUm020885@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mozldap Alias: mozldap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196401 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-12-08 09:46 EST ------- You need to BR cyrus-sasl-devel @@ -28,2 +29,3 @@ BuildRequires: %{svrcore_name} >= %{svrcore_version} +BuildRequires: cyrus-sasl-devel Wrt lib*ldap60.so: Upstream seems to prefer to disambiguate the library by changing the core name (the embedded "60") and therefore sees no urge to use properly versioned libraries. You can either a) go along and *not* do any symlinking on the packaging level. E.g. the 'so's remain in the core package and there are no so symlinks in *-devel b) clean it up and rename the SONAMEs from lib*ldap60.so -> lib*ldap.so.6 with a patch against the build in the tarball. a) is quick and dirty and matches current upstream methology, b) is clean and proper, but requires you to get the patch submitted upstream, otherwise we'll be breaking library ABI. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 14:47:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 09:47:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196393] Review Request: svrcore-devel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612081447.kB8Elifq020938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: svrcore-devel Alias: svrcore https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196393 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias|svrcore-devel |svrcore -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 14:53:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 09:53:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612081453.kB8ErSFH021376@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-12-08 09:53 EST ------- AFAICT, the qtdemo.py example likely only works 100% if you have qt4-doc installed (it worksforme). Then, you can compare qtdemo.oy against how qtdemo-qt works (it should be identical). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 14:57:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 09:57:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612081457.kB8EvS8x021713@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2006-12-08 09:57 EST ------- rpm -q qt4-doc qt4-doc-4.2.2-1.fc6 Must be some other problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 14:59:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 09:59:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612081459.kB8ExpOo021967@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-12-08 09:59 EST ------- you may also have qt-devel-docs installed (?), which may be interfering (they both provide something called qtdemo). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 15:02:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 10:02:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612081502.kB8F2evl022239@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2006-12-08 10:02 EST ------- rpm -q qt-devel-docs package qt-devel-docs is not installed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 15:08:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 10:08:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196393] Review Request: svrcore In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612081508.kB8F8evU022651@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: svrcore Alias: svrcore https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196393 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: svrcore- |Review Request: svrcore |devel | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 15:11:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 10:11:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612081511.kB8FBedh022921@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-12-08 10:11 EST ------- OK, it's qt-devel's 'assistant' running interference (not qt's qtdemo) here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 15:14:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 10:14:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612081514.kB8FE2SL023097@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-12-08 10:13 EST ------- Root cause of problems running with "Show Documentation", is that it assumes the presence of qt4's assistant, which we install as assistant-qt4 (to avoid file conflicts with qt(3)'s assistant). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 15:15:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 10:15:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218839] Review Request: pyflakes - A Lint-like tool for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612081515.kB8FFoNW023180@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyflakes - A Lint-like tool for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218839 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-12-08 10:15 EST ------- Spec URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/pyflakes-0.0-1.10526svn.fc6.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/pyflakes-0.0-1.10526svn.fc6.src.rpm That should fix the naming problem... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 16:11:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 11:11:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196393] Review Request: svrcore In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612081611.kB8GBpkx026743@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: svrcore Alias: svrcore https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196393 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2006-12-08 11:11 EST ------- Yes, Windows is a requirement. I can take care of building on Windows. Here is the upstream bug for the work that you guys have done: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363168 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 16:30:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 11:30:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612081630.kB8GUc8F027549@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-12-08 11:30 EST ------- Here's a quick-n-dirty workaround: export PATH=/usr/lib/qt4/bin:$PATH (or /usr/lib64/qt4/bin if on x86_64) before running qtdemo.py -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 16:37:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 11:37:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196393] Review Request: svrcore In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612081637.kB8GbQQI028140@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: svrcore Alias: svrcore https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196393 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-12-08 11:37 EST ------- i tested the build of Toshio's build on Aurora Corona the equivelant of FC-6 sparc. build was ok but i have not tested runtime or building against it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 17:17:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 12:17:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 180092] Review Request: NRPE - Monitoring agent for Nagios In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612081717.kB8HHfuo030729@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NRPE - Monitoring agent for Nagios https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180092 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-12-08 12:17 EST ------- Mike, Could you also build it for FC-5 and FC-6 ? Tia, jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 17:36:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 12:36:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 180092] Review Request: NRPE - Monitoring agent for Nagios In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612081736.kB8Hag79031875@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NRPE - Monitoring agent for Nagios https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180092 ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2006-12-08 12:36 EST ------- Sure thing, I'll have them built by tonight. Should be on the mirrors in the next couple of days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 17:40:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 12:40:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196393] Review Request: svrcore In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612081740.kB8HeTQo032196@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: svrcore Alias: svrcore https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196393 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-12-08 12:40 EST ------- New srpm: http://www.tiki-lounge.com/~toshio/fedora/svrcore-4.0.2.02-0.src.rpm I've gone through the #ifdefs now and made a few minor changes. I think this tarball is good to go as far as replacing coreconf with autotools. It will need some tweaking from your end (documentation, runtime testing, etc) but is largely complete. Changes: * configure.ac: We don't have any fallbacks in code for missing string.h, termios.h, or unistd.h so Have configure error if any of those are missing. * ntgetpin.c, user.c: Code was using both #ifdef WIN32 and #ifdef _WIN32. Changed all to the _WIN32 form. * user.c: Instead of checking if we're building on XP_UNIX, check that we aren't building on _WIN32. This matches with code later in the file that uses the functions define here if we are not on _WIN32. I'll post this to the upstream bugzilla as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 17:51:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 12:51:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218831] Review Request: python-urljr - A common interface to urllib2 and curl for making HTTP requests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612081751.kB8HpXVx000488@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-urljr - A common interface to urllib2 and curl for making HTTP requests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218831 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mr.ecik at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-12-08 12:51 EST ------- I'll review it :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 18:07:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 13:07:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196401] Review Request: mozldap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612081807.kB8I76Ls001781@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mozldap Alias: mozldap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196401 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2006-12-08 13:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > You can either > a) go along and *not* do any symlinking on the packaging level. E.g. the 'so's > remain in the core package and there are no so symlinks in *-devel > b) clean it up and rename the SONAMEs from lib*ldap60.so -> lib*ldap.so.6 with > a patch against the build in the tarball. > > a) is quick and dirty and matches current upstream methology, b) is clean and > proper, but requires you to get the patch submitted upstream, otherwise we'll be > breaking library ABI. Note that mozldap follows the Mozilla library naming conventions that are used by NSPR and NSS which have been in Fedora for a while now (e.g. libnspr4.so, libnss3.so, etc.). So, unless there are plans to also convert those libraries to the proper naming convention, I think it suffices to stick with libldap60.so.6.0.0. It should not be a big deal to put the proper so name in the shared libraries, so that the main package will have libldap60.so.6.0.0 and the devel package will have libldap60.so -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 18:09:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 13:09:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218831] Review Request: python-urljr - A common interface to urllib2 and curl for making HTTP requests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612081809.kB8I9sg1001935@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-urljr - A common interface to urllib2 and curl for making HTTP requests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218831 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-12-08 13:09 EST ------- MUST items: * rpmlint is quiet * package is named well * spec file name is good * package meets Packaging Guidelines * package is licensed with an LGPL open-source compatible license * License field in spec file matches actual license * license file isn't included in %doc * md5sums are matching (0b120d08dc4538ed5c4ee5c77447b865) * BuildRequires listed well * no locales * no need to %post and %postun sections * not relocatable * package owns directories well * no duplicates in %files * %files section includes %defattr * proper %clean section * macros used well In fact, license file isn't included as a COPYING file contains only information about license, not the license itself. However, guidelines say that: "If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its wn file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc." so it's not a blocker. Package is approved :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 18:48:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 13:48:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218176] Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612081848.kB8ImNCp005193@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218176 ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2006-12-08 13:48 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.republika.pl/belegdol/rpmstuff/gchempaint.spec SRPM URL: http://www.republika.pl/belegdol/rpmstuff/gchempaint-0.6.6-5.src.rpm New release: - Added upstream patch #18159, fixing AMD64 startup crash - Disabled -devel package until unresolved non-weak symbols issue is fixed - Added hicolor-icon-theme to Requires I have decided to leave the commented out sections in the spec, as the issue has been fixed in the development branch of gchempaint and the devel package will return once 0.8.0 version is released. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 19:04:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 14:04:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218176] Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612081904.kB8J4GPi006628@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218176 ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2006-12-08 14:04 EST ------- Re-uploaded. un-resolved -> un-defined -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 21:10:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 16:10:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218768] Review Request: poppler-extras - PDF rendering library extras (qt/qt4) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612082110.kB8LA9Tv015154@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poppler-extras - PDF rendering library extras (qt/qt4) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218768 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2006-12-08 16:10 EST ------- Ok, I will review it for you after it's modified. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 21:16:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 16:16:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612082116.kB8LGYTQ015335@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208034 ------- Additional Comments From paul_kunz at slac.stanford.edu 2006-12-08 16:16 EST ------- configure script fixed. used AC_CHECK_LIB instaead of AC_CHECK_FILE. build failure was related and fixed in upstream sources. URLs SRPM ftp://ftp.slac.stanford.edu/users/pfkeb/hippodraw/HippoDraw-1.19.1-1.src.rpm SPEC ftp://ftp.slac.stanford.edu/users/pfkeb/hippodraw/HippoDraw.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 21:33:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 16:33:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218839] Review Request: pyflakes - A Lint-like tool for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612082133.kB8LXAFS016110@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyflakes - A Lint-like tool for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218839 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2006-12-08 16:32 EST ------- Is this a pre-release of 0.2.1 or a snapshot post 0.2.1? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 21:50:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 16:50:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218839] Review Request: pyflakes - A Lint-like tool for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612082150.kB8LoCgA017128@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyflakes - A Lint-like tool for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218839 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-12-08 16:50 EST ------- It's post 0.2.1 - I didn't see the old web page at http://divmod.org/projects/pyflakes before creating these packages so I guess I just assumed that there hadn't been a release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 22:09:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 17:09:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207202] Review Request: bes - Back-end server software framework for OPeNDAP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612082209.kB8M90q1018285@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bes - Back-end server software framework for OPeNDAP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207202 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163776 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2006-12-08 17:08 EST ------- I am providing you a review, but I do not have a contributor account (no sponsor), so I can't assign the bug to myself. rpmlint is quiet on all files mock-build FC6 is successful MUST Items: - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. I did not see the license in the source file or on the website. A review of one of the source files seems to indicate that it is LGPL. This would not be considered "bsd-like". Please work with upstream on getting the LGPL license document included in the source file, and then add it to the %doc section. I think you have a well put together package. If you have the facilities, in the future try to mock-build your packages first as that will tend to weed out the missing BuildRequires. Do continue to pursue upstream regarding any build issues (broken autotools etc.) or dependency bloat. This ends my review. Flipping you back to FE-NEW so that you can have a sponsored reviewer make an official review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 22:14:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 17:14:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218839] Review Request: pyflakes - A Lint-like tool for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612082214.kB8MEoqb018494@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyflakes - A Lint-like tool for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218839 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2006-12-08 17:14 EST ------- Check me on this, but I believe it would then be considered a snapshot release, and your version numbering would need to be different based off the prior release number. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-cfd71146dbb6f00cec9fe3623ea619f843394837 Perhaps you want to revert to the released package. Either way, fix it up, and I'll review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 22:26:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 17:26:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207202] Review Request: bes - Back-end server software framework for OPeNDAP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612082226.kB8MQ73v018851@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bes - Back-end server software framework for OPeNDAP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207202 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-12-08 17:26 EST ------- Indeed, it seems to be LGPL. I really dunno how I managed to miss that! Thanks. I'll also mention that the COPYING file is missing to upstream when I contact them. Corrected in: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/bes-3.2.0-2.src.rpm - set License to LGPL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 22:52:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 17:52:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207202] Review Request: bes - Back-end server software framework for OPeNDAP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612082252.kB8MqAgK019791@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bes - Back-end server software framework for OPeNDAP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207202 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-12-08 17:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Corrected in: > > http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/bes-3.2.0-2.src.rpm Sorry, it is in: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/bes-3.2.0-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 23:07:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 18:07:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218839] Review Request: pyflakes - A Lint-like tool for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612082307.kB8N7AKn020637@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyflakes - A Lint-like tool for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218839 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-12-08 18:07 EST ------- I'll stick with the SVN snapshot since it's what I've tested with. Spec URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/pyflakes-0.2.1-1.10526svn.fc6.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/pyflakes-0.2.1-1.10526svn.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 23:31:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 18:31:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612082331.kB8NVuEM021843@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 ------- Additional Comments From wilmer at fedoraproject.org 2006-12-08 18:31 EST ------- Parag okeys. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 8 23:40:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 18:40:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218839] Review Request: pyflakes - A Lint-like tool for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612082340.kB8NeKSu022379@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyflakes - A Lint-like tool for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218839 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2006-12-08 18:40 EST ------- SVN/CVS versions are generally frowned upon unless they provide significant bug fixes (that would not be easily provided with patch) or significant features or functionality that dependent packages rely on. I would prefer that you first verify against the release version if you are providing such fixes are features before we take the path of introducing a snapshot into FE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 9 00:01:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 19:01:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612090001.kB9017gg022955@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218556 ------- Additional Comments From mhalcrow at us.ibm.com 2006-12-08 19:01 EST ------- Bernard - Thanks for taking the time to look over the package. I have made updates in response to your comments. The new SPEC file is at . The new source RPM is at . In response to your question, eCryptfs is in the 2.6.19 mainline kernel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 9 01:30:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 20:30:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196401] Review Request: mozldap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612090130.kB91ULV3024820@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mozldap Alias: mozldap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196401 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-12-08 20:30 EST ------- Going with the Mozilla library naming conventions is OK, but these don't suggest adding a more or less artificial .6.0.0 suffix (artificial since it's part of the packaging layer and not upstream intention). If you check NSPR and NSS they keep the soname as is, e..g don't add a versioning suffix, and thus the respective devel file has no library parts at all, not even symlinks. So it's a) in comment #14. I played a bit with the specfile and implemented a), I'll post the patch in the next comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 9 01:38:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 20:38:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196401] Review Request: mozldap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612090138.kB91c1eC025000@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mozldap Alias: mozldap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196401 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-12-08 20:38 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=143200) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=143200&action=view) specfile patch This patch makes rpmlint happy and the package more inline with both Fedora and Mozilla standards. There is still room for improvement, e.g. eliminating the major/minor/subminor macros, but I wouldn't block on that. Please test this together with Toshio's new svrcore package (e.g. through the SDK acceptance test). * Fri Dec 8 2006 Axel Thimm - 6.0.0-2 - Rename to mozldap. - move configure step to %%build section. - clean up excessive use of %%defines, make more Fedora like. - fix mismatching soname issue. - generic specfile cosmetics. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 9 01:54:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 20:54:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218360] Review Request: evolution-plugin-remove-duplicates - Evolution plugin for removing duplicate mails In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612090154.kB91slQR025323@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-plugin-remove-duplicates - Evolution plugin for removing duplicate mails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218360 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-08 20:54 EST ------- Nice. Mock build is successfully building package. working fine. Will post review later on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 9 04:06:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 23:06:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612090406.kB946fF5029390@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218556 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2006-12-08 23:06 EST ------- rpmlint is much happier now. Here is the output on the srpm and rpm: W: ecryptfs-utils summary-not-capitalized eCryptfs mount helper and support libraries W: ecryptfs-utils devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libecryptfs.so Package mock-builds for FC6. As far as the first one, just to keep lint quit, maybe you'd change the summary from "eCryptfs mount helper ..." to "The eCryptfs mount helper...". As far as the second regarding libcryptfs.so, it should be removed from the package if it is a development file and you don't intend to provide a -devel package. I see there are still .so files in /usr/lib/ecryptfs although you never stated their purpose. Are they dl'opened modules or develop libraries? It's recommended that the Source directives are direct download links. It's also recommended that your first source sould be Source0: Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/ecryptfs/ecryptfs-utils-6.tar.bz2 Since its support in the kernel starts at a specific version number, the package should require this number or greater. This is a little more complicated that it sounds, because although a kernel may have a number like 2.6.18, the kernel developers might have (probably did) pulled in additional snapshot patches. You should check with the upstream RPM developers of the kernel or verify for yourself what kernel number (exactly which RPM release) ecryptfs support starts in. MUST Items: - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. The exception to this are directories listed explicitly in the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard ([WWW] http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html), as it is safe to assume that those directories exist. Take ownership of %{_libdir}/ecryptfs via a %dir statement or by recommendation below. - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. See previous comments regarding .so files. A couple of recommendations: This is redundant, as make install will do it for you: mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/sbin mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/ecryptfs mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_bindir} mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_mandir}/man7 These lines: %{_libdir}/ecryptfs/libecryptfs_pki_passphrase.so %{_libdir}/ecryptfs/libecryptfs_pki_openssl.so can be replaced with: %{_libdir}/ecryptfs which will include the files and directory and solve the directory ownership problem above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 9 05:45:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 00:45:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208420] Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612090545.kB95jhNH003650@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208420 ------- Additional Comments From pkovacs at users.sourceforge.net 2006-12-09 00:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #27) > It is clearly not GPL compatible due to the restrictions on commercial > use. Maybe the author could accept to relicense it under a GPL > compatible license? You could also consider adding the isbn to > the license notice. Seems to be 1565924533. OK. I removed the hash modules from the project completely and reprogrammed using GLib's GHashTable. Conky 1.4.5 will reflect this change. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 9 06:14:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 01:14:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218230] Review Request: php-pear-Image-Canvas - Common interface to image drawing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612090614.kB96Efr5004021@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Image-Canvas - Common interface to image drawing Alias: pear-Image-Canvas https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218230 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |Fedora at FamilleCollet.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 9 06:55:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 01:55:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218230] Review Request: php-pear-Image-Canvas - Common interface to image drawing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612090655.kB96tS2O004631@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Image-Canvas - Common interface to image drawing Alias: pear-Image-Canvas https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218230 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-12-09 01:55 EST ------- Tests works. Example doesn't because it's use MS Windows Fonts. REVIEW * source files match upstream: 41dd36fb05436159fb6fccca02cb7aaa /tmp/Image_Canvas-0.3.0.tgz 41dd36fb05436159fb6fccca02cb7aaa ../SOURCES/Image_Canvas-0.3.0.tgz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible (LGPL). * latest version is being packaged (0.3.0) * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides are sane: php-pear(Image_Canvas) = 0.3.0 php-pear-Image-Canvas = 0.3.0-2.fc7 * final Requires are sane: php-pear(Image_Color) -> php-gd * %check is not present; * owns the directories it creates => own directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (pear install) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. MUST : - not own /usr/share/pear/Image which is owned by php-pear-Image-Color (required , remplace with %file /usr/share/pear/Image/Canvas* SHOULD : - also remove /usr/share/pear/test/Image_Canvas/tests/pdf.php - add a information (in description or a README.fedora) about "PDF not available" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 9 06:59:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 01:59:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218230] Review Request: php-pear-Image-Canvas - Common interface to image drawing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612090659.kB96xAKp004666@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Image-Canvas - Common interface to image drawing Alias: pear-Image-Canvas https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218230 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-12-09 01:59 EST ------- > I think it would be better to add a php-pecl-pdflib package to Extras. > I think the license should be okay. php-pecl-pdflib is PHP License It's the "PDFlib Lite License" which is a special License -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 9 08:35:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 03:35:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218217] Review Request: telepathy-stream-engine - Telepathy client to handle media streaming In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612090835.kB98Z22f005991@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-stream-engine - Telepathy client to handle media streaming https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218217 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-09 03:35 EST ------- I cannot read your spec/srpm. Is piedmont.homelinux.org alive? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 9 10:27:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 05:27:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217256] Review Request: alsa-tools - Specialist tools for ALSA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612091027.kB9ARZ4w010881@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-tools - Specialist tools for ALSA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217256 rpm at timj.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2006-12-09 05:27 EST ------- OK, since nobody seems interested in ppc, I've ExcludeArch'd it for now. The corresponding bug is over in bug #219010. alsa-tools is now built successfully in devel for x86 and i386 (job #23253). FC-6 is running now. Thanks for the input everyone. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 9 10:33:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 05:33:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217259] Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612091033.kB9AXpj7011447@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217259 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2006-12-09 05:33 EST ------- Thanks Nicolas. Your spec seems substantially the same at a glance; are there any specific bits you think need importing into mine? Also would you consider reviewing this package so we can have it in FE? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 9 10:53:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 05:53:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217259] Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612091053.kB9ArZQr012800@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217259 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2006-12-09 05:53 EST ------- I fear I won't have this kind of free time before next year at least, that's why I dumped my spec on you -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 9 11:24:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 06:24:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219013] New: Review Request: pdflib-lite - Portable C library for dynamically generating PDF files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219013 Summary: Review Request: pdflib-lite - Portable C library for dynamically generating PDF files Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: Fedora at FamilleCollet.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/pdflib-lite.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/pdflib-lite-7.0.0p3-1.fc7.src.rpm Mock log: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/pdflib-lite-build.log Description: PDFlib is a C library for generating PDF files. It offers a graphics API with support for drawing, text, fonts, images, and hypertext. Call PDFlib routines from within your client program and voila: dynamic PDF files! For detailed instructions on PDFlib programming and the associated API, see the PDFlib Programming Manual, included in PDF format in the PDFlib distribution. -- Fisrt purpose is to build "php-pecl-pdflib" to allow on the fly PDF creation from PHP scripts/pages. I don't know if the "PDFlib Lite License" is acceptable for Extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 9 12:47:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 07:47:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219020] New: Review Request: php-pecl-pdflib - Package for generating PDF files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219020 Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-pdflib - Package for generating PDF files Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: Fedora at FamilleCollet.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pecl-pdflib.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pecl-pdflib-2.1.2-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: This PHP extension wraps the PDFlib programming library for processing PDF on the fly. More info on how to use PDFlib with PHP can be found at http://www.pdflib.com/developer-center/technical-documentation/php-howto -- Samples in /usr/share/doc/pdflib-lite-devel-7.0.0p3/examples/php only hello, image and pdfclock works with "lite" version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 9 12:48:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 07:48:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219020] Review Request: php-pecl-pdflib - Package for generating PDF files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612091248.kB9CmXLp015245@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-pdflib - Package for generating PDF files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219020 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |219013 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 9 12:48:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 07:48:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219013] Review Request: pdflib-lite - Portable C library for dynamically generating PDF files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612091248.kB9CmXbZ015249@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pdflib-lite - Portable C library for dynamically generating PDF files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219013 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |219020 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 9 14:24:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 09:24:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] New: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bjohnson at symetrix.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/Fedora-Extras/ntop.spec SRPM URL: http://www.symetrix.com/~bj/projects/Fedora-Extras/ntop-3.2-1.20061208cvs.fc6.src.rpm Description: ntop is a network traffic probe that shows the network usage, similar to what the popular top Unix command does. ntop is based on libpcap and it has been written in a portable way in order to virtually run on every Unix platform and on Win32 as well. ntop users can use a a web browser (e.g. netscape) to navigate through ntop (that acts as a web server) traffic information and get a dump of the network status. In the latter case, ntop can be seen as a simple RMON-like agent with an embedded web interface. The use of: * a web interface * limited configuration and administration via the web interface * reduced CPU and memory usage (they vary according to network size and traffic) make ntop easy to use and suitable for monitoring various kind of networks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 9 14:28:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 09:28:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 197198] Review Request: ntop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612091428.kB9ESKUn018964@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197198 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bjohnson at symetrix.com ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2006-12-09 09:28 EST ------- I started a new package review with bug #219025. The FE instruction say to mark a FE-DEADREVIEW bug as a duplicate of the new bug when you take it over, but I don't have the permissions. Unfortunately, I had to create mine from scratch as the prior srpm and spec file had been taken offline. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 9 14:32:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 09:32:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612091432.kB9EWklJ019206@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2006-12-09 09:32 EST ------- If someone could mark bug #197198 a duplicate of this bug, that would be great. The package currently has many problems. I need some advice on how to correct them. The most annoying is: E: ntop shared-lib-without-dependency-information /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/ntop/plugins/icmpPlugin.so.debug What is triggering debug files to be packaged in the arch rpm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 9 16:01:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 11:01:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218367] Review Request: compat-guile - Guile compatibility package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612091601.kB9G1X6u021834@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-guile - Guile compatibility package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218367 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-12-09 11:01 EST ------- I have fixed most of the above. * The symlink to slib does not dangle anymore oncen the package is installed, since the slib package is required. * Most warnings about the macros in changelog are spurious, since they are not macros, but section headers. They appear correctly in the changelog of the package. http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/6/i386/SRPMS.gemi/compat-guile-1.6.7-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 9 16:51:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 11:51:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 197198] Review Request: ntop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612091651.kB9Gp0dV022648@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197198 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-12-09 11:50 EST ------- I have uploaded the latest srpm here: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/ntop-3.2-6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 9 17:06:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 12:06:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218258] Review Request: - In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612091706.kB9H67Kf022911@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218258 ------- Additional Comments From yufanyufan at gmail.com 2006-12-09 12:06 EST ------- This is my first time, and I'm looking for a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 9 17:21:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 12:21:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218839] Review Request: pyflakes - A Lint-like tool for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612091721.kB9HLoHF023235@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyflakes - A Lint-like tool for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218839 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-12-09 12:21 EST ------- Spec URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/pyflakes-0.2.1-2.fc6.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/pyflakes-0.2.1-2.fc6.src.rpm Switching to released tarball -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 9 17:36:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 12:36:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 197198] Review Request: ntop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612091736.kB9HaxU2023712@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197198 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-09 12:36 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 219025 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 9 17:37:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 12:37:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612091737.kB9HbLGG023737@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michael at knox.net.nz ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-09 12:37 EST ------- *** Bug 197198 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 9 17:39:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 12:39:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219013] Review Request: pdflib-lite - Portable C library for dynamically generating PDF files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612091739.kB9HdtkZ023835@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pdflib-lite - Portable C library for dynamically generating PDF files Alias: pdflib-lite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219013 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chris.stone at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | Alias| |pdflib-lite -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 9 17:43:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 12:43:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219013] Review Request: pdflib-lite - Portable C library for dynamically generating PDF files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612091743.kB9HhCoo024000@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pdflib-lite - Portable C library for dynamically generating PDF files Alias: pdflib-lite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219013 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-12-09 12:43 EST ------- Asked about the license on IRC: 09:10:14 XulChris | http://www.pdflib.com/products/pdflib-family/pdflib-lite/pdflib-lite-licensing/ <-- is this license okay for FE? 09:22:51 spot | XulChris: iirc, no 09:23:18 spot | commercial use restriction == BAD 09:36:24 tibbs | Hmm. pdflib-lite doesn't seem to have a commercial use restriction when used in open source applications. 09:36:47 XulChris | ya 09:37:08 XulChris | seems like its more GPL than BSD 09:37:13 tibbs | Doesn't seem any less free than the GPL, certainly. 09:38:24 XulChris | okay, well im going to assume its okay, see bug #219013 if anyone here sees something wrong with the license So it looks like it might be okay, will let this bug sit for a few days to see if there are any objections that come up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 9 17:44:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 12:44:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219020] Review Request: php-pecl-pdflib - Package for generating PDF files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612091744.kB9HiHIL024051@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-pdflib - Package for generating PDF files Alias: php-pecl-pdflib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219020 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chris.stone at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | Alias| |php-pecl-pdflib -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 9 17:46:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 12:46:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218230] Review Request: php-pear-Image-Canvas - Common interface to image drawing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612091746.kB9HktfB024175@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Image-Canvas - Common interface to image drawing Alias: pear-Image-Canvas https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218230 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-12-09 12:46 EST ------- Ah okay, I didn't realize pdflib-lite was needed for pecl-pdflib. I've discussed the license for pdflib-lite briefly on IRC and initial discussion seemed to indicate it was okay. I'm going to wait a few days to see if there are any objections, and if we can get it in Extras then I'll modify this package to use php-pecl-pdflib and readd the PDF files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 9 18:44:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 13:44:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219036] New: Review Request: perl-Roman - Roman module from CPAN Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219036 Summary: Review Request: perl-Roman - Roman module from CPAN Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mrsam at courier-mta.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.courier-mta.com/perl-Roman.spec SRPM URL: http://www.courier-mta.com/perl-Roman-1.1-0.fc.1.src.rpm Description: This is the Roman perl module, from CPAN. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 9 20:18:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 15:18:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218839] Review Request: pyflakes - A Lint-like tool for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612092018.kB9KI617027415@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyflakes - A Lint-like tool for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218839 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2006-12-09 15:18 EST ------- The package builds cleanly with a mock-build on FC6. There is one minor rpmlint complaint that should be fixed: rpmlint -i pyflakes-0.2.1-2.fc6.src.rpm W: pyflakes mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 12) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. No tabs please. MUST Items: - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. This is the MIT license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 9 20:20:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 15:20:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218907] Review Request: search4files - A handy file search tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612092020.kB9KKU0j027484@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: search4files - A handy file search tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218907 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at christoph-wickert.de OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 9 21:39:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 16:39:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218839] Review Request: pyflakes - A Lint-like tool for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612092139.kB9LdQNG028996@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyflakes - A Lint-like tool for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218839 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-12-09 16:39 EST ------- Spec URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/pyflakes-0.2.1-3.fc6.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/pyflakes-0.2.1-3.fc6.src.rpm License fixed... Thanks, all the different licenses confuse me! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 9 21:44:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 16:44:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218839] Review Request: pyflakes - A Lint-like tool for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612092144.kB9Lirxd029070@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyflakes - A Lint-like tool for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218839 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2006-12-09 16:44 EST ------- I see you fixed the lint output as well. This ends my review of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 9 22:31:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 17:31:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218844] Review Request: python-yadis - Relying party support for the Yadis service discovery protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612092231.kB9MVaRm029924@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-yadis - Relying party support for the Yadis service discovery protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218844 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bjohnson at symetrix.com ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2006-12-09 17:31 EST ------- This is an unofficial review as I'm not sponsored. rpmlint is silent on srpm. Package mock-builds for FC6 A license file is not included with the distribution - please query upstream for inclusion. All "Must" requirements met. Nice packaging. This ends my review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 9 22:37:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 17:37:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218907] Review Request: search4files - A handy file search tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612092237.kB9MbOtd030096@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: search4files - A handy file search tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218907 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-12-09 17:37 EST ------- REVIEW for f7bdb6dfd5f9fb3350954bb20c11381b search4files-0.1c-1.src.rpm OK - rpmlint gives a 'configure-without-libdir-spec' error on the srpm: ./configure doesn't take --configure. no libs, so this doesn't matter. OK - package named according to the package naming guidelines OK - specfile name matches package name OK - package meets packaging guidelines OK - license is open-source compatible (GPL) OK - license field in spec matches actual license OK - license included in source and correctly installed in %doc OK - spec is in American English OK - spec is legible and very well documented OK - source in srpm matches upstream by md5 d568697071bf93fad090a77e9d78f4d1 OK - package compiles and build into noarch rpm on core 6 i386 OK - BuildRequires are sane OK - no locales to worry about OK - no shared libs to worry about OK - package is not relocatable OK - package owns all directories it creates OK - no duplicates in %files OK - file permissions and %defattr are correct OK - valid clean section present OK - macro usage consistent OK - code, not content OK - no header files, static libs or *.pc files OK - no libtool archives OK - fedora-search4files.desktop is correctly installed with desktop-file-install OK - package doesn't own directories already owned by other files OK - package builds in mock (devel) OK - package works fine APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 9 22:46:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 17:46:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218852] Review Request: python-openid - Python OpenID libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612092246.kB9MkCAh030414@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-openid - Python OpenID libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218852 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bjohnson at symetrix.com ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2006-12-09 17:46 EST ------- This is an unofficial review as I'm not sponsored. rpmlint is silent on the srpm and the rpm. A mock-build for FC6 is successful. This package meets all "Must" requirements. Nice packaging. This ends my review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 9 22:47:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 17:47:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 202946] Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612092247.kB9MlHqi030437@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202946 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |201449 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-12-09 17:47 EST ------- Marking as bug #201449 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 9 22:49:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 17:49:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 197198] Review Request: ntop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612092249.kB9Mne2e030505@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197198 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2006-12-09 17:49 EST ------- Thanks Patrice, I'll look through it and integrate any prior work into my package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 9 23:50:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 18:50:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612092350.kB9Novm1031449@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 ------- Additional Comments From wilmer at fedoraproject.org 2006-12-09 18:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) Sorry, I just disabled mail delivery CC for you by a time for know how the bugzilla system worked, also i'm learning fine with others review process and i'm not worried aobut the approved thing, i'm just learning to get it how to work, any recommend is welcome. Sorry for my english again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 00:11:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 19:11:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218907] Review Request: search4files - A handy file search tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612100011.kBA0BARn031741@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: search4files - A handy file search tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218907 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-09 19:10 EST ------- Well, * Rebuild for FE-devel succeeded. * SyncNeeded is requested for FE5/6. I close this bug as CLOSED NEXTRELEASE. Thank you for reviewing and approving this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 00:40:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 19:40:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612100040.kBA0e5kc032085@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 ------- Additional Comments From wilmer at fedoraproject.org 2006-12-09 19:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) Sorry, I just disabled mail delivery CC for you by a time for know how the bugzilla system worked, also i'm learning fine with others review process and i'm not worried aobut the approved thing, i'm just learning to get it how to work, any recommend is welcome. Sorry for my english again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 01:11:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 20:11:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612100111.kBA1BVkS032537@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218556 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163776 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2006-12-09 20:11 EST ------- Sorry, I should have left the FE-NEW blocker since I wasn't sponsored. Fixing that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 01:11:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 20:11:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209511] Review Request: gnbd - global network block device In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612100111.kBA1BujQ032581@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnbd - global network block device https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209511 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163776 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2006-12-09 20:11 EST ------- Sorry, I should have left the FE-NEW blocker since I wasn't sponsored. Fixing that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 01:35:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 20:35:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217311] Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612100135.kBA1ZlKN000514@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217311 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-12-09 20:35 EST ------- Sorry for slowing this down... (In reply to comment #8) > > x-ar isn't in the mimetype database. x-archive is, but since xarchive > fails to open ar archives, I am not sure that it is right. Of x-ar was wrong. My fault, if I did not add this mimetype most likely nobody would have tried to open an .a file ;) Also I should have tested it before. (In reply to comment #13) > > * I don't want to accept the package with the mimetypes > for lha and rar without further discussion As I have not tested lha I have also removed x-lha and x-lhz now. I still would like rar in. If required programm (from the other repo) is not installed, xarchiver will show a message that tells you to install it. This should IMHO be allowed. > * the segfault with the .a is not a blocker to me for > devel, but it is for other branches (it may open a > security risk). Can you please clairfy the symlink-attack problem from comment #4 a little? My hacking skills are too low to explain Guiseppe what you mean. Seems like he already noticed there's something not sane, see http://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2616 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 02:38:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 21:38:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612100238.kBA2ct4q001639@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-09 21:38 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=143230) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=143230&action=view) Mock build log of ntop 3.2-1.20061208cvs.fc6. I cannot rebuild this by mockbuild on FC-devel rawhide. Note: [tasaka1 at localhost SRPMS]$ rpm -q automake autoconf automake-1.10-2 autoconf-2.61-2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 03:59:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 22:59:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219050] New: Review Request: gaim-libnotify - Libnotify Gaim plugin Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219050 Summary: Review Request: gaim-libnotify - Libnotify Gaim plugin Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: peter at thecodergeek.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/gaim-libnotify.spec SRPM URL: http://thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/gaim-libnotify-0.12-1.src.rpm Description: gaim-libnotify is a plugin for the open-source Gaim instant messaging client that uses libnotify to display graphic notifications of new messages and other events such as a buddy signing on or off. This was previously submitted in bug #211834, but the reporter (Jon Nettleton) decided that "this entire process is a bit much for [him]." However, I find it to be a very nice replacement for Guifications, and so would like to see it in Extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 04:55:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 23:55:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219050] Review Request: gaim-libnotify - Libnotify Gaim plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612100455.kBA4tbJl008135@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-libnotify - Libnotify Gaim plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219050 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 04:57:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 23:57:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211834] Review Request: gaim-libnotify - libnotify notification plugin for gaim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612100457.kBA4v4dd008285@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-libnotify - libnotify notification plugin for gaim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211834 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|DEFERRED |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-09 23:57 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 219050 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 04:57:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 23:57:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219050] Review Request: gaim-libnotify - Libnotify Gaim plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612100457.kBA4vcs5008348@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-libnotify - Libnotify Gaim plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219050 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jon.nettleton at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-09 23:57 EST ------- *** Bug 211834 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 05:01:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 00:01:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219056] New: Review Request: iscsitarget - iSCSI Enterprise Target Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219056 Summary: Review Request: iscsitarget - iSCSI Enterprise Target Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: david.nalley at fedoraproject.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://nalley.sc/david/fedora/iscsitarget.spec SRPM URL: http://nalley.sc/david/fedora/iscsitarget-0.4.14-7.src.rpm Description: IET is software (specifically a kernel module, daemon, and management app) for building a iSCSI storage system on Linux) This is my first package, and I need a sponsor. I am sure there are a plethora of mistakes, please feel free to point out my problems. rpmlint on the application RPM complains about documentation permissions, (0644) but that makes sense to me for documentation. rpmlint also complains about lack of capitalization in the first letter of the package name, but what is present is correct for the package, though many places have to capitalize, so if I need to change that, please let me know. rpmlint on the kernel module complains that depmod is being run against something other than the running kernel, which appears to be incorrect (both from reading the spec file and seeing what was built and whats running. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 05:29:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 00:29:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219056] Review Request: iscsitarget - iSCSI Enterprise Target In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612100529.kBA5TroQ009520@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iscsitarget - iSCSI Enterprise Target https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219056 david.nalley at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: iscsitarget |Review Request: iscsitarget |- iSCSI Enterprise Target |- iSCSI Enterprise Target ------- Additional Comments From david.nalley at fedoraproject.org 2006-12-10 00:29 EST ------- I missed adding the URL to source, just changed that new spec and srpm are: Spec URL: http://nalley.sc/david/fedora/iscsitarget.spec SRPM URL: http://nalley.sc/david/fedora/iscsitarget-0.4.14-8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 06:10:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 01:10:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217557] Review Request: keurocalc - KEuroCalc is a universal currency converter and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612100610.kBA6AlRF010593@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: keurocalc - KEuroCalc is a universal currency converter and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217557 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-10 01:10 EST ------- Any reason behind not closing this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 06:14:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 01:14:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217066] Review Request: python-gpod - A python module to access iPod content In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612100614.kBA6EXPL010714@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-gpod - A python module to access iPod content Alias: python-gpod-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217066 michel.salim at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |219059 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 07:36:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 02:36:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219050] Review Request: gaim-libnotify - Libnotify Gaim plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612100736.kBA7aa1O012795@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-libnotify - Libnotify Gaim plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219050 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-10 02:36 EST ------- Well, For http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * Use rpmlint - rpmlint complains: --------------------------------------------------------- [root at localhost mock]# rpmlint gaim-libnotify E: gaim-libnotify description-line-too-long gaim-libnotify is a plugin for the open-source Gaim instant messaging client that [root at localhost mock]# rpmlint gaim-libnotify E: gaim-libnotify description-line-too-long gaim-libnotify is a plugin for the open-source Gaim instant messaging client that [root at localhost mock]# rpmlint -I description-line-too-long description-line-too-long : Your description lines must not exceed 79 characters. If a line is exceeding this number, cut it to fit in two lines. --------------------------------------------------------- * File and Directory Ownership - /usr/lib/gaim This directory is not owned by any package required by this rpm. This package should need gaim as Requires. * BuildRequires - Why does this package need gettext perl-XML-Parser as BuildRequires? Mockbuild for FC-devel i386 is fine without these two packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 07:41:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 02:41:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218360] Review Request: evolution-plugin-remove-duplicates - Evolution plugin for removing duplicate mails In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612100741.kBA7faxB012964@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-plugin-remove-duplicates - Evolution plugin for removing duplicate mails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218360 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-10 02:41 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPMS. + source files match upstream. 5ed885b9dd6bc69df2978be8cc6dc089 remove-duplicates-plugin-0.0.2.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists + no .la files. + no translations are available + Dose owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 07:47:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 02:47:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612100747.kBA7lL9W013147@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-10 02:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > (In reply to comment #15) > Sorry, I just disabled mail delivery CC for you by a time for know how the > bugzilla system worked, aah OK. > also i'm learning fine with others review process and Nice to hear from you. > i'm not worried aobut the approved thing, i'm just learning to get it how to > work, any recommend is welcome. Sorry for my english again. OK. So start posting reviews on others packages. See also some progressed BUGS with FE-REVIEW status for how review progresses and how to post them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 07:52:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 02:52:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612100752.kBA7q0nk013267@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-10 02:51 EST ------- You must increase release tag number each time you modifies SPEC file. I saw you said you did some changes to SPEC in comment #12 but you kept package name as mybashburn-1.0-1.src.rpm which SHOULD be mybashburn-1.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 08:07:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 03:07:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612100807.kBA87NNI013676@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 ------- Additional Comments From wilmer at fedoraproject.org 2006-12-10 03:07 EST ------- if I understand it, that is something that Jorge(jtorres) me said it out, during today Sunday i increase tag number release. thx -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 08:15:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 03:15:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219050] Review Request: gaim-libnotify - Libnotify Gaim plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612100815.kBA8FLgF013935@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-libnotify - Libnotify Gaim plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219050 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2006-12-10 03:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > [root at localhost mock]# rpmlint gaim-libnotify > E: gaim-libnotify description-line-too-long gaim-libnotify is a plugin for the > open-source Gaim instant messaging client that > [root at localhost mock]# rpmlint gaim-libnotify > E: gaim-libnotify description-line-too-long gaim-libnotify is a plugin for the > open-source Gaim instant messaging client that > [root at localhost mock]# rpmlint -I description-line-too-long > description-line-too-long : > Your description lines must not exceed 79 characters. If a line is exceeding > this number, cut it to fit in two lines. Gaah I didn't see that expansion of the %name macro would push it past this limit. I've fixed this in release 2 (0.12-2). * File and Directory Ownership > - /usr/lib/gaim > This directory is not owned by any package required by this > rpm. This package should need gaim as Requires. Thanks for catching that. Fixed in 0.12-2 > * BuildRequires > - Why does this package need > gettext perl-XML-Parser > as BuildRequires? Mockbuild for FC-devel i386 is fine without > these two packages. I put those in as the first ones in the spec mostly of habit when I saw that gettext was being used for the translation foo, but then forgot to test whether or not they were actually needed. >_> Thanks for checking this; and they're gone in 0.12-2. Spec: http://thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/gaim-libnotify.spec Source RPM: http://thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/gaim-libnotify-0.12-2.src.rpm Thanks for your time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 08:33:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 03:33:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612100833.kBA8XQxq014811@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2006-12-10 03:33 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/Fedora-Extras/ntop.spec SRPM URL: http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/Fedora-Extras/ntop-3.2-2.fc7.src.rpm Mamoru, try these. They mock-build on FC6/rawhide for me. I'm no autotools expert, and I think I botched something the first time around. I reverted the cvs version back to 3.2 on this build. Also, I integrated a great deal of the differences from the previous submission. Still some work to do, but I thought I'd throw this out for you to take a look at. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 10:29:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 05:29:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219013] Review Request: pdflib-lite - Portable C library for dynamically generating PDF files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612101029.kBAATWvt005577@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pdflib-lite - Portable C library for dynamically generating PDF files Alias: pdflib-lite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219013 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-12-10 05:29 EST ------- > So it looks like it might be okay, will let this bug sit for a few days to see > if there are any objections that come up. Good. It's probably better to have the other language bindings. So i add support for perl and python (the most used i think) I have really no experience with ruby, tcl and java, so i don't work on this. Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/pdflib-lite.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/pdflib-lite-7.0.0p3-2.fc7.src.rpm Mock log: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/pdflib-lite-build.log Note that only hello, image and pdfclock examples are working with "lite" version of pdflib. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 10:44:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 05:44:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219013] Review Request: pdflib-lite - Portable C library for dynamically generating PDF files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612101044.kBAAi9Kq006261@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pdflib-lite - Portable C library for dynamically generating PDF files Alias: pdflib-lite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219013 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-12-10 05:44 EST ------- I am not convinced that the license is really OSI compatible, although I am not sure that it isn't OSI compatible. * about the 'GPL like' part, there is a restriction that the code must be on the web. So it may not be compatible with the GPL, and I don't now if this doesn't put too much obligation on somebody redistributing the code. * There is also this which doesn't seems to me to be right: PDF files generated with the program must include the same Producer entry in the document info field as those generated with the original (unmodified) program. Changing the Producer entry renders this license invalid. * also there is the "don't remove files clause". It may not be problematic if they don't need to be compiled in, still it is a strange condition. 3.2 Source Code Redistribution Redistributions of source code must include all files which are part of the original distribution. Omitting one or more files would result in a distribution which is not compliant with this license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 11:06:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 06:06:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217557] Review Request: keurocalc - KEuroCalc is a universal currency converter and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612101106.kBAB6NWC007124@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: keurocalc - KEuroCalc is a universal currency converter and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217557 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-12-10 06:06 EST ------- Yes, I don't have an internet connection with certain ports opened. :( I'll close thiss bug soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 12:05:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 07:05:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612101205.kBAC5cSX008923@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-10 07:05 EST ------- Well, I have not looked into this package. For now I comment only for this issue: (In reply to comment #1) > The most annoying is: > E: ntop shared-lib-without-dependency-information > /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/ntop/plugins/icmpPlugin.so.debug > > What is triggering debug files to be packaged in the arch rpm? This is because of %files entry of spec file: -------------------------------------------- %{_libdir}/* -------------------------------------------- This tries to package all files under /usr/lib (in i386) in main package, which includes /usr/lib/debug. Please specify more explicitly the file lists under %{_libdir}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 12:21:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 07:21:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219071] New: Review Request: pyfribidi - A Python binding for GNU FriBidi Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219071 Summary: Review Request: pyfribidi - A Python binding for GNU FriBidi Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: roozbeh at farsiweb.info QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://guava.farsiweb.info/~roozbeh/pyfribidi.spec SRPM URL: http://guava.farsiweb.info/~roozbeh/pyfribidi-0.6.0-1.src.rpm Description: PyFriBidi is a simple Python binding for FriBidi, providing an implementation of The Unicode Bidirectional Algorithm in Python. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 12:28:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 07:28:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612101228.kBACSGAc009594@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-10 07:28 EST ------- Well, a quick glance at this package: * some files should not be in main package, like: -------------------------------------------------- W: ntop devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libntop.so -------------------------------------------------- * permissions of some files in -debug package is wrong. ---------------------------------------------------- E: ntop-debuginfo script-without-shebang /usr/src/debug/ntop-3.2/fcUtils.c E: ntop-debuginfo script-without-shebang /usr/src/debug/ntop-3.2/plugins/xmldumpPlugin.c E: ntop-debuginfo script-without-shebang /usr/src/debug/ntop-3.2/globals-structtypes.h ------------------------------------------------------ * By the way, what is fedora-groupadd? Is there any reason that this cannot be replaced with groupadd? * Usually calling userdel or groupdel is not recommended. Usually it is left as it is and deleting user or group should be manually done by administrator. * For Requires: Please don't write the explicit dependency which is required automatically by dependencies of libraries. For example, libgd.so.2 dependency pulls gd, so adding "gd" explicitly to Requires is not needed. * For BuildRequires: Please don't write redundant dependencies. For example, zlib-devel is required by openssl-devel, so adding "zlib-devel" to BuildRequires is not necessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 12:41:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 07:41:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219050] Review Request: gaim-libnotify - Libnotify Gaim plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612101241.kBACfBKU009898@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-libnotify - Libnotify Gaim plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219050 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-10 07:40 EST ------- Well, please consider to add "TODO" to %doc entry. Other things are all okay. ---------------------------------------------- This package (gaim-libnotify) is APPROVED by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 14:06:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 09:06:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612101406.kBAE6Eav012481@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-10 09:06 EST ------- Well, another: * Timestamps: For cp or install, please use "cp -p" or "install -p" to keep timestamps http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines * Source0 Please specify URL. * # strip off version number from plugin .so files Why is this needed? * applying patch I prefer adding some suffix to original files. i.e. for example: ------------------------------------ %patch0 -p1 -b .plugins %patch1 -p1 -b .conf ------------------------------------- * %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/logrotate.d/ntop I think Requires: %{_sysconfdir}/logrotate.d or Requires: logrotate should be added. * Requires: fedora-usermgmt This is for scriplets? If so, please write: Requires(pre): /usr/sbin/fedora-groupadd and so on and not write "Requires: fedora-usermgmt", however, please consider to use normal %{_sbindir}/groupadd and so on. ref: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 14:07:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 09:07:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612101407.kBAE7plx012578@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 14:36:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 09:36:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174377] Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612101436.kBAEa29R013739@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174377 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-10 09:35 EST ------- Well, * If rebuilding this package has already succeeded (for at least one arch), please close this bug as CLOSED NEXTRELEASE. * If rebuilding this package fails for a arch (for example, on x86_64) * disable x86_64 arch * open a new bugzilla entry which tells that this package does not build on x86_64 and make it block Bug 179259 * then close this bug as CLOSED NEXTRELEASE . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 15:14:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 10:14:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219056] Review Request: iscsitarget - iSCSI Enterprise Target In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612101514.kBAFEedS014359@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iscsitarget - iSCSI Enterprise Target https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219056 david.nalley at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 15:34:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 10:34:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219036] Review Request: perl-Roman - Roman module from CPAN In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612101534.kBAFYQaG014891@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Roman - Roman module from CPAN https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219036 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 15:34:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 10:34:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219036] Review Request: perl-Roman - Roman module from CPAN In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612101534.kBAFYwiG014905@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Roman - Roman module from CPAN https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219036 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jpo at di.uminho.pt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 15:55:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 10:55:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219036] Review Request: perl-Roman - Roman module from CPAN In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612101555.kBAFtXSX015402@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Roman - Roman module from CPAN https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219036 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-12-10 10:55 EST ------- NEEDSWORK MD5SUMS: 3bcd42265a01a9261b18146273872a0d perl-Roman-1.1-0.fc.1.src.rpm 0ded0e59e44267c803c4c8609ee52523 perl-Roman.spec 67b0e6affdc50fdf28cfc438c045fd9b Roman-1.1.tar.gz Sources: * Roman-1.1.tar.gz: MD5 digest matches the CPAN tarball NeedsWork: * wrong release (and dist tag) * the license information is incomplete: perl is dual licensed (GPL or Artistic) * changelog entry missing * remove the dot at the end of the summary (rpmlint) Suggestions: * change the URL to "http://search.cpan.org/dist/Roman/" (no author or version info - easier to maintain) * the perl build requirement can be dropped * when copying files try to preserve the timestamps (use install with the -p option) * you can also use install to create the perl directory (%{__install} -d -m 0755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{perl_vendorlib}) * don't mix spaces and tabs in the specfile (check the release line) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 16:01:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 11:01:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219036] Review Request: perl-Roman - Roman module from CPAN In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612101601.kBAG146v015568@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Roman - Roman module from CPAN https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219036 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-12-10 11:01 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=143242) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=143242&action=view) specfile patch Sam, The attached patch corrects all the problems mentioned in the previous comment (also removes a couple of lost spaces and reformats a couple of lines). jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 16:04:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 11:04:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218176] Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612101604.kBAG49mP015622@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218176 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-10 11:04 EST ------- Well, this package seems good to me. I leave this as the judgment of Paul. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 16:14:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 11:14:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218176] Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612101614.kBAGEK7L015857@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218176 ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2006-12-10 11:14 EST ------- Finally ;) Paul, what do you think? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 17:05:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 12:05:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219084] New: Review Request: perl-Geo-Constants - Standard Geo:: constants Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219084 Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-Constants - Standard Geo:: constants Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-Geo-Constants.spec SRPM URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-Geo-Constants-0.05-1.src.rpm Description: Standard Geo:: constants. Note: the Geo::* modules are requirements of Net::GPSD -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 17:07:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 12:07:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219086] New: Review Request: perl-Geo-Functions - Standard Geo:: functions Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219086 Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-Functions - Standard Geo:: functions Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-Geo-Functions.spec SRPM URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-Geo-Functions-0.04-1.src.rpm Description: Standard Geo:: functions. Note: the Geo::* modules are requirements of Net::GPSD -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 17:09:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 12:09:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219087] New: Review Request: perl-Geo-Ellipsoids - Standard Geo:: ellipsoids Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219087 Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-Ellipsoids - Standard Geo:: ellipsoids Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-Geo-Ellipsoids.spec SRPM URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-Geo-Ellipsoids-0.10-1.src.rpm Description: Standard Geo:: ellipsoids. Note: the Geo::* modules are requirements of Net::GPSD -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 17:09:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 12:09:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219086] Review Request: perl-Geo-Functions - Standard Geo:: functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612101709.kBAH9vsU017072@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-Functions - Standard Geo:: functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219086 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |219084 OtherBugsDependingO| |219087 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 17:10:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 12:10:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219084] Review Request: perl-Geo-Constants - Standard Geo:: constants In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612101710.kBAHA8kj017098@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-Constants - Standard Geo:: constants https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219084 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |219086 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 17:10:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 12:10:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219087] Review Request: perl-Geo-Ellipsoids - Standard Geo:: ellipsoids In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612101710.kBAHA87A017090@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-Ellipsoids - Standard Geo:: ellipsoids https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219087 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |219086 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 17:34:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 12:34:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215224] Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612101734.kBAHYA3V017549@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215224 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-10 12:33 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 17:38:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 12:38:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218600] Review Request: resapplet - Resolution Switching Applet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612101738.kBAHc4ja017642@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: resapplet - Resolution Switching Applet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218600 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-10 12:38 EST ------- Try patching Makefiles in icons directory to install icons in path $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/pixmaps/hicolor instead default installation to $(datadir)/icons/gnome/16x16/apps in Makefiles.am Then no need of icons scriptlets remains. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 17:42:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 12:42:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218600] Review Request: resapplet - Resolution Switching Applet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612101742.kBAHgrba017765@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: resapplet - Resolution Switching Applet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218600 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-10 12:42 EST ------- I mean change $(datadir)/icons/gnome/16x16/apps to $(datadir)/pixmaps/hicolor/16x16/apps -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 17:48:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 12:48:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218831] Review Request: python-urljr - A common interface to urllib2 and curl for making HTTP requests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612101748.kBAHmnAb017953@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-urljr - A common interface to urllib2 and curl for making HTTP requests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218831 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-12-10 12:48 EST ------- I see package in CVS, but you haven't even tried to rebuild it, why? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 17:57:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 12:57:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215224] Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612101757.kBAHvkBv018231@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215224 ------- Additional Comments From sdl.web at gmail.com 2006-12-10 12:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #27) > ping? Got too busy these days. I might have to postpone the work until after Christmas. Sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 18:05:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:05:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215224] Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612101805.kBAI55NR018401@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215224 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-10 13:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #28) > Got too busy these days. I might have to postpone the work until after > Christmas. Sorry. Okay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 18:13:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:13:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218831] Review Request: python-urljr - A common interface to urllib2 and curl for making HTTP requests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612101813.kBAIDdgB018583@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-urljr - A common interface to urllib2 and curl for making HTTP requests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218831 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-12-10 13:13 EST ------- python-urljr depends on python-pycurl. python-pycurl in development needs to be updated to a CVS snapshot since curl in development is newer than curl in FC <= 6. I'm waiting for the python-pycurl to be branched for FC-5 and FC-6 to upgrade development to the CVS snapshot (FC-5 and FC-6 will stick with the released version that was reviewed). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 18:33:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:33:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219050] Review Request: gaim-libnotify - Libnotify Gaim plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612101833.kBAIXQhl018858@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-libnotify - Libnotify Gaim plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219050 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2006-12-10 13:33 EST ------- Imported into CVS (with TODO added to %doc); branch requested for FC-6, and the build for devel/FC7 is churning through the build system now. Thanks for your review and comments! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 18:44:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:44:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174377] Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612101844.kBAIi8iu019073@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174377 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-12-10 13:44 EST ------- Becouse build fails on x86_64, I have open Bug #219096. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 18:44:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:44:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219097] New: Review Request: vdr-wapd - WAP daemon for VDR Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219097 Summary: Review Request: vdr-wapd - WAP daemon for VDR Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ville.skytta at iki.fi QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com http://cachalot.mine.nu/6/SRPMS/vdr-wapd.spec http://cachalot.mine.nu/6/SRPMS/vdr-wapd-0.8-15.cmn6.src.rpm The wapd plugin lets VDR listen to WAP requests to allow remote control by WML enabled browsers such as mobile phones. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 18:44:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:44:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174377] Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612101844.kBAIiXCQ019125@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174377 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-12-10 13:44 EST ------- Becouse build fails on x86_64, I have open Bug #219096. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 18:46:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:46:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215258] Review Request: clucene - A C++ port of Lucene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612101846.kBAIkAM1019202@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clucene - A C++ port of Lucene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215258 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-12-10 13:46 EST ------- OK, I don't want to block you, so you package will be APPROVED. But it will be nice if you can implement my suggestion into your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 20:50:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 15:50:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215258] Review Request: clucene - A C++ port of Lucene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612102050.kBAKorTu021827@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clucene - A C++ port of Lucene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215258 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2006-12-10 15:50 EST ------- Not wanting to argue with you, but I'll point out to you from the B/ #174377 you referred me to (and from your words in comment #10), that using the timestamp option is only necessary for file that go unmodified into the package. And for such files in clucene, you'll noticed I'd already used the copy command with timestamp option (cp -pr) in the rpm spec, so that should be sufficient for this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 21:26:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 16:26:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 168690] Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612102126.kBALQ8R1022736@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168690 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2006-12-10 16:25 EST ------- I filed these bugs in some brief testing I did: http://projects.sucs.org/projects/pybackpack/ticket/35 http://projects.sucs.org/projects/pybackpack/ticket/36 http://projects.sucs.org/projects/pybackpack/ticket/37 http://projects.sucs.org/projects/pybackpack/ticket/38 #36 would be considered a blocker because pybackpack is not useful until this one is addressed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 22:12:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 17:12:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216536] Review Request: FuzzyOcr - Checks for specific keywords in image attachments, using gocr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612102212.kBAMC4dJ023632@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FuzzyOcr - Checks for specific keywords in image attachments, using gocr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216536 ------- Additional Comments From greg at runlevel7.ca 2006-12-10 17:12 EST ------- New version 3.5.0-rc1 additionally requires perl-MLDBM-Sync, perl-Log-Agent and perl-Time-Hires. http://fuzzyocr.own-hero.net/wiki/Downloads http://fuzzyocr.own-hero.net/wiki/Installation-3.5.x -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 22:19:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 17:19:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219103] New: Review Request: dvdauthor - Command line DVD authoring tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219103 Summary: Review Request: dvdauthor - Command line DVD authoring tool Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ville.skytta at iki.fi QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com http://cachalot.mine.nu/6/SRPMS/dvdauthor.spec http://cachalot.mine.nu/6/SRPMS/dvdauthor-0.6.11-8.cmn6.src.rpm dvdauthor is a program that will generate a DVD movie from a valid mpeg2 stream that should play when you put it in a DVD player. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 22:21:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 17:21:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219103] Review Request: dvdauthor - Command line DVD authoring tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612102221.kBAMLAg7023804@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvdauthor - Command line DVD authoring tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219103 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-12-10 17:21 EST ------- spot, I think it wouldn't hurt to look at this from the FE-Legal POV as the package touches the DVD and MPEG areas. Could you have a look? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 22:27:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 17:27:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219104] New: Review Request: mussh - Multihost SSH wrapper Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219104 Summary: Review Request: mussh - Multihost SSH wrapper Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kevin at tummy.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora-extras/mussh.spec SRPM URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora-extras/mussh-0.6-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Mussh is a shell script that allows you to execute a command or script over ssh on multiple hosts with one command. When possible mussh will use ssh-agent and RSA/DSA keys to minimize the need to enter your password more than once. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 22:43:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 17:43:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 168690] Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612102243.kBAMh8Od024427@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168690 ------- Additional Comments From andy at andrewprice.me.uk 2006-12-10 17:43 EST ------- I agree that #36 is a big problem. It was introduced when I fixed the infinite loop with symlinks bug and I think it might be due to files being stat-ed too much but I won't know for sure until I investigate further, which will occur after I've sorted out a handful of university deadlines and Christmas-related business. Bernard: Thanks for your testing work. It's very much appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 22:55:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 17:55:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612102255.kBAMtBPc024711@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2006-12-10 17:55 EST ------- > * %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/logrotate.d/ntop > I think Requires: %{_sysconfdir}/logrotate.d or > Requires: logrotate should be added. Please read this thread: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/46042 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 10 23:47:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 18:47:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217311] Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612102347.kBANlwf0025818@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217311 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-12-10 18:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > As I have not tested lha I have also removed x-lha and x-lhz now. I still would > like rar in. If required programm (from the other repo) is not installed, > xarchiver will show a message that tells you to install it. This should IMHO be > allowed. Ok for rar. > Can you please clairfy the symlink-attack problem from comment #4 a little? My > hacking skills are too low to explain Guiseppe what you mean. Seems like he > already noticed there's something not sane, see > http://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2616 If a program creates a file below /tmp with a predictable name, it opens a possibility for this well known attack. In short an attacker have to create the conditions for a race condition by slowing down xarchiver, then creates a symlink in /tmp which overwrites a file. A longer story is: the attacker waits for you to begin opening a .deb, slows xarchiver, create a symlink in /tmp/ with the predictable name pointing to one of your file, and this file content will be overwritten by the newly created file content. A simple fix is to use mkdtemp or mkstemp to create the directory or the file with an unpredictable name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 00:53:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 19:53:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219104] Review Request: mussh - Multihost SSH wrapper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612110053.kBB0rvQo026706@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mussh - Multihost SSH wrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219104 ed at eh3.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ed at eh3.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2006-12-10 19:53 EST ------- Here's a review for this essentially one-file (shell script) package: + source matches upstream + builds in mock on FC6 + license is ok and not included since it's not present in the upstream tarball (OK) + spec is clean and looks correct + rpmlint reports no warnings or errors I've looked through the other required items (and the script itself, a little) and don't see anything amiss so this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 02:05:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 21:05:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219112] New: Review Request: mmsrip - mms stream recorder Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219112 Summary: Review Request: mmsrip - mms stream recorder Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: foolish at guezz.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/mmsrip.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/mmsrip-0.7.0-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: MMSRIP is a program which allows you to save on your hard-disk the content being streamed by an MMS server. Note: Not sure if this somehow is a ForbiddenItem, review will hopefully reveal if it is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 02:47:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 21:47:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219036] Review Request: perl-Roman - Roman module from CPAN In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612110247.kBB2lO81029300@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Roman - Roman module from CPAN https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219036 ------- Additional Comments From mrsam at courier-mta.com 2006-12-10 21:47 EST ------- Thanks for doing my work for me. I'll slap myself later, for forgetting to use rpmlint. Updated spec file: http://www.courier-mta.com/perl-Roman.spec Updated SRPM: http://www.courier-mta.com/perl-Roman-1.1-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 03:16:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 22:16:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219114] New: Review Request: flac123 - Command-line program for playing FLAC audio files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219114 Summary: Review Request: flac123 - Command-line program for playing FLAC audio files Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: foolish at guezz.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/flac123.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/flac123-0.0.9-1.src.rpm Description: flac123 is a command-line program for playing FLAC audio files FLAC stands for Free Lossless Audio Codec. Grossly oversimplified, FLAC is similar to Ogg Vorbis, but lossless -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 03:42:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 22:42:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218360] Review Request: evolution-plugin-remove-duplicates - Evolution plugin for removing duplicate mails In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612110342.kBB3gPuE030666@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-plugin-remove-duplicates - Evolution plugin for removing duplicate mails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218360 michel.salim at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 04:26:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:26:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219112] Review Request: mmsrip - mms stream recorder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612110426.kBB4QVww000450@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mmsrip - mms stream recorder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219112 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-10 23:26 EST ------- Better to have a dicussion on FE mailing list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 04:27:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:27:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219103] Review Request: dvdauthor - Command line DVD authoring tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612110427.kBB4R1Jw000479@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvdauthor - Command line DVD authoring tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219103 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-10 23:27 EST ------- Better to have a dicussion on FE mailing list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 04:33:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:33:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219114] Review Request: flac123 - Command-line program for playing FLAC audio files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612110433.kBB4XJdd000923@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flac123 - Command-line program for playing FLAC audio files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219114 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 04:37:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:37:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219112] Review Request: mmsrip - mms stream recorder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612110437.kBB4bcFP001290@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mmsrip - mms stream recorder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219112 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2006-12-10 23:37 EST ------- (In reply to comment #0) > Note: Not sure if this somehow is a ForbiddenItem, review will hopefully reveal if it is. I've set this to block FE-Legal for such a purpose. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 04:53:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:53:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219084] Review Request: perl-Geo-Constants - Standard Geo:: constants In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612110453.kBB4rlvH002232@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-Constants - Standard Geo:: constants https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219084 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 04:54:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:54:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219084] Review Request: perl-Geo-Constants - Standard Geo:: constants In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612110454.kBB4sUQW002293@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-Constants - Standard Geo:: constants https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219084 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 04:57:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:57:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219084] Review Request: perl-Geo-Constants - Standard Geo:: constants In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612110457.kBB4v135002515@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-Constants - Standard Geo:: constants https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219084 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-10 23:56 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPMS. + source files match upstream. 9c9b41d178d47fc124c5f4be9630491f Geo-Constants-0.05.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + %check used make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/base....ok All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=8, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 cusr + 0.00 csys = 0.01 CPU) + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Dose owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Followed perl packaging guidelines. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 05:03:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:03:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219086] Review Request: perl-Geo-Functions - Standard Geo:: functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612110503.kBB538Wm002945@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-Functions - Standard Geo:: functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219086 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 05:15:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:15:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219114] Review Request: flac123 - Command-line program for playing FLAC audio files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612110515.kBB5FAmT003458@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flac123 - Command-line program for playing FLAC audio files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219114 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-11 00:15 EST ------- packaging is ok. rpmlint is silent. Is grip is also in extras? where can i find files that i can play with flac123? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 05:26:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:26:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219086] Review Request: perl-Geo-Functions - Standard Geo:: functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612110526.kBB5Q25d003753@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-Functions - Standard Geo:: functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219086 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-11 00:26 EST ------- I installed perl-Geo-Constants-0.05-1 then i built this package and installed and i found now /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Geo is owned by both packages. I think this package's SPEC need to change line under %files %{perl_vendorlib}/Geo/ to %{perl_vendorlib}/Geo/Functions.pm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 05:40:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:40:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219086] Review Request: perl-Geo-Functions - Standard Geo:: functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612110540.kBB5eLOH004272@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-Functions - Standard Geo:: functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219086 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-11 00:40 EST ------- OR is that ok for perl packages? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 05:49:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:49:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219119] New: Review Request: pyscript - Postscript graphics with Python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219119 Summary: Review Request: pyscript - Postscript graphics with Python Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jspaleta at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://jspaleta%40thecodergeek.com at ftp.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/pyscript/pyscript.spec SRPM URL: ftp://jspaleta%40thecodergeek.com at ftp.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/pyscript/pyscript-0.6-5.fc6.src.rpm Description: PyScript is a Python module for producing high quality postscript graphics. Rather than use a GUI to draw a picture, the picture is programmed using Python and the PyScript objects. Note: I am re-submitting this with the support of the project author. I plan to have the project author as a co-maintainer, and will act as a gateway for cvs commits for him until such time as he gains fedora cvs access through sponsorship. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 05:50:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:50:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219087] Review Request: perl-Geo-Ellipsoids - Standard Geo:: ellipsoids In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612110550.kBB5oqHj004909@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-Ellipsoids - Standard Geo:: ellipsoids https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219087 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 05:52:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:52:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 191218] Review Request: PyScript - Postscript graphics with Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612110552.kBB5qMA1004981@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyScript - Postscript graphics with Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191218 jspaleta at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2006-12-11 00:52 EST ------- Okay I have opened a new review ticket. I am closing this ticket as a duplicate of my new ticket. I did make changes to the spec file to bring the spec into line with current python packaging policy. ghosting of the pyo's is no longer prefered according to the python specific packaging guidance. If you have the ability to do a full review, please head on over to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219119 -jef *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 219119 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 05:52:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:52:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219119] Review Request: pyscript - Postscript graphics with Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612110552.kBB5qjWQ005026@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyscript - Postscript graphics with Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219119 jspaleta at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paultcochrane at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2006-12-11 00:52 EST ------- *** Bug 191218 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 06:03:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 01:03:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219119] Review Request: pyscript - Postscript graphics with Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612110603.kBB63tBW005376@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyscript - Postscript graphics with Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219119 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |peter at thecodergeek.com ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2006-12-11 01:03 EST ------- Eh, sorry Jef. The hosting is HTTP-only for anonymous/public access. Spec: http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/pyscript/pyscript.spec SRPM: http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/pyscript/pyscript-0.6-5.fc6.src.rpm Thanks for your understanding; and apologies for the slight inconvenience. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 06:14:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 01:14:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219119] Review Request: pyscript - Postscript graphics with Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612110614.kBB6Ejuj005669@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyscript - Postscript graphics with Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219119 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2006-12-11 01:14 EST ------- opps, I just cut and pasted the url through nautilus this time. I didn't think about the ftp/http issue oh well. For everyone playing along, the urls in Comment #2 are correct for public access. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 07:28:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 02:28:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219114] Review Request: flac123 - Command-line program for playing FLAC audio files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612110728.kBB7SoBx008417@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flac123 - Command-line program for playing FLAC audio files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219114 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2006-12-11 02:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > where can i find files that i can play with flac123? You can create them with flac (in package flac) from .wav files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 07:35:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 02:35:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219112] Review Request: mmsrip - mms stream recorder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612110735.kBB7ZgTI008646@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mmsrip - mms stream recorder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219112 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-12-11 02:35 EST ------- See bug 205798 comment 22 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 08:12:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 03:12:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612110812.kBB8CZxC009637@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2006-12-11 03:12 EST ------- > Well, a quick glance at this package: > * some files should not be in main package, like: > -------------------------------------------------- > W: ntop devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libntop.so > -------------------------------------------------- Fixing that in the next release. * permissions of some files in -debug package is wrong. > ---------------------------------------------------- > E: ntop-debuginfo script-without-shebang /usr/src/debug/ntop-3.2/fcUtils.c > E: ntop-debuginfo script-without-shebang > /usr/src/debug/ntop-3.2/plugins/xmldumpPlugin.c > E: ntop-debuginfo script-without-shebang > /usr/src/debug/ntop-3.2/globals-structtypes.h > ------------------------------------------------------ Fixing that in the next release. > * By the way, what is fedora-groupadd? Is there any reason > that this cannot be replaced with groupadd? fedora-usermgmt provides wrappers around useradd, userdel, groupadd and groupdel to allow predictable but configurable uids/gids. I took these from the old package. If the consensus is that we should not use the fedora tools, then I can replace them with normal user*/group* tools. > * Usually calling userdel or groupdel is not recommended. > Usually it is left as it is and deleting user or group should > be manually done by administrator. I've been looking for any packaging guidelines regarding this. It seems sloppy to me to leave (program) users hanging around. > * For Requires: > Please don't write the explicit dependency which is required > automatically by dependencies of libraries. > For example, libgd.so.2 dependency pulls gd, so adding "gd" > explicitly to Requires is not needed. I will work on this. How good is RPM? How far can it be trusted to find the right dependencies? > * For BuildRequires: > Please don't write redundant dependencies. For example, zlib-devel > is required by openssl-devel, so adding "zlib-devel" to BuildRequires > is not necessary. I will work on this as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 08:21:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 03:21:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219086] Review Request: perl-Geo-Functions - Standard Geo:: functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612110821.kBB8LEtC009866@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-Functions - Standard Geo:: functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219086 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-12-11 03:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > OR is that ok for perl packages? It is a MUST. Perl module-package must own all dirs which are not owned by the base perl-packages or a standard filesystem packages. BTW: The same consideration also applies to other "module-like" systems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 08:36:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 03:36:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612110836.kBB8aMvU010515@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2006-12-11 03:36 EST ------- > Well, another: > * Timestamps: > For cp or install, please use "cp -p" or "install -p" to keep > timestamps > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines Fixed. > * Source0 > Please specify URL. Fixed. > * # strip off version number from plugin .so files > Why is this needed? This was suggested by Patrice here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197198#c37. This makes sense to me as dl'opened modules aren't versioned. > * applying patch > I prefer adding some suffix to original files. i.e. for example: > ------------------------------------ > %patch0 -p1 -b .plugins > %patch1 -p1 -b .conf > ------------------------------------- Fixed. > * Requires: fedora-usermgmt > This is for scriplets? If so, please write: > Requires(pre): /usr/sbin/fedora-groupadd > and so on and not write "Requires: fedora-usermgmt", however, > please consider to use normal %{_sbindir}/groupadd and so on. > ref: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets Looking into this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 09:38:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 04:38:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219086] Review Request: perl-Geo-Functions - Standard Geo:: functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612110938.kBB9c7B1016135@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-Functions - Standard Geo:: functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219086 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-11 04:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > OR is that ok for perl packages? > It is a MUST. > > Perl module-package must own all dirs which are not owned by the base > perl-packages or a standard filesystem packages. > > BTW: The same consideration also applies to other "module-like" systems. Thanks for info. So perl modules, python modules MUST own all directories. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 09:40:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 04:40:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219086] Review Request: perl-Geo-Functions - Standard Geo:: functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612110940.kBB9eVIQ016264@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-Functions - Standard Geo:: functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219086 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-11 04:40 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPMS. + source files match upstream. 32a4eb2ec009cec6c2175d9166ffd911 Geo-Functions-0.04.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + %check used make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/base....ok All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=31, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 cusr + 0.00 csys = 0.02 CPU) + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Dose owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Followed perl packaging guidelines. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 10:06:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 05:06:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219087] Review Request: perl-Geo-Ellipsoids - Standard Geo:: ellipsoids In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612111006.kBBA6vVJ017982@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-Ellipsoids - Standard Geo:: ellipsoids https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219087 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-11 05:06 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPMS. + source files match upstream. 6281160b1c9d6c21bb8fc261100fa35c Geo-Ellipsoids-0.10.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + %check used make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/base....ok All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=37, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 cusr + 0.00 csys = 0.02 CPU) + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Dose owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Followed perl packaging guidelines. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 10:28:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 05:28:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207676] Review Request: SDL_Pango - Rendering of internationalized text for SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612111028.kBBASJjp019445@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SDL_Pango - Rendering of internationalized text for SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207676 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2006-12-11 05:28 EST ------- Thanks to both! I just got confused somewhere in the process, it seems... ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 11:02:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 06:02:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 197765] Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612111102.kBBB2IRP021558@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197765 seg at haxxed.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(seg at haxxed.com) | ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2006-12-11 06:02 EST ------- I emailed omar at tinysofa.org on Oct 28, no reply so far. Sigh, looks like this upstream may have died as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 11:22:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 06:22:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217836] Review Request: vimoutliner - set of vim macros for editing outlines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612111122.kBBBMGdZ022161@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vimoutliner - set of vim macros for editing outlines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217836 tmraz at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tmraz at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From tmraz at redhat.com 2006-12-11 06:22 EST ------- I'll sponsor Matej as soon as this passes a review. Mamoru, thanks for co-reviewing this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 13:09:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 08:09:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612111309.kBBD9Cat027338@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2006-12-11 08:09 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/Fedora-Extras/ntop.spec SRPM URL: http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/Fedora-Extras/ntop-3.2-3.fc6.src.rpm * Mon Dec 11 2006 Bernard Johnson - 3.2-3 - fix: do not package debug files in arch package - fix: remove x bit from /usr/src debug files - fix: direct source download link - fix: don't package devel libraries in /usr/lib - integrate previous package ntop.sysv to ntop.init - remove sysconfig file - clean up usage of fedora-usermgt - remove ldconfig calls - create a ntop-passwd wrapper to set the passwd - fix: directory permission in directory, init, and passwd wrapper -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 14:53:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:53:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217836] Review Request: vimoutliner - set of vim macros for editing outlines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612111453.kBBErCpM002276@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vimoutliner - set of vim macros for editing outlines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217836 ------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com 2006-12-11 09:53 EST ------- 1) I made comments to the .spec file why some Sources don't have URL (e.g., do you want http://www.vimoutliner.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=Downloads&file=index&req=getit&lid=16 for otl2html?) 2) I use 'cp -p -f' to keep timestamp for README.Fedora, but I am not sure how much worth it is -- the file is written and maintained as part of the package. 3) Yes, calling update-desktop-database was just a bug. Removed. 4) Business with helpztags -- I have talked about that with karsten (maintainer of vim) and we came to the conclusion that I should use just vim command which is now in .spec. Updated files are http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/progs/rpms/vimoutliner-0.3.4-7.src.rpm and location of .spec hasn't changed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 16:21:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:21:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217836] Review Request: vimoutliner - set of vim macros for editing outlines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612111621.kBBGLr6g010048@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vimoutliner - set of vim macros for editing outlines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217836 ------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com 2006-12-11 11:21 EST ------- There is a problem with ownership of /usr/share/vim/vimfiles/*/ directories, which has to be fixed in co-operation with vim maintainer (see bug 219154). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 16:42:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:42:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612111642.kBBGgQN1011801@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-11 11:42 EST ------- Well, before checking 3.2-3 : >> * %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/logrotate.d/ntop >> I think Requires: %{_sysconfdir}/logrotate.d or >> Requires: logrotate should be added. > Please read this thread: > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/46042 Actually I have already known these long discussion because I always receive mails from fedora-extras-list. Anyway leaving /etc/logrotate.d unowned by any pacakge is wrong. You should either - require logrotate as Requires - require /etc/logrotate.d - have this package (ntop) own /etc/logrotate.d (easiest) *for now* and my thought is this package (ntop) should require logroate. >> * Usually calling userdel or groupdel is not recommended. >> Usually it is left as it is and deleting user or group should >> be manually done by administrator. > I've been looking for any packaging guidelines regarding this. It seems sloppy > to me to leave (program) users hanging around. I checked http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageUserCreation and your usermgmt usage seems okay. >> * For Requires: >> Please don't write the explicit dependency which is required >> automatically by dependencies of libraries. >> For example, libgd.so.2 dependency pulls gd, so adding "gd" >> explicitly to Requires is not needed. > I will work on this. How good is RPM? How far can it be trusted to find the > right dependencies? rpm uses ldd and objdump to check libraries' dependency and this _should_ work ( _should_ means that if this does not work, it means that some rpms installed together should be fixed because they conflict functionally anyway). Details are on: /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/find-requires And, writing like "Requires: openssl" does not make sense because requirement of openssl or so is "version specific". This is correctly treated by libraries' dependencies, where "explicit" requirement of rpm name does not care about these. Note: If this package needs another "version specific" issue, this should be written to Requires. A example is xscreensaver-base (which I maintain), which has a explicit requirement "pam > 0.80-7" because /etc/pam.d/xscreensaver says: ----------------------------------------------------- auth include system-auth ----------------------------------------------------- this content can be interpreted only by pam >= 0.80 >> * # strip off version number from plugin .so files >> Why is this needed? > This was suggested by Patrice here: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197198#c37. This makes > sense to me as dl'opened modules aren't versioned. Leaving symlinks as they are is sufficient. Please check: ------------------------------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ for f in /usr/lib/*/*.so ; do if [ -L $f ] ; then echo $f ; fi ; done ------------------------------------------------------------------------- I don't think removing version info is a good idea. * Another issue: ----------------------------------- %post /sbin/chkconfig --add %{name} 2>&1 > /dev/null ----------------------------------- scriptlets like these need corresponding requirement as Requires(post) or so. Please check the section "Services" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets By the way, is this okay? --------------------------------------------------------- gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I.. -I../myrrd -DLINUX -I/usr/include/libgdome -I/usr/local/include -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -I/usr/local/include -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wnested-externs -fPIC -DPIC -MT libxmldumpPlugin_la-xmldumpPlugin.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/libxmldumpPlugin_la-xmldumpPlugin.Tpo -c xmldumpPlugin.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/libxmldumpPlugin_la-xmldumpPlugin.o xmldumpPlugin.c:50:2: warning: #warning xmldumpPlugin.c:51:2: warning: #warning =========================================================== xmldumpPlugin.c:52:2: warning: #warning xmldumpPlugin.c:53:2: warning: #warning Missing header files, disabling xmldump plugin xmldumpPlugin.c:54:2: warning: #warning xmldumpPlugin.c:55:2: warning: #warning FOR MOST USERS THIS IS NOT A PROBLEM xmldumpPlugin.c:56:2: warning: #warning ntop will build and run just fine... xmldumpPlugin.c:57:2: warning: #warning xmldumpPlugin.c:58:2: warning: #warning Why? xmldumpPlugin.c:59:2: warning: #warning xmldumpPlugin.c:61:2: warning: #warning glibconfig.h unavailable xmldumpPlugin.c:64:2: warning: #warning glib.h unavailable xmldumpPlugin.c:67:2: warning: #warning gdome.h unavailable xmldumpPlugin.c:72:2: warning: #warning xmldumpPlugin.c:73:2: warning: #warning =========================================================== xmldumpPlugin.c:74:2: warning: #warning xmldumpPlugin.c:1076:1: warning: multi-line comment xmldumpPlugin.c:28: warning: 'dumpXML' used but never defined xmldumpPlugin.c:107: warning: 'traceEvent_forked' declared 'static' but never defined xmldumpPlugin.c:242: warning: 'xmlDebug' defined but not used xmldumpPlugin.c:470: warning: 'handleXmldumpHTTPrequest' defined but not used --------------------------------------------------------- I have not checked this package 'functionally' yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 16:59:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:59:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219164] New: Review Request: FontyPython - TTF font manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219164 Summary: Review Request: FontyPython - TTF font manager Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cr33dog at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://cr33.is-a-geek.com/RPMS/fontypython.spec SRPM URL: http://cr33.is-a-geek.com/RPMS/fontypython-0.2.0-1.src.rpm Description: Manage your ttf fonts on Gnu/Linux with Fonty Python. You can collect any fonts together ( even ones not in your system font folders )into 'pogs' and then install and remove the pogs as you need them. In this way you can control what fonts are in your user font folder - thus avoiding long lists of fonts in the font chooser dialogues of your apps. FontyPython basically makes symlinks from various font sources to ~/.fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 17:22:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 12:22:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219119] Review Request: pyscript - Postscript graphics with Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612111722.kBBHMHq3014531@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyscript - Postscript graphics with Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219119 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mr.ecik at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-12-11 12:22 EST ------- I'll do the review soon... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 18:15:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:15:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219119] Review Request: pyscript - Postscript graphics with Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612111815.kBBIFjkr019103@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyscript - Postscript graphics with Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219119 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-12-11 13:15 EST ------- MUST items: !* rpmlint output: W: pyscript macro-in-%changelog python_sitelib W: pyscript macro-in-%changelog ghost W: pyscript macro-in-%changelog __python W: pyscript macro-in-%changelog _libdir E: pyscript no-binary E: pyscript-debuginfo empty-debuginfo-package * package is named well * spec file name is good * package meets Packaging Guidelines * package is licensed with a GPL open-source compatible license * License field in spec file matches actual license * license file is included in %doc * md5sums are matching (8b4945fda4318abdcd77f1573996b9da) * package successfully compiles on x86_64 * BuildRequires listed well * no locales * no need to %post and %postun sections * not relocatable * package owns directories well * no duplicates in %files * %files section includes %defattr * proper %clean section * macros used well THINGS to do: * get rid of all macro-in-%changelog rpmlint warnings by doubling all % characters in %changelog. For example: instead of %{_libdir} write %%{_libdir} * fix no-binary and debuginfo package problems by adding BuildArch: noarch to preamble * from my experience I know that using python-devel BR instead of python is better solution * do we really need tetex package? I have grepped all the sources and I found that pyscript needs only latex application which is part of tetex-latex package. Thus I believe that it is a dependency we really need. Correct me if I am wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 18:27:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:27:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219164] Review Request: FontyPython - TTF font manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612111827.kBBIRirE020067@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FontyPython - TTF font manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219164 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-11 13:27 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=143309) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=143309&action=view) Mock build log of fontpython 0.2.0-1 Well, * I cannot find your name in owners.list. If this package is the first package you try to import to Fedora Extras, then you have to get sponsored. Please check: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/HowToGetSponsored For general packaging information, please check: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines Then: * mockbuild fails on FC-devel i386. Perhaps some BuildRequires are missing. Note: for FC-devel (rawhide), python is 2.5! ----------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ rpm -q python python-2.5-2.fc7 ----------------------------------------------------- Please make it sure that your spec file works well for both python 2.4/2.5 . * Please check the dependency for this package and add the needed Requires correctly. -------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost fontypython]$ ( for f in *py ; do grep import $f ; done ) | grep -v ^# | sort | uniq import re import wxversion from fontitem import * from basicfontlist import * from emptyview import * from folder import * from optparse import OptionParser from pathcontrol import * from pog import * from pubsub import * from wx.lib.splitter import MultiSplitterWindow gui = __import__ ( "fontypython." + chosengui ) if fpsys.config.max: import dialogues import wx.html as html import Image, ImageFont, ImageDraw import cli import fontybugs import fpsys import fpsys # Global objects import fpversion import imp import os import pathcontrol import pathcontrol import strings import sys import sys, os import sys, os, pickle import wx import wx.lib.scrolledpanel import wx.lib.statbmp try: import Image, ImageFont, ImageDraw try: import wx --------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 18:33:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:33:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219164] Review Request: fontypython - TTF font manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612111833.kBBIX5Pg020487@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fontypython - TTF font manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219164 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: FontyPython |Review Request: fontypython |- TTF font manager |- TTF font manager ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-11 13:33 EST ------- And: * I think /usr/bin/fp should be renamed. ( to /usr/bin/fontpython, for example ) * Copyright clause in %description is not necessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 19:47:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:47:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219104] Review Request: mussh - Multihost SSH wrapper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612111947.kBBJlVaL025489@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mussh - Multihost SSH wrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219104 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-11 14:47 EST ------- Thanks for the review... imported and built for devel, fc5/fc6 branches requested. Closing this request now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 20:46:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:46:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218176] Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612112046.kBBKktPE030537@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218176 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-12-11 15:46 EST ------- I'll crack on with it, but my buildsys is currently broken due to the ongoing Python problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 20:47:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:47:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219036] Review Request: perl-Roman - Roman module from CPAN In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612112047.kBBKl7ss030590@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Roman - Roman module from CPAN https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219036 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-12-11 15:47 EST ------- APPROVED MD5SUMS: df12af9eef0433eb70f89c431111c05e perl-Roman-1.1-1.src.rpm 7c93de8cd3de204072b194a561368629 perl-Roman.spec 67b0e6affdc50fdf28cfc438c045fd9b Roman-1.1.tar.gz Sources: * Roman-1.1.tar.gz: MD5 digest matches the CPAN tarball Good: * Package name follows standard * URL and Source url are OK * License verified (main pod page and License file) * perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_xxx) requirement present * the requirements are sane * the provides are sane * perl vendor libs macros present * File permissions are ok * Builds without problems in FC-6 * (Un)installs without problems in FC-6 * Runs on FC-6 (perl -MRoman -e 'print Roman(1004);') * No opened tickets in http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Dist/Display.html?Name=Roman Random notes about this module: * no Makefile.PL/Build.PL * no testsuite * no VERSION variable jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 21:17:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 16:17:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219084] Review Request: perl-Geo-Constants - Standard Geo:: constants In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612112117.kBBLHGaX000498@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-Constants - Standard Geo:: constants https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219084 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-12-11 16:17 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Package imported and built for FC-5, FC-6, and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 21:17:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 16:17:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219086] Review Request: perl-Geo-Functions - Standard Geo:: functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612112117.kBBLHRkO000515@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-Functions - Standard Geo:: functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219086 Bug 219086 depends on bug 219084, which changed state. Bug 219084 Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-Constants - Standard Geo:: constants https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219084 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 21:19:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 16:19:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219086] Review Request: perl-Geo-Functions - Standard Geo:: functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612112119.kBBLJ5fJ000588@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-Functions - Standard Geo:: functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219086 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-12-11 16:19 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Package imported and built for FC-5, FC-6, and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 21:20:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 16:20:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219086] Review Request: perl-Geo-Functions - Standard Geo:: functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612112120.kBBLKTEK000656@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-Functions - Standard Geo:: functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219086 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 21:20:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 16:20:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219087] Review Request: perl-Geo-Ellipsoids - Standard Geo:: ellipsoids In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612112120.kBBLKWqP000681@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-Ellipsoids - Standard Geo:: ellipsoids https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219087 Bug 219087 depends on bug 219086, which changed state. Bug 219086 Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-Functions - Standard Geo:: functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219086 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 21:28:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 16:28:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219087] Review Request: perl-Geo-Ellipsoids - Standard Geo:: ellipsoids In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612112128.kBBLSZ2f001372@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-Ellipsoids - Standard Geo:: ellipsoids https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219087 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-12-11 16:28 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Package imported and built for FC-5, FC-6, and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 22:28:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:28:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612112228.kBBMSH3l005873@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218556 ------- Additional Comments From mhalcrow at us.ibm.com 2006-12-11 17:28 EST ------- Updated SPEC is here: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/ecryptfs/ecryptfs-utils.spec?use_mirror=osdn Updated SRPM is here: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/ecryptfs/ecryptfs-utils-7-0.src.rpm?use_mirror=osdn I will have to get in touch with the kernel package maintainers about eCryptfs in older kernel versions, but I am almost positive that eCryptfs is not in Red Hat kernels prior to 2.6.19, since that would involve some backport work. For now, I have set the kernel version requirement to 2.6.19 or greater. I have also added a -debug package for the header file and the libecryptfs.so file. The libraries in /usr/lib/ecryptfs are dlopen'd. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 22:57:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:57:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219164] Review Request: fontypython - TTF font manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612112257.kBBMva6Z008060@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fontypython - TTF font manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219164 cr33dog at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 23:12:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:12:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219164] Review Request: fontypython - TTF font manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612112312.kBBNCUI5008676@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fontypython - TTF font manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219164 ------- Additional Comments From cr33dog at gmail.com 2006-12-11 18:12 EST ------- Spec URL: http://cr33.is-a-geek.com/RPMS/fontypython.spec SRPM URL: http://cr33.is-a-geek.com/RPMS/fontypython-0.2.0-2.src.rpm %changelog * Mon Dec 11 2006 Chris Mohler 0.2.0-2 - Added wxPython, python-imaging to build requires - Removed copyright notice from description Thanks for reminding me about mock. Mock build completes in fedora-6, but not in fedora-devel (should the bug/package version be fc6?) I'm not sure it's a problem with the package - I've pasted sections of the root.log from the devel build below: ... Executing /usr/sbin/mock-helper yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386-core/root resolvedep 'python -imaging' 'desktop-file-utils' 'python-devel' 'rpmdevtools' 'wxPython' 0:python-imaging-1.1.5-6.fc6.i386 0:desktop-file-utils-0.12-1.fc7.i386 0:python-devel-2.5-3.fc7.i386 0:rpmdevtools-5.3-1.fc6.noarch 0:wxPython-2.6.3.2-2.fc6.i386 ... Executing /usr/sbin/mock-helper yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386-core/root install 'python-im aging' 'desktop-file-utils' 'python-devel' 'rpmdevtools' 'wxPython' Error: Missing Dependency: python(abi) = 2.4 is needed by package python-imaging Error: Missing Dependency: python(abi) = 2.4 is needed by package wxPython ... I will contact the author regarding renaming /usr/bin/fp - I believe I'll have to edit setup.py in order to make that change. My BZ account won't let me view the sponsor list, I've added 'FE-NEEDSPONSOR' to the blocks section. I could use pointers on getting it to compile im mock devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 23:40:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:40:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218258] Review Request: audacious-docklet - a docklet plugin for Audacious In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612112340.kBBNebeL010176@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-docklet - a docklet plugin for Audacious https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218258 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: - |for Audacious CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-12-11 18:40 EST ------- Adding the FE-NEEDSPONSOR tracker. Some initial comments on you specfile: - please don't use %define rel and ver. - don't repeat the name of the package in Summary, just use "A docklet plugin for Audacious". - the release tag is wrong, should be "1%{?dist}", which will result in audacious-docklet-0.1.1-1.fc6.src.rpm. Please read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-5ea39bbc33cf351b41b51325ac3527eff4c58dac and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-beca3bf84972f19a384cc2e5091ed47c2b3cebc7 - BuildRoot should be "%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)", see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-f196e7b2477c2f5dd97ef64e8eacddfb517f1aa1 - no BuildRequires are certainly not correct - %description should be more elaborate while it's only the summary again. You should describe the features of the program a little. - remove the link to the website from %description, rpm has it's own tag "URL" for that, which is missing in your specfile. - linking to http://nedudu.hu/?page_id=11 is a bad idea, for it's not a permanent link. In a feew weeks this will be on page 12 and so on. The permalink for this entry is http://nedudu.hu/index.php?entry=entry060828-105151, but I suggest you use http://nedudu.hu/static.php?page=audacious instead. So you would insert "URL: http://nedudu.hu/static.php?page=audacious" somewhere, e. g. below License: - simplyfy the %clean section to "rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" - you should clean the built-root at the beginning of %install, too: %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT make DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT install - %defattr should be (-,root,root,-) - remove INSTALL and ABOUT-NLS from %doc, not needed if the programm is installed via rpm - the %files is not ok, simply using %{_datadir} will result in directories which are owned by multiple packages. - locales need to be handled with %find_lang, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-8c605ebf8330f6d505f384e671986fa99a8f72ee -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 11 23:59:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:59:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219164] Review Request: fontypython - TTF font manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612112359.kBBNx43w010953@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fontypython - TTF font manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219164 ------- Additional Comments From cr33dog at gmail.com 2006-12-11 18:59 EST ------- I see that python-imaging and wxpython are on the broken packages list... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 00:04:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:04:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612120004.kBC040OE011275@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2006-12-11 19:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > Anyway leaving /etc/logrotate.d unowned by any pacakge is > wrong. You should either I don't disagree with you on that point. I was just pointing out that a discussion of how to to resolve this issue has not been finalized. > *for now* and my thought is this package (ntop) > should require logroate. Agreed. For now, this is the answer, but it may change in the future. > Leaving symlinks as they are is sufficient. Please check: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ for f in /usr/lib/*/*.so ; do if [ -L $f ] ; then echo > $f ; fi ; done > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > I don't think removing version info is a good idea. Because of the way the software works (it loads all files/links in the .../plugins directory), we can have either a versioned file (libnetflowPlugin-3.2.so) or unversioned (libnetflowPlugin.so). We can not have a symbolic link, because that would cause the plugin to load twice. Why do you think it's so important to keep the versioning? There are no dependencies on these files - they are dlopened by the application. > scriptlets like these need corresponding requirement as > Requires(post) or so. Please check the section "Services" of > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets Fixed. > By the way, is this okay? > xmldumpPlugin.c:53:2: warning: #warning Missing header files, disabling xmldump > plugin No, it just took me awhile to figure out the problem. Fixed now. Still the pid file is being written to /var/ntop although the config seems to indicate it should go elsewhere. Not sure why. Looking into that. Also, the syslog should be logged at facility=daemon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 00:37:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:37:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612120037.kBC0bJ6g012888@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2006-12-11 19:37 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/Fedora-Extras/ntop.spec SRPM URL: http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/Fedora-Extras/ntop-3.2-4.fc6.src.rpm * Mon Dec 11 2006 Bernard Johnson - 3.2-4 - fix detection of glib-2.0 and gdome2 - remove Requires: entries to let rpm figure them out - remove BR libxml2, zlib-devel as they are pulled by other packages - added scriplet requires for /sbin/chkconfig - add logrotate to requires - add BR dependency on pkgconfig since patch to fix missing files depends on it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 00:43:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:43:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216536] Review Request: FuzzyOcr - Checks for specific keywords in image attachments, using gocr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612120043.kBC0h1Hc013063@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FuzzyOcr - Checks for specific keywords in image attachments, using gocr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216536 ------- Additional Comments From greg at runlevel7.ca 2006-12-11 19:42 EST ------- Still there Orion? Maybe someone else that is looking at this would like to help with getting the required perl modules into Extras. Maybe get the attention of Fedora's perl SIG somehow... In 3.5.0-rc1 perl-Tie-Cache is also needed (enables some functionality in MLDBM- Sync - not in Extras - rpmforge packages it currently). It has a few dependancies - perl-Tie-Cache-LRU (not in Extras - rpmforge packages it currently), perl-enum (not in Extras - rpmforge packages it currently), perl- Carp-Assert (in Extras). Our cvs is updated with a spec file for 3.5.0-rc1 (on EL4). Ignore the netpbm patches, you won't need them for FC6/7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 01:08:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:08:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612120108.kBC18Nkf014030@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218556 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2006-12-11 20:08 EST ------- I think you missed what I meant regarding kernel versions. Here's an example of a kernel spec file for a version of kernel-2.6.18: http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/rpms/kernel/devel/kernel-2.6.spec?rev=1.2834&only_with_tag=kernel-2_6_18-1_2834_fc7&view=markup Notice these patches: Patch1: patch-2.6.19-rc6.bz2 Patch2: patch-2.6.19-rc6-git10.bz2 Does this mean that a 2.6.18 kernel supports ecryptfs? Probably, I dunno. But that's what I'm looking for in a Require: Remember you're requires is against the functionality of the RPM, not what was released upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 01:39:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:39:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612120139.kBC1duLu014851@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218556 ------- Additional Comments From mhalcrow at us.ibm.com 2006-12-11 20:39 EST ------- If ``2.6.18'' is really ``2.6.19-rc6,'' then yes, it does support eCryptfs. I'll ask around about this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 02:33:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:33:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218176] Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612120233.kBC2Xv8T016389@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218176 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-11 21:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > I'll crack on with it, but my buildsys is currently broken due to the ongoing > Python problems. Ah... actually I also use rawhide and I had to rebuild several packages against python 2.5. * If you have trouble with mock, please see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219029 * Additional info: If you have trouble with plague, please see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214687 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 02:53:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:53:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218768] Review Request: poppler-extras - PDF rendering library extras (qt/qt4) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612120253.kBC2rWUB016925@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poppler-extras - PDF rendering library extras (qt/qt4) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218768 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-12-11 21:53 EST ------- Since the qt bindings will soon be included in the Core package, and AFAIK, nothing currenty needs/uses the qt4 bindings (yet), I withdraw this Review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 02:54:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:54:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218768] Review Request: poppler-extras - PDF rendering library extras (qt/qt4) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612120254.kBC2sKMS016966@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poppler-extras - PDF rendering library extras (qt/qt4) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218768 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |201449 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 03:09:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:09:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612120309.kBC393Tq018293@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 ------- Additional Comments From wilmer at fedoraproject.org 2006-12-11 22:09 EST ------- Now, I'm a little confused with presence of %build section, without this rpmlint is silent, with it is necessary to make %{buildroot}/usr/lib/debug directory. Also remember that i need a sponsor. ;) All other suggestions have been implemented: Updated to 1.0-2 -- package at: http://www.fedora-ve.org/mybashburn/downloads/mybashburn.spec SRPM URL: http://www.fedora-ve.org/mybashburn/downloads/mybashburn-1.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 03:16:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:16:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216536] Review Request: FuzzyOcr - Checks for specific keywords in image attachments, using gocr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612120316.kBC3GEr3019364@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FuzzyOcr - Checks for specific keywords in image attachments, using gocr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216536 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-12-11 22:16 EST ------- I'm afraid I'm getting swamped and I'm getting put off by how crappy gocr appears to be. If someone else want to drive this, I'd be more than happy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 03:37:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:37:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612120337.kBC3bJs9021634@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 ------- Additional Comments From wilmer at fedoraproject.org 2006-12-11 22:37 EST ------- Others considerations: I run rpmlint command and the output: $ rpmlint mybashburn-1.0-2.noarch.rpm W: mybashburn conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/mybashburnrc E: mybashburn script-without-shebang /usr/share/mybashburn/lang/Swedish/iso_menu.lang E: mybashburn script-without-shebang /usr/share/mybashburn/lang/Czech/convert_mp3s.lang [...] --> I can't understand how fix it. E: mybashburn world-writable /etc/mybashburnrc 0666 ---> Note that this is good and is necessary for the package, see comment #3 E: mybashburn standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/bin E: mybashburn wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/mybashburn/lang/Polish/multi.lang --> WTF?. That's a new one to me. These are apparently false positives?, Thanks for spending time on this! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 04:54:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:54:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 206398] Review Request: php-pecl-Fileinfo - libmagic bindings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612120454.kBC4sNbK028990@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-Fileinfo - libmagic bindings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206398 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-12-11 23:54 EST ------- Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 05:02:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 00:02:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218831] Review Request: python-urljr - A common interface to urllib2 and curl for making HTTP requests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612120502.kBC52Zbq029897@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-urljr - A common interface to urllib2 and curl for making HTTP requests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218831 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-12-12 00:02 EST ------- OK, now that python-pycurl has been built, I've pushed builds for python-urljr. They should be available in the next push. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 05:02:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 00:02:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218852] Review Request: python-openid - Python OpenID libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612120502.kBC52aXO029901@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-openid - Python OpenID libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218852 Bug 218852 depends on bug 218831, which changed state. Bug 218831 Summary: Review Request: python-urljr - A common interface to urllib2 and curl for making HTTP requests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218831 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 05:03:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 00:03:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218844] Review Request: python-yadis - Relying party support for the Yadis service discovery protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612120503.kBC5375I029985@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-yadis - Relying party support for the Yadis service discovery protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218844 Bug 218844 depends on bug 218831, which changed state. Bug 218831 Summary: Review Request: python-urljr - A common interface to urllib2 and curl for making HTTP requests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218831 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 05:23:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 00:23:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612120523.kBC5NdXa031138@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2006-12-12 00:23 EST ------- Once we resolve the .so naming for plugins, I think this resolves all blockers. One particular thing to consider is whether ntop should be running in /var/ntop or some other directory (/var/lib/ntop?) Spec URL: http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/Fedora-Extras/ntop.spec SRPM URL: http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/Fedora-Extras/ntop-3.2-5.fc6.src.rpm * Mon Dec 11 2006 Bernard Johnson - 3.2-5 - use ntop.conf.sample with some modifications - change default syslog facilty to daemon in init file - add repo tag for those who want to use it - install as-data by default, at least for now - fix package detection of gdome library - remove extraneous ldconfig call E: ntop non-standard-gid /var/ntop/dnsCache.db ntop E: ntop non-standard-gid /var/ntop/rrd/interfaces ntop E: ntop non-standard-dir-perm /var/ntop/rrd/interfaces 0775 E: ntop non-standard-gid /var/ntop/ntop_pw.db ntop E: ntop non-standard-gid /var/ntop/macPrefix.db ntop E: ntop non-standard-gid /var/ntop ntop E: ntop non-standard-dir-perm /var/ntop 0775 E: ntop non-standard-gid /var/ntop/rrd/graphics ntop E: ntop non-standard-dir-perm /var/ntop/rrd/graphics 0775 E: ntop non-standard-gid /var/ntop/prefsCache.db ntop E: ntop non-standard-gid /var/ntop/fingerprint.db ntop E: ntop non-standard-gid /var/ntop/rrd ntop E: ntop non-standard-dir-perm /var/ntop/rrd 0775 E: ntop non-standard-gid /var/ntop/addressQueue.db ntop E: ntop non-standard-gid /var/ntop/rrd/flows ntop E: ntop non-standard-dir-perm /var/ntop/rrd/flows 0775 E: ntop non-standard-gid /var/ntop/LsWatch.db ntop W: ntop non-standard-dir-in-var ntop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 05:27:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 00:27:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219164] Review Request: fontypython - TTF font manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612120527.kBC5R35b031217@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fontypython - TTF font manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219164 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-12 00:27 EST ------- Well, * please check if the dependency a package (python-imaging, ...) should be BuildRequires or Requires or _both_ . From setup.py, wxPython, python-imaging is needed for BuildRequires, surely. And, as I noted in comment #1, these dependency should also required by "Requires". Note that python-related dependency is currently not checked automatically by rpmbuild and we have to check these manually. Currently I get the following error: --------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ fp Neither wxgui nor qtgui interfaces could be found. Please consult the help. --------------------------------------------- * Is rpmdevtools required for BuildRequires? * for desktop files: Category Application is deprecated and this is warned by desktop-file-utils >= 0.11. Please remove this. * rpmlint complains about description-line-too-long. (rpmlint command is in "rpmlint" rpm in Fedora Extras) This means: ------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost SRPMS]$ rpmlint -I description-line-too-long description-line-too-long : Your description lines must not exceed 79 characters. If a line is exceeding this number, cut it to fit in two lines. -------------------------------------------------- * for src.rpm: --------------------------------------------------- W: fontypython strange-permission fontypython.desktop 0600 W: fontypython strange-permission fontypython.spec 0600 --------------------------------------------------- Please change the permisson to 0644. (In reply to comment #4) > I will contact the author regarding renaming /usr/bin/fp - I believe I'll have > to edit setup.py in order to make that change. I think ------------------------------------ mv ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_bindir}/fp ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_bindir}/fontypython ------------------------------------ meet the demand. For mock problem on FC-devel, python-imaging is updated to python-imaging-1.1.5-7.fc7 (this is in queue and not published yet) and I rebuilt wxPython locally so I can check this by mockbuild. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 05:28:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 00:28:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219164] Review Request: fontypython - TTF font manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612120528.kBC5S21k031285@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fontypython - TTF font manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219164 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 06:00:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 01:00:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612120600.kBC60qO2000881@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218556 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2006-12-12 01:00 EST ------- FC6 2.6.18-1.2849: no 2.6.19 git patches FC6 test 2.6.18-1.2860: no 2.6.19 git patches So FC6 will probably never support it. rawhide 2.6.18-1.2849.fc6 (not yet respun) CVS head holds 2.6.19, so the next rawhide respin will be a 2.6.19 kernel. Therefore, I think requires >= 2.6.19 is ok for this case. I re-reviewed your spec and the rpmlint output and I don't see any further problems. One thing to note... In the future, please prepend to your %changelog as you make any changes. This ends my review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 06:26:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 01:26:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218258] Review Request: audacious-docklet - a docklet plugin for Audacious In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612120626.kBC6Q3gK002640@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-docklet - a docklet plugin for Audacious https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218258 ------- Additional Comments From yufanyufan at gmail.com 2006-12-12 01:26 EST ------- Thank you so much for your carefully review. This is my first time... I update the spec file as required. Spec URL: SRPM URL: Description: However, After I change Release tag to "1%{?dist}", there's no "fc6" in the src.rpm. Is that correct? Thank you again! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 06:59:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 01:59:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216723] Review Request: libsieve - A library for parsing, sorting and filtering your mail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612120659.kBC6xoB1004120@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsieve - A library for parsing, sorting and filtering your mail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216723 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2006-12-12 01:59 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/Fedora-Extras/libsieve.spec SRPM URL: http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/Fedora-Extras/libsieve-2.1.13-3.src.rpm * Mon Dec 11 2006 Bernard Johnson - 2.1.13-3 - added repotag for anyone who may want to use it - move ldconfig calls to post and postun with -p - minor spec file cleanups -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 07:01:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 02:01:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216723] Review Request: libsieve - A library for parsing, sorting and filtering your mail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612120701.kBC71Lnd004250@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsieve - A library for parsing, sorting and filtering your mail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216723 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2006-12-12 02:01 EST ------- Bad URL for srpm. Try this instead. SRPM URL: http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/Fedora-Extras/libsieve-2.1.13-3.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 08:02:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 03:02:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216536] Review Request: FuzzyOcr - Checks for specific keywords in image attachments, using gocr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612120802.kBC82AHb006227@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FuzzyOcr - Checks for specific keywords in image attachments, using gocr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216536 ------- Additional Comments From greg at runlevel7.ca 2006-12-12 03:02 EST ------- ocrad is used more than gocr in the new version, and the scansets are configurable: http://fuzzyocr.own-hero.net/browser/trunk/devel/FuzzyOcr.scansets I don't blame you for becoming disinterested seeing as no one who could do a review has made a comment in 3 weeks. As a start, could someone please comment on the naming of this rpm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 08:09:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 03:09:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216536] Review Request: FuzzyOcr - Checks for specific keywords in image attachments, using gocr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612120809.kBC89Aar006437@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FuzzyOcr - Checks for specific keywords in image attachments, using gocr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216536 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-12-12 03:09 EST ------- spamassassin-FuzzyOcr is what I would name it if it were my package, but I'll leave this to the packager's discretion, as it is an obvious grey area. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 08:52:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 03:52:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213600] Review Request: tinyca2 - Simple graphical userinterface to manage a small CA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612120852.kBC8qEBh008749@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tinyca2 - Simple graphical userinterface to manage a small CA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213600 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-12 03:52 EST ------- Well, what is the current state of this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 08:53:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 03:53:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214087] Review Request: libextractor -- Simple library for keyword extraction In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612120853.kBC8rf8D008930@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libextractor -- Simple library for keyword extraction https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214087 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-12 03:53 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 09:01:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 04:01:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219119] Review Request: pyscript - Postscript graphics with Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612120901.kBC91KBC009766@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyscript - Postscript graphics with Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219119 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2006-12-12 04:01 EST ------- Okay I think the new srpm and spec cover everything in the TODO. rpmlint retunrs clean for me now. I read over the py files and it is calling latex and dvips which are both in the tetex-latex package, not tetex. http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/pyscript/pyscript.spec http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/pyscript/pyscript-0.6-6.fc7.src.rpm http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/pyscript/pyscript-0.6-6.fc7.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 09:02:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 04:02:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216534] Review Request: gocr - GNU Optical Character Recognition program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612120902.kBC92lrS009969@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gocr - GNU Optical Character Recognition program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216534 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-12-12 04:02 EST ------- There is a new version available, maybe it fixes some of the issues? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 09:43:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 04:43:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612120943.kBC9hxpw016055@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-12-12 04:43 EST ------- > E: mybashburn world-writable /etc/mybashburnrc 0666 > ---> Note that this is good and is necessary for the package, > see comment #3 Are you kidding? Files in /etc must not be writable by ordinary users. The software is flawed, if there is no implementation of user-local configuration files in $HOME. > %{buildroot}/usr/lib/debug Then your RPM config or installation is broken. You don't need to create that directory. > mybashburn conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/mybashburnrc This refers to %config(noreplace) /etc/mybashburnrc which influences RPM's strategy for *.rpmsave/*.rpmnew config files. > E: mybashburn script-without-shebang This is a hint about all the executable files which should not be executable. Take a close look at "rpm --query --list mybashburn" and notice the questionable file permissions. The manual page is executable, too. And so are many other files which need not be executable. > E: mybashburn standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/bin List the files included in your package: rpm --query --list --verbose mybashburn You include the directory /usr/bin which is wrong, since it belongs into the core "filesystem" package already. > E: mybashburn wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding > /usr/share/mybashburn/lang/Polish/multi.lang > > --> WTF?. There are DOS/Windows-style 0x0d 0x0a (carriage return, linefeed) line delimiters used in that file instead of just 0x0a (linefeed). Should be fixed upstream. Can be fixed with dos2unix or sed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 10:13:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 05:13:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218769] Review Request: hunspell-en - english dictionaries for hunspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612121013.kBCADDX5017682@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-en - english dictionaries for hunspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218769 alexl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |alexl at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188267 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 10:14:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 05:14:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218769] Review Request: hunspell-en - english dictionaries for hunspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612121014.kBCAEL01017775@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-en - english dictionaries for hunspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218769 alexl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|188267 |188268 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From alexl at redhat.com 2006-12-12 05:14 EST ------- Looks good to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 10:41:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 05:41:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612121041.kBCAfpef019768@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-12-12 05:41 EST ------- * the autotools related patches should be made upstream (after removal of fedora specific stuff). Did you contact them? * tcp_wrappers-devel is out in devel * rpmlint warnings seems to be ignorable. * I reiterate that dlopened objects are better without version, I think the current spec is right. * ntop is still uninterruptible by Ctrl-C when the password is entered, but I guess it is because Ctrl-C is interpreted as a character of the password. * I still get, after ctrl-C for the first run: mar 12 d?c 2006 12:07:28 CET THREADMGMT[t3029126032]: RRD: Data collection thread terminated [p11257] *** glibc detected *** ntop: malloc(): memory corruption: 0x096121f0 *** ======= Backtrace: ========= /lib/libc.so.6[0x2ff54b] /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_malloc+0x7e)[0x300c6e] /usr/lib/libntop-3.2.so(ntop_safestrdup+0x39)[0xb585c9] /usr/lib/libntop-3.2.so(traceEvent+0x312)[0xb7c472] /usr/lib/libntop-3.2.so(pcapDispatch+0x1d2)[0xb5ba02] /lib/libpthread.so.0[0x1532db] /lib/libc.so.6(clone+0x5e)[0x365eee] ======= Memory map: ======== Abandon * Kevin made this relevant comment: 8. Instead of removing the .a files you could just pass '--disable-static' to configure. Possibly also enable: --enable-snmp ? * I dislike the following in the init file: chown -f root.ntop /var/ntop/*db > /dev/null 2>&1 chmod -f 664 /var/ntop/*db > /dev/null 2>&1 Is it really needed? * when starting ntop with /etc/init.d/ntop start the [ OK ] doesn't appear. * the mechanism described in the "PRIVACY NOTICE" of the man page should be disabled, at least when started from init file. (the option may be in the ntp.conf file, for example). * ntop web server listens on all interfaces. In the default case it should only listen to localhost, with -w 127.0.0.1:3000 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 11:59:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 06:59:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612121159.kBCBxTPS024186@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2006-12-12 06:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > * the autotools related patches should be made upstream (after removal > of fedora specific stuff). Did you contact them? No, I want to make sure everything is working first. > * tcp_wrappers-devel is out in devel I will fix that in the next update. > * rpmlint warnings seems to be ignorable. I agree. > * I reiterate that dlopened objects are better without version, I > think the current spec is right. I agree. > * ntop is still uninterruptible by Ctrl-C when the password is > entered, but I guess it is because Ctrl-C is interpreted as a > character of the password. I believe that is true, but I'll look into it. > * I still get, after ctrl-C for the first run: > mar 12 d?c 2006 12:07:28 CET THREADMGMT[t3029126032]: RRD: Data collection > thread terminated [p11257] > *** glibc detected *** ntop: malloc(): memory corruption: 0x096121f0 *** > ======= Backtrace: ========= > /lib/libc.so.6[0x2ff54b] > /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_malloc+0x7e)[0x300c6e] > /usr/lib/libntop-3.2.so(ntop_safestrdup+0x39)[0xb585c9] > /usr/lib/libntop-3.2.so(traceEvent+0x312)[0xb7c472] > /usr/lib/libntop-3.2.so(pcapDispatch+0x1d2)[0xb5ba02] > /lib/libpthread.so.0[0x1532db] > /lib/libc.so.6(clone+0x5e)[0x365eee] > ======= Memory map: ======== > Abandon I'm unable to reproduce this. Try loading the debug symbols and getting a backtrace under gdb. > * Kevin made this relevant comment: > 8. Instead of removing the .a files you could just pass '--disable-static' > to configure. Possibly also enable: --enable-snmp ? I'll include both of those in the next release. > * I dislike the following in the init file: > chown -f root.ntop /var/ntop/*db > /dev/null 2>&1 > chmod -f 664 /var/ntop/*db > /dev/null 2>&1 > > Is it really needed? I dislike it too. There are some non-trivial permission problems that we must overcome. I think another patch is in order because I just found a security hole (the admin password file is created world readable). > * when starting ntop with /etc/init.d/ntop start > the [ OK ] doesn't appear. Fixed for the next release. > * the mechanism described in the "PRIVACY NOTICE" of the man > page should be disabled, at least when started from init file. > (the option may be in the ntp.conf file, for example). I forgot about this, so I'll fix it in the next release. > * ntop web server listens on all interfaces. In the default case > it should only listen to localhost, with > -w 127.0.0.1:3000 You're right, I'll change that in the init script and config file as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 12:08:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 07:08:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 191036] Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612121208.kBCC8o9c024660@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191036 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |matthias at rpmforge.net OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2006-12-12 07:08 EST ------- Great, if we can have this in Extras. First review steps, the spec file : - Please don't mix space and tab identing in spec files (there is one tab). - I suggest you use %{version} in Source0 line to be sure not to miss an update. - You should update to your 1.5.0.1 package, I guess... - Do we want to be shipping the static library? Probably not. - You should switch to "make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" (it works). About the build : - It compiles fine (tested FC6 x86_64), but with quite a few warnings. About the resulting packages : I tried to recompile the latest easytag, enabling libmp4v2 support, but the build failed with this error : gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libpng12 -o easytag about.o ape_tag.o bar.o browser.o cddb.o charset.o crc32.o dlm.o easytag.o et_core.o flac_header.o flac_tag.o id3_tag.o misc.o monkeyaudio_header.o mpeg_header.o mp4_header.o mp4_tag.o musepack_header.o msgbox.o ogg_header.o ogg_tag.o picture.o prefs.o scan.o setting.o vcedit.o -L/lib64 -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lpangocairo-1.0 -lpango-1.0 -lcairo -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lglib-2.0 libapetag/libapetag.a id3lib/libid3bugfix.a -lmp4v2 -lz -lstdc++ -lid3 -lFLAC -lvorbisfile -lvorbis -logg -lm mp4_header.o: In function `getType': /usr/src/rpm/BUILD/easytag-1.99.13/src/mp4_header.c:125: undefined reference to `MP4GetTrackMediaDataName' mp4_header.o: In function `Mp4_Header_Read_File_Info': /usr/src/rpm/BUILD/easytag-1.99.13/src/mp4_header.c:240: undefined reference to `MP4GetTrackAudioChannels' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status The linking stage seems to be including -lmp4v2 properly, but fails to find those two functions (using 1.4.1). Do you have any idea why? Would it be a problem with libmp4v2 or with how easytag tries to use it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 12:48:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 07:48:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210424] Review Request: fail2ban - scan log files and ban IPs with too many password failures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612121248.kBCCmJHi027407@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fail2ban - scan log files and ban IPs with too many password failures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210424 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(wcervini at gmail.com | |) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-12 07:47 EST ------- Well, again ping? I will close this bug as NOTABUG if I cannot receive any response within one week according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Policy/StalledReviews -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 12:48:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 07:48:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208113] Review Request: freepops - a tool to get html mail through a pop daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612121248.kBCCmfp7027453@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freepops - a tool to get html mail through a pop daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208113 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-12 07:48 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 12:50:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 07:50:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208113] Review Request: freepops - a tool to get html mail through a pop daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612121250.kBCCoKj1027592@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freepops - a tool to get html mail through a pop daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208113 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(thibaud.mouton at gma | |il.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 12:56:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 07:56:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219103] Review Request: dvdauthor - Command line DVD authoring tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612121256.kBCCug63027834@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvdauthor - Command line DVD authoring tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219103 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rpm at greysector.net ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-12-12 07:56 EST ------- I'll try to review this once legal doubts are cleared. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 13:04:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 08:04:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 186452] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612121304.kBCD4B4D028154@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186452 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2006-12-12 08:04 EST ------- New ping. Rex, what is the status of this RR? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 13:36:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 08:36:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 185531] Review Request: fcron, a task scheduler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612121336.kBCDanUe030198@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fcron, a task scheduler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185531 ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2006-12-12 08:36 EST ------- reply to comment#56: fcron couldn't replace vixie-cron, until fcron had selinux support, pam authentification, ... It has to work well under selinux enforcing. Preventing running jobs when system is on battery is also good feature. I'm working on it in vixie-cron. I'm looking forward to see new features in fcron. Replacing could be good in the future. Regards Marcela -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 13:39:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 08:39:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211729] Review Request: museek+ - Soulseek network filesharing client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612121339.kBCDdcfx030365@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: museek+ - Soulseek network filesharing client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211729 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-12-12 08:39 EST ------- 1. package meets naming and packaging guidelines. 2. specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. 3. dist tag is present. 4. build root is correct. %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) 5. license field matches the actual license. 6. license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. 7. source files match upstream: 5d871e40dc93c04e60688a06e0e143e8 museek+-0.1.12.tar.bz2 8. latest version is being packaged. 9. BuildRequires are proper. 10. package builds in mock (fc6 i386). 11. rpmlint is NOT silent. W: museek+ strange-permission museek-launcher 0775 W: museek+ macro-in-%changelog _datadir 12. final provides and requires are sane: museek+-0.1.12-2.fc6.i386.rpm: _mucipherc.so museek+ = 0.1.12-2.fc6 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/env /usr/bin/python libX11.so.6 libc.so.6 libfam.so.0 libgcc_s.so.1 libglib-2.0.so.0 libglibmm-2.4.so.1 libgobject-2.0.so.0 libm.so.6 libnsl.so.1 libogg.so.0 libpthread.so.0 libqt-mt.so.3 libsigc-2.0.so.0 libstdc++.so.6 libvorbis.so.0 libvorbisfile.so.3 libxml++-2.6.so.2 libxml2.so.2 libz.so.1 python(abi) = 2.4 museek+-0.1.12-2.fc6.src.rpm: (none) = desktop-file-utils python-devel libxml++-devel qt-devel gamin-devel swig libvorbis-devel PyXML pygtk2-devel scons 13. no shared libraries are present. 14. package is not relocatable. 15. owns the directories it creates. 16. doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. 17. no duplicates in %files. 18. file permissions are appropriate (?) -> see 11. 19. %clean is present. 20. %check is not present and no testsuite present 21. no scriptlets present. 22. code, not content. 23. documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. 24. %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. 25. no headers. 26. no pkgconfig files. 27. no libtool .la droppings. 28. not a GUI app. 29. not a web app. Please fix 11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 14:18:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 09:18:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214830] Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612121418.kBCEIr5B001736@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214830 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2006-12-12 09:18 EST ------- Is there anything further I need to do here, or were my most recent changes sufficient? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 14:21:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 09:21:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219289] New: Review Request: python-CDDB - CDDB and FreeDB audio CD track info access in Python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219289 Summary: Review Request: python-CDDB - CDDB and FreeDB audio CD track info access in Python Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jeff at ocjtech.us QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/python-CDDB-1.4-1.fc6.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/python-CDDB-1.4-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: This is actually a set of three modules to access the CDDB and FreeDB online databases of audio CD track titles and information. It includes a C extension module to fetch track lengths under Linux, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, Mac OS X, Solaris, and Win32, which is easily ported to other operating systems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 14:23:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 09:23:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219289] Review Request: python-CDDB - CDDB and FreeDB audio CD track info access in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612121423.kBCEND33002356@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-CDDB - CDDB and FreeDB audio CD track info access in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219289 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |219059 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 14:30:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 09:30:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 191036] Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612121430.kBCEUNKm003207@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191036 ------- Additional Comments From noa at resare.com 2006-12-12 09:30 EST ------- I'm sorry to say that I won't have time to pick this up in reasonable time. I had some hopes that when my employment situation changed a month ago I would get some time to contribute to FE, but it seems like being the proud employee of a two person startup doesn't give that much free time. Feel free to carry on with the contribution as you see fit Matthias. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 15:15:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:15:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216534] Review Request: gocr - GNU Optical Character Recognition program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612121515.kBCFFiQm007421@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gocr - GNU Optical Character Recognition program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216534 ------- Additional Comments From greg at runlevel7.ca 2006-12-12 10:15 EST ------- Maybe it does, but relating to use with FuzzyOcr, I read this comment on the FuzzyOcr mailing list: (it is a private archive) http://lists.own-hero.net/mailman/private/devel-spam/2006-December/001091.html Someone wrote: "I can confirm that - on large images, scanning times can go through the roof (over 30 secs on a pic i had... gocr0.40 needed 1 sec, 0.41 8 secs and 0.42 35 secs) And I already found 3 of 10 images which crash gocr 0.42 with Error in ocr0.c L208: idx out of range" Granted, it's just one person's comment, but it seems gocr is heading in a different direction than what is good for scanning possible spam. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 15:20:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:20:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218600] Review Request: resapplet - Resolution Switching Applet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612121520.kBCFKnff007813@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: resapplet - Resolution Switching Applet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218600 ------- Additional Comments From rvokal at redhat.com 2006-12-12 10:20 EST ------- I have decided to remove all Suse icons and keep only the original ones. Please check my latest changes http://people.redhat.com/rvokal/resapplet/resapplet.spec http://people.redhat.com/rvokal/resapplet/resapplet-0.1.1-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 16:32:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:32:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219327] New: Review Request: kazehakase - Kazehakase browser Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219327 Summary: Review Request: kazehakase - Kazehakase browser Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/kazehakase.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/kazehakase-0.4.3-1.src.rpm Description: Kazehakase is a Web browser which aims to provide a user interface that is truly user-friendly & fully customizable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 16:32:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:32:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209260] Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612121632.kBCGWktj014954@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209260 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-12-12 11:32 EST ------- Blah, sorry for the delayed response. I've been completely tied up with another project (my "day job" deals mostly w/the rhel kernel, not fedora). I hope to be able to look at this today, along with hopefully spinning 0.1.3 packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 16:49:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:49:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210424] Review Request: fail2ban - scan log files and ban IPs with too many password failures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612121649.kBCGnmIC017157@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fail2ban - scan log files and ban IPs with too many password failures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210424 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-12-12 11:49 EST ------- Note also http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2006-6302 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 16:54:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:54:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 185531] Review Request: fcron, a task scheduler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612121654.kBCGs8Z8017843@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fcron, a task scheduler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185531 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-12-12 11:53 EST ------- fcron allready uses pam and it has selinux support. I don't know to what extent it works well with selinux enforcing, though, as I don't have selinux enabled. And regarding pam what exactly are you waiting for? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 17:28:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:28:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219119] Review Request: pyscript - Postscript graphics with Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612121728.kBCHSfQN022854@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyscript - Postscript graphics with Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219119 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-12-12 12:28 EST ------- rpmlint is silent now, so nothing stands in the way to make this package accepted. APPROVED. Don't forget to close this ticket after rebuilding package in devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 17:54:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:54:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219289] Review Request: python-CDDB - CDDB and FreeDB audio CD track info access in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612121754.kBCHsLbL024914@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-CDDB - CDDB and FreeDB audio CD track info access in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219289 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mr.ecik at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-12-12 12:54 EST ------- MUST items: * rpmlint is quiet * package is named well * spec file name is good * package meets Packaging Guidelines * package is licensed with a GPL open-source compatible license * License field in spec file matches actual license * license file is included in %doc * md5sums are matching (254698082bafe3030d07d88fb7e13fe2) * package successfully compiles on x86_64 * BuildRequires listed well * no locales * no need to %post and %postun sections * not relocatable * package owns directories well * no duplicates in %files * %files section includes %defattr * proper %clean section * macros used well Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 18:54:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 13:54:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219352] New: Review Request: perl-Geo-Forward - Calculate geographic location from lat, lon, distance, and heading Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219352 Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-Forward - Calculate geographic location from lat, lon, distance, and heading Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-Geo-Forward.spec SRPM URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-Geo-Forward-0.11-1.src.rpm Description: Calculate geographic location from lat, lon, distance, and heading Note: the Geo::* modules are requirements of Net::GPSD -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 18:55:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 13:55:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219353] New: Review Request: perl-Geo-Inverse - Calculate geographic distance from a lat & lon pair Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219353 Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-Inverse - Calculate geographic distance from a lat & lon pair Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-Geo-Inverse.spec SRPM URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-Geo-Inverse-0.04-1.src.rpm Description: Calculate geographic distance from a lat & lon pair Note: the Geo::* modules are requirements of Net::GPSD -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 19:01:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 14:01:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213600] Review Request: tinyca2 - Simple graphical userinterface to manage a small CA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612121901.kBCJ1PdJ030629@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tinyca2 - Simple graphical userinterface to manage a small CA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213600 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-12-12 14:01 EST ------- sorry; password manager does not work for wiki and I forget everytime the password and was not able to file a branch request -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 19:02:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 14:02:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214087] Review Request: libextractor -- Simple library for keyword extraction In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612121902.kBCJ2KDl030684@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libextractor -- Simple library for keyword extraction https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214087 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-12-12 14:02 EST ------- * Fri Nov 24 2006 Enrico Scholz - 0.5.16-1 - updated to 0.5.16; handling of libgsf linking of main library needs some rethinking: adding such a heavy dependency just to workaround a problem in one plugin is not acceptably -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 19:54:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 14:54:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211729] Review Request: museek+ - Soulseek network filesharing client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612121954.kBCJsro6003757@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: museek+ - Soulseek network filesharing client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211729 ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2006-12-12 14:54 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.republika.pl/belegdol/rpmstuff/museek+.spec SRPM URL: http://www.republika.pl/belegdol/rpmstuff/museek+-0.1.12-3.src.rpm New release: - Fixed museek-launcher permissions - Fixed %%changelog section - Updated museek-launcher script - Use $RPM_OPT_FLAGS instead %%{optflags} for consistency - Add -fPIC to $RPM_OPT_FLAGS to make x86-64 build possible -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 20:44:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:44:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211729] Review Request: museek+ - Soulseek network filesharing client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612122044.kBCKiUAG009263@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: museek+ - Soulseek network filesharing client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211729 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-12-12 15:44 EST ------- Builds in x86_64 mock, too. Looks like rpmlint doesn't recognize museek-launcher as a script and still complains: W: museek+ strange-permission museek-launcher 0755 Try changing the first line to #!/bin/sh. It doesn't need bash anyway, does it? Nevertheless, it's no blocker, so... APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 20:45:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:45:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211729] Review Request: museek+ - Soulseek network filesharing client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612122045.kBCKj5TT009308@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: museek+ - Soulseek network filesharing client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211729 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 22:01:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:01:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189188] Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612122201.kBCM18aA017572@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189188 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-12-12 17:00 EST ------- http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/sqlgrey-1.7.4-3.src.rpm This version addresses all obvious problems that I'm aware of. I'm still not completely sure that it works properly, but it does start up with no errors or warnings. I have it installed on a new mail server that is (hopefully) going live tomorrow, so I'll know more then. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 22:07:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:07:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218367] Review Request: compat-guile - Guile compatibility package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612122207.kBCM7c0Q018225@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-guile - Guile compatibility package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218367 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-12-12 17:07 EST ------- TeXmacs, the package for which I needed compat-guile, supports in its new version guile 1.8, so my interest in a compat-guile package has all but vanished. It would be better if someone who needs it takes up the request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 22:18:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:18:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218258] Review Request: audacious-docklet - a docklet plugin for Audacious In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612122218.kBCMINop018918@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-docklet - a docklet plugin for Audacious https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218258 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-12-12 17:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Thank you so much for your carefully review. This is my first time... No problem, you are welcome. > I update the spec file as required. > Spec URL: > SRPM URL: I'm getting a 404 error on these. > However, After I change Release tag to "1%{?dist}", there's no "fc6" in the > src.rpm. Is that correct? Yes, but the buildsys will resolve it to fc5/6/7. You could add something like %distname fc %distversion %(rpm -qf --qf='%{VERSION}' /etc/redhat-release) %dist .%{distname}%{distversion} to your ~/.rpmmacros to also have the disttag for your local builds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 12 22:26:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:26:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 197765] Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612122226.kBCMQFRA019617@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197765 ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2006-12-12 17:26 EST ------- >From the lead Citadel developer: Mon 11 Dec 2006 12:43:30 PM EST from IGnatius T Foobar @uncnsrd > Do you guy's have contact with Omar at all? Is libical dead again? Is > there a new maintainer? I've sent him a few emails but I seem to have lost touch with him. He was given admin access to the SourceForge site, and we all expected that he was going to upload his code there, which would essentially make it *the* new version. Andrea Campi and Eric Busboom were happy to hand over maintainership of it to him. I really don't want to take ownership of libical if we don't have to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 02:06:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:06:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 172869] Review Request: nss-mdns In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612130206.kBD26vKP032395@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nss-mdns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172869 ------- Additional Comments From adam at spicenitz.org 2006-12-12 21:06 EST ------- When trying this out on x86_64, I found that installing the 64-bit version and changing the nsswitch file to use nss-mdns would break 32-bit name lookup. I'm guessing that the 32-bit version is definitely required to be installed when the 64-bit version is? How would the build system allow for this? Requires: %{name}.i386 ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 02:25:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:25:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 168690] Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612130225.kBD2P0k7000788@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168690 ------- Additional Comments From andy at andrewprice.me.uk 2006-12-12 21:24 EST ------- As mentioned on comment #22 my bug tracker now has support for proper user accounts. Hopefully some of the noise I'm generating on this bugzilla can be transferred over there now. See http://projects.sucs.org/projects/pybackpack/ Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 02:40:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:40:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218367] Review Request: compat-guile - Guile compatibility package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612130240.kBD2e0YJ001668@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-guile - Guile compatibility package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218367 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-12 21:39 EST ------- Chitlesh, that you want a new "reviewer" means you want to take over this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 02:54:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:54:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208420] Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612130254.kBD2ssTb002755@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208420 ------- Additional Comments From pkovacs at users.sourceforge.net 2006-12-12 21:54 EST ------- Conky 1.4.5 has been released. http://sourceforge.net/projects/conky/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 03:36:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 22:36:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219289] Review Request: python-CDDB - CDDB and FreeDB audio CD track info access in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612130336.kBD3aRlV005798@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-CDDB - CDDB and FreeDB audio CD track info access in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219289 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-12-12 22:36 EST ------- Thanks for the review! Package imported and built. Branches for FC-6 and FC-6 requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 04:06:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 23:06:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219164] Review Request: fontypython - TTF font manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612130406.kBD46kIt008461@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fontypython - TTF font manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219164 ------- Additional Comments From cr33dog at gmail.com 2006-12-12 23:06 EST ------- Sorry for delay - I've been re-evaluating build practices. Should have something tangible tomorrow... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 04:11:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 23:11:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208420] Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612130411.kBD4B8E0008929@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208420 ------- Additional Comments From miker5slow at grandecom.net 2006-12-12 23:11 EST ------- http://errr.fluxbox-wiki.org/fedora_stuff/conky/conky-1.4.5-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 04:20:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 23:20:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219119] Review Request: pyscript - Postscript graphics with Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612130420.kBD4K80L010088@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyscript - Postscript graphics with Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219119 jspaleta at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 04:22:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 23:22:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215258] Review Request: clucene - A C++ port of Lucene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612130422.kBD4MKTg010441@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clucene - A C++ port of Lucene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215258 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2006-12-12 23:22 EST ------- Hi Jochen, Would you please go ahead with the approval; a package I'm intending to submit for reviews is waiting on it. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 04:30:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 23:30:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219352] Review Request: perl-Geo-Forward - Calculate geographic location from lat, lon, distance, and heading In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612130430.kBD4UWiY011474@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-Forward - Calculate geographic location from lat, lon, distance, and heading https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219352 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 04:30:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 23:30:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219353] Review Request: perl-Geo-Inverse - Calculate geographic distance from a lat & lon pair In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612130430.kBD4UgpB011508@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-Inverse - Calculate geographic distance from a lat & lon pair https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219353 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 04:34:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 23:34:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215569] Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612130434.kBD4Yqon012140@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215569 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-12 23:34 EST ------- Well, any state change on this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 04:48:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 23:48:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612130448.kBD4mcg7014100@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 ------- Additional Comments From wilmer at fedoraproject.org 2006-12-12 23:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #24) > > E: mybashburn world-writable /etc/mybashburnrc 0666 > > ---> Note that this is good and is necessary for the package, > > see comment #3 > > Are you kidding? Files in /etc must not be writable by ordinary > users. The software is flawed, if there is no implementation of > user-local configuration files in $HOME. > Yes, i'm sure, this should be ignored. > > %{buildroot}/usr/lib/debug > Then your RPM config or installation is broken. You don't need to > create that directory. Yes, fixed. > You include the directory /usr/bin which is wrong, since it belongs into > the core "filesystem" package already. Fixed. All other rpmlint E: have been solved: 1) Fixed DOS/Windows-like (CRLF) end-of-line encoding with %%{__sed} tag. 2) Replaced %%{_bindir}/* tag of %%files section by %%{_bindir}/files. 3) Cleanup in %%install section. 4) Replaced %%config(noreplace) instead %%config. Updated to 1.0-2 -- package at: http://www.fedora-ve.org/mybashburn/downloads/mybashburn.spec SRPM URL: http://www.fedora-ve.org/mybashburn/downloads/mybashburn-1.0-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 04:53:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 23:53:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612130453.kBD4rQ8i014793@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 ------- Additional Comments From wilmer at fedoraproject.org 2006-12-12 23:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #25) > Updated to 1.0-2 -- package at: i meant 1.0-3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 05:14:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 00:14:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219352] Review Request: perl-Geo-Forward - Calculate geographic location from lat, lon, distance, and heading In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612130514.kBD5EuUV017755@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-Forward - Calculate geographic location from lat, lon, distance, and heading https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219352 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-13 00:14 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPMS. + source files match upstream. 6142d7c7c67bf1d7aee09a40ad5e0512 Geo-Forward-0.11.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + %check used make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/base....ok All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=17, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.03 cusr + 0.00 csys = 0.03 CPU) + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Dose owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Followed perl packaging guidelines. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 05:17:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 00:17:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612130517.kBD5HwgB018109@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-12-13 00:17 EST ------- E: mybashburn world-writable /etc/mybashburnrc 0666 (In reply to comment #25) > (In reply to comment #24) > > > E: mybashburn world-writable /etc/mybashburnrc 0666 > > > ---> Note that this is good and is necessary for the package, > > > see comment #3 > > > > Are you kidding? Files in /etc must not be writable by ordinary > > users. The software is flawed, if there is no implementation of > > user-local configuration files in $HOME. > > > > Yes, i'm sure, this should be ignored. Bummer, I guess, I can't avoid some _very clear_ words: * A world-wide writeable file is NOT acceptable. * A package relying on such a "feature" is maldesigned. => Your only choices are * Fix this defect/maldesign of the package * Withdraw this review request. Unless this has been fixed, there is NO WAY for this package to make into Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 05:21:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 00:21:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219353] Review Request: perl-Geo-Inverse - Calculate geographic distance from a lat & lon pair In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612130521.kBD5LDcA018454@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-Inverse - Calculate geographic distance from a lat & lon pair https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219353 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-13 00:21 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPMS. + source files match upstream. 0f401e9878fcf69d3ad701b1b2103898 Geo-Inverse-0.04.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + %check used make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/base....ok All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=11, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 cusr + 0.01 csys = 0.03 CPU) + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Dose owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Followed perl packaging guidelines. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 05:56:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 00:56:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189188] Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612130556.kBD5uN8G020369@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189188 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-13 00:56 EST ------- Looking at the package from comment #18: >> 1. Might include the gpl COPYING file? >> >> 2. Might include the Changelog and CONTRIB as %doc files? > >I'll fix that in -3. Doesn't look like those are addressed from what I can see... Otherwise it's looking pretty good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 06:02:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 01:02:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 204493] Review Request: perl-Mozilla-DOM - Perl interface to Mozilla DOM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612130602.kBD622Mo020652@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mozilla-DOM - Perl interface to Mozilla DOM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204493 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-12-13 01:02 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=143491) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=143491&action=view) Hack to get this package compiled against firefox With this patch applied and the spec having been changed to use firefox-devel, this package compiles. I haven't tried to use this perl-dist nor am I particularily interested in this package, so I don't know if this breaks something or not ;) Afterwards, this exposes ca. 10 further bogus Requires and *Provides*. => You also need to filter provides. Instead of using external filter scripts, I prefer using filter scripts being inlined into the spec (For details of how I do this, c.f. rt3's spec in FE's CVS). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 06:02:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 01:02:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207473] Review Request: ruby-activerecord - Implements the ActiveRecord pattern for ORM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612130602.kBD62K2b020680@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-activerecord - Implements the ActiveRecord pattern for ORM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207473 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-12-13 01:02 EST ------- My apologies; somehow this slipped past me. Still builds fine on rawhide, tests are run and all pass: Finished in 0.657058 seconds. 117 tests, 298 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors 1.14.4 is still current. Everything else looks good. Already did the review, and everything these still applies except that %check has been added. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 06:03:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 01:03:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211728] Review Request: stklos - Scheme Interpreter/Compiler System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612130603.kBD63xFU020779@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stklos - Scheme Interpreter/Compiler System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211728 ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-12-13 01:03 EST ------- gdk-pixbuf-devel in FC6 extras no longer depends on gtk+-devel, so the BR is not redundant. What's the decision regarding -devel? IMHO it'll be nice to just make stklos Provides: stklos-devel for now. Especially if third-party modules can be compiled against the headers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 06:59:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 01:59:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218367] Review Request: compat-guile - Guile compatibility package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612130659.kBD6xTKi023141@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-guile - Guile compatibility package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218367 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-12-13 01:59 EST ------- Yes, I'll take over this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 07:14:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 02:14:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218367] Review Request: compat-guile - Guile compatibility package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612130714.kBD7Es4R023634@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-guile - Guile compatibility package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218367 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-13 02:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Yes, I'll take over this package. Well, then please * once close this bug as NOTABUG and make this report block bug 201449 * request a new review request (of which the reporter is you) * then, change the status of this bug from NOTABUG to DUPLICATE of your new review request (this time I can notice that this bug is marked as a duplicate) Then I will review your review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 07:47:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 02:47:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612130747.kBD7lohV024796@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 ------- Additional Comments From wilmer at fedoraproject.org 2006-12-13 02:47 EST ------- Really thanks for this very clear words, now with the amount of problems arisen with this revision i lost of see the development of the project, consequently, I maintain the request of this revision and I concentrate in the development and adjustment of defect/maldesign of the package. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 09:10:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 04:10:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612130910.kBD9ACHq029941@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 wilmer at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: MyBashBurn |Review Request: MyBashBurn - |1.0-1 - burn data and songs.|burn data and songs. ------- Additional Comments From wilmer at fedoraproject.org 2006-12-13 04:10 EST ------- Ready, removed /etc/mybashburnrc, now it's configure in run time to ~/.mybashburnrc, Builds OK, rpmlint is silent, permissions fine. New files updated: http://www.fedora-ve.org/mybashburn/downloads/mybashburn.spec SRPM URL: http://www.fedora-ve.org/mybashburn/downloads/mybashburn-1.0-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 10:00:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 05:00:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208420] Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612131000.kBDA0uWt005922@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208420 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-12-13 05:00 EST ------- There are still timed_thread.c and timed_thread.h with an author and no license, which means a restrictive license: /* timed_thread.c * Author: Philip Kovacs I missed them in my previous audit, but it is Philip who is the author, so it shouldn't be problematic... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 10:14:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 05:14:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208420] Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612131014.kBDAE9eD006825@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208420 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-12-13 05:14 EST ------- Also NEWS is now relevant so should be shipped. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 10:37:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 05:37:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 195645] Review Request: rasqal - RDF query library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612131037.kBDAbVMn008757@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rasqal - RDF query library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195645 ------- Additional Comments From thomas at apestaart.org 2006-12-13 05:37 EST ------- I can't update to a newer raptor: gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -o .libs/roqet roqet.o ../src/.libs/librasqal.so -L/usr/lib64 -lraptor roqet.o: In function `main': /usr/src/rpm/BUILD/rasqal-0.9.13/utils/roqet.c:649: undefined reference to `raptor_get_feature_count' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[1]: *** [roqet] Error 1 The extras version of rasqal is four releases behind, I assume updating that one would allow me to build this one. Pushing a new build with the fixed requires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 11:09:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 06:09:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218258] Review Request: audacious-docklet - a docklet plugin for Audacious In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612131109.kBDB9oKC012367@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-docklet - a docklet plugin for Audacious https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218258 ------- Additional Comments From yufanyufan at gmail.com 2006-12-13 06:09 EST ------- fixed URL: Spec URL: SRPM URL: I hope everything goes right this time! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 12:00:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 07:00:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 201418] Review Request: widelands - GPL Settlers II clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612131200.kBDC0bRq015366@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: widelands - GPL Settlers II clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201418 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-12-13 07:00 EST ------- I'm afraid this time it is me taking a long time to respond. I'm currently moving from one home to another and thus I'm both very busy and without internet at home. I will get back to this as time permits, but for now I have to ask for some patience. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 13:28:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 08:28:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208420] Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612131328.kBDDSk3t020287@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208420 ------- Additional Comments From miker5slow at grandecom.net 2006-12-13 08:28 EST ------- So is shipping NEWS the only thing needed for this to get added or is there another blocker?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 14:52:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:52:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208420] Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612131452.kBDEqeAC028303@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208420 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-12-13 09:52 EST ------- Shipping the NEWS file is not a blocker, but the license issue is a blocker. We need a word from Philip on timed_thread.c. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 15:48:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 10:48:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215258] Review Request: clucene - A C++ port of Lucene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612131548.kBDFmXn8000906@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clucene - A C++ port of Lucene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215258 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-12-13 10:48 EST ------- On #12 I have APPROVED !!! your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 15:48:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 10:48:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215258] Review Request: clucene - A C++ port of Lucene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612131548.kBDFmq5U000926@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clucene - A C++ port of Lucene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215258 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-12-13 10:48 EST ------- On #12 I have APPROVED !!! your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 15:52:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 10:52:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209260] Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612131552.kBDFq2UR001237@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209260 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-12-13 10:51 EST ------- Okay, in the forthcoming 0.1.3 build, xy_XY translations have all been moved to just xy, where they really ought to be. The remaining unowned translation directories will be added to the filesystem package, once I've collected all of them from all the latest beryl components. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 16:05:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:05:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189188] Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612131605.kBDG5H4j003042@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189188 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-12-13 11:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > Looking at the package from comment #18: > > >> 1. Might include the gpl COPYING file? > >> > >> 2. Might include the Changelog and CONTRIB as %doc files? > > > >I'll fix that in -3. > > Doesn't look like those are addressed from what I can see... Oops, try -4. http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/sqlgrey-1.7.4-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 16:11:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:11:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215258] Review Request: clucene - A C++ port of Lucene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612131611.kBDGBqDI004026@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clucene - A C++ port of Lucene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215258 dakingun at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2006-12-13 11:11 EST ------- Oh, thanks. However, you should have changed the blocker bug from FE-REVIEW to FE-ACCEPT (bz #163779). I'm doing so on your behalf now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 16:50:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:50:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208420] Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612131650.kBDGoiuj007731@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208420 ------- Additional Comments From pkovacs at users.sourceforge.net 2006-12-13 11:50 EST ------- Sorry, I forgot to affix the Lesser GPL licens to my original modules. The following now appears on the timed_thread modules in svn: /* * timed_thread.h: Abstraction layer for timed threads * * Copyright (C) 2006 Philip Kovacs pkovacs at users.sourceforge.net * * This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or * modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public * License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either * version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. * * This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU * Lesser General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public * License along with this library; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 * USA. * */ The NEWS file is in the tarball, but I forgot to update it for 1.4.5. That too has been updated in svn. I hope these minor points don't hold up inclusion for you. NEWS ---- Summary of changes for Conky release 1.4.5: ------------------------------------------- Added config items: - max_specials - max_port_monitor_connections Removed config items: - min_port_monitors - min_port_monitor_connections Added variables: - entropy_avail - entropy_poolsize - entropy_bar Added length specifier to audacious_title. Split battery var into: - battery and battery_time Fixed broken texeci variable. Fixed build error with --disable-x11. Fixed build error with --disable-xdamage. Fixed acpi battery issues. Fixed mem var overflows when >= 4GB. Close pop3/imap sockets properly. Improved internal thread handling. Converted tcp_portmon internal hash to GLib for GPL compatibility. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 16:59:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:59:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218600] Review Request: resapplet - Resolution Switching Applet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612131659.kBDGxpFq008440@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: resapplet - Resolution Switching Applet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218600 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-13 11:59 EST ------- Thanks. rpmlint is reporting only no-url-tag warning. Everthign other looks OK. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 17:47:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:47:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215258] Review Request: clucene - A C++ port of Lucene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612131747.kBDHl9p4010998@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clucene - A C++ port of Lucene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215258 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-12-13 12:47 EST ------- Sorry, I have forgotten to change to FE-ACCEPT -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 19:02:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 14:02:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217311] Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612131902.kBDJ27M2017548@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217311 ------- Additional Comments From mike at cchtml.com 2006-12-13 14:02 EST ------- The opening of ar archives has been fixed in SVN r24084. What's left to do? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 19:06:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 14:06:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189195] Review Request: horde - php application framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612131906.kBDJ61Ff017945@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-12-13 14:05 EST ------- I've found myself needing to get horde running in the relatively near term, and the CentOS packaging seems to be bogus in that they don't actually have the entire dependency chain packaged. (You can install horde and such but you still don't have the PEAR modules needed to run it.) So I'm willing to put in some review time if there's still interest in getting this in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 19:16:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 14:16:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217311] Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612131916.kBDJGvoC019413@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217311 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-12-13 14:16 EST ------- I'll have to package the svn version. I'm not really sure that the segfault is really fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 19:58:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 14:58:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189195] Review Request: horde - php application framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612131958.kBDJwMrZ023940@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-12-13 14:58 EST ------- I'm extremely still interested in getting this package in... I've just not had anyone committed to a full review. I'll try to get some new RPMs out the door tonight that include php-domxml instead of php-xml per Greg's comments. WRT php-database, I'm torn. Granted, it's not required for horde to be operational, but most users will want to use horde's DB storage for preferences, etc. What is FE's usual "best-practice" for optional dependencies: minimalistic dependency chains for advanced users, or added dependencies for more default functionality? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 20:09:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:09:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208420] Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612132009.kBDK95bq024947@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208420 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-12-13 15:09 EST ------- I attach the svn patch, adding it would be satisfying in my opinion. The review was already done in comment #23. still match upstream. 4625c052852f2919a5e7ce2eb7c31189 conky-1.4.5.tar.bz2 APPROVED with the patch applied. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 20:10:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:10:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208420] Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612132010.kBDKAk26025188@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208420 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-12-13 15:10 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=143549) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=143549&action=view) diff against svn with NEWS and licenses updates -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 20:11:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:11:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208420] Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612132011.kBDKBNaj025235@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208420 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-12-13 15:11 EST ------- I also would like to thanks Philip for helping with the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 20:40:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:40:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189195] Review Request: horde - php application framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612132040.kBDKeAY6027365@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-12-13 15:40 EST ------- The thing about requiring php_database is that if someone just does "yum install horde" then yum will find the packages providing php_database and if none is installed then it will pick the one with the shortest name. Since php-odbc is likely to be the least useful of all the packages, this is rather bad. So in general the dependency doesn't really help anyone. You'll still need to know to install whichever php-??sql you need, and in addition you'd need to get rid of the errant php-odbc package. So if the package is at all useful without one of those packages, I'd say to leave out the dependency. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 20:54:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:54:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219539] New: Review Request: qsa - QT Script for Applications Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219539 Summary: Review Request: qsa - QT Script for Applications Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: belegdol at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.republika.pl/belegdol/rpmstuff/qsa.spec SRPM URL: http://www.republika.pl/belegdol/rpmstuff/qsa-1.1.4-1.src.rpm Description: Qt Script for Applications can be used to build scripable applications with Qt Package builds fine inside mock. RPM is not completely silent, but I have fixed a bit more warnings/errors than qt4-qsa. The ones that still persist are as follows: qsa-1.1.4-1.src.rpm E: qsa configure-without-libdir-spec rpmlint qsa-devel-1.1.4-1.i386.rpm E: qsa-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib W: qsa-devel hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/qsa-devel-1.1.4/examples/spreadsheet/.examplefiles W: qsa-devel hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/qsa-devel-1.1.4/examples/spreadsheet/.examplefiles This package will add qsa support for qt3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 20:57:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:57:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219539] Review Request: qsa - QT Script for Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612132057.kBDKvD6t030111@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qsa - QT Script for Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219539 frank-buettner at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: qsa - QT |Review Request: qsa - QT |Script for Applications |Script for Applications ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-12-13 15:57 EST ------- We still have an QSA Package inside FC Extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 21:03:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:03:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215569] Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612132103.kBDL3InZ030823@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215569 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-12-13 16:03 EST ------- I've incorporated the asm stuff Tom suggested in comment #12 and done a 0.1.3 build, but it still suffers from the same undefined symbols problem, which I've not been able to trace the root cause of just yet. http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/beryl-vidcap-0.1.3-1.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 21:04:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:04:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219539] Review Request: qsa - QT Script for Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612132104.kBDL4fJ0030947@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qsa - QT Script for Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219539 ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2006-12-13 16:04 EST ------- but the one you have packaged is for qt4 and does not work with qt3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 21:07:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:07:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219539] Review Request: qsa - QT Script for Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612132107.kBDL73Ve031310@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qsa - QT Script for Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219539 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-12-13 16:07 EST ------- Because 1.2.1 can only run with Qt4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 21:10:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:10:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219539] Review Request: qsa - QT Script for Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612132110.kBDLAk9f031619@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qsa - QT Script for Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219539 ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2006-12-13 16:10 EST ------- Indeed. That's why I packaged 1.1.4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 21:12:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:12:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219539] Review Request: qsa - QT Script for Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612132112.kBDLCNd1031751@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qsa - QT Script for Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219539 ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2006-12-13 16:12 EST ------- To clarify: qsa and qt4-qsa can be installed simultaneously, independently of each other. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 21:28:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:28:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219539] Review Request: qsa - QT Script for Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612132128.kBDLSCQ4000907@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qsa - QT Script for Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219539 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-12-13 16:28 EST ------- Yes but an better name will be qt3-qsa. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 21:32:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:32:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219539] Review Request: qsa - QT Script for Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612132132.kBDLWx80001435@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qsa - QT Script for Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219539 ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2006-12-13 16:32 EST ------- Well, possibly. I can change that with next release. I can ask at tomorrow's FESCO meeting as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 21:55:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:55:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219327] Review Request: kazehakase - Kazehakase browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612132155.kBDLtfLc004628@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kazehakase - Kazehakase browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219327 gemi at bluewin.ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gemi at bluewin.ch ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-12-13 16:55 EST ------- Builds fine in mock(FC-6). * /usr/lib/kazehakase is not owned by the package * the desktop file categories should be: Categories=Network;Application;X-Fedora; -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 21:57:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:57:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217311] Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612132157.kBDLvxIB004815@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217311 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-12-13 16:57 EST ------- Update to 0.4.9-0.1.svn_r24096: - fixes segfault from comment #9 - xa now checks for debs correctly (comment #10) - remove all patches, included upstream now - remove mimetypes x-ar, x-lha and lx-hz - remove mimetype x-deb as long as debs are extracted to /tmp/data.tar.gz SPEC: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras/review/SPECS/xarchiver.spec SRPM: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras/review/SRPMS/xarchiver-0.4.9-0.1.20061213svn.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 22:10:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:10:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189195] Review Request: horde - php application framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612132210.kBDMABGp005722@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 ------- Additional Comments From greg at runlevel7.ca 2006-12-13 17:10 EST ------- > I'll try to get some new RPMs out the door > tonight that include php-domxml instead of php-xml per Greg's comments. Thanks, but if you're planning to make horde available for FC6, you'll still need to use php-xml - I think the issue was only fixed so far in Rawhide and RHEL5. Don't bother changing it - I'm sure it's more correct for you to require php-xml - my comments about that were off-topic for this bug report - sorry - I can't wait for Enterprise Extras though ;-) Also wanted to note that php-pear(File) is a suggested but optional pear module to install with Horde. I think it's the only pear module the horde apps can use that isn't in Extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 23:19:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:19:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212003] Review Request: mugshot - Companion software for mugshot.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612132319.kBDNJtem009683@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mugshot - Companion software for mugshot.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212003 ------- Additional Comments From dff at redhat.com 2006-12-13 18:19 EST ------- This is irrelevant to the client software package review happening here, but minor correction to the initial description: while the client software is 100% GPL, the server software is primarily licensed under the OSL 3.0. See http://developer.mugshot.org/wiki/License for info. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 23:37:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:37:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208420] Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612132337.kBDNbL0o010510@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208420 ------- Additional Comments From pkovacs at users.sourceforge.net 2006-12-13 18:37 EST ------- My pleasure. Thank you for including conky in your distribution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 23:42:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:42:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218258] Review Request: audacious-docklet - a docklet plugin for Audacious In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612132342.kBDNg4Xj010634@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-docklet - a docklet plugin for Audacious https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218258 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-12-13 18:42 EST ------- Some more things I'd like you to fix: - BuildRequires: are incorrect. Instead of glib-devel you mean glib2-devel. audacious-devel already requires glib2-devel and gtk2-devel, so there's no need to list them (twice). On the other hand you need gettext for %find_lang (see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-8c605ebf8330f6d505f384e671986fa99a8f72ee) and maybe perl(XML::Parser) for generating the locales. - better change Requires: audacious to audacious-plugins, because that packgage owns /usr/lib/audacious/(General). - there are two typos in %description, also I think that you don't need to mention the minimize feature, "control Audacious" is IMO enought. How about: "A plugin that allows you to control Audacious from the system tray."? If your description is longer, don't forget to add a line warp after 79 characters. - add "--disable-static" to %configure, because we don't want no static libs, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-2302ec1e1f44202c9cc4bcce24cb711266557ad7libdocklet.a - we also don't want no libtool archives, so remove libdocklet.la after install: %find_lang %{name} rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{plugin_dir}/General/libdocklet.la - audacious-docklet-0.1.1.tar.bz2 inside of the srpm has permissions of 555, please change it to 644. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 23:53:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:53:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189195] Review Request: horde - php application framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612132353.kBDNr8Qw010992@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-12-13 18:52 EST ------- I hesitate to suggest it, but theoretically someone could push a php-domxml package into extras that has no files and a single dependency on php-xml. But in the end it should be easy to just conditionalize the dependency based on the Fedora (or RHEL) release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 13 23:58:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:58:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217311] Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612132358.kBDNwpul011480@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217311 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-12-13 18:58 EST ------- In the spec file comment, there is svn co http://svn.xfce.org/svn/goodies/xfce4-websearch-plugin/trunk xfce4-websearch-plugin I think it should be svn co -r24096 http://svn.xfce.org/svn/xfce/xarchiver/trunk xarchiver Otherwise * rpmlint gives: W: xarchiver mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 12) * name is right * follow guidelines * svn snapshot used for good reasons * .desktop file shipped * icons installed scriptlets used correctly * match upstream (verified with a diff) * %files section right needs work: Should the BR be gettext or gettext-devel? Currently it seems to need some autoconf macros from gettext-devel, but even after they are not needed anymore isn't gettext-devel needed? APPROVED, with the gettext question answered, and the proper comment for source generation added. Please, don't push to FC-6 or FC-5 until the security issue has been solved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 00:15:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:15:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217311] Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612140015.kBE0Fm80012127@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217311 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://bugzilla.xfce.org/sho | |w_bug.cgi?id=2616 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-12-13 19:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > In the spec file comment, there is > svn co http://svn.xfce.org/svn/goodies/xfce4-websearch-plugin/trunk > xfce4-websearch-plugin Oops, thanks for catching this. > Should the BR be gettext or gettext-devel? Currently it seems > to need some autoconf macros from gettext-devel, but even after > they are not needed anymore isn't gettext-devel needed? Should be gettext for %find_lang. Because this package is a SVN snapshot it also BuildRequires xfce-dev-tools, which have a dependency on gettext-devel (I think you know, because you reviewed it) > APPROVED, with the gettext question answered, and the proper comment > for source generation added. Ok, will do that tomorrow, now I'm going to bed. I promise not to publish this for Core 5/6 until http://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2616 has been resolved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 00:44:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:44:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219575] New: Review Request: php-pear-File - Common file and directory routines Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219575 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-File - Common file and directory routines Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chris.stone at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-File.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-File-1.2.2-1.src.rpm Description: Provides easy access to read/write to files along with some common routines to deal with paths. Also provides interface for handling CSV files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 00:45:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:45:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219575] Review Request: php-pear-File - Common file and directory routines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612140045.kBE0jIof013347@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-File - Common file and directory routines Alias: php-pear-File https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219575 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |php-pear-File -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 00:52:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:52:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189195] Review Request: horde - php application framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612140052.kBE0qRfw013569@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |219575 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 00:52:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:52:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219575] Review Request: php-pear-File - Common file and directory routines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612140052.kBE0qonb013606@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-File - Common file and directory routines Alias: php-pear-File https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219575 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |189195 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 02:48:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 21:48:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219327] Review Request: kazehakase - Kazehakase browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612140248.kBE2mE2f019600@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kazehakase - Kazehakase browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219327 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-13 21:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Builds fine in mock(FC-6). > * /usr/lib/kazehakase is not owned by the package Oops... I will fix this. > * the desktop file categories should be: > Categories=Network;Application;X-Fedora; Both categories (Application, X-Fedora) are deprecated and warned or treated as error from desktop-fiele-utils >= 0.11 (FC-devel) and should not used any longer (this is applied to at FC5/6). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 03:06:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 22:06:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219327] Review Request: kazehakase - Kazehakase browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612140306.kBE36HWH020917@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kazehakase - Kazehakase browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219327 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-13 22:06 EST ------- Uploaded. http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/kazehakase.spec http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/kazehakase-0.4.3-2.src.rpm * Wed Dec 13 2006 Mamoru Tasaka - 0.4.3-2 - Forgot to own %%{_libdir}/%%{name}, fixing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 03:52:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 22:52:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216103] Review Request: python-twisted-names - A Twisted DNS implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612140352.kBE3qKKO026150@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-names - A Twisted DNS implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216103 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-13 22:52 EST ------- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (MIT) OK - License field in spec matches See below - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 5aa672d0e26718466351351e7bfcf22a TwistedNames-0.3.0.tar.bz2 5aa672d0e26718466351351e7bfcf22a TwistedNames-0.3.0.tar.bz2.1 OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. See below - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane: SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. x86_64/i386 - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. Why the %{?!python:%define python python} macro? It just means you have "%{python}" instead of "python" in several places. How is that a win? 2. You should include the shipped LICENSE file as a doc. 3. For devel (python 2.5) you need to add: BuildRequires: python-devel 4. rpmlint says: E: python-twisted-names no-binary Shouldn't this package be noarch? W: python-twisted-names doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-twisted-names-0.3.0/examples/dns-service.py /usr/bin/python W: python-twisted-names doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-twisted-names-0.3.0/examples/gethostbyname.py /usr/bin/env Perhaps make those mode 644 ? 444? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 04:21:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 23:21:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219581] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219581 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: johnp at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~johnp/gourmet.spec SRPM URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~johnp/gourmet-0.12.2-1.src.rpm Description: Recipe organization app which can generate shopping lists -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 04:21:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 23:21:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219582] New: Review Request: gourmet - personal recipe database Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219582 Summary: Review Request: gourmet - personal recipe database Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: johnp at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~johnp/gourmet.spec SRPM URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~johnp/gourmet-0.12.2-1.src.rpm Description: Recipe organization app which can generate shopping lists -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 04:26:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 23:26:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214087] Review Request: libextractor -- Simple library for keyword extraction In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612140426.kBE4QLpp029701@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libextractor -- Simple library for keyword extraction https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214087 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-13 23:26 EST ------- Okay, I will check this later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 04:39:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 23:39:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219164] Review Request: fontypython - TTF font manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612140439.kBE4dNMq031144@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fontypython - TTF font manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219164 ------- Additional Comments From cr33dog at gmail.com 2006-12-13 23:39 EST ------- Spec URL: http://cr33.is-a-geek.com/RPMS/fontypython.spec SRPM URL: http://cr33.is-a-geek.com/RPMS/fontypython-0.2.0-3.src.rpm %changelog - removed rpmdevtools from BuildRequires - added python >= 2.4, wxPython, python-imaging to Requires - removed 'Application;' from .desktop file - shortened line length of description The author prefers /usr/bin/fp for CLI use. If this is out-of-line with packaging guidelines, I will add the 'mv' to the specfile. Otherwise, I humbly ask that it be left as it is. I built it under mock fc6 and installed it in mock fc6 as well. I did not build/install it in mock devel. The SRPM passes rpmlint. I'm not sure about this: Requires: python >= 2.4 Also, what's the best way to ensure that it builds install with Python 2.4 and 2.5? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 05:18:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:18:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219581] Review Request:
- In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612140518.kBE5ICWL002931@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219581 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- - |summary here> Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-14 00:18 EST ------- IMHO,In case you forgot to type/insert package name and summary then you can set Alias to it instead to resubmit same package review request. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 219582 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 05:18:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:18:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219582] Review Request: gourmet - personal recipe database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612140518.kBE5INGb002959@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gourmet - personal recipe database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219582 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-14 00:18 EST ------- *** Bug 219581 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 05:31:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:31:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189195] Review Request: horde - php application framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612140531.kBE5V0sP003660@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-12-14 00:30 EST ------- Spec URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/horde.spec SRPM URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/horde-3.1.3-6.src.rpm As promised, new RPMs. I've removed all mention of php_database and (hint): php-mysql. I've also taken the liberty of requiring php-pear-File, whose review this bug is depending on. I haven't changed php-xml. What I have should be sufficient to pass review for FC[56], and can be conditional-ized later for FC7 and EL. Also, instead of spamming the RPM install with configuration instructions, I have placed the instructions in a README.fedora file and subtly refer users to that file during the RPM install. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 05:31:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:31:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219575] Review Request: php-pear-File - Common file and directory routines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612140531.kBE5VqTu003723@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-File - Common file and directory routines Alias: php-pear-File https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219575 fedora at theholbrooks.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at theholbrooks.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 05:41:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:41:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219575] Review Request: php-pear-File - Common file and directory routines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612140541.kBE5fgnh004169@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-File - Common file and directory routines Alias: php-pear-File https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219575 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-12-14 00:41 EST ------- package meets naming and packaging guidelines. specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. dist tag is present. build root is correct. license field matches the actual license. license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. source files match upstream: ba8f020b70fb6a37c6258e0e42033aad File-1.2.2.tgz latest version is being packaged. BuildRequires are proper. rpmlint is silent. final provides and requires are sane no shared libraries are present. package is not relocatable. owns the directories it creates. doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. no duplicates in %files. file permissions are appropriate. %clean is present. no %check is present no scriptlets present. code, not content. documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. no headers. no pkgconfig files. no libtool .la droppings. not a GUI app. not a web app. Very standard PEAR package, everything check out - APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 05:48:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:48:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189195] Review Request: horde - php application framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612140548.kBE5mNQ3004472@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-12-14 00:48 EST ------- Spec URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/horde.spec SRPM URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/horde-3.1.3-7.src.rpm Oops! Fixed a couple incorrect paths pointing users to documentation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 06:28:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:28:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219582] Review Request: gourmet - personal recipe database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612140628.kBE6StDa006480@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gourmet - personal recipe database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219582 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2006-12-14 01:28 EST ------- This is already in Extras and is orphaned... I'm in the process of de-orphaning it. Would you like to be co-maintainer? -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 06:51:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:51:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219575] Review Request: php-pear-File - Common file and directory routines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612140651.kBE6pZmG007266@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-File - Common file and directory routines Alias: php-pear-File https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219575 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-12-14 01:51 EST ------- Built for devel. Added entry on CVS sync page for FC-5/6. Updated owners.list. Thanks for the review. BTW, this bug was not set to block FE-ACCEPT. I'll go ahead and do that for you now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 06:51:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:51:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189195] Review Request: horde - php application framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612140651.kBE6pwUf007321@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 Bug 189195 depends on bug 219575, which changed state. Bug 219575 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-File - Common file and directory routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219575 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 06:52:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:52:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219575] Review Request: php-pear-File - Common file and directory routines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612140652.kBE6qxmQ007409@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-File - Common file and directory routines Alias: php-pear-File https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219575 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 06:59:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:59:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208420] Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612140659.kBE6xe9T007674@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208420 ------- Additional Comments From miker5slow at grandecom.net 2006-12-14 01:59 EST ------- Patrice, that patch wont apply cleanly.. I just made a diff -Naur of the timed_thread.c and .h files and of the News file, will that be fine?? http://errr.fluxbox-wiki.org/fedora_stuff/conky/conky-1.4.5-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 07:08:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 02:08:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215569] Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612140708.kBE78Ist008125@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215569 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-14 02:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > but it still suffers from the same undefined symbols problem, which I've > not been able to trace the root cause of just yet. Well, for this I change my opinion. This library (/usr/lib/beryl/libcapture.so) is a plugin module for beryl and undefined non-weal symbols issue can be ignored. Then please check this rpmlint error. ------------------------------------------- E: beryl-vidcap shlib-with-non-pic-code /usr/lib/libseom.so.0.0.0 ------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 07:26:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 02:26:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219582] Review Request: gourmet - personal recipe database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612140726.kBE7Qfxh008743@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gourmet - personal recipe database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219582 jspaleta at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2006-12-14 02:26 EST ------- Okay I'm closing this out. My de-orphaned gourmet package built in extras-development, so this review request is redundant. John, shoot me an email if you want to co-maintain this. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 07:35:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 02:35:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216103] Review Request: python-twisted-names - A Twisted DNS implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612140735.kBE7Z4AH009043@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-names - A Twisted DNS implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216103 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-12-14 02:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Issues: > > 1. Why the > %{?!python:%define python python} > macro? It just means you have "%{python}" instead of "python" in several places. > How is that a win? I suspect that Thomas has added this so that the package can be built on older distros with recent pythons installed as "python24" etc. > 2. You should include the shipped LICENSE file as a doc. +1 > 3. For devel (python 2.5) you need to add: > BuildRequires: python-devel +1 > 4. rpmlint says: > E: python-twisted-names no-binary > > Shouldn't this package be noarch? No, this is correct since some of the Twisted packages are arch-specific and python's module code doesn't like a single module hierarchy split between the arch-specific and arch-independent directory locations. So all of the python-twisted-* packages have to be arch-specific. > W: python-twisted-names doc-file-dependency > /usr/share/doc/python-twisted-names-0.3.0/examples/dns-service.py /usr/bin/python > W: python-twisted-names doc-file-dependency > /usr/share/doc/python-twisted-names-0.3.0/examples/gethostbyname.py /usr/bin/env > > Perhaps make those mode 644 ? 444? They aren't really adding any extra deps; the first is a dep on python, which is already required by this package, and the second is a dep on coreutils, which every system is going to have anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 07:51:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 02:51:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218258] Review Request: audacious-docklet - a docklet plugin for Audacious In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612140751.kBE7p0Ve009545@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-docklet - a docklet plugin for Audacious https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218258 ------- Additional Comments From yufanyufan at gmail.com 2006-12-14 02:50 EST ------- Once again, all fixed. Sorry for my mistakes. Spec URL: SRPM URL: Please check it out! Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 09:00:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 04:00:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217311] Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612140900.kBE90Kxs013383@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217311 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-12-14 04:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20) > Should be gettext for %find_lang. Because this package is a SVN snapshot it also > BuildRequires xfce-dev-tools, which have a dependency on gettext-devel (I think > you know, because you reviewed it) Right. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 09:04:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 04:04:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208420] Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612140904.kBE94ELZ013975@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208420 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-12-14 04:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #40) > Patrice, that patch wont apply cleanly.. I just made a diff -Naur of the > timed_thread.c and .h files and of the News file, will that be fine?? Yes, it's fine, you can import it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 09:18:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 04:18:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219539] Review Request: qsa - QT Script for Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612140918.kBE9I26l015342@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qsa - QT Script for Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219539 ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2006-12-14 04:17 EST ------- Well, how about qt-qsa? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 09:48:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 04:48:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612140948.kBE9m7PJ020063@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2006-12-14 04:48 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/Fedora-Extras/ntop.spec SRPM URL: http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/Fedora-Extras/ntop-3.2-6.fc6.src.rpm * Thu Dec 14 2006 Bernard Johnson - 3.2-6 - configure --disable-static - configure --enable-snmp - patch to fix permissions of created gdbm databases - no more ntop-passwd - fix OK printing in init file, redirect stdout of ntop command to null - fix permissions on LsWatch.db database creation - only listen on 127.0.0.1:3000 by default (In reply to comment #17) > > * tcp_wrappers-devel is out in devel > > I will fix that in the next update. I'm building for FC6, so I can't do it at this time. > > * ntop is still uninterruptible by Ctrl-C when the password is > > entered, but I guess it is because Ctrl-C is interpreted as a > > character of the password. > I believe that is true, but I'll look into it. ntop calls the GETPASS(3) routine. From the man page: While reading the password, signal generation (SIGINT, SIGQUIT, SIGSTOP, SIGTSTOP) is disabled and the corresponding characters (usually control-C, control-\, control-Z and control-Y) are transmitted as part of the password. So "as designed". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 09:57:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 04:57:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208420] Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612140957.kBE9vJ3d020554@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208420 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-12-14 04:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #39) > My pleasure. Thank you for including conky in your distribution. I think that you should consider adding the GPL and LGPL license texts in your package, for example with names like COPYING.LGPL, COPYING.GPL. Otherwise it may be possible that one (a judge) consider the GPL/LGPL to be invalid for your code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 11:03:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 06:03:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215569] Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612141103.kBEB3aw5026909@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215569 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-12-14 06:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > Then please check this rpmlint error. > ------------------------------------------- > E: beryl-vidcap shlib-with-non-pic-code /usr/lib/libseom.so.0.0.0 > ------------------------------------------- > If beryl-vidcap is installed, each time yum performs a ldconfig, it spits an error dur to usr/lib/libseom.so.0.0.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 11:08:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 06:08:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219582] Review Request: gourmet - personal recipe database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612141108.kBEB8qgU027289@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gourmet - personal recipe database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219582 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-12-14 06:08 EST ------- # 001 : Shouldn't this be removed from the spec file now ? Vendor: Thomas Mills Hinkle [...] Packager: John (J5) Palmieri [...] # 002 : Source0: %{name}-%{version}.tar.gz should have a complete url # 003 : The buildroot tag should comply to FE packaging guidelines #004 : These should be a changelog as well. Perhaps these should be among the changes to be made to the already approuved FE package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 11:35:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 06:35:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217497] Review Request: dbmail - The DBMail mail storage system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612141135.kBEBZQ1D028872@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbmail - The DBMail mail storage system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217497 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2006-12-14 06:35 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/Fedora-Extras/dbmail.spec SRPM URL: http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/Fedora-Extras/dbmail-2.2.1-4.fc6.src.rpm * Thu Dec 14 2006 Bernard Johnson 2.2.1-4 - cleanup of spec file - use fedora-usermgmt hooks - split and build all database libraries - kill modules/.libs from the module load path -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 13:55:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 08:55:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219610] New: Review Request: uncrustify-0.30 - code beautifier Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219610 Summary: Review Request: uncrustify-0.30 - code beautifier Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ndbecker2 at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://nbecker.dyndns.org:8080/RPM/uncrustify.spec SRPM URL: http://nbecker.dyndns.org:8080/RPM/uncrustify-0.30-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: Source Code Beautifier for C, C++, C#, D, Java, and Pawn -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 13:57:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 08:57:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216103] Review Request: python-twisted-names - A Twisted DNS implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612141357.kBEDvW0e005329@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-names - A Twisted DNS implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216103 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-12-14 08:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > > > W: python-twisted-names doc-file-dependency > > /usr/share/doc/python-twisted-names-0.3.0/examples/dns-service.py /usr/bin/python > > W: python-twisted-names doc-file-dependency > > /usr/share/doc/python-twisted-names-0.3.0/examples/gethostbyname.py /usr/bin/env > > > > Perhaps make those mode 644 ? 444? > > They aren't really adding any extra deps; the first is a dep on python, which is > already required by this package, and the second is a dep on coreutils, which > every system is going to have anyway. Still, they are annoyances that are easily fixed in %prep. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 14:10:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 09:10:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612141410.kBEEAwd2006712@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 Bug 190189 depends on bug 214193, which changed state. Bug 214193 Summary: sip: upgrade to 4.5.1+ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214193 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|RAWHIDE | Status|CLOSED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 14:33:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 09:33:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219164] Review Request: fontypython - TTF font manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612141433.kBEEXkOl008911@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fontypython - TTF font manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219164 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-14 09:33 EST ------- Well, now I do a full review. A. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * Requires - python >= 2.4 Current rpm automatically checks python abi requirement, so this requirement is not needed. ---------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost things]$ rpm -q --requires fontypython /usr/bin/python python >= 2.4 python(abi) = 2.5 <- this is automatically by rpmbuild process python-imaging rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 wxPython ---------------------------------------------- B. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : * The sources used to build the package must..... - Please specify the URL of Source0. Other things are okay. = For command name: - Well, in fact I maintain a rpm package named "jd", which contains a binary named "/usr/bin/jd"!! So I cannot reject it if you don't want to rename /usr/bin/fp . Then: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to formally review other submitters' review request and approve the packages. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is descriped on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) of other person's review request. When you submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora Extras package review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/showdependencytree.cgi?id=FE-NEW&hide_resolved=1 Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 14:43:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 09:43:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 186452] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612141443.kBEEhdEW010172@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186452 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-12-14 09:43 EST ------- Yeah, been swamped with other stuff, and I was dreading treading into the selinux ickiness. I'll see about addressing at least the other issues, and update this soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 14:59:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 09:59:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612141459.kBEEx8Wf011902@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-12-14 09:59 EST ------- There is a missing BR on net-snmp-devel. After net-snmp-devel is installed, build fails with: gcc -shared .libs/libsnmpPlugin_la-snmpPlugin.o -L/lib -lgdome -lglib-2.0 -lxml2 -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/lib -lne tsnmpmibs -lnetsnmpagent -lnetsnmphelpers -lnetsnmp -lsensors -L/usr/lib/lib /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread -multi/auto/DynaLoader/DynaLoader.a -L/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/CORE -lperl -lresolv -lnsl -ldl -lm -lutil -lpthread -lcrypt -lc -lssl -lcrypto -lpcap -lgdbm -lgd -lpng -lz -lwrap -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generi c -Wl,-E -Wl,-rpath -Wl,/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/CORE -Wl,-soname -Wl,libsnmpPlugin-3.2.so -o . libs/libsnmpPlugin-3.2.so /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lsensors collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [libsnmpPlugin.la] Error 1 Before it fails, there is a big warning: *** Warning: Linking the shared library libsnmpPlugin.la against the *** static library /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/DynaLoader/DynaLoader.a is not portable! Some warnings that may be worrisome: address.c: In function 'ipaddr2str': address.c:516: warning: 'key_data.dptr' may be used uninitialized in this function address.c:516: warning: 'key_data.dsize' may be used uninitialized in this function fcUtils.c: In function 'processFcNSCacheFile': fcUtils.c:565: warning: format '%02hx' expects type 'short unsigned int *', but argument 3 has type 'u_int32_t *' fcUtils.c:565: warning: format '%02hx' expects type 'short unsigned int *', but argument 4 has type 'u_int32_t *' fcUtils.c:565: warning: format '%02hx' expects type 'short unsigned int *', but argument 5 has type 'u_int32_t *' plugin.c: In function 'loadPlugins': plugin.c:54: warning: 'prev' may be used uninitialized in this function pbuf.c: In function 'processPacket': pbuf.c:3153: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 2 of '__builtin___strncpy_chk' differ in signedness pbuf.c:3153: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 2 of '__strncpy_ichk' differ in signedness pbuf.c: In function 'processIpPkt': pbuf.c:951: warning: 'off' may be used uninitialized in this function pbuf.c:943: warning: 'snapend' may be used uninitialized in this function pbuf.c:942: warning: 'cp' may be used uninitialized in this function pbuf.c:944: warning: 'icmp6len' may be used uninitialized in this function sessions.c: In function 'handleSession': sessions.c:2550: warning: suggest parentheses around && within || sessions.c:2552: warning: suggest parentheses around && within || util.c: In function 'createThread': util.c:1670: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'pthread_t *' util.c: In function '_killThread': util.c:1688: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'pthread_t *' util.c: In function '_joinThread': util.c:1708: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'pthread_t *' util.c: In function '_accessMutex': util.c:1796: warning: format '%s' expects type 'char *', but argument 7 has type 'void *' util.c:1796: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 8 has type 'char *' util.c:1796: warning: too many arguments for format util.c: In function '_tryLockMutex': util.c:1870: warning: format '%s' expects type 'char *', but argument 7 has type 'void *' util.c:1870: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 8 has type 'char *' util.c:1870: warning: too many arguments for format util.c: In function '_releaseMutex': util.c:1957: warning: format '%p' expects type 'void *', but argument 10 has type 'pid_t' util.c: In function 'pathSanityCheck': util.c:3020: warning: array subscript has type 'char' util.c: In function 'fileSanityCheck': util.c:3093: warning: array subscript has type 'char' util.c: In function 'ipSanityCheck': util.c:3149: warning: array subscript has type 'char' util.c: In function '_ntopSleepMSWhileSameState': util.c:3950: warning: format '%u' expects type 'unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'long unsigned int' util.c:3968: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 5 has type '__time_t' util.c:3968: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 6 has type 'long int' util.c: In function 'i18n_xvert_locale2common': util.c:4252: warning: passing argument 1 of 'ntop_safestrdup' discards qualifiers from pointer target type util.c: In function 'i18n_xvert_acceptlanguage2common': util.c:4277: warning: passing argument 1 of 'ntop_safestrdup' discards qualifiers from pointer target type util.c: In function 'convertNtopVersionToNumber': util.c:5050: warning: format '%1[a-z' expects type 'char *', but argument 5 has type 'unsigned char (*)[4]' util.c: In function 'computeIdx': util.c:266: warning: 'idx' may be used uninitialized in this function util.c: In function 'computeTransId': util.c:296: warning: 'transactionId' may be used uninitialized in this function util.c: In function 'mkdir_p': util.c:6544: warning: 'rc' may be used uninitialized in this function traffic.c: In function 'matrixHostHash': traffic.c:567: warning: 'hash' is used uninitialized in this function graph.c: In function 'drawVsanStatsBytesDistribution': graph.c:2393: warning: value computed is not used graph.c: In function 'drawVsanStatsPktsDistribution': graph.c:2476: warning: value computed is not used http.c: In function '_sendStringLen': http.c:1035: warning: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'econnresetcount' http.c:1047: warning: too few arguments for format fcReport.c: In function 'drawVsanStatsGraph': fcReport.c:4639: warning: value computed is not used fcReport.c: In function 'printFcTrafficSummary': fcReport.c:4706: warning: value computed is not used fcReport.c: In function 'makeFcHostLink': fcReport.c:39: warning: 'linkStr' may be used uninitialized in this function webInterface.c: In function 'initSocket': webInterface.c:8180: warning: 'ai' may be used uninitialized in this function webInterface.c: In function 'printNtopConfigInfoData': webInterface.c:7089: warning: 'pT' may be used uninitialized in this function webInterface.c:7089: warning: 'pM' may be used uninitialized in this function webInterface.c:7087: warning: 'qT' may be used uninitialized in this function webInterface.c:7087: warning: 'qM' may be used uninitialized in this function ssl.c: In function 'term_ssl_connection': ssl.c:307: warning: 'return' with no value, in function returning non-void ssl.c:305: warning: 'rc' may be used uninitialized in this function rrdPlugin.c: In function 'graphCounter': rrdPlugin.c:567: warning: statement with no effect rrdPlugin.c: In function 'netflowSummary': rrdPlugin.c:707: warning: statement with no effect rrdPlugin.c: In function 'graphSummary': rrdPlugin.c:971: warning: statement with no effect rrdPlugin.c: In function 'updateRRD': rrdPlugin.c:1242: warning: statement with no effect rrdPlugin.c:1298: warning: statement with no effect rrdPlugin.c:1322: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 5 has type 'time_t' rrdPlugin.c:1322: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 7 has type 'time_t' rrdPlugin.c:1322: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 9 has type 'time_t' rrdPlugin.c:1329: warning: left-hand operand of comma expression has no effect rrdPlugin.c:1329: warning: left-hand operand of comma expression has no effect rrdPlugin.c:1329: warning: left-hand operand of comma expression has no effect rrdPlugin.c:1329: warning: left-hand operand of comma expression has no effect rrdPlugin.c:1329: warning: left-hand operand of comma expression has no effect rrdPlugin.c:1329: warning: statement with no effect rrdPlugin.c: In function 'rrdUpdateIPHostStats': rrdPlugin.c:2835: warning: left-hand operand of comma expression has no effect rrdPlugin.c:2835: warning: left-hand operand of comma expression has no effect rrdPlugin.c:2835: warning: left-hand operand of comma expression has no effect rrdPlugin.c:2835: warning: left-hand operand of comma expression has no effect rrdPlugin.c:2835: warning: statement with no effect rrdPlugin.c:2920: warning: left-hand operand of comma expression has no effect rrdPlugin.c:2920: warning: left-hand operand of comma expression has no effect rrdPlugin.c:2920: warning: statement with no effect .... many other similar rrdPlugin.c: In function 'rrdTrafficThreadLoop': rrdPlugin.c:3081: warning: control reaches end of non-void function rrdPlugin.c: In function 'handleRRDHTTPrequest': rrdPlugin.c:384: warning: 'total' may be used uninitialized in this function snmpPlugin.c: In function 'createAnswer': snmpPlugin.c:739: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 5 has type 'oid' snmpPlugin.c: In function 'processRequest': snmpPlugin.c:833: warning: pointer targets in assignment differ in signedness snmpPlugin.c: In function 'processRequest': snmpPlugin.c:788: warning: 'size' may be used uninitialized in this function snmpPlugin.c:787: warning: 'cp' may be used uninitialized in this function -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 16:06:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:06:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214087] Review Request: libextractor -- Simple library for keyword extraction In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612141606.kBEG6P1W018989@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libextractor -- Simple library for keyword extraction https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214087 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-14 11:06 EST ------- Well, three questions/issues. * Is /usr/bin/extract work with no plugins? I think libextractor should depend at least on libextractor-plugins-base. * Please use the more specific home URL. I suggest http://gnunet.org/libextractor/ * I think README.debian is not needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 16:18:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:18:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219013] Review Request: pdflib-lite - Portable C library for dynamically generating PDF files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612141618.kBEGIxFX020572@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pdflib-lite - Portable C library for dynamically generating PDF files Alias: pdflib-lite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219013 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-12-14 11:18 EST ------- NOT OSI, this in particular: "All other uses not mentioned here require a commercial license." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 16:19:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:19:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612141619.kBEGJYb3020632@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-12-14 11:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > I'm unable to reproduce this. Try loading the debug symbols and getting a > backtrace under gdb. I don't know how to do that. I start with gdb, enters the pasword, and then hit ctrl-C, but then gdb catch the signal: jeu 14 d?c 2006 17:17:06 CET THREADMGMT[t3018537872]: NPS(1,eth0): pcapDispatch thread running [p12392] Program received signal SIGINT, Interrupt. [Switching to Thread -1209092416 (LWP 12392)] 0x001d6402 in __kernel_vsyscall () (gdb) What should I do now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 16:27:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:27:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219013] Review Request: pdflib-lite - Portable C library for dynamically generating PDF files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612141627.kBEGRqTw021432@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pdflib-lite - Portable C library for dynamically generating PDF files Alias: pdflib-lite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219013 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-12-14 11:27 EST ------- Rex: You are quoting something that is from a "summary" and not the actual license. The actual license is here: http://www.pdflib.com/fileadmin/pdflib/pdf/license/PDFlib-Lite-license.pdf In which clause 2.1 excepts open source uses from needed a commercial license. Please refer to the actual license text if you find something not OSI compatible. I apologize for not linking directly to it before. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 16:29:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:29:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612141629.kBEGThWA021628@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-14 11:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20) > (In reply to comment #17) > > > I'm unable to reproduce this. Try loading the debug symbols and getting a > > backtrace under gdb. > > I don't know how to do that. I start with gdb, enters the pasword, > and then hit ctrl-C, but then gdb catch the signal: > > jeu 14 d?c 2006 17:17:06 CET THREADMGMT[t3018537872]: NPS(1,eth0): pcapDispatch > thread running [p12392] > > Program received signal SIGINT, Interrupt. > [Switching to Thread -1209092416 (LWP 12392)] > 0x001d6402 in __kernel_vsyscall () > (gdb) > > What should I do now? > I don't checked 3.2-6, however, what happens if you try (gdb) handle SIGINT nonstop print pass ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 16:31:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:31:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612141631.kBEGVInQ021763@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-14 11:31 EST ------- Sorry: the correct one is: (gdb) handle SIGINT nostop print pass not "nonstop". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 16:32:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:32:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612141632.kBEGWUFU021869@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-12-14 11:32 EST ------- PyQt4-4.1.1 hit the streets, (haven't had a chance to track down the rpath issue(s) yet): %changelog * Mon Dec 11 2006 Rex Dieter 4.1.1-1 - PyQt4-4.1.1 - BR: sip-devel >= 4.5.1 Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/PyQt4.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/PyQt4-4.1.1-1.src.rpm Bad news, is that this *again* needs a sip upgrade. *sigh*. Maybe we'll have to resign ourselves to target this only for F*7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 16:37:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:37:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219013] Review Request: pdflib-lite - Portable C library for dynamically generating PDF files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612141637.kBEGbuPu022479@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pdflib-lite - Portable C library for dynamically generating PDF files Alias: pdflib-lite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219013 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-12-14 11:37 EST ------- Doesn't matter. OSI requires that the license cannot restrict use of the software, see items 5,6 on: http://www.opensource.org/docs/definition.php which is exactly what pdflib-lite's license (apparently) does: limits use to only OSS developers, private non-profit users, or edu/research. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 16:43:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:43:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219013] Review Request: pdflib-lite - Portable C library for dynamically generating PDF files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612141643.kBEGhA2m022984@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pdflib-lite - Portable C library for dynamically generating PDF files Alias: pdflib-lite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219013 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-12-14 11:42 EST ------- okay. closing as wontfix. Thanks for the clarification. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 16:43:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:43:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219020] Review Request: php-pecl-pdflib - Package for generating PDF files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612141643.kBEGhWBQ023051@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-pdflib - Package for generating PDF files Alias: php-pecl-pdflib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219020 Bug 219020 depends on bug 219013, which changed state. Bug 219013 Summary: Review Request: pdflib-lite - Portable C library for dynamically generating PDF files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219013 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |WONTFIX Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 16:44:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:44:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219013] Review Request: pdflib-lite - Portable C library for dynamically generating PDF files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612141644.kBEGi9RX023097@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pdflib-lite - Portable C library for dynamically generating PDF files Alias: pdflib-lite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219013 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 16:45:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:45:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219020] Review Request: php-pecl-pdflib - Package for generating PDF files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612141645.kBEGjpvP023219@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-pdflib - Package for generating PDF files Alias: php-pecl-pdflib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219020 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-12-14 11:45 EST ------- Since pdflib-lite cannot be included in extras, Im closing this bug also as wontfix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 16:48:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:48:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218230] Review Request: php-pear-Image-Canvas - Common interface to image drawing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612141648.kBEGm9qD023393@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Image-Canvas - Common interface to image drawing Alias: pear-Image-Canvas https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218230 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-12-14 11:47 EST ------- Okay, looks like the pdflib stuff can't go into Extras, I'll go ahead and start working on the items you mentioned in comment #3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 16:51:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:51:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218230] Review Request: php-pear-Image-Canvas - Common interface to image drawing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612141651.kBEGpih9023685@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Image-Canvas - Common interface to image drawing Alias: pear-Image-Canvas https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218230 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-12-14 11:51 EST ------- I think perhaps it would be better to leave the PDF files in the RPM. Even though they require a package which cannot be included in Extras, I think we should keep the files there anyway incase someone wants to install the packages from another repository such as Remi's repo. However I agree that adding a README.Fedora file explaining this should be required. Please let me know if you think this is not a good idea. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 17:07:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:07:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219653] New: Review Request: solfege - music education software Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219653 Summary: Review Request: solfege - music education software Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: foolish at guezz.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/solfege.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/solfege-3.6.4-1.src.rpm Description: Solfege is free music education software. Use it to train your rhythm, interval, scale and chord skills. Solfege - Smarten your ears! Note: Solfege relies on esound for large parts of it's functionality. To ensure that esd is running I've created a simple wrapper script. The wrapper script uses a pid file instead of the -terminate option of esd due to Solfege breaking the connection to esd and as such, esd would stop. The goal of the wrapper script is to ensure that Solfege "just works". This is a hack and if someone has a better solution to make Solfege "just work" please provide it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 17:09:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:09:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612141709.kBEH92lY025713@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-12-14 12:09 EST ------- Thanks, I got a backtrace. It isn't very reproducible. Sometimes it segfaults, and sometimes it shutdowns gracefully. It is not only during the first run but anytime. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 17:10:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:10:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612141710.kBEHAmsZ025968@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-12-14 12:10 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=143662) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=143662&action=view) backtrace from the segfault -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 17:31:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:31:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218230] Review Request: php-pear-Image-Canvas - Common interface to image drawing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612141731.kBEHVNxM027346@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Image-Canvas - Common interface to image drawing Alias: pear-Image-Canvas https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218230 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-12-14 12:31 EST ------- > I think we should keep the files there anyway Ok for me > However I agree that adding a README.Fedora file explaining this should be required Of course, i also think it is a MUST. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 17:44:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:44:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219653] Review Request: solfege - music education software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612141744.kBEHihtb028264@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: solfege - music education software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219653 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2006-12-14 12:44 EST ------- Changes: - Use install to install wrapper script - Improvements to wrapper script Updated: Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/solfege.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/solfege-3.6.4-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 17:52:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:52:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196393] Review Request: svrcore In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612141752.kBEHqCFM028695@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: svrcore Alias: svrcore https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196393 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2006-12-14 12:52 EST ------- Thank you very much, Toshio-san. I have taken your changes and added some code to make finding nspr and nss flexible depending on the build environment. I unfortunately could not make configure/libtool work on Windows with the MSVC compiler, so the Windows builds will have to build the old way. No big deal. But the new configure way to build should be much better on the linux/unix platforms we have to support. Since these changes are pretty significant, I went ahead and changed the version number. The new files are here: SRPM: ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/directory/svrcore/releases/4.0.3/svrcore-4.0.3.01-0.src.rpm SOURCE: ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/directory/svrcore/releases/4.0.3/svrcore-4.0.3.01.tar.gz SPEC: ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/directory/svrcore/releases/4.0.3/svrcore.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 17:52:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:52:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219653] Review Request: solfege - music education software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612141752.kBEHqK56028713@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: solfege - music education software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219653 ------- Additional Comments From jima at beer.tclug.org 2006-12-14 12:52 EST ------- Not sure I should be doing the review, as you're implementing some of my ideas already, but I'll clear up a few simple points. rpmlint produces output for the RPMs. SRPM: W: solfege strange-permission solfege.sh.in 0755 W: solfege mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 6, tab: line 4) For the first, `chmod -x olfege.sh.in` -- the script doesn't need to be executable in the SRPM. The second isn't particularly critical, just a matter of presentation. Pretty easy to fix so you don't have any warnings, though. the main RPM: W: solfege unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/solfege/_solfege_c_midi.so E: solfege non-executable-script /usr/share/solfege/mpd/testsetup.py 0644 E: solfege non-executable-script /usr/share/solfege/src/testsetup.py 0644 No idea what's going on there. debuginfo RPM: E: solfege-debuginfo empty-debuginfo-package I'm a bit confused by this; it looks like the binaries may have gotten stripped by the `make install` or something. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 18:23:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:23:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219653] Review Request: solfege - music education software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612141823.kBEIN2FQ030918@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: solfege - music education software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219653 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-14 13:23 EST ------- Just a comment: W: solfege unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/solfege/_solfege_c_midi.so E: solfege non-executable-script /usr/share/solfege/mpd/testsetup.py 0644 E: solfege non-executable-script /usr/share/solfege/src/testsetup.py 0644 E: solfege-debuginfo empty-debuginfo-package Perhaps all permission issues. * *.py python script should have the permission 0755 * python module (_solfege_c_midi.so) should have the permission 0644. This is also related to debuginfo issue. Binaries are not stripped unless they have executable permission flags. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 18:25:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:25:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219653] Review Request: solfege - music education software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612141825.kBEIPQLW031125@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: solfege - music education software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219653 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-14 13:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > * python module (_solfege_c_midi.so) should have the permission 0644. Oops, I wanted to say this should be 0755, not 0644. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 18:36:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:36:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208420] Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612141836.kBEIaQik031977@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208420 ------- Additional Comments From pkovacs at users.sourceforge.net 2006-12-14 13:36 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=143672) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=143672&action=view) conky-1.4.5 patch for fedora Attached is a patch that will work against the conky 1.4.5 tarball. The svn keyword $Id$ was the problem. Working copies have expanded keywords, but the svn repository does not. tar -xjf conky-1.4.5.tar.bz2 cd conky-1.4.5 patch -p0 < patchfile That should work cleanly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 18:44:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:44:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208420] Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612141844.kBEIiOMf000863@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208420 ------- Additional Comments From pkovacs at users.sourceforge.net 2006-12-14 13:44 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=143674) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=143674&action=view) conky-1.4.5 patch for fedora (signature) My signature for the patch. My public key: http://home.comcast.net/~147F2970/pubkey.asc Philip -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 19:01:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:01:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189195] Review Request: horde - php application framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612141901.kBEJ1PWg002567@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 ------- Additional Comments From greg at runlevel7.ca 2006-12-14 14:01 EST ------- Should you be restarting httpd in post and postun? I can't find a guideline on that on the Fedora wiki, but for example the moin rpm in Extras doesn't. Also http://wiki.horde.org/SecurityTips has a good example of apache configuration. I think some improvements can be made with the addition of the two sections: # Deny access to files that are not served directly by the webserver # Deny access to the test.php files except from localhost -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 19:09:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:09:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209112] Review Request: gspca - v4l2 kernel module driver for webcams In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612141909.kBEJ9NU2003544@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gspca - v4l2 kernel module driver for webcams https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209112 ------- Additional Comments From jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org 2006-12-14 14:09 EST ------- This was discussed in the FESCo meeting today. The largest concern is the need to get kmods in the upstream kernel (all kmods, not just this one). After further review and a few testimonials from some developers, we have decided to approve this kmod for the period of one year. We'll revisit this after that and see what the status is. Thank you for your submission, and good luck with your packaging! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 19:26:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:26:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189188] Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612141926.kBEJQifb005390@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189188 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-12-14 14:26 EST ------- After using this for an entire day (finally), the only issue that I've noticed is the init script clobbering its own output. I'll try to get -5 together later today with a fix for that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 20:06:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:06:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189188] Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612142006.kBEK63B2009303@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189188 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-12-14 15:06 EST ------- That was easy... http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/sqlgrey-1.7.4-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 20:06:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:06:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189195] Review Request: horde - php application framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612142006.kBEK6RMU009358@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 ------- Additional Comments From greg at runlevel7.ca 2006-12-14 15:06 EST ------- > for example the moin rpm in Extras doesn't. Sorry, that was a dumb example as it doesn't put anything in conf.d. phpMyAdmin is a better example and it does do condrestart so I guess that's right for Fedora Extras (although not my preference). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 20:35:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:35:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189195] Review Request: horde - php application framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612142035.kBEKZvlt012098@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-12-14 15:35 EST ------- While I agree that a full restart is unnecessary, at least HUPing apache is required in order for it to read the new conf entries (Aliases, VirtualHosts, whatever the case may be). Since we only want to signal httpd if it's already running, but can't guarantee it's running on every end user's box, we have to use condrestart. An ideal solution would be a 'condreload' command in apache's init script. Would the benefits of reload vs. restart warrant filing an RFE against httpd in Core? What other concerns would need to be considered? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 20:41:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:41:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189195] Review Request: horde - php application framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612142041.kBEKfCWx012580@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-12-14 15:41 EST ------- Perhaps "service httpd status |grep running && service httpd graceful"? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 20:55:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:55:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 195645] Review Request: rasqal - RDF query library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612142055.kBEKtQSK013952@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rasqal - RDF query library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195645 ------- Additional Comments From thomas at apestaart.org 2006-12-14 15:55 EST ------- http://thomas.apestaart.org/download/pkg/fedora-6-x86_64-extras/rasqal-0.9.12-4.fc6/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 21:09:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:09:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216103] Review Request: python-twisted-names - A Twisted DNS implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612142109.kBEL9efF015492@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-names - A Twisted DNS implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216103 ------- Additional Comments From thomas at apestaart.org 2006-12-14 16:09 EST ------- http://thomas.apestaart.org/download/pkg/fedora-6-x86_64-extras/python-twisted-names-0.3.0-3.fc6/ incorporated suggested changes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 21:15:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:15:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189195] Review Request: horde - php application framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612142115.kBELFF8X016176@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 ------- Additional Comments From greg at runlevel7.ca 2006-12-14 16:15 EST ------- > at least HUPing apache is required in order for it to read the new conf > entries Yes, but people are going to manually edit that to remove the 127.0.0.1 line and switch the deny/allow, etc, so really it only needs to be done after you edit that file, not on every minor update from 3.1.3 to 3.1.4, etc (that file is marked noreplace). How about just changeing the README.fedora bit to say: "By default, Horde is only accessible from localhost. To enable wider access, edit: /etc/httpd/conf.d/%{name}.conf and then issue the command 'service httpd grafeful'" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 21:30:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:30:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189195] Review Request: horde - php application framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612142130.kBELUr9V017083@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 ------- Additional Comments From greg at runlevel7.ca 2006-12-14 16:30 EST ------- or better: "By default, Horde is only configured to be accessible only from localhost. It is unlikely that this is sufficient. To enable wider access and apply the configuration, edit /etc/httpd/conf.d/%{name}.conf and then issue the command 'service httpd grafeful'" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 21:51:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:51:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612142151.kBELpZfI018213@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2006-12-14 16:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > There is a missing BR on net-snmp-devel. After net-snmp-devel is > installed, build fails with: > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lsensors You'll need to put lm_sensors-devel in your BR as well. I'll fix this in the next version. > Before it fails, there is a big warning: > *** Warning: Linking the shared library libsnmpPlugin.la against the > *** static library > /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/DynaLoader/DynaLoader.a is not > portable! I don't believe that this is relevent as we nuke libtool archives anyway. > Some warnings that may be worrisome: I'll try to look into some of these, but don't have time for a full code review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 22:08:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:08:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215569] Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612142208.kBEM8Tt0019509@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215569 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-12-14 17:08 EST ------- Ugh. I get no such errors (no rpmlint error and no ldconfig spew) at all on my system, but its x86_64. I have a feeling this is an issue with the x86 asm... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 22:22:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:22:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215569] Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612142222.kBEMMoTp020599@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215569 ------- Additional Comments From tom at dbservice.com 2006-12-14 17:22 EST ------- It could be.. the .rodata section on top of frame.asm could cause this, but I'm not an assembler expert so I can't tell for sure. but I could convert the [yuv]Mul variables to 'immediates' (or how they are called), simply use the values directly in the code instead of referencing the variables. Just need to figure out how to do that correctly WRT endianess :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 22:23:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:23:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219610] Review Request: uncrustify-0.30 - code beautifier In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612142223.kBEMNMDZ020659@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uncrustify-0.30 - code beautifier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219610 ed at eh3.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ed at eh3.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2006-12-14 17:23 EST ------- Hi Neil, here are some observations and I'll post a more thorough review as soon as I get a chance: good: + source matches upstream + builds in mock on FC6 i386 needswork: - rpmlint reports: W: uncrustify summary-not-capitalized reformat source W: uncrustify invalid-license gpl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 23:23:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 18:23:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208420] Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612142323.kBENN7lT025042@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208420 miker5slow at grandecom.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 14 23:48:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 18:48:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207473] Review Request: ruby-activerecord - Implements the ActiveRecord pattern for ORM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612142348.kBENmO2W026242@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-activerecord - Implements the ActiveRecord pattern for ORM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207473 dlutter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2006-12-14 18:48 EST ------- Imported and successfully built as plague job 23782 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 00:03:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:03:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219732] New: Review Request: ruby-fam - Gamin/FAM bindings for Ruby Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219732 Summary: Review Request: ruby-fam - Gamin/FAM bindings for Ruby Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dlutter at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/spec/ruby-fam.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/SRPMS/ruby-fam-0.2.0-1.src.rpm Description: FAM-Ruby is a Ruby interface to SGI's File Alteration Monitor (http://oss.sgi.com/projects/fam/). FAM allows you to monitor files and directories for changes (file modification, creation, and removal) -- in an event-driven manner. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 00:32:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:32:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217806] Review Request: tktreectrl - flexible listbox widget for Tk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612150032.kBF0WQM9027603@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tktreectrl - flexible listbox widget for Tk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217806 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-12-14 19:32 EST ------- Update to 2.2.1: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/tktreectrl.spec http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/tktreectrl-2.2.1-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 00:58:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:58:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219653] Review Request: solfege - music education software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612150058.kBF0wAUl028562@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: solfege - music education software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219653 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2006-12-14 19:58 EST ------- Tried to fix the permissions. There are still problems, solutions welcome. SRPM: W: solfege strange-permission solfege.sh.in 0755 W: solfege mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 6, tab: line 4) RPM: W: solfege unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/solfege/_solfege_c_midi.so.debug E: solfege shared-lib-without-dependency-information /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/solfege/_solfege_c_midi.so.debug Updated: Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/solfege.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/solfege-3.6.4-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 01:14:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:14:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219164] Review Request: fontypython - TTF font manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612150114.kBF1EuuW029192@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fontypython - TTF font manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219164 ------- Additional Comments From cr33dog at gmail.com 2006-12-14 20:14 EST ------- Spec URL: http://cr33.is-a-geek.com/RPMS/fontypython.spec SRPM URL: http://cr33.is-a-geek.com/RPMS/fontypython-0.2.0-4.src.rpm %changelog - Corrected Source0 to include URL - removed python >= 2.4 from Requires OK, hopefully this latest package is now up to par. I will try (pre)reviewing some other requests. In the meanwhile, if someone else wants to adopt this package I will not be offended. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 02:02:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 21:02:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209112] Review Request: gspca - v4l2 kernel module driver for webcams In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612150202.kBF22gfX030964@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gspca - v4l2 kernel module driver for webcams https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209112 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-14 21:02 EST ------- Thanks very much to FESCO members for approving this. Before proceeding further on this review i think i should wait for FE-KMOD-APPROVED set on this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 02:12:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 21:12:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218678] Review Request: pybluez - python API for the bluez bluetooth stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612150212.kBF2CRDd031510@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pybluez - python API for the bluez bluetooth stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218678 cr33dog at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cr33dog at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From cr33dog at gmail.com 2006-12-14 21:12 EST ------- This is my first review. I cannot officially review the package - this is just a "pre-review". The SRPM passes rpmlint. It builds in mock fc6-i386, which is a good sign. I notice a couple of issues with the spec file, however: * You need to remove the appropriate line (and the comment) from the beginning of the spec file. At appears that this is an arch-specific(?) package, so you need to remove the '%{!?python_sitelib' line. * I think you should remove the comment from the Build section, and also the one from above '%{python_sitearch}/*' According to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-b7d622f4bb245300199c6a33128acce5fb453213: * The changelog items should begin with a dash. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 02:18:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 21:18:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217497] Review Request: dbmail - The DBMail mail storage system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612150218.kBF2IquQ031688@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbmail - The DBMail mail storage system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217497 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2006-12-14 21:18 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/Fedora-Extras/dbmail.spec SRPM URL: http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/Fedora-Extras/dbmail-2.2.1-5.fc6.src.rpm * Thu Dec 14 2006 Bernard Johnson 2.2.1-5 - fix my local svn that caused x bit on init files to sneak in My local svn caused the init files to be executable, in the srpm, which they shouldn't have been. Other than that, everything is the same as the previous release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 02:44:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 21:44:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219164] Review Request: fontypython - TTF font manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612150244.kBF2ibk8032504@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fontypython - TTF font manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219164 ------- Additional Comments From cr33dog at gmail.com 2006-12-14 21:44 EST ------- I've pre-reviewed #218678. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 03:15:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:15:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219653] Review Request: solfege - music education software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612150315.kBF3F9Qf001282@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: solfege - music education software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219653 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-14 22:15 EST ------- Again just a comment: W: solfege strange-permission solfege.sh.in 0755 - permission should be 0644 W: solfege mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 6, tab: line 4) - Indentation in spec file should be spaces _or_ tabs and using _both_ is not considered good for cosmetic annoyance. W: solfege unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/solfege/_solfege_c_midi.so.debug E: solfege shared-lib-without-dependency-information /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/solfege/_solfege_c_midi.so.debug - This is because normal binary rpm contain debug information binary. You should not write: ----------------------------------------- %files ....... %{_libdir}/* ------------------------------------------ because this includes %{_libdir}/debug, this is wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 03:27:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:27:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189188] Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612150327.kBF3RaFe002181@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189188 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-14 22:27 EST ------- Looks all good to me. All the blockers I saw have been fixed... so this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this package NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported and built. Do consider reviewing another waiting package to help spread out the reviewing load. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 03:56:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:56:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219164] Review Request: fontypython - TTF font manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612150356.kBF3uWlp004202@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fontypython - TTF font manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219164 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-14 22:56 EST ------- Well, okay. ----------------------------------------------------- This package (fontypython) is APPROVED by me. ----------------------------------------------------- Please go forward according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors to import this package to Fedora Extras. I will sponsor you when you have taken steps partway written in the page above (then I should receive the mail that you need a sponsor) ------------------------------------------------------ Note: This package cannot be rebuilt on FE-devel until wxPython is rebuilt against python 2.5. It seems that the maintainer of wxPython (on FE) wants to upgrade it to 2.8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 04:07:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 23:07:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215569] Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612150407.kBF472ff005150@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215569 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-14 23:06 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=143732) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=143732&action=view) Mock build log of beryl-vidcap 0.1.3-1 on FC-devel i386 Well, I am working on FC-devel i386 and on this environ rpmlint surely complains about beryl-vidcap 0.1.3-1. I don't know about yasm, however I suspect this does something because mockbuild log says: ---------------------------------------------------------------- libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile yasm -f elf -m x86 -o src/arch/x86/frame.lo -prefer-non-pic src/arch/x86/frame.asm mkdir src/arch/x86/.libs yasm -f elf -m x86 src/arch/x86/frame.asm -o src/arch/x86/.libs/frame.o yasm -f elf -m x86 src/arch/x86/frame.asm -o src/arch/x86/frame.o >/dev/null 2>&1 libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -Wl,--as-needed -rpath /usr/lib -o libseom.la src/buffer.lo src/client.lo src/codec.lo src/frame.lo src/server.lo src/stream.lo src/arch/x86/frame.lo -ldl -lpthread --------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 04:24:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 23:24:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189195] Review Request: horde - php application framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612150424.kBF4Ow0A006940@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-12-14 23:24 EST ------- Yes thanks Greg but if you read that paragraph in context we don't WANT them to enable wider access until after they've been to the horde configuration web site and set up their own Authentication backend. Since horde comes predefined to auto-login every web session as Administrator, we want them to go to the site, set up something else, THEN and only THEN let other IPs hit the site. Otherwise they would be opening their horde site for lots of other people to play Administrator. If you think it's important I tell users that they need to graceful apache after editing the conf file, that's not a big deal, but that doesn't preclude this RPM's need to re[load|start]ing apache in %post. Now, if you don't mind, I'd like to give Jason a chance to do a real review on this package and give his feedback. This review has been open for 8 months... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 05:32:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 00:32:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219751] New: Review Request: python-TurboMail - Multi-threaded mail queue manager for TurboGears applications. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219751 Summary: Review Request: python-TurboMail - Multi-threaded mail queue manager for TurboGears applications. Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lmacken at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/SPECS/python-TurboMail.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/SRPMS/python-TurboMail-2.0.3-1.src.rpm Description: TurboMail is a TurboGears extension, meaning that it starts up and shuts down alongside any TurboGears applications you write, in the same way that visit tracking and identity do. TurboMail uses built-in Python modules for SMTP communication and MIME e-mail creation, but greatly simplifies these tasks by performing the grunt-work for you. Additionally, TurboMail is multi-threaded, allowing for single or batch enqueueing and background delivery of mail. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 06:19:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 01:19:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216130] Review Request: glest - 3D real time strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612150619.kBF6JbrO015016@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glest - 3D real time strategy game Alias: glest https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216130 ------- Additional Comments From wayward4now at yahoo.com 2006-12-15 01:19 EST ------- It plays real choppy on my machine. The audio stutters and the mouse is very slow. I have FC6 installed, 32bit on an Athlon 64 3200+ with two gigs of memory. I have an nVidia 5200 video card with 256megs of memory. Ric -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 06:35:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 01:35:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219653] Review Request: solfege - music education software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612150635.kBF6ZIbZ015772@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: solfege - music education software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219653 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2006-12-15 01:35 EST ------- Got rid of all the rpmlint errors and warnings. updated: Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/solfege.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/solfege-3.6.4-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 07:22:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 02:22:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612150722.kBF7M5wf017642@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-12-15 02:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #25) > > Before it fails, there is a big warning: > > *** Warning: Linking the shared library libsnmpPlugin.la against the > > *** static library > > /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/DynaLoader/DynaLoader.a is not > > portable! > > I don't believe that this is relevent as we nuke libtool archives anyway. Only partially correct. This is libtool warning you about this package doing something non-portable: Linking a shared library against a static. This warning is largely irrelevant when building on Linux, because linking a shared against a static library basically (i.e. in most cases) is possible on Linux. Whether this warning is related to the breakdown is a different question, and should be analyzed. It's rather unlikely, but it could be an indication of ntop not being ready for dynamic linkage. All removing the *.la would do, is to silence the warning, it would not change anything about ntop potentially doing something "naughty". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 07:28:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 02:28:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219581] Review Request:
- In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612150728.kBF7S1rR017821@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219581 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 07:33:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 02:33:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219581] Review Request: gourmet - Recipe organization app In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612150733.kBF7XjOW018006@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gourmet - Recipe organization app https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219581 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 07:39:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 02:39:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612150739.kBF7dd8M018241@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2006-12-15 02:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #26) > (In reply to comment #25) > > > > Before it fails, there is a big warning: > > > *** Warning: Linking the shared library libsnmpPlugin.la against the > > > *** static library > > > /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/DynaLoader/DynaLoader.a is not > > > portable! > > > > I don't believe that this is relevent as we nuke libtool archives anyway. > Only partially correct. Understood, but I'd like to point out that if you google search this error, you'll find that this is not the only package that suffers from this. As one site puts it - it's a result of perl's crappy dynamic linking/loading facilities. In fact, FE's own xchat suffers from it. Here is a recent build log of xchat in the build system: http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/23222-xchat-gnome-0.15-2.fc7/i386/build.log You can find an almost identical warning there. I'm not saying it's ok, just probably not the end of the world. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 09:26:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 04:26:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219751] Review Request: python-TurboMail - Multi-threaded mail queue manager for TurboGears applications. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612150926.kBF9QqbE024559@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-TurboMail - Multi-threaded mail queue manager for TurboGears applications. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219751 jamatos at fc.up.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jamatos at fc.up.pt OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2006-12-15 04:26 EST ------- The spec looks really clean, just one small comment (nitpicking :-): If the package is noarch why do you need to set the CFLAGS? :-) No need to change the spec because of this detail you do it when importing. The full review will follow soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 09:59:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 04:59:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215569] Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612150959.kBF9x7Ce026580@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215569 ------- Additional Comments From tom at dbservice.com 2006-12-15 04:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile yasm -f elf -m x86 -o src/arch/x86/frame.lo > -prefer-non-pic src/arch/x86/frame.asm > mkdir src/arch/x86/.libs > yasm -f elf -m x86 src/arch/x86/frame.asm -o src/arch/x86/.libs/frame.o > yasm -f elf -m x86 src/arch/x86/frame.asm -o src/arch/x86/frame.o >/dev/null > 2>&1 Don't get fooled by the '-prefer-non-pic' because that's only there to tell libtool not to add -DPIC to the commandline when executing yasm. If there is a better way of doing that, please tell me - executing anything else than gcc with libtool just asks for trouble.. :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 10:20:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 05:20:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219769] New: Package request: yamipod, gpixpod (ipod music and photo managers) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219769 Summary: Package request: yamipod, gpixpod (ipod music and photo managers) Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sg266 at cornell.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Packaging request: YamiPod (http://www.yamipod.com/main/modules/home/) YamiPod is a freeware application to efficiently manage your iPod under Mac OS X, Windows and Linux. It can be run directly from your iPod and needs no installation. Take a look at the feature list to find out what it can do and feel free to suggest anything that might be missing. GPixPod (http://www.gpixpod.org/wordpress/) GPixPod is a cross-platform application written in Python/GTK to upload and organize photos on recent photo-capable Apple iPod models. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 12:02:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 07:02:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612151202.kBFC2qhf001123@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2006-12-15 07:02 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/Fedora-Extras/ntop.spec SRPM URL: http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/Fedora-Extras/ntop-3.2-7.fc6.src.rpm %changelog * Thu Dec 14 2006 Bernard Johnson - 3.2-7 - add missing net-snmp-devel, and lm_sensors-devel BR There are no other fixes in this package. I won't be able to update it again until around the first of the year, but please post any relevent comments regarding your experience or recommendations. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 12:50:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 07:50:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218769] Review Request: hunspell-en - english dictionaries for hunspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612151250.kBFCoWZF004130@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-en - english dictionaries for hunspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218769 caolanm at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |219777 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 15:18:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 10:18:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612151518.kBFFIIGJ018244@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 ------- Additional Comments From cgtobi at gmail.com 2006-12-15 10:18 EST ------- We just released aqsis-1.2.0alpha1. We fixed all the issued mentioned above. You can download the latest aqsis.spec right from the SVN server. http://aqsis.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/*checkout*/aqsis/tags/release-1.2.0alpha1/aqsis/ distribution/linux/rpm/aqsis.spec And here is the link to the official aqsis-1.2.0alpha1.tar.gz: http://download.aqsis.org/stable/source/tar/aqsis-1.2.0alpha1.tar.gz RPM's can be found right here: http://cgtobi.de/aqsis/aqsis-1.2.0-0.1.alpha1.i386.rpm http://cgtobi.de/aqsis/aqsis-1.2.0-0.1.alpha1.src.rpm http://cgtobi.de/aqsis/aqsis-devel-1.2.0-0.1.alpha1.i386.rpm http://cgtobi.de/aqsis/aqsis-data-1.2.0-0.1.alpha1.i386.rpm A few comments on the aqsis.spec. This spec is for cross-distribution and works on Fedora, Suse and Mandrive. To make it working on Fedora FC4 we used a little workaround, using touch, to exclude the .pyo/.pyc files, as suggested on #fedora-extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 15:38:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 10:38:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219352] Review Request: perl-Geo-Forward - Calculate geographic location from lat, lon, distance, and heading In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612151538.kBFFcBlb019769@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-Forward - Calculate geographic location from lat, lon, distance, and heading https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219352 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-12-15 10:38 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Package imported and built for FC-5, FC-6, and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 15:38:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 10:38:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219353] Review Request: perl-Geo-Inverse - Calculate geographic distance from a lat & lon pair In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612151538.kBFFcTst019803@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-Inverse - Calculate geographic distance from a lat & lon pair https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219353 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-12-15 10:38 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Package imported and built for FC-5, FC-6, and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 15:45:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 10:45:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189195] Review Request: horde - php application framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612151545.kBFFjKOX020440@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 ------- Additional Comments From greg at runlevel7.ca 2006-12-15 10:45 EST ------- No problem, just my opinions and you both are free to ignore them. Thanks for putting this package up for review, and I do appreciate your efforts, and Jason's effort to do the review. Sorry one more comment ;-) - Something like your first paragraph in Comment 33 would be a great addition to the readme file as a warning to users to maybe only widen access at first to their local network or single remote IP. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 16:40:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 11:40:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219582] Review Request: gourmet - personal recipe database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612151640.kBFGe7sh026067@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gourmet - personal recipe database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219582 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-12-15 11:39 EST ------- Hmm... Looking through the spec file that's in cvs, I don't see any of these problems in this or the previous version. Chitlesh, I think J5 created his spec file from scratch because he didn't know about the orphaned package. Jef has built on the orphaned spec file so I don't think these problems are present there. Checkout the gourmet module from cvs and take a look there for any problems. (And create a new bug report if you find some as there should be a gourmet module in bugzilla to file the report against.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 16:52:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 11:52:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218769] Review Request: hunspell-en - english dictionaries for hunspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612151652.kBFGqvCB027623@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-en - english dictionaries for hunspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218769 caolanm at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 17:00:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 12:00:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 190000] Review Request: partimage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612151700.kBFH0Qed028561@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: partimage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190000 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-12-15 12:00 EST ------- David, are you interested in submitting this again? If not I'm going to close the ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 17:01:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 12:01:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 193157] Review Request: system-config-selinux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612151701.kBFH1MgR028683@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-selinux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193157 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 17:02:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 12:02:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199592] Review Request: icu4j In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612151702.kBFH2hwp028931@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: icu4j https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199592 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-12-15 12:02 EST ------- Whats going on here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 17:04:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 12:04:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199592] Review Request: icu4j In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612151704.kBFH4md7029337@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: icu4j https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199592 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2006-12-15 12:04 EST ------- I believe Jeff Johnston is planning on doing this sometime early in the new year. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 19:27:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 14:27:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196401] Review Request: mozldap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612151927.kBFJRpu8008982@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mozldap Alias: mozldap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196401 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2006-12-15 14:27 EST ------- Works fine, and with the new svrcore as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 19:46:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 14:46:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612151946.kBFJkLDP010725@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From davidz at redhat.com 2006-12-15 14:46 EST ------- Any progress on this? Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 19:47:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 14:47:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196393] Review Request: svrcore In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612151947.kBFJlGJu010863@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: svrcore Alias: svrcore https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196393 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-12-15 14:47 EST ------- Lots of progress here... Re-review notes: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. The spec file in the src.rpm is dirsec-svrcore.spec, references other dirsec- bits, I presume this isn't the version aiming to get into Fedora Extras. The stand-alone svrcore.spec you link to looks correct though. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. MPL/GPL/LGPL, text included in package. * source files match upstream: fbb56acf580aa0ebb32df58594458b28 svrcore-4.0.3.01-orig.tar.gz fbb56acf580aa0ebb32df58594458b28 svrcore-4.0.3.01.tar.gz * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (rawhide/x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. only 1 ignorable warning about no docs in -devel * final provides and requires are sane: svrcore-4.0.3.01-0.fc7.x86_64.rpm libsvrcore.so.0()(64bit) svrcore = 4.0.3.01-0.fc7 = /sbin/ldconfig /sbin/ldconfig libnspr4.so()(64bit) libnss3.so()(64bit) libnss3.so(NSS_3.10.2)(64bit) libnss3.so(NSS_3.2)(64bit) libplc4.so()(64bit) libplds4.so()(64bit) libssl3.so()(64bit) libsvrcore.so.0()(64bit) nspr >= 4.6 nss >= 3.11 svrcore-debuginfo-4.0.3.01-0.fc7.x86_64.rpm libsvrcore.so.0.0.0.debug()(64bit) svrcore-debuginfo = 4.0.3.01-0.fc7 = (none) svrcore-devel-4.0.3.01-0.fc7.x86_64.rpm svrcore-devel = 4.0.3.01-0.fc7 = libsvrcore.so.0()(64bit) nspr-devel >= 4.6 nss-devel >= 3.11 pkgconfig svrcore = 4.0.3.01-0.fc7 * shared libraries are properly split between main and -devel packages. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is N/A * appropriate minimal ldconfig scriptlets. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * header in -devel package, installs in /usr/include/. * pkgconfig files appropriately in -devel. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. * not a web app. Assuming you create a new srpm with the correct spec (the one w/o dirsec-), I'm gonna say APPROVED, import at will. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 20:00:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:00:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 170303] Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612152000.kBFK0DJi011996@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170303 ------- Additional Comments From csilvers2000 at yahoo.com 2006-12-15 15:00 EST ------- Sorry it's been so long since I've posted here; I've been hoping to be able to wait until I have something useful to say. But I figured I'd give an end-of-year update in any case. We've made a lot of progress on getting the heap-checker and -profiler to work on modern kernels; it basically involved rewriting that functionality from scratch. We still have a few more changes pending, and the folks working on it have been overwhelmed by other projects, so it hasn't gone as quickly as I'd like. :-( That said, the tcmalloc_minimal library should work on all FC versions, as far as I know. So it would be possible to push that library, and wait until we have a fix for all the profiling tools before pushing the full package, if you wanted to try that. If there are problems with tcmalloc_minimal, please file them as separate bugs from the normal 'doesn't work on FC5/6' category, since it would be a separate issue from the ones we know about. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 20:02:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:02:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219869] New: Review Request: perl-Mozilla-LDAP Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219869 Summary: Review Request: perl-Mozilla-LDAP Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rmeggins at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com CC: jwilson at redhat.com This perl module is a wrapper around the Mozilla LDAP C SDK. This package is necessary for Fedora Directory Server (not for core server functionality, but for management scripts) and other applications that require the use of the Mozilla LDAP C SDK from perl applications. The reason why we must use this module and not the more common Net::LDAP module is because we require the use of Mozilla NSS for crypto, and Net::LDAP uses openssl (via Net::SSLeay). SPEC: ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/directory/perldap/releases/1.5/perl-Mozilla-LDAP.spec SRPM: ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/directory/perldap/releases/1.5/perl-Mozilla-LDAP-1.5-6.src.rpm Sources: ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/directory/perldap/releases/1.5/perl-mozldap-1.5.tar.gz ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/directory/perldap/releases/1.5/Makefile.PL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 20:02:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:02:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196401] Review Request: mozldap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612152002.kBFK2x7A012230@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mozldap Alias: mozldap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196401 rmeggins at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |219869 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 20:03:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:03:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 163778] Tracker: Extras packages currently being reviewed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612152003.kBFK3WFr012299@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: Extras packages currently being reviewed Alias: FE-REVIEW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163778 rmeggins at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |219869 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 20:05:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:05:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196393] Review Request: svrcore In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612152005.kBFK56FP012352@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: svrcore Alias: svrcore https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196393 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2006-12-15 15:04 EST ------- Darn it, that's the wrong srpm. I'm uploading a better one now. SRPM: ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/directory/svrcore/releases/4.0.3/svrcore-4.0.3.01-0.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 20:17:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:17:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219872] New: Review Request: curlftpfs - user-space FTP filesystem using libcurl and FUSE Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219872 Summary: Review Request: curlftpfs - user-space FTP filesystem using libcurl and FUSE Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora-packaging at dw-perspective.org.uk QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com This is my first package - I am seeking a sponsor. Spec URL: http://david.dw-perspective.org.uk/tmp/curlftpfs.spec SRPM URL: http://david.dw-perspective.org.uk/tmp/curlftpfs-0.9-1.fc5.src.rpm Description: CurlFtpFS is a filesystem for accessing FTP hosts based on FUSE and libcurl. It features SSL support, connecting through tunneling HTTP proxies, and automatically reconnecting if the server times out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 20:19:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:19:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219872] Review Request: curlftpfs - user-space FTP filesystem using libcurl and FUSE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612152019.kBFKJdHp013319@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: curlftpfs - user-space FTP filesystem using libcurl and FUSE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219872 fedora-packaging at dw-perspective.org.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 20:25:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:25:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219873] New: Review Request: kio_sword - lightweight Sword front-end for KDE Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219873 Summary: Review Request: kio_sword - lightweight Sword front-end for KDE Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora-packaging at dw-perspective.org.uk QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com This is my first package - I am seeking a sponsor. Spec URL: http://david.dw-perspective.org.uk/tmp/ SRPM URL: http://david.dw-perspective.org.uk/tmp/ Description: A lightweight easy-to-use Bible tool for KDE. Kio-Sword provides access to Bibles, commentaries and other texts in an easy to use and attractive interface -- the Konqueror web browser. It does so using the SWORD Bible project and implementing a KDE ioslave, providing the sword:/ protocol. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 20:27:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:27:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219873] Review Request: kio_sword - lightweight Sword front-end for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612152027.kBFKRIT9014210@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kio_sword - lightweight Sword front-end for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219873 ------- Additional Comments From fedora-packaging at dw-perspective.org.uk 2006-12-15 15:27 EST ------- Spec URL: http://david.dw-perspective.org.uk/tmp/kio_sword.spec SRPM URL: http://david.dw-perspective.org.uk/tmp/kio_sword-0.2-2.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 20:34:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:34:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219653] Review Request: solfege - music education software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612152034.kBFKYQ7n014717@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: solfege - music education software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219653 gemi at bluewin.ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gemi at bluewin.ch ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-12-15 15:34 EST ------- Better use spaces instead of tabs, the formatting is messy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 20:39:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:39:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 170303] Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612152039.kBFKd0Yf015342@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170303 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-12-15 15:38 EST ------- Is there a separate set of tests we should be running which will target tcmalloc_minimal as opposed to the entire perftools suite? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 21:33:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 16:33:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 200918] Review Request: pgadmin3-admin81 - Server instrumentation for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612152133.kBFLXIB4019794@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgadmin3-admin81 - Server instrumentation for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200918 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jpmahowald at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-12-15 16:33 EST ------- Looks good overall. Need to fix: - remove Vendor tag - Source0 needs a URL protocol, looks like ftp:// Good: + license (Artistic) + use of macros + builds and installs on FC6 x86_64 + Group + %defattr + %clean section The pgadmin3-admin81 name looks a little strange, but does reflect that it requires pgadmin3 and is the admin pack for 8.1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 22:07:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:07:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218678] Review Request: pybluez - python API for the bluez bluetooth stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612152207.kBFM7A7M022744@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pybluez - python API for the bluez bluetooth stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218678 ------- Additional Comments From wwoods at redhat.com 2006-12-15 17:07 EST ------- Ah, good suggestions. I've rebuilt the package with them. I'm not sure whether I should just replace the SRPM/specfile or bump the release number and give the new spec a different name. I'll do the latter for now. Spec URL: http://homepage.mac.com/wgwoods/fedora/pybluez-0.9.1-2.spec SRPM URL: http://homepage.mac.com/wgwoods/fedora/pybluez-0.9.1-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 22:25:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:25:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218258] Review Request: audacious-docklet - a docklet plugin for Audacious In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612152225.kBFMPD63024025@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-docklet - a docklet plugin for Audacious https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218258 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-12-15 17:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Sorry for my mistakes. Once again: There's no need for an excuse. You are new to Fedora Extras, but you are doing fine. :) REVIEW for 887e3df8edb6a71276a6c1abb3be1bcb audacious-docklet-0.1.1-1.src.rpm MUST Items: FAIL - rpmlint is not happy with the package: rpmlint audacious-docklet-0.1.1-1.fc6.i386.rpm W: audacious-docklet no-version-in-last-changelog E: audacious-docklet zero-length /usr/share/doc/audacious-docklet-0.1.1/README To fix these: - Add the version to the changelog entry: * Thu Dec 14 2006 Yu Fan - 0.1.1-1 - Remove README from doc as long as it's empty. OK - package meets naming guidelines OK - spec file meets naming guidelines OK - package meets package guidelines OK - license open-source compatible (GPL) OK - license in spec file matches actual license OK - license included in %doc OK - spec file in American English OK - spec file is legible FAIL - source in SRPM doesn't match upstream source, md5 is 7503981a0a0ee229e5bdbe18553810db while upstream is 9b51ac5fd179ede8d0d75be12f920ed2 Please download a new source tarball for the SRPM. OK - package builds on i386 OK - all build dependencies listed in BuildRequires OK - none of the exceptions of packaging guidelines in BuildRequires OK - locales handled correctly with %find_lang OK - no shared libs to worry about OK - package is not relocatable OK - package owns all directories that it creates OK - no duplicate files in %files section OK - permissions and %defattr correct OK - clean section with "rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" present OK - macro usage consistent OK - code, not content OK - no large docs OK - docs don't affect runtime OK - no headers, static libs or pkgconfig files, no -devel package needed OK - no libtool archives OK - plugin, no need for a *.desktop file. OK - package doesn't own files/directories owned by other packages SHOULD items: OK - package builds in mock (Core 6 and devel on i386) OK - package functions as described (but see note below) OK - package uses disttag NEEDSWORK Please fix the issues I mentioned before I can approve this package. Also I found audacious ui freezing when I choose "Preferences" from the docklet right after the start. This only happens when the prefes window is showing "Appearence" and if it has net been opened before in the audacious session. If I opened the prefs before from the audaciuos main window or if I selected something else but "Appearance", everything works fine. Do you see the same behaviour? If so: - Please notify upstream. Not sure if this is an audacious or a docklet bug. - Do not build this package for branches other than devel. I'd like to see this fixed before the package enters FE 5/6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 22:25:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:25:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219869] Review Request: perl-Mozilla-LDAP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612152225.kBFMPIwI024045@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mozilla-LDAP Alias: perldap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219869 rmeggins at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perldap -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 22:26:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:26:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218258] Review Request: audacious-docklet - a docklet plugin for Audacious In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612152226.kBFMQ2Dw024160@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-docklet - a docklet plugin for Audacious https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218258 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at christoph-wickert.de -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 22:32:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:32:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 195645] Review Request: rasqal - RDF query library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612152232.kBFMW6iP024723@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rasqal - RDF query library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195645 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-15 17:32 EST ------- Hey Thomas. Not sure I understand comment #19. You can't update this rasqal submission because of raptor (already in extras) needs updating? Perhaps you could file a bug to have the maintainer update that? It's not a showstopper though... Items 1, 3, and 4 look to be addressed in the package in comment #20. Do you have any comment on item #2: 2. Are there some missing BuildRequires? checking for pcre-config... no checking for pcre-config... no checking for pcre... not present checking for xml2-config... no checking for libxml2 library... no Thats the last item I see that needs addressing... thanks for your patience. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 22:47:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:47:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219889] New: Review Request: bootchart - a utility for profiling the boot process Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219889 Summary: Review Request: bootchart - a utility for profiling the boot process Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: johnp at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~johnp/bootchart.spec SRPM URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~johnp/bootchart-0.9-1.src.rpm Description: A tool for performance analysis and visualization of the GNU/Linux boot process. Resource utilization and process information are collected during the boot process and are later rendered in a PNG, SVG or EPS encoded chart. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 23:08:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:08:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216103] Review Request: python-twisted-names - A Twisted DNS implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612152308.kBFN8HKn026513@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-names - A Twisted DNS implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216103 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-15 18:08 EST ------- 1. Ok, I can see how a python macro might be useful on systems where python isn't installed as 'python', but since this package is for extras and python will always be 'python', is it needed here? Not a blocker I don't think, but would be nice to fix for readability... 2, 3, 4 all look resolved. I don't see any further blockers, so this package is APPROVED. Do consider issue #1 before importing, and don't forget to close this review NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported and built. (I am going to look at reviewing the rest of these so we can get them all in and fix flumotion. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 23:11:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:11:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219751] Review Request: python-TurboMail - Multi-threaded mail queue manager for TurboGears applications. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612152311.kBFNBDf0026714@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-TurboMail - Multi-threaded mail queue manager for TurboGears applications. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219751 ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2006-12-15 18:11 EST ------- Building fails in mock because the spec file is missing BuildRequires: python-setuptools -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 23:16:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:16:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219751] Review Request: python-TurboMail - Multi-threaded mail queue manager for TurboGears applications. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612152316.kBFNG7KQ027021@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-TurboMail - Multi-threaded mail queue manager for TurboGears applications. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219751 ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2006-12-15 18:16 EST ------- OK, better yet, make that BuildRequires: TurboGears since the installation requires it to be present. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 15 23:53:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:53:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219751] Review Request: python-TurboMail - Multi-threaded mail queue manager for TurboGears applications. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612152353.kBFNrC8K028905@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-TurboMail - Multi-threaded mail queue manager for TurboGears applications. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219751 jamatos at fc.up.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2006-12-15 18:53 EST ------- Assuming that my previous suggestion is followed this is the revision: ---------------------------------------- Review for release 1: * RPM name is OK * Source TurboMail-2.0.3.tar.gz is the same as upstream * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint looks OK * File list looks OK * License is correct (MIT) and OK for Fedora * Spec is clear and well written Needs work: * The package should contain the text of the license (wiki: Packaging/ReviewGuidelines) Notes: superfuluous CFLAGS when building. BR TurboGears If you merge these two changes the package is APPROVED. You can do the changes when importing. After the building of this package do not forget to close this bug as NEXTRELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 16 02:57:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 21:57:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219164] Review Request: fontypython - TTF font manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612160257.kBG2vh3I000864@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fontypython - TTF font manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219164 ------- Additional Comments From cr33dog at gmail.com 2006-12-15 21:57 EST ------- Not sure if this is the appropriate place for this, but I think that I've completed all steps up to checking in/out of CVS - I'm awaiting some type of notification before going further... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 16 03:58:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 22:58:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219164] Review Request: fontypython - TTF font manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612160358.kBG3w7Mp003739@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fontypython - TTF font manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219164 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-15 22:58 EST ------- Now I sponsored you and you should receive a mail. Note: for FE-devel wxGTK and wxPython are both upgraded to 2.8 and you can rebuild this on FE-devel, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 16 03:58:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 22:58:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219164] Review Request: fontypython - TTF font manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612160358.kBG3whUl003833@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fontypython - TTF font manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219164 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 16 04:35:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 23:35:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215569] Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612160435.kBG4ZkPV007461@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215569 ------- Additional Comments From garrick at usc.edu 2006-12-15 23:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > Ugh. I get no such errors (no rpmlint error and no ldconfig spew) at all on my > system, but its x86_64. I have a feeling this is an issue with the x86 asm... Definitely happens on i686. [root at localhost ~]# ldconfig ldconfig: /usr/lib/libseom.so.0 is not a symbolic link [root at localhost ~]# ls -al /usr/lib/libseom.so* -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 21948 Nov 13 11:58 /usr/lib/libseom.so.0 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 20436 Nov 13 11:58 /usr/lib/libseom.so.0.0.0 [root at localhost ~]# rpm -q beryl-vidcap beryl-vidcap-0.1.2-3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 16 08:56:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 03:56:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211729] Review Request: museek+ - Soulseek network filesharing client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612160856.kBG8uwbO016434@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: museek+ - Soulseek network filesharing client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211729 belegdol at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 16 09:31:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 04:31:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219909] New: software updater bug Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219909 Summary: software updater bug Product: Fedora Core Version: fc6 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vojtek at gdynia.mm.pl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: ------- Additional Comments From vojtek at gdynia.mm.pl 2006-12-16 04:31 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=143842) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=143842&action=view) software updater output -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 16 09:32:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 04:32:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219910] New: software updater bug Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219910 Summary: software updater bug Product: Fedora Core Version: fc6test3 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vojtek at gdynia.mm.pl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: ------- Additional Comments From vojtek at gdynia.mm.pl 2006-12-16 04:32 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=143843) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=143843&action=view) software updater output -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 16 09:52:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 04:52:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216130] Review Request: glest - 3D real time strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612160952.kBG9qNd7019257@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glest - 3D real time strategy game Alias: glest https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216130 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-12-16 04:52 EST ------- Please open a new bug if you want to report a problem, this bug was dedicated to the package review, and is already closed. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 16 10:14:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 05:14:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219909] software updater bug In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612161014.kBGAEi3w019838@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: software updater bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219909 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Package Review |pirut AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |katzj at redhat.com QAContact|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org | CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2006-12-16 05:14 EST ------- [ Reassigning to Pirut component and removing fedora-package-review from the CC: list. ] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 16 11:10:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 06:10:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219915] New: Review Request: kio_resources - Kio_resources provides the "resources" protocol for KDE Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219915 Summary: Review Request: kio_resources - Kio_resources provides the "resources" protocol for KDE Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/kio_resources/kio_resources.spec SRPM URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/kio_resources/kio_resources-0.2-1.src.rpm Description: kio_resources provides the "resources" protocol for KDE. It allows you to browse all installed files in the standard search paths (generally .kde and /usr). The general format of a resources URL is resources:/resource-type[/relative-path]. Thus, to view all wallpapers installed on your system, both in your home directory and in the KDE installation path, you type resources:/wallpaper. If you simply want to look through all the available resource types, use resources:/. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 16 12:52:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 07:52:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219910] software updater bug In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612161252.kBGCqu6O025521@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: software updater bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219910 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Package Review |pirut AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |katzj at redhat.com QAContact|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org | CC|notting at redhat.com, fedora- | |package-review at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 16 13:03:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 08:03:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218258] Review Request: audacious-docklet - a docklet plugin for Audacious In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612161303.kBGD3gSl025728@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-docklet - a docklet plugin for Audacious https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218258 ------- Additional Comments From yufanyufan at gmail.com 2006-12-16 08:03 EST ------- All the issues you mentioned above are fixed, except the md5 problem. The md5 of up stream source is 7503981a0a0ee229e5bdbe18553810db, which match exactly the one inside src.rpm. The freezing preferece window bug does exist. A review of the source code suggests that it is a bug inside audacious, but not the plugin. To be a quick fix, I create a patch that removed the preference menu entry and related stuff from the docklet plugin. I will try to notify the upstreams. The SPEC and src.rpm Spec URL: SRPM URL: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 16 14:24:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 09:24:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612161424.kBGEObhu028733@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-12-16 09:24 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=143854) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=143854&action=view) Patch to fix DBUS interface to gnome-screensaver This review seems stall. Mola, please respond within one week if you are still interested. Martin has expressed an interest in maintaining this otherwise. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 16 15:47:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 10:47:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215569] Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612161547.kBGFlglk031632@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215569 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-16 10:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #21) > [root at localhost ~]# ls -al /usr/lib/libseom.so* > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 21948 Nov 13 11:58 /usr/lib/libseom.so.0 > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 20436 Nov 13 11:58 /usr/lib/libseom.so.0.0.0 > [root at localhost ~]# rpm -q beryl-vidcap > beryl-vidcap-0.1.2-3 Please try 0.1.3-1. My complaint about shlib-with-non-pic-code is for 0.1.3-1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 16 15:48:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 10:48:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218258] Review Request: audacious-docklet - a docklet plugin for Audacious In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612161548.kBGFmo8o031683@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-docklet - a docklet plugin for Audacious https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218258 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-12-16 10:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > All the issues you mentioned above are fixed, except the md5 problem. Sorry, my fault. > To be a quick > fix, I create a patch that removed the preference menu entry and related stuff > from the docklet plugin. Sounds good and the patch looks sane. As all outstanding issues are fixed now, this package is APPROVED for all versions of Fedora Extras (audaciuos is only in > 6). You are now at step 9 of the new contributor's process, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors#head-bb3314e7b80fd98f037edd46f6d1efafbb611752 I'm also willing to sponsor you, but before I do I'd like you to get more familiar with Fedora Extras, especially with http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/HowToGetSponsored and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/UsingCvsFaq Are you planing to release more packages? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 16 16:01:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 11:01:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213594] Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612161601.kBGG1HHu032000@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213594 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #140853|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-12-16 11:01 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=143855) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=143855&action=view) Latest mock build results on fc6 This is the latest mock build result for this package. Is it supposed to build for FC6? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 16 16:29:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 11:29:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219653] Review Request: solfege - music education software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612161629.kBGGT5h7032669@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: solfege - music education software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219653 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-16 11:29 EST ------- Well, I will review this.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 16 16:53:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 11:53:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612161653.kBGGrF02001013@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 michel.salim at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #143854|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-12-16 11:53 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=143858) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=143858&action=view) Fixed screensaver patch, borrowed from Totem Turns out just changing the message name is not enough. I ported the code to handle the old and new screensaver API from Totem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 16 17:15:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 12:15:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218258] Review Request: audacious-docklet - a docklet plugin for Audacious In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612161715.kBGHF7X8001655@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-docklet - a docklet plugin for Audacious https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218258 ------- Additional Comments From yufanyufan at gmail.com 2006-12-16 12:14 EST ------- Thank you for you supporting all the way! It's a great honor to be a contributor. By now, I indeed has another package to release. Hopefully, all I learned here will save me a lot of time in the future. Please come by and see by the time! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 16 17:51:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 12:51:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 205755] Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612161751.kBGHpIFf002987@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205755 ------- Additional Comments From jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org 2006-12-16 12:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #22) > Josh, > > I have completed my review. Throwing over to you :-) Sorry for such a delay. Things around here have been a bit hectic. I'll try and take a look at this tomorrow or Monday and get the ball rolling again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 16 18:51:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 13:51:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216102] Review Request: python-twisted-conch - Twisted SSHv2 implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612161851.kBGIplbM004744@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-conch - Twisted SSHv2 implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216102 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-16 13:51 EST ------- See below - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 0236162d53cf7f34ed341d9179e7783b TwistedConch-0.7.0.tar.bz2 0236162d53cf7f34ed341d9179e7783b TwistedConch-0.7.0.tar.bz2.1 See below - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. x86_64/i386 - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane: SHOULD Items: See below - Should build in mock. i386/x86_64 - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. Same comment as from the python-twisted-names review about the %{python} macro You will be maintaining these packages so it's your call, but it doesn't do anything useful for this fedora extras spec IMHO. 2. Might add the LICENSE and NEWS files in as %doc? 3. Needs BuildRequires: python-devel for fc7/devel. 4. rpmlint says: E: python-twisted-conch no-binary (which can be ignored in this case) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 16 19:09:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 14:09:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216104] Review Request: python-twisted-runner - process management library and inetd replacement In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612161909.kBGJ9JE0005187@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-runner - process management library and inetd replacement https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216104 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-16 14:09 EST ------- OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (MIT) OK - License field in spec matches See below - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: ec4677a59dd2643d50da0914b3a1df88 TwistedRunner-0.2.0.tar.bz2 ec4677a59dd2643d50da0914b3a1df88 TwistedRunner-0.2.0.tar.bz2.1 OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. See below - final provides and requires are sane: SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. x386/x86_64 - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. Ditto the %{python} macro comment from the other python-twisted reviews. ;) 2. Should include LICENSE and NEWS as %doc files. 3. I see that this package is providing: portmap.so (on i386) and portmap.so()(64bit) (on x86_64) Should that be the case? Or should that be filtered out? Thats a pretty generic .so name and it's not in a standard dir where something could link to it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 16 19:16:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 14:16:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216104] Review Request: python-twisted-runner - process management library and inetd replacement In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612161916.kBGJGiaf005392@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-runner - process management library and inetd replacement https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216104 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 16 19:22:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 14:22:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208169] Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612161922.kBGJMx4d005650@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208169 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-16 14:22 EST ------- The one issue with this package not being built for fc6 at least is that if it was there the flumotion package could be built, which would fix a E-V-R problem with that package. (flumotion in fc5 is newer than fc6, so people who upgrade don't get an updated package). In any case I am trying to move forward all the other python-twisted-* reviews. Are there any that are not submitted yet? Or can we get this in once the other pending ones are finished? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 16 19:27:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 14:27:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217836] Review Request: vimoutliner - set of vim macros for editing outlines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612161927.kBGJRwkL005820@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vimoutliner - set of vim macros for editing outlines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217836 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-16 14:27 EST ------- This review request should probibly be in the 'REVIEW' state, not the 'NEW' state. Fixing the blocking bugs for that... I see that the bug referred to in comment #10 is closed WONTFIX. Is there a solution to the problem there? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 16 19:28:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 14:28:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218258] Review Request: audacious-docklet - a docklet plugin for Audacious In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612161928.kBGJSn0H005904@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-docklet - a docklet plugin for Audacious https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218258 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 16 19:31:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 14:31:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216106] Review Request: python-twisted-words - Twisted Words contains Instant Messaging implementations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612161931.kBGJVRip006002@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-words - Twisted Words contains Instant Messaging implementations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216106 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-16 14:31 EST ------- OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (MIT) OK - License field in spec matches See below - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 37d34da233aefe4a7a41b97bc9222b6a TwistedWords-0.4.0.tar.bz2 37d34da233aefe4a7a41b97bc9222b6a TwistedWords-0.4.0.tar.bz2.1 See below - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. x386/x86_64 - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. The obligatory comment about the %{python} macro. ;) 2. Should include LICENSE and NEWS as %doc files. 3. Needs BuildRequires: python-devel on fc7/devel at least. 4. rpmlint says: E: python-twisted-words no-binary (which can be ignored in this case) 5. Should the Requires on python-twisted-core be versioned? I just noticed it isn't here or any of the other python-twisted-* packages. Is core likely to upgrade in a way that is compatible with all the subpackages? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 16 19:35:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 14:35:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209615] Review Request: wmcpuload - WindowMaker dockapp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612161935.kBGJZt6s006106@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wmcpuload - WindowMaker dockapp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209615 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-16 14:35 EST ------- Hey Patrice. Are you formally reviewing this package? It's assigned to you, but still blocking the FE-NEW blocker. If you are reviewing it, can you move that to FE-REVIEW? If not, can you move it back to being assigned to nobody at fedoraproject.org? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 16 19:38:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 14:38:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176712] Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-gcc-newlib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612161938.kBGJcsot006191@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-gcc-newlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176712 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|tsanders at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-16 14:38 EST ------- This bug is a unassigned fedora extras review request, so it should be assigned to 'nobody at fedoraproject.org'. Feel free to change it back if I am mistaken. Also, why is this blocking FE-GUIDELINES? Can someone add a comment on what guideline it's waiting for? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 16 19:40:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 14:40:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176582] Review Request: freedt -- Reimplementation of Dan Bernstein's daemontools under the GNU GPL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612161940.kBGJeMQx006253@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freedt -- Reimplementation of Dan Bernstein's daemontools under the GNU GPL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176582 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|tsanders at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-16 14:40 EST ------- This bug is a unassigned fedora extras review request, so it should be assigned to 'nobody at fedoraproject.org'. Feel free to change it back if I am mistaken. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 16 19:46:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 14:46:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216105] Review Request: python-twisted-web - Twisted web server, programmable in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612161946.kBGJkCdi006462@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-web - Twisted web server, programmable in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216105 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-16 14:46 EST ------- Hey Thomas. Any news on the mustfix/suggestion items from this review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 16 20:43:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 15:43:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219751] Review Request: python-TurboMail - Multi-threaded mail queue manager for TurboGears applications. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612162043.kBGKh4O0007699@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-TurboMail - Multi-threaded mail queue manager for TurboGears applications. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219751 lmacken at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From lmacken at redhat.com 2006-12-16 15:43 EST ------- http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/SPECS/python-TurboMail.spec http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/SRPMS/python-TurboMail-2.0.3-2.src.rpm * Fri Dec 15 2006 Luke Macken 2.0.3-2 - Add TurboGears to BuildRequires - Remove superfluous CFLAGS - Add LICENSE.txt Imported into CVS, added to owners.list, requested FC-6 CVS branch, tagged and built for devel. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 16 21:47:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 16:47:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176712] Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-gcc-newlib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612162147.kBGLlLEE009090@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-gcc-newlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176712 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-12-16 16:47 EST ------- This blocks FE-GUIDELINES because it awaits the drafting and ratification of guidelines for cross compilers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 16 23:48:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 18:48:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209615] Review Request: wmcpuload - WindowMaker dockapp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612162348.kBGNml8B011769@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wmcpuload - WindowMaker dockapp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209615 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-12-16 18:48 EST ------- Yes, I am formally reviewing it. I don't want the libdockapp internal library to be used. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 17 00:04:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 19:04:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219930] New: Review Request: lxpanel - A lightweight X11 desktop panel Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219930 Summary: Review Request: lxpanel - A lightweight X11 desktop panel Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at deadbabylon.de QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://deadbabylon.de/fedora/extras/lxpanel/lxpanel.spec SRPM URL: http://deadbabylon.de/fedora/extras/lxpanel/lxpanel-0.2.4-2.src.rpm Description: lxpanel is a lightweight X11 desktop panel. It works with any ICCCM / NETWM compliant window manager (eg sawfish, metacity, xfwm4, kwin) and features a tasklist, pager, launchbar, clock, menu and sytray. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 17 00:10:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 19:10:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219931] New: Review Request: perl-Net-GPSD - Provides an object client interface to the gpsd server daemon Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219931 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-GPSD - Provides an object client interface to the gpsd server daemon Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-Net-GPSD.spec SRPM URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-Net-GPSD-0.32-1.src.rpm Description: Net::GPSD provides an object client interface to the gpsd server daemon. gpsd is an open source GPS deamon from http://gpsd.berlios.de/. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 17 00:16:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 19:16:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219932] New: Review Request: driconf - A configuration applet for the Direct Rendering Infrastructure Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219932 Summary: Review Request: driconf - A configuration applet for the Direct Rendering Infrastructure Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kevin at tummy.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora-extras/driconf.spec SRPM URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora-extras/driconf-0.9.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: DRIconf is a configuration applet for the Direct Rendering Infrastructure. It allows customizing performance and visual quality settings of OpenGL drivers on a per-driver, per-screen and/or per-application level. The settings are stored in system wide and per-user XML configuration files, which are parsed by the OpenGL drivers on startup. DRIConf is written in Python with the python-gtk toolkit bindings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 17 02:31:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 21:31:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219930] Review Request: lxpanel - A lightweight X11 desktop panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612170231.kBH2V6I2014430@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lxpanel - A lightweight X11 desktop panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219930 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de, | |candyz0416 at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-12-16 21:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #0) > SRPM URL: http://deadbabylon.de/fedora/extras/lxpanel/lxpanel-0.2.4-2.src.rpm Error 404. I took your spec and built the package, but there are some things it don't like: - Source0: should not use a mirror, instead use dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/lxde/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz - BR startup-notification-devel? - In the default config two starters (firefox and pcman-fm) are not working. Please take a look at Chung-Yen's package at ftp://cle.linux.org.tw/pub/fedora/cle/6/SRPMS/lxpanel-0.2.4-1.fc6.src.rpm for a fix. Some othe more thoughts: I think someone should also roll a pcman-fm package, we should package the whole lx-desktop in extras. I have an icewm package that I can offer. You and Chung-Yen should unite your powers on pcman-fm, lxpanel, lxsession and lxmusic. What do you think? As long as we don't have no pcman-fm package I suggest this starter should be removed from the default config. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 17 03:00:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 22:00:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219164] Review Request: fontypython - TTF font manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612170300.kBH30QID014782@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fontypython - TTF font manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219164 cr33dog at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cr33dog at gmail.com 2006-12-16 22:00 EST ------- Thanks - I'm marking resolved - NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 17 03:08:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 22:08:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219932] Review Request: driconf - A configuration applet for the Direct Rendering Infrastructure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612170308.kBH38XZm014987@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: driconf - A configuration applet for the Direct Rendering Infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219932 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-16 22:08 EST ------- I don't know I will review this. however... I am always annoyed when I have to check the requirements for python related packages (because this is not done automatically by rpmbuild process). Please check the requirements for this package and add proper Requires. For instance, driconf/driconf.py includes the line: ----------------------------- import pygtk ----------------------------- This means this package should have Requires: pygobject2 (or pygtk2) . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 17 03:14:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 22:14:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217311] Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612170314.kBH3Ex96015074@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217311 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-12-16 22:14 EST ------- 23856 (xarchiver): Build on target fedora-development-extras succeeded. Build logs may be found at http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/23856-xarchiver-0.4.9-0.1.20061213svn.fc7/ Closing NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 17 03:15:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 22:15:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215241] Review Request: thunar-archive-plugin - Archive plugin for the Thunar file manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612170315.kBH3FZoQ015118@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thunar-archive-plugin - Archive plugin for the Thunar file manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215241 Bug 215241 depends on bug 217311, which changed state. Bug 217311 Summary: Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217311 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 17 03:20:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 22:20:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219932] Review Request: driconf - A configuration applet for the Direct Rendering Infrastructure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612170320.kBH3KLmp015193@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: driconf - A configuration applet for the Direct Rendering Infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219932 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-16 22:20 EST ------- I also found: ----------------------------------------- driconf/dri.py: infopipe = os.popen ("glxinfo " + dpyStr, "r") ----------------------------------------- I don't know this package well, however, this line perhaps implies that this package should require glx-utils as Requires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 17 03:34:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 22:34:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219932] Review Request: driconf - A configuration applet for the Direct Rendering Infrastructure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612170334.kBH3Y0HH015397@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: driconf - A configuration applet for the Direct Rendering Infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219932 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-16 22:33 EST ------- In reply to comments #1 and #2: Quite right. :( Sorry I missed those... new version with those requirements added: New -2 packages at the same urls: Spec URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora-extras/driconf.spec SRPM URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora-extras/driconf-0.9.1-2.fc7.src.rpm diff of spec from previous version: 5c5 < Release: 2%{?dist} --- > Release: 1%{?dist} 17,18d16 < Requires: pygtk2 < Requires: glx-utils 74,76d71 < * Sat Dec 16 2006 Kevin Fenzi - 0.9.1-2 < - Added Requires for pygtk2 and glx-utils < -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 17 04:38:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 23:38:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216534] Review Request: gocr - GNU Optical Character Recognition program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612170438.kBH4cNIu017970@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gocr - GNU Optical Character Recognition program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216534 ------- Additional Comments From greg at runlevel7.ca 2006-12-16 23:38 EST ------- Good news, the FuzzyOcr developers are recommending gocr 0.43 now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 17 04:40:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 23:40:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612170440.kBH4eW6d018106@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 michel.salim at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #143858|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-12-16 23:40 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=143863) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=143863&action=view) New screensaver patch Updated patch to 0.5.9, also fixes an upstream bug (change priv to gtv->priv) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 17 04:49:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 23:49:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612170449.kBH4ngvS018749@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 michel.salim at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #141214|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #141215|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-12-16 23:49 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=143864) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=143864&action=view) gxine-0.5.9 spec Updated spec to 0.5.9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 17 07:36:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 02:36:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612170736.kBH7aKm4024172@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 ------- Additional Comments From mola at c100c.com 2006-12-17 02:36 EST ------- gxine 0.5.9 checking for gnome-screensaver-command... /usr/bin/gnome-screensaver-command checking for DBUS... configure: error: Package requirements (dbus-glib-1) were not met: Package dbus-1 was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing `dbus-1.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable Package 'dbus-1', required by 'dbus-glib', not found -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 17 09:43:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 04:43:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219653] Review Request: solfege - music education software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612170943.kBH9hSEB023551@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: solfege - music education software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219653 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-17 04:43 EST ------- Well, this time I only checked for packaging issue and not checked this package for its funtion. A. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * Filesystem Layout - Usually when a wrapper script for the original binary is needed, the original binary should be where user's path are not passed, which is usually %{_libexecdir}. * Use rpmlint - rpmlint (for FC-devel) is not silent, for which please see below * Requires - Well, python related dependencies are not checked automatically by rpmbuild process and then should be checked manually. -- For example, /usr/share/solfege/src/utils.py contails: ----------------------------------------- import gtk ----------------------------------------- This means that this package (solfege) should need "Requires: pygtk2". -- And another example is that /usr/share/solfege/soundcard/midifilesynth.py includes the line: ----------------------------------------- import win32api ----------------------------------------- However, what package provides win32api python module? (or can this file be ignored??) * BuildRequires - libxslt-devel Please check whether this should be whether "libxslt-devel" or "libxslt", since it seems only /usr/bin/xsltproc is used and this package is included in libxslt, not -devel pacakge. * Desktop files -------------------------------------------- Categories=GNOME;Application;AudioVideo;Audio;Education;X-Fedora; -------------------------------------------- Categories "Application" "X-Fedora" is deprecated from desktop-file-utils >= 0.11 and these should be removed (this is also applied for FC5/6). For FC-devel, these causes rpmlint warnings/errors. * Documentation - /usr/share/doc/solfege-3.6.4/{AUTHORS,README} contain non-UTF8 character(s). Please change the encodings of these files to UTF-8. * Timestamps - This package (solfege) contains many image files and for these files timestamps should be kept to show correctly when these files are created. For these purpose: 1. ----------------------------------------------- export INSTALL="%{__install} -c -p" ----------------------------------------------- is needed before ----------------------------------------------- %configure --enable-docbook-stylesheet=%stylesheet ----------------------------------------------- line to pass INSTALL environment to Makefile.in 2. ------------------------------------------------ %{__sed} -i.stamp -e 's|shutil\.copy|shutil.copy2|' tools/pcopy.py ------------------------------------------------ is needed at %prep stage to keep timestamps on image files. B. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : = this is okay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 17 10:02:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 05:02:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219873] Review Request: kio_sword - lightweight Sword front-end for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612171002.kBHA289b024276@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kio_sword - lightweight Sword front-end for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219873 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-12-17 05:01 EST ------- #1. Parallel make should be used see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-525c7d76890cb22df33b759c65c35c82bf434d2e #2. gcc-c++ is among the exceptions, remove it from BR see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-4cadce5e79d38a63cad3941de1dadc9d25d67d30 #3: is there a specific reason why you used: [ -n "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" -a "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" != / ] && %{__rm} -rf --preserve-root $RPM_BUILD_ROOT The buildroot is already defined. #4: you should use see: Scriptlets http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-7103f6c38d1b5735e8477bdd569ad73ea2c49bda #5: during rpmbuild, I have: /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.59067: line 30: kdeconfig: command not found + export KDEDIR= + KDEDIR= is it useful to use kdeconfig ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 17 10:05:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 05:05:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219930] Review Request: lxpanel - A lightweight X11 desktop panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612171005.kBHA53wc024391@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lxpanel - A lightweight X11 desktop panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219930 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2006-12-17 05:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > (In reply to comment #0) > > SRPM URL: http://deadbabylon.de/fedora/extras/lxpanel/lxpanel-0.2.4-2.src.rpm > > Error 404. My fault. Fixed it. > I took your spec and built the package, but there are some things it don't like: > > - Source0: should not use a mirror, instead use > dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/lxde/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz Corrected. > - BR startup-notification-devel? Added. > - In the default config two starters (firefox and pcman-fm) are not working. > Please take a look at Chung-Yen's package at > ftp://cle.linux.org.tw/pub/fedora/cle/6/SRPMS/lxpanel-0.2.4-1.fc6.src.rpm > for a fix. Added the patch. > Some othe more thoughts: I think someone should also roll a pcman-fm package, we > should package the whole lx-desktop in extras. I have an icewm package that I > can offer. You and Chung-Yen should unite your powers on pcman-fm, lxpanel, > lxsession and lxmusic. What do you think? I didn't know that someone else ist working on it. I will ask him what he would think. Package the whole LXDE-Desktop could be interesting for others. I only use lxpanel for myself and have never used lxmusic. Will have a look on it. > As long as we don't have no pcman-fm package I suggest this starter should be > removed from the default config. At first I've thought to replace pcmanfm.desktop with gnome-nautilus-home.desktop. But perhaps this could irritate some users when updating the package later and replace it again with pcmanfm.desktop. For the moment: SPEC Url: http://deadbabylon.de/fedora/extras/lxpanel/lxpanel.spec SRPM Url: http://deadbabylon.de/fedora/extras/lxpanel/lxpanel-0.2.4-3.src.rpm Changelog: - BR: startup-notification-devel - Added Patch1 from Chung-Yen to fix wrong starters in default config -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 17 10:54:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 05:54:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218176] Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612171054.kBHAsuZb026534@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218176 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-12-17 05:54 EST ------- rpmlint is not quiet gchempaint.i386.rpm W: gchempaint non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/gchempaint-arrows.schemas builds fine in mock Once you sort out the conffile, I'll do the full review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 17 11:01:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 06:01:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612171101.kBHB1wlP026836@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 ------- Additional Comments From martin.sourada at seznam.cz 2006-12-17 06:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #41) > gxine 0.5.9 > > checking for gnome-screensaver-command... /usr/bin/gnome-screensaver-command > checking for DBUS... configure: error: Package requirements (dbus-glib-1) were > not met: > Package dbus-1 was not found in the pkg-config search path. > Perhaps you should add the directory containing `dbus-1.pc' > to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable > Package 'dbus-1', required by 'dbus-glib', not found Try adding BuildRequires: dbus-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 17 11:30:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 06:30:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218176] Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612171130.kBHBUn7f027519@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218176 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-17 06:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20) > W: gchempaint non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/gchempaint-arrows.schemas This should be ignored as gconf schemas file is not a config file while this file is usually installed under /etc/gconf. This is rather rpmlint bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 17 12:12:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 07:12:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218176] Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612171212.kBHCCql3028221@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218176 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-12-17 07:12 EST ------- rpmlint, so much fun in a package so small ;-p Review spec file in US English, UTF-8 macros consistent MD5s check Includes docs Actually works Can't see any missing deps -devel comments noted APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 17 12:53:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 07:53:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219932] Review Request: driconf - A configuration applet for the Direct Rendering Infrastructure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612171253.kBHCr5HA029126@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: driconf - A configuration applet for the Direct Rendering Infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219932 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 17 13:58:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 08:58:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219931] Review Request: perl-Net-GPSD - Provides an object client interface to the gpsd server daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612171358.kBHDwC1w030871@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-GPSD - Provides an object client interface to the gpsd server daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219931 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 17 14:14:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 09:14:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219943] New: Review Request: perl-GPS-PRN - Package for PRN - Object ID conversions Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219943 Summary: Review Request: perl-GPS-PRN - Package for PRN - Object ID conversions Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-GPS-PRN.spec SRPM URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-GPS-PRN-0.02-1.src.rpm Description: Package for PRN - Object ID conversions. Note: New requirement of Net::GPSD (v0.33). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 17 16:46:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 11:46:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219949] New: Review Request: perl-File-Which - Portable implementation of the 'which' utility Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219949 Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Which - Portable implementation of the 'which' utility Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-File-Which.spec SRPM URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-File-Which-0.05-1.src.rpm Description: File::Which is a portable implementation (in Perl) of 'which', and can be used to get the absolute filename of an executable program installed somewhere in your PATH, or just check for its existence. It includes the command-line utility 'pwhich' which has the same function as 'which'. Note: this module will help improving the test coverage of Perl::Critic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 17 16:47:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 11:47:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219950] New: Review Request: perl-Pod-Spell - A formatter for spellchecking Pod Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219950 Summary: Review Request: perl-Pod-Spell - A formatter for spellchecking Pod Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-Pod-Spell.spec SRPM URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-Pod-Spell-1.01-1.src.rpm Description: Pod::Spell is a Pod formatter whose output is good for spellchecking. Pod::Spell rather like Pod::Text, except that it doesn't put much effort into actual formatting, and it suppresses things that look like Perl symbols or Perl jargon (so that your spellchecking program won't complain about mystery words like "$thing" or "Foo::Bar" or "hashref"). Note: this module will help improving the test coverage of Perl::Critic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 17 17:48:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 12:48:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219949] Review Request: perl-File-Which - Portable implementation of the 'which' utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612171748.kBHHmkDv004387@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Which - Portable implementation of the 'which' utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219949 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-17 12:48 EST ------- Taking this for review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 17 17:49:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 12:49:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219950] Review Request: perl-Pod-Spell - A formatter for spellchecking Pod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612171749.kBHHnKcx004437@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Pod-Spell - A formatter for spellchecking Pod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219950 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Component|Package Review |915resolution AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-17 12:49 EST ------- Taking this for review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 17 17:50:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 12:50:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219943] Review Request: perl-GPS-PRN - Package for PRN - Object ID conversions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612171750.kBHHoL1S004495@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GPS-PRN - Package for PRN - Object ID conversions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219943 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-17 12:50 EST ------- Taking this for review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 17 18:00:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 13:00:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219950] Review Request: perl-Pod-Spell - A formatter for spellchecking Pod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612171800.kBHI0lOc004778@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Pod-Spell - A formatter for spellchecking Pod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219950 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|915resolution |Package Review CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-12-17 13:00 EST ------- * rpmlint is silent * free software, license file not included * follow naming and packaging guidelines * match upstream aa4964844da2586562aae5208e2dbe61 Pod-Spell-1.01.tar.gz * sane provides Provides: perl(Pod::Spell) = 1.01 perl(Pod::Wordlist) * %files section and directory ownership right I would have APPROVED it, but I am not doing the review ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 17 18:08:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 13:08:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219949] Review Request: perl-File-Which - Portable implementation of the 'which' utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612171808.kBHI8PbW005006@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Which - Portable implementation of the 'which' utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219949 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-12-17 13:08 EST ------- * rpmlint is silent * free software, license not included * follow packaging and naming guidelines * match upstream bd671a65f770fc0a124095e74c7c8013 File-Which-0.05.tar.gz * sane provides Provides: perl(File::Which) * %files and directory ownership right I would have approved it if I were doing the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 17 18:17:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 13:17:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219956] New: Review Request: perl-IO-Capture - Abstract Base Class to build modules to capture output Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219956 Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Capture - Abstract Base Class to build modules to capture output Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-IO-Capture.spec SRPM URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-IO-Capture-0.05-1.src.rpm Description: The IO::Capture Module defines an abstract base class that can be used to create any number of useful sub-classes that capture output being sent on a filehandle such as STDOUT or STDERR. Note: this module will help improving the test coverage of Perl::Critic (Module::CPANTS::Analyse --> Test::Kawlitee --> Perl::Critic) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 17 18:33:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 13:33:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219957] New: Review Request: perl-Pod-Strip - Remove POD from Perl code Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219957 Summary: Review Request: perl-Pod-Strip - Remove POD from Perl code Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-Pod-Strip.spec SRPM URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-Pod-Strip-1.02-1.src.rpm Description: Pod::Strip is a subclass of Pod::Simple that strips all POD from Perl Code. Note: this module will help improving the test coverage of Perl::Critic (Module::ExtractUse --> Module::CPANTS::Analyse --> Test::Kawlitee --> Perl::Critic) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 17 18:36:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 13:36:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219956] Review Request: perl-IO-Capture - Abstract Base Class to build modules to capture output In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612171836.kBHIaM9G005603@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Capture - Abstract Base Class to build modules to capture output https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219956 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ville.skytta at iki.fi OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-12-17 13:36 EST ------- Approved, please just fix the order of arguments to find(1) in %install (-depth before -type d) before the first build, see spectemplate-perl.spec in rpmdevtools. $ find /tmp -type d -depth -name foo >/dev/null find: warning: you have specified the -depth option after a non-option argument -type, but options are not positional (-depth affects tests specified before it as well as those specified after it). Please specify options before other arguments. $ find /tmp -depth -type d -name foo >/dev/null (no warnings) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 17 19:46:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 14:46:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219956] Review Request: perl-IO-Capture - Abstract Base Class to build modules to capture output In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612171946.kBHJkkvK007351@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Capture - Abstract Base Class to build modules to capture output https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219956 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-12-17 14:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Approved, please just fix the order of arguments to find(1) in %install (-depth > before -type d) before the first build, see spectemplate-perl.spec in rpmdevtools. Done. Packaged imported and built (only devel at the moment). I will close this ticket as soon as this package gets built for FC-5 and FC-6. Thanks for the review, jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 17 21:00:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 16:00:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219932] Review Request: driconf - A configuration applet for the Direct Rendering Infrastructure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612172100.kBHL0Yv5008602@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: driconf - A configuration applet for the Direct Rendering Infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219932 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |219961 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 17 21:21:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 16:21:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219962] New: Review Request: crystal-clear - Crystal Clear KDE Icon set Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219962 Summary: Review Request: crystal-clear - Crystal Clear KDE Icon set Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/crystal-clear/crystal-clear.spec SRPM URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/crystal-clear/crystal-clear-20050622-1.src.rpm Description: Crystal Clear is a KDE Icon set -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 17 22:22:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 17:22:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612172222.kBHMMVO4009945@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-12-17 17:22 EST ------- Ah, right. I've been wondering if dbus-devel is required or not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 17 23:39:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 18:39:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219971] New: Review Request: perl-Text-Tree - Format a simple tree of strings into a textual tree graph Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219971 Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Tree - Format a simple tree of strings into a textual tree graph Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Text-Tree/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Text-Tree-1.0-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Text-Tree.spec Description: Allows the caller to develop a tree structure, using nested arrays of strings and references. Once developed, the whole tree can be printed as a diagram, with the root of the tree at the top, and child nodes formatted horizontally below them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 17 23:39:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 18:39:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219971] Review Request: perl-Text-Tree - Format a simple tree of strings into a textual tree graph In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612172339.kBHNdhGh011895@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Tree - Format a simple tree of strings into a textual tree graph https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219971 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 17 23:53:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 18:53:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219972] New: Review Request: poker-network - Base package for poker client and server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 Summary: Review Request: poker-network - Base package for poker client and server Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chris.stone at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network-1.0.32-1.src.rpm Description: Base package for poker client and server. There are still some issues which I have noted in the spec file. Putting package up for review comments in the meantime. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 17 23:54:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 18:54:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - Base package for poker client and server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612172354.kBHNse0F012374@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - Base package for poker client and server Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |171543, 219954 Alias| |poker-network -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 00:01:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 19:01:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612180001.kBI016K9012634@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: poker- |Review Request: poker- |network - Base package for |network - A poker server, |poker client and server |client and abstract user | |interface library -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 00:09:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 19:09:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219973] New: Review Request: powerdns - A modern, advanced and high performance authoritative-only nameserver Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219973 Summary: Review Request: powerdns - A modern, advanced and high performance authoritative-only nameserver Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ruben at rubenkerkhof.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/powerdns/powerdns.spec SRPM URL: http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/powerdns/powerdns-2.9.20-1.src.rpm Description: The PowerDNS Nameserver is a modern, advanced and high performance authoritative-only nameserver. It is written from scratch and conforms to all relevant DNS standards documents. Furthermore, PowerDNS interfaces with almost any database. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 00:11:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 19:11:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219973] Review Request: powerdns - A modern, advanced and high performance authoritative-only nameserver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612180011.kBI0BQ6s012886@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: powerdns - A modern, advanced and high performance authoritative-only nameserver Alias: powerdns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219973 ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |powerdns -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 00:19:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 19:19:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208169] Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612180019.kBI0JS9U013069@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208169 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chris.stone at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-12-17 19:19 EST ------- Hi, I need this for poker-network bug #219972 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 01:05:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 20:05:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215569] Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612180105.kBI15QUf014165@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215569 ------- Additional Comments From tom at dbservice.com 2006-12-17 20:05 EST ------- As of right now, the seom svn:extenals reference has been removed from beryl-vidcap and the preferred way is to have separate seom and beryl-vidcap packages. But it's still unclear whether the beryl-vidcap plugin should be merged with beryl-plugins or not, hopefully we'll have this resolved before the 0.1.4 release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 02:10:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 21:10:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219978] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219978 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at christoph-wickert.de QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras/review/SPECS/thunar-media-tags-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras/review/SRPMS/thunar-media-tags-plugin-0.1.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: This plugin adds special features for media files to the Thunar file manager. It includes a special media file page for the file properties dialog, a tag editor for ID3 or OGG/Vorbis tags and a so-called bulk renamer, which allows users to rename multiple audio files at once, based on their tags. Note: ATM %{_libdir}/thunarx-1/ is not owned by any package, but this is a bug in Thunar. I already informed Kevin about this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 02:11:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 21:11:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219978] Review Request: thunar-media-tags-plugin - Media Tags plugin for the Thunar file manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612180211.kBI2Bnx0015898@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thunar-media-tags-plugin - Media Tags plugin for the Thunar file manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219978 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- |Tags plugin for the Thunar | |file manager -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 02:24:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 21:24:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219979] New: Review Request: perl-Text-ASCIITable - Create a nice formatted table using ASCII characters Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219979 Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-ASCIITable - Create a nice formatted table using ASCII characters Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Text-ASCIITable/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Text-ASCIITable-0.18-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Text-ASCIITable.spec Description: Pretty nifty if you want to output dynamic text to your console or other fixed-size-font displays, and at the same time it will display it in a nice human-readable, or "cool" way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 02:24:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 21:24:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219979] Review Request: perl-Text-ASCIITable - Create a nice formatted table using ASCII characters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612180224.kBI2Ok1i016238@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-ASCIITable - Create a nice formatted table using ASCII characters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219979 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 02:27:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 21:27:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219981] New: Review Request:xfce4-xfapplet-plugin - A plugin to use gnome-panel based applets inside the Xfce4 one Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219981 Summary: Review Request:xfce4-xfapplet-plugin - A plugin to use gnome-panel based applets inside the Xfce4 one Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at christoph-wickert.de QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras/review/SPECS/xfce4-xfapplet-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras/review/SRPMS/xfce4-xfapplet-plugin-0.1.0-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: The XfApplet Plugin is a plugin for the Xfce 4 Panel which allows one to use applets designed for the Gnome Panel inside the Xfce Panel. You can think of XfApplet as a tiny Gnome Panel that lives inside the Xfce Panel and allows you to show the same applets that the Gnome Panel is capable of showing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 02:38:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 21:38:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219986] New: Review Request: xfce4-smartbookmark-plugin - Smart bookmarks for the Xfce panel Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219986 Summary: Review Request: xfce4-smartbookmark-plugin - Smart bookmarks for the Xfce panel Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at christoph-wickert.de QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras/review/SPECS/xfce4-smartbookmark-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras/review/SRPMS/xfce4-smartbookmark-plugin-0.4.2-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: A plugin which allows you to do a search directly on Internet on sites like Google or Red Hat Bugzilla. It allows you to send requests directly to your browser and perform custom searches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 02:40:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 21:40:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219981] Review Request: xfce4-xfapplet-plugin - A plugin to use gnome-panel based applets inside the Xfce4 one In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612180240.kBI2e1LG016893@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-xfapplet-plugin - A plugin to use gnome-panel based applets inside the Xfce4 one https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219981 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:xfce4- |Review Request: xfce4- |xfapplet-plugin - A plugin |xfapplet-plugin - A plugin |to use gnome-panel based |to use gnome-panel based |applets inside the Xfce4 one|applets inside the Xfce4 one -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 02:56:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 21:56:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219990] New: Review Request: xfce4-timer-plugin - Timer from the XFCE panel Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219990 Summary: Review Request: xfce4-timer-plugin - Timer from the XFCE panel Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at christoph-wickert.de QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras/review/SPECS/xfce4-timer-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras/review/SRPMS/xfce4-timer-plugin-0.5-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: A timer for the XFCE panel. It supports countdown periods and alarms at certain times. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 04:07:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 23:07:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219979] Review Request: perl-Text-ASCIITable - Create a nice formatted table using ASCII characters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612180407.kBI47QFQ020276@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-ASCIITable - Create a nice formatted table using ASCII characters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219979 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 04:07:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 23:07:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219971] Review Request: perl-Text-Tree - Format a simple tree of strings into a textual tree graph In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612180407.kBI47h6M020328@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Tree - Format a simple tree of strings into a textual tree graph https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219971 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 04:08:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 23:08:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219957] Review Request: perl-Pod-Strip - Remove POD from Perl code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612180408.kBI484F8020417@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Pod-Strip - Remove POD from Perl code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219957 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 04:21:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 23:21:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219949] Review Request: perl-File-Which - Portable implementation of the 'which' utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612180421.kBI4LBF9021464@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Which - Portable implementation of the 'which' utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219949 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-17 23:21 EST ------- Patrice, Thanks. Hey feel free to remove me if i have not posted any initial comments and take that package review under REVIEW. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 04:21:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 23:21:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219950] Review Request: perl-Pod-Spell - A formatter for spellchecking Pod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612180421.kBI4LLqA021498@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Pod-Spell - A formatter for spellchecking Pod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219950 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-17 23:21 EST ------- Patrice, Thanks. Hey feel free to remove me if i have not posted any initial comments and take that package review under REVIEW. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 04:44:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 23:44:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219931] Review Request: perl-Net-GPSD - Provides an object client interface to the gpsd server daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612180444.kBI4iT85022943@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-GPSD - Provides an object client interface to the gpsd server daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219931 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-17 23:44 EST ------- rpmlint is silent W: perl-Net-GPSD spelling-error-in-description deamon daemon You made a misspelling in the Description. Please double-check. But you can correct it while importing package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 04:47:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 23:47:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219931] Review Request: perl-Net-GPSD - Provides an object client interface to the gpsd server daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612180447.kBI4l04l023102@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-GPSD - Provides an object client interface to the gpsd server daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219931 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-17 23:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > rpmlint is silent oops rpmlint is NOT silent > W: perl-Net-GPSD spelling-error-in-description deamon daemon > You made a misspelling in the Description. Please double-check. > > But you can correct it while importing package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 04:47:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 23:47:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219931] Review Request: perl-Net-GPSD - Provides an object client interface to the gpsd server daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612180447.kBI4lfSE023179@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-GPSD - Provides an object client interface to the gpsd server daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219931 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-17 23:47 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). - rpmlint is NOT silent for SRPM and for RPMS but not affecting other packages. W: perl-Net-GPSD spelling-error-in-description deamon daemon You made a misspelling in the Description. Please double-check. + source files match upstream. 7869c7d1cc20a37e70b3ea5a0c546bc7 Net-GPSD-0.32.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + %check used make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/base....ok All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=45, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.08 cusr + 0.01 csys = 0.09 CPU) + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Dose owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Followed perl packaging guidelines. APPROVED. Kindly change spelling in SPEC before you will import this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 04:50:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 23:50:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219943] Review Request: perl-GPS-PRN - Package for PRN - Object ID conversions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612180450.kBI4og5G023362@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GPS-PRN - Package for PRN - Object ID conversions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219943 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-17 23:50 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPMS. + source files match upstream. 60d48e68181cc0a50f039165021b8555 GPS-PRN-0.02.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + %check used make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/base....ok All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=19, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.01 cusr + 0.01 csys = 0.02 CPU) + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Dose owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Followed perl packaging guidelines. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 04:58:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 23:58:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219949] Review Request: perl-File-Which - Portable implementation of the 'which' utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612180458.kBI4wLBP024002@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Which - Portable implementation of the 'which' utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219949 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-17 23:58 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPMS. + source files match upstream. bd671a65f770fc0a124095e74c7c8013 File-Which-0.05.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + %check used make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/all.......ok t/load......ok t/simple....ok 5/9 skipped: All tests successful, 5 subtests skipped. Files=3, Tests=13, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.05 cusr + 0.02 csys = 0.07 CPU) + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Dose owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Followed perl packaging guidelines. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 05:02:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 00:02:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219950] Review Request: perl-Pod-Spell - A formatter for spellchecking Pod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612180502.kBI52gEb024317@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Pod-Spell - A formatter for spellchecking Pod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219950 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-18 00:02 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPMS. + source files match upstream. aa4964844da2586562aae5208e2dbe61 Pod-Spell-1.01.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + %check used make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-Iblib/lib" "-Iblib/arch" test.pl 1..22 # Running under perl version 5.008008 for linux # Current time local: Sun Dec 17 23:54:19 2006 # Current time GMT: Mon Dec 18 04:54:19 2006 # Using Test.pm version 1.25 # Perl version 5.008008 under linux ok 1 # Pod::Spell version 1.01 # Pod::Wordlist version 1.01 ok 2 # I see 1001 keys in %Pod::Wordlist::Wordlist # # Universe tests... # I'm in ASCII world. ok 3 # "A" is 65 ok 4 # "\n" is 10 ok 5 # "\r" is 13 ok 6 # "\cm" is 13 ok 7 # "\cj" is 10 ok 8 # "\t" is 9 ok 9 # "\f" is 12 ok 10 # "\b" is 8 ok 11 # "\a" is 7 ok 12 # "\e" is 27 # Universe tests complete. #------------------------ # Real tests. # ok 13 # Wrote >psin.pod (length 123 bytes) ok 14 # Opened psout.txt ok 15 # Created parser object. ok 16 # Converted. # Destroyed objects. # psout.txt is 26 bytes long. ok 17 # Opened Message-ID: <200612180508.kBI58Klw024778@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Pod-Strip - Remove POD from Perl code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219957 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-18 00:08 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPMS. + source files match upstream. b5ac7b0e68d8d44bd737f1ba71aaee3f Pod-Strip-1.02.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + ./Build test t/00_load.....................ok t/10_strip....................ok t/11_replace_with_comments....ok t/99_pod......................ok t/99_pod_coverage.............ok All tests successful. Files=5, Tests=9, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.35 cusr + 0.06 csys = 0.41 CPU) + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Dose owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Followed perl packaging guidelines. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 05:14:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 00:14:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219971] Review Request: perl-Text-Tree - Format a simple tree of strings into a textual tree graph In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612180514.kBI5EhbG025064@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Tree - Format a simple tree of strings into a textual tree graph https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219971 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-18 00:14 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPMS. + source files match upstream. 83232a177d199d90894cf3f1d30d534c Text-Tree-1.0.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + %check used make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/Text-Tree....ok All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=13, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 cusr + 0.00 csys = 0.02 CPU) +Provides: perl(Text::Tree) = 1.0 + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Dose owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Followed perl packaging guidelines. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 05:23:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 00:23:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219979] Review Request: perl-Text-ASCIITable - Create a nice formatted table using ASCII characters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612180523.kBI5NDAu025312@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-ASCIITable - Create a nice formatted table using ASCII characters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219979 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-18 00:23 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPMS. + source files match upstream. 25fea1cef17be49a6da1d9b5267fba97 Text-ASCIITable-0.18.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + %check used make test + ./Build test t/01_default........ok t/02_custom.........ok t/03_options........ok t/04_multiline......ok t/05_wordwrap.......ok t/06_htmlstrip......ok t/07_aligning.......ok t/08_heading........ok t/09_ansistrip......ok t/10_pages..........ok t/11_overloading....ok t/12_chaining.......ok All tests successful. Files=12, Tests=105, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.24 cusr + 0.07 csys = 0.31 CPU) + Provides: perl(Text::ASCIITable) = 0.18 perl(Text::ASCIITable::Wrap) = 0.2 + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Dose owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Followed perl packaging guidelines. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 05:24:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 00:24:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219971] Review Request: perl-Text-Tree - Format a simple tree of strings into a textual tree graph In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612180524.kBI5O1Ob025370@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Tree - Format a simple tree of strings into a textual tree graph https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219971 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-12-18 00:24 EST ------- Imported and building for devel; branches requested for FC-[56]. Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 05:33:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 00:33:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219979] Review Request: perl-Text-ASCIITable - Create a nice formatted table using ASCII characters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612180533.kBI5XKCh025626@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-ASCIITable - Create a nice formatted table using ASCII characters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219979 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE AssignedTo|panemade at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-12-18 00:33 EST ------- Imported and building for devel; branches requested. Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 05:33:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 00:33:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219979] Review Request: perl-Text-ASCIITable - Create a nice formatted table using ASCII characters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612180533.kBI5Xdcw025664@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-ASCIITable - Create a nice formatted table using ASCII characters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219979 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-12-18 00:33 EST ------- Imported and building for devel; branches requested. Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 05:34:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 00:34:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219979] Review Request: perl-Text-ASCIITable - Create a nice formatted table using ASCII characters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612180534.kBI5Y0xs025679@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-ASCIITable - Create a nice formatted table using ASCII characters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219979 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 05:35:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 00:35:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219979] Review Request: perl-Text-ASCIITable - Create a nice formatted table using ASCII characters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612180535.kBI5ZOl9025713@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-ASCIITable - Create a nice formatted table using ASCII characters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219979 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-12-18 00:35 EST ------- Slipped with the mouse there; should be to where things should be now :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 05:51:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 00:51:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219932] Review Request: driconf - A configuration applet for the Direct Rendering Infrastructure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612180551.kBI5pBBT026106@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: driconf - A configuration applet for the Direct Rendering Infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219932 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-18 00:51 EST ------- Well, two issues. * For BuildRequires: - BuildRequires: pygtk2-devel python-devel (for FC-devel) is sufficient. And, IMO this package should need no BuildRequires apart from minimum build environment (please check bug 219961) * For desktop file - This is a GUI application so providing a desktop file is generally recommended. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 06:16:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 01:16:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218600] Review Request: resapplet - Resolution Switching Applet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612180616.kBI6GIio026655@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: resapplet - Resolution Switching Applet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218600 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-18 01:16 EST ------- Don't Forget to CLOSE this review request once you import and build package in CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 07:12:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 02:12:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218600] Review Request: resapplet - Resolution Switching Applet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612180712.kBI7CIsW028320@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: resapplet - Resolution Switching Applet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218600 ------- Additional Comments From rvokal at redhat.com 2006-12-18 02:12 EST ------- I won't. Just didn't have time to import it yet. I'll do it today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 07:17:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 02:17:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218600] Review Request: resapplet - Resolution Switching Applet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612180717.kBI7H2jJ028472@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: resapplet - Resolution Switching Applet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218600 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-18 02:17 EST ------- take your time. I just reminded you :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 07:31:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 02:31:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217836] Review Request: vimoutliner - set of vim macros for editing outlines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612180731.kBI7VkoK028937@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vimoutliner - set of vim macros for editing outlines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217836 ------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com 2006-12-18 02:31 EST ------- I should probably not use private comments in Extras bugs -- see comment 11. Sorry for that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 07:43:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 02:43:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 188478] Review Request: fxload-2002_04_11.spec In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612180743.kBI7hRwA029345@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fxload-2002_04_11.spec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188478 ------- Additional Comments From tzafrir at cohens.org.il 2006-12-18 02:43 EST ------- What's the current status of this package? It is needed by various USB devices. Regarding the license: apart from a3load.hex I see no problem. a3load.hex is an optional second-stage loader. Its source is included in the development kit of the device, but I'm not sure about the license. In the worst case, you should be able to remove it without harming the main functionality of the package: it is used later as a .hex file and not used in the build process itself. Also note that it is firmware: code that runs on the guest processor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 08:12:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 03:12:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214087] Review Request: libextractor -- Simple library for keyword extraction In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612180812.kBI8CFOV030209@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libextractor -- Simple library for keyword extraction https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214087 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-12-18 03:12 EST ------- * Thu Dec 14 2006 Enrico Scholz - 0.5.16-2 - added a requirement for plugins to the main package - do not ship README.debian anymore - improved URL: http://ensc.de/fedora/libextractor/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 09:06:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 04:06:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218887] Review Request: fxload - Firmware loader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612180906.kBI96AOP001129@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fxload - Firmware loader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218887 ------- Additional Comments From tzafrir at cohens.org.il 2006-12-18 04:06 EST ------- Dupplicate? Please see #188478 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 09:47:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 04:47:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219962] Review Request: crystal-clear - Crystal Clear KDE Icon set In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612180947.kBI9lKMl004042@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crystal-clear - Crystal Clear KDE Icon set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219962 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 10:02:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 05:02:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219962] Review Request: crystal-clear - Crystal Clear KDE Icon set In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612181002.kBIA2IFI004831@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crystal-clear - Crystal Clear KDE Icon set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219962 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-18 05:02 EST ------- rpmlint is not silent on RPM W: crystal-clear no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. W: crystal-clear dangling-symlink /usr/share/icons/Crystal-Clear/48x48/apps/kmenu.png /usr/share/icons/Bluecurve/48x48/apps/gnome-main-menu.png The symbolic link points nowhere. W: crystal-clear symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/icons/Crystal-Clear/48x48/apps/kmenu.png /usr/share/icons/Bluecurve/48x48/apps/gnome-main-menu.png Absolute symlinks are problematic eg. when working with chroot environments. W: crystal-clear dangling-symlink /usr/share/icons/Crystal-Clear/32x32/apps/kmenu.png /usr/share/icons/Bluecurve/32x32/apps/gnome-main-menu.png The symbolic link points nowhere. W: crystal-clear symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/icons/Crystal-Clear/32x32/apps/kmenu.png /usr/share/icons/Bluecurve/32x32/apps/gnome-main-menu.png Absolute symlinks are problematic eg. when working with chroot environments. W: crystal-clear dangling-symlink /usr/share/icons/Crystal-Clear/22x22/apps/kmenu.png /usr/share/icons/Bluecurve/24x24/apps/gnome-main-menu.png The symbolic link points nowhere. W: crystal-clear symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/icons/Crystal-Clear/22x22/apps/kmenu.png /usr/share/icons/Bluecurve/24x24/apps/gnome-main-menu.png Absolute symlinks are problematic eg. when working with chroot environments. W: crystal-clear dangling-symlink /usr/share/icons/Crystal-Clear/16x16/apps/kmenu.png /usr/share/icons/Bluecurve/16x16/apps/gnome-main-menu.png The symbolic link points nowhere. W: crystal-clear symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/icons/Crystal-Clear/16x16/apps/kmenu.png /usr/share/icons/Bluecurve/16x16/apps/gnome-main-menu.png Absolute symlinks are problematic eg. when working with chroot environments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 12:16:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 07:16:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612181216.kBICGLtx010827@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 latkinson at aqsis.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |latkinson at aqsis.org ------- Additional Comments From latkinson at aqsis.org 2006-12-18 07:16 EST ------- Further to Tobi's previous comments this is a cross-distribution SPEC, targeted at Fedora (FC5 tested), Mandriva (2006 tested) and SUSE (10.2 tested)... and uses a couple of conditional statements to reflect this. The 'touch' work-around (FC5 tested) was for an issue in 'rpmbuild' which seemed to be creating unnecessary binaries for a Python script we distribute. Our goal is to release 1.2.0 before Xmas (1 week) and we are still looking for a sponsor should anyone be able to help - The work involved should be little/minimal for this person. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 14:27:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 09:27:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219990] Review Request: xfce4-timer-plugin - Timer for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612181427.kBIERDBt019815@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-timer-plugin - Timer for the Xfce panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219990 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: xfce4-timer-|Review Request: xfce4-timer- |plugin - Timer from the XFCE|plugin - Timer for the Xfce |panel |panel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 14:55:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 09:55:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214087] Review Request: libextractor -- Simple library for keyword extraction In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612181455.kBIEtFhF022203@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libextractor -- Simple library for keyword extraction https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214087 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-18 09:55 EST ------- Well, * For main package: ---------------------------------- Requires: plugin(%name) ---------------------------------- What I meant was main package (libextract) should require at least base plugin package (libextract-plugins-base). plugin(%name) is not provided by libextract-plugins-base and then currently extra plugin package is needed for main (libextract) package. * For fake plugin package (libextract-plugins) Dependency for pdf plugin (libextract-plugins-pdf) is missing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 15:02:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 10:02:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612181502.kBIF2Gr1022850@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From snecklifter at gmail.com 2006-12-18 10:02 EST ------- Just to update everyone. Gstreamer-plugins-good is still at 0.10.4 in Fedora Development. This week should see the release of a version compliant with Jokosher's requirements. LADSPA is a new requirement in Jokosher 0.2 however it is also packaged in FE. I'm not sure of policy for updating gstreamer in FC6 however I think this will be a showstopper until FC7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 15:20:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 10:20:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216103] Review Request: python-twisted-names - A Twisted DNS implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612181520.kBIFKUxa025257@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-names - A Twisted DNS implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216103 ------- Additional Comments From thomas at apestaart.org 2006-12-18 10:20 EST ------- wrt. the %{python} macro - the spec files were originally made by people from the pyvault project, and as a courtesy to them I would like to keep this in because it makes it easy to rebuild and sync changes with them. If other packagers are allowed to use %{__rm} to invoke a command that has not, afaik, changed its name for over 30 years, then surely as a packager I can be granted this one small peculiarity :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 15:43:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 10:43:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612181543.kBIFh2hp027992@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 cgtobi at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL|http://www.cgtobi.de |http://www.aqsis.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 15:57:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 10:57:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219956] Review Request: perl-IO-Capture - Abstract Base Class to build modules to capture output In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612181557.kBIFvVlx029654@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Capture - Abstract Base Class to build modules to capture output https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219956 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-12-18 10:57 EST ------- Also built for FC-5 and FC-6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 15:58:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 10:58:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219950] Review Request: perl-Pod-Spell - A formatter for spellchecking Pod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612181558.kBIFws30029794@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Pod-Spell - A formatter for spellchecking Pod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219950 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-12-18 10:58 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Package imported and built for FC-5, FC-6, and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 15:59:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 10:59:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219957] Review Request: perl-Pod-Strip - Remove POD from Perl code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612181559.kBIFx5F2029839@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Pod-Strip - Remove POD from Perl code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219957 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-12-18 10:59 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Package imported and built for FC-5, FC-6, and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 16:11:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 11:11:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219949] Review Request: perl-File-Which - Portable implementation of the 'which' utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612181611.kBIGBYCd031024@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Which - Portable implementation of the 'which' utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219949 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-12-18 11:11 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Package imported and built for FC-5, FC-6, and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 16:14:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 11:14:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219943] Review Request: perl-GPS-PRN - Package for PRN - Object ID conversions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612181614.kBIGE8Jj031319@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GPS-PRN - Package for PRN - Object ID conversions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219943 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-12-18 11:14 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Package imported and built for FC-5, FC-6, and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 16:15:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 11:15:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213594] Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612181615.kBIGFR6i031576@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213594 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2006-12-18 11:15 EST ------- The osgi.sharedConfiguration.area is incorrect. It needs to be as Ben mentioned in comment #14. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 16:16:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 11:16:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216103] Review Request: python-twisted-names - A Twisted DNS implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612181616.kBIGG3mW031735@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-names - A Twisted DNS implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216103 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-18 11:15 EST ------- in reply to comment #6: Sure, it's not a blocker, if you want to maintain it that way you can do so. One related issue is that I see you call %{__python} in the install step. Won't that fail on systems where %{python} has been defined as something like 'python23' ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 16:40:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 11:40:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612181640.kBIGe4bq001336@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wart at kobold.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 17:06:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 12:06:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 188478] Review Request: fxload-2002_04_11.spec In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612181706.kBIH6sQW003772@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fxload-2002_04_11.spec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188478 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kwizart at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2006-12-18 12:06 EST ------- In my view there is no problem with the license since the License owner is included. That what this text try to say no? Thought it conform (!? need to confim ?) to the extras rules which can now provides binaries (and sources) firmware which are needed to support hardware. (exemple has been discussed with ipw2200-firmware ). Thought the Spec file provides 404... You can see #218887 but version is the same... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 17:55:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 12:55:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612181755.kBIHtTcQ007154@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-12-18 12:55 EST ------- I read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/SELinux and the problem is that I do not run selinux myself, so I do not know what (if anything) is required to run this with selinux. Should I remove the selinux stuff from the init script? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 17:56:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 12:56:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219962] Review Request: crystal-clear - Crystal Clear KDE Icon set In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612181756.kBIHux1J007235@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crystal-clear - Crystal Clear KDE Icon set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219962 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-12-18 12:56 EST ------- That's true. As you have seen I've added links to fedora logo as kmenu icon. Is there any better solution for this ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 18:08:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 13:08:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612181808.kBII8hgN008319@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-12-18 13:08 EST ------- Yes, just turn it off for now until the selinux bits are ready, otherwise the semange bits in the init script will generate an error. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 18:15:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 13:15:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612181815.kBIIF6lT008773@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul at city-fan.org ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-12-18 13:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > I read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/SELinux and the problem is > that I do not run selinux myself, so I do not know what (if anything) is > required to run this with selinux. > > Should I remove the selinux stuff from the init script? IMHO yes. In the absence of an SELinux policy for the server, it will run "unconfined" by SELinux, and there will be no definition of the type pokerserver_port_t, so the semanage call to assign that type to a specific port number won't work. Someone would have to write a policy for the server to make any of that worthwhile. Which is pretty much what Wart said, only he said it quicker than me :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 18:30:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 13:30:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612181830.kBIIUffx009830@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-12-18 13:30 EST ------- Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network-1.0.32-1.src.rpm %changelog * Mon Dec 18 2006 Christopher Stone 1.0.32-2 - Remove semanage call in init file until an selinux policy is written - Add comment to %%check section indicating that it is not functional - Update TODO comments -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 18:31:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 13:31:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612181831.kBIIVlTi009966@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-12-18 13:31 EST ------- oops, SRPM URL for comment #4 should be: SRPM: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network-1.0.32-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 18:48:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 13:48:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 191036] Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612181848.kBIImpH4011807@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191036 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2006-12-18 13:48 EST ------- OK, I'll pick it up. I've tried the latest 1.5.0.1 which seems to work fine with all the packages I have over at freshrpms.net, so I'll submit a package of that version to this bug report once I'm 100% sure all is working (haven't tried easytag again with that version yet). At that point, someone will have to reassign the but to themselves in order to do the formal review, since I can't review a package which will be my own (obviously). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 18:57:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 13:57:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209112] Review Request: gspca - v4l2 kernel module driver for webcams In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612181857.kBIIvavr012857@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gspca - v4l2 kernel module driver for webcams https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209112 eric.tanguy at univ-nantes.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |eric.tanguy at univ-nantes.fr ------- Additional Comments From eric.tanguy at univ-nantes.fr 2006-12-18 13:57 EST ------- what will be the next step ? I hope to see this module in extras asap. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 19:05:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:05:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 191036] Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612181905.kBIJ53Zu013630@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191036 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rpm at greysector.net ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-12-18 14:04 EST ------- I will do the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 19:58:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:58:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219932] Review Request: driconf - A configuration applet for the Direct Rendering Infrastructure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612181958.kBIJwAng018533@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: driconf - A configuration applet for the Direct Rendering Infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219932 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-18 14:57 EST ------- Both issues fixed. Spec URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora-extras/driconf.spec SRPM URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora-extras/driconf-0.9.1-3.fc7.src.rpm diff of spec: --- driconf.spec-2 2006-12-16 20:31:44.000000000 -0700 +++ driconf.spec 2006-12-18 12:55:27.000000000 -0700 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Name: driconf Version: 0.9.1 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: A configuration applet for the Direct Rendering Infrastructure Group: User Interface/X @@ -12,7 +12,8 @@ Patch1: driconf-0.9.1-setup.patch BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) -BuildRequires: pygtk2-devel +BuildRequires: python-devel +BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils BuildArch: noarch Requires: pygtk2 Requires: glx-utils @@ -40,9 +41,29 @@ %find_lang driconf +cat << EOF > %{name}.desktop +[Desktop Entry] +Name=Driconf +Comment=configuration applet for the Direct Rendering Infrastructure +Exec=/usr/bin/driconf +Icon=/usr/share/driconf/driconf-icon.png +Terminal=false +Type=Application +Encoding=UTF-8 +Categories=Application;X-Fedora; +EOF + +desktop-file-install --vendor fedora \ + --dir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/applications/ %{name}.desktop + %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT +%post +update-desktop-database > /dev/null 2>&1 || : + +%postun +update-desktop-database > /dev/null 2>&1 || : %files -f driconf.lang %defattr(-,root,root,-) @@ -69,8 +90,13 @@ %{_datadir}/driconf/screen.png %{_datadir}/driconf/screencard.png %{_datadir}/driconf/driconf-icon.png +%{_datadir}/applications/*.desktop %changelog +* Mon Dec 18 2006 Kevin Fenzi - 0.9.1-3 +- Changed pygtk2-devel BuildRequires to python-devel +- Added desktop file. + * Sat Dec 16 2006 Kevin Fenzi - 0.9.1-2 - Added Requires for pygtk2 and glx-utils -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 20:05:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 15:05:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208613] Review Request: libgcj - separate libgcj srpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612182005.kBIK5e3W019493@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgcj - separate libgcj srpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208613 ------- Additional Comments From tromey at redhat.com 2006-12-18 15:05 EST ------- I'd like to request a review for this for FC-7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 20:19:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 15:19:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208613] Review Request: libgcj - separate libgcj srpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612182019.kBIKJDXM020531@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgcj - separate libgcj srpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208613 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-12-18 15:19 EST ------- With our intent to move all packages externally, can this split wait until then? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 20:37:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 15:37:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 203864] Review Request: tripwire - IDS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612182037.kBIKbiYw021671@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tripwire - IDS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203864 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-12-18 15:37 EST ------- *ping* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 20:41:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 15:41:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216517] Review Request: gnome-valgrind-session - Run an entire GNOME session under valgrind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612182041.kBIKfSEa022013@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-valgrind-session - Run an entire GNOME session under valgrind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216517 ------- Additional Comments From hpj at novell.com 2006-12-18 15:41 EST ------- I've put up a new tarball at http://hp.cl.no/proj/gnome-valgrind-session/src/. It does not contain any backup files, and I added a LICENSE file and individual license headers to the scripts. The new version is 1.1. I'll leave the FC packaging fixes to Dave, if he's got the time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 20:43:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 15:43:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216517] Review Request: gnome-valgrind-session - Run an entire GNOME session under valgrind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612182043.kBIKhQV5022162@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-valgrind-session - Run an entire GNOME session under valgrind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216517 ------- Additional Comments From dmalcolm at redhat.com 2006-12-18 15:43 EST ------- Thanks hpj. I'm doomed timewise until early January, I hope to pick this up again then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 21:26:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 16:26:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209112] Review Request: gspca - v4l2 kernel module driver for webcams In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612182126.kBILQ44F025299@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gspca - v4l2 kernel module driver for webcams https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209112 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org OtherBugsDependingO|208686 |208687 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org 2006-12-18 16:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Thanks very much to FESCO members for approving this. Before proceeding further > on this review i think i should wait for FE-KMOD-APPROVED set on this bug. Set. I should have done this earlier. My mistake. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 21:32:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 16:32:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208169] Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612182132.kBILWpC6025892@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208169 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-12-18 16:32 EST ------- Hi, if this package is dependent on other packages can you please add those to the depend list. If not can you please go ahead and push this out for devel and FC6? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 23:27:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 18:27:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612182327.kBINReIN002905@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |208169, 216105 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 23:27:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 18:27:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208169] Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612182327.kBINRgh0002930@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208169 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |219972 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 23:28:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 18:28:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216105] Review Request: python-twisted-web - Twisted web server, programmable in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612182328.kBINS5hr002984@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-web - Twisted web server, programmable in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216105 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |219972 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 23:42:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 18:42:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216106] Review Request: python-twisted-words - Twisted Words contains Instant Messaging implementations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612182342.kBINgUiK003922@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-words - Twisted Words contains Instant Messaging implementations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216106 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |171543 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 23:42:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 18:42:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216102] Review Request: python-twisted-conch - Twisted SSHv2 implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612182342.kBINgg07003948@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-conch - Twisted SSHv2 implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216102 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |171543 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 23:42:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 18:42:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216104] Review Request: python-twisted-runner - process management library and inetd replacement In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612182342.kBINgsr5003974@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-runner - process management library and inetd replacement https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216104 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |171543 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 23:43:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 18:43:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216105] Review Request: python-twisted-web - Twisted web server, programmable in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612182343.kBINh6Z2003996@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-web - Twisted web server, programmable in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216105 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |171543 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 23:45:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 18:45:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216103] Review Request: python-twisted-names - A Twisted DNS implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612182345.kBINjbrl004328@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-names - A Twisted DNS implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216103 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |171543 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 18 23:49:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 18:49:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208169] Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612182349.kBINnGld004616@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208169 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-12-18 18:49 EST ------- I have placed all the dependencies in bug #171543 so now this one can be closed and pushed for devel, then when all sub packages are done you can push to fc6 and close 171543. Does this make sense? I need python-twisted-core and python-twisted-web as soon as possible for my package review. Please let me know if I have missed any dependencies for bug #171543. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 19 00:12:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 19:12:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612190012.kBJ0CKN0005481@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-12-18 19:12 EST ------- Spec: http://repo.ocjtech.us/asterisk-1.4/fedora/development/SRPMS/asterisk-1.4.0-6.beta4.fc7.spec SRPM: http://repo.ocjtech.us/asterisk-1.4/fedora/development/SRPMS/asterisk-1.4.0-6.beta4.fc7.src.rpm %changelog * Fri Dec 15 2006 Jeffrey C. Ollie - 1.4.0-6.beta4 - Update to 1.4.0-beta4 - Various cleanups. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 19 02:55:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 21:55:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213594] Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612190255.kBJ2tN7G010959@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213594 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-12-18 21:55 EST ------- Spec URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/eclipse-phpeclipse.spec SRPM URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/eclipse-phpeclipse-1.1.8-13.src.rpm Yeah sorry, when the new eclipse RPMs came out I built new packages for myself but forgot to add them to this review. Enjoy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 19 04:29:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 23:29:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209112] Review Request: gspca - v4l2 kernel module driver for webcams In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612190429.kBJ4TRLW018691@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gspca - v4l2 kernel module driver for webcams https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209112 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-18 23:29 EST ------- Now i am looking for Sponsor. Is there any FESCO member watching this review can review this package please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 19 04:52:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 23:52:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219962] Review Request: crystal-clear - Crystal Clear KDE Icon set In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612190452.kBJ4qw9t021125@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crystal-clear - Crystal Clear KDE Icon set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219962 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-18 23:52 EST ------- Can you check whether https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217557#c17 is helpful to you. I have already suggested this in your https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217557 bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 19 04:53:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 23:53:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217557] Review Request: keurocalc - KEuroCalc is a universal currency converter and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612190453.kBJ4rNde021181@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: keurocalc - KEuroCalc is a universal currency converter and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217557 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-18 23:53 EST ------- Are you willing to implement solution given it https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217557#c17? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 19 06:43:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 01:43:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216517] Review Request: gnome-valgrind-session - Run an entire GNOME session under valgrind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612190643.kBJ6hVHQ025906@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-valgrind-session - Run an entire GNOME session under valgrind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216517 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-19 01:43 EST ------- I saw tarball Is single line in LICENSE file, acceptable? "This package is in the Public Domain." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 19 08:33:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 03:33:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216517] Review Request: gnome-valgrind-session - Run an entire GNOME session under valgrind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612190833.kBJ8Xkrr029416@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-valgrind-session - Run an entire GNOME session under valgrind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216517 ------- Additional Comments From hpj at novell.com 2006-12-19 03:33 EST ------- I am not a lawyer, so I don't know what the exact requirements are to release something into the public domain. I would assume that it's sufficient if you can prove beyond reasonable doubt that I said it is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 19 11:17:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 06:17:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 195645] Review Request: rasqal - RDF query library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612191117.kBJBHnNa009398@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rasqal - RDF query library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195645 ------- Additional Comments From thomas at apestaart.org 2006-12-19 06:17 EST ------- Updated package for buildrequires: http://thomas.apestaart.org/download/pkg/fedora-6-x86_64-extras/rasqal-0.9.12-5.fc6/ wrt. 19, I get a build error when I build rasqal 0.9.13 as I pasted above. Looks to me like 0.9.13 of rasqal depends on a newer version of raptor than is in extras. The one in extras is four releases behind, so I am building one release of rasqal behind since that would actually work today. I have no direct need of pushing an update to raptor, but if the raptor maintainer pushes a new build I will follow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 19 13:00:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 08:00:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216103] Review Request: python-twisted-names - A Twisted DNS implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612191300.kBJD0M1G013086@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-names - A Twisted DNS implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216103 ------- Additional Comments From thomas at apestaart.org 2006-12-19 08:00 EST ------- I double-checked; pyvault builds with a custom rpm-python. https://opensvn.csie.org/traccgi/pyvault/trac.cgi/browser/rpm-python/ so the %{python} macro is fine. If you don't use that rpm-python, then yes, you are responible for defining the two compatibly with each other. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 19 13:34:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 08:34:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219932] Review Request: driconf - A configuration applet for the Direct Rendering Infrastructure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612191334.kBJDYR6i014425@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: driconf - A configuration applet for the Direct Rendering Infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219932 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-19 08:34 EST ------- Well, Categories entry is a problem because now both categories "Application" "X-Fedora" are deprecated For Application: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-October/msg00723.html And for X-Fedora: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2006-October/msg00188.html Both started from me... https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-October/msg00698.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 19 14:32:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 09:32:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208169] Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612191432.kBJEWgiD020528@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208169 ------- Additional Comments From thomas at apestaart.org 2006-12-19 09:32 EST ------- pushed to devel, keeping open for an FC-6 push -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 19 14:42:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 09:42:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219327] Review Request: kazehakase - Kazehakase browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612191442.kBJEgIVr021412@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kazehakase - Kazehakase browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219327 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-19 09:42 EST ------- I would appreciate it if someone would review this... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 19 14:46:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 09:46:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216103] Review Request: python-twisted-names - A Twisted DNS implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612191446.kBJEk8sl021998@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-names - A Twisted DNS implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216103 ------- Additional Comments From thomas at apestaart.org 2006-12-19 09:46 EST ------- imported. devel build requested. fc6 branch requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 19 15:32:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 10:32:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217735] Review Request: tcldict - Tcl dictionary extensiuon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612191532.kBJFWfDc026766@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcldict - Tcl dictionary extensiuon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217735 mmaslano at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2006-12-19 10:32 EST ------- I'll upgrade on Tcl 8.5 soon. RELATED #160441 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 19 16:11:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 11:11:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220185] New: Review Request: kvm - Kernel Based Virtual Machine Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220185 Summary: Review Request: kvm - Kernel Based Virtual Machine Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: katzj at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/~katzj/kvm/kvm.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/~katzj/kvm/kvm-7-1.src.rpm Description: This is the userspace side of the kvm virtualization that is being included in 2.6.20. Since it's largely qemu + some patches, I've packaged it so that it a) coexists with the existing qemu package and b) requires the qemu package for some of the stuff they share (keymaps, etc). Currently, the -devel package only has a static lib as that's all that is included upstream as it's very new and so there's no semblance of an ABI but for people wanting to start to try to play, it's somewhat important to have. Alternately, we just drop the devel subpackage altogether. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 19 17:08:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 12:08:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220185] Review Request: kvm - Kernel Based Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612191708.kBJH856X004448@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kvm - Kernel Based Virtual Machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220185 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-19 12:07 EST ------- I love packages with kernel word. Anyway i tried to build this package in mock build environment but build failed with make[1]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/kvm-7/qemu' gcc34 -DQEMU_TOOL -I /builddir/build/BUILD/kvm-7/qemu/../user -Wall -O2 -g -fno-strict-aliasing -I. -g -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -o qemu-img qemu-img.c block.c block-cow.c block-qcow.c aes.c block-vmdk.c block-cloop.c block-dmg.c block-bochs.c block-vpc.c block-vvfat.c -lz -luuid block-vmdk.c:25:23: uuid/uuid.h: No such file or directory block-vmdk.c: In function `vmdk_snapshot_create': block-vmdk.c:194: error: `uuid_t' undeclared (first use in this function) block-vmdk.c:194: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once block-vmdk.c:194: error: for each function it appears in.) block-vmdk.c:194: error: syntax error before "name" block-vmdk.c:211: warning: implicit declaration of function `uuid_generate' block-vmdk.c:211: error: `name' undeclared (first use in this function) block-vmdk.c:212: warning: implicit declaration of function `uuid_unparse' block-vmdk.c: In function `vmdk_open': block-vmdk.c:420: warning: passing arg 1 of `dirname' discards qualifiers from pointer target type make[1]: *** [qemu-img] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/kvm-7/qemu' make: *** [qemu] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.21186 (%build) Looks to me you need to add e2fsprogs-devel as BuildRequires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 19 17:16:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 12:16:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 172869] Review Request: nss-mdns In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612191716.kBJHGdjY005365@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nss-mdns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172869 ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2006-12-19 12:16 EST ------- A bit outdated, but packages are there now: http://www.hadess.net/tmp/nss-mdns/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 19 17:56:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 12:56:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219932] Review Request: driconf - A configuration applet for the Direct Rendering Infrastructure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612191756.kBJHulDC008512@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: driconf - A configuration applet for the Direct Rendering Infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219932 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-19 12:56 EST ------- Well, I was looking at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-254ddf07aae20a23ced8cecc219d8f73926e9755 What do you suggest instead of Application? The example above uses Application. For vendor the above says: "If upstream uses , leave it intact, otherwise use fedora as ." Since there is no desktop file from upstream, I used 'fedora' as the vendor id. Or are you talking about: Categories=Application;X-Fedora; What would you suggest there? Is there some place that has a list of available categories? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 19 18:16:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 13:16:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220207] New: Review Request: python-lxml - Pythonic binding for the libxml2 and libxslt libraries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220207 Summary: Review Request: python-lxml - Pythonic binding for the libxml2 and libxslt libraries Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jeff at ocjtech.us QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/python-lxml-1.1.2-1.fc6.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/python-lxml-1.1.2-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: A Pythonic binding for the libxml2 and libxslt libraries. It provides safe and convenient access to these libraries using the ElementTree API. It extends the ElementTree API significantly to offer support for XPath, RelaxNG, XML Schema, XSLT, C14N and much more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 19 18:20:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 13:20:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219932] Review Request: driconf - A configuration applet for the Direct Rendering Infrastructure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612191820.kBJIKSKq009682@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: driconf - A configuration applet for the Direct Rendering Infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219932 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-19 13:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Well, I was looking at: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-254ddf07aae20a23ced8cecc219d8f73926e9755 > > What do you suggest instead of Application? > The example above uses Application. Yes, however Category "Application" is now deprecated. It seems that this application deals with DRI settings so I recommend: ------------------------------------------ Categories=Settings; ------------------------------------------ > For vendor the above says: > "If upstream uses , leave it intact, otherwise use fedora as > ." > > Since there is no desktop file from upstream, > I used 'fedora' as the vendor id. I didn't mention about vendor tag. Only Categories entry is a problem. > What would you suggest there? Is there some place that has a list of available > categories? >From desktop-file-valiate warning: ----------------------------------------------------- Categories values must be one of "AudioVideo", "Audio", "Video", "Development", "Education", "Game", "Graphics", "Network", "Office", "Settings", "System", "Utility", "Building", "Debugger", "IDE", "GUIDesigner", "Profiling", "RevisionControl", "Translation", "Calendar", "ContactManagement", "Database", "Dictionary", "Chart", "Email", "Finance", "FlowChart", "PDA", "ProjectManagement", "Presentation", "Spreadsheet", "WordProcessor", "2DGraphics", "VectorGraphics", "RasterGraphics", "3DGraphics", "Scanning", "OCR", "Photography", "Viewer", "DesktopSettings", "HardwareSettings", "PackageManager", "Dialup", "InstantMessaging", "IRCClient", "FileTransfer", "HamRadio", "News", "P2P", "RemoteAccess", "Telephony", "WebBrowser", "WebDevelopment", "Midi", "Mixer", "Sequencer", "Tuner", "TV", "AudioVideoEditing", "Player", "Recorder", "DiscBurning", "ActionGame", "AdventureGame", "ArcadeGame", "BoardGame", "BlocksGame", "CardGame", "KidsGame", "LogicGame", "RolePlaying", "Simulation", "SportsGame", "StrategyGame", "Art", "Construction", "Music", "Languages", "Science", "Astronomy", "Biology", "Chemistry", "Geology", "Math", "MedicalSoftware", "Physics", "Amusement", "Archiving", "Electronics", "Emulator", "Engineering", "FileManager", "TerminalEmulator", "Filesystem", "Monitor", "Security", "Accessibility", "Calculator", "Clock", "TextEditor", "Core", "KDE", "GNOME", "GTK", "Qt", "Motif", "Java", "ConsoleOnly", "Screensaver", "TrayIcon", "Applet", "Shell" ----------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 19 18:26:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 13:26:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220185] Review Request: kvm - Kernel Based Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612191826.kBJIQ25J010147@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kvm - Kernel Based Virtual Machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220185 ------- Additional Comments From katzj at redhat.com 2006-12-19 13:25 EST ------- Indeed -- that'll teach me to trust based on inspection for deps. Build actually tested in mock now (after setting up my new workstation with a sane config) and it builds fine on x86_64 in mock with that buildreq. Updated spec file in the same location, and http://people.redhat.com/~katzj/kvm/kvm-7-2.src.rpm is there -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 19 18:28:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 13:28:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220210] New: Review Request: krename - Powerful batch file renamer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220210 Summary: Review Request: krename - Powerful batch file renamer Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mr.ecik at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ecik.zspswidwin.pl/krename/krename.spec SRPM URL: http://ecik.zspswidwin.pl/krename/krename-3.0.13-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: KRename is a powerful batch renamer for KDE. It allows you to easily rename hundreds or even more files in one go. The filenames can be created by parts of the original filename, numbering the files or accessing hundreds of informations about the file, like creation date or Exif informations of an image. Mock builds successfully. Note that package owns whole %{_datadir}/icons/locolor directory, because it is owned by openoffice and it would be a very stupid dependency if krename needed openoffice to run ;) Also, packaging guidelines says that: "The rule of thumb is that your package should own all of the directories it creates except those owned by packages which your package depends on." Thus I believe my solution is good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 19 18:41:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 13:41:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218577] Review Request: glump - A small web application to glue files from multiple sources In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612191841.kBJIfBkL011351@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glump - A small web application to glue files from multiple sources https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218577 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-19 13:41 EST ------- I cannot see your spec/srpm as access seems forbidden... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 19 18:52:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 13:52:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219932] Review Request: driconf - A configuration applet for the Direct Rendering Infrastructure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612191852.kBJIqJxe012251@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: driconf - A configuration applet for the Direct Rendering Infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219932 Bug 219932 depends on bug 219961, which changed state. Bug 219961 Summary: "setup.py install" doesn't work without pyconfig-32.h for most cases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219961 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NOTABUG Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 19 19:06:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 14:06:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 195645] Review Request: rasqal - RDF query library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612191906.kBJJ62wj013761@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rasqal - RDF query library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195645 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-19 14:05 EST ------- ok, the pcre and libxml2 buildrequires look good. I don't see any further blockers here, so this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this package NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 19 19:07:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 14:07:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218577] Review Request: glump - A small web application to glue files from multiple sources In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612191907.kBJJ7663013889@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glump - A small web application to glue files from multiple sources https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218577 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-12-19 14:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > I cannot see your spec/srpm as access seems forbidden... The spec file that was stored in the SRPM didn't have world read permissions set, so when my script that I use to publish SRPMS to my web server extracted the specfile it overwrote the permissions. I've updated the SRPM with a spec file that has the proper permissions. Spec URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/glump-0.9.11-2.fc6.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/glump-0.9.11-2.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 19 19:25:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 14:25:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220217] New: Review Request: perl-Test-Spelling - Check for spelling errors in POD files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220217 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Spelling - Check for spelling errors in POD files Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-Test-Spelling.spec SRPM URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-Test-Spelling-0.11-1.src.rpm Description: "Test::Spelling" lets you check the spelling of a POD file, and report its results in standard "Test::Simple" fashion. This module requires the spell program. Note: helps improving the test coverage of Perl::Critic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 19 19:26:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 14:26:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220218] New: Review Request: perl-Module-Find - Find and use installed modules in a (sub)category Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220218 Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Find - Find and use installed modules in a (sub)category Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-Module-Find.spec SRPM URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-Module-Find-0.05-1.src.rpm Description: Module::Find lets you find and use modules in categories. This can be very useful for auto-detecting driver or plugin modules. You can differentiate between looking in the category itself or in all subcategories. Note: requirement of Archive::Any --> Module::CPANTS::Analyse --> ... --> Perl::Critic -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 19 19:49:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 14:49:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 172869] Review Request: nss-mdns In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612191949.kBJJnFth019337@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nss-mdns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172869 ------- Additional Comments From wahjava at gmail.com 2006-12-19 14:49 EST ------- Got following errors while installing: -- begin dump -- [wahjava at chatteau SPECS]$ sudo rpm -ivh ../RPMS/i686/nss-mdns-0.8-2.i686.rpm Password: Preparing... ########################################### [100%] 1:nss-mdns ########################################### [100%] /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.58781: line 3: fg: no job control error: %post(nss-mdns-0.8-2.i686) scriptlet failed, exit status 1 [wahjava at chatteau SPECS]$ sudo rpm -ivh ../RPMS/x86_64/nss-mdns-0.8-2.x86_64.rpm Preparing... ########################################### [100%] 1:nss-mdns ########################################### [100%] /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.91686: line 3: fg: no job control error: %post(nss-mdns-0.8-2.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status 1 -- end dump -- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 19 19:57:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 14:57:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 193898] Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612191957.kBJJv2ga020298@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2006-12-19 14:56 EST ------- Newly updated spec and SRPM without jpp: http://people.redhat.com/overholt/jython.spec http://people.redhat.com/overholt/jython-2.2-0.a1.1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 19 20:07:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 15:07:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 193898] Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612192007.kBJK7cn3021429@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2006-12-19 15:07 EST ------- Newly updated spec and SRPM with correct release: http://people.redhat.com/overholt/jython.spec http://people.redhat.com/overholt/jython-2.2-0.1.a1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 19 20:08:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 15:08:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219873] Review Request: kio_sword - lightweight Sword front-end for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612192008.kBJK8aMF021602@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kio_sword - lightweight Sword front-end for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219873 ------- Additional Comments From fedora-packaging at dw-perspective.org.uk 2006-12-19 15:08 EST ------- Thanks for the review. All issues have been addressed: New versions (note the upstream version bump): Spec URL: http://david.dw-perspective.org.uk/tmp/kio_sword.spec SRPM URL: http://david.dw-perspective.org.uk/tmp/kio_sword-0.3-1.fc5.src.rpm Fixed 1, 2, 3, 4. (The reason for #3 was paranoia). For 5, the value of it is used in the autoconf scripts in the tarball. (My error in using kdeconfig instead of kde-config (now fixed) was leading to a pre-programmed default being used, which happened to be the right thing). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 19 21:42:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 16:42:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213594] Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612192142.kBJLgd4e030718@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213594 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-12-19 16:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > Spec URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/eclipse-phpeclipse.spec > SRPM URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/eclipse-phpeclipse-1.1.8-13.src.rpm Thanks. This is almost ready. See lines starting with 'X' below. * package meets and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * License text included in package. * source files match upstream (extracted from upstream cvs so no md5sum available.) * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock. X rpmlint on eclipse-phpeclipse-1.1.8-13.fc6.i386.rpm says: W: eclipse-phpeclipse wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/eclipse/features/net.sourceforge.phpeclipse_1.1.8/cpl-v10.html Fix it with sed in the %prep section: %{__sed} -i 's/\r//' src/path/to/cpl-v10.html rpmlint on eclipse-phpeclipse-1.1.8-13.fc6.src.rpm says: W: eclipse-phpeclipse strange-permission make-phpeclipse-source-archive.sh 0755 I think we can ignore this. * final provides and requires are sane: eclipse-phpeclipse-1.1.8-13.fc6.i386.rpm core.jar.so debug.jar.so externaltools.jar.so launch.jar.so phpeclipse.jar.so phphelp.jar.so smartyui.jar.so ui.jar.so webbrowser.jar.so webcore.jar.so xmlcore.jar.so xmlui.jar.so eclipse-phpeclipse = 1.1.8-13.fc6 == /usr/bin/rebuild-gcj-db eclipse-platform >= 1:3.2.1 httpd java-gcj-compat >= 1.0.33 php * shared libraries are present, but no ldconfig required. * package is not relocatable. X does not own the directories it creates. %files contains... %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name}/* but I think that should be... %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name} * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is not present * scriptlets OK * code, not content. * documentation is integrated, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app (no .desktop file required). * not a web app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 19 22:37:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 17:37:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612192237.kBJMb6nL002484@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2006-12-19 17:37 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=144049) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=144049&action=view) perlbindings failing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 19 22:39:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 17:39:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612192239.kBJMdhPG002654@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2006-12-19 17:39 EST ------- Hi Thorsten, I tried building the srpm on FC-6, but it failed on the perl and python bindings. Building the tarball worked though, so I'm not sure what's wrong. Buildlog is attached. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 19 23:53:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 18:53:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220207] Review Request: python-lxml - Pythonic binding for the libxml2 and libxslt libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612192353.kBJNr3Mr007469@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-lxml - Pythonic binding for the libxml2 and libxslt libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220207 ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2006-12-19 18:53 EST ------- python-lxml is already in Fedora (Extras), or am I missing something? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 00:22:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 19:22:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219932] Review Request: driconf - A configuration applet for the Direct Rendering Infrastructure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612200022.kBK0Musv008756@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: driconf - A configuration applet for the Direct Rendering Infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219932 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-19 19:22 EST ------- wow... I could see this applying to any of: Video, Graphics, Settings, 3DGraphics, DesktopSettings, HardwareSettings I guess Settings makes as much sense as any...I'm not sure if it should be any of the others above. Spec URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora-extras/driconf.spec SRPM URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora-extras/driconf-0.9.1-4.fc7.src.rpm --- driconf.spec-3 2006-12-19 17:18:36.000000000 -0700 +++ driconf.spec 2006-12-19 17:19:16.000000000 -0700 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Name: driconf Version: 0.9.1 -Release: 3%{?dist} +Release: 4%{?dist} Summary: A configuration applet for the Direct Rendering Infrastructure Group: User Interface/X @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ Terminal=false Type=Application Encoding=UTF-8 -Categories=Application;X-Fedora; +Categories=Settings; EOF desktop-file-install --vendor fedora \ @@ -93,6 +93,9 @@ %{_datadir}/applications/*.desktop %changelog +* Tue Dec 19 2006 Kevin Fenzi - 0.9.1-4 +- Changed desktop category to Settings. + * Mon Dec 18 2006 Kevin Fenzi - 0.9.1-3 - Changed pygtk2-devel BuildRequires to python-devel - Added desktop file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 01:55:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 20:55:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220218] Review Request: perl-Module-Find - Find and use installed modules in a (sub)category In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612200155.kBK1tlDX011388@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Find - Find and use installed modules in a (sub)category https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220218 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-19 20:55 EST ------- will review this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 02:09:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 21:09:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220217] Review Request: perl-Test-Spelling - Check for spelling errors in POD files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612200209.kBK29EWG011916@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Spelling - Check for spelling errors in POD files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220217 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 03:28:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 22:28:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220207] Review Request: python-lxml - Pythonic binding for the libxml2 and libxslt libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612200328.kBK3SHV7014870@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-lxml - Pythonic binding for the libxml2 and libxslt libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220207 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-12-19 22:28 EST ------- (Annoyed Grunt!) Of course, you are correct. I don't know why I missed that before. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 04:31:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 23:31:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213594] Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612200431.kBK4V66e020237@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213594 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-12-19 23:31 EST ------- Spec URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/eclipse-phpeclipse.spec SRPM URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/eclipse-phpeclipse-1.1.8-14.src.rpm Both taken care of -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 05:14:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 00:14:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 203864] Review Request: tripwire - IDS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612200514.kBK5EdQZ024100@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tripwire - IDS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203864 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-12-20 00:14 EST ------- Spec URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/tripwire.spec SRPM URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/tripwire-2.4.0.1-3.src.rpm Removed BR: autoconf Renamed README.RPM to README.Fedora instead of cat'ing the README file during install, just a one-liner pointing users to read the file themselves. chmod'ed /var/lib/tripwire and /var/lib/tripwire/report to 0700 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 06:00:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 01:00:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220284] New: Review Request: bcfg2 - Configuration management client and server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220284 Summary: Review Request: bcfg2 - Configuration management client and server Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jeff at ocjtech.us QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/bcfg2-0.8.7.1-1.fc6.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/bcfg2-0.8.7.1-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: Bcfg2 helps system administrators produce a consistent, reproducible, and verifiable description of their environment, and offers visualization and reporting tools to aid in day-to-day administrative tasks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 06:07:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 01:07:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220284] Review Request: bcfg2 - Configuration management client and server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612200607.kBK67TbB025868@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bcfg2 - Configuration management client and server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220284 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-12-20 01:07 EST ------- Note that this package hasn't been tested much (there's some rpmlint cruft that needs cleaning up), and the license needs reviewing. See: http://trac.mcs.anl.gov/projects/bcfg2/browser/trunk/bcfg2/LICENSE for the license and https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-December/msg00417.html for some discussion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 06:55:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 01:55:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220218] Review Request: perl-Module-Find - Find and use installed modules in a (sub)category In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612200655.kBK6tC10027719@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Find - Find and use installed modules in a (sub)category https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220218 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-20 01:55 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPMS. + source files match upstream. 1b756c84e476fc8179fcf2699a4d1a86 Module-Find-0.05.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + %check used PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/1-use..............ok t/2-find.............ok t/3-usesub...........ok t/4-useall...........ok t/5-setmoduledirs....ok t/pod-coverage.......ok t/pod................ok All tests successful. Files=7, Tests=26, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.43 cusr + 0.12 csys = 0.55 CPU) + Provides: perl(Module::Find) = 0.05 + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Dose owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Followed perl packaging guidelines. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 06:55:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 01:55:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220217] Review Request: perl-Test-Spelling - Check for spelling errors in POD files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612200655.kBK6tlcg027774@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Spelling - Check for spelling errors in POD files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220217 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-20 01:55 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPMS. + source files match upstream. 1820e1248bf5dfba6139b6812a5f92ae Test-Spelling-0.11.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + %check used make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/load....ok t/pod.....ok All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=2, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.14 cusr + 0.02 csys = 0.16 CPU) + Provides: perl(Test::Spelling) = 0.11 + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Dose owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Followed perl packaging guidelines. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 07:00:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 02:00:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189195] Review Request: horde - php application framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612200700.kBK70WC9027973@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-12-20 02:00 EST ------- Well, I had set aside time to look at this and then promptly got busy with holiday preparations. But I'm off tomorrow, and so I went ahead and build this and did some preliminary investigations. Here are a few questions: What's the registry.php file for? I see the configuration is in /etc/horde, but that you originally had them in /var/lib/horde. I'm wondering how selinux might ever be made to tolerate apache writing to things under /etc. Frankly I had anticipated them under /var/lib because I'd expect that most users would edit them only via the configuration interface, but I'm honestly not sure which location is more appropriate. Some packages I've seen disable the test.php script. I'm not sure why; it's pretty useful for an administrator to check things out, but I suppose it's not needed in normal use. What do you think? You should probably add a note to README.fedora about how to install the proper database module, just to be kind. Why do you explicitly list out the files/directories under %{_datadir}/%{name}? In general I really like the look of this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 07:12:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 02:12:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220185] Review Request: kvm - Kernel Based Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612200712.kBK7CYMU028394@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kvm - Kernel Based Virtual Machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220185 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-20 02:12 EST ------- I will review this. mock build for i386 successfull but rpmlint is not silent You SHOULD: - Add disttag {?dist} to release tag - Add direct download link of any mirror of sf.net say http://jaist.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/kvm/kvm-7.tar.gz - Add COPYRIGHT file under %doc - You may add test directory under %doc Kindly check against rpmlint command both RPM and SRPM and resubmit package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 07:41:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 02:41:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220185] Review Request: kvm - Kernel Based Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612200741.kBK7fNN3029322@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kvm - Kernel Based Virtual Machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220185 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2006-12-20 02:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > - Add disttag {?dist} to release tag Disttag ist still optional > - Add direct download link of any mirror of sf.net > say http://jaist.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/kvm/kvm-7.tar.gz Using download.sourceforge.net is prefered: http://download.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/kvm/kvm-7.tar.gz That will redirect to a mirror. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 08:34:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 03:34:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219653] Review Request: solfege - music education software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612200834.kBK8Y62p031763@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: solfege - music education software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219653 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2006-12-20 03:34 EST ------- Changes: - Move original binary to %{_libexecdir} - Remove X-Fedora Category from meny entry - Add pygtk2 Requires - Replace libxlst-devel BuildRequires with libxlst - Keep timestamps for image files - Convert AUTHORS and README from iso8859 to UTF-8 Not sure if I've used the prefered method for converting from iso8859-15 to UTF-8. Please correct me if I've messed this up. Updated: SPEC: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/solfege.spec SRPM: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/solfege-3.6.4-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 09:49:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 04:49:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218600] Review Request: resapplet - Resolution Switching Applet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612200949.kBK9nr9q006600@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: resapplet - Resolution Switching Applet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218600 ------- Additional Comments From rvokal at redhat.com 2006-12-20 04:49 EST ------- hmm, I haven't touched extras for some time and now I get this radek at localhost CVS$ export CVSROOT=:ext:rvokal at cvs.fedora.redhat.com:/cvs/extras radek at localhost CVS$ export CVS_RSH=ssh radek at localhost CVS$ cvs co common Permission denied (publickey,keyboard-interactive). cvs [checkout aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages if any) and I tried to upload new ssh publickey but still I'm seeing this. What should be wrong? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 10:07:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 05:07:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220185] Review Request: kvm - Kernel Based Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612201007.kBKA7KOs008335@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kvm - Kernel Based Virtual Machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220185 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-20 05:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > - Add disttag {?dist} to release tag > > Disttag ist still optional Ohh sorry, i thought asking reporter for adding disttag is essential. Will take care from next time for not to ask anyone to add disttag. > > > - Add direct download link of any mirror of sf.net > > say http://jaist.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/kvm/kvm-7.tar.gz > > Using download.sourceforge.net is prefered: > http://download.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/kvm/kvm-7.tar.gz > That will redirect to a mirror. Ohh sorry, actually i was asked same for my own v4l2-tool package review, so similarly i asked here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 10:33:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 05:33:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220185] Review Request: kvm - Kernel Based Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612201033.kBKAX7qW010888@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kvm - Kernel Based Virtual Machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220185 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-20 05:33 EST ------- Information given on kvm.sf.net said "KVM (for Kernel-based Virtual Machine) is a full virtualization solution for Linux on x86 hardware. It consists of a loadable kernel module (kvm.ko) and a userspace component." IMHO, Either you need to submit KMOD package for kvm.ko for kernel versions lesser than 2.6.20 if this module supports existing FC6/devel kernels or this package needs dependency to be set for kernel's > 2.6.20 Kindly ignore my comment for disttag and Source URL and use http://download.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/kvm/kvm-7.tar.gz as Source URL Also static libraries need FESCO approval. So I request you to ask FESCO for permission to include .a files ot drop -devel package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 10:33:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 05:33:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612201033.kBKAXNbE010973@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 ------- Additional Comments From tscherf at redhat.com 2006-12-20 05:33 EST ------- ok, it must have something to do with the perl-bindings. installing the SRPM in mock works without any problems, but I guess you have perl-devel installed which forces the configure script to do perl-bindings. I disabled them in a new packeg which is available here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=144049&action=view could you please check of this one works without the binding problem? Thanks, Thorsten -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 10:34:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 05:34:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612201034.kBKAYlD2011217@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 ------- Additional Comments From tscherf at redhat.com 2006-12-20 05:34 EST ------- sorry, correct link for the SRPM is: http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/libprelude-0.9.11-3.src.rpmv -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 10:35:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 05:35:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612201035.kBKAZJI2011297@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 ------- Additional Comments From tscherf at redhat.com 2006-12-20 05:35 EST ------- arrg, next try: http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/libprelude-0.9.11-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 11:50:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 06:50:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220284] Review Request: bcfg2 - Configuration management client and server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612201150.kBKBowBB017027@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bcfg2 - Configuration management client and server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220284 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 12:37:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 07:37:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612201237.kBKCb8FG019655@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218556 buytenh at gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |buytenh at gnu.org ------- Additional Comments From buytenh at gnu.org 2006-12-20 07:37 EST ------- The -devel package has Requires: keyutils-lib-dev openssl-dev, both of those need s/dev/devel/ for the -devel package to be installable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 12:41:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 07:41:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209112] Review Request: gspca - v4l2 kernel module driver for webcams In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612201241.kBKCfgda019853@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gspca - v4l2 kernel module driver for webcams https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209112 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2006-12-20 07:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > Now i am looking for Sponsor. Is there any FESCO member watching this review can > review this package please? Just to clarify: - Parag is sponsored already, so all we need is someone that reviews this package - FESCo members are not needed, just someone with kmod-experiences (scop or I for example) should do a quick ACK *after* the package was reviewed and aproved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 12:50:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 07:50:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213594] Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612201250.kBKCoYgF020216@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213594 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-12-20 07:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > Spec URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/eclipse-phpeclipse.spec > SRPM URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/eclipse-phpeclipse-1.1.8-14.src.rpm > > Both taken care of Thanks, but why did you add a call to "bash" after the end-of-line conversion? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 13:15:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 08:15:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220284] Review Request: bcfg2 - Configuration management client and server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612201315.kBKDF0mE021186@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bcfg2 - Configuration management client and server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220284 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-12-20 08:14 EST ------- Just for future reference rpmlint says W: bcfg2 invalid-license BCFG Public License E: bcfg2 wrong-line-in-lsb-tag # installs configuration files served by bcfg2-server E: bcfg2 wrong-line-in-lsb-tag # This is a client that installs the server provided E: bcfg2 wrong-line-in-lsb-tag # Configuration. E: bcfg2 subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/bcfg2 W: bcfg2-server invalid-license BCFG Public License E: bcfg2-server wrong-line-in-lsb-tag # installs configuration files served by bcfg2-server E: bcfg2-server subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/bcfg2-server The wrong-line-in-lsb-tag is due to continuation of the Description fields. I'm not sure whether rpmlint is wrong, or the init file. subsys-not-used: I wouldn't had marked it as and error in rpmlint, but maybe it's not a bad idea to add it to the init file. rpm install is noisy, the openssl output should go to /dev/null. You need to reverse the order of 2>&1 and /dev/null. The file /etc/bcfg2.key is unowned. That's like for openssh's keys, but perhaps not the best practice. Better own a dummy file, mark it as %config(noreplace), and overwrite it on first install. The key would remain in the rpmdb as a changed config file, so upgrades would not touch it and uninstalls would keep it as *.rpmsave. This is just a (very) weak suggestion, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 13:33:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 08:33:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 193898] Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612201333.kBKDXurS022171@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-12-20 08:33 EST ------- Thanks Andrew. Here's the full review. I only have two comments. One seems easy and the other looks like a little more work. Look for the lines starting in 'X'. * package meets and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * License text included in package. * source files match upstream (extracted from upstream cvs so no md5sum available.) * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock. * rpmlint jython-2.2-0.1.a1.fc6.i386.rpm W: jython invalid-license Modified CNRI Open Source License We can ignore this. rpmlint jython-demo-2.2-0.1.a1.fc6.i386.rpm W: jython-demo invalid-license Modified CNRI Open Source License E: jython-demo no-jar-manifest /usr/share/jython/Demo/jreload/example.jar We can ignore these. rpmlint jython-javadoc-2.2-0.1.a1.fc6.i386.rpm W: jython-javadoc invalid-license Modified CNRI Open Source License We can ignore this. rpmlint jython-2.2-0.1.a1.fc6.src.rpm W: jython invalid-license Modified CNRI Open Source License We can ignore this. X are these final provides and requires are sane?: jython-2.2-0.1.a1.fc6.i386.rpm jython-2.2.jar.so jython = 2.2-0.1.a1.fc6 == java-gcj-compat >= 1.0.31 jpackage-utils >= 0:1.5 oro python >= 2.4 servlet Don't we need to Require libreadline-java and mysql-connector-java? * shared libraries are present, but no ldconfig required. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is not present * scriptlets OK * code, not content. X ht2html generated documentation isn't being generated even though we require ht2html. I think build.xml needs one more if="full-build" removed, and then these docs should probably go in a documentation package. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app (no .desktop file required). * not a web app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 13:55:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 08:55:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 186452] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612201355.kBKDtWbx023770@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186452 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |201449 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-12-20 08:55 EST ------- I guess it's time to admit defeat here. ): Frankly, I'm finding myself lacking the time (and motivation, since I currently don't use bluetooth) to give this one the love and attention it deserves. I'd like to hope that someone else with interest and motivation picks this up where we left off. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 15:33:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 10:33:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220284] Review Request: bcfg2 - Configuration management client and server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612201533.kBKFXdG5031761@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bcfg2 - Configuration management client and server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220284 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-12-20 10:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > > W: bcfg2 invalid-license BCFG Public License > W: bcfg2-server invalid-license BCFG Public License We're (Axel and I) working with the upstream on this issue. > E: bcfg2 wrong-line-in-lsb-tag # installs configuration files > served by bcfg2-server > E: bcfg2 wrong-line-in-lsb-tag # This is a client that > installs the server provided > E: bcfg2 wrong-line-in-lsb-tag # Configuration. > E: bcfg2-server wrong-line-in-lsb-tag # installs > configuration files served by bcfg2-server > The wrong-line-in-lsb-tag is due to continuation of the Description > fields. I'm not sure whether rpmlint is wrong, or the init > file. subsys-not-used: I wouldn't had marked it as and error in > rpmlint, but maybe it's not a bad idea to add it to the init file. According to this: http://www.freestandards.org/spec/booksets/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/initscrcomconv.html the continuation of the Description field should be OK, so it looks like a bug in rpmlint. > E: bcfg2 subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/bcfg2 The bcfg2 init script is a one-shot script - it doesn't actually start a server in the background so creating a file in /var/lock/subsys doesn't make sense. > E: bcfg2-server subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/bcfg2-server Fixed in the next release. > rpm install is noisy, the openssl output should go to /dev/null. You > need to reverse the order of 2>&1 and /dev/null. Turns out that runing openssh in %post to generate a key is not needed. The bcfg2-admin script will take care of generating the key. > The file /etc/bcfg2.key is unowned. That's like for openssh's keys, > but perhaps not the best practice. Better own a dummy file, mark it > as %config(noreplace), and overwrite it on first install. The key > would remain in the rpmdb as a changed config file, so upgrades > would not touch it and uninstalls would keep it as *.rpmsave. This > is just a (very) weak suggestion, though. /etc/bcfg2.key should be marked %ghost and %config(noreplace) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 15:36:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 10:36:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220185] Review Request: kvm - Kernel Based Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612201536.kBKFaeHB031896@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kvm - Kernel Based Virtual Machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220185 ------- Additional Comments From katzj at redhat.com 2006-12-20 10:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > mock build for i386 successfull but rpmlint is not silent rpmlint errors are bogus -- E: kvm configure-without-libdir-spec The configure script isn't a standard autoconf configure and so doesn't take a libdir argument W: kvm no-documentation Upstream doesn't really include any documentation in the tarball > You SHOULD: > - Add disttag {?dist} to release tag disttag isn't required. > - Add direct download link of any mirror of sf.net > say http://jaist.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/kvm/kvm-7.tar.gz Fixed, but with the link from the other comment > - Add COPYRIGHT file under %doc There's not an explicit COPYRIGHT for the top-level and adding more copies of the GPL to the distro doesn't help anyone. > - You may add test directory under %doc This doesn't make any sense at all; tests aren't documentation. (In reply to comment #6) > IMHO, Either you need to submit KMOD package for kvm.ko for kernel versions > lesser than 2.6.20 if this module supports existing FC6/devel kernels or this > package needs dependency to be set for kernel's > 2.6.20 The package is only going to be submitted for devel (where rawhide has 2.6.20-rc). And a requires on a "new" kernel isn't the answer as a user can trivially build the module if they really don't want to bump versions. Also, the requires doesn't mean that the user is actually running said kernel. The more right answer is that as tools get built up, they need to check and make sure the kernel provides the functionality, much like tools for xen need to ensure that they're running on a Xen dom0. > Also static libraries need FESCO approval. So I request you to ask FESCO for > permission to include .a files ot drop -devel package. I don't think that's actually been fully passed yet, but I don't care enough to keep the library around for now. Nuking -devel. http://people.redhat.com/~katzj/kvm/kvm-7-3.src.rpm and http://people.redhat.com/~katzj/kvm/kvm.spec updated -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 15:39:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 10:39:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220284] Review Request: bcfg2 - Configuration management client and server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612201539.kBKFd5Ol032128@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bcfg2 - Configuration management client and server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220284 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-12-20 10:39 EST ------- > /etc/bcfg2.key should be marked %ghost and %config(noreplace) That may make the key be removed upon package removal, but I'm not 100% sure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 15:43:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 10:43:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220284] Review Request: bcfg2 - Configuration management client and server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612201543.kBKFhUN8032415@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bcfg2 - Configuration management client and server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220284 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-12-20 10:43 EST ------- Spec URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/bcfg2-0.8.7.1-3.fc6.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/bcfg2-0.8.7.1-3.fc6.src.rpm * Wed Dec 20 2006 Jeffrey C. Ollie - 0.8.7.1-3 - Don't generate SSL cert in post script, it only needs to be done on the server and is handled by the bcfg2-admin tool. - Move the /etc/bcfg2.key file to the server package - Don't install a sample copy of the config file, just ghost it - Require gamin-python for the server package - Don't require openssl - Make the client a separate package so you don't have to have the client if you don't want it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 15:46:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 10:46:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220284] Review Request: bcfg2 - Configuration management client and server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612201546.kBKFkQLp032612@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bcfg2 - Configuration management client and server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220284 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-12-20 10:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > > /etc/bcfg2.key should be marked %ghost and %config(noreplace) > > That may make the key be removed upon package removal, but I'm not 100% sure. Here's what happens when you remove the -1 version: [root at an00 ~]# rpm -e bcfg2 bcfg2-server warning: /etc/bcfg2.conf saved as /etc/bcfg2.conf.rpmsave [root at an00 ~]# ls /etc/bcfg2.* /etc/bcfg2.conf.rpmsave /etc/bcfg2.key -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 16:41:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 11:41:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216534] Review Request: gocr - GNU Optical Character Recognition program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612201641.kBKGf23R003942@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gocr - GNU Optical Character Recognition program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216534 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-12-20 11:41 EST ------- Just need the new spec file: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/gocr.spec http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/gocr-0.43-1.fc6.src.rpm This disables the front-ends as they seem unmaintained. No segfaults. gzip/bzip2 only supported for: src/pnm.c: ".pnm.gz", "gzip -cd", /* compressed pnm-files, gzip package */ src/pnm.c: ".pbm.gz", "gzip -cd", src/pnm.c: ".pgm.gz", "gzip -cd", src/pnm.c: ".ppm.gz", "gzip -cd", But this is in the source and I'm not really interested in adding features. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 16:41:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 11:41:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219932] Review Request: driconf - A configuration applet for the Direct Rendering Infrastructure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612201641.kBKGfGIl004030@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: driconf - A configuration applet for the Direct Rendering Infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219932 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-20 11:41 EST ------- Well, * The last thing: ------------------------------------------- %post update-desktop-database > /dev/null 2>&1 || : %postun update-desktop-database > /dev/null 2>&1 || : ------------------------------------------- Both scriptlets are not necessary because the desktop file in this package does not contain mimetype description. Other things are okay. ------------------------------------------------- This package (driconf) is APPROVED by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 18:21:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 13:21:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612201821.kBKILWew010516@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #144049|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2006-12-20 13:21 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=144124) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=144124&action=view) Libprelude without perl and python bindings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 18:26:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 13:26:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612201826.kBKIQP36010971@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2006-12-20 13:26 EST ------- I didn't have perl-devel installed, but nevermind, now it fails on the python bindings. --disable-perl doesn't work, it's --enable-perl=no. I disabled perl and python and now it builds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 18:33:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 13:33:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219653] Review Request: solfege - music education software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612201833.kBKIXlaV011372@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: solfege - music education software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219653 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-20 13:33 EST ------- Well, * Use rpmlint - For src.rpm: ----------------------------------------------------- W: solfege macro-in-%changelog _libexecdir ----------------------------------------------------- rpmbuild tries to expand the macro in %changelog and this should be avoilded. In %changelog, when you want to use percent, please use %%, i.e. ----------------------------------------------------- - Move original binary to %%{_libexecdir} ----------------------------------------------------- * Desktop files ----------------------------------------------------- Categories=GNOME;Application;AudioVideo;Audio;Education; ----------------------------------------------------- - Well, category "Application" is also deprecated and this should be removed. You can use: ----------------------------------------------------- desktop-file-install --vendor fedora --delete-original \ --dir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications \ --remove-category Application \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop ----------------------------------------------------- * Documentation ----------------------------------------------------- iconv -o $RPM_BUILD_DIR/%{name}-%{version}/AUTHORS -f ISO-8859-15 -t UTF-8 $RPM_BUILD_DIR/%{name}-%{version}/AUTHORS iconv -o $RPM_BUILD_DIR/%{name}-%{version}/README -f ISO-8859-15 -t UTF-8 $RPM_BUILD_DIR/%{name}-%{version}/README ----------------------------------------------------- - Well, actually these remove AUTHORS and README. In fact rpmlint complaints as following. ----------------------------------------------------- E: solfege zero-length /usr/share/doc/solfege-3.6.4/AUTHORS E: solfege zero-length /usr/share/doc/solfege-3.6.4/README ----------------------------------------------------- And, $RPM_BUILD_DIR/%{name}-%{version} is not needed because the working directory at this stage is there. Usually: ----------------------------------------------------- for f in AUTHORS README ; do iconv -f ISO-8859-15 -t UTF-8 $f > ${f}.tmp && \ %{__mv} -f ${f}.tmp ${f} || \ %{__rm} -f ${f}.tmp done ----------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 19:18:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 14:18:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220284] Review Request: bcfg2 - Configuration management client and server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612201918.kBKJIaMj015206@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bcfg2 - Configuration management client and server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220284 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-12-20 14:18 EST ------- Full review: o rpmlint output: OK W: bcfg2 invalid-license BCFG Public License E: bcfg2 non-readable /etc/bcfg2.conf 0600 W: bcfg2-client invalid-license BCFG Public License E: bcfg2-client wrong-line-in-lsb-tag # installs configuration files served by bcfg2-server E: bcfg2-client wrong-line-in-lsb-tag # This is a client that installs the server provided E: bcfg2-client wrong-line-in-lsb-tag # Configuration. E: bcfg2-client subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/bcfg2 W: bcfg2-client incoherent-init-script-name bcfg2 W: bcfg2-server invalid-license BCFG Public License E: bcfg2-server non-readable /etc/bcfg2.key 0600 E: bcfg2-server wrong-line-in-lsb-tag # installs configuration files served by bcfg2-server invalid-license: may change to BSD, soon, anyway non-readable: rpmlint false positive wrong-line-in-lsb-tag: rpmlint false positive subsys-not-used: see Jeff's explenation above: non-daemon start script incoherent-init-script-name: OK o package naming: OK o specfile name: OK o guidelines: OK o open-source compatible license: todo o license field: todo o license in source: todo o specfile in American English: OK o specfile legible: OK o sources match upstream: OK (md5sum, timestamps diverge) o successfully compiles: OK o excluding archs (none): OK o BRs complete: OK o locale: OK o ldconfig (none needed): OK o relocatable package (no): OK o dir ownership: OK o %files duplicates (none): OK o sane permissions on files: OK o %clean: OK o consistent use of macros: OK o contains code: OK o doc subpackage (not needed): OK o %doc influences package (no): OK o *.pc files (none): OK o shared libs (none): OK o devel dependencies (no devel): OK o *.la files (none): OK o *.desktop file (no guis): OK o cross-ownership (none): OK The few todos are all about the new license which is about to be changed, so I'm preapproving on the assumption that upstream will switch to plain BSD licensing (according to our PM with the author). I'm also removing FE-LEGAL on the same assumption. :) Irrelevant nitpicking: Is %{_localstatedir} not preferred over %{_var}? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 19:21:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 14:21:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220284] Review Request: bcfg2 - Configuration management client and server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612201921.kBKJLVo7015481@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bcfg2 - Configuration management client and server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220284 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|182235 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 19:48:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 14:48:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219962] Review Request: crystal-clear - Crystal Clear KDE Icon set In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612201948.kBKJmGmu018855@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crystal-clear - Crystal Clear KDE Icon set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219962 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-12-20 14:48 EST ------- Sounds like you didn't understand what make those rpmlint warnings. It is not about the normal kde issues for "common", but about making the Fedora Logo appear on kmenu when this icon set is used! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 19:48:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 14:48:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219539] Review Request: qsa - QT Script for Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612201948.kBKJmewO018912@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qsa - QT Script for Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219539 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mr.ecik at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-12-20 14:48 EST ------- I'll do the review. Well, the first problem I noticed is non-building in mock: RPM build errors: File not found by glob: /var/tmp/qsa-1.1.4-1.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/ qt-3.3/lib64/libqsa.so.* File not found: /var/tmp/qsa-1.1.4-1.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/ lib64/libqsa.so Also, before I make a full review, I recommend to get rid of dos2unix and use sed instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 20:04:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 15:04:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219539] Review Request: qsa - QT Script for Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612202004.kBKK4baq020679@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qsa - QT Script for Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219539 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-12-20 15:04 EST ------- In order to remove an error I mentioned above you have to simply delete %ifarch lines in the beginning of the spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 20:22:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 15:22:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219539] Review Request: qsa - QT Script for Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612202022.kBKKMkYQ022512@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qsa - QT Script for Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219539 ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2006-12-20 15:22 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.republika.pl/belegdol/rpmstuff/qt-qsa.spec SRPM URL: http://www.republika.pl/belegdol/rpmstuff/qt-qsa-1.1.4-2.src.rpm New release: - Added missing headers - Renamed to qt-qsa - Got rif of dos2unix BuildRequires - Fixed building on x86-64 I did not add Provides and Obsoletes because i don't think it's necessary in such an early stage of review process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 20:23:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 15:23:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219539] Review Request: qt-qsa - QT Script for Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612202023.kBKKNMmJ022628@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt-qsa - QT Script for Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219539 belegdol at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: qsa - QT |Review Request: qt-qsa - QT |Script for Applications |Script for Applications -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 20:59:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 15:59:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220381] New: Review Request: flex-old - Legacy version of flex, a tool for creating scanners Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220381 Summary: Review Request: flex-old - Legacy version of flex, a tool for creating scanners Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pmachata at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/~pmachata/flex-old.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/~pmachata/flex-old-2.5.4a-1.src.rpm Description: We are preparing to get reentrant flex (2.5.33) into Fedora Core. After the discussion with notting, we settled down on a following scenario: * starting with FC7, the package flex will provide flex-2.5.33 * in addition, flex-old will be provided, holding 2.5.4 branch of flex * the two packages don't conflict, it's possible to install them side by side flex-old installs everything with the -old suffix, e.g. /usr/bin/flex-old, /usr/lib/libfl-old.a. Header file is in /usr/include/flex-old/FlexLexer.h, so that it's possible to request its inclusion via gcc's -I flag (dirs added with -I have precedence before system include directories). The output of rpmlint is as follows: $ rpmlint ../RPMS/i386/flex-old-2.5.4a-1.i386.rpm W: flex-old devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libfl-old.a W: flex-old devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/flex-old/FlexLexer.h flex is of course development package itself, so the warnings should be ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 21:09:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 16:09:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220381] Review Request: flex-old - Legacy version of flex, a tool for creating scanners In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612202109.kBKL9IVN026646@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flex-old - Legacy version of flex, a tool for creating scanners https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220381 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(pmachata at redhat.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-12-20 16:09 EST ------- Any particular reason why this has to be in Core, especially since we're merging core and extras? Couldn't this go directly into Extras? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 21:11:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 16:11:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219539] Review Request: qt-qsa - QT Script for Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612202111.kBKLBYmr026761@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt-qsa - QT Script for Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219539 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-12-20 16:11 EST ------- MUST items: * rpmlint output: E: qt-qsa-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib W: qt-qsa-devel hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/qt-qsa-devel-1.1.4/examples/ spreadsheet/.examplefiles W: qt-qsa-devel hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/qt-qsa-devel-1.1.4/examples/ spreadsheet/.examplefiles E: qt-qsa configure-without-libdir-spec it looks like we can ignore all the issues * package is named well * spec file name is good * package meets Packaging Guidelines * package is licensed with a GPL open-source compatible license * License field in spec file matches actual license * license file is included in %doc * md5sums are matching (24eb504e51de3a04161f6df8c39c24ac) * package successfully compiles on x86_64 * BuildRequires listed well * no locales * %post and %postun sections present * relocatable * package owns directories well * no duplicates in %files * every %files section includes %defattr * proper %clean section * macros used well !* -devel subpackage presents, but needs to have an additional dependency THINGS to do: * qt-qsa-devel stores its files in %{_libdir}/qt-3.3/{include,mkspecs/ features} which are owned by qt-devel so you need to append a qt-devel dependency to devel subpackage Fix that and package will be approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 21:22:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 16:22:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219539] Review Request: qt-qsa - QT Script for Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612202122.kBKLMOkc027821@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt-qsa - QT Script for Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219539 ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2006-12-20 16:22 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.republika.pl/belegdol/rpmstuff/qt-qsa.spec SRPM URL: http://www.republika.pl/belegdol/rpmstuff/qt-qsa-1.1.4-3.src.rpm New release: - Fixed typo in %%changelog - Added qt-devel to -devel subpackage Requires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 21:25:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 16:25:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219539] Review Request: qt-qsa - QT Script for Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612202125.kBKLPMJL028056@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt-qsa - QT Script for Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219539 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-12-20 16:25 EST ------- It looks good right now. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 21:35:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 16:35:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612202135.kBKLZxH4028941@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 ------- Additional Comments From tscherf at redhat.com 2006-12-20 16:35 EST ------- info from upstream was to remove the smp compiler flag which often leads to problem with perl- and python bindings. could you please test the new release, if this one builds without problems (in my mock buildsystem it actually builds). new link is: http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/libprelude-0.9.11-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 21:38:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 16:38:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219653] Review Request: solfege - music education software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612202138.kBKLcWQf029097@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: solfege - music education software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219653 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2006-12-20 16:38 EST ------- Changes: - Fix charset conversion - Remove Application category from desktop file - Fix changelog Updated: SPEC: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/solfege.spec SRPM: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/solfege-3.6.4-6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 22:10:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 17:10:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220381] Review Request: flex-old - Legacy version of flex, a tool for creating scanners In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612202210.kBKMAC7k031534@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flex-old - Legacy version of flex, a tool for creating scanners https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220381 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-12-20 17:10 EST ------- Aren't packages like thus usually named compat-*? There seems to be no precedent for *-old. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 22:15:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 17:15:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220393] New: Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code Introspection Tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220393 Summary: Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code Introspection Tool Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: seefeld at sympatico.ca QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: Part of the source tarball at http://synopsis.fresco.org/download/ (Current release is http://synopsis.fresco.org/download/synopsis-0.9.tar.gz) Description: Synopsis is a multi-language source code introspection tool that provides a variety of representations for the parsed code, to enable further processing such as documentation extraction, reverse engineering, and source-to-source translation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 22:20:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 17:20:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213594] Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612202220.kBKMKU0n032210@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213594 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-12-20 17:20 EST ------- Spec URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/eclipse-phpeclipse.spec SRPM URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/eclipse-phpeclipse-1.1.8-15.src.rpm That's a feature, not a bug :) Actually it was leftover debugging that I forgot to take out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 22:26:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 17:26:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213594] Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612202226.kBKMQK6R032598@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213594 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-12-20 17:26 EST ------- This package is APPROVED. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 22:38:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 17:38:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189195] Review Request: horde - php application framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612202238.kBKMcMKU001025@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 ------- Additional Comments From greg at runlevel7.ca 2006-12-20 17:38 EST ------- > What's the registry.php file for? Compare it to registry.php.dist. It looks to be modified as horde expects the /horde directory to be '..' relative to the config directory, but that won't work obviously if the config directory is in /etc/horde or /var/lib/horde. eg: 'fileroot' => dirname(__FILE__) . '/..', 'templates' => dirname(__FILE__) . '/../templates', is changed to: 'fileroot' => $fileroot, 'templates' => $fileroot . '/templates', and he's added: $fileroot = '/usr/share/horde'; -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 22:48:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 17:48:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219889] Review Request: bootchart - a utility for profiling the boot process In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612202248.kBKMm3Mr001481@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bootchart - a utility for profiling the boot process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219889 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |green at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-12-20 17:47 EST ------- Hi John. I'll review this package. Does this package really need a javadoc subpackage? It's an application, not a development library, right? Also, I don't think System/Benchmark is a valid Group tag for Extras. Maybe this should be Applications/System. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 20 23:27:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 18:27:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220402] New: Review Request: jscall-sharp-0.0.2 - a JS binding for gecko-sharp Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220402 Summary: Review Request: jscall-sharp-0.0.2 - a JS binding for gecko-sharp Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/jscall-sharp-0.0.2-1.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/jscall-sharp.spec Description: jscall-sharp is a very simple javascript binding for gecko#. Primary use is for use with monodevelop to help support ASP.NET and ASP.NET designers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 01:23:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 20:23:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213594] Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612210123.kBL1N5Uh007358@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213594 fedora at theholbrooks.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-12-20 20:23 EST ------- Imported, FC6 branch requested, and build requested (job 24299) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 04:08:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 23:08:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220393] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code Introspection Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612210408.kBL48PBL015730@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code Introspection Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220393 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-20 23:08 EST ------- Kindly submit SPEC as well as SRPM URL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 04:21:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 23:21:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219932] Review Request: driconf - A configuration applet for the Direct Rendering Infrastructure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612210421.kBL4Lvj0017652@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: driconf - A configuration applet for the Direct Rendering Infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219932 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-20 23:21 EST ------- Thanks. Removed those scriptlets before import. Package imported and built for devel. fc5/fc6 branches requested. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 05:34:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:34:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219653] Review Request: solfege - music education software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612210534.kBL5Y1V4027797@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: solfege - music education software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219653 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-21 00:33 EST ------- Okay. -------------------------------------------------- This package (solfege) is APPROVED by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 06:32:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 01:32:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220210] Review Request: krename - Powerful batch file renamer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612210632.kBL6WQZw030594@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: krename - Powerful batch file renamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220210 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-21 01:32 EST ------- I will review this later (In reply to comment #0) > Note that package owns whole %{_datadir}/icons/locolor directory This package _should_ own this directory -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 07:51:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 02:51:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219327] Review Request: kazehakase - Kazehakase browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612210751.kBL7pM7P000743@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kazehakase - Kazehakase browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219327 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-12-21 02:51 EST ------- Package doesn't build in an ordinary user environment on FC6: # rpmbuild -ba kazehakase.spec ... libtool: compile: unable to infer tagged configuration libtool: compile: specify a tag with `--tag' make[4]: *** [GtkPromptService.lo] Error 1 make[4]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... libtool: compile: unable to infer tagged configuration libtool: compile: specify a tag with `--tag' Also, I will not review nor approve any package which runs any of the autotools during building, esp. if they are incorrecly applied, such as in this case (Hint: aclocal, version of autoconf being used). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 08:00:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 03:00:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219962] Review Request: crystal-clear - Crystal Clear KDE Icon set In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612210800.kBL80ejn001118@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crystal-clear - Crystal Clear KDE Icon set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219962 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-21 03:00 EST ------- Then you can ask for help on Fedora-extras mailing list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 08:19:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 03:19:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219327] Review Request: kazehakase - Kazehakase browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612210819.kBL8JIKn001782@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kazehakase - Kazehakase browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219327 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-21 03:19 EST ------- Well, would you attach the full build log, Ralf? I cannot catch only from your comment. I use rawhide, and I cannot check "ordinary" FC6 environ. Note: mockbuild on FC6/devel i386 succeeds. also, for me "ordinary" rpmbuild succeeds on FC-devel. And as this srpm "touch"es all files which are not needed to be regenerated, rebuilding this srpm should succeed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 08:35:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 03:35:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219327] Review Request: kazehakase - Kazehakase browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612210835.kBL8ZbqR002722@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kazehakase - Kazehakase browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219327 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-21 03:35 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=144168) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=144168&action=view) Mock build log of kazehakase 0.4.3-2 on FC6 i386 Well, it is true that mockbuild of 0.4.3-2 on FC6 i386 succeeds. Maybe rebuilding failure is related with your settings or something else? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 08:45:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 03:45:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220381] Review Request: flex-old - Legacy version of flex, a tool for creating scanners In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612210845.kBL8jAB0003353@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flex-old - Legacy version of flex, a tool for creating scanners https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220381 pmachata at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(pmachata at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From pmachata at redhat.com 2006-12-21 03:45 EST ------- jkeating: Other core components have their compat- package in core, too. E.g. compat-db, compat-gcc family, compat-slang. jason: It occured to me that -compat packages are libraries, but yes, now I see there are also tools. I adjusted the files: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/~pmachata/compat-flex.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/~pmachata/compat-flex-2.5.4a-1.src.rpm Note that everything still installs with *postfix* compat. It seems more natural to me to have e.g. libfl-compat.a instead of libcompat-fl.a, and flex-compat will be offered on commandline when tab-completing flex. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 09:44:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 04:44:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219962] Review Request: crystal-clear - Crystal Clear KDE Icon set In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612210944.kBL9iW8d008504@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crystal-clear - Crystal Clear KDE Icon set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219962 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-12-21 04:44 EST ------- SPEC: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/crystal-clear/crystal-clear.spec rpmlint /home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/crystal-clear-20050622-2.noarch.rpm W: crystal-clear no-documentation W: crystal-clear dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/icons/Crystal-Clear/48x48/apps/kmenu.png ../../../Bluecurve/48x48/apps/gnome-main-menu.png W: crystal-clear dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/icons/Crystal-Clear/32x32/apps/kmenu.png ../../../Bluecurve/32x32/apps/gnome-main-menu.png W: crystal-clear dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/icons/Crystal-Clear/22x22/apps/kmenu.png ../../../Bluecurve/24x24/apps/gnome-main-menu.png W: crystal-clear dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/icons/Crystal-Clear/16x16/apps/kmenu.png ../../../Bluecurve/16x16/apps/gnome-main-menu.png -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 10:24:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 05:24:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218256] Review Request: - In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612211024.kBLAOoIO011979@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218256 yufanyufan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: - - |Audacious media player> ------- Additional Comments From yufanyufan at gmail.com 2006-12-21 05:24 EST ------- Updated SPEC and SRPM Spec URL: SRPM URL: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 10:31:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 05:31:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219962] Review Request: crystal-clear - Crystal Clear KDE Icon set In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612211031.kBLAVOF5012659@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crystal-clear - Crystal Clear KDE Icon set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219962 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-21 05:31 EST ------- Quick update Included tarball and upstream tarball md5sum matches adb7962b585c8ad12adc3b82246edb35 CrystalClear.tar.gz According to http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=389499, you also need to replace firefox.png icon or remove it while installing. Thanks for giving this link Chitlesh. I have one question, how to check that a given individual icon is LGPL/GPL or non-LPGL. Do you know about this? Also where is LGPL written? I mean no license text is added in RPM Also, URL: http://linuxcult.com/node/10 is not working. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 12:35:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 07:35:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220443] New: Review Request: gnome-commander - A nice and fast file manager for the GNOME desktop Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220443 Summary: Review Request: gnome-commander - A nice and fast file manager for the GNOME desktop Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/gnome-commander.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/gnome-commander-1.2.3-2.src.rpm Description: GNOME Commander is a nice and fast file manager for the GNOME desktop. In addition to performing the basic filemanager functions the program is also an FTP-client and it can browse SMB-networks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 13:28:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:28:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219610] Review Request: uncrustify-0.30 - code beautifier In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612211328.kBLDSA6F024452@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uncrustify-0.30 - code beautifier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219610 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |limb at jcomserv.net ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2006-12-21 08:28 EST ------- I just downloaded, build and rpmlinted this. I get none of the above issues. Neal, have you made changes to the available files since 12/14, or am I missing something? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 13:33:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:33:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219610] Review Request: uncrustify-0.30 - code beautifier In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612211333.kBLDXHxe024683@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uncrustify-0.30 - code beautifier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219610 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2006-12-21 08:33 EST ------- Yes, I updated the files. I'm sorry for any confusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 13:37:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:37:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220210] Review Request: krename - Powerful batch file renamer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612211337.kBLDbbs2025114@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: krename - Powerful batch file renamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220210 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-21 08:37 EST ------- First review of this package. A. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * BuildRequires ----------------------------------------------------------- Requires: hicolor-icon-theme ----------------------------------------------------------- - Usually this is regarded as "not needed to be written" because hicolor-icon-theme is generally considered as a type of rpms like "filesystem" and many GUI packages depend on this package directly/indirectly. * Documentation The following documentations include non-UTF8 characters. Consider them to UTF-8 characters. ----------------------------------------------------------- /usr/share/doc/krename-3.0.13/ChangeLog: ISO-8859 English text /usr/share/doc/krename-3.0.13/TODO: Non-ISO extended-ASCII English text, with very long lines ----------------------------------------------------------- * Desktop files ----------------------------------------------------------- Categories=Application;Utility;Qt;KDE; ----------------------------------------------------------- Category "Application" is deprecated and so this should be removed. ----------------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at dhcp158 krename]$ desktop-file-validate /usr/share/applications/fedora-krename.desktop /usr/share/applications/fedora-krename.desktop: warning: The 'Application' category is not defined by the desktop entry specification. Please use one of "AudioVideo", "Audio", "Video", "Development", "Education", "Game", "Graphics", "Network", "Office", "Settings", "System", "Utility" instead ----------------------------------------------------------- * Scriptlets requirements ----------------------------------------------------------- %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/*/apps/%{name}.png ----------------------------------------------------------- This requires updating of GTK+ icon cache (desribed in the following). http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets Actually I cannot see icons on KRename menu entry. * File and Directory Ownership - On my system, the following directories are not owned by any packages. ------------------------------------------------------------ /usr/share/apps/konqueror/ /usr/share/apps/konqueror/servicemenus/ ------------------------------------------------------------ ... because I am a GNOME user and I don't have kdebase installed. I think this package should own these directories as this package can be used for non-KDE users, too. B. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : (= this is okay, except for things written in A) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 13:47:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:47:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219610] Review Request: uncrustify-0.30 - code beautifier In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612211347.kBLDlxru026035@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uncrustify-0.30 - code beautifier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219610 ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2006-12-21 08:47 EST ------- Hi Neal, when you update the files *please* always increase the EVR and please post a comment with a link to the new SRPM. I find it quite confusing when people skip those two steps. I'm very busy today/tomorrow but will make an effort to finish the review on Saturday. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 13:54:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:54:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219610] Review Request: uncrustify-0.30 - code beautifier In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612211354.kBLDsurY026563@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uncrustify-0.30 - code beautifier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219610 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2006-12-21 08:54 EST ------- That explains quite a bit. :) I would have envisioned a bumped release number and new URLs. Would it not be helpful to include a copy of the default config (http://uncrustify.sourceforge.net/default.cfg) as ~/.uncrustify.cfg? Running it right after installation results in a complaint, and you can't even uncrustify --show-config -o ~/.uncrustify.cfg without it already existing. If I manually create ~/.uncrustify.cfg from default.cfg, it works fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 13:57:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:57:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220381] Review Request: flex-old - Legacy version of flex, a tool for creating scanners In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612211357.kBLDvOIW026797@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flex-old - Legacy version of flex, a tool for creating scanners https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220381 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |163776 nThis| | Flag| |needinfo?(pmachata at redhat.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-12-21 08:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > jkeating: Other core components have their compat- package in core, too. E.g. > compat-db, compat-gcc family, compat-slang. Yes, but all of these are moving to Extras with the merger. Unless there is specific reason (needed to build something else) for this new package to go into Core, it must go into Extras instead. I'm not interested in reviewing/importing/building into core, just to move/review/build it in the new merged land a few months later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 13:59:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:59:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219610] Review Request: uncrustify-0.30 - code beautifier In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612211359.kBLDxvom027085@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uncrustify-0.30 - code beautifier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219610 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2006-12-21 08:59 EST ------- I agree that's a problem. (I didn't write this code :)) Anyway, how would that recommendation work? (I don't think it would). Here is my proposal, which I think is consistent with other Fedora apps. On install, a message is printed telling the user they need to do this. OK? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 14:01:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 09:01:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219610] Review Request: uncrustify-0.30 - code beautifier In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612211401.kBLE1NCm027249@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uncrustify-0.30 - code beautifier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219610 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2006-12-21 09:01 EST ------- After thinking for two seconds, I realized my above comment won't work. I think including default.cfg as /etc/uncrustify.cfg, and having it check that first, then override with ~/uncrustify.cfg, would be better. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 14:04:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 09:04:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219610] Review Request: uncrustify-0.30 - code beautifier In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612211404.kBLE4fJ7027509@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uncrustify-0.30 - code beautifier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219610 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2006-12-21 09:04 EST ------- That is really how it should work, but I didn't write it. If nobody has strong objections, I think I'd rather just print the message then spend time figuring out how to do fix the code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 14:14:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 09:14:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219990] Review Request: xfce4-timer-plugin - Timer for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612211414.kBLEEKJW028411@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-timer-plugin - Timer for the Xfce panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219990 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-12-21 09:14 EST ------- * rpmlint is silent * free software, license included * follow packaging guidelines * follow naming guidelines except if there is some specific guideline for panel applets, but it doesn't seems so (I remember vaguely some discussion) * match upstream: fe20a7c1bba78d6c2a7483a894294155 xfce4-timer-plugin-0.5.tar.bz2 * sane provides * %files section right * seems to have everything needed for an xfce panel applet (although I didn't test). APPROVED There are the usual unneeded dependencies on sonames: $ ldd -u -r /usr/libexec/xfce4/panel-plugins/xfce4-timer Unused direct dependencies: /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 /usr/lib/libatk-1.0.so.0 /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 /lib/libm.so.6 /usr/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0 /usr/lib/libcairo.so.2 /lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0 /lib/libdl.so.2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 14:18:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 09:18:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220393] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code Introspection Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612211418.kBLEIrl8028851@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code Introspection Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220393 ------- Additional Comments From seefeld at sympatico.ca 2006-12-21 09:18 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=144183) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=144183&action=view) rpm spec file Please find attached the spec file. It is also included in the released source tarball, so 'rpmbuild -ta synopsis-0.9.tar.gz' works fine, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 14:26:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 09:26:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219990] Review Request: xfce4-timer-plugin - Timer for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612211426.kBLEQq3S029511@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-timer-plugin - Timer for the Xfce panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219990 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-12-21 09:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > * follow naming guidelines except if there is some specific > guideline for panel applets, but it doesn't seems so (I remember > vaguely some discussion) I started this discussion because I think we need a clarification for these packages. There wasn't much feedback, so obviously people are not interested in a clarification or don't think it is necessary. > APPROVED Thanks for the review. > There are the usual unneeded dependencies on sonames: Yeah, but I'm pretty sure this is a bug in glibc-devel package, not in my packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 14:36:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 09:36:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219610] Review Request: uncrustify-0.30 - code beautifier In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612211436.kBLEaaTD030086@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uncrustify-0.30 - code beautifier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219610 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2006-12-21 09:36 EST ------- I've played around with it, and am close, but I couldn't get it to compile. Not worth further time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 14:42:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 09:42:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219990] Review Request: xfce4-timer-plugin - Timer for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612211442.kBLEgKO4030443@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-timer-plugin - Timer for the Xfce panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219990 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-12-21 09:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > a clarification or don't think it is necessary. It could be interesting to help users find the package name. However searching by name is not very convenient, it is the summary which is really important in my opinion. > Yeah, but I'm pretty sure this is a bug in glibc-devel package, not in my packages. It isn't in your package, I don't think it is in glibc-devel either, but somewhere along the -devel dependencies there is an improper use of Requires.private and/or Libs.private. Since most are gtk2 dependencies it is certainly in gtk+-2.0.pc, which has Requires: gdk-${target}-2.0 atk cairo And should certainly have Requires.private: gdk-${target}-2.0 atk cairo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 15:13:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 10:13:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218599] Review Request: klibido - NNTP (Usenet) file grabber for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612211513.kBLFDmxi032609@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: klibido - NNTP (Usenet) file grabber for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218599 ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2006-12-21 10:13 EST ------- Ping? Please note, I'll be on holiday from tomorrow (22 Dec) till the 6th of January 2007, with very little (if any) Internet access, so I won't be able to respond on any comments until that time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 15:38:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 10:38:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220210] Review Request: krename - Powerful batch file renamer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612211538.kBLFcQOV002478@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: krename - Powerful batch file renamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220210 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-12-21 10:38 EST ------- Spec URL: http://mutebox.net/~ecik/krename/krename.spec SRPM URL: http://mutebox.net/~ecik/krename/krename-3.0.13-2.src.rpm * Thu Dec 21 2006 Micha? Bentkowski - 3.0.13-2 - Fix encoding of ChangeLog and TODO files - Fix desktop file issue - Add %%post and %%postun sections - Make %%{_datadir}/apps/konqueror owned by this package I didn't change hicolor-icon-theme dependency, because in my opinion it is good if it's present. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 15:51:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 10:51:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214087] Review Request: libextractor -- Simple library for keyword extraction In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612211551.kBLFpi8t003543@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libextractor -- Simple library for keyword extraction https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214087 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-12-21 10:51 EST ------- > * For main package: > ---------------------------------- > Requires: plugin(%name) > ---------------------------------- > What I meant was main package (libextract) should require at least > base plugin package (libextract-plugins-base). plugin(%name) is > not provided by libextract-plugins-base and then currently extra > plugin package is needed for main (libextract) package. I do not think so: 1. libextract works without plugins too. But because output is very limited in this case, you can say that plugins are highly recommended (*not* required) Nevertheless, because 'highly recommended' can not be expressed with RPM, I accept that some 'Requires:' should be used. 2. libextract does not require the -plugins-base plugins but works e.g. with the thumbnail plugin when e.g. a collection of images shall be indexed Therefore, I use | Requires: plugin(%name) which satisfies 1. and allows users to install only the really needed plugins (2.). > * For fake plugin package (libextract-plugins) > Dependency for pdf plugin (libextract-plugins-pdf) is missing. ok; I will add this dependency (but do not ship a new package for this change). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 15:55:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 10:55:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 188138] Review Request: mod_auth_ntlm_winbind - NTLM authentication for the Apache web server using winbind daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612211555.kBLFtYq6003778@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_auth_ntlm_winbind - NTLM authentication for the Apache web server using winbind daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188138 ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2006-12-21 10:55 EST ------- The upstream have changed to the name of "auth_ntlm_winbind" completely, introduced VERSION file and have done some fixes. I've changed version-release scheme to VERSION-0.svnrev.X because of this. New SPEC: http://dmitry.butskoy.name/mod_auth_ntlm_winbind/mod_auth_ntlm_winbind.spec New SRPM: http://dmitry.butskoy.name/mod_auth_ntlm_winbind/mod_auth_ntlm_winbind-0.0.0-0.svn692.1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 16:00:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 11:00:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213600] Review Request: tinyca2 - Simple graphical userinterface to manage a small CA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612211600.kBLG0jnr004218@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tinyca2 - Simple graphical userinterface to manage a small CA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213600 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-21 11:00 EST ------- (Well, for libextractor, I will check it later, althogh it may be tomorrow. By the way, it seems that tinyca2 has been already imported into FE-devel/6/5, so please close this bug when it is possible) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 16:29:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 11:29:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219327] Review Request: kazehakase - Kazehakase browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612211629.kBLGTWth006142@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kazehakase - Kazehakase browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219327 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-12-21 11:29 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=144198) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=144198&action=view) Log of build failure on FC6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 16:35:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 11:35:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219327] Review Request: kazehakase - Kazehakase browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612211635.kBLGZ1x6006556@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kazehakase - Kazehakase browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219327 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-12-21 11:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Maybe rebuilding failure is related with your settings > or something else? Without having looked into details (I am scarce on time, ATM), my guess would be the breakdown related to you running the autotools, so may-be something related to * The package uses autoconf-2.60a, while FC6 has 2.59. * My user environment also has autoconf/automake/libtool installed, a mock environment doesn't. * They are using autoconf-2.60a (a beta version), so they might also be using a beta of libtool. rpm and/or you running autoconf can interfere. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 17:10:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 12:10:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213600] Review Request: tinyca2 - Simple graphical userinterface to manage a small CA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612211710.kBLHAcMe009021@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tinyca2 - Simple graphical userinterface to manage a small CA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213600 enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-12-21 12:10 EST ------- ok; closed... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 17:30:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 12:30:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189195] Review Request: horde - php application framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612211730.kBLHUQdN010342@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-12-21 12:30 EST ------- Spec URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/horde.spec SRPM URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/horde-3.1.3-8.src.rpm Thanks for the dialog guys, this is going to be one solid package by the time it gets approved :D Greg is right about registry.php, that's the one file I had to edit in order to relocate the config files to an arbitrary location. Whether they reside in /etc/horde or /var/lib/horde is a very trivial change and completely up to you.. I'm also not sure which is more appropriate. I've also added some additional Apache security params per Greg's suggestion in comment 27, which also addresses your question about test.php: it's now only accessible from localhost. I did NOT include horde's recommended "expose_php off" or "display_errors off" because they seem a little TOO paranoid at the application-level, and more appropriate for the sysadmin to set globally if he desires. Finally, I've added a LOT more to README.fedora, including being more specific about the security implications of opening horde to the world and a whole paragraph of additional recommended actions (pear modules and such) Incidentally, horde flips out if you access it at http://localhost/horde/ and logs: "Session cookies will not work without a FQDN and with a non-empty cookie domain". It causes my FF to reload infinitely until it freezes and has to be 'kill -9'ed. Using http://localhost.localdomain/horde/ or http://127.0.0.1/horde/ has no problems. Should we mention this in the README? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 17:39:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 12:39:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189195] Review Request: horde - php application framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612211739.kBLHdjhu010711@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-12-21 12:39 EST ------- Now that I'm starting to think about packaging horde applications, what is the appropriate naming convention, "horde-imp" or just "imp"? If we go with horde-imp (which seems the logical choice to me), should we try to "Provides: imp" for people who try: "yum install imp" or should we expect them to know imp is a subpackage of the horde framework? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 17:51:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 12:51:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220381] Review Request: flex-old - Legacy version of flex, a tool for creating scanners In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612211751.kBLHpLYQ011185@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flex-old - Legacy version of flex, a tool for creating scanners https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220381 pmachata at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(pmachata at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From pmachata at redhat.com 2006-12-21 12:51 EST ------- > Yes, but all of these are moving to Extras with the merger. Oh, I idn't know that. So I'll have to set up extras account sooner or later. Good to know. > Yes, but all of these are moving to Extras with the merger. Unless there is > specific reason (needed to build something else) for this new package to go > into Core, it must go into Extras instead. Well, that will turn out. The whole point of providing compat flex is that the changes between 2.5.4 and 2.5.33 were very internal, and there are lots of them. I don't want to be stuck with the same ancient version of flex forever, .33 has interesting features, and people are requesting it for some time already. But on the other hand, I don't dare upgrade without a fallback. So some components actually may end up with BuildRequires: compat-flex, although this should be rare, and hopefully temporary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 18:06:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 13:06:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189195] Review Request: horde - php application framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612211806.kBLI6Dn0011964@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-12-21 13:06 EST ------- I would just call it "imp". IMP is a web application that happens to require the Horde framework, but I wouldn't call it a subpackage of Horde. About the registry.php file, one thing I noticed when diffing against registry.php.dist is that the original file has moved on a bit, and thus there are many differences between the file you ship and the one in the source. Would you consider rebasing it? I still can't decide about the configuration files, but I've found myself doing plenty of manual edits to those files lately so I'm leaning towards /etc being more appropriate. After all, they're still config files, not random internal state. I do think it would be a good idea to mention your localhost issue in the readme; it certainly can't hurt. I'm in the FESCo meeting at the moment, so I'll take a more complete look at this a bit later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 18:30:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 13:30:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612211830.kBLIUZnE013145@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2006-12-21 13:30 EST ------- Ah, much better, now it builds in my mock as well. I'm not a sponsor, but I do have a few notes: Review for release 4: * RPM name is OK * Source libprelude-0.9.11.tar.gz is the same as upstream * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint of libprelude looks OK Needs work: * Use of buildroot is not consistant (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#UsingBuildRootOptFlags) * Missing SMP flags. If it doesn't build with it, please add a comment (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#parallelmake) * rpmlint of libprelude-devel: Please fix the errors and warnings * The package should contain the text of the license Please add COPYING to %doc, and ChangeLog (wiki: Packaging/ReviewGuidelines) * The package owns /usr/share/doc, which is a standard directory (wiki: Packaging/ReviewGuidelines) * Config files of libprelude: Is there a reason the config files are in /etc/prelude/prelude and not in / etc/prelude? Minor: * Duplicate BuildRequires: gnutls (by gnutls-devel) * The latest upstream version is 0.9.12. rpmlint output for libprelude-devel-0.9.11-3.i386.rpm W: libprelude-devel summary-ended-with-dot Header files and libraries for libprelude development. W: libprelude-devel non-standard-group Environment/Libraries E: libprelude-devel standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/doc Thanks, Ruben -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 19:28:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 14:28:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220495] New: package update missisng dependency Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220495 Summary: package update missisng dependency Product: Fedora Core Version: fc6 Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wrebel at terra.com.br QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Description of problem: Missing Dependency: firefox = 1.5.0.8 is needed by package openvrml -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 19:51:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 14:51:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220495] package update missisng dependency In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612211951.kBLJpNfA019709@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: package update missisng dependency https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220495 ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(wrebel at terra.com.b | |r) ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2006-12-21 14:51 EST ------- Hi, Can you please be a bit more specific in describing your issue? OpenVRML indeed depends on firefox, do you think this is a bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 20:35:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 15:35:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220495] package update missisng dependency In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612212035.kBLKZa1W023613@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: package update missisng dependency https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220495 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Core |Fedora Extras Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Component|Package Review |Package Review QAContact|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com Flag|needinfo?(wrebel at terra.com.b| |r) | ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-12-21 15:35 EST ------- The current FC6 firefox is 1.5.0.9, not 1.5.0.8 -> openvrml's dependency on 1.5.0.8 blocks yum from updating. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 20:36:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 15:36:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220495] package update missisng dependency In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612212036.kBLKa3mM023664@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: package update missisng dependency https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220495 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Package Review |openvrml AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |braden at endoframe.com QAContact|fedora-package- |extras-qa at fedoraproject.org |review at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 21:04:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 16:04:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214893] Review Request: sipp - SIP test tool / traffic generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612212104.kBLL4Q7A025441@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sipp - SIP test tool / traffic generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214893 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2006-12-21 16:04 EST ------- Version 1.1.rc8 http://lemenkov.newmail.ru/SPECS/sipp.spec http://lemenkov.newmail.ru/SRPMS/sipp-1.1-0.rc8.src.rpm changed naming scheme. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 21:07:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 16:07:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218839] Review Request: pyflakes - A Lint-like tool for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612212107.kBLL7wFK025610@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyflakes - A Lint-like tool for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218839 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-12-21 16:07 EST ------- Bernard, do you have the reviewer bits set on your Fedora account? If yes, could you set the status and assignment of this package according to the result/phase of your review as documented at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 21:13:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 16:13:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 200600] Review Request: phpPgAdmin - web based PostgreSQL administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612212113.kBLLDEUp025999@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpPgAdmin - web based PostgreSQL administration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200600 ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |ruben at rubenkerkhof.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2006-12-21 16:12 EST ------- Hi Devrim, A few remarks: - Please don't include the name of the package in the Summary - Please don't use the Vendor tag - Web applications should not put their content in /var/www (see Guidelines/Web Applications in the Wiki - It fails to build in mock, since /etc/httpd/conf.d does not exist over there. I think it's safe to skip the check for that directory, and install -d your config file - httpd reload in %post fails if you don't have httpd installed, but another webserver, but I'm not sure how to handle that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 21:23:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 16:23:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612212123.kBLLNMeD026567@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 ------- Additional Comments From cgtobi at gmail.com 2006-12-21 16:23 EST ------- After discussing the spec on #fedora-extras I created a fedora-only spec. You can get it right here: http://www.cgtobi.de/aqsis/aqsis.fedora.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 21:26:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 16:26:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 200600] Review Request: phpPgAdmin - web based PostgreSQL administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612212126.kBLLQ9g5026819@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpPgAdmin - web based PostgreSQL administration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200600 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-12-21 16:25 EST ------- Hi, (In reply to comment #13) > A few remarks: > > - Please don't include the name of the package in the Summary > - Please don't use the Vendor tag > - Web applications should not put their content in /var/www (see Guidelines/Web Applications in the > Wiki > - It fails to build in mock, since /etc/httpd/conf.d does not exist over there. I think it's safe to skip the > check for that directory, and install -d your config file Both are fixed. > - httpd reload in %post fails if you don't have httpd installed, but another webserver, but I'm not sure > how to handle that. This package now requires httpd directly. Spec URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/phpPgAdmin/phpPgAdmin.spec SRPM URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/phpPgAdmin/phpPgAdmin-4.0.1-4.src.rpm Thanks, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 21:31:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 16:31:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189195] Review Request: horde - php application framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612212131.kBLLVdXe027002@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-12-21 16:31 EST ------- Spec URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/horde.spec SRPM URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/horde-3.1.3-9.src.rpm I've gone ahead and rebased registry.php to 1.255.2.17 (the version that ships with 3.1.3), but there were only 2 differences (lines 53 and 55) when calculating $webroot. All the other diff entries you saw involving $fileroot are intentional and required. By default, registry.php assumes that it is living in "$webroot/config/", so it assigns fileroot to be './../appname' which normally resolves to "$webroot/appname/" and the world keeps on turning. However, since our registry.php lives in /etc/horde/, './../appname' resolves to '/etc/appname' which doesn't exist let alone contain web content, so horde dies. To fix this issue, I created the $fileroot variable that statically contains '/usr/share/horde', and then manually tweak all the application-specific sections to reference $fileroot instead of __FILE__. Since I agree it's not very clear this is intentional, I've renamed $fileroot to a constant: FEDORA_FILEROOT, to make it obvious this is an intentional distro-specific tweak. I also added a bit about localhost in the README -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 21:38:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 16:38:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 200600] Review Request: phpPgAdmin - web based PostgreSQL administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612212138.kBLLcY1A027491@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpPgAdmin - web based PostgreSQL administration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200600 ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2006-12-21 16:38 EST ------- Two last issues: - Replace usr/share with %{datadir} - Add /sbin/service to Requires(post) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 21:59:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 16:59:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 200600] Review Request: phpPgAdmin - web based PostgreSQL administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612212159.kBLLxXBW028997@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpPgAdmin - web based PostgreSQL administration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200600 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-12-21 16:59 EST ------- Hi, (In reply to comment #15) > Two last issues: > > - Replace usr/share with %{datadir} > - Add /sbin/service to Requires(post) Both are done: Spec URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/phpPgAdmin/phpPgAdmin.spec SRPM URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/phpPgAdmin/phpPgAdmin-4.0.1-5.src.rpm Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 22:04:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 17:04:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 203864] Review Request: tripwire - IDS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612212204.kBLM43Pa029362@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tripwire - IDS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203864 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-12-21 17:04 EST ------- Please remove that as well: # Print getting started help message if [ $1 -eq 1 ]; then echo To configure tripwire, read: %_docdir/%{name}-%{version}/README.Fedora fi I am of the opinion that any rpm console output during installation should be an indication of either an error or a warning and other packagers agree with me. Otherwise looks fine. It is APPROVED provided the above is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 22:10:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 17:10:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 200600] Review Request: phpPgAdmin - web based PostgreSQL administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612212210.kBLMAm0N029721@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpPgAdmin - web based PostgreSQL administration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200600 ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2006-12-21 17:10 EST ------- Looks good, moving to FE-ACCEPT -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 21 22:34:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 17:34:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 200600] Review Request: phpPgAdmin - web based PostgreSQL administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612212234.kBLMYaKe031811@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpPgAdmin - web based PostgreSQL administration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200600 devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 00:16:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 19:16:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612220016.kBM0GbTZ003267@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 ------- Additional Comments From tscherf at redhat.com 2006-12-21 19:16 EST ------- * now used %buildroot all over the spec file * removed smp-flags/-j flag because the package won't build with it * added doc files * moved config to /etc/prelude instead of /etc/prelude/prelude * removed duplicate BuildReqs * upgraded to new upstream verson 0.9.12 no more output from rpmlint on the SRPM. any sponsor available? new package is online: http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/libprelude-0.9.12-1.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/libprelude.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 00:23:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 19:23:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219539] Review Request: qt-qsa - QT Script for Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612220023.kBM0NBWc003615@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt-qsa - QT Script for Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219539 belegdol at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 00:27:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 19:27:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220495] package update missisng dependency In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612220027.kBM0RnuS003876@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: package update missisng dependency https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220495 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|notting at redhat.com, fedora- | |package-review at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 00:39:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 19:39:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189195] Review Request: horde - php application framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612220039.kBM0dMYT004245@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 ------- Additional Comments From greg at runlevel7.ca 2006-12-21 19:39 EST ------- > I would just call it "imp". I hesitate to agree that is the best choice for the long run, although I wouldn't object if you named it imp-h3, like the upstream tarball, and CentOS... If 'imp' ends up being the choice, out of courteosy could you add... # Obsolete latest version in CentOS Extras Obsoletes: imp-h3 <= 4.1.3-1.c4 Provides: imp-h3 = %{version} ...to your spec file. Especially once Enterprise Extras gets going that would be appreciated, as I'm sure they won't maintain their own version then. (The CentOS imp-h3 rpm obsoletes 'imp' without a version number...oops. I will raise that as a bug in their tracker if the Fedora Extras rpm will be named 'imp'.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 01:21:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 20:21:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 197754] Review Request: perl-Perl6-Bible In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612220121.kBM1L8QA005929@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Perl6-Bible https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197754 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-12-21 20:21 EST ------- Oops, forgot about this... http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Perl6-Bible-0.30-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 01:28:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 20:28:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219990] Review Request: xfce4-timer-plugin - Timer for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612220128.kBM1ST7o006194@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-timer-plugin - Timer for the Xfce panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219990 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-12-21 20:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Since most are gtk2 dependencies > it is certainly in gtk+-2.0.pc, which has > Requires: gdk-${target}-2.0 atk cairo > And should certainly have > Requires.private: gdk-${target}-2.0 atk cairo Bingo! Thanks for the pointer, I haven't looked through the chain of dependencies. Package built for FE6 and devel. Closing. Once again: Thanks _a_lot_ for your help, Patrice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 02:46:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 21:46:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612220246.kBM2kBiH008483@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-21 21:46 EST ------- I have added it to owners.list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 03:03:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 22:03:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199679] Review Request: postgresql-pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612220303.kBM33WtH009182@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199679 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: pgpool - |Review Request: postgresql- |Connection |pgpool - Connection |pooling/replication server |pooling/replication server |for PostgreSQL |for PostgreSQL ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-21 22:03 EST ------- Fixing the Summary for tracking purposes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 03:07:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 22:07:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 184331] Review Request: k3d - 3D modeling and rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612220307.kBM37NnH009424@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: k3d - 3D modeling and rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184331 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: K-3D - 3D |Review Request: k3d - 3D |modeling and rendering |modeling and rendering |system |system ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-21 22:07 EST ------- Changing the Summary for tracking purposes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 03:08:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 22:08:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176253] Review Request: clement - An application to filter and manage E-mail traffic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612220308.kBM38qHk009523@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clement - An application to filter and manage E-mail traffic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176253 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: clement-2.1 |Review Request: clement - An | |application to filter and | |manage E-mail traffic ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-21 22:08 EST ------- Changing Summary for tracking purposes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 03:10:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 22:10:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 206872] Review Request: sipsak - SIP swiss army knife In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612220310.kBM3AV3g009587@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sipsak - SIP swiss army knife https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206872 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: sipsak- SIP |Review Request: sipsak - SIP |swiss army knife |swiss army knife ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-21 22:10 EST ------- Changing summary for tracking purposes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 03:12:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 22:12:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 206836] Review Request: python-turbojson - Python template plugin that supports json In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612220312.kBM3CXiC009820@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-turbojson - Python template plugin that supports json https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206836 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: TurboJson - |Review Request: python- |Python template plugin that |turbojson - Python template |supports json |plugin that supports json ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-21 22:12 EST ------- Changing the summary for tracking purposes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 03:14:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 22:14:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 206837] Review Request: python-turbocheetah - TurboGears plugin to support use of Cheetah templates In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612220314.kBM3EC5e009942@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-turbocheetah - TurboGears plugin to support use of Cheetah templates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206837 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: TurboCheetah|Review Request: python- |- TurboGears plugin to |turbocheetah - TurboGears |support use of Cheetah |plugin to support use of |templates |Cheetah templates ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-21 22:14 EST ------- Changing the summary for tracking purposes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 03:14:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 22:14:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 206838] Review Request: python-tgfastdata - Automatic user interface generation for TurboGears In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612220314.kBM3Exug009995@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-tgfastdata - Automatic user interface generation for TurboGears https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206838 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: TGFastData -|Review Request: python- |Automatic user interface |tgfastdata - Automatic user |generation for TurboGears |interface generation for | |TurboGears ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-21 22:14 EST ------- Changing summary for tracking purposes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 03:16:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 22:16:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 206839] Review Request: python-turbokid - Python template plugin that supports Kid templates In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612220316.kBM3G8rq010138@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-turbokid - Python template plugin that supports Kid templates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206839 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: TurboKid - |Review Request: python- |Python template plugin that |turbokid - Python template |supports Kid templates |plugin that supports Kid | |templates ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-21 22:15 EST ------- Changing summary for tracking purposes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 03:19:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 22:19:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 180068] Review Request: GeoIP - Library for mapping IP/hostname to a country/city/organization In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612220319.kBM3J1Ud010338@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GeoIP - Library for mapping IP/hostname to a country/city/organization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180068 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: geoip - |Review Request: GeoIP - |Library for mapping |Library for mapping |IP/hostname to a |IP/hostname to a |country/city/organization |country/city/organization ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-21 22:18 EST ------- Changing the summary for tracking purposes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 03:19:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 22:19:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218360] Review Request: evolution-remove-duplicates - Evolution plugin for removing duplicate mails In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612220319.kBM3Jxgu010448@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-remove-duplicates - Evolution plugin for removing duplicate mails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218360 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: evolution- |Review Request: evolution- |plugin-remove-duplicates - |remove-duplicates - |Evolution plugin for |Evolution plugin for |removing duplicate mails |removing duplicate mails ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-21 22:19 EST ------- Changed summary for tracking purposes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 03:20:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 22:20:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 205265] Review Request: libxml - Old libXML library for Gnome-1 application compatibility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612220320.kBM3KvJF010558@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libxml - Old libXML library for Gnome-1 application compatibility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205265 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: libxml- Old |Review Request: libxml - Old |libXML library for Gnome-1 |libXML library for Gnome-1 |application compatibility |application compatibility ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-21 22:20 EST ------- Changed summary for tracking purposes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 03:29:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 22:29:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 190144] Review Request: hevea - LaTeX to HTML translator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612220329.kBM3TVCn011428@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hevea - LaTeX to HTML translator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190144 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-21 22:29 EST ------- ok, so this has been accepted, imported, branched and built. It should be closed NEXTRELEASE right? not NEW? Can you do so if I am correct, or explain why not? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 03:33:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 22:33:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215258] Review Request: clucene - A C++ port of Lucene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612220333.kBM3XpMX011710@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clucene - A C++ port of Lucene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215258 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-21 22:33 EST ------- This package appears to have been accepted, imported and built. This bug should be closed NEXTRELEASE. I am going to go ahead and do so. If I am in error, please reopen. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 03:37:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 22:37:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 191175] Review Request: pyserial - Python serial port access library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612220337.kBM3b4LP011987@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyserial - Python serial port access library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191175 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-21 22:36 EST ------- This package appears to have been accepted, imported and built. This bug should be closed NEXTRELEASE. I am going to go ahead and do so. If I am in error, please reopen. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 03:42:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 22:42:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 193156] Review Request: devallocator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612220342.kBM3gkQO012567@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: devallocator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193156 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-21 22:42 EST ------- removing FE-REVIEW since this has been closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 03:45:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 22:45:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 192313] Review Request: koan In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612220345.kBM3jGn2012890@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: koan https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192313 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-21 22:45 EST ------- David: It doesn't look like this was ever changed to block FE-ACCEPT instead of FE-REVIEW. Could you please do so if you really approved this package? It helps with tracking to make sure all packages have been approved... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 03:47:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 22:47:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187706] Review Request: alsa-oss - Userspace OSS emulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612220347.kBM3lijP013173@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-oss - Userspace OSS emulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187706 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |201449 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-21 22:47 EST ------- Changing the blocker here to FE-DEADREVIEW instead of FE-REVIEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 03:52:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 22:52:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 191218] Review Request: PyScript - Postscript graphics with Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612220352.kBM3qKEg013544@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyScript - Postscript graphics with Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191218 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841 |201449 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-21 22:52 EST ------- Moving blockers to FE-DEADREVIEW. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 04:11:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 23:11:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612220411.kBM4B9Ht015469@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218556 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-21 23:11 EST ------- Hey Michael. I'm interested in this package, any chance of an updated version with corrections from comment #10? Note that if the xen mess ever gets figured out in fc6, there will probibly be a 2.6.19 for it, so this may well work in fc6 someday. (At least that is my understanding) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 04:29:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 23:29:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219981] Review Request: xfce4-xfapplet-plugin - A plugin to use gnome-panel based applets inside the Xfce4 one In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612220429.kBM4Ti0e017509@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-xfapplet-plugin - A plugin to use gnome-panel based applets inside the Xfce4 one https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219981 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-21 23:29 EST ------- I'd be happy to review this package. Expect a full review in a bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 04:57:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 23:57:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219981] Review Request: xfce4-xfapplet-plugin - A plugin to use gnome-panel based applets inside the Xfce4 one In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612220457.kBM4va9I020953@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-xfapplet-plugin - A plugin to use gnome-panel based applets inside the Xfce4 one https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219981 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-21 23:57 EST ------- OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPL) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 6a06c44b18a97626f44a240ad3bc3244 xfce4-xfapplet-plugin-0.1.0.tar.bz2 6a06c44b18a97626f44a240ad3bc3244 xfce4-xfapplet-plugin-0.1.0.tar.bz2.1 OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. See below - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane: SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. i386/x86_64 - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. The summary seems a bit odd to me: "A plugin to use gnome-panel based applets inside the Xfce4 one" How about: "A plugin to use gnome-panel based applets inside the Xfce4 panel" 2. Your desktop file needs desktop-file-install: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-254ddf07aae20a23ced8cecc219d8f73926e9755 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 05:00:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 00:00:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219986] Review Request: xfce4-smartbookmark-plugin - Smart bookmarks for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612220500.kBM507Rd021274@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-smartbookmark-plugin - Smart bookmarks for the Xfce panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219986 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-22 00:00 EST ------- I'd be happy to review this package. Look for a full review in a bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 05:02:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 00:02:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 192876] Review Request: V2Strip ID3v2(Mp3 Files) tags remover In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612220502.kBM521YZ021536@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: V2Strip ID3v2(Mp3 Files) tags remover https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192876 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |WONTFIX Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED OtherBugsDependingO|163779 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-12-22 00:01 EST ------- Approval rescinded. Bug closed WONTFIX. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 05:02:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 00:02:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 203864] Review Request: tripwire - IDS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612220502.kBM52WMu021613@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tripwire - IDS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203864 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-12-22 00:02 EST ------- I've removed all output from %post and imported this package for devel/ and requested a build. You're welcome to check it out and see for yourself, and move this bug to block FE-ACCEPT. Thanks for all your time! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 05:14:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 00:14:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219327] Review Request: kazehakase - Kazehakase browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612220514.kBM5ESkD022543@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kazehakase - Kazehakase browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219327 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-12-22 00:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #7) > > Maybe rebuilding failure is related with your settings > > or something else? Urgh, I have to apologize - This was a DUE (Dumb User Error) on my part. The machine I was building on didn't have g++ installed, sorry. But ... after having corrected this ... the package still doesn't build: ... kz-mozlauncher.cpp:69: error: prototype for 'nsresult KzContentHandler::Show(nsIHelperAppLauncher*, nsISupports*, PRBool)' does not match any in class 'KzContentHandler' kz-mozlauncher.h:57: error: candidate is: virtual nsresult KzContentHandler::Show(nsIHelperAppLauncher*, nsISupports*, PRUint32) /usr/include/firefox-1.5.0.9/xpcom/nsCOMPtr.h: In instantiation of 'nsDerivedSafe': kz-mozlauncher.cpp:81: instantiated from here -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 05:17:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 00:17:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219986] Review Request: xfce4-smartbookmark-plugin - Smart bookmarks for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612220517.kBM5HXI8022709@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-smartbookmark-plugin - Smart bookmarks for the Xfce panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219986 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-22 00:17 EST ------- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPL) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 284e26595637dd2e900b75534372496b xfce4-smartbookmark-plugin-0.4.2.tar.gz 284e26595637dd2e900b75534372496b xfce4-smartbookmark-plugin-0.4.2.tar.gz.1 OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. See below - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. See below - final provides and requires are sane: SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. Whats with the commented line in the files section? #%{_libexecdir}/xfce4/panel-plugins/%{name} 2. Your desktop file needs desktop-file-install: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-254ddf07aae20a23ced8cecc219d8f73926e9755 3. This package provides: libsmartbookmark.so Is that correct? Or should that be filtered? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 05:30:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 00:30:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219327] Review Request: kazehakase - Kazehakase browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612220530.kBM5UlYb023309@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kazehakase - Kazehakase browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219327 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-22 00:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > But ... after having corrected this ... the package still doesn't build: Well, again please attach your full build log and config.h on failure rebuild? I have only FC-devel i386 and I can check if this can be rebuild on FC-6 only by mockbuild and only on i386. My mockbuild log on FC-6 i386 is in comment #7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 06:10:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 01:10:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220577] New: Review Request: imp - webmail Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220577 Summary: Review Request: imp - webmail Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at theholbrooks.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/imp.spec SRPM URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/imp-4.1.3-1.src.rpm Description: IMP is the Internet Messaging Program, one of the Horde applications. It provides webmail access to IMAP and POP3 accounts. The Horde Project writes web applications in PHP and releases them under Open Source licenses. For more information (including help with IMP) please visit http://www.horde.org/. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 06:11:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 01:11:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220577] Review Request: imp - webmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612220611.kBM6BeqI025026@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: imp - webmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220577 fedora at theholbrooks.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |189195 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 06:11:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 01:11:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189195] Review Request: horde - php application framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612220611.kBM6BpZD025061@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 fedora at theholbrooks.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |220577 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 06:27:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 01:27:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612220627.kBM6RkJI025879@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-12-22 01:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > * moved config to /etc/prelude instead of /etc/prelude/prelude Well, did you? # rpm -qlp libprelude-0.9.12-1.i386.rpm | grep /etc/prelude /etc/prelude /etc/prelude/prelude /etc/prelude/prelude/default /etc/prelude/prelude/default/client.conf /etc/prelude/prelude/default/global.conf /etc/prelude/prelude/default/idmef-client.conf /etc/prelude/prelude/default/tls.conf /etc/prelude/prelude/profile Further issues: - The perl modules are being installed into site_perl # rpm -qlp libprelude-devel-0.9.12-1.i386.rpm | grep perl5 /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/perllocal.pod /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/Prelude.pm /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/Prelude /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/Prelude/.packlist /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/Prelude/Prelude.bs /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/Prelude/Prelude.so Fedora supplied perl-modules MUST go into vendor_perl (or outside of the perl5/ hierarchy). Installing into site_perl is a no-no. - The perl-module contains files supposed not to be shipped (.packlist, etc.) You might want to check how perl modules are suppose to be packaged in FE. - Package must not own /usr/share/aclocal # rpm -qlp libprelude-devel-0.9.12-1.i386.rpm | grep aclocal /usr/share/aclocal /usr/share/aclocal/libprelude.m4 The FPC has not decided upon yet, but so far the recommendation is to requires packages providing aclocal macros to Requires: automake - I don't understand why the perl-module is part of *-devel. Perl modules normally all are run-time packages. - I'd split the language bindings into separate packages (esp. move the perl module into a separate perl-Prelude package). This would avoid pulling in unnecessary deps in cases users are only interested into one of the language bindings. I am not sufficiently familiar with python, but I presume similar consideration as to the perl bindings also apply to it (Toshio, Ville, f13?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 06:35:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 01:35:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219327] Review Request: kazehakase - Kazehakase browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612220635.kBM6ZqMg026199@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kazehakase - Kazehakase browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219327 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-22 01:35 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=144252) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=144252&action=view) config.h of mockbuild 0.4.3-2 on FC6 i386 I attach config.h created during mockbuild of kazehakase 0.4.3-2 on FC6 i386. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 06:36:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 01:36:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189195] Review Request: horde - php application framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612220636.kBM6aGh4026234@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-12-22 01:36 EST ------- imp-h3 makes no sense for a distro-level package, other than blindly naming it the same as upstream's tarball. 'h3' is merely to designate this branch of imp development is designed to run on horde 3.x instead of 2.x so users don't mess up their dependencies. Since we are distro packagers in this case, we have built-in mechanisms to ensure version dependencies, and don't need to use the package name to further 'enforce' this idea. For now (fedora rawhide) I'll make no mention of imp-h3... we can cross the Obsoletes: bridge if/when imp branches for EPEL. I just opened bug 220577 review for imp, further discussions about imp can take place over there. I started with centos's RPM and heavily updated it to reflect the progress we've made in here so far. Jason, one last imp-related question that does pertain to this package. How far are we interested in isolating these various applications from horde (wrt file paths and URL paths)? By default horde applications plant themselves beneath the horde/ directory, which is also reflected in the URL. Imp, for instance, is found at http://site.com/horde/imp/. My imp RPM reflects this by putting config files in /etc/horde/imp and web files in /usr/share/horde/imp/. How all this pertains to this package is the registry.php file needs to know these relative relationships for everything to work. If we'd like to move these applications to /etc/imp and /usr/share/imp, we need to reflect that in registry.php before this gets approved to avoid having to parse-and-edit with each application later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 06:37:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 01:37:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219327] Review Request: kazehakase - Kazehakase browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612220637.kBM6bOSq026301@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kazehakase - Kazehakase browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219327 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-22 01:37 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=144253) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=144253&action=view) config.log of mockbuild 0.4.3-2 on FC6 i386 Samely, config.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 07:00:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 02:00:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208113] Review Request: freepops - a tool to get html mail through a pop daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612220700.kBM70joJ027087@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freepops - a tool to get html mail through a pop daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208113 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-22 02:00 EST ------- Again ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 07:01:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 02:01:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210287] Review Request: Qt# - A set of qt bindings for mono In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612220701.kBM715fp027118@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Qt# - A set of qt bindings for mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210287 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(paul at all-the- | |johnsons.co.uk) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-22 02:00 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 07:02:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 02:02:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210424] Review Request: fail2ban - scan log files and ban IPs with too many password failures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612220702.kBM72eox027183@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fail2ban - scan log files and ban IPs with too many password failures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210424 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-22 02:02 EST ------- I will wait 2 days before closing this bug as NOTABUG. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 07:53:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 02:53:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220210] Review Request: krename - Powerful batch file renamer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612220753.kBM7rMtI028819@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: krename - Powerful batch file renamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220210 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-22 02:53 EST ------- Well, for TODO file, some characters are fixed, however there are still some garbage characters which are not correctly seen by "less" command. I cannot figure out in what coding these characters are encoded.... Maybe it may be better that we leave TODO file as it is. Other things are okay. --------------------------------------------------------- This package (krename) is APPROVED by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 08:21:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 03:21:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214087] Review Request: libextractor -- Simple library for keyword extraction In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612220821.kBM8LuEc029944@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libextractor -- Simple library for keyword extraction https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214087 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-22 03:21 EST ------- Well, (In reply to comment #8) > > * For main package: > > ---------------------------------- > > Requires: plugin(%name) > > ---------------------------------- > > What I meant was main package (libextract) should require at least > > base plugin package (libextract-plugins-base). > I do not think so: > > 1. libextract works without plugins too. But because output is very > limited in this case, you can say that plugins are highly recommended > (*not* required) > > 2. libextract does not require the -plugins-base plugins but works > e.g. with the thumbnail plugin when e.g. a collection of images > shall be indexed > > Therefore, I use > Requires: plugin(%name) > > which satisfies 1. and allows users to install only the really needed > plugins (2.). My biggest worry is that when libextractor requires plugin(libextractor), I cannot tell in advance which package this Requires actually pulls to satisfy this dependency because plugin(libextractor) is provided more than one package. ... For me, this always pulls a same package: ----------------------------------------------------- [root at localhost i386]# yum --disablerepo=\*debug\* --disablerepo=\*dries\* --disablerepo=\*freshrpms\* install libextractor Loading "installonlyn" plugin Setting up Install Process Setting up repositories Reading repository metadata in from local files Parsing package install arguments Resolving Dependencies --> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait. ---> Package libextractor.i386 0:0.5.16-2.fc7 set to be updated --> Running transaction check --> Processing Dependency: plugin(libextractor) for package: libextractor --> Restarting Dependency Resolution with new changes. --> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait. ---> Package libextractor-plugins-pdf.i386 0:0.5.16-2.fc7 set to be updated --> Running transaction check Dependencies Resolved ============================================================================= Package Arch Version Repository Size ============================================================================= Installing: libextractor i386 0.5.16-2.fc7 LOCAL 70 k Installing for dependencies: libextractor-plugins-pdf i386 0.5.16-2.fc7 LOCAL 131 k Transaction Summary ============================================================================= Install 2 Package(s) Update 0 Package(s) Remove 0 Package(s) Total download size: 201 k Is this ok [y/N]: N Exiting on user Command Complete! ----------------------------------------------------- however, * I am not sure if yum always pulls -pdf package for everyone * and I am not sure if pulling -pdf package is what you expect if yum always pulls -pdf package. If there is no "best" idea as of what plugins main package should require for a minimal usage, you may want to remove plugin requirement as before. My idea is requiring -plugins-base package is convenient for libextractor users. How do you think? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 08:30:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 03:30:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219962] Review Request: crystal-clear - Crystal Clear KDE Icon set In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612220830.kBM8U68b030429@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crystal-clear - Crystal Clear KDE Icon set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219962 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-12-22 03:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Quick update > Included tarball and upstream tarball md5sum matches > adb7962b585c8ad12adc3b82246edb35 CrystalClear.tar.gz > > According to http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=389499, you also > need to replace firefox.png icon or remove it while installing. > Thanks for giving this link Chitlesh. I've asked in the FE mailing list to see what they think of it, since I've once read that its only trademarks by the authors, however this is an icon set. The situation might be different. > I have one question, how to check that a given individual icon is LGPL/GPL or > non-LPGL. Do you know about this? > Also where is LGPL written? I mean no license text is added in RPM > see the commented link below the url: http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=25668 > Also, > URL: http://linuxcult.com/node/10 is not working. > Ok, I'll use http://www.everaldo.com/crystal.html as URL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 10:07:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 05:07:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218176] Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612221007.kBMA7bD4008539@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gchempaint - A 2D chemical formulae drawing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218176 belegdol at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 10:47:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 05:47:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612221047.kBMAlSWQ012128@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 ------- Additional Comments From tscherf at redhat.com 2006-12-22 05:47 EST ------- ok, here we go: * config is _now_ in /etc/prelude * perl-modules are now in vendor_perl instead of site_perl * unnecessary files were deleted * package does not own /usr/share/aclocal anymore * automake is a new Requirement for libprelude-devel * language bindings are in separated packages now sponsors? new package is here: http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/libprelude-0.9.12-2.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/libprelude.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 11:07:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 06:07:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 203864] Review Request: tripwire - IDS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612221107.kBMB7qYQ014364@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tripwire - IDS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203864 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-12-22 06:07 EST ------- Thank you, too. Good work. Remember to close this as RESOLVED NEXTRELEASE when it builds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 12:04:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 07:04:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214087] Review Request: libextractor -- Simple library for keyword extraction In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612221204.kBMC4HC0016669@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libextractor -- Simple library for keyword extraction https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214087 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-12-22 07:04 EST ------- * I think, it is a bug in yum. It should fail on such ambiguities instead of using the short-name-wins method * I see the following two solutions: 1. abuse yum's (mis)behavior and add a | Provides: plugin(%name) to 'libextractor-plugins' package. This will pull in all available plugins (because 'libextractor-plugins' is the shortest package name and wins therefore). This will not address problems with smart or apt. 2. remove the 'Requires: plugin(%name)' accordingly your suggestion and add a README.fedora which explains that user has to install additional plugin packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 12:12:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 07:12:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220217] Review Request: perl-Test-Spelling - Check for spelling errors in POD files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612221212.kBMCCNLt017243@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Spelling - Check for spelling errors in POD files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220217 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-12-22 07:12 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Package imported and built for FC-5, FC-6, and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 12:12:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 07:12:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220218] Review Request: perl-Module-Find - Find and use installed modules in a (sub)category In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612221212.kBMCClQU017287@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Find - Find and use installed modules in a (sub)category https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220218 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-12-22 07:12 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Package imported and built for FC-5, FC-6, and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 12:15:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 07:15:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219931] Review Request: perl-Net-GPSD - Provides an object client interface to the gpsd server daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612221215.kBMCFGl7017424@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-GPSD - Provides an object client interface to the gpsd server daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219931 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-12-22 07:15 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Package imported and built for FC-5, FC-6, and devel (with the typo corrected). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 13:14:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 08:14:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219986] Review Request: xfce4-smartbookmark-plugin - Smart bookmarks for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612221314.kBMDEnOM019616@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-smartbookmark-plugin - Smart bookmarks for the Xfce panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219986 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-12-22 08:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Issues: > > 1. Whats with the commented line in the files section? > #%{_libexecdir}/xfce4/panel-plugins/%{name} This is the new location of xfce4-panel plugins. Hopefully with the next version libsmarbookmark.so will be moved from %{_libdir}/xfce4/panel-plugins to %{_libexecdir}/xfce4/panel-plugins. When all panel plugins are _fully_ ported to the new panel plugin API you can drop %{_libdir}/xfce4/panel-plugins from you xfce4-panel package. > 2. Your desktop file needs desktop-file-install: Really? I always thought this was only for applications that show up in the main menu. This desktop file only appears in the "Add Items to the Panel" dialog. I think in this case there's not need to install the file with desktop-file-install, because we don't need to modify it (--add-category, --vendor etc.). Think of your xfce-utils package, which installs xfce4.desktop in /usr/share/xsessions or of all the files installed under /etc/xdg/autostart by xfce4-session and others. None of these packages uses desktop-file-install. > 3. This package provides: > libsmartbookmark.so > Is that correct? Or should that be filtered? IMO it is correct, but useless. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 13:16:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 08:16:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214087] Review Request: libextractor -- Simple library for keyword extraction In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612221316.kBMDG88F019707@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libextractor -- Simple library for keyword extraction https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214087 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-22 08:16 EST ------- I think the latter (No.2) of your suggestion is better if you feel no reluctance to write README.fedora . Pulling all plugins is not preferable if this package can be used without plugins IMO. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 13:24:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 08:24:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219981] Review Request: xfce4-xfapplet-plugin - A plugin to use gnome-panel based applets inside the Xfce4 one In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612221324.kBMDOCHW020291@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-xfapplet-plugin - A plugin to use gnome-panel based applets inside the Xfce4 one https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219981 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-12-22 08:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Issues: > > 1. The summary seems a bit odd to me: > "A plugin to use gnome-panel based applets inside the Xfce4 one" > How about: > "A plugin to use gnome-panel based applets inside the Xfce4 panel" Thanks, will change that. As I'm not a native english speaker, I wouldn't have recognized this. > 2. Your desktop file needs desktop-file-install: As I said in Bug #219986 Comment #3 I don't think so. Quoting from the guidelines: "This is mostly for the sake of menu-editing (which bases off of .desktop file/path names)." ... but nothing in the "Add Items to the Panel" dialog can be edited. BTW: Is the above sentence from the guidelines correct? "bases OFF OF .desktop file" sounds strange to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 14:40:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 09:40:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219986] Review Request: xfce4-smartbookmark-plugin - Smart bookmarks for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612221440.kBMEewhK025373@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-smartbookmark-plugin - Smart bookmarks for the Xfce panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219986 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-12-22 09:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > > 3. This package provides: > > libsmartbookmark.so > > Is that correct? Or should that be filtered? > > IMO it is correct, but useless. I think that it is incorrect, but harmless. And not worth taking care of it manually in fedora, it should be handled * upstream, by not providing the useless soname (which certainly means changing libtool) * at the rpm level, by automatically adding sonames only for sonames in %_libdir and directories searched for by ldd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 14:59:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 09:59:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219986] Review Request: xfce4-smartbookmark-plugin - Smart bookmarks for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612221459.kBMExEVE026323@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-smartbookmark-plugin - Smart bookmarks for the Xfce panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219986 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-12-22 09:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > I think that it is incorrect, but harmless. And not worth taking care > of it manually in fedora, it should be handled > * upstream, by not providing the useless soname (which certainly means > changing libtool) > * at the rpm level, by automatically adding sonames only for sonames > in %_libdir and directories searched for by ldd I can certainly talk to upstream about the first, but the second needs to be fixed in rpm. As we all know rpm is about to change a lot in the near future, so I don't think that this will be fixed soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 15:19:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 10:19:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 203864] Review Request: tripwire - IDS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612221519.kBMFJEKl027988@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tripwire - IDS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203864 fedora at theholbrooks.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-12-22 10:19 EST ------- Build successfully in devel and FC6 branch requested -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 16:16:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 11:16:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218020] Review Request: postgrey - Postfix Greylisting Policy Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612221616.kBMGGiYq001619@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgrey - Postfix Greylisting Policy Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218020 tmz at pobox.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tmz at pobox.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tmz at pobox.com 2006-12-22 11:16 EST ------- I'll review this Matthias. (Fair warning: it's my first review, so if anyone else wants to jump in and make sure it's done right, it will be welcome.) * rpmlint runs without errors on the srpm (just a few warnings) $ rpmlint postgrey-1.27-3.src.rpm W: postgrey strange-permission postgrey.init 0755 W: postgrey setup-not-quiet These warnings are minor and easily silenced with the addition of -q to %setup and chmod'ing postgrey.init. Neither of them are blockers as far as I know. Anyone know differently? * Adheres to naming guidelines * Specfile name matches package name * Meets the packaging guidelines The perl(IO::Multiplex) Requires seems unneeded. RPM automatically picks up perl(Net::Server::Multiplex) which is provided by the perl-Net-Server package and perl-Net-Server requires perl-IO-Multiplex. * License meets open-source requirements * License included in %doc * License field matches the upstream license * Specfile is in American English * Specfile is legible * Source matches upstream (md5sum: df3a8b4a0c6ab7e8e5bb5be0de096c47) * Builds, installs, and works on FC6, i386 * Owns directories that it creates * Does not own files or dirs of other packages * File list has no duplicates * File perms are generally sane Why is /var/spool/postfix/postgrey 0751? I don't see anything in the postgrey docs about the need to have such tight permissions on the dbdir. Can you enlighten me? * Specfile includes %clean section * Macros used consistently * Package contains code or permissable content * Builds in mock against fedora-{5,6,development}-i386-core targets * Scriplets are sane * Package functions correctly (tested on FC6) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 16:51:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 11:51:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219986] Review Request: xfce4-smartbookmark-plugin - Smart bookmarks for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612221651.kBMGp5Gt005216@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-smartbookmark-plugin - Smart bookmarks for the Xfce panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219986 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-22 11:51 EST ------- ok, on item 1, perhaps a comment above that line explaining that the plugin will move there someday? on item 2, sorry about that. I saw .desktop and didn't look as closely as I should have. I agree that desktop-file-install is unneeded. on item 3, yeah, mentioning it to upstream would probibly be a good idea. I wonder if the new rpm.org has a 'wishlist' page we could add that idea to? I don't see any further issues... so this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 16:54:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 11:54:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219981] Review Request: xfce4-xfapplet-plugin - A plugin to use gnome-panel based applets inside the Xfce4 one In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612221654.kBMGsdYN005743@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-xfapplet-plugin - A plugin to use gnome-panel based applets inside the Xfce4 one https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219981 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-22 11:54 EST ------- Yeah, desktop-file-install isn't needed here. Sorry about that. Oddly, that sentence is ok. English is a weird language. ;) I don't see any further blockers here, so this package is APPPROVED. You can fix the summary on import. Don't forget to close this NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 16:56:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 11:56:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 192313] Review Request: koan In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612221656.kBMGujpM006008@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: koan https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192313 dlutter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 16:57:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 11:57:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 192313] Review Request: koan In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612221657.kBMGvrQk006168@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: koan https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192313 ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2006-12-22 11:57 EST ------- Oops .. sorry; totally slipped through teh cracks. I did ACCEPT the package; changed blocker to FE-ACCEPT now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 17:06:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 12:06:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220630] New: Review Request: qpidc - C++ implementation of AMQP messaging spec from Apache Qpid. Upstream for Red Hat Messaging. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220630 Summary: Review Request: qpidc - C++ implementation of AMQP messaging spec from Apache Qpid. Upstream for Red Hat Messaging. Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: aconway at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.apache.org/dist/incubator/qpid/M1-incubating/cpp/qpidc.spec SRPM URL: http://people.apache.org/dist/incubator/qpid/M1-incubating/cpp/qpidc-0.1-1.src.rpm Description: First time submitter, need a sponsor. Background: C++ implementation of the AMQP messaging specification (http://amqp.org/) from Apache Qpid project (http://incubator.apache.org/qpid). This is the upstream for the Red Hat Messaging project hosted at https://etp.108.redhat.com. I will submit an RPM for 108 stuff shortly. %description Run-time libraries for AMQP client applications developed using Qpid C++. Clients exchange messages with an AMQP message broker using the AMQP protocol. %description devel Libraries, header files and documentation for developing AMQP clients in C++ using Qpid. Qpid implements the AMQP messaging specification. %description -n qpidd A message broker daemon that receives stores and routes messages using the open AMQP messaging protocol. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 17:21:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 12:21:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219986] Review Request: xfce4-smartbookmark-plugin - Smart bookmarks for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612221721.kBMHLaR2008164@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-smartbookmark-plugin - Smart bookmarks for the Xfce panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219986 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-12-22 12:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > ok, on item 1, perhaps a comment above that line explaining that the plugin will > move there someday? Ok, will do after import. > I wonder if the new rpm.org has a 'wishlist' page we could add that idea to? rpm.org is under construction ATM, they don't have a whishlist nor bugzilla. On http://wiki.rpm.org/ReportingBugs Jesse suggests to file bugs in Fedora's bugzilla for now. Thanks for the review, Kevin! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 17:29:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 12:29:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219986] Review Request: xfce4-smartbookmark-plugin - Smart bookmarks for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612221729.kBMHTQam008996@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-smartbookmark-plugin - Smart bookmarks for the Xfce panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219986 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-12-22 12:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > I can certainly talk to upstream about the first, I don't think it is worth it, since it is libtool which drives the link, and (to my knowledge) there is no way to prevent libtool to add a soname. It is also possible that I am wrong and that a soname is needed even if it has no practical use. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 17:29:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 12:29:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220630] Review Request: qpidc - C++ implementation of AMQP messaging spec from Apache Qpid. Upstream for Red Hat Messaging. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612221729.kBMHTX9L009011@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qpidc - C++ implementation of AMQP messaging spec from Apache Qpid. Upstream for Red Hat Messaging. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220630 dlutter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 17:36:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 12:36:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207846] Review Request: perl-Finance-YahooQuote - Perl interface to get stock quotes from Yahoo! Finance In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612221736.kBMHa6Gu009634@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Finance-YahooQuote - Perl interface to get stock quotes from Yahoo! Finance Alias: finance-YahooQuote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207846 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-12-22 12:36 EST ------- This package is currently approved for FC7+ only. mod_perl-2.0.3-3 must be built for FC6/FC5 before branching to those releases. See bug #197841 for more information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 17:46:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 12:46:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220635] New: Review Request: livecd-tools - Tools for creating Live CD's Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220635 Summary: Review Request: livecd-tools - Tools for creating Live CD's Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: davidz at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/davidz/livecd/spec/livecd-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/davidz/livecd/src/livecd-tools-001-1.src.rpm Description: Tools for generating live CD's on Fedora based systems including derived distributions such as RHEL, CentOS and others. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraLiveCD for more details. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 17:53:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 12:53:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220637] New: Review Request: fedora-livecd - This package defines the contents of Fedora live CD's Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220637 Summary: Review Request: fedora-livecd - This package defines the contents of Fedora live CD's Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: davidz at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/davidz/livecd/spec/fedora-livecd.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/davidz/livecd/src/fedora-livecd-6-1.src.rpm Description: This package defines the contents of Fedora live CD's. The three RPM's from this SRPM is used by the livecd-tools package to create Fedora specific live CD's. See bug 220635 for livecd-tools review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 20:54:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 15:54:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 198836] Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612222054.kBMKsCao022581@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198836 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |163779 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-12-22 15:53 EST ------- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 21:03:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 16:03:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189195] Review Request: horde - php application framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612222103.kBML3J6I022997@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-12-22 16:03 EST ------- I urge caution in trying to add symbols that might satisfy whatever CentOS is doing; this package won't cleanly replace that one since it puts the config files under /usr/share/horde. We're very nearly done here; I just need to run through my checklist and double-check everything. Unfortunately holiday issues keep intruding; I really hope to have it done today. Regarding how the various consumers of the Horde infrastructure store their files, I think it's rather expected that, say, IMP files show up under the Horde directory and changing that would break various user expectations. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 21:04:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 16:04:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220577] Review Request: imp - webmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612222104.kBML42ZN023082@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: imp - webmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220577 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 21:48:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 16:48:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189195] Review Request: horde - php application framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612222148.kBMLmKw3025247@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-12-22 16:48 EST ------- Don't push yourself; it's Christmas! I'll be in and out until Tuesday anyway, so no need to rush. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 21:53:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 16:53:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218600] Review Request: resapplet - Resolution Switching Applet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612222153.kBMLrxgY025532@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: resapplet - Resolution Switching Applet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218600 rvokal at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 22:57:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 17:57:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220637] Review Request: fedora-livecd - This package defines the contents of Fedora live CD's In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612222257.kBMMvRRC028030@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-livecd - This package defines the contents of Fedora live CD's https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220637 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-12-22 17:57 EST ------- I note that all three packages generated from this spec own /etc/livecd, and ownership of a single directory by multiple packages is generally something to be avoided. Since there's a clear dependency chain (fedora-livecd is required by the two subpackages), the base package should probably own it and the others shouldn't. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 22:57:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 17:57:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219986] Review Request: xfce4-smartbookmark-plugin - Smart bookmarks for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612222257.kBMMvhMQ028076@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-smartbookmark-plugin - Smart bookmarks for the Xfce panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219986 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-12-22 17:57 EST ------- Build on target fedora-development-extras succeeded. Build logs may be found at http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/24429-xfce4-smartbookmark-plugin-0.4.2-1.fc7/ Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 23:09:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 18:09:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219981] Review Request: xfce4-xfapplet-plugin - A plugin to use gnome-panel based applets inside the Xfce4 one In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612222309.kBMN9F0l028441@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-xfapplet-plugin - A plugin to use gnome-panel based applets inside the Xfce4 one https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219981 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-12-22 18:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Oddly, that sentence is ok. English is a weird language. ;) No, it's not _that_ weird, German is even worse for non native speakers I think. :) Glad to have English spell-checking in Firefox 2.0 now. > You can fix the summary on import. Done. > Don't forget to close this NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported and built. Done. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 23:23:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 18:23:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220635] Review Request: livecd-tools - Tools for creating Live CD's In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612222323.kBMNNqr2029062@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: livecd-tools - Tools for creating Live CD's https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220635 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-12-22 18:23 EST ------- #1: Rpmlint's output isn't clean chitlesh(SPECS)[0]$rpmlint /home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/livecd-tools-001-1.i386.rpm E: livecd-tools statically-linked-binary /usr/lib/livecd-creator/run-init chitlesh(SPECS)[0]$rpmlint /home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/livecd-tools-debuginfo-001-1.i386.rpm E: livecd-tools-debuginfo empty-debuginfo-package #2: Parallel build is missing #3: BuildRoot tag should be fixed according to FE guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 23:32:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 18:32:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218256] Review Request: audacious-itouch - iTouch keyboard control plugin for the Audacious media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612222332.kBMNWg92029695@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-itouch - iTouch keyboard control plugin for the Audacious media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218256 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: - |Audacious media player BugsThisDependsOn| |163776 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 22 23:45:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 18:45:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218256] Review Request: audacious-itouch - iTouch keyboard control plugin for the Audacious media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612222345.kBMNjCOx030606@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-itouch - iTouch keyboard control plugin for the Audacious media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218256 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|163776 | OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 23 00:46:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 19:46:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218217] Review Request: telepathy-stream-engine - Telepathy client to handle media streaming In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612230046.kBN0k1gn001775@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-stream-engine - Telepathy client to handle media streaming https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218217 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2006-12-22 19:45 EST ------- yes it looks like the piedmont.homelinux.org server is down again. Brian email me the spec and src.rpm and I can host them for you. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 23 00:55:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 19:55:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189188] Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612230055.kBN0t3QG002202@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189188 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-12-22 19:54 EST ------- Imported, branches (finally) created, and builds requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 23 01:28:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 20:28:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218217] Review Request: telepathy-stream-engine - Telepathy client to handle media streaming In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612230128.kBN1SZOJ004925@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-stream-engine - Telepathy client to handle media streaming https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218217 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2006-12-22 20:28 EST ------- Here you go, these urls are live. http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/telepathy-stream-engine/telepathy-stream-engine-0.3.16-1.src.rpm http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/telepathy-stream-engine/telepathy-stream-engine.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 23 01:37:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 20:37:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220683] New: Review Request: rubygems - the Ruby standard for packaging ruby libraries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220683 Summary: Review Request: rubygems - the Ruby standard for packaging ruby libraries Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dlutter at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/spec/rubygems.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/SRPMS/rubygems-0.9.0-1.src.rpm Description: RubyGems is the Ruby standard for publishing and managing third party libraries. NOTE: While the guidelines currently don't allow packaging of ruby gems, this package is *not* a gem, it contains the libraries/utilities needed to deal with gems, and is packaged like any other ruby package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 23 01:43:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 20:43:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207685] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-farsight - GStreamer plug-ins for farsight protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612230143.kBN1hQiK006143@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-farsight - GStreamer plug-ins for farsight protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207685 jspaleta at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jspaleta at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |63778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 23 02:09:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 21:09:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220185] Review Request: kvm - Kernel Based Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612230209.kBN291GD008440@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kvm - Kernel Based Virtual Machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220185 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 23 02:19:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 21:19:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207685] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-farsight - GStreamer plug-ins for farsight protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612230219.kBN2JjuB009249@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-farsight - GStreamer plug-ins for farsight protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207685 jspaleta at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|63778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2006-12-22 21:19 EST ------- GOOD: *Built in mock on i386 against fedora-development *rpmlint runs cleanly against it *follows naming guidelines for addon packages *licnese is GPL and spec tag matches *COPYING file in %doc *spec in US/english and legible *Include source matches upstream md5sum 77c92554c2bd57ad1b426e5ba50eb9a8 gst-plugins-farsight-0.10.2.tar.gz *buildrequires look good *no locales to worry about *only gstreamer plugin so's no shared libs in default linker path *not relocatable *does not create any unowned directories. Package requires gstreamer-plugins-base which in turns requires gstreamer which owns /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10 *no duplicates in %files *file permissions seem fine *install and clean sections look good *macro use is consistent *docs is good *no -devel subpackage *la files removed in install section *not a gui, no desktop file needed *appears to meet all packaging guidelines One small thing I'd like to see changed. Can you rename the macro at from majorminor to gst_majorminor? I was slightly confused initially because its the same numerical value as the package version majorminor. Its clear now its a macro to define the gstreamer majorminor, but it would be helpful for clarity to change the name to gst_majorminor. This is not a blocker however, but it may help save a little time if someone has to pick this package up from you later. This package is APPROVED for entry into the development tree. I haven't tested this yet, I'm be building stream-engine next so I can test this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 23 02:27:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 21:27:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218217] Review Request: telepathy-stream-engine - Telepathy client to handle media streaming In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612230227.kBN2RcxW009867@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-stream-engine - Telepathy client to handle media streaming https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218217 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2006-12-22 21:27 EST ------- Uhm looks like they bumped up to 0.3.18 in the meantime. Would you like me to spin up an updated srpm and spec for 0.3.18 and place them on the website for you? -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 23 03:41:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 22:41:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216105] Review Request: python-twisted-web - Twisted web server, programmable in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612230341.kBN3fOqb013946@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-web - Twisted web server, programmable in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216105 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2006-12-22 22:41 EST ------- thanks to python 2.5 now in the development tree you'll need a new Buildrequires: python-devel You'll find the updated srpm and spec which builds against current fedora-development here: http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/python-twisted-web/python-twisted-web-0.6.0-4.src.rpm http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/python-twisted-web/python-twisted-web.spec I've also included the LICENSE and NEWS fileas as %doc and updated the URL tag as suggested in the review comment -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 23 03:50:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 22:50:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218217] Review Request: telepathy-stream-engine - Telepathy client to handle media streaming In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612230350.kBN3oWTE014510@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-stream-engine - Telepathy client to handle media streaming https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218217 jspaleta at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jspaleta at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2006-12-22 22:50 EST ------- URL updated http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/telepathy-stream-engine/telepathy-stream-engine-0.3.18-1.src.rpm I will be starting the formal review of 0.3.18 srpm tonite as time allows. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 23 04:32:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 23:32:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218217] Review Request: telepathy-stream-engine - Telepathy client to handle media streaming In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612230432.kBN4WSjf018066@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-stream-engine - Telepathy client to handle media streaming https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218217 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2006-12-22 23:32 EST ------- It looks good. Here is the formal review. I'm going to start a clock on this, and if noone brings up any blockers I'll approve tomorrow evening. -jef GOOD: *Built in mock on i386 against fedora-development *rpmlint runs cleanly against it *follows naming guidelines *licnese is LGPL and spec tag matches *COPYING file in %doc *spec in US/english and legible *Include source matches upstream md5sum 52c0b48905f11cac71df1f8560c8f4d7 telepathy-stream-engine-0.3.18.tar.gz *buildrequires look good *no locales to worry about *no shared libraries *not relocatable *does not create any unowned directories. Package requires libdbus-1.so.3 which is provided by dbus which owns %{_datadir}/dbus-1/services/ *no duplicates in %files *file permissions seem fine *install and clean sections look good *macro use is consistent *docs is good *no -devel subpackage *no la files *not a gui, no desktop file needed *appears to meet all packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 23 05:27:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 00:27:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218217] Review Request: telepathy-stream-engine - Telepathy client to handle media streaming In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612230527.kBN5ReiH021842@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-stream-engine - Telepathy client to handle media streaming https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218217 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-23 00:27 EST ------- Well, * please check if the following is what you expect. --------------------------------------------------- checking for pic2plot... no checking for gs... no checking for convert... no configure: WARNING: Imagemagick not found, drawing sequence diagrams will be disabled. configure: WARNING: Ghostscript not found, drawing sequence diagrams will be disabled. configure: WARNING: GNU plotutils not found, drawing sequence diagrams will be disabled. ---------------------------------------------------- Note: all of them are available in Fedora Core/Extras and a people who has already installed them beforehand may create different binary rpm of telepathy-stream-engine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 23 06:16:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 01:16:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218217] Review Request: telepathy-stream-engine - Telepathy client to handle media streaming In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612230616.kBN6G6ea023389@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-stream-engine - Telepathy client to handle media streaming https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218217 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-12-23 01:16 EST ------- Yes, this was on purpose since the sequence diagrams generation support isn't complete yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 23 07:29:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 02:29:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218217] Review Request: telepathy-stream-engine - Telepathy client to handle media streaming In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612230729.kBN7TUWP025231@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-stream-engine - Telepathy client to handle media streaming https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218217 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-23 02:29 EST ------- Okay, then this package can be approved IMO. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 23 09:42:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 04:42:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612230942.kBN9g1oN030623@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-23 04:41 EST ------- Well, would you provide both spec/srpm of this package for convenience? Also, each you modify spec/srpm, you must change (increment) release number because only changing srpm/spec without release number confuses people who check it. Only from I viewed the spec file in comment #25 (I have not tried to rebuild this, please provide srpm), * Don't write redundant Requires which are required automatically by libraries' dependencies. * Don't write redundant BuildRequires which are included in minimal. Check: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/FullExceptionList * Please explain why -devel package should include static archives Check "Exclusion of Static Libraries" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines -------------------------------------------- %{_libdir}/%{name}/*.a -------------------------------------------- * -------------------------------------------- %{_bindir}/mpanalyse.py %exclude %{_bindir}/mpanalyse.pyo %exclude %{_bindir}/mpanalyse.pyc -------------------------------------------- Would you consider to rename this python script to mpanalyse? Generally, putting a script named *.py is regarded to be avioded. Unnecessary Byte compilation of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python * Requires: %{name} = %{version} Why not require release dependency? ----------------------------------------------------------- - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} ----------------------------------------------------------- from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines * %config %{_sysconfdir}/aqsisrc Please explain why this is not marked as %config(noreplace). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 23 13:00:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 08:00:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612231300.kBND0br9007268@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 ------- Additional Comments From cgtobi at gmail.com 2006-12-23 08:00 EST ------- I fixed the release number chaos and uploaded the new spec ans srpm. http://www.cgtobi.de/aqsis/aqsis.fedora.spec http://www.cgtobi.de/aqsis/aqsis-1.2.0-0.3.alpha1.src.rpm I also cleaned up the BuildRequires and Requires and fixed the dependency issue. >> Please explain why -devel package should include static archives We want to deliver two useful developer libraries, libri2rib, and libslxargs. Both rely on libaqsistypes, if we deliver them both with libaqsistypes embedded, there will be clashes if anyone wants to use both of them, which means we'll be delivering a whole load more libraries, and to compile a simple program that relies on libri2rib would mean linking with libri2rib, and libaqsistypes, which is messy. >> Would you consider to rename this python script to mpanalyse? I could do it, but I'd prefere to leave it a .py because it would be in line with other platforms we support and it showes the user that it is a python script. >> Please explain why this is not marked as %config(noreplace). We discussed that and came to the conclusion that it's more important to provide a working version rather keeping the users modifications. This will definitly change in future releases. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 23 16:31:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 11:31:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219327] Review Request: kazehakase - Kazehakase browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612231631.kBNGVIf8012819@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kazehakase - Kazehakase browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219327 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-23 11:31 EST ------- Umm, I checked firefox-devel-1.5.0.9-1.fc6, however, it seems that this should succeed in rebuilding. /usr/include/firefox-1.5.0.9/exthandler/nsIHelperAppLauncherDialog.h expects that the last argument of KzContentHandler::Show should be PRUint32 --------------------------------------------------- 65 NS_IMETHOD Show(nsIHelperAppLauncher *aLauncher, nsISupports *aContext, PRUint32 aReason) = 0; --------------------------------------------------- Then kazehakase-0.4.3/src/mozilla/kz-mozlauncher.cpp says: --------------------------------------------------- 66 NS_IMETHODIMP KzContentHandler::Show(nsIHelperAppLauncher *aLauncher, 67 nsISupports *aContext, 68 #ifdef MOZ_NSIHELPERAPPLAUNCHERDIALOG_NSPRBOOL_ 69 PRBool aForced) 70 #else 71 PRUint32 aForced) 72 #endif --------------------------------------------------- this means that MOZ_NSIHELPERAPPLAUNCHERDIALOG_NSPRBOOL_ should be undefined. When rebuilding my srpm, this value is correctly undefined (as written in spec file), so at least no error should occur at this point.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 23 16:36:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 11:36:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207685] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-farsight - GStreamer plug-ins for farsight protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612231636.kBNGag82012919@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-farsight - GStreamer plug-ins for farsight protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207685 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-12-23 11:36 EST ------- Jef, thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 23 16:39:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 11:39:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218020] Review Request: postgrey - Postfix Greylisting Policy Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612231639.kBNGdjGx013013@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgrey - Postfix Greylisting Policy Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218020 ------- Additional Comments From tmz at pobox.com 2006-12-23 11:39 EST ------- Two other minor points that were brought up in the other postgrey review by Michael Fleming: 1) The preferred BuildRoot tag is %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) I'm sure there are some folks that would be bothered by this. I'm not, but it can't hurt to follow the guidelines. 2) The empty postgrey_whitelist_clients.local. I noticed this in the rpmlint output and thought it seemed okay to ignore, but perhaps a better solution is to add a comment to the file instead of just creating an empty file. echo "# Local clients that should not be greylisted. See postgrey(8)." \ > %{buildroot}%{confdir}/postgrey_whitelist_clients.local A note on this file in README-rpm might also be warranted. Sorry for not mentioning these things on the first pass. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 23 17:40:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 12:40:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612231740.kBNHewvR014610@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-23 12:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #27) > >> Please explain why -devel package should include static archives > We want to deliver two useful developer libraries, libri2rib, and libslxargs. Well, I rebuilt this, however I cannot understand what you want to do... Build log says that all files used in these archives are included in libaqsis.so.1, so including libaqsis.so in -devel package should be enough. And.... including _static_ archive into _shared_ dynamic library is wrong because rpmlint complains: ---------------------------------------------------- E: aqsis shlib-with-non-pic-code /usr/lib/libaqsis.so.1.2 shlib-with-non-pic-code : The listed shared libraries contain object code that was compiled without -fPIC. All object code in shared libraries should be recompiled separately from the static libraries with the -fPIC option. ---------------------------------------------------- .. You should * compile all files used in libaqsis.so.1.2 with -fPIC. libaqsis.so.1.2 uses compiled objects in static archives without -fPIC used, which is wrong. * After it is modified so as all files used in libaqsis.so.1.2 are compiled with -fPIC, providing static archives should not be necessary as all files are included in libaqsis.so.1.2. > Both rely on libaqsistypes, if > we deliver them both with libaqsistypes embedded, there will > be clashes if anyone wants to use both of > them, This should be fixed when libaqsis compilation is fixed. > >> Would you consider to rename this python script to mpanalyse? > I could do it, but I'd prefere to leave it a .py because > it would be in line with other platforms we support > and it showes the user that it is a python script. IMO that "it showes the user that it is a python script" is not a enough reason. Many (in my environment, almost all) python scripts in /usr/bin has a name without .py suffix. Generally, * Executables used in users directly (which are under normal path) should not have suffix as possible. * If a executable is normally considered to be used from other executables and not to be used directly by user, the executable may have a suffix like .py or .sh, however, generally it should not under normal path and should be under %{_libexecdir}. (For second one, check "Filesystem Layout" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines). IMO, if no special reason exists, the filename should be renamed also on other platforms (however, I don't care about them). ================================================================== And.. aqsis related packages make lots of rpmlint complaint. ------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. E: aqsis shlib-with-non-pic-code /usr/lib/libaqsis.so.1.2 2. W: aqsis conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/aqsisrc 3. E: aqsis invalid-spec-name aqsis.fedora.spec 4. W: aqsis rpm-buildroot-usage %build scons %{?_smp_mflags} destdir=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT \ 5. W: aqsis mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 89, tab: line 6) 6. E: aqsis-data summary-too-long Example content for the open source RenderMan-compliant Aqsis 3D rendering solution 7. W: aqsis-data no-documentation 8. E: aqsis-data non-executable-script /usr/share/aqsis/content/ribs/features/layeredshaders/render.sh 0644 9. E: aqsis-data non-executable-script /usr/share/aqsis/content/ribs/scenes/vase/render.sh 0644 10. E: aqsis-debuginfo script-without-shebang /usr/src/debug/aqsis-1.2.0/build/shadercompiler/slparse/scanner.ll 11. E: aqsis-debuginfo script-without-shebang /usr/src/debug/aqsis-1.2.0/build/texturing/plugins/png2tif/png2tif.c 12. E: aqsis-debuginfo script-without-shebang /usr/src/debug/aqsis-1.2.0/build/displays/d_sdcBMP/d_sdcBMP.cpp 13. E: aqsis-debuginfo script-without-shebang /usr/src/debug/aqsis-1.2.0/build/thirdparty/dbo_plane/implicit.h 14. E: aqsis-debuginfo wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/src/debug/aqsis-1.2.0/build/thirdparty/dbo_plane/implicit.h 15. E: aqsis-debuginfo script-without-shebang /usr/src/debug/aqsis-1.2.0/build/thirdparty/dbo_plane/dbo_plane.c 16. E: aqsis-debuginfo wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/src/debug/aqsis-1.2.0/build/thirdparty/dbo_plane/dbo_plane.c 17. E: aqsis-debuginfo script-without-shebang /usr/src/debug/aqsis-1.2.0/build/aqsistypes/pool.h 18. E: aqsis-debuginfo script-without-shebang /usr/src/debug/aqsis-1.2.0/build/displays/d_exr/dspyhlpr.c 19. E: aqsis-debuginfo script-without-shebang /usr/src/debug/aqsis-1.2.0/build/aqsistypes/noise1234.cpp 20. E: aqsis-debuginfo script-without-shebang /usr/src/debug/aqsis-1.2.0/build/aqsistypes/noise1234.h 21. E: aqsis-debuginfo script-without-shebang /usr/src/debug/aqsis-1.2.0/build/rib/rib2/scanner.ll 22. E: aqsis-devel summary-too-long Development files for the open source RenderMan-compliant Aqsis 3D rendering solution 23. W: aqsis-devel no-documentation ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Well, ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. As said above, /usr/lib/libaqsis.so.1.2 uses object files without -fPIC used on compilation. 2. For now, I leave at it is. 3. The name of spec file must be aqsis.spec 4. Usually using $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in build stage is wrong because this frequently causes wrong results in "real" install. Consider if this description (i.e. using $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) can be moved at %install stage. 5. For indentation, you should use tabs or spaces, not both, for cosmetic issue. 6,22 The "Summary:" must not exceed 79 characters. 7,23 This can be ignored. 8,9 Shell scripts with shebang should have executable permissons. If the shell scripts should not have executable permissions, then shebangs should be removed. 10-21: These usually means: A. source code should not have executable permissions. B. A file with Windows-like end-of-line encodings should be fixed so as to have Unix end-of-line encoding. I have not checked these packages by installing them because I think there is a lot of things to be fixed before doing so.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 23 17:45:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 12:45:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612231745.kBNHjYUc014704@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-23 12:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #28) > (In reply to comment #27) > .. You should > * compile all files used in libaqsis.so.1.2 with -fPIC. libaqsis.so.1.2 > uses compiled objects in static archives without -fPIC used, which > is wrong. Or, you should change all static archives to shared dynamic libraries with -fPIC used correctly, and have libaqsis.so linked against them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 23 17:53:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 12:53:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220703] New: Review Request: libgtksourceviewmm - A C++ wrapper for the gtksourceview widget library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220703 Summary: Review Request: libgtksourceviewmm - A C++ wrapper for the gtksourceview widget library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: splinux25 at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL:http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/libgtksourceviewmm/libgtksourceviewmm.spec SRPM URL: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/libgtksourceviewmm/libgtksourceviewmm-0.2.0-1.src.rpm Description: libgtksourceviewmm is a C++ wrapper for the gtksourceview widget library. It offers all the power of gtksourceview with an interface familiar to c++ developers, including users of the gtkmm library -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 23 18:08:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 13:08:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207846] Review Request: perl-Finance-YahooQuote - Perl interface to get stock quotes from Yahoo! Finance In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612231808.kBNI85ME015323@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Finance-YahooQuote - Perl interface to get stock quotes from Yahoo! Finance Alias: finance-YahooQuote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207846 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-12-23 13:08 EST ------- Imported and branched on FC5 and FC6. (mod_perl while problematic was a non-issue for this.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 23 18:33:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 13:33:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220703] Review Request: libgtksourceviewmm - A C++ wrapper for the gtksourceview widget library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612231833.kBNIXOln015766@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgtksourceviewmm - A C++ wrapper for the gtksourceview widget library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220703 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |libgtksourceviewmm - A C++ |libgtksourceviewmm - A C++ |wrapper for the |wrapper for the |gtksourceview widget library|gtksourceview widget library CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-23 13:33 EST ------- A quick note: * /usr/lib/gtksourceviewmm-1.0 should be in -devel package. * The existence of /usr/lib/pkgconfig/libgtksourceviewmm-1.0.pc and its contents means that -devel package should Require some other packages (pkgconfig + else). Check "Requires" section of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 23 18:37:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 13:37:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220703] Review Request: libgtksourceviewmm - A C++ wrapper for the gtksourceview widget library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612231837.kBNIbxEF015834@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgtksourceviewmm - A C++ wrapper for the gtksourceview widget library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220703 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-23 13:37 EST ------- Oops.. Also: * COPYING must be in main package. I think AUTHORS should also be in main package (and also README?) * ChangeLog, NEWS should be added in -devel package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 23 18:45:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 13:45:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220704] New: Review Request: perl-GPS - Perl interface to a GPS receiver that implements the Garmin protocol Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220704 Summary: Review Request: perl-GPS - Perl interface to a GPS receiver that implements the Garmin protocol Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-GPS.spec SRPM URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-GPS-0.15-1.src.rpm Description: This is a perl interface to a GPS receiver that implements the Garmin protocol. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 23 18:51:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 13:51:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 186452] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612231851.kBNIp3W2016126@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186452 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-12-23 13:51 EST ------- Some "progress" here: http://cachalot.mine.nu/6/SRPMS/kdebluetooth.spec http://cachalot.mine.nu/6/SRPMS/kdebluetooth-1.0-0.15.beta2.cmn6.src.rpm I can't get a PIN dialog, nor do I know how that stuff is supposed to work with bluez 3.x (FC6) which I hear no longer supports pin helpers. SELinux is disabled, I suppose kbluepin is never executed, "bluez-pin --dbus" doesn't seem to do anything either. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 23 19:14:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 14:14:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219036] Review Request: perl-Roman - Roman module from CPAN In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612231914.kBNJEox1016699@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Roman - Roman module from CPAN https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219036 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-12-23 14:14 EST ------- ping! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 23 19:14:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 14:14:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220703] Review Request: libgtksourceviewmm - A C++ wrapper for the gtksourceview widget library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612231914.kBNJEpiA016710@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgtksourceviewmm - A C++ wrapper for the gtksourceview widget library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220703 ------- Additional Comments From splinux25 at gmail.com 2006-12-23 14:14 EST ------- New Spec file : http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/libgtksourceviewmm/libgtksourceviewmm.spec New SRPM file : http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/libgtksourceviewmm/libgtksourceviewmm-0.2.0-2.src.rpm - add libdir/gtksourceviewmm-1.0 in devel package - add Changelog and NEWS in devel package - add gtkmm24-devel and gtksourceview-devel in devel package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 23 19:26:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 14:26:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220706] New: Review Request: linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm - with wacomcpl tool, man page Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220706 Summary: Review Request: linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm - with wacomcpl tool, man page Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: marcel at meverhagen.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://meverhagen.nl/fc6/linuxwacom.spec SRPM URL: http://meverhagen.nl/fc6/linuxwacom-devel-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm Debug URL: http://meverhagen.nl/fc6/linuxwacom-debuginfo-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm RPM URL: http://meverhagen.nl/fc6/linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm Description: This is my first rpm, it is lunixwacom 0.7.6 wich updates lunixwacom 0.7.4 It includes the wacomcpl (wacomcpl-exec) tool, wich is used for adjusting the pressure of the stylus and the buttons on the drawing tablet. And a manpage for the xorg.conf editing: man wacom -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 23 19:28:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 14:28:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220707] New: Review Request: linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm - with wacomcpl tool, man page Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220707 Summary: Review Request: linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm - with wacomcpl tool, man page Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: marcel at meverhagen.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://meverhagen.nl/fc6/i386/linuxwacom.spec SRPM URL: http://meverhagen.nl/fc6/i386/linuxwacom-devel-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm Debug URL: http://meverhagen.nl/fc6/i386/linuxwacom-debuginfo-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm RPM URL: http://meverhagen.nl/fc6/i386/linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm Description: This is my first rpm, it is lunixwacom 0.7.6 wich updates lunixwacom 0.7.4 It includes the wacomcpl (wacomcpl-exec) tool, wich is used for adjusting the pressure of the stylus and the buttons on the drawing tablet. And a manpage for the xorg.conf editing: man wacom -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 23 19:34:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 14:34:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220703] Review Request: libgtksourceviewmm - A C++ wrapper for the gtksourceview widget library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612231934.kBNJY0QH017356@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgtksourceviewmm - A C++ wrapper for the gtksourceview widget library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220703 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-23 14:33 EST ------- Well, * I think adding "pkgconfig" to Requires for -devel package is safe for .pc file * I didn't notice it, however, this is licensed under LGPL, not GPL... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 23 19:43:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 14:43:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220707] Review Request: linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm - with wacomcpl tool, man page In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612231943.kBNJhI0R017532@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm - with wacomcpl tool, man page https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220707 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2006-12-23 14:43 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 220706 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 23 19:43:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 14:43:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220706] Review Request: linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm - with wacomcpl tool, man page In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612231943.kBNJhT9H017543@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm - with wacomcpl tool, man page https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220706 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2006-12-23 14:43 EST ------- *** Bug 220707 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 23 19:45:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 14:45:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220706] Review Request: linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm - with wacomcpl tool, man page In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612231945.kBNJjZkr017635@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm - with wacomcpl tool, man page https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220706 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |peter at thecodergeek.com ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2006-12-23 14:45 EST ------- Maybe it's just me, but I get a spinning globe GIF image for each of those URLs with text "orbiting" it. Hotlink protection of some sort, perhaps? Though refreshing the page (hence having my Referrer header that of your domain) does not fix it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 23 20:31:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 15:31:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220704] Review Request: perl-GPS - Perl interface to a GPS receiver that implements the Garmin protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612232031.kBNKVv68018765@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GPS - Perl interface to a GPS receiver that implements the Garmin protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220704 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dan at danny.cz OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 23 21:04:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 16:04:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220704] Review Request: perl-GPS - Perl interface to a GPS receiver that implements the Garmin protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612232104.kBNL4uQF019334@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GPS - Perl interface to a GPS receiver that implements the Garmin protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220704 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2006-12-23 16:04 EST ------- Review: - no rpmlint output on any package - package name OK - spec file name OK, is in English and is legible - package meets the Packaging Guidelines - license OK (GPL) and is included - source matches upstream 9569057d491c73cd597057de85472673 perl-GPS-0.15.tar.gz 9569057d491c73cd597057de85472673 perl-GPS-0.15.tar.gz.1 - builds on i386/x86_64 (FC6 and devel) - BuildRequires and Requires are correct - no localized files - has no shared lib - owns created directories - no duplicates files, permissions are set properly, uses %defattr - has %clean section - consistent use of macros - contains code - no large docs, %doc is not required during runtime - no devel subpackage required, no pkgconfig file - no .la libtool archives - not a GUI application APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 23 21:05:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 16:05:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220704] Review Request: perl-GPS - Perl interface to a GPS receiver that implements the Garmin protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612232105.kBNL5aRx019362@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GPS - Perl interface to a GPS receiver that implements the Garmin protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220704 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 23 21:54:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 16:54:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220710] New: Review Request: glade3 - Gnome RAD library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220710 Summary: Review Request: glade3 - Gnome RAD library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/glade3.spec SRPM URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/glade3-3.1.4-1.src.rpm Description: Glade is a RAD tool to enable quick & easy development of user interfaces for the GTK+ toolkit and the GNOME desktop environment, released under the GNU GPL License. The user interfaces designed in Glade are saved as XML, and by using the libglade library these can be loaded by applications dynamically as needed. By using libglade, Glade XML files can be used in numerous programming languages including C, C++, Java, Perl, Python, C#, Pike, Ruby, Haskell, Objective Caml and Scheme. Adding support for other languages is easy too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 23 22:04:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 17:04:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220706] Review Request: linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm - with wacomcpl tool, man page In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612232204.kBNM4AbO020322@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm - with wacomcpl tool, man page https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220706 ------- Additional Comments From marcel at meverhagen.nl 2006-12-23 17:04 EST ------- there was a subdir missing Spec URL: http://meverhagen.nl/fc6/i386/linuxwacom.spec SRPM URL: http://meverhagen.nl/fc6/i386/linuxwacom-devel-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm Debug URL: http://meverhagen.nl/fc6/i386/linuxwacom-debuginfo-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm RPM URL: http://meverhagen.nl/fc6/i386/linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 23 22:08:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 17:08:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210823] Review Request: wxsvg - wxSVG is C++ library to create, manipulate and render SVG files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612232208.kBNM8laL020405@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wxsvg - wxSVG is C++ library to create, manipulate and render SVG files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210823 ------- Additional Comments From mgansser at k-p-ebert.de 2006-12-23 17:08 EST ------- on FC6 the compilation fails with the following error message: g++ -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"wxsvgtest\" -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"wxsvgtest\" -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"1.0\" "-DPACKAGE_STRING=\"wxsvgtest 1.0\"" -DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\"wx-svg-users at lists.sourceforge.net\" -DPACKAGE=\"wxsvgtest\" -DVERSION=\"1.0\" -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 -DHAVE_SYS_TYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_STAT_H=1 -DHAVE_STDLIB_H=1 -DHAVE_STRING_H=1 -DHAVE_MEMORY_H=1 -DHAVE_STRINGS_H=1 -DHAVE_INTTYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_STDINT_H=1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 -DHAVE_DLFCN_H=1 -I. -I. -I../../include -I../../include/wxSVG -I/usr/include/freetype2 -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -DUSE_RENDER_LIBART -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/libart-2.0 -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -DUSE_RENDER_LIBART -I/usr/lib/wx/include/gtk2-unicode-release-2.6 -I/usr/include/wx-2.6 -DGTK_NO_CHECK_CASTS -D__WXGTK__ -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGE_FILES -DNO_GCC_PRAGMA -MT SVGCanvasTextFreetype.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/SVGCanvasTextFreetype.Tpo -c SVGCanvasTextFreetype.cpp -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/SVGCanvasTextFreetype.o /usr/include/wx-2.6/wx/hashmap.h: In member function 'wxLongToLongHashMap_wxImplementation_HashTable::Node** wxLongToLongHashMap_wxImplementation_HashTable::GetNodePtr(const long int&) const': /usr/include/wx-2.6/wx/hashmap.h:705: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules ../../include/wxXML/xml.h: In member function 'wxXmlAttrHashBase_wxImplementation_HashTable::Node** wxXmlAttrHashBase_wxImplementation_HashTable::GetNodePtr(const wxString&) const': ../../include/wxXML/xml.h:83: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules /usr/include/wx-2.6/wx/gdicmn.h: In member function 'wxStringToColourHashMap_wxImplementation_HashTable::Node** wxStringToColourHashMap_wxImplementation_HashTable::GetNodePtr(const wxString&) const': /usr/include/wx-2.6/wx/gdicmn.h:476: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules ../../include/wxSVG/CSSStyleDeclaration.h: In member function 'wxHashMapCSSValue_wxImplementation_HashTable::Node** wxHashMapCSSValue_wxImplementation_HashTable::GetNodePtr(const wxCSS_PROPERTY&) const': ../../include/wxSVG/CSSStyleDeclaration.h:81: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules /usr/include/wx-2.6/wx/image.h: In member function 'wxImageHistogramBase_wxImplementation_HashTable::Node** wxImageHistogramBase_wxImplementation_HashTable::GetNodePtr(const long unsigned int&) const': /usr/include/wx-2.6/wx/image.h:123: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules SVGCanvasTextFreetype.cpp: At global scope: SVGCanvasTextFreetype.cpp:231: error: invalid conversion from 'gint (*)(FT_Vector*, void*)' to 'int (*)(const FT_Vector*, void*)' SVGCanvasTextFreetype.cpp:231: error: invalid conversion from 'gint (*)(FT_Vector*, void*)' to 'int (*)(const FT_Vector*, void*)' SVGCanvasTextFreetype.cpp:231: error: invalid conversion from 'gint (*)(FT_Vector*, FT_Vector*, void*)' to 'int (*)(const FT_Vector*, const FT_Vector*, void*)' SVGCanvasTextFreetype.cpp:231: error: invalid conversion from 'gint (*)(FT_Vector*, FT_Vector*, FT_Vector*, void*)' to 'int (*)(const FT_Vector*, const FT_Vector*, const FT_Vector*, void*)' make[2]: *** [SVGCanvasTextFreetype.lo] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/wxsvg-1.0b7/src/freetype' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/wxsvg-1.0b7/src' make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 Fehler: Fehler-Status beim Beenden von /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.55997 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 23 22:16:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 17:16:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210823] Review Request: wxsvg - wxSVG is C++ library to create, manipulate and render SVG files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612232216.kBNMGoXJ020516@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wxsvg - wxSVG is C++ library to create, manipulate and render SVG files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210823 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-12-23 17:16 EST ------- Are you building against rawhide wx or FC6? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 23 23:57:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 18:57:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217557] Review Request: keurocalc - KEuroCalc is a universal currency converter and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612232357.kBNNvKqh021860@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: keurocalc - KEuroCalc is a universal currency converter and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217557 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-12-23 18:57 EST ------- Yes, I have -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 24 02:27:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 21:27:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217557] Review Request: keurocalc - KEuroCalc is a universal currency converter and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612240227.kBO2RbNv023689@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: keurocalc - KEuroCalc is a universal currency converter and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217557 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-23 21:27 EST ------- thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 24 02:57:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 21:57:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218217] Review Request: telepathy-stream-engine - Telepathy client to handle media streaming In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612240257.kBO2v3NT024122@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-stream-engine - Telepathy client to handle media streaming https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218217 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2006-12-23 21:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Yes, this was on purpose since the sequence diagrams generation support isn't > complete yet. Does the configure script let you explicitly disable imagemagik,gs, and plotutils support? It would be best if these features were explicitly disabled so we can get consistent rebuilds of the srpm even in build environments where these exist. I'm not sure this should count as a blocker or not, but I think Mamoru has a point concerning binary reproducibility. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 24 03:36:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 22:36:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218217] Review Request: telepathy-stream-engine - Telepathy client to handle media streaming In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612240336.kBO3aW8x024669@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-stream-engine - Telepathy client to handle media streaming https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218217 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-12-23 22:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Does the configure script let you explicitly disable imagemagik,gs, and > plotutils support? It would be best if these features were explicitly disabled > so we can get consistent rebuilds of the srpm even in build environments where > these exist. I believe there is a '--enable-sequence-diagrams=no' option we can add to disable the building of this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 24 08:40:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 03:40:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189195] Review Request: horde - php application framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612240840.kBO8e7O8001859@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 ------- Additional Comments From greg at runlevel7.ca 2006-12-24 03:39 EST ------- Here's a few more lines you could add to the directory section if you want to make sure the all the test.php tests pass, even with a more restrictive php configuration (Not crucial stuff, don't let this interfere with your review): php_admin_flag magic_quotes_runtime off php_flag session.use_trans_sid off php_flag session.auto_start off php_admin_flag file_uploads on # Optional - required for weather block in Horde to function # php_admin_flag allow_url_fopen on # Set to your preference - memory_limit, should be at least 32M # and be greater than the value set for post_max_size php_value memory_limit 32M php_value post_max_size 20M php_value upload_max_filesize 10M -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 24 10:37:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 05:37:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 201636] Review Request: CSpace p2p Instant Messenger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612241037.kBOAbccO004046@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: CSpace p2p Instant Messenger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201636 ------- Additional Comments From thomasasta at gmx.net 2006-12-24 05:37 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=144338) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=144338&action=view) cspace-0.1.24-r0.i386.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 24 10:38:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 05:38:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 201636] Review Request: CSpace p2p Instant Messenger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612241038.kBOAcfuG004160@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: CSpace p2p Instant Messenger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201636 ------- Additional Comments From thomasasta at gmx.net 2006-12-24 05:38 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=144339) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=144339&action=view) cspace-0.1.24.ebuild -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 24 10:39:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 05:39:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 201636] Review Request: CSpace p2p Instant Messenger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612241039.kBOAdqmU004267@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: CSpace p2p Instant Messenger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201636 ------- Additional Comments From thomasasta at gmx.net 2006-12-24 05:39 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=144340) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=144340&action=view) cspace-0.1.24.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 24 10:40:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 05:40:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 201636] Review Request: CSpace p2p Instant Messenger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612241040.kBOAeWMR004351@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: CSpace p2p Instant Messenger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201636 ------- Additional Comments From thomasasta at gmx.net 2006-12-24 05:40 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=144341) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=144341&action=view) ncrypt-0.6.4-r0.i386.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 24 10:46:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 05:46:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 201636] Review Request: CSpace p2p Instant Messenger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612241046.kBOAkPcI004683@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: CSpace p2p Instant Messenger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201636 thomasasta at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Core Version|devel |fc3 URL| |http://www.aabdalla.com/cspa | |ce/ Component|Package Review |Package Review ------- Additional Comments From thomasasta at gmx.net 2006-12-24 05:46 EST ------- files are uploaded, can you add it to the distribution ? http://www.aabdalla.com/cspace/ Installing the ebuild NOTE: This requires ncrypt to be installed Set up a portage overlay: # mkdir /usr/local/portage # echo "/usr/local/portage >> /etc/make.conf Create portage directories: # mkdir /usr/local/portage/app-crypt # mkdir /usr/local/portage/app-crypt/cspace Download the ebuild (or move it to this directory) # cd /usr/local/portage/app-crypt/cspace # wget http://www.aabdalla.com/cspace.com/cspace-0.1_alpha.ebuild Digest the ebuild: # ebuild cspace-0.1_alpha.ebuild digest Emerge cspace: # emerge -av cspace Run cspace: # cspace -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 24 12:00:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 07:00:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219962] Review Request: crystal-clear - Crystal Clear KDE Icon set In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612241200.kBOC0aaE007422@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crystal-clear - Crystal Clear KDE Icon set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219962 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-12-24 07:00 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/crystal-clear/crystal-clear.spec SRPM URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/crystal-clear/crystal-clear-20050622-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 24 12:07:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 07:07:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210424] Review Request: fail2ban - scan log files and ban IPs with too many password failures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612241207.kBOC7lSH007741@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fail2ban - scan log files and ban IPs with too many password failures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210424 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 177841 |201449 nThis| | Flag|needinfo?(wcervini at gmail.com| |) | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-24 07:07 EST ------- I regard this bug as stalled review. I mark this bug as NOTABUG and make this bug block FE-DEADREVIEW. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 24 12:12:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 07:12:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211336] Review Request: adesklets - A simple architecture for desktop applets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612241212.kBOCCGvN007885@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adesklets - A simple architecture for desktop applets Alias: adeskets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211336 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-24 07:12 EST ------- Again ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 24 12:12:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 07:12:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211336] Review Request: adesklets - A simple architecture for desktop applets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612241212.kBOCCtM9007907@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adesklets - A simple architecture for desktop applets Alias: adeskets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211336 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(luya_tfz at thefinalz | |one.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 24 12:15:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 07:15:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220703] Review Request: libgtksourceviewmm - A C++ wrapper for the gtksourceview widget library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612241215.kBOCFxiR007964@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgtksourceviewmm - A C++ wrapper for the gtksourceview widget library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220703 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 24 19:57:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 14:57:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219036] Review Request: perl-Roman - Roman module from CPAN In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612241957.kBOJvMEB018486@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Roman - Roman module from CPAN https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219036 ------- Additional Comments From mrsam at courier-mta.com 2006-12-24 14:57 EST ------- Was this ping directed at me? Is there something else that I need to do? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 24 22:24:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 17:24:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 201636] Review Request: CSpace p2p Instant Messenger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612242224.kBOMOMp0020569@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: CSpace p2p Instant Messenger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201636 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Core |Fedora Extras Component|Package Review |Package Review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 24 23:15:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 18:15:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220730] New: Review Request:gpodder - Podcast receiver/catcher written in Python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220730 Summary: Review Request:gpodder - Podcast receiver/catcher written in Python Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jspaleta at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/gpodder/gpodder.spec SRPM URL: http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/gpodder/gpodder-0.8.0-2.src.rpm Description: gPodder is a Podcast receiver/catcher written in Python, using GTK. It manages podcast feeds for you and automatically downloads all podcasts from as many feeds as you like. It also optionally supports syncing with ipods. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 25 00:55:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 19:55:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218258] Review Request: audacious-docklet - a docklet plugin for Audacious In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612250055.kBP0t8L3022486@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-docklet - a docklet plugin for Audacious https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218258 yufanyufan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 25 06:22:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2006 01:22:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220710] Review Request: glade3 - Gnome RAD library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612250622.kBP6MiD0029981@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glade3 - Gnome RAD library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220710 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-25 01:22 EST ------- Is this the same with bug 177747? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 25 06:28:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2006 01:28:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220710] Review Request: glade3 - Gnome RAD library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612250628.kBP6S0V5030082@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glade3 - Gnome RAD library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220710 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-25 01:27 EST ------- More comment: If this bug is the same with bug 177747, would you close this bug and review the bug? (you are a sponsor and you can review the bug). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 25 07:50:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2006 02:50:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220736] New: Review Request: doclifter - lifts man pages and other troff-based markups to XML-DocBook Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220736 Summary: Review Request: doclifter - lifts man pages and other troff-based markups to XML-DocBook Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: esr at thyrsus.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.catb.org/esr/doclifter/doclifter.spec SRPM URL: http://www.catb.org/esr/doclifter/doclifter-2.3-1.src.rpm Description: The doclifter program translates documents written in troff macros to XML-DocBook. Lifting documents from presentation level to semantic level is difficult, and a really good job requires human polishing, but this tool does about 95% of the work. It aims to do everything that can be mechanized, and to preserve in XML comments any troff-level information that might have structural implications. Also includes manlifter, a driver script that can be used to convert entire manual-page hierarchies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 25 07:54:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2006 02:54:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220736] Review Request: doclifter - lifts man pages and other troff-based markups to XML-DocBook In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612250754.kBP7s5sa031260@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: doclifter - lifts man pages and other troff-based markups to XML-DocBook https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220736 esr at thyrsus.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: doclifter - |Review Request: doclifter - |lifts man pages and other |lifts man pages and other |troff-based markups to XML- |troff-based markups to XML- |DocBook |DocBook OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From esr at thyrsus.com 2006-12-25 02:54 EST ------- This is my first Fedora package, and I am seeking a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 25 09:46:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2006 04:46:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218217] Review Request: telepathy-stream-engine - Telepathy client to handle media streaming In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612250946.kBP9kFhT004734@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-stream-engine - Telepathy client to handle media streaming https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218217 jspaleta at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2006-12-25 04:46 EST ------- Approved, just add --enable-sequencec-diagrams=no to the %configure before you build. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 25 10:03:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2006 05:03:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612251003.kBPA3frX006132@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-25 05:03 EST ------- Well, Compared to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * Requires - Check the requirement for -devel package. -------------------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at dhcp158 bin]$ ./libprelude-config --libs -L/usr/lib -lprelude -lgnutls -lgcrypt -lgpg-error -lrt -ldl -------------------------------------------------------------- This usually means that -devel package should require gnutls-devel. * Beware of Rpath - This package fails on rpath checking. ----------------------------------------------------------- + /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh /home/tasaka1/rpmbuild/BUILD/libprelude-0.9.12 extracting debug info from /var/tmp/libprelude-0.9.12-2-root-tasaka1/usr/bin/prelude-adduser extracting debug info from /var/tmp/libprelude-0.9.12-2-root-tasaka1/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/Prelude/Prelude.so extracting debug info from /var/tmp/libprelude-0.9.12-2-root-tasaka1/usr/lib/libprelude.so.2.9.0 extracting debug info from /var/tmp/libprelude-0.9.12-2-root-tasaka1/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/_prelude.so 10681 blocks + /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot ******************************************************************************* * * WARNING: 'check-rpaths' detected a broken RPATH and will cause 'rpmbuild' * to fail. To ignore these errors, you can set the '$QA_RPATHS' * environment variable which is a bitmask allowing the values * below. The current value of QA_RPATHS is 0x0000. * * 0x0001 ... standard RPATHs (e.g. /usr/lib); such RPATHs are a minor * issue but are introducing redundant searchpaths without * providing a benefit. They can also cause errors in multilib * environments. * 0x0002 ... invalid RPATHs; these are RPATHs which are neither absolute * nor relative filenames and can therefore be a SECURITY risk * 0x0004 ... insecure RPATHs; these are relative RPATHs which are a * SECURITY risk * 0x0008 ... the special '$ORIGIN' RPATHs are appearing after other * RPATHs; this is just a minor issue but usually unwanted * 0x0010 ... the RPATH is empty; there is no reason for such RPATHs * and they cause unneeded work while loading libraries * 0x0020 ... an RPATH references '..' of an absolute path; this will break * the functionality when the path before '..' is a symlink * * * Examples: * - to ignore standard and empty RPATHs, execute 'rpmbuild' like * $ QA_RPATHS=$[ 0x0001|0x0010 ] rpmbuild my-package.src.rpm * - to check existing files, set $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and execute check-rpaths like * $ RPM_BUILD_ROOT= /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths * * 'check-rpaths' is part of 'rpmdevtools'. * ******************************************************************************* ERROR 0010: file '/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/Prelude/Prelude.so' contains an empty rpath in [] error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.71892 (%install) ----------------------------------------------------------- Prelude.so contains empty rpath and this should be removed. * Timestamps - Please consider to keep timestamps on installed files, especially on text files because * timestamps can show when the files are created and if vendor (like you) have modified the files. This package contain many HTML documents and header files, so keeping timestamps on those files are preferable. For this package, this can be done by ------------------------------------------------------------ make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="%{__install} -c -p" cp -p AUTHORS ChangeLog README INSTALL LICENSE.README HACKING.README \ ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 25 10:07:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2006 05:07:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220703] Review Request: libgtksourceviewmm - A C++ wrapper for the gtksourceview widget library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612251007.kBPA7tUO006411@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgtksourceviewmm - A C++ wrapper for the gtksourceview widget library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220703 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-25 05:07 EST ------- Additional comment: Inclusion of m4 file usually means that -devel package should require automake. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 25 10:12:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2006 05:12:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612251012.kBPACqMu006789@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-25 05:12 EST ------- Oops. I forgot to add the following comments... * File and Directory Ownership - Please own all directories which are not owned by other packages needed by this package. From a quick view, the following directories are not owned by any package. ------------------------------------------------------------- /usr/share/doc/libprelude-0.9.12/ /usr/include/libprelude/ ------------------------------------------------------------- - And.. please don't own directories which are owned by other packages needed by this package. This package owns the following directories unnecessarily. -------------------------------------------------------------- /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto -------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 25 10:42:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2006 05:42:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 177747] Review Request: glade3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612251042.kBPAgFLo008783@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glade3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-12-25 05:42 EST ------- Okay, this is a dup of something I've submitted for FE. The problem with libgladeui is the potential for clash with the current libgladeui (okay, different version I know)... As it's Christmas day, I'm doing nothing today other than with my family, so I'll hack on with this tomorrow. In the meantime, my version of the spec and srpm are available at http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/glade3-3.1.4-1.src.rpm http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/glade3.spec Personally, I'd rather not separate out the libgladeui from the main package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 25 10:43:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2006 05:43:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220710] Review Request: glade3 - Gnome RAD library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612251043.kBPAhIsK008911@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glade3 - Gnome RAD library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220710 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-12-25 05:43 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 177747 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 25 10:43:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2006 05:43:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 177747] Review Request: glade3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612251043.kBPAhdQu008944@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glade3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-12-25 05:43 EST ------- *** Bug 220710 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 25 10:46:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2006 05:46:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 177747] Review Request: glade3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612251046.kBPAkFMg009158@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glade3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 25 10:56:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2006 05:56:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210424] Review Request: fail2ban - scan log files and ban IPs with too many password failures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612251056.kBPAu1LP009788@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fail2ban - scan log files and ban IPs with too many password failures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210424 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-12-25 05:55 EST ------- Mamoru, do you want to continue on this package as a new submitter? I would review it if you like to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 25 11:04:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2006 06:04:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210424] Review Request: fail2ban - scan log files and ban IPs with too many password failures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612251104.kBPB4vwa010192@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fail2ban - scan log files and ban IPs with too many password failures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210424 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-25 06:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Mamoru, do you want to continue on this package as a new submitter? I would > review it if you like to. No, I don't..... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 25 11:11:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2006 06:11:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220710] Review Request: glade3 - Gnome RAD library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612251111.kBPBBKlZ010406@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glade3 - Gnome RAD library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220710 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 25 12:03:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2006 07:03:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210424] Review Request: fail2ban - scan log files and ban IPs with too many password failures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612251203.kBPC3o16011902@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fail2ban - scan log files and ban IPs with too many password failures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210424 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-12-25 07:03 EST ------- I took a look at the package submitted in comment 0. This is just the upstream provided package with the changelog trimmed and the Packager field replaced, this isn't quite what it considered packaging for Fedora. ;) I'll submit a new package, then - Mamoru, hope you haven't lost your patience on fail2ban and will be willing to review :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 25 12:33:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2006 07:33:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210424] Review Request: fail2ban - scan log files and ban IPs with too many password failures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612251233.kBPCXVB9012619@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fail2ban - scan log files and ban IPs with too many password failures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210424 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-25 07:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > I'll submit a new package, then - Mamoru, hope > you haven't lost your patience on > fail2ban and will be willing to review :) Well, when you submit a new package, I will review your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 25 12:41:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2006 07:41:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612251241.kBPCfaYY012777@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-25 07:41 EST ------- More comments: Please check the permissions of files: ------------------------------------------------------------- E: libprelude-perl non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/Prelude/Prelude.so 0555 ------------------------------------------------------------- Also, check if 0444 permission of /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/Prelude.pm is correct. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 25 14:35:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2006 09:35:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220743] New: Review Request: postgis - Geographic Information Systems Extensions to PostgreSQL Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220743 Summary: Review Request: postgis - Geographic Information Systems Extensions to PostgreSQL Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: devrim at commandprompt.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/postgis/postgis.spec SRPM URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/postgis/postgis-1.2.0-1.src.rpm Description: PostGIS adds support for geographic objects to the PostgreSQL object-relational database. In effect, PostGIS "spatially enables" the PostgreSQL server, allowing it to be used as a backend spatial database for geographic information systems (GIS), much like ESRI's SDE or Oracle's Spatial extension. PostGIS follows the OpenGIS "Simple Features Specification for SQL" and has been certified as compliant with the "Types and Functions" profile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 25 18:07:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2006 13:07:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220635] Review Request: livecd-tools - Tools for creating Live CD's In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612251807.kBPI7hap020064@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: livecd-tools - Tools for creating Live CD's https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220635 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mr.ecik at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-12-25 13:07 EST ------- It fails to build on x86_64: Nie znaleziono pliku: /var/tmp/livecd-tools-001-1-root/usr/lib64/livecd- creator/mayflower Nie znaleziono pliku: /var/tmp/livecd-tools-001-1-root/usr/lib64/livecd- creator/run-init "Nie znaleziono pliku": "File not found" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 25 23:49:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2006 18:49:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220759] New: Review Request: pdfcube - PDF viewer with a spinning cube Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220759 Summary: Review Request: pdfcube - PDF viewer with a spinning cube Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: maxx at krakoa.dk QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://krakoa.dk/fedora/pdfcube.spec SRPM URL: http://krakoa.dk/fedora/pdfcube-0.0.2-1.src.rpm Description: PDF Cube is an OpenGL API-based PDF viewer that adds a compiz/Keynote-like spinning cube trasition effect to your PDF presentations (including Latex, Beamer and Prosper). You can also zoom on 5 predefined areas of any presentation page with a smooth zooming effect. rpmlint gives no errors. However I am not entirely happy about explicitly stating /usr/bin/pdfcube in the files section. Is that the right way to do it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 26 00:03:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2006 19:03:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220759] Review Request: pdfcube - PDF viewer with a spinning cube In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612260003.kBQ038TX026487@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pdfcube - PDF viewer with a spinning cube https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220759 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-12-25 19:03 EST ------- Normally, you would use %{_bindir}/pdfcube or %{_bindir}/* instead of hardcoding /usr/bin. $ rpm --eval %_bindir /usr/bin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 26 00:17:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2006 19:17:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220759] Review Request: pdfcube - PDF viewer with a spinning cube In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612260017.kBQ0HoXQ026671@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pdfcube - PDF viewer with a spinning cube https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220759 ------- Additional Comments From maxx at krakoa.dk 2006-12-25 19:17 EST ------- By the way this is my first package. I have uploaded a new version which uses %{_bindir}. New SRPM: http://krakoa.dk/fedora/pdfcube-0.0.2-2.src.rpm The new spec file has the same url as the old one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 26 00:20:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2006 19:20:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220759] Review Request: pdfcube - PDF viewer with a spinning cube In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612260020.kBQ0KdiE026725@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pdfcube - PDF viewer with a spinning cube https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220759 maxx at krakoa.dk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From maxx at krakoa.dk 2006-12-25 19:20 EST ------- Adding FE-NEEDSSPONSOR as per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors#head-350f978b25c60398e0d16100bb3da317c1fd18c3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 26 04:20:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2006 23:20:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219610] Review Request: uncrustify-0.30 - code beautifier In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612260420.kBQ4K6Ie001424@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uncrustify-0.30 - code beautifier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219610 ed at eh3.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2006-12-25 23:19 EST ------- $ sha1sum uncrustify-0.30-1.fc6.src.rpm d4a0326889cd994e29422723fd9be1517e41edc8 uncrustify-0.30-1.fc6.src.rpm good: + builds in mock for FC6 i386 + rpmlint is silent + license is OK and correctly included + spec is very simple and clean + no shared libs and no *.la + perms and dir ownership OK + %clean OK could be improved: - the "Summary: Reformat source" line is a little ambiguous and it might be more helpful to say "Tool for source code reformatting" or similar -- but that's just a suggestion, not a blocker Its unfortunate how the config files are handled but I agree that it is an upstream problem. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 26 05:10:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 00:10:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219114] Review Request: flac123 - Command-line program for playing FLAC audio files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612260510.kBQ5A1FN005553@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flac123 - Command-line program for playing FLAC audio files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219114 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-26 00:09 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPMS. + source files md5sum. No upstream is available. 1614e1d1fe5b427ffd5988ea766abcf4 flac123-0.0.9.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + COPYING included in %doc. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel or any subpackages exists + no .la files. + no translations are available + Dose owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 26 06:03:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 01:03:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220185] Review Request: kvm - Kernel Based Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612260603.kBQ63Wox006444@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kvm - Kernel Based Virtual Machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220185 avi at argo.co.il changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |avi at argo.co.il ------- Additional Comments From avi at argo.co.il 2006-12-26 01:03 EST ------- Suggest calling the binary 'kvm' instead of qemu-kvm, and adding a softlink to the qemu manual page. Alternatively, merge it to the qemu package. That's perhaps a little premature at this moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 26 07:10:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 02:10:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219872] Review Request: curlftpfs - user-space FTP filesystem using libcurl and FUSE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612260710.kBQ7A6d8007593@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: curlftpfs - user-space FTP filesystem using libcurl and FUSE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219872 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-26 02:09 EST ------- Interesting package. I will review this later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 26 07:12:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 02:12:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219071] Review Request: pyfribidi - A Python binding for GNU FriBidi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612260712.kBQ7CDqt007688@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyfribidi - A Python binding for GNU FriBidi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219071 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-26 02:12 EST ------- I will review this later -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 26 07:19:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 02:19:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220393] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code Introspection Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612260719.kBQ7JbYa007839@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code Introspection Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220393 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-26 02:19 EST ------- I have to say that the spec file included in source tarball is far from ones which can be accepted into Fedora Extras. Please write spec file of this package by yourself according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 26 07:31:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 02:31:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220766] New: Review Request: ScientificPython - a collection of Python modules that are useful for scientific computing Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220766 Summary: Review Request: ScientificPython - a collection of Python modules that are useful for scientific computing Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jspaleta at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/ScientificPython/ScientificPython.spec SRPM URL: http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/ScientificPython/ScientificPython-2.6-2.src.rpm Description: ScientificPython is a collection of Python modules that are useful for scientific computing. In this collection you will find modules that cover basic geometry (vectors, tensors, transformations, vector and tensor fields), quaternions, automatic derivatives, (linear) interpolation, polynomials, elementary statistics, nonlinear least-squares fits, unit calculations, Fortran-compatible text formatting, 3D visualization via VRML, and two Tk widgets for simple line plots and 3D wireframe models. There are also interfaces to the netCDF library (portable structured binary files), to MPI (Message Passing Interface, message-based parallel programming), and to BSPlib (Bulk Synchronous Parallel programming) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 26 08:59:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 03:59:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219653] Review Request: solfege - music education software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612260859.kBQ8x6I1011085@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: solfege - music education software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219653 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 26 09:08:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 04:08:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220736] Review Request: doclifter - lifts man pages and other troff-based markups to XML-DocBook In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612260908.kBQ98Kpo012258@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: doclifter - lifts man pages and other troff-based markups to XML-DocBook https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220736 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-12-26 04:08 EST ------- $ manlifter Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/manlifter", line 599, in ? exec 'import doclifter_test%s' % os.getpid() File "", line 1, in ? ImportError: No module named doclifter_test2931 Current directory, where you create the temporary copy of doclifter, is not in standard module search path list by default. This is because manlifter lives in /usr/bin, and hence /usr/bin is in sys.path, but os.getcwd() is not. You could append it as work-around, however. [...] $ man doclifter looks very damaged at the end in section "Troff Translation" on FC6. [...] Packaging hints: > Requires: python2 Instead you want "Requires: python" (which is v2 since a long time), because your scripts depend on just /usr/bin/python (and /usr/bin/env python) and not /usr/bin/python2. > %install > [ "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" -a "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" != / ] && rm -rf "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" > %clean > [ "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" -a "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" != / ] && rm -rf "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" This is just added obscurity. Useless for many years. In particular, since you do define a custom BuildRoot in your spec file already. rm -rf ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} is sufficient and nice to the eyes. Btw, it is a myth that the extra check has ever been useful. Unless you've been burnt yourself you will have a hard time finding anybody who has ever set --buildroot=/ while it that was possible. Nowadays, BuildRoot cannot be "/". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 26 09:23:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 04:23:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220766] Review Request: ScientificPython - a collection of Python modules that are useful for scientific computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612260923.kBQ9NBee013335@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ScientificPython - a collection of Python modules that are useful for scientific computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220766 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2006-12-26 04:23 EST ------- Updated srpm and spec: http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/ScientificPython/ScientificPython-2.6-3.src.rpm http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/ScientificPython/ScientificPython.spec Changelog * Mon Dec 25 2006 Jef Spaleta 2.6-3 - Add tk and qt subpackages - Add bsp and mpi subpackages - Requires clean-ups for all subpackages - Patch to correctly locate netcdf.a and netcdf.h * Mon Dec 25 2006 Jef Spaleta 2.6-2 - Add docs subpackage * Sun Dec 24 2006 Jef Spaleta 2.6-1 - Initial ScientificPython Package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 26 09:28:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 04:28:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 192876] Review Request: V2Strip ID3v2(Mp3 Files) tags remover In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612260928.kBQ9SSSU013668@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: V2Strip ID3v2(Mp3 Files) tags remover https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192876 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |NOTABUG BugsThisDependsOn| |201449 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 26 09:30:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 04:30:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 192876] Review Request: V2Strip ID3v2(Mp3 Files) tags remover In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612260930.kBQ9U8nr013833@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: V2Strip ID3v2(Mp3 Files) tags remover https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192876 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|201449 | OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 26 12:36:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 07:36:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220743] Review Request: postgis - Geographic Information Systems Extensions to PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612261236.kBQCaL97023538@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgis - Geographic Information Systems Extensions to PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220743 ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ruben at rubenkerkhof.com ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2006-12-26 07:36 EST ------- Review for release 1: * RPM name is OK * Source postgis-1.2.0.tar.gz is the same as upstream * This is the latest version * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint of postgis-utils looks OK * rpmlint of postgis-jdbc looks OK * rpmlint of postgis looks OK * File list of postgis-utils looks OK * File list of postgis-jdbc looks OK * File list of postgis looks OK Needs work: * BuildRoot should be %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#BuildRoot) * Spec file: some paths are not replaced with RPM macros (wiki: QAChecklist item 7) Minor: * Duplicate BuildRequires: jpackage-utils (by ant), ant (by ant-junit), junit (by ant-junit) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 26 12:40:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 07:40:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216105] Review Request: python-twisted-web - Twisted web server, programmable in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612261240.kBQCeOs4023646@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-web - Twisted web server, programmable in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216105 ------- Additional Comments From thomas at apestaart.org 2006-12-26 07:40 EST ------- Paul, Kevin, pulled in Jef's updated spec as is. Any further comments, or can this be APPROVEd ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 26 12:49:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 07:49:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220743] Review Request: postgis - Geographic Information Systems Extensions to PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612261249.kBQCnbmj023830@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgis - Geographic Information Systems Extensions to PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220743 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-12-26 07:49 EST ------- Hi, (In reply to comment #1) > Review for release 1: > Needs work: > * BuildRoot should be %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) > (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#BuildRoot) Ok, fixed. > * Spec file: some paths are not replaced with RPM macros > (wiki: QAChecklist item 7) Oops, fixed. Please let me know if I'm still missing one. > Minor: > * Duplicate BuildRequires: jpackage-utils (by ant), ant (by ant-junit), junit (by ant-junit) Very good catch. This is fixed, too. Spec URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/postgis/postgis.spec SRPM URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/postgis/postgis-1.2.0-2.src.rpm Thanks for the review. Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 26 13:27:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 08:27:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216105] Review Request: python-twisted-web - Twisted web server, programmable in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612261327.kBQDR9oH024799@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-web - Twisted web server, programmable in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216105 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-12-26 08:26 EST ------- Has anybody else seen the problem with the dropin cache at package removal time that I mentioned in Comment #1? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 26 14:19:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 09:19:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220210] Review Request: krename - Powerful batch file renamer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612261419.kBQEJhoq027251@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: krename - Powerful batch file renamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220210 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-26 09:19 EST ------- Please rebuild this... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 26 14:40:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 09:40:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216102] Review Request: python-twisted-conch - Twisted SSHv2 implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612261440.kBQEeLvN027713@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-conch - Twisted SSHv2 implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216102 ------- Additional Comments From thomas at apestaart.org 2006-12-26 09:40 EST ------- http://thomas.apestaart.org/download/pkg/fedora-6-i386-extras/python-twisted-conch-0.7.0-4.fc6/ incorporated changes suggested -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 26 14:49:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 09:49:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219036] Review Request: perl-Roman - Roman module from CPAN In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612261449.kBQEnhV5027955@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Roman - Roman module from CPAN https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219036 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-12-26 09:49 EST ------- Sam, (In reply to comment #6) > Was this ping directed at me? Yes. > Is there something else that I need to do? Please read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors and, if this is your first package, see also http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/HowToGetSponsored and add FE-NEEDSPONSOR to the blocking list (see step 7 of the first link). Regards, jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 26 15:12:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 10:12:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216105] Review Request: python-twisted-web - Twisted web server, programmable in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612261512.kBQFCQQm028350@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-web - Twisted web server, programmable in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216105 ------- Additional Comments From thomas at apestaart.org 2006-12-26 10:12 EST ------- I removed all my packages (including the divmod ones) and now I am able to reproduce it. Before I had it spuriously and couldn't figure out a way to debug it. I dug a little deeper now and it seems that the Twisted code logs an exception using its own log handler when it finds a plugin in the cache that is no longer on disk. Since this is the point of updating the cache - removing plugins that no longer exist - I changed twisted-dropin-cache to not log on that particular error. I pushed a new python-twisted-core package to extras that should fix this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 26 15:58:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 10:58:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220775] New: Review Request: Exaile! - A music player Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220775 Summary: Review Request: Exaile! - A music player Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dakingun at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/exaile/exaile.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/exaile/exaile-0.2.6-1.src.rpm Description: Exaile is a media player aiming to be similar to KDE's AmaroK, but for GTK+. It incorporates many of the cool things from AmaroK (and other media players) like automatic fetching of album art, handling of large libraries, lyrics fetching, artist/album information via the wikipedia, last.fm support, optional iPod support (assuming you have python-gpod installed). In addition, Exaile also includes a built in shoutcast directory browser, tabbed playlists (so you can have more than one playlist open at a time), blacklisting of tracks (so they don't get scanned into your library), downloading of guitar tablature from fretplay.com, and submitting played tracks on your iPod to last.fm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 26 16:37:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 11:37:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220730] Review Request:gpodder - Podcast receiver/catcher written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612261637.kBQGbNQg030246@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:gpodder - Podcast receiver/catcher written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220730 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bdpepple at ameritech.net OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-12-26 11:37 EST ------- Jef, I'll get you a review for this later today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 26 17:26:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 12:26:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219071] Review Request: pyfribidi - A Python binding for GNU FriBidi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612261726.kBQHQl5F031547@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyfribidi - A Python binding for GNU FriBidi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219071 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-26 12:26 EST ------- Well, * Please consider to include ChangeLog file. Other things are okay. ----------------------------------------------------- This package (pyfribidi) is APPROVED by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 26 17:44:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 12:44:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220775] Review Request: Exaile! - A music player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612261744.kBQHiVDE032089@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Exaile! - A music player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220775 dakingun at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|915resolution |Package Review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 26 18:59:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 13:59:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219872] Review Request: curlftpfs - user-space FTP filesystem using libcurl and FUSE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612261859.kBQIxahJ000909@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: curlftpfs - user-space FTP filesystem using libcurl and FUSE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219872 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-26 13:59 EST ------- Okay. * Please consider to include ChangeLog file. Other things are okay. Then: ---------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few (or no) work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to formally review other submitters' review request and approve the packages. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines". Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) of other person's review request. When you submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora Extras package review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/showdependencytree.cgi?id=FE-NEW&hide_resolved=1 Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets And Please check the details on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/HowToGetSponsored -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 26 20:28:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 15:28:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216105] Review Request: python-twisted-web - Twisted web server, programmable in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612262028.kBQKSGRi003205@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-web - Twisted web server, programmable in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216105 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-26 15:28 EST ------- I don't see any more blockers here... using the new python-twisted-core from the buildsys (it's not been pushed yet) I don't see any dropin cache issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 26 20:31:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 15:31:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216102] Review Request: python-twisted-conch - Twisted SSHv2 implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612262031.kBQKVgur003283@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-conch - Twisted SSHv2 implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216102 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-26 15:31 EST ------- All those changes look good... 1 isn't really a blocker. 2 and 3 are fixed. 4 isn't a issue. I don't see any blockers, this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this review request with NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 26 20:58:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 15:58:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219973] Review Request: powerdns - A modern, advanced and high performance authoritative-only nameserver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612262058.kBQKwrep003893@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: powerdns - A modern, advanced and high performance authoritative-only nameserver Alias: powerdns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219973 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-26 15:58 EST ------- I would be happy to review this package... See below - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPL) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 33b20ef1b767f93297101f2aa09e99ed pdns-2.9.20.tar.gz 33b20ef1b767f93297101f2aa09e99ed pdns-2.9.20.tar.gz.1 OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK/See below - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane: SHOULD Items: See below - Should build in mock. See below - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have sane scriptlets. See below - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. The upstream tar is 'pdns' and their shipped spec file makes a 'pdns-static' package. Should this package be called 'pdns' instead of 'powerdns' ? 2. Doesn't build on x86_64 under mock. Looks like they have a hard coded check for mysql libs using /usr/lib: checking for MySQL library directory... configure: error: Didn't find the mysql library dir in '/usr/local/mysql/lib/mysql /usr/local/lib/mysql /opt/mysql/lib/mysql /usr/lib/mysql /usr/local/mysql/lib /usr/local/lib /opt/mysql/lib /usr/lib' error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.75004 (%build) I would be happy to provide access to a x86_64 box for testing if you need one. 3. You should probably have your Requires for the subpackages also require the release, ie: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} 4. Why the ldconfig calls in post/postun? The main package has no library files at all, and the subpackages just have .so's in %{_libdir}/%{name}/ directory that I assume are dlopened by the package when configured to do so. There should be no need for any ldconfig that I can see here, unless I am missing something... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 26 21:25:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 16:25:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220210] Review Request: krename - Powerful batch file renamer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612262125.kBQLP0LK004400@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: krename - Powerful batch file renamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220210 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-12-26 16:24 EST ------- I would really like to, but currently I'm encountering problems with my internet connection, so I'm simply unable to upload it. I hope I'll be within a week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 26 22:11:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 17:11:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220730] Review Request:gpodder - Podcast receiver/catcher written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612262211.kBQMBvlq005223@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:gpodder - Podcast receiver/catcher written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220730 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-12-26 17:11 EST ------- MD5Sum: 8c58c613d049bd2387e09876c574ebf9 gpodder-0.8.0.tar.gz Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * Files have appropriate permissions and owners * Rpmlint produces no warnings or errors. * Package builds in Mock fine. * Package installs and uninstalls cleanly on FC6 * Package seems to work fine, based on a quick test. Minor Items that should be fixed before building in FE: * Drop the 'X-Fedora-Extras' category from the desktop file. It was recently decided to drop the 'X-Fedora' & 'X-Fedora-Extras' categories. Refer to the example at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-254ddf07aae20a23ced8cecc219d8f73926e9755 * Drop the Requires on Python, since it is redundant. The BR on python-devel will provide python(abi) = 2.4 automatically. Refer to your build logs for verification. Minor: * Close button on about window does not work. This isn't a blocker, but probably at a minimum should be reported upstream. +1 APPROVE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 26 23:32:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 18:32:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218678] Review Request: pybluez - python API for the bluez bluetooth stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612262332.kBQNWoAa007535@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pybluez - python API for the bluez bluetooth stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218678 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-26 18:32 EST ------- Hey Will. I would be happy to move this review forward and look at sponsoring you. Do you have any other packages ready to review right now? It helps to see a few packages to know when someone knows the ropes and is ready to be sponsored. Anyhow, here is a review of this package: OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPL) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 3e7e951ea4e8433f3b80ef8c14d99c28 pybluez-src-0.9.1.tar.gz 3e7e951ea4e8433f3b80ef8c14d99c28 pybluez-src-0.9.1.tar.gz.1 OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. See below - No rpmlint output. See below - final provides and requires are sane: SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. i386/x86_64 - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. Why the: BuildArch: i386 x86_64 ppc line? Does it not work on other arches? 2. In build you have: # Remove CFLAGS=... for noarch packages (unneeded) CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" %{__python} setup.py build why are you passing them in if you don't need them? Perhaps that line should be: %{__python} setup.py build 3. rpmlint says: W: pybluez incoherent-version-in-changelog -0.9.1-2 0.9.1-2.fc7 There is a - in there that shouldn't be. Also, you don't need to add dist tags normally to changelog versions. W: pybluez doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/pybluez-0.9.1/examples/bluezchat/bluezchat.py /usr/bin/python The bluezchat.py example should be made mode 644 like all the other examples. 4. The package provides: _bluetooth.so Which is kinda ugly, but not a blocker I guess. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 26 23:48:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 18:48:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 177747] Review Request: glade3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612262348.kBQNmjvZ007830@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glade3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-12-26 18:48 EST ------- Hmm, I can't see the logic (to be honest) of splitting the package in the way you have. To me, it makes far more sense to have glade3 with the binary and any shared libs (will the glade3 binary run without the libs?) and having a devel file with the .so files. Also, why have you moved from the standard version-release system to version-release.number? Please re-instate any changes that you made to the spec file prior to the version you want reviewing in the changelog - it helps people learn. 3.0.2 is quite an old version now - any chance of moving it to 3.1.4? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 00:04:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 19:04:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220789] New: Review Request: fail2ban - Ban IPs that make too many password failures Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220789 Summary: Review Request: fail2ban - Ban IPs that make too many password failures Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/fail2ban.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/fail2ban-0.6.2-1.at.src.rpm Description: Fail2ban scans log files like /var/log/pwdfail or /var/log/apache/error_log and bans IP that makes too many password failures. It updates firewall rules to reject the IP address. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 00:06:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 19:06:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210424] Review Request: fail2ban - scan log files and ban IPs with too many password failures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612270006.kBR06HXl008184@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fail2ban - scan log files and ban IPs with too many password failures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210424 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-12-26 19:06 EST ------- Thanks Mamoru, the new package is under bug #220789 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 00:09:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 19:09:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220789] Review Request: fail2ban - Ban IPs that make too many password failures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612270009.kBR09beb008257@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fail2ban - Ban IPs that make too many password failures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220789 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-12-26 19:09 EST ------- Expected rpmlint output: E: fail2ban only-non-binary-in-usr-lib W: fail2ban service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/fail2ban o service-default-enabled: The service may be enabled, but in absence of /etc/fail2ban.conf (which is the default) it will not start. o only-non-binary-in-usr-lib: Unfortunately it installs its python bits under /usr/lib. I'm not sure why upstream has chosen so, it looks quite similar to how yum deals with its python files, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 00:22:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 19:22:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220789] Review Request: fail2ban - Ban IPs that make too many password failures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612270022.kBR0McNt008590@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fail2ban - Ban IPs that make too many password failures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220789 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-26 19:22 EST ------- I will review this, however, now I am preparing for going back to my parents' home so it may be tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 00:24:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 19:24:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210424] Review Request: fail2ban - scan log files and ban IPs with too many password failures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612270024.kBR0OmDA008672@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fail2ban - scan log files and ban IPs with too many password failures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210424 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-26 19:24 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 220789 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 00:25:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 19:25:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220789] Review Request: fail2ban - Ban IPs that make too many password failures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612270025.kBR0PAn2008698@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fail2ban - Ban IPs that make too many password failures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220789 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wcervini at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-26 19:24 EST ------- *** Bug 210424 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 00:38:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 19:38:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219036] Review Request: perl-Roman - Roman module from CPAN In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612270038.kBR0cFlO008924@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Roman - Roman module from CPAN https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219036 mrsam at courier-mta.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 01:54:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 20:54:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219978] Review Request: thunar-media-tags-plugin - Media Tags plugin for the Thunar file manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612270154.kBR1sb9T010104@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thunar-media-tags-plugin - Media Tags plugin for the Thunar file manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219978 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-26 20:54 EST ------- I'd be happy to review this package... Look for a full review in a bit. > Note: ATM %{_libdir}/thunarx-1/ is not owned by any package, but this is a bug in Thunar. I already informed Kevin about this. Yeah, sorry about that. I have the fix queued up... it should go out with the next update to Thunar. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 02:13:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 21:13:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219978] Review Request: thunar-media-tags-plugin - Media Tags plugin for the Thunar file manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612270213.kBR2D931010400@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thunar-media-tags-plugin - Media Tags plugin for the Thunar file manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219978 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-26 21:13 EST ------- See below - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License(GPL) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 1535da390f7e26350e9bff1a5bc3cdae thunar-media-tags-plugin-0.1.1.tar.bz2 1535da390f7e26350e9bff1a5bc3cdae thunar-media-tags-plugin-0.1.1.tar.bz2.1 OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. i386/x86_64 - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. Should the name of this package have a capital T ? ie, thunar-media-tags-plugin should be Thunar-media-tags-plugin Since the Thunar package uses a uppercase T? Otherwise I see no blockers or issues, so this package is APPROVED. If you do decide to change it to use a uppercase T, also do change the summary of this bug so the package is tracked properly. Don't forget to close this package review NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 02:30:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 21:30:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210423] Review Request: snitch - a powerful packet-shaping utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612270230.kBR2U69O010705@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: snitch - a powerful packet-shaping utility Alias: volp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210423 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(wcervini at gmail.com | |) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-26 21:29 EST ------- Changing the status to NEEDINFO from reporter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 02:33:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 21:33:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217232] Review Request: keyTouch In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612270233.kBR2XEZC010756@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: keyTouch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217232 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-26 21:33 EST ------- One month passed since my comment #5. I will close this bug as NOTABUG if no response from Denis is received on this bug within another one week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 03:40:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 22:40:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612270340.kBR3eULX013111@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 03:42:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 22:42:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220796] New: Review Request: turba - horde contact manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220796 Summary: Review Request: turba - horde contact manager Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at theholbrooks.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/turba.spec SRPM URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/turba-2.1.3-1.src.rpm Description: Turba is the Horde contact management application, which allows access to and storage of personal contacts (including name, email address, phone number, and other easily customizable fields). Turba integrates with IMP (Horde's webmail application) as its address book. The Horde Project writes web applications in PHP and releases them under Open Source licenses. For more information (including help with Turba) please visit http://www.horde.org/. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 03:43:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 22:43:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220796] Review Request: turba - horde contact manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612270343.kBR3hvAN013397@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: turba - horde contact manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220796 fedora at theholbrooks.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |189195 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 03:44:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 22:44:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189195] Review Request: horde - php application framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612270344.kBR3i0vv013416@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 fedora at theholbrooks.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |220796 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 04:24:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 23:24:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220775] Review Request: Exaile! - A music player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612270424.kBR4ObuV016851@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Exaile! - A music player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220775 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-26 23:24 EST ------- pacakaging looks nice. as its pygtk application no need for -devel for included .so file. desktop file even worked well. But mock build failed with In file included from mmkeys.override:6: /usr/include/pygtk-2.0/pygobject.h:20: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before 'PyObject' /usr/include/pygtk-2.0/pygobject.h:27: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before 'PyObject_HEAD' /usr/include/pygtk-2.0/pygobject.h:38: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before 'PyObject_HEAD' /usr/include/pygtk-2.0/pygobject.h:48: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before 'PyObject_HEAD' /usr/include/pygtk-2.0/pygobject.h:60: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before 'PyObject_HEAD' /usr/include/pygtk-2.0/pygobject.h:67: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before 'PyTypeObject' /usr/include/pygtk-2.0/pygobject.h:68: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '*' token /usr/include/pygtk-2.0/pygobject.h:76: error: expected ')' before '*' token /usr/include/pygtk-2.0/pygobject.h:78: error: expected ';' before 'void' mmkeys.c:16: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '*' token mmkeys.c:21: warning: data definition has no type or storage class mmkeys.c:21: error: expected ',' or ';' before 'PyMmKeys_Type' mmkeys.c:30: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before 'PyObject' mmkeys.c:30: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before 'PyObject' mmkeys.c: In function '_wrap_mmkeys_new': mmkeys.c:34: error: 'args' undeclared (first use in this function) mmkeys.c:34: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once mmkeys.c:34: error: for each function it appears in.) mmkeys.c:34: error: 'kwargs' undeclared (first use in this function) mmkeys.c:39: error: 'struct _PyGObject_Functions' has no member named 'pygobject_constructv' mmkeys.c:40: error: 'PyGObject' has no member named 'obj' mmkeys.c:42: error: 'PyExc_RuntimeError' undeclared (first use in this function) mmkeys.c: At top level: mmkeys.c:49: warning: data definition has no type or storage class mmkeys.c:49: error: expected ',' or ';' before 'PyMmKeys_Type' mmkeys.c:98: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'mmkeys_functions' mmkeys.c:104: error: expected ')' before '*' token make[1]: *** [mmkeyspy.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/exaile_0.2.6/mmkeys' make: *** [mmkeys.so] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.14826 (%install) Maybe you need to add python-devel as BR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 04:59:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 23:59:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219962] Review Request: crystal-clear - Crystal Clear KDE Icon set In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612270459.kBR4xnP3020271@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crystal-clear - Crystal Clear KDE Icon set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219962 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-26 23:59 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM - rpmlint is NOT for RPMS but I found them harmless. + source files match upstream. adb7962b585c8ad12adc3b82246edb35 CrystalClear.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. - But License text is NOT included in package. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists + no .la files. + no translations are available + Dose owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + icon set installed successfully. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 05:03:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 00:03:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216517] Review Request: gnome-valgrind-session - Run an entire GNOME session under valgrind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612270503.kBR53klQ020564@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-valgrind-session - Run an entire GNOME session under valgrind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216517 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-27 00:03 EST ------- Better to discuss this then on Fedora-extras mailing list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 05:04:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 00:04:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219114] Review Request: flac123 - Command-line program for playing FLAC audio files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612270504.kBR54Ixl020606@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flac123 - Command-line program for playing FLAC audio files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219114 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-27 00:04 EST ------- Don't forget to CLOSE this review after you finished building package in CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 06:13:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 01:13:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 177747] Review Request: glade3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612270613.kBR6D4BO021778@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glade3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 ------- Additional Comments From braden at endoframe.com 2006-12-27 01:13 EST ------- libgladeui belongs in its own package because it is useful on its own (i.e., without the glade3 binary). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 11:11:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 06:11:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218225] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysql - MySQL MDB2 Driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612271111.kBRBBlMK005616@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysql - MySQL MDB2 Driver Alias: pear-MDB2-mysql https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218225 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mr.ecik at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-12-27 06:11 EST ------- MUST items: * rpmlint output: W: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysql no-documentation * package is named well * spec file name is good * package meets Packaging Guidelines * package is licensed with a BSD open-source compatible license * License field in spec file matches actual license * license file isn't included in %doc * md5sums are matching (16a7b836904b36ca77a743554c7f0061) * package successfully compiles on x86_64 * BuildRequires listed well * no locales * proper %post and %postun sections * not relocatable * package owns directories well * no duplicates in %files * %files section includes %defattr * proper %clean section * macros used well We can omit rpmlint output because in fact package doesn't contain any documentation. So package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 12:34:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 07:34:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214087] Review Request: libextractor -- Simple library for keyword extraction In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612271234.kBRCYBf8008563@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libextractor -- Simple library for keyword extraction https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214087 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-12-27 07:34 EST ------- * Wed Dec 27 2006 Enrico Scholz - 0.5.16-3 - added a README.fedora - removed the previously added 'Requires: plugin(%name)' - added the pdf plugin to the requirements of the -plugins subpackage http://ensc.de/fedora/libextractor/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 12:46:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 07:46:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216105] Review Request: python-twisted-web - Twisted web server, programmable in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612271246.kBRCk2Cb008945@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-web - Twisted web server, programmable in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216105 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-12-27 07:45 EST ------- OK, Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 13:04:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 08:04:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220766] Review Request: ScientificPython - a collection of Python modules that are useful for scientific computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612271304.kBRD4i3M009524@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ScientificPython - a collection of Python modules that are useful for scientific computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220766 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-12-27 08:04 EST ------- Some rpmlints issues which need to be corrected: rpmlint /home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/SRPMS/ScientificPython-2.6-3.src.rpm W: ScientificPython summary-not-capitalized a collection of Python modules that are useful for scientific computing E: ScientificPython description-line-too-long ScientificPython is a collection of Python modules that are useful for scientific computing. In this collection you will find modules that cover basic geometry (vectors, tensors, transformations, vector and tensor fields), quaternions, automatic derivatives, (linear) interpolation, polynomials, elementary statistics, nonlinear least-squares fits, unit calculations, Fortran-compatible text formatting, 3D visualization via VRML, and two Tk widgets for simple line plots and 3D wireframe models. There are also interfaces to the netCDF library (portable structured binary files), to MPI (Message Passing Interface, message-based parallel programming), and to BSPlib (Bulk Synchronous Parallel programming) chitlesh(SPECS)[1]$rpmlint /home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/ScientificPython-mpi-2.6-3.i386.rpm E: ScientificPython-mpi description-line-too-long This package contains the ScientificPython mpi enabled python intepreter and associated modules rpmlint /home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/ScientificPython-bsp-2.6-3.i386.rpm E: ScientificPython-bsp description-line-too-long This package contains the necessary ScientificPython modules for virtual bsp. This is useful for running multiple virtual processes in a bsp manner on a single cpu. chitlesh(SPECS)[1]$rpmlint /home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/ScientificPython-tk-2.6-3.i386.rpm W: ScientificPython-tk summary-not-capitalized tk widgets from ScientificPython chitlesh(SPECS)[1]$rpmlint /home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/ScientificPython-qt-2.6-3.i386.rpm W: ScientificPython-qt summary-not-capitalized qt widgets from ScientificPython shouldn't the sub packages be a dependency of the ScientificPython package ? you missed Doc/BSP_Tutorial.pdf in ScientificPython-doc package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 13:28:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 08:28:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220775] Review Request: Exaile! - A music player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612271328.kBRDS5ru010089@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Exaile! - A music player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220775 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2006-12-27 08:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > > Maybe you need to add python-devel as BR. I already did add python-devel as BR, and I also built it succesfully in rawhide mock. However, I think i know where the problem is. The updated version below should be ok. Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/exaile/exaile.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/exaile/exaile-0.2.6-2.src.rpm Thanks for doing the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 13:58:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 08:58:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216105] Review Request: python-twisted-web - Twisted web server, programmable in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612271358.kBRDwW9g011451@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-web - Twisted web server, programmable in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216105 ------- Additional Comments From thomas at apestaart.org 2006-12-27 08:58 EST ------- imported, waiting for fc-6 branch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 14:14:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 09:14:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216102] Review Request: python-twisted-conch - Twisted SSHv2 implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612271414.kBREEuwP012668@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-conch - Twisted SSHv2 implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216102 ------- Additional Comments From thomas at apestaart.org 2006-12-27 09:14 EST ------- imported, waiting for branch to build -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 14:23:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 09:23:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216104] Review Request: python-twisted-runner - process management library and inetd replacement In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612271423.kBRENKCq013155@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-runner - process management library and inetd replacement https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216104 ------- Additional Comments From thomas at apestaart.org 2006-12-27 09:23 EST ------- portmap.so is a python module, afaict everything works correctly. It's not meant to be linked against. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 14:46:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 09:46:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216104] Review Request: python-twisted-runner - process management library and inetd replacement In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612271446.kBREk8jr013835@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-runner - process management library and inetd replacement https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216104 ------- Additional Comments From thomas at apestaart.org 2006-12-27 09:45 EST ------- http://thomas.apestaart.org/download/pkg/fedora-6-i386-extras/python-twisted-runner-0.2.0-4.fc6/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 14:53:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 09:53:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208169] Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612271453.kBREr3Hn014028@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208169 thomas at apestaart.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 14:53:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 09:53:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612271453.kBRErUHu014127@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 Bug 219972 depends on bug 208169, which changed state. Bug 208169 Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208169 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 15:13:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 10:13:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612271513.kBRFDbpd014693@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 ------- Additional Comments From tscherf at redhat.com 2006-12-27 10:13 EST ------- ok, rpath and permission problems are fixed now. timestamp issue is fixed as well. new package is available here: http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/libprelude-0.9.12-3.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/libprelude.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 15:51:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 10:51:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216106] Review Request: python-twisted-words - Twisted Words contains Instant Messaging implementations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612271551.kBRFpEtj015643@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-words - Twisted Words contains Instant Messaging implementations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216106 ------- Additional Comments From thomas at apestaart.org 2006-12-27 10:51 EST ------- http://thomas.apestaart.org/download/pkg/fedora-6-i386-extras/python-twisted-words-0.4.0-3.fc6/ the idea of core is that indeed it upgrades compatibly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 17:16:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 12:16:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216104] Review Request: python-twisted-runner - process management library and inetd replacement In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612271716.kBRHGkSW019934@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-runner - process management library and inetd replacement https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216104 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-27 12:16 EST ------- In reply to comment #2: Yeah, I know it's not meant to be linked against, but the rpm shows it as a provides. So, if some package somewhere requires 'portmap.so' it will get this package installed. Nothing currently does that I can see, but it just looks messy to provide something that isn't really usable by other packages. There's nothing in the guidelines blocking this, I just thought I would bring it to your attention. The package in comment #3 looks good. I don't see any further blockers, so this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this review request with NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 17:56:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 12:56:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218225] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysql - MySQL MDB2 Driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612271756.kBRHun4Y021208@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysql - MySQL MDB2 Driver Alias: pear-MDB2-mysql https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218225 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-12-27 12:56 EST ------- - SRPM checked into CVS - Entry added to owners.list - Built for devel - Requested branch for FC5/6 Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 18:06:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 13:06:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218226] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-MDB2 - DataSource driver using PEAR::MDB2 and an SQL query In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612271806.kBRI6sRE021577@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-MDB2 - DataSource driver using PEAR::MDB2 and an SQL query Alias: pear-DG-MDB2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218226 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mr.ecik at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-12-27 13:06 EST ------- MUST items: * rpmlint output: W: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-MDB2 filename-too-long-for-joliet php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-MDB2-0.1.2-1.fc7.noarch.rpm * package is named wel * spec file name is good * package meets Packaging Guidelines * package is licensed with a PHP open-source compatible license * License field in spec file matches actual license * license file is included in %doc * md5sums are matching (2c31b48d18bc610cae3f91b86b822932) * BuildRequires listed well * no locales * proper %post and %postun sections * not relocatable * package owns directories well * no duplicates in %files * %files section includes %defattr * proper %clean section * macros used well Another easy to review package ;) Approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 18:07:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 13:07:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209468] Review Request: Sjitter - Another network performance tool... In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612271807.kBRI7CiD021613@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sjitter - Another network performance tool... Alias: sjitter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209468 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(nicolashennion at gma | |il.com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-27 13:07 EST ------- switching to NEEDINFO from reporter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 19:06:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 14:06:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 177747] Review Request: glade3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612271906.kBRJ6sq5023921@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glade3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-12-27 14:06 EST ------- Hmm, is it going to be a painless dropin replacement for older versions of glade available in core? Regarding the packaging. 1. Builds fine in mock (x86) 2. glade3 rpm contains no documentation as does the -devel package (which is fine for the devel). 3. src.rpm has the mixed spaces/tabs warning 4. Why does this have an epoch number? As glade3 is a new package, it shouldn't need an epoch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 19:23:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 14:23:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218232] Review Request: php-pear-Math-Stats - Classes to calculate statistical parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612271923.kBRJNYa3024617@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Math-Stats - Classes to calculate statistical parameters Alias: pear-Math-Stats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218232 josef at toxicpanda.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |josef at toxicpanda.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 19:34:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 14:34:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 177747] Review Request: glade3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612271934.kBRJYVWa025025@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glade3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 ------- Additional Comments From braden at endoframe.com 2006-12-27 14:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > Hmm, is it going to be a painless dropin replacement for older versions of glade > available in core? We can infer from the name of the source distribution and the binary--i.e., deliberately different from the 2.x series--that the answer is "no". But I don't see how this is a packaging issue. (I asked Yuan Yijun to ignore my comment #8 and I ask that others do the same. This is an upstream issue.) I think it's up to the Core and glade2 package maintainers whether they want to keep that package alive alongside a glade3 package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 19:41:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 14:41:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220210] Review Request: krename - Powerful batch file renamer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612271941.kBRJfpHR025277@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: krename - Powerful batch file renamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220210 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-12-27 14:41 EST ------- I managed to build this package today. Closing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 19:43:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 14:43:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216106] Review Request: python-twisted-words - Twisted Words contains Instant Messaging implementations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612271943.kBRJhxHR025355@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-words - Twisted Words contains Instant Messaging implementations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216106 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-27 14:43 EST ------- 1-4: all ok on 5: > the idea of core is that indeed it upgrades compatibly. So, these python-twisted-* subpackages will work with _any_ version of python-twisted-core? Is that always going to be the case? If I have a python-twisted-core I install now, then down the road if I install say python-twisted-words it will work with the old un-updated core package I have? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 20:05:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 15:05:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220284] Review Request: bcfg2 - Configuration management client and server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612272005.kBRK5bYr026243@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bcfg2 - Configuration management client and server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220284 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-12-27 15:05 EST ------- Here's the latest Spec/SRPM: Spec URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/bcfg2-0.8.7.1-5.fc6.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/bcfg2-0.8.7.1-5.fc6.src.rpm I know that this has been approved but I want to wait until upstream pushes a new package that will be licenced according to the standard BSD license (which should happedn RSN). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 20:08:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 15:08:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220766] Review Request: ScientificPython - a collection of Python modules that are useful for scientific computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612272008.kBRK8Z8f026331@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ScientificPython - a collection of Python modules that are useful for scientific computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220766 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2006-12-27 15:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) I'll clean up the descriptive tag crap before I submit. > shouldn't the sub packages be a dependency of the ScientificPython package ? > No, its the other way around. Subpackages depend on the main package. I broke these out as sub-packages specifically because they drag in additional requirements which may or may not be needed and as a result they should be optional. This is a codebase aimed at people writing homebrew scientific simulation code, not an end-user application. I expect everyone using this to have enough grey matter to look for subpackages as needed. I've no desire to delibrately force all subpackages to install dragging in tk and qt and openmpi on every system, systems which be delibrately streamlined for batched scientific computing. You'll notice this sort of thing is already done for python-matplotlib and python-matplotlib-tk so I'm not setting a precendent here. > you missed Doc/BSP_Tutorial.pdf in ScientificPython-doc package Crap thats suppose to be in -BSP subpackage, I missed it when I split off BSP. I'm on the fence about the BSP stuff in general because libBSP is not available in Fedora yet. I'm not even sure what the licensing conditions on libBSP are. The only reason I'm including the BSP python modules at all is because ScientificPython includes a virtual BSP utility which allows you to simulate the use of the BSP protocal on a single processor without the need of libBSP. Cute, but I'm not sure how useful packaging that actually is. Since I've no experience with libBSP installs yet I wasn't going to hold up packaging ScientificPython for this optional functionality. I'm primarily interested in the provided netCDF support, and secondarily the mpi support. I probably need to add a README.Fedora to the -bsp subpackage stating that the libBSP support isn't available yet. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 20:13:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 15:13:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218232] Review Request: php-pear-Math-Stats - Classes to calculate statistical parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612272013.kBRKDdZf026498@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Math-Stats - Classes to calculate statistical parameters Alias: pear-Math-Stats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218232 ------- Additional Comments From josef at toxicpanda.com 2006-12-27 15:13 EST ------- [jwhiter at dhcp59-101 ~]$ rpmlint /home/jwhiter/redhat/RPMS/noarch/php-pear-Math-Stats-0.9.0-0.1.beta3.noarch.rpm W: php-pear-Math-Stats non-standard-dir-in-usr doc [jwhiter at dhcp59-101 ~]$ I'm assuming thats ok since you are putting the doc into a php-pear doc directory. Everything else looks good. As this is my first review I'm going to wait on feedback for the rpmlint error before approving this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 20:54:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 15:54:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219973] Review Request: powerdns - A modern, advanced and high performance authoritative-only nameserver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612272054.kBRKsYwX027400@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: powerdns - A modern, advanced and high performance authoritative-only nameserver Alias: powerdns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219973 ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2006-12-27 15:54 EST ------- Thanks for the review Kevin, > 1. The upstream tar is 'pdns' and their shipped spec file makes a 'pdns-static' > package. Should this package be called 'pdns' instead of 'powerdns' ? Changed it to pdns, althought I'm not entirely happy about it. Most users will try to "yum install powerdns". > 2. Doesn't build on x86_64 under mock. Looks like they have a hard coded > check for mysql libs using /usr/lib: Changed to %{_libdir}/mysql, but I can't test if that works. Can you give it a try? 3. You should probably have your Requires for the subpackages also require the release, ie: Fixed. 4. Why the ldconfig calls in post/postun? Left them in by accident, now fixed. New files: http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/powerdns/pdns.spec http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/powerdns/pdns-2.9.20-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 21:16:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 16:16:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220743] Review Request: postgis - Geographic Information Systems Extensions to PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612272116.kBRLGfhw027995@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgis - Geographic Information Systems Extensions to PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220743 ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 21:17:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 16:17:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220743] Review Request: postgis - Geographic Information Systems Extensions to PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612272117.kBRLHIQ5028049@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgis - Geographic Information Systems Extensions to PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220743 ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ruben at rubenkerkhof.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 21:20:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 16:20:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218232] Review Request: php-pear-Math-Stats - Classes to calculate statistical parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612272120.kBRLKFvw028165@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Math-Stats - Classes to calculate statistical parameters Alias: pear-Math-Stats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218232 ------- Additional Comments From josef at toxicpanda.com 2006-12-27 16:20 EST ------- Ok everything looks good, here is my review check list. review check: -rpmlint output: [jwhiter at dhcp59-101 ~]$ rpmlint /home/jwhiter/redhat/RPMS/noarch/php-pear-Math-Stats-0.9.0-0.1.beta3.noarch.rpm [jwhiter at dhcp59-101 ~]$ - package is named according to the php package naming guidelines - spec file name matches %{name} - package meets package guidlines - package is licensed with appropriate open source license - license feild matches actual license - license is in %doc - license file is written in american english - spec file is legible - sources match upstream ffc0b653e5e2985113262a5299ebe69b Math_Stats-0.9.0beta3.tgz - package successfully compiled on fc6 x86_64 box - buildrequires makes sense and everything required is present - no locales - no shared libraries - not relocatable - owns all directories it creates - no duplicates in %files - permissions set properly - contains a %clean section - uses macros consistently - contains code - no large documentation - files in %doc do not affect runtime - no header files or static libraries - no pkgconfig files - no dynamic libraries provided by package, no need for -devel package - no .la files - not a GUI application - does not own files or directories owned by other packages sorry about the rpmlint problem before, I hadn't run fedora-buildrpmtree on the box I was building on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 21:32:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 16:32:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189195] Review Request: horde - php application framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612272132.kBRLWnOJ028747@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-12-27 16:32 EST ------- OK, finally some time. I note that you emit a message in %post; you generally shouldn't do this. (There's a good chance that the packaging committee will add a guideline banning this sort of output soon.) I set up a test machine with a minimal OS install, installed this package and started httpd. Everything works fine, so that's good. Still, I wonder if we couldn't have this package spit out a subpackage that pulls in all of the optional dependencies (save php-mysql and php-pgsql, leaving the admin to choose). This would make it even easier for an admin to get up and running. The stuff in comment 45 might be useful as well, although we should carefully consider whether increasing the limits like that is safe. Perhaps you could include the lines but comment them out and include some useful info, like how high you need to increase the limits to handle attachments of a certain size (assuming it's possible to calculate that). Now, let's deal with the rpmlint output. I'll put any issues worth considering at the front. Only two things I consider blockers: E: horde script-without-shebang /usr/share/horde/lib/Net/IMSP/Auth/imtest.php This could be an issue; this is executable, but it has no shebang line and thus won't do anything useful if executed. Perhaps it shouldn't be executable? W: horde symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/horde/config /etc/horde This is valid; the symlink should be relative to avoid breaking various odd setups like chroots. W: horde strange-permission registry.php 0640 W: horde mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 143, tab: line 1) These are not a big deal; clean them up if you like. I think checking into CVS will fix the first one, as it's only complaining about the permissions of the file in the SRPM. E: horde htaccess-file /usr/share/horde/lib/.htaccess E: horde htaccess-file /usr/share/horde/locale/.htaccess E: horde htaccess-file /usr/share/horde/po/.htaccess E: horde htaccess-file /usr/share/horde/scripts/.htaccess E: horde htaccess-file /usr/share/horde/templates/.htaccess Yes, indeed, these are htaccess files, and they need to be there. E: horde non-executable-script /usr/share/horde/scripts/temp-cleanup.cron 0644 Not a big deal, although it does open the question of whether we should consider running that. I've never done so on any of my systems. E: horde non-readable /etc/horde/conf.php 0660 E: horde non-readable /etc/horde/conf.php.dist 0640 E: horde non-readable /etc/horde/conf.xml 0660 E: horde non-readable /etc/horde/mime_drivers.php 0660 E: horde non-readable /etc/horde/mime_drivers.php.dist 0640 E: horde non-readable /etc/horde/motd.php 0660 E: horde non-readable /etc/horde/motd.php.dist 0640 E: horde non-readable /etc/horde/nls.php 0660 E: horde non-readable /etc/horde/nls.php.dist 0640 E: horde non-readable /etc/horde/prefs.php 0660 E: horde non-readable /etc/horde/prefs.php.dist 0640 E: horde non-readable /etc/horde/registry.php 0660 E: horde non-readable /etc/horde/registry.php.dist 0640 Yes, and they need to be non-readable. E: horde non-standard-dir-perm /etc/horde 0770 Again, this is necessary. E: horde non-standard-gid /etc/horde apache E: horde non-standard-gid /etc/horde/conf.php apache E: horde non-standard-gid /etc/horde/conf.php.dist apache E: horde non-standard-gid /etc/horde/conf.xml apache E: horde non-standard-gid /etc/horde/mime_drivers.php apache E: horde non-standard-gid /etc/horde/mime_drivers.php.dist apache E: horde non-standard-gid /etc/horde/motd.php apache E: horde non-standard-gid /etc/horde/motd.php.dist apache E: horde non-standard-gid /etc/horde/nls.php apache E: horde non-standard-gid /etc/horde/nls.php.dist apache E: horde non-standard-gid /etc/horde/prefs.php apache E: horde non-standard-gid /etc/horde/prefs.php.dist apache E: horde non-standard-gid /etc/horde/registry.php apache E: horde non-standard-gid /etc/horde/registry.php.dist apache E: horde non-standard-uid /etc/horde apache E: horde non-standard-uid /etc/horde/conf.php apache E: horde non-standard-uid /etc/horde/conf.php.dist apache E: horde non-standard-uid /etc/horde/conf.xml apache E: horde non-standard-uid /etc/horde/mime_drivers.php apache E: horde non-standard-uid /etc/horde/mime_drivers.php.dist apache E: horde non-standard-uid /etc/horde/motd.php apache E: horde non-standard-uid /etc/horde/motd.php.dist apache E: horde non-standard-uid /etc/horde/nls.php apache E: horde non-standard-uid /etc/horde/nls.php.dist apache E: horde non-standard-uid /etc/horde/prefs.php apache E: horde non-standard-uid /etc/horde/prefs.php.dist apache E: horde non-standard-uid /etc/horde/registry.php apache E: horde non-standard-uid /etc/horde/registry.php.dist apache Again, these need to be owned by that UID. W: horde conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/horde/conf.php.dist W: horde conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/horde/conf.xml W: horde conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/horde/mime_drivers.php.dist W: horde conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/horde/motd.php.dist W: horde conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/horde/nls.php.dist W: horde conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/horde/prefs.php.dist W: horde conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/horde/registry.php.dist It is normal for distributed example config files to be installed without noreplace. Review: * source files match upstream: fbc56c608ac81474b846b1b4b7bb5ee7 horde-3.1.3.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. O BuildRequires are proper (BR: perl is unnecessary, but not a blocker) * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly X rpmlint has a couple of valid complaints * final provides and requires are sane: config(horde) = 3.1.3-9.fc7 horde = 3.1.3-9.fc7 = /bin/sh /sbin/service /usr/bin/php config(horde) = 3.1.3-9.fc7 php >= 4.3.0 php-pear(DB) php-pear(File) php-pear(Log) php-pear(Mail_Mime) php-xml * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. Manual tests show everything's working OK. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * locales seem to be handled properly. X file permissions are appropriate (imtest.php) X scriptlets not OK; %post has intentional output * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 21:33:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 16:33:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220743] Review Request: postgis - Geographic Information Systems Extensions to PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612272133.kBRLX5ld028791@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgis - Geographic Information Systems Extensions to PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220743 ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2006-12-27 16:33 EST ------- Must items: OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPL,LGPL for the jdbc driver) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 59b5f89d0a0230b00d80e779bb517520 postgis-1.2.0.tar.gz 59b5f89d0a0230b00d80e779bb517520 postgis-1.2.0.tar.gz.1 OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files are good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have sane scriptlets. NOT OK - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. You need Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version I'll accept the package trusting you'll fix that last item. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 21:56:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 16:56:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220743] Review Request: postgis - Geographic Information Systems Extensions to PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612272156.kBRLuQAn029520@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgis - Geographic Information Systems Extensions to PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220743 devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 21:58:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 16:58:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 197754] Review Request: perl-Perl6-Bible In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612272158.kBRLwh5Z029576@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Perl6-Bible https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197754 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-12-27 16:58 EST ------- I almost forgot about it too. * source files match upstream: b0cbdf1397f1a16ad6e34a39bbb12382 Perl6-Bible-0.30.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream, but appropriate clarification is included in the package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (none needed) * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Perl6::Bible) perl-Perl6-Bible = 0.30-2.fc7 = /usr/bin/perl perl >= 0:5.000 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(File::Spec) perl(Perl6::Bible) perl(strict) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=2, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.03 cusr + 0.03 csys = 0.06 CPU) * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * This is mostly content, not code, but it is permissible content (package documentation) * This is pretty much all documentation; a -docs subpackage would be kind of dumb. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. (Most of the content is not marked %doc, as then the package would indeed be useless.) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 22:00:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 17:00:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 198839] Review Request: sear - WorldForge client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612272200.kBRM0JoK029660@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sear - WorldForge client Alias: sear https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198839 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-12-27 17:00 EST ------- So this has been sitting for a couple of months now; has there been any progress? The blocking SDL bug has been fixed for about a month. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 22:00:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 17:00:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 193059] Review Request: ibmasm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612272200.kBRM0P9q029668@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ibmasm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193059 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-12-27 17:00 EST ------- Ping - has anything happened with this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 22:01:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 17:01:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612272201.kBRM1XeN029740@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-12-27 17:01 EST ------- Was there an update for gstreamer to fix this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 22:01:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 17:01:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220393] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code Introspection Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612272201.kBRM1m03029783@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code Introspection Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220393 ------- Additional Comments From seefeld at sympatico.ca 2006-12-27 17:01 EST ------- I did write the spec file myself, and validated the generated packages with rpmlint. (In fact, I started by using python's own rpm packaging tools, i.e. distutils / build_rpm, and then applied manual modifications to customize the generated spec file to obtain the desired sub-packages as required by the project structure.) I would appreciate if you could provide some detail as to what aspects of the packaging guidelines the existing spec file violates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 22:22:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 17:22:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 193059] Review Request: ibmasm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612272222.kBRMMvSN031151@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ibmasm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193059 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(konradr at redhat.com | |) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 22:24:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 17:24:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 206877] Review Request: bzr-gtk - Bazaar plugin for GTK+ interfaces to most Bazaar operations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612272224.kBRMO7g7031218@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bzr-gtk - Bazaar plugin for GTK+ interfaces to most Bazaar operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206877 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(wtogami at redhat.com | |) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 22:38:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 17:38:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189195] Review Request: horde - php application framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612272238.kBRMcgnN031538@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-12-27 17:38 EST ------- Spec URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/horde.spec SRPM URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/horde-3.1.3-10.src.rpm * Wed Dec 27 2006 Brandon Holbrook 3.1.3-10 - Remove execute permission from all php scripts under horde/lib/ - Make /usr/share/horde/config/ symlink relative - Don't echo anything in %%post Thanks, Jason. I've addressed your blockers in this next RPM. All the php files under horde/lib/ are just class definitions and aren't supposed to be executed. upstream must have let that slip by. I put a find section in prep to clear these bits. I also made the config symlink relative. WRT output in %post, I've been keeping my eye on the thread in the list with interest, knowing that I output in this package. The only issue I have is that this (and some of my other) packages don't work "out of the box", but first require per-site configuration. Coupled with this is the fact that /usr/share/doc is almost unheard of outside of our die-hard linux users circle, and even less so that some packages create a README.Fedora file targeted specifically at users for post-install instructions. We need to find a way to better educate our userbase about /usr/share/doc and README.Fedora files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 22:42:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 17:42:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219071] Review Request: pyfribidi - A Python binding for GNU FriBidi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612272242.kBRMgjT9031665@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyfribidi - A Python binding for GNU FriBidi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219071 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-12-27 17:42 EST ------- this is not a propper review i will not branch until it has a full review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 22:47:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 17:47:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220210] Review Request: krename - Powerful batch file renamer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612272247.kBRMl6lc031792@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: krename - Powerful batch file renamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220210 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-12-27 17:47 EST ------- This package has not had a proper review, and wont be branched until it has. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 23:10:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 18:10:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219962] Review Request: crystal-clear - Crystal Clear KDE Icon set In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612272310.kBRNAQNi032386@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crystal-clear - Crystal Clear KDE Icon set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219962 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 27 23:43:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 18:43:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218226] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-MDB2 - DataSource driver using PEAR::MDB2 and an SQL query In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612272343.kBRNhmTq000593@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-MDB2 - DataSource driver using PEAR::MDB2 and an SQL query Alias: pear-DG-MDB2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218226 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-12-27 18:43 EST ------- - srpm checked into cvs - entry added to owners.list - built for devel - branch requested for fc5/6 Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 00:31:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 19:31:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218217] Review Request: telepathy-stream-engine - Telepathy client to handle media streaming In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612280031.kBS0VbJe001708@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-stream-engine - Telepathy client to handle media streaming https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218217 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-12-27 19:31 EST ------- Jef, thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 01:31:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 20:31:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207839] Review Request: lush - An object-oriented Lisp interpreter and compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612280131.kBS1VPeg002730@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lush - An object-oriented Lisp interpreter and compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207839 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-12-27 20:31 EST ------- My sincere apologies; I seem to have completely forgotten about this one. The compiler flags certainly look correct now. The debuginfo package looks better as a result. Only the acceptable (since this is a compiler) "devel-file-in-non-devel-package" rpmlint complaints remain. Those were the only problems I was, and they're all fixed. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 01:51:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 20:51:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189195] Review Request: horde - php application framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612280151.kBS1pD9I003236@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-12-27 20:50 EST ------- OK, the issues I had are fixed; the symlink is relative, the errant executable permissions are fixed and %post is slient. I agree with you that we need a better way of notifying administrators about things like additional necessary configuration work, but I doubt my suggestion for a simple script to notify the admin in a configurable fashion will get much traction and I doubt anyone would actually see anything sent to syslog. One think you might do is mention README.fedora in your %description. I did ask around about the feasibility of having a subpackage which pulls in the optional dependency and the concensus seems to be that it's not a bad idea. It would be trivial to add and would save the admin some typing. In any case, though, this review is finally done. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 01:53:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 20:53:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220707] Review Request: linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm - with wacomcpl tool, man page In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612280153.kBS1r8Uo003347@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm - with wacomcpl tool, man page https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220707 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 01:57:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 20:57:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196837] Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit3 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612280157.kBS1vXcq003477@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit3 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests Alias: pear-PHPUnit3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196837 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-12-27 20:57 EST ------- Any movement here? It would be nice to get this closed out once and for all. I'm hapy to review this even if it doesn't end up replacing the older versionf of PHPUnit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 03:16:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 22:16:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612280316.kBS3GurU005175@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-12-27 22:16 EST ------- gstreamer-plugins-good 0.10.5 was released a few days ago but it hasn't made it into Fedora yet... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 03:22:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 22:22:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219973] Review Request: powerdns - A modern, advanced and high performance authoritative-only nameserver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612280322.kBS3MwTH005510@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: powerdns - A modern, advanced and high performance authoritative-only nameserver Alias: powerdns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219973 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-27 22:22 EST ------- On the name, I don't think it's a blocker either way, but since the upstream source calls it pdns, I think thats the better choice. If a lot of people know it by 'powerdns' perhaps you could add a: Provides: powerdns = %{name}-%{version} That way if someone does a 'yum install powerdns' it would install the pdns package, and if someone brings in a package called powerdns, you could just make sure it is a newer version than pdns... 3 and 4 look to be fixed. 2 seems to still be broken. You will need to patch the configure or the like... :( checking whether we will be doing verbose logging... no checking whether we should build static binaries... checking whether we will be building the server... yes checking whether we will be building the recursor... no checking for MySQL library directory... configure: error: Didn't find the mysql library dir in '/usr/local/mysql/lib/mysql /usr/local/lib/mysql /opt/mysql/lib/mysql /usr/lib/mysql /usr/local/mysql/lib /usr/local/lib /opt/mysql/lib /usr/lib' error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.2512 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 03:43:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 22:43:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220284] Review Request: bcfg2 - Configuration management client and server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612280343.kBS3hHRN006538@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bcfg2 - Configuration management client and server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220284 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-12-27 22:43 EST ------- Spec URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/bcfg2-0.8.7.3-1.fc6.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/bcfg2-0.8.7.3-1.fc6.src.rpm This is the new version of the package with the updated license... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 04:12:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 23:12:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220860] New: Review Request: galternatives - Alternatives Configurator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220860 Summary: Review Request: galternatives - Alternatives Configurator Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dakingun at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/galternatives/galternatives.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/galternatives/galternatives-0.13.4-1.src.rpm Description: Graphical setup tool for the alternatives system. A GUI to help the system administrator to choose what program should provide a given service. Builds fine in (rawhide) mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 04:32:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 23:32:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220862] New: Review Request: php-channel-phpunit - Add phpunit channel to pear Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220862 Summary: Review Request: php-channel-phpunit - Add phpunit channel to pear Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chris.stone at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-channel-phpunit.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-channel-phpunit-1.0-1.src.rpm Description: This package adds the phpunit channel which allows PEAR packages from this channel to be installed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 04:33:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 23:33:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220862] Review Request: php-channel-phpunit - Add phpunit channel to pear In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612280433.kBS4X5NN010857@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-phpunit - Add phpunit channel to pear Alias: channel-phpunit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220862 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |196837 nThis| | Alias| |channel-phpunit -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 04:33:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 23:33:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196837] Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit3 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612280433.kBS4X6Oo010871@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit3 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests Alias: pear-PHPUnit3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196837 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |220862 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 04:35:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 23:35:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196837] Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit3 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612280435.kBS4ZESo011094@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit3 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests Alias: pear-PHPUnit3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196837 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-12-27 23:35 EST ------- SPEC: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-PHPUnit.spec SRPM: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-PHPUnit-3.0.0-1.src.rpm New SRPM updating to 3.0.0 final. Incorporates Remi's suggestion of adding a channel package. For some really strange reason, if you have php-pear-PHPUnit2 installed, and rpm -Uvh this package, it will remove all the files that are in common between the two packages. I do not understand why, either I am doing something wrong or there is a bug in rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 05:03:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 00:03:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189195] Review Request: horde - php application framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612280503.kBS53wcR013684@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 fedora at theholbrooks.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-12-28 00:03 EST ------- * I went ahead and created a horde-enhanced subpackage as 3.1.3-11 before I imported it that pulls in all the suggested packages * devel build succeeded (logs at http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/24665-horde-3.1.3-11.fc7/) * FC-6 branch requested -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 05:04:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 00:04:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220796] Review Request: turba - horde contact manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612280504.kBS54XJr013757@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: turba - horde contact manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220796 Bug 220796 depends on bug 189195, which changed state. Bug 189195 Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 05:04:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 00:04:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220577] Review Request: imp - webmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612280504.kBS54iYh013779@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: imp - webmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220577 Bug 220577 depends on bug 189195, which changed state. Bug 189195 Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 05:13:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 00:13:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220683] Review Request: rubygems - the Ruby standard for packaging ruby libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612280513.kBS5Dpjc013941@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygems - the Ruby standard for packaging ruby libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220683 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-28 00:13 EST ------- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. see below - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. See below - License See below - License field in spec matches See below - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 5d496e1f415b8b4033ab867f01d1161f rubygems-0.9.0.tgz 5d496e1f415b8b4033ab867f01d1161f rubygems-0.9.0.tgz.1 OK - BuildRequires correct See below - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane: SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. You seem to be mixing %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT best to pick one macro style and stick with it. 2. What is the license here? The web page says: License: Ruby License Your spec says "GPL" The source files all say: "# See LICENSE.txt for permissions." There is no included LICENSE.txt file. 3. Might change %defattr(-, root, root) to %defattr(-, root, root,-) 4. The i386 and x86_64 packages are different, which if this should really be noarch. I see in them: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/ /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/ 5. Do you need the 'ruby' BuildRequires since you have ruby-devel? That should pull that in I would think... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 06:48:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 01:48:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220730] Review Request:gpodder - Podcast receiver/catcher written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612280648.kBS6mR1c016585@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:gpodder - Podcast receiver/catcher written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220730 jspaleta at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2006-12-28 01:48 EST ------- Built in the development tree awaiting signing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 07:14:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 02:14:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220766] Review Request: ScientificPython - a collection of Python modules that are useful for scientific computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612280714.kBS7E5go016922@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ScientificPython - a collection of Python modules that are useful for scientific computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220766 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2006-12-28 02:14 EST ------- Okay here's the latest version of the package. This should take care of everything brought up so far in the comments. http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/ScientificPython/ScientificPython-2.6-4.src.rpm http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/ScientificPython/ScientificPython.spec Changelog: * Wed Dec 27 2006 Jef Spaleta 2.6-4 - move impipython to docs section of mpi subpackage - this is a script which must be editted by hand per system. - Added Doc/BSP_Tutorial.pdf to docs subpackage - Fixed description text line wrapping. rpmlint warnings from All binary packages under mock development: W: ScientificPython* invalid-license CeCILL This is a bogus warning. CeCILL is explicitly compatible with the GPL http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/index_html#GPLCompatibleLicenses W: ScientificPython-devel no-documentation Bogus, I made a seperate docs package to hold the html and pdf documentation W: ScientificPython-qt no-documentation Bogus W: ScientificPython-tk no-documentation Bogus W: ScientificPython-mpi doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/ScientificPython-mpi-2.6/impipython /bin/csh Do I need to strip the executable bits from this file. I've moved this script into documentation because its not strictly necessary for operation and is meant as a troubleshooting aid when using the mpi capability. This is stated in the README.MPI file included in the mpi subpackage docs. In any event, this has to be hand editted to pass the correct number of processors to use to mpirun so its system dependant. Anyone have thoughts concerning any additional effort I need to make with the impipython script? -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 07:39:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 02:39:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220775] Review Request: Exaile! - A music player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612280739.kBS7dOCR017458@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Exaile! - A music player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220775 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-28 02:39 EST ------- Same mock build errors i got. Then i removed patch and it worked well in mock build -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 07:48:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 02:48:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220775] Review Request: Exaile! - A music player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612280748.kBS7mKQU017748@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Exaile! - A music player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220775 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-28 02:48 EST ------- Also add license.txt to %doc then will do final review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 10:03:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 05:03:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220185] Review Request: kvm - Kernel Based Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612281003.kBSA3ZDR024296@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kvm - Kernel Based Virtual Machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220185 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-28 05:03 EST ------- Mock build failed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 10:08:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 05:08:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220210] Review Request: krename - Powerful batch file renamer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612281008.kBSA82Is024523@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: krename - Powerful batch file renamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220210 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-28 05:08 EST ------- Though I am not willing, I will attach a detail for sumbitter's benefit. >From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines = Naming of this package is good = License documentation is included = License is OSI approved = License documentation is actually consistent with the ones actually used in source files. = No shareware data is included = No patents issue is found = This is not a emulators = This is not a binary firmware = No libexecdir files is needed as no wrapper scripts are needed = rpmlint is silent = Changelog entry is proper = Tag is correctly used = Build root tag is okay = Generally "Requires: hicolor-icon-theme" description is not needed, however, I don't object to this. = Dependencies other than libraries' dependencies automatically added by rpmbuild is not necessary = BuildRequires is enough: mockbuild is okay for FC-devel = No redundant BuildRequires is described = Summary and description is okay = Documentation Encodings are fixed (according to my suggestion) = Needed documentation - AUTHORS - COPYING - ChangeLog - README - TODO --- all included (in main package) = Mock build log says that fedora specific compilation flags are correctly passed (checked by grep -v FORTIFY MOCK-krename.log ) = No static libraries nor .la files = There is no libraries duplicate of system libraries = /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpath-worker `rpm -ql krename` does not complain = No conf file = Desktop description is okay desktop-file-varidate does not report any error = desktop-file-install correctly used = Macros correctly used = No mixed use of %{buildroot} <-> $RPM_BUILD_ROOT = %makeinstall not used = Locale files are handled by %find_lang = Timestamps are correctly kept for - xml/html - gettext mo files - png file (checked by `rpm -qilvv --changelog --scripts krename) = Parallel build okay = For scriplets -> According to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets = No shared libraries, ldconfig not needed = No services = No GConf = No Texinfo = No Scrollkeeper = mime type is not needed nor described in desktop file (desktop update is not needed, proper) = mimetype xml is not included = files are installed under %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor -> GTK+ icon cache updating is needed --- correctly handled!! = No fonts = No conditional dependencies = Mockbuild is okay, this means that non-root users' rebuild should work = No content which cannot be accepted in FE is not included = Unowned directory - /usr -> filesystem - /usr/bin -> filesystem - /usr/share -> filesystem - /usr/share/applications -> filesystem - /usr/share/apps -> kdelibs - /usr/share/doc -> filesystem - /usr/share/doc/HTML -> kdelibs - /usr/share/doc/HTML/en -> kdelibs - /usr/share/icons -> redhat-artwork - /usr/share/icons/hicolor -> hicolor-icon-theme - /usr/share/icons/hicolor/??x?? -> hicolor-icon-theme - /usr/share/icons/hicolor/??x??/apps -> hicolor-icon-theme = all okay = Owned directory - /usr/share/apps/konqueror - /usr/share/apps/krename - /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/krename - /usr/share/icons/lcolor = all are not owned by other packages needed by this package ( as for /usr/share/apps/konqueror, this is owned by kdebase, however, this package can be used for NON-KDE user so owning this directory is okay and recommended) = This is no web app and /var/www is not used Then from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines = rpmlint for source is silent = rpmlint for binary rpm is silent = rpmlint for installed rpm is silent = Naming is okay (described above) = Consistency for package guideline is checked above = License is okay (described above) = License documentation included (described above) = Actually I don't know the deferrence between American/British/Other English in detail...... = I can read this spec file with ease = Downloading all sources (one) from described URLs succeeded = md5sum values are same = mockbuild is okay for FC-devel i386 = BuildRequires is okay (described above) = locale handling okay (described above) = ldconfig not needed (described above) = relocable description is not used = Directory ownership is okay (described above) = permission is okay - checked by rpmlint and rpm -qilvv krename = %clean section handled properly = macro usage is okay (described above) = code/content issue is no problem (described above) = No large documentation is included in source tarball and -doc subpackage is not needed = -devel subpackage is not needed = .la files/static archives are not included (described above) = desktop file is correctly installed (described above) = directory ownership is handled correctly (described above) Well, other thing I have noticed = mock build log is okay = file `rpm -ql krename` is no problem = rpm -qilvv --changelog --scripts krename is okay = ( for f in `rpm -ql krename` ; do if file $f | grep -q text ; then echo $f ; done ) | xargs less is okay = It seems that this app works and no segv happened for now = ( for f in `rpm -ql krename` ; do if file $f | grep -q image l then echo $f ; done ) | xargs display is okay = w3m /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/krename/index.html is okay APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 10:18:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 05:18:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220704] Review Request: perl-GPS - Perl interface to a GPS receiver that implements the Garmin protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612281018.kBSAIRAJ025027@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GPS - Perl interface to a GPS receiver that implements the Garmin protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220704 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-12-28 05:18 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Package imported and built for FC-5, FC-6, and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 10:23:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 05:23:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 206877] Review Request: bzr-gtk - Bazaar plugin for GTK+ interfaces to most Bazaar operations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612281023.kBSANxmn025567@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bzr-gtk - Bazaar plugin for GTK+ interfaces to most Bazaar operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206877 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|needinfo?(wtogami at redhat.com| |) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 10:58:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 05:58:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220766] Review Request: ScientificPython - a collection of Python modules that are useful for scientific computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612281058.kBSAwLhg028166@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ScientificPython - a collection of Python modules that are useful for scientific computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220766 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-12-28 05:58 EST ------- I'll review it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 11:43:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 06:43:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216106] Review Request: python-twisted-words - Twisted Words contains Instant Messaging implementations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612281143.kBSBh8fj029802@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-words - Twisted Words contains Instant Messaging implementations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216106 ------- Additional Comments From thomas at apestaart.org 2006-12-28 06:43 EST ------- I can only parrot what the Twisted developers say, and they say this is indeed the intention for a reasonably long series of Twisted (e.g. the 2.x series) If they actually live up to this or will fix stuff when something goes wrong is something I cannot predict of course. What I am reasonably (99.9%) sure of is that *if* there are any problems of that kind an updated -core will be put out to fix whatever is wrong. I don't think versioned depends make a lot of sense in this scenario since you cannot predict when it will *stop* working, so you cannot put an upper limit on your versioned depends anyway. Whatever you put in is going to break regardless . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 11:45:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 06:45:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216104] Review Request: python-twisted-runner - process management library and inetd replacement In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612281145.kBSBjxHk029902@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-runner - process management library and inetd replacement https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216104 ------- Additional Comments From thomas at apestaart.org 2006-12-28 06:45 EST ------- Ah, I see what you mean. Well, it's probably not a problem, given that e.g. [root at otto ~]# rpm -q --provides pygtk2 _gtk.so atk.so gobject.so pango.so pangocairo.so pygtk2 = 2.8.6-0.fc5.1 this looks like something that is already happening. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 11:51:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 06:51:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220766] Review Request: ScientificPython - a collection of Python modules that are useful for scientific computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612281151.kBSBp2rF030124@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ScientificPython - a collection of Python modules that are useful for scientific computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220766 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-12-28 06:51 EST ------- # for the ScientificPython-mpi package: rpm -qlvp /home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/ScientificPython-mpi-2.6-4.i386.rpm -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1090528 Dec 28 12:39 /usr/bin/mpipython [..] -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 111 Oct 6 12:49 /usr/share/doc/ScientificPython-mpi-2.6/impipython contents of : /usr/share/doc/ScientificPython-mpi-2.6/impipython #!/bin/csh mpirun -np 2 /usr/local/bin/mpipython /usr/lib/python2.1/site-packages/Scientific/BSP/Console.py $* you should adjust the path of mpipython since it is found at /usr/bin/mpipython instead of /usr/local/bin/mpipython /usr/lib/python2.1/site-packages/Scientific/BSP/Console.py is incorrect as well since the rpm -qvlp /home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/ScientificPython-bsp-2.6-4.i386.rpm gives -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5278 Oct 6 12:49 /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Scientific/BSP/Console.py [..] Hence the ScientificPython-bsp is a dependecy of ScientificPython-mpi in your spec file you should also add tcsh as requires for the ScientificPython-mpi package, like Requires: openmpi-libs tcsh ScientificPython-bsp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 11:54:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 06:54:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219071] Review Request: pyfribidi - A Python binding for GNU FriBidi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612281154.kBSBsale030345@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyfribidi - A Python binding for GNU FriBidi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219071 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-28 06:54 EST ------- I am not willing, however I attach a detail for submitter's benefit. >From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : = Naming (pyfribidi) is consistent with source tarball = License is OSI approved (GPL) = License document is really consistent with source codes = License document is included = This is not shareware = Patents issue is not found = This is not a emulator = No binary firmware is included = Putting files into %{_libexecdir} is not needed, no wrapper script is needed = rpmlint for srpm is silent = rpmlint for binary rpm is silent = rpmlint for installed rpm is silent = Changelog is properly written = Tags are properly handled = Buildroot description is okay = For Requires: This package does not require anything other than dependencies automatically pulled by rpmbuild from libraries' dependency. For this package, this is correct = Mockbuild is okay. = No redundant BuildRequires are included = Summary and description are okay = The included text files have no special encodings = Documentation needed to be included - AUTHORS - COPYING - ChangeLog = All added (ChangeLog is added on -2) = Mockbuild log says that = fedora specific compilation flags are passed = -fPIC is correctly used for .so file = No static libraries nor .la files = There is no libraries duplicate of system libraries = /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths-worker `rpm -ql pyfribidi` does not complain = This package has no %config file = Do desktop files are needed = Macros are correctly used = No mixed usage of %{buildroot} <-> $RPM_BUILD_ROOT = %makeinstall is not used = This package has no gettext mo files = ... not needed to check timestamps for this package (accroding to `rpm -ql pyfribidi`) = ... not needed to use "parallel make" as this use distutils.core in python = No scriptlets are needed = No worry about conditional dependency = Mockbuild is okay so normal users' rpmbuild should succeed = No relocatable description is written = No unacceptable code/content is included in source tarball = Unowned directories: /usr -> filesystem /usr/lib -> filesystem /usr/lib/python2.5 -> python /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ /usr/share/ -> filesystem /usr/share/doc -> filesystem = all okay = Owned directories: /usr/share/doc/pyfribidi-0.6.0 = only owned by this package = This is not web application and /var/www is not used >From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python : = Python version description is no longer needed = site_arch usage is properly used (this is arch-dependent and some codes are written in C) = setuptools/eggs ... not needed... = pyo file is included = No needed to worry about unnecessary bite compilation Special note about python related package: = Note: for some python related package manual check of what the package require as runtime is needed. This is usually done by checking "import" sentence. For this package, no worry is needed for manual checking of python related requirement. Then From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : = rpmlint is no problem (already described) = Naming is okay (already described) = spec file naming is consistent with package name = License issue is okay (already described) = Well, actually I don't like to use dl.sourceforge.net description because this requires many time to resolve DNS (and in many cases it fails... for me), however some reviewers say that dl.sourceforge.net should be used... so I leave as it is = md5sum value coincides. = License documents are included (already described) = I can read this spec file with ease = Mockbuild is okay for FC-devel i386 (already described) = BuildRequires okay (already described) = ldconfig not needed = relocatable description is not written (already described) = permissions of files are correct (checked by rpm -qilvv pyfribidi) = macros are correctly used (already described) = code/content issues are okay (already described) = No large documentations are added = no %doc dependency = no header files and -devel package is not needed = no .la files nor static archives = this is not a GUI package = directory ownership is correct (already described) Other things I have noticed = mock build log is no problem = file `rpm -ql pyfribidi` is no problem = less /usr/share/doc/pyfribidi*/* is no problem = -------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at softbank218114170036 pyfribidi-0.6.0]$ ldd -r /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pyfribidi.so undefined symbol: dlsym (/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pyfribidi.so) undefined symbol: dlerror (/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pyfribidi.so) undefined symbol: log (/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pyfribidi.so) undefined symbol: fmod (/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pyfribidi.so) undefined symbol: forkpty (/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pyfribidi.so) undefined symbol: openpty (/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pyfribidi.so) undefined symbol: exp (/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pyfribidi.so) undefined symbol: sin (/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pyfribidi.so) undefined symbol: hypot (/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pyfribidi.so) undefined symbol: pow (/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pyfribidi.so) undefined symbol: atan2 (/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pyfribidi.so) undefined symbol: cos (/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pyfribidi.so) undefined symbol: dlopen (/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pyfribidi.so) linux-gate.so.1 => (0x00748000) libfribidi.so.0 => /usr/lib/libfribidi.so.0 (0x00eb8000) libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x004a8000) libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x0078b000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x00b8d000) ------------------------------------------------- - all undefined symbols are in libm.so (used in /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0) libdl.so.2 (same as above) so they are okay APPROVED (already)...... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 11:54:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 06:54:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220766] Review Request: ScientificPython - a collection of Python modules that are useful for scientific computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612281154.kBSBso1K030369@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ScientificPython - a collection of Python modules that are useful for scientific computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220766 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-12-28 06:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > /usr/lib/python2.1/site-packages/Scientific/BSP/Console.py is incorrect as well > since the > rpm -qvlp /home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/ScientificPython-bsp-2.6-4.i386.rpm > gives > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5278 Oct 6 12:49 > /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Scientific/BSP/Console.py > [..] Beware in rawhide, it will be usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Scientific/BSP/Console.py -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 12:09:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 07:09:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220766] Review Request: ScientificPython - a collection of Python modules that are useful for scientific computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612281209.kBSC9oO3031085@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ScientificPython - a collection of Python modules that are useful for scientific computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220766 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-12-28 07:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > I probably need to add a README.Fedora to the -bsp subpackage stating that the > libBSP support isn't available yet. Or perhaps document it somewhere in the fedoraproject.org/wiki :) Since in the /usr/share/doc/ScientificPython-mpi-2.6/README.MPI, it states, The module Scientific.MPI is documented in the ScientificPython manual. The main purpose of this file is to explain how to install ScientificPython with MPI support.[...] You could possibly add useful information from that file to the wiki page without those installation notes. Then /usr/share/doc/ScientificPython-mpi-2.6/README.MPI might be useless, afterwards /usr/share/doc/ScientificPython-mpi-2.6/impipython could be at /usr/bin/impipython What do you think ? Since, I'm concerned too with scientific packages at Fedora, possibly we could gather some packagers (scientific packages) to document their changes during packaging on the wiki. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/SciTech We already have SciTech SIG, we could bring it to life, just like the PHP SIG is doing a great job. And help each other during reviews, troubleshooting, etc... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 12:15:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 07:15:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220766] Review Request: ScientificPython - a collection of Python modules that are useful for scientific computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612281215.kBSCFbic031343@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ScientificPython - a collection of Python modules that are useful for scientific computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220766 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-12-28 07:15 EST ------- # for the qt package Requires: pyQt The real name is PyQt is not yum won't be able to find that dependency :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 12:37:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 07:37:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220443] Review Request: gnome-commander - A nice and fast file manager for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612281237.kBSCbUkF032259@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-commander - A nice and fast file manager for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220443 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 12:38:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 07:38:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220443] Review Request: gnome-commander - A nice and fast file manager for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612281238.kBSCcjxe032396@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-commander - A nice and fast file manager for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220443 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-28 07:38 EST ------- wow i like this application. its cool app for FE :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 12:40:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 07:40:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220443] Review Request: gnome-commander - A nice and fast file manager for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612281240.kBSCeeCf032574@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-commander - A nice and fast file manager for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220443 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-28 07:40 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPMS. + source files match upstream. 817ee443d970c9efb5553b7b6103ab86 gnome-commander-1.2.3.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists + no .la files. + translations are available + Dose owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + Provides: libcvs.so.0 libfileroller.so.0 libgcmd.so.0 libgviewer.so.0 + file permissions are appropriate. + Desktop file installed succesfully + Desktop file is handled correclty in SPEC file. + GUI app APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 13:00:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 08:00:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220888] New: Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220888 Summary: Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/fakeroot.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/fakeroot-1.5.10-9.at.src.rpm Description: Gives a fake root environment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 13:00:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 08:00:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220889] New: Review Request: fakechroot - Gives a fake chroot environment Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220889 Summary: Review Request: fakechroot - Gives a fake chroot environment Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/fakechroot.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/fakechroot-2.5-8.at.src.rpm Description: Gives a fake chroot environment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 13:00:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 08:00:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220890] New: Review Request: libcdaudio - Control operation of a CD-ROM when playing audio CDs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220890 Summary: Review Request: libcdaudio - Control operation of a CD- ROM when playing audio CDs Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/libcdaudio.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/libcdaudio-0.99.12p2-7.at.src.rpm Description: libcdaudio is a library designed to provide functions to control operation of a CD-ROM when playing audio CDs. It also contains functions for CDDB and CD Index lookup. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 13:00:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 08:00:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220891] New: Review Request: greylistd - Greylisting daemon Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220891 Summary: Review Request: greylistd - Greylisting daemon Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/greylistd.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/greylistd-0.8.2-6.at.src.rpm Description: Greylisting is a simple but highly effective means to weed out messages that are being delivered via spamware/ratware tools. The idea is to establish whether a prior relationship exists between the sender and the receiver of a message. Most of the time it does, and the delivery proceeds normally. On the other hand, if no prior relationship exists, the delivery is temporarily rejected. Legitimate MTAs will treat this response accordingly, and retry the delivery in a while. In contrast, ratware will usually fail to retry the delivery in a normal fashion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 13:37:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 08:37:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220284] Review Request: bcfg2 - Configuration management client and server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612281337.kBSDbsiP002140@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bcfg2 - Configuration management client and server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220284 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-12-28 08:37 EST ------- Reapproving :) Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 14:00:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 09:00:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612281400.kBSE08x4003539@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-12-28 09:00 EST ------- I just repinged the authors and other patent holders on what the situation is with vtk and patents (other than the "trivial" mpeg bits): http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/vtkusers/2006-December/088816.html (note that I don't expect an answer this year anymore, so you should follow up the archives into January if you are viewing this in 2007). I'm not sure whether this is the proper action yet, perhaps this package should be marked as blocking FE-LEGAL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 14:34:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 09:34:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220888] Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612281434.kBSEYr6e005367@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220888 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-28 09:34 EST ------- When i look at SPEC only i found %{_libdir}/libfakeroot/libfakeroot.a %{_libdir}/libfakeroot/libfakeroot.la above things should not be added and they must be removed from installation. Following file should be installed from -devel package %{_libdir}/libfakeroot/libfakeroot-0.so you need to add -devel package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 14:47:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 09:47:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220888] Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612281447.kBSEl4Zx005728@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220888 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-28 09:47 EST ------- Kindly check your other package's SPEC which looks good. http://dl.atrpms.net/all/libcdaudio.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 14:50:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 09:50:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220890] Review Request: libcdaudio - Control operation of a CD-ROM when playing audio CDs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612281450.kBSEoCxH005792@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcdaudio - Control operation of a CD-ROM when playing audio CDs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220890 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-28 09:50 EST ------- rpmlint on SRPM gave me W: libcdaudio invalid-license GPL2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 15:06:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 10:06:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220888] Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612281506.kBSF6nO7006251@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220888 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-12-28 10:06 EST ------- What does libcdaudio have to do with this submission? :) I'm removing static and libtool (although the latter has been in investigation by the FPC whether it is really neccessary), but it makes no sense to add a devel subpackage with a single symlink in it. Other than that libfakeroot-0.so isn't a symlink, but libfakeroot.so is, so it would had been the latter that would need to be cast out. But the latter is the one that is being used by fakeroot, so it isn't even possible to split these two. Note that the so files found here are not conventional shared libs that are intended to be linked against, but are dsos for preloading ld.so, e.g. part of runtime proper. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 15:12:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 10:12:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220889] Review Request: fakechroot - Gives a fake chroot environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612281512.kBSFCdLW006531@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fakechroot - Gives a fake chroot environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220889 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Package Review |915resolution ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-28 10:12 EST ------- Kindly remove .a and .la files from installation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 15:15:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 10:15:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220888] Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612281515.kBSFF9u4006628@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220888 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|panemade at gmail.com | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-28 10:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > What does libcdaudio have to do with this submission? :) You are right. My comment was not complete. I am really sorry for that. I should have mentioned that check what other SPEC did with .so* files installation. > > I'm removing static and libtool (although the latter has been in investigation > by the FPC whether it is really neccessary), but it makes no sense to add a > devel subpackage with a single symlink in it. > > Other than that libfakeroot-0.so isn't a symlink, but libfakeroot.so is, so it > would had been the latter that would need to be cast out. But the latter is the > one that is being used by fakeroot, so it isn't even possible to split these two. > > Note that the so files found here are not conventional shared libs that are > intended to be linked against, but are dsos for preloading ld.so, e.g. part of > runtime proper. OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 15:19:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 10:19:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220888] Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612281519.kBSFJhOr006781@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220888 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-12-28 10:19 EST ------- P.S. This package is missing a BR in Fedora (po4a), so it's not 100% ready for review, yet. I'm commiting the missing BR shortly and will block this submission with it then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 15:53:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 10:53:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220443] Review Request: gnome-commander - A nice and fast file manager for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612281553.kBSFrrgc007818@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-commander - A nice and fast file manager for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220443 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-28 10:53 EST ------- Thank you!! I * rebuild this package on FE-devel, which succeeded * requested to import this package to FE5/6. Now I close this bug as CLOSED NEXTRELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 16:13:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 11:13:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220775] Review Request: Exaile! - A music player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612281613.kBSGD042008345@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Exaile! - A music player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220775 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2006-12-28 11:12 EST ------- The patch is necessary for build on fedora devel. I've reworked the patch, and tested it on FC6 so it should be o.k. now I don't think adding license.txt to %doc is necessary, it just repeating what's been already specified in the spec, that the package is under GPL license. Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/exaile/exaile.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/exaile/exaile-0.2.6-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 16:24:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 11:24:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220789] Review Request: fail2ban - Ban IPs that make too many password failures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612281624.kBSGOpLH008689@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fail2ban - Ban IPs that make too many password failures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220789 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-28 11:24 EST ------- Well, A. First for general packaging issue of this package: E: fail2ban only-non-binary-in-usr-lib ! Well, for this package moving all files in /usr/lib to %{_datadir} seems very easy and I recommend it (currently not a blocker, however would you contact with upstream?) * And... for this package the directory is /usr/lib, not %{_libdir}!! You can check this by setup.py (hard-coded) W: fail2ban service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/fail2ban * Umm.. I think this should be avoided. This warning is due to the line --------------------------------------------------------------- # chkconfig: 345 91 9 --------------------------------------------------------------- of /etc/rc.d/init.d/fail2ban . The description "345" means that fail2ban service is automatically enabled when installed on the level of 3-5 (man 8 chkconfig) And... > The service may be enabled, but in absence of > /etc/fail2ban.conf (which is the default) it will not start. * I think only the default behaviour of this script is unkind because fail2ban won't start but no error message is printed out. Current message is: ------------------------------------------------------ Starting fail2ban: ------------------------------------------------------ Some messages like ------------------------------------------------------ Starting fail2ban: configulation file not found [ FAILED ] ------------------------------------------------------ should be printed out. Also, the exit status of the failure should not be 0. Even I copyed /usr/share/doc/fail2ban/fail2ban.conf.iptables to /etc/fail2ban.conf, no message is printed out. Some messages which tells that starting daemon succeeded should be printed out. Well, then... B. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : ! Licensing - Well, this package is licensed under GPL, however, GPL document is not included in source tarball. Currently this is not a blocker, however, please ask the upstream to include GPL document to source tarball. ! Filesystem Layout - Described above (not a blocker) - My opinion is fail2ban should be under %{_sbindir}. - Usually config files of initscripts should be under %{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig * Scriptlets requirements ( http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ) - For /sbin/chkconfig and etc Please write Requires(post): /sbin/chkconfig and others - condrestart scriptlet on %postun stage is needed * File and Directory Ownership - My opinion is that this package should own /var/log/fail2ban as a ghost file. C. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : = Okay, except for written in A and B. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 16:53:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 11:53:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220789] Review Request: fail2ban - Ban IPs that make too many password failures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612281653.kBSGr4Tx009445@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fail2ban - Ban IPs that make too many password failures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220789 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-12-28 11:53 EST ------- Thanks for the first pass. I agree on the /usr/lib stuff. I'll fix it and contact upstream. I also agree with most other points and am disappointed for forgetting /sbin/chkconfig :/ I'll attack all points and come back with "-2" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 16:56:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 11:56:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196837] Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit3 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612281656.kBSGufR2009589@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit3 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests Alias: pear-PHPUnit3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196837 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-12-28 11:56 EST ------- Okay, I think I know what is going on with the Provides/Obsoletes for PHPUnit2. When PHPUnit2 gets to its %postun section it calls pear uninstall which removes the files. So I don't think we can use Provides/Obsoletes in this case. We probably have to explicitly use a Conflicts tag in this case. Comments/Suggestions? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 17:47:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 12:47:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220766] Review Request: ScientificPython - a collection of Python modules that are useful for scientific computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612281747.kBSHllpW011458@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ScientificPython - a collection of Python modules that are useful for scientific computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220766 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2006-12-28 12:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > # for the ScientificPython-mpi package: > > rpm -qlvp /home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/ScientificPython-mpi-2.6-4.i386.rpm > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1090528 Dec 28 12:39 /usr/bin/mpipython > [..] > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 111 Oct 6 12:49 > /usr/share/doc/ScientificPython-mpi-2.6/impipython > > contents of : /usr/share/doc/ScientificPython-mpi-2.6/impipython > #!/bin/csh > mpirun -np 2 /usr/local/bin/mpipython > /usr/lib/python2.1/site-packages/Scientific/BSP/Console.py $* > > you should adjust the path of mpipython since it is found at /usr/bin/mpipython > instead of /usr/local/bin/mpipython I noticed this... it was yet another reason I put this into the documentation section. It has to be hand adjusted for number of cpus to use regardless. I'm just going to end up just replacing this file completely and generating a new one. The patch for this file would be longer than the inline cat command to produce a new one. > > /usr/lib/python2.1/site-packages/Scientific/BSP/Console.py is incorrect as well since the rpm -qvlp /home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/ScientificPython-bsp-2.6-4.i386.rpm > Hence the ScientificPython-bsp is a dependecy of ScientificPython-mpi I think I'm going to merge the bsp and mpi stuff into one subpackage. Should I just call the new subpackage ScientificPython-mpi or should I be more encompassing and call it ScientificPython-parallelprocessing ? If we ever get libbsp in Fedora Extras I can build the additional libbsp support into the subpackage. Once you are doing parallelization having libbsp installed is probably acceptable. > > in your spec file you should also add tcsh as requires for the > ScientificPython-mpi package, like > Requires: openmpi-libs tcsh ScientificPython-bsp technically I dont think so since the script is placed in as part of the documetnation. It is a reference script, its not critical.. I would even call it trivial. No matter what you do you have to edit this by hand to at least set the number of processors for mpirun to use. My understanding is that reference scripts or examples included as documentation in a packages %doc section do not need to include their intepreter as a hard requirement on the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 17:52:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 12:52:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214087] Review Request: libextractor -- Simple library for keyword extraction In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612281752.kBSHqeKn011641@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libextractor -- Simple library for keyword extraction https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214087 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-28 12:52 EST ------- Well, this package is okay. This package (libextractor) is APPROVED by me -------------------------------------------------- COMMENTS (none of the following two are blockers) - I recommend to add your name to README.fedora - My opinion is -------------------------------------------------- /etc/alternatives/libextractor_thumbnail /usr/lib/libextractor/plugins/ibextractor-thumbnail.so -------------------------------------------------- should be owned as ghost files by -thumbnailgtk and -thumbnailqt packages, however, currently no other package own /etc/alternatives/* files nor alternate link files. How do you think?? NOTES A. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines = Naming okay = Legal okay - GPL (OSI approved) - Documentation included - Actually coincide with source code license - No patent-related issue = Filesystem Layout okay = rpmlint -- not silent, however all can be ignored = Changelog proper = Tag okay = Buildroot okay (although not a format of "recommended") = Requires - not needed but for ones automatically checked by rpmbuild = BuildRequires - mockbuild okay = Summary/Description okay = Documentation - all files which should be included are all included actually = Mockbuild says Fedora specific compilation flags are passed = No static archives/la files = No use of local copy of system libraries = rpm -qa libextractor\* | xargs rpm -ql | xargs /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths-worker does not complain = No config file = This is not GUI package = Macros are correctly handled = No mixed usage of %buildroot <-> $RPM_BUILD_ROOT = %makeinstall not used = proper %find_lang usage = Timestamps okay = Parallel make intentionally disabled = Scriptlets: ... okay - ldconfig - alternatives = Relocation disabled = Ownership okay = Not web apps, /var/www is not used B. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines = Source download okay = md5sum coincide = No duplicate files description = %clean section okay = -doc subpackage not needed = -devel package okay = Requires ... as discussed = BuildRequires okay -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 17:58:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 12:58:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220766] Review Request: ScientificPython - a collection of Python modules that are useful for scientific computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612281758.kBSHwYq5011861@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ScientificPython - a collection of Python modules that are useful for scientific computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220766 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2006-12-28 12:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Or perhaps document it somewhere in the fedoraproject.org/wiki :) > Since in the /usr/share/doc/ScientificPython-mpi-2.6/README.MPI, it states,> > The module Scientific.MPI is documented in the ScientificPython > manual. The main purpose of this file is to explain how to install > ScientificPython with MPI support.[...] > > You could possibly add useful information from that file to the wiki page > without those installation notes. No, I'm not thrilled at using the wiki as the primary source of information. If you want to make a scientific computing wiki section that provides more expansive information across the spectrum of available software tools... go right ahead. But my primary concern is to provide the necessary information in the packaging documentation for this package. Other packages already use README.Fedora files to document Fedora specific changes. If you have suggestions on what I should be including in a README.Fedora file, I'll do that. But I'm not going to try to divide my time between the package CVS and the wiki for package specific documentation. Then > /usr/share/doc/ScientificPython-mpi-2.6/README.MPI might be useless, afterwards > /usr/share/doc/ScientificPython-mpi-2.6/impipython could be at /usr/bin/impipython No impipython cannot be in /usr/bin/ because you still have to set the number of processors to use with mpirun by hand. There is no way around it, the script is clearly a trivial reference script. I'm not going to work on enhancing this script into a generally useful executable as part of downstream packaging activity. > > What do you think ? > Since, I'm concerned too with scientific packages at Fedora, possibly we could > gather some packagers (scientific packages) to document their changes during > packaging on the wiki. > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/SciTech > We already have SciTech SIG, we could bring it to life, I'm not interested in participating in any coordinated SIG activities at this point. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 18:00:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 13:00:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219114] Review Request: flac123 - Command-line program for playing FLAC audio files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612281800.kBSI0qxM011951@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flac123 - Command-line program for playing FLAC audio files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219114 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 18:33:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 13:33:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216106] Review Request: python-twisted-words - Twisted Words contains Instant Messaging implementations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612281833.kBSIXgaV012805@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-words - Twisted Words contains Instant Messaging implementations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216106 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-28 13:33 EST ------- >I can only parrot what the Twisted developers say, and they say this is indeed >the intention for a reasonably long series of Twisted (e.g. the 2.x series) > >If they actually live up to this or will fix stuff when something goes wrong is >something I cannot predict of course. Thats fine... as long as they plan to keep compatibility thats good. > >What I am reasonably (99.9%) sure of is that *if* there are any problems of >that kind an updated -core will be put out to fix whatever is wrong. Well, if that has to happen, you will also have to add a versioned requirement to any of the subpackages that need the new fixed core package. Otherwise you can have a case where someone installs fc6, installs python-twisted-core, and then many months later installs say python-twisted-words. Since there isn't a version requirement there it will happily install with the older python-twisted-core package. > >I don't think versioned depends make a lot of sense in this scenario since you >cannot predict when it will *stop* working, so you cannot put an upper limit on >your versioned depends anyway. Whatever you put in is going to break >regardless . As long as the subpackages are working with the available core package there shouldn't be an issue. If there is something in a subpackage that needs a fix in the core package, I think at that point you will have to add a versioned requirement for the fixed core. So, I think there is no issue now with it being unversioned. If it needs to be versioned later for a fix you can do so at that point. I see no further blockers here... this package is APPROVED. Please remember to close this package review as NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 18:42:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 13:42:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219978] Review Request: thunar-media-tags-plugin - Media Tags plugin for the Thunar file manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612281842.kBSIg8rT013134@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thunar-media-tags-plugin - Media Tags plugin for the Thunar file manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219978 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-12-28 13:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > > 1. Should the name of this package have a capital T ? I don't think so. Yes, Thunar has a capital T, but in case of Thunar * source has capital T * the binary has capital T * lowercase "thunar" is only a symlink to capital Thunar In case of this package we have * lowercase source * lowercase lib %{name}.so * lowercase locales %{name}.mo So I think we should leave it lowercase. Thanks for the review, wish you a happy new year! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 18:44:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 13:44:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220862] Review Request: php-channel-phpunit - Add phpunit channel to pear In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612281844.kBSIiiPP013194@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-phpunit - Add phpunit channel to pear Alias: channel-phpunit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220862 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |Fedora at FamilleCollet.com ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-12-28 13:44 EST ------- As i proposed this solution i think i could not review it ;) Who own %{pear_phpdir}/.channels ? This package probably should own it, or you could post a RFE against php-pear. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 18:51:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 13:51:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220862] Review Request: php-channel-phpunit - Add phpunit channel to pear In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612281851.kBSIpacH013366@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-phpunit - Add phpunit channel to pear Alias: channel-phpunit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220862 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-12-28 13:51 EST ------- I think php-pear already owns it: # rpm -qf /usr/share/pear/.channels/ php-pear-1.4.9-4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 18:57:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 13:57:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612281857.kBSIvgGw013499@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-28 13:57 EST ------- Well, I will check -3 package today (in Japan: EST+14h)... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 19:40:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 14:40:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211807] Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612281940.kBSJeP1O014723@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211807 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-28 14:40 EST ------- Hey Gawain. I'd like to move this forward if possible. 1. Any chance of an updated 2.0.0.1 rpm? 2. Can you ping Christopher ( caillon at redhat.com ) and confirm that he is ok with you moving forward with this package. He's the firefox maintainer in core, and I don't think we want to cause him problems or issues. I would like to see a up or down from him here before reviewing this. I will take a look at the x86_64 build as soon as my mock build gets there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 20:10:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:10:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219973] Review Request: powerdns - A modern, advanced and high performance authoritative-only nameserver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612282010.kBSKAUnV015691@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: powerdns - A modern, advanced and high performance authoritative-only nameserver Alias: powerdns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219973 ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2006-12-28 15:10 EST ------- Hi Kevin, - I added Provide: powerdns = %{name}-%{version}-%{release} - It should now find the mysql libs on x64, turns out it is --with-mysql-lib= instead of --with-mysql- libs. New versions: http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/powerdns/pdns.spec http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/powerdns/pdns-2.9.20-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 20:14:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:14:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612282014.kBSKEvjh015794@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ed at eh3.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |ed at eh3.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2006-12-28 15:14 EST ------- Hi Axel, I saw your comments on the VTK list. I'm an occasional VTK user and hope that it can be included in Fedora. I'm also a little concerned about the possible legal problems stemming from past (have they expired?) patents. Would you be willing to continue with the review process (that is, addressing the items in comments #10 and #26) while, in parallel, we contact FESCO, Fedora Legal, or whoever it is within Fedora who can provide an authoritative response to the legal issues? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 20:52:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:52:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612282052.kBSKqg6P016846@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-12-28 15:52 EST ------- Thanks for picking this up for review, it's been w/o a reviewer for more than 5 months. :) The next thing that needs to be done on a technical level is to remove the mpeg source code (which will also remove any weak symbol issues). I already contacted fedora-packaging for some advice on what the proper procedure is to have a documented way for a reviewer to check that the remaining source is still what upstream created and not some trojan horse ;) But let's wait until both kitware and GE make their comments on the patents (especially GE and Marching Cubes). I wouldn't like to find us placing lots of efforts which some of the patent holders may send to /dev/null for fun. BTW this package depends on bug #199402, which is needed for testing this one. Bug #199402 also needs a review. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 20:58:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:58:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612282058.kBSKw5UJ017065@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-12-28 15:58 EST ------- > BTW this package depends on bug #199402, which is needed for testing this one. > Bug #199402 also needs a review. :) Well, putting my brain back into shape: a) the bug in question is bug #199406, not bug #199402 ... b) technically the dependencies are reverse, e.g. the vtkdata package requires this one, but for vtkdata is a very good test for vtk. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 21:43:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 16:43:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220919] New: Review Request: kronolith - The Horde calendar application Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220919 Summary: Review Request: kronolith - The Horde calendar application Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at theholbrooks.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/kronolith.spec SRPM URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/kronolith-2.1.3-1.src.rpm Description: Kronolith is the Horde calendar application. It provides repeating events, all-day events, custom fields, keywords, and managing multiple users through Horde Authentication. The calendar API that Kronolith uses is abstracted; MCAL and SQL drivers are currently provided. The Horde Project writes web applications in PHP and releases them under Open Source licenses. For more information (including help with Kronolith) please visit http://www.horde.org/. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 21:49:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 16:49:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220577] Review Request: imp - webmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612282149.kBSLnVac018728@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: imp - webmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220577 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-12-28 16:49 EST ------- Spec URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/imp.spec SRPM URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/imp-4.1.3-2.src.rpm Fallout from the horde package review, the symlink to /etc/horde/imp is now relative. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 21:57:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 16:57:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220796] Review Request: turba - horde contact manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612282157.kBSLvav4019259@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: turba - horde contact manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220796 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-12-28 16:57 EST ------- Spec URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/turba.spec SRPM URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/turba-2.1.3-2.src.rpm Fallout from the horde review: the symlink to /etc/horde/turba/ is now relative. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 22:02:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:02:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220919] Review Request: kronolith - The Horde calendar application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612282202.kBSM2vGv019667@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kronolith - The Horde calendar application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220919 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-12-28 17:02 EST ------- Spec URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/kronolith.spec SRPM URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/kronolith-2.1.4-1.src.rpm Wups, forgot to bump to 2.1.4 :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 22:15:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:15:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220922] New: Review Request: geany - a lightweight gtk2 based IDE Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220922 Summary: Review Request: geany - a lightweight gtk2 based IDE Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: josef at toxicpanda.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.toxicpanda.com/geany.spec SRPM URL: http://www.toxicpanda.com/geany-0.10-1.src.rpm Description: Geany is a small and fast editor with basic features of an integrated development environment. Some features: - syntax highlighting - code completion - code folding - call tips - folding - many supported filetypes like C, Java, PHP, HTML, Python, Perl, Pascal - symbol lists -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 22:26:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:26:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 200630] Review Request: postgresql_autodoc - PostgreSQL AutoDoc Utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612282226.kBSMQUc3021393@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql_autodoc - PostgreSQL AutoDoc Utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200630 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-12-28 17:26 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=144501) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=144501&action=view) Patch to add prompt for password -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 22:28:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:28:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220926] New: Review Request: ingo - The Horde email filter manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220926 Summary: Review Request: ingo - The Horde email filter manager Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at theholbrooks.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/ingo.spec SRPM URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/ingo-1.1.2-1.src.rpm Description: Ingo, the "Email Filter Rules Manager", started as a frontend for the Sieve filter language, and is now a generic and complete filter rule frontend that currently is able to create Sieve, procmail, and IMAP filter rules. The IMAP filter driver translates the filter rules on demand to IMAP commands, executed via PHP's IMAP extension and has replaced IMP's internal filtering code. It is now the default filtering agent in IMP H3 (4.0). The Horde Project writes web applications in PHP and releases them under Open Source licenses. For more information (including help with ingo) please visit http://www.horde.org/. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 22:31:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:31:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220922] Review Request: geany - a lightweight gtk2 based IDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612282231.kBSMVWwc021530@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geany - a lightweight gtk2 based IDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220922 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 22:35:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:35:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 200630] Review Request: postgresql_autodoc - PostgreSQL AutoDoc Utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612282235.kBSMZY7E021660@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql_autodoc - PostgreSQL AutoDoc Utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200630 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-12-28 17:35 EST ------- Previous patch is untested. It uses Term::ReadKey to prompt for a password if the user specifies --password on the commandline. You'll need to add a BuildRequires for perl(Term::ReadKey). Not sure if rpm will pick up the matching Requires: automatically as I haven't tested this. The spec file is now picking up duplicate files in the %files section: %{_datadir}/pgsql/%{name} %{_datadir}/pgsql/%{name}/*.tmpl You should only have the first of those two lines as rpm will find files inside the directory recursively. I'd say the next step is to see if the patch I proposed works for you, see if upstream is amenable to including it, and then release an rpm with it included. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 22:38:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:38:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219973] Review Request: pdns - A modern, advanced and high performance authoritative-only nameserver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612282238.kBSMc2fM021724@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pdns - A modern, advanced and high performance authoritative-only nameserver Alias: powerdns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219973 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: powerdns - A|Review Request: pdns - A |modern, advanced and high |modern, advanced and high |performance authoritative- |performance authoritative- |only nameserver |only nameserver ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-28 17:37 EST ------- I don't think you want the %{name} in the provides, since that will be 'pdns' in this case... providing powerdns version 'pdns-2.9.20-3' isn't what you want. Just remove the '%{name}-' from there and it should be correct. FYI, I am changing the Summary to match the new name (This helps for tracking purposes). I now get a compiled package on x86_64, but it contains rpaths: E: pdns binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/sbin/pdns_server ['/usr/lib64'] E: pdns binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/zone2ldap ['/usr/lib64'] E: pdns binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/pdns_control ['/usr/lib64'] E: pdns binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/zone2sql ['/usr/lib64'] E: pdns-backend-geo binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/pdns/libgeobackend.so ['/usr/lib64'] E: pdns-backend-ldap binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/pdns/libldapbackend.so ['/usr/lib64'] E: pdns-backend-mysql binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/pdns/libgmysqlbackend.so ['/usr/lib64'] E: pdns-backend-pipe binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/pdns/libpipebackend.so ['/usr/lib64'] E: pdns-backend-postgresql binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/pdns/libgpgsqlbackend.so ['/usr/lib64'] See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines?#head-a1dfb5f46bf4098841e31a75d833e6e1b3e72544 for some possible ways to fix this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 23:11:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:11:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220922] Review Request: geany - a lightweight gtk2 based IDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612282311.kBSNB9CZ022711@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geany - a lightweight gtk2 based IDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220922 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2006-12-28 18:11 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=144508) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=144508&action=view) patch to spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 23:17:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:17:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220922] Review Request: geany - a lightweight gtk2 based IDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612282317.kBSNHWDq022829@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geany - a lightweight gtk2 based IDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220922 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2006-12-28 18:17 EST ------- Seems you're a new contributor, so you'll need a sponsor. In the meantime, here are a couple of things (not exhaustive) that needs to be fixed with the spec file; 1. Your package includes a .desktop file, and that needs to be properly install with desktop-file-install, and include a Buildrequire on desktop-file-utils. 2. Locales needs to be installed using the %find_lang macro. 3. You also likely need another BR on gettext (because of the locales). Also the Requires on glib, gtk, and pango are not necessary, they are automatically pulled in by rpm. I've attached a patch to your spec file that fix these issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 23:21:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:21:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220922] Review Request: geany - a lightweight gtk2 based IDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612282321.kBSNLRHp022924@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geany - a lightweight gtk2 based IDE Alias: geany https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220922 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chris.stone at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | Alias| |geany ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-12-28 18:21 EST ------- Deji: Thanks for the patch and comments. I've already mentioned these problems to Josef, as I'm in the process of sponsering him. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 23:23:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:23:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220922] Review Request: geany - a lightweight gtk2 based IDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612282323.kBSNNCLV023024@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geany - a lightweight gtk2 based IDE Alias: geany https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220922 ------- Additional Comments From josef at toxicpanda.com 2006-12-28 18:23 EST ------- ahh ok thanks much, I was kind of confused how to handle the desktop file. I have updated the src.rpm and the spec file, its at the same location Spec URL: http://www.toxicpanda.com/geany.spec SRPM URL: http://www.toxicpanda.com/geany-0.10-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 23:28:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:28:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216105] Review Request: python-twisted-web - Twisted web server, programmable in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612282328.kBSNS303023175@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-web - Twisted web server, programmable in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216105 thomas at apestaart.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From thomas at apestaart.org 2006-12-28 18:27 EST ------- built, closing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 23:28:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:28:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612282328.kBSNSdjL023283@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 Bug 219972 depends on bug 216105, which changed state. Bug 216105 Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-web - Twisted web server, programmable in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216105 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 23:30:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:30:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220931] New: Review Request: ZoneMinder - Linux CCTV package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220931 Summary: Review Request: ZoneMinder - Linux CCTV package Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: martin at zepler.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ebourne.me.uk/dload/fedora/ZoneMinder.spec SRPM URL: http://ebourne.me.uk/dload/fedora/ZoneMinder-1.22.3-1.src.rpm Description: ZoneMinder is the top Linux video camera security and surveillance solution from here: http://www.zoneminder.com/ This is my first package so I will need a sponser. I'll follow up with more details on packaging decisions made. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 23:32:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:32:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216102] Review Request: python-twisted-conch - Twisted SSHv2 implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612282332.kBSNWkUM023428@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-conch - Twisted SSHv2 implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216102 thomas at apestaart.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 23:33:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:33:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216103] Review Request: python-twisted-names - A Twisted DNS implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612282333.kBSNXaFo023513@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-names - A Twisted DNS implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216103 thomas at apestaart.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 23:41:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:41:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220931] Review Request: ZoneMinder - Linux CCTV package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612282341.kBSNfW3m023741@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ZoneMinder - Linux CCTV package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220931 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-12-28 18:41 EST ------- How did you get around the requirement for ffmpeg? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 23:47:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:47:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220931] Review Request: ZoneMinder - Linux CCTV package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612282347.kBSNlEQE023846@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ZoneMinder - Linux CCTV package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220931 fedora at ebourne.me.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From fedora at ebourne.me.uk 2006-12-28 18:47 EST ------- ^sponser^sponsor Package name: I've called the package ZoneMinder because this is the name of the program (as used generally and as per configure.in) and the name of the tarball. However, the original is a bit schizophrenic and variously puts things in subdirectores called ZoneMinder, or just zm. The init script in the tarball is just called zm. I've gone along with what the tarball uses where possible. For further confusion there are older ZoneMinder RPM packages around just called zm, but these have been inaccessible for some months and were never in a fedora repo. I personally would prefer to call it zoneminder but nothing else really uses that. I'm up for any suggestions on this one though. Conflicts: Because of the old zm package some people have installed I've marked this package as conflicts: zm. I originally tried obsoletes but the old zm package does rm -rf /var/lib/zm in postun which is very antisocial and I didn't want this to happen accidentally to anyone. X10: This package does not include the X10 option since it needs the perl X10 module. If this is accepted I'll look into packaging that as well, then add a ZoneMinder-X10 subpackage. FFMPEG: This package is built without mpeg. Quote from the ZoneMinder manual: 'ZoneMinder can generate MPEG videos if necessary, for this you'll need either ffmpeg (recommended) or the Berkeley MPEG encoder (mpeg_encode). If you don't have either, don't worry, as the options will be hidden and you'll not really miss too much.' The builtin jpeg streaming works perfectly well and is more portable than mpeg. I've not used the mpeg support in over a year of using ZoneMinder. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 28 23:55:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:55:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220931] Review Request: ZoneMinder - Linux CCTV package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612282355.kBSNtLqS024018@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ZoneMinder - Linux CCTV package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220931 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at ebourne.me.uk 2006-12-28 18:55 EST ------- RPM lint reports the following, interspersed with my reasons for not fixing them: E: ZoneMinder non-readable /etc/zm.conf 0600 The database password is stored in this file, it is intentionally root only readable. E: ZoneMinder non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/zmfix 04755 E: ZoneMinder setuid-binary /usr/bin/zmfix root 04755 This is an intentional upstream setuid helper for handling device permissions. E: ZoneMinder non-standard-gid /etc/zm.conf apache E: ZoneMinder non-standard-uid /etc/zm.conf apache E: ZoneMinder non-standard-gid /var/lib/zm apache E: ZoneMinder non-standard-uid /var/lib/zm apache E: ZoneMinder non-standard-gid /var/log/zm apache E: ZoneMinder non-standard-uid /var/log/zm apache Half of ZoneMinder runs under apache/php so these permissions are needed. W: ZoneMinder incoherent-init-script-name zm Package name inconsistency as described above. W: ZoneMinder log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/zm ZoneMinder does its own log rotation. W: ZoneMinder no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/zm As per upstream, not needed for this package. W: ZoneMinder service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/zm This is not a network listening daemon, nor is it installed by default, so if you installed it you probably want it. Again, as per upstream. W: ZoneMinder symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/ZoneMinder/www/events /var/lib/zm/events W: ZoneMinder symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/ZoneMinder/www/images /var/lib/zm/images W: ZoneMinder symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/ZoneMinder/www/temp /var/lib/zm/temp Don't think the usual chroot implications are valid here. Also I don't see how to make the links relative while using the rpm macros for locations (barring nasty sed hackery). W: ZoneMinder wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/ZoneMinder-1.22.3/README.pdf Just wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 00:51:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 19:51:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220931] Review Request: ZoneMinder - Linux CCTV package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612290051.kBT0p1Gb025023@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ZoneMinder - Linux CCTV package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220931 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-12-28 19:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > W: ZoneMinder wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding > /usr/share/doc/ZoneMinder-1.22.3/README.pdf > > Just wrong. See bug #220061 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 01:01:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 20:01:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220577] Review Request: imp - webmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612290101.kBT11tXP025229@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: imp - webmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220577 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-12-28 20:01 EST ------- First let's go over the rpmlint complaints. All of them are bogus in the context of this package. E: imp htaccess-file /usr/share/horde/imp/lib/.htaccess E: imp htaccess-file /usr/share/horde/imp/locale/.htaccess E: imp htaccess-file /usr/share/horde/imp/po/.htaccess E: imp htaccess-file /usr/share/horde/imp/scripts/.htaccess E: imp htaccess-file /usr/share/horde/imp/templates/.htaccess Yes, these are htaccess files. I'm not sure what rpmlint has against them. E: imp non-readable /etc/horde/imp/conf.xml 0660 E: imp non-readable /etc/horde/imp/filter.txt 0660 E: imp non-readable /etc/horde/imp/filter.txt.dist 0640 E: imp non-readable /etc/horde/imp/header.php 0660 E: imp non-readable /etc/horde/imp/header.php.dist 0640 E: imp non-readable /etc/horde/imp/menu.php 0660 E: imp non-readable /etc/horde/imp/menu.php.dist 0640 E: imp non-readable /etc/horde/imp/mime_drivers.php 0660 E: imp non-readable /etc/horde/imp/mime_drivers.php.dist 0640 E: imp non-readable /etc/horde/imp/motd.php 0660 E: imp non-readable /etc/horde/imp/motd.php.dist 0640 E: imp non-readable /etc/horde/imp/prefs.php 0660 E: imp non-readable /etc/horde/imp/prefs.php.dist 0640 E: imp non-readable /etc/horde/imp/servers.php 0660 E: imp non-readable /etc/horde/imp/servers.php.dist 0640 E: imp non-readable /etc/horde/imp/trailer.txt 0660 E: imp non-readable /etc/horde/imp/trailer.txt.dist 0640 E: imp non-standard-dir-perm /etc/horde/imp 0770 Permissions restricted as necessary for security. E: imp non-standard-gid /etc/horde/imp apache E: imp non-standard-gid /etc/horde/imp/conf.xml apache E: imp non-standard-gid /etc/horde/imp/filter.txt apache E: imp non-standard-gid /etc/horde/imp/filter.txt.dist apache E: imp non-standard-gid /etc/horde/imp/header.php apache E: imp non-standard-gid /etc/horde/imp/header.php.dist apache E: imp non-standard-gid /etc/horde/imp/menu.php apache E: imp non-standard-gid /etc/horde/imp/menu.php.dist apache E: imp non-standard-gid /etc/horde/imp/mime_drivers.php apache E: imp non-standard-gid /etc/horde/imp/mime_drivers.php.dist apache E: imp non-standard-gid /etc/horde/imp/motd.php apache E: imp non-standard-gid /etc/horde/imp/motd.php.dist apache E: imp non-standard-gid /etc/horde/imp/prefs.php apache E: imp non-standard-gid /etc/horde/imp/prefs.php.dist apache E: imp non-standard-gid /etc/horde/imp/servers.php apache E: imp non-standard-gid /etc/horde/imp/servers.php.dist apache E: imp non-standard-gid /etc/horde/imp/trailer.txt apache E: imp non-standard-gid /etc/horde/imp/trailer.txt.dist apache E: imp non-standard-uid /etc/horde/imp apache E: imp non-standard-uid /etc/horde/imp/conf.xml apache E: imp non-standard-uid /etc/horde/imp/filter.txt apache E: imp non-standard-uid /etc/horde/imp/filter.txt.dist apache E: imp non-standard-uid /etc/horde/imp/header.php apache E: imp non-standard-uid /etc/horde/imp/header.php.dist apache E: imp non-standard-uid /etc/horde/imp/menu.php apache E: imp non-standard-uid /etc/horde/imp/menu.php.dist apache E: imp non-standard-uid /etc/horde/imp/mime_drivers.php apache E: imp non-standard-uid /etc/horde/imp/mime_drivers.php.dist apache E: imp non-standard-uid /etc/horde/imp/motd.php apache E: imp non-standard-uid /etc/horde/imp/motd.php.dist apache E: imp non-standard-uid /etc/horde/imp/prefs.php apache E: imp non-standard-uid /etc/horde/imp/prefs.php.dist apache E: imp non-standard-uid /etc/horde/imp/servers.php apache E: imp non-standard-uid /etc/horde/imp/servers.php.dist apache Ownership set as necessary for security. W: imp conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/horde/imp/conf.xml W: imp conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/horde/imp/filter.txt.dist W: imp conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/horde/imp/header.php.dist W: imp conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/horde/imp/menu.php.dist W: imp conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/horde/imp/mime_drivers.php.dist W: imp conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/horde/imp/motd.php.dist W: imp conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/horde/imp/prefs.php.dist W: imp conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/horde/imp/servers.php.dist W: imp conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/horde/imp/trailer.txt.dist These are distributed config files and should not be marked %noreplace. Review: * source files match upstream: 91fb63a44805bdff178c39c9bd1c73c5 imp-h3-4.1.3.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (x86_64, development). * package installs properly * rpmlint has only ignoreable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: config(imp) = 4.1.3-2.fc7 imp = 4.1.3-2.fc7 = config(imp) = 4.1.3-2.fc7 horde >= 3 php >= 4.3.0 php-imap >= 4.3.0 * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. Manual testing shows everything seems to work OK. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. That was easier than I anticipated. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 01:03:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 20:03:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220796] Review Request: turba - horde contact manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612290103.kBT134mb025292@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: turba - horde contact manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220796 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 02:09:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 21:09:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220393] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code Introspection Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612290209.kBT29V3n026731@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code Introspection Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220393 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-28 21:09 EST ------- Well, I must say that there are a lot of issues to be fixed... I didn't check this package fully, only just pointing out what should be fixed. Details are written on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines !! I just glanced at a spec file and only did a quick check, not checked fully ! A. From Summary to %description *Release tag - Use %?dist tag * Source0 - Specify URL * BuildRoot - Check the recommended BuildRoot * Prefix/Vendor - Both are forbidden for Fedora * BuildRequiers - This package cannot be rebuild by mockbuild. Please check the BuildRequires (I attach a mockbuild log) * Isn't the description of License for -idl package is redundant? B. %prep * %setup - %setup stage is not quiet C. %build * Fedora specific compilation flags are not passed (I attach a build log) ------------------------------------------------------------- generating dependencies for tools/display-symbols.cc /bin/sh -ec 'g++ -M -I . -I /home/tasaka1/rpmbuild/BUILD/synopsis-0.9/src -I /home/tasaka1/rpmbuild/BUILD/synopsis-0.9/src/Synopsis/gc/include /home/tasaka1/rpmbuild/BUILD/synopsis-0.9/src/tools/display-symbols.cc | sed "s,display-symbols\\.o[ :]*,tools/display-symbols\\.d tools/display-symbols\\.o : ,g" > tools/display-symbols.d' ------------------------------------------------------------- D. %install * Before installing, $RPM_BUILD_ROOT must be cleaned first. E. %post/%postun * Please do not make this package invoke unnecessary shell process (use "%post -p /sbin/ldconfig") F %files * Usually libraries in %{_libdir} should have sominor (not a blocker, however would you contact upsteam?) * Directory ownership is not proper. For example, %{py_sitedir}/Synopsis/ is not owned by any package. * -devel package with pkgconfig .pc files should have "Requires: pkgconfig" * All documentations should be moved to %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version} * Perhaps 3 files ------------------------------------------ README COPYING NEWS ------------------------------------------ are installed twice by main and -doc package (these should in main) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 02:10:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 21:10:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220796] Review Request: turba - horde contact manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612290210.kBT2AwJ2026795@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: turba - horde contact manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220796 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-12-28 21:10 EST ------- First off, I think the License: tag is wrong. It's certainly not GPL; the Horde site lists it as "Apache-like". In truth it is essentially the Apache license, version 1.0, with some strings changed and the "some parts are public domain" bit removed from the end. It is obviously free. It's also kind of dumb; how can you distribute a bunch of scripts in binary form? But in any case, can you change the license tag to "Apache Software License v1"? I see nothing else problematic with this package, so you can go ahead and fix it when you check in. Also, I note that a Perl dependency snuck in. I don't suppose this hurts anything, although the single script that uses it is not terribly useful. As usual, I'll start with rpmlint, but these are getting repetetive so I'll just post a summary. E: turba htaccess-file /usr/share/horde/turba/lib/.htaccess And four more. All are acceptable; these htaccess files are needed. E: turba non-readable /etc/horde/turba/attributes.php 0660 And ten more. E: turba non-standard-dir-perm /etc/horde/turba 0770 These are all necessary for security. E: turba non-standard-gid /etc/horde/turba apache And twenty-three more. These are all necessary for security. W: turba conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/horde/turba/attributes.php.dist And five more. These are distributed config files, and should not be marked %noreplace. Review: * source files match upstream: a0407717f3f64fb33f6a57e2244a12b4 turba-h3-2.1.3.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. X license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint has only acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: config(turba) = 2.1.3-2.fc7 turba = 2.1.3-2.fc7 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/perl /usr/bin/php config(turba) = 2.1.3-2.fc7 horde >= 3 perl(Getopt::Std) php >= 4.3.0 * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * locales are handled properly * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED, provided you change the License: tag appropriately. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 02:11:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 21:11:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220919] Review Request: kronolith - The Horde calendar application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612290211.kBT2BnZv026864@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kronolith - The Horde calendar application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220919 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 02:13:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 21:13:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220393] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code Introspection Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612290213.kBT2DvKh026949@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code Introspection Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220393 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-28 21:13 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=144516) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=144516&action=view) Mock build log of synopsis-0.9-1 mock build log of synopsis-0.9-1 on FC-devel i386 * NOTE: ------------------------------------------- distutils.errors.DistutilsPlatformError: invalid Python installation: unable to open /usr/include/python2.5/pyconfig-32.h (No such file or directory) -------------------------------------------- means that this package needs python-devel for BuildRequires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 02:15:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 21:15:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612290215.kBT2F27N026985@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2006-12-28 21:15 EST ------- I confirm it built on x86_64 with a patch discussed here: http://www.aqsis.org/xoops/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=1394&forum=3 http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/patches/aqsis-1.2.0-long_86_64.patch http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/SPECS/aqsis.spec http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/aqsis/aqsis-1.2.0-0.2.alpha1.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 02:18:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 21:18:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220393] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code Introspection Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612290218.kBT2IU5O027117@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code Introspection Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220393 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-28 21:18 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=144517) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=144517&action=view) rpmbuild log of synopsis-0.9-1 rpmbuild log of synopis-0.9-1 on FC-devel i386 Please ensure that Fedora specific compilation flags are correctly passed NOTE: "Fedora specific compilation flags" can be shown by: ------------------------------------------------------ [tasaka1 at localhost synopsis]$ rpm --eval %optflags -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables ------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 02:38:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 21:38:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220860] Review Request: galternatives - Alternatives Configurator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612290238.kBT2ccH8027421@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: galternatives - Alternatives Configurator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220860 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |galternatives - Alternatives|galternatives - Alternatives |Configurator |Configurator CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-28 21:38 EST ------- Please check the packages you created by rpmlint Very Very quick note: -------------------------------------- E: galternatives no-binary E: galternatives non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/galternatives/main.py 0644 E: galternatives non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/galternatives/gadebug.py 0644 E: galternatives non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/galternatives/common.py 0644 E: galternatives non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/galternatives/__init__.py 0644 E: galternatives non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/galternatives/alternative.py 0644 E: galternatives-debuginfo empty-debuginfo-package ---------------------------------------- * This seems to be a noarch rpm * Scripts with shebang should have executable permission (or, if 0644 permissons are correct, shebangs should be removed) * .pyo files are not marked as ghosts due to SELinux issues. * Please check Requires - This package should require pam explicitly - And "include" line of pam configuration file means that requirement of pam is version-specific (pam >= 0.80) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 03:40:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 22:40:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220759] Review Request: pdfcube - PDF viewer with a spinning cube In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612290340.kBT3eULa029509@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pdfcube - PDF viewer with a spinning cube https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220759 ------- Additional Comments From mrsam at courier-mta.com 2006-12-28 22:40 EST ------- Package built and installed fine, but: 1. pdfcube does not appear to be fully mature. On my laptop compiz works fine. Since I cannot run pdfcube directly from gnome (see #2), with this package, I have to start it from gnome-terminal. pdfcube runs, and shows a portion of the first page in the PDF file in full screen mode. The pdf is of a legal-sized document, so I only see the top half of the tall page. pgup and pgdn seems to advance to the next/prev page, still showing the top-half of the page. Tried to figure out how to reduce magnification, to fit the entire page on the screen, with no luck. There was no documentation in the package, so I went to the project home's page, and found some documentation. Despite the claims on the project's web site, the cube transition result in some visible, and rather annoying, display flicker from me. Furthermore, the zoom keys only zoom in on parts of the visible page, and I still can't find a way to view the bottom half of the pdf page. This appears to be a bug, and the software does not appear to handle pdf files of arbitrary page size. Additionally, running pdfcube from gnome-terminal, a "corrupted shadow" of the gnome-terminal window, that pdfcube gets started from, is overlayed on top of the pdf page, and it remains on top when I flip between the pages. On a hunch, I ran "sleep" in the shell, before starting pdfcube, and minimized the gnome-terminal window while it slept. That got rid of the diplay corruption. 2. Package did not install a desktop file. So, there's no way to run pdfcube from gnome, except indirectly from firefox, and manually overriding the default handler (evince, or xpdf) and manually typing /usr/bin/pdfcube. An application file should be added to the package. Look at /usr/share/applications/evince.desktop, and create a similar file and add it to the package. You can try looking for a generic icon present in the base gnome install, and use it as an icon for this package, or quickly hack something up yourself. Doing this should result in pdfcube being runnable from the Gnome menu, and Firefox should then offer pdfcube as an option for viewing PDF files. But the first issue with this package is much more serious, IMHO. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 04:48:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 23:48:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220775] Review Request: Exaile! - A music player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612290448.kBT4me1h002875@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Exaile! - A music player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220775 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-28 23:48 EST ------- IMHO, AFAIK %doc is used to install files in /usr/share/doc right? So if you include license.txt to %doc then other users who don't have SPEC can see which license this package is using. Review Guidelines said that if a source package contains license text included as separate file then that file must be added to %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 04:57:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 23:57:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220577] Review Request: imp - webmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612290457.kBT4vWnM003591@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: imp - webmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220577 fedora at theholbrooks.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-12-28 23:57 EST ------- Imported, Built (http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/24705-imp-4.1.3-2.fc7/), Branch Requested -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 05:10:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 00:10:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220796] Review Request: turba - horde contact manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612290510.kBT5AbGO004147@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: turba - horde contact manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220796 fedora at theholbrooks.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-12-29 00:10 EST ------- Imported, Built (http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/24706-turba-2.1.3-2.fc7/), Branch Requested Incidentally, I changed the License: to "Apache Software License v1" as instructed, but rpmlint complains about it. Is there another abbreviation / spelling that rpmlint likes better? I suppose as long as us humans understand what license I'm referring to it's not a big deal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 05:22:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 00:22:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220860] Review Request: galternatives - Alternatives Configurator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612290522.kBT5MSQv004350@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: galternatives - Alternatives Configurator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220860 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 05:37:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 00:37:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218600] Review Request: resapplet - Resolution Switching Applet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612290537.kBT5bahq004575@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: resapplet - Resolution Switching Applet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218600 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-12-29 00:37 EST ------- Have you checked whether your ssl cert has expired? Also, I noticed that the owners.list file lists resapplet as belonging to rvokal at eredhat.com. If this is just a typo, please change it to rvokal at redhat.com. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 05:40:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 00:40:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220860] Review Request: galternatives - Alternatives Configurator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612290540.kBT5ePmV004638@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: galternatives - Alternatives Configurator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220860 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2006-12-29 00:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Please check the packages you created by rpmlint > > * This seems to be a noarch rpm Yes, you're right, changed it to be so. > * Scripts with shebang should have executable permission > (or, if 0644 permissons are correct, shebangs should be removed) This is _strictly_ _not_ necessary (I've seen other reviews ignoring these kind of warning on python packages); anyways to make everyone happy, I've sed out the shebangs. > * .pyo files are not marked as ghosts due to SELinux issues. Right, fixed. > * Please check Requires > - This package should require pam explicitly It does already rightly requires usermode, which in turn explicitly requires pam. Besides other packages in Extras that uses consolehelper only requires usermode. New file with changes uploaded, thanks for the review. Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/galternatives/galternatives.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/galternatives/galternatives-0.13.4-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 05:43:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 00:43:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220796] Review Request: turba - horde contact manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612290543.kBT5hYB6004695@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: turba - horde contact manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220796 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-12-29 00:43 EST ------- Unfortunately rpmlint gets out of sync with things every so often. The packaging committee is working on cleaning up license specifications so that there's at least a single way to specify each of the common licenses. "Apache Software License v1" is in the curent draft as the recommended string to use for that license. I expect that rpmlint will catch up only once we're done with the process and have a full list of recommended license strings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 05:45:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 00:45:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220775] Review Request: Exaile! - A music player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612290545.kBT5jkR2004741@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Exaile! - A music player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220775 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2006-12-29 00:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > IMHO, AFAIK %doc is used to install files in /usr/share/doc right? So if you > include license.txt to %doc then other users who don't have SPEC can see which > license this package is using. one can always do 'rpm -qi exaile | grep License' > Review Guidelines said that if a source package contains license text included > as separate file then that file must be added to %doc Note it says 'license text'; that file, license.txt, does not contain the license text, it only expresses what the license is. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 05:52:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 00:52:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612290552.kBT5qcvG004844@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-29 00:52 EST ------- Well, A. Genenal packaging issues * Please add the following documentation(s) ---------------------------------------- NEWS COPYING ---------------------------------------- * Please remove the following documentation(s) ---------------------------------------- INSTALL - only need by manual installation and not needed by rpm installation ---------------------------------------- B. For debuginfo rpm issue ! It seems that some of the source files are borrowed from libgpg-error. (borrowed means "copied with some modifications for the usage of libprelude") --------------------------------------- /usr/src/debug/libprelude-0.9.12/src/libprelude-error/code-from-errno.c /usr/src/debug/libprelude-0.9.12/src/libprelude-error/code-from-errno.h /usr/src/debug/libprelude-0.9.12/src/libprelude-error/code-to-errno.c /usr/src/debug/libprelude-0.9.12/src/libprelude-error/code-to-errno.h /usr/src/debug/libprelude-0.9.12/src/libprelude-error/err-codes.h /usr/src/debug/libprelude-0.9.12/src/libprelude-error/err-sources.h /usr/src/debug/libprelude-0.9.12/src/libprelude-error/strerror.c /usr/src/debug/libprelude-0.9.12/src/libprelude-error/strsource.c --------------------------------------- Usually local copies of other libraries are forbidden, however, as long as I checked how these source codes are used, these codes can be allowed because it seems that the part of codes borrowed from libgpg-error seems very trivial. However, would you check if this is proper? (IMO this is not a blocker for this package). Then: C: Related to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines * Use rpmlint ------------------------------------------------ E: libprelude-perl script-without-shebang /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/Prelude.pm ------------------------------------------------ permission should be 0644 for this file. * BuildRequires - Mockbuild fails. BuildRequires: gnutls should be BuildRequires: gnutls-devel * Parallel make - Does this package fail on parallel make? If not, please use make %{?_smp_mflags} D. Related to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : = This is okay, except for the issues on A-C. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 05:52:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 00:52:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220775] Review Request: Exaile! - A music player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612290552.kBT5qtGp004860@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Exaile! - A music player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220775 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-29 00:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > IMHO, AFAIK %doc is used to install files in /usr/share/doc right? So if you > > include license.txt to %doc then other users who don't have SPEC can see which > > license this package is using. > one can always do 'rpm -qi exaile | grep License' ahh i forgot that option. Thanks. > > > Review Guidelines said that if a source package contains license text included > > as separate file then that file must be added to %doc > Note it says 'license text'; that file, license.txt, does not contain the > license text, it only expresses what the license is. > Thanks. I got this point now thanks for explaining this to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 05:55:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 00:55:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220775] Review Request: Exaile! - A music player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612290555.kBT5txG6004931@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Exaile! - A music player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220775 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-29 00:55 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPMS. + source files match upstream. 05f8ad394f872f24c201d51687c96890 exaile_0.2.6.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text is not included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists + no .la files. + no translations are available + Dose owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Desktop file installed successfully + Desktop file is handled correctly in SPEC file. + GUI app APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 05:56:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 00:56:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612290556.kBT5uBxb004950@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-29 00:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #30) > http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/patches/aqsis-1.2.0-long_86_64.patch > http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/SPECS/aqsis.spec > http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/aqsis/aqsis-1.2.0-0.2.alpha1.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Is this regarded as the revised version of comment #27? Is so, please "increase" release. And.. none of the issues I pointed out are fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 05:57:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 00:57:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220775] Review Request: Exaile! - A music player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612290557.kBT5vgIF005033@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Exaile! - A music player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220775 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-29 00:57 EST ------- Don't Forget to CLOSE this Review once package will be imported in CVS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 06:10:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 01:10:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220775] Review Request: Exaile! - A music player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612290610.kBT6AmNM005399@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Exaile! - A music player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220775 dakingun at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2006-12-29 01:10 EST ------- Imported into CVS. Thanks Parag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 06:49:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 01:49:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220766] Review Request: ScientificPython - a collection of Python modules that are useful for scientific computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612290649.kBT6nZEJ006050@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ScientificPython - a collection of Python modules that are useful for scientific computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220766 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2006-12-29 01:49 EST ------- Here is the updated srpm to address outstanding issues. PyQt requires has been fixed as well as removal of redudant requires: openmpi-libs and netcdf. I've re-integrated the mpi and bsp subpackages back into the main package. Picking up the depchain for openmpi-libs isn't a significant burden. But I still feel its appropriate to leave the Qt and tk toolkit modules as subpackages. I've also spun up a fedora-specific impipython.sh file to replace the upstream one. It has the correct filepath information generated at package buildtime. It's still included as a doc file, because you still have to hand edit it for the number or processors you want to run it with via mpirun. You'll notice I added a nice verbose comment header in the script explaining what its there for. This is my best effort to cover all the problems pointed out by Chitlesh. Is there anything else I need to fix? I've look a bit more at the Visualization subdirectory of included python code. At the moment they pretty much require someone to have additional non Fedora space items installs to operate correctly. They do have runtime detection of the needed helper programs so they don't fall over and die with python tracebacks. They should exit gracefully and tell you you don't have the needed additional software installed. I'm still inclined to include them since they do no harm, but I'm not sure if I should split this off as a subpackage. There is no real gain in splitting them off as a subpackage at the moment. If at some point we get the 3d visualization programs in Fedora packaging space we may consider it if we want to make one the 3d visualization stacks a hard requirement on the package, I don't consider this a blocker issue, but I'm open to dealing with this a different way if the reviewer(s) think otherwise. SRPM: http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/ScientificPython/ScientificPython-2.6-5.src.rpm Spec: http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/ScientificPython/ScientificPython.spec Changelog: * Thu Dec 28 2006 Jef Spaleta 2.6-5 - remove mpi and bsp subpackages. On more thought, - it makes more sense to have the parallel computing items - in the main package. - Added inline impipython.sh reference script - Replaces upstreams impipython reference file - This will have the correct path statements generated at - package buildtime. Still included as a doc item -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 07:18:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 02:18:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220860] Review Request: galternatives - Alternatives Configurator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612290718.kBT7IKXR006515@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: galternatives - Alternatives Configurator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220860 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-29 02:18 EST ------- ... not a packaging issue, however... I get the following backtrace. ----------------------------------------------------- [root at softbank218114170036 ~]# LANG=C alternatives --display print print - status is auto. link currently points to /usr/bin/lpr.cups /usr/bin/lpr.cups - priority 40 slave print-cancel: /usr/bin/cancel.cups slave print-lp: /usr/bin/lp.cups slave print-lpq: /usr/bin/lpq.cups slave print-lprm: /usr/bin/lprm.cups slave print-lpstat: /usr/bin/lpstat.cups slave print-lpc: /usr/sbin/lpc.cups slave print-cancelman: /usr/share/man/man1/cancel-cups.1.gz slave print-lpman: /usr/share/man/man1/lp-cups.1.gz slave print-lpqman: /usr/share/man/man1/lpq-cups.1.gz slave print-lprman: /usr/share/man/man1/lpr-cups.1.gz slave print-lprmman: /usr/share/man/man1/lprm-cups.1.gz slave print-lpstatman: /usr/share/man/man1/lpstat-cups.1.gz slave print-lpcman: /usr/share/man/man8/lpc-cups.8.gz Current `best' version is /usr/bin/lpr.cups. [root at softbank218114170036 ~]# galternatives ========================================== (then select the item of print) ========================================== Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/galternatives/main.py", line 364, in alternative_selected_cb self.update_options_tree () File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/galternatives/main.py", line 400, in update_options_tree self.PRIORITY, int(option['priority']), ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10: '40 cups' ---------------------------------------------------- Would you know why? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 08:00:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 03:00:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220759] Review Request: pdfcube - PDF viewer with a spinning cube In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612290800.kBT80ed6007317@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pdfcube - PDF viewer with a spinning cube https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220759 ------- Additional Comments From maxx at krakoa.dk 2006-12-29 03:00 EST ------- 1. It is stated on the website (and in the packaged documentation) that pdfcube is alpha software, so yes it is probably a bit buggy. However since it is specifically made only for showing presentations it is a design feature that it only shows the top half of a page. PDF files should be made using LaTeX, Beamer, etc. 2. pdfcube is (for the time being at least) a commandline application, so therefore I didn't think to add a .desktop file. I haven't been able to find a Fedora Extras policy for whether or not the create .desktop files for commandline applications. I guess it could be done using a .desktop file that only sets the mime type for pdf, and is otherwise hidden. So in short: pdfcube might be a bit buggy, but it is a specialized pdf-viewer for presentations. And it is a commandline application. Maybe I should change the short description to: PDF presentation viewer with a spinning cube? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 08:03:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 03:03:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220860] Review Request: galternatives - Alternatives Configurator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612290803.kBT83wjo007392@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: galternatives - Alternatives Configurator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220860 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-29 03:03 EST ------- Well, also I * launch galternatives * select one item on "alternatimes" column (in the left) * select one options * push the button "Properties" (then a new window titled "Details" pops up) * Break the windows which poped up newly * Then push again the button "Properties" --- Then the new window poped up is totally gray.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 08:14:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 03:14:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220860] Review Request: galternatives - Alternatives Configurator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612290814.kBT8EMAP007545@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: galternatives - Alternatives Configurator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220860 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-29 03:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > I get the following backtrace. > ----------------------------------------------------- > [root at softbank218114170036 ~]# LANG=C alternatives --display print > print - status is auto. > link currently points to /usr/bin/lpr.cups > /usr/bin/lpr.cups - priority 40 > slave print-cancel: /usr/bin/cancel.cups > slave print-lp: /usr/bin/lp.cups > slave print-lpq: /usr/bin/lpq.cups > slave print-lprm: /usr/bin/lprm.cups > slave print-lpstat: /usr/bin/lpstat.cups > slave print-lpc: /usr/sbin/lpc.cups > slave print-cancelman: /usr/share/man/man1/cancel-cups.1.gz > slave print-lpman: /usr/share/man/man1/lp-cups.1.gz > slave print-lpqman: /usr/share/man/man1/lpq-cups.1.gz > slave print-lprman: /usr/share/man/man1/lpr-cups.1.gz > slave print-lprmman: /usr/share/man/man1/lprm-cups.1.gz > slave print-lpstatman: /usr/share/man/man1/lpstat-cups.1.gz > slave print-lpcman: /usr/share/man/man8/lpc-cups.8.gz > Current `best' version is /usr/bin/lpr.cups. > [root at softbank218114170036 ~]# galternatives > ========================================== > (then select the item of print) > ========================================== > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/galternatives/main.py", line 364, in > alternative_selected_cb > self.update_options_tree () > File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/galternatives/main.py", line 400, in > update_options_tree > self.PRIORITY, int(option['priority']), > ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10: '40 cups' > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Would you know why? Ah... I found because /var/lib/alternatives/print says: ------------------------------------------------------ auto /usr/bin/lpr print-cancel /usr/bin/lpr.cups 40 cups <- THIS LINE /usr/bin/cancel.cups -------------------------------------------------- And.... -------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ rpm -q --scripts cups postinstall scriptlet (using /bin/sh): /usr/sbin/alternatives --install /usr/bin/lpr print /usr/bin/lpr.cups 40 \ --slave /usr/bin/lp print-lp /usr/bin/lp.cups \ --initscript cups -------------------------------------------------- and --initscripts option is "a Red Hat Linux specific option" according to "man alternatives" Then a patch is needed * to treat initscripts options correctly * or to ignore initscripts options for now. Then a documentation (like README.fedora) which explains that this package ignores initscripts option currently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 08:32:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 03:32:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220860] Review Request: galternatives - Alternatives Configurator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612290832.kBT8WhOV007996@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: galternatives - Alternatives Configurator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220860 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2006-12-29 03:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Well, also I > * launch galternatives > * select one item on "alternatimes" column (in the left) > * select one options > * push the button "Properties" (then a new window titled "Details" pops up) > * Break the windows which poped up newly > * Then push again the button "Properties" > > --- Then the new window poped up is totally gray.. This is a longstanding upstream bug, its not resolved yet. I was just about point out the --initscript option issue, but you already figured it out, I see what I can do about it tomorrow (well, later today ;). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 08:39:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 03:39:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220759] Review Request: pdfcube - PDF viewer with a spinning cube In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612290839.kBT8dQel008293@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pdfcube - PDF viewer with a spinning cube https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220759 ------- Additional Comments From maxx at krakoa.dk 2006-12-29 03:39 EST ------- Just an additional comment: There does some to be a bug in compiz (or maybe en pdfcube - but it works fine with metacity) that gives some weird shadow effects. But that shouldn't prevent packaging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 09:22:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 04:22:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612290922.kBT9M1Vs011042@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 ------- Additional Comments From tscherf at redhat.com 2006-12-29 04:21 EST ------- * new docs (NEWS, COPYING) added to the package, removed INSTALL * corrected permissions on /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/Prelude.pm to 0644 * gnutls-devel is added to BuildRequires, MockBuild works now again * when using parallel make, package building fails. thats the reason why I avoid using parallel make with this package. * no other issues found new package is available here: http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/libprelude-0.9.12-4.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/libprelude.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 10:57:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 05:57:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207839] Review Request: lush - An object-oriented Lisp interpreter and compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612291057.kBTAvMCV017655@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lush - An object-oriented Lisp interpreter and compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207839 gemi at bluewin.ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-12-29 05:57 EST ------- Build for FC-6 and FC-7. Added entries in owners.list and comps files. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 12:19:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 07:19:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220943] New: Review Request: po4a - A tool maintaining translations anywhere Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220943 Summary: Review Request: po4a - A tool maintaining translations anywhere Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/po4a.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/po4a-0.29-3.at.src.rpm Description: The po4a (po for anything) project goal is to ease translations (and more interestingly, the maintenance of translations) using gettext tools on areas where they were not expected like documentation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 12:19:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 07:19:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220944] New: Review Request: perl-Text-WrapI18N - Line wrapping with support for several locale setups Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220944 Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-WrapI18N - Line wrapping with support for several locale setups Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/perl-Text-WrapI18N.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/perl-Text-WrapI18N-0.06-1.at.src.rpm Description: This is a module which intends to substitute Text::Wrap, which supports internationalized texts including: - multibyte encodings such as UTF-8, EUC-JP, EUC-KR, GB2312, and Big5, - fullwidth characters like east Asian characters which appear in UTF-8, EUC-JP, EUC-KR, GB2312, Big5, and so on, - combining characters like diacritical marks which appear in UTF-8, ISO-8859-11 (aka TIS-620), and so on, and - languages which don't use whitespaces between words, like Chinese and Japanese. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 12:19:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 07:19:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220945] New: Review Request: perl-Text-CharWidth - Get number of occupied columns of a string on terminal Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220945 Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-CharWidth - Get number of occupied columns of a string on terminal Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/perl-Text-CharWidth.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/perl-Text-CharWidth-0.04-1.at.src.rpm Description: This is a module to provide equivalent feature as wcwidth(3) and wcswidth(3). This also provides mblen(3) equivalent subroutine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 12:20:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 07:20:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220943] Review Request: po4a - A tool maintaining translations anywhere In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612291220.kBTCKlV4021206@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: po4a - A tool maintaining translations anywhere https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220943 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |220888 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 12:20:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 07:20:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220888] Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612291220.kBTCKmVF021210@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220888 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |220943 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 12:21:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 07:21:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220944] Review Request: perl-Text-WrapI18N - Line wrapping with support for several locale setups In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612291221.kBTCLA64021227@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-WrapI18N - Line wrapping with support for several locale setups https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220944 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |220943 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 12:21:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 07:21:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220943] Review Request: po4a - A tool maintaining translations anywhere In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612291221.kBTCLB7G021231@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: po4a - A tool maintaining translations anywhere https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220943 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |220944 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 12:21:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 07:21:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220945] Review Request: perl-Text-CharWidth - Get number of occupied columns of a string on terminal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612291221.kBTCLQBQ021243@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-CharWidth - Get number of occupied columns of a string on terminal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220945 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |220944 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 12:21:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 07:21:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220944] Review Request: perl-Text-WrapI18N - Line wrapping with support for several locale setups In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612291221.kBTCLQh0021247@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-WrapI18N - Line wrapping with support for several locale setups https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220944 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |220945 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 12:22:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 07:22:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220789] Review Request: fail2ban - Ban IPs that make too many password failures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612291222.kBTCMsPt021299@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fail2ban - Ban IPs that make too many password failures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220789 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-12-29 07:22 EST ------- Spec URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/fail2ban.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/fail2ban-0.6.2-2.at.src.rpm * Fri Dec 29 2006 Axel Thimm - 0.6.2-2 - Move /usr/lib/fail2ban to %%{_datadir}/fail2ban. - Don't default chkconfig to enabled. - Add dependencies on service/chkconfig. - Use example iptables/ssh config as default config. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 12:25:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 07:25:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220888] Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612291225.kBTCPLnB021373@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220888 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-12-29 07:25 EST ------- OK, the missing packages are now submitted as well - note that the dependency depth is three more packages found in bug #220943, bug #220944 and bug #220945. Spec URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/fakeroot.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/fakeroot-1.5.10-10.at.src.rpm * Thu Dec 28 2006 Axel Thimm - 1.5.10-10 - Don't build static lib. - Exclude libtool lib. - %%makeinstall to make install DESTDIR=%%buildroot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 12:26:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 07:26:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220889] Review Request: fakechroot - Gives a fake chroot environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612291226.kBTCQ0uL021389@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fakechroot - Gives a fake chroot environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220889 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-12-29 07:25 EST ------- Spec URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/fakechroot.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/fakechroot-2.5-9.at.src.rpm * Thu Dec 28 2006 Axel Thimm - 2.5-9 - Don't build static lib. - Exclude libtool lib. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 14:34:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 09:34:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209222] Review Request: prelude-lml - Prelude log analyzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612291434.kBTEYfTg027267@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prelude-lml - Prelude log analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209222 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-29 09:34 EST ------- I am still checking libprelude. Well, you requested a sponsorship, however according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/HowToGetSponsored a person who want to get sponsored has to either * submit (other) quality packages * assist with package reviews (i.e. do a pre-review of other submitters' review requests and have your pre-review checked) So... would you rewrite the spec file of this package before I sponsor you? I have not checked this package yet, however as far as I glanced at the spec file of this package, your spec file has a issue at least on directory ownership. Perhaps the attribute of the files under %{_sysconfdir}, the requirement for -devel package are also problems (Again, I only glanced at the spec file) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 15:20:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 10:20:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209222] Review Request: prelude-lml - Prelude log analyzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612291520.kBTFK134028539@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prelude-lml - Prelude log analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209222 ------- Additional Comments From tscherf at redhat.com 2006-12-29 10:20 EST ------- up to now I just corrected libprelude (#209214) and libpreludedb (#209215). Maybe we can work on libpreludedb before we move over to prelude-lml, altought I will work on this package as well. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 16:09:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 11:09:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209215] Review Request: libpreludedb - Provides an abstraction layer for the libprelude In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612291609.kBTG9bAZ029965@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpreludedb - Provides an abstraction layer for the libprelude https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209215 ------- Additional Comments From tscherf at redhat.com 2006-12-29 11:09 EST ------- new package is available here: http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/libpreludedb-0.9.11-1.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/libpreludedb.spec the only rpmlint complain is on the devel-package which is not completely clear to me: [tscherf at tiffy SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/tscherf/redhat/RPMS/i386/libpreludedb-devel-0.9.11-1.i386.rpm W: libpreludedb-devel no-documentation E: libpreludedb-devel library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib/libpreludedb.so.0.4.2 E: libpreludedb-devel library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/libpreludedb.so.0.4.2 in the spec I have this: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig what is rpmlint complaining about? don't think there are other issues available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 16:36:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 11:36:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209215] Review Request: libpreludedb - Provides an abstraction layer for the libprelude In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612291636.kBTGaPN2030701@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpreludedb - Provides an abstraction layer for the libprelude https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209215 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-29 11:36 EST ------- Umm?? Why is /usr/lib/libpreludedb.so.0.4.2 in -devel package? -devel package does not call ldconfig, so rpmlint complaint is reasonable (I just glanced at your spec file) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 16:50:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 11:50:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209215] Review Request: libpreludedb - Provides an abstraction layer for the libprelude In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612291650.kBTGoslL031160@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpreludedb - Provides an abstraction layer for the libprelude https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209215 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-29 11:50 EST ------- Well, would you submit a new spec/srpm? If they are good to some content, I will sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 16:51:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 11:51:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612291651.kBTGpZt4031197@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-29 11:51 EST ------- ( Some comments mentioned on bug 209215 ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 17:20:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 12:20:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220890] Review Request: libcdaudio - Control operation of a CD-ROM when playing audio CDs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612291720.kBTHKpsr031800@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcdaudio - Control operation of a CD-ROM when playing audio CDs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220890 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-12-29 12:20 EST ------- * /usr/bin/libcdaudio-config needs a patch for option --libs, because it contains a hardcoded ${exec_prefix}/lib path. * RPM Group better is changed to: System Environment/Libraries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 17:40:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 12:40:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220862] Review Request: php-channel-phpunit - Add phpunit channel to pear In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612291740.kBTHeWvD032524@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-phpunit - Add phpunit channel to pear Alias: channel-phpunit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220862 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-12-29 12:40 EST ------- After IRC meeting, all is OK. Build fine, and allow the build of new php-pear-PHPUnit in mock. REVIEW * no source files * package meets naming and packaging guidelines (no special guideline for channels). * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible (BSD). * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development). * package installs properly * rpmlint : W: php-channel-phpunit no-documentation * final provides are sane: php-channel-phpunit = 1.0-1.fc6 * %check is not present; no test suite provide. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (pear channel..) * no documentation No version for the .xml file, but i think using 1.0 is OK. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 17:41:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 12:41:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220862] Review Request: php-channel-phpunit - Add phpunit channel to pear In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612291741.kBTHf2q9032542@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-phpunit - Add phpunit channel to pear Alias: channel-phpunit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220862 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |Fedora at FamilleCollet.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 17:46:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 12:46:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220862] Review Request: php-channel-phpunit - Add phpunit channel to pear In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612291746.kBTHkFXf032670@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-phpunit - Add phpunit channel to pear Alias: channel-phpunit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220862 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-12-29 12:46 EST ------- Oups... You probably should provide a virtual Provide php-channel(pear.phpunit.de) I will propose this for the PHP Guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 17:46:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 12:46:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220888] Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612291746.kBTHkPv0032684@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220888 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-12-29 12:46 EST ------- Is it possible to expand upon the %description a bit? I can't discern the function of this package from reading what's currently there. Even the summary from the web page: fakeroot provides a fake "root environment" by means of LD_PRELOAD and SYSV IPC or TCP trickery. is better, although it's still not all that explanatory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 17:53:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 12:53:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208064] Review Request: courier-authlib - Courier authentication library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612291753.kBTHrnnr000381@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: courier-authlib - Courier authentication library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208064 ------- Additional Comments From lists at forevermore.net 2006-12-29 12:53 EST ------- Michael, any reply? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 18:00:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 13:00:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220862] Review Request: php-channel-phpunit - Add phpunit channel to pear In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612291800.kBTI0mot000511@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-phpunit - Add phpunit channel to pear Alias: channel-phpunit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220862 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-12-29 13:00 EST ------- - src rpm checked into cvs - Virtual provides added in -2 release - added entry to owners.list - built on devel - requested branch on fc5/6 Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 18:01:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 13:01:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196837] Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit3 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612291801.kBTI1AM0000539@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit3 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests Alias: pear-PHPUnit3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196837 Bug 196837 depends on bug 220862, which changed state. Bug 220862 Summary: Review Request: php-channel-phpunit - Add phpunit channel to pear https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220862 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 18:05:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 13:05:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220890] Review Request: libcdaudio - Control operation of a CD-ROM when playing audio CDs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612291805.kBTI559i000649@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcdaudio - Control operation of a CD-ROM when playing audio CDs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220890 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-12-29 13:05 EST ------- God catch, thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 18:05:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 13:05:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220888] Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612291805.kBTI5DQU000660@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220888 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-12-29 13:05 EST ------- Indeed, maybe something along the lines of the following (assembled from the manpage): fakeroot runs a command in an environment wherein it appears to have root privileges for file manipulation. fakeroot works by replacing the file manipulation library functions (chmod(2), stat(2) etc.) by ones that simulate the effect the real library functions would have had, had the user really been root. But I won't yet respin a package with only this change, e.g. whoover reviews this, please assume the description will be the one above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 18:10:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 13:10:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209215] Review Request: libpreludedb - Provides an abstraction layer for the libprelude In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612291810.kBTIAk7H000865@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpreludedb - Provides an abstraction layer for the libprelude https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209215 ------- Additional Comments From tscherf at redhat.com 2006-12-29 13:10 EST ------- ok, fixed the problem with /usr/lib/libpreludedb.so.0.4.2 and ldconfig. rpmlint isn't complaining anymore. find the new packages here: http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/libpreludedb-0.9.11-1.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/libpreludedb.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 18:12:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 13:12:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220889] Review Request: fakechroot - Gives a fake chroot environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612291812.kBTICgkR000936@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fakechroot - Gives a fake chroot environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220889 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-12-29 13:12 EST ------- %description is a bit terse, please assume the %description reads: fakechroot runs a command in an environment were is additionally possible to use the chroot(8) call without root privileges. This is useful for allowing users to create their own chrooted environment with possibility to install another packages without need for root privileges. E.g. this and fakeroot are useful a) for mock and friends for students w/o root access, as well as b) for hardening buildsystems (impossible to gain root privileges by injecting malicious packages into build hosts) There is no technical dependency between fakeroot and fakechroot, but it makes most sense to use both together for faking chroot calls and setting up faked chroots. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 18:13:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 13:13:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209222] Review Request: prelude-lml - Prelude log analyzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612291813.kBTIDd8V000986@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prelude-lml - Prelude log analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209222 ------- Additional Comments From tscherf at redhat.com 2006-12-29 13:13 EST ------- updated package is online: http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/prelude-lml-0.9.8.1-1.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/prelude-lml.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 18:18:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 13:18:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220862] Review Request: php-channel-phpunit - Add phpunit channel to pear In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612291818.kBTIIdXC001111@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-phpunit - Add phpunit channel to pear Alias: channel-phpunit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220862 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-12-29 13:18 EST ------- oops removed branch request for fc5/6, forgot that this is for fc7+ only. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 18:28:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 13:28:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218678] Review Request: pybluez - python API for the bluez bluetooth stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612291828.kBTISaUd001339@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pybluez - python API for the bluez bluetooth stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218678 ------- Additional Comments From wwoods at redhat.com 2006-12-29 13:28 EST ------- Thanks very much for the help! I don't currently have any other packages ready to review, but if you absolutely need to see some example specfiles I could dig some up from some internal packages I've made. As for the issues you mentioned: 1) Heh! I just wasn't sure what to do with the BuildArch line, so I put the three arches that Fedora currently supports. I'll remove it so this package can be all-arch. 2) This package is *not* noarch, hence the CFLAGS part *is* needed. I've removed the comment to avoid confusion. 3) Whoops, there should have been a space between that initial dash and the version. Fixed. Also, bluezchat.py is now chmod'd a-x before installation, which makes that rpmlint warning go away. 4) Why is that ugly? Isn't it normal for python modules which contain binary extensions to provide the .so file for that extension? Here are the updated files: Spec URL: http://homepage.mac.com/wgwoods/fedora/pybluez-0.9.1-3.spec SRPM URL: http://homepage.mac.com/wgwoods/fedora/pybluez-0.9.1-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 18:40:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 13:40:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220967] New: Review Request: libscigraphica - A library of gtk+ widgets for SciGraphica Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220967 Summary: Review Request: libscigraphica - A library of gtk+ widgets for SciGraphica Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dakingun at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/scigraphica/libscigraphica.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/scigraphica/libscigraphica-2.1.1-1.src.rpm Description: A library of gtk+ widgets for SciGraphica. SciGraphica is a free (GPL) scientific application for data analysis and technical graphics. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 18:43:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 13:43:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220967] Review Request: libscigraphica - A library of gtk+ widgets for SciGraphica In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612291843.kBTIhbHa001857@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libscigraphica - A library of gtk+ widgets for SciGraphica https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220967 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |libscigraphica - A library |libscigraphica - A library |of gtk+ widgets for |of gtk+ widgets for |SciGraphica |SciGraphica Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-12-29 13:43 EST ------- I'll give this a shot tonight -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 18:49:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 13:49:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220967] Review Request: libscigraphica - A library of gtk+ widgets for SciGraphica In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612291849.kBTIn5k3002007@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libscigraphica - A library of gtk+ widgets for SciGraphica https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220967 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-12-29 13:49 EST ------- Requires: %name = %{version} needs to be Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} pkgconfig BuildRequires: gettext perl(XML::Parser) pkgconfig should really be BuildRequires: gettext-devel perl(XML::Parser) you don't need pkgconfig as a main package BR as it's not used, but is in the devel package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 18:49:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 13:49:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220968] New: Review Request: scigraphica - Scientific application for data analysis and technical graphics Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220968 Summary: Review Request: scigraphica - Scientific application for data analysis and technical graphics Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dakingun at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/scigraphica/scigraphica.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/scigraphica/scigraphica-2.1.0-1.src.rpm Description: SciGraphica is a free (GPL) scientific application for data analysis and technical graphics. It pretends to be a clone of the popular commercial (and expensive) application "Microcal Origin". It fully supplies plotting features for 2D, 3D and polar charts. Please note that this will not build in mock at the moment, as it depends on libscigraphica, which I've just submitted for reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 18:49:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 13:49:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220967] Review Request: libscigraphica - A library of gtk+ widgets for SciGraphica In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612291849.kBTIngbb002060@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libscigraphica - A library of gtk+ widgets for SciGraphica https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220967 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-12-29 13:49 EST ------- gtk+extras-devel doesn't seem to be in FE (rawhide). Is it correctly named? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 18:52:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 13:52:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220968] Review Request: scigraphica - Scientific application for data analysis and technical graphics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612291852.kBTIqVBR002126@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scigraphica - Scientific application for data analysis and technical graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220968 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk BugsThisDependsOn| |220967 OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-12-29 13:52 EST ------- I've got libscigraphica so I shall do this as well :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 18:52:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 13:52:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220967] Review Request: libscigraphica - A library of gtk+ widgets for SciGraphica In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612291852.kBTIqkJU002163@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libscigraphica - A library of gtk+ widgets for SciGraphica https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220967 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |220968 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 18:57:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 13:57:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220967] Review Request: libscigraphica - A library of gtk+ widgets for SciGraphica In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612291857.kBTIvcIU002284@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libscigraphica - A library of gtk+ widgets for SciGraphica https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220967 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2006-12-29 13:57 EST ------- It is, I've built it (libscigraphica) in mock. In response to the other comment, I believe pkgconfig is used in configure process. I'll put the corrected files up in a moment at Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/scigraphica/libscigraphica.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/scigraphica/libscigraphica-2.1.1-2.src.rpm Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 19:27:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 14:27:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220967] Review Request: libscigraphica - A library of gtk+ widgets for SciGraphica In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612291927.kBTJRCVA003366@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libscigraphica - A library of gtk+ widgets for SciGraphica https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220967 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2006-12-29 14:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Requires: %name = %{version} > > needs to be > > Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} pkgconfig > > BuildRequires: gettext perl(XML::Parser) pkgconfig > > should really be > > BuildRequires: gettext-devel perl(XML::Parser) > > you don't need pkgconfig as a main package BR as it's not used, but is in the The build actually only relies on binaries in gettext itself, it doesn't compile against gettext libs or use anything fron gettext-devel. Also, as mentioned earlier, libscigraphica checks for pkgconfig when running the configure script. > devel package. > I've added it. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 19:32:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 14:32:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220969] New: Review Request: isomaster - GUI CD image editor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220969 Summary: Review Request: isomaster - GUI CD image editor Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mszpak at wp.pl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/zrzut/isomaster.spec SRPM URL: http://timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/zrzut/isomaster-0.6-2.src.rpm Description: Iso Master is an open-source, easy to use, GUI CD image editor. It allows to extract files from an ISO, add files to an ISO, and create bootable ISOs - all in a graphical user interface. This is my first package for Fedora Extras and I'm seeking a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 19:38:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 14:38:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220969] Review Request: isomaster - GUI CD image editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612291938.kBTJcCmU003611@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: isomaster - GUI CD image editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220969 mszpak at wp.pl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 20:12:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 15:12:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220969] Review Request: isomaster - GUI CD image editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612292012.kBTKCYPQ004918@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: isomaster - GUI CD image editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220969 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-12-29 15:12 EST ------- Hi! Nice to see that another Pole wants to put his package in Extras! :-) However there's a lot to do in your spec file. * First of all mock build of your package fails due to a simple mistake. You put desktop-file-utils as Requires but it should be BuildRequires. * You don't have to explicitly set a version of gtk2 in requires. RPM should build fine without it. * Your %files section doesn't look good. Package owns files in %{_datadir}/%{name}/icons/ but doesn't own the parent one. It means that if you remove RPM, all files within %{_datadir}/%{name}/icons/ will be deleted but the dir remains. In order to fix it you ought to simply remove all %{_datadir}/%{name}/icons/ lines and replace them with a simple %{_datadir}/%{name} * I don't see it as a blocker but in my opinion much better solution would be if you move a desktop file to another Source instead of creating it in spec. That should be a lot more legible. And the last thing: SPEC files are different at the URL you passed here and inside SRPM. I hope you'll get rid of that issue in next release ;-) PS. I also added FE-NEW blocker as it were missing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 20:18:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 15:18:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219973] Review Request: pdns - A modern, advanced and high performance authoritative-only nameserver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612292018.kBTKIPQZ005089@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pdns - A modern, advanced and high performance authoritative-only nameserver Alias: powerdns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219973 ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2006-12-29 15:18 EST ------- Hi Kevin, - Fixed the provides - I tried patching the Makefile.in for the backends to remove the -rpath options, and tried patching the included libtool as well, but the build failed in the install phase because it couldn't find a number of .lai files. I've now used chrpath to remove the rpath information. New versions: http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/powerdns/pdns.spec http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/powerdns/pdns-2.9.20-4.src.rpm Thanks, Ruben -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 20:20:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 15:20:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220736] Review Request: doclifter - lifts man pages and other troff-based markups to XML-DocBook In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612292020.kBTKKPZk005128@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: doclifter - lifts man pages and other troff-based markups to XML-DocBook https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220736 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-29 15:20 EST ------- Hey Eric. I'm re-adding the FE-NEW blocker bug here. That needs to be there in addition to the FE-NEEDSPONSOR so people can see that the review request is new and waiting for a reviewer. If no one else reviews this in the next few days I can try and do so... Can you spin a new version addressing the items in comment #2? Remember to increase the version and add a changelog so we can keep track of what was addressed when. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 21:44:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 16:44:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220969] Review Request: isomaster - GUI CD image editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612292144.kBTLi5Q2006917@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: isomaster - GUI CD image editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220969 ------- Additional Comments From mszpak at wp.pl 2006-12-29 16:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Hi! Nice to see that another Pole wants to put his package in Extras! :-) > However there's a lot to do in your spec file. No-one is perfect ;) > * First of all mock build of your package fails due to a simple mistake. You > put desktop-file-utils as Requires but it should be BuildRequires. I moved it there due to: desktop-file-install --vendor fedora \ --dir %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications \ %{name}.desktop in %install section. But If mock doesn't like it I moved it back to BuildRequires. > * Your %files section doesn't look good. Package owns files in > %{_datadir}/%{name}/icons/ but doesn't own the parent one. It means that if > you remove RPM, all files within %{_datadir}/%{name}/icons/ will be deleted > but the dir remains. In order to fix it you ought to simply remove all > %{_datadir}/%{name}/icons/ lines and replace them with a simple > %{_datadir}/%{name} Indeed. I missed it bacause I usually update my packages rather than remove :) > * I don't see it as a blocker but in my opinion much better solution would be > if you move a desktop file to another Source instead of creating it in spec. > That should be a lot more legible. Ok, I moved it. > And the last thing: SPEC files are different at the URL you passed here and > inside SRPM. I hope you'll get rid of that issue in next release ;-) This time I did my best to not update descriptions at the last moment :) Thanks for you suggestions. 0.6-3 is ready for a review: http://timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/zrzut/isomaster.spec http://timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/zrzut/isomaster-0.6-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 22:01:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:01:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220979] New: Review Request: tesseract - Raw OCR Engine Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220979 Summary: Review Request: tesseract - Raw OCR Engine Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: karlikt at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://mutebox.net/~karlik/tesseract.spec SRPM URL: http://mutebox.net/~karlik/tesseract-1.02-1.src.rpm Description: A commercial quality OCR engine originally developed at HP between 1985 and 1995. In 1995, this engine was among the top 3 evaluated by UNLV. It was open-sourced by HP and UNLV in 2005. It is my first rpm and I am looking for sponsor. I want to add this rpm (in future I hope add more), because in extras is not any ocr and this program is on wishlist. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 22:05:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:05:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220922] Review Request: geany - a lightweight gtk2 based IDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612292205.kBTM5BM6007416@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geany - a lightweight gtk2 based IDE Alias: geany https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220922 ------- Additional Comments From josef at toxicpanda.com 2006-12-29 17:05 EST ------- hmm, for some reason I nuked all of the other BR's that are supposed to be there. Fixed that and added vte-devel for the virtual-terminal stuff that comes with geany. Same url as above for updated src.rpm and spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 22:07:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:07:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220979] Review Request: tesseract - Raw OCR Engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612292207.kBTM76hd007446@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tesseract - Raw OCR Engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220979 karlikt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 22:14:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:14:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220969] Review Request: isomaster - GUI CD image editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612292214.kBTMEWr4007690@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: isomaster - GUI CD image editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220969 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-12-29 17:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > I moved it there due to: > > desktop-file-install --vendor fedora \ > --dir %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications \ > %{name}.desktop > > in %install section. But If mock doesn't like it I moved it back to BuildRequires. > Remember that %install section is executed at building an SRPM, not at installing the binary one. That's why you need to put it into BR. > > * I don't see it as a blocker but in my opinion much better solution would be > > if you move a desktop file to another Source instead of creating it in spec. > > That should be a lot more legible. > > Ok, I moved it. > Desktop files aren't as large to put them into tarball. You can remove a tar compression and get rid of second %setup macro. Now, you can put %{SOURCE1} macro into desktop-file-install: desktop-file-install --vendor fedora \ --dir %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications \ %{SOURCE1} and it looks much better :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 22:27:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:27:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220979] Review Request: tesseract - Raw OCR Engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612292227.kBTMRNL8007908@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tesseract - Raw OCR Engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220979 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2006-12-29 17:27 EST ------- This has been discussed before IIRC. tesseract might give good results, but it is hopeless to compile with 64bit. IMHO, this indicates very poor code quality. I wouldn't want to volunteer to maintain something like that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 23:17:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 18:17:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219973] Review Request: pdns - A modern, advanced and high performance authoritative-only nameserver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612292317.kBTNH3GY009027@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pdns - A modern, advanced and high performance authoritative-only nameserver Alias: powerdns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219973 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-29 18:17 EST ------- The package in comment #6 still has some rpath issues. You fixed up the binaries, but some of the shared libraries still have rpath. rpmlint says: E: pdns-backend-geo binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/pdns/libgeobackend.so ['/usr/lib64'] E: pdns-backend-ldap binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/pdns/libldapbackend.so ['/usr/lib64'] E: pdns-backend-mysql binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/pdns/libgmysqlbackend.so ['/usr/lib64'] E: pdns-backend-pipe binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/pdns/libpipebackend.so ['/usr/lib64'] E: pdns-backend-postgresql binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/pdns/libgpgsqlbackend.so ['/usr/lib64'] Fix those up and I think we are reaching approval... ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 23:30:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 18:30:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218678] Review Request: pybluez - python API for the bluez bluetooth stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612292330.kBTNUF5n009209@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pybluez - python API for the bluez bluetooth stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218678 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 177841 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-29 18:30 EST ------- 1, 2, 3 all look fixed up in the package in comment #5. On item 4: rpm happily looks for .so files anywhere in the package and then automagically "Provides" them in the rpm namespace. I think that rpm should instead only do this with .so files when they are in the standard ldconfig directories. The only thing that can really use the _bluetooth.so thats provided here is this package, so the provides just adds to the rpm provides namespace. It's not a blocker though, since it doesn't hurt anything. If the .so here was bluetooth.so that would be a problem... since bluez-libs-devel already provides that. Hopefully that makes some sense to someone aside from me. ;) I don't see any other blockers here... I will go ahead and APPROVE this package and sponsor you. You can continue the process from here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors#head-a89c07b5b8abe7748b6b39f0f89768d595234907 Don't forget to close this review request NEXTRELASE once everything has been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 29 23:54:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 18:54:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211807] Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612292354.kBTNsb7D009701@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211807 ------- Additional Comments From gawain.lynch at gmail.com 2006-12-29 18:54 EST ------- Hey Kevin, I have been away and unable to get to this earlier. The good news is that I am working on an updated rpm now. The bad news is that initial discussion with caillon was that he was not in favour of having this happen[1]. However if we could find a way to appease his concerns there might be hope. 1. https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2006-October/msg00624.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 00:14:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 19:14:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211807] Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612300014.kBU0Ecvj010064@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211807 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-29 19:14 EST ------- Yeah, I thought that was the case, but I couldn't find the discussion when I looked for it a while ago. ;( I have mailed Christopher and asked him to comment here on this package. Perhaps something has changed since October. Hopefully he will have time to do so soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 01:20:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 20:20:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612300120.kBU1KSkj011477@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-12-29 20:20 EST ------- Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network-1.0.32-3.src.rpm %changelog * Fri Dec 29 2006 Christopher Stone 1.0.32-3 - Update BR/R to new python-twisted stack -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 01:24:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 20:24:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220860] Review Request: galternatives - Alternatives Configurator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612300124.kBU1OCKa011609@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: galternatives - Alternatives Configurator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220860 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2006-12-29 20:24 EST ------- > -------------------------------------------------- > and --initscripts option is "a Red Hat Linux specific option" > according to "man alternatives" > > Then a patch is needed > * to treat initscripts options correctly > * or to ignore initscripts options for now. Then a documentation > (like README.fedora) which explains that this package ignores > initscripts option currently. I've added a patch to treat the initscripts appropriately, and thus fixing the traceback. Updated spec and srpm below; Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/galternatives/galternatives.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/galternatives/galternatives-0.13.4-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 01:32:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 20:32:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209215] Review Request: libpreludedb - Provides an abstraction layer for the libprelude In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612300132.kBU1W6rc011718@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpreludedb - Provides an abstraction layer for the libprelude https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209215 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 02:11:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 21:11:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220919] Review Request: kronolith - The Horde calendar application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612300211.kBU2BoYH012370@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kronolith - The Horde calendar application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220919 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-12-29 21:11 EST ------- I needed to remove "tarballs/" from the Source URL in order to grab the tarball. Other than that, this package is fine so you can fix it when you check in. As with the other horde-using packages, these rpmlint warnings are expected and necessary: E: kronolith htaccess-file /usr/share/horde/kronolith/scripts/.htaccess E: kronolith non-readable /etc/horde/kronolith/conf.xml 0660 [six more] E: kronolith non-standard-dir-perm /etc/horde/kronolith 0770 E: kronolith non-standard-gid /etc/horde/kronolith apache [seven more] E: kronolith non-standard-uid /etc/horde/kronolith apache [seven more] W: kronolith conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/horde/kronolith/conf.xml [three more] Review: * source files match upstream: df6d6fc99012865b18b089212c7544ad kronolith-h3-2.1.4.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint has only ignoreable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: config(kronolith) = 2.1.4-1.fc7 kronolith = 2.1.4-1.fc7 = /usr/bin/php config(kronolith) = 2.1.4-1.fc7 horde >= 3 php >= 4.3.0 * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. Basic manual testing shows things work OK * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * locales are handled properly. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 02:51:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 21:51:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220926] Review Request: ingo - The Horde email filter manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612300251.kBU2plSW013021@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ingo - The Horde email filter manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220926 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 03:12:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 22:12:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220926] Review Request: ingo - The Horde email filter manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612300312.kBU3Ciik013475@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ingo - The Horde email filter manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220926 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-12-29 22:12 EST ------- As with the Kronolith package, I needed to remove "tarballs/" from the Source URL in order to download the source. Also like the Turba package, this package has an incorrect license. I believe this one should also be "Apache Software License v1". It doesn't look like anyone has packaged up the Net_Sieve module, which limits the utility of Ingo a bit. As usual for these Horde-based packages, there are a number of acceptable rpmlint complaints: E: ingo htaccess-file /usr/share/horde/ingo/scripts/.htaccess E: ingo non-readable /etc/horde/ingo/backends.php 0660 [six more] E: ingo non-standard-dir-perm /etc/horde/ingo 0770 E: ingo non-standard-gid /etc/horde/ingo apache [seven more] E: ingo non-standard-uid /etc/horde/ingo apache [seven more] W: ingo conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/horde/ingo/backends.php.dist [three more] Review: * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. X license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has only ignoreable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: config(ingo) = 1.1.2-1.fc7 ingo = 1.1.2-1.fc7 = config(ingo) = 1.1.2-1.fc7 horde >= 3 php >= 4.3.0 * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. Things seem OK after manual testing. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * locales are handle appropriately. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 03:49:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 22:49:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220381] Review Request: flex-old - Legacy version of flex, a tool for creating scanners In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612300349.kBU3nrbO015302@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flex-old - Legacy version of flex, a tool for creating scanners https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220381 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-12-29 22:49 EST ------- This builds fine for me; a few comments: rpmlint says: W: compat-flex devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/flex-compat/FlexLexer.h I think this is OK; the whole point of flex is to produce C output which requires this header. W: compat-flex devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libfl-compat.a Static libraries are generally frowned upon, but I don't know enough about just how flex is used to say whether this is completely unacceptable. The makeinstall macro should not be used unless there is no other choice. Does the preferred "make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}" not work? What's the purpose of the fine command at the end of %install with no action? I guess it's just debugging. You should follow the recommendations from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets for installing the info files. Specifically, you don't need the loop (there's only the one .info file anyway) and you should really have the "|| :" bit there so no-documentation installs don't break. Your comment about needing to set up an extras account makes me think that you'll need to be sponsored; if so, this ticket should additionally block FE-NEEDSPONSOR. (I can offer sponsorship, but I'm unsure about the static library issue at this point.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 04:09:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 23:09:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220630] Review Request: qpidc - C++ implementation of AMQP messaging spec from Apache Qpid. Upstream for Red Hat Messaging. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612300409.kBU49gmc017044@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qpidc - C++ implementation of AMQP messaging spec from Apache Qpid. Upstream for Red Hat Messaging. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220630 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-12-29 23:09 EST ------- A couple of comments: This package has rpath problems: E: qpidd binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/sbin/qpidd ['/usr/lib64'] Loads of undefined-non-weak-symbol complaints from the installed package: W: qpidc undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libqpidclient.so.0.1.0 _ZTIN4qpid7framing11BodyHandlerE W: qpidc undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libqpidclient.so.0.1.0 _ZTIN4qpid3sys8RunnableE W: qpidc undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libqpidclient.so.0.1.0 _ZNK4qpid7framing13AMQMethodBody6encodeERNS0_6BufferE and 161 others. Picking nits, I know, but: BuildReqires: cppunit is redundant. Requires: apr is also redundant; rpm finds the libapr-1.so.0 dependency automatically. Oddly, it doesn't find the boost dependency. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 04:55:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 23:55:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209215] Review Request: libpreludedb - Provides an abstraction layer for the libprelude In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612300455.kBU4tqtL021587@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpreludedb - Provides an abstraction layer for the libprelude https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209215 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-29 23:55 EST ------- Well, * For ownership issue: - Please check if directories/files are owned correctly. ---------------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost mock]$ rpm -qlp libpreludedb-*i386*rpm | grep -v debug | sort ---------------------------------------------------------- says: ---------------------------------------------------------- /usr/lib/libpreludedb/plugins/sql/mysql.so /usr/lib/libpreludedb/plugins/sql/mysql.so /usr/lib/libpreludedb/plugins/sql/pgsql.so /usr/lib/libpreludedb/plugins/sql/pgsql.so /usr/lib/libpreludedb/plugins/sql/sqlite3.so /usr/lib/libpreludedb/plugins/sql/sqlite3.so /usr/share/libpreludedb/classic/mysql2sqlite.sh /usr/share/libpreludedb/classic/pgsql-update-14-1.sql /usr/share/libpreludedb/classic/pgsql-update-14-1.sql /usr/share/libpreludedb/classic/pgsql-update-14-2.sql /usr/share/libpreludedb/classic/pgsql-update-14-2.sql /usr/share/libpreludedb/classic/pgsql-update-14-3.sql /usr/share/libpreludedb/classic/pgsql-update-14-3.sql /usr/share/libpreludedb/classic/pgsql-update-14-4.sql /usr/share/libpreludedb/classic/pgsql-update-14-4.sql /usr/share/libpreludedb/classic/pgsql-update-14-5.sql /usr/share/libpreludedb/classic/pgsql-update-14-5.sql /usr/share/libpreludedb/classic/pgsql.sql /usr/share/libpreludedb/classic/pgsql.sql /usr/share/libpreludedb/classic/sqlite.sql /usr/share/libpreludedb/classic/sqlite.sql ---------------------------------------------------------- ... There are duplicate entries. ---------------------------------------------------------- /usr/share/doc/libpreludedb-0.9.11/html/libpreludedb/style.css /usr/share/doc/libpreludedb-0.9.11/html/libpreludedb/up.png /usr/share/libpreludedb/classic/mysql-update-14-1.sql /usr/share/libpreludedb/classic/mysql-update-14-2.sql /usr/share/libpreludedb/classic/mysql-update-14-3.sql ---------------------------------------------------------- /usr/share/libpreludedb /usr/share/libpreludedb/classic are not owned by any packages. * For -devel package: - Why is the dependency for main package with >=, not equal? (also for other subpackages) - And again check the dependency against other package. ----------------------------------------------------------- [root at localhost mock]# /usr/bin/libpreludedb-config --libs -L/usr/lib -lpreludedb -L/usr/lib -lprelude -lgnutls -lgcrypt -lgpg-error -lrt -ldl ----------------------------------------------------------- This means that this package requires other -devel packages (like bug 209214) (libprelude-devel) Also ------------------------------------------------------------ /usr/share/aclocal/libpreludedb.m4 ------------------------------------------------------------ requires "Requires: automake". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 05:02:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 00:02:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612300502.kBU52enX022025@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-30 00:02 EST ------- Well, now this package meets http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines ------------------------------------------------------------ This package (libprelude) is APPROVED by me. ------------------------------------------------------------ Please step forward according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 05:08:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 00:08:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612300508.kBU58f4m022359@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-30 00:08 EST ------- Umm... It seems that Paul Johnson has already sponsored you (I don't know why, however, it is okay..) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 05:08:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 00:08:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209215] Review Request: libpreludedb - Provides an abstraction layer for the libprelude In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612300508.kBU58vis022383@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpreludedb - Provides an abstraction layer for the libprelude https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209215 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 05:09:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 00:09:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209215] Review Request: libpreludedb - Provides an abstraction layer for the libprelude In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612300509.kBU5938x022400@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpreludedb - Provides an abstraction layer for the libprelude https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209215 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 05:09:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 00:09:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209222] Review Request: prelude-lml - Prelude log analyzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612300509.kBU59BaO022425@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prelude-lml - Prelude log analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209222 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 05:10:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 00:10:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209217] Review Request: libpreludedb-mysql - mysql plugin for libpreludedb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612300510.kBU5AsT1022470@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpreludedb-mysql - mysql plugin for libpreludedb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209217 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-30 00:10 EST ------- (removing NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 05:13:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 00:13:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209219] Review Request: libpreludedb-sqlite - Sqlite plugin for libprelude In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612300513.kBU5DN3L022544@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpreludedb-sqlite - Sqlite plugin for libprelude https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209219 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-30 00:13 EST ------- (removing NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 05:14:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 00:14:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209220] Review Request: libpreludedb-pgsql - pgsql plugin for libprelude In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612300514.kBU5EVwC022582@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpreludedb-pgsql - pgsql plugin for libprelude https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209220 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-30 00:14 EST ------- (removing NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 05:15:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 00:15:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209224] Review Request: prelude-manager - Prelude Management server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612300515.kBU5FBF8022619@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prelude-manager - Prelude Management server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209224 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-30 00:15 EST ------- (removing NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 05:31:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 00:31:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220381] Review Request: flex-old - Legacy version of flex, a tool for creating scanners In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612300531.kBU5VhWM022837@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flex-old - Legacy version of flex, a tool for creating scanners https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220381 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-12-30 00:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > This builds fine for me; a few comments: > W: compat-flex devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libfl-compat.a > Static libraries are generally frowned upon, but I don't know enough about > just how flex is used to say whether this is completely unacceptable. Well, libfl basically provides a single function. One, most real world lex-scanners normally implement themselves (i.e. link against statically) and won't use anyway. However, what is an issue, is the name of this library: libfl-compat.a. This will break all packages because they expect to link against libfl. IMO, it must remain libfl. Similar considerations apply to the location of FlexScanner.h. I.e. instead of playing games with directories named "compat" and renaming libs, I'd prefer to see the flex's headers and link-libraries files (*.h,*.a) to be installed into a versioned directory, e.g. %{libdir}/flex- %{includedir}/flex- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 05:45:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 00:45:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220945] Review Request: perl-Text-CharWidth - Get number of occupied columns of a string on terminal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612300545.kBU5jQ0c023087@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-CharWidth - Get number of occupied columns of a string on terminal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220945 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-12-30 00:45 EST ------- Missing directory ownerships: The package must own these dirs: /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/Text /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/Text -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 06:15:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 01:15:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220999] New: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Sieve - Communication with timsieved Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220999 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Sieve - Communication with timsieved Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at theholbrooks.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/php-pear-Net-Sieve.spec SRPM URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/php-pear-Net-Sieve-1.1.5-1.src.rpm Description: Provides an API to talk to the timsieved server that comes with Cyrus IMAPd. Can be used to install, remove, mark active, etc sieve scripts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 06:21:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 01:21:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220926] Review Request: ingo - The Horde email filter manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612300621.kBU6LF5m023680@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ingo - The Horde email filter manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220926 fedora at theholbrooks.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |220999 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-12-30 01:21 EST ------- Spec URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/ingo.spec SRPM URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/ingo-1.1.2-2.src.rpm Added a requirement on php-pear(Net_Sieve) (bug 220999), fixed the download URL, and changed the license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 06:21:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 01:21:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220999] Review Request: php-pear-Net-Sieve - Communication with timsieved In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612300621.kBU6LFbq023684@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Sieve - Communication with timsieved https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220999 fedora at theholbrooks.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |220926 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 06:25:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 01:25:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220919] Review Request: kronolith - The Horde calendar application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612300625.kBU6Pguc023784@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kronolith - The Horde calendar application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220919 fedora at theholbrooks.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-12-30 01:25 EST ------- Changed download URL, Imported, Built, Branches requested -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 06:42:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 01:42:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220999] Review Request: php-pear-Net-Sieve - Communication with timsieved In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612300642.kBU6gvnK024059@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Sieve - Communication with timsieved Alias: pear-Net-Sieve https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220999 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chris.stone at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | Alias| |pear-Net-Sieve ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-12-30 01:42 EST ------- I'll review this (probably tomorrow). Two second glance at spec looks like you have the wrong license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 06:47:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 01:47:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220999] Review Request: php-pear-Net-Sieve - Communication with timsieved In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612300647.kBU6lY3g024149@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Sieve - Communication with timsieved Alias: pear-Net-Sieve https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220999 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-12-30 01:47 EST ------- Brandon, I'm seeing a couple little minor things that need fixing. Could you please redo this spec using the fedora-newrpmspec command? Just run fedora-newrpmsepc php-pear-Net-Sieve and it will create a default template for you to use. This will be much easier for me to review. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 06:54:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 01:54:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220999] Review Request: php-pear-Net-Sieve - Communication with timsieved In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612300654.kBU6suXD024264@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Sieve - Communication with timsieved Alias: pear-Net-Sieve https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220999 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-12-30 01:54 EST ------- I don't mind regenerating a new spec file, but this one is almost verbatim the pear template found at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/PHP/PearSpecTemplate If something is wrong with the template I'd rather point out specifics so the wiki can be updated as well as this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 07:09:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 02:09:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220926] Review Request: ingo - The Horde email filter manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612300709.kBU79lpG024440@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ingo - The Horde email filter manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220926 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-12-30 02:09 EST ------- Spec URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/ingo.spec SRPM URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/ingo-1.1.2-3.src.rpm Found and fixed a bug (that also exists in imp :( ) in prefs.php where the web was trying to access something under /etc/horde and dying -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 07:36:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 02:36:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220860] Review Request: galternatives - Alternatives Configurator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612300736.kBU7a65Q024862@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: galternatives - Alternatives Configurator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220860 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-30 02:36 EST ------- Your patch works well, thanks. Then, first full review for galternatives * General notes for python related packages - Unlike shared libraries' dependencies, python related dependencies are not checked automatically by rpmbuild and these have to be looked into manually. Normally, this can be done by checking what modules this package has to import. For this package ------------------------------------------------------------ [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ grep import /usr/sbin/galternatives `rpm -ql galternatives | grep py$` /usr/sbin/galternatives:import os, sys /usr/sbin/galternatives:import galternatives /usr/sbin/galternatives:from galternatives import gtk /usr/sbin/galternatives:import gettext /usr/sbin/galternatives:from galternatives.common import PACKAGE /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/galternatives/__init__.py:from main import * /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/galternatives/alternative.py:from common import PACKAGE /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/galternatives/alternative.py:import os, gettext /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/galternatives/alternative.py:from gadebug import print_debug /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/galternatives/main.py:import pygtk /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/galternatives/main.py: import gtk, gobject /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/galternatives/main.py: from gtk import glade /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/galternatives/main.py:from common import PACKAGE /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/galternatives/main.py:import sys, os, gettext /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/galternatives/main.py:from alternative import Alternative ------------------------------------------------------------ This means that this package needs "Requires: pygtk2" Then A. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines * Licensing - Please include the license document. For this package, debian/copyright seems the best - Also, adding debian/changelog seems useful and should be included in the package. B. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines = This is okay, except for issues on A C. Other notes: - For upstream URL: Maybe http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/galternatives.html is more useful? - I think this package to be useful, however, how do you think of http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=365365 ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 08:10:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 03:10:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220789] Review Request: fail2ban - Ban IPs that make too many password failures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612300810.kBU8AUBA025245@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fail2ban - Ban IPs that make too many password failures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220789 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-30 03:10 EST ------- Well: * Would you explain why you think that condrestart treatment of the service on %postun stage is unneeded? * I still does not like the appearance of the start/exit of fai2ban service. Currently: -------------------------------------------- [root at localhost ~]# service fail2ban start Starting fail2ban: [root at localhost ~]# service fail2ban stop Stopping fail2ban: -------------------------------------------- This should be like: -------------------------------------------- [root at localhost ~]# service sshd start Starting sshd: [ OK ] [root at localhost ~]# service sshd stop Stopping sshd: [ OK ] -------------------------------------------- * And.. -------------------------------------------- [ "${NETWORKING}" = "no" ] && exit 0 [ -f /etc/fail2ban.conf ] || exit 0 --------------------------------------------- should be "exit 1" or something else: exit code 0 is wrong IMO. Also some messages which tells why starting fail2ban failed should be printed out. * Still I think (strongly) that /usr/bin/fail2ban should be moved under /usr/sbin because this is a sysadmin tool ... and /etc/fail2ban.conf should be /etc/sysconfig/fail2ban . * And I think this package should own /var/log/fail2ban -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 09:52:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 04:52:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221004] New: Review Request: jeta - Horde SSH Java Applet Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221004 Summary: Review Request: jeta - Horde SSH Java Applet Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at theholbrooks.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/jeta.spec SRPM URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/jeta-0-1.0.rc2.1.src.rpm Description: Jeta is the Horde module that provides a Java SSH interface to login to the webserver (or another server with the use of additional relay software). The Horde Project writes web applications in PHP and releases them under Open Source licenses. For more information (including help with jeta) please visit http://www.horde.org/. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 09:56:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 04:56:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221004] Review Request: jeta - Horde SSH Java Applet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612300956.kBU9ujAT030356@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jeta - Horde SSH Java Applet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221004 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-12-30 04:56 EST ------- Since JTA explicitly says in several locations that is for "non-commercial use only", I removed all traces of it from this package. It still functions fine with SSHTermApplet (which is the default anyway). One last issue we may need to work out: jeta is currently set to "inactive" in horde's registry.php, but Jeta doesn't show up and won't do anything until that gets changed to "active". Should we programmatically do that upon install or inform our users that they need to do that manually? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 10:10:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 05:10:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220860] Review Request: galternatives - Alternatives Configurator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612301010.kBUAAxis030993@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: galternatives - Alternatives Configurator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220860 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2006-12-30 05:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > This means that this package needs "Requires: pygtk2" > I think I ave this in before, don't know why I removed it, re-added. > Then > A. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines > * Licensing > - Please include the license document. For this package, debian/copyright > seems the best > - Also, adding debian/changelog seems useful and should be included in > the package. > Done. > C. Other notes: > - For upstream URL: > Maybe http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/galternatives.html is more useful? > I'm not sure, I've changed to it though (at least the latest source package is found there). > - I think this package to be useful, however, how do you think of > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=365365 ? Yes, I've seen it. However, I also believe the package to be useful and as long as there is no security issue(s) with it, and no real alternative for it, then we can as well have it and maintain it for fedora. File with new changes below. Thanks for the thorough review. Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/galternatives/galternatives.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/galternatives/galternatives-0.13.4-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 10:33:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 05:33:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220789] Review Request: fail2ban - Ban IPs that make too many password failures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612301033.kBUAXfUa000344@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fail2ban - Ban IPs that make too many password failures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220789 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-12-30 05:33 EST ------- > * Would you explain why you think that condrestart treatment of the > service on %postun stage is unneeded? Yes, I consider fail2ban in this respect to be as fragile as for example the iptables or httpd services: I don't want to automate therestart, the sysadmin should do that manually and watch for side effects. > [ "${NETWORKING}" = "no" ] && exit 0 This is the typical snipplet used throught all FC packages: $ grep -l '\[ "${NETWORKING}" = "no" \] && exit 0' /etc/init.d/* | tr '\n' ' ' /etc/init.d/bgpd /etc/init.d/btseed /etc/init.d/bttrack /etc/init.d/dhcdbd /etc/init.d/fail2ban /etc/init.d/gkrellmd /etc/init.d/innd /etc/init.d/netfs /etc/init.d/network /etc/init.d/nfs /etc/init.d/nfslock /etc/init.d/ospfd /etc/init.d/postgresql /etc/init.d/ripd /etc/init.d/rpcgssd /etc/init.d/rpcidmapd /etc/init.d/rpcsvcgssd /etc/init.d/sendmail /etc/init.d/zebra > [ -f /etc/fail2ban.conf ] || exit 0 Same here $ grep -l '\[ -f .* \] || exit 0' /etc/init.d/* | tr '\n' ' ' /etc/init.d/acpid /etc/init.d/anacron /etc/init.d/bgpd /etc/init.d/bootparamd /etc/init.d/capi /etc/init.d/clamav /etc/init.d/cpuspeed /etc/init.d/dhcp6r /etc/init.d/dhcp6s /etc/init.d/dhcpd /etc/init.d/dhcrelay /etc/init.d/dund /etc/init.d/exim /etc/init.d/fail2ban /etc/init.d/gkrellmd /etc/init.d/hidd /etc/init.d/hsqldb /etc/init.d/innd /etc/init.d/irda /etc/init.d/irqbalance /etc/init.d/mdmonitor /etc/init.d/mdmpd /etc/init.d/netdump /etc/init.d/netfs /etc/init.d/nscd /etc/init.d/ospf6d /etc/init.d/ospfd /etc/init.d/pand /etc/init.d/portmap /etc/init.d/radiusd /etc/init.d/radvd /etc/init.d/restorecond /etc/init.d/rgmanager /etc/init.d/rhnsd /etc/init.d/ripd /etc/init.d/ripngd /etc/init.d/sendmail /etc/init.d/spamassassin /etc/init.d/squid /etc/init.d/syslog /etc/init.d/winbind /etc/init.d/yppasswdd /etc/init.d/ypserv /etc/init.d/ypxfrd /etc/init.d/zaptel /etc/init.d/zebra > --------------------------------------------- > should be "exit 1" or something else: exit code 0 is > wrong IMO. Also some messages which tells why starting > fail2ban failed should be printed out. Well, it is obviously a Fedora convention not to do so. Whether it is right or wrong is a different thing, but fail2ban has to blend in properly so the above are correct. Anything else would have to be discussed with the FPC. > * Still I think (strongly) that /usr/bin/fail2ban should > be moved under > /usr/sbin because this is a sysadmin tool You can use fail2ban as a user, too. > ... and /etc/fail2ban.conf should be /etc/sysconfig/fail2ban . No, that's wrong, /etc/sysconfig carries config files for the init files themselves (e.g. what arguments to use for calling a daemon), everything else is defined by the application, e.g. check httpd, ntpd and so on. > * And I think this package should own /var/log/fail2ban Again no other packages caters for its logfile ownership, having fail2ban behave differently is wrong. But I 100% with you on defining a general solution, just not through a package submission. You're welcome to raise the issues at fedora-packaging instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 11:25:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 06:25:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221010] New: Review Request: librfid - Free Software RFID library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221010 Summary: Review Request: librfid - Free Software RFID library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kushaldas at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://freeshell.in/~kushal/librfid.spec SRPM URL: http://freeshell.in/~kushal/librfid-0.1.0-1.src.rpm Description: librfid is a Free Software RFID library. It implements the PCD (reader) side protocol stack of ISO 14443 A, ISO 14443 B, ISO 15693, Mifare Ultralight and Mifare Classic. Support for iCODE and other 13.56MHz based transponders is planned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 11:28:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 06:28:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220969] Review Request: isomaster - GUI CD image editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612301128.kBUBSm7V003227@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: isomaster - GUI CD image editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220969 ------- Additional Comments From mszpak at wp.pl 2006-12-30 06:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Remember that %install section is executed at building an SRPM, not at > installing the binary one. That's why you need to put it into BR. Sure, it was logical mistake. > Desktop files aren't as large to put them into tarball. You can remove a tar > compression and get rid of second %setup macro. Now, you can put %{SOURCE1} > macro into desktop-file-install: > desktop-file-install --vendor fedora \ > --dir %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications \ > %{SOURCE1} Yesterday I remembered why I had switched to generated .desktop files. In prebuilt .desktop file there has to be fixed path to icon which can be incorrent if package isn't installed in /usr. But it isn't probably a common problem. > and it looks much better :) Hopefully good enough to find a sponsor :) Updated version: http://timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/zrzut/isomaster.spec http://timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/zrzut/isomaster-0.6-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 11:32:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 06:32:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220945] Review Request: perl-Text-CharWidth - Get number of occupied columns of a string on terminal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612301132.kBUBW0xT003301@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-CharWidth - Get number of occupied columns of a string on terminal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220945 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-12-30 06:31 EST ------- Thanks! P.S. How did you spot them? Eyeballs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 11:37:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 06:37:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211807] Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612301137.kBUBbNjl003433@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211807 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2006-12-30 06:37 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > The bad news is that initial discussion with caillon was that he was not in > favour of having this happen[1]. Well, there seems to be a lot of users out there (including me) that are probably interested in this package; I think we should find a solution for them. Telling users to wait another four months until F7 is not the answer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 11:57:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 06:57:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220766] Review Request: ScientificPython - a collection of Python modules that are useful for scientific computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612301157.kBUBv58J004188@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ScientificPython - a collection of Python modules that are useful for scientific computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220766 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-12-30 06:57 EST ------- MUST Items: - MUST: rpmlint's output isn' clean but can be ignored, since CeCILL is a free software license, explicitly compatible with the GNU GPL. http://www.cecill.info/licences.en.html - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name} - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed (CeCill) with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. - MUST: the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - MUST: The spec file for the package is be legible. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least i386. - MUST: All build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires. - MUST: If the package does not contain shared library files located in the dynamic linker's default paths - MUST: the package is not designed to be relocatable - MUST: the package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: There are no Large documentation files - MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - MUST: There are no Header files or static libraries - MUST: The package does not contain library files with a suffix - MUST: Package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives - MUST: Package containing GUI applications includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: The source package does include license text(s) as Licence - SHOULD: mock builds succcessfully in i386. - SHOULD: The reviewer tested that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. - SHOULD: No scriptlets were used APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 11:57:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 06:57:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220766] Review Request: ScientificPython - a collection of Python modules that are useful for scientific computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612301157.kBUBvXoH004225@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ScientificPython - a collection of Python modules that are useful for scientific computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220766 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 12:01:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 07:01:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221015] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221015 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: johan at x-tnd.be QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/moodin/ksplash-engine-moodin.spec SRPM URL: http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/moodin/ksplash-engine-moodin-0.4.2-0.2.fc6.src.rpm Description: Moodin is a splash engine for KDE Desktop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 12:02:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 07:02:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221016] New: Review Request: Moodin - Splash engine for KDE Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221016 Summary: Review Request: Moodin - Splash engine for KDE Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: johan at x-tnd.be QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/moodin/ksplash-engine-moodin.spec SRPM URL: http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/moodin/ksplash-engine-moodin-0.4.2-0.2.fc6.src.rpm Description: Moodin is a splash engine for KDE Desktop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 12:02:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 07:02:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221015] Review Request: ksplash-engine-moodin - Moodin is a splash engine for KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612301202.kBUC2sKY004590@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksplash-engine-moodin - Moodin is a splash engine for KDE Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221015 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- |splash engine for KDE | |Desktop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 12:06:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 07:06:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221015] Review Request: ksplash-engine-moodin - Moodin is a splash engine for KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612301206.kBUC6eTj004838@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksplash-engine-moodin - Moodin is a splash engine for KDE Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221015 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-12-30 07:06 EST ------- *** Bug 221016 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 12:06:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 07:06:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221016] Review Request: Moodin - Splash engine for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612301206.kBUC6d4F004830@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Moodin - Splash engine for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221016 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-12-30 07:06 EST ------- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Policy/StalledReviews *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 221015 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 12:14:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 07:14:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221015] Review Request: ksplash-engine-moodin - Moodin is a splash engine for KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612301214.kBUCEBo0005107@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksplash-engine-moodin - Moodin is a splash engine for KDE Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221015 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 12:18:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 07:18:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221015] Review Request: ksplash-engine-moodin - Moodin is a splash engine for KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612301218.kBUCIcVL005255@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksplash-engine-moodin - Moodin is a splash engine for KDE Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221015 ------- Additional Comments From johan at x-tnd.be 2006-12-30 07:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #0) SRPM URL: http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/moodin/ksplash-engine-moodin-0.4.2-1.fc6.src.rpm Changed release from 0.2 to 1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 12:41:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 07:41:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218887] Review Request: fxload - Firmware loader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612301241.kBUCfZk2005789@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fxload - Firmware loader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218887 bart.vanbrabant at zoeloelip.be changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From bart.vanbrabant at zoeloelip.be 2006-12-30 07:41 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 188478 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 12:42:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 07:42:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 188478] Review Request: fxload-2002_04_11.spec In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612301242.kBUCgC0U005812@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fxload-2002_04_11.spec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188478 bart.vanbrabant at zoeloelip.be changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bart.vanbrabant at zoeloelip.be ------- Additional Comments From bart.vanbrabant at zoeloelip.be 2006-12-30 07:42 EST ------- *** Bug 218887 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 13:01:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 08:01:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612301301.kBUD18cp006389@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 ------- Additional Comments From martin.sourada at seznam.cz 2006-12-30 08:01 EST ------- I have finally discovered, by accident, the core of the problem with gxine crashing while playing certain videos, though I still don't know why I encounter it only with some movies... I have not right gamma on my monitor, so I use gamma correction (via video>post-processing eq2 plugin) to get the right colors. But, lately, I turned the post-processing for video off and gxine suddenly stopped segfaulting. Furthermore, I discovered, that if I enable eq2 plugin in video>deinterlacing gxine still works. So I moved eq2 plugin from video>post-processing to video>deinterlacing and gxine now works as it ought to. My conclusion about the problem therefore is that video>post-processing in gxine is very unstable. Furthermore, I recently installed gxine on a different machine and tried to set up and enable video>post-processing - and without crashes I was able to enable it only via file>configure>preferences dialog... It only supports my conclusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 13:14:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 08:14:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209215] Review Request: libpreludedb - Provides an abstraction layer for the libprelude In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612301314.kBUDE4sr006721@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpreludedb - Provides an abstraction layer for the libprelude https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209215 ------- Additional Comments From tscherf at redhat.com 2006-12-30 08:14 EST ------- ok, there has been a problem with file globbing, it's fixed now. new package is here: http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/libpreludedb-0.9.11-2.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/libpreludedb.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 13:16:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 08:16:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219973] Review Request: pdns - A modern, advanced and high performance authoritative-only nameserver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612301316.kBUDGU6G006763@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pdns - A modern, advanced and high performance authoritative-only nameserver Alias: powerdns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219973 ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2006-12-30 08:16 EST ------- Ah, of course. New version: http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/powerdns/pdns.spec http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/powerdns/pdns-2.9.20-5.src.rpm Thanks again, Ruben -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 13:24:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 08:24:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219915] Review Request: kio_resources - Kio_resources provides the "resources" protocol for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612301324.kBUDOSk8006939@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kio_resources - Kio_resources provides the "resources" protocol for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219915 johan at x-tnd.be changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |johan at x-tnd.be ------- Additional Comments From johan at x-tnd.be 2006-12-30 08:24 EST ------- == Not an official review as I'm not yet sponsored == The spec file seems to be ok. rpmlint's out is clean, packages build correctly with mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 14:28:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 09:28:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219872] Review Request: curlftpfs - user-space FTP filesystem using libcurl and FUSE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612301428.kBUESrAI010156@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: curlftpfs - user-space FTP filesystem using libcurl and FUSE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219872 ------- Additional Comments From fedora-packaging at dw-perspective.org.uk 2006-12-30 09:28 EST ------- Thank you for that. I have another review request here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219873 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 14:39:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 09:39:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219071] Review Request: pyfribidi - A Python binding for GNU FriBidi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612301439.kBUEdnWa010488@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyfribidi - A Python binding for GNU FriBidi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219071 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-30 09:39 EST ------- Please close this bug when rebuilding is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 15:00:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 10:00:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219915] Review Request: kio_resources - Kio_resources provides the "resources" protocol for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612301500.kBUF0jHG011149@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kio_resources - Kio_resources provides the "resources" protocol for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219915 ------- Additional Comments From karlikt at gmail.com 2006-12-30 10:00 EST ------- It is prereview, I am not sponsored. Rpmlint return NULL, so OK. I didn't check build with mock, but under normal user it built correct. I think You should use macros in source-url. 26521-kio_resources-0.2.tar.bz2 change for example: 26521-%(name)-%{version}.tar.bz2 And the last: Is kdebase realy needed by this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 15:29:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 10:29:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219915] Review Request: kio_resources - Kio_resources provides the "resources" protocol for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612301529.kBUFTsSG012068@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kio_resources - Kio_resources provides the "resources" protocol for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219915 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-12-30 10:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > I think You should use macros in source-url. > 26521-kio_resources-0.2.tar.bz2 > change for example: > 26521-%(name)-%{version}.tar.bz2 to please you, I'll modify it for the next release since it is not really a blocker > And the last: Is kdebase realy needed by this package? This package is useless without konqueror chitlesh(~)[1]$whereis konqueror konqueror: /usr/bin/konqueror chitlesh(~)[1]$rpm -qf /usr/bin/konqueror kdebase-3.5.5-0.4.fc6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 15:38:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 10:38:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219872] Review Request: curlftpfs - user-space FTP filesystem using libcurl and FUSE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612301538.kBUFcvWX012331@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: curlftpfs - user-space FTP filesystem using libcurl and FUSE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219872 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-30 10:38 EST ------- Well, * Please include ChangeLog = This package meets ReviewGuidelines/Guidelines = Your another review request seems to have quality enough for being sponsored. Okay. ------------------------------------------------ This package (curlftpfs) is APPROVED by me. Please step forward according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors When you proceed to a stage, I should receive a mail which tells that you need a sponsor. Then I will sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 15:41:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 10:41:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221027] New: Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221027 Summary: Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/LabPlot/LabPlot.spec SRPM URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/LabPlot/LabPlot-1.5.1.4-1.src.rpm Description: LabPlot is for scientific 2D and 3D data and function plotting. The various display and analysis functions are explained in the handbook (KDE help center). LabPlot also provides a component for easily viewing the project files in Konqueror. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 16:24:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 11:24:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220860] Review Request: galternatives - Alternatives Configurator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612301624.kBUGOUVl013873@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: galternatives - Alternatives Configurator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220860 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-30 11:24 EST ------- Now * This package meets ReviewGuidelines/Guidelines * Works functionally Okay ------------------------------------------------- This package (galternatives) is APPROVED by me -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 16:27:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 11:27:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220999] Review Request: php-pear-Net-Sieve - Communication with timsieved In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612301627.kBUGRBiW014007@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Sieve - Communication with timsieved Alias: pear-Net-Sieve https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220999 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-12-30 11:27 EST ------- Fixed. Thanks for pointing this out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 16:35:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 11:35:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220969] Review Request: isomaster - GUI CD image editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612301635.kBUGZvBS014189@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: isomaster - GUI CD image editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220969 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-12-30 11:35 EST ------- I tried to run rpmlint for your newest package and I got: E: isomaster description-line-too-long ISO Master: an easy to use GUI CD image editor. It allows to extract files from an ISO, add files to an ISO, and create bootable ISOs - all in a graphical user interface. E: isomaster description-line-too-long ISO Master: an easy to use GUI CD image editor. It allows to extract files from an ISO, add files to an ISO, and create bootable ISOs - all in a graphical user interface. W: isomaster macro-in-%changelog _datadir In order to get rid of the first two ones you have to split your %description. One line inside it may be max 79 characters long. To remove a warning just double % character, so instead of %{_datadir} write %%{_datadir} etc. Also I noticed that gtk2 dependency ought to be removed completely. Running rpm -qpR for RPM gives me following result: gtk2 libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit) libcairo.so.2()(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgmodule-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) As you can see, there is libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 file. $ rpm -qf /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 gtk2-2.10.4-4.fc6.x86_64 So it is owned by gtk2 package. It means you can remove that dependency without concern. (In reply to comment #4)) > Hopefully good enough to find a sponsor :) It does look for me that if you fix the last issues I mentioned above, this package surely will be good enough. Remember to make unoffical reviews of another packages to let sponsors pay attention to you ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 17:00:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 12:00:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211807] Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612301700.kBUH0jnn014728@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211807 ------- Additional Comments From gawain.lynch at gmail.com 2006-12-30 12:00 EST ------- Firefox 2.0.0.1 packages are up: http://gawain.thecodergeek.com/fedora/6/SRPMS/firefox2-2.0.0.1-2.1.fc6.src.rpm http://gawain.thecodergeek.com/fedora/6/SPECS/firefox2.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 17:06:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 12:06:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211807] Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612301706.kBUH6W1p014907@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211807 ------- Additional Comments From gawain.lynch at gmail.com 2006-12-30 12:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > Well, there seems to be a lot of users out there (including me) that are > probably interested in this package; I think we should find a solution for them. > Telling users to wait another four months until F7 is not the answer. Agree whole heartedly. Chris is maintaining ff2 in rawhide and I adjust his spec file slightly, there is little in the way of effort at the moment. As for the legal aspect, I am sure that RH legal could talk to Moz legal about the patch included in this, it only changes cosmetics to add a '2'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 17:12:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 12:12:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196837] Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit3 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612301712.kBUHCVU8015185@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit3 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests Alias: pear-PHPUnit3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196837 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-12-30 12:12 EST ------- I confirm that it's a pear bug. I file it : http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=9712 So using Conflicts seems a good workaround. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 17:54:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 12:54:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221010] Review Request: librfid - Free Software RFID library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612301754.kBUHsu5N016186@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librfid - Free Software RFID library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221010 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: librfid - |Review Request: librfid - |Free Software RFID library |Free Software RFID library AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bdpepple at ameritech.net OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 18:06:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 13:06:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211807] Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612301806.kBUI6dJA016530@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211807 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-12-30 13:06 EST ------- > As for the legal aspect, I am sure that RH legal could talk to Moz legal about > the patch included in this, it only changes cosmetics to add a '2'. I think RH legal is the wrong contact, AFAIK Chris is the direct contact to the Mozilla folks, anything regarding TMs and required grants on this has to go through him. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 18:14:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 13:14:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221031] New: Review Request: PyOpenGL - Cross platform Python binding to OpenGL Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221031 Summary: Review Request: PyOpenGL - Cross platform Python binding to OpenGL Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rafalzaq at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.mutebox.net/~rafalzaq/PyOpenGL/PyOpenGL.spec SRPM URL: http://www.mutebox.net/~rafalzaq/PyOpenGL/PyOpenGL-3.0.0-0.1.a5.fc6.src.rpm Description: PyOpenGL is the cross platform Python binding to OpenGL and related APIs. The binding is created using the SWIG wrapper generator, and is provided under an extremely liberal BSD-style Open-Source license. rpmlint returns "W: PyOpenGL-doc doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/PyOpenGL-doc-3.0.0/pydoc/builddocs.py /usr/bin/env" but coreutils (which is an exception) include it. This is my first package and I'm looking for a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 18:20:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 13:20:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221031] Review Request: PyOpenGL - Cross platform Python binding to OpenGL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612301820.kBUIK0jA016891@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyOpenGL - Cross platform Python binding to OpenGL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221031 rafalzaq at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 18:26:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 13:26:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211807] Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612301826.kBUIQ4Xn017048@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211807 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |caillon at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-12-30 13:26 EST ------- Christopher Aillon said: > And most importantly, no matter who ends up maintaining this in Extras, I am > ultimately responsible for it as I'm the Fedora contact for upstream, have the > upstream cred, and am part of the security and release teams upstream. > Anything that happens between Extras and upstream will come back to me if > only for my opinion. Questions about processes, etc. from whoever would own > the Extras package will likely come through me. I'd be responsible for making > sure security fixes get out at roughly the same time as the Core versions. > And this is an unnecessary responsibility. I think this package needs to be explicitly allowed or disallowed by Chris to enter extras (regardless of any packaging issues a reviewer might yet hit, that's the next step). E.g. please get his explicit consent before any further actions. I've added Chris to the Cc for him to give his definitive thumbs up or down. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 18:35:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 13:35:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220789] Review Request: fail2ban - Ban IPs that make too many password failures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612301835.kBUIZQ3E017245@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fail2ban - Ban IPs that make too many password failures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220789 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-30 13:35 EST ------- Well: A. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines ! Licensing - Please ask upstream to include to src tarball a copy of GPL (not a blocker) = Scriptlets requirements (In reply to comment #8) > > * Would you explain why you think that condrestart treatment of the > > service on %postun stage is unneeded? > > Yes, I consider fail2ban in this respect to be as > fragile as for example the > iptables or httpd services: I don't want to automate therestart However, I found on your spec file (0.6.2-2) ------------------------------------------ %post /sbin/chkconfig --add %{name} /sbin/service %{name} condrestart > /dev/null 2>&1 <- THIS LINE ------------------------------------------ Perhaps you may want to remove the line (I don't object to it according to your opinition). Note: leaving the line needs "Requires(post): /sbin/service" B. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines = okay, except for the issues on A. ------------------------------------------------------------------ This package (fail2ban) is APPROVED by me. ------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: the issue under discussion on fedora-maintainers about "very short APPROVED comments" was actually caused by my review....... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 18:52:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 13:52:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211807] Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612301852.kBUIqEkN017598@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211807 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2006-12-30 13:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #22) > I think this package needs to be explicitly allowed or disallowed by Chris to > enter extras Well, if he disallows it in the scope of the trademark issue then I'll stongly vote to rename the pacakge to "iceweasel". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 18:59:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 13:59:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219973] Review Request: pdns - A modern, advanced and high performance authoritative-only nameserver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612301859.kBUIx5j1017801@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pdns - A modern, advanced and high performance authoritative-only nameserver Alias: powerdns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219973 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-30 13:59 EST ------- The package in comment #8 handles all the rpath issues... I see no further blockers, so this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this review request with NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 19:01:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 14:01:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211807] Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612301901.kBUJ1BM1017889@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211807 ------- Additional Comments From heiko.adams at gmx.de 2006-12-30 14:01 EST ------- I would recomend another way for installation if he disallows: install firefox2 at /opt and place the symlink "firefox" at /usr/local/bin on this way there shouldn't be any conflicts with an installed firefox1.5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 19:14:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 14:14:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220789] Review Request: fail2ban - Ban IPs that make too many password failures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612301914.kBUJE8vk018338@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fail2ban - Ban IPs that make too many password failures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220789 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-12-30 14:13 EST ------- Upstream has been notified on both /usr/lib and license issue > /sbin/service %{name} condrestart > /dev/null 2>&1 <- THIS LINE Yes, that needs to go away. I added it, then regretted it and forgot to remove it. :/ > This package (fail2ban) is APPROVED by me. Thanks, I'll remove the line and import 0.6.2-3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 19:26:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 14:26:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221010] Review Request: librfid - Free Software RFID library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612301926.kBUJQ0lO018741@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librfid - Free Software RFID library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221010 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-12-30 14:25 EST ------- MD5Sum: 695e7f30f570a08407e42ed278ca2fe3 librfid-0.1.0.tar.bz2 Good: * Source URL is canonical. * License field in spec, match tarball license. * Group Tag is from the official list * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros. * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * Files have appropriate permissions and owners. * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines. * rpmlint produces no errors. * Package builds in Mock fine. * Package install and uninstalls cleanly on FC6. Minor: * I really don't think you need to add the same docs that are in the main package to the devel package. This isn't a blocker, but I would drop them. +1 APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 19:28:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 14:28:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215241] Review Request: thunar-archive-plugin - Archive plugin for the Thunar file manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612301928.kBUJSQF6018805@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thunar-archive-plugin - Archive plugin for the Thunar file manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215241 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-30 14:28 EST ------- Whats the status on this package? Patrice: Do you want to do a formal review of it? Or would you like me to do so? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 19:32:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 14:32:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220979] Review Request: tesseract - Raw OCR Engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612301932.kBUJW7PN018945@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tesseract - Raw OCR Engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220979 ------- Additional Comments From karlikt at gmail.com 2006-12-30 14:32 EST ------- I fixed one rpmlint warning (mixed space and tabs). new SRPM: http://mutebox.net/~karlik/tesseract-1.02-2.src.rpm new SPECS has the same URL like old -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 19:39:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 14:39:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219973] Review Request: pdns - A modern, advanced and high performance authoritative-only nameserver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612301939.kBUJdJSa019164@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pdns - A modern, advanced and high performance authoritative-only nameserver Alias: powerdns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219973 ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 19:39:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 14:39:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219973] Review Request: pdns - A modern, advanced and high performance authoritative-only nameserver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612301939.kBUJdvHo019202@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pdns - A modern, advanced and high performance authoritative-only nameserver Alias: powerdns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219973 ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163779 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 19:42:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 14:42:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208737] Review Request: ivman - Generic handler for HAL events In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612301942.kBUJgxnv019292@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivman - Generic handler for HAL events https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208737 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-30 14:42 EST ------- I see that 0.6.13 was released. Does this address the config file issue you were seeing? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 19:50:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 14:50:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219973] Review Request: pdns - A modern, advanced and high performance authoritative-only nameserver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612301950.kBUJo5hl019676@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pdns - A modern, advanced and high performance authoritative-only nameserver Alias: powerdns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219973 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-30 14:50 EST ------- You should leave the FE-ACCEPT blocker for recordkeeping. Re-added it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 20:03:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 15:03:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211807] Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612302003.kBUK3Pci020050@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211807 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-30 15:03 EST ------- In reply to comment #22: Yeah, I mailed Chris directly to come and comment. I didn't want to add him to CC as I figured he got enough email already. ;) In reply to comments #23, #24: I don't think we should speculate on such things yet. Lets see what Chris says... FYI, The package in comment #19 now compiles fine in mock for x86_64 here. I am posting this comment via the version in comment #19 and it's working just fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 20:18:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 15:18:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220969] Review Request: isomaster - an easy to use GUI CD image editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612302018.kBUKIaTH020340@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: isomaster - an easy to use GUI CD image editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220969 mszpak at wp.pl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: isomaster - |Review Request: isomaster - |GUI CD image editor |an easy to use GUI CD image | |editor ------- Additional Comments From mszpak at wp.pl 2006-12-30 15:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > I tried to run rpmlint for your newest package and I got: > E: isomaster description-line-too-long ISO Master: an easy to use GUI CD image > editor. It allows to extract files from an ISO, add files to an ISO, and create > bootable ISOs - all in a graphical user interface. I tested earlier RPM with rpmlint, but it was with a shorter description. > Also I noticed that gtk2 dependency ought to be removed completely. > > As you can see, there is libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 file. > $ rpm -qf /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 > gtk2-2.10.4-4.fc6.x86_64 > > So it is owned by gtk2 package. It means you can remove that dependency > without concern. I removed it. > It does look for me that if you fix the last issues I mentioned above, this > package surely will be good enough. > Remember to make unoffical reviews of another packages to let sponsors > pay attention to you ;-) I can try. All my comments will be with footer "I'm looking for a sponsor. Call now: bug 220969" Thanks for all your suggestions. Updated version: http://timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/zrzut/isomaster.spec timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/zrzut/isomaster-0.6-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 20:27:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 15:27:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220969] Review Request: isomaster - an easy to use GUI CD image editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612302027.kBUKRBtr020598@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: isomaster - an easy to use GUI CD image editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220969 ------- Additional Comments From mszpak at wp.pl 2006-12-30 15:27 EST ------- Links with http prefix: http://timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/zrzut/isomaster.spec http://timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/zrzut/isomaster-0.6-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 20:27:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 15:27:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221027] Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612302027.kBUKRPte020622@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221027 ------- Additional Comments From karlikt at gmail.com 2006-12-30 15:27 EST ------- I am not sponsored, it is a prereview. I think You should be consistently using the macro %{name} in %files in spec-file. For example in %files devel %{_libdir}/lib%{name}.so %{_libdir}/libLabPlotnetCDF.so I think it will be better if it is: %{_libdir}/lib%{name}.so %{_libdir}/lib%{name}netCDF.so Rebuild with mock is correct. Rpmlint: SRPM - NULL - ok RPM(base): W: LabPlot dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/br/LabPlot/small_pics /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/LabPlot/small_pics/ W: LabPlot symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/br/LabPlot/small_pics /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/LabPlot/small_pics/ W: LabPlot dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/pl/LabPlot/small_pics /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/LabPlot/small_pics/ W: LabPlot symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/pl/LabPlot/small_pics /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/LabPlot/small_pics/ W: LabPlot dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/fr/LabPlot/small_pics /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/LabPlot/small_pics/ W: LabPlot symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/fr/LabPlot/small_pics /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/LabPlot/small_pics/ W: LabPlot dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/nl/LabPlot/small_pics /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/LabPlot/small_pics/ W: LabPlot symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/nl/LabPlot/small_pics /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/LabPlot/small_pics/ W: LabPlot dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/sv/LabPlot/small_pics /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/LabPlot/small_pics/ W: LabPlot symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/sv/LabPlot/small_pics /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/LabPlot/small_pics/ W: LabPlot dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/de/LabPlot/small_pics /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/LabPlot/small_pics/ W: LabPlot symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/de/LabPlot/small_pics /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/LabPlot/small_pics/ W: LabPlot dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/it/LabPlot/small_pics /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/LabPlot/small_pics/ W: LabPlot symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/it/LabPlot/small_pics /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/LabPlot/small_pics/ It is not ok. RPM(devel) - NULL - ok You should fix it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 20:47:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 15:47:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221027] Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612302047.kBUKllqd021100@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221027 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 22:32:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 17:32:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220979] Review Request: tesseract - Raw OCR Engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612302232.kBUMWUG0022813@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tesseract - Raw OCR Engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220979 karlikt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |179259 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 22:45:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 17:45:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220999] Review Request: php-pear-Net-Sieve - Communication with timsieved In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612302245.kBUMjvTJ022999@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Sieve - Communication with timsieved Alias: pear-Net-Sieve https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220999 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-12-30 17:45 EST ------- Spec URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/php-pear-Net-Sieve.spec SRPM URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/php-pear-Net-Sieve-1.1.5-2.src.rpm Cleaned up to match the new template. Thanks for updating it Chris! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 22:51:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 17:51:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220999] Review Request: php-pear-Net-Sieve - Communication with timsieved In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612302251.kBUMpqXj023068@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Sieve - Communication with timsieved Alias: pear-Net-Sieve https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220999 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-12-30 17:51 EST ------- I also changed the license to BSD (at least that's what it looked like in the header comment in Sieve.php) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 22:52:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 17:52:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221010] Review Request: librfid - Free Software RFID library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612302252.kBUMqa62023095@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librfid - Free Software RFID library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221010 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-12-30 17:52 EST ------- One thing to consider: The %{_bindir}/send_script in the main package has a very generic file name and bears the risk of creating a conflict with other packages. The upstream authors are advised to choose a more unique file name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 23:00:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 18:00:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221015] Review Request: ksplash-engine-moodin - Moodin is a splash engine for KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612302300.kBUN0kHH023215@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksplash-engine-moodin - Moodin is a splash engine for KDE Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221015 ------- Additional Comments From rafalzaq at gmail.com 2006-12-30 18:00 EST ------- This is not an official review, I'm looking for a sponsor. I think you should use %{name} and %{version} macros in Source0. * rpmlint is silent for RPM & SRPM * source files match upstream * specfile is properly named * BuildRequires listed well (mock builds successfully on FC6 i386) * latest version is being packaged * license field matches the actual license (included in %doc) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 23:15:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 18:15:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220922] Review Request: geany - a lightweight gtk2 based IDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612302315.kBUNF2BQ023446@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geany - a lightweight gtk2 based IDE Alias: geany https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220922 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-12-30 18:14 EST ------- Josef: Looked a little deeper into this package and it is installing documentation files in /usr/share/doc/%{name} _and_ /usr/share/doc/%{name}-%{version}. I attempted to add --docdir=%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} but this did not work either. All the documentation should go in the same directory and be set as %doc files. For now, I would suggest moving the files out of %{_docdir}/%{name} in the %install section after they have been installed. Just move the files to . and then include them in %doc. Be sure to add a comment above the mv command indicating that --docdir is not working in %configure. Please also fix these rpmlint warnings: W: geany mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 39) W: geany wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/geany/ScintillaLicense.txt Fixing end of line encodings is typically done with sed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 23:28:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 18:28:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 177832] Review Request: wmweather+ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612302328.kBUNS57g023648@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wmweather+ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177832 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2006-12-30 18:28 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 165488 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 23:28:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 18:28:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 165488] Review Request: wmweather+ - Weather status dockapp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612302328.kBUNScxx023690@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wmweather+ - Weather status dockapp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165488 Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dcantrell at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2006-12-30 18:28 EST ------- *** Bug 177832 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 23:32:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 18:32:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189452] Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612302332.kBUNWf0a023736@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189452 Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2006-12-30 18:32 EST ------- Properly block FE-ACCEPT -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 23:35:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 18:35:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221039] New: Review Request: aria2 - High speed download utility with resuming and segmented downloading. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221039 Summary: Review Request: aria2 - High speed download utility with resuming and segmented downloading. Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mr.ecik at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ecik.nonlogic.org/aria/aria2.spec SRPM URL: http://ecik.nonlogic.org/aria/aria2-0.9.0-1.src.rpm Description: aria2 is a download utility with resuming and segmented downloading. Supported protocols are HTTP/HTTPS/FTP/BitTorrent. It also supports Metalink version 3.0. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 30 23:38:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 18:38:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167943] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-base In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612302338.kBUNcnlS023908@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sblim-cmpi-base https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167943 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO| |163779 nThis| | CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2006-12-30 18:38 EST ------- Properly block FE-ACCEPT -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 00:04:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 19:04:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220999] Review Request: php-pear-Net-Sieve - Communication with timsieved In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612310004.kBV043jN024304@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Sieve - Communication with timsieved Alias: pear-Net-Sieve https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220999 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-12-30 19:04 EST ------- ==== REVIEW CHECKLIST ==== - rpmlint output: W: php-pear-Net-Sieve no-documentation permissible, no documentation - package named according to package naming guidelines - spec filename matches %{name} - package meets packaging guidelines - licensed with open source compatible license - license matches actual license - source package does not include license file - spec written in American english - spec file is legible - package successfully compiles and builds on FC6 x86_64 - all build dependices listed in BR - no locales - no shared libraries - package is not relocatable - packge owns all directories it creates - no duplicates in %files - file permissions set properly - package contains proper %clean section - macro usage is consistent - contains code - no large documentation - no %doc - no header files or static libraries - no pkgconfig files - no library files - no need for devel subpackage - no .la files - not a GUI app needing a .desktop file - packages shares directory ownership with other Net packages. Acceptable for pear packages APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 00:05:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 19:05:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220999] Review Request: php-pear-Net-Sieve - Communication with timsieved In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612310005.kBV05Z1a024361@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Sieve - Communication with timsieved Alias: pear-Net-Sieve https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220999 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-12-30 19:05 EST ------- oops forgot one checklist item: - sources match upstream 2f0b868d5bde1742721d525233274f5a Net_Sieve-1.1.5.tgz APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 00:10:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 19:10:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 191507] Review Request: wifi-radar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612310010.kBV0AgWY024424@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wifi-radar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191507 Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2006-12-30 19:10 EST ------- (I assume spot did accept this package...) Properly block FE-ACCEPT -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 00:13:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 19:13:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 186811] Review Request: libnfnetlink - Netfilter netlink userspace library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612310013.kBV0Dbiu024482@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnfnetlink - Netfilter netlink userspace library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186811 Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2006-12-30 19:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > I'm happy to APPOROVE your package. Please do block FE-ACCEPT when you approve a package. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 00:24:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 19:24:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612310024.kBV0OHrq024636@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 tscherf at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 00:24:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 19:24:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209217] Review Request: libpreludedb-mysql - mysql plugin for libpreludedb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612310024.kBV0Ocj0024656@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpreludedb-mysql - mysql plugin for libpreludedb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209217 Bug 209217 depends on bug 209214, which changed state. Bug 209214 Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 00:24:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 19:24:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209215] Review Request: libpreludedb - Provides an abstraction layer for the libprelude In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612310024.kBV0On9c024670@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpreludedb - Provides an abstraction layer for the libprelude https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209215 Bug 209215 depends on bug 209214, which changed state. Bug 209214 Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 00:25:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 19:25:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209219] Review Request: libpreludedb-sqlite - Sqlite plugin for libprelude In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612310025.kBV0P17h024692@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpreludedb-sqlite - Sqlite plugin for libprelude https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209219 Bug 209219 depends on bug 209214, which changed state. Bug 209214 Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 00:25:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 19:25:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209224] Review Request: prelude-manager - Prelude Management server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612310025.kBV0PBDS024705@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prelude-manager - Prelude Management server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209224 Bug 209224 depends on bug 209214, which changed state. Bug 209214 Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 00:25:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 19:25:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209222] Review Request: prelude-lml - Prelude log analyzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612310025.kBV0PMiT024718@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prelude-lml - Prelude log analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209222 Bug 209222 depends on bug 209214, which changed state. Bug 209214 Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 00:25:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 19:25:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209220] Review Request: libpreludedb-pgsql - pgsql plugin for libprelude In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612310025.kBV0PXS3024728@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpreludedb-pgsql - pgsql plugin for libprelude https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209220 Bug 209220 depends on bug 209214, which changed state. Bug 209214 Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 00:27:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 19:27:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209219] Review Request: libpreludedb-sqlite - Sqlite plugin for libprelude In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612310027.kBV0RRBI024754@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpreludedb-sqlite - Sqlite plugin for libprelude https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209219 tscherf at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 00:28:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 19:28:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221039] Review Request: aria2 - High speed download utility with resuming and segmented downloading. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612310028.kBV0S6Ol024791@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aria2 - High speed download utility with resuming and segmented downloading. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221039 ------- Additional Comments From rafalzaq at gmail.com 2006-12-30 19:28 EST ------- This is not an official review, I'm looking for a sponsor. * rmplint returns W: aria2 summary-ended-with-dot High speed download utility with resuming and segmented downloading. * specfile is properly named * source files match upstream * BuildRequires listed well (mock builds successfully on FC6 i386) * latest version is being packaged * license field matches the actual license (included in %doc) * no duplicates in %files * spec file handles locales properly -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 00:28:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 19:28:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209220] Review Request: libpreludedb-pgsql - pgsql plugin for libprelude In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612310028.kBV0SkqS024813@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpreludedb-pgsql - pgsql plugin for libprelude https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209220 tscherf at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 01:26:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 20:26:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221027] Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612310126.kBV1QLhY025659@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221027 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-12-30 20:26 EST ------- A new upstream stable version has been released. Ill make those changes in the upcoming days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 01:43:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 20:43:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209224] Review Request: prelude-manager - Prelude Management server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612310143.kBV1hEU1025955@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prelude-manager - Prelude Management server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209224 ------- Additional Comments From tscherf at redhat.com 2006-12-30 20:43 EST ------- updated packages: http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/prelude-manager-0.9.7.1-1.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/prelude-manager.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 01:45:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 20:45:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220891] Review Request: greylistd - Greylisting daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612310145.kBV1jlGA025997@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: greylistd - Greylisting daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220891 ------- Additional Comments From rafalzaq at gmail.com 2006-12-30 20:45 EST ------- This is not an official review, I'm looking for a sponsor. rpmlint for SRPM returns this: W: greylistd summary-ended-with-dot Greylisting daemon. W: greylistd no-url-tag E: greylistd unknown-key GPG#66534c2b W: greylistd strange-permission greylistd.init 0755 W: greylistd prereq-use /sbin/chkconfig, /sbin/service Package fails to build (in mock too - FC6 i386): http://pastebin.ca/297379 Prefered BuildRoot is %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) Maybe you should use spaces or tabs to make specfile preamble more legible? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 02:28:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 21:28:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221045] New: Review Request: gtk-rezlooks-engine - Rezlooks GTK2 engine Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221045 Summary: Review Request: gtk-rezlooks-engine - Rezlooks GTK2 engine Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: maxx at krakoa.dk QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.krakoa.dk/fedora/gtk-rezlooks-engine.spec SRPM URL: http://www.krakoa.dk/fedora/gtk-rezlooks-engine-0.6-1.src.rpm Description: Rezlooks is a gtk2 theme engine based on clearlooks. This is my second package (first one is #220759), and I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 02:29:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 21:29:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221045] Review Request: gtk-rezlooks-engine - Rezlooks GTK2 engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612310229.kBV2TvIs026656@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-rezlooks-engine - Rezlooks GTK2 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221045 maxx at krakoa.dk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From maxx at krakoa.dk 2006-12-30 21:29 EST ------- Adding FE-NEEDSSPONSOR -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 02:31:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 21:31:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220891] Review Request: greylistd - Greylisting daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612310231.kBV2V61f026703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: greylistd - Greylisting daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220891 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-12-30 21:31 EST ------- Sorry, the URL of the srpm was wrong (but that of the specfile was correct), I had fixed most of the above already in greylistd-0.8.3.2-6.at.src.rpm But the issue with _initdir wasn't fixed, so the above will still not build for you. Please use Spec URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/greylistd.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/greylistd-0.8.3.2-7.at.src.rpm instead. There is still no URL tag as the project doesn't have a homepage, and the GPG key will be unknown to rpmlint (unless you import the ATrpms key which is what this was used to sign the package with, but you don't need to import anything, I'm just explaining rpmlint's error message on the GPG key) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 02:38:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 21:38:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221039] Review Request: aria2 - High speed download utility with resuming and segmented downloading. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612310238.kBV2cNPY026836@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aria2 - High speed download utility with resuming and segmented downloading. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221039 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-12-30 21:38 EST ------- "download accellerators" with "segmented downloading of one file with multiple connections from one URL" are evil. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 04:08:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 23:08:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220945] Review Request: perl-Text-CharWidth - Get number of occupied columns of a string on terminal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612310408.kBV481vT028602@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-CharWidth - Get number of occupied columns of a string on terminal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220945 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-12-30 23:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > P.S. How did you spot them? Eyeballs? More or less yes. My initial steps before diving into a "formal review" are: 1. Visually inspect the *.spec. 2. rpmbuild -ba *.spec 3. rpmlint *.rpm 4. rpm -qlvp *.rpm (This is where I actually spotted it). ... Theoretically, rpmlint could have complained, but ... rpmlint . Theoretically, I should have noticed it in #1 (packaging perl modules is pretty simple; I maintain a fair number of perl-modules myself and had been involved into reviewing many others), but ... things happens, this time it had been step #4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 04:16:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 23:16:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220945] Review Request: perl-Text-CharWidth - Get number of occupied columns of a string on terminal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612310416.kBV4GxmV029021@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-CharWidth - Get number of occupied columns of a string on terminal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220945 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-12-30 23:16 EST ------- Yes, rpmlint noticing that would be nice, but it can probably only do so if the package has been installed, or is there a way to check this on a cold package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 05:59:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 00:59:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220999] Review Request: php-pear-Net-Sieve - Communication with timsieved In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612310559.kBV5x0HG031943@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Sieve - Communication with timsieved Alias: pear-Net-Sieve https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220999 fedora at theholbrooks.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-12-31 00:58 EST ------- Thanks again Chris. Imported, built, FC[56] branches requested -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 05:59:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 00:59:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220926] Review Request: ingo - The Horde email filter manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612310559.kBV5xF5r031967@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ingo - The Horde email filter manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220926 Bug 220926 depends on bug 220999, which changed state. Bug 220999 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Sieve - Communication with timsieved https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220999 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 06:06:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 01:06:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220766] Review Request: ScientificPython - a collection of Python modules that are useful for scientific computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612310606.kBV66Ed4032072@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ScientificPython - a collection of Python modules that are useful for scientific computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220766 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2006-12-31 01:06 EST ------- Well I'm an idiot. failed to build on 64bit. I hard coded /usr/lib/ into my patch for the netcdf library location. I'll need to fix that so it catches /usr/lib64/ if its applicable. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 06:08:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 01:08:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612310608.kBV681lO032144@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2006-12-31 01:08 EST ------- builds in mock in fc6 and devel on x86. I'm going through this now, doing a detailed review. PROBLEM #1: poker2d desktopfile has the EXEC in the wrong location. should be EXEC=%{_exec_prefix}/games/poker2d because %{_exec_prefix}/games/poker2d because /usr/games is not in the standard executable path. PROBLEM #2: On my fc-6 system gnome seems to be unable to recognize that poker2D.xpm is there. Even if I create a custom panel launcher and attemnpt to select the poker2D.xpm from the pixmap directory in the icon chooser interface, it throws an icon 'poker at D' not found error dialog. Do we have to do somethng silly and convert this to png? -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 06:09:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 01:09:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612310609.kBV69CnH032232@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 jspaleta at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jspaleta at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2006-12-31 01:09 EST ------- opps the error reads poker2d, the @ was a typo on my part -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 06:32:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 01:32:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612310632.kBV6WaMX000327@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2006-12-31 01:32 EST ------- Clarifiation: Are we running counter to the python module naming scheme in the naming guidance? Shouldnt it be python-poker-network and python-poker-client-lib because these are primarily python modules which can be used to develop multiple applications? poker-bot poker-server poker-web and poker2d look fine to me as names because they are the application level items which sit on top of pokernetwork or poker-client-lib. Did this naming issue come up with poker-engine? I'm not convinced this is enough to block on, especially now that poker-engine is already in the tree. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 07:10:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 02:10:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612310710.kBV7A1vJ000957@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2006-12-31 02:09 EST ------- PROBLEM #3: poker-network-devel needs to require pkgconfig MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). Clarification: is %{_libdir}/%{name}/poker-interface a shared library? I don't think it is but I just want to be sure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 07:27:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 02:27:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612310727.kBV7REur001173@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2006-12-31 02:27 EST ------- poker2d appears to work. I haven't had a chance to test the server related subpackages. I'm not a kde user, so forgive me if I sound ignorant, but the payload for poker2d-kde looks very thin to me. Is the payload really only suppose to be: /usr/share/apps/khotkeys/poker2d.khotkeys /usr/share/doc/poker2d-kde-1.0.32 /usr/share/doc/poker2d-kde-1.0.32/COPYING -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 08:19:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 03:19:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221010] Review Request: librfid - Free Software RFID library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612310819.kBV8J6fl001765@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librfid - Free Software RFID library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221010 ------- Additional Comments From kushaldas at gmail.com 2006-12-31 03:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Minor: > * I really don't think you need to add the same docs that are in the main > package to the devel package. This isn't a blocker, but I would drop them. > > +1 APPROVED Done :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 08:20:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 03:20:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221010] Review Request: librfid - Free Software RFID library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612310820.kBV8K7S3001819@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librfid - Free Software RFID library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221010 ------- Additional Comments From kushaldas at gmail.com 2006-12-31 03:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > One thing to consider: > > The %{_bindir}/send_script in the main package has a very generic > file name and bears the risk of creating a conflict with other > packages. The upstream authors are advised to choose a more unique > file name. > Will inform the upstream authors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 08:21:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 03:21:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221010] Review Request: librfid - Free Software RFID library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612310821.kBV8LXhM001891@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librfid - Free Software RFID library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221010 kushaldas at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 08:27:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 03:27:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220945] Review Request: perl-Text-CharWidth - Get number of occupied columns of a string on terminal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612310827.kBV8RUqD002128@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-CharWidth - Get number of occupied columns of a string on terminal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220945 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-12-31 03:27 EST ------- It definitely would require the package to be installed. But this was discussed in September on fedora-extras-list and I filed an upstream RFE, but it was rejected. rpmlint site is broken at the moment, but when it comes back up, the RFE can be seen at http://rpmlint.zarb.org/cgi-bin/trac.cgi/ticket/35 See also http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.maintainers/2883/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 08:31:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 03:31:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220766] Review Request: ScientificPython - a collection of Python modules that are useful for scientific computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612310831.kBV8VfsZ002269@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ScientificPython - a collection of Python modules that are useful for scientific computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220766 jspaleta at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2006-12-31 03:31 EST ------- fixed and built in the development tree, awaiting signing. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 08:52:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 03:52:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221015] Review Request: ksplash-engine-moodin - Moodin is a splash engine for KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612310852.kBV8qxTm003453@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksplash-engine-moodin - Moodin is a splash engine for KDE Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221015 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |Fedora at FamilleCollet.com ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-12-31 03:52 EST ------- Can't do an official Review as i can't sponsor you. MUST : - The .la libtool archives must be removed in the spec. - The %{name}.desktop file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 09:27:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 04:27:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221010] Review Request: librfid - Free Software RFID library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612310927.kBV9RTaO000544@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librfid - Free Software RFID library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221010 ------- Additional Comments From laforge at gnumonks.org 2006-12-31 04:27 EST ------- (I'm the upstream author): The send_script program has been renamed into librfid_send_script in our SVN tree. The next release of the library will reflact that change. Thanks for letting us know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 10:51:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 05:51:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 194563] Review Request: conman - the console manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612311051.kBVApskW004864@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conman - the console manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194563 Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2006-12-31 05:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > Built for FC4 and 5, closing ticket. Please do not remove the FE-ACCEPT blocker. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 10:53:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 05:53:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 193846] Review Request: ganglia - Ganglia Distributed Monitoring System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612311053.kBVArfWv004977@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ganglia - Ganglia Distributed Monitoring System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193846 Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2006-12-31 05:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Packages all built, closing. Please do not remove the FE-ACCEPT blocker. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 10:55:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 05:55:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 198586] Review Request: ip6sic - IPv6 Stack Integrity Checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612311055.kBVAtBLC005071@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ip6sic - IPv6 Stack Integrity Checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198586 Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2006-12-31 05:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Built for FC5, closing ticket. Please do not remove the FE-ACCEPT blocker. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 10:57:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 05:57:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 194355] Review Request: imlib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612311057.kBVAvikn005165@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: imlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194355 Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|133779 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2006-12-31 05:57 EST ------- Fixed typo... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 11:21:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 06:21:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 165689] Review Request: SquidGuard: filter, redirector and access controller plugin for squid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612311121.kBVBLka8005818@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SquidGuard: filter, redirector and access controller plugin for squid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165689 Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO| |163779 nThis| | CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2006-12-31 06:21 EST ------- This should now block FE-ACCEPT. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 11:26:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 06:26:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612311126.kBVBQ2iH005984@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2006-12-31 06:25 EST ------- Please do not remove the FE-ACCEPT blocker. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 11:28:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 06:28:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189727] Review Request: Scribes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612311128.kBVBSO58006062@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Scribes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189727 Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2006-12-31 06:28 EST ------- Please do not remove the FE-ACCEPT blocker. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 11:30:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 06:30:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 195412] Review Request: obconf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612311130.kBVBU9is006111@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: obconf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195412 Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2006-12-31 06:30 EST ------- Please do not remove the FE-ACCEPT blocker. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 11:32:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 06:32:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 195292] Review Request: Openbox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612311132.kBVBWeaQ006177@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Openbox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195292 Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2006-12-31 06:32 EST ------- Please do not remove the FE-ACCEPT blocker. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 11:37:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 06:37:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174915] Review Request: gnome-sudoku - A numerical logic puzzle game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612311137.kBVBbxN9006291@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-sudoku - A numerical logic puzzle game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174915 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO| |163779 nThis| | CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2006-12-31 06:37 EST ------- Please do not remove the FE-ACCEPT blocker. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 11:39:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 06:39:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175291] Review Request: perl-PatchReader - utilities to read and manipulate patches and CVS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612311139.kBVBdnBj006350@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-PatchReader - utilities to read and manipulate patches and CVS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175291 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO| |163779 nThis| | CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2006-12-31 06:39 EST ------- Please do not remove the FE-ACCEPT blocker. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 12:10:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 07:10:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221039] Review Request: aria2 - High speed download utility with resuming and segmented downloading. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612311210.kBVCAwAt007451@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aria2 - High speed download utility with resuming and segmented downloading. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221039 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-12-31 07:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > "download accellerators" with "segmented downloading of one file with multiple > connections from one URL" are evil. Nevertheless, they can be used by a lot of people and also metalink feature is quite nice :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 12:22:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 07:22:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209215] Review Request: libpreludedb - Provides an abstraction layer for the libprelude In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612311222.kBVCMjqO007638@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpreludedb - Provides an abstraction layer for the libprelude https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209215 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-31 07:22 EST ------- For 0.9.11-2: * Directories/files ownership issue - Well, this issue becomes rather complicate when one package creates several subpackages like this package. You have to make it sure that the directories created by the installation of your packages are actually owned by some package for every situation. - For example, now we check /usr/lib/libpreludedb/plugins/sql/. This directory is owned by -mysql package, however, this is actually wrong. When we install main + -sqlite package (with yum), it succeeds without -mysql package. The installation of -sqlite creates /usr/lib/libpreludedb/plugins/sql/ , however in this situation this package is not owned by any package. The following can happen: -------------------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ rpm -qa --qf '%{NAME}\n' libpreludedb\* | sort libpreludedb libpreludedb-devel libpreludedb-python libpreludedb-sqlite [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ LANG=C rpm -qf /usr/lib/libpreludedb/plugins/sql/ file /usr/lib/libpreludedb/plugins/sql is not owned by any package -------------------------------------------------------------- To resolve this unwilling ownership issue, you should either = make -sqlite package require -mysql package *if this is proper* (i.e. it is really true that -sqlite package requires -mysql package). = or change the owner of the directory from -mysql package to main package. - Some other directories have this issue. Please check it. * rpmlint issue ----------------------------------------------------- W: libpreludedb macro-in-%changelog python_sitearch (for srpm) ----------------------------------------------------- Macros are expanded on %changelog. To avoild this, please use: ----------------------------------------------------- - fixed x86_64 arch build problem with %%python_sitearch ----------------------------------------------------- * Requirement - For devel package ----------------------------------------------------- Requires: libpreludedb = %{version}-%{release}, gnutls-devel, automake ----------------------------------------------------- Well, "gnutls-devel" is insufficient as "/usr/bin/libpreludedb-config --libs" require libprelude.so. gnutls-devel should be libprelude-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 12:33:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 07:33:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221039] Review Request: aria2 - High speed download utility with resuming and segmented downloading. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612311233.kBVCXUQE007811@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aria2 - High speed download utility with resuming and segmented downloading. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221039 karlikt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |karlikt at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From karlikt at gmail.com 2006-12-31 07:33 EST ------- I am not sponsored, it is prereview. -Rpmlint: (S)RPM: "W: aria2 summary-ended-with-dot High speed download utility with resuming and segmented downloading." Summary is: "Summary: High speed download utility with resuming and segmented downloading." It should be: "Summary: High speed download utility with resuming and segmented downloading" -The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. -The spec file name is in the format %{name}.spec -I think that the package meets the Packaging Guidelines. -License GPL - ok -In spec the actual license is written -The text of the license is included in %doc -The spec file is written in American English. -The spec file for the package is legible. -md5sum source in srpm and from url is the same -SRPM succesfully compiles with mock (Fc6, arch i386) -All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. There are not any packages from ExceptionList -The spec file handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. There are not used %{_datadir}/locale/* -RPM package have not shared library files -The package is not designed to be relocatable. -The package own all directories that it creates. -There are not any duplicate files in %files listing. -Permissions on files are set properly. -Package have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). -The package consistently uses macros -The package contains code, or permissable content. -There are not large documentation files -Files in %doc do not affect the runtime of the application. -There are not header files or static libraries. -There are not pkgconfig(.pc) files. -There are not any library files with a suffix -There are not a devel package -There are not any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. -It is not a GUI application -Packages does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 13:16:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 08:16:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221039] Review Request: aria2 - High speed download utility with resuming and segmented downloading. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612311316.kBVDGWmt008487@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aria2 - High speed download utility with resuming and segmented downloading. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221039 belegdol at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 13:17:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 08:17:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221039] Review Request: aria2 - High speed download utility with resuming and segmented downloading. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612311317.kBVDH7Ym008508@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aria2 - High speed download utility with resuming and segmented downloading. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221039 belegdol at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |belegdol at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 13:33:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 08:33:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220967] Review Request: libscigraphica - A library of gtk+ widgets for SciGraphica In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612311333.kBVDXq75008812@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libscigraphica - A library of gtk+ widgets for SciGraphica https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220967 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-12-31 08:33 EST ------- Builds cleanly in mock rpmlint is quiet (warning on the devel package, but it can be ignored) Review Bad: Release: 2 - must have the .%{?dist} tag Requires: %name = %{version}-%{release} - inconsistent naming - should be %{name} %{_libdir}/scigraphica/ - this takes the ownership of the directory which should be owned by scigraphical Good: UTF-8, American English, contains documentation for the main package pkgconfig in R for the -devel package MD5SUM matches upstream No .la or .a files packaged Unsure: Does the -devel need ldconfig to be run? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 13:38:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 08:38:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221039] Review Request: aria2 - High speed download utility with resuming and segmented downloading. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612311338.kBVDcaDb008904@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aria2 - High speed download utility with resuming and segmented downloading. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221039 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-12-31 08:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Summary is: > "Summary: High speed download utility with resuming and segmented > downloading." > It should be: > "Summary: High speed download utility with resuming and segmented > downloading" > Fixed. Spec URL: http://ecik.nonlogic.org/aria/aria2.spec SRPM URL: http://ecik.nonlogic.org/aria/aria2-0.9.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 13:38:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 08:38:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220968] Review Request: scigraphica - Scientific application for data analysis and technical graphics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612311338.kBVDcb85008916@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scigraphica - Scientific application for data analysis and technical graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220968 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-12-31 08:38 EST ------- rpmlint is giving 2 warnings for the main package - looks like you need a devel subpackage adding W: scigraphica devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/pixmaps/scigraphica/stock_pixmaps.h W: scigraphica devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/pixmaps/scigraphica/pixmaps.h -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 13:40:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 08:40:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221027] Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612311340.kBVDekA2008972@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221027 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 13:59:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 08:59:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209215] Review Request: libpreludedb - Provides an abstraction layer for the libprelude In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612311359.kBVDxfsC010011@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpreludedb - Provides an abstraction layer for the libprelude https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209215 ------- Additional Comments From tscherf at redhat.com 2006-12-31 08:59 EST ------- * dirowner problem I changed the owner of some directories to the main package, which seems to be the smartest solution here. * escaped the macro in %changelog * changed the requirements in -devel find the new packages here: http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/libpreludedb-0.9.11-3.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/libpreludedb.spec Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 13:59:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 08:59:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221039] Review Request: aria2 - High speed download utility with resuming and segmented downloading. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612311359.kBVDxor6010034@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aria2 - High speed download utility with resuming and segmented downloading. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221039 belegdol at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2006-12-31 08:59 EST ------- - MUST: rpmlint is silent - MUST: Package is named well - MUST: Spec file name matches the package name - MUST: Package meets packaging guidelines - MUST: Pachage is licensed with GPL - MUST: License field matches actual license - MUST: COPYING file is included in %doc - MUST: Spec is written in English, most probably American (I am not that familiar with the differences to be 100% sure) - MUST: I can understand the spec file - MUST: MD5 sums match - MUST: Package build in mock (fc6/i386) - MUST: I can't check other architectures - MUST: All deps are listed in BR - MUST: %find_lang is used - MUST: Package does not contain shared libs - MUST: Package is not relocatable - MUST: Directory ownership is ok - MUST: There are no duplicates in %files - MUST: Permissions are OK - MUST: Clean section is present - MUST: Macros are used consistently - MUST: Package contains code - MUST: There is no large documentation - MUST: %doc is not required at runtime - MUST: There is no headers nor static libs - MUST: No pkgconfig files - MUST: There is no shared libs - MUST: There is no -devel subpackage - MUST: There is no libtool archives - MUST: Not a GUI app - MUST: Pachage does not own dirs owned by other packages SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: License is included - SHOULD: There are not translantions - SHOULD: Package builds in mock (fc6/i386) - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. - SHOULD: Package works (smoke tested on fc6/i386) - SHOULD: Scriptlets are not used - SHOULD: There is no devel subpackage - SHOULD: There are no pkgconfig files APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 14:23:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 09:23:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220968] Review Request: scigraphica - Scientific application for data analysis and technical graphics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612311423.kBVEN3uZ011959@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scigraphica - Scientific application for data analysis and technical graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220968 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-12-31 09:22 EST ------- Builds cleanly in mock -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 14:32:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 09:32:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221045] Review Request: gtk-rezlooks-engine - Rezlooks GTK2 engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612311432.kBVEWfBF012330@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-rezlooks-engine - Rezlooks GTK2 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221045 rds204 at zepler.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rds204 at zepler.net ------- Additional Comments From rds204 at zepler.net 2006-12-31 09:32 EST ------- What's the license of the "Source1?" files? Those archives don't appear to contain a license. But otherwise: * rpmlint output is clean * source in srpm is as spec file specifies * builds on i386 * installs and works on i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 14:50:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 09:50:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221054] New: Review Request: gerbv - A gerber file viewer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221054 Summary: Review Request: gerbv - A gerber file viewer Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rds204 at zepler.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://xgoat.com/rpm/gerbv/gerbv.spec SRPM URL: http://xgoat.com/rpm/gerbv/gerbv-1.0.2-1.src.rpm Description: Gerber Viewer (gerbv) is a viewer for Gerber files. Gerber files are generated from PCB CAD systems and sent to PCB manufacturers as a basis for the manufacturing process. This is my first package, and I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 14:54:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 09:54:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221054] Review Request: gerbv - A gerber file viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612311454.kBVEsuRt013105@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gerbv - A gerber file viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221054 rds204 at zepler.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rds204 at zepler.net 2006-12-31 09:54 EST ------- Added FE-NEEDSPONSOR -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 15:00:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 10:00:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221031] Review Request: PyOpenGL - Cross platform Python binding to OpenGL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612311500.kBVF0ng5013262@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyOpenGL - Cross platform Python binding to OpenGL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221031 ------- Additional Comments From rafalzaq at gmail.com 2006-12-31 10:00 EST ------- New URLs: Spec URL: http://rafalzaq.webd.pl/fedora/PyOpenGL/PyOpenGL.spec SRPM URL: http://rafalzaq.webd.pl/fedora/PyOpenGL/PyOpenGL-3.0.0-0.1.a5.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 15:04:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 10:04:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221031] Review Request: PyOpenGL - Cross platform Python binding to OpenGL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612311504.kBVF4eku013358@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyOpenGL - Cross platform Python binding to OpenGL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221031 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-12-31 10:04 EST ------- How alpha is this software? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 15:29:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 10:29:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221045] Review Request: gtk-rezlooks-engine - Rezlooks GTK2 engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612311529.kBVFT0Ft013722@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-rezlooks-engine - Rezlooks GTK2 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221045 ------- Additional Comments From maxx at krakoa.dk 2006-12-31 10:28 EST ------- I have found that unfortunately themes rarely contain a license. However Gilouche and Graphite are linked to from the main gnome-look.org page for the theme and there the license is specified to be GPL. The rest of the themes are from the same author and all appear next to each other on his website (http://people.os-zen.net/rezza/themes/). So I assumed GPL. I will try to get in touch with him to clear up any licensing issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 16:10:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 11:10:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221054] Review Request: gerbv - A gerber file viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612311610.kBVGAhNL014377@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gerbv - A gerber file viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221054 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-12-31 11:10 EST ------- * In build log: gerbv.c:1526: warning: call to __builtin___snprintf_chk will always overflow destination buffer * Gerber file format support fails to load test files. * Drill file format support crashes with buffer overflow. * Passing files at the command-line results in 100% buffer overflow crash: *** buffer overflow detected ***: gerbv terminated ======= Backtrace: ========= /lib/libc.so.6(__chk_fail+0x41)[0x87c161] /lib/libc.so.6[0x87bba3] /lib/libc.so.6(__snprintf_chk+0x37)[0x87ba87] gerbv[0x8055686] gerbv[0x805625a] /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0[0x12a5e1] * Directories %{_datadir}/gerbv and %{_datadir}/gerbv/scheme are not included: $ rpmls -p /home/qa/tmp/rpm/RPMS/gerbv-1.0.2-1.i386.rpm -rwxr-xr-x /usr/bin/gerbv -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/applications/fedora-gerbv.desktop -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/gerbv/scheme/init.scm -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/gerbv.png -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/man/man1/gerbv.1.gz * Scriptlets for GTK icon cache are missing: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets?action=show&redirect=ScriptletSnippets#head-7103f6c38d1b5735e8477bdd569ad73ea2c49bda * No %doc files are included. Not even the GPL license. * Manual pages are marked %doc automatically. * Upstream project site contains the following warning: "If anyone is interested to takeover this project, please contact Stefan. Else this project will risk to rot away yet again." Hints: * It is commonly considered better style to make "Summary" in headline-style: Summary: Gerber file viewer from the gEDA toolkit * Second sentence in %description is missing punctuation. * Manual pages contains unexpanded ${prefix}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 17:31:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 12:31:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209215] Review Request: libpreludedb - Provides an abstraction layer for the libprelude In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612311731.kBVHVOft016128@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpreludedb - Provides an abstraction layer for the libprelude https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209215 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-31 12:31 EST ------- In Japan (EST+14h) new year started. A Happy new year! Well, one more issue: --------------------------------------- %doc %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version}/* --------------------------------------- I watched HTML docs under this directory and it seems they should be -devel package. = Now directories ownership issue are correctly fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 17:45:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 12:45:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209215] Review Request: libpreludedb - Provides an abstraction layer for the libprelude In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612311745.kBVHj32L016401@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpreludedb - Provides an abstraction layer for the libprelude https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209215 ------- Additional Comments From tscherf at redhat.com 2006-12-31 12:45 EST ------- In Germany we still have a couple of hours before the New Year starts, but nevertheless, wish you a very happy New Year in Japan. :) You are right with the docs, the html stuff should go into -devel. Done. Find new packages here: http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/libpreludedb-0.9.11-3.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/libpreludedb.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 17:52:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 12:52:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220979] Review Request: tesseract - Raw OCR Engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612311752.kBVHqjhD016548@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tesseract - Raw OCR Engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220979 ------- Additional Comments From karlikt at gmail.com 2006-12-31 12:52 EST ------- I had to change URLs, here are correct: SPEC: http://karlik.nonlogic.org/tesseract/tesseract.spec SRPM: http://karlik.nonlogic.org/tesseract/tesseract-1.02-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 18:15:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 13:15:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209215] Review Request: libpreludedb - Provides an abstraction layer for the libprelude In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612311815.kBVIFjHk016931@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpreludedb - Provides an abstraction layer for the libprelude https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209215 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-31 13:15 EST ------- Okay. As I get 404 for http://prelude-ids.org/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz, Please change to http://prelude-ids.org/download/releases/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz Other things are okay. --------------------------------------------------------------- This package (libpreludedb) is APPROVED by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 18:42:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 13:42:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612311842.kBVIgnwd017496@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-12-31 13:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > builds in mock in fc6 and devel on x86. > I'm going through this now, doing a detailed review. > > PROBLEM #1: > poker2d desktopfile has the EXEC in the wrong location. > should be EXEC=%{_exec_prefix}/games/poker2d > because %{_exec_prefix}/games/poker2d Fixed this. > > because /usr/games is not in the standard executable path. > > PROBLEM #2: > On my fc-6 system gnome seems to be unable to recognize that poker2D.xpm is > there. Even if I create a custom panel launcher and attemnpt to select the > poker2D.xpm from the pixmap directory in the icon chooser interface, it throws > an icon 'poker at D' not found error dialog. Do we have to do somethng silly and > convert this to png? I asked in #fedora-packaging about icons placed in pixmap directory, and this is the reply: 15:27:20 XulChris | if upstream installs in icon in %{_datadir}/pixmaps/ should it be moved to %{_datadir}/icons/ instead and run gtk-update-icon-cache? 15:28:02 XulChris | or should it just be left in pixmaps/ w/o running gtk-update-icon-cache? 17:49:19 ---| User: *** rdieter_away is now known as rdieter1 18:05:45 rdieter1 | XulChris: imo, move it, yadda, and ping upstream to do the same. So perhaps moving the icon to the icons/ directory will fix it in GNOME? Not sure since I run KDE, I will try moving the icons in the spec let me know if it fixes it in GNOME. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 18:43:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 13:43:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221059] New: Review Request: cowsay - configurable speaking/thinking cow Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221059 Summary: Review Request: cowsay - configurable speaking/thinking cow Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mr.ecik at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ecik.nonlogic.org/cowsay/cowsay.spec SRPM URL: http://ecik.nonlogic.org/cowsay/cowsay-3.03-1.src.rpm Description: cowsay is a configurable talking cow, written in Perl. It operates much as the figlet program does, and it written in the same spirit of silliness. It generates ASCII pictures of a cow with a message. It can also generate pictures of other animals. rpmlint gives following output: W: cowsay non-conffile-in-etc /etc/bash_completion.d/cowsay.bashcomp but that same output is given on rpmlint.rpm so it looks like we can ignore it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 18:45:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 13:45:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612311845.kBVIjm3q017594@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-12-31 13:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > Clarifiation: > > Are we running counter to the python module naming scheme in the naming guidance? > > Shouldnt it be python-poker-network and python-poker-client-lib because these > are primarily python modules which can be used to develop multiple applications? Let me get clarification on upstream with this. I think debian has the same policy, and upstream packages for debian so let me see what they say. I'll get back to you on this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 18:47:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 13:47:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612311847.kBVIlItc017633@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-12-31 13:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > PROBLEM #3: poker-network-devel needs to require pkgconfig > > MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for > directory ownership and usability). Fixed. > > > Clarification: > is %{_libdir}/%{name}/poker-interface a shared library? I don't think it is but > I just want to be sure. > > I will ask upstream to make sure. Will get back to you on this item as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 18:50:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 13:50:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612311850.kBVIoalo017736@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-12-31 13:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > poker2d appears to work. I haven't had a chance to test the server related > subpackages. > > I'm not a kde user, so forgive me if I sound ignorant, but the payload for > poker2d-kde looks very thin to me. Is the payload really only suppose to be: > /usr/share/apps/khotkeys/poker2d.khotkeys > /usr/share/doc/poker2d-kde-1.0.32 > /usr/share/doc/poker2d-kde-1.0.32/COPYING This is done on purpose. Otherwise a user would have to install kdebase to pick up the /usr/share/apps/khotkeys/ directory when they install poker2d which is probably not what people want to do if they do not have KDE installed. Having a package with a single file in it I deemed a better alternative than requiring kdebase just to install poker2d, and poker2d does not need kdebase to run. So basically its just a directory ownership issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 18:53:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 13:53:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220889] Review Request: fakechroot - Gives a fake chroot environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612311853.kBVIrxmP017848@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fakechroot - Gives a fake chroot environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220889 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-31 13:53 EST ------- Well, a very quick check: * Please add a license documentation. Note: LICENSE documentation says that this is licensed under LGPL, not GPL. * Can the files under test/ can be used for %check? * What are other scripts under scripts/ directories? * %{_libdir}/fakechroot/ is not owned by any packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 18:54:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 13:54:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220789] Review Request: fail2ban - Ban IPs that make too many password failures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612311854.kBVIsHk4017869@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fail2ban - Ban IPs that make too many password failures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220789 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 19:54:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 14:54:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209215] Review Request: libpreludedb - Provides an abstraction layer for the libprelude In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612311954.kBVJsqRH019386@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpreludedb - Provides an abstraction layer for the libprelude https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209215 ------- Additional Comments From tscherf at redhat.com 2006-12-31 14:54 EST ------- ok, changed url. thanks for the hint. will upload the package to the buildsystem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 20:13:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 15:13:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221045] Review Request: gtk-rezlooks-engine - Rezlooks GTK2 engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612312013.kBVKDboE019671@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-rezlooks-engine - Rezlooks GTK2 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221045 ------- Additional Comments From maxx at krakoa.dk 2006-12-31 15:13 EST ------- I have just received an e-mail from the author confirming that the themes are under the GPL license. So everything is okay there as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 20:38:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 15:38:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612312038.kBVKcFxA020031@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-12-31 15:38 EST ------- Have you had a chance to look at upgrading to 1.4.0 final? Are there any major blockers to getting this into Extras now? This review is getting rather long, so I'm not quite sure... :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 20:43:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 15:43:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612312043.kBVKhgmr020214@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-12-31 15:43 EST ------- One other thought... It might be worth making some of the features that are being excluded due to license and patent issues optional in the spec, obviously defaulting to off. That might make it easier to re-enable those features as some of the license issues are resolved, plus it would be useful for people who didn't mind rebuilding a local copy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 21:28:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 16:28:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 200498] Review Request: btsco-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612312128.kBVLSQp5021037@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: btsco-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200498 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-31 16:28 EST ------- It appears that btsco is depreciated now... the new 'plugz' bluetooth-alsa project no longer requires a kernel module. See: http://bluetooth-alsa.sourceforge.net/history.html Perhaps this should be closed now? Might you consider packaging the new 'plugz' and 'sbc' packages? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 21:28:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 16:28:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 200499] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612312128.kBVLSXYp021052@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200499 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-31 16:28 EST ------- It appears that btsco is depreciated now... the new 'plugz' bluetooth-alsa project no longer requires a kernel module. See: http://bluetooth-alsa.sourceforge.net/history.html Perhaps this should be closed now? Might you consider packaging the new 'plugz' and 'sbc' packages? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 22:21:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 17:21:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221065] New: Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time strategy Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221065 Summary: Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time strategy Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: karlikt at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://karlik.nonlogic.org/warzone/warzone2100.spec SRPM URL: http://karlik.nonlogic.org/warzone/warzone2100-2.0.5-1.src.rpm Description: Warzone 2100 was an innovative 3D real-time strategy game back in 1999, and most will agree it didn't enjoy the commercial success it should have had. The game's source code was liberated on December 6th, 2004, under a GPL license (see COPYING in this directory for details). Soon after that, the Warzone 2100 ReDev project was formed to take care of its future. I am looking for a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 22:23:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 17:23:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221065] Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time strategy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612312223.kBVMNfsG021892@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time strategy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221065 karlikt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 22:54:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 17:54:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221065] Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time strategy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612312254.kBVMsGr4022428@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time strategy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221065 ------- Additional Comments From rafalzaq at gmail.com 2006-12-31 17:54 EST ------- This is not an official review, I'm looking for a sponsor. * rpmlint returns only no-documentation in warzone2100-data package * package and specfile are named well * package is licensed under GPL (which is included) * specfile is legible * source file match upstream * package successfully build in mock (FC6 i386)- BuildRequires are proper * no locales * no duplicates in %files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 23:19:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 18:19:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612312319.kBVNJMkv022686@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-12-31 18:19 EST ------- I'm upgrading my phone system today, so pardon the noise. :-) Issue #1: In the script you use to modify the source from Digium, you have this: # tar xf asterisk-1.4.0-beta4.tar.gz That should have been this: # tar zxf asterisk-1.4.0-beta4.tar.gz Other than that, following the directions does indeed give me identical sources (according to "diff -urN") to the source included in the src.rpm. Issue #2: I'd suggest changing %post to something like this: /sbin/chkconfig --add asterisk || : /sbin/service asterisk condrestart || : If there is a good way to do a graceful restart here, that would be even better. I'd also prefer it if %pre and %preun looked like this: %pre /usr/sbin/fedora-groupadd 31 -r asterisk || : /usr/sbin/fedora-useradd 31 -r -s /sbin/nologin -d /var/lib/asterisk -M \ -c 'Asterisk User' -g asterisk asterisk || : %preun if [ $1 = 0 ]; then /sbin/service asterisk stop || : /sbin/chkconfig --del asterisk || : fi That way we see failures, but they don't make rpm fail. When I installed the packages on my phone system (which had old asterisk/zaptel/libpri packages of mine, which might be the problem), I got the following error: Installing: zaptel ####################### [ 9/13] id: asterisk: No such user usermod: user asterisk does not exist error: %pre(asterisk-zaptel-1.4.0-6.beta4.fc6.i386) scriptlet failed, exit status 6 error: install: %pre scriptlet failed (2), skipping asterisk-zaptel-1.4.0-6.beta4.fc6 Since the asterisk %pre was redirected to /dev/null, I have no idea if there was a failure there. Again, the real problem might have been caused by old packages, but, since I don't have diagnostic output, I can't be sure. I would definitely test an install on a clean system though to be safe. So far those are the only problems that I've found. The package builds fine in mock (i386 and x86_64), and the handful of rpmlint warnings can be safely ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 23:22:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 18:22:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220967] Review Request: libscigraphica - A library of gtk+ widgets for SciGraphica In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612312322.kBVNMOwu022811@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libscigraphica - A library of gtk+ widgets for SciGraphica https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220967 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2006-12-31 18:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Bad: > Release: 2 - must have the .%{?dist} tag > Requires: %name = %{version}-%{release} - inconsistent naming - should be %{name} Fixed > %{_libdir}/scigraphica/ - this takes the ownership of the directory which should > be owned by scigraphical > Maybe not. It just seems to design mistake on the part of upstream to name that directory scigraphica, its a superset of things scigraphica itself installs under it. I've modified scigraphica not to own that directory, but just install it own stuff under it. > Unsure: > Does the -devel need ldconfig to be run? I believe the package guildline says it has to be done for the package and its subpackage that contains a *.so. Corrected spec and srpms below, thanks. Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/scigraphica/libscigraphica.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/scigraphica/libscigraphica-2.1.1-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 23:25:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 18:25:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220967] Review Request: libscigraphica - A library of gtk+ widgets for SciGraphica In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612312325.kBVNPKZE022889@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libscigraphica - A library of gtk+ widgets for SciGraphica https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220967 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-12-31 18:25 EST ------- The scigraphica directory must belong to the application and not the library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 23:28:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 18:28:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220968] Review Request: scigraphica - Scientific application for data analysis and technical graphics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612312328.kBVNStaB022951@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scigraphica - Scientific application for data analysis and technical graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220968 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2006-12-31 18:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > rpmlint is giving 2 warnings for the main package - looks like you need a devel > subpackage adding > > W: scigraphica devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/share/pixmaps/scigraphica/stock_pixmaps.h > W: scigraphica devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/share/pixmaps/scigraphica/pixmaps.h > The rpmlint warnings can be ignored as those *.h are just listings of the contained pixmaps, I don't think they are being used to build anything. I've corrected the package not to own %{_libdir}/%{name} (already owned by libscigraphical) but it sub-directory that it creates. Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/scigraphica/scigraphica.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/scigraphica/scigraphica-2.1.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 31 23:35:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 18:35:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200612312335.kBVNZwpZ023099@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-12-31 18:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > (In reply to comment #10) > > Clarification: > > is %{_libdir}/%{name}/poker-interface a shared library? I don't think it is but > > I just want to be sure. > > > > > > I will ask upstream to make sure. Will get back to you on this item as well. dachary | poker-interface is a shared library (really a python module but a shared library) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.