[Bug 218232] Review Request: php-pear-Math-Stats - Classes to calculate statistical parameters
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Dec 27 21:20:15 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Math-Stats - Classes to calculate statistical parameters
Alias: pear-Math-Stats
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218232
------- Additional Comments From josef at toxicpanda.com 2006-12-27 16:20 EST -------
Ok everything looks good, here is my review check list.
review check:
-rpmlint output:
[jwhiter at dhcp59-101 ~]$
rpmlint /home/jwhiter/redhat/RPMS/noarch/php-pear-Math-Stats-0.9.0-0.1.beta3.noarch.rpm
[jwhiter at dhcp59-101 ~]$
- package is named according to the php package naming guidelines
- spec file name matches %{name}
- package meets package guidlines
- package is licensed with appropriate open source license
- license feild matches actual license
- license is in %doc
- license file is written in american english
- spec file is legible
- sources match upstream
ffc0b653e5e2985113262a5299ebe69b Math_Stats-0.9.0beta3.tgz
- package successfully compiled on fc6 x86_64 box
- buildrequires makes sense and everything required is present
- no locales
- no shared libraries
- not relocatable
- owns all directories it creates
- no duplicates in %files
- permissions set properly
- contains a %clean section
- uses macros consistently
- contains code
- no large documentation
- files in %doc do not affect runtime
- no header files or static libraries
- no pkgconfig files
- no dynamic libraries provided by package, no need for -devel package
- no .la files
- not a GUI application
- does not own files or directories owned by other packages
sorry about the rpmlint problem before, I hadn't run fedora-buildrpmtree on
the box I was building on.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list