[Bug 221039] Review Request: aria2 - High speed download utility with resuming and segmented downloading.

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: aria2 - High speed download utility with resuming and segmented downloading.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221039


karlikt at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |karlikt at gmail.com




------- Additional Comments From karlikt at gmail.com  2006-12-31 07:33 EST -------
I am not sponsored, it is prereview.

-Rpmlint:
(S)RPM: "W: aria2 summary-ended-with-dot High speed download utility with
resuming and segmented downloading."

Summary is:
"Summary:        High speed download utility with resuming and segmented
downloading."
It should be:
"Summary:        High speed download utility with resuming and segmented
downloading"

-The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
-The spec file name is in the format %{name}.spec
-I think that the package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
-License GPL - ok
-In spec the actual license is written
-The text of the license is included in %doc
-The spec file is written in American English.
-The spec file for the package is legible.
-md5sum source in srpm and from url is the same
-SRPM succesfully compiles with mock (Fc6, arch i386)
-All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. There are not any packages
from ExceptionList
-The spec file handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang
macro. There are not used %{_datadir}/locale/*
-RPM package have not shared library files
-The package is not designed to be relocatable.
-The package own all directories that it creates. 
-There are not any duplicate files in %files listing.
-Permissions on files are set properly.
-Package have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
-The package consistently uses macros
-The package contains code, or permissable content.
-There are not large documentation files
-Files in %doc do not affect the runtime of the application.
-There are not header files or static libraries.
-There are not pkgconfig(.pc) files.
-There are not any library files with a suffix
-There are not a devel package
-There are not any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec.
-It is not a GUI application
-Packages does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. 

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.