[Bug 190345] Review Request: vdr-femon - DVB frontend status monitor plugin for VDR

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Dec 3 23:44:05 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: vdr-femon - DVB frontend status monitor plugin for VDR


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190345


kevin at tummy.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com  2006-12-03 18:44 EST -------
OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
OK - License (GPL)
OK - License field in spec matches
OK - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
845886d484d998e79f997320f53bbf6d  vdr-femon-1.1.0.tgz
845886d484d998e79f997320f53bbf6d  vdr-femon-1.1.0.tgz.1
OK - BuildRequires correct
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
OK - Package has correct buildroot
OK - Package is code or permissible content.
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.

OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates.
OK - No rpmlint output.
OK - final provides and requires are sane:

SHOULD Items:

OK - Should build in mock.
i386/x86_64 - Should build on all supported archs
OK - Should have dist tag
OK - Should package latest version

Issues:

I don't see any blockers here, so this package is APPROVED.

Don't forget to close this review request NEXTRELEASE once it's been
imported and built.

Also consider doing a review of another waiting package in
the review queue.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list