[Bug 218678] Review Request: pybluez - python API for the bluez bluetooth stack
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Dec 29 23:30:15 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: pybluez - python API for the bluez bluetooth stack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218678
kevin at tummy.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 177841 |163779
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-12-29 18:30 EST -------
1, 2, 3 all look fixed up in the package in comment #5.
On item 4: rpm happily looks for .so files anywhere in the package and then
automagically "Provides" them in the rpm namespace. I think that rpm should
instead only do this with .so files when they are in the standard ldconfig
directories. The only thing that can really use the _bluetooth.so thats provided
here is this package, so the provides just adds to the rpm provides namespace.
It's not a blocker though, since it doesn't hurt anything. If the .so here was
bluetooth.so that would be a problem... since bluez-libs-devel already provides
that. Hopefully that makes some sense to someone aside from me. ;)
I don't see any other blockers here... I will go ahead and APPROVE this package
and sponsor you.
You can continue the process from here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors#head-a89c07b5b8abe7748b6b39f0f89768d595234907
Don't forget to close this review request NEXTRELASE once everything has been
imported and built.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list