[Bug 220999] Review Request: php-pear-Net-Sieve - Communication with timsieved

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Dec 31 00:04:03 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Sieve - Communication with timsieved
Alias: pear-Net-Sieve

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220999


chris.stone at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com  2006-12-30 19:04 EST -------
==== REVIEW CHECKLIST ====
- rpmlint output:
W: php-pear-Net-Sieve no-documentation
permissible, no documentation
- package named according to package naming guidelines
- spec filename matches %{name}
- package meets packaging guidelines
- licensed with open source compatible license
- license matches actual license
- source package does not include license file
- spec written in American english
- spec file is legible
- package successfully compiles and builds on FC6 x86_64
- all build dependices listed in BR
- no locales
- no shared libraries
- package is not relocatable
- packge owns all directories it creates
- no duplicates in %files
- file permissions set properly
- package contains proper %clean section
- macro usage is consistent
- contains code
- no large documentation
- no %doc
- no header files or static libraries
- no pkgconfig files
- no library files
- no need for devel subpackage
- no .la files
- not a GUI app needing a .desktop file
- packages shares directory ownership with other Net packages.  Acceptable for
pear packages

APPROVED


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list