[Bug 218195] Review Request: scipy - array processing for numbers, strings, records, and objects.
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Dec 3 22:13:26 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: scipy - array processing for numbers, strings, records, and objects.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218195
------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2006-12-03 17:13 EST -------
The rpmlint warnings concerning the .h files down in the python site-packages
tree are a matter of interpretation I think. Since these files are not in
/usr/include/python2.4/ I'm not sure there is an expectation that they are to be
built against. There are many python packages which continue to place .h files
down in the site-packages tree without splitting into a -devel.
The only python module packages that I am aware of that uses a devel subpackage
install their .h files into the /usr/include/python2.4/ tree. python-ogg-devel
for example. But even that isn't consistently done, python-numarry doesn't
make the effort. I don't have a problem splitting this stuff off, I just don't
want to set a new packaging policy precedent in the process.
If you could point me to a python module package (ie not a graphical end-user
application) which has .h files down in site-packages and splits out a -devel
subpackage I'd like to look over its spec as a reference.
I fixed the %install section issue and the silly dot at the end of the summar.
Can you tell I'm a couple of months out of practise. I'm going to play with the
requires and buildrequires a little to see if I can answer the questions. For
example, I don't know if this will work with fftw version 3....yet.
-jef
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list