[Bug 220860] Review Request: galternatives - Alternatives Configurator

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: galternatives - Alternatives Configurator


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220860





------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com  2006-12-30 05:10 EST -------
(In reply to comment #8)

>    This means that this package needs "Requires: pygtk2"
>
I think I ave this in before, don't know why I removed it, re-added.
 
> Then
> A. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines
> * Licensing
>   - Please include the license document. For this package, debian/copyright
>     seems the best
>   - Also, adding debian/changelog seems useful and should be included in
>     the package.
> 
Done.

> C. Other notes:
>   - For upstream URL:
>     Maybe http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/galternatives.html is more useful?
>
I'm not sure, I've changed to it though (at least the latest source package is
found there).
 
>   - I think this package to be useful, however, how do you think of
>     http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=365365 ?
Yes, I've seen it. However, I also believe the package to be useful and as long
as there is no security issue(s) with it, and no real alternative for it, then
we can as well have it and maintain it for fedora.
File with new changes below. Thanks for the thorough review.
Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/galternatives/galternatives.spec
SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/galternatives/galternatives-0.13.4-4.src.rpm



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.