[Bug 218768] Review Request: poppler-extras - PDF rendering library extras (qt/qt4)

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: poppler-extras -  PDF rendering library extras (qt/qt4)


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218768


bjohnson at symetrix.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |bjohnson at symetrix.com




------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com  2006-12-08 04:15 EST -------
Rex- 

> # yes, this file is owned by 2 packages, deal.  -- Rex

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines?highlight=%28Packaging%29#head-a5931a7372c4a00065713430984fa5875513e6d4
Packages must not own files already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb
here is that the first package to be installed should own the files that other
packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora
should ever share ownership with any of the files owned by the filesystem or man
package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or that another
package owns, then please present that at package review time.

I think this is meant more to address having entirely different packages owning
the same file, rather than a collection of related packages sharing a file, but
I thought I'd get your take on it.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.