[Bug 214087] Review Request: libextractor -- Simple library for keyword extraction

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libextractor -- Simple library for keyword extraction


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214087





------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de  2006-12-21 10:51 EST -------
> * For main package:
> ----------------------------------
> Requires:	plugin(%name)
> ----------------------------------
>   What I meant was main package (libextract) should require at least
>   base plugin package (libextract-plugins-base).  plugin(%name) is
>   not provided by libextract-plugins-base and then currently extra
>   plugin package is needed for main (libextract) package.

I do not think so:

1. libextract works without plugins too. But because output is very
   limited in this case, you can say that plugins are highly recommended
   (*not* required)

   Nevertheless, because 'highly recommended' can not be expressed
   with RPM, I accept that some 'Requires:' should be used.


2. libextract does not require the -plugins-base plugins but works
   e.g. with the thumbnail plugin when e.g. a collection of images
   shall be indexed


Therefore, I use

| Requires: plugin(%name)

which satisfies 1. and allows users to install only the really needed
plugins (2.).



> * For fake plugin package (libextract-plugins)
>   Dependency for pdf plugin (libextract-plugins-pdf) is missing.

ok; I will add this dependency (but do not ship a new package for this
change).


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.