From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 1 00:07:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 20:07:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190007] Review Request: php-pecl-zip In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607010007.k6107GGg024088@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-zip Alias: php-pecl-zip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190007 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-06-30 19:58 EST ------- I think the Group tags for pecl and pear packages are completely reversed as they currently stand. I believe pecl packages should be Development/Libraries and pear packages should be Development/Languages. I'm waiting to hear back from Fedora-Packaging on this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 1 00:38:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 20:38:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 172755] Review Request: xcompmgr - X11 composite manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607010038.k610ceWS024963@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcompmgr - X11 composite manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172755 dakingun at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2006-06-30 20:30 EST ------- Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 1 03:37:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 23:37:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195867] Review Request: tetex-IEEEtran Official LaTeX class for IEEE transactions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607010337.k613bv08001572@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tetex-IEEEtran Official LaTeX class for IEEE transactions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195867 rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 1 03:38:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 23:38:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195420] Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607010338.k613cNO9001650@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195420 rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 1 04:57:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 00:57:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197411] New: Review Request: php-pear-Date - PEAR: Date and Time Zone Classes Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197411 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Date - PEAR: Date and Time Zone Classes Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: chris.stone at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-Date.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-Date-1.4.6-1.src.rpm Description: Generic classes for representation and manipulation of dates, times and time zones without the need of timestamps, which is a huge limitation for php programs. Includes time zone data, time zone conversions and many date/time conversions. It does not rely on 32-bit system date stamps, so you can display calendars and compare dates that date pre 1970 and post 2038. This package also provides a class to convert date strings between Gregorian and Human calendar formats. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 1 04:59:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 00:59:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196847] Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit2 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607010459.k614xPbW004424@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit2 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests Alias: php-pear-PHPUnit2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196847 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |196802 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 1 04:59:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 00:59:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197411] Review Request: php-pear-Date - PEAR: Date and Time Zone Classes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607010459.k614xa85004437@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Date - PEAR: Date and Time Zone Classes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197411 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |196802 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 1 04:59:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 00:59:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196837] Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit2-alpha - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607010459.k614xmaG004451@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit2-alpha - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests Alias: pear-PHPUnit2-alpha https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196837 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |196802 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 1 04:59:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 00:59:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196793] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2 - PEAR: Database Abstraction Layer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607010459.k614xxcL004465@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2 - PEAR: Database Abstraction Layer Alias: php-pear-MDB2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196793 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |196802 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 1 05:00:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 01:00:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197411] Review Request: php-pear-Date - PEAR: Date and Time Zone Classes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607010500.k6150iAJ004496@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Date - PEAR: Date and Time Zone Classes Alias: php-pear-Date https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197411 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |php-pear-Date -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 1 05:28:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 01:28:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197413] New: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Curl - PEAR: OO interface to PHP's cURL extension Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197413 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Curl - PEAR: OO interface to PHP's cURL extension Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: chris.stone at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-Net-Curl.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-Net-Curl-1.2.3-1.src.rpm Description: Provides an Object-Oriented interface to PHP's curl extension. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 1 05:29:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 01:29:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197413] Review Request: php-pear-Net-Curl - PEAR: OO interface to PHP's cURL extension In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607010529.k615TfPI004900@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Curl - PEAR: OO interface to PHP's cURL extension Alias: php-pear-Net-Curl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197413 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |php-pear-Net-Curl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 1 05:43:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 01:43:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197417] New: Review Request: php-pear-Validate - PEAR: Validation class Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197417 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Validate - PEAR: Validation class Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: chris.stone at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-Validate.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-Validate-0.6.3-1.src.rpm Description: Package to validate various datas. It includes : - numbers (min/max, decimal or not) - email (syntax, domain check, rfc822) - string (predifined type alpha upper and/or lowercase, numeric,...) - date (min, max) - uri (RFC2396) - possibility valid multiple data with a single method call (::multiple) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 1 05:44:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 01:44:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197417] Review Request: php-pear-Validate - PEAR: Validation class In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607010544.k615ieim005644@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Validate - PEAR: Validation class Alias: php-pear-Validate https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197417 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |php-pear-Validate -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 1 05:56:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 01:56:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197419] New: Review Request: php-pear-Validate-Finance-CreditCard - PEAR: Validation class for Credit Cards Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197419 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Validate-Finance-CreditCard - PEAR: Validation class for Credit Cards Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: chris.stone at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-Validate-Finance-CreditCard.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-Validate-Finance-CreditCard-0.5.2-1.src.rpm Description: Package to validate Credit Card numbers and types. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 1 05:57:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 01:57:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197419] Review Request: php-pear-Validate-Finance-CreditCard - PEAR: Validation class for Credit Cards In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607010557.k615vfKC006204@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Validate-Finance-CreditCard - PEAR: Validation class for Credit Cards Alias: Validate-Finance-CC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197419 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |Validate-Finance-CC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 1 06:11:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 02:11:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197420] New: Review Request: php-pear-Payment-Process - PEAR: Unified payment processor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197420 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Payment-Process - PEAR: Unified payment processor Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: chris.stone at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-Payment-Process.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-Payment-Process-0.6.5-1.src.rpm Description: Payment_Process is a gateway-independent framework for processing credit cards, e-checks and eventually other forms of payments as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 1 06:16:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 02:16:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197420] Review Request: php-pear-Payment-Process - PEAR: Unified payment processor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607010616.k616Gu12006481@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Payment-Process - PEAR: Unified payment processor Alias: pear-Payment-Process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197420 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |pear-Payment-Process -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 1 06:23:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 02:23:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197420] Review Request: php-pear-Payment-Process - PEAR: Unified payment processor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607010623.k616NDUL006569@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Payment-Process - PEAR: Unified payment processor Alias: pear-Payment-Process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197420 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |192583, 197413, 197417, | |197419 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 1 06:23:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 02:23:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197419] Review Request: php-pear-Validate-Finance-CreditCard - PEAR: Validation class for Credit Cards In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607010623.k616NORg006583@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Validate-Finance-CreditCard - PEAR: Validation class for Credit Cards Alias: Validate-Finance-CC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197419 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |197420 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 1 06:23:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 02:23:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197413] Review Request: php-pear-Net-Curl - PEAR: OO interface to PHP's cURL extension In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607010623.k616Nanu006597@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Curl - PEAR: OO interface to PHP's cURL extension Alias: php-pear-Net-Curl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197413 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |197420 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 1 06:23:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 02:23:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197417] Review Request: php-pear-Validate - PEAR: Validation class In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607010623.k616Nlcn006615@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Validate - PEAR: Validation class Alias: php-pear-Validate https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197417 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |197420 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 1 06:24:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 02:24:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192583] Review Request: php-pear-XML-Parser - XML parsing class based on PHP's bundled expat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607010624.k616O8tn006632@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-XML-Parser - XML parsing class based on PHP's bundled expat Alias: php-pear-XML-Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192583 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |197420 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 1 06:25:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 02:25:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197417] Review Request: php-pear-Validate - PEAR: Validation class In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607010625.k616Pk78006671@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Validate - PEAR: Validation class Alias: php-pear-Validate https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197417 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |197411 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 1 06:25:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 02:25:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197411] Review Request: php-pear-Date - PEAR: Date and Time Zone Classes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607010625.k616Pvtb006684@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Date - PEAR: Date and Time Zone Classes Alias: php-pear-Date https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197411 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |197417 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 1 07:28:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 03:28:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194420] Review Request: mlton, an optimizing compiler for Standard ML In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607010728.k617SY4B009535@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mlton, an optimizing compiler for Standard ML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194420 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-07-01 03:20 EST ------- There is now substantial debuginfo. The built takes over 700M of memory and generates a lot of thrashing. This used to happen with some previous version, but seemed to have to improved since. Can you confirm this? rpmlint on the src rpm: W: mlton macro-in-%changelog _docdir simply use %%{_docdir} instead of %{_docdir} W: mlton mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs Don't know where this occurs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 1 14:51:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 10:51:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196120] Review Request: gresistor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607011451.k61Ep6hh028170@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gresistor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196120 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-07-01 10:42 EST ------- Fixed and Updated. Spec URL: http://beta.glwb.info/gresistor/gresistor.spec SRPM URL: http://beta.glwb.info/gresistor/gresistor-0.0.1-3.src.rpm Upstream has been informed for the licence, but hasn't yet replied. I'm waiting upstream's release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 1 15:39:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 11:39:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197442] New: Review Request: fatsort Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197442 Summary: Review Request: fatsort Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: opensource at till.name QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www-users.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de/~tmaas/fedora/fatsort.spec SRPM URL: http://www-users.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de/~tmaas/fedora/fatsort-0.9.6.1-1.src.rpm Description: Fatsort is a utility written in C to sort FAT16 and FAT32 filesystems. It is needed to sort files on cheap mp3 players that display files not sorted by their name but by their entry in the file allocation table. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 1 15:47:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 11:47:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197442] Review Request: fatsort In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607011547.k61Flhub029832@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fatsort https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197442 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2006-07-01 11:39 EST ------- I forgot to mention that I this is my first package and I need a sponsor. By the way, a review should be very simple, since this is a small package, it builds fast in mock and rpmlint does not complain about anything. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 1 17:58:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 13:58:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197445] New: Review Request:
Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197445 Summary: Review Request:
Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: hellwolf at seu.edu.cn QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gro.clinux.org/scm/cvsweb.php/hwrepos/sys-base/fuse-convmvfs/fuse-convmvfs.specin?rev=1.1&contenttype=text/x-cvsweb-markup&cvsroot=fedora SRPM URL: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/fuse-convmvfs/fuse-convmvfs-0.2-1.fc5.y7.src.rpm?download Description: This is a filesystem client use the FUSE(Filesystem in USErspace) interface to convert file name from one charset to another. Inspired by convmv. README: http://fuse-convmvfs.cvs.sourceforge.net/fuse-convmvfs/fuse-convmvfs/README?revision=1.1.1.2&view=markup&pathrev=REL_0_2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 1 17:59:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 13:59:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197446] New: Review Request: fuse-convmvfs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197446 Summary: Review Request: fuse-convmvfs Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: hellwolf at seu.edu.cn QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gro.clinux.org/scm/cvsweb.php/hwrepos/sys-base/fuse-convmvfs/fuse-convmvfs.specin?rev=1.1&contenttype=text/x-cvsweb-markup&cvsroot=fedora SRPM URL: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/fuse-convmvfs/fuse-convmvfs-0.2-1.fc5.y7.src.rpm?download Description: This is a filesystem client use the FUSE(Filesystem in USErspace) interface to convert file name from one charset to another. Inspired by convmv. README: http://fuse-convmvfs.cvs.sourceforge.net/fuse-convmvfs/fuse-convmvfs/README?revision=1.1.1.2&view=markup&pathrev=REL_0_2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 1 18:03:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 14:03:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197445] Review Request: fuse-convmvfs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607011803.k61I3OOA000814@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-convmvfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197445 hellwolf at seu.edu.cn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
|convmvfs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 1 18:27:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 14:27:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197446] Review Request: fuse-convmvfs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607011827.k61IRoT3001926@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-convmvfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197446 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-01 14:19 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 197445 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 1 18:28:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 14:28:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197445] Review Request: fuse-convmvfs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607011828.k61IS1pm001948@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-convmvfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197445 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-01 14:19 EST ------- *** Bug 197446 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 1 21:59:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 17:59:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193531] Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607012159.k61LxMsG010337@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193531 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 1 22:02:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 18:02:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193531] Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607012202.k61M2CnR010414@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193531 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 1 22:08:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 18:08:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187913] Review Request: mysql-query-browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607012208.k61M8Muh010525@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-query-browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187913 ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2006-07-01 18:00 EST ------- Has anyone made any headway on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 2 00:00:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 20:00:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187913] Review Request: mysql-query-browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607020000.k6200bSU013629@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-query-browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187913 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-07-01 19:52 EST ------- I still havent been able to figure out why it crashes when connecting 64bit client to old 32 bit servers. In my day to day use it works fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 2 03:39:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 23:39:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194420] Review Request: mlton, an optimizing compiler for Standard ML In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607020339.k623d0tf019181@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mlton, an optimizing compiler for Standard ML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194420 ------- Additional Comments From adam at spicenitz.org 2006-07-01 23:30 EST ------- Yes, MLton is infamous for using a large amount of core. Upstream is aware of the problem and tries to keep it under control, but since MLton is a whole-program compiler (and has core assumptions that rely on this), a lot of memory use is expected when compiling something complex (like MLton itself). New package: http://www.spicenitz.org/fedora/mlton-20051202-7.src.rpm http://www.spicenitz.org/fedora/mlton.spec Fixes the 2 rpmlint problems above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 2 05:32:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 01:32:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197459] New: Review Request: perl-Object-InsideOut Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197459 Summary: Review Request: perl-Object-InsideOut Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Object-InsideOut.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Object-InsideOut-1.45-0.fc5.src.rpm Description: This module provides comprehensive support for implementing classes using the inside-out object model. This module implements inside-out objects as anonymous scalar references that are blessed into a class with the scalar containing the ID for the object (usually a sequence number). For Perl 5.8.3 and later, the scalar reference is set as readonly to prevent accidental modifications to the ID. Object data (i.e., fields) are stored within the class's package in either arrays indexed by the object's ID, or hashes keyed to the object's ID. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 2 06:04:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 02:04:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197461] New: Review Request: perl-Class-InsideOut Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197461 Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-InsideOut Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Class-InsideOut.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Class-InsideOut-1.00-0.fc5.src.rpm Description: This is a simple, safe and streamlined toolkit for building inside-out objects. Unlike most other inside-out object building modules already on CPAN, this module aims for minimalism and robustness: * Does not require derived classes to subclass it * Uses no source filters, attributes or CHECK blocks * Supports any underlying object type including foreign inheritance * Does not leak memory on object destruction * Overloading-safe * Thread-safe for Perl 5.8 or better * mod_perl compatible * Makes no assumption about inheritance or initializer needs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 2 06:14:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 02:14:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194420] Review Request: mlton, an optimizing compiler for Standard ML In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607020614.k626EB8T023454@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mlton, an optimizing compiler for Standard ML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194420 adam at spicenitz.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 2 09:06:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 05:06:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192432] Review Request: compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607020906.k6296h4Z016851@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192432 bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 2 09:11:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 05:11:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193531] Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607020911.k629B45S017207@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193531 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-07-02 05:02 EST ------- I'll ignore this W: kicad file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/kicad/en/pcbnew/doc_pcbnew.zip But however, mock failed on i386 make[1]: *** [basepcbframe.o] Error 1 make[1]: Target `all' not remade because of errors. make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/kicad-dev/gerbview' make: *** [all] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.20325 (%build) and you need not to own the following directories %dir %{_libdir}/%{name} %dir %{_datadir}/%{name} %dir %{_docdir}/%{name}/ use %{name} instead of kicad as much as you can in kde menu, kicad is found under Lost and Found, which should be corrected -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 2 13:10:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 09:10:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193531] Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607021310.k62DA6Lv025721@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193531 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-02 09:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > But however, mock failed on i386 > make[1]: *** [basepcbframe.o] Error 1 > make[1]: Target `all' not remade because of errors. > make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/kicad-dev/gerbview' > make: *** [all] Error 2 > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.20325 (%build) Is there nothing further up the log showing what the problem with basepcbframe.o was? > and you need not to own the following directories > %dir %{_libdir}/%{name} > %dir %{_datadir}/%{name} > %dir %{_docdir}/%{name}/ The files list contains: %dir %{_libdir}/%{name} %{_libdir}/%{name}/plugins/* %dir %{_datadir}/%{name} %{_datadir}/%{name}/* %dir %{_docdir}/%{name}/ %{_docdir}/%{name}/* This could possibly be simplified to: %{_libdir}/%{name}/ %{_datadir}/%{name}/ %{_docdir}/%{name}/ Some people prefer to own directories explicitly though. No harm in that. The only issue I see what what's currently there is that directory %{_libdir}/%{name}/plugins needs to be owned by this package. > use %{name} instead of kicad as much as you can That already seems to be the case, and again that's just a maintainer preference and not something that *needs* to be changed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 2 17:16:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 13:16:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197198] Review Request: ntop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607021716.k62HGAhU001109@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197198 ------- Additional Comments From yaneti at declera.com 2006-07-02 13:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #8) > > The upstream for ntop has a rather distorted interpretation of the GPL as can be > > seen in the distribution terms of another one of their wares - nProbe. > > http://www.ntop.org/nProbe.html. > > > > So even if it says GPL, its most likely not what the authors really mean. > > He sells nProbe, a GPl'ed application he authors... nothing wrong there. Right. Except when he contradicts the GPL with placing additional restrictions, say: "Note that for nProbe OEM reselling (including device embed) you need a written commercial licence that's available on request from its author." Perhaps he believes the GPL to be that restrictive, which I don't think it is. > Please, this is a GPL'ed application and as such, subject to the terms and > conditions of the GPL and should be evaluated as such. My point was that perhaps the author reads the GPL differently than everybody else. A possible argument about whats on paper (GPL) and what the author means ("reselling (including device embed) you need a written commercial licence that's available on request") is an invitation to lawyerland. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 2 19:26:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 15:26:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197295] Review Request: perl-List-Compare In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607021926.k62JQ2vk006265@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-List-Compare https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197295 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-02 15:17 EST ------- Imported and built for FC-4,5,devel. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 2 19:45:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 15:45:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194355] Review Request: imlib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607021945.k62JjZXV007117@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: imlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194355 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-02 15:37 EST ------- OK.. getting back to what the purpose of this bugzilla report is about! To the question of if its worth fixing, was no. The email is on the maintainer's list. Kevin, are you happy with the state of this package now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 2 19:49:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 15:49:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197198] Review Request: ntop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607021949.k62JnBWX007327@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197198 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-02 15:40 EST ------- You are talking about nProbe. If you are that concerned or feel strongly that Luca is not compling to the GPL properly, in regards to nProbe, please take that to him and/or FSF.. this review request is not the place to discuss license concerns on applications not under this review. This is ntop, a freely available and GPL'ed application. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 2 19:57:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 15:57:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197476] New: Review Request: python-cvstoys Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197476 Summary: Review Request: python-cvstoys Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: michael at knox.net.nz QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~michael/python-cvstoys.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~michael/python-cvstoys-1.0.10-1.src.rpm Description: CVSToys is a collection of companion tools for the Concurrent Versions System, better known as CVS. The biggest best and only toy we've got is Fresh CVS, a commit monitoring daemon which can keep a mirror of the repository or checked-out working copy up to date, and send out notifications by e-mail, on the web as HTML or RSS, or to a chat service such as IRC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 2 20:54:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 16:54:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197198] Review Request: ntop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607022054.k62KshEZ009603@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197198 ------- Additional Comments From yaneti at declera.com 2006-07-02 16:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > You are talking about nProbe. Not really. I am talking about the legally challenged upstream for ntop. How much its relevant for the review of ntop? I'll leave that to the powers that be... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 2 21:06:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 17:06:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197198] Review Request: ntop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607022106.k62L67vs009915@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197198 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-02 16:57 EST ------- OK, itemize your concerns. Instead of saying "legally challenged upstream" tell me excatly what you believe the problem is with ntop. I will seek some clarification from Luca. But at the end of the day though, the application is licensed under the terms and conditions of the GPL. How the author reads the GPL is kind of irrelevent IMO. So, unless you can clarify you concern, I can't see how nProbes commerical license affects the GPL'ed ntop. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 2 21:20:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 17:20:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197484] New: Review Request: perl-Class-MakeMethods Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197484 Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-MakeMethods Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Class-MakeMethods.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Class-MakeMethods-1.01-0.fc5.src.rpm Description: The Class::MakeMethods framework allows Perl class developers to quickly define common types of methods. When a module uses Class::MakeMethods or one of its subclasses, it can select from a variety of supported method types, and specify a name for each method desired. The methods are dynamically generated and installed in the calling package. Construction of the individual methods is handled by subclasses. This delegation approach allows for a wide variety of method-generation techniques to be supported, each by a different subclass. Subclasses can also be added to provide support for new types of methods. Over a dozen subclasses are available, including implementations of a variety of different method-generation techniques. Each subclass generates several types of methods, with some supporting their own open-eneded extension syntax, for hundreds of possible combinations of method types. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 2 21:54:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 17:54:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190007] Review Request: php-pecl-zip In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607022154.k62Ls5FG011488@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-zip Alias: php-pecl-zip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190007 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-07-02 17:45 EST ------- Don't let the group tag thing prevent you from checking this into cvs, or is there another reason why this has not been checked into cvs yet? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 2 22:18:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 18:18:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190007] Review Request: php-pecl-zip In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607022218.k62MIDHR011891@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-zip Alias: php-pecl-zip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190007 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-07-02 18:09 EST ------- https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-June/msg01130.html: * As a result of the PHP guidelines not being approved, a moratorium was placed on all php packages. JasonTibbs announced this on the fedora-extras and fedora-maintainers lists. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 2 22:19:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 18:19:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190007] Review Request: php-pecl-zip In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607022219.k62MJest011921@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-zip Alias: php-pecl-zip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190007 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-07-02 18:11 EST ------- Comment 8 doesn't mean this can't be checked to CVS though, but that it shouldn't be shipped yet before the guidelines are finalized and approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 2 22:20:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 18:20:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196003] Review Request: Kmenu-gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607022220.k62MKSQI011956@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Kmenu-gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196003 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-07-02 18:12 EST ------- New release 0.6 Spec URL: http://chitlesh.ch.funpic.de/kmenugnome/kmenu-gnome.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.ch.funpic.de/kmenugnome/kmenu-gnome-0.6-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 2 22:21:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 18:21:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197198] Review Request: ntop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607022221.k62MLvWW012015@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197198 ------- Additional Comments From yaneti at declera.com 2006-07-02 18:13 EST ------- I'll try this one last time, hopefuly this time it becomes clearer. My one and only (but grave enough for me) concern with ntop is that it has an upstream author/maintainer that cannot be trusted. nProbe and its licensing was just an example of why I think so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 2 22:28:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 18:28:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193531] Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607022228.k62MSHme012093@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193531 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-07-02 18:19 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=131864) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=131864&action=view) build.log output of chitlesh(SRPMS)[1]$mock -r fedora-5-i386-core.cfg kicad-2006.06.26-1.src.rpm init clean prep This may take a while setup build Error building package from kicad-2006.06.26-1.fc5.src.rpm, See build log ending done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 2 22:29:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 18:29:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193531] Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607022229.k62MTklr012131@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193531 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-07-02 18:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > Is there nothing further up the log showing what the problem with basepcbframe.o was? I don't see much, see attachment build.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 2 22:48:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 18:48:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197487] New: Review Request: flasm - Flash bytecode assembler disassembler Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197487 Summary: Review Request: flasm - Flash bytecode assembler disassembler Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: pertusus at free.fr QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/flasm-1.61-1.src.rpm Description: Flasm is a free command line assembler/disassembler of Flash ActionScript bytecode. It lets you make changes to any SWF. Flasm fully supports SWFs produced by Macromedia Flash 8 and earlier Flash versions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 2 22:48:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 18:48:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197488] New: Review Request: uread - Utilities for unformatted fortran files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197488 Summary: Review Request: uread - Utilities for unformatted fortran files Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: pertusus at free.fr QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/uread-0.19981218-1.src.rpm Description: These utilities enable you to have a look at a Fortran unformatted file to see the size of the data records, and to swap its endianess from big to little, or vis versa. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 2 23:11:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 19:11:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197489] New: Review Request: ming - SWF output library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197489 Summary: Review Request: ming - SWF output library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: pertusus at free.fr QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/ming-0.4.0-0.2006_04_20.src.rpm Description: Ming is a c library for generating SWF ("Flash") format movies. It comprises a lot of Flash functionality, including features of Flash 6. Specifically, it lets you create: shapes (including morphs), text, sprites (aka movie clips), buttons, and actions in flash movies, plus more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 01:05:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 21:05:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196629] Review Request: perl-SVK - A Distributed Version Control System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607030105.k631513O017347@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SVK - A Distributed Version Control System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196629 ------- Additional Comments From ianburrell at gmail.com 2006-07-02 20:56 EST ------- All of the dependencies have been built and in Extras for FC-4, FC-5, and devel. Could you code review the package now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 01:49:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 21:49:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190040] Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607030149.k631ndFn018755@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190040 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-07-02 21:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > NEEDSWORK: > > Source0 should be a full URL. It should be > http://dl.sf.net/sourceforge/hydrogen/hydrogen-0.9.3.tar.gz I've updated this to the easynews link. > You have a lingering buildreq on portaudio-devel. Fixed. > I would recommend disabling OSS support. (%configure --disable-oss-support) > AFAIK OSS has been deprecated for some time now. Fixed. > I don't think you need all that QTDIR stuff. It seems to build just fine without > it. Mock sources profile.d properly. I think all that stuff is a good idea in order to ensure a reproducable build outside of mock. > I don't think you need to update the icon cache, its not installing any into > /usr/share/icons Fixed. > Don't need ldconfig, its not installing systemwide libraries. Fixed. > The update-desktop-database doesn't match what's in ScriptletSnippets, and > according to ScriptletSnippets, you only need it if there's a MimeType key. Fixed (it does have a MimeType key). Here are the updated bits: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/hydrogen.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/hydrogen-0.9.3-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 02:21:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 22:21:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191014] Review Request: ganymed-ssh2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607030221.k632L5oX019597@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ganymed-ssh2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191014 robert at marcanoonline.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 02:21:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 22:21:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191017] Review Request: eclipse-subclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607030221.k632Lwah019658@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-subclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191017 Bug 191017 depends on bug 191014, which changed state. Bug 191014 Summary: Review Request: ganymed-ssh2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191014 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 02:22:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 22:22:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191015] Review Request: javasvn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607030222.k632MUZC019693@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: javasvn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191015 Bug 191015 depends on bug 191014, which changed state. Bug 191014 Summary: Review Request: ganymed-ssh2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191014 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 02:23:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 22:23:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191016] Review Request: svn-client-adapter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607030223.k632N4l9019736@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: svn-client-adapter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191016 Bug 191016 depends on bug 191014, which changed state. Bug 191014 Summary: Review Request: ganymed-ssh2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191014 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 02:42:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 22:42:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191015] Review Request: javasvn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607030242.k632g6IV020466@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: javasvn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191015 robert at marcanoonline.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 02:42:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 22:42:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191017] Review Request: eclipse-subclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607030242.k632gStH020512@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-subclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191017 Bug 191017 depends on bug 191015, which changed state. Bug 191015 Summary: Review Request: javasvn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191015 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 02:42:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 22:42:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191016] Review Request: svn-client-adapter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607030242.k632gr7O020573@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: svn-client-adapter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191016 Bug 191016 depends on bug 191015, which changed state. Bug 191015 Summary: Review Request: javasvn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191015 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 02:56:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 22:56:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193531] Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607030256.k632uDxr021278@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193531 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-02 22:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #13) > > Is there nothing further up the log showing what the problem with > basepcbframe.o was? > > I don't see much, see attachment build.log There you find this: ... /usr/include/wx-2.6/wx/gtk/glcanvas.h:25:20: error: GL/glu.h: No such file or directory ... => The package owning /usr/include/wx-2.6/wx/gtk/glcanvas.h (wx-devel?) probably lacks a depencency on the package providing GL/glu.h (libGLU-devel). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 02:58:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 22:58:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190045] Review Request: caps - A set of audio plugins for LADSPA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607030258.k632wmDK021335@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: caps - A set of audio plugins for LADSPA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190045 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-07-02 22:50 EST ------- Updated bits... Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/caps.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/caps-0.3.0-2.src.rpm This just adds a patch to give the installed .so files execute permission. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 03:03:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 23:03:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191175] Review Request: pyserial - Python serial port access library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607030303.k6333khf021466@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyserial - Python serial port access library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191175 adam at spicenitz.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |adam at spicenitz.org OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 03:14:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 23:14:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191017] Review Request: eclipse-subclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607030314.k633E5AN021656@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-subclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191017 ------- Additional Comments From robert at marcanoonline.com 2006-07-02 23:05 EST ------- updated, using the "svn export" command and a fetch script added as source http://www.marcanoonline.com/downloads/fedora/package_submissions/subclipse/eclipse-subclipse-1.0.3-2.src.rpm http://www.marcanoonline.com/downloads/fedora/package_submissions/subclipse/eclipse-subclipse.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 03:16:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 23:16:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191017] Review Request: eclipse-subclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607030316.k633Glgn021709@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-subclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191017 robert at marcanoonline.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|191016 | ------- Additional Comments From robert at marcanoonline.com 2006-07-02 23:08 EST ------- Removing bug #191016 from the dependecies list -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 03:17:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 23:17:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191016] Review Request: svn-client-adapter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607030317.k633HLNs021735@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: svn-client-adapter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191016 robert at marcanoonline.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|191017 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 04:05:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 00:05:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191175] Review Request: pyserial - Python serial port access library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607030405.k6345IaY023343@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyserial - Python serial port access library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191175 ------- Additional Comments From adam at spicenitz.org 2006-07-02 23:56 EST ------- rpmlint SRPM results: W: pyserial invalid-license PSF - see LICENSE.txt E: pyserial no-cleaning-of-buildroot * Please use "Python license" for License. * Don't forget "rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" as the first step of %install. rpmlint RPM results: W: pyserial invalid-license PSF - see LICENSE.txt W: pyserial wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/pyserial-2.2/CHANGES.txt E: pyserial wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/pyserial-2.2/examples/wxTerminal.py W: pyserial wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/pyserial-2.2/LICENSE.txt E: pyserial non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/serial/serialposix.py 0644 E: pyserial wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/serial/serialposix.py E: pyserial wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/serial/serialwin32.py "python" E: pyserial non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/serial/serialwin32.py 0644 E: pyserial wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/serial/serialwin32.py E: pyserial wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/pyserial-2.2/examples/scan.py W: pyserial wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/pyserial-2.2/examples/wxSerialConfigDialog.wxg E: pyserial wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/pyserial-2.2/examples/miniterm.py E: pyserial wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/pyserial-2.2/examples/test.py W: pyserial wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/pyserial-2.2/examples/setup_demo.py E: pyserial wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/pyserial-2.2/examples/tcp_serial_redirect.py E: pyserial non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/serial/__init__.py 0644 E: pyserial wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/serial/__init__.py W: pyserial wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/pyserial-2.2/README.txt E: pyserial wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/pyserial-2.2/examples/test_advanced.py E: pyserial wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/pyserial-2.2/examples/wxSerialConfigDialog.py E: pyserial wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/pyserial-2.2/examples/test_high_load.py E: pyserial wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/serial/serialutil.py "python" E: pyserial non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/serial/serialutil.py 0644 E: pyserial wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/serial/serialutil.py E: pyserial wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/pyserial-2.2/examples/enhancedserial.py W: pyserial wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/pyserial-2.2/examples/wxTerminal.wxg E: pyserial wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/serial/serialjava.py "jython" E: pyserial non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/serial/serialjava.py 0644 E: pyserial wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/serial/serialjava.py * Most of the problems here are bad line endings. Perhaps you need to use a sed script or something to fix the endings on these files? * The other problem relates to the modules (.py files) having an interpreter line at the top. I suggest a patch to remove the #! lines from the top of each file. Also see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python * In %description: do you mean "encapsulates" ? * You don't need Requires: python-abi ... * Include the .py and .pyc files only, but specify %ghost for the .pyo files I look forward to seeing your result ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 04:13:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 00:13:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191175] Review Request: pyserial - Python serial port access library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607030413.k634DjmO023541@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyserial - Python serial port access library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191175 ------- Additional Comments From adam at spicenitz.org 2006-07-03 00:05 EST ------- For the problem with line endings, you might be able to get away with putting export UNZIP="-aa" in %prep before %setup -q This works because the archive contains only text files. But I would check carefully that the module continues to work correctly! (Even though a Python module should be safe.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 04:56:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 00:56:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181445] Review Request: php-shout In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607030456.k634uBLw025048@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-shout https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181445 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-07-03 00:47 EST ------- I would use these macros instead: %define extdir %(php-config --extension-dir || echo %{_libdir}/php/modules) %define apiver %((phpize --version 2>/dev/null || echo 'PHP Api Version: 20041225' ) | sed -n '/PHP Api Version/ s/.*: *//p') -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 05:14:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 01:14:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190007] Review Request: php-pecl-zip In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607030514.k635EhUX025495@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-zip Alias: php-pecl-zip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190007 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-07-03 01:06 EST ------- After checking this into CVS, please add: %define apiver %((phpize --version 2>/dev/null || echo 'PHP Api Version: 20041225' ) | sed -n '/PHP Api Version/ s/.*: *//p') And change Requires: php to: Requires: php-api >= %{apiver} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 10:07:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 06:07:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181445] Review Request: php-shout In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607031007.k63A7Ylh008038@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-shout https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181445 ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2006-07-03 05:59 EST ------- "be_happy_mock" variant gives you a chance to not overlook that this is just the "mock" issue. Note, rpmbuild always detects these macros correctly. The "correct" fallback variant (%{_libdir}/php/modules etc.) is not needed here anyway. (Moreover such a fallback looks a little ugly, because to be clean you are caused to change it each time the extdir/apiver was changed, which makes all the auto-detection superfluous). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 10:57:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 06:57:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193531] Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607031057.k63AvAYh010714@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193531 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-07-03 06:48 EST ------- Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/kicad.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/kicad-2006.06.26-2.src.rpm %changelog * Mon Jul 3 2006 Alain Portal 2006.06.26-2 - BR mesa-libGLU-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 11:26:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 07:26:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 179758] Review Request: Eiciel (ACL editor) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607031126.k63BQgGv012060@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Eiciel (ACL editor) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179758 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at adslpipe.co.uk 2006-07-03 07:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > Is this still your first package? yes it is > If so, you should add the bug FE-NEEDSPONSOR > to the list of bugs this one blocks. Ok, thanks for the prod, I'll update to latest source, push new versions, and then add the blocker -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 12:05:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 08:05:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193531] Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607031205.k63C5YV1013606@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193531 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |197501 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 12:08:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 08:08:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193531] Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607031208.k63C8IwA013685@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193531 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-03 07:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > %changelog > * Mon Jul 3 2006 Alain Portal 2006.06.26-2 > - BR mesa-libGLU-devel A better workaround would be to BR: libGLU-devel so as not to require a specific GL implementation. The real fix is to get the dependency added to wxGTK-devel so that packages using it don't have to add the dependency themselves. I have raised Bug #197501 to address this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 14:53:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 10:53:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193531] Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607031453.k63Eripb021447@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193531 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-07-03 10:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > (In reply to comment #17) > > %changelog > > * Mon Jul 3 2006 Alain Portal 2006.06.26-2 > > - BR mesa-libGLU-devel > > A better workaround would be to BR: libGLU-devel so as not to require a specific > GL implementation. > > The real fix is to get the dependency added to wxGTK-devel so that packages > using it don't have to add the dependency themselves. I have raised Bug #197501 > to address this. > OK, thanks. I let the Build Requires for the moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 14:54:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 10:54:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193531] Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607031454.k63EsxsK021515@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193531 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-07-03 10:46 EST ------- Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/kicad.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/kicad-2006.06.26-3.src.rpm %changelog * Mon Jul 3 2006 Alain Portal 2006.06.26-3 - s/mesa-libGLU-devel/libGLU-devel/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 14:56:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 10:56:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197353] Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607031456.k63EulrI021586@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197353 aportal at univ-montp2.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-07-03 10:48 EST ------- Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/man-pages-fr.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/man-pages-fr-2.07.0-1.src.rpm %changelog * Mon Jul 3 2006 Alain Portal 2.07.0-1 - Update to 2.07.0 - New extra tarball -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 16:06:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 12:06:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193531] Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607031606.k63G6tXZ024462@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193531 Bug 193531 depends on bug 197501, which changed state. Bug 197501 Summary: wxGTK-devel should Require: libGLU-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197501 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 16:26:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 12:26:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194355] Review Request: imlib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607031626.k63GQfl7024962@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: imlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194355 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-07-03 12:18 EST ------- Yeah, since the package isn't active upstream, and fixing that soname issue could well break all the legacy apps (or at least require changes from them), I agree it's ok to leave it as it is. That was the last blocker I saw, so this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this bug NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 16:32:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 12:32:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184080] Review Request: webmin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607031632.k63GWVDd025119@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: webmin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184080 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-07-03 12:23 EST ------- I'm closing this review. Please re-submit with a new spec if there is still interest. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 17:19:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 13:19:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197292] Review Request: perl-Contextual-Return In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607031719.k63HJkp8026897@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Contextual-Return https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197292 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-03 13:11 EST ------- All tests now pass with none skipped: All tests successful. Files=17, Tests=184, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.75 cusr + 0.28 csys = 1.03 CPU) The provides are OK now: perl(Contextual::Return) perl(Contextual::Return::Failure) perl(Contextual::Return::Lvalue) perl(Contextual::Return::Value) perl-Contextual-Return = v0.1.0-0.1.fc6 APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 17:23:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 13:23:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197293] Review Request: perl-IO-Prompt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607031723.k63HNuu9027020@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Prompt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197293 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-03 13:15 EST ------- The test suite now passes with no tests skipped: All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=3, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.20 cusr + 0.05 csys = 0.25 CPU) There is this warning: t/pod-coverage....Too late to run CHECK block at /builddir/build/BUILD/IO-Prompt-v0.99.4/blib/lib/IO/Prompt.pm line 315. which might be useful to report upstream. I'm not sure what it means. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 17:39:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 13:39:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181445] Review Request: php-shout In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607031739.k63HdrY5027454@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-shout https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181445 ------- Additional Comments From holbrookbw at users.sourceforge.net 2006-07-03 13:31 EST ------- No offense guys, but debate about these macros have been going on for over 3 months now, and I've made several new rpm releases just to appease one reviewer or the next, and I'm tired of going back and forth. Christopher's latest recommendation look like exactly what I started with, and I'm not real keen on spending all this time just to end up back where I started. SO, since Jason is the one actually assigned to this review and will be the one to sponsor me, I leave it to him to decide what the final macros should be. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 17:51:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 13:51:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181445] Review Request: php-shout In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607031751.k63Hprsc027748@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-shout https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181445 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-03 13:43 EST ------- I have to agree; we should pick one thing and stick with it. However, unfortunately the PHP guidelines did not pass at the recent packaging committee meeting, so I cannot approve this package at this time no matter what happens to the guidelines. I will make sure that the ratified guidelines include the proper macros for extracting the PHP API version and the review this package against those. Honestly, my preference will be to avoid BS like "be_happy_mock" or hardcoding a specific default API version and just using "0". The only requirement is that the result after the macro expansions be a specfile with the proper syntax so that the initial BuildRequires can be extracted. It shouldn't even be necessary to play with the extdir define. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 17:53:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 13:53:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197476] Review Request: python-cvstoys In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607031753.k63HrWub027796@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-cvstoys https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197476 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |Jochen at herr-schmitt.de OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-07-03 13:45 EST ------- Good: + Tarball in SRPM match with upstream. + Local build works fine. + License OK. + rpmlint of source RPM ok. + Mock build works fine on FC-5 as root. Bad: - No verbatin license in %doc stanza - I think the Group should be Development/Tools - Why you set CFLAGS, when no binary file will be created - rpmlint have the following complaints to the binary RPM. E: python-cvstoys non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/cvstoys/setup.py 0644 E: python-cvstoys non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/cvstoys/loginfo.py 0644 E: python-cvstoys non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/cvstoys/clients/words.py 0644 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 17:59:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 13:59:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181445] Review Request: php-shout In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607031759.k63HxxQ4027938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-shout https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181445 ------- Additional Comments From holbrookbw at users.sourceforge.net 2006-07-03 13:51 EST ------- I thought (also in comment 36 and comment 37) that the php moratorium only applied to packages containing php code or pear/pecl packages, not packages containing binary extensions to the php engine, like this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 18:04:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 14:04:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197293] Review Request: perl-IO-Prompt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607031804.k63I4KcJ028061@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Prompt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197293 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-03 13:55 EST ------- Imported and building for devel -- will build for FC-4, FC-5 after branching. CHECK issue will be reported upstream. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 18:04:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 14:04:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197292] Review Request: perl-Contextual-Return In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607031804.k63I4fat028079@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Contextual-Return https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197292 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-03 13:56 EST ------- Imported and building for devel -- will build for FC-4, FC-5 after branching. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 18:04:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 14:04:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197304] Review Request: perl-WWW-Myspace In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607031804.k63I4qjv028097@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-WWW-Myspace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197304 Bug 197304 depends on bug 197292, which changed state. Bug 197292 Summary: Review Request: perl-Contextual-Return https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197292 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 18:04:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 14:04:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197293] Review Request: perl-IO-Prompt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607031804.k63I4soG028105@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Prompt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197293 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 18:04:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 14:04:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197304] Review Request: perl-WWW-Myspace In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607031804.k63I4tFI028113@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-WWW-Myspace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197304 Bug 197304 depends on bug 197293, which changed state. Bug 197293 Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Prompt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197293 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 18:23:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 14:23:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181445] Review Request: php-shout In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607031823.k63INVAd029180@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-shout https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181445 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-03 14:15 EST ------- Sorry, that's incorrect. Applications which are simply written in PHP are OK. Extensions to PHP, either PEAR, PECL, or binary are not to be approved until we have guidelines for packaging them. Feel free to join the fedora-packaging list and help us to complete those guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 18:48:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 14:48:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197487] Review Request: flasm - Flash bytecode assembler disassembler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607031848.k63Im1gB031468@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flasm - Flash bytecode assembler disassembler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197487 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |Jochen at herr-schmitt.de OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-07-03 14:39 EST ------- Good: + Tarballs is the same as the upstream. + Local build ok. + Mock build works fine to FC-5. + rpmlint doesn't complaints the source rpm. + rpmlint doesn't complaints the binary rpm. + license seem to be OSS compilant. + rpm contains verbatin copy of the license. + filelist in binary rpm ok. + program can start without crash. ACCEPTED !!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 18:52:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 14:52:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197489] Review Request: ming - SWF output library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607031852.k63IqEoo031948@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ming - SWF output library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197489 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |Jochen at herr-schmitt.de OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-07-03 14:43 EST ------- Bad: - Source ming-0.4.0-dev-2006_04_20.tar.bz2 is different from upstream. - Perl should not be included. - Duplicate BuildRequires: perl (by perl), zlib-devel (by libpng-devel) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 19:05:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 15:05:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197488] Review Request: uread - Utilities for unformatted fortran files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607031905.k63J59o3032286@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uread - Utilities for unformatted fortran files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197488 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |Jochen at herr-schmitt.de OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-07-03 14:56 EST ------- Good: + rpmlint doesn't complaint the source rpm. Bad: - Source0 should conatins a full-qualified URL. Question: Will this software continue supported by the developers? On the top of the SPEC file I found a time stamp from the year 1998. This are 8 years ago now, so I have to asume, that there will be no active development of this software. Want point, which inprove my asumetion is, I have not found a full-qualified URL to the sources, so I think that this may be a cvs snapshot. So I mus asume, that there will be no active development of this software. If I will be right, I must block an inclusion of this software as a reviewer of Fedora Extras. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 19:30:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 15:30:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197489] Review Request: ming - SWF output library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607031930.k63JU18O000449@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ming - SWF output library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197489 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-03 15:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Bad: > - Source ming-0.4.0-dev-2006_04_20.tar.bz2 is different from upstream. I hope that this time this is right. > - Perl should not be included. What do you mean by that? > - Duplicate BuildRequires: perl (by perl), zlib-devel (by libpng-devel) ?? What does mean Duplicate BuildRequires: perl (by perl)? I know that perl is an optionnal buildrequires since it is in the buildroot, however as there is a perl module having perl as buildrequires makes sense. zlib-devel is searched for in configure.in, so even though it is a dep of libpng-devel I think that it deserves to be a direct dep of ming. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 19:39:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 15:39:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197461] Review Request: perl-Class-InsideOut In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607031939.k63Jdh1o001248@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-InsideOut https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197461 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |Jochen at herr-schmitt.de OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-07-03 15:31 EST ------- Good: + Tarball match with upstream. + rpmlint doesn't complaints source rpm. + Local build works fine. + Package contains verbatin copy of the license. + rpmlint doesn't complaint the binary rpm. Bad: - Perl have not to be inclussion in the BR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 19:45:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 15:45:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197489] Review Request: ming - SWF output library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607031945.k63Jjv0Z001872@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ming - SWF output library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197489 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-03 15:37 EST ------- Here is an enhanced version with more interfaces and cleanings: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/ming-0.4.0-0.1.2006_04_20.src.rpm - Split out makeswf since it is covered by a different licence (GPL) - fix the release tag - add tcl bindings - add java bindings, even though I didn't manage to use them I have downloaded the tar.bz2 with spectool -g from the spec file so I hope it is the right tarball now. Also the release number doesn't increase, because I made a mistake in the previous release tag -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 19:46:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 15:46:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197488] Review Request: uread - Utilities for unformatted fortran files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607031946.k63JkruT001947@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uread - Utilities for unformatted fortran files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197488 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-03 15:38 EST ------- It is not a cvs snapshot, it is just a stable software. If you look at the comments at the top of the spec file you'll see where the real source come from. since it is unversionned, I use the timestamp to have a versionned file. You can have a look at tetex-tex4ht for another example. #Source0: http://www.engineers.auckland.ac.nz/~snor007/src/uread.tar.gz There is no active development, but is is not a bad thing, it is a very good thing, it means that it is a stable software. Hopefully there will be no more development for that software. The upstream is still responsive, however as I was able to have a licence clarifiction in 2 days. That's a pretty responsive upstream... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 19:48:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 15:48:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191017] Review Request: eclipse-subclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607031948.k63Jm3m0002049@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-subclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191017 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-03 15:39 EST ------- I don't think it's going to be possible for a tarball I generated from an svn export to have the same checksum as yours, since the timestamps of the directories will always show the checkout time. diff, however, doesn't find any differences and that's good enough for me. Unfortunately the package doesn't build in mock for me. I get down to here: + java -cp /usr/share/eclipse/startup.jar -Duser.home=/builddir/build/BUILD/subclipse-1.0.3/subclipse/home org.eclipse.core.launcher.Main -application org.eclipse.ant.core.antRunner -Dtype=feature -Did=org.tigris.subversion.subclipse -DsourceDirectory=/builddir/build/BUILD/subclipse-1.0.3/subclipse -DbaseLocation=/builddir/build/BUILD/subclipse-1.0.3/subclipse/SDK -Dbuilder=/usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.pde.build_3.1.2/templates/package-build -f /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.pde.build_3.1.2/scripts/build.xml Buildfile: /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.pde.build_3.1.2/scripts/build.xml BUILD FAILED Buildfile: /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.pde.build_3.1.2/scripts/build.xml does not exist I'll attach my build.log; let me know if there's any other information I can provide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 19:48:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 15:48:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191017] Review Request: eclipse-subclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607031948.k63JmxbT002142@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-subclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191017 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-03 15:40 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=131887) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=131887&action=view) log from failed build -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 19:51:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 15:51:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 180092] Review Request: NRPE - Monitoring agent for Nagios In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607031951.k63JpOtw002455@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NRPE - Monitoring agent for Nagios https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180092 ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2006-07-03 15:43 EST ------- SPEC: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/nrpe/nrpe.spec SRPM: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/nrpe/nrpe-2.5.2-1.src.rpm Sorry for the delay, here's 2.5.2-1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 19:53:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 15:53:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196629] Review Request: perl-SVK - A Distributed Version Control System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607031953.k63JrS9U002689@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SVK - A Distributed Version Control System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196629 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-03 15:44 EST ------- I cannot fetch the upstream source from the Source0 URL in the specfile. I believe you need to use "by-authors", not "by-author". I'll make that change. Unfortunately it seems that perl-Algorithm-Annotate isn't on the mirrors; it's in CVS, but I don't see a build request for it. I'll build and stuff it in a local repo when I get home from work today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 19:55:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 15:55:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197484] Review Request: perl-Class-MakeMethods In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607031955.k63JtNxN002884@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-MakeMethods https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197484 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |Jochen at herr-schmitt.de ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-07-03 15:46 EST ------- Good: + tarballs in SRPM match upstream version. + rpmlint doensn't complaints source rpm. + Local Build works fine. + Mock build works fine. + rpmlint doesn't complaints binary rpm. + License is the same as perl. Bad: - perl should not be included - Package doesn't contain verbatin license text. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 19:58:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 15:58:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191017] Review Request: eclipse-subclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607031958.k63JwobZ003024@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-subclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191017 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2006-07-03 15:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > BUILD FAILED > Buildfile: > /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.pde.build_3.1.2/scripts/build.xml does > not exist This is 'cause we updated to 3.2.0 in rawhide. I forget if we kept the versionless pde.build symlink in there -- I think we did -- but I can provide a patch tomorrow. Sorry about that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 20:03:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 16:03:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197298] Review Request: perl-Locale-SubCountry In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607032003.k63K39ME003202@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Locale-SubCountry https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197298 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 20:14:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 16:14:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197298] Review Request: perl-Locale-SubCountry In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607032014.k63KERAE003566@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Locale-SubCountry https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197298 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-03 16:05 EST ------- BuildRequires: perl is not necessary (not a blocker). It's not necessary to pass OPTIMIZE for a noarch package (not a blocker). Please add BR: perl(Test::Pod), perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) for complete test coverage. Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * source files match upstream: b6d365e2db967821c2f1fdfcf064cab6 Locale-SubCountry-1.37.tar.gz * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Locale::SubCountry) = 1.37 perl(Locale::SubCountry::World) perl-Locale-SubCountry = 1.37-0.fc6 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Exporter) perl(locale) perl(strict) * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. X %check is present but tests are skipped due to missing BuildRequires: All tests successful, 2 tests skipped. Files=3, Tests=15, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.10 cusr + 0.03 csys = 0.13 CPU) * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 20:14:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 16:14:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197302] Review Request: perl-Math-Round In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607032014.k63KEp9i003595@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-Round https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197302 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 20:20:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 16:20:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197302] Review Request: perl-Math-Round In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607032020.k63KKx6P003964@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-Round https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197302 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-03 16:12 EST ------- BR: perl is not necessary (not a blocker). No need to pass OPTIMIZE for a noarch package (not a blocker). Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * source files match upstream: ef35f988b32be4af3b3ccee131ece87f Math-Round-0.05.tar.gz * latest version is being packaged. O BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Math::Round) = 0.05 perl-Math-Round = 0.05-0.fc6 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Exporter) perl(POSIX) perl(strict) perl(vars) * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass: nhimult..........ok 11 All tests successful. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 20:21:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 16:21:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197304] Review Request: perl-WWW-Myspace In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607032021.k63KLXZo004035@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-WWW-Myspace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197304 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 20:21:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 16:21:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197304] Review Request: perl-WWW-Myspace In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607032021.k63KLj3H004061@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-WWW-Myspace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197304 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 20:26:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 16:26:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197459] Review Request: perl-Object-InsideOut In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607032026.k63KQFNN004204@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Object-InsideOut https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197459 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 20:34:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 16:34:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197459] Review Request: perl-Object-InsideOut In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607032034.k63KYdeN004514@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Object-InsideOut https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197459 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-03 16:26 EST ------- Your URL points to Class-InsideOut, not Object-InsideOut. perl(attributes) and perl(overload) are part of base Perl. Generally I won't see a BR: for a module that is part of base Perl as a blocker, but these are pragmas. What's next, perl(strict) and perl(warnings)? Is there really a reason for you to include these? Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * source files match upstream: cde46297b346e329996b0cd40e9b81df Object-InsideOut-1.45.tar.gz * latest version is being packaged. X BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Object::InsideOut) = 1.45 perl(Object::InsideOut::Exception) = 1.45 perl(Object::InsideOut::Results) = 1.45 perl(Object::InsideOut::Util) = 1.45 perl-Object-InsideOut = 1.45-0.fc6 = perl >= 0:5.006 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(B) perl(Exception::Class) perl(Object::InsideOut) >= 1.45 perl(Object::InsideOut::Exception) >= 1.45 perl(Object::InsideOut::Util) >= 1.45 perl(Scalar::Util) >= 1.10 perl(strict) perl(warnings) * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=32, Tests=541, 2 wallclock secs ( 1.98 cusr + 0.54 csys = 2.52 CPU) * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 20:34:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 16:34:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197446] Review Request: fuse-convmvfs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607032034.k63KYtNo004539@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-convmvfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197446 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 20:42:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 16:42:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197484] Review Request: perl-Class-MakeMethods In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607032042.k63KgdSH005220@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-MakeMethods https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197484 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-03 16:34 EST ------- Jochen, are you reviewing this? You should block FE-REVIEW instead of FE-NEW is you are. Note that BR: perl is in the optional list; generally we don't see it as a blocker. I can't tell if you're inticating that it's a blocker or not. Also note that it is quite rare for a Perl module to include the verbatim license text, and it not a blocker to fail to include the license text in the package when the upstream tarball does not include it. Just some friendly comments. Thanks for helping out with the reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 20:54:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 16:54:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190156] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607032054.k63KsMM3006035@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190156 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-07-03 16:45 EST ------- Approved version 1.4.0-3 push to CVS. Waiting for PHP guidelines before running the build and adding the last suggestion (Comment #5 and #6). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 21:01:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 17:01:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190007] Review Request: php-pecl-zip In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607032101.k63L1sQV006352@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-zip Alias: php-pecl-zip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190007 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-07-03 16:53 EST ------- Approved version 1.4.1-1 push to CVS. Waiting for PHP guidelines being approved before building it and adding the suggestion (Comment #5 and #10) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 21:05:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 17:05:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192606] Review Request: yafc: yet another ftp client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607032105.k63L5CvD006508@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yafc: yet another ftp client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192606 ------- Additional Comments From lists at forevermore.net 2006-07-03 16:56 EST ------- I've fixed most of the concerns (haven't posted yet since I want to address the other concerns, first). I don't know what you mean about the fix for kerberos. I think you meant to type "static keywords" but don't know which ones you're talking about. I don't know much about compiling things, so I'm having a hard time figuring out what you mean. I'm also asking upstream, in hope that they can just fix the problem so I don't need to maintain a patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 21:13:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 17:13:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185423] Review Request: php-pear-PEAR-Command-Packaging: make-rpm-spec command for PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607032113.k63LDpe5006840@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PEAR-Command-Packaging: make-rpm-spec command for PEAR Alias: php-pear-PCP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185423 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2006-07-03 17:05 EST ------- Updated packages to conform with the standards currently being proposed on fedora-packaging: http://www.timj.co.uk/linux/specs/php-pear-PEAR-Command-Packaging.spec http://www.timj.co.uk/linux/srpms/php-pear-PEAR-Command-Packaging-0.1.2-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 22:54:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 18:54:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197542] New: Review Request: perl-Package-Constants Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197542 Summary: Review Request: perl-Package-Constants Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Package-Constants/perl-Package-Constants.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Package-Constants-0.01-1.src.rpm Description: Package::Constants lists all the constants defined in a certain package. This can be useful for, among others, setting up an autogenerated @EXPORT/@EXPORT_OK for a Constants.pm file. This is a new dependency for the version of CPANPLUS in devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 23:11:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 19:11:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197545] New: Review Request: perl-File-ReadBackwards Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197545 Summary: Review Request: perl-File-ReadBackwards Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-File-ReadBackwards/perl-File-ReadBackwards.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-File-ReadBackwards-1.04-1.src.rpm Description: This module reads a file backwards line by line. It is simple to use, memory efficient and fast. It supports both an object and a tied handle interface. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 23:14:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 19:14:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197545] Review Request: perl-File-ReadBackwards In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607032314.k63NEBNp012387@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-ReadBackwards https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197545 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |193080 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 23:25:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 19:25:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194355] Review Request: imlib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607032325.k63NPCkB012773@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: imlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194355 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE OtherBugsDependingO|163779, 195652 |133779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-03 19:16 EST ------- Awesome! Thank you Kevin. On the buildsys now... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 23:37:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 19:37:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197476] Review Request: python-cvstoys In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607032337.k63Nb7Of013261@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-cvstoys https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197476 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-03 19:28 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~michael/python-cvstoys.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~michael/python-cvstoys-1.0.10-2.src.rpm There is no license file provided, upstream has been contacted. As for the rpmlint errors, I check other python packages and they were the same. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 3 23:55:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 19:55:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197298] Review Request: perl-Locale-SubCountry In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607032355.k63NtjBC014530@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Locale-SubCountry https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197298 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-03 19:47 EST ------- Additional buildrequires added. Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Locale-SubCountry.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Locale-SubCountry-1.37-0.1.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 4 00:00:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 20:00:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197302] Review Request: perl-Math-Round In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607040000.k6400W1b014672@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-Round https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197302 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-03 19:51 EST ------- Imported to cvs and built for devel (job 12000!); will build for FC-4,5 after branching takes place. Thanks! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 4 00:00:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 20:00:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197304] Review Request: perl-WWW-Myspace In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607040000.k6400htN014692@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-WWW-Myspace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197304 Bug 197304 depends on bug 197302, which changed state. Bug 197302 Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-Round https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197302 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 4 00:10:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 20:10:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197459] Review Request: perl-Object-InsideOut In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607040010.k640AaE0014985@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Object-InsideOut https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197459 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-03 20:02 EST ------- Pragma point well taken -- buildrequires removed. URL corrected. Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Object-InsideOut.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Object-InsideOut-1.45-0.1.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 4 00:13:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 20:13:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197552] New: Review Request: perl-Set-Infinite Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197552 Summary: Review Request: perl-Set-Infinite Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Set-Infinite/perl-Set-Infinite.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Set-Infinite-0.61-1.src.rpm Description: Set::Infinite is a Set Theory module for infinite sets. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 4 00:34:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 20:34:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 179758] Review Request: Eiciel (ACL editor) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607040034.k640YRKw015602@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Eiciel (ACL editor) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179758 fedora at adslpipe.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From fedora at adslpipe.co.uk 2006-07-03 20:26 EST ------- I've updated the package to 0.9.2 and taken on board remaining comments received so far, I've uploaded the SRPM and FC5 i386 RPMs to http://adslpipe.co.uk/fedora/extras/eiciel/eiciel-0.9.2-3.src.rpm http://adslpipe.co.uk/fedora/extras/eiciel/eiciel-0.9.2-3.i386.fc5.rpm http://adslpipe.co.uk/fedora/extras/eiciel/eiciel-debuginfo-0.9.2-3.i386.fc5.rpm I will build RPMs for FC5 x86_64 and FC6T1 i386 tomorrow -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 4 01:10:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 21:10:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 179758] Review Request: Eiciel (ACL editor) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607040110.k641AYxE017491@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Eiciel (ACL editor) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179758 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at adslpipe.co.uk 2006-07-03 21:02 EST ------- It took an extra version bump to build it for x86_64 0.9.2-4 SRPM and i386/x86_64 RPMs available at http://adslpipe.co.uk/fedora/extras/eiciel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 4 04:12:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 00:12:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197559] New: scim-standard: Make SCIM conform to Input Method specification of Chinese Linux Standard. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197559 Summary: scim-standard: Make SCIM conform to Input Method specification of Chinese Linux Standard. Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: qwang at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=162943&package_id=184064&release_id=429472 SRPM URL: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=162943&package_id=184064&release_id=429472 Description: This is an adapter to make SCIM conform to Input Method specification of Chinese Linux Standard. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 4 05:12:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 01:12:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187843] Review Request: phpMyAdmin - Web based MySQL browser written in php In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607040512.k645CBtI032576@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpMyAdmin - Web based MySQL browser written in php https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187843 ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2006-07-04 01:03 EST ------- Ok, I think most of these are added. Changelog - New upstream version - Added httpd/conf.d/phpMyAdmin.conf restrictions - Upstream now uses http authentication by default - Added versions to requires We don't need FollowSymLinks because php's actually following the links, not apache. I'm still pondering whether or not to restrict the mysql user. I have a feeling I'll get bug reports about it. I don't necessarily think its a bad idea. SPEC: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/phpMyAdmin/phpMyAdmin.spec SRPM: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/phpMyAdmin/phpMyAdmin-2.8.2-1.src.rpm 62905d19638d6b62140e0544028df886 phpMyAdmin.spec 1629d2755b688f0a3f64b0bf6f3b2bb3 phpMyAdmin-2.8.2-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 4 06:07:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 02:07:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197198] Review Request: ntop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607040607.k6467vwf002231@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197198 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-04 01:59 EST ------- I really don't get what your concern is.... He sells nProbe? So?? Some info I found for Harald Welte, who runs gpl-violations.org [?] Re: GPL?!? by Harald Welte - May 19th 2005 03:56:50 > I don't understand how this is GPL? Can > anyone explain? Of course it is GPL. You get the program licensed under GPL if you pay 99 EUR. You then have the right to redistribute it modified or unmodified as often and as long you please. So as soon as one buyer puts it's on his homepage, you will be able to download it for free. -- So can we please drop this rubbish about nProbe when this is a ntop review????? If you have any further concerns on the licensing of nProbe email Luca! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 4 06:20:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 02:20:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197476] Review Request: python-cvstoys In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607040620.k646KOdR002546@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-cvstoys https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197476 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-04 02:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > As for the rpmlint errors, I check other python packages and they were the same. However, they should be fixable by editing out the shellbangs from the files concerned, which would shut rpmlint up and make everyone happy :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 4 06:21:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 02:21:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197198] Review Request: ntop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607040621.k646LtJ6002615@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197198 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-04 02:13 EST ------- Michael, can we get back to business? If you're really interested in ntop, you better start working on fixing this broken src.rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 4 06:45:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 02:45:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197476] Review Request: python-cvstoys In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607040645.k646jHg4003695@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-cvstoys https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197476 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-04 02:36 EST ------- is that the correct way to fix it? this certainly isn't happening with existing python-* packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 4 07:24:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 03:24:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197565] New: Review Request: buildbot Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197565 Summary: Review Request: buildbot Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: michael at knox.net.nz QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~michael/buildbot.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~michael/buildbot-0.7.3-1.src.rpm Description: The BuildBot is a system to automate the compile/test cycle required by most software projects to validate code changes. By automatically rebuilding and testing the tree each time something has changed, build problems are pinpointed quickly, before other developers are inconvenienced by the failure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 4 07:46:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 03:46:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197476] Review Request: python-cvstoys In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607040746.k647kSct007770@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-cvstoys https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197476 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-04 03:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > is that the correct way to fix it? Yes. The shellbangs are put there by the upstream developers so that they can run individual parts of the package on their own for debugging. Given that the files are not installed with exec permissions, this isn't something that an end user is going to be needing to do. > this certainly isn't happening with existing > python-* packages. Perhaps many reviewers are happy to let them go because it's not an important issue (true in itself), or because they don't know how to fix it, or because they think the fix clutters the spec file and is therefore worse than the problem itself? My view is that it's best to shut rpmlint up as much as is reasonably possible (some things just can't be fixed because the package wouldn't work if they were), so that rpmlint generates as little output as possible. The benefit of this is that any new issues that crop up with package version or rpmlint changes are less likely to be lost amongst a barrage of unimportant issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 4 07:54:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 03:54:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197476] Review Request: python-cvstoys In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607040754.k647su5Q008594@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-cvstoys https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197476 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-04 03:46 EST ------- OK, I will patch it up shortly. Only asked cuz I didn't know and its not been covered in the python packaging guidelines :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 4 08:49:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 04:49:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191005] Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607040849.k648nlfS012889@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191005 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-04 04:41 EST ------- Good to hear you've got some decent hosting now and to see you active in bugzilla again. I'll do a full review of glob2 now. But please understand that having just one good package isn't enough to get you sponsored. In order to get you sponsored you must show a thorough understanding of the packaging guidelines. There are 2 ways to show this understanding: 1) Do some reviews of other peoples packages, you can use the review below as a template. Please put a comment above the review that it is not an official review as you're not yet a Fedora Extras contributer. For the review guidelines see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines 2) Have a couple (I usually require 3) packages submitted which have been reviewed and are approvable (They cannot be actually approved untill you're sponsored). Your SRPM btw seems to be corrupt, luckily I managed to extract the patch you use from it, so I can still do a review. MUST: ===== O rpmlint output is: E: glob2 description-line-too-long Globulation 2 is a realtime strategy game with a different approach on micromanagement. E: glob2 description-line-too-long Globulation 2 is a realtime strategy game with a different approach on micromanagement. W: glob2 no-version-in-last-changelog W: glob2-debuginfo no-version-in-last-changelog E: glob2-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/glob2-0.8.19/src/MultiplayersOfferScreen.cpp E: glob2-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/glob2-0.8.19/src/MultiplayersOfferScreen.h E: glob2-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/glob2-0.8.19/src/MultiplayersCrossConnectable.cpp E: glob2-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/glob2-0.8.19/src/MultiplayersChooseMapScreen.h E: glob2-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/glob2-0.8.19/src/MainMenuScreen.cpp E: glob2-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/glob2-0.8.19/src/MultiplayersCrossConnectable.h E: glob2-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/glob2-0.8.19/src/MultiplayersChooseMapScreen.cpp E: glob2-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/glob2-0.8.19/src/MainMenuScreen.h These must all be fixed. * Package and spec file named appropriately * Packaged according to packaging guidelines * License (GPL) ok, license file included * spec file is legible and in Am. English. O Could not verify that Sources matches upstream because of corrupt SRPM * Compiles and builds on FC5-i386 * BR: ok (see below) * No locales * No shared libraries * Not relocatable * Package does not owns / or requires all dirs (see Must fix below) * No duplicate files & Permissions ok * %clean & macro usage OK * Contains code only * %doc does not affect runtime, and isn't large enough to warrent a sub package * no -devel package needed, no libs / .la files. * .desktop file as required and properly installed MUST fix: ========= * All rpmlint messages. Hint, to fix these: E: glob2-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/glob2-0.8.19/src/xx do "chmod -x src/*" in %prep * Completly drop the bogus (already commented) Requires: SDL * Drop unnescesarry automake14 BR, you do not call autoXXX from the specs so this isn't needed. Also using old versions of libs/tools in new packages is highly discouraged. I now you explicitly added this for mock, mock used to have automake installed by default and you probably needed to add automake14 because the package breaks with automake15. With neither installed it should build fine though as you don't call autoXXX from the spec file. * Split the BuildRequires line over multiple lines (you can repeat the BuildRequires: on a next line and add more BR's there). * Remove INSTALL from %doc, since the users use an rpm to have no need for install instructions. * unowned dir %{_datadir}/%{name} you can fix this by replacing all the %{_datadir}/%{name}/xxxx entries under %files with just one entry containging: %{_datadir}/%{name} * Under %files I see %{_datadir}/pixmaps/glob2-icon-xxx.png, that is not according to the freedesktop.org icon standard, it should go under: %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps Where 32x32 is the size of the icon, please do ls /usr/share/icons/hicolor/ to see the available valid sizes, if the icon doesn't match any pick the closest. Also under these dirs it should be named just glob2.png not glob2-icon-size.png. The fact that its an icon and its size our made clear by the dir its under. * Once the icons are in the proper case you must add %post(un) script to update the icon-cache see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ScriptletSnippets#head-fc74f078205565f961f6d836b77c3428619c689d * Don't forget to fix the .desktop file to contain just: Icon=glob2.png instead of Icon=glob2-icon-48x48.png Should fix: =========== *Redundant BR: SDL_ttf-devel already requires SDL-devel, please remove SDL-devel from the BR-s -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 4 09:26:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 05:26:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197476] Review Request: python-cvstoys In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607040926.k649QMBB014820@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-cvstoys https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197476 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-04 05:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > OK, I will patch it up shortly. Only asked cuz I didn't know and its not been > covered in the python packaging guidelines :) It's not a python-specific thing; it happens quite often with perl modules too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 4 10:03:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 06:03:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197198] Review Request: ntop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607041003.k64A3p0e016539@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197198 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-04 05:55 EST ------- updates Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~michael/ntop.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~michael/ntop-3.2-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 4 10:41:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 06:41:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195666] Review Request: mod_fcgid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607041041.k64AfZHo018130@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_fcgid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195666 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-04 06:33 EST ------- Package updated to -10: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/mod_fcgid/ I updated the SELinux policy module to allow httpd to read httpd_fastcgi_content_t content without having to set the httpd_builtin_scripting boolean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 4 11:59:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 07:59:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188462] Review Request: bmp-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for BMP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607041159.k64BxCQB022372@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bmp-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for BMP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188462 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2006-07-04 07:50 EST ------- Closing as WONTFIX since the author doesn't seem to have time or motivation to fix the plugin, and the newer bmpx is gstreamer-based now anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 4 11:59:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 07:59:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188462] Review Request: bmp-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for BMP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607041159.k64Bxj1k022427@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bmp-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for BMP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188462 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 4 13:07:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 09:07:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192432] Review Request: compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607041307.k64D7Pnx025811@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192432 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2006-07-04 08:58 EST ------- Note: this package accidentally for assigned to me. That's wrong, I'm not interested in it and won't do a review. This bug should be treated as it was in a NEW state (it still blocks FE_NEW so most people will know that nobody is reviewing this yet). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 4 13:07:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 09:07:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192438] Review Request: fedora-xgl-settings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607041307.k64D7L4m025806@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-xgl-settings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192438 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2006-07-04 08:58 EST ------- Note: this package accidentally for assigned to me. That's wrong, I'm not interested in it and won't do a review. This bug should be treated as it was in a NEW state (it still blocks FE_NEW so most people will know that nobody is reviewing this yet). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 4 13:58:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 09:58:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195666] Review Request: mod_fcgid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607041358.k64Dwr2U028121@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_fcgid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195666 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-04 09:50 EST ------- A new upstream version (1.10) has been released. I have also updated the SELinux policy to allow httpd_fastcgi_script_t to read /etc/resolv.conf without having the httpd_can_network_connect boolean set. Packages (1.10-1) available in usual place: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/mod_fcgid/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 4 14:19:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 10:19:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191017] Review Request: eclipse-subclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607041419.k64EJwRA028759@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-subclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191017 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2006-07-04 10:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > (In reply to comment #17) > > BUILD FAILED > > Buildfile: > > /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.pde.build_3.1.2/scripts/build.xml does > > not exist > > This is 'cause we updated to 3.2.0 in rawhide. I forget if we kept the > versionless pde.build symlink in there -- I think we did -- but I can provide a > patch tomorrow. Patch: http://www.overholt.ca/eclipse/eclipse-subclipse.spec.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 4 15:21:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 11:21:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197608] New: Review Request: BuildBot - build/test cycle automation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197608 Summary: Review Request: BuildBot - build/test cycle automation Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: giallu at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://giallu.interfree.it/fedora/buildbot.spec SRPM URL: http://giallu.interfree.it/fedora/buildbot-0.7.3-1.src.rpm Description: BuildBot is a system to automate the compile/test cycle required by most software projects to validate code changes. By automatically rebuilding and testing the tree each time something has changed, build problems are pinpointed quickly, before other developers are inconvenienced by the failure. The guilty developer can be identified and harassed without human intervention. By running the builds on a variety of platforms, developers who do not have the facilities to test their changes everywhere before checkin will at least know shortly afterwards whether they have broken the build or not. Warning counts, lint checks, image size, compile time, and other build parameters can be tracked over time, are more visible, and are therefore easier to improve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 4 15:30:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 11:30:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197609] New: Review Request: poster Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197609 Summary: Review Request: poster Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: redhat at flyn.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/poster.spec SRPM URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/poster-20060221-1.src.rpm Description: Poster scales PostScript images to a larger size, and prints them on larger media and/or tiles them to print on multiple sheets. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 4 15:47:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 11:47:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197608] Review Request: BuildBot - build/test cycle automation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607041547.k64FlgPC032608@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: BuildBot - build/test cycle automation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197608 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-07-04 11:39 EST ------- See bug 197565, one of these should be closed as a dupe. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 4 15:47:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 11:47:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197565] Review Request: buildbot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607041547.k64FlpkS032626@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: buildbot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197565 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: buildbot |Review Request: buildbot ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-07-04 11:39 EST ------- See bug 197608, one of these should be closed as a dupe. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 4 17:42:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 13:42:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197489] Review Request: ming - SWF output library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607041742.k64HgrnK003918@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ming - SWF output library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197489 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-07-04 13:34 EST ------- Bad: - You should not include perl in the BuildRequires. - Don't add zlib-devel in the BuildRequires, becouse is deps on libpng-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 4 17:45:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 13:45:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197488] Review Request: uread - Utilities for unformatted fortran files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607041745.k64Hjwe1003970@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uread - Utilities for unformatted fortran files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197488 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-07-04 13:37 EST ------- OK. Then please post a fixed SRPM, so I can continue the review process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 4 17:46:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 13:46:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190343] Review Request: VDR - Video Disk Recorder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607041746.k64HkCxd003984@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDR - Video Disk Recorder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190343 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-07-04 13:37 EST ------- http://cachalot.mine.nu/5/SRPMS/vdr-1.4.1-4.src.rpm * Sat Jul 1 2006 Ville Skytt? - 1.4.1-4 - Update liemikuutio patch to 1.7. - Conditionally build the skincurses and sky plugins; disabled by default, rebuild with "--with plugins" to enable. - Make symlinks relative. * Fri Jun 23 2006 Ville Skytt? - 1.4.1-3 - Move headers to %%{_includedir}. - Add README.package to docs, describing some aspects of the package (#1063). - Add LIBDIR to Make.config to ease local plugin builds (#1063). - Update VDR_PLUGIN_ORDER in sysconfig snippet, loading potential output plugins before others. See commentary in the file for details. - Add example how to affect OSD time/date formats to sysconfig snippet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 4 17:52:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 13:52:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197484] Review Request: perl-Class-MakeMethods In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607041752.k64HqRAd004113@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-MakeMethods https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197484 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-07-04 13:44 EST ------- @Jason, Thank you for your clarification. @Christ, After the clarification from Jason, I will be able to APPROVE you package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 4 18:47:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 14:47:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197609] Review Request: poster In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607041847.k64IlVVh007547@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poster https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197609 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |Jochen at herr-schmitt.de OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-07-04 14:38 EST ------- Good: + Source match with upstream. + Local Build works fine. + Mock Build works fine. + rpmlint on source rpm quite. + rpmlint on binary rpm quite. Bad: - Could not display the poster man page, I thing the man page should have the name poster.1.gz instead of poster.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 4 19:44:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 15:44:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197488] Review Request: uread - Utilities for unformatted fortran files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607041944.k64JiKw8009847@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uread - Utilities for unformatted fortran files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197488 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-04 15:35 EST ------- Urm. Fixed how? What do you propose for the source tarball name, the release and the version? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 4 20:10:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 16:10:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197489] Review Request: ming - SWF output library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607042010.k64KAUI8010642@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ming - SWF output library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197489 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-04 16:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Bad: > - You should not include perl in the BuildRequires. > - Don't add zlib-devel in the BuildRequires, becouse is deps on libpng-devel. Ok, if you really want to. Fixed in: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/ming-0.4.0-0.2.2006_04_20.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 4 20:33:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 16:33:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197542] Review Request: perl-Package-Constants In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607042033.k64KXqAK011339@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Package-Constants https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197542 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |Jochen at herr-schmitt.de OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-07-04 16:25 EST ------- Good: + Source match to upstream + Local build work fine. + rpmlint quite for source rpm + rpmlint quite for binary rpm. + Mock build work fine. ** APPROVED ** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 4 21:17:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 17:17:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189092] Review Request: boo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607042117.k64LHsfn012951@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189092 david at lovesunix.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |david at lovesunix.net BugsThisDependsOn| |193957 ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2006-07-04 17:09 EST ------- This needs NAnt to build, NAnt is marked for review here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193957 or this happens duing build: + nant -D:install.prefix=/usr -D:install.libdir=/usr/lib /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.63861: line 23: nant: command not found error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.63861 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.63861 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 4 21:18:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 17:18:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193957] Review Request: nant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607042118.k64LIJsB012985@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193957 david at lovesunix.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |189092 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 4 21:21:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 17:21:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178901] Review Request: gtksourceview-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607042121.k64LLvPQ013084@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtksourceview-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178901 ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2006-07-04 17:13 EST ------- For this to compile on a machine that has /usr/lib64 set as _libdir you need to add: %define _libdir %{_exec_prefix}/lib -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 4 21:37:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 17:37:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178901] Review Request: gtksourceview-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607042137.k64LbDK0013381@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtksourceview-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178901 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-04 17:28 EST ------- I know. The problem is that things now need to comply with the mono packaging guidelines which I'm having all hells job with trying to get things to work on all platforms with. If you're after the actual packages, http://www.all-the-johnsons.co.uk/mono/rpms.html have the lot as binaries and I know they're fairly happy as well! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 4 21:51:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 17:51:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196629] Review Request: perl-SVK - A Distributed Version Control System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607042151.k64LpOBm014315@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SVK - A Distributed Version Control System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196629 ------- Additional Comments From ianburrell at gmail.com 2006-07-04 17:42 EST ------- I uploaded a new spec with the fixed Source URL. I just built perl-Algorithm-Annotate for devel. I had accidentally only built it for FC-4 and FC-5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 4 23:48:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 19:48:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192432] Review Request: compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607042348.k64NmXVx017680@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192432 krh at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |krh at redhat.com BugsThisDependsOn|193807 | ------- Additional Comments From krh at redhat.com 2006-07-04 19:39 EST ------- Reassigning to myself, dropping libsvg-cairo dependency bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 4 23:49:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 19:49:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193807] Review Request: libsvg-cairo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607042349.k64Nn7rg017748@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsvg-cairo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193807 krh at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|192432 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 02:43:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 22:43:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195942] Review Request: Veusz - a scientific plotting package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607050243.k652hlst024017@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Veusz - a scientific plotting package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195942 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-07-04 22:35 EST ------- I'm building on x86_64. On this architecture %{python_sitelib} evaluates to /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages while %{python_sitearch} is /usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages. The build log shows the icon copy doing things like "copying windows/icons/stock-new.png -> /var/tmp/veusz-0.10-6.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/veusz/windows/icons" And: in you mv command in the spec you use %{python_sitelib}. Change to %{python_sitearch}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 04:12:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 00:12:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192311] Review Request: cobbler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607050412.k654CRan029518@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cobbler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192311 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-07-05 00:04 EST ------- Now that we have some changes please increment the release every time you make some changes. It allows for tracking of stuff via %changelog and ensures we all have the latest version. Different packages circulating with the same version and release is bad. Don't bother with defining your own macros for name, version, and release, rpm does that. Typically the URL points at an informational page. Does one exist? Is your packages the only release? Seems INSTALLED_FILES doesn't list directories, so don't use that. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python (this page has some other hints for python packaging as well) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 06:45:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 02:45:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197189] Review Request: fonts-sinhala In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607050645.k656jAaK001922@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fonts-sinhala https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197189 llch at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jkeating at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From llch at redhat.com 2006-07-05 02:36 EST ------- Jesse, please review and would be great to add the component. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 06:47:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 02:47:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197608] Review Request: BuildBot - build/test cycle automation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607050647.k656lhki002141@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: BuildBot - build/test cycle automation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197608 ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2006-07-05 02:39 EST ------- Great, submitted 8 hours before mine... I guess we can close this one so I can took the chance to review Michael's one. thanks a lot for pointing that out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 07:13:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 03:13:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194320] Review Request: im-chooser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607050713.k657Dl2N003256@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: im-chooser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194320 llch at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|WONTFIX | ------- Additional Comments From llch at redhat.com 2006-07-05 03:05 EST ------- Hi Bill, let me try to justify this before creating a request solely to RHEL release. There are user preferences where user would like to install language packs in anaconda for reading web pages, but not input the native scripts. Especially for now even en_US users will load SCIM if they have installed SCIM packages. There should be a quick way for user in GUI to disable/enable IM temporary - having the user to disable SCIM by uninstalling them by rpm command is probably low in usability. We consider this tool just like an config tool for user to config their keyboard (enable/disable their native key maps), or enabling/disabling samba service. All those actions do not require uninstalling the packages should they want to disable the function, instead we have a good user interface for them to disable temporary. In this sense, we should have similar GUI tool for Input Method. In the long term wise, we want to standardize this IM configuration and merged it into Keyboard properties. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 07:36:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 03:36:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197641] New: Review Request: ode - High performance library for simulating rigid body dynamics Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197641 Summary: Review Request: ode - High performance library for simulating rigid body dynamics Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ode.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ode-0.6-2.src.rpm Description: ODE is an open source, high performance library for simulating rigid body dynamics. It is fully featured, stable, mature and platform independent with an easy to use C/C++ API. It has advanced joint types and integrated collision detection with friction. ODE is useful for simulating vehicles, objects in virtual reality environments and virtual creatures. It is currently used in many computer games, 3D authoring tools and simulation tools. rpmlint output: W: ode-devel no-documentation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 07:40:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 03:40:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197641] Review Request: ode - High performance library for simulating rigid body dynamics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607050740.k657eIWN005853@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ode - High performance library for simulating rigid body dynamics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197641 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hugo at devin.com.br ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-05 03:31 EST ------- Hugo, I've submitted this for review as I'll be the primary maintainer as discussed per mail. Can you review this? Others, Notice that ode contains and will use a private copy of the Opcode collision detect library. This has been "discussed" on f-e-l, that is I posted my intention to package ode with this private copy an rational for it and nobody objected (actually no body replied). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 07:47:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 03:47:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197476] Review Request: python-cvstoys In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607050747.k657lIhD006544@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-cvstoys https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197476 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-05 03:38 EST ------- OK, patched... rpmlint is rather quiet now :-) Updates: Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~michael/python-cvstoys.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~michael/python-cvstoys-1.0.10-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 09:15:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 05:15:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197565] Review Request: buildbot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607050915.k659Ffuf013210@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: buildbot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197565 ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2006-07-05 05:07 EST ------- A quick review for your package, based on differences from what I used in mine. 1. Group is valid, but I preferred Development/Build Tools 2. Source0: can't find it right now, but I read somewhere the download location from sourceforge pacakges should be set to http://download.sourceforge.net/ and not on of the mirrors 3. the require on python-abi seems to be redundant on FC4 onwards. If you are _not_ going to build this also for FC3, you can safely remove the Req and the second line on the spec. 4. I used Requires: python-twisted >= 1.3.0 (from the buildbot web site); it's probably safe to omit that unless some repo has an older version. 5. Requires: python-cvstoys is not _really_ required. I know we lack a "Enhances" tag, so that's your choice. I am generally against pushing in packages if not strictly necessary. 6. I think it's better to run %{__pyhton} instead of hardcoding python 7. if you feel comfortable with maintaining the full list of files, leave it that way. Otherwise, the I found the solution drafted at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python being quite smart None of this points seems to be blockers, but I hope you can consider them carefully. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 10:07:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 06:07:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197649] New: Review Request: gnustep-make - GNUstep makefile package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197649 Summary: Review Request: gnustep-make - GNUstep makefile package Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~athimm/fedorasubmit/gnustep-make/gnustep-make.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~athimm/fedorasubmit/gnustep-make/gnustep-make-1.12.0-3.at.src.rpm Description: The makefile package is a simple, powerful and extensible way to write makefiles for a GNUstep-based project. It allows the user to write a project without having to deal with the complex issues associated with configuration, building, installation, and packaging. It also allows the user to easily create cross-compiled binaries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 10:14:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 06:14:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197649] Review Request: gnustep-make - GNUstep makefile package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607051014.k65AEuTs015979@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnustep-make - GNUstep makefile package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197649 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-07-05 06:06 EST ------- Note that rpmlint will produce the following expected output: E: gnustep-make dir-or-file-in-usr-local /usr/local/lib/GNUstep E: gnustep-make non-executable-script /usr/lib/GNUstep/Library/Makefiles/executable.template 0644 E: gnustep-make non-executable-script /usr/lib/GNUstep/Library/Makefiles/java-executable.template 0644 o The /usr/local entry is where user built packages will install into. If this doesn't exist simple "make install"s can fail. o The two non-executable-script are just templates (as the name implies) they shouldn't be executables. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 10:38:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 06:38:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197189] Review Request: fonts-sinhala In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607051038.k65AcYIZ017221@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fonts-sinhala https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197189 ------- Additional Comments From paskalis at di.uoa.gr 2006-07-05 06:29 EST ------- Some comments regarding the spec file: > BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-root Please use the recommended BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) > Prereq: fontconfig This is not necessary in font packages, since they could be installed in systems without fontconfig. See a policy explanation in http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2005-May/msg00887.html Moreover, provisions are made in the spec file to check the presense of fc-cache before running it. > # %%ghost the fonts.cache-1 file > touch $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/fonts/sinhala/fonts.cache-1 > %ghost %{_datadir}/fonts/sinhala/fonts.cache-1 This is not necessary for fontconfig > 2.3.93, i.e. for FC>=5. If this package is intended for Fedora >=5 only, ghosting this file is superfluous. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 10:54:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 06:54:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191005] Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607051054.k65Asn6E018669@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191005 ------- Additional Comments From brkamikaze at gmail.com 2006-07-05 06:46 EST ------- Most things fixed. The host is already updated and I believe this time the file isn't corrupted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 11:30:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 07:30:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195666] Review Request: mod_fcgid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607051130.k65BUDiK019780@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_fcgid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195666 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-05 07:21 EST ------- I have updated the SELinux policy again to allow FastCGI apps to do DNS lookups. Packages (1.10-2) available in usual place: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/mod_fcgid/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 11:58:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 07:58:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197653] New: Review Request: x3270 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197653 Summary: Review Request: x3270 Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: karsten at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/karsten/x3270.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/karsten/x3270-3.3.4p7-2.fc6.src.rpm Description: x3270 had been added to extras before most package policies were put in place. I'd therefore like to get a review of the package. although rpmlint complains about 'x3270 obsolete-not-provided x3270-tcl', I don't think that's of any concern. We shipped x3270-tcl prior to 2002 until upstream stopped the tcl frontend. I can either delete that obsolete line or just leave it in as it does no harm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 13:45:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 09:45:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174377] Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607051345.k65DjlVQ026954@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174377 Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:gnu-smalltalk|Review Request: gnu- |- GNU Smalltalk |smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 13:47:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 09:47:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190090] Review Request: ocrad In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607051347.k65DlTia027088@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocrad https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190090 Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: ocrad -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 14:01:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 10:01:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192438] Review Request: fedora-xgl-settings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607051401.k65E1F3k028103@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-xgl-settings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192438 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2006-07-05 09:52 EST ------- Just an operability comment... I'm not sure how many others may be having trouble with these packages, but at first I couldn't get gdm to start with Xgl. The problem was that Xgl was taking too long to start and gdm was timing out. The (simple) solution was to put the following line in /etc/gdm/custom.conf after the [daemon] line: GdmXserverTimeout=60 Poking around on several Xgl and compiz lists it looks like this is a fairly common issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 14:01:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 10:01:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192436] Review Request: xorg-x11-server-Xgl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607051401.k65E1NxD028118@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-server-Xgl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192436 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2006-07-05 09:52 EST ------- Just an operability comment... I'm not sure how many others may be having trouble with these packages, but at first I couldn't get gdm to start with Xgl. The problem was that Xgl was taking too long to start and gdm was timing out. The (simple) solution was to put the following line in /etc/gdm/custom.conf after the [daemon] line: GdmXserverTimeout=60 Poking around on several Xgl and compiz lists it looks like this is a fairly common issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 14:44:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 10:44:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165899] Review Request: pam_pkcs11 : PKCS #11 PAM login module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607051444.k65Ei3af030598@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_pkcs11 : PKCS #11 PAM login module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165899 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|188267 |188268 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-05 10:35 EST ------- Accepting. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 14:48:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 10:48:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165899] Review Request: pam_pkcs11 : PKCS #11 PAM login module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607051448.k65EmojJ031041@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_pkcs11 : PKCS #11 PAM login module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165899 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO_REPORTER ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-05 10:40 EST ------- Please let me know when you build this into rawhide and I'll make the comps changes for this package set. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 14:49:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 10:49:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165899] Review Request: pam_pkcs11 : PKCS #11 PAM login module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607051449.k65Enh2M031154@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_pkcs11 : PKCS #11 PAM login module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165899 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(rrelyea at redhat.com | |) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 14:53:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 10:53:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197189] Review Request: fonts-sinhala In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607051453.k65Erup6031611@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fonts-sinhala https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197189 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |jkeating at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO| |188267 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 14:57:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 10:57:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197653] Review Request: x3270 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607051457.k65EvEtI031910@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: x3270 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197653 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jkeating at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-05 10:48 EST ------- Package looks good now. The rpmlint warning can be ignored, since this no longer provides said functionality. Removing it would be fine too. Accepting this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 15:08:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 11:08:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197487] Review Request: flasm - Flash bytecode assembler disassembler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607051508.k65F8CZ6032454@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flasm - Flash bytecode assembler disassembler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197487 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-05 10:59 EST ------- Built now, thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 15:24:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 11:24:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197688] New: Review Request: inotify-tools - Command line utilities for inotify Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197688 Summary: Review Request: inotify-tools - Command line utilities for inotify Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: gajownik at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://fedora.pl/~gajownik/inotify-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.pl/~gajownik/inotify-tools-2.1-1.src.rpm Description: inotify-tools is a set of command line utilities for the Linux inotify filesystem change notification system. This is quite simple package so review should be easy ;-) I only don't know how to fix this build warning: In file included from inotifywait.c:17: inotify-syscalls.h: In function 'inotify_init': inotify-syscalls.h:55: warning: implicit declaration of function 'syscall' inotify-syscalls.h includes sys/syscall.h and unistd.h. Have I missed something? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 15:27:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 11:27:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197189] Review Request: fonts-sinhala In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607051527.k65FRHRq001071@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fonts-sinhala https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197189 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO_REPORTER ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-05 11:18 EST ------- Other than the above comments, rpmlint has this to say: W: fonts-sinhala wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/fonts-sinhala-0.2/COPYING W: fonts-sinhala wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/fonts-sinhala-0.2/license.txt Those two files may have windows encoding or the like. Fix that and the comments above and I'll be happy to approve this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 15:36:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 11:36:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197488] Review Request: uread - Utilities for unformatted fortran files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607051536.k65Fa8x6001626@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uread - Utilities for unformatted fortran files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197488 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-07-05 11:27 EST ------- For the Source tag, you should have a full qualified URL points to the download location of the source file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 15:55:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 11:55:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197484] Review Request: perl-Class-MakeMethods In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607051555.k65FtXnn003721@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-MakeMethods https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197484 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-05 11:47 EST ------- Imported and built for devel; will build for FC-[45] after branching. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 16:00:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 12:00:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197484] Review Request: perl-Class-MakeMethods In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607051600.k65G0wIL003966@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-MakeMethods https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197484 imlinux at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |imlinux at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2006-07-05 11:52 EST ------- Is this actually Approved or still waiting for approval? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 16:02:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 12:02:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185359] Review Request: kchm - CHM file viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607051602.k65G2ame004103@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kchm - CHM file viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185359 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-05 11:53 EST ------- kchmviewer is in extras allready, kchm doesn't seems to be very active, and has trouble with accented entity characters in indices, nobody seems really interested in it, maybe it is not worth pursuing the effort to include it in fedora extras? I am not that interrested anymore to maintain it, given that kchmviewer seems superior. It seems to me that the cost of maintaining it would overcome largely the benefits. I propose to close the request. Anybody really wanting kchm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 16:08:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 12:08:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197649] Review Request: gnustep-make - GNUstep makefile package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607051608.k65G8L3J004465@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnustep-make - GNUstep makefile package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197649 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-07-05 11:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > o The /usr/local entry is where user built packages will install into. If this > doesn't exist simple "make install"s can fail. I don't have a clue about this package or gnustep, but can't this be fixed by patching things in the package so that the required dirs are always created? This sounds like something that would also cause problems with staged installs (eg. during rpmbuild of packages that use this stuff). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 16:08:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 12:08:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197484] Review Request: perl-Class-MakeMethods In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607051608.k65G8sND004483@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-MakeMethods https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197484 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-05 12:00 EST ------- Given the blocker bug was switched from FE-REVIEW to FE-ACCEPT, I understood comment #3 to be an approval. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 16:12:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 12:12:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197353] Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607051612.k65GCFAA004731@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197353 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-07-05 12:03 EST ------- Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/man-pages-fr.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/man-pages-fr-2.08.0-1.src.rpm %changelog * Wed Jul 5 2006 Alain Portal 2.08.0-1 - Update to 2.08.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 16:12:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 12:12:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195363] Review Request: esc and esc-xulrunner-devel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607051612.k65GCdRh004782@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esc and esc-xulrunner-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195363 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo? | ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2006-07-05 12:04 EST ------- Last word was there won't be a system xulrunner for fc6/rhel5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 16:18:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 12:18:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197488] Review Request: uread - Utilities for unformatted fortran files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607051618.k65GIaBM005208@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uread - Utilities for unformatted fortran files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197488 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-05 12:09 EST ------- The source tag corresponds with the tarball name. In that case the tarball on the web don't have a version associated. So to have a tarball with a version, one cannot have the real url in the source tag. In my opinion it is better to have a tarball with a version (a timestamp here) than to have the real url, given that the url is in comment near the Source tag, with an instruction to use wget to retrieve the source. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 16:25:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 12:25:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192311] Review Request: cobbler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607051625.k65GPkBD005588@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cobbler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192311 ------- Additional Comments From mdehaan at redhat.com 2006-07-05 12:17 EST ------- please increment the release every time you make some changes. -- The installed product didn't technically change. Regardless, this can be done. Don't bother with defining your own macros for name, version, and release, rpm does that. -- If I remove the version macro, 'version' will be seperately hard coded into 3 parts of the file. Having the version macro at the top of the file is most convient for editing and is very much D.R.Y. If i need to call it something other than 'version', this can be done, though I need to understand the technical reason for this. Typically the URL points at an informational page. Does one exist? -- Not *yet*. Full documentation is provided in the man pages and can be saved to file if required. Seems INSTALLED_FILES doesn't list directories, so don't use that. -- Directories will be added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 16:28:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 12:28:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197442] Review Request: fatsort - sorf fat of FAT32/FAT16 on cheap mp3 players In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607051628.k65GSXrd005656@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fatsort - sorf fat of FAT32/FAT16 on cheap mp3 players https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197442 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: fatsort |Review Request: fatsort - | |sorf fat of FAT32/FAT16 on | |cheap mp3 players ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2006-07-05 12:19 EST ------- Updated Source0 to contain a valid URL: Spec URL: http://www-users.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de/~tmaas/fedora/fatsort.spec SRPM URL: http://www-users.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de/~tmaas/fedora/repo/fatsort-0.9.6.1-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 16:29:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 12:29:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197442] Review Request: fatsort - sort fat of FAT32/FAT16 on cheap mp3 players In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607051629.k65GTFT8005705@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fatsort - sort fat of FAT32/FAT16 on cheap mp3 players https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197442 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: fatsort - |Review Request: fatsort - |sorf fat of FAT32/FAT16 on |sort fat of FAT32/FAT16 on |cheap mp3 players |cheap mp3 players -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 16:44:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 12:44:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184582] Review Request: xchm - A GUI front-end to CHMlib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607051644.k65GisAp006890@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xchm - A GUI front-end to CHMlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184582 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-05 12:36 EST ------- New version available: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/xchm-1.9-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 16:55:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 12:55:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197641] Review Request: ode - High performance library for simulating rigid body dynamics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607051655.k65GtnD7007649@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ode - High performance library for simulating rigid body dynamics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197641 hugo at devin.com.br changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |hugo at devin.com.br OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 17:12:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 13:12:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192311] Review Request: cobbler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607051712.k65HC65K008295@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cobbler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192311 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-05 13:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Don't bother with defining your own macros for name, version, and release, rpm > does that. > > -- If I remove the version macro, 'version' will be seperately hard coded into 3 > parts of the file. Having the version macro at the top of the file is most > convient for editing and is very much D.R.Y. If i need to call it something > other than 'version', this can be done, though I need to understand the > technical reason for this. If you remove the line: %define version 0.1.0 And replace: Version: %{version} with: Version: 0.1.0 then rpm will define the %{version} macro for you, which you can use in the rest of the spec file just as you are now. Defining it manually is simply redundant. Same goes for the %{name} and %{release} macros; there is no need to define them manually. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 17:14:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 13:14:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197641] Review Request: ode - High performance library for simulating rigid body dynamics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607051714.k65HErrA008366@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ode - High performance library for simulating rigid body dynamics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197641 ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-07-05 13:06 EST ------- I can't connect to people.atrpms.net, the host is unreachable (I can't ping or connect to port 80). Is it a problem only with me? (I'll try sometime later too). Once I get the SRPM I'll begin doing the review. To the others about the opcode collision detection lib, here is the thread: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-June/msg01139.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 17:22:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 13:22:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197641] Review Request: ode - High performance library for simulating rigid body dynamics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607051722.k65HMMUu008746@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ode - High performance library for simulating rigid body dynamics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197641 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-05 13:13 EST ------- You are right people.atrpms.net seems to be unreachable atm. I didn't make any significant changes, so if you want to start packaging ode using programs you can use my last version. For the review, I hope people.atrpms.net will be back up soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 17:55:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 13:55:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187294] Review Request: gwyddion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607051755.k65Htw2I010671@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwyddion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187294 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-05 13:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > The License tag is GNU GPL because the license is GNU GPL. In addition in > subpackage devel it reads `GNU GPL, parts public domain' now, because > significant parts are in public domain. In that case the licence tag should be License: GPL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 17:56:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 13:56:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191005] Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607051756.k65HuWIv010736@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191005 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-05 13:47 EST ------- The new SRPM indeeds is not corrupted like the old one. This has allowed me to verify that the source matches upstream, good. Not so good is this: mode of `src/CVS' changed to 0644 (rw-r--r--) chmod: `src/CVS': Permission denied mode of `src/MainMenuScreen.cpp' changed to 0644 (rw-r--r--) mode of `src/MainMenuScreen.h' changed to 0644 (rw-r--r--) mode of `src/MultiplayersChooseMapScreen.cpp' changed to 0644 (rw-r--r--) mode of `src/MultiplayersChooseMapScreen.h' changed to 0644 (rw-r--r--) mode of `src/MultiplayersCrossConnectable.cpp' changed to 0644 (rw-r--r--) mode of `src/MultiplayersCrossConnectable.h' changed to 0644 (rw-r--r--) mode of `src/MultiplayersOfferScreen.cpp' changed to 0644 (rw-r--r--) mode of `src/MultiplayersOfferScreen.h' changed to 0644 (rw-r--r--) error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.93697 (%prep) After which the build exits I guess you're not seeing this because you build as root? (bad idea). Anywas change the chmod from: chmod -Rc -x src/* to: chmod -x src/*.cpp src/*.h Because chmod -x on dirs is a bad idea. Other items which still need work: *some of the BR lines are still longer then 80 chars. *you can drop the requires zlib-devel as that is already required by libpng-devel I missed that the last time because the one long long line approach was kinda impossible to read *same goes for libX11-devel because its required by libXext-devel * you still have no version in your changelog, instead of this: "* Thu Jul 04 2006 Nikolai " you dhould write: "* Thu Jul 04 2006 Nikolai 0.8.19-3" * You should install all size icons into their appropriate places the whole idea behind the sized dirs is that instead of using sometimes ugly software scaling there are different handmade sizes of icons available for cases like menu, desktop icon and (large/medium/small) panel icon. * please put empty lines between your different changelog entries, so that the changleog looks like this: %changelog * Thu Jul 04 2006 Nikolai - Fixed almost all rpmlint errors; can't figure out how to get rid of the 'no-v - Fixed the desktop file and the icons to use more standard standards :-) * Tue Jun 27 2006 Nikolai - Added the automake14 to BuildRequires to help 'mocking' the package. * Sun May 7 2006 Nikolai - First created. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 18:00:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 14:00:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197189] Review Request: fonts-sinhala In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607051800.k65I0pSV011108@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fonts-sinhala https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197189 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-07-05 13:52 EST ------- Do we have a plan in place to get translations for the desktops? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 18:08:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 14:08:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194320] Review Request: im-chooser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607051808.k65I8UjH012118@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: im-chooser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194320 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-07-05 13:59 EST ------- How is it obtrusive if it's installed but not generally used - where are users going to bump into it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 18:16:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 14:16:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197461] Review Request: perl-Class-InsideOut In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607051816.k65IGSXr013114@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-InsideOut https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197461 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-05 14:08 EST ------- Is the inclusion of perl a blocker for approval? The review guidelines say: "- MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 18:35:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 14:35:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197461] Review Request: perl-Class-InsideOut In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607051835.k65IZHol015335@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-InsideOut https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197461 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-07-05 14:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Is the inclusion of perl a blocker for approval? s/of perl a/of perl in BR a/: no. On the other hand, FWIW, in this case there are various other perl(Foo::Bar) build dependencies which are unlikely to suddenly change so that the main perl package would not be pulled in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 18:52:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 14:52:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193059] Review Request: ibmasm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607051852.k65IqDq3017441@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ibmasm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193059 ------- Additional Comments From konradr at redhat.com 2006-07-05 14:43 EST ------- The packages are up on the sourceforge website. Spec URL: http://ibmasm.cvs.sourceforge.net/*checkout*/ibmasm/ibmasm/ibmasm.spec SRPM URL: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/ibmasm/ ibmasm-3.0-6.src.rpm?download What else is required to have this package be part in FC? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 18:54:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 14:54:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197649] Review Request: gnustep-make - GNUstep makefile package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607051854.k65Is4Yt017665@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnustep-make - GNUstep makefile package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197649 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-07-05 14:45 EST ------- The /usr/local/GNUstep entry is for pure user actions, e.g. no package should install anything there. It is just a parallel to the typical /usr vs /usr/local idiom, /usr belongs to packages and /usr/local is the default configure prefix in pristine upstream sources. GNUstep is a bit peculiar, there is even a network root that is mapped by default on the local root. They also refuse to adhere to the FHS (normally GNUStep wants to use /usr/GNUstep/{System,Local} instead of the above), since they were first on the planet and FHS is only for one of their many targets (Linux/Unix). :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 19:05:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 15:05:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197459] Review Request: perl-Object-InsideOut In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607051905.k65J58KO018310@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Object-InsideOut https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197459 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-05 14:56 EST ------- Looks fine now. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 19:10:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 15:10:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197716] New: Review Request: connect-proxy - SSH Proxy command helper Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197716 Summary: Review Request: connect-proxy - SSH Proxy command helper Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jwilson at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://wilsonet.com/packages/connect-proxy/connect-proxy.spec SRPM URL: http://wilsonet.com/packages/connect-proxy/connect-proxy-1.95-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: -- connect-proxy is the simple relaying command to make network connection via SOCKS and https proxy. It is mainly intended to be used as proxy command of OpenSSH. You can make SSH session beyond the firewall with this command. Features of connect-proxy are: * Supports SOCKS (version 4/4a/5) and https CONNECT method. * Supports NO-AUTH and USERPASS authentication of SOCKS * Partially supports telnet proxy (experimental). * You can input password from tty, ssh-askpass or environment variable. * Simple and general program independent from OpenSSH. * You can also relay local socket stream instead of standard I/O. -- Note that the upstream name is simply "connect", but this has been packaged for Red Hat/Fedora (by me) and Debian (by someone else before me) already as connect-proxy, so maintaining this name is in line with the package naming guidelines. I've pinged upstream to see about having a license file included, as well as the man page and Makefile I snarfed from the Debian package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 19:13:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 15:13:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197649] Review Request: gnustep-make - GNUstep makefile package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607051913.k65JD2SL018818@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnustep-make - GNUstep makefile package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197649 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-07-05 15:04 EST ------- I did not mean that any packages should be installed to /usr/local, but just that if the stuff is set up so that things are blindly installed to some dirs without creating the dirs, /usr/local/GNUstep is probably not the only case affected. Think for example "make install DESTDIR=..." (if this package provides something like that). Thus, including it as a special case in the package sounds like a dubious workaround for one specific symptom, leaving the cause untouched. Caveats in comment 2 still apply :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 19:25:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 15:25:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197298] Review Request: perl-Locale-SubCountry In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607051925.k65JPJB7019531@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Locale-SubCountry https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197298 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-05 15:16 EST ------- Looks good now; all tests pass with none skipped: All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=17, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.75 cusr + 0.06 csys = 0.81 CPU) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 20:15:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 16:15:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197641] Review Request: ode - High performance library for simulating rigid body dynamics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607052015.k65KFuL9023536@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ode - High performance library for simulating rigid body dynamics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197641 hugo at devin.com.br changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-07-05 16:07 EST ------- I've got the SRPM and now I'll do the review. MUST OK: * rpmlint returns ok for the ode package. The source does not contain documentation for development files, so rpmlint's warning about no-documentation on ode-devel should be fine. * Package is named according to Packaging Guidelines (following upstream's name too) * Spec file name matches the base package * Package meets Packaging Guidelines * Package is legal and licensed under BSD and LGPL, the license field on spec matches the source license. * License files within the source tarball are packaged as %%doc files. * Spec file is in American English and legible :) * Source package matches the upstream tarball: 7afdb1d434a1e2cc2d701fdf8d1f2fad ode-src-0.6.zip * Package builds fine * All BR listed fine, no unusued BR listed. * Package does not need locale files. * The package contains shared libraries and have ldconfig run in %%post and %%postun. * Package owns all directory it creates, does not own other packages' directories. * No duplicate files in %%files * Permission on packaged files are fine * The %%clean section on the spec file is right * Spec file uses macros consistently * No large documentation files in the package, no need for -doc subpackage. * %%doc files does not affect package runtime. * Development files are under the -devel subpackage. * No pkgconfig files. * Devel package requires the base package using a fully versioned dependency * No .la files in the packages. * No GUI application under the package. SHOULD OK: * No scriptlets use * Package build and works fine for i386 and x86_64 I don't see any blockers on this. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 20:19:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 16:19:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197459] Review Request: perl-Object-InsideOut In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607052019.k65KJ2lg023706@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Object-InsideOut https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197459 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-05 16:10 EST ------- +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +devel build succeeds +Request branching +Close bug Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 20:19:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 16:19:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197298] Review Request: perl-Locale-SubCountry In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607052019.k65KJJcE023740@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Locale-SubCountry https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197298 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-05 16:10 EST ------- +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +devel build succeeds +Request branching +Close bug Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 20:19:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 16:19:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197304] Review Request: perl-WWW-Myspace In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607052019.k65KJKKL023752@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-WWW-Myspace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197304 Bug 197304 depends on bug 197298, which changed state. Bug 197298 Summary: Review Request: perl-Locale-SubCountry https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197298 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 20:27:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 16:27:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197726] New: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Set Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197726 Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Set Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-DateTime-Set/perl-DateTime-Set.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-DateTime-Set-0.25-1.src.rpm Description: DateTime::Set is a module for datetime sets. It can be used to handle two different types of sets. The first is a fixed set of predefined datetime objects. For example, if we wanted to create a set of datetimes containing the birthdays of people in our family. The second type of set that it can handle is one based on the idea of a recurrence, such as "every Wednesday", or "noon on the 15th day of every month". This type of set can have fixed starting and ending datetimes, but neither is required. So our "every Wednesday set" could be "every Wednesday from the beginning of time until the end of time", or "every Wednesday after 2003-03-05 until the end of time", or "every Wednesday between 2003-03-05 and 2004-01-07". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 20:28:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 16:28:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197726] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Set In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607052028.k65KSRSF024289@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197726 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |197552 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 20:28:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 16:28:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197552] Review Request: perl-Set-Infinite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607052028.k65KSdaX024319@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Set-Infinite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197552 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |197726 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 20:46:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 16:46:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197732] New: Review Request: optipng - a PNG optimizer and converter - need a Sponsor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197732 Summary: Review Request: optipng - a PNG optimizer and converter - need a Sponsor Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: opensource at till.name QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www-users.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de/~tmaas/fedora/optipng.spec SRPM URL: http://www-users.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de/~tmaas/fedora/repo/optipng-0.5.3-1.src.rpm Description: OptiPNG is a PNG optimizer that recompresses image files to a smaller size, without losing any information. This program also converts external formats (BMP, GIF, PNM; TIFF support is coming up) to optimized PNG, and performs PNG integrity checks and corrections. OptiPNG uses it's own versions of libpng and zlib to work properly. The systems zlib could be used but then the efficiency of OptiPNG is less than with its own version. With libpng this is not possible at this moment and patching upstream libpng will not happen soon, because OptiPNG accesses internal functions and structures of libpng. I need a sponsor. I have submitted another package for review: fatsort. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 20:50:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 16:50:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197732] Review Request: optipng - a PNG optimizer and converter - need a Sponsor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607052050.k65Kobro026992@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: optipng - a PNG optimizer and converter - need a Sponsor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197732 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 21:11:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 17:11:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197716] Review Request: connect-proxy - SSH Proxy command helper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607052111.k65LBprx028237@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: connect-proxy - SSH Proxy command helper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197716 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |pertusus at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-05 17:03 EST ------- Needswork: * rpm compilation flags are not used * wrong buildroot Notes: * %{?_smp_mflags} is not usefull since there is nothing to parallelize * maybe it would be a good idea to have the html page packaged since it holds some documentation * since the source isn't versionned, all the source files will have the same name. A trick is to use the timestamp in the format YYYYMMDD obtained for example by using wget -N. Something along Source0: connect.c-20060402 # real source is below, renamed to connect.c-YYYYMMDD based on latest # timestamp, obtained with wget -N #Source0: http://www.taiyo.co.jp/~gotoh/ssh/connect.c -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 21:18:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 17:18:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197716] Review Request: connect-proxy - SSH Proxy command helper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607052118.k65LIJ0V028557@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: connect-proxy - SSH Proxy command helper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197716 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-05 17:09 EST ------- Alternatively you could also rename the file by appending the version number since there is a version number, maybe it would be cleaner in that case: Source0: connect.c-1.95 # Real source is #Source0: http://www.taiyo.co.jp/~gotoh/ssh/connect.c -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 21:19:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 17:19:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197734] New: Review Request: xmoto - Challenging 2D Motocross Platform Game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197734 Summary: Review Request: xmoto - Challenging 2D Motocross Platform Game Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: hugo at devin.com.br QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/fextras/SPECS/xmoto.spec SRPM URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/fextras/SRPMS/xmoto-0.1.16-1.src.rpm Description: X-Moto is a challenging 2D motocross platform game, where physics play an all important role in the gameplay. You need to control your bike to its limit, if you want to have a chance finishing the more difficult of the challenges. First you'll try just to complete the levels, while later you'll compete with yourself and others, racing against the clock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 21:21:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 17:21:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197734] Review Request: xmoto - Challenging 2D Motocross Platform Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607052121.k65LLT4E028798@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmoto - Challenging 2D Motocross Platform Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197734 hugo at devin.com.br changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |197641 ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-07-05 17:13 EST ------- This package needs ode. The ode package is the review process too. See Bug #197641. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 21:21:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 17:21:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197641] Review Request: ode - High performance library for simulating rigid body dynamics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607052121.k65LLpfi028858@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ode - High performance library for simulating rigid body dynamics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197641 hugo at devin.com.br changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |197734 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 21:32:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 17:32:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197716] Review Request: connect-proxy - SSH Proxy command helper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607052132.k65LWwJE029391@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: connect-proxy - SSH Proxy command helper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197716 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-07-05 17:24 EST ------- Blah, doing too many things at once. BuildRoot corrected, make now uses CFLAGS. Updated spec and srpm pushed. I know the smp flags are useless in this case, but the guidelines suggest this is a required field unless there is something blocking its use. It doesn't help, but it also doesn't hurt, so nothing really blocks it from being in the spec. Who knows, maybe some day the author refactors the code and they become useful. :) As for Source0... If I'm going to do anything to munge the name of the source, I just assume put it into a tarball and clean up the messy %setup line (and remove the line after it). Thoughts on that route versus just renaming the .c file? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 21:36:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 17:36:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197736] New: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197736 Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime/perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime-1.0700-1.src.rpm Description: This module implements most of strptime(3), the POSIX function that is the reverse of strftime(3), for DateTime. While strftime takes a DateTime and a pattern and returns a string, strptime takes a string and a pattern and returns the DateTime object associated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 21:39:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 17:39:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197198] Review Request: ntop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607052139.k65Ld9vk029900@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197198 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-05 17:30 EST ------- The perl substitutions are unusefull: the first one is allready done in a patch. The second operates on a file that is regenerated. I couldn't find 'user =' in the main.c file. It is in prefs.c however. I think that it should be replaced with a patch it is more robust than a substitution (it fails more easily). There is also a nobody in webInterface.c. Also maybe a comment could explain why other users are used. unix2dos may be replaced by sed -i 's/\r//' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 21:42:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 17:42:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187196] Review Request: kernel-module-rt2500 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607052142.k65LgJLx030205@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kernel-module-rt2500 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187196 ------- Additional Comments From eric.tanguy at univ-nantes.fr 2006-07-05 17:33 EST ------- No news ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 21:43:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 17:43:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197716] Review Request: connect-proxy - SSH Proxy command helper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607052143.k65Lhc2D030334@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: connect-proxy - SSH Proxy command helper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197716 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-05 17:35 EST ------- > I know the smp flags are useless in this case, but the guidelines suggest this > is a required field unless there is something blocking its use. It doesn't help, > but it also doesn't hurt, so nothing really blocks it from being in the spec. > Who knows, maybe some day the author refactors the code and they become useful. :) Ok, no problem here. > As for Source0... If I'm going to do anything to munge the name of the source, I > just assume put it into a tarball and clean up the messy %setup line (and remove > the line after it). Thoughts on that route versus just renaming the .c file? I think it is better to only rename the file since it is easier to verify that it is the right file. However if you prefer doing a tarball, do it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 21:44:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 17:44:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197739] New: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Event-Recurrence Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197739 Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Event-Recurrence Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-DateTime-Event-Recurrence/perl-DateTime-Event-Recurrence.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-DateTime-Event-Recurrence-0.16-1.src.rpm Description: This module provides convenience methods that let you easily create DateTime::Set objects for various recurrences, such as "once a month" or "every day". You can also create more complicated recurrences, such as "every Monday, Wednesday and Thursday at 10:00 AM and 2:00 PM". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 21:45:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 17:45:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197739] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Event-Recurrence In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607052145.k65LjiV7030561@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Event-Recurrence https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197739 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |197726 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 21:46:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 17:46:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197726] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Set In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607052146.k65Lk57W030597@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197726 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |197739 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 21:48:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 17:48:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197740] New: Review Request: dircproxy - IRC proxy server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197740 Summary: Review Request: dircproxy - IRC proxy server Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jwilson at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://wilsonet.com/packages/dircproxy/dircproxy.spec SRPM URL: http://wilsonet.com/packages/dircproxy/dircproxy-1.2.0-0.beta.fc6.src.rpm Description: -- dircproxy is an IRC proxy server ("bouncer") designed for people who use IRC from lots of different workstations or clients, but wish to remain connected and see what they missed while they were away. You connect to IRC through dircproxy, and it keeps you connected to the server, even after you detach your client from it. While you're detached, it logs channel and private messages as well as important events, -- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 21:50:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 17:50:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165899] Review Request: pam_pkcs11 : PKCS #11 PAM login module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607052150.k65LoEOp030969@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_pkcs11 : PKCS #11 PAM login module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165899 rrelyea at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |MODIFIED Flag|needinfo?(rrelyea at redhat.com| |) | ------- Additional Comments From rrelyea at redhat.com 2006-07-05 17:41 EST ------- pam_pkcs11 has now been imported. bob -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 21:54:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 17:54:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197716] Review Request: connect-proxy - SSH Proxy command helper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607052154.k65LsZ8t031437@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: connect-proxy - SSH Proxy command helper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197716 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-07-05 17:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > I think it is better to only rename the file since it is easier to > verify that it is the right file. However if you prefer doing a tarball, > do it. Nah, I'll go with renaming the source file, with a slight twist: Source0: connect-%{version}.c Build -3 pushed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 21:58:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 17:58:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197744] New: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Event-ICal Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197744 Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Event-ICal Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-DateTime-Event-ICal/perl-DateTime-Event-ICal.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-DateTime-Event-ICal-0.09-1.src.rpm Description: This module provides convenience methods that let you easily create DateTime::Set objects for rfc2445 style recurrences. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 21:59:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 17:59:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182254] Review Request: SS5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607052159.k65LxPrN031737@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SS5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182254 ------- Additional Comments From matteo.ricchetti at libero.it 2006-07-05 17:50 EST ------- Hi, I installed build system to do make, but during testing I got the following error: # plague-client list (to test the build system configuration...) Error: API version mismatch. Client: 1, Server: 100 Can you help me, please? Thx Bye -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 22:01:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 18:01:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197744] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Event-ICal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607052201.k65M1F68031835@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Event-ICal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197744 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |197739 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 22:01:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 18:01:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197739] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Event-Recurrence In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607052201.k65M1bDJ031860@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Event-Recurrence https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197739 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |197744 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 22:03:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 18:03:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197304] Review Request: perl-WWW-Myspace In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607052203.k65M3GZp031944@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-WWW-Myspace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197304 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-05 17:54 EST ------- I added perl-Locale-SubCountry to my local repo to test this. It looks like RPM bugs strike again; there are no manual dependencies in this package (save the MODULE_COMPAT thing) but RPM somehow extracts these: perl(WWW::Myspace) perl(WWW::Myspace) >= 0.21 which will probably need to be filtered. Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * source files match upstream: 655665da1b696e4b7d30989d623356e9 WWW-Myspace-0.49.tar.gz * latest version is being packaged. O BuildRequires are proper (redundant BR: perl not a blocker) * package builds in mock (development, x86_64) with one local package. * rpmlint is silent. X final provides and requires are sane: perl(WWW::Myspace) = 0.49 perl(WWW::Myspace::Comment) = 0.15 perl(WWW::Myspace::Data) = 0.05 perl(WWW::Myspace::FriendAdder) = 0.08 perl(WWW::Myspace::FriendChanges) = 0.03 perl(WWW::Myspace::Message) = 0.13 perl(WWW::Myspace::MyBase) = 0.3 perl-WWW-Myspace = 0.49-0.fc6 = /usr/bin/perl perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(Class::DBI) perl(Class::DBI::AbstractSearch) perl(Class::DBI::Loader) perl(Config::General) perl(Contextual::Return) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(DateTime) perl(File::Spec::Functions) perl(IO::Prompt) perl(List::Compare) perl(Locale::SubCountry) perl(Math::Round) perl(Params::Validate) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(Spiffy) perl(WWW::Mechanize) X perl(WWW::Myspace) X perl(WWW::Myspace) >= 0.21 perl(WWW::Myspace::Comment) perl(WWW::Myspace::Data) perl(WWW::Myspace::FriendAdder) perl(WWW::Myspace::Message) >= 0.08 perl(WWW::Myspace::MyBase) perl(YAML) perl(strict) perl(warnings) * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present but necessarily disabled. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 22:07:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 18:07:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197545] Review Request: perl-File-ReadBackwards In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607052207.k65M7CKH032054@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-ReadBackwards https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197545 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 22:09:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 18:09:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197745] New: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-ICal Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197745 Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-ICal Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-DateTime-Format-ICal/perl-DateTime-Format-ICal.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-DateTime-Format-ICal-0.08-1.src.rpm Description: This module understands the ICal date/time and duration formats, as defined in RFC 2445. It can be used to parse these formats in order to create the appropriate objects. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 22:10:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 18:10:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197745] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-ICal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607052210.k65MAGmj032304@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-ICal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197745 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |197744 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 22:10:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 18:10:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197744] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Event-ICal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607052210.k65MAcG3032337@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Event-ICal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197744 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |197745 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 22:11:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 18:11:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197736] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607052211.k65MBPcu032388@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197736 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |193078 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 22:11:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 18:11:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197745] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-ICal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607052211.k65MBk4F032422@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-ICal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197745 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |193078 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 22:15:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 18:15:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193059] Review Request: ibmasm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607052215.k65MFLkD032597@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ibmasm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193059 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2006-07-05 18:06 EST ------- - The Release-tag misses %{?dist}, e.g. Release: 6%{?dist} - The spec file does not use %{optflags}, so nothing is compiled with the typical flags of Fedora that include some security relevant flags. You can change this, e.g. with export CFLAGS="%{optflags}" prior to the first make and patch the Makefiles to make the compiler use CFLAGS - You need to run ldconfig since you install an .so file in /lib. - The License should be installed in the docdir and included in the upstream source package if it is not. Btw. you just need to wait until an official reviewer reviews your package and a Sponsor sponsers you. They will also tell you what else you need to change, if there is anything. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 22:23:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 18:23:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197716] Review Request: connect-proxy - SSH Proxy command helper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607052223.k65MNDDc000468@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: connect-proxy - SSH Proxy command helper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197716 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-05 18:14 EST ------- The %setup may be simplified as: %setup -q -T -c cp %{SOURCE0} connect.c %patch0 -p1 One rpmlint warning, not a big deal in my opinion (though I prefer spaces, since it looks the same in every editors): W: connect-proxy mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. There are many warning durings compilation, some may be worrying. These are not blockers. Full review: * follow approximately naming guidelines, with a valid reason to deviate. * licence is GPL, not included since it is not included upstream * match upstream source b856937f1cdfca7a3ccfb2fac36ef726 ../SOURCES/connect-1.95.c * build on devel i386 * don't crash at start * remove $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in clean and install * right buildroot * %files right APPROVED I still think that having the html file located at the package URL would be a good idea. Not a blocker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 22:34:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 18:34:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197716] Review Request: connect-proxy - SSH Proxy command helper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607052234.k65MYZJH001373@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: connect-proxy - SSH Proxy command helper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197716 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 23:25:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 19:25:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197304] Review Request: perl-WWW-Myspace In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607052325.k65NP7ZY003632@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-WWW-Myspace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197304 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-05 19:16 EST ------- It's interesting to note that while rpmlint issues warnings for errant provides, it doesn't do the same for requires. Filter added. Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-WWW-Myspace.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-WWW-Myspace-0.49-0.1.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 23:28:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 19:28:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196740] Review Request: ogre - Object-Oriented Graphics Rendering Engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607052328.k65NSp8C003692@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ogre - Object-Oriented Graphics Rendering Engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196740 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |wart at kobold.org OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 23:36:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 19:36:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197753] New: Review Request: gdmap-0.7.5-1 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197753 Summary: Review Request: gdmap-0.7.5-1 Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: splinux25 at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/gdmap/gdmap.spec SRPM URL: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/gdmap/gdmap-0.7.5-1.src.rpm Description: GdMap is a tool which allows you to visualize disk space with one single picture. To display directory structures, cushion treemaps are used to visualize a complete folder or even the whole hard drive with one picture. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 23:44:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 19:44:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197754] New: Review Request: perl-Perl6-Bible Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197754 Summary: Review Request: perl-Perl6-Bible Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Perl6-Bible/perl-Perl6-Bible.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Perl6-Bible-0.30-1.src.rpm Description: This Perl module distribution contains all the latest Perl 6 documentation and a utility called p6bible for viewing it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 23:48:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 19:48:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197304] Review Request: perl-WWW-Myspace In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607052348.k65Nm3K0004976@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-WWW-Myspace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197304 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-05 19:39 EST ------- Looks good; the requires list is now: /usr/bin/perl perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(Class::DBI) perl(Class::DBI::AbstractSearch) perl(Class::DBI::Loader) perl(Config::General) perl(Contextual::Return) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(DateTime) perl(File::Spec::Functions) perl(IO::Prompt) perl(List::Compare) perl(Locale::SubCountry) perl(Math::Round) perl(Params::Validate) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(Spiffy) perl(WWW::Mechanize) perl(WWW::Myspace) >= 0.21 perl(WWW::Myspace::Comment) perl(WWW::Myspace::Data) perl(WWW::Myspace::FriendAdder) perl(WWW::Myspace::Message) >= 0.08 perl(WWW::Myspace::MyBase) perl(YAML) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 23:53:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 19:53:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197545] Review Request: perl-File-ReadBackwards In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607052353.k65NrjNN005318@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-ReadBackwards https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197545 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-05 19:45 EST ------- * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * source files match upstream: bda339c8b2e5139649cb28c4b775fb42 File-ReadBackwards-1.04.tar.gz * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(File::ReadBackwards) = 1.04 perl-File-ReadBackwards = 1.04-1.fc6 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(Fcntl) perl(Symbol) perl(strict) perl(vars) * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=173, 2 wallclock secs ( 1.19 cusr + 0.02 csys = 1.21 CPU) * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 5 23:56:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 19:56:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197552] Review Request: perl-Set-Infinite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607052356.k65NuNhj005423@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Set-Infinite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197552 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 00:19:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 20:19:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197304] Review Request: perl-WWW-Myspace In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607060019.k660JDjx006102@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-WWW-Myspace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197304 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-05 20:10 EST ------- +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +devel build succeeds +Request branching +Close bug Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 01:22:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 21:22:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196629] Review Request: perl-SVK - A Distributed Version Control System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607060122.k661MgT4008506@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SVK - A Distributed Version Control System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196629 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-05 21:14 EST ------- I still didn't see perl-Algorithm-Annotate, and when I tried to build on FC5 I was missing perl-Data-Hierarchy. I'm pretty sure my local mirror is up to date. I just added perl-Algorithm-Annotate to my local repo. Unfortunately %check is failing, which breaks the build. I'm seeing many of these errors: Undefined subroutine &Clone::clone called at t/tree.pl line 186. which terminates the test, leading to: Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t/01depotmap.t 255 65280 17 30 176.47% 3-17 t/01help.t 255 65280 86 172 200.00% 1-86 t/03import.t 255 65280 26 52 200.00% 1-26 t/04merge.t 255 65280 15 30 200.00% 1-15 t/05svm-head.t 255 65280 4 8 200.00% 1-4 t/05svm-move.t 255 65280 9 18 200.00% 1-9 t/05svm-rm.t 255 65280 6 12 200.00% 1-6 t/10switch.t 255 65280 13 26 200.00% 1-13 t/13patch.t 255 65280 36 72 200.00% 1-36 t/32list.t 255 65280 69 138 200.00% 1-69 t/35admin.t 255 65280 4 8 200.00% 1-4 t/75hook.t 255 65280 2 4 200.00% 1-2 2 tests and 6 subtests skipped. Failed 12/73 test scripts, 83.56% okay. 285/1422 subtests failed, 79.96% okay. I verified that perl-Clone is getting installed. Also, the module would like to have Locale::Maketext::Lexicon and Locale::Maketext::Simple; these are available in Extras. Is there some reason not to BR: them? (It also wants IO::Pager, but we don't have that one in Extras.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 01:33:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 21:33:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194320] Review Request: im-chooser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607060133.k661XcKJ008753@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: im-chooser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194320 ------- Additional Comments From llch at redhat.com 2006-07-05 21:24 EST ------- It will be mainly on the trayicon on the panel, and also the trigger key for toggle the input method. As those lead to more a preference of usage so it is solely providing a preference for user to enable/disable the service without uninstall the package from the command line. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 01:45:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 21:45:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194320] Review Request: im-chooser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607060145.k661jNcg009637@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: im-chooser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194320 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-07-05 21:36 EST ------- So, it's .... removing something from the autostart folder on the desktop? Something else? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 02:03:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 22:03:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194320] Review Request: im-chooser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607060203.k6623O4K010550@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: im-chooser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194320 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wtogami at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-07-05 21:54 EST ------- Note that this is comparable to how you enable IM on Windows or Mac. If you are logged into an English desktop, you find IM options in desktop preferences somewhere and enable it. Then from then on IM is visible from your systray and active within desktop applications. We definitely need something comparable to this in our base distribution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 03:03:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 23:03:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194320] Review Request: im-chooser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607060303.k6633ER8014443@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: im-chooser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194320 ------- Additional Comments From llch at redhat.com 2006-07-05 22:54 EST ------- notting: SCIM autoloads with the initial use of gtk im module, so it is to control the xinput behavior. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 03:23:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 23:23:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197716] Review Request: connect-proxy - SSH Proxy command helper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607060323.k663NSvt015745@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: connect-proxy - SSH Proxy command helper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197716 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-07-05 23:14 EST ------- Made the %setup changes, those look a lot nicer, thank you. :) Missed the spaces vs. tabs warning, didn't have the development rpmlint installed (just installed it), that's fixed too. Also added the html page as a %doc. I'll import a -4 build momentarily... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 03:43:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 23:43:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189092] Review Request: boo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607060343.k663hEL5017457@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189092 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-07-05 23:34 EST ------- Needs nant to build = needs nant as a BuildRequires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 03:52:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 23:52:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189195] Review Request: horde - php application framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607060352.k663qc2Z018498@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 ------- Additional Comments From holbrookbw at users.sourceforge.net 2006-07-05 23:44 EST ------- Spec URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/horde.spec SRPM URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/horde-3.1.2-1.1.src.rpm Horde released 3.1.2 today to fix some security holes, thought I'd go ahead and package it up before the next review cycle :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 04:12:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 00:12:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197740] Review Request: dircproxy - IRC proxy server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607060412.k664CFo8019518@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dircproxy - IRC proxy server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197740 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-06 00:03 EST ------- Not an official review as I'm not yet sponsored Mock build for development i386 is sucessfull MUST Items: - MUST: rpmlint shows no error. - MUST: dist tag is present. - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matching the base package dircproxy, in the format dircproxy.spec. - MUST: This package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license GPL. - MUST: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. md5sum is correct (bd6abe933f90d80fbc71a00563f9c7de) - MUST: This package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: This package did not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: This package have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. - MUST: This package used macros. - MUST: Document files are included like INSTALL README, RFCs, SPEC, PROTOCOL. - MUST: Package did NOT contained any .la libtool archives. * Source URL is present and working. * BuildRoot is correct BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) * BuildRequires is correct * preun and postun installing service correctly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 04:17:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 00:17:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193071] Review Request: ruby-sqlite3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607060417.k664HHnr019594@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-sqlite3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193071 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-06 00:08 EST ------- My apologies; somehow this managed to slip my mind. The first thing I notice is that the included test suite doesn't get run; it has a dependency on FlexMock which of course isn't in Extras. I don't think it should block this package, but it would definitely be nice to get FlexMock into extras so that the test suite can be turned on. The gemspec file looks like a source of useful data; I wonder if we could use it to generate a reasonable starting spec file. The site{lib,arch} thing should be resolved now. The guidelines say sitearchdir and sitelib dir; is that we really wanted to go with? There's no ruby(abi) requirement. Interestingly, BR: ruby really is required; ruby-devel only pulls in ruby-libs. Is the explicit sqlite requirement necessary? rpm finds the libsqlite3.so.0 dependency on its own. Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. ? specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. X No ruby(abi) requirement. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * source files match upstream: 56e47e1736bd50e2b71f11726ff9ecdd sqlite3-ruby-1.1.0.tar.gz * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: ruby(sqlite3) sqlite3_api.so()(64bit) ruby-sqlite3 = 1.1.0-3.fc6 = libruby.so.1.8()(64bit) libsqlite3.so.0()(64bit) sqlite >= 3 * shared libraries are present, but internal to ruby. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. O %check is present; dependencies not yet available for running test suite. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 04:26:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 00:26:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197688] Review Request: inotify-tools - Command line utilities for inotify In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607060426.k664Q3Ym019777@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inotify-tools - Command line utilities for inotify https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197688 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-06 00:17 EST ------- Not an official review as I'm not yet sponsored Mock build for development i386 is sucessfull MUST Items: - MUST: rpmlint shows no error. - MUST: dist tag is present. - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matching the base package inotify-tools, in the format inotify-tools.spec. - MUST: This package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license GPL. - MUST: This package includes License file COPYING. - MUST: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. md5sum is correct (8053f441fc3fe0f0c73cf483399da17b) - MUST: This package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: This package did not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: This package have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. - MUST: This package used macros. - MUST: Document files are included like README. - MUST: Package did NOT contained any .la libtool archives. * Source URL is present and working. * BuildRoot is correct BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) * BuildRequires is correct -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 04:34:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 00:34:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197552] Review Request: perl-Set-Infinite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607060434.k664YLwj020052@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Set-Infinite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197552 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-06 00:25 EST ------- * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * source files match upstream: c9912f4ee6ac2e2291be94a5a2bd11f2 Set-Infinite-0.61.tar.gz * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * no debuginfo package (noarch) * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Set::Infinite) = 0.61 perl(Set::Infinite::Arithmetic) perl(Set::Infinite::Basic) perl-Set-Infinite = 0.61-1.fc6 = perl >= 0:5.005_03 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(Exporter) perl(POSIX) perl(Set::Infinite::Arithmetic) perl(Time::Local) perl(base) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(vars) * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=10, Tests=442, 3 wallclock secs ( 3.29 cusr + 0.17 csys = 3.46 CPU) * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 04:35:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 00:35:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197726] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Set In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607060435.k664ZYYW020110@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197726 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 04:46:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 00:46:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197732] Review Request: optipng - a PNG optimizer and converter - need a Sponsor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607060446.k664kWQI020886@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: optipng - a PNG optimizer and converter - need a Sponsor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197732 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-06 00:37 EST ------- Correct your SRPM URL. I think it MUST be http://www-users.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de/~tmaas/fedora/repo/optipng-0.5.2-1.src.rpm Or upload that SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 05:10:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 01:10:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197753] Review Request: gdmap-0.7.5-1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607060510.k665A4j4021587@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdmap-0.7.5-1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197753 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-06 01:01 EST ------- == Not an official review as I'm not yet sponsored == * Mock build for development i386 is NOT sucessfull Error is=> checking for XML::Parser... configure: error: XML::Parser perl module is required for intltool I tried adding perl-XML-Parser in BuildRequires but still build failed. MUST Items: - MUST: rpmlint shows no error - MUST: dist tag is present - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matching the base package gdmap, in the format gdmap.spec - MUST: This package contains License file COPYING. - MUST: This package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license GPL. - MUST: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. md5sum is correct (e27f9a4c029449182ce5a4dbec38870e). - MUST: This package have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. - MUST: This package used macros. - MUST: Document files are included like INSTALL README. - MUST: Package did NOT contained any .la libtool archives. * Source URL is present and working. * BuildRoot is correct BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) * BuildRequires is correct -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 05:12:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 01:12:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197764] New: Review Request: hfsplus-tools Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197764 Summary: Review Request: hfsplus-tools Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/hfsplus-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/hfsplus-tools-332.11-0.fc5.src.rpm Description: HFS+, HFS Plus, or Mac OS Extended are names for a file system developed by Apple Computer to replace their Hierarchical File System (HFS). In addition to being the default file system on modern Apple computers, HFS+ is one of two formats, FAT being the other, that are supported by the iPod hard-disk based music player. Unlike FAT, HFS+ supports UNIX style file permissions, which makes it useful, for serving and sharing files in a secured manner. As Apple Computer's devices and systems become increasingly ubiquitous, it becomes important that Linux fully support this format. This package provides tools to create and check HFS+ filesystems under Linux. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 05:22:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 01:22:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197765] New: Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197765 Summary: Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: seg at haxxed.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.haxxed.com/rpms/libical.spec SRPM URL: http://www.haxxed.com/rpms/libical-0.26.6-0.1.aurore.src.rpm Description: libical is an Open Source (MPL/LGPL) implementation of the IETF's iCalendar Calendaring and Scheduling protocols. (RFC 2445, 2446, and 2447). It parses iCal components and provides a C API for manipulating the component properties, parameters, and subcomponents. This library is required for calendaring support in the Citadel groupware server, which I will be submitting soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 05:24:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 01:24:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197732] Review Request: optipng - a PNG optimizer and converter - need a Sponsor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607060524.k665OgG4022010@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: optipng - a PNG optimizer and converter - need a Sponsor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197732 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-06 01:16 EST ------- Ok i search your website and found that SRPM. == Not an official review as I'm not yet sponsored == * Mock build for development i386 is sucessfull MUST Items: - MUST: rpmlint shows error as rpmlint -i optipng-0.5.2-1.src.rpm W: optipng invalid-license zlib/libpng The license you specified is invalid. The valid licenses are: -GPL -LGPL -Artistic -BSD -MIT -QPL -MPL -IBM Public License -Apache License -PHP License -Public Domain -Modified CNRI Open Source License -zlib License -CVW License -Ricoh Source Code Public License -Python license -Vovida Software License -Sun Internet Standards Source License -Intel Open Source License -Jabber Open Source License if the license is close to an existing one, you can use ' style'. ==>You Need provide package with Open Source Licenses Mentioned above. Though you have provided zlib/libpng and zlib is present, you can ignore this warning. - MUST: dist tag is present - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matching the base package optipng, in the format optipng.spec - MUST: This package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license zlib/libpng. - MUST: License file License.txt is included in package. - MUST: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. md5sum is correct (8cc507e596c95ee44621f7adc8ce0534). - MUST: This package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: This package did not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: This package have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. - MUST: This package used macros. - MUST: Document files are included like README.txt. - MUST: Package did NOT contained any .la libtool archives. * Source URL is present and working. * BuildRoot is correct BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) * BuildRequires is correct -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 05:37:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 01:37:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197559] Review Request: scim-chinese-standard: Chinese Linux Standard IM adapter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607060537.k665bf2Z022466@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-chinese-standard: Chinese Linux Standard IM adapter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197559 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|scim-standard: Make SCIM |Review Request: scim- |conform to Input Method |chinese-standard: Chinese |specification of Chinese |Linux Standard IM adapter |Linux Standard. | AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |petersen at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-07-06 01:29 EST ------- I suggest to rename the package to scim-chinese-standard to make it clearer what it is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 05:43:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 01:43:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197559] Review Request: scim-chinese-standard: Chinese Linux Standard IM adapter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607060543.k665hb9H022921@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-chinese-standard: Chinese Linux Standard IM adapter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197559 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 05:45:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 01:45:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197559] Review Request: scim-chinese-standard: Chinese Linux Standard IM adapter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607060545.k665jHfQ023057@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-chinese-standard: Chinese Linux Standard IM adapter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197559 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-07-06 01:36 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=131976) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=131976&action=view) scim-chinese-standard.spec I cleaned up the spec file a bit but it still needs some polishing before it can be accepted for Extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 05:47:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 01:47:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197198] Review Request: ntop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607060547.k665lb78023201@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197198 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-06 01:39 EST ------- configure: error: GLib2 distribution not found. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.31577 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 05:51:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 01:51:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197198] Review Request: ntop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607060551.k665ppta023495@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197198 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-06 01:43 EST ------- glib2-devel is listed as a BR... BuildRequires: openssl-devel, gdbm-devel, libpcap, rrdtool-devel, zlib-devel, glib2-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 05:54:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 01:54:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197559] Review Request: scim-chinese-standard: Chinese Linux Standard IM adapter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607060554.k665s8ZZ023670@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-chinese-standard: Chinese Linux Standard IM adapter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197559 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-07-06 01:45 EST ------- I do not think that scim-chinese-standard needs to provide and own the chinese-standard directories in libdir, they should be owned by whatever engines and helper that go in there IMHO. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 05:57:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 01:57:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197559] Review Request: scim-chinese-standard: Chinese Linux Standard IM adapter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607060557.k665v4D1023764@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-chinese-standard: Chinese Linux Standard IM adapter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197559 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |197560 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 06:03:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 02:03:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197198] Review Request: ntop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607060603.k66630Pe023998@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197198 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-06 01:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #22) > glib2-devel is listed as a BR... Yes, nevertheless building fails ... ... but now that you say it, I noticed this to be a followup error to something else: # rpmbuild --rebuild ntop-3.2-4.src.rpm ... checking for GLIB - version >= 2.0.0... *** 'pkg-config --modversion glib-2.0' returned 2.10.3, but GLIB (1.2.10) *** was found! If pkg-config was correct, then it is best *** to remove the old version of GLib. You may also be able to fix the error *** by modifying your LD_LIBRARY_PATH enviroment variable, or by editing *** /etc/ld.so.conf. Make sure you have run ldconfig if that is *** required on your system. *** If pkg-config was wrong, set the environment variable PKG_CONFIG_PATH *** to point to the correct configuration files no configure: error: GLib2 distribution not found. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.42330 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 06:04:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 02:04:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196629] Review Request: perl-SVK - A Distributed Version Control System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607060604.k6664Ibx024049@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SVK - A Distributed Version Control System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196629 ------- Additional Comments From ianburrell at gmail.com 2006-07-06 01:55 EST ------- Odd. It was working before on my machine, but now it is giving the same test failures. A new version was just released upstream and it includes a patch to t/tree.pl to add "require Clone". The new version fixes the test failures. I also added the optional build requires. Spec: http://znark.com/fedora/perl-SVK.spec SRPMS: http://znark.com/fedora/perl-SVK-1.08-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 06:33:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 02:33:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197765] Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607060633.k666Xvda024758@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197765 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-06 02:25 EST ------- Just some comments: * The spec file and http://www.aurore.net/projects/libical say: "This is a modified version of the original libical project." i.e. this package would conflict with the "original libical" I am not sufficiently familiar with libical, but this raises concerns on your package: - Is this libical*aurore API compatible to the "original libical"? What are the differences? - Is the "original libical" still alive? - How is this package supposed to interact with an "original libical"? * The package installs its headers to /usr/include. Though the headers all are prefixed "ical*", this pollutes the system header include path. Besides this, the package seems to be clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 06:37:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 02:37:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189400] Review Request: em8300(-kmod) - Hollywood+/DXR3 hardware MPEG decoder drivers and tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607060637.k666bBlH024911@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: em8300(-kmod) - Hollywood+/DXR3 hardware MPEG decoder drivers and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189400 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at leemhuis.info ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-07-06 02:28 EST ------- Per Packaging/KernelModules in the wiki, here's the additional required explanation about the mainline merge status (from Nicolas Boullis and yours truly): The em8300 modules are not part of mainline kernel yet partly because nobody has got around to submit it, and partly because there some things are still thought of as unfinished in the sense that they'd be better off behaving and being accessible more like other related devices in the kernel do, requiring less manual configuration, and the like. At this time, there are no specific deadlines or promises set for the submission, but it is expected to happen in not too distant future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 06:50:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 02:50:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197765] Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607060650.k666oFu7025763@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197765 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |triad at df.lth.se ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-07-06 02:41 EST ------- One existing package in FE that could be checked whether/how it works with this version of libical is gnokii (maintainer Cc'd). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 06:56:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 02:56:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197649] Review Request: gnustep-make - GNUstep makefile package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607060656.k666uId2026088@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnustep-make - GNUstep makefile package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197649 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-06 02:47 EST ------- == Not an official review as I'm not yet sponsored == * Mock build for development i386 is sucessfull with errors as ** No gnustep-make installation found, attempting to create a local/temporary one. ** make[2]: texi2pdf: Command not found make[2]: texi2html: Command not found I really got confused over why such errors was shown besides addding texinfo in BuildRequires. MUST Items: - MUST: rpmlint shows same ERRORS as posted by author of package. - MUST: dist tag is present - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matching the base package gnustep-make, in the format gnustep-make.spec - MUST: This package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license GPL. - MUST: License file COPYING is included in package. - MUST: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. md5sum is correct (1883a6387405e51ff4c384fb5cc547a7). - MUST: This package have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. - MUST: This package used macros. - MUST: Document files are included like README. - MUST: Package did NOT contained any .la libtool archives. * Source URL is present and working. * BuildRoot is correct BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) * BuildRequires is correct Also it will be good to move /usr/local to /usr directory if there is no such requirement. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 06:56:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 02:56:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197198] Review Request: ntop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607060656.k666uWe5026106@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197198 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-06 02:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20) > The perl substitutions are unusefull: the first one is allready done in a > patch. The second operates on a file that is regenerated. I couldn't > find 'user =' in the main.c file. It is in prefs.c however. I think > that it should be replaced with a patch it is more robust than a > substitution (it fails more easily). There is also a nobody in > webInterface.c. Also maybe a comment could explain why other users > are used. Thanks, made a patch. This spec was imported from dag rpms, so I (wrongly) assumed that the perl usage was correct. > unix2dos may be replaced by > sed -i 's/\r//' Thanks, made that change. updates: Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~michael/ntop.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~michael/ntop-3.2-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 07:03:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 03:03:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187843] Review Request: phpMyAdmin - Web based MySQL browser written in php In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607060703.k6673Ul8026355@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpMyAdmin - Web based MySQL browser written in php https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187843 kayvan at sylvan.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kayvan at sylvan.com ------- Additional Comments From kayvan at sylvan.com 2006-07-06 02:55 EST ------- Question: Why did you use the "mysql" python extension rather than mysqli? When I tried your RPM on FC4, I got the following result: [root at satyr conf.d]# service httpd start Starting httpd: [FAILED] [root at satyr conf.d]# mv phpMyAdmin.conf /tmp [root at satyr conf.d]# service httpd start Starting httpd: [ OK ] So, there's something in the phpMyAdmin.conf file that apache did not like. Will try to track it down... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 07:11:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 03:11:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197641] Review Request: ode - High performance library for simulating rigid body dynamics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607060711.k667BWEK026684@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ode - High performance library for simulating rigid body dynamics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197641 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-06 03:02 EST ------- Imported and build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 07:11:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 03:11:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197734] Review Request: xmoto - Challenging 2D Motocross Platform Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607060711.k667BiwK026708@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmoto - Challenging 2D Motocross Platform Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197734 Bug 197734 depends on bug 197641, which changed state. Bug 197641 Summary: Review Request: ode - High performance library for simulating rigid body dynamics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197641 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 07:16:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 03:16:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197198] Review Request: ntop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607060716.k667GP8Y026858@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197198 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-06 03:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #23) > (In reply to comment #22) > > glib2-devel is listed as a BR... > Yes, nevertheless building fails ... > ... but now that you say it, I noticed this to be a followup error to something > else: > > # rpmbuild --rebuild ntop-3.2-4.src.rpm > ... > checking for GLIB - version >= 2.0.0... > *** 'pkg-config --modversion glib-2.0' returned 2.10.3, but GLIB (1.2.10) > *** was found! If pkg-config was correct, then it is best > *** to remove the old version of GLib. You may also be able to fix the error > *** by modifying your LD_LIBRARY_PATH enviroment variable, or by editing > *** /etc/ld.so.conf. Make sure you have run ldconfig if that is > *** required on your system. > *** If pkg-config was wrong, set the environment variable PKG_CONFIG_PATH > *** to point to the correct configuration files > no > configure: error: GLib2 distribution not found. > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.42330 (%build) > Looks like the patch for glib2 is not 100%... This builds in mock fine, so I would not call it a show stopper. I will review the patch tonight all the same. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 07:16:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 03:16:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197753] Review Request: gdmap-0.7.5-1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607060716.k667GWjJ026875@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdmap-0.7.5-1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197753 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-06 03:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > == Not an official review as I'm not yet sponsored == > * Mock build for development i386 is NOT sucessfull > Error is=> > checking for XML::Parser... configure: error: XML::Parser perl module is > required for intltool > > I tried adding perl-XML-Parser in BuildRequires but still build failed. A buildreq of intltool is needed. And the current buildreq of gettext-devel should be changed to gettext - the -devel package isn't needed. I also noticed the use of %{_datadir}/locale in the files list. That is a blocker, and should be removed. Use: %find_lang GdMap at the end of %install, and then: %files -f GdMap.lang -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 07:26:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 03:26:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197765] Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607060726.k667QPoq027798@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197765 ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2006-07-06 03:17 EST ------- libical has lacked a solid upstream in the past. Most of its users have forked their own copies. (kdepim, sunbird, evolution) This version seems to be an attempt to merge them back together. The "original libical" has been dead since 2003. According to pbone.net, libical has not been packaged for any version of Fedora/Red Hat before at all, ever. It was pulled from Debian a while back, nothing ever used it. Backward compatability does not seem to be a realistic concern. Citadel seems to be its sole non-forked user. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 07:41:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 03:41:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197198] Review Request: ntop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607060741.k667fWQ5029816@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197198 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-06 03:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #25) > Looks like the patch for glib2 is not 100%... > > This builds in mock fine, so I would not call it a show stopper. I do, because this error implies rebuilding the package produces non-deterministic results, esp. when users rebuild the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 07:44:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 03:44:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197198] Review Request: ntop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607060744.k667ieeU030204@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197198 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-06 03:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #24) > (In reply to comment #20) > updates: > > Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~michael/ntop.spec > SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~michael/ntop-3.2-5.src.rpm Seems like you've uploaded the wrong file, there is a ntop-3.2-5.i386.rpm but no ntop-3.2-5.src.rpm... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 07:52:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 03:52:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197198] Review Request: ntop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607060752.k667qmjg030960@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197198 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-06 03:44 EST ------- bugger.. Sorry.. I have just uploaded the src.rpm this time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 08:44:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 04:44:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197765] Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607060844.k668iMtS005425@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197765 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-06 04:35 EST ------- == Not an official review as I'm not yet sponsored == * Mock build for development i386 is sucessfull MUST Items: - MUST: rpmlint shows no error - MUST: dist tag is present - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matching the base package libical, in the format libical.spec - MUST: This package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license GPL. - MUST: License file COPYING is included in package. - MUST: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. md5sum is correct as 36c80c43940841e53e5a985204851c46. - MUST: This package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: This package did not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: This package have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. - MUST: This package used macros. - MUST: Document files are included like README.txt. - MUST: Package did NOT contained any .la libtool archives. - MUST: Header files are going in a -devel package. - MUST: Library files that end in .so (without suffix) are in a -devel package. - MUST: This package contains shared library files located in the dynamic linker's default paths, and therefore this package is calling ldconfig in %post and %postun. But Devel package is NOT calling a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. * Source URL is present and working. * BuildRoot is correct BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) * BuildRequires is correct * devel package contains the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 08:57:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 04:57:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175168] Review Request: gideon - GUI designer for GTK/C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607060857.k668vGDW006602@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gideon - GUI designer for GTK/C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175168 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-07-06 04:48 EST ------- One thing I've waited for has happened: * On July 3rd, the author released: gideon-2.7.0.tar.bz2 This gets rid of the unusual versioning scheme. Fortunately, "2 > R". [Previously, the author sounded as if he would continue using "Rx" release names.] The new release also breaks the ABI. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 09:01:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 05:01:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197688] Review Request: inotify-tools - Command line utilities for inotify In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607060901.k6691Li9006838@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inotify-tools - Command line utilities for inotify https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197688 ------- Additional Comments From gajownik at gmail.com 2006-07-06 04:52 EST ------- Thanks for the review! Today was released new version so here's an updated package: http://fedora.pl/~gajownik/inotify-tools.spec http://fedora.pl/~gajownik/inotify-tools-2.2-1.src.rpm * Thu Jul 6 2006 Dawid Gajownik - 2.2-1 - New version 2.2 - Update URL and description - Add man pages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 09:12:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 05:12:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177105] Review Request: gnomeradio - Graphical FM-Tuner program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607060912.k669CEuc007380@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnomeradio - Graphical FM-Tuner program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177105 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugs.michael at gmx.net |bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|163779 |163776 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-07-06 05:03 EST ------- Okay, everyone who reads this please listen: Hereby I announce that I withdraw my approval from 2006-04-04 and move this ticket back into the FE-NEW queue. Too much time has passed without action from the packager. Further, another package submission from a different packager has been rejected (bug 188395), but the software is still not in Fedora Extras after three months. This simply doesn't work and is a major hindrance, IMO. An approved package must not block other submissions for months. And it becomes an extra burden for me as a reviewer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 09:12:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 05:12:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177104] Review Request: abook - Text-based addressbook program for mutt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607060912.k669CqGm007464@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: abook - Text-based addressbook program for mutt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177104 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugs.michael at gmx.net |bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|163779 |163776 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-07-06 05:04 EST ------- Withdrawing my approval from 2006-04-04. Back to FE-NEW. See bug 177105 comment 14 for background. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 09:13:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 05:13:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197764] Review Request: hfsplus-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607060913.k669DppX007541@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hfsplus-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197764 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-06 05:05 EST ------- When i Mock build this SRPM, I got error: unpacking of archive failed on file /builddir/build/SOURCES/diskdev_cmds-332.11.tar.gz;44acd0bf: cpio: read failed - Invalid argument -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 09:24:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 05:24:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192436] Review Request: xorg-x11-server-Xgl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607060924.k669OVbG008112@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-server-Xgl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192436 ------- Additional Comments From alcapcom at gmail.com 2006-07-06 05:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) Yes, it is a known solution for launching KDE from GDM. Considering that this solution requires changes in a config file of a core package, we wait until the package is reviewed for asking Core packages to apply a patch to do that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 09:47:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 05:47:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197442] Review Request: fatsort - sort fat of FAT32/FAT16 on cheap mp3 players In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607060947.k669laIC009486@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fatsort - sort fat of FAT32/FAT16 on cheap mp3 players https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197442 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-06 05:38 EST ------- == Not an official review as I'm not yet sponsored == Mock build for development i386 is sucessfull * MUST Items: - MUST: rpmlint shows no error - MUST: dist tag is present - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matching the base package fatsort, in the format fatsort.spec - MUST: This package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license GPL. - MUST: This Package contains License file as LICENSE.txt - MUST: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. md5sum is correct (ddf8e98b27455da104e8cca13d29d0cc). - MUST: This package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: This package did not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: This package have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. - MUST: This package used macros. - MUST: Document files are included like README. - MUST: Package did NOT contained any .la libtool archives. * Source URL is present and working. * BuildRoot is correct BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) * BuildRequires is correct -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 09:49:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 05:49:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192438] Review Request: fedora-xgl-settings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607060949.k669nW8U009564@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-xgl-settings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192438 ------- Additional Comments From alcapcom at gmail.com 2006-07-06 05:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) We can add the possibility of changing this property via the GUI of 3ddesktop-configurator. But if the mofification of the default.conf file is made on the GDM package, I think that it would not be necessary? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 10:00:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 06:00:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197753] Review Request: gdmap-0.7.5-1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061000.k66A0dQM009982@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdmap-0.7.5-1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197753 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-06 05:52 EST ------- Paul, Now as per your usggestions i did adding gettext and removed gettext-devel. The BuildRequires line i used is BuildRequires: gtk2-devel, libxml2-devel, desktop-file-utils, gettext But still getting same error. checking for XML::Parser... configure: error: XML::Parser perl module is required for intltool -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 10:08:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 06:08:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197688] Review Request: inotify-tools - Command line utilities for inotify In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061008.k66A8oPK010227@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inotify-tools - Command line utilities for inotify https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197688 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-06 06:00 EST ------- == Not an official review as I'm not yet sponsored == Mock build for development i386 is sucessfull * MUST Items: - MUST: rpmlint shows no error. - MUST: dist tag is present. - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matching the base package inotify-tools, in the format inotify-tools.spec. - MUST: This package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license GPL. - MUST: This package includes License file COPYING. - MUST: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. md5sum is correct (0ca1dd7a9bb0c6d0bbd084d8436b850f) - MUST: This package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: This package did not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: This package have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. - MUST: This package used macros. - MUST: Document files are included like README. - MUST: Package did NOT contained any .la libtool archives. * Source URL is present and working. * BuildRoot is correct BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) * BuildRequires is correct -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 10:22:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 06:22:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197753] Review Request: gdmap-0.7.5-1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061022.k66AMVGD010873@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdmap-0.7.5-1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197753 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-06 06:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Paul, > Now as per your usggestions i did adding gettext and removed gettext-devel. > The BuildRequires line i used is > BuildRequires: gtk2-devel, libxml2-devel, desktop-file-utils, gettext > But still getting same error. > checking for XML::Parser... configure: error: XML::Parser perl module is > required for intltool I also said a buildreq of intltool was needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 10:25:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 06:25:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197753] Review Request: gdmap-0.7.5-1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061025.k66APRrk011087@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdmap-0.7.5-1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197753 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-06 06:16 EST ------- I have already tried that one also with gettext but still same error. Have you got it working with those BuildRequires?? I am doing mock build in development i386 environment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 10:29:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 06:29:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197445] Review Request: fuse-convmvfs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061029.k66ATOjv011278@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-convmvfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197445 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-06 06:20 EST ------- == Not an official review as I'm not yet sponsored == Mock build for development i386 is sucessfull * MUST Items: - MUST: rpmlint shows error as W: fuse-convmvfs incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.2-1 0.2-1.fc5.y Your last entry in %changelog contains a version that is not coherent with the current version of your package. Change 0.2.1 to 0.2.1.fc5.y - MUST: dist tag is present - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matching the base package fuse-convmvfs, in the format fuse-convmvfs.spec - MUST: This package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: This package contains License file as COPYING. - MUST: The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license GPL. - MUST: This package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: This package did not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: This package have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. - MUST: This package used macros. - MUST: Document files are included like INSTALL README. - MUST: Package did NOT contained any .la libtool archives. * Source URL is NOT present and NOT working. * BuildRoot is correct BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) * BuildRequires is correct -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 10:29:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 06:29:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197753] Review Request: gdmap-0.7.5-1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061029.k66ATJSp011263@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdmap-0.7.5-1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197753 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-06 06:20 EST ------- I built it in mock for FC5 i386 with the changes suggested in Comment #2 this morning. I don't have a rawhide mirror at home, which is why I built for FC5, but I doubt that it would be different for development. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 10:44:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 06:44:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197198] Review Request: ntop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061044.k66Aidet012533@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197198 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-06 06:36 EST ------- More issues: * plugins loaded twice After some look at the code and some testing I have found that all the plugins in the plugins directory are loaded, so they are loaded twice since they appear twice in the package... In my opinion either the *.so without version number should be removed, or they should be moved to *.so without version numbers. * a plugin is not functionnal **WARNING** Unable to load plugin /usr/lib/ntop/plugins/libxmldumpPlugin-3.2.so' **WARNING** Message is '/usr/lib/ntop/plugins/libxmldumpPlugin-3.2.so: undefined symbol: gdome_str_mkref' And there is also another error, but it may only happen on the first run **ERROR** LASTSEEN: Unable to open LsWatch database (/var/ntop/LsWatch.db)- the plugin will be disabled * many unneeded files in the docs: CONTENTS FILES ntop.txt README.Suse INSTALL BUILD-MinGW.txt BUILD-NTOP.txt ntop-autotools.* PORTING RedHat-rpmbuild-HOWTO.txt, and certainly DAG * should depend on logrotate * less rpmbuild warnings with the following line in %setup chmod -x docs/ntop-autotools.pdf *.c *.h plugins/*.c plugins/*.xml * you should remove /usr/lib/libntop.so, /usr/lib/libmyrrd.so and /usr/lib/libntopreport.so since there are no associated headers and also since they use -release, see below. * myrrd seems to be an old included version of rrdtools. It shouldn't be used but instead linked against the system rrd, unless there is a very good reason not to do so. * upstream uses the -release for libtool using the package version, this is wrong in general, since it trigggers a soname change even when the abi don't change, however those libraries are not meant to ne linked against, so if the *.so that don't have the release within their names are not distributed it is right. * The mechanisme described under PRIVACY NOTICE should be disabled in the default case (and reenabled with, for example --version-check) or completly disabled. * ntop doesn't seems to be interruptible by a control-C. It doesn't seems right to me but I may be wrong. Maybe for a similar reason, when killing ntop on the first run when ntop asks for a password, the console is broken. This last issue is not blocking the inclusion in extras in my opinion, it is more for upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 10:46:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 06:46:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197753] Review Request: gdmap-0.7.5-1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061046.k66Akb9w012724@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdmap-0.7.5-1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197753 ------- Additional Comments From splinux25 at gmail.com 2006-07-06 06:38 EST ------- - Fix Buidrequires, add intltool - Fix locales, add %find_lang GdMap and %files -f GdMap.lang and remove {_datadir}/locales Spec URL : http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/gdmap/gdmap.spec Srpms URL : http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/gdmap/gdmap-0.7.5-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 10:51:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 06:51:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197732] Review Request: optipng - a PNG optimizer and converter - need a Sponsor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061051.k66Ap3hL013111@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: optipng - a PNG optimizer and converter - need a Sponsor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197732 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2006-07-06 06:42 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www-users.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de/~tmaas/fedora/optipng.spec SRPM URL: http://www-users.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de/~tmaas/fedora/repo/optipng-0.5.2-1.src.rpm Sorry, SRPM contained a type, you reviewed the correct SRPM. http://www.opensource.org/licenses/zlib-license.php calls the license zlib/libpng, libpng in Core uses OSI approved as license text. But I can change the license tag to zlib next time I boot my development machine. Thx for the review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 11:04:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 07:04:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183953] Review Request: bit (A bit-oriented data stream parser and gtkmm widget set) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061104.k66B4bk1014016@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bit (A bit-oriented data stream parser and gtkmm widget set) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183953 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|183322 | OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-07-06 06:56 EST ------- It must be "BuildRequires: cppunit-devel" instead of cppunit. Apart from that: * reported issues fixed * packager is upstream * APPROVED Warnings: - compiler warnings about type-punning are worrisome (I see dangerous C-style casts in the code) Suggested cleanup: - Remove *.md5, *.map and *.dot files from the HTML documentation (91 files in total). Hints: - Note that "mv docs/reference/html ." in your %install section breaks --short-circuit installs, which are _very_ useful during debugging of spec files. As a rule of thumb, never modify your source tree in a way that repeating commands would fail. In this case, better "cp" the html tree to somewhere. "rpm --short-circuit -ivh bit.spec" should work again and again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 11:05:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 07:05:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183322] Review Request: conexus (network and serial I/O library with Gtkmm widgets) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061105.k66B52QM014073@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conexus (network and serial I/O library with Gtkmm widgets) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183322 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|183953 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 11:18:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 07:18:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197353] Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061118.k66BItG0014639@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197353 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-07-06 07:10 EST ------- Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/man-pages-fr.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/man-pages-fr-2.09.0-1.src.rpm %changelog * Thu Jul 5 2006 Alain Portal 2.09.0-1 - Update to 2.09.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 12:14:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 08:14:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187843] Review Request: phpMyAdmin - Web based MySQL browser written in php In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061214.k66CEUff016634@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpMyAdmin - Web based MySQL browser written in php https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187843 ------- Additional Comments From kayvan at sylvan.com 2006-07-06 08:06 EST ------- Looks like the stock httpd-2.0.54-10.3 did not like the space in the "Order Deny, Allow" line. Making that be "Order Deny,Allow" fixed my httpd startup problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 13:36:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 09:36:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197688] Review Request: inotify-tools - Command line utilities for inotify In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061336.k66DaZeF021154@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inotify-tools - Command line utilities for inotify https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197688 ------- Additional Comments From gajownik at gmail.com 2006-07-06 09:28 EST ------- I've e-mailed upstream about this compilation warning and he gave me instructions how to fix it :-) http://fedora.pl/~gajownik/inotify-tools.spec http://fedora.pl/~gajownik/inotify-tools-2.2-2.src.rpm * Thu Jul 6 2006 Dawid Gajownik - 2.2-2 - Fix compilation warnings -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 13:40:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 09:40:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197791] New: Review Request: stacaccli - Stateless Cached Client Tools Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197791 Summary: Review Request: stacaccli - Stateless Cached Client Tools Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: markmc at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/markmc/stacaccli/stacaccli.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/markmc/stacaccli/stacaccli-0.2-1.src.rpm Description: Stateless Linux is not a deployment model. It is not any single technology. It's a new way of thinking about how a system is supposed to run and be managed. The "Cached Client" mode of deploying stateless clients is similar to using a network mounted root filesystem, except that an entire copy of the OS image is cached locally thereby allowing offline support and better performance. stacaccli contains the tools needed for running a cached client. stacaccli-install is responsible for installing such a client by initializing the local cache of the OS image. stacacclid is a daemon which downloads updates from the image server and integrates them into the local image cache. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 13:45:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 09:45:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197791] Review Request: stacaccli - Stateless Cached Client Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061345.k66DjuEW022126@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stacaccli - Stateless Cached Client Tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197791 ------- Additional Comments From markmc at redhat.com 2006-07-06 09:37 EST ------- Some notes: - Overview of what this is all about: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/StatelessLinuxCachedClient - In order for the updating part of this to work, we need a new "snapshot merging" feature in LVM and device-mapper. Patches here: http://www.gnome.org/~markmc/code/lvm-snapshot-merging/ agk is currently reviewing these for upstream inclusion. The cached client install part works without this feature, though. - Only works on i386 and x86_64 currently. The partitioning and bootloader code is specific to these arches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 13:58:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 09:58:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197796] New: Review Request: glipper-0.89 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197796 Summary: Review Request: glipper-0.89 Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: splinux25 at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/glipper/glipper.spec SRPM URL: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/glipper/glipper-0.89-1.src.rpm Description: Glipper is a simple Clipboardmanager for the GNOME Desktop Environment -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 14:04:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 10:04:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190991] Review Request: libpar2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061404.k66E47H0023715@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpar2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190991 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-07-06 09:55 EST ------- Some of the "discoveries" in this ticket are wrong and misleading. The biggest problem with "config.h" (regardless of its contents!) is global namespace pollution when installing the file into a location that takes precedence in the search-path list. The observation that auto-generated headers are wrong/bad in general, is wrong. Surely there are valid scenarios in which it makes sense to re-use generated headers in a public API. Finally, I fail to see where libsigc++-2.0 and gtkmm-2.4 are affected by this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 14:12:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 10:12:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190991] Review Request: libpar2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061412.k66ECi79024245@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpar2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190991 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-06 10:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > The observation that auto-generated headers are wrong/bad in general, > is wrong. Surely there are valid scenarios in which it makes sense to > re-use generated headers in a public API. Then I have to correct you: Installing files generated by "autoheader" is always wrong. They are not *designed* for this purpose. Any program doing so is abusing them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 14:18:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 10:18:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187294] Review Request: gwyddion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061418.k66EI0Cm024538@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwyddion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187294 ------- Additional Comments From yeti at physics.muni.cz 2006-07-06 10:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > In that case the licence tag should be > License: GPL If everyone likes to repeat the common `GNU license' mistake just with the second part of the name this time (there are dozens of SomeProgram General Public Licenses that are not GNU GPL), if everyone thinks that `GPL' actually denotes something, or that it should be put to the License field even it does not mean anything, or that something should be put into the License field even if the license of a large part of the software if very different, and above all that the proper license acronym `GNU GPL' cannot be there, well, I can put GPL or cauliflower or whatever there, no problem, the tag is obviously not supposed to mean anything. But it isn't a technical issue so I won't make new src.rpm now just to mangle one tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 14:26:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 10:26:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193380] Review Request: hardinfo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061426.k66EQbg9025058@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hardinfo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193380 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-07-06 10:18 EST ------- * Wrong. This package does not use any cached pixmap location, but an absolute path in the .desktop file. Touching the hicolor directory and running gtk-update-icon-cache is completely useless here. * Bad: Software is not compiled with Fedora global %{optflags}. Image files are executable. Missing: Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig Requires(post)un: /sbin/ldconfig Duplicate .desktop files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 14:28:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 10:28:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193380] Review Request: hardinfo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061428.k66ESVh3025156@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hardinfo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193380 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-07-06 10:19 EST ------- > Missing: > Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig > Requires(post)un: /sbin/ldconfig Should read: Missing: Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig Requires(postun): /sbin/ldconfig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 14:28:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 10:28:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187843] Review Request: phpMyAdmin - Web based MySQL browser written in php In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061428.k66ESxri025189@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpMyAdmin - Web based MySQL browser written in php https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187843 ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2006-07-06 10:20 EST ------- Doah! Forgot to update that source file. http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/phpMyAdmin/phpMyAdmin.spec http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/phpMyAdmin/phpMyAdmin-2.8.2-2.src.rpm As for why I used php-mysql. Just habit I guess, I've always used it for my php mysql support. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 14:31:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 10:31:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192430] Review Request: python-kiwi - Framework for Python GUI applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061431.k66EVaiU025486@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-kiwi - Framework for Python GUI applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192430 icon at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |197793 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 14:35:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 10:35:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192430] Review Request: python-kiwi - Framework for Python GUI applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061435.k66EZEqk025742@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-kiwi - Framework for Python GUI applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192430 ------- Additional Comments From icon at fedoraproject.org 2006-07-06 10:26 EST ------- Ping. I need this to continue providing gazpacho. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 14:37:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 10:37:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191589] Review Request: qt4-qsa: Qt Script for Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061437.k66EbU4l025955@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4-qsa: Qt Script for Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: qsa: Qt |Review Request: qt4-qsa: Qt |Script for Applications |Script for Applications -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 14:38:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 10:38:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171541] Review Request: kimdaba: KDE Image Database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061438.k66Ec7Vj026056@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kimdaba: KDE Image Database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171541 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-06 10:29 EST ------- FYI, name deprecated, package renamed upstream to kphotoalbum. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 14:41:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 10:41:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190991] Review Request: libpar2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061441.k66Efe3r026476@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpar2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190991 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-07-06 10:33 EST ------- "auto-generated headers" != "using autoheader" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 14:47:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 10:47:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190991] Review Request: libpar2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061447.k66El2u3027091@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpar2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190991 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-06 10:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > "auto-generated headers" != "using autoheader" Exactly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 15:40:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 11:40:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187294] Review Request: gwyddion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061540.k66FeiK1000488@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwyddion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187294 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-06 11:32 EST ------- Using GPL instead of GNU GPL is a matter of convention. If there is a mix of GPL and public domain code, the resulting subpackage is covered by the GPL. However if you want to make clear which part of the subpackage are under which licence, you can add a file explaining more precisely the licences of the different parts of that subpackage, and put it in %docs. If you can isolate the parts that are public domain in a subpackage, then the licence may be public domain for that subpackage. Licence issues are not technical issues, but they are as important as technical issues. As a side note, you can omit the Licence: tag from subpackages when it is the same than the licence of the main package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 16:01:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 12:01:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183322] Review Request: conexus (network and serial I/O library with Gtkmm widgets) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061601.k66G1MwN002248@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conexus (network and serial I/O library with Gtkmm widgets) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183322 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2006-07-06 11:52 EST ------- I'm getting ready to release a new version of this library in the next couple of weeks. Since it needs another review, it would probably be best to wait until the new release comes out. Also, I'll clean up the spec a bit to include the hints you provided on the bit library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 16:01:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 12:01:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197461] Review Request: perl-Class-InsideOut In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061601.k66G1ang002269@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-InsideOut https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197461 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-07-06 11:53 EST ------- ihave read the Packaging Guidelines again. The packages in the exception list may be listed as a BR optional. So that this is not a blocker. I will APPROVED your package now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 16:07:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 12:07:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197476] Review Request: python-cvstoys In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061607.k66G720K002577@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-cvstoys https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197476 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-07-06 11:58 EST ------- rpmlint is noew quite for the binary rpm. So I will APPROVE your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 16:09:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 12:09:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176253] Review Request: clement-2.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061609.k66G9DG5002716@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clement-2.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176253 ------- Additional Comments From jmp at safe.ca 2006-07-06 12:00 EST ------- Version 2.1-175 SPECS file is now clean according rpmlint-0.77-1.fc5 rpmbuild give no warning anymore about "File listed twice" Spec Url: ftp://ftp.safe.ca/pub/clement-2.1/SPECS/clement-2.1-175.spec SRPM Url: ftp://ftp.safe.ca/pub/clement-2.1/SRPMS/clement-2.1-175.src.rpm Numerous bug-fix/improvement have been done since last bugzilla Clement update (2.1-99), see the Changes file and SPEC Changelog for details. According to me SPEC file is really better, there 2 issue not yet addressed: 1) /var/lib/clement-2.1 contents. those file are mainly day to day clement own management, I am really reluctant to put them in /usr/bin as they are for the sole clement purpose. what is the best option in such case? 2) ownership for /var/www/clement-2.1: putting everything own by 'mail' is may be overkilling, this web part is not meaningful if clement daemon is not up and running, Clement itself run with uid 'mail', that why I chose to set the ownership as 'mail'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 16:11:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 12:11:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197488] Review Request: uread - Utilities for unformatted fortran files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061611.k66GB5ew002878@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uread - Utilities for unformatted fortran files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197488 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-07-06 12:02 EST ------- I disagree with comment #6, I expect a full-qualified URL in the source tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 16:42:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 12:42:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197814] New: Review Request: autogen Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197814 Summary: Review Request: autogen Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/autogen.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/autogen-5.8.4-1.src.rpm Description: AutoGen is a tool designed to simplify the creation and maintenance of programs that contain large amounts of repetitious text. It is especially valuable in programs that have several blocks of text that must be kept synchronized. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 16:44:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 12:44:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189685] Review Request: Anjuta2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061644.k66GinXR005661@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Anjuta2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189685 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |197814 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-06 12:36 EST ------- Now requires autogen to build (submitted as BZ 197814) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 16:45:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 12:45:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197814] Review Request: autogen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061645.k66Gj1rK005698@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197814 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |189685 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 16:46:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 12:46:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182320] Review Request: gnome-build In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061646.k66GkH6R005796@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182320 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-06 12:37 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/gnome-build.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/gnome-build-0.1.3-2.src.rpm Updated spec and src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 16:59:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 12:59:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197542] Review Request: perl-Package-Constants In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061659.k66GxjwH006628@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Package-Constants https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197542 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-07-06 12:51 EST ------- Imported in CVS, branches created, and builds requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 17:35:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 13:35:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197821] New: Review Request: perl-IO-Socket-INET6 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197821 Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Socket-INET6 Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: wtogami at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/perl-IO-Socket-INET6.spec SRPM URL: http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/perl-IO-Socket-INET6-2.51-1.src.rpm Description: Perl Object interface for AF_INET|AF_INET6 domain sockets Spamassassin requires this in order to support IPv6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 17:45:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 13:45:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197814] Review Request: autogen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061745.k66HjKew008787@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197814 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |Jochen at herr-schmitt.de OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 189685 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-07-06 13:36 EST ------- Good: + Local Source math with upstream Bad: - rpmlint complaints on the source rpm: W: autogen strange-permission autogen-5.8.4.tar.bz2 0666 - Source could not be downloaded automaticly: Source 0 is not available (http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.net/autogen/autogen-5.8.4.tar.bz2) I have open a tracker on sf.net, becouse I have a simular problem on a other project. - rpmlint on binary rpm complaints: W: autogen devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libguileopts.so W: autogen devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/bin/autoopts-config W: autogen devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/autoopts/usage-txt.h E: autogen library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib/libopts.so.25.2.1 E: autogen info-files-without-install-info-postin /usr/share/info/autogen.info-2.gz E: autogen postin-without-install-info /usr/share/info/autogen.info-2.gz W: autogen devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libopts.so W: autogen devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/autoopts/options.h W: autogen devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/pkgconfig/autoopts.pc E: autogen script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/pkgconfig/autoopts.pc E: autogen info-files-without-install-info-postin /usr/share/info/autogen.info.gz E: autogen postin-without-install-info /usr/share/info/autogen.info.gz E: autogen library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib/libguileopts.so.0.0.1 E: autogen info-files-without-install-info-postin /usr/share/info/autogen.info-1.gz E: autogen postin-without-install-info /usr/share/info/autogen.info-1.gz - Mock build on FC-5 failed: extracting debug info from /var/tmp/autogen-5.8.4-1-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/libgu ileopts.so.0.0.1 2392 blocks + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-compress + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-static-archive /usr/bin/strip + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-comment-note /usr/bin/strip /usr/bin/objdump + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-python-bytecompile Processing files: autogen-5.8.4-1 error: File not found: /var/tmp/autogen-5.8.4-1-root-mockbuild/usr/bin/xml2ag error: File not found by glob: /var/tmp/autogen-5.8.4-1-root-mockbuild/usr/share /man/man1/xml2ag* Processing files: autogen-debuginfo-5.8.4-1 Provides: libguileopts.so.0.0.1.debug libopts.so.25.2.1.debug Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHave Prefix) <= 4.0-1 RPM build errors: File not found: /var/tmp/autogen-5.8.4-1-root-mockbuild/usr/bin/xml2ag File not found by glob: /var/tmp/autogen-5.8.4-1-root-mockbuild/usr/share/ma W: autogen one-line-command-in-%preun /sbin/ldconfig W: autogen one-line-command-in-%postun /sbin/ldconfig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 17:45:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 13:45:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189685] Review Request: Anjuta2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061745.k66HjhL8008829@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Anjuta2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189685 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|197814 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 17:56:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 13:56:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197826] New: Review Request: perl-IO-Socket-SSL Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197826 Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Socket-SSL Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: wtogami at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/perl-IO-Socket-SSL.spec SRPM URL: http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/perl-IO-Socket-SSL-0.97-1.src.rpm Description: Nearly transparent SSL encapsulation for IO::Socket::INET Spamasssasin requires this for SSL encryption between spamc and spamd. This also requires the inclusion of perl-Net-SSLeay currently in Extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 18:03:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 14:03:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197827] New: Review Request: perl-Net-SSLeay Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197827 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SSLeay Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: wtogami at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/perl-Net-SSLeay.spec SRPM URL: http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/perl-Net-SSLeay-1.30-4.src.rpm Description: This module offers some high level convinience functions for accessing web pages on SSL servers (for symmetry, same API is offered for accessing http servers, too), a sslcat() function for writing your own clients, and finally access to the SSL api of SSLeay/OpenSSL package so you can write servers or clients for more complicated applications. This package was previously in Extras. It is required for perl-IO-Socket-SSL, which is required for Spamassassin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 18:05:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 14:05:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197826] Review Request: perl-IO-Socket-SSL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061805.k66I5H6t010094@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Socket-SSL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197826 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED BugsThisDependsOn| |197827 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 18:05:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 14:05:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197827] Review Request: perl-Net-SSLeay In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061805.k66I5d5Y010153@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SSLeay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197827 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |197826 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 18:07:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 14:07:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 180571] Review Request: puppet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061807.k66I7pce010289@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: puppet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180571 ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2006-07-06 13:59 EST ------- * Updated to latest upstream release 0.18.2 Spec: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/spec/puppet.spec SRPM: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/SRPMS/puppet-0.18.2-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 18:22:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 14:22:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197488] Review Request: uread - Utilities for unformatted fortran files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061822.k66IMXDf011809@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uread - Utilities for unformatted fortran files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197488 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-06 14:13 EST ------- There will source tarball with different content and the same name. Do you really want that? I guess the buildsystem is able to handle such a case, but it is very unconvenient. Maybe it is time to throw the issue in fedora-extras-list? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 18:41:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 14:41:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197827] Review Request: perl-Net-SSLeay In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061841.k66Iff4W014531@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SSLeay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197827 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jpo at di.uminho.pt ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-07-06 14:33 EST ------- jpo, note that we're adding this to Core soon in order to satisfy a dependency of spamassassin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 18:53:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 14:53:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 180092] Review Request: NRPE - Monitoring agent for Nagios In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061853.k66IrOJd016412@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NRPE - Monitoring agent for Nagios https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180092 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-07-06 14:44 EST ------- Good: + Local build works fine. + Mock build works fine. + rpmlint quite on binary rpm. Bad: - rpmlint complaints the binary rpm: E: nrpe configure-without-libdir-spec - Can't sheck source tarball agains upstream during a technical problem on download the upstream source. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 18:56:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 14:56:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193059] Review Request: ibmasm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061856.k66IuOOk016916@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ibmasm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193059 konradr at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |arozansk at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From konradr at redhat.com 2006-07-06 14:47 EST ------- Updated the spec file (per suggestions in comment #8) and the source code to compile more cleanly now. SPEC URL:http://ibmasm.cvs.sourceforge.net/*checkout*/ibmasm/ibmasm/ibmasm.spec SRPM URL: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/ibmasm/ibmasm-3.0-6.src.rpm?download Also adding Aristeu who is the maintainner of ibmasm for RHEL4 and RHEL5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 18:57:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 14:57:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193059] Review Request: ibmasm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061857.k66IvUbq017052@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ibmasm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193059 ------- Additional Comments From konradr at redhat.com 2006-07-06 14:49 EST ------- err, correction (wrong version): SRPMS URL: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/ibmasm/ibmasm-3.0-7.src.rpm?download -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 19:05:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 15:05:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197847] New: Review Request: pymsnt - MSN Transport for Jabber Servers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197847 Summary: Review Request: pymsnt - MSN Transport for Jabber Servers Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/5/SRPMS/pymsnt-0.11-1.fc5.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/5/SRPMS/pymsnt-0.11-1.fc5.src.rpm Description: The MSN Transport provides a gateway which allows Jabber users to communicate with their contacts on the MSN Messenger network. The transport must be installed on the Jabber server, and it's operation is nearly transparent to the user. They can interact with their MSN contacts in the same way as they do with their Jabber contacts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 19:07:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 15:07:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197821] Review Request: perl-IO-Socket-INET6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061907.k66J7FxV017995@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Socket-INET6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197821 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-06 14:58 EST ------- Some comments: * Source0 should be a URL * rpmbuild -ba perl-IO-Socket-INET6.spec ... Warning: prerequisite Socket6 0.12 not found Probably a missing BR: perl(Socket6) * Package is noarch => passing OPTIMIZE to Makefile.PL is superfluous => "find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name '*.bs' -a -size 0 -exec rm -f {} ';'" probably also is not necessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 19:14:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 15:14:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191005] Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061914.k66JELOA018412@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191005 ------- Additional Comments From brkamikaze at gmail.com 2006-07-06 15:05 EST ------- I will do some chmods on the build system because my build fails when not built as root even before that chmod line. For the sake of completeness, I will put the md5sums on the download pages too. When I finish building/uploading the new RPM, I will answer here. About your requirements for sponsorship, I'd prefer to do one package at a time. When I get this one working, I'll move to another one :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 19:40:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 15:40:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197476] Review Request: python-cvstoys In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061940.k66JeVoT020255@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-cvstoys https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197476 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-06 15:32 EST ------- awesome. Thank you. In devel now and building. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 19:42:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 15:42:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191005] Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061942.k66Jg3Dr020414@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191005 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-06 15:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > About your requirements for sponsorship, I'd prefer to do one package at a time. > When I get this one working, I'll move to another one :) Fine by me, I agree this is better then juggling 3 reviews at the same time. You won't be able to import glob2 though untill you've done one or more other packages. While we're talking process I'll be on holiday for 5 days starting next monday. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 19:44:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 15:44:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196748] Review Request: setroubleshoot - automatic diagnosis of SELinux problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061944.k66JiupJ020657@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setroubleshoot - automatic diagnosis of SELinux problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196748 ------- Additional Comments From jdennis at redhat.com 2006-07-06 15:36 EST ------- I realize the package needs documentation but let me explain what Bill probably experienced. There are two basic modes the analyzer can run it, either running in the background waiting to be triggered by an real time AVC, or run against a log file which might contain AVC messages. In the former case, AVC real time event mode, the trigger is fired by auditd, it invokes the analyzer because /etc/auditd.conf has its dispatcher line set to /usr/sbin/avc_snap (BTW, that name is going to change), avc_snap talks to the troubleshooter daemon setroubleshootd. However, the rpm in its current form does not edit auditd.conf or manage the auditd service, all for a variety of good packaging practices. Thus you may not have seen anything if auditd was not running or it's dispatcher was not set to avc_snap. Steve Grubb and I are working on fixing this issue this week. The plan is to have auditd find plugin configuration files in /etc/audisp.d. When that functionality is present (expected next week) then setroubleshoot will install a configuration file there. (BTW, I did just notice the spec file was missing a requires for "audit", that has been fixed). The second mode, log file scanning, can be done via % /usr/sbin/setroubleshoot filename Just be aware the version you have does not throttle multiple alerts and may fire off a bunch of them in succession, throttling code will be checked in tommorow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 19:47:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 15:47:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196748] Review Request: setroubleshoot - automatic diagnosis of SELinux problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061947.k66JlhLu021060@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setroubleshoot - automatic diagnosis of SELinux problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196748 ------- Additional Comments From jdennis at redhat.com 2006-07-06 15:39 EST ------- I spoke with Pete Graner today because we're trying to get this into RHEL5, but that has a dependency on this being in FC6t2 (as I understand it). FC6t2 freeze is 7/12, can we get this approved so that its in the pipeline? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 19:50:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 15:50:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196748] Review Request: setroubleshoot - automatic diagnosis of SELinux problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607061950.k66Jo5eb021313@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setroubleshoot - automatic diagnosis of SELinux problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196748 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-07-06 15:41 EST ------- OK, I installed auditd and started it, and still didn't get any pop-ups or similar; setroubleshoot /var/log/messages also gave no output. Does it only handle certain AVCs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 19:58:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 15:58:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197867] New: Review Request: iscsitarget (includes kernel module) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197867 Summary: Review Request: iscsitarget (includes kernel module) Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://iscsitarget.sourceforge.net OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: fedora at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: i.pilcher at comcast.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Proposed package name: iscsitarget (and kmod-iscsitarget) Project URL: http://iscsitarget.sourceforge.net Tarball: http://download.sf.net/iscsitarget/iscsitarget-0.4.13.tar.gz License: GPL Explanation: It won't get merged. At some point it was submitted to linux-scsi for review: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=110966161714414&w=2 However, IET will be superceded by a generic target framework: http://developer.berlios.de/projects/stgt . "tgt" will also provide iSCSI target functionality (among others). It is more likely to be merged, because it addresses the points made in the linux-scsi review, and well, because it's a generic framework. ;-) HTH, Arne Note: I will be adding a warning about the "stopgap" status of the project to the %description of each package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 20:14:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 16:14:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197821] Review Request: perl-IO-Socket-INET6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607062014.k66KEFmn022714@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Socket-INET6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197821 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-07-06 16:05 EST ------- http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/perl-IO-Socket-INET6.spec http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/perl-IO-Socket-INET6-2.51-2.src.rpm Added your changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 20:16:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 16:16:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197874] New: Review Request: perl-Socket6 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197874 Summary: Review Request: perl-Socket6 Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: wtogami at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/perl-Socket6.spec SRPM URL: http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/perl-Socket6-0.19-3.fc6.src.rpm Description: This module supports getaddrinfo() and getnameinfo() to intend to enable protocol independent programing. If your environment supports IPv6, IPv6 related defines such as AF_INET6 are included. This package is required for perl-IO-Socket-INET6, which is needed by spamassassin in order to support IPv6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 20:17:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 16:17:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196748] Review Request: setroubleshoot - automatic diagnosis of SELinux problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607062017.k66KHBGN022876@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setroubleshoot - automatic diagnosis of SELinux problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196748 ------- Additional Comments From jdennis at redhat.com 2006-07-06 16:08 EST ------- There are two pieces to the package, the framework, and a set of analysis plugins. It is the analysis plugin's job to recognise an AVC. So far most of the work has gone into the framework, not the set of plugins, and the current rpm only has two analysis plugins. The plugin's are meant to be simple to author, and on the TODO list is simplyfying them even further. I'm attaching a trival log file you can test with that has an AVC which would be generated by ftpd, one of the existing plugins. I suppose I should mention as well that we would like to distribute the plugin's separately and I'll probably tweak the spec file to make the plugin's a sub package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 20:17:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 16:17:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197821] Review Request: perl-IO-Socket-INET6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607062017.k66KHlPq022912@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Socket-INET6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197821 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED BugsThisDependsOn| |197874 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 20:17:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 16:17:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197874] Review Request: perl-Socket6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607062017.k66KHxDk022936@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Socket6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197874 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |197821 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 20:18:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 16:18:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196748] Review Request: setroubleshoot - automatic diagnosis of SELinux problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607062018.k66KIePG022997@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setroubleshoot - automatic diagnosis of SELinux problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196748 ------- Additional Comments From jdennis at redhat.com 2006-07-06 16:10 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=132021) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=132021&action=view) trival log file with ftpd AVC message to use for testing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 20:58:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 16:58:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191005] Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607062058.k66Kw5Y1026390@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191005 ------- Additional Comments From brkamikaze at gmail.com 2006-07-06 16:49 EST ------- Files uploaded. I also made a new index page to support other projects. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 21:09:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 17:09:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189685] Review Request: Anjuta2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607062109.k66L9bWc026854@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Anjuta2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189685 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-06 17:01 EST ------- Why have you removed 197814 as a depends on when it clearly needs it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 21:44:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 17:44:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197814] Review Request: autogen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607062144.k66LiEBf028977@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197814 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-06 17:35 EST ------- I can't understand why you should be getting build errors. If I remove %{_bindir}/xml2ag and %{_mandir}/man1/xml2ag* from the spec file, the rpm builds, but then when it checks, complains they are there, but not packaged. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 21:55:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 17:55:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197137] Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607062155.k66Ltjfc029981@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197137 ------- Additional Comments From kupcevic at redhat.com 2006-07-06 17:47 EST ------- Please check out version 0.8-7 (will publish on Friday, July, 7th 2006): Spec URL: http://sourceware.org/cluster/conga/extras/conga.spec SRPM URL: http://sourceware.org/cluster/conga/extras/conga-0.8-7.fc6.src.rpm * It would be better to split the package into several source packages (e.g., conga, luci, ricci, and cluster-*). That would probably also help expediting the review; when you do that, file separate review requests for each package - ricci, ricci-modcluster, cluster-cim and cluster-snmp build from the same source code, and has been split into several packages so that users can pick and choose what they need * Please run rpmlint on the generated packages and either fix the errors/warnings it generates, or explain here why you think they are ok to ignore - rpmlint output at the end * You shouldn't require /bin/bash, it's in the list of requirement exceptions (see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-4cadce5e79d38a63cad3941de1dadc9d25d67d30) - removed * The summary of the packages should be a short one-sentence description of each package. - added * There is no need to have a 'Provides: %name' for each package - removed * You shouldn't hardcode the distribution in the release tag; instead use '6{%?dist}' as the release - the build system will fill in the appropriate value (.fc5, .fc6 etc.) - fixed * Do not manually set _libdir on x86_64; it's automatically set to the right thing by rpm - rpmbuild used not to do that, not setting manually any more * Why does ricci have a number of 'Requires: ricci-xyz = version' and 'Provides: ricci-xyz' ? Shouldn't the provides be versioned, too ? There's no need for those requires - fixed rpmlint *rpm | grep -v non-standard-uid (both ricci and luci run under their own respective users): E: luci non-readable /var/lib/luci/var/Data.fs 0600 - Data.fs contains data that should be viewed by luci only E: luci non-executable-script /var/lib/luci/Extensions/ModelBuilder.py 0644 - python file with self-test function E: luci executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/luci - init script W: luci dangerous-command-in-%post chmod - rpm generates private ssl key, has to be readable by luci only E: ricci executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/ricci - init script E: ricci setuid-binary /usr/sbin/ricci-auth root 04755 E: ricci non-standard-executable-perm /usr/sbin/ricci-auth 04755 - authentication helper; verifies root password against pam libraries, while ricci runs as non-root -> should be set-uid W: ricci dangerous-command-in-%post chown - rpm generates private ssl key, has to be readable by ricci only W: ricci service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/ricci - idea behind ricci is that after installation, luci connects to it, without any user interaction W: ricci-modcluster service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/ricci-modclusterd - same goes for cluster module E: ricci-modcluster executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/ricci-modclusterd - init script W: ricci-modcluster incoherent-init-script-name ricci-modclusterd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 21:59:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 17:59:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197732] Review Request: optipng - a PNG optimizer and converter - need a Sponsor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607062159.k66LxpvZ030407@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: optipng - a PNG optimizer and converter - need a Sponsor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197732 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2006-07-06 17:51 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www-users.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de/~tmaas/fedora/optipng.spec SRPM URL: http://www-users.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de/~tmaas/fedora/repo/optipng-0.5.2-2.src.rpm License Tag is now zlib. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 22:02:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 18:02:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192052] Review Request: bitgtkmm (Gtkmm widgets for the bit library) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607062202.k66M2bV2030759@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitgtkmm (Gtkmm widgets for the bit library) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192052 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2006-07-06 17:54 EST ------- Spec URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/bitgtkmm.spec SRPM URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/fedora/5/srpms/bitgtkmm-0.2.2-1.src.rpm Changes: - New upstream release - Removed *.md5, *.map and *.dot in upstream package - Changed mv of docs to cp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 22:35:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 18:35:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197814] Review Request: autogen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607062235.k66MZnFq000373@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197814 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-06 18:27 EST ------- Hmmm, I'm getting these mock errors as well. That said, I've sorted most of the rpmlint warnings, though some of them are wrong (the two about no !# in a COPYING and some other one spring to mind). As soon as I've sorted out the problem with mock, I'll upload 5.8.4-2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 22:38:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 18:38:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197726] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Set In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607062238.k66Mc1Xk000598@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197726 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-06 18:29 EST ------- The requires list for this module comes up with: perl(Set::Infinite) >= 0.59 perl(Set::Infinite) >= 0.59 so I think you can drop your explicit Requirement for that module. (I did so and rebuilt and only one of those showed up.) Since this is the only issue, I'll go ahead and approve this. Perhaps you could pass on the favor and review someone else's package. Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * source files match upstream: 777f0d8c2f6c6092cd7a70bf7e701831 DateTime-Set-0.25.tar.gz * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64) (one dependency added locally) * rpmlint is silent. * noarch package; no debuginfo package * final provides and requires are sane: perl(DateTime::Set) = 0.25 perl(DateTime::Span) perl(DateTime::SpanSet) perl(Set::Infinite::_recurrence) perl-DateTime-Set = 0.25-1.fc6 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(DateTime) >= 0.12 perl(DateTime::Duration) perl(DateTime::Infinite) perl(DateTime::Set) perl(DateTime::Span) perl(DateTime::SpanSet) perl(Params::Validate) perl(Set::Infinite) >= 0.59 perl(Set::Infinite) >= 0.59 perl(Set::Infinite::_recurrence) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(vars) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=19, Tests=196, 57 wallclock secs (55.93 cusr + 0.67 csys = 56.60 CPU) * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED, just remove the explicit Requires: perl(Set::Infinite) >= 0.59 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 22:41:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 18:41:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197736] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607062241.k66Mf0DB001000@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197736 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 22:45:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 18:45:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196740] Review Request: ogre - Object-Oriented Graphics Rendering Engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607062245.k66Mj945001222@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ogre - Object-Oriented Graphics Rendering Engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196740 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-07-06 18:36 EST ------- rpmlint warnings: W: ogre-devel no-documentation - Can be safely ignored since docs are in a -doc subpackage. E: ogre-devel invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libOgrePlatform.so libOgrePlatform.so - Not sure where this is coming from. MUST ==== * Package/spec named appropriately * GPL license ok, license file included * spec file legible and in Am. English * Builds on FC6-i386, FC6-x86_64, FC5-i386, FC5-x86_64 * Sources match upstream: 6ff98b1f14ca679ceaeec00daff2ff87 ogre-linux_osx-v1-2-1.tar.bz2 * No locales * ldconfig called correctly from %post/%postun * Not relocatable * RPM_BUILD_ROOT cleaned as needed * headers, unversioned .so, and pkgconfig files in -devel subpackage * No libtool archives * Does not own any directories that it should not. * No .desktop file needed MUSTFIX ======= * The 'tr' trick in Source0: is cute, but my preference is to limit macro substitutions in Source0 to simple %{name} and %{version} only. Anything more complicated (like spawning subshells) becomes harder to read. In this case, just hard code the version string. * -devel subpackage should use full version in base package dependency (it is missing -%{release}), or add a comment why it's not needed: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} * BR: flex, bison seem to be unnecessary. COMMENTS ======== * One duplicate file found: Docs/styles.css. This is ok, however, as it is needed for the docs in both the base and the -devel-doc subpackage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 22:51:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 18:51:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197736] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607062251.k66MpBKA001475@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197736 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-06 18:42 EST ------- * source files match upstream: fcda7127b01dcad43ca7cf30be9a1dc6 DateTime-Format-Strptime-1.0700.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * noarch package; no debuginfo. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(DateTime::Format::Strptime) = 1.0700 perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime = 1.0700-1.fc6 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(DateTime) perl(DateTime::Locale) perl(DateTime::TimeZone) perl(Exporter) perl(Params::Validate) perl(strict) perl(vars) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=7, Tests=373, 2 wallclock secs ( 1.30 cusr + 0.15 csys = 1.45 CPU) * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 22:52:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 18:52:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197739] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Event-Recurrence In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607062252.k66MqIow001574@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Event-Recurrence https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197739 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 23:20:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 19:20:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197565] Review Request: buildbot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607062320.k66NKN35002375@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: buildbot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197565 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-06 19:11 EST ------- Thanks for the review. 1) used I changed it to Development/Tools as Development/Build Tools is not a valid group. 2) fixed 3) fixed 4) fixed 5) I am choosing to leave this one it. buildbot is 100x more functional with it. 6) fixed 7) its only a small files list, so in this case I will leave it. If it were bigger, then I would certainly use the method suggested on the wiki. Updated: Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~michael/buildbot.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~michael/buildbot-0.7.3-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 23:27:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 19:27:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196710] Review Request: coldet - 3D Collision Detection Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607062327.k66NRuZa002526@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coldet - 3D Collision Detection Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196710 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |wart at kobold.org OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-07-06 19:19 EST ------- MUST ==== * Package/spec named appropriately * Source matches upstream: 26c2db12ec5ad2d7a0b1d0fe2597ed4a coldet_11.zip * LGPL license ok, license file included * rpmlint output clean * spec file legible and in Am. English * Builds ok in mock on FC4, FC5, and FC6 for both i386 and x86_64 * No excessive BR: (no BR: at all!) * ldconfig called in %post/%postud as needed * headers and unversioned .so properly located in -devel subpackage * Owns all directories that it creates; doesn't own directories that it should not. * No locales * No .desktop file needed * Not relocatable * No duplicate %files * File permissions look ok * No libtool archives MUSTFIX ======= * -devel subpackage missing the -%{release} component of e-v-r when requiring the base package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 23:44:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 19:44:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189724] Review Request: libflaim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607062344.k66Ni8X4003343@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libflaim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189724 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-06 19:35 EST ------- withdrawning the review for this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 23:59:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 19:59:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197739] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Event-Recurrence In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607062359.k66NxvVL004211@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Event-Recurrence https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197739 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-06 19:51 EST ------- Your two manual versioned dependencies are duplicated by unversioned dependencies found by RPM; you will have to remove yours or filter RPM's. Review: * source files match upstream: 9a08830b081a93619f4a8564063e3bf0 DateTime-Event-Recurrence-0.16.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged (0.16 12 May 2005) * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64) (with DateTime-Set and Set-Infinite in my local repo) * rpmlint is silent. * noarch package, so no debuginfo. X final provides and requires are sane: perl(DateTime::Event::Recurrence) = 0.16 perl(DateTime::Set::ICal) perl-DateTime-Event-Recurrence = 0.16-1.fc6 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) X perl(DateTime) X perl(DateTime) >= 0.27 X perl(DateTime::Set) X perl(DateTime::Set) >= 0.17 perl(DateTime::Span) perl(Params::Validate) perl(constant) perl(integer) perl(strict) perl(vars) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=14, Tests=195, 16 wallclock secs (15.10 cusr + 0.35 csys = 15.45 CPU) * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 00:11:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 20:11:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193071] Review Request: ruby-sqlite3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607070011.k670BSh2004759@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-sqlite3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193071 ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2006-07-06 20:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > The gemspec file looks like a source of useful data; I wonder if we could use it > to generate a reasonable starting spec file. I tried that with http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/gem2spec.html which works reasonably well. The thing that makes me hesitant about packaging gems are outlined at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/RubyGems > The site{lib,arch} thing should be resolved now. The guidelines say sitearchdir > and sitelib dir; is that we really wanted to go with? I wanted to keep it close to the entry in Config::CONFIG those get set from. Do you think the resulting macro names are too long ? > There's no ruby(abi) requirement. Oops. > Is the explicit sqlite requirement necessary? rpm finds the libsqlite3.so.0 > dependency on its own. You are right - that was overkill > Review: > X No ruby(abi) requirement. Fixed Updated stuff: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/spec/ruby-sqlite3.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/SRPMS/ruby-sqlite3-1.1.0-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 00:37:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 20:37:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189685] Review Request: Anjuta2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607070037.k670bgiV005465@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Anjuta2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189685 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-06 20:29 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/anjuta-2.spec SRPM : http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/anjuta-2.0.2-2.src.rpm (Okay, I know the src rpm was not built with the anjuta-2 spec file, it is the same file as in the src.rpm, only renamed) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 00:39:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 20:39:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197814] Review Request: autogen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607070039.k670dJ6n005591@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197814 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-06 20:30 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/autogen.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/autogen-5.8.4-2.src.rpm mock builds fine a couple of warnings from rpmlint (3 in total) lots of changes to the spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 00:49:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 20:49:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196629] Review Request: perl-SVK - A Distributed Version Control System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607070049.k670ntQ1006319@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SVK - A Distributed Version Control System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196629 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-06 20:41 EST ------- I noticed this during configuration: Warning: prerequisite File::Spec 3.18 not found. We have 3.12. File::Spec is in the core Perl package so updating it isn't really feasible. I'm not sure if this causes any problems. Some rpmlint issues: E: perl-SVK useless-explicit-provides perl(SVK) It looks like RPM is screwing up yet again. I think you'll have to filter this. W: perl-SVK doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/perl-SVK-1.08/contrib/svk-completion.pl perl(warnings) W: perl-SVK doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/perl-SVK-1.08/contrib/svkopendiff /bin/sh Documentation should not be executable. Some issues with the tests: t/05svm-lock.................ok 2/3 skipped: no lock found Not sure what's up here. t/06keyword..................ok 4/27 skipped: fix inconsistent eol-style after commit This looks like an intentionally skipped test. t/50dav......................skipped all skipped: Apache::Test 1.18 required for testing dav Not sure if it would make sense to test this without network access. t/71autovivify............... Use of uninitialized value in join or string at (eval 62) line 2. t/72sign.....................skipped all skipped: gnupg not found I added BR: gnupg but the result isn't confidence inspiring. Perhaps you could take a look and see if any of that is intended. I see the rpmlint issues as blockers. Review: * source files match upstream: 92a90bf73dfa958fd3633ec50c5798b1 SVK-1.08.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). X rpmlint has valid complaints. * noarch package; no debuginfo. X final provides and requires are sane: X perl(SVK) perl(SVK) = 1.08 perl(SVK::Command) perl(SVK::Command::Add) perl(SVK::Command::Admin) perl(SVK::Command::Annotate) perl(SVK::Command::Cat) perl(SVK::Command::Checkout) perl(SVK::Command::Checkout::detach) perl(SVK::Command::Checkout::list) perl(SVK::Command::Checkout::purge) perl(SVK::Command::Checkout::relocate) perl(SVK::Command::Cleanup) perl(SVK::Command::Cmerge) perl(SVK::Command::Commit) perl(SVK::Command::Copy) perl(SVK::Command::Delete) perl(SVK::Command::Depotmap) perl(SVK::Command::Depotmap::add) perl(SVK::Command::Depotmap::detach) perl(SVK::Command::Depotmap::list) perl(SVK::Command::Depotmap::relocate) perl(SVK::Command::Describe) perl(SVK::Command::Diff) perl(SVK::Command::Help) perl(SVK::Command::Import) perl(SVK::Command::Info) perl(SVK::Command::List) perl(SVK::Command::Log) perl(SVK::Command::Merge) perl(SVK::Command::Mirror) perl(SVK::Command::Mirror::detach) perl(SVK::Command::Mirror::list) perl(SVK::Command::Mirror::recover) perl(SVK::Command::Mirror::relocate) perl(SVK::Command::Mirror::unlock) perl(SVK::Command::Mirror::upgrade) perl(SVK::Command::Mkdir) perl(SVK::Command::Move) perl(SVK::Command::Patch) perl(SVK::Command::Patch::FileRequired) perl(SVK::Command::Patch::apply) perl(SVK::Command::Patch::delete) perl(SVK::Command::Patch::dump) perl(SVK::Command::Patch::list) perl(SVK::Command::Patch::regen) perl(SVK::Command::Patch::test) perl(SVK::Command::Patch::update) perl(SVK::Command::Patch::view) perl(SVK::Command::Propdel) perl(SVK::Command::Propedit) perl(SVK::Command::Propget) perl(SVK::Command::Proplist) perl(SVK::Command::Propset) perl(SVK::Command::Pull) perl(SVK::Command::Push) perl(SVK::Command::Resolved) perl(SVK::Command::Revert) perl(SVK::Command::Smerge) perl(SVK::Command::Status) perl(SVK::Command::Switch) perl(SVK::Command::Sync) perl(SVK::Command::Update) perl(SVK::Command::Verify) perl(SVK::Editor::Combine) perl(SVK::Editor::Delay) perl(SVK::Editor::Diff) perl(SVK::Editor::Merge) perl(SVK::Editor::Patch) perl(SVK::Editor::Rename) perl(SVK::Editor::Sign) perl(SVK::Editor::Status) perl(SVK::Editor::Translate) perl(SVK::Editor::XD) perl(SVK::I18N) perl(SVK::Merge) perl(SVK::Merge::Info) perl(SVK::Notify) perl(SVK::Patch) perl(SVK::Patch::CommitEditor) perl(SVK::Resolve) perl(SVK::Resolve::AraxisMerge) perl(SVK::Resolve::Emacs) perl(SVK::Resolve::FileMerge) perl(SVK::Resolve::GVim) perl(SVK::Resolve::GtkDiff) perl(SVK::Resolve::Guiffy) perl(SVK::Resolve::KDiff3) perl(SVK::Resolve::Meld) perl(SVK::Resolve::P4WinMerge) perl(SVK::Resolve::TkDiff) perl(SVK::Resolve::TortoiseMerge) perl(SVK::Resolve::Vim) perl(SVK::Resolve::XXDiff) perl(SVK::Target) perl(SVK::Target::Universal) perl(SVK::Util) perl(SVK::VerifyEditor) perl(SVK::Version) perl(SVK::XD) perl(SVK::XD::Root) perl(SVK::XD::Signature) perl-SVK = 1.08-1.fc6 = ? /bin/sh /usr/bin/perl perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Algorithm::Annotate) perl(Algorithm::Diff) perl(Class::Autouse) perl(Clone) perl(Compress::Zlib) perl(Config) perl(Data::Hierarchy) perl(Date::Format) perl(Date::Parse) perl(Digest::MD5) perl(Encode) perl(Encode::TW) perl(Exporter) perl(Fcntl) perl(File::Compare) perl(File::Copy) perl(File::Glob) perl(File::Path) perl(File::Spec) perl(File::Type) perl(FreezeThaw) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(IO::Digest) perl(List::Util) perl(MIME::Base64) perl(PerlIO) perl(PerlIO::eol) >= 0.10 perl(PerlIO::scalar) perl(PerlIO::via) perl(PerlIO::via::dynamic) perl(PerlIO::via::symlink) perl(Pod::Escapes) perl(Pod::Simple) perl(Regexp::Shellish) perl(SVK) perl(SVK::Command::Log) perl(SVK::Command::Sync) perl(SVK::Editor::Combine) perl(SVK::Editor::Delay) perl(SVK::Editor::Diff) perl(SVK::Editor::Merge) perl(SVK::Editor::Patch) perl(SVK::Editor::Rename) perl(SVK::Editor::Sign) perl(SVK::Editor::Status) perl(SVK::Editor::Translate) perl(SVK::I18N) perl(SVK::Merge) perl(SVK::Patch) perl(SVK::Target::Universal) perl(SVK::Util) perl(SVK::Version) perl(SVK::XD) perl(SVN::Core) perl(SVN::Delta) perl(SVN::Fs) perl(SVN::Ra) perl(SVN::Repos) perl(SVN::Simple::Edit) >= 0.27 perl(Sys::Hostname) perl(URI) perl(YAML) perl(autouse) perl(base) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful, 1 test and 6 subtests skipped. Files=74, Tests=1439, 136 wallclock secs (51.90 cusr + 16.46 csys = 68.36 CPU) Note that this is with BR: gnupg; without it, another test is skipped. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. X file permissions are appropriate (executable documentation) * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 01:12:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 21:12:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196007] Review Request: kdirstat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607070112.k671CJrZ007054@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdirstat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196007 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-06 21:03 EST ------- This has been in the repo for several days now; any reason this bug hasn't been closed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 01:28:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 21:28:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175047] Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607070128.k671S5AM007463@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175047 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-06 21:19 EST ------- It's now a couple of weeks past June 20th; anything happening here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 01:35:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 21:35:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195645] Review Request: rasqal - RDF query library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607070135.k671Z5me007657@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rasqal - RDF query library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195645 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-06 21:26 EST ------- Is there any chance we could make some progress here? Perhaps the guidelines do need to be clarified a bit, but I think the only way they're going to change is to allow %makeinstall if and only if "make DESTDIR=..." doesn't work, which it clearly does here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 02:29:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 22:29:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193499] Review Request: XPad - A sticky notes application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607070229.k672To2w010419@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: XPad - A sticky notes application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193499 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2006-07-06 22:21 EST ------- I have not used XPad in a long time and have in fact found Tomboy to be incredibly useful for these purposes. Thus, I have no further intention to submit it to or maintain it in Extras, as I feel that maintaining a package which I do not actively use is inappropriate from a contributing standpoint, and would be very prone to me not being able to solve bugs or properly test things. I'm closing this as WONTFIX. If anyone wants to continue from my packaging, please feel free to do so. Space and bandwidth limitations notwithstanding, the spec file and source RPM as linked to from here will likely remain on my webspace indefinitely. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 02:39:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 22:39:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197764] Review Request: hfsplus-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607070239.k672dJVL011266@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hfsplus-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197764 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-06 22:30 EST ------- Erm... works for me? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 03:07:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 23:07:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192430] Review Request: python-kiwi - Framework for Python GUI applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607070307.k67379CK014052@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-kiwi - Framework for Python GUI applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192430 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-07-06 22:58 EST ------- Build failed. msgfmt is missing, not installing translations ... No translations found for kiwi in /var/tmp/python-kiwi-1.9.8-0.3.fc6-root-mockbuild error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.45913 (%install) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 03:38:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 23:38:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197461] Review Request: perl-Class-InsideOut In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607070338.k673c6Mw016334@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-InsideOut https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197461 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-06 23:29 EST ------- +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +devel build succeeds +Request branching +Close bug Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 03:59:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 23:59:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197764] Review Request: hfsplus-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607070359.k673xWfr018231@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hfsplus-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197764 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-06 23:51 EST ------- == Not an official review as I'm not yet sponsored == Mock build for development i386 is sucessfull with some warnings SBTree.c: In function 'SearchBTreeRecord': SBTree.c:96: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'DebugStr' differ in signedness * MUST Items: - MUST: rpmlint on binary RPM shows error. W: hfsplus-tools invalid-license Apple Public Source License The license you specified is invalid. The valid licenses are: -GPL -LGPL -Artistic -BSD -MIT -QPL -MPL -IBM Public License -Apache License -PHP License -Public Domain -Modified CNRI Open Source License -zlib License -CVW License -Ricoh Source Code Public License -Python license -Vovida Software License -Sun Internet Standards Source License -Intel Open Source License -Jabber Open Source License if the license is close to an existing one, you can use ' style'. W: hfsplus-tools no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. - MUST: dist tag is present. - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matching the base package hfsplus-tools, in the format hfsplus-tools.spec. - MUST: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. md5sum is correct (2a707860a8e81308777afd5a821eec07) - MUST: This package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: This package did not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: This package have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. - MUST: This package used macros. - MUST: Document files are included like README. - MUST: Package did NOT contained any .la libtool archives. * Source URL is present and working. * BuildRoot is correct BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) * BuildRequires is correct You Need to do : Add Documentation files and also package must conatain Open source License. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 04:02:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 00:02:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607070402.k6742w1l018343@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-07-06 23:54 EST ------- Why is the debuginfo package disabled? Manual copying of the readme and license is not needed with the %doc macro in the %files section which copies automatically. Merely specify %doc lazarus/COPYING* etc. You can drop the Requires: gdk-pixbuf, gtk+ and glibc, because rpm figures out the library dependencies by itself. (rpm -q --requires to see them) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 05:19:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 01:19:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197908] New: Review Request: im-chooser - Input Method configuration tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197908 Summary: Review Request: im-chooser - Input Method configuration tool Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: tagoh at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/tagoh/im-chooser/im-chooser.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/tagoh/im-chooser/im-chooser-0.2.0-1.src.rpm Description: im-chooser is a GUI configuration tool for Input Method that easily choose what you would use for your desktop. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 05:25:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 01:25:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197189] Review Request: fonts-sinhala In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607070525.k675Pqf3021180@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fonts-sinhala https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197189 llch at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From llch at redhat.com 2006-07-07 01:17 EST ------- Thanks. It is updated. Jesse please approve: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/llch/fonts-sinhala/fonts-sinhala.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/llch/fonts-sinhala/fonts-sinhala-0.2-2.src.rpm Packge Owner: dsantani at redhat.com Description: An essential font for Sinhala language for FC6. Size: noarch = 107k; SRPMS = 105k -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 06:26:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 02:26:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197198] Review Request: ntop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607070626.k676QmKQ023836@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197198 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-07 02:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #29) > More issues: > > * plugins loaded twice > > After some look at the code and some testing I have found that all > the plugins in the plugins directory are loaded, so they are loaded > twice since they appear twice in the package... In my opinion > either the *.so without version number should be removed, or they > should be moved to *.so without version numbers. Ok, I will remove the plugins dangling in the /usr/lib directory. > * a plugin is not functionnal > **WARNING** Unable to load plugin /usr/lib/ntop/plugins/libxmldumpPlugin-3.2.so' > **WARNING** Message is '/usr/lib/ntop/plugins/libxmldumpPlugin-3.2.so: undefined > symbol: gdome_str_mkref' hrmm.. good spotting. > And there is also another error, but it may only happen on the first run > **ERROR** LASTSEEN: Unable to open LsWatch database (/var/ntop/LsWatch.db)- the > plugin will be disabled Did you test to see if it re-occurs ? The file is present on my system. > * many unneeded files in the docs: CONTENTS FILES ntop.txt README.Suse > INSTALL BUILD-MinGW.txt BUILD-NTOP.txt ntop-autotools.* PORTING > RedHat-rpmbuild-HOWTO.txt, and certainly DAG I will remove the %doc doc/* line > * should depend on logrotate Done > * less rpmbuild warnings with the following line in %setup > chmod -x docs/ntop-autotools.pdf *.c *.h plugins/*.c plugins/*.xml Done > * you should remove /usr/lib/libntop.so, /usr/lib/libmyrrd.so and > /usr/lib/libntopreport.so since there are no associated headers > and also since they use -release, see below. Removed > * myrrd seems to be an old included version of rrdtools. It shouldn't > be used but instead linked against the system rrd, unless there is > a very good reason not to do so. myrrd is indeed an older rrdtool, however, according to Luca, it has been modified enough to warrant using it instead of the system provided rrdtool. I will leave it with myrrd. > * upstream uses the -release for libtool using the package version, > this is wrong in general, since it trigggers a soname change even > when the abi don't change, however those libraries are not meant to > ne linked against, so if the *.so that don't have the release within > their names are not distributed it is right. I am not sure I follow you here. Could you clarify? > * The mechanisme described under PRIVACY NOTICE should be disabled in > the default case (and reenabled with, for example --version-check) > or completly disabled. I have disabled the version check in the init script. > * ntop doesn't seems to be interruptible by a control-C. It doesn't seems > right to me but I may be wrong. > Maybe for a similar reason, when killing ntop on the first run when ntop > asks for a password, the console is broken. A control-C does shut down ntop here. Its not instant, it performs a graceful shutdown. > This last issue is not blocking the inclusion in extras in my opinion, > it is more for upstream. I am working on Ralf's glib concern at the moment, so I wont post the updated srpm and spec. I have mostly corrected it, however, it still looks for libglib.so incorrectly when building the xmldump plugin. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 11:32:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 07:32:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196710] Review Request: coldet - 3D Collision Detection Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071132.k67BWej3007729@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coldet - 3D Collision Detection Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196710 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-07 07:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > MUSTFIX > ======= > * -devel subpackage missing the -%{release} component of e-v-r when requiring > the base package. Fixed, new version is here: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/coldet.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/coldet-1.1-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 11:33:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 07:33:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196710] Review Request: coldet - 3D Collision Detection Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071133.k67BX9OR007762@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coldet - 3D Collision Detection Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196710 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-07 07:24 EST ------- Correction that should be: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/coldet.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/coldet-1.1-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 11:38:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 07:38:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196740] Review Request: ogre - Object-Oriented Graphics Rendering Engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071138.k67BcWEc008003@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ogre - Object-Oriented Graphics Rendering Engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196740 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-07 07:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > rpmlint warnings: > > W: ogre-devel no-documentation > - Can be safely ignored since docs are in a -doc subpackage. > > E: ogre-devel invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libOgrePlatform.so libOgrePlatform.so > - Not sure where this is coming from. Oops, I meant to fix that one but never got around to fixing it, rpmlint is unhappy because that is an unversioned .so directly under libdir. Since this lib actually gets dlopened by libOgreMain I've moved it to libdir/OGRE > MUSTFIX > ======= > * The 'tr' trick in Source0: is cute, but my preference is to limit > macro substitutions in Source0 to simple %{name} and %{version} only. > Anything more complicated (like spawning subshells) becomes > harder to read. In this case, just hard code the version string. Erm, shouldn't that be a should fix. Nowhere in the guidelines it says use of macros etc is forbbiden in Source0. I know some people want to copy and paste the Source0 URL to wget, some people even want it to contain 0 macro's. I say those people should learn to use "spectool -g name.spec" which will do the macro expansion and cut and pasting for them, directly calling wget. -> EWONTFIX > * -devel subpackage should use full version in base package dependency (it > is missing -%{release}), or add a comment why it's not needed: > Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} Fixed > * BR: flex, bison seem to be unnecessary. ./configure was checking for them but indeed it builds fine without, removed. New version is here: * Fri Jul 7 2006 Hans de Goede 1.2.1-2 - Make -devel package Requires on the main package fully versioned. - Move libOgrePlatform.so out of %%{_libdir} and into the OGRE plugins dirs as its not versioned and only used through dlopen, so its effectivly a plugin. Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ogre.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ogre-1.2.1-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 11:44:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 07:44:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197489] Review Request: ming - SWF output library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071144.k67BipWr008270@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ming - SWF output library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197489 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-07 07:36 EST ------- This ming development snapshot is broken, I'll repost a new srpm once there is a new snapshot with the fix (allready in cvs). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 11:46:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 07:46:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197796] Review Request: glipper-0.89 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071146.k67BkCHC008330@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glipper-0.89 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197796 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 11:47:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 07:47:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197753] Review Request: gdmap-0.7.5-1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071147.k67BlG7d008449@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdmap-0.7.5-1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197753 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 12:15:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 08:15:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197753] Review Request: gdmap-0.7.5-1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071215.k67CFeqg009570@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdmap-0.7.5-1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197753 ------- Additional Comments From splinux25 at gmail.com 2006-07-07 08:07 EST ------- - Fixed mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs and %%find_lang in changelog - added category System and delete-original in desktop-file-install Spec URL : http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/gdmap/gdmap.spec Srpms URL : http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/gdmap/gdmap-0.7.5-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 12:17:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 08:17:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197753] Review Request: gdmap-0.7.5-1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071217.k67CHwL1009705@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdmap-0.7.5-1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197753 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-07-07 08:09 EST ------- MUST Items: - MUST: rpmlint's output is clean - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name} - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed (GPL) with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. - MUST: the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - MUST: The spec file for the package is be legible. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least i386. - MUST: All build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires. - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly. - MUST: If the package does not contain shared library files located in the dynamic linker's default paths - MUST: the package is not designed to be relocatable - MUST: the package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: There are no Large documentation files - MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - MUST: There are no Header files or static libraries - MUST: The package does not contain library files with a suffix - MUST: Package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives - MUST: Package containing GUI applications includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: The source package does include license text(s) as COPYING - SHOULD: mock builds succcessfully in i386. - SHOULD: The reviewer tested that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. - SHOULD: No scriptlets were used, those scriptlets must be sane. - SHOULD: No subpackages present. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 12:18:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 08:18:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197753] Review Request: gdmap-0.7.5-1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071218.k67CIUNQ009751@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdmap-0.7.5-1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197753 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 12:21:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 08:21:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197753] Review Request: gdmap-0.7.5-1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071221.k67CLN6Q009972@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdmap-0.7.5-1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197753 splinux25 at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 12:28:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 08:28:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197559] Review Request: scim-chinese-standard: Chinese Linux Standard IM adapter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071228.k67CSCJ7010349@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-chinese-standard: Chinese Linux Standard IM adapter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197559 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-07-07 08:19 EST ------- Thanks for uploading http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/clsi/scim-chinese-standard-0.0.1-0.1.src.rpm Here are some review comments: - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. E: scim-chinese-standard description-line-too-long This is an adapter to allow SCIM to interoperate with the Input Method specification of the Chinese Linux Standard. W: scim-chinese-standard mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs Fixing in attachment. - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec OK - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. Attached spec file is reworked in Fedora format to meet the guidelines. - MUST: The package must be licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. I think some of the code is derived from scim, which is LGPL. So I think the license should also be LGPL. - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. Ok. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. Ok. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. Please upload an updated .tar.gz file to Sourceforge. Do not include autom4te.cache/ in the tarball. It is 2MB. ;-) Please use "make dist" to generate the tarball. - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Builds file on FC5 x86_64. - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. Builds ok with mock for fc5. - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. Adding %{_libdir}/scim-1.0/IMEngine/*/ - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. ok - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. ok - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). ok - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. ok - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. OK - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. OK - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. SCIM runs okay with scim-chinese-standard installed. A fixed spec file and tarball is at: http://people.redhat.com/petersen/extras/scim-chinese-standard-0.0.1-0.2.src.rpm I think these files %{_libdir}/scim-1.0/IMEngine/standard-im.so %{_libdir}/scim-1.0/Helper/standard-helper.so should be named chinese-standard-*.so also to avoid confusion with any later CJK standard, or other international standard. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 12:52:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 08:52:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197908] Review Request: im-chooser - Input Method configuration tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071252.k67CqL4m012085@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: im-chooser - Input Method configuration tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197908 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |petersen at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 14:15:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 10:15:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 180092] Review Request: NRPE - Monitoring agent for Nagios In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071415.k67EFTtF017009@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NRPE - Monitoring agent for Nagios https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180092 ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2006-07-07 10:06 EST ------- The RPM lint error is safe to ignore because there is nothing that would go in a lib dir. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 14:20:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 10:20:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197353] Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071420.k67EKm0R017533@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197353 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-07-07 10:11 EST ------- Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/man-pages-fr.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/man-pages-fr-2.10.0-1.src.rpm %changelog * Fri Jul 7 2006 Alain Portal 2.10.0-1 - Update to 2.10.0 - New extra tarball -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 14:22:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 10:22:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197936] New: Review Request: NAS The Network Audio System Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197936 Summary: Review Request: NAS The Network Audio System Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: frank-buettner at gmx.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Description: NAS is the audio equivalent of an X display server. The Network Audio System (NAS) was developed by NCD for playing, recording, and manipulating audio data over a network. Like the X Window System, it uses the client/server model to separate applications from the specific drivers that control audio input and output devices. It is also needed to support sound's in Qt. Problem: The license. The autor write: Copyright 1995 Network Computing Devices, Inc. Permission to use, copy, modify, distribute, and sell this software and its documentation for any purpose is hereby granted without fee, provided that the above copyright notice appear in all copies and that both that copyright notice and this permission notice appear in supporting documentation, and that the name Network Computing Devices, Inc. not be used in advertising or publicity pertaining to distribution of this software without specific, written prior permission. THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED `AS-IS'. NETWORK COMPUTING DEVICES, INC., DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES WITH REGARD TO THIS SOFTWARE, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL NETWORK COMPUTING DEVICES, INC., BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER, INCLUDING SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, INCLUDING LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY THEREOF, AND REGARDLESS OF WHETHER IN AN ACTION IN CONTRACT, TORT OR NEGLIGENCE, ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE. Translation: You can do whatever you want with this software! what type of license is it? And can it use in FC extras?? ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-07-07 10:13 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=132052) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=132052&action=view) The first spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 14:53:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 10:53:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197936] Review Request: NAS The Network Audio System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071453.k67Eri8s020312@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NAS The Network Audio System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197936 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |197937 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 14:57:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 10:57:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181831] Review Request: bitbake - Build Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071457.k67EvQ1O020593@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitbake - Build Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181831 Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|UPSTREAM |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 15:07:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 11:07:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197936] Review Request: NAS The Network Audio System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071507.k67F7Bqa021425@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NAS The Network Audio System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197936 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-07 10:58 EST ------- A few comments: 1. Regarding license, for now, use something generic like License: Distributable 2. use lower case pkg name, like Name: nas 3. libaudio.so.2 should be in main pkg, not -devel 4. -devel should (instead) Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} 5. /etc/nas is unowned, add to main pkg %dir /etc/nas 6. %{_includedir}/sound is unowned, change %{_includedir}/audio/* to %{_includedir}/audio/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 15:16:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 11:16:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196710] Review Request: coldet - 3D Collision Detection Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071516.k67FGF9M021798@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coldet - 3D Collision Detection Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196710 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-07-07 11:07 EST ------- All MUSTFIX items addressed. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 15:46:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 11:46:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197198] Review Request: ntop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071546.k67FkZAY025129@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197198 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-07 11:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #30) > (In reply to comment #29) > Ok, I will remove the plugins dangling in the /usr/lib directory. I was speaking about the /usr/lib/ntop/plugins/ directory: every file in this directory ending in .so is loaded. > > And there is also another error, but it may only happen on the first run > > **ERROR** LASTSEEN: Unable to open LsWatch database (/var/ntop/LsWatch.db)- the > > plugin will be disabled > > Did you test to see if it re-occurs ? The file is present on my system. It re-occured. I guess I know why, since for an unknown reason most of the files in /var/ntop/ belong to root, although I never started ntop with -u root. Maybe this comes from the kills of ntop while it asked for a password? > myrrd is indeed an older rrdtool, however, according to Luca, it has been > modified enough to warrant using it instead of the system provided rrdtool. I > will leave it with myrrd. Ok. But at least put a comment in the spec file. And you'll have to watch out the rrdtool updates, especially the security issues... > I have disabled the version check in the init script. It is still used during the required first run that sets the password. I think it shouldn't. > A control-C does shut down ntop here. Its not instant, it performs a graceful > shutdown. Not when ntop is asking for a password. At least seems so to me. I'll retest with the next srpm. (and I get that with ntop -t 4 interrupted by control-C: ven 07 jui 2006 17:37:06 CEST RRD: Thanks for using the rrdPlugin ven 07 jui 2006 17:37:06 CEST RRD: Done ven 07 jui 2006 17:37:06 CEST CLEANUP: Freeing device eth0 (idx=0) *** glibc detected *** ntop: free(): invalid next size (normal): 0x0962c2d8 *** ======= Backtrace: ========= /lib/libc.so.6[0x1fec88] /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_free+0x78)[0x20216f] /usr/lib/libntop-3.2.so(ntop_safefree+0x2c)[0x935d4c] /usr/lib/libntop-3.2.so(cleanup+0xf13)[0x937953] [0xb7f08420] /usr/lib/libntop-3.2.so(_ntopSleepWhileSameState+0x2f)[0x95b09f] ntop[0x804b12f] /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xdc)[0x1b0794] ntop[0x8049d31] ======= Memory map: ======== Abandon ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 15:53:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 11:53:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197489] Review Request: ming - SWF output library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071553.k67FrjEH026052@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ming - SWF output library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197489 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-07 11:45 EST ------- moreover the java bindings are not free software... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 15:55:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 11:55:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197936] Review Request: NAS The Network Audio System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071555.k67Ftd5j026229@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NAS The Network Audio System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197936 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-07-07 11:47 EST ------- ok fixed here the new .spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 15:56:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 11:56:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197936] Review Request: NAS The Network Audio System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071556.k67FuUQE026375@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NAS The Network Audio System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197936 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-07-07 11:48 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=132061) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=132061&action=view) 1.8.-2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 15:58:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 11:58:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197936] Review Request: NAS The Network Audio System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071558.k67FwDpQ026548@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NAS The Network Audio System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197936 frank-buettner at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #132061|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 16:02:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 12:02:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189384] Review Request: python-ruledispatch: A generic function package for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071602.k67G2erg027016@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-ruledispatch: A generic function package for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189384 lmacken at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lmacken at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From lmacken at redhat.com 2006-07-07 11:53 EST ------- Ignacio seems to be MIA, so I'll help push this one along. http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/python-ruledispatch.spec http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/python-ruledispatch-0.5a0-1.svnr2115.src.rpm * Thu Jul 6 2006 Luke Macken 0.5a0-1.svnr2115 - Use sitearch instead of sitelib in the files - Remove python-abi requirement - Ghost the .pyo files - Add the URL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 16:06:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 12:06:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183953] Review Request: bit (A bit-oriented data stream parser and gtkmm widget set) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071606.k67G6kWL027303@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bit (A bit-oriented data stream parser and gtkmm widget set) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183953 rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 16:07:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 12:07:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192052] Review Request: bitgtkmm (Gtkmm widgets for the bit library) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071607.k67G79JG027376@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitgtkmm (Gtkmm widgets for the bit library) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192052 Bug 192052 depends on bug 183953, which changed state. Bug 183953 Summary: Review Request: bit (A bit-oriented data stream parser and gtkmm widget set) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183953 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 16:30:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 12:30:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197565] Review Request: buildbot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071630.k67GUORi028833@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: buildbot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197565 ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2006-07-07 12:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > 1) used I changed it to Development/Tools as Development/Build Tools is not a > valid group. That's good, but AFAIK "Development/Build Tools" _is_ a valid group. At least it is listed in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RPMGroups > 5) I am choosing to leave this one it. buildbot is 100x more functional with it. OK > 7) its only a small files list, so in this case I will leave it. If it were > bigger, then I would certainly use the method suggested on the wiki. Good I can't see any other blockers. rpmlint is silent on the srpm while on the actual rpm gives 3 warnings I would ignore: W: buildbot wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/buildbot-0.7.3/contrib/windows/buildbot2.bat W: buildbot doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/buildbot-0.7.3/contrib/run_maxq.py /usr/bin/env W: buildbot doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/buildbot-0.7.3/contrib/svn_buildbot.py /usr/bin/env -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 16:40:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 12:40:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191017] Review Request: eclipse-subclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071640.k67Ges3a029421@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-subclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191017 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-07 12:32 EST ------- Did you want me to review this package with that patch in place, or should I wait for you to cut a new package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 16:47:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 12:47:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197608] Review Request: BuildBot - build/test cycle automation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071647.k67GlIbg030044@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: BuildBot - build/test cycle automation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197608 giallu at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2006-07-07 12:38 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 197565 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 16:47:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 12:47:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197565] Review Request: buildbot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071647.k67GlTAc030066@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: buildbot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197565 giallu at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |giallu at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2006-07-07 12:38 EST ------- *** Bug 197608 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 16:50:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 12:50:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191549] Review Request: hping3 - TCP/IP stack auditing and much more In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071650.k67GoIJf030301@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hping3 - TCP/IP stack auditing and much more https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191549 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO|163779 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-07 12:41 EST ------- I give up. I have seen activity from the package submitter on the mailing lists but can't get any response. So I'm closing this bug. At this point, consider my approval revoked. I will be happy to re-review at a later date if this bug is reopened or if someone else wishes to submit this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 16:51:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 12:51:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174021] Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071651.k67Gp13h030390@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174021 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-07 12:42 EST ------- I will close this ticket if I don't hear back soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 16:52:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 12:52:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175623] Review Request: yaz - Z39.50/SRW/SRU programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071652.k67GqiYK030513@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yaz - Z39.50/SRW/SRU programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175623 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-07 12:44 EST ------- This package has been in the repo for a couple of weeks now; any reason this bug hasn't been closed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 17:00:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 13:00:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197936] Review Request: NAS The Network Audio System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071700.k67H0O0e031102@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NAS The Network Audio System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197936 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |rdieter at math.unl.edu OtherBugsDependingO| |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 17:11:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 13:11:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197545] Review Request: perl-File-ReadBackwards In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071711.k67HBGC6031689@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-ReadBackwards https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197545 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-07-07 13:02 EST ------- Imported into CVS, branches created, and builds requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 17:12:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 13:12:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196007] Review Request: kdirstat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071712.k67HCcl5031803@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdirstat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196007 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 17:15:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 13:15:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191017] Review Request: eclipse-subclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071715.k67HFmwn031939@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-subclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191017 ------- Additional Comments From robert at marcanoonline.com 2006-07-07 13:07 EST ------- I was planning to install rawhide on a VM this weekend, in order to test with the added eclipse 3.2, to see if nothing breaks, specially my patch to disable the native javahl interface to see if something fixs it in the current incarnation of FC-6. but If you can review it with the patch, better -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 17:32:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 13:32:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197552] Review Request: perl-Set-Infinite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071732.k67HWaQU001217@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Set-Infinite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197552 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-07-07 13:24 EST ------- Imported into CVS, branches created, and builds requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 17:32:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 13:32:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197726] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Set In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071732.k67HWwNa001251@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197726 Bug 197726 depends on bug 197552, which changed state. Bug 197552 Summary: Review Request: perl-Set-Infinite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197552 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 17:34:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 13:34:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197726] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Set In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071734.k67HYX5m001388@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197726 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-07-07 13:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > The requires list for this module comes up with: > perl(Set::Infinite) >= 0.59 > perl(Set::Infinite) >= 0.59 Sorry, I was trying to watch for those kinds of things, but I guess I missed this one... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 17:38:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 13:38:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197936] Review Request: NAS The Network Audio System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071738.k67Hc0VK001893@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NAS The Network Audio System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197936 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-07 13:29 EST ------- OK, I'll review this. More comments: 1. Other good things to %doc: %doc BUGS FAQ HISTORY TODO 2. man3 bits should be in -devel (they're api man pages) 3. rename /etc/nas/nasd.conf.eg -> /etc/nas/nasd.conf 4. changelog format is goofy, instead of: 1.8.-2%{?dist} use just 1.8-2 (you can leave the %{?dist} appended if you like, that's your preference), just don't have a '.-' in there. 5. (fc5) needs BuildRequires: libXext-devel libXt-devel (found by trying to build in a fc5 mock buildroot) 6. Would be nice to be buildable on < fc5. Could be done if you don't mind doing something like: BuildRequires: bison flex %if "%{?fedora}" > "4" BuildRequires: imake BuildRequires: libXaw-devel libXext-devel libXpm-devel libXp-devel libXt-devel %else BuildRequires: xorg-x11-devel %endif and for %install, use: make DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT install install.man \ BINDIR=%{_bindir} \ INCROOT=%{_includedir} \ LIBDIR=%{_libdir}/X11 \ SHLIBDIR=%{_libdir} \ USRLIBDIR=%{_libdir} \ MANPATH=%{_mandir} 7. Re license, mandriva uses License: Public Domain ?? (: 8. Include init script for nasd, I'll attach what Mandriva uses add to spec: Source1: nasd.init Source2: nasd.sysconfig and in %install install -p -m755 -D %{SOURCE1} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_initrddir}/nasd install -p -m644 -D %{SOURCE2} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/nasd and in %files: %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/nasd %{_initrddir}/nasd and scriptlets: %preun if [ $1 = 0 ] ; then /sbin/chkconfig --del nasd /sbin/service nasd stop >/dev/null 2>&1 ||: fi %post /sbin/chkconfig --add nasd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 17:39:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 13:39:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197936] Review Request: NAS The Network Audio System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071739.k67HdQAT002035@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NAS The Network Audio System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197936 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-07 13:30 EST ------- Source1: http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/SOURCES/nas/nasd.init Source2: http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/SOURCES/nas/nasd.sysconfig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 17:40:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 13:40:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197936] Review Request: NAS The Network Audio System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071740.k67HegU3002178@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NAS The Network Audio System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197936 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #132052|0 |1 is obsolete| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 17:42:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 13:42:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197739] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Event-Recurrence In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071742.k67HgbrP002357@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Event-Recurrence https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197739 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-07-07 13:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Your two manual versioned dependencies are duplicated by unversioned > dependencies found by RPM; you will have to remove yours or filter RPM's. I dropped the manual dependencies. http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-DateTime-Event-Recurrence-0.16-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 17:43:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 13:43:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197608] Review Request: BuildBot - build/test cycle automation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071743.k67HhxO7002548@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: BuildBot - build/test cycle automation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197608 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 17:44:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 13:44:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196740] Review Request: ogre - Object-Oriented Graphics Rendering Engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071744.k67HiYc6002602@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ogre - Object-Oriented Graphics Rendering Engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196740 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-07-07 13:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > MUSTFIX > > ======= > > * The 'tr' trick in Source0: is cute, but my preference is to limit > > macro substitutions in Source0 to simple %{name} and %{version} only. > > Anything more complicated (like spawning subshells) becomes > > harder to read. In this case, just hard code the version string. > > Erm, shouldn't that be a should fix. Nowhere in the guidelines it says use of > macros etc is forbbiden in Source0. I know some people want to copy and paste > the Source0 URL to wget, some people even want it to contain 0 macro's. I say > those people should learn to use "spectool -g name.spec" which will do the macro > expansion and cut and pasting for them, directly calling wget. -> EWONTFIX While there are no explicit guidelines against this, I feel that it falls into the "spec file must be legible" category. I don't think we should have to rely on spectool to decipher source urls. I'm willing to live with macro substitutions, but I think shell escapes add too much indirection. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 17:46:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 13:46:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197936] Review Request: nas: Network Audio System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071746.k67HkTtm002783@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nas: Network Audio System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197936 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: NAS The |Review Request: nas: Network |Network Audio System |Audio System -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 17:49:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 13:49:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197739] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Event-Recurrence In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071749.k67Hn5wA003138@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Event-Recurrence https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197739 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-07 13:40 EST ------- Looks good now. The dependency list is now: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(DateTime) perl(DateTime::Set) perl(DateTime::Span) perl(Params::Validate) perl(constant) perl(integer) perl(strict) perl(vars) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 17:50:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 13:50:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197744] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Event-ICal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071750.k67Ho9UN003269@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Event-ICal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197744 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 18:01:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 14:01:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196740] Review Request: ogre - Object-Oriented Graphics Rendering Engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071801.k67I12at004142@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ogre - Object-Oriented Graphics Rendering Engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196740 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-07 13:52 EST ------- There is precedent in Extras for using shell escapes for this. For instance, my own perl-Math-Pari package has a far less obvious one: http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-Math-Pari/perl-Math-Pari.spec?root=extras&view=markup I think that if anyone looking at ths spec file doesn't "get" the "tr" subsitution almost instantly, they're going to have great difficulty following just about any type of shell script, including the rest of the spec file. The "tr" program is something you'd come across in "Scripting 101" after all. I really do think this comes down to the packager's preference myself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 18:02:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 14:02:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192577] Review Request: perl-OpenFrame In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071802.k67I2gcB004421@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-OpenFrame https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192577 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-07-07 13:54 EST ------- I'm not entirely sure how much of the email I should include in the package. (I had to reach the author via a third party. :-) I've included the relevant bit in a README.LICENSE in -3. Given that it is confirmation of the license statement in lib/OpenFrame/Argument/Blob.pm, I hope that's sufficient. http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-OpenFrame-3.05-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 18:05:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 14:05:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196740] Review Request: ogre - Object-Oriented Graphics Rendering Engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071805.k67I5ZsP004690@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ogre - Object-Oriented Graphics Rendering Engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196740 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-07 13:57 EST ------- Thanks for the support Paul! Wart, There are plenty of examples in FE with similar and much much harder to read shell scriptlets, please if this is the only blokcer approve. What gain is there in my removing the shellscript only to readd it with the first upstream release. I want a new upstream release to be as easy as: -bump %version -reset %release to 1 -add changelog -spectool -g -rebuild Now I know things aren't always going to be as easy as this, but having to manually edit Source0 for each upstream update is a pain, especially since one then has to remember the prefered filename-formating for all upstreams, or goto the website of upstream find the download page and find out the correct URL that way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 18:08:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 14:08:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192577] Review Request: perl-OpenFrame In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071808.k67I8mBa004888@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-OpenFrame https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192577 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-07 14:00 EST ------- Yes, that looks reasonable; we now have some blanket statement of what the license is. Unfortunately the dependency list includes: perl(Pipeline) perl(Pipeline) >= 2.00 which has been clarified to be a blocker since this review was started. That is the only remaining issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 18:09:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 14:09:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196740] Review Request: ogre - Object-Oriented Graphics Rendering Engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071809.k67I9FB5004936@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ogre - Object-Oriented Graphics Rendering Engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196740 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-07-07 14:00 EST ------- I didn't realize that there was already precedent for this type of thing. I hadn't seen it until now. While I don't necessarily like it, I won't have it be the only thing blocking the review. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 18:14:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 14:14:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189375] Re-Review Request: Maelstrom: space combat game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071814.k67IEjrY005473@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Re-Review Request: Maelstrom: space combat game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189375 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-07-07 14:06 EST ------- Ping. Any response from upstream? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 18:38:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 14:38:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193531] Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071838.k67IcBvs007535@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193531 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-07-07 14:29 EST ------- Can you correct these ? a spec file in a srpm w/o world-read perms can cause issues with mock chitlesh(SPECS)[1]$rpmlint -i ../SRPMS/kicad-2006.06.26-3.src.rpm W: kicad strange-permission kicad.spec 0600 A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. W: kicad strange-permission kicad.desktop 0755 A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. W: kicad mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 18:42:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 14:42:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197963] New: Review Request: bouncycastle Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197963 Summary: Review Request: bouncycastle Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: fitzsim at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/fitzsim/bouncycastle.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/fitzsim/bouncycastle-1.33-1.src.rpm Description: The Bouncy Castle JCE provider. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 18:43:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 14:43:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196710] Review Request: coldet - 3D Collision Detection Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071843.k67IhdDo008584@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coldet - 3D Collision Detection Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196710 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-07 14:35 EST ------- Thanks! Imported & build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 18:43:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 14:43:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196744] Review Request: chess - 3D chess game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071843.k67Ihqqh008652@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chess - 3D chess game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196744 Bug 196744 depends on bug 196710, which changed state. Bug 196710 Summary: Review Request: coldet - 3D Collision Detection Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196710 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 18:45:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 14:45:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197963] Review Request: bouncycastle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071845.k67IjGmD008880@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouncycastle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197963 fitzsim at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |green at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2006-07-07 14:36 EST ------- I'm introducing this package because currently we include the BouncyCastle JCE in java-1.4.2-gcj-compat, whereas it really deserves to be its own package. I don't think BouncyCastle should go in Extras because it is a crypto library and therefore needs approval by Red Hat legal. The upstream BouncyCastle tarball includes the patented IDEA algorithm. The tarball in this SRPM has those sources and references removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 18:45:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 14:45:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197936] Review Request: nas: Network Audio System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071845.k67Ijc7o008947@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nas: Network Audio System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197936 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-07-07 14:37 EST ------- FC4 will get deprecated near and for new packages I think FC5 and FC6 are ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 18:46:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 14:46:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197936] Review Request: nas: Network Audio System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071846.k67Ikqrr009080@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nas: Network Audio System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197936 frank-buettner at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #132061|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-07-07 14:38 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=132080) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=132080&action=view) 1.8.-3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 18:53:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 14:53:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197936] Review Request: nas: Network Audio System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071853.k67IrJBW010151@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nas: Network Audio System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197936 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-07 14:44 EST ------- > FC4 will get deprecated near and for new packages I think FC5 and FC6 are ok. OK, it's only that I have a vested interest in EL4 support too. (: I can patch my own local builds if you're not willing to do that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 19:00:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 15:00:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197936] Review Request: nas: Network Audio System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071900.k67J0HcU011012@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nas: Network Audio System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197936 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-07 14:51 EST ------- I guess we missed adding Req's for the scriptlets: Requires(preun): chkconfig /sbin/service Requires(post): chkconfig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 19:05:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 15:05:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197967] New: Review Request: gkrellm - Multiple stacked system monitors in one process Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197967 Summary: Review Request: gkrellm - Multiple stacked system monitors in one process Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/gkrellm.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ Description: GKrellM charts SMP CPU, load, Disk, and all active net interfaces automatically. An on/off button and online timer for the PPP interface is provided. Monitors for memory and swap usage, file system, internet connections, APM laptop battery, mbox style mailboxes, and cpu temps. Also includes an uptime monitor, a hostname label, and a clock/calendar. Additional features are: * Autoscaling grid lines with configurable grid line resolution. * LED indicators for the net interfaces. * A gui popup for configuration of chart sizes and resolutions. Note 1: This packages is moving from core to extras! The core packages also includes the gkrellm wireless plugin, but that _really_ should be packaged seperatly as its a completly seperate tarbal. Expect a review request for gkrellm-wireless soon (ish) Note 2: I'm going on a short vacation from monday 10 juli till friday 14 juli, so if I'm quiet thats why. Note 3, rpmlint output: W: gkrellm-daemon dangerous-command-in-%postun userdel Needed, can be ignored W: gkrellm-daemon incoherent-init-script-name gkrellmd The initscript is / was called gkrellmd in FC, changing the name to be consistent with the package name would cause more pain then its worth. W: gkrellm-devel no-documentation There are no development related docs to package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 19:17:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 15:17:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189375] Re-Review Request: Maelstrom: space combat game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071917.k67JHuGJ011930@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Re-Review Request: Maelstrom: space combat game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189375 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-07-07 15:09 EST ------- No. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 19:34:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 15:34:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197936] Review Request: nas: Network Audio System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071934.k67JY7xJ013330@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nas: Network Audio System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197936 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-07-07 15:25 EST ------- It is better to build an extra spec file for FC4. But this is not an real problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 19:35:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 15:35:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197936] Review Request: nas: Network Audio System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071935.k67JZsQo013495@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nas: Network Audio System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197936 frank-buettner at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #132080|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-07-07 15:27 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=132084) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=132084&action=view) 1.8.-4 incl. remark for FC4 and Requires(preun)/ Requires(post) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 19:39:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 15:39:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196740] Review Request: ogre - Object-Oriented Graphics Rendering Engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071939.k67JdHSo013915@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ogre - Object-Oriented Graphics Rendering Engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196740 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-07 15:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > I didn't realize that there was already precedent for this type of thing. I > hadn't seen it until now. While I don't necessarily like it, I won't have it be > the only thing blocking the review. > > APPROVED Thanks, actually the precedents for this is where I learned todo this, thats how one develops bad habbits :) Imported & build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 19:39:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 15:39:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196744] Review Request: chess - 3D chess game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071939.k67Jdoof013973@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chess - 3D chess game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196744 Bug 196744 depends on bug 196740, which changed state. Bug 196740 Summary: Review Request: ogre - Object-Oriented Graphics Rendering Engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196740 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 19:39:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 15:39:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197814] Review Request: autogen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071939.k67JdwSh014012@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197814 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-07-07 15:31 EST ------- Not trivial to review due to lots of issues: * AutoOpts licence is LGPL, not GPL! * Run rpmlint on the binary rpms! It gives further hints. * -devel DSO files (*.so) in non-devel package! * -devel package is missing %defattr definition * missing scriptlet dependencies for /sbin/ldconfig * "INSTALL" %doc file is irrelevant to users * /usr/include/autoopts/ is orphaned * /usr/share/autogen is orphaned * pkgconfig file is executable * worrisome compiler warnings, not limited to: putshell.c: In function 'optionPutShell': putshell.c:203: warning: format '%1$ld' expects type 'long int', but argument 2 has type 'uintptr_t' putshell.c:203: warning: format '%1$lX' expects type 'long unsigned int', but ar gument 2 has type 'uintptr_t' guileopt.c:126: warning: format '%ld' expects type 'long int', but argument 4 ha s type 'int' defParse-fsm.c:395: warning: embedded '\0' in format * /usr/share/autogen/libopts-27.1.2.tar.gz -- ??? * Error during installation and package removal (Get better *.info scriptlets from the Wiki! Avoid the wildcards!): install-info: excess command line argument `/usr/share/info/autogen.info.gz' install-info: excess command line argument `/usr/share/info/autogen.info.gz' install-info: warning: no entries found for `/usr/share/info/autogen.info-1.gz'; nothing deleted * "Provides: libopts" should be versioned: libopts = %{version}-%{release} * rpmlint ~/tmp/reviews/autogen/autogen-5.8.4-2.src.rpm W: autogen strange-permission autogen-5.8.4.tar.bz2 0666 W: autogen rpm-buildroot-usage %prep rm -rf %{buildroot} * The main package installs some executables into /usr/bin which have _very_ generic names, which pollute the global namespace and which bear a huge risk of causing collisions in the future: -rwxr-xr-x /usr/bin/autogen -rwxr-xr-x /usr/bin/columns (!) -rwxr-xr-x /usr/bin/getdefs (!) -rwxr-xr-x /usr/bin/xml2ag This alone would be a blocker criterion. Upstream ought to choose more unique names and e.g. use a proper autogen_ prefix. * /usr/share/aclocal/liboptschk.m4 looks for a missing script. * /usr/share/aclocal/autoopts.m4 looks for a script which is only included in the -devel package! It is not working this way! * autoopts-config man page is in main package, script is in -devel package! * Section 3 API manuals are in main package instead of -devel package! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 19:41:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 15:41:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197974] New: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Product: Fedora Extras Version: fc5 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: ignored at math.uh.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com This is a tracking bug for package reviews which are blocked on the adoption of relevant packaging guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 19:42:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 15:42:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071942.k67JgHvf014260@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: FE-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 ignored at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |FE-GUIDELINES -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 19:43:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 15:43:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176697] Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-binutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071943.k67JhVU6014420@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-binutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176697 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |197974 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 19:43:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 15:43:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071943.k67JhgaU014444@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: FE-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |176697 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 19:43:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 15:43:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176712] Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-gcc-newlib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071943.k67Jhj3c014471@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-gcc-newlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176712 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |197974 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 19:43:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 15:43:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071943.k67JhlSg014484@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: FE-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |176712 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 19:46:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 15:46:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176697] Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-binutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071946.k67Jkuvu014792@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-binutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176697 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|197974 | OtherBugsDependingO| |197974 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-07 15:38 EST ------- Trying to get FE-GUIDELINES blockers right; sorry for the spam. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 19:47:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 15:47:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071947.k67Jl7fj014824@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: FE-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |176697 OtherBugsDependingO|176697 | nThis| | BugsThisDependsOn| |181445 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 19:47:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 15:47:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181445] Review Request: php-shout In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071947.k67Jl9Vt014836@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-shout https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181445 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|181523 | OtherBugsDependingO| |197974 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 19:47:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 15:47:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176712] Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-gcc-newlib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071947.k67Jle5t014933@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-gcc-newlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176712 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|197974 | OtherBugsDependingO| |197974 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 19:47:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 15:47:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071947.k67Jlpb3014985@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: FE-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |176712 OtherBugsDependingO|176712 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 19:50:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 15:50:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190101] Review Request: php-pear-Log In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071950.k67JoPqS015324@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Log Alias: php-pear-Log https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190101 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |197974 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 19:50:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 15:50:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071950.k67JonL6015392@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: FE-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |190101 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 19:51:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 15:51:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071951.k67Jp7JU015436@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: FE-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |196793 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 19:51:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 15:51:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196793] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2 - PEAR: Database Abstraction Layer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071951.k67Jp6eN015422@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2 - PEAR: Database Abstraction Layer Alias: php-pear-MDB2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196793 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |197974 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 19:51:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 15:51:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196824] Review Request: php-pear-Mail-Mime In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071951.k67JpWf7015487@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Mail-Mime Alias: php-pear-Mail-Mime https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196824 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |197974 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 19:51:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 15:51:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071951.k67JpivL015512@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: FE-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |196824 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 20:16:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 16:16:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197981] New: Review Request: gkrellm-wifi - Wireless monitor plugin for the GNU Krell Monitors Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197981 Summary: Review Request: gkrellm-wifi - Wireless monitor plugin for the GNU Krell Monitors Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/gkrellm-wifi.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/gkrellm-wifi-0.9.12-1.src.rpm Description: Plug-in for gkrellm (a system monitor) which monitors the wireless LAN cards in your PC and displays a graph of the link quality percentage for each card. --- Notice please play special attention to the Obsoletes and Provides gkrellm-wireless. Previously this package was (wrongly) integrated into the gkrellm package itself, and there it was called gkrellm-wireless despite upstreams different name, this packages should automaticly replace gkrellm-wireless, hence the Obsoletes & Provides -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 20:26:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 16:26:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196749] Review Request: php-pecl-xdebug - PECL package for debugging PHP scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607072026.k67KQNkM017098@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-xdebug - PECL package for debugging PHP scripts Alias: php-pecl-xdebug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196749 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |197974 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 20:26:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 16:26:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191005] Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607072026.k67KQHQo017086@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191005 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-07 16:17 EST ------- Okay, This package now is approvable. But as discussed I cannot approve it untill I sponsor you, we have some automated scripts which check things like approved packages actually getting imported into CVS and the likes, and until sponsored you cannot approve. I'm looking forward to your next package Some things to make this one perfect: -remove -Rc param from chmod, there is nothing to _R_ecurse and begin verbose isn't nescesarry either as rpm already show the command with the full (wildcard expanded) filelist. -remove this no longer valid comment: "# Get the used icon on the right dir with the right name and get rid of the unused icons" -please put empty lines between your different changelog entries, so that the changlog looks like this: %changelog * Thu Jul 04 2006 Nikolai - Fixed almost all rpmlint errors; can't figure out how to get rid of the 'no-v - Fixed the desktop file and the icons to use more standard standards :-) * Tue Jun 27 2006 Nikolai - Added the automake14 to BuildRequires to help 'mocking' the package. * Sun May 7 2006 Nikolai - First created. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 20:26:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 16:26:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607072026.k67KQYMY017140@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: FE-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |196749 BugsThisDependsOn| |196827 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 20:26:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 16:26:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196827] Review Request: php-pear-Image-GraphViz - PEAR: Interface to AT&T's GraphViz tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607072026.k67KQWC6017121@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Image-GraphViz - PEAR: Interface to AT&T's GraphViz tools Alias: pear-Image-GraphViz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196827 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |197974 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 20:26:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 16:26:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607072026.k67KQh13017157@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: FE-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |196749 BugsThisDependsOn| |196827 OtherBugsDependingO| |196837 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 20:26:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 16:26:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607072026.k67KQhXX017164@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: FE-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |196837 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 20:26:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 16:26:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196837] Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit2-alpha - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607072026.k67KQWlW017129@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit2-alpha - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests Alias: pear-PHPUnit2-alpha https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196837 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |197974 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 20:26:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 16:26:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196837] Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit2-alpha - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607072026.k67KQjNm017174@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit2-alpha - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests Alias: pear-PHPUnit2-alpha https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196837 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |197974 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 20:27:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 16:27:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197981] Review Request: gkrellm-wifi - Wireless monitor plugin for the GNU Krell Monitors In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607072027.k67KRZHA017221@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gkrellm-wifi - Wireless monitor plugin for the GNU Krell Monitors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197981 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-07 16:19 EST ------- Note 2: I'm going on a short vacation from monday 10 juli till friday 14 juli, so if I'm quiet thats why. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 20:27:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 16:27:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196837] Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit2-alpha - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607072027.k67KRbI4017227@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit2-alpha - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests Alias: pear-PHPUnit2-alpha https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196837 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|197974 | OtherBugsDependingO| |197974 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 20:27:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 16:27:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607072027.k67KRm90017241@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: FE-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |196837 OtherBugsDependingO|196837 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 20:28:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 16:28:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196843] Review Request: php-pear-Benchmark - PEAR: Framework to benchmark PHP scripts or function calls In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607072028.k67KSQpE017271@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Benchmark - PEAR: Framework to benchmark PHP scripts or function calls Alias: php-pear-Benchmark https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196843 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |197974 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 20:28:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 16:28:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607072028.k67KSSKi017293@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: FE-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |196843 BugsThisDependsOn| |196847 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 20:28:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 16:28:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607072028.k67KSSVa017297@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: FE-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |196843 BugsThisDependsOn| |196847 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 20:28:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 16:28:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191005] Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607072028.k67KScth017314@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191005 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-07 16:19 EST ------- p.s. 1) I'm going on a short vacation from monday 10 juli till friday 14 juli, so if I'm quiet thats why. 2) If you open a new review request please put me in the CC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 20:29:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 16:29:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197413] Review Request: php-pear-Net-Curl - PEAR: OO interface to PHP's cURL extension In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607072029.k67KTSm7017353@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Curl - PEAR: OO interface to PHP's cURL extension Alias: php-pear-Net-Curl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197413 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |197974 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 20:29:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 16:29:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197411] Review Request: php-pear-Date - PEAR: Date and Time Zone Classes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607072029.k67KTLsZ017341@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Date - PEAR: Date and Time Zone Classes Alias: php-pear-Date https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197411 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |197974 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 20:29:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 16:29:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197417] Review Request: php-pear-Validate - PEAR: Validation class In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607072029.k67KTcx1017399@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Validate - PEAR: Validation class Alias: php-pear-Validate https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197417 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |197974 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 20:29:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 16:29:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607072029.k67KTU94017365@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: FE-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |197411 BugsThisDependsOn| |197413 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 20:29:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 16:29:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607072029.k67KTW9k017377@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: FE-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |197411 BugsThisDependsOn| |197413 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 20:29:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 16:29:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607072029.k67KTdsQ017412@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: FE-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |197411 BugsThisDependsOn| |197413 BugsThisDependsOn| |197417 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 20:29:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 16:29:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197419] Review Request: php-pear-Validate-Finance-CreditCard - PEAR: Validation class for Credit Cards In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607072029.k67KTnl4017437@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Validate-Finance-CreditCard - PEAR: Validation class for Credit Cards Alias: Validate-Finance-CC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197419 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |197974 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 20:30:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 16:30:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196229] Review Request: xkeyboard-config In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607072030.k67KU8lp017492@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xkeyboard-config https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196229 mharris at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mclasen at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From mharris at redhat.com 2006-07-07 16:21 EST ------- *** Bug 197939 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 20:30:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 16:30:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607072030.k67KUAwv017501@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: FE-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |197419 BugsThisDependsOn| |197420 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 20:30:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 16:30:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197420] Review Request: php-pear-Payment-Process - PEAR: Unified payment processor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607072030.k67KU7dL017478@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Payment-Process - PEAR: Unified payment processor Alias: pear-Payment-Process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197420 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |197974 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 20:30:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 16:30:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607072030.k67KUTOH017568@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: FE-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |197419 BugsThisDependsOn| |197420 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 20:39:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 16:39:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195942] Review Request: Veusz - a scientific plotting package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607072039.k67KdJTf018205@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Veusz - a scientific plotting package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195942 ------- Additional Comments From jeremy at jeremysanders.net 2006-07-07 16:30 EST ------- SRPM URL: http://download.gna.org/veusz/rpms/review/veusz-0.10-7.src.rpm Spec URL: http://download.gna.org/veusz/rpms/review/veusz.spec Thanks for spotting that. I've fixed the sitearch/sitelib problem and tested the package on an x86_64 and an i386 system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 20:41:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 16:41:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176253] Review Request: clement-2.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607072041.k67KfnbA018526@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clement-2.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176253 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-07 16:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Version 2.1-175 SPECS file is now clean according rpmlint-0.77-1.fc5 > rpmbuild give no warning anymore about "File listed twice" > Good, whats with the release tag inflation (very high number)? > Spec Url: ftp://ftp.safe.ca/pub/clement-2.1/SPECS/clement-2.1-175.spec > SRPM Url: ftp://ftp.safe.ca/pub/clement-2.1/SRPMS/clement-2.1-175.src.rpm > > Numerous bug-fix/improvement have been done since last bugzilla Clement > update (2.1-99), see the Changes file and SPEC Changelog for details. > > According to me SPEC file is really better, Yes it is, its becoming readable, with the proper order and stuff, it almost looks like a real specfile now :) there 2 issue not yet addressed: > 1) /var/lib/clement-2.1 contents. > those file are mainly day to day clement own management, I am really > reluctant to put them in /usr/bin as they are for the sole clement purpose. > what is the best option in such case? You could & should put them under /usr/lib/clement (%{_libdir}/%{name}) really) > 2) ownership for /var/www/clement-2.1: > putting everything own by 'mail' is may be overkilling, this web part is not > meaningful if clement daemon is not up and running, Clement itself run with > uid 'mail', that why I chose to set the ownership as 'mail'. > I think a default of root root as normal would be better, with an exception for files and or dir which clement needs to write. Also I recently learned that web application packages should not touch /var/www as they might accidently overwrite user content put there, instead the should install their files under /usr/share/%{name}, see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-5d1681fa7cf3714ad490fbf7c095a0cfe16da27f Besides that things are looking good, accept for the: #----------------------------------------------------------- #Clement SPEC definition #----------------------------------------------------------- comment, please remove that. Let me know when you've a new version with these issues fixed. p.s. I'm going on a short vacation from Monday 10 juli till Friday 14 juli, so if I'm quiet for a while thats why. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 20:54:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 16:54:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191549] Review Request: hping3 - TCP/IP stack auditing and much more In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607072054.k67KshUU019668@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hping3 - TCP/IP stack auditing and much more https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191549 paul at xtdnet.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 21:03:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 17:03:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191549] Review Request: hping3 - TCP/IP stack auditing and much more In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607072103.k67L3SvF020200@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hping3 - TCP/IP stack auditing and much more https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191549 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xtdnet.nl 2006-07-07 16:54 EST ------- I am sorry. I am trying to get my bugzilla email address changed, but it is stuck between two bugzilla accounts now. The xtdnet.nl address is swamped in spam and not my main contact address anymore (previous employer), so I'm sure I'm missing more email on that account. the address I use at the fedora email lists work fine, and I read those daily. (paul at cypherpunks.ca or paul at xelerance.com) I'm ready to actually start the import with: ./common/cvs-import.sh hping3-0.0.20051105-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 21:05:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 17:05:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197814] Review Request: autogen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607072105.k67L5JLe020344@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197814 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-07 16:56 EST ------- * AutoOpts licence is LGPL, not GPL! No, according to the autogen website, it's GPL I've contacted the author over the bindir filenames and am awaiting a reply. The package is currently rebuilding and I'll upload as soon as mock and rpmlint are happy. One thing that puzzles me is this W: autogen strange-permission autogen-5.8.4.tar.bz2 0666 How do I change the permission of the tarball from within the spec or is this something I can just do in my SOURCES directory by hand? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 21:39:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 17:39:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196629] Review Request: perl-SVK - A Distributed Version Control System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607072139.k67Ld9sU022349@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SVK - A Distributed Version Control System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196629 ------- Additional Comments From ianburrell at gmail.com 2006-07-07 17:30 EST ------- I noticed the dependency on File::Spec 3.18. Using the version in perl 5.8.8 does not seem to have an effect on the tests. Since we can't upgrade core modules, I think using the old version will be fine. I fixed the rpmlint errors and warnings. I just removed the contrib scripts. I think rpm is getting confused about the duplicate provides because SVK/Version.pl is "package SVK" with the version number while SVK.pm just has "package SVK". I had added "perl(SVK::Version)" to the provides. I am guessing that RPM is looking at the package statement which is technically wrong for Perl. "use Foo::Bar;" loads Foo/Bar.pm which usually contains Foo::Bar package. Spec: http://znark.com/fedora/perl-SVK.spec SRPMS: http://znark.com/fedora/perl-SVK-1.08-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 21:58:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 17:58:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175623] Review Request: yaz - Z39.50/SRW/SRU programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607072158.k67LwxxC023579@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yaz - Z39.50/SRW/SRU programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175623 icon at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From icon at fedoraproject.org 2006-07-07 17:50 EST ------- Just lack of attention. :) Closing, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 22:07:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 18:07:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191743] Review Request: sysprof - a sampling CPU profiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607072207.k67M7AEh023847@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sysprof - a sampling CPU profiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191743 giallu at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2006-07-07 17:58 EST ------- Forgot to mention this is my first package submission so I am seeking for a sponsor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 22:12:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 18:12:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196229] Review Request: xkeyboard-config In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607072212.k67MC48X024125@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xkeyboard-config https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196229 mharris at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED CC| |xgl-maint at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From mharris at redhat.com 2006-07-07 18:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Package looks good, you'll have to add a Obsoletes: xorg-x11-xkbdata and > Provides xorg-x11-xkbdata for upgrade paths. Yep to both. > Can we get rid if the "super ugly hack" in %pre now? My comment in there suggests so, but I'll need to review all possible upgrade paths to be sure. I like to err on the side of caution though. A quick cursory look appears that I should be able to remove that ugliness though. Sometimes I put hacks of that nature in to prevent short term developmental upgrade problems from causing unnecessary bug reports - but later after an OS release is out, and there are unlikely to be any (or many) people who would have gotten bitten by a development only transient issue, it makes sense to flush the toilet so to speak. ;) > I'm going to approve. Cool. I'm going to create the new package now, import it and update the report when I'm done. Thanks Jesse. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 22:35:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 18:35:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197814] Review Request: autogen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607072235.k67MZMIw024723@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197814 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-07 18:26 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/autogen.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/autogen-5.8.4-3.src.rpm Addresses all except the bindir names. I've had this back from the author "The problem with renaming "columns" is that the templates I provide fairly pervasively use "columns" as the program name for performing that formatting function, and I have a fair number of "clients" who use that program in their templates, too. Actually, the "columns" program is intended to be a generic program. ``ls -1 | columns --by-col'' will produce pretty much what you would get with just ``ls''. (Obviously, you would not do that, but it means you do not have to insert columnizing code into programs that produce list outputs.) So, please argue a little bit. Failing that, it could get installed as $bindir/autogen.d/columns and autogen could add that directory to PATH at startup time. It's quite a bother and I use columns in other contexts anyway. I would very much not want to do anything like that." Looks like it's either create the autogen.d directory and have autogen add that directory at startup time or keep them as they are. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 22:36:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 18:36:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196229] Review Request: xkeyboard-config In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607072236.k67Ma73Y024768@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xkeyboard-config https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196229 ------- Additional Comments From mharris at redhat.com 2006-07-07 18:27 EST ------- Ok, after closer review, it turns out that the %pre hack was only needed to work around an rpm limitation which occured when updating from early rawhide versions of xorg-x11-xkbdata which contained the X.Org xkbdata - to the xorg-x11-xkbdata which contains xkeyboard-config. Therefore, the issue can never occur on an official OS upgrade from any FC release to any newer FC release, or any RHEL release to a newer one. So, I've axed the %pre hack. Anyone hit by the issue now, deserves it. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 22:39:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 18:39:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192430] Review Request: python-kiwi - Framework for Python GUI applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607072239.k67Md9VX025028@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-kiwi - Framework for Python GUI applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192430 ------- Additional Comments From icon at fedoraproject.org 2006-07-07 18:30 EST ------- Ah, yes, the buildsystem changed on me. :) Added gettext BR. http://blues.mcgill.ca/~icon/fe/python-kiwi.spec http://blues.mcgill.ca/~icon/fe/python-kiwi-1.9.8-0.4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 22:43:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 18:43:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189685] Review Request: Anjuta-2.0.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607072243.k67MhP0V025386@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Anjuta-2.0.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189685 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: Anjuta2 |Review Request: Anjuta-2.0.x -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 22:49:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 18:49:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189384] Review Request: python-ruledispatch: A generic function package for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607072249.k67MnqtH026142@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-ruledispatch: A generic function package for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189384 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-07-07 18:41 EST ------- - Release should have gone to 0.svnr2115.1, I think. - Let's get a better %decription than "Something about generic functions in Python." - Is zip-safe necessary? E: python-ruledispatch zero-length /usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/RuleDispatch-0.5a0.dev_r2115-py2.4.egg-info/zip-safe -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 23:02:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 19:02:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196229] Review Request: xkeyboard-config In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607072302.k67N20VT026911@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xkeyboard-config https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196229 ------- Additional Comments From mharris at redhat.com 2006-07-07 18:53 EST ------- Ok, I've imported xkeyboard-config-0.8-1 into CVS, fixed a minor issue and tagged 0.8-2. I've built it locally and upgraded my modular X system with it successfully. No rpm upgrade warnings/errors. I have at least temporarily left out "Provides: xorg-x11-xkbdata" for now for 2 reasons: 1) I believe only our modular X server package and possibly the xorg-x11-xkbutils packages depend on xkbdata, and both are using the virtual provides "Requires: xkbdata" which was present in both the old and new package - so "Provides: xorg-x11-xkbdata" shouldn't be needed in theory. 2) I'd like to find out if #1 is false right now, by putting a package in rawhide without the Provides to see if other packages do have incorrectly specified dependencies, so we can fix them to use the virtual provide. Closer to the FC6 release, I can always add the virtual dep if there are any problems or if we want to play things safe (albeit a bit pedantically) ;) The package is now ready, tested and waiting. Can you add it to dist-fc6 so I can build it, and then disable xorg-x11-xkbdata from dist-fc6. TIA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 23:07:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 19:07:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187913] Review Request: mysql-query-browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607072307.k67N7kM9027084@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-query-browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187913 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |197881 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 00:18:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 20:18:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182320] Review Request: gnome-build In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607080018.k680IMdp030064@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182320 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-07 20:09 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/gnome-build.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/gnome-build-0.1.3-3.src.rpm Various rpmlint fixes Builds in i386 mock -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 00:35:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 20:35:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198012] New: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-JobQueue Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198012 Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-JobQueue Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Component-JobQueue.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Component-JobQueue-0.5402-0.fc5.src.rpm Description: POE::Component::JobQueue manages a finite pool of worker sessions as they handle an arbitrarily large number of tasks. It often is used as a form of flow control, preventing an arbitrarily large number of worker sessions from exhausting some finite resource. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 01:14:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 21:14:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198013] New: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Child Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198013 Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Child Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Component-Child.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Component-Child-1.39-0.fc5.src.rpm Description: This POE component serves as a wrapper for POE::Wheel::Run, obviating the need to create a session to receive the events it dishes out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 01:49:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 21:49:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198013] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Child In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607080149.k681nu1Q001268@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Child https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198013 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-07 21:41 EST ------- Trying to access the URL above gives: Page URL Not Found!! The requested page does not exist on this server. The URL you typed or followed is either outdated or inaccurate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 01:57:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 21:57:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198013] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Child In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607080157.k681vrKH001589@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Child https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198013 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-07 21:49 EST ------- My bad; fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 03:00:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 23:00:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197744] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Event-ICal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607080300.k6830KK6005960@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Event-ICal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197744 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-07 22:51 EST ------- * source files match upstream: a68e58f5aac48a739249118d078e9947 DateTime-Event-ICal-0.09.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64, some dependencies added to local repo) * rpmlint is silent. * noarch package, so no debuginfo. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(DateTime::Event::ICal) = 0.09 perl-DateTime-Event-ICal = 0.09-1.fc6 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(DateTime) perl(DateTime::Event::Recurrence) >= 0.11 perl(DateTime::Set) perl(DateTime::Span) perl(DateTime::SpanSet) perl(Exporter) perl(Params::Validate) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(vars) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=6, Tests=68, 111 wallclock secs (110.89 cusr + 0.23 csys = 111.12 CPU) * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 03:00:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 23:00:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197745] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-ICal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607080300.k6830tcv006037@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-ICal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197745 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 03:28:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 23:28:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197745] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-ICal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607080328.k683SUoa007834@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-ICal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197745 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-07 23:19 EST ------- Unfortunately three of your manual Requires: statements duplicate rpm's autodependencies. * source files match upstream: b0be692f3a84f2a7f73a39220ec69a52 DateTime-Format-ICal-0.08.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64, many dependencies added to my local repo). * rpmlint is silent. * noarch package, so no debuginfo. X final provides and requires are sane: perl(DateTime::Format::ICal) = 0.08 perl-DateTime-Format-ICal = 0.08-1.fc6 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) X perl(DateTime) X perl(DateTime) >= 0.17 X perl(DateTime::Event::ICal) X perl(DateTime::Event::ICal) >= 0.03 perl(DateTime::Set) >= 0.1 perl(DateTime::Span) perl(DateTime::TimeZone) >= 0.22 X perl(Params::Validate) X perl(Params::Validate) >= 0.59 perl(strict) perl(vars) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=5, Tests=134, 11 wallclock secs (11.29 cusr + 0.19 csys = 11.48 CPU) * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 03:33:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 23:33:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198012] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-JobQueue In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607080333.k683XQ4b008186@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-JobQueue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198012 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 03:44:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 23:44:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198020] New: Review Request: perl- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198020 Summary: Review Request: perl- Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Component-SimpleLog.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Component-SimpleLog-1.03-0.fc5.src.rpm Description: This module is a vastly simplified logging system that can do nice stuff. Think of this module as a dispatcher for various logs. This module *DOES NOT* do anything significant with logs, it simply routes them to the appropriate place ( Events ) You register a log that you are interested in, by telling SimpleLog the target session and target event. Once that is done, any log messages your program generates ( sent to SimpleLog of course ) will be massaged, then sent to the target session / target event for processing. This enables an interesting logging system that can be changed during runtime and allow pluggable interpretation of messages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 03:45:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 23:45:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198020] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-SimpleLog In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607080345.k683jWO4009545@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-SimpleLog https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198020 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: perl- |Review Request: perl-POE- | |Component-SimpleLog -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 04:00:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 00:00:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198021] New: Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-Config Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198021 Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-Config Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Log-Dispatch-Config.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Log-Dispatch-Config-1.01-0.fc5.src.rpm Description: Log::Dispatch::Config is a subclass of Log::Dispatch and provides a way to configure Log::Dispatch object with configulation file (default, in AppConfig format). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 04:07:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 00:07:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198023] New: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Logger Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198023 Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Logger Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Component-Logger.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Component-Logger-1.00-0.fc5.src.rpm Description: POE::Component::Logger provides a simple logging component that uses Log::Dispatch::Config to drive it, allowing you to log to multiple places at once (e.g. to STDERR and Syslog at the same time) and also to flexibly define your logger's output. It is very simple to use, because it creates a Logger::log method (yes, this is namespace corruption, so shoot me). If you don't like this, feel free to post directly to your logger as follows: $kernel->post('logger', 'log', "An error occurred: $!"); All logging is done in the background, so don't expect immediate output - the output will only occur after control goes back to the kernel so it can process the next event. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 04:07:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 00:07:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198021] Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-Config In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607080407.k6847bn0010589@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-Config https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198021 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |198023 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 04:11:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 00:11:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198012] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-JobQueue In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607080411.k684BXeA010700@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-JobQueue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198012 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-08 00:03 EST ------- Good idea packaging the test as an example. * source files match upstream: 3abbef8df7527bdc4f8bf99005f3b567 POE-Component-JobQueue-0.5402.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. O BuildRequires are proper (BR: perl is optional) * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * noarch package; no debuginfo. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(POE::Component::JobQueue) = 0.54 perl-POE-Component-JobQueue = 0.5402-0.fc6 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(POE::Session) perl(strict) perl(vars) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=3, 7 wallclock secs ( 0.06 cusr + 0.03 csys = 0.09 CPU) * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 04:11:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 00:11:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 180571] Review Request: puppet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607080411.k684Bmb6010720@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: puppet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180571 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-07-08 00:03 EST ------- Built against 1.3.3-1 facter. rpmlint is noisy. E: puppet zero-length /usr/share/doc/puppet-0.18.2/examples/root/etc/configfile E: puppet zero-length /usr/share/doc/puppet-0.18.2/examples/root/etc/otherfile Ignore. E: puppet non-standard-uid /var/lib/puppet puppet E: puppet non-standard-gid /var/lib/puppet puppet E: puppet non-standard-uid /var/log/puppet puppet E: puppet non-standard-gid /var/log/puppet puppet E: puppet non-standard-uid /var/run/puppet puppet E: puppet non-standard-gid /var/run/puppet puppet The user/group was added. Ignore. W: puppet doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/puppet-0.18.2/examples/root/bin/sleeper /usr/bin/ruby Required for puppet, ok. E: puppet incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/puppet puppet} W: puppet mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs Cosmetic. W: puppet-server no-documentation Fine. W: puppet-server incoherent-init-script-name puppetmaster Not puppet, ok. Defines %ruby_sitelibdir as per guidlines. - license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86) - no missing BR Do you need both of: Requires: ruby >= 1.8.1 and Requires: ruby(abi) = 1.8 ? Merely redundant if so. - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 04:12:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 00:12:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198013] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Child In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607080412.k684CTmP010801@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Child https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198013 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 04:27:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 00:27:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198013] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Child In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607080427.k684Rhaq011091@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Child https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198013 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-08 00:19 EST ------- This package seems to be under the GPL only. The version in your changelog entry is a bit odd ("-0"), causing rpmlint indigestion: W: perl-POE-Component-Child incoherent-version-in-changelog -0 1.39-0.fc6 Review: * source files match upstream: 35827260ad62e9d1bcbf74ada943deb9 POE-Component-Child-1.39.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. X license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. O BuildRequires are proper (BR: perl is not required) * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). X rpmlint is silent. * noarch package, so no debuginfo. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(POE::Component::Child) = 1.39 perl-POE-Component-Child = 1.39-0.fc6 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(Cwd) perl(POE) >= 0.29 perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: ok 19 - all tests successful * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 04:28:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 00:28:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198020] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-SimpleLog In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607080428.k684SV73011126@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-SimpleLog https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198020 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 04:40:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 00:40:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198020] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-SimpleLog In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607080440.k684eilD011817@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-SimpleLog https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198020 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-08 00:32 EST ------- * source files match upstream: fc5d648853b82364ba92fccd0326e0bd POE-Component-SimpleLog-1.03.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. O BuildRequires are proper (BR: perl is not required) * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * noarch package, so debuginfo. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(POE::Component::SimpleLog) = 1.03 perl-POE-Component-SimpleLog = 1.03-0.fc6 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(POE) perl(strict) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=1, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.08 cusr + 0.02 csys = 0.10 CPU) * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 04:42:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 00:42:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198021] Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-Config In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607080442.k684gK76011965@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-Config https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198021 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 04:51:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 00:51:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198013] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Child In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607080451.k684piCg012532@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Child https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198013 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-08 00:43 EST ------- package is noarch => OPTIMIZE="%{optflags}" is unused/superfluous. => This find also is very likely unnecessary: find %{buildroot} -type f -name '*.bs' -a -size 0 -exec rm -f {} ';' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 04:52:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 00:52:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198021] Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-Config In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607080452.k684q2mV012568@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-Config https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198021 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-08 00:43 EST ------- Just a note that there's an empty line at the top of your .spec. * source files match upstream: 9d9b7b5d3426819e6b6e14e91b867242 Log-Dispatch-Config-1.01.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. O BuildRequires are proper (BR: perl is not required). * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * noarch package, so no debuginfo. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Log::Dispatch::Config) = 1.01 perl(Log::Dispatch::Configurator) = 1.00 perl(Log::Dispatch::Configurator::AppConfig) = 1.00 perl-Log-Dispatch-Config = 1.01-0.fc6 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(AppConfig) perl(Log::Dispatch) >= 2.00 perl(Log::Dispatch::Configurator) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(vars) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=15, Tests=48, 4 wallclock secs ( 0.68 cusr + 0.27 csys = 0.95 CPU) * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 04:53:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 00:53:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198020] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-SimpleLog In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607080453.k684rG5v012691@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-SimpleLog https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198020 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-08 00:44 EST ------- package is noarch => OPTIMIZE="%{optflags}" is unused/superfluous. => This find also is very likely unnecessary: find %{buildroot} -type f -name '*.bs' -a -size 0 -exec rm -f {} ';' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 04:54:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 00:54:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198025] New: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-amd Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198025 Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-amd Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: ajackson at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~ajax/xorg-x11-drv-amd/xorg-x11-drv-amd.spec SRPM URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~ajax/xorg-x11-drv-amd/xorg-x11-drv-amd-0.0-0.git20060707.fc6.src.rpm Description: Updated X driver from AMD for Geode GPUs, such as those on the OLPC board. Taken from a git snapshot for now. Spec file was based on that of the existing nsc driver. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 04:54:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 00:54:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198023] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Logger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607080454.k684sHmt012806@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Logger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198023 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 04:55:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 00:55:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198023] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Logger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607080455.k684tRBw012878@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Logger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198023 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-08 00:46 EST ------- package is noarch => OPTIMIZE="%{optflags}" is unused/superfluous. => This find also is very likely unnecessary: find %{buildroot} -type f -name '*.bs' -a -size 0 -exec rm -f {} ';' Chris, Jason, this is a systematic bug in most (all) of Chris's perl packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 05:11:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 01:11:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607080511.k685B37S013166@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-07-08 01:02 EST ------- SRPM is 404 not found. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 05:18:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 01:18:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198023] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Logger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607080518.k685IJL7013260@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Logger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198023 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-08 01:09 EST ------- I was finishing up the review, so I'll include it below. The lines are indeed superfluous and simply caused by following the specfile template. I don't see them as blockers, or honestly even as bugs, although I'll try to note them in the future. * source files match upstream: b36cfad2d2d446103cbcf671270681ff POE-Component-Logger-1.00.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. O BuildRequires are proper (BR: perl is not required) * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64, approved dependencies added to local repo) * rpmlint is silent. * noarch package, so no debuginfo. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(POE::Component::Logger) = 1.00 perl-POE-Component-Logger = 1.00-0.fc6 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Log::Dispatch::Config) perl(POE) perl(strict) perl(vars) * %check is present and all tests (all one of them) pass: All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=1, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.07 cusr + 0.03 csys = 0.10 CPU) * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 05:29:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 01:29:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196281] Review Request: php-manual-en - English language PHP manual In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607080529.k685TvMW013431@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-manual-en - English language PHP manual https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196281 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chris.stone at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-07-08 01:21 EST ------- Use %{_defaultdocdir} instead of %{_datadir}/doc Use %{_defaultdocdir}/php-manual instead of %{_defaultdocdir}/php-manual/en in your %files section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 08:50:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 04:50:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197796] Review Request: glipper-0.89 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607080850.k688oG0d027230@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glipper-0.89 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197796 ------- Additional Comments From splinux25 at gmail.com 2006-07-08 04:41 EST ------- - Fixed mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs in changelog - Added category Text and delete-original in desktop-file-install - Added intltool as BR Spec URL : http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/glipper/glipper.spec SRPMS URL : http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/glipper/glipper-0.89-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 09:02:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 05:02:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197796] Review Request: glipper-0.89 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607080902.k6892EAu027896@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glipper-0.89 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197796 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-07-08 04:53 EST ------- MUST Items: - MUST: rpmlint's output is clean - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name} - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed (GPL) with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. - MUST: the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - MUST: The spec file for the package is be legible. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least i386. - MUST: All build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires. - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly. - MUST: If the package does not contain shared library files located in the dynamic linker's default paths - MUST: the package is not designed to be relocatable - MUST: the package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: There are no Large documentation files - MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - MUST: There are no Header files or static libraries - MUST: The package does not contain library files with a suffix - MUST: Package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives - MUST: Package containing GUI applications includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: The source package does include license text(s) as COPYING - SHOULD: mock builds succcessfully in i386. - SHOULD: The reviewer tested that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. - SHOULD: No scriptlets were used, those scriptlets must be sane. - SHOULD: No subpackages present. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 09:04:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 05:04:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197796] Review Request: glipper-0.89 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607080904.k6894wGv028004@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glipper-0.89 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197796 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 09:20:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 05:20:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197796] Review Request: glipper-0.89 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607080920.k689KRi5028540@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glipper-0.89 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197796 splinux25 at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 09:30:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 05:30:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175433] Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607080930.k689Uvl9028892@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175433 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-07-08 05:21 EST ------- * Sat Jul 08 2006 Enrico Scholz - 0.1.1.22-0 - updated to 0.1.1.22 http://ensc.de/fedora/tor/ http://ensc.de/fedora/tor/tor.spec http://ensc.de/fedora/tor/tor-0.1.1.22-0.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 09:47:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 05:47:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175433] Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607080947.k689l5rG029629@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175433 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-07-08 05:38 EST ------- regarding comment #22 (sorry, I forget it) ------------------------------------------ > >- renamed the current main-package into a '-core' subpackage and > > created a new main-package which requires both the 'tor-core' > > subpackage and this with the current default init-method. This > > allows 'yum install tor' to work better; because yum is not very > > smart, the old packaging might install unwanted packages else. > > Humm.. Can you elobrate on what situation would result in unwanted > packages? We had the following situation with the old packaging: | Name: tor | Requires: init(tor) | | %package lsb | Provides: init(tor) = lsb | Requires: lsb | | %package initng | Provides: init(tor) = initng | Requires: initng Assuming you have a minimal system with the 'initng' initsystem but without 'tor' packages. Now When you install 'tor' now, two possibilities exist for the resulting package combination : * 'tor' + 'tor-initng'; this is the probably wanted result and will not bring unwanted packages in * 'tor' + 'tor-lsb'; this will install 'tor-lsb' (which will not work with the initng system) with its huge dependency chain. This option is probably unwanted. yum has a lousy depsolver and will use the second, unwanted option due to the shortest-packagename-wins rule. Therefore, I moved 'tor' into the -core subpackage and made 'tor' a metapackage requiring 'tor-core' plus the subpackage for the current initsystem. This might be tor-lsb for FC4-FC6 and tor-initng for FC7. This eases package installation for people with standard installation doing | # yum install tor and those with initng who can do | # yum install tor-core tor-initng -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 09:55:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 05:55:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197565] Review Request: buildbot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607080955.k689tSWE029917@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: buildbot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197565 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-07-08 05:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > That's good, but AFAIK "Development/Build Tools" _is_ a valid group. At least > it is listed in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RPMGroups I think that page is somewhat misleading and its intention is not to say that all values for the group tag found in FC4 (the latter list, where Development/Build Tools is) are ok. /usr/share/doc/rpm-*/GROUPS is the list of group tag values generally considered valid. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 10:11:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 06:11:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197649] Review Request: gnustep-make - GNUstep makefile package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607081011.k68AB5r9030320@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnustep-make - GNUstep makefile package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197649 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-07-08 06:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > I did not mean that any packages should be installed to /usr/local, but just > that if the stuff is set up so that things are blindly installed to some dirs > without creating the dirs, /usr/local/GNUstep is probably not the only case > affected. You mean subdirectories? In the case of the pure non-fhs setup, again only the root directory of the "local root" is created. So all I did is adjust the path. The purest packaging would dwell into it and fully convert it to FHS, and that's what I was aiming for at the beginning. But I followed up archived discussions on the pain and "impossibility" involved, as well as the "strong opinion" of upstream to not accept patches for Linux/Unix targets. Debian for example maintained a larger fhs-patch which needed adjustments on each upstream release and after the package was never being updated they consider dropping gnustep-make due to that burden. If it weren't needed as a build dependency for further packages, I would had done the same. :/ In a nutshell: I need to move out the /usr/local like bits of gnustep-make to avoid default user installs under /usr and this seems the least intrusive way to do so. (In reply to comment #5) > == Not an official review as I'm not yet sponsored == Sponsored means that you are allowed to do a first review of a new contributor and to pull in this contributor into the Fedora family. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 10:19:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 06:19:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197565] Review Request: buildbot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607081019.k68AJn4X030658@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: buildbot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197565 ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2006-07-08 06:11 EST ------- Thanks for the info bout valid groups. So, I can't see anything else preventing this from being committed. I hope someone will accept it soon (I'm deplyoing a buildbot based infrastructure at work). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 10:42:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 06:42:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197649] Review Request: gnustep-make - GNUstep makefile package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607081042.k68AgVPS031815@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnustep-make - GNUstep makefile package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197649 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-07-08 06:33 EST ------- No, I don't mean *any* dir in particular. If 3rd party packages that use functionality from this package and due to issues/intrinsics of this package end up blindly installing files into dirs that don't exist without creating the dirs as part of the install process, that sounds like the root cause that needs fixing. Think for example stuff using autotools, if you run "./configure --prefix=/foo/bar ; make ; make install DESTDIR=/quux", things Just Work wrt creation of the /quux/foo/bar hierarchy and none of those dirs need to exist beforehand. If gnustep-make would work like that, there would be no need to create nor own the /usr/local/GNUstep dir. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 10:53:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 06:53:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197649] Review Request: gnustep-make - GNUstep makefile package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607081053.k68Ar7gf032648@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnustep-make - GNUstep makefile package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197649 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-07-08 06:44 EST ------- Duh, the example in comment 7 may be a bit suboptimal (apples/oranges), but I hope that the intention is clear. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 10:59:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 06:59:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197649] Review Request: gnustep-make - GNUstep makefile package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607081059.k68AxPlp000467@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnustep-make - GNUstep makefile package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197649 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-07-08 06:50 EST ------- The local root (be it /usr/GNUstep/Local or /usr/local/GNUstep) is created by upstream make install of this package, I'm not explicitly creating it and including it to the package. So the upstream model is to provide the local root dir and let the gnustep-make using software create the subdirs. Whether all such gnustep-make based packages would also have a safeguard to try to create the root dir if it's missing I can't say, but why risk it? About the autoconf example: In that case /usr/local itself is not needed beforehand :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 11:22:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 07:22:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191005] Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607081122.k68BMrJS000941@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191005 ------- Additional Comments From brkamikaze at gmail.com 2006-07-08 07:14 EST ------- I'm building with those changes and I will upload the package soon. Have a nice vacation :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 11:53:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 07:53:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197649] Review Request: gnustep-make - GNUstep makefile package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607081153.k68BrZtc001883@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnustep-make - GNUstep makefile package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197649 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-07-08 07:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > About the autoconf example: In that case /usr/local itself is not needed > beforehand :) Exactly. And thus should not be, and is not, included/owned in the autotools packages, considering that is /usr/local which is reserved to local stuff (no matter if it's owned by other packages or not). Anyway, I think you got at least most of the point, so I'll shut up now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 12:20:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 08:20:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182319] Review Request: anjuta-gdl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607081220.k68CKQ2M002595@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anjuta-gdl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182319 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-07-08 08:11 EST ------- * Missing -devel package dependencies! Notice the "Requires" line in the pkgconfig file. You have a broken pkgconfig dependency chain there. The C headers also include missing headers. Add the required -devel packages as dependencies of your anjuta-gdl-devel package. * Prefer "Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} in your -devel package, so main package and -devel package are in sync as much as possible. > post/postun ldconfig ok When there's no scriptlet body, prefer: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig That adds automatic dependencies on /sbin/ldconfig, too. Else, add the missing dependencies manually: Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig Requires(postun): /sbin/ldconfig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 12:28:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 08:28:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189482] Review Request: pcb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607081228.k68CS1Kx002773@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189482 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-07-08 08:19 EST ------- Hello there, It's nearly 3 months, now. PCB is an application, I personnally will be dependent on since Im an electronic student. Im asking whether I can take over it, can I ? I have already a spec file - with the latest release 20060422 - rpmlint does not complain - builds successfully under mock (i386) SPEC : http://beta.glwb.info/pcb/pcb.spec SRPM : http://beta.glwb.info/pcb/pcb-0.20060422-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 12:51:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 08:51:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197649] Review Request: gnustep-make - GNUstep makefile package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607081251.k68CpTIq003998@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnustep-make - GNUstep makefile package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197649 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-07-08 08:42 EST ------- But the autotools packages are not BuildRequired on, gnustep-make is. The /usr/local/GNUstep folder should theoretically be part of a "filesystem" type category package, but that would be overkill. So, if you like, gnustep-make is also some kind of "filesystem-gnustep". And the argument on /usr/local would apply to "filesystem", not autotools (assuming all packages installing under /usr/local are autotooled, which is not true, but since we're in the apples/orange business anyway, let's pass this, too ;). I did get your point, I just don't know how to improve the situation short of dropping the package or making it fully FHS conformant, which (currently) means that it would become unmaintainable very soon. :/ I'll look into some more FHS vs GNUstep discussions, perhaps there is some nice compromise somehwere, and I'm certainly open to any suggestions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 13:06:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 09:06:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189482] Review Request: pcb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607081306.k68D6Keo004381@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189482 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-08 08:57 EST ------- Since almost a month has past since my last ping without any reply, I think its reasonable for you to take over. I'll do a review as / when time permits. I dunno if its wise todo this here though, maybe it would be better to close this ticket and submit a new review request, anyone any opinions / advice on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 13:56:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 09:56:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197609] Review Request: poster In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607081356.k68DuEWO006242@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poster https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197609 ------- Additional Comments From redhat at flyn.org 2006-07-08 09:47 EST ------- Fixed man page install: Spec URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/poster.spec SRPM URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/poster-20060221-2.src.rpm Description: Poster scales PostScript images to a larger size, and prints them on larger media and/or tiles them to print on multiple sheets. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 14:06:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 10:06:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189384] Review Request: python-ruledispatch: A generic function package for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607081406.k68E684Y006475@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-ruledispatch: A generic function package for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189384 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-07-08 09:57 EST ------- > - Release should have gone to 0.svnr2115.1, I think. According to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#PreReleasePackages) (someone please fix this parenthesis) it should be : 0.1.svnr2115 If you want to bump the release without changing the version it will become 0.2.svnr2115 > - Is zip-safe necessary? It looks like a dummy file to avoid the zip extractor bug were empty dirs are not created. Harmless to remove, but harmless to keep also. I would not consider it a blocker (sometimes one just has to ignore rpmlint's warnings) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 15:36:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 11:36:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196176] Review Request: crystal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607081536.k68Fao23009177@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crystal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196176 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 15:42:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 11:42:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198021] Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-Config In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607081542.k68FgtKf009661@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-Config https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198021 ------- Additional Comments From dtimms at bigpond.net.au 2006-07-08 11:34 EST ------- * "...object with configulation file..." The upstream developer's summary used the word configulation, which is copied into the spec file. I don't think it's a real word. If it was changed to configuration, then package searches are more likely to be successful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 16:10:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 12:10:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189384] Review Request: python-ruledispatch: A generic function package for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607081610.k68GANq3010571@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-ruledispatch: A generic function package for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189384 ------- Additional Comments From lmacken at redhat.com 2006-07-08 12:01 EST ------- Fixed release and description. http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/python-ruledispatch.spec http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/python-ruledispatch-0.5a0-0.1.svnr2115.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 16:25:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 12:25:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195942] Review Request: Veusz - a scientific plotting package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607081625.k68GPLAD010833@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Veusz - a scientific plotting package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195942 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-07-08 12:16 EST ------- The helper C module is the architcture dependent part. rpmlint: W: veusz mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. Minor. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - .desktop file works - mime association works (no icon, minor) - runs APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 16:26:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 12:26:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196281] Review Request: php-manual-en - English language PHP manual In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607081626.k68GQgjN010892@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-manual-en - English language PHP manual https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196281 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2006-07-08 12:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Use %{_defaultdocdir}/php-manual instead of %{_defaultdocdir}/php-manual/en in > your %files section. How does this take account of the i18n issues raised in the linked thread? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 16:33:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 12:33:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198021] Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-Config In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607081633.k68GXdHF011062@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-Config https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198021 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-08 12:24 EST ------- Oops, my brain simply read over the typo. Time for a script to spellcheck Symmary: and %description, I suppose. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 16:41:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 12:41:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182319] Review Request: anjuta-gdl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607081641.k68GfjEX011522@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anjuta-gdl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182319 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-08 12:33 EST ------- #10, thanks. I'll get that fixed tonight and it should be out for the next push (probably Sunday) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 16:42:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 12:42:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182319] Review Request: anjuta-gdl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607081642.k68Gg50c011544@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anjuta-gdl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182319 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 16:42:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 12:42:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182320] Review Request: gnome-build In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607081642.k68GgH9q011577@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182320 Bug 182320 depends on bug 182319, which changed state. Bug 182319 Summary: Review Request: anjuta-gdl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182319 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Status|CLOSED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 16:51:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 12:51:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197726] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Set In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607081651.k68GphZn012155@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197726 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-07-08 12:43 EST ------- Imported into CVS, branches created, and builds requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 16:52:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 12:52:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197739] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Event-Recurrence In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607081652.k68Gq5WC012194@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Event-Recurrence https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197739 Bug 197739 depends on bug 197726, which changed state. Bug 197726 Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197726 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 16:53:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 12:53:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197736] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607081653.k68Gr39N012258@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197736 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-07-08 12:44 EST ------- Imported into CVS, branches created, and builds requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 17:00:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 13:00:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192577] Review Request: perl-OpenFrame In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607081700.k68H08xw012454@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-OpenFrame https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192577 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-07-08 12:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Unfortunately the dependency list includes: > perl(Pipeline) > perl(Pipeline) >= 2.00 > > which has been clarified to be a blocker since this review was started. For the record, I think that's silly. :-) It's fixed in -4 though. http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-OpenFrame-3.05-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 18:06:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 14:06:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 179758] Review Request: Eiciel (ACL editor) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607081806.k68I6nQo013957@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Eiciel (ACL editor) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179758 fedora at adslpipe.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|fedora at adslpipe.co.uk |bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 18:30:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 14:30:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198021] Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-Config In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607081830.k68IUtfQ015410@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-Config https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198021 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-08 14:22 EST ------- Hm, I wonder if we can get rpmlint to do that. I glossed right over it, too... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 19:01:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 15:01:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198012] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-JobQueue In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607081901.k68J1pJG018038@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-JobQueue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198012 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-08 14:53 EST ------- +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +devel build succeeds +Request branching (FC-4, FC-5) +Close bug Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 19:02:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 15:02:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198012] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-JobQueue In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607081902.k68J2LXe018069@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-JobQueue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198012 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 19:05:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 15:05:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198021] Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-Config In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607081905.k68J5kwv018164@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-Config https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198021 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-08 14:57 EST ------- rpmlint does check for some common misspellings. It should be pretty easy to have it call aspell instead if it's installed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 19:13:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 15:13:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197565] Review Request: buildbot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607081913.k68JDOuW018290@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: buildbot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197565 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-08 15:04 EST ------- Hey Gianluca, you weren't doing the review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 19:15:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 15:15:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192577] Review Request: perl-OpenFrame In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607081915.k68JF5Ip018361@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-OpenFrame https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192577 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-08 15:06 EST ------- Well, the versioned dependency is completely meaningless in that case, so there's little point in having both. The dependency list is now: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(CGI) perl(CGI::Cookie) perl(Exporter) perl(File::Spec) perl(File::Temp) perl(File::Type) perl(FileHandle) perl(HTTP::Headers) perl(HTTP::Response) perl(HTTP::Status) perl(IO::Null) perl(OpenFrame) perl(OpenFrame::Argument::Blob) perl(OpenFrame::Cookie) perl(OpenFrame::Cookies) perl(OpenFrame::Object) perl(OpenFrame::Request) perl(OpenFrame::Response) perl(OpenFrame::Segment::HTTP::Response) perl(Pipeline) perl(Pipeline::Production) perl(Pipeline::Segment) perl(base) perl(constant) perl(strict) Looks good; APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 19:25:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 15:25:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196281] Review Request: php-manual-en - English language PHP manual In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607081925.k68JPfV9018661@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-manual-en - English language PHP manual https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196281 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-07-08 15:16 EST ------- There is no clear hierachry of directory ownership of the %{_defaultdocdir}/php-manual so all packages that use this directory should own this directory. Unless there is some other issue I am missing? I'm not sure what you are referring to when you say "linked thread". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 20:08:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 16:08:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197745] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-ICal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607082008.k68K8fqC020303@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-ICal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197745 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-07-08 16:00 EST ------- Fixed in -2. http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-DateTime-Format-ICal-0.08-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 20:12:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 16:12:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196744] Review Request: chess - 3D chess game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607082012.k68KCVOq020436@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chess - 3D chess game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196744 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |wart at kobold.org OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 20:21:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 16:21:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196744] Review Request: chess - 3D chess game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607082021.k68KL3YH020648@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chess - 3D chess game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196744 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-07-08 16:12 EST ------- This ran fine for me on FC4-x86_64 with a NVidia 6800 and the binary NVidia drivers. Average of ~53 fps. MUST ==== * Source matches upstream, with the noted exception that the copyrighted ttf file has been removed. * Package and spec named appropriately * GPL license ok, license file included * .desktop file installed correctly * icon cache updated properly * RPM_BUILD_ROOT cleaned where it ought to be * Owns directories that it creates * Does not own directories that it should not * Builds in mock on FC5-i386, FC5-x86_64 * No need for -devel or -doc subpackages * No locales * Not relocatable * No duplicate %files SHOULD ====== * Use 'convert -transparent black ...' to make the desktop icon background transparent. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 21:10:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 17:10:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197745] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-ICal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607082110.k68LAbwr022168@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-ICal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197745 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-08 17:01 EST ------- The dependency list is now: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(DateTime) perl(DateTime::Event::ICal) perl(DateTime::Set) >= 0.1 perl(DateTime::Span) perl(DateTime::TimeZone) >= 0.22 perl(Params::Validate) perl(strict) perl(vars) which looks good to me. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 22:00:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 18:00:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196629] Review Request: perl-SVK - A Distributed Version Control System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607082200.k68M0fkq024007@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SVK - A Distributed Version Control System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196629 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-08 17:52 EST ------- rpmlint is now silent, the extra perl(SVK) provide is gone, and the /bin/sh dependency is gone as well. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 22:03:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 18:03:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182319] Review Request: anjuta-gdl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607082203.k68M39Md024107@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anjuta-gdl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182319 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 22:03:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 18:03:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182320] Review Request: gnome-build In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607082203.k68M3Vr1024137@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182320 Bug 182320 depends on bug 182319, which changed state. Bug 182319 Summary: Review Request: anjuta-gdl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182319 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 22:06:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 18:06:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193957] Review Request: nant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607082206.k68M6p3O024233@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193957 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-07-08 17:58 EST ------- Mono packaging guidelines say to put in arch dependent, however, basically %_libdir. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Mono In this case it seems to be portable but since we have to allow for native compilation it's going into arch dependent. My attempt at forcing %_libdir: http://fedorared.org/~john/review/nant-0.85-4.src.rpm Note the hack to substiute in %_lib. It does make this self-building thing install to /usr/lib64 on x86_64, however. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 22:15:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 18:15:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195683] Review Request: smarteiffel - The GNU Eiffel Compiler and Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607082215.k68MFjil024519@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smarteiffel - The GNU Eiffel Compiler and Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195683 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-08 18:07 EST ------- Were you going to cut a new package? (In reply to comment #6) > I don't think it makes much sense to change the settings in /etc/serc. Seems reasonable to me. > I always thought that /usr/libexec is the standard directory for executables > that are called as subprocesses and not directly by the user. It is; the packaging committee codified this and hopefully rpmlint will be patched to stop warning about this soon. > Hmm, if I chmod 0644 these files, I must also remove the shebang. Not as I understand things. > Maybe I should move the contrib directory to /usr/share/SmartEiffel. I'm not sure it would be worth it. Just remove execute permission and anyone who wants to play with those files can copy them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 23:01:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 19:01:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198013] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Child In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607082301.k68N1EPp026071@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Child https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198013 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-08 18:52 EST ------- Updated to deal with licensing and version issues. Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Component-Child.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Component-Child-1.39-0.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 23:01:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 19:01:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198013] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Child In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607082301.k68N1aOL026092@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Child https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198013 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-08 18:53 EST ------- Updated to deal with licensing and version issues. Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Component-Child.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Component-Child-1.39-0.1.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 23:03:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 19:03:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193957] Review Request: nant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607082303.k68N3b2k026126@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193957 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-08 18:55 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/nant.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/nant-0.85-4.src.rpm Tested and looking good. I've built boo against it and that seems happy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 23:18:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 19:18:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193957] Review Request: nant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607082318.k68NIjRj026385@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193957 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-07-08 19:10 EST ------- Almost there. nant-0.85-4.src.rpm On nant-docs: * Missing dependancy on scrollkeeper-update for %post (package scrollkeeper) * Missing dependancy on scrollkeeper-update for %postun (package scrollkeeper) rpmlint: W: nant non-standard-group Development/Other Suggest Development/Tools W: nant strange-permission nant-0.85-rc4-src.tar.gz 0666 W: nant strange-permission nant.spec 0666 Ignore. E: nant non-utf8-spec-file nant.spec file says nant.spec: ISO-8859 Java program text. Save as utf8. W: nant rpm-buildroot-usage %build export MONO_PATH=%{buildroot}/lib E: nant hardcoded-library-path in %{buildroot}/lib Needed, as far as I can tell. Ignore. E: nant no-binary Ignore. E: nant only-non-binary-in-usr-lib Assemblies and such. Ignore. W: nant wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/nant-0.85/license.html W: nant wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/nant-0.85/COPYING.txt W: nant wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/nant-0.85/README.txt W: nant wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/nant-0.85/releasenotes.html And everything from nant-docs has wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding. Optionally fix these. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - -docs package - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 00:11:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 20:11:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198013] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Child In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607090011.k690BYoi028168@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Child https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198013 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-08 20:03 EST ------- The license is now correct. The version in the changelog entry is now sensible. The two issues I had are fixed. The issues Ralf pointed out are not. I don't see them as blockers, but I do recommend that you address them as needless cruft in specfiles should always be cleaned up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 00:12:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 20:12:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198013] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Child In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607090012.k690CiYn028220@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Child https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198013 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-08 20:04 EST ------- I neglected to add: APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 00:15:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 20:15:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193493] Review Request: iksemel - An XML parser library designed for Jabber applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607090015.k690Fn3r028319@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iksemel - An XML parser library designed for Jabber applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193493 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-08 20:07 EST ------- Any movement here? This package just needs a couple of things: documentation about the partial x86_64 brokenness, and at least an attempt to build on PPC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 00:18:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 20:18:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193957] Review Request: nant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607090018.k690IF41028387@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193957 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-08 20:09 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/nant.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/nant-0.85-5.src.rpm All of the fixes as required in #12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 00:19:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 20:19:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178904] Review Request: Monodevelop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607090019.k690JNdv028424@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178904 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-08 20:10 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/monodevelop.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/monodevelop-0.11-9.src.rpm Follows packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 00:28:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 20:28:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198023] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Logger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607090028.k690SP3A028633@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Logger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198023 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-08 20:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > package is noarch > > => OPTIMIZE="%{optflags}" > is unused/superfluous. > > => This find also is very likely unnecessary: > find %{buildroot} -type f -name '*.bs' -a -size 0 -exec rm -f {} ';' > > Chris, Jason, this is a systematic bug in most (all) of Chris's perl packages. How is this a "bug"? It's part of the standard perl specfile template, doesn't conflict with any of the packaging guidelines, and it certainly isn't doing any harm. Is it worth 5-10 min of my time to to make sure that these lines are indeed not needed, and then another 5-10min for the reviewer to also 1) notice the deviation from the template, and 2) ensure that the packager's determination that the lines are superfluous and can be dropped is correct? If this is a "bug", then let's get it before the packaging committee and have the guidelines for perl packages changed to explicitly require excising those lines. Otherwise, let's call it "packager's preference/style"; and as they say in perl-land, TMTOWTDI :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 00:32:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 20:32:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198025] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-amd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607090032.k690W1x2028754@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-amd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198025 ajackson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |191527 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 00:45:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 20:45:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198021] Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-Config In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607090045.k690jtB5029585@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-Config https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198021 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-08 20:37 EST ------- +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +devel build succeeds +Request branching (FC-4, FC-5) +Close bug Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 00:46:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 20:46:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198023] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Logger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607090046.k690kHbu029614@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Logger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198023 Bug 198023 depends on bug 198021, which changed state. Bug 198021 Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-Config https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198021 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 01:07:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 21:07:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198023] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Logger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607090107.k6917mi2030319@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Logger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198023 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-08 20:59 EST ------- +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +devel build succeeds +Request branching (FC-4, FC-5) +Close bug Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 01:11:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 21:11:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198023] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Logger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607090111.k691BDfZ030398@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Logger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198023 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-08 21:02 EST ------- For noarch packages, passing OPTIMIZE is pointless as the compiler isn't called, and perl will never create .bs files. Ralf says including them is a bug, which is rather ludicrous; I just call them cruft that doesn't need to be there but which doesn't hurt. If you were inventing random needless things and sticking them in the spec then I would see an issue, but these are verbatim from the specfile template and honestly I don't see how you coule expect anyone but an expert to know that the find line is always needless for a noarch package. If it were my package, I would remove the cruft because I'd want the spec to be as simple as possible. I don't expect and certainly don't require that everyone else do the same thing; keeping things as close as possible to the template also has its benefits. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 01:39:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 21:39:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178901] Review Request: gtksourceview-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607090139.k691d9hW031010@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtksourceview-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178901 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-07-08 21:30 EST ------- Patching configure.in and Makefile.am to use %(libdir) works with lib64. http://fedorared.org/~john/review/gtksourceview-sharp-2.0-12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 02:56:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 22:56:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165230] Review Request: Eclipse Graphical Editing Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607090256.k692u0SD001278@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Eclipse Graphical Editing Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165230 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-08 22:47 EST ------- Wow, this ticket has been idle for seven months. Anything happening here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 03:23:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 23:23:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193059] Review Request: ibmasm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607090323.k693Nkvh001737@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ibmasm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193059 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-08 23:15 EST ------- Konrad, have you read through http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/HowToGetSponsored ? It's obvious that you're actively maintaining this package and responding to comments, but prospective sponsors will probably want to see some reviews or other packages. If you have something else you'd like to submit, go ahead and send it in. Otherwise, consider commenting on some other open reviews as Till did above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 03:35:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 23:35:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193071] Review Request: ruby-sqlite3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607090335.k693ZCWJ001912@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-sqlite3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193071 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-08 23:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > I wanted to keep it close to the entry in Config::CONFIG those get set from. Do > you think the resulting macro names are too long ? I don't think the length is a problem; what is at issue is the fact that what's in the current guidelines doesn't match what's being done here. The first approved Ruby package should follow the spec rather closely, I think. So, if you want to keep it close to what's in Config::CONFIG, then the guidelines don't reflect that and need to be changed, assuming it's not too late to do that. Finally, you use "%{__chmod}" instead of just plain "chmod", but don't use "%{__rm}". Any reason for using just one obsfucating macro? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 03:57:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 23:57:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198023] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Logger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607090357.k693vOOF002958@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Logger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198023 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-08 23:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #1) > > package is noarch > > > > => OPTIMIZE="%{optflags}" > > is unused/superfluous. > > > > => This find also is very likely unnecessary: > > find %{buildroot} -type f -name '*.bs' -a -size 0 -exec rm -f {} ';' > > > > Chris, Jason, this is a systematic bug in most (all) of Chris's perl packages. > > How is this a "bug"? It's part of the standard perl specfile template, @Cris: Start thinking about what you are doing! > doesn't conflict with any of the packaging guidelines, If you were around to perl packaging in Fedora a little longer, you'd know that not using OPTIMIZE and dropping the find had been part of older Fedora perl templates. For reasons unknown to me, this somehow has fallen out of the current templates. > and it certainly isn't doing any harm. Perl makefiles are generated on the fly, therefore you never can be sure what they are doing. Are you sure the package's author hasn't added a custom VAR named OPTIMIZE? Are you sure the perl-magic a package uses, suffers from a bug and abused OPTIMIZE? => They are likely not to do any harm, but certainly not "certainly". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 04:07:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 00:07:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197609] Review Request: poster In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607090407.k6947T80003107@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poster https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197609 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-08 23:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Spec URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/poster.spec > SRPM URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/poster-20060221-2.src.rpm Error 404 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 04:41:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 00:41:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178904] Review Request: Monodevelop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607090441.k694fphj004201@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178904 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-07-09 00:33 EST ------- http://fedorared.org/~john/review/monodevelop-0.11-10.src.rpm This patches the build scripts to respect %(libdir). Also adds missing BuildRequires like ivkm-devel and mono-data-sqlite. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 08:43:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 04:43:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196744] Review Request: chess - 3D chess game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607090843.k698hqF3031733@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chess - 3D chess game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196744 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-09 04:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > SHOULD > ====== > * Use 'convert -transparent black ...' to make the desktop icon background > transparent. > Good idea, but it cannnot be done (atleast not that way) I created (gimped) the icon from a screen shot and that black is far from black, also its not one color and it contains a reflection of the chess piece. > APPROVED Thanks a million for this and the other reviews! Imported & build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 10:50:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 06:50:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189482] Review Request: pcb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607091050.k69Ao4iX004535@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189482 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|Jochen at herr-schmitt.de |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-09 06:41 EST ------- Since no one has commented lets just handle things in this Review Request. Here is a full Review for Chitlesh's version, not Peter's! : MUST: ===== * rpmlint output is: E: pcb info-dir-file /usr/share/info/dir This must be fixed, add "rm -f ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_infodir}/dir" in %install * Package and spec file named appropriately * Packaged according to packaging guidelines * License (GPL) ok, license fileS included * spec file is legible and in Am. English. * Source matches upstream * Compiles and builds on devel-x86_64 * BR: ok * No locales * No shared libraries * Not relocatable * Package owns / or requires all dirs (with some strangeness see Must fix below) * No duplicate files & Permissions ok * %clean & macro usage OK * Contains code. * %doc does not affect runtime, and isn't large enough to warrent a sub package * no -devel package needed, no libs / .la files. * .desktop file as required and properly installed MUST fix: ========= * rpmlint output is: E: pcb info-dir-file /usr/share/info/dir This must be fixed, add "rm -f ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_infodir}/dir" in %install. Without this fixed installing it gives: Preparing... ########################################### [100%] file /usr/share/info/dir from install of pcb-0.20060422-1 conflicts with file from package info-4.8-11 You probaly didn't see this on your system because the dir file getting generated depends on the system configuration on which the package is build, hence the -f to rm, so that if the dir file isn't there it doesn't cause an error. * You are missing the following requires for the texinfo script: Requires(post): /sbin/install-info Requires(preun): /sbin/install-info Should fix: =========== * Add an icon and install it under: %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps Where 32x32 is the size of the icon, please do ls /usr/share/icons/hicolor/ to see the available valid sizes, if the icon doesn't match any pick the closest. * Once the icon is in the proper plase you must add %post(un) script to update the icon-cache see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ScriptletSnippets#head-fc74f078205565f961f6d836b77c3428619c689d -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 10:53:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 06:53:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607091053.k69ArgVS004805@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: polypaudio: |Review Request: pulseaudio: |Improved Linux sound server |Improved Linux sound server ------- Additional Comments From drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx 2006-07-09 06:45 EST ------- Spec URL: http://homes.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/pulseaudio/pulseaudio.spec SRPM URL: http://homes.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/pulseaudio/pulseaudio-0.9.2-1.src.rpm Updated to the new name and added the zeroconf parts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 11:07:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 07:07:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194420] Review Request: mlton, an optimizing compiler for Standard ML In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607091107.k69B7OjG005179@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mlton, an optimizing compiler for Standard ML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194420 gemi at bluewin.ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-07-09 06:58 EST ------- There are no blockers as far as I can see. I could only test on i386, so I can't comment on the other platforms. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 11:29:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 07:29:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192606] Review Request: yafc: yet another ftp client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607091129.k69BTgP5005738@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yafc: yet another ftp client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192606 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-07-09 07:21 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=132127) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=132127&action=view) Patch for compiling with krb5 Here is the patch for compiling with krb5. You need of course add krb5-devel to the BR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 11:33:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 07:33:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178904] Review Request: Monodevelop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607091133.k69BXie5005921@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178904 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-09 07:25 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/monodevelop.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/monodevelop-0.11-11.src.rpm Minor cosmetic changes to satisfy rpmlint -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 11:35:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 07:35:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178901] Review Request: gtksourceview-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607091135.k69BZjmN005990@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtksourceview-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178901 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-09 07:27 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/gtksourceview-sharp.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/gtksourceview-sharp-2.0-12.src.rpm Very minor change to John's version... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 12:04:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 08:04:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195223] Review Request: pavucontrol: Volume control for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607091204.k69C4idi006658@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pavucontrol: Volume control for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195223 drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: pavucontrol:|Review Request: pavucontrol: |Volume control for |Volume control for |Polypaudio |PulseAudio ------- Additional Comments From drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx 2006-07-09 07:56 EST ------- Spec URL: http://homes.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/pulseaudio/pavucontrol.spec SRPM URL: http://homes.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/pulseaudio/pavucontrol-0.9.2-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 12:05:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 08:05:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195222] Review Request: paman: Management tool for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607091205.k69C5A9V006689@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: paman: Management tool for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195222 drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: paman: |Review Request: paman: |Management tool for |Management tool for |Polypaudio |PulseAudio ------- Additional Comments From drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx 2006-07-09 07:56 EST ------- Spec URL: http://homes.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/pulseaudio/paman.spec SRPM URL: http://homes.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/pulseaudio/paman-0.9.2-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 12:06:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 08:06:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198088] New: Review Request: pavumeter: Volume meter for PulseAudio Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198088 Summary: Review Request: pavumeter: Volume meter for PulseAudio Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://homes.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/pulseaudio/pavumeter.spec SRPM URL: http://homes.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/pulseaudio/pavumeter-0.9.2-1.src.rpm Description: PulseAudio Volume Meter (pavumeter) is a simple GTK volume meter for the PulseAudio sound server. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 12:07:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 08:07:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198088] Review Request: pavumeter: Volume meter for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607091207.k69C7p8i006803@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pavumeter: Volume meter for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198088 drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |195221 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 12:07:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 08:07:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607091207.k69C7pMe006811@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |198088 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 12:09:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 08:09:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198089] New: Review Request: padevchooser: Control applet for PulseAudio Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198089 Summary: Review Request: padevchooser: Control applet for PulseAudio Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://homes.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/pulseaudio/padevchooser.spec SRPM URL: http://homes.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/pulseaudio/padevchooser-0.9.2-1.src.rpm Description: PulseAudio Device Chooser (padevchooser) is a simple GTK tool which registers an icon in the tray area and allows quick access to some features of the PulseAudio sound server. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 12:10:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 08:10:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198089] Review Request: padevchooser: Control applet for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607091210.k69CALMQ006906@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: padevchooser: Control applet for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198089 drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |195221 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 12:10:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 08:10:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607091210.k69CAW3C006924@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |198089 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 12:19:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 08:19:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182319] Review Request: anjuta-gdl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607091219.k69CJuhw007167@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anjuta-gdl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182319 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-07-09 08:11 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=132128) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=132128&action=view) spec patch (CVS) Not fixed yet. Let me try to rephrase: Your anjuta-gdl-devel package is missing several "Requires". You need to make it depend on other -devel package, which are needed by /usr/lib/pkgconfig/gdl-1.0.pc (notice the Requires line in there!) and the C headers (notice which files from other packages they "#include"). To find the other packages which provide the pkgconfig files, you can do, for example: $ repoquery --whatprovides /usr/lib/pkgconfig/libbonoboui-2.0.pc /usr/lib/pkgconfig/libgnome-2.0.pc /usr/lib/pkgconfig/gtk+-2.0.pc /usr/lib/pkgconfig/libxml-2.0.pc /usr/lib/pkgconfig/libglade-2.0.pc libbonoboui-devel-0:2.14.0-3.i386 libgnome-devel-0:2.14.1-4.i386 gtk2-devel-0:2.10.0-1.i386 libxml2-devel-0:2.6.26-2.i386 libglade2-devel-0:2.5.1-5.i386 and then make your anjuta-gdl-devel package "Requires" these packages. See attached patch. The change related to /sbin/ldconfig was an "either or". With "-p" the dependency on /sbin/ldconfig is _automatic_. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 12:25:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 08:25:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189482] Review Request: pcb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607091225.k69CPg1u007312@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189482 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-07-09 08:17 EST ------- Does this mean that I am the _official_ packager of pcb now ? SPEC : http://beta.glwb.info/pcb/pcb.spec SRPM : http://beta.glwb.info/pcb/pcb-0.20060422-2.src.rpm %changelog - fixed E: pcb info-dir-file /usr/share/info/dir - added /sbin/install-info as requires for %%post and %%preun - added icon and treated GTK+ icon cache as required I was not quite sure how to deal with the icon, so i put it in %post. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 12:29:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 08:29:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182319] Review Request: anjuta-gdl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607091229.k69CTHDd007354@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anjuta-gdl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182319 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-09 08:20 EST ------- Thanks for the clarification. 0.6.1-4 should be in the next push -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 12:38:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 08:38:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197814] Review Request: autogen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607091238.k69CcCgo007649@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197814 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-09 08:29 EST ------- ping! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 12:39:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 08:39:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198023] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Logger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607091239.k69CdsgR007774@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Logger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198023 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-09 08:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Ralf says including them is a bug, which is rather ludicrous; Well, cluttering a spec file with superfluous and useless cruft to me is a specfile bug. May be you would agree to the words "sloppy" or "careless"? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 12:52:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 08:52:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182320] Review Request: gnome-build In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607091252.k69CqkpO008517@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182320 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-07-09 08:44 EST ------- In what build environment did you try this? No Match for argument: oaf-devel No Match for argument: gnome-libs-devel No Match for argument: gal-devel [...] checking for pkg-config... no checking for GBF... configure: error: The pkg-config script could not be found o r is too old. Make sure it is in your PATH or set the PKG_CONFIG environment variable to the full path to pkg-config. Alternatively, you may set the environment variables GBF_CFLAGS and GBF_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config. See the pkg-config man page for more details. To get pkg-config, see . See `config.log' for more details. error: Bad exit status from /home/qa/tmp/rpm/tmp/rpm-tmp.74787 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 13:06:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 09:06:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182320] Review Request: gnome-build In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607091306.k69D64SY008712@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182320 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-09 08:57 EST ------- Building in FC-5. I'll fix the problems you've highlighted -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 13:54:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 09:54:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197867] Review Request: iscsitarget (includes kernel module) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607091354.k69DshrG010616@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iscsitarget (includes kernel module) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197867 fedora at leemhuis.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|fedora at leemhuis.info |bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2006-07-09 09:45 EST ------- Was there any specific reason why you assigned this bug directly to me? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 14:19:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 10:19:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191208] Review Request: The Ipe extensible drawing editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607091419.k69EJte9011074@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: The Ipe extensible drawing editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191208 gemi at bluewin.ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-07-09 10:11 EST ------- * rpmlint is silent * package name "ipe" is good * license is gpl and included with the main package * spec file is readable and clear * builds in mock/i386 and installs flawlessly * contains shared libraries and invokes ldconfig in %post and %postun * owns all directories it creates * large documentation in -doc subpackage * desktop file installed SHOULD: * there is no icon for the .desktop file, add one later, if available * the documentation is in /usr/share/ipe/6.0/doc; if it is not too much work, move it to /usr/share/doc/ipe-doc-6.0 * if the doc package is not installed, the web browser will report an error, if help is invoked in ipe; I don't consider this a blocker, but should probably dealt with somehow MUST: * ipe-doc must depend on ipe please deal with MUST, then import the package APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 14:37:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 10:37:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193109] Review Request: plotmm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607091437.k69EbtYu011551@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: plotmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193109 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-09 10:29 EST ------- I had preferred, if you installed the examples to somewhere outside of %{_bindir} instead of renaming them, because this would have helped to keep %{_bindir} free of "more or less useless examples", but ... this basically is a matter of personal preference. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 15:58:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 11:58:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197867] Review Request: iscsitarget (includes kernel module) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607091558.k69Fwnf4014600@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iscsitarget (includes kernel module) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197867 ------- Additional Comments From i.pilcher at comcast.net 2006-07-09 11:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Was there any specific reason why you assigned this bug directly to me? I was trying to follow the instructions at: http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/KernelModules Besides rules around the packaging there is one additional *before* you start packaging a kernel module for Fedora Extras: Open a Review bug in [WWW] http://bugzilla.redhat.com and ask FESCo via fedoraleemhuisinfo for permission if this module is allowed for Extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 16:35:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 12:35:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197867] Review Request: iscsitarget (includes kernel module) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607091635.k69GZqgs015281@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iscsitarget (includes kernel module) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197867 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2006-07-09 12:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Was there any specific reason why you assigned this bug directly to me? > > I was trying to follow the instructions at: Okay, sorry, I didn't get that ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 16:37:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 12:37:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197867] Review Request: iscsitarget (includes kernel module) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607091637.k69Gbbi8015405@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iscsitarget (includes kernel module) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197867 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2006-07-09 12:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Okay, sorry, I didn't get that ;-) Ohh, and we'll look at it during the next meeting on thursday and post results here -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 16:46:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 12:46:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197814] Review Request: autogen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607091646.k69GkkOB015983@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197814 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-09 12:38 EST ------- IMO, there are 2 must fixes: * columms + getdefs. * libopts. Autogen comes with libopts integrated, and you are shipping it merged into this package. However, devel has libopts packaged separately. How do you plan to resolve this conflict? I only see two clean alternatives: a) Not to package the libopts in autogen, better not to use the libopts inside of autogen, but to link against the external one. I haven't checked the sources if and how this is easily possible (probably). b) To abandon the separate libopts-package and to build a libopts packages as separate package being build from autogen's sources. A bit of hackerish approach would be to exclude all libopts related files from the autogen package. I do not recommend to do so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 17:09:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 13:09:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198098] New: Review Request: xarchiver Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198098 Summary: Review Request: xarchiver Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: splinux25 at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/xarchiver/xarchiver.spec SRPM URL: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/xarchiver/xarchiver-0.3.3-1.src.rpm Description: Xarchiver is a GTK2 archiver, create, add, extract and delete files in the above formats, arj,7z,rar,zip,tar,bzip, gzip and RPM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 17:28:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 13:28:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196865] Review Request: audacious - A GTK2 based media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607091728.k69HSdDf017210@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious - A GTK2 based media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196865 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at camperquake.de 2006-07-09 13:20 EST ------- So, the (I hope) final version is up at http://www.skytale.net/files/audacious/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 17:32:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 13:32:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196281] Review Request: php-manual-en - English language PHP manual In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607091732.k69HWnwc017304@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-manual-en - English language PHP manual https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196281 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2006-07-09 13:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) Are you trying to say I should *add* a %dir %{_defaultdocdir}/php-manual? If so, yep, good call. What you implied was that the docs should go in %{_defaultdocdir}/php-manual instead of %{_defaultdocdir}/php-manual/en , which seems to not cater for further internationalisation (e.g. future packages providing ....php-manual/fr for example. "Linked thread" refers to the thread mentioned in the bug description, namely: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-May/msg00237.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 17:51:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 13:51:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607091751.k69HpZ0w017862@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-09 13:43 EST ------- Before I start reviewing this, I checked and I don't see anything resembling "drzeus" or your name in the cvsextras group. If you haven't been sponsored, your review tickets need to block FE-NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 18:11:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 14:11:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607091811.k69IBgDv018246@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx 2006-07-09 14:03 EST ------- I haven't. So I'll add the dependency. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 18:59:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 14:59:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 179758] Review Request: Eiciel (ACL editor) [Seeking Sponsor] In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607091859.k69Ixu5c022307@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Eiciel (ACL editor) [Seeking Sponsor] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179758 fedora at adslpipe.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: Eiciel (ACL |Review Request: Eiciel (ACL |editor) |editor) [Seeking Sponsor] ------- Additional Comments From fedora at adslpipe.co.uk 2006-07-09 14:51 EST ------- OK, I've taken on-board comments made by Michael Schwendt, spec file tidied up, rebuilt and checked on FC5/i386, FC6-rawhide/i386 and FC5/x86_64 rpmlint is now silent, also I've done rpm2cpio xxx.rpm | cpio -itv to check the files and directories inside the rpm make sense to me. SPEC: http://adslpipe.co.uk/fedora/extras/eiciel/eiciel.spec SRPM: http://adslpipe.co.uk/fedora/extras/eiciel/eiciel-0.9.2-5.src.rpm I'd really appreciate any informal review(s), prior to seeking a formal review and sponsor for this package :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 19:12:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 15:12:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198013] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Child In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607091912.k69JCGa1022604@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Child https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198013 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-09 15:03 EST ------- +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +devel build succeeds +Request branching (FC-4, FC-5) +Close bug Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 19:14:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 15:14:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198020] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-SimpleLog In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607091914.k69JERmQ022683@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-SimpleLog https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198020 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-09 15:05 EST ------- +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +devel build succeeds +Request branching (FC-4, FC-5) +Close bug Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 20:29:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 16:29:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189482] Review Request: pcb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607092029.k69KTsti025116@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189482 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-09 16:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > Does this mean that I am the _official_ packager of pcb now ? > I guess it does, there is no official procedure for this, but packages have been taken over while in review like tihs before. > SPEC : http://beta.glwb.info/pcb/pcb.spec > SRPM : http://beta.glwb.info/pcb/pcb-0.20060422-2.src.rpm > > %changelog > - fixed E: pcb info-dir-file /usr/share/info/dir > - added /sbin/install-info as requires for %%post and %%preun > - added icon and treated GTK+ icon cache as required > > I was not quite sure how to deal with the icon, so i put it in %post. Erm, thats wrong, really wrong, on other peoples systems %{SOURCE2} won't even be available the commented line at the end of %install is how it should be done, you probably need to put a: mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps above that line to make it to work. Once the icon installation is ok (and completly removed from %post) the package is ok and I'll approve it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 20:32:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 16:32:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196865] Review Request: audacious - A GTK2 based media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607092032.k69KWvQN025209@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious - A GTK2 based media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196865 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-09 16:24 EST ------- Looks good, approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 21:32:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 17:32:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189482] Review Request: pcb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607092132.k69LWGuO027105@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189482 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-07-09 17:23 EST ------- thanks, Updated: SPEC : http://beta.glwb.info/pcb/pcb.spec SRPM : http://beta.glwb.info/pcb/pcb-0.20060422-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 21:34:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 17:34:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607092134.k69LYShG027164@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-09 17:25 EST ------- OK, I'll take a look over the various packages; there should be enough here to show me what I need to know but if you've done some review work them please include the links so that I can take a look. Check http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/HowToGetSponsored for more information on the sponsorship process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 21:49:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 17:49:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193957] Review Request: nant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607092149.k69LneM5028080@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193957 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-07-09 17:41 EST ------- You can also optionally fix the end of line on every other file in the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 21:58:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 17:58:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193957] Review Request: nant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607092158.k69LwdK9028403@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193957 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-09 17:50 EST ------- Thanks :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 21:59:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 17:59:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189092] Review Request: boo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607092159.k69LxMPI028440@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189092 Bug 189092 depends on bug 193957, which changed state. Bug 193957 Summary: Review Request: nant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193957 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 22:22:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 18:22:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197814] Review Request: autogen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607092222.k69MM2hk028898@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197814 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-09 18:13 EST ------- columns and getdefs is the more difficult of the two. As upstream suggests, a solution would be to include an autogen.d directory in %{_bindir}. I'll have to look into the viability of not packing libopts - there isn't anything in the configure script which allows it though -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 22:28:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 18:28:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191208] Review Request: The Ipe extensible drawing editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607092228.k69MS8q7029021@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: The Ipe extensible drawing editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191208 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2006-07-09 18:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > > MUST: > * ipe-doc must depend on ipe > > please deal with MUST, then import the package > > APPROVED Thank you for your review! I have commited release 6.0-0.7.pre26: * Tue Jul 4 2006 Laurent Rineau - 6.0-0.7.pre26 - In %%files, use libipe.so.1*, instead of libipe.so.* - Make sub-package %%{name}-doc depend on %%{name} * Wed Jun 28 2006 Laurent Rineau - 6.0-0.6.pre26 - Added a patch, ipe_6.0pre26-initui.cpp.patch, to fix temporarely an upstream bug: QMenu aboutToshow() signal has a lowercase "a". > SHOULD: > * there is no icon for the .desktop file, add one later, if available The upstream tarball has no icon. Who should create one. Me?! > * the documentation is in /usr/share/ipe/6.0/doc; if it is not > too much work, move it to /usr/share/doc/ipe-doc-6.0 Well, I do not know how to install things into /usr/share/doc/ipe-doc-6.0, because the %doc macro of the -doc subpackage begins with: rm -rf %{_buildroot}/usr/share/doc/ipe-doc-6.0 which remove all files installed here during %install > * if the doc package is not installed, the web browser will report an error, > if help is invoked in ipe; I don't consider this a blocker, but should > probably dealt with somehow Maybe I should merge the doc package with the main package. Or trick a IPEBROWSER script that checks the presence of the documentation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 22:31:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 18:31:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198098] Review Request: xarchiver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607092231.k69MVu6K029142@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xarchiver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198098 jtorresh at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jtorresh at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From jtorresh at gmail.com 2006-07-09 18:23 EST ------- Hi Damien, Some comments on your package: - I think the description grammar could be improved. It says "Xarchiver is a GTK2 archiver, create, add...", and also refers to "the above formats" (above what? which formats?). - You shouldn't own %{_datadir}/pixmaps as it is already owned by filesystem. - You must own %{_datadir}/%{name}. - rpmlint complains about the following: W: xarchiver mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (check the Version tag) E: xarchiver zero-length /usr/share/doc/xarchiver-0.3.3/NEWS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 22:51:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 18:51:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191208] Review Request: The Ipe extensible drawing editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607092251.k69MpOoL030205@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: The Ipe extensible drawing editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191208 laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2006-07-09 18:42 EST ------- ipe build in devel: http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=12338 Branches requested for FC-4 and FC-5. I close this ticket, but I still expect suggestions, for my questions of comment #7. You can continue to write in this ticket, G?rard. -- Laurent, sad because of France has not won the world cup, today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 22:56:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 18:56:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196281] Review Request: php-manual-en - English language PHP manual In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607092256.k69MuKKD030396@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-manual-en - English language PHP manual https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196281 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-07-09 18:47 EST ------- Yes this is what I'm trying to say. You can add the %dir, or I think just saying %{_defaultdocdir}/php-manual in the %files section will accomplish the same thing, either way you want to code it is fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 03:30:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 23:30:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197609] Review Request: poster In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607100330.k6A3U1fd007898@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poster https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197609 ------- Additional Comments From redhat at flyn.org 2006-07-09 23:21 EST ------- Please try the link above again. I made a mistake and placed the wrong file on the webserver. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 04:39:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 00:39:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189482] Review Request: pcb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607100439.k6A4dc3n010532@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189482 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-10 00:31 EST ------- Looks good now, approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 05:00:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 01:00:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197908] Review Request: im-chooser - Input Method configuration tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607100500.k6A505nq011601@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: im-chooser - Input Method configuration tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197908 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-07-10 00:51 EST ------- - rpmlint ok - naming ok ! shouldn't use %makeinstall - license is GPL and included in doc files - md5sum is good - builds fine on fc5 x86_64 - uses find_lang ! need desktop file and icon? ! doesn't build in mock: checking for XML::Parser... configure: error: XML::Parser perl module is required for intltool ! there seems to be a small bug in how it handles user-defined configs: if one clicks on the selector showing "User defined", and then clicks somewhere else, the selector changes to "scim" and a symlink to "User specific" is created. I attach a spec file with some fixes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 05:04:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 01:04:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197908] Review Request: im-chooser - Input Method configuration tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607100504.k6A54WVP011770@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: im-chooser - Input Method configuration tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197908 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-07-10 00:55 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=132157) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=132157&action=view) im-chooser.spec-1.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 05:22:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 01:22:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 179758] Review Request: Eiciel (ACL editor) [Seeking Sponsor] In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607100522.k6A5Moi6012382@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Eiciel (ACL editor) [Seeking Sponsor] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179758 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-10 01:14 EST ------- My $0.02. Note this is not a "you will be asked to change" but just a stylistic suggestion: split the BuildRequires line into multiple BReq lines < 80 chars in length. Makes things easier to read. For that matter, having standard-width lines wherever practical makes things a touch easier... That being said, I have eiciel built and installed from your package. Tho I'm only using it casually right now, it does appear to be working quite nicely :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 05:43:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 01:43:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198131] New: Review Request: glibmm Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198131 Summary: Review Request: glibmm Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: kevin at planetsaphire.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.planetsaphire.com/rpms/glibmm/glibmm.spec SRPM URL: http://www.planetsaphire.com/rpms/glibmm/SRPMS/2.10/2.10.4/glibmm-2.10.4-1.src.rpm Description: A C++ Wrapper for the GNU GLib, created by the GNOME developers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 05:50:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 01:50:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197908] Review Request: im-chooser - Input Method configuration tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607100550.k6A5olSP014177@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: im-chooser - Input Method configuration tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197908 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |182541 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 06:01:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 02:01:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607100601.k6A61XPV014501@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 ------- Additional Comments From drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx 2006-07-10 01:52 EST ------- I'm afraid I haven't done any reviews as of yet as I hadn't gotten that deeply involved in the Extras project until now. I just figured that I, as one of the main developers of PulseAudio, could give these packages the attention they need. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 06:06:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 02:06:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189322] Review Request: rosegarden4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607100606.k6A6665T014658@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rosegarden4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189322 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-07-10 01:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Alright, shiny new package update: > > http://www.haxxed.com/rpms/rosegarden4-1.2.3-2.src.rpm > http://www.haxxed.com/rpms/rosegarden4.spec Do you know what all this is about? # rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/rosegarden4-1.2.3-2.i386.rpm E: rosegarden4 zero-length /usr/share/apps/rosegarden/fonts/feta/6/custodes-medicaea.xpm E: rosegarden4 zero-length /usr/share/apps/rosegarden/fonts/feta/4/custodes-rvaticana.xpm E: rosegarden4 zero-length /usr/share/apps/rosegarden/fonts/feta/8/custodes-mensural.xpm E: rosegarden4 zero-length /usr/share/apps/rosegarden/fonts/feta/12/custodes-rmedicaea.xpm E: rosegarden4 zero-length /usr/share/apps/rosegarden/fonts/feta/12/accordion-accSB.xpm E: rosegarden4 zero-length /usr/share/apps/rosegarden/fonts/feta/12/custodes-rvaticana.xpm E: rosegarden4 zero-length /usr/share/apps/rosegarden/fonts/feta/4/accordion-accDot.xpm etc etc etc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 07:00:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 03:00:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198131] Review Request: glibmm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607100700.k6A70qNG016658@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glibmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198131 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2006-07-10 02:52 EST ------- Hmm, it's already in extras! (gtkmm24) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 07:25:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 03:25:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198131] Review Request: glibmm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607100725.k6A7Pdft017900@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glibmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198131 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at planetsaphire.com 2006-07-10 03:16 EST ------- gtkmm24 != glibmm24 :) However, glibmm24 was in there. I guess my searching didn't notice the packages. :( Although off-topic to this bug, I believe that the packages shouldn't have the '24' suffix. GNOME named the glibmm and gtkmm without the suffix, so why does Red Hat add the suffix? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 07:44:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 03:44:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197559] Review Request: scim-chinese-standard: Chinese Linux Standard IM adapter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607100744.k6A7i2uM019410@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-chinese-standard: Chinese Linux Standard IM adapter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197559 ------- Additional Comments From qwang at redhat.com 2006-07-10 03:35 EST ------- I updated the new tarball: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=162943&package_id=184064&release_id=430913 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 08:14:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 04:14:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198131] Review Request: glibmm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607100814.k6A8EGqX022027@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glibmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198131 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2006-07-10 04:05 EST ------- Right, I meant glibmm24. There are about 8 packages, though they all fall under the denomination of 'gtkmm' (gtkmm.sourceforge.net). The 24 suffix represents the API version (as in /usr/lib/pkgconfig/glibmm-2.4.pc, 2.10 is the ABI version) and is there mostly for historical reasons since we used to also package the older 2.0 APIs. I agree we could get rid of the 24 suffix now, I'm just not sure it's worth the trouble. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 08:55:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 04:55:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197559] Review Request: scim-chinese-standard: Chinese Linux Standard IM adapter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607100855.k6A8tbvo025612@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-chinese-standard: Chinese Linux Standard IM adapter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197559 ------- Additional Comments From qwang at redhat.com 2006-07-10 04:47 EST ------- new srpm and spec file were updated: Spec URL: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=162943&package_id=184064&release_id=430913 SRPM URL: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=162943&package_id=184064&release_id=430913 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 09:10:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 05:10:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198131] Review Request: glibmm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607100910.k6A9A7VN026638@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glibmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198131 kevin at planetsaphire.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 09:15:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 05:15:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190027] Review Request: hexter-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607100915.k6A9Fvcf026975@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hexter-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190027 ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2006-07-10 05:07 EST ------- Alright, I finally blew most of a day figuring out why qjackctl was hanging my machines, maybe now I can finish this review. :) (kernel-2.6.17-1.2145_FC5 seems to work so far) For those watching at home, jack-dssi-host is not a GUI app. We can't give hexter an icon because trying to start it without jackd running results in a silent failure. MUST items: - rpmlint: Ok $ rpmlint hexter-dssi-0.5.9-3.fc5.i386.rpm W: hexter-dssi dangling-relative-symlink /usr/bin/hexter jack-dssi-host Supplied by dssi. - Package name: Ok - Spec name: Ok - Meets packaging guidelines: NEEDSWORK - License: Ok - Spec in American English: Ok - Spec legible: Ok - Sources match upstream: Ok - Builds: Ok - BuildRequires: Ok - Locales: Ok - ldconfig: Ok - Relocation: Ok - Directory ownership: Ok - %files: Ok - %clean: Ok - Macros: Ok - Code vs. Content: Ok - Documentation: Ok - devel package: Ok - .desktop file: Ok SHOULD: - Includes license text: Ok - Mock build: Ok - Builds on all archs: Built on i386, x86_64 - Package functional: Tested on i386, x86_64 - Scriptlets: Ok - Subpackages: Ok NEEDSWORK: Source URL needs to be [...]sourceforge/dssi/[...] Don't use %makeinstall, apparently its horribly broken. (This was news to me too) Non-blockers: Summary could perhaps mention it's a DX7 clone. "DX7 compatible software synthesizer plugin" or something. Also tomboy just revealed "compatible" is spelled wrong, heh... Put a trailing slash on "%{_datadir}/hexter" in the %files list. Fix the two NEEDWORK before import, and this is APPROVED. Now if you could review Rosegarden for me I'd appreciate it. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 09:23:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 05:23:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189322] Review Request: rosegarden4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607100923.k6A9NoMl027473@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rosegarden4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189322 ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2006-07-10 05:15 EST ------- That's part of the pre-rendered music notation font its using. Dunno why there's a bunch of null files in there. I figure we can ignore it for now, and I'll report it upstream along with all the patches once the review is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 09:29:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 05:29:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190027] Review Request: hexter-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607100929.k6A9T91m027744@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hexter-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190027 seg at haxxed.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 09:33:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 05:33:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175168] Review Request: gideon - GUI designer for GTK/C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607100933.k6A9XAgQ027990@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gideon - GUI designer for GTK/C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175168 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2006-07-10 05:24 EST ------- Gosh, and now they release 3 tarballs instead of one. I need to check with upstream what is to be done wrt packaging (all 3 are released under the same version number but I'm guessing that won't always be the case). I can't say I'm thrilled at the idea of having to split this review into 3 different ones... (gideon, gideon-guiloader and gideon-guiloader-c++)... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 10:44:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 06:44:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197908] Review Request: im-chooser - Input Method configuration tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101044.k6AAib7q032373@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: im-chooser - Input Method configuration tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197908 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2006-07-10 06:35 EST ------- Thanks. updated. Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/tagoh/im-chooser/im-chooser.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/tagoh/im-chooser/im-chooser-0.2.1-1.src.rpm I can't reproduce the last comment however. if you have the exact steps to reproduce it, it would be appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 10:58:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 06:58:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197559] Review Request: scim-chinese-standard: Chinese Linux Standard IM adapter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101058.k6AAwKo7001155@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-chinese-standard: Chinese Linux Standard IM adapter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197559 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-07-10 06:49 EST ------- (The .spec file was not updated btw.) Okay the srpm is now enough. Please bump the release number to 1, put the full version-release in the %changelog, and add a reference to this bug. APPROVED. Then please follow the rest of . I don't think there is any need to make branches for FC-5 or FC-4 for this, just devel should be sufficient. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 11:36:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 07:36:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197908] Review Request: im-chooser - Input Method configuration tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101136.k6ABap5O002862@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: im-chooser - Input Method configuration tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197908 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-07-10 07:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > I can't reproduce the last comment however. if you have the exact steps to > reproduce it, it would be appreciated. Ok, I don't think it is a blocking issue (it needs to be a file not a symlink to reproduce it btw) and by "clicks somewhere else" I meant clicking away from the selector to cancel any change or clicking on "User defined" ("User specific"). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 11:44:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 07:44:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197353] Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101144.k6ABiwYJ003252@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197353 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-07-10 07:36 EST ------- Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/man-pages-fr.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/man-pages-fr-2.11.0-1.src.rpm %changelog * Fri Jul 10 2006 Alain Portal 2.11.0-1 - Update to 2.11.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 11:48:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 07:48:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175047] Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101148.k6ABmLfu003403@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175047 ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2006-07-10 07:39 EST ------- I have put a new version of the package (0.3.2) together based on the NM 0.6 branch in CVS. I tested it with the current version of NetworkManager from FC5-updates. You can find my source RPM here: http://www.niemueller.de/software/patches/NetworkManager-openvpn-0.3.2-1.src.rpm There is also a new spec at the location mentioned in the first post. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 12:02:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 08:02:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197908] Review Request: im-chooser - Input Method configuration tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101202.k6AC2nBD003967@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: im-chooser - Input Method configuration tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197908 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-07-10 07:54 EST ------- I get this error now in mock: Making all in po make[2]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/im-chooser-0.2.1/po' file=`echo ja | sed 's,.*/,,'`.gmo \ && rm -f $file && -o $file ja.po /bin/sh: -o: command not found make[2]: *** [ja.gmo] Error 127 Otherwise the package looks good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 12:07:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 08:07:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197908] Review Request: im-chooser - Input Method configuration tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101207.k6AC7536004142@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: im-chooser - Input Method configuration tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197908 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-07-10 07:58 EST ------- I think you need to BR gettext for msgfmt. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 12:27:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 08:27:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197908] Review Request: im-chooser - Input Method configuration tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101227.k6ACR97w004869@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: im-chooser - Input Method configuration tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197908 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-07-10 08:18 EST ------- Feel to import it into extras cvs for more eyes to see it. This is an important package for i18n. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 12:48:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 08:48:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197908] Review Request: im-chooser - Input Method configuration tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101248.k6ACmJDn006419@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: im-chooser - Input Method configuration tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197908 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-07-10 08:39 EST ------- Builds ok in mock on fc5 with BR gettext. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 13:10:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 09:10:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197814] Review Request: autogen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101310.k6ADAgQG007888@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197814 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-10 09:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > One thing that puzzles me is this > > W: autogen strange-permission autogen-5.8.4.tar.bz2 0666 > > How do I change the permission of the tarball from within the spec or is this > something I can just do in my SOURCES directory by hand? chmod 644 SOURCES/autogen-5.8.4.tar.bz2 then rebuild the SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 13:33:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 09:33:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197908] Review Request: im-chooser - Input Method configuration tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101333.k6ADXxWC009004@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: im-chooser - Input Method configuration tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197908 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-07-10 09:25 EST ------- Thanks for the import. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 13:45:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 09:45:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198198] New: Review Request: ooo2txt - Convert OpenOffice documents to simple text Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198198 Summary: Review Request: ooo2txt - Convert OpenOffice documents to simple text Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: pertusus at free.fr QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/ooo2txt-0.0.6-1.src.rpm Description: ooo2txt converts OpenOffice documents to simple text. Sadly, it seems that the upstream author has passed away. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 14:05:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 10:05:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188138] Review Request: mod_auth_ntlm_winbind - NTLM authentication for the Apache web server using winbind daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101405.k6AE5sEt012199@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_auth_ntlm_winbind - NTLM authentication for the Apache web server using winbind daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188138 ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2006-07-10 09:57 EST ------- Add patch to fix IE6 "CONNECT HTTP/1.0" issue. Do "chgrp apache /var/cache/samba/winbindd_privileged/" on install, or trigger "usermod -a -G squid apache" when squid already installed (i.e. this dir has group "squid"). New SPEC: http://dmitry.butskoy.name/mod_auth_ntlm_winbind/mod_auth_ntlm_winbind.spec New SRPM: http://dmitry.butskoy.name/mod_auth_ntlm_winbind/mod_auth_ntlm_winbind-20060510-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 14:57:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 10:57:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197353] Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101457.k6AEvP7M016657@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197353 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-07-10 10:48 EST ------- Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/man-pages-fr.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/man-pages-fr-2.12.0-1.src.rpm %changelog * Mon Jul 10 2006 Alain Portal 2.12.0-1 - Update to 2.12.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 14:59:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 10:59:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165230] Review Request: Eclipse Graphical Editing Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101459.k6AExvlH016771@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Eclipse Graphical Editing Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165230 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2006-07-10 10:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Wow, this ticket has been idle for seven months. Anything happening here? We can't build GEF until some of GNU Classpath head is backported to the libgcj we have. This work has been done and is waiting on one more patch before we can test it. When this finishes (before test2 I've been told), someone will re-submit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 15:09:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 11:09:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197137] Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101509.k6AF9648017711@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197137 ------- Additional Comments From jparsons at redhat.com 2006-07-10 11:00 EST ------- New version with fixes for list above: http://sourceware.org/cluster/conga/extras/conga.spec http://sourceware.org/cluster/conga/extras/conga-0.8-7.FC6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 15:19:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 11:19:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101519.k6AFJBmf018381@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 ------- Additional Comments From eric.moret at epita.fr 2006-07-10 11:10 EST ------- Building on Rawhide works fine but does not work on FC5 with the following error: [emoret at fc5 pkgconfig]$ sudo ldconfig [...] gcc -shared .libs/libpulse_browse_la-browser.o -Wl,--rpath - Wl,/home/emoret/rpmbuild/BUILD/pulseaudio-0.9.2/src/.libs ./.libs/libpulse.so - lhowl -lcap -ldl -lm -pthread -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -Wl,-soname - Wl,libpulse-browse.so.0 -o .libs/libpulse-browse.so.0.0.0 /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lhowl collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [libpulse-browse.la] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/emoret/rpmbuild/BUILD/pulseaudio-0.9.2/src' make[2]: *** [all] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/emoret/rpmbuild/BUILD/pulseaudio-0.9.2/src' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/emoret/rpmbuild/BUILD/pulseaudio-0.9.2' make: *** [all] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.9607 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.9607 (%build) [emoret at fc5 SPECS]$ locate avahi-compat-howl.pc /usr/lib/pkgconfig/avahi-compat-howl.pc [emoret at fc5 SPECS]$ cd /usr/lib/pkgconfig/ [emoret at fc5 pkgconfig]$ ls -la howl.pc lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 Jul 10 00:15 howl.pc -> avahi-compat-howl.pc [emoret at fc5 pkgconfig]$ locate libhowl /usr/lib/libhowl.so [emoret at fc5 pkgconfig]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 15:22:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 11:22:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101522.k6AFMP94018697@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 ------- Additional Comments From eric.moret at epita.fr 2006-07-10 11:13 EST ------- Also I have noticed that pabrowse is part of module-zeroconf while pax11publish is in utils even if it depends on module-x11. Don't you think it might make more sense to either include pabrowse in utils or move pax11publish in module- x11 for sake of consistency? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 15:30:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 11:30:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197716] Review Request: connect-proxy - SSH Proxy command helper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101530.k6AFUQU9019530@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: connect-proxy - SSH Proxy command helper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197716 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-07-10 11:21 EST ------- Packages all built and pushed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 15:36:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 11:36:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198244] New: Review Request: libglade Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198244 Summary: Review Request: libglade Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: paul at city-fan.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/Gnome-1/libglade.spec SRPM URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/Gnome-1/libglade-0.17-17.src.rpm Description: Gnome-1 support library for loading user interfaces. This package was removed from Core for FC6 and I am submitting it to Extras to support the people that still need it for legacy applications. I pulled the package from Core CVS and then tweaked it for Extras and to suit my own cosmetic preferences. Reviewers may consider using rpmdiff to compare the built packages with the versions in Fedora Core 5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 15:37:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 11:37:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198245] New: Review Request: gnome-libs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198245 Summary: Review Request: gnome-libs Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: paul at city-fan.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/Gnome-1/gnome-libs.spec SRPM URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/Gnome-1/gnome-libs-1.4.2-1.src.rpm Description: The main GNOME1 libraries. This package was removed from Core for FC6 and I am submitting it to Extras to support the people that still need it for legacy applications. I pulled the package from Core CVS and then tweaked it for Extras and to suit my own cosmetic preferences. I also updated it to the latest upstream version and removed patches that had been incorporated upstream. Reviewers may consider using rpmdiff to compare the built packages with the versions in Fedora Core 5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 15:37:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 11:37:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198198] Review Request: ooo2txt - Convert OpenOffice documents to simple text In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101537.k6AFb61U020188@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ooo2txt - Convert OpenOffice documents to simple text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198198 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us 2006-07-10 11:28 EST ------- Please post the .spec as a separate file. Having the .spec as a separate file makes it easier for people to look over the package and make comments without having to download the whole SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 15:39:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 11:39:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198246] New: Review Request: ORBit Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198246 Summary: Review Request: ORBit Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: paul at city-fan.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/Gnome-1/ORBit.spec SRPM URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/Gnome-1/ORBit-0.5.17-17.src.rpm Description: ORBA Object Request Broker for GNOME-1 compatibility This package was removed from Core for FC6 and I am submitting it to Extras to support the people that still need it for legacy applications. I pulled the package from Core CVS and then tweaked it for Extras and to suit my own cosmetic preferences. Reviewers may consider using rpmdiff to compare the built packages with the versions in Fedora Core 5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 15:40:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 11:40:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198247] New: Review Request: libpng10 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198247 Summary: Review Request: libpng10 Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: paul at city-fan.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/Gnome-1/libpng10.spec SRPM URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/Gnome-1/libpng10-1.0.20-1.src.rpm Description: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/Gnome-1/libpng10-1.0.20-1.src.rpm This package was removed from Core for FC6 and I am submitting it to Extras to support the people that still need it for legacy applications. I pulled the package from Core CVS and then tweaked it for Extras and to suit my own cosmetic preferences. I also updated it to the latest upstream version and updated the configuration patch so that it would apply against the new version. Reviewers may consider using rpmdiff to compare the built packages with the versions in Fedora Core 5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 15:40:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 11:40:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198198] Review Request: ooo2txt - Convert OpenOffice documents to simple text In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101540.k6AFevQY020828@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ooo2txt - Convert OpenOffice documents to simple text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198198 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-10 11:32 EST ------- spec file should be here soon: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/ooo2txt.spec Having the spec file may be usefull in some cases, but in that specific case I doubt it given that the spec is simple but there is no source packaged... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 15:41:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 11:41:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198245] Review Request: gnome-libs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101541.k6AFfPTb020903@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-libs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198245 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |198246, 198247 OtherBugsDependingO| |198244 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 15:41:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 11:41:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198244] Review Request: libglade In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101541.k6AFfQXT020916@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libglade https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198244 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |198245 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 15:41:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 11:41:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197791] Review Request: stacaccli - Stateless Cached Client Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101541.k6AFfXqf020933@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stacaccli - Stateless Cached Client Tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197791 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |jkeating at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188267 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-10 11:32 EST ------- NEEDSWORK: - pyver checking not necessary. Python now autoadds the python(abi) requirement. - needs 'noarch' listed in ExclusiveArch. - Currently our build system doesn't like the combo of BuildArch: noarch and ExclusiveArch: i386 x86_64. As a workaround I would put noarch in the ExclusiveArch. I don't know what this will do for composes though, we need to fix the build system. - rpmlint output on the packages: E: stacaccli explicit-lib-dependency libxml2-python E: stacaccli non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/stacaccli/common/bootloader.py 0644 E: stacaccli non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/stacaccli/common/config.py 0644 E: stacaccli non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/stacaccli/common/fileutils.py 0644 E: stacaccli non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/stacaccli/common/grabutils.py 0644 E: stacaccli non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/stacaccli/common/imagemetadata.py 0644 E: stacaccli non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/stacaccli/common/__init__.py 0644 E: stacaccli non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/stacaccli/common/logger.py 0644 E: stacaccli non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/stacaccli/common/lvm.py 0644 E: stacaccli non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/stacaccli/common/shvar.py 0644 E: stacaccli non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/stacaccli/common/sysutils.py 0644 E: stacaccli non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/stacaccli/common/udevmonitor.py 0644 E: stacaccli non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/stacaccli/daemon/config.py 0644 E: stacaccli non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/stacaccli/daemon/__init__.py 0644 E: stacaccli non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/stacaccli/daemon/main.py 0644 E: stacaccli non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/stacaccli/daemon/updater.py 0644 E: stacaccli non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/stacaccli/__init__.py 0644 E: stacaccli non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/stacaccli/install/config.py 0644 E: stacaccli non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/stacaccli/install/__init__.py 0644 E: stacaccli non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/stacaccli/install/installer.py 0644 E: stacaccli non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/stacaccli/install/main.py 0644 W: stacaccli incoherent-init-script-name stacacclid W: stacaccli incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.1-1 0.2-1 W: stacaccli non-conffile-in-etc /etc/rwtab.d/stacaccli W: stacaccli strange-permission stacaccli.spec 0600 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 15:41:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 11:41:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198247] Review Request: libpng10 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101541.k6AFfbad020965@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpng10 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198247 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |198245 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 15:41:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 11:41:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198246] Review Request: ORBit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101541.k6AFfnHW020997@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ORBit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198246 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |198245 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 15:43:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 11:43:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193712] Review Request: sos In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101543.k6AFhQ3w021179@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193712 ------- Additional Comments From jwb at redhat.com 2006-07-10 11:34 EST ------- On behalf of Steve C: I've just rolled new packages with corrections that Steve made in the source; the only thing I can see from the above list is that the .pyo files are still packaged. I didn't ghost these out for two reasons: 1) I can't find the guideline in the FE packaging requirements that says these should be ghosted, and 2) the main python package in FC doesn't ghost out .pyo files, so it seems more consistent to go ahead and package the .pyo's. New packages located at: SPEC: http://www.berningeronline.net/sos.spec SRPM: http://www.berningeronline.net/sos-0.1-6.src.rpm I'm providing these packages to try and speed the review along since Steve has been swamped with moving to a new house and there are lots of people inside RH who'd like to see this accepted. Steve will remain the main contact for this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 16:03:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 12:03:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182320] Review Request: gnome-build In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101603.k6AG3UMC022820@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182320 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |198244, 198245 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 16:03:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 12:03:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198244] Review Request: libglade In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101603.k6AG3fPI022847@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libglade https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198244 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |182320 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 16:03:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 12:03:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198245] Review Request: gnome-libs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101603.k6AG3rav022879@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-libs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198245 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |182320 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 16:04:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 12:04:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197137] Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101604.k6AG43JA022903@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197137 ------- Additional Comments From jparsons at redhat.com 2006-07-10 11:55 EST ------- Sorry - link for new src rpm is actually: http://sourceware.org/cluster/conga/extras/conga-0.8-7.fc6.src.rpm spec file link is OK: http://sourceware.org/cluster/conga/extras/conga.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 16:09:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 12:09:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174021] Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101609.k6AG9VJG023266@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174021 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-07-10 12:00 EST ------- /usr/share/X11/app-default own to the X11 System, so I can't get ownership to this directory. The problem with the xterm file is, that apl has its own font with special characters which will be maped to the keyboard. Next Release: Spec: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/aplus-fsf/aplus-fsf.spec SRPM: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/aplus-sfs/aplus-fsf-4.20.2-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 16:15:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 12:15:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188138] Review Request: mod_auth_ntlm_winbind - NTLM authentication for the Apache web server using winbind daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101615.k6AGFUAx023534@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_auth_ntlm_winbind - NTLM authentication for the Apache web server using winbind daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188138 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-10 12:06 EST ------- A few initial comments (and given enough time later this week, I'll hopefully be able to pull off a full review): 1. Drop Epoch: 0 it's not necessary, nor desired. 2. Yuck, %post, %triggerin squid Changing dir ownership in a scriplet is bad, especially, since the target is owned by another package (samba-common). I can see where you're coming from here, but in the end, it's just an unacceptable hack. Arg, on checking, it appears squid does that same thing! A better solution would be to ask/bug the samba maintainer to make /var/cache/samba/winbindd_privileged group writable (owned by some group, say, samba). Then apache and squid could simply add themselves to this group on install. (I'll go file a bug/enhancement-request for that now...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 16:18:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 12:18:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198246] Review Request: ORBit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101618.k6AGIuV6023713@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ORBit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198246 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-10 12:10 EST ------- Since -devel has files in %{_libdir}/pkgconfig and %_datadir/aclocal, to avoid possible unowned dirs, it should: Requires: pkgconfig and Requires: automake (or Requires: %_datadir/aclocal) respectively. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 16:20:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 12:20:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198245] Review Request: gnome-libs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101620.k6AGKlNd023841@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-libs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198245 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-10 12:12 EST ------- Since -devel has files in %_datadir/aclocal, to avoid possible unowned dirs, it should: Requires: automake or Requires: %_datadir/aclocal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 16:21:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 12:21:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198244] Review Request: libglade In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101621.k6AGLZpD023888@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libglade https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198244 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-10 12:12 EST ------- Since -devel has files in %{_libdir}/pkgconfig and %_datadir/aclocal, to avoid possible unowned dirs, it should: Requires: pkgconfig and Requires: automake (or Requires: %_datadir/aclocal) respectively. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 16:22:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 12:22:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198247] Review Request: libpng10 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101622.k6AGMKSA023945@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpng10 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198247 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-10 12:13 EST ------- Since -devel has files in %{_libdir}/pkgconfig , to avoid possible unowned dirs, it should: Requires: pkgconfig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 16:29:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 12:29:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188138] Review Request: mod_auth_ntlm_winbind - NTLM authentication for the Apache web server using winbind daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101629.k6AGTYhx024244@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_auth_ntlm_winbind - NTLM authentication for the Apache web server using winbind daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188138 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |198251 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 16:33:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 12:33:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198247] Review Request: libpng10 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101633.k6AGXg4R024549@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpng10 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198247 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-10 12:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Since -devel has files in %{_libdir}/pkgconfig , to avoid possible unowned > dirs, it should: > Requires: pkgconfig It already does: %package devel Group: Development/Libraries Summary: Development tools for version 1.0 of libpng Requires: libpng10 = %{version}-%{release}, zlib-devel, pkgconfig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 16:37:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 12:37:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198247] Review Request: libpng10 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101637.k6AGbQDs024867@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpng10 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198247 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-10 12:28 EST ------- doh, sorry for the noise (I'm used to only looking at one Requires: item per line). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 16:42:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 12:42:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182320] Review Request: gnome-build In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101642.k6AGg4K5025347@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182320 ------- Additional Comments From ianburrell at gmail.com 2006-07-10 12:33 EST ------- Is there a reason you are using the gnome 1 libraries to build gnome-build? It requires gnome2. The configure script says is needs gtk 2.3.0 and gnome 2.3.3. The gnome-build.spec.in in the tarball is either really old or for another distribution that packages gnome differently. The nrpms.net gnome-build for FC4 uses the gnome2 dependencies. Its requirements are: BuildRequires: gtk2-devel BuildRequires: gnome-vfs2-devel BuildRequires: libbonobo-devel BuildRequires: libglade2-devel BuildRequires: libgal2-devel BuildRequires: gdl-devel BuildRequires: gtkhtml2-devel BuildRequires: libxml2-devel Requires: gnome-vfs2 Requires: libbonobo Requires: libglade2 Requires: gtkhtml2 Requires: libgal2 Requires: gdl Requires: libxml2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 16:45:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 12:45:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198244] Review Request: libglade In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101645.k6AGjMLB025628@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libglade https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198244 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-10 12:36 EST ------- Double checked, and Requires: pkgconfig is already there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 16:56:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 12:56:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188138] Review Request: mod_auth_ntlm_winbind - NTLM authentication for the Apache web server using winbind daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101656.k6AGuqJk026440@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_auth_ntlm_winbind - NTLM authentication for the Apache web server using winbind daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188138 ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2006-07-10 12:48 EST ------- > Drop Epoch: 0 OK > A better solution would be to ask/bug the samba maintainer to > make /var/cache/samba/winbindd_privileged group writable Actually "group accessable", write permissions is not needed here! ;) I would prefer to not wait for samba changes, as it can leads to some time delay... Maybe save these ugly things "as is", at least for a while? Note, that this permission problem can confuse the "end-user" here a lot. IMO it is better to do these group manipulations rather than do nothing... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 17:00:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 13:00:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188138] Review Request: mod_auth_ntlm_winbind - NTLM authentication for the Apache web server using winbind daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101700.k6AH0WWj026640@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_auth_ntlm_winbind - NTLM authentication for the Apache web server using winbind daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188138 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-10 12:51 EST ------- > I would prefer to not wait for samba changes, as it can leads to some time > delay... Maybe save these ugly things "as is", at least for a while? If by "for a while" you mean before package is approved, yes. (: Seriously, imo, this is a blocker that MUST be fixed before acceptance into Extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 17:09:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 13:09:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193820] Review Request: libcm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101709.k6AH9eJ9026943@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193820 sandmann at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From sandmann at redhat.com 2006-07-10 13:00 EST ------- Sorry, I went on vacation. It isn't actually clear whether we are going to use the metacity compositor, so I'll return when that's figured out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 17:10:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 13:10:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198246] Review Request: ORBit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101710.k6AHACDH026977@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ORBit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198246 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-10 13:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Since -devel has files in %{_libdir}/pkgconfig and %_datadir/aclocal, to avoid > possible unowned dirs, it should: > Requires: pkgconfig > and > Requires: automake > (or Requires: %_datadir/aclocal) > respectively. Fixed in -18: Spec URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/Gnome-1/ORBit.spec SRPM URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/Gnome-1/ORBit-0.5.17-18.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 17:30:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 13:30:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197874] Review Request: perl-Socket6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101730.k6AHUjrm028248@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Socket6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197874 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |jkeating at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188268 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-10 13:21 EST ------- Suggestion: - Use generic number in changelog so that the spec could be identical across releases instead of having a bit change for '.fc6' or '.fc5'. Package spec looks clean, builds in mock, rpmlint is quiet. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 17:35:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 13:35:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182320] Review Request: gnome-build In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101735.k6AHZnxp028654@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182320 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|198244, 198245 | ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-10 13:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > Is there a reason you are using the gnome 1 libraries to build gnome-build? Yes; I read the spec too literally and it was a mistake. I'll remove them again. I've had a look at the buildreqs that are actually needed for this package and will attach a specfile patch shortly. The patch will also address the directory ownership issues. I'm doing a test build for mock/rawhide/i386 at the moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 17:35:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 13:35:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198244] Review Request: libglade In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101735.k6AHZpJ3028666@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libglade https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198244 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|182320 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 17:36:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 13:36:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198245] Review Request: gnome-libs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101736.k6AHa3uo028707@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-libs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198245 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|182320 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 17:42:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 13:42:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197821] Review Request: perl-IO-Socket-INET6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101742.k6AHgpAC029128@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Socket-INET6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197821 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |jkeating at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188268 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-10 13:33 EST ------- Package looks good. rpmlint is silent on the srpm. Above fixes have been integrated. Package builds in mock (once Socket6 is put in the buildroot) Approving. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 17:44:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 13:44:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198245] Review Request: gnome-libs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101744.k6AHiMlM029214@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-libs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198245 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-10 13:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Since -devel has files in %_datadir/aclocal, to avoid > possible unowned dirs, it should: > > Requires: automake > or > Requires: %_datadir/aclocal Fixed in -2: Spec URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/Gnome-1/gnome-libs.spec SRPM URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/Gnome-1/gnome-libs-1.4.2-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 17:54:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 13:54:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197740] Review Request: dircproxy - IRC proxy server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101754.k6AHssVF029802@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dircproxy - IRC proxy server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197740 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-07-10 13:46 EST ------- Blocker: * runs as root although daemon supports non-root operation ("switch_user" feature) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 17:56:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 13:56:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197827] Review Request: perl-Net-SSLeay In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101756.k6AHuBjE029927@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SSLeay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197827 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |jkeating at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188267 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-10 13:47 EST ------- NEEDSWORK: - Why the Provides: perl-Net_SSLeay = %{version}-%{release} ? Isn't this automatic? - Perl is part of the exception list, no need to list it as a BR RPMLINT only complains about the file modes in the source package, and about the changelog (ignorable as changelog has non dist'd version but release has dist. rpmlint should allow this) W: perl-Net-SSLeay strange-permission perl-Net-SSLeay-1.2.5-CVE-2005-0106.patch 0666 W: perl-Net-SSLeay strange-permission perl-Net-SSLeay-test14.patch 0666 W: perl-Net-SSLeay strange-permission perl-Net-SSLeay.spec 0666 W: perl-Net-SSLeay strange-permission Net_SSLeay.pm-1.30.tar.gz 0666 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 17:59:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 13:59:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182320] Review Request: gnome-build In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101759.k6AHxM3m030132@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182320 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-10 13:50 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=132189) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=132189&action=view) Fix myriad of issues with this spec AFter applying this spec patch, the package builds in mock for rawhide. No need for any Gnome-1 packages. PFJ should chmod 644 his spec and tarball before building a new SRPM, and then the only rpmlint issue left should be: W: gnome-build-devel no-documentation Given that the perl modules in /usr/share/gnome-build/GBF are not going to be found by any random perl package that looks for them in standard places, I would advocate stripping out the perl requires and provides from the main package altogether. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 17:59:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 13:59:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189482] Review Request: pcb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101759.k6AHxUv5030159@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189482 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 18:18:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 14:18:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195363] Review Request: esc and esc-xulrunner-devel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101818.k6AIIVVR031486@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esc and esc-xulrunner-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195363 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2006-07-10 14:09 EST ------- A couple of comments. We upstream ESC, yes? Can we make the tarball .tar.bz2 or .tar.gz instead of .tgz ? It's more consistent that way. Also, why don't we ship the shell script and desktop file in the upstream tarball? I've noticed in the %install section you are manually copying over files. Does the makefile have a working install target? The usual procedure is make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 18:24:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 14:24:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197826] Review Request: perl-IO-Socket-SSL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101824.k6AIOiEi032173@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Socket-SSL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197826 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO_REPORTER AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |jkeating at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188267 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-10 14:15 EST ------- NEEDSWORK: - Noarch package, so OPTIMIZE not needed, ditto removing .bs files - BuildRequires should be perl(NET::SSLeay) not the package name. rpmlint only has one warning: W: perl-IO-Socket-SSL file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/man3/IO::Socket::SSL.3pm.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 18:33:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 14:33:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197827] Review Request: perl-Net-SSLeay In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101833.k6AIXaYt000472@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SSLeay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197827 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-07-10 14:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > - Why the Provides: perl-Net_SSLeay = %{version}-%{release} ? Isn't > this automatic? No, note Net-SSLeay vs Net_SSLeay, and see the Sun Jul 11 2004 %changelog entry. I renamed it a few years ago because I thought that the upstream Net_SSLeay.pm distribution name doesn't follow general CPAN naming and would be confusing (underscore vs hyphen, trailing .pm). perl-Net-SSLeay just felt right, and FWIW still does to me even if it doesn't strictly follow the current naming guidelines for CPAN packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 18:37:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 14:37:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197827] Review Request: perl-Net-SSLeay In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101837.k6AIbRfV000997@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SSLeay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197827 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-10 14:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > RPMLINT only complains about the file modes in the source package, and about the > changelog (ignorable as changelog has non dist'd version but release has dist. > rpmlint should allow this) That's not what it's complaining about. The spec release is -4 but the changelog only has -3. > W: perl-Net-SSLeay strange-permission perl-Net-SSLeay-1.2.5-CVE-2005-0106.patch 0666 > W: perl-Net-SSLeay strange-permission perl-Net-SSLeay-test14.patch 0666 > W: perl-Net-SSLeay strange-permission perl-Net-SSLeay.spec 0666 > W: perl-Net-SSLeay strange-permission Net_SSLeay.pm-1.30.tar.gz 0666 Trivially fixed by chmod 644-ing the files before building the SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 18:37:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 14:37:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197826] Review Request: perl-IO-Socket-SSL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101837.k6AIboLS001074@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Socket-SSL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197826 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-07-10 14:29 EST ------- This package is already in Extras, maintained by jpo, and that version has the reported issues fixed as well as some other enhancements over the submitted one. The release tag in this one would also cause a broken upgrade path. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 19:00:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 15:00:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196378] Review Request: kdegraphics-extras: Extras, including kuickshow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101900.k6AJ0JZ6004062@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdegraphics-extras: Extras, including kuickshow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196378 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-07-10 14:51 EST ------- ok now that imlib is in extras i can review this [dennis at files extrasreviews]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core/result/kdegraphics-extras-3.5.3-3.fc6.x86_64.rpm W: kdegraphics-extras incoherent-version-in-changelog 7:3.5.3-3 3.5.3-3.fc6 E: kdegraphics-extras invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libkdeinit_kuickshow.so libkdeinit_kuickshow.so you have removed the epoch from the package but left it in the changelog entry. [dennis at files SPECS]$ md5sum ../SOURCES/kdegraphics-3.5.3.tar.bz2 56bd5537521dc94633f8effaace523cb ../SOURCES/kdegraphics-3.5.3.tar.bz2 matches what is posted on http://www.kde.org/download/ kdegraphics-3.5.3 6.9MB 56bd5537521dc94633f8effaace523cb builds fine in mock -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 19:06:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 15:06:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196378] Review Request: kdegraphics-extras: Extras, including kuickshow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101906.k6AJ6M8s004677@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdegraphics-extras: Extras, including kuickshow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196378 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-10 14:57 EST ------- > you have removed the epoch from the package but left it in the changelog > entry. A side-effect of my using a single specfile for both kdegraphics and kdegraphics-extras, and choosing to omit the Epoch from the new package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 19:15:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 15:15:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197827] Review Request: perl-Net-SSLeay In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101915.k6AJF3Qo005228@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SSLeay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197827 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-10 15:06 EST ------- Couldn't we get around the abiquity by just using perl(Net::SLeay) ? Ah, yes, the changelog version needs to be changed, and those files should probably be chmodded in CVS. Fix those issues and I can approve the move of this package from Extras to Core. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 19:16:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 15:16:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197826] Review Request: perl-IO-Socket-SSL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101916.k6AJGLTg005334@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Socket-SSL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197826 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-10 15:07 EST ------- Warren, please update to the Extras version of the package for this review. Ville, we need to bring this package into Core for spamassassin to support ipv6 and ssl communication. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 19:39:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 15:39:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197874] Review Request: perl-Socket6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101939.k6AJdv1q006865@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Socket6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197874 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jpo at di.uminho.pt ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-07-10 15:31 EST ------- rpmlint complains about the missing changelog entry for release 3: W: perl-Socket6 incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.19-2 0.19-3 jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 19:47:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 15:47:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197827] Review Request: perl-Net-SSLeay In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101947.k6AJlFfW007517@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SSLeay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197827 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-07-10 15:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Couldn't we get around the abiquity by just using perl(Net::SLeay) ? Yes, things depending on the Net::SSLeay module should have a dependency on perl(Net::SSLeay). At the time I did the rename there were some packages using name based dependencies to this so the Provides could not be just dropped. > those files should probably be chmodded in CVS. Shouldn't be needed. Unless something has changed recently, the only thing CVS remembers is whether files have executable bits or not, and permissions like 0666 don't propagate anywhere. Files are usually 0555 or 0444 inside the repo, and on checkout/export they retain the executable status while other bits are set according to the checkouter's umask. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 19:47:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 15:47:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197826] Review Request: perl-IO-Socket-SSL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607101947.k6AJlg4T007583@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Socket-SSL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197826 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-07-10 15:38 EST ------- Yep, noticed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 20:06:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 16:06:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197967] Review Request: gkrellm - Multiple stacked system monitors in one process In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607102006.k6AK6Bml009272@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gkrellm - Multiple stacked system monitors in one process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197967 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-07-10 15:57 EST ------- I'm a firm believer in that users/groups created by packages should *not* be erased when the package is removed, and won't set myself as the reviewer because of that. Let me know if you're willing to leave them behind when erasing -daemon, and I'll take care of the review. Anyway, a couple of comments: The switch to lm_sensors means that ppc will need special treatment, as lm_sensors is not (nor obviously -devel) available for it. ExcludeArch: ppc would sound like a regression. -daemon has grown a "Provides: gkrellm-server" for no apparent reason, and -daemon has become self-obsoleting because of that, which may or may not cause problems. I'd suggest removing it and adding a "< $some_known_version-$release" to Obsoletes: gkrellm-server. There's a mismatch between %install and %files where the former uses various hardcoded paths while the latter uses macros (at least /etc vs %{_sysconfdir}). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 20:26:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 16:26:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197609] Review Request: poster In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607102026.k6AKQHgB011308@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poster https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197609 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-07-10 16:17 EST ------- The complaint bug is fixed, so I can APPROVE your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 20:44:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 16:44:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607102044.k6AKi4gp014344@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 ------- Additional Comments From drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx 2006-07-10 16:35 EST ------- pabrowse is packaged with lib-zeroconf (client side), not module-zeroconf (server side). There is no client side package for X11 integration (it's in the client lib unconditionally) so it made no sense to put pax11publish in its own package. The broken build is an error in the avahi package which has forgotten to add a dependency from the devel package to the "main" one. Filed as bug 198282. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 20:49:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 16:49:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198284] New: Review Request: python-configobj - Config file reading, writing, and validation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198284 Summary: Review Request: python-configobj - Config file reading, writing, and validation Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: lmacken at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/python-configobj.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/python-configobj-4.3.2-1.src.rpm Description: ConfigObj is a simple but powerful config file reader and writer: an ini file round tripper. Its main feature is that it is very easy to use, with a straightforward programmer's interface and a simple syntax for config files. It has lots of other features though: * Nested sections (subsections), to any level * List values * Multiple line values * String interpolation (substitution) * Integrated with a powerful validation system o including automatic type checking/conversion o repeated sections o and allowing default values * All comments in the file are preserved * The order of keys/sections is preserved * No external dependencies * Full Unicode support * A powerful unrepr mode for storing basic datatypes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 20:51:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 16:51:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198284] Review Request: python-configobj - Config file reading, writing, and validation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607102051.k6AKpeuM015767@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-configobj - Config file reading, writing, and validation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198284 lmacken at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |189338 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 20:53:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 16:53:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198285] New: Review Request: python-simplejson - Simple, fast, extensible JSON encoder/decoder for Python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198285 Summary: Review Request: python-simplejson - Simple, fast, extensible JSON encoder/decoder for Python Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: lmacken at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/python-simplejson.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/python-simplejson-1.3-1.src.rpm Description: simplejson is a simple, fast, complete, correct and extensible JSON encoder and decoder for Python 2.3+. It is pure Python code with no dependencies. simplejson was formerly known as simple_json, but changed its name to comply with PEP 8 module naming guidelines. The encoder may be subclassed to provide serialization in any kind of situation, without any special support by the objects to be serialized (somewhat like pickle). The decoder can handle incoming JSON strings of any specified encoding (UTF-8 by default). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 20:54:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 16:54:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198285] Review Request: python-simplejson - Simple, fast, extensible JSON encoder/decoder for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607102054.k6AKs8bD016336@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-simplejson - Simple, fast, extensible JSON encoder/decoder for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198285 lmacken at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |189338 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 20:56:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 16:56:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198287] New: Review Request: python-paste - Tools for using a Web Server Gateway Interface stack Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198287 Summary: Review Request: python-paste - Tools for using a Web Server Gateway Interface stack Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: lmacken at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/python-paste.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/python-paste-0.9.3-1.src.rpm Description: These provide several pieces of "middleware" (or filters) that can be nested to build web applications. Each piece of middleware uses the WSGI (PEP 333) interface, and should be compatible with other middleware based on those interfaces. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 20:57:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 16:57:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198288] New: Review Request: python-pastedeploy - Load, configure, and compose WSGI applications and servers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198288 Summary: Review Request: python-pastedeploy - Load, configure, and compose WSGI applications and servers Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: lmacken at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/python-pastedeploy.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/python-pastedeploy-0.5-1.src.rpm Description: This tool provides code to load WSGI applications and servers from URIs; these URIs can refer to Python Eggs for INI-style configuration files. PasteScript provides commands to serve applications based on this configuration file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 20:58:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 16:58:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198289] New: Review Request: python-pastescript - A pluggable command-line frontend Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198289 Summary: Review Request: python-pastescript - A pluggable command-line frontend Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: lmacken at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/python-pastescript.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/python-pastescript-0.9-1.src.rpm Description: Paster is pluggable command-line frontend, including commands to setup package file layouts Built-in features: * Creating file layouts for packages. For instance a setuptools-ready file layout. * Serving up web applications, with configuration based on paste.deploy -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 20:59:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 16:59:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197963] Review Request: bouncycastle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607102059.k6AKxQnP017244@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouncycastle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197963 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |jkeating at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188267 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-10 16:50 EST ------- NEEDSWORK: - Buildroot should be %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) - Remove Epoch: 0 - Specifying 0 epoch on Requires and BuildRequires is not necessary. Remove them. - RPM_BUILD_ROOT=bctmp aot-compile-rpm <-- what is this doing? Why reset the buildroot? - Post and postun scripts should probably have logic for final removal vs upgrade. As it stands you'll run rebuild-security-providers and rebuild-gcj-db twice every time you upgrade the package. Once for the new package, and once for removing the old package. rpmlint output: E: bouncycastle zero-length /etc/java/security/security.d/2000-org.bouncycastle.jce.provider.BouncyCastleProvider W: bouncycastle-debuginfo objdump-failed objdump: /tmp/bouncycastle-debuginfo-1.33-1.x86_64.rpm.17761/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/gcj/bouncycastle/bcprov-1.33.jar.so.debug: File format not recognized W: bouncycastle mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs W: bouncycastle non-conffile-in-etc /etc/java/security/security.d/2000-org.bouncycastle.jce.provider.BouncyCastleProvider W: bouncycastle objdump-failed objdump: /tmp/bouncycastle-1.33-1.x86_64.rpm.17761/usr/lib64/gcj/bouncycastle/bcprov-1.33.jar.so: File format not recognized The Zero length file, I see it just being touched. Does it just need to exist? If so, we can ignore the error. However it should be marked as a config file. Not sure about the objdump warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 21:01:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 17:01:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198287] Review Request: python-paste - Tools for using a Web Server Gateway Interface stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607102101.k6AL1GNK017569@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-paste - Tools for using a Web Server Gateway Interface stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198287 lmacken at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |189338 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 21:01:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 17:01:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198288] Review Request: python-pastedeploy - Load, configure, and compose WSGI applications and servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607102101.k6AL1vGN017733@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pastedeploy - Load, configure, and compose WSGI applications and servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198288 lmacken at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |189338, 198287 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 21:02:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 17:02:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198289] Review Request: python-pastescript - A pluggable command-line frontend In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607102102.k6AL2JbI017824@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pastescript - A pluggable command-line frontend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198289 lmacken at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |189338, 198287, 198288 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 21:02:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 17:02:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198287] Review Request: python-paste - Tools for using a Web Server Gateway Interface stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607102102.k6AL2MB8017864@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-paste - Tools for using a Web Server Gateway Interface stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198287 lmacken at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |198288 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 21:02:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 17:02:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198288] Review Request: python-pastedeploy - Load, configure, and compose WSGI applications and servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607102102.k6AL2Ulm017884@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pastedeploy - Load, configure, and compose WSGI applications and servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198288 lmacken at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |198289 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 21:03:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 17:03:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198287] Review Request: python-paste - Tools for using a Web Server Gateway Interface stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607102103.k6AL34u0017997@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-paste - Tools for using a Web Server Gateway Interface stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198287 lmacken at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |198289 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 21:23:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 17:23:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193071] Review Request: ruby-sqlite3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607102123.k6ALN9hq021356@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-sqlite3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193071 ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2006-07-10 17:14 EST ------- You are right about following the guidelines very closely. I have fixed the ruby_site* macros to coincide with the guidelines (no dir at the end, Ville Skyttae pointed out that all outher scripting languages use _sitelib, not _sitelibdir, so let's stick with that) As for using %{__chmod}, %{__rm} vs chmod, rm, I am open to either, though I am never quite sure what the recommended one is, and whether it is correct to rely on the $PATH of the user building the RPM. Updated: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/spec/ruby-sqlite3.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/SRPMS/ruby-sqlite3-1.1.0-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 21:40:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 17:40:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197963] Review Request: bouncycastle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607102140.k6ALeRmV024473@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouncycastle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197963 fitzsim at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2006-07-10 17:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > NEEDSWORK: > - Buildroot should be %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) Done. > - Remove Epoch: 0 Done. > - Specifying 0 epoch on Requires and BuildRequires is not necessary. Remove them. Done. > - RPM_BUILD_ROOT=bctmp aot-compile-rpm <-- what is this doing? Why reset the > buildroot? Yeah, I realized I don't need this, it's already done by aot-compile-rpm in the %install section. > - Post and postun scripts should probably have logic for final removal vs > upgrade. As it stands you'll run rebuild-security-providers and rebuild-gcj-db > twice every time you upgrade the package. Once for the new package, and once > for removing the old package. OK. > > rpmlint output: > > E: bouncycastle zero-length > /etc/java/security/security.d/2000-org.bouncycastle.jce.provider.BouncyCastleProvider > W: bouncycastle-debuginfo objdump-failed objdump: > /tmp/bouncycastle-debuginfo-1.33-1.x86_64.rpm.17761/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/gcj/bouncycastle/bcprov-1.33.jar.so.debug: > File format not recognized > W: bouncycastle mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs > W: bouncycastle non-conffile-in-etc > /etc/java/security/security.d/2000-org.bouncycastle.jce.provider.BouncyCastleProvider > W: bouncycastle objdump-failed objdump: > /tmp/bouncycastle-1.33-1.x86_64.rpm.17761/usr/lib64/gcj/bouncycastle/bcprov-1.33.jar.so: > File format not recognized > > The Zero length file, I see it just being touched. Does it just need to exist? > If so, we can ignore the error. However it should be marked as a config file. The filename 2000-org.bouncycastle.jce.provider.BouncyCastleProvider is interpreted by rebuild-security-providers as -, and is used to rebuild /usr/lib/security/classpath.security. Its contents are meaningless. I don't want to mark it as %config because then if someone edits it and then updates, a backup file with the extension .rpmsave will be created and will cause a bogus entry to appear in /usr/lib/security/classpath.security. > > Not sure about the objdump warnings. I ran rpmlint (0.77-1.fc5) on my x86 workstation and didn't see those warnings. I'll post the updated package shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 21:45:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 17:45:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197963] Review Request: bouncycastle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607102145.k6ALjKdO025468@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouncycastle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197963 ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2006-07-10 17:36 EST ------- Updated Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/fitzsim/bouncycastle.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/fitzsim/bouncycastle-1.33-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 21:58:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 17:58:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193071] Review Request: ruby-sqlite3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607102158.k6ALw7aS028013@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-sqlite3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193071 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-10 17:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > You are right about following the guidelines very closely. I have fixed the > ruby_site* macros to coincide with the guidelines (no dir at the end, Ville > Skyttae pointed out that all outher scripting languages use _sitelib, not > _sitelibdir, so let's stick with that) > > As for using %{__chmod}, %{__rm} vs chmod, rm, I am open to either, though I am > never quite sure what the recommended one is, and whether it is correct to rely > on the $PATH of the user building the RPM. It's up to you but be consistent about it. My personal preference is not to trust the user's $PATH and use either macros or full paths for commands that don't have macros. I think from Jason's "obsfucating macro" terminology that his preference lies the other way... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 22:04:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 18:04:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197740] Review Request: dircproxy - IRC proxy server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607102204.k6AM4x1u028836@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dircproxy - IRC proxy server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197740 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-07-10 17:56 EST ------- The daemon can be run as any user, but it won't work for multiple users unless run as root. The "switch_user" feature does not run the daemon as non-root, it only briefly seteuid's to display another name: 6.1 How do I change what username is presented on IRC? The obvious answer is to run dircproxy under that username, but that doesn't help if you're proxying for multiple people. Another option is to use one of the many fake ident daemons to return a false answer for you. There's also a third option, which is available to those running dircproxy as root (either as a daemon or from inetd). You can use the 'switch_user' configuration file directive. This ensures that the connection to the server appears as from whatever local username you give it (by seteuid()ing to that briefly) while the dircproxy process remains as root. Exactly what should be done here, I dunno. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 22:28:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 18:28:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197814] Review Request: autogen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607102228.k6AMSEt9031944@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197814 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-10 18:19 EST ------- Next release of the tarball should (according to upstream) include the ability to disable the version of libopts supplied in the tarball. I'll hang fire until that comes out, though I think I've fixed the two blocker filenames (I'm adding a directory called autogen.d to %{_bindir} if that is allowed and getting autogen to add that to the path when it's fired up) upstream will NOT be renaming them -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 22:49:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 18:49:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189685] Review Request: Anjuta-2.0.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607102249.k6AMnZlU003085@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Anjuta-2.0.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189685 lyz27 at yahoo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lyz27 at yahoo.com ------- Additional Comments From lyz27 at yahoo.com 2006-07-10 18:40 EST ------- Where can I find the anjuta-gdl-devel package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 22:53:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 18:53:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192311] Review Request: cobbler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607102253.k6AMr28b003694@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cobbler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192311 ------- Additional Comments From mdehaan at redhat.com 2006-07-10 18:44 EST ------- Updated. - added doc URL - added directories - removed redundant macros - bumped release New RPM: http://et.redhat.com/~mdehaan/software/cobbler/cobbler-0.1.0-2.src.rpm New spec file: http://et.redhat.com/~mdehaan/software/cobbler/cobbler.spec Documentation URL as listed in spec: http://et.redhat.com/page/Cobbler_%26_Koan_Provisioning_Tools (largely a manpage copy for now) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 22:53:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 18:53:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189685] Review Request: Anjuta-2.0.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607102253.k6AMrXvs003803@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Anjuta-2.0.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189685 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-10 18:44 EST ------- #10 : Rawhide (Fedora Extras development branch). I've not put it into FE5 yet as until Anjuta-2.0.x is released into FE (which may be a while off yet as autogen is giving much grief!), there isn't any point. Also, if you are raising a bug (or request), can you file it under a different BZ? anjuta-gdl is a different package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 10 22:53:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 18:53:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192313] Review Request: koan In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607102253.k6AMrupb003901@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: koan https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192313 ------- Additional Comments From mdehaan at redhat.com 2006-07-10 18:45 EST ------- Updated. - added doc URL - added directories - removed redundant macros - bumped release New RPM: http://et.redhat.com/~mdehaan/software/koan/koan-0.1.0-2.src.rpm New spec file: http://et.redhat.com/~mdehaan/software/koan/koan.spec Documentation URL as listed in spec: http://et.redhat.com/page/Cobbler_%26_Koan_Provisioning_Tools (largely a manpage copy for now) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 00:24:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 20:24:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197609] Review Request: poster In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607110024.k6B0OIoY013132@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poster https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197609 redhat at flyn.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 00:34:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 20:34:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175047] Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607110034.k6B0YVeU013864@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175047 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2006-07-10 20:25 EST ------- Observations: 1) When a new VPN is added, it does not appear until after NetworkManager is restarted. Ideally, it would show up immediately. 2) There is still some interaction with selinux that needs to be dealt with (this output was run in permissive mode to capture full set of messages): Jul 10 18:25:24 localhost kernel: audit(1152577524.671:21): avc: denied { node_bind } for pid=2781 comm="openvpn" saddr=127.0.0.1 src=1194 scontext=system_u:system_r:NetworkManager_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:lo_node_t:s0 tclass=tcp_socket Jul 10 18:25:24 localhost kernel: audit(1152577524.671:22): avc: denied { search } for pid=2781 comm="openvpn" name="etc" dev=dm-1 ino=818771 scontext=system_u:system_r:NetworkManager_t:s0 tcontext=user_u:object_r:user_home_t:s0 tclass=dir Jul 10 18:25:24 localhost kernel: audit(1152577524.671:23): avc: denied { read } for pid=2781 comm="openvpn" name="bjohnson.crt" dev=dm-1 ino=818840 scontext=system_u:system_r:NetworkManager_t:s0 tcontext=user_u:object_r:user_home_t:s0 tclass=file Jul 10 18:25:24 localhost kernel: audit(1152577524.671:24): avc: denied { getattr } for pid=2781 comm="openvpn" name="bjohnson.crt" dev=dm-1 ino=818840 scontext=system_u:system_r:NetworkManager_t:s0 tcontext=user_u:object_r:user_home_t:s0 tclass=file Jul 10 18:25:30 localhost kernel: audit(1152577530.332:25): avc: denied { read write } for pid=2781 comm="openvpn" name="tun" dev=tmpfs ino=1315 scontext=system_u:system_r:NetworkManager_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:tun_tap_device_t:s0 tclass=chr_file Jul 10 18:25:30 localhost kernel: audit(1152577530.332:26): avc: denied { ioctl } for pid=2781 comm="openvpn" name="tun" dev=tmpfs ino=1315 scontext=system_u:system_r:NetworkManager_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:tun_tap_device_t:s0 tclass=chr_file 3) On the "Create VPN Connection 2 of 2" screen, if you click the "Optional Information" area, the window expands well outside of the borders of my display (1440x900). I would guess that you want to try to stay near the lowest common denominator, maybe 600 pixels tall. Other than that, it looks good, and useful (bug from comment #9 is gone). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 00:52:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 20:52:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192313] Review Request: koan In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607110052.k6B0qJ9F015772@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: koan https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192313 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2006-07-10 20:43 EST ------- Those pages are 404'ing for me... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 01:07:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 21:07:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193071] Review Request: ruby-sqlite3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607110107.k6B17X6k016596@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-sqlite3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193071 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-10 20:58 EST ------- If you really would prefer to type seven characters, five of which require the shift key, instead of two for zero gain, then you're free to do so but you should be consistent. Personally my eyes start to bleed and my wrists start to ache in empathy everytime someone uses a ton of needless macros. However, even the specfile templates aren't consistent about this. (See, for example, the python spec which uses "rm" and "%{__python}" on consecutive lines.) In any case, the latest package looks good to me. The only issue that hasn't been addressed is that of the test suite; obviously we can't run it as is, but now that we have functional guidelines, perhaps it will eventually be packaged up and this package can then run its test suite. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 01:36:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 21:36:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174021] Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607110136.k6B1aZOT017604@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174021 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-10 21:27 EST ------- If you don't own this directory and you depend on nothing that does, then you cannot under any circumstances put files there. (Yes, there are packages in core that violate this; that is a bug.) The packages in FC5 which provide this directory are: xorg-x11-apps xorg-x11-resutils xorg-x11-server-utils xorg-x11-utils xorg-x11-xdm xorg-x11-xsm xscreensaver-base You will either have to own the directory, require one of those packages or require the directory itself, which will have the effect of requiring xorg-x11-xdm unless one of the other packages is already installed. (Personally I think that xorg-x11-filesystem should own this directory, but that's another ticket.) In any case, this package still doesn't even start build, because you put %{?dist} at the end of your "rel" define and not at the end of release. How are you able to build this package to test it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 02:15:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 22:15:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175047] Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607110215.k6B2Fp2X019648@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175047 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us 2006-07-10 22:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #25) > Observations: > > 1) When a new VPN is added, it does not appear until after NetworkManager is > restarted. Ideally, it would show up immediately. This is a bug in Network Manager's VPN support from what I recall, and is not specific to the Network Manager OpenVPN plugin. > 2) There is still some interaction with selinux that needs to be dealt with > (this output was run in permissive mode to capture full set of messages): This isn't specific to the Network Manager OpenVPN plugin. I've had the same problem with starting OpenVPN manually and recent SELinux policies. This command: setsebool -P openvpn_disable_trans 1 should disable SELinux for OpenVPN (and you shouldn't even need to reboot). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 02:19:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 22:19:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192430] Review Request: python-kiwi - Framework for Python GUI applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607110219.k6B2Jo9b019911@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-kiwi - Framework for Python GUI applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192430 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-07-10 22:11 EST ------- rpmlint of python-kiwi-gazpacho-1.9.8-0.4.fc6.noarch.rpm: W: python-kiwi-gazpacho no-documentation Ignore. rpmlint of python-kiwi-1.9.8-0.4.fc6.noarch.rpm:E: python-kiwi non-executable-script /etc/kiwi/setup.py 0644 E: python-kiwi non-executable-script f/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/kiwi/i18n/msgfmt.py 0644 W: python-kiwi doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-kiwi-1.9.8/examples/framework/diary/diary.py /usr/bin/env W: python-kiwi doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-kiwi-1.9.8/examples/framework/diary/diary2.py /usr/bin/env Happens with python. Ignore. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (LGPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - locales handled - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 03:12:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 23:12:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195412] Review Request: obconf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607110312.k6B3CIw9024312@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: obconf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195412 jtorresh at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jtorresh at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 03:22:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 23:22:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194375] Review Request: kdeutils: K Desktop Environment - Utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607110322.k6B3M9wJ025003@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeutils: K Desktop Environment - Utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194375 imlinux at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |imlinux at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2006-07-10 23:13 EST ------- - no URL tag - %config %{_datadir}/config*/* <- Why aren't these in /etc/? - python is provided by python-devel (non-blocker) - need requires(pre,post) for update-desktop-database -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 03:25:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 23:25:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193161] Review Request: ruby-postgres In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607110325.k6B3P94t025227@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-postgres https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193161 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-10 23:16 EST ------- Would you care to fix up this spec given the discussion from the ruby-sqlite3 package? (ruby(abi) require, strip "dir" from the first two macros, consistency of macros, etc.) As before, rpm will find the postgres.so dependency so you can probably drop the manual postrgresql require. Also, I note you list the license as Distributable, but "Ruby License" should be fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 03:44:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 23:44:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193529] Review Request: radiusclient-ng - RADIUS protocol client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607110344.k6B3iX7r027174@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: radiusclient-ng - RADIUS protocol client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193529 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-10 23:35 EST ------- This failed to build for me due to the autotools no longer being in the default build environment. I tried to get rid of that and use the usual "make LIBTOOL=blah" bit, but the included makefile doesn't seem to support DESTDIR either, so perhaps it is better to run all of the autotools. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 04:45:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 00:45:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198285] Review Request: python-simplejson - Simple, fast, extensible JSON encoder/decoder for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607110445.k6B4jmp2029905@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-simplejson - Simple, fast, extensible JSON encoder/decoder for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198285 lmacken at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|189338 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 04:45:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 00:45:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198289] Review Request: python-pastescript - A pluggable command-line frontend In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607110445.k6B4jxaB029926@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pastescript - A pluggable command-line frontend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198289 lmacken at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|189338 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 04:46:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 00:46:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198288] Review Request: python-pastedeploy - Load, configure, and compose WSGI applications and servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607110446.k6B4kAm5029946@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pastedeploy - Load, configure, and compose WSGI applications and servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198288 lmacken at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|189338 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 04:46:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 00:46:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198287] Review Request: python-paste - Tools for using a Web Server Gateway Interface stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607110446.k6B4kBiP029959@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-paste - Tools for using a Web Server Gateway Interface stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198287 lmacken at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|189338 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 04:46:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 00:46:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198284] Review Request: python-configobj - Config file reading, writing, and validation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607110446.k6B4kXUb029979@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-configobj - Config file reading, writing, and validation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198284 lmacken at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|189338 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 05:36:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 01:36:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197908] Review Request: im-chooser - Input Method configuration tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607110536.k6B5acBx031823@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: im-chooser - Input Method configuration tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197908 tagoh at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2006-07-11 01:27 EST ------- imported and built into devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 06:27:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 02:27:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198330] New: Review Request: spca5xx-kmod-common Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198330 Summary: Review Request: spca5xx-kmod-common Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: panemade at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/Spca5xx/spca5xx-kmod-common.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/Spca5xx/spca5xx-kmod-common-20060501-1.fc5.src.rpm Description: This is the spca5xx-kmod-common package that contains documentation files for spca5xx video for linux (v4l) driver. This package is dependency requirement for spca5xx-kmod package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 06:30:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 02:30:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198330] Review Request: spca5xx-kmod-common In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607110630.k6B6UfJG002330@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spca5xx-kmod-common https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198330 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 06:34:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 02:34:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198331] New: Review Request: spca5xx-kmod Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198331 Summary: Review Request: spca5xx-kmod Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: panemade at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/Spca5xx/spca5xx-kmod.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/Spca5xx/spca5xx-kmod-20060501-1.2.6.16_1.2133_FC5.src.rpm Description: This is the spca5xx-kmod package that contains spca5xx kernel module. spca5xx is video for linux (v4l) driver, providing support for webcams and digital cameras based on the spca5xx range of chips manufactured by SunPlus Sonix Z-star Vimicro Conexant Etoms Transvision Mars-Semi Pixart. This package requires spca5xx-kmod-common package to be installed prior. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 06:36:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 02:36:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198331] Review Request: spca5xx-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607110636.k6B6aatj002601@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spca5xx-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198331 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |198330 OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 06:36:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 02:36:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198330] Review Request: spca5xx-kmod-common In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607110636.k6B6alBT002637@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spca5xx-kmod-common https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198330 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |198331 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 06:46:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 02:46:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178905] Review Request: smbldap-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607110646.k6B6kXsS003472@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smbldap-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178905 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From timosha at gmail.com 2006-07-11 02:37 EST ------- and now you can remove smbldap-tools files from samba package rpm -qd samba | grep smbldap-tools /usr/share/doc/samba-3.0.22/LDAP/smbldap-tools-0.9.1/CONTRIBUTORS /usr/share/doc/samba-3.0.22/LDAP/smbldap-tools-0.9.1/COPYING /usr/share/doc/samba-3.0.22/LDAP/smbldap-tools-0.9.1/ChangeLog /usr/share/doc/samba-3.0.22/LDAP/smbldap-tools-0.9.1/FILES /usr/share/doc/samba-3.0.22/LDAP/smbldap-tools-0.9.1/INFRA /usr/share/doc/samba-3.0.22/LDAP/smbldap-tools-0.9.1/INSTALL /usr/share/doc/samba-3.0.22/LDAP/smbldap-tools-0.9.1/Makefile /usr/share/doc/samba-3.0.22/LDAP/smbldap-tools-0.9.1/README /usr/share/doc/samba-3.0.22/LDAP/smbldap-tools-0.9.1/TODO /usr/share/doc/samba-3.0.22/LDAP/smbldap-tools-0.9.1/configure.pl /usr/share/doc/samba-3.0.22/LDAP/smbldap-tools-0.9.1/doc/html/contents_motif.gif /usr/share/doc/samba-3.0.22/LDAP/smbldap-tools-0.9.1/doc/html/index.html /usr/share/doc/samba-3.0.22/LDAP/smbldap-tools-0.9.1/doc/html/next_motif.gif /usr/share/doc/samba-3.0.22/LDAP/smbldap-tools-0.9.1/doc/html/previous_motif.gif /usr/share/doc/samba-3.0.22/LDAP/smbldap-tools-0.9.1/doc/html/smbldap-tools.html /usr/share/doc/samba-3.0.22/LDAP/smbldap-tools-0.9.1/doc/html/smbldap-tools001.html /usr/share/doc/samba-3.0.22/LDAP/smbldap-tools-0.9.1/doc/html/smbldap-tools002.html /usr/share/doc/samba-3.0.22/LDAP/smbldap-tools-0.9.1/doc/html/smbldap-tools003.html /usr/share/doc/samba-3.0.22/LDAP/smbldap-tools-0.9.1/doc/html/smbldap-tools004.html /usr/share/doc/samba-3.0.22/LDAP/smbldap-tools-0.9.1/doc/html/smbldap-tools005.html /usr/share/doc/samba-3.0.22/LDAP/smbldap-tools-0.9.1/doc/html/smbldap-tools006.html /usr/share/doc/samba-3.0.22/LDAP/smbldap-tools-0.9.1/doc/html/smbldap-tools007.html /usr/share/doc/samba-3.0.22/LDAP/smbldap-tools-0.9.1/doc/html/smbldap-tools008.html /usr/share/doc/samba-3.0.22/LDAP/smbldap-tools-0.9.1/doc/html/smbldap-tools009.html /usr/share/doc/samba-3.0.22/LDAP/smbldap-tools-0.9.1/doc/html/smbldap-tools010.html /usr/share/doc/samba-3.0.22/LDAP/smbldap-tools-0.9.1/doc/smbldap-migrate-pwdump-accounts /usr/share/doc/samba-3.0.22/LDAP/smbldap-tools-0.9.1/doc/smbldap-migrate-pwdump-groups /usr/share/doc/samba-3.0.22/LDAP/smbldap-tools-0.9.1/doc/smbldap-migrate-unix-accounts /usr/share/doc/samba-3.0.22/LDAP/smbldap-tools-0.9.1/doc/smbldap-migrate-unix-groups /usr/share/doc/samba-3.0.22/LDAP/smbldap-tools-0.9.1/doc/smbldap-tools.pdf /usr/share/doc/samba-3.0.22/LDAP/smbldap-tools-0.9.1/smb.conf /usr/share/doc/samba-3.0.22/LDAP/smbldap-tools-0.9.1/smbldap-groupadd /usr/share/doc/samba-3.0.22/LDAP/smbldap-tools-0.9.1/smbldap-groupdel /usr/share/doc/samba-3.0.22/LDAP/smbldap-tools-0.9.1/smbldap-groupmod /usr/share/doc/samba-3.0.22/LDAP/smbldap-tools-0.9.1/smbldap-groupshow /usr/share/doc/samba-3.0.22/LDAP/smbldap-tools-0.9.1/smbldap-passwd /usr/share/doc/samba-3.0.22/LDAP/smbldap-tools-0.9.1/smbldap-populate /usr/share/doc/samba-3.0.22/LDAP/smbldap-tools-0.9.1/smbldap-tools.spec /usr/share/doc/samba-3.0.22/LDAP/smbldap-tools-0.9.1/smbldap-useradd /usr/share/doc/samba-3.0.22/LDAP/smbldap-tools-0.9.1/smbldap-userdel /usr/share/doc/samba-3.0.22/LDAP/smbldap-tools-0.9.1/smbldap-userinfo /usr/share/doc/samba-3.0.22/LDAP/smbldap-tools-0.9.1/smbldap-usermod /usr/share/doc/samba-3.0.22/LDAP/smbldap-tools-0.9.1/smbldap-usershow /usr/share/doc/samba-3.0.22/LDAP/smbldap-tools-0.9.1/smbldap.conf /usr/share/doc/samba-3.0.22/LDAP/smbldap-tools-0.9.1/smbldap_bind.conf /usr/share/doc/samba-3.0.22/LDAP/smbldap-tools-0.9.1/smbldap_tools.pm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 06:49:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 02:49:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198331] Review Request: spca5xx-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607110649.k6B6noIl003705@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spca5xx-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198331 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-11 02:41 EST ------- All kernel modules should be named kmod-*, otherwise installers (yum/apt/smart etc.) are likely not to be able to handle them properly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 07:01:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 03:01:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193071] Review Request: ruby-sqlite3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607110701.k6B71SKL004210@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-sqlite3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193071 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-07-11 02:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > python spec which uses "rm" and "%{__python}" on consecutive lines The intention of using the macroized form for the python executable is to provide some flexibility for local rebuilds in setups where multiple versions of python are installed. And upstream rpm (not in FC yet) uses that form for computing sitelib and sitearch, we need to be in sync with that as long as those variables are only conditionally defined in the template. Ditto perl. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 07:06:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 03:06:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198331] Review Request: spca5xx-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607110706.k6B76wKP004377@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spca5xx-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198331 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-07-11 02:58 EST ------- *-kmod is correct for the source package. But see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/KernelModules , missing "A publishable explanation from the author(s) why the module is not merged with the mainline kernel yet and when it's planned to get merged." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 07:33:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 03:33:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607110733.k6B7X3au006425@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 ------- Additional Comments From eric.moret at epita.fr 2006-07-11 03:24 EST ------- Actually you must be right regarding pabrowse :) Something else I noticed on rawhide, I don't get the nice icons I can see on the screenshot for the GUI interfaces in the default gnome fedora theme. IE, I see a red cross in the trayicon when launching padevchooser instead of the speaker from the main site's screenshot. Likewise no icon in Applications ! Sound & Video Menu for Pulseaudio Device Chooser. I must be missing something but what? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 07:52:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 03:52:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175047] Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607110752.k6B7qsai009411@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175047 ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2006-07-11 03:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #25) 1) NM-problem 2) Needs fixes for the OpenVPN-package/SELinux policy for OpenVPN 3) This is true. It seems that after the last patch we finally reached the size where we need either more tabs or a popup with these settings. > Other than that, it looks good, and useful (bug from comment #9 is gone). Maybe you meant comment 11? Hans, are you going to sponsor this now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 08:38:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 04:38:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198331] Review Request: spca5xx-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607110838.k6B8cGIf014008@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spca5xx-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198331 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-11 04:29 EST ------- Ville Skytt?, Should i have to include publishable explanation from upstream source's Author? If yes then i am going to contact author for that and will include it in package. But where can i add that file in spca5xx-kmod package or in spca5xx-kmod-common package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 08:43:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 04:43:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194276] Review Request: kdeaccessibility: KDE accessibility tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607110843.k6B8hTWd014645@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeaccessibility: KDE accessibility tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194276 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-07-11 04:34 EST ------- Helle SRPM: URL Not found -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 08:43:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 04:43:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193531] Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607110843.k6B8hjOP014695@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193531 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-07-11 04:35 EST ------- Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/kicad.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/kicad-2006.06.26-4.src.rpm %changelog * Mon Jul 10 2006 Alain Portal 2006.06.26-4 - Remove BR libGLU-devel that is no more needed (bug #197501 is closed) - Fix files permissions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 09:57:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 05:57:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198331] Review Request: spca5xx-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607110957.k6B9vAiJ019708@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spca5xx-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198331 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-11 05:48 EST ------- There is one file regarding this i included already in spca5xx-kmod-common and its contents are like this ============================================================================= Dear users, For some strange reason "Luca Risolia" is setting a lot of drivers inside the main Kernel tree, specially those chips supported by spca5xx. Maybe there are not enought hardware to Hack:) As a consequence, you have to choice between spca5xx or the others. The problem is, hotplug will detect, the in kernel driver and maybe reject spca5xx claim. If you load the spca5xx first with modprobe spca5xx there are no problem. You can also blacklist the in kernel driver:) .If you get problem with the main kernel drivers, don't ask me please, you should ask here to get help: linux-usb-devel at lists.sourceforge.net or here for the v4l2 features :) video4linux-list at redhat.com best regards Michel Xhaard http://mxhaard.free.fr ================================================================== But I have not found any problem from this package in FC5 with any 2.6.16 kernels. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 10:04:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 06:04:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193867] Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607111004.k6BA4FJq020103@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193867 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 10:08:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 06:08:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193867] Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607111008.k6BA8SkH020334@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193867 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 10:26:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 06:26:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193867] Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607111026.k6BAQ0qO021574@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193867 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-07-11 06:17 EST ------- It looks good to me, but however the following needs to be solved: 1. ERROR 0001: file '/usr/bin/klamav' contains a standard rpath '/usr/lib' in [/usr/lib:/usr/lib/qt-3.3/lib] error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.9887 (%install) You have a rpath error, you solve this add --disable-rpath in %configure 2. your package is a gui, and hence you need to install the .desktop properly in the menus: see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop here , desktop-file-install --vendor fedora \ --add-category X-Fedora \ --add-category Utilities \ --delete-original \ --dir ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_datadir}/applications/ \ ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_datadir}/applnk/Utilities/%{name}.desktop would be appropriate then in %files it will be %{_datadir}/applications/fedora-%{name}.desktop rather than %{_datadir}/applnk/Utilities/klamav.desktop don't forget to add desktop-file-utils as BuildRequires 3. you can remove %define qtdir %(echo ${QTDIR}) and --with-qt-dir="%{qtdir}" from %configure 4. Icons You need to update the gtk+ icon cache as decribed here http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ScriptletSnippets#head-fc74f078205565f961f6d836b77c3428619c689d though its a package for kde. %post touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || : if [ -x %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache ]; then %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache --quiet %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || : fi %postun touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || : if [ -x %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache ]; then %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache --quiet %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || : fi Correct all this afterwards, Ill make a full review and approved it if needed :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 10:27:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 06:27:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197189] Review Request: fonts-sinhala In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607111027.k6BARrFt021776@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fonts-sinhala https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197189 ------- Additional Comments From paskalis at di.uoa.gr 2006-07-11 06:19 EST ------- The first and third issue (i.e. BuildRoot and superfluous %ghosting) are still in -2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 10:32:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 06:32:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193531] Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607111032.k6BAWBR4022505@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193531 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-07-11 06:23 EST ------- Line 187: %{__rm} -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/%{name}/modules/packages3d/#push_butt_shape1_blue.wings# I think you forgot to remove or correct this line because before this line you have installed lots of directories in it and then delete them completely. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 10:56:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 06:56:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186817] Review Request: kshutdown In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607111056.k6BAu1hd025968@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kshutdown https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186817 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-07-11 06:47 EST ------- It has been more than 3 full months since your last comment, Kushal can you post a new version which does build in Mock, or are you no longer interested? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 11:11:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 07:11:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193867] Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607111111.k6BBBwe7027648@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193867 ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2006-07-11 07:03 EST ------- Thanks for review. Updated file here: SRPM URL: ftp://andriy.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/klamav-0.37- 2.src.rpm * Tue Jul 11 2006 Andy Shevchenko 0.37-2 - adjust spec according to Fedora Extras review: - remove --with-qt-dir, add --disable-rpath - BRs: desktop-file-utils - place desktop file properly - update gtk icon cache -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 11:38:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 07:38:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193531] Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607111138.k6BBc0Wo029296@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193531 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-07-11 07:29 EST ------- Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/kicad.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/kicad-2006.06.26-5.src.rpm %changelog * Mon Jul 10 2006 Alain Portal 2006.06.26-5 - Removing backup files is no more needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 12:18:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 08:18:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193867] Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607111218.k6BCIfo7031318@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193867 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-07-11 08:10 EST ------- MUST Items: - MUST: rpmlint's output is clean - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name} - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed (GPL) with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. - MUST: the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - MUST: The spec file for the package is be legible. **** - MUST: The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. You can use http://kent.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/klamav/klamav-0.37-source.tar.gz **** - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least i386. - MUST: All build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires. - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly. - MUST: If the package does not contain shared library files located in the dynamic linker's default paths - MUST: the package is not designed to be relocatable - MUST: the package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: There are no Large documentation files - MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - MUST: There are no Header files or static libraries - MUST: The package does not contain library files with a suffix - MUST: Package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives - MUST: Package containing GUI applications includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: The source package does include license text(s) as COPYING - SHOULD: mock builds succcessfully in i386. - SHOULD: The reviewer tested that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. - SHOULD: No scriptlets were used, those scriptlets must be sane. - SHOULD: No subpackages present. Correct Source and post an updated srpm, Ill approve it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 12:52:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 08:52:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194420] Review Request: mlton, an optimizing compiler for Standard ML In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607111252.k6BCqp8u001948@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mlton, an optimizing compiler for Standard ML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194420 adam at spicenitz.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 13:12:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 09:12:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197353] Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607111312.k6BDCbhf003366@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197353 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-07-11 09:03 EST ------- Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/man-pages-fr.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/man-pages-fr-2.13.0-1.src.rpm %changelog * Tue Jul 11 2006 Alain Portal 2.13.0-1 - Update to 2.13.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 13:19:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 09:19:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193529] Review Request: radiusclient-ng - RADIUS protocol client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607111319.k6BDJFtR004008@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: radiusclient-ng - RADIUS protocol client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193529 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us 2006-07-11 09:10 EST ------- Spec URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/5/SRPMS/radiusclient-ng-0.5.2-2.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/5/SRPMS/radiusclient-ng-0.5.2-2.src.rpm * Tue Jul 11 2006 Jeffrey C. Ollie - 0.5.2-2 - Add BR so that building in minimal buildroot works - Run libtoolize. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 13:39:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 09:39:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194276] Review Request: kdeaccessibility: KDE accessibility tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607111339.k6BDd8lx006034@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeaccessibility: KDE accessibility tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194276 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-11 09:30 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/kdeaccessibility.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/kdeaccessibility-3.5.3-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 14:14:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 10:14:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198025] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-amd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607111414.k6BEEcM9009724@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-amd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198025 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |jkeating at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188267 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-11 10:05 EST ------- FEEDBACK: - Since you went to the trouble of defining gitdate, might as well use it in Source0 (: - driver packages shouldn't own %{_libdir}/x11/modules or %{_libdir}/x11/modules/drivers. These are owned by xorg-x11-server-Xorg, which all drivers require. Other than that, it looks good. Fix those, and I can approve it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 14:31:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 10:31:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197936] Review Request: nas: Network Audio System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607111431.k6BEV19O011761@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nas: Network Audio System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197936 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-07-11 10:22 EST ------- Are all ok? Or shut I fix somethink? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 14:37:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 10:37:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193531] Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607111437.k6BEbV7r012400@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193531 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-07-11 10:28 EST ------- - MUST: rpmlint's output The package was signed, but with an unknown key. See the rpm --import option for more information. W: kicad mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. Which im ignoring, but next time can you rpmlint your package first before the review ? rpmlint -i package.src.rpm - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name} - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed (GPL) with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. - MUST: the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - MUST: The spec file for the package is be legible. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least i386. - MUST: All build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires. - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly. - MUST: If the package does not contain shared library files located in the dynamic linker's default paths - MUST: the package is not designed to be relocatable - MUST: the package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: There are no Large documentation files - MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - MUST: There are no Header files or static libraries - MUST: The package does not contain library files with a suffix - MUST: Package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives - MUST: Package containing GUI applications includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: The source package does include license text(s) as COPYING - SHOULD: mock builds succcessfully in i386. - SHOULD: The reviewer tested that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. - SHOULD: No scriptlets were used, those scriptlets must be sane. - SHOULD: No subpackages present. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 14:37:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 10:37:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197936] Review Request: nas: Network Audio System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607111437.k6BEbuFL012484@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nas: Network Audio System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197936 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-11 10:29 EST ------- Looks close yes, I'm just having trouble finding time to test this to make sure it actually works. (: Any recommended test-cases? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 14:38:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 10:38:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193531] Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607111438.k6BEcdPg012607@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193531 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 14:39:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 10:39:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192313] Review Request: koan In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607111439.k6BEdCma012710@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: koan https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192313 ------- Additional Comments From mdehaan at redhat.com 2006-07-11 10:30 EST ------- Thanks for the heads up. These are the correct links: http://et.redhat.com/~mdehaan/software/cobbler/koan-0.1.0-2.src.rpm http://et.redhat.com/~mdehaan/software/cobbler/koan.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 14:40:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 10:40:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193531] Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607111440.k6BEe3v3012816@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193531 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 14:42:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 10:42:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182320] Review Request: gnome-build In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607111442.k6BEgANc013193@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182320 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-11 10:33 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/gnome-build.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/gnome-build-0.1.3-5.src.rpm Fixed all of the above problems as well as stripping out the perl stuff. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 15:13:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 11:13:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193867] Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607111513.k6BFDAFi016114@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193867 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-07-11 11:04 EST ------- one more thing i forgot to say: %build CFLAGS="${RPM_OPT_FLAGS}" \ CXXFLAGS="${RPM_OPT_FLAGS}" \ %configure --disable-rpath %{__make} use %{__make} %{?_smp_mflags} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 15:20:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 11:20:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193867] Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607111520.k6BFKu9u016525@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193867 ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2006-07-11 11:12 EST ------- Updated file here: ftp://andriy.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/klamav-0.37-3.src.rpm * Tue Jul 11 2006 Andy Shevchenko 0.37-3 - fix Source0 URL - change patch1 to patch0 - use smp if possible when make P.S. The klamav-X.Y-source isn't same klamav-X.Y. First of their is a couple of sources (klamav + dazuko) at one tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 15:25:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 11:25:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193867] Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607111525.k6BFPg6G016907@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193867 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-11 11:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > %build > CFLAGS="${RPM_OPT_FLAGS}" \ > CXXFLAGS="${RPM_OPT_FLAGS}" \ > %configure --disable-rpath There is no need to set CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS like this. The %configure macro already includes those definitions. Try: $ rpm --eval '%configure' to see for yourself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 15:25:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 11:25:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194276] Review Request: kdeaccessibility: KDE accessibility tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607111525.k6BFPe7b016903@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeaccessibility: KDE accessibility tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194276 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-07-11 11:17 EST ------- 1. # FIXME/TODO: get dfi to shut-the-hell-up about KDE's use of Keywords= and # use of invalidate characters... bah. What is it about ? Can you document me a bit please? 2. Duplicates desktop-file-install \ --add-category="X-Fedora" --vendor="" \ --dir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications/kde \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications/kde/*.desktop ||: desktop-file-install \ --add-category="X-Fedora" --vendor="" \ --dir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications/kde \ --delete-original \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applnk/Applications/*.desktop ||: 3. chitlesh(~)[0]$rpmlint -i kdeaccessibility-3.5.3-2.src.rpm W: kdeaccessibility mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 15:29:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 11:29:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194276] Review Request: kdeaccessibility: KDE accessibility tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607111529.k6BFTBXh017155@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeaccessibility: KDE accessibility tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194276 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-07-11 11:20 EST ------- Sorry forget the 2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 15:32:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 11:32:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182320] Review Request: gnome-build In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607111532.k6BFWkLx017592@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182320 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-11 11:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > Spec Name or Url: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/gnome-build.spec > SRPM Name or Url: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/gnome-build-0.1.3-5.src.rpm > > Fixed all of the above problems as well as stripping out the perl stuff. You've just copied the perl dep-stripping stuff verbatim from the wiki page, including the literal text "unwanted_provide" and "unwanted_require". You're supposed to replace that text with a sed regex matching the perl deps you're trying to get rid of (it's unusual to want to get rid of all of them as is the case here). You should check that you've got this right by doing: $ rpm -qp --provides your-binary-rpm-filename $ rpm -qp --requires your-binary-rpm-filename after building them to make sure that the provides and requires are as you want them. If the perl deps are still there, the filter isn't working. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 15:34:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 11:34:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607111534.k6BFYMC1017688@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 ------- Additional Comments From drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx 2006-07-11 11:25 EST ------- PulseAudio follows the icon naming spec and GNOME isn't fully compliant yet. So in good time my friend :) (I have no insight into Bluecurve with regard to the naming spec) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 15:35:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 11:35:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198198] Review Request: ooo2txt - Convert OpenOffice documents to simple text In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607111535.k6BFZAZu017785@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ooo2txt - Convert OpenOffice documents to simple text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198198 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-11 11:26 EST ------- It's always nice to be able to click on the spec to look at it the browser. I'll do a quick review in a bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 15:34:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 11:34:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194276] Review Request: kdeaccessibility: KDE accessibility tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607111534.k6BFYvwc017744@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeaccessibility: KDE accessibility tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194276 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-11 11:26 EST ------- 1. Build the package, and you'll see desktop-file-install refusing to process perfectly legal .desktop files, yielding errors (which *should* be at most warnings): ... error: invalid characters in value of key "Keywords[bg]", keys of type string may contain ASCII characters except control characters ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 15:49:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 11:49:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197936] Review Request: nas: Network Audio System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607111549.k6BFn4gi020590@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nas: Network Audio System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197936 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-07-11 11:40 EST ------- ok tested and it works(with sb live!). simple install it and run sevice nasd start -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 16:28:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 12:28:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189400] Review Request: em8300(-kmod) - Hollywood+/DXR3 hardware MPEG decoder drivers and tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607111628.k6BGSQGP024437@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: em8300(-kmod) - Hollywood+/DXR3 hardware MPEG decoder drivers and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189400 fedora at leemhuis.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |fedora at leemhuis.info OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 16:20:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 12:20:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198198] Review Request: ooo2txt - Convert OpenOffice documents to simple text In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607111620.k6BGKKto023886@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ooo2txt - Convert OpenOffice documents to simple text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198198 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-11 12:11 EST ------- * source files match upstream: 3751eb30189c1d546aa404dff34954fa LGPL.txt 9f3c3794ba9ba61f6dc2c3b9465279ae ooo2txt.006.pl 1cd6103b0b9c49524438c2f17fede3a9 readme.txt ce95a6c73a221041321d9582276a5358 update.txt * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: ooo2txt = 0.0.6-1.fc6 = /usr/bin/perl perl(Archive::Zip) perl(File::Temp) perl(Getopt::Std) perl(XML::Twig) perl(strict) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 16:41:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 12:41:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187351] Review Request: bmpx - Media player with the WinAmp GUI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607111641.k6BGfBbY025937@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bmpx - Media player with the WinAmp GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187351 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2006-07-11 12:32 EST ------- I'm not sure what to do here... bmpx has evolved quite fast. It's still somewhat buggy from my experience, and the current 0.20.2 release optionally uses faad2 (MP4/AAC decoder...) to read some tags, so it cannot be shipped full-featured in Extras. This does seem wrong though, since using gstreamer for all the tags would be the proper thing to do... *sigh* It also has a dependency on a version of libnotify that isn't even in FC development yet (see bug #191731). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 16:53:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 12:53:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198331] Review Request: spca5xx-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607111653.k6BGrLhE027572@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spca5xx-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198331 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-07-11 12:44 EST ------- The explanation is not required in any package (although it doesn't hurt). Its intention is to help FESCO to decide whether the module is appropriate for FE, and it is sufficient to include the explanation in this bug report, see the Wiki page. I think the text in comment 4 does not answer that request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 17:00:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 13:00:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187351] Review Request: bmpx - Media player with the WinAmp GUI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607111700.k6BH0gws028214@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bmpx - Media player with the WinAmp GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187351 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-07-11 12:51 EST ------- Does it really require faad2 for reading the tags, or would libmp4v2 (bug 191036) be enough? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 17:05:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 13:05:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187351] Review Request: bmpx - Media player with the WinAmp GUI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607111705.k6BH5SRp028664@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bmpx - Media player with the WinAmp GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187351 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2006-07-11 12:56 EST ------- Thanks for the pointer. Indeed, only libmp4v2 should be enough. Still the libnotify requirement left... then wait for legal... then continue with the submission. Might be a while... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 17:11:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 13:11:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174021] Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607111711.k6BHBgqU029387@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174021 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-07-11 13:03 EST ------- During the mock run, I have read http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2006-July/msg00126.html Now, I own /usr/share/X11/app-defaults in the current release. But I agree with you, that /usr/share/X11/app-defaults should go into xorg-x11-filesystem and all packages which put files into /usr/share/X11/app-defaults should depend on it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 17:13:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 13:13:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191036] Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607111713.k6BHDkCi029515@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191036 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |matthias at rpmforge.net ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2006-07-11 13:05 EST ------- FWIW, mpeg4ip 1.5.0.1 has been released. Is there any effort going on to try and get upstream to officially split out libmp4v2 from mpeg4ip, so that the whole mess between mpeg4ip and faad2 both providing it can be fixed? It seems like this is what you're trying to do for Fedora packages, but it would definitely benefit to other people and distributions if done upstream directly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 17:18:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 13:18:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175047] Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607111718.k6BHIMNG029904@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175047 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2006-07-11 13:09 EST ------- Regarding comment #27 When I get a spare moment, I'll file bugs for #1 and #2. In regards to #3, I was actually referring to commment #13, which is no longer a problem for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 18:07:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 14:07:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174021] Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607111807.k6BI7gMR004306@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174021 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-07-11 13:59 EST ------- Next release: Spec: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/aplus-fsf/aplus-fsf.spec SRPM: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/aplus-sfs/aplus-fsf-4.20.2-4.src.rpm Caution: In acording to the naming guidelines I have rename the subpackage aplus-fsf-el to xemacs-aplus-fsf. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 18:29:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 14:29:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189400] Review Request: em8300(-kmod) - Hollywood+/DXR3 hardware MPEG decoder drivers and tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607111829.k6BITY3B006886@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: em8300(-kmod) - Hollywood+/DXR3 hardware MPEG decoder drivers and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189400 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2006-07-11 14:20 EST ------- == General == Review without appropriate hardware to test, but I'm sure it'll work. >These packages provide drivers and utilities for Sigma Designs Hollywood > Plus/ Creative DXR3 hardware MPEG decoder cards. The cards require a > microcode (firmware) blob which is not included due to redistribution > issues Ehh, I don't get that here. I saw a file modules/em8300.uc in the package. Is that the firmware? If yes: why it is included? At least there is a file em8300-nofirmware-0.15.3.tar.gz on http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5165&package_id=5202 and it's missing exactly that file. But from the docs it look like a file "em8300.bin" needs to contain the firmware. /me confused > but can be extracted from vendor provided Windows drivers using the tools in the em8300-devel package, or >downloaded from the upstream project site at Is there a good reason why it needs to be in the devel package? It's not the obvious place where I would look out for it. == em8300 == rpmlint: SRPM: no output RPM: W: em8300-devel no-documentation -> can be ignored * download of Source0 doesn't work -- seems to be a sourceforge problem afaics * Open-Source-License (GPL) * Source matches upstream * package is named according to the guidelines * builds in mock on ix86-FC5 * Is there a reason why the devel package doesn't require the base package? * "Requires: kmod-em8300 = %{version}" is wrong -- it needs to be "Requires: em8300-kmod >= %{version}" == em8300-kmod == rpmlint: SRPM: W: em8300-kmod mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs -> Might be a good idea to fix that in the longer term RPMS: W: kmod-em8300 summary-not-capitalized em8300 kernel module(s) -> This is probably the right thing in this case W: kmod-em8300 unstripped-binary-or-object /lib/modules/2.6.17-1.2139_FC5/extra/em8300/adv717x.ko W: kmod-em8300 unstripped-binary-or-object /lib/modules/2.6.17-1.2139_FC5/extra/em8300/bt865.ko W: kmod-em8300 unstripped-binary-or-object /lib/modules/2.6.17-1.2139_FC5/extra/em8300/em8300.ko -> they get stripped during build. Hmmm, this looks like a problem in rpm. Could you look into this? W: kmod-em8300 no-documentation -> expected behaviour for kmod-packages Review: * package is named according to the guidelines * Open-Source-License (GPL) * Source matches upstream * builds in mock on ix86-FC5 * download of Source0 doesn't work -- seems to be a sourceforge problem afaics Probably needs fixing: - The module isn't build for smp-kernels on ppc. Please fix if there isn't a good reason not to do so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 18:35:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 14:35:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195363] Review Request: esc and esc-xulrunner-devel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607111835.k6BIZ404007522@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esc and esc-xulrunner-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195363 ------- Additional Comments From caillon at redhat.com 2006-07-11 14:26 EST ------- I need to schedule a meeting with some people to figure out what the update strategy for gecko is going to be moving on into the future before I can accurately comment as to what I think we should do here. But now with the latest revisions of the schedule, xulrunner 1.0 is slated to not be officially released until after FC6 is out, which will cause problems one way or another... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 18:36:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 14:36:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193529] Review Request: radiusclient-ng - RADIUS protocol client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607111836.k6BIaqkC007790@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: radiusclient-ng - RADIUS protocol client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193529 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-11 14:28 EST ------- Both of those URLs give 404 errors, but I found the proper files in that directory. Running autotools and libtoolize are generally avoided in Fedora Extras. However, not only does this package have an rpath problem, but DESTDIR doesn't work in the makefile and the patches requires many fixes to various .in files which would be much more complicated to make after configure has processed them. So in this case I do think it reasonable to do what you're doing. rpmlint complains: E: radiusclient-ng non-readable /etc/radiusclient-ng/servers 0600 which is acceptable for a server configuration file. Nothing seems to own /etc/radiusclient-ng; this is a blocker. Since there's just one issue and the fix is simple, I'll go ahead and approve and you can fix it when you check in. Review: * source files match upstream: c54eb70e964bdd22dd44b39a9b4df8ca radiusclient-ng-0.5.2.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. *license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * Compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). O rpmlint has only ignorable complaints. * debuginfo package looks complete. * final provides and requires are sane: radiusclient-ng-0.5.2-2.fc6.x86_64.rpm config(radiusclient-ng) = 0.5.2-2.fc6 libradiusclient-ng.so.2()(64bit) radiusclient-ng = 0.5.2-2.fc6 = /sbin/ldconfig config(radiusclient-ng) = 0.5.2-2.fc6 libradiusclient-ng.so.2()(64bit) radiusclient-ng-devel-0.5.2-2.fc6.x86_64.rpm radiusclient-ng-devel = 0.5.2-2.fc6 = libradiusclient-ng.so.2()(64bit) radiusclient-ng = 0.5.2-2.fc6 radiusclient-ng-utils-0.5.2-2.fc6.x86_64.rpm radiusclient-ng-utils = 0.5.2-2.fc6 = /bin/sh libradiusclient-ng.so.2()(64bit) radiusclient-ng = 0.5.2-2.fc6 * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * shared libraries are present; ldconfig is called and unversioned .so files are in the -devel subpackage. * package is not relocatable. X owns the directories it creates (/etc/radiusclient-ng). * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets present are OK (calls to ldconfig) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers are in the -devel subpackage. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED, just make sure you own /etc/radiusclient-ng. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 19:15:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 15:15:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193529] Review Request: radiusclient-ng - RADIUS protocol client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607111915.k6BJFh6W012287@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: radiusclient-ng - RADIUS protocol client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193529 jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us 2006-07-11 15:06 EST ------- Thanks for the review! Package imported, built for rawhide, branches for FC-4 and FC-5 requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 19:53:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 15:53:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189400] Review Request: em8300(-kmod) - Hollywood+/DXR3 hardware MPEG decoder drivers and tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607111953.k6BJroGQ016777@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: em8300(-kmod) - Hollywood+/DXR3 hardware MPEG decoder drivers and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189400 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-07-11 15:45 EST ------- Thanks for the thorough review. modules/em8300.uc is indeed the firmware blob (which should be installed as /lib/firmware/em8300.bin), and the kmod package used accidentally the wrong source tarball even though the firmware wasn't installed. The microcode/firmware extractor depends on perl which was a bigger issue a long time ago when things were packaged differently, but that's no longer the case. Devel doesn't require the main package or -utils simply because there's nothing in it that would require those, -devel is self contained. Adding the dependency would additionally inflict the need to install a kernel and a suitable em8300 module package for it which seems just useless and may be a problem in eg. some build systems. Strip vs not-stripped: the modules are stripped of something indeed, but something is also left behind which causes "file" to report "not stripped" and rpmlint uses that for its check. Note: it's the same as for all kernel modules, including those shipped with the kernel itself. I'm not compentent to analyze this, to me it's just how /usr/lib/rpm/debugedit seems to behave ;) Other than those: http://cachalot.mine.nu/5/SRPMS/em8300-0.15.3-4.src.rpm * Tue Jul 11 2006 Ville Skytt? - 0.15.3-4 - Require >= em8300-kmod, not = kmod-em8300 (#189400). - Move microcode extractor to -utils as em8300-mc_ex (like Debian) (#189400). - Don't ship microcode_upload.pl, the modules and em8300setup already can handle that. http://cachalot.mine.nu/5/SRPMS/em8300-kmod-0.15.3-6.2.6.17_1.2145_FC5.src.rpm * Tue Jul 11 2006 Ville Skytt? - 0.15.3-6 - Enable PPC SMP builds (#189400). - Use firmwareless tarball (#189400). - Untabify specfile (#189400). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 20:44:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 16:44:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189384] Review Request: python-ruledispatch: A generic function package for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607112044.k6BKifFd024544@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-ruledispatch: A generic function package for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189384 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-07-11 16:36 EST ------- APPROVED. Luke - are you going to be the maintainer now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 21:05:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 17:05:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196229] Review Request: xkeyboard-config In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607112105.k6BL5Hoj026103@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xkeyboard-config https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196229 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-11 16:56 EST ------- Added to dist, package approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 21:08:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 17:08:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198025] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-amd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607112108.k6BL8ABF026224@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-amd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198025 ajackson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2006-07-11 16:59 EST ------- Updated URLs: http://people.freedesktop.org/~ajax/xorg-x11-drv-amd/xorg-x11-drv-amd.spec http://people.freedesktop.org/~ajax/xorg-x11-drv-amd/xorg-x11-drv-amd-0.0-1.git20060707.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 21:10:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 17:10:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192311] Review Request: cobbler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607112110.k6BLAHeA026329@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cobbler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192311 ------- Additional Comments From dmalcolm at redhat.com 2006-07-11 17:01 EST ------- Looks like you're missing a dep on yaml: rpm -q cobbler cobbler-0.1.0-2 cobbler help Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/cobbler", line 18, in ? import cobbler.cobbler as app File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/cobbler/cobbler.py", line 18, in ? import api File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/cobbler/api.py", line 17, in ? import config File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/cobbler/config.py", line 27, in ? import serializer File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/cobbler/serializer.py", line 15, in ? import yaml # Howell-Clark version ImportError: No module named yaml -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 21:15:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 17:15:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198025] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-amd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607112115.k6BLFmfo026621@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-amd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198025 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|188267 |188268 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-11 17:06 EST ------- Problems fixed, and the name changed per guidelines. Approving. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 21:56:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 17:56:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198561] New: Review Request:
Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198561 Summary: Review Request:
Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jwilson at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://wilsonet.com/packages/zabbix/zabbix.spec SRPM URL: http://wilsonet.com/packages/zabbix/zabbix-1.1-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: ZABBIX is software that monitors numerous parameters of a network and the health and integrity of servers. ZABBIX uses a flexible notification mechanism that allows users to configure e-mail based alerts for virtually any event. This allows a fast reaction to server problems. ZABBIX offers excellent reporting and data visualisation features based on the stored data. This makes ZABBIX ideal for capacity planning. ZABBIX supports both polling and trapping. All ZABBIX reports and statistics, as well as configuration parameters are accessed through a web-based front end. A web-based front end ensures that the status of your network and the health of your servers can be assessed from any location. Properly configured, ZABBIX can play an important role in monitoring IT infrastructure. This is equally true for small organisations with a few servers and for large companies with a multitude of servers. Assorted notes: -rpmlint complains about the non-standard-uid/gid on some directories that are owned by 'zabbix'. This is necessary to run zabbix as non-root. (Similar deal to my ganglia package). -the zabbix server component is currently set to Requires: mysql-server. Technically, it doesn't, as the mysql server could be on another machine, but I think this is a nice convenience, since the vast majority of people run the zabbix server against a local db. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 21:56:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 17:56:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198562] New: Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198562 Summary: Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jwilson at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://wilsonet.com/packages/zabbix/zabbix.spec SRPM URL: http://wilsonet.com/packages/zabbix/zabbix-1.1-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: ZABBIX is software that monitors numerous parameters of a network and the health and integrity of servers. ZABBIX uses a flexible notification mechanism that allows users to configure e-mail based alerts for virtually any event. This allows a fast reaction to server problems. ZABBIX offers excellent reporting and data visualisation features based on the stored data. This makes ZABBIX ideal for capacity planning. ZABBIX supports both polling and trapping. All ZABBIX reports and statistics, as well as configuration parameters are accessed through a web-based front end. A web-based front end ensures that the status of your network and the health of your servers can be assessed from any location. Properly configured, ZABBIX can play an important role in monitoring IT infrastructure. This is equally true for small organisations with a few servers and for large companies with a multitude of servers. Assorted notes: -rpmlint complains about the non-standard-uid/gid on some directories that are owned by 'zabbix'. This is necessary to run zabbix as non-root. (Similar deal to my ganglia package). -the zabbix server component is currently set to Requires: mysql-server. Technically, it doesn't, as the mysql server could be on another machine, but I think this is a nice convenience, since the vast majority of people run the zabbix server against a local db. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 22:01:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 18:01:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198561] Review Request:
In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607112201.k6BM16S1030325@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198561 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
|package name here> Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-07-11 17:52 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 198562 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 22:01:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 18:01:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198562] Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607112201.k6BM1IU3030356@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198562 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-07-11 17:52 EST ------- *** Bug 198561 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 22:02:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 18:02:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198561] Review Request:
In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607112202.k6BM25JO030447@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198561 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 22:03:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 18:03:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193161] Review Request: ruby-postgres In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607112203.k6BM3Wal030570@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-postgres https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193161 ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2006-07-11 17:54 EST ------- Oops .. I've been meaning to make those changes, but didn't get around to it yetserday. Made them today. New files: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/spec/ruby-postgres.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/SRPMS/ruby-postgres-0.7.1-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 22:32:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 18:32:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194276] Review Request: kdeaccessibility: KDE accessibility tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607112232.k6BMWAJT031723@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeaccessibility: KDE accessibility tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194276 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-07-11 18:23 EST ------- I see, ill have a look at them -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 22:43:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 18:43:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192311] Review Request: cobbler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607112243.k6BMh4ai032744@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cobbler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192311 ------- Additional Comments From mdehaan at redhat.com 2006-07-11 18:34 EST ------- Thanks. Fixed (per my email to David) at 17:38 EST. Same URLs are still valid. The setup.py file was not updated after doing some work to make the code build/run on RHEL, which involved swapping out yaml modules. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 22:54:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 18:54:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189384] Review Request: python-ruledispatch: A generic function package for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607112254.k6BMsl3i001171@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-ruledispatch: A generic function package for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189384 ------- Additional Comments From lmacken at redhat.com 2006-07-11 18:46 EST ------- I have no problem maintaining this until Ignacio returns. Imported into CVS, added to owners.list, FC{4,5} branches requested, tagged and built for fc6. Thanks! (please close this bug as NEXTRELEASE; I don't have the privs) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 22:59:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 18:59:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198285] Review Request: python-simplejson - Simple, fast, extensible JSON encoder/decoder for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607112259.k6BMxvER001547@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-simplejson - Simple, fast, extensible JSON encoder/decoder for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198285 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-11 18:51 EST ------- I'm not terribly well-versed in Python, but this looks to violate the guidelines: Python packages that use setuptools need to add python-setuptools as a BuildRequires and must either add --single-version-externally-managed to the line invoking setup.py in %install, or must add a .pth file containing the path to the egg or egg directory to %{python_sitelib}. I don't believe either of those are being done. In addition: E: python-simplejson zero-length /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/simplejson-1.3-py2.4.egg-info/zip-safe In general the packaging here looks odd. Why is the test suite included in the installed module, but not called at all by a %check section in the spec? What about the contents of /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/simplejson-1.3-py2.4.egg-info? Shouldn't this all be %doc, if it must be installed at all? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 11 23:01:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 19:01:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189384] Review Request: python-ruledispatch: A generic function package for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607112301.k6BN19w3001632@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-ruledispatch: A generic function package for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189384 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 00:03:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 20:03:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193224] Review Request: streamer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607120003.k6C03cAY004279@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: streamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193224 fedora at adslpipe.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at adslpipe.co.uk ------- Additional Comments From fedora at adslpipe.co.uk 2006-07-11 19:54 EST ------- Review of http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/Qcwebcam/streamer-1.1.3-1.fc5.src.rpm * rpmlint must be run on every package. $rpmlint -v /home/andy/Desktop/streamer-1.1.3-1.fc5.src.rpm I: streamer checking $ rpmlint -v /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/streamer-1.1.3-1.i386.rpm I: streamer checking W: streamer incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.1-3-1 1.1.3-1 $ rpmlint -v /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/streamer-debuginfo-1.1.3-1.i386.rpm I: streamer-debuginfo checking suggest correcting version 1.1-3-1 to 1.1.3-1 likewise 1.1-2-1 to 1.1.2-1 otherwise ok * package must be named according to the guidelines. ok * spec file name must match the base package name ok * package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. It amuses me that meeting the packaging guidlines is an item within the packaging guidelines checklist * package must be licensed with an open-source compatible license spec file = GPL tarball contains licence file = GPL v2 * The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. most source files themselves do contain copyright, but not licencing info, of those that do, only one or two clearly state GPL, others in contrib-plugin directory seem to make a weaker GPL claim. * If package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file must be included in %doc. ok * The spec file must be written in American English. ok * The spec file for the package MUST be legible. ok, to be ultrapicky, add a space between "Name:" and "streamer"? suggestion, make Description: slightly more, err, descriptive e.g. use "Command line tool for streaming capture, including audio." from the README file. * The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source cannot test because source http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/Qcwebcam/streamer-1.1.3.tar.bz2 does not exist * The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. compiled and build on i386 (FC6T1/rawhide) * If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. (Extras Only) The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: [WWW] FE-ExcludeArch-x86, [WWW] FE-ExcludeArch-x64, [WWW] FE-ExcludeArch-ppc nothing excluded, I can test on FC5/x86_64 later, does the packager know how it performs on other architectures? * All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. Some BRs are specified, I have not checked the list is exhaustive * The spec file MUST handle locales properly No locales in package * If the package contains shared library files located in the dynamic linker's default paths, that package must call ldconfig ok, .so files in own directory only, not added to linker path * If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. no such statement, assume this is correct. * A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. The exception to this are directories listed explicitly in the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard ([WWW] http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html), as it is safe to assume that those directories exist. ok (/usr/lib/streamer and /usr/share/doc/streamer-version) * A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. ok, all files explicitly listed, no wildcards used at all would it be considered neater to use %{_libdir}/streamer/*.so instead? * Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. ok, permissions on files set within rpm, not modified by %defattr or %attr * package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). ok * package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. does use both $ and % macros, but never mixes usage for the same macro, so meets guidelines * The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. ok, executable + supporting libraries * Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) separate -doc not justified! * If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. ok * Header files or static libraries must be in a -devel package. none * Files used by pkgconfig (.pc files) must be in a -devel package. none * If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. ok, no suffixes used * In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} ok, no devel package * Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. ok * Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of Packaging Guidelines. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. ok, not a GUI app * must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. ok * If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. ok, GPL file included * The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. none included * The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. not tested * The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. only tested on i386/FC6T1(rawhide) * The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. I do not have appropriate video capture hardware on this machine * If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. Ok, none used. * Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. ok, no sub-packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 00:08:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 20:08:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193224] Review Request: streamer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607120008.k6C08Xue004439@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: streamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193224 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at adslpipe.co.uk 2006-07-11 19:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source > > cannot test because source > http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/Qcwebcam/streamer-1.1.3.tar.bz2 > does not exist However previous versions of streamer source tarballs appear to be in http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/streamer/ directory, rather than http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/Qcwebcam -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 00:25:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 20:25:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197847] Review Request: pymsnt - MSN Transport for Jabber Servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607120025.k6C0PCHD004905@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pymsnt - MSN Transport for Jabber Servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197847 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-11 20:16 EST ------- Looks like you just beat 0.11.1 ouut. Some rpmlint issues: E: pymsnt no-status-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/pymsnt W: pymsnt mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs Indeed, the init script doesn't accept status, and some lines in the spec are indented with tabs while others use spaces. (I.e. spaces for Source0 and tabs for Source1.) You don't seem to include the spool directory in the package. In case you find making the %files list tedious, you might consider using the stuff at the end of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python, which gets it down to three find statements and a few calls to sed. You don't seem to include the spool directory in the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 00:46:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 20:46:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193071] Review Request: ruby-sqlite3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607120046.k6C0kSVi006138@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-sqlite3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193071 dlutter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2006-07-11 20:37 EST ------- Built successfully as job 12477 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 00:48:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 20:48:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194276] Review Request: kdeaccessibility: KDE accessibility tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607120048.k6C0mSH2006308@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeaccessibility: KDE accessibility tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194276 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-07-11 20:39 EST ------- 1. /var/tmp/kdeaccessibility-3.5.3-2-root-chitlesh/usr/share/applications/kde/kmag.desktop: warning: file contains key "DocPath", this key is currently reserved for use within KDE, and should in the future KDE releases be prefixed by "X-" /var/tmp/kdeaccessibility-3.5.3-2-root-chitlesh/usr/share/applications/kde/kmousetool.desktop: warning: file contains key "DocPath", this key is currently reserved for use within KDE, and should in the future KDE releases be prefixed by "X-" /var/tmp/kdeaccessibility-3.5.3-2-root-chitlesh/usr/share/applications/kde/kmouth.desktop: warning: file contains key "DocPath", this key is currently reserved for use within KDE, and should in the future KDE releases be prefixed by "X-" Use the following to correct the shut-the-hell-up about KDE's use of DocPath: for f in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applnk/Applications/{kmag,kmousetool,kmouth}.desktop do %{__sed} -i -e 's/DocPath/X-DocPath/' $f done 2. /var/tmp/kdeaccessibility-3.5.3-2-root-chitlesh/usr/share/applications/kde/kcmkttsd.desktop: warning: file contains key "Keywords", this key is currently reserved for use within KDE, and should in the future KDE releases be prefixed by "X-" /var/tmp/kdeaccessibility-3.5.3-2-root-chitlesh/usr/share/applications/kde/kcmkttsd.desktop: warning: file contains key "ServiceTypes", this key is currently reserved for use within KDE, and should in the future KDE releases be prefixed by "X-" /var/tmp/kdeaccessibility-3.5.3-2-root-chitlesh/usr/share/applications/kde/kcmkttsd.desktop: warning: file contains key "DocPath", this key is currently reserved for use within KDE, and should in the future KDE releases be prefixed by "X-" you can use this before desktop-file-installs, to correct the shut-the-hell-up about KDE's use of 'Keywords': %{__sed} -i \ -e 's/Keywords/X-Keywords/' \ -e 's/ServiceTypes/X-ServiceTypes/' \ -e 's/DocPath/X-DocPath/' \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications/kde/kcmkttsd.desktop 3. /var/tmp/kdeaccessibility-3.5.3-2-root-chitlesh/usr/share/applications/kde/ksayit.desktop: warning: file contains key "DocPath", this key is currently reserved for use within KDE, and should in the future KDE releases be prefixed by "X-" Solution: %{__sed} -i -e 's/DocPath/X-DocPath/' $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications/kde/ksayit.desktop 4. /var/tmp/kdeaccessibility-3.5.3-2-root-chitlesh/usr/share/applications/kde/kttsmgr.desktop: warning: non-standard key "MimeTypes" lacks the "X-" prefix 5. Now the repetitive: /var/tmp/kdeaccessibility-3.5.3-2.fc5-root-mockbuild/usr/share/applications/kde/kcmkttsd.desktop: error: invalid characters in value of key "Keywords[ca]", keys of type string may contain ASCII characters except control characters have gone. yooohoo :) I've updated the spec file, see attachment. I've left W: kdeaccessibility mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs for you to correct :) Post an updated SRPM, Rex, i'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 00:49:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 20:49:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194276] Review Request: kdeaccessibility: KDE accessibility tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607120049.k6C0nFZE006378@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeaccessibility: KDE accessibility tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194276 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-07-11 20:40 EST ------- 4 Solution: %{__sed} -i -e 's/MimeTypes/X-MimeTypes/' $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications/kde/kttsmgr.desktop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 00:50:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 20:50:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194276] Review Request: kdeaccessibility: KDE accessibility tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607120050.k6C0oXFw006480@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeaccessibility: KDE accessibility tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194276 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-07-11 20:41 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=132273) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=132273&action=view) spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 01:08:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 21:08:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182064] Review Request: facter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607120108.k6C18gO2007173@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: facter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182064 dlutter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2006-07-11 21:00 EST ------- Imported and built successfully as job 12478 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 01:09:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 21:09:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 180571] Review Request: puppet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607120109.k6C19Gw9007205@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: puppet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180571 Bug 180571 depends on bug 182064, which changed state. Bug 182064 Summary: Review Request: facter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182064 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 01:19:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 21:19:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 180571] Review Request: puppet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607120119.k6C1JkOB007529@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: puppet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180571 dlutter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2006-07-11 21:11 EST ------- The ruby(abi) is provided by ruby-libs, not ruby (!) Since the package contains scripts that want /usr/bin/ruby, I added the explicit R: ruby, analogous to what python packages do (e.g., yum requires both python and /usr/bin/python) If that's not the right thing to do, I'll fix it in the next release. Imported and built successfully as job 12479 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 01:51:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 21:51:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195363] Review Request: esc and esc-xulrunner-devel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607120151.k6C1plUC009189@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esc and esc-xulrunner-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195363 ------- Additional Comments From jmagne at redhat.com 2006-07-11 21:42 EST ------- Thanks for the comments on the spec file. I have updated the esc source RPM with suggested changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 02:49:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 22:49:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175047] Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607120249.k6C2nePR013704@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175047 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2006-07-11 22:40 EST ------- For those trying to keep track, #1 from comment #25 is already filed as bug #185992. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 03:17:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 23:17:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197559] Review Request: scim-chinese-standard: Chinese Linux Standard IM adapter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607120317.k6C3H6Ld016015@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-chinese-standard: Chinese Linux Standard IM adapter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197559 qwang at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 03:18:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 23:18:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197559] Review Request: scim-chinese-standard: Chinese Linux Standard IM adapter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607120318.k6C3Itpn016200@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-chinese-standard: Chinese Linux Standard IM adapter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197559 ------- Additional Comments From qwang at redhat.com 2006-07-11 23:10 EST ------- I have commited this packge to FC6 Extras and built successfully. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 03:36:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 23:36:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194320] Review Request: im-chooser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607120336.k6C3aOxb017723@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: im-chooser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194320 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-07-11 23:27 EST ------- OK, has my ACK. Some comments: 'Use legacy' or 'use custom' should probably only be available if there are legacy/custom IMs installed. If you select 'Always use' with no SCIM installed, you get a dangling symlink. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 03:40:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 23:40:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194320] Review Request: im-chooser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607120340.k6C3el4p018273@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: im-chooser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194320 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2006-07-11 23:31 EST ------- yes, I'm aware of those issues and in my todo list actually FWIW. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 03:44:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 23:44:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198586] New: Review Request: ip6sic - IPv6 Stack Integrity Checker Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198586 Summary: Review Request: ip6sic - IPv6 Stack Integrity Checker Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jwilson at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://wilsonet.com/packages/ip6sic/ip6sic.spec SRPM URL: http://wilsonet.com/packages/ip6sic/ip6sic-0.1-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: ip6sic is a tool for stress testing an IPv6 stack implementation. It works in a way much similar to isic which lives at http://www.packetfactory.net/Projects/ISIC/. It was developed mainly on FreeBSD and is known to work on OpenBSD and Linux. Theoretically, it should work wherever libdnet works. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 03:51:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 23:51:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194320] Review Request: im-chooser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607120351.k6C3pmDH019736@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: im-chooser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194320 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |182541 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 04:10:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 00:10:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193224] Review Request: streamer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607120410.k6C4AB0f020561@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: streamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193224 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-12 00:01 EST ------- Andy Burns, Thanks for brief review. I updated following Changes in SPEC file * Wed Jul 12 2006 Parag Nemade - 1.1.3-2 - Corrected Changelog entry - Added wildcard in files section - Changed Source Package Path - Clean the SPEC file look I have changed Source URL now. I will be happy if you please do review for x86_64 architecture. I updated SPEC file and rebuild RPM. Updated files are at Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/streamer/streamer.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/streamer/streamer-1.1.3-2.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 04:27:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 00:27:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198331] Review Request: spca5xx-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607120427.k6C4RrnD021523@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spca5xx-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198331 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-12 00:19 EST ------- Can you tell me what more information here required? Is not the publishable explanation from Author given above is sufficient? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 04:41:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 00:41:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197189] Review Request: fonts-sinhala In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607120441.k6C4fCgO022276@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fonts-sinhala https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197189 ------- Additional Comments From llch at redhat.com 2006-07-12 00:32 EST ------- Jesse: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/llch/fonts-sinhala/fonts-sinhala.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/llch/fonts-sinhala/fonts-sinhala-0.2-3.src.rpm Packge Owner: dsantani at redhat.com Description: An essential font for Sinhala language for FC6. Size: noarch = 107k; SRPMS = 105k -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 06:33:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 02:33:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198331] Review Request: spca5xx-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607120633.k6C6XvQ4026770@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spca5xx-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198331 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-07-12 02:25 EST ------- Well, it is a publishable explanation, but does not seem to explicitly answer the questions asked from such an explanation (again, see comment 2 and the Wiki): - why the module is not merged with the mainline kernel yet, and - when it's planned to get merged -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 06:35:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 02:35:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198331] Review Request: spca5xx-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607120635.k6C6ZYXF026820@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spca5xx-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198331 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-12 02:26 EST ------- I have asked about this to Author and waiting for answer from him. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 07:37:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 03:37:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193867] Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607120737.k6C7blBp031937@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193867 ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2006-07-12 03:29 EST ------- Sure. I've updated package. New file here: ftp://andriy.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/klamav-0.37-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 07:42:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 03:42:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175047] Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607120742.k6C7gs7W032697@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175047 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-12 03:34 EST ------- I have fixed the SELinux issues with using openvpn manually by using a local policy module: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-selinux-list/2006-July/msg00036.html I expect this will get fixed in the next policy update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 08:04:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 04:04:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193224] Review Request: streamer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607120804.k6C84tA3003445@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: streamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193224 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at adslpipe.co.uk 2006-07-12 03:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > - Added wildcard in files section I was genuinely asking if it would be better to use the wildcard, or have the multiple single files, I'd be interested to see an answer from an experienced reviewer on this ... > I have changed Source URL now. I will be happy if you please do review for > x86_64 architecture. ok, will do so this evening, would appreciate a review in return https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179758 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 09:29:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 05:29:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197353] Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607120929.k6C9TWBk011580@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197353 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-07-12 05:20 EST ------- Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/man-pages-fr.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/man-pages-fr-2.14.0-1.src.rpm %changelog * Wed Jul 12 2006 Alain Portal 2.14.0-1 - Update to 2.14.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 10:46:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 06:46:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198613] New: Review Request: compat-libgda - gnome database access library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198613 Summary: Review Request: compat-libgda - gnome database access library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: denis at poolshark.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/compat-libgda.spec SRPM URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/compat-libgda-1.2.3-1.src.rpm Description: This package provides the last stable version of libgda, from the 1.2.x tree (libgda-2.so). Since FC-5, fedora-extras has moved on to the unstable versions (1.3.x and 1.9.x), which provide libgda-3.so. The main goal of this compat package is to package Glom, the much talked-about database design tool. Glom is based on libgdamm (already part of Extras though not currently built), which in turn requires libgda-2.so. Once built, we will be able to revive libgdamm then finally submit Glom itself for review (it will also need gnome-python2-gda). This compat package is somewhat minimalist so as to not create conflicts with the libgda 1.9.x, and currently only enables the postgresQL module by default (because it's the only one used by Glom), however we can enable other modules in the future if some package needs it (the mysql module compiles fine with mysqlclient10). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 10:57:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 06:57:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 179758] Review Request: Eiciel (ACL editor) [Seeking Sponsor] In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607121057.k6CAvQZT017755@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Eiciel (ACL editor) [Seeking Sponsor] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179758 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-12 06:48 EST ------- == Not an official review as I'm not yet sponsored == Mock build for development i386 is sucessfull * MUST Items: - MUST: rpmlint shows no error. - MUST: dist tag is present. - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matching the base package eiciel, in the format eiciel.spec. - MUST: This package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license GPL. - MUST: This package includes License file COPYING. - MUST: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. md5sum is correct (72576cce092ff36a4fef0311bdc0dede) - MUST: This package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: This package did not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: This package have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. - MUST: This package used macros. - MUST: Document files are included like README. - MUST: Package did NOT contained any .la libtool archives. * Source URL is present and working. * BuildRoot is correct BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) * BuildRequires is correct What you need to do:- I am not able to see Desktop file installed and can be executed from Application->Accessories You need to add following lines Requires(post): desktop-file-utils Requires(postun): desktop-file-utils ... %post update-desktop-database &> /dev/null ||: %postun update-desktop-database &> /dev/null ||: see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ScriptletSnippets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 12:22:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 08:22:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 179758] Review Request: Eiciel (ACL editor) [Seeking Sponsor] In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607121222.k6CCMhTd021831@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Eiciel (ACL editor) [Seeking Sponsor] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179758 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-07-12 08:13 EST ------- Doesn't sound right, because update-desktop-database is for MIME types. It does not make a hidden or non-existant menu entry become visible. FYI: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ScriptletSnippets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 12:33:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 08:33:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197353] Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607121233.k6CCXlWL022264@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197353 ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2006-07-12 08:25 EST ------- Hello, I'm maintaining this package within RedHat now. I'll be glad if you continue maintaining Extras (fedora). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 12:56:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 08:56:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197353] Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607121256.k6CCuiTH023761@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197353 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-07-12 08:47 EST ------- Hi, Since nobody maintains this package in Fedora, I'll continue maintaining it. But I think its place is in Fedora Core, not Extras. In addition, this package isn't yet in Extras since there is no review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 13:22:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 09:22:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197791] Review Request: stacaccli - Stateless Cached Client Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607121322.k6CDMCfo025119@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stacaccli - Stateless Cached Client Tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197791 markmc at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From markmc at redhat.com 2006-07-12 09:13 EST ------- Thanks (In reply to comment #2) > - pyver checking not necessary. Python now autoadds the python(abi) requirement. Done. > - needs 'noarch' listed in ExclusiveArch. Done. > E: stacaccli explicit-lib-dependency libxml2-python Not actually a lib dependency. Just matches the regex. > E: stacaccli non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/stacaccli/common/bootloader.py 0644 [snip more non-executable-script] Yes, they're python modules and not intended to be executable, even though they start with #! Fairly common with python code e.g. rpmlint yum. > W: stacaccli incoherent-init-script-name stacacclid i.e. rename the initscript stacaccli ? It starts the daemon (stacacclid), so I think the current name is probably more appropriate. > W: stacaccli incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.1-1 0.2-1 Fixed. > W: stacaccli non-conffile-in-etc /etc/rwtab.d/stacaccli /etc/rwtab isn't marked with %config, and I don't think it's correct to mark this one either. > W: stacaccli strange-permission stacaccli.spec 0600 Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 13:41:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 09:41:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198613] Review Request: compat-libgda - gnome database access library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607121341.k6CDfG6v026947@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-libgda - gnome database access library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198613 ------- Additional Comments From murrayc at murrayc.com 2006-07-12 09:32 EST ------- Thanks Denis. As the maintainer of Glom, libgdamm, and pygda, and a contributor to libgda, I'd much prefer of course that Fedora just revert their libgda package back to the stable API. It seems silly to do all this work just to restore a stable API. Nobody should be using the unstable API. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 14:44:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 10:44:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198644] New: new packet suggestion: keepass Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198644 Summary: new packet suggestion: keepass Product: Fedora Core Version: fc6test1 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: pb at bieringer.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com New packet suggestion: package keepass is missing, a very nice multi-platform password manager. URL: http://keepassx.sourceforge.net/ I can provide a spec file for proper build on FC5, if required. The one delivered in the source rpm is some kind of strange (at least the 0.2.0 version) and not working without any modification. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 14:47:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 10:47:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193224] Review Request: streamer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607121447.k6CElshH032211@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: streamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193224 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-12 10:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > * package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. > > It amuses me that meeting the packaging guidlines is an item within the > packaging guidelines checklist The package review guidelines is not actually a checklist of things in the packaging guidelines. The packaging guidelines as a whole encompasses a bunch of pages on the wiki (see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging), which include the main packaging guidelines, the package naming guidelines, plus a number of pages on language-specific guidelines. Extras contributors are expected to have read the main packaging and naming guidelines and be familar with them (committing them all to memory isn't expected but it's worth re-reading them from time to time as a refresher and to catch up with changes). The review guidelines page just includes a checklist of things that apply to most packages. > * All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that > are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines; inclusion of those > as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. > > Some BRs are specified, I have not checked the list is exhaustive Building the package in mock is a good way to test this. > * If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this > fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of > that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. > > no such statement, assume this is correct. This relates to the use of the "Prefix:" rpm tag. If present, the package is telling rpm that it's supposed to be relocatable (whether it actually is or not depends on how the rest of the package is built). Some packagers tend to include the "Prefix:" tag because they've copied the spec from some template that included it. This check is there to catch that mistake. > * A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. > > ok, all files explicitly listed, no wildcards used at all > would it be considered neater to use %{_libdir}/streamer/*.so instead? This check is looking for instances of the same file being installed in multiple different places (e.g. a README installed in %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} and also %{datadir}/%{name}) rather than being included more than once in the %files list (which rpmbuild will warn about actually). (In reply to comment #20) > (In reply to comment #19) > > > - Added wildcard in files section > > I was genuinely asking if it would be better to use the wildcard, or have the > multiple single files, I'd be interested to see an answer from an experienced > reviewer on this ... This is really a matter of personal preference and may vary from package to package. In general I like to enumerate all of the files individually, particularly for binaries, as this results in unpackaged file errors if you build a later version of the package that contains additional files, something that you really should know about as the new files might clash with some other package. An alternative approach here would be to use rpmdiff to compare old and new packages. For some packages though, the list of files would simply be unmanagable if done individually, so using a wildcard is the only sane option. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 14:55:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 10:55:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198025] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-amd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607121455.k6CEtfnl000518@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-amd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198025 ajackson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2006-07-12 10:46 EST ------- imported, woo! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 14:56:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 10:56:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198644] new package suggestion: keepass In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607121456.k6CEu0FG000602@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: new package suggestion: keepass https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198644 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|new packet suggestion: |new package suggestion: |keepass |keepass Product|Fedora Core |Fedora Extras Version|fc6test1 |devel Component|Package Review |Package Review AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info QAContact|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-07-12 10:47 EST ------- Seems like something best suited for Extras first. Moving over there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 15:24:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 11:24:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192430] Review Request: python-kiwi - Framework for Python GUI applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607121524.k6CFOoqb004135@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-kiwi - Framework for Python GUI applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192430 icon at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From icon at fedoraproject.org 2006-07-12 11:16 EST ------- Built and will show up in extras shortly. Thanks a lot for your help! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 15:26:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 11:26:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197353] Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607121526.k6CFQFu5004362@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197353 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-07-12 11:17 EST ------- Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/man-pages-fr.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/man-pages-fr-2.15.0-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 15:32:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 11:32:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 179758] Review Request: Eiciel (ACL editor) [Seeking Sponsor] In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607121532.k6CFWdXv004869@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Eiciel (ACL editor) [Seeking Sponsor] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179758 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-12 11:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20) > What you need to do:- > I am not able to see Desktop file installed and can be executed from > Application->Accessories It's under Applications->System Tools :) And, FWIW, works here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 15:57:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 11:57:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194276] Review Request: kdeaccessibility: KDE accessibility tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607121557.k6CFvoWI007537@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeaccessibility: KDE accessibility tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194276 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-12 11:48 EST ------- But these are (mostly?) valid .desktop entities (see http://standards.freedesktop.org/desktop-entry-spec/latest/apb.html) and will break if renamed to have X- Prefixes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 16:46:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 12:46:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198285] Review Request: python-simplejson - Simple, fast, extensible JSON encoder/decoder for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607121646.k6CGkwjg010433@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-simplejson - Simple, fast, extensible JSON encoder/decoder for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198285 ------- Additional Comments From lmacken at redhat.com 2006-07-12 12:38 EST ------- http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/python-simplejson-1.3-2.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/python-simplejson.spec Added --single-version-externally-managed flag to setup.py install. The tests in the package all import the module itself, and are not setup to be run from the command line, so I think it would require way too much hassle (patches or much %{__python} -c uglyness) to deal with to get them running. As for the egg-info directory, I don't believe there is any policy on this, and every other python module I've seen packages up the directory and ignores the empty file warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 16:53:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 12:53:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197827] Review Request: perl-Net-SSLeay In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607121653.k6CGrewo011234@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SSLeay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197827 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-07-12 12:44 EST ------- Should I import this after simply removing the perl buildreq? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 16:58:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 12:58:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197936] Review Request: nas: Network Audio System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607121658.k6CGwngE011708@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nas: Network Audio System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197936 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #132084|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 17:00:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 13:00:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197826] Review Request: perl-IO-Socket-SSL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607121700.k6CH0n3U011907@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Socket-SSL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197826 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-07-12 12:51 EST ------- http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/perl-IO-Socket-SSL.spec http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/perl-IO-Socket-SSL-0.97-3.fc6.src.rpm Extras version -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 17:02:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 13:02:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197936] Review Request: nas: Network Audio System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607121702.k6CH2gnj011997@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nas: Network Audio System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197936 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-12 12:54 EST ------- Per comment #2, point 6: %_includedir/audio is (still) unowned. change %{_includedir}/audio/* to %{_includedir}/audio/ And I'll mark this APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 17:11:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 13:11:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192420] Review Request: Bonfire - CD/DVD burning app for gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607121711.k6CHB1gR012441@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Bonfire - CD/DVD burning app for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192420 ------- Additional Comments From rouquier.p at wanadoo.fr 2006-07-12 13:02 EST ------- I updated everything for 0.4.0 and tried to remember your remarks for this new one. Here is my second attempt at creating a package. I tried to remember the previous remarks and used rpmlint. Except I didn't find the magic fedora-qa script. Spec URL: http://perso.orange.fr/bonfire/bonfire.spec SRPM URL: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/bonfire/bonfire-0.4.0-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 17:26:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 13:26:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 179758] Review Request: Eiciel (ACL editor) [Seeking Sponsor] In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607121726.k6CHQqsY013183@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Eiciel (ACL editor) [Seeking Sponsor] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179758 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |paul at city-fan.org OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-12 13:18 EST ------- Review: - rpmlint clean - package and spec file naming OK - package meets guidelines - license is GPL, matches spec, text included - spec file written in English and is quite legible - sources match upstream - package builds OK on FC5(i386) and in mock for rawhide(i386) - buildreqs OK, but could be trimmed - locales handled properly - no shared libraries in default paths - not relocatable - no directory ownership or permissions issues - %clean section present and correct - macro usage is consistent, apart from a couple of commented-out lines, which should probably be dropped from the spec - code, not content - docs OK - no devel files to consider - no subpackages to consider - no libtool archives - desktop file installed properly - no scriptlets Needswork: - The full contents of the NEWS file is "Refer to ChangeLog" There is no point packaging this file. - Duplicate files: there are a number of images present in both %{_datadir}/%{name}/doc/C/figures and %{_datadir}/%{name}/img; could these be replaced with links? Suggestions: I agree with Comment #19 that you should try to avoid lines longer than 80 characters if possible. This helps make the spec file more legible. You could drop the buildreqs on gnome-vfs2-devel and libattr-devel as they are pulled in by libgnomeui-devel and libacl-devel respectively, which would help with the line length. I'm also seeing the issue from Comment #20 where the application is not appearing in my menus. Running update-desktop-database doesn't fix it (no surprise there) and I expect I'll have to log out and back in before I see it. Running the application manually, I'm not able to open anything, possibly due to lack of acl support in the filesystems I'm using? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 17:31:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 13:31:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190101] Review Request: php-pear-Log In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607121731.k6CHVTUf013612@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Log Alias: php-pear-Log https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190101 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-07-12 13:22 EST ------- SPEC : http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Log.spec SRPM : http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Log-1.9.7-1.fc5.src.rpm Mock : http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Log-build.log Changes : - update to 1.9.7 - use new macros from /etc/rpm/macros.pear - add Requires php-pear(DB) and php-pear(MDB2) MDB2/DB are defined as optional upstream and i'm using Log extension without them for a while. But you're probably right that we must include "optional" requires as mandatory while they are not handled by rpm/yum. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 17:35:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 13:35:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192441] Review Request: gset-compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607121735.k6CHZNRZ013785@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gset-compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192441 ------- Additional Comments From alcapcom at gmail.com 2006-07-12 13:26 EST ------- SRPM: http://fedoraxgl.tuxfamily.org/repository/5/SRPMS/gset-compiz-0.3.3-2.fc5.src.rpm Build with mock on i386 arch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 17:59:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 13:59:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197936] Review Request: nas: Network Audio System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607121759.k6CHxbNQ015071@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nas: Network Audio System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197936 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-07-12 13:50 EST ------- When I do this then rpmlint say that the dir permison are wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 18:09:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 14:09:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197936] Review Request: nas: Network Audio System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607121809.k6CI9LYt015487@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nas: Network Audio System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197936 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-12 14:00 EST ------- I didn't see any rpmlint message pertaining to that, but regardless, omitting ownership of the dir is only hiding, not fixing the problem. Also to consider, W: nas service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/nasd W: nas incoherent-init-script-name nasd Not sure if it's worth doing anything about. Should we consider making nasd *not* start by default? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 18:19:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 14:19:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197936] Review Request: nas: Network Audio System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607121819.k6CIJ0BY016328@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nas: Network Audio System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197936 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-07-12 14:10 EST ------- I think it is ok when it is enabled per default. When change %{_includedir}/audio/* to %{_includedir}/audio/ it fails with E: nas-devel non-standard-dir-perm /usr/include/audio 0644 so I must be at %{_includedir}/audio/* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 18:22:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 14:22:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197936] Review Request: nas: Network Audio System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607121822.k6CIMvIo016713@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nas: Network Audio System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197936 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-12 14:14 EST ------- Fix, change %defattr(0644,root,root) to %defattr(-,root,root) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 18:36:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 14:36:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197936] Review Request: nas: Network Audio System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607121836.k6CIaVem018073@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nas: Network Audio System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197936 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-07-12 14:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > I think it is ok when it is enabled per default. Is there a good reason why it *should* be enabled by default? Example: install build dependencies for a package that has nas-devel in its BR's, (build it, whatever), reboot, and you suddenly have a new network service running that you didn't ask for and nobody told you about. I think it's fair to assume that people who need things such as nas are capable of setting it to auto-start if wanted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 18:42:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 14:42:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197936] Review Request: nas: Network Audio System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607121842.k6CIg9of018931@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nas: Network Audio System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197936 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-07-12 14:33 EST ------- But not all know that for example Qt will need an running nas daemon to play sounds. And they are wondering:( So it will be better to run start it when the system starts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 18:43:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 14:43:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197936] Review Request: nas: Network Audio System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607121843.k6CIh4cp019081@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nas: Network Audio System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197936 frank-buettner at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #132084|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-07-12 14:34 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=132322) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=132322&action=view) 1.8.-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 18:43:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 14:43:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193894] Review Request: ant-contrib - A collection of tasks for Ant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607121843.k6CIhU5O019129@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ant-contrib - A collection of tasks for Ant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193894 ------- Additional Comments From ifoox at redhat.com 2006-07-12 14:34 EST ------- Sorry for not responding for long, New files: http://people.redhat.com/ifoox/extras/ant-contrib.spec http://people.redhat.com/ifoox/extras/ant-contrib-1.0-0.1.b2.src.rpm I've fixed all the problems that you've mentioned, except the class-path in manifest file rpmlint problem, about which I sent an email to f-e-l. Thanks, Igor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 18:50:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 14:50:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197936] Review Request: nas: Network Audio System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607121850.k6CIogSx020144@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nas: Network Audio System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197936 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-12 14:42 EST ------- Ville, it's not so bad, the default configuration listens only to localhost. Looks good, APPROVED p.s. I can't want for qt-4.2 (: , after fc6 is released, I think I'll stuff qt-4.2 tp1 (or whatever it is then) into devel/rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 19:02:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 15:02:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197936] Review Request: nas: Network Audio System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607121902.k6CJ2Eg7021411@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nas: Network Audio System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197936 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-07-12 14:53 EST ------- Ok I will import it tomorrow in the extra repo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 19:38:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 15:38:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194320] Review Request: im-chooser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607121938.k6CJcKrZ023697@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: im-chooser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194320 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-07-12 15:29 EST ------- 1) "Always use input methods" and "Use custom input method" is redundant and confusing. It is unclear what the difference is between "Always" and selecting the first option of custom. Why not eliminate "Always" and make the pulldown menu the top option? 2) Wouldn't it be best to hide "scim-qtimm" and "scim-bridge" because they are not stand-alone, but rather additions to the environment set by "scim"? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 19:40:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 15:40:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197874] Review Request: perl-Socket6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607121940.k6CJesOb023976@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Socket6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197874 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 19:40:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 15:40:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197821] Review Request: perl-IO-Socket-INET6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607121940.k6CJetFl023998@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Socket-INET6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197821 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Bug 197821 depends on bug 197874, which changed state. Bug 197874 Summary: Review Request: perl-Socket6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197874 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 19:41:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 15:41:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197874] Review Request: perl-Socket6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607121941.k6CJf8rg024063@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Socket6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197874 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 20:24:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 16:24:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198691] New: Review Request: steghide - A Steganography Program Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198691 Summary: Review Request: steghide - A Steganography Program Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: Jochen at herr-schmitt.de QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/steghide/steghide.spec SRPM: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/steghide/steghide-0.5.1-1.src.rpm Steghide is a steganography program that is able to hide data in various kinds of image- and audio-files. The color- respectivly sample-frequencies are not changed thus making the embedding resistant against first-order statistical tests. Features of steghide include compression and encryption of embedded data, embedding of a checksum to verify the integrity of the extracted data and support for jpeg, bmp, wav and au files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 21:09:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 17:09:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193156] Review Request: devallocator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607122109.k6CL94gr030700@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: devallocator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193156 riek at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(dwalsh at redhat.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 22:38:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 18:38:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169717] Review Request: Internode DSL usage applet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607122238.k6CMcGfE003042@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Internode DSL usage applet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169717 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-07-12 18:29 EST ------- Ping Can we either fix this or close the bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 12 22:55:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 18:55:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193224] Review Request: streamer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607122255.k6CMtY2t004420@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: streamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193224 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at adslpipe.co.uk 2006-07-12 18:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > - Corrected Changelog entry > - Added wildcard in files section > - Changed Source Package Path > - Clean the SPEC file look > > I have changed Source URL now. I will be happy if you please do review for > x86_64 architecture. changelog version tidy-up has silenced rpmlint Source0: now points to correct location $ md5sum /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/streamer-1.1.3.tar.bz2 ce10341fb74870e4b69fe2c778cd17b1 /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/streamer-1.1.3.tar.bz2 $ wget http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/streamer/streamer-1.1.3.tar.bz2 $ md5sum /tmp/streamer-1.1.3.tar.bz2 ce10341fb74870e4b69fe2c778cd17b1 /tmp/streamer-1.1.3.tar.bz2 srpm is built from the specified source file installed http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/streamer/streamer-1.1.3-2.fc5.src.rpm on x86_64 FC5+updates compiler spits out a few 64bit related warnings (mainly %llx format strings in printf expecting, but not receiving long long arguments) libng/plugins/read-avi.c: In function 'avi_add_movi': libng/plugins/read-avi.c:66: warning: format '%llx' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 6 has type 'off_t' libng/plugins/read-avi.c:66: warning: format '%llx' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 7 has type 'off_t' libng/plugins/read-avi.c: In function 'avi_find_chunk': libng/plugins/read-avi.c:216: warning: format '%llx' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'off_t' libng/plugins/drv0-v4l2-old.c: In function 'xioctl': libng/plugins/drv0-v4l2-old.c:234: warning: format '%Ld' expects type 'long long int', but argument 11 has type 'stamp_t' however these will probably get type promoted ok, and don't stop the build, could be cleaned up with a patch though, at minimum casting arguments to long long to silence the warnings. spec file now cleaner to my eye I've got a creative webcam pro somewhere, which has V4L1 drivers, but not V4L2 drivers from what I remember, I'll dig it out and check if the program can actuall do any streaming ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 00:03:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 20:03:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198708] New: Review Request: gnome-vfs2-monikers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198708 Summary: Review Request: gnome-vfs2-monikers Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: mclasen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/review/gnome-vfs2-monikers.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/review/gnome-vfs2-monikers-2.15.3-1.src.rpm Description: This is a part of the gnome-vfs2 package that has been split out as a separate tarball upstream. I first wanted to keep it in the gnome-vfs2 package, but that turned out to be not entirely trivial, since gnome-vfs2-monikers buildrequires gnome-vfs2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 00:54:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 20:54:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194320] Review Request: im-chooser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607130054.k6D0sYCe009541@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: im-chooser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194320 tagoh at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2006-07-12 20:45 EST ------- BTW im-chooser has been approved for Extras now and new one is available on it. "Always use input methods" option has been gone and it is now "Follow the system-wide configuration" instead of. I still think that eliminating this option isn't a good idea. technically "custom" makes a symlink to something directly. it may be not good in some cases. about 2), yes, Jens and I discussed about it to add the kind of tag in xinput script to let im-chooser understand to hide from the option menu. any comments about im-chooser are welcome. please try the latest version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 01:41:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 21:41:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198711] New: Review Request: splint - An implementation of the lint program Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198711 Summary: Review Request: splint - An implementation of the lint program Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: mitr at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/mitr/review/splint.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/mitr/review/splint-3.1.1-15.fc6.src.rpm Description: Splint is a tool for statically checking C programs for coding errors and security vulnerabilities. With minimal effort, Splint can be used as a better lint. If additional effort is invested adding annotations to programs, Splint can perform even stronger checks than can be done by any standard lint. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 01:43:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 21:43:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198711] Review Request: splint - An implementation of the lint program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607130143.k6D1hHfe011307@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: splint - An implementation of the lint program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198711 mitr at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188271, 197183 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 02:21:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 22:21:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189322] Review Request: rosegarden4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607130221.k6D2LDTP012995@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rosegarden4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189322 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-07-12 22:12 EST ------- I don't have the "fedorabugs" membership yet, so this I can't approve yet, but here's my formal review anyways... * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * source files match upstream: md5sum is e7fb7ebcb21ac6841ac5cfd6683f5fb2 * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock ( ). * rpmlint is silent apart from empty file complaints which we've discussed in bugzilla. Those will be fixed upstream. * final provides and requires are sane: rosegarden4-1.2.3-2.x86_64.rpm rosegarden4 = 1.2.3-2 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/perl desktop-file-utils libDCOP.so.4()(64bit) libX11.so.6()(64bit) libXft.so.2()(64bit) libXrender.so.1()(64bit) libasound.so.2()(64bit) libasound.so.2(ALSA_0.9)(64bit) libfontconfig.so.1()(64bit) libfreetype.so.6()(64bit) libjack.so.0()(64bit) libkdecore.so.4()(64bit) libkdeprint.so.4()(64bit) libkdeui.so.4()(64bit) libkio.so.4()(64bit) liblirc_client.so.0()(64bit) liblo.so.0()(64bit) liblrdf.so.2()(64bit) libqt-mt.so.3()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.1)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) perl(File::Basename) perl(File::Copy) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(XML::Twig) perl(strict) * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a web app. I would approve this if I had "fedorabugs" membership (which I've requested). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 02:25:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 22:25:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198711] Review Request: splint - An implementation of the lint program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607130225.k6D2PO8w013318@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: splint - An implementation of the lint program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198711 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2006-07-12 22:16 EST ------- Splint is already in Extras: $ yum list splint [...] Reading repository metadata in from local files Available Packages splint.i386 3.1.1-13.fc5 extras -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 02:31:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 22:31:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198711] Review Request: splint - An implementation of the lint program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607130231.k6D2VLWW013790@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: splint - An implementation of the lint program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198711 ------- Additional Comments From mitr at redhat.com 2006-07-12 22:22 EST ------- Yep, this request is for RHEL though. I have no idea whether f-p-r cares about that... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 02:42:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 22:42:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198711] Review Request: splint - An implementation of the lint program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607130242.k6D2gxnQ014981@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: splint - An implementation of the lint program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198711 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2006-07-12 22:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Yep, this request is for RHEL though. I have no idea whether f-p-r cares about > that... Ah. I didn't notice that part. Mea Culpa. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 02:56:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 22:56:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198711] Review Request: splint - An implementation of the lint program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607130256.k6D2ustJ016376@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: splint - An implementation of the lint program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198711 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Core |Red Hat Enterprise Linux | |Beta Version|devel |5.0.0 Component|Package Review |Package Review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 03:05:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 23:05:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198708] Review Request: gnome-vfs2-monikers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607130305.k6D35r3x017095@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-vfs2-monikers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198708 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |jkeating at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188267 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-12 22:56 EST ------- NEEDSWORK: - buildroot needs to follow guidelines - if possible, Source0 should be a URL to the source. - missing BR perl(XML::Parser) rpmlint only has one complaint: E: gnome-vfs2-monikers zero-length /usr/share/doc/gnome-vfs2-monikers-2.15.3/README -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 03:09:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 23:09:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169717] Review Request: Internode DSL usage applet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607130309.k6D39Uip017382@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Internode DSL usage applet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169717 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-07-12 23:00 EST ------- I really am not going to use this. Closing. If anybody would like to take over based on this spec feel free. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 03:28:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 23:28:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198708] Review Request: gnome-vfs2-monikers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607130328.k6D3SYM9018772@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-vfs2-monikers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198708 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2006-07-12 23:19 EST ------- New revision, incorporates the feedback Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/review/gnome-vfs2-monikers.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/review/gnome-vfs2-monikers-2.15.3-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 03:30:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 23:30:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198708] Review Request: gnome-vfs2-monikers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607130330.k6D3UnUG018946@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-vfs2-monikers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198708 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|188267 |188268 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-12 23:21 EST ------- Looks good. Approving. Since this is just a split-out of existing subpackage, approving for dist too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 03:55:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 23:55:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197189] Review Request: fonts-sinhala In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607130355.k6D3ttTk021476@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fonts-sinhala https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197189 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|188267 |188268 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-12 23:46 EST ------- Issues look resolved. RPMLINT is silent. Approving. Adding to dist per notting's approval. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 04:29:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 00:29:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195412] Review Request: obconf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607130429.k6D4T5dE022174@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: obconf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195412 ------- Additional Comments From jtorresh at gmail.com 2006-07-13 00:20 EST ------- Review: + rpmlint shows no error. + package meets the naming guidelines. + spec-file is properly named. + package meets the packaging guidelines. + package license is open-source compatible (GPL). + license field matches the actual license. + license file included in %doc. + spec file is written in english. + spec file is legible. + source files match upstream: aaf62498b11d52dfce7a0b6060867a19 obconf-1.6.tar.gz + package successfully compiled, built and tested on i386 (rawhide). + all build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. + package doesn't need to use %find_lang (no locales present). + package doesn't contain shared libraries. + package isn't relocatable. + package owns all directories that it creates. + no duplicate files in %files. + file permissions are properly set. + package has a %clean section. + package uses macros consistently. + package contains code, not content. + no -doc subpackage needed. + %docs don't affect application runtime. + package doesn't contain headers, static libraries or pkgconfig files (no devel package). ? GUI application; desktop file is installed with a small warning (as pointed out by Parag AN): I don't think this issue is worth patching the file (specially since it is automatically fixed) but I do think a bug should be filed upstream. + package doesn't own directories owned by other packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 04:40:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 00:40:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197189] Review Request: fonts-sinhala In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607130440.k6D4eBXT022705@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fonts-sinhala https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197189 llch at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From llch at redhat.com 2006-07-13 00:31 EST ------- Thanks Jesse. Package is imported into cvs-dist and built in dist-fc6. But seems the owner should be dsantani at redhat.com instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 05:01:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 01:01:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198331] Review Request: spca5xx-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607130501.k6D51Ve9023936@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spca5xx-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198331 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-13 00:52 EST ------- I need help i am not able to modprobe kernel module. modprobe spca5xx FATAL: Error inserting spca5xx (/lib/modules/2.6.16-1.2133_FC5/extra/spca5xx.ko): Invalid module format whereas installed driver from this package is at /lib/modules/2.6.16-1.2133_FC5/extra/spca5xx/spca5xx.ko now how can i solve this problem? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 05:09:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 01:09:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198331] Review Request: spca5xx-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607130509.k6D59Juu024178@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spca5xx-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198331 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-13 01:00 EST ------- if i do manual module insertion insmod /lib/modules/2.6.16-1.2133_FC5/extra/spca5xx/spca5xx.ko it succeeds -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 05:36:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 01:36:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190027] Review Request: hexter-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607130536.k6D5afXf025395@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hexter-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190027 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-07-13 01:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Fix the two NEEDWORK before import, and this is APPROVED. Fixed - thanks! > Now if you could review Rosegarden for me I'd appreciate it. :) Done (kind of). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 09:01:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 05:01:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193224] Review Request: streamer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607130901.k6D91TDh011593@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: streamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193224 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-13 04:52 EST ------- Ok i have updated Source tarball. I don't have 64 bit machine but from warning messages i changed code and now updated files are at Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/streamer/streamer.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/streamer/streamer-1.1.4-1.fc5.src.rpm can you again review this new package for x86_64 arch? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 09:20:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 05:20:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197353] Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607130920.k6D9KfB6012846@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197353 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-07-13 05:11 EST ------- Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/man-pages-fr.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/man-pages-fr-2.16.0-1.src.rpm %changelog * Thu Jul 13 2006 Alain Portal 2.16.0-1 - Update to 2.16.0 - New extra tarball -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 09:29:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 05:29:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193531] Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607130929.k6D9TR21013433@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193531 aportal at univ-montp2.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 10:39:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 06:39:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 172869] Review Request: nss-mdns In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607131039.k6DAdBnp017606@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nss-mdns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172869 bnocera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pdemauro at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2006-07-13 06:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > One of the requirements to get this included from Ulrich was that lookups are > never done directly by the nss-mdns plugin, and only through avahi where it > would be cached. Lennart fixed this properly in nss-mdns 0.8 Pancrazio `Ezio' de Mauro also wrote a Perl script that will be more solid than the previous scriptlets to add and remove the mdnsminimal and mdns lines from /etc/nsswitch.conf http://files.hadess.net/redhat/perso/spec/nss-mdns.spec and http://files.hadess.net/redhat/perso/source/nss-mdns-0.8-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 10:48:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 06:48:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197936] Review Request: nas: Network Audio System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607131048.k6DAmB42018505@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nas: Network Audio System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197936 frank-buettner at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 10:58:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 06:58:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190045] Review Request: caps - A set of audio plugins for LADSPA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607131058.k6DAwop0019272@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: caps - A set of audio plugins for LADSPA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190045 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-07-13 06:50 EST ------- Without running any special script on the rpm, three orphaned directories can be spotted due to missing ownership or missing dependencies: /usr/lib/ladspa/ /usr/share/ladspa/ /usr/share/ladspa/rdf/ $ rpm -qpR /home/qa/tmp/rpm/RPMS/caps-0.3.0-2.i386.rpm | grep lad $ rpmls -p /home/misc5/tmp/rpm/RPMS/caps-0.3.0-2.i386.rpm -rwxr-xr-x /usr/lib/ladspa/caps.so drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/doc/caps-0.3.0 -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/caps-0.3.0/CHANGES -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/caps-0.3.0/COPYING -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/caps-0.3.0/README -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/caps-0.3.0/README.ardour -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/caps-0.3.0/README.dist -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/caps-0.3.0/caps-0.3.0.pdf -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/caps-0.3.0/caps.html -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/ladspa/rdf/caps.rdf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 11:09:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 07:09:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198758] New: Review Request: gnome-phone-manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198758 Summary: Review Request: gnome-phone-manager Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: triad at df.lth.se QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.df.lth.se/~triad/krad/fc/gnome-phone-manager.spec SRPM URL: http://www.df.lth.se/~triad/krad/fc/gnome-phone-manager-0.7-1.src.rpm Description: gnome-phone-manager is a mobile phone manager for GNOME. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 12:12:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 08:12:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 172869] Review Request: nss-mdns In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607131212.k6DCCiOC022866@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nss-mdns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172869 blizzard at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |191931 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 12:13:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 08:13:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 172869] Review Request: nss-mdns In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607131213.k6DCD4iC022902@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nss-mdns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172869 markmc at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|191931 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From markmc at redhat.com 2006-07-13 08:04 EST ------- Some links on the previous conversation: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2005-November/msg00805.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2005-December/msg00249.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 12:14:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 08:14:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 172869] Review Request: nss-mdns In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607131214.k6DCEK1X023023@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nss-mdns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172869 bnocera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |191931 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2006-07-13 08:05 EST ------- Readding Chris' blocker -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 12:32:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 08:32:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 172869] Review Request: nss-mdns In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607131232.k6DCWigw023750@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nss-mdns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172869 ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2006-07-13 08:23 EST ------- The original discussion on GMane, easier to follow. http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/30633 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 13:10:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 09:10:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197189] Review Request: fonts-sinhala In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607131310.k6DDAqCi026506@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fonts-sinhala https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197189 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-13 09:01 EST ------- fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 14:19:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 10:19:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196146] Review Request: mod_nss In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607131419.k6DEJK7Y030619@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_nss https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196146 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jwilson at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-07-13 10:10 EST ------- I don't have sponsor status, but can do the review and then kick someone who does have sponsor status when the package is approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 14:22:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 10:22:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196401] Review Request: mozldap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607131422.k6DEMhYW030987@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mozldap Alias: mozldap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196401 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jwilson at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-07-13 10:13 EST ------- I don't have sponsor status, but can do the review and then kick someone who does have sponsor status when the package is approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 14:23:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 10:23:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196393] Review Request: svrcore-devel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607131423.k6DEN7Aj031053@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: svrcore-devel Alias: svrcore-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196393 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jwilson at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-07-13 10:14 EST ------- I don't have sponsor status, but can do the 'official' review and then kick someone who does have sponsor status when the package is approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 14:23:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 10:23:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196393] Review Request: svrcore-devel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607131423.k6DENHAq031077@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: svrcore-devel Alias: svrcore-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196393 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jwilson at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-07-13 10:14 EST ------- I don't have sponsor status, but can do the 'official' review and then kick someone who does have sponsor status when the package is approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 14:37:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 10:37:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186919] Review Request: eric: Python IDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607131437.k6DEb9lE032215@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eric: Python IDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186919 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-13 10:28 EST ------- Thanks for the tips, Jason. Spec Name or Url: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/eric-3.9.0-3.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/eric-3.9.0-3.src.rpm %changelog * Wed Jul 12 2006 Rex Dieter 3.9.0-3 - %%ghost .pyo files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 15:43:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 11:43:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193867] Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607131543.k6DFhvUI005044@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193867 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-07-13 11:35 EST ------- Did you try the rpm ? Each time, Im falling on : "Update Process died unexpectedly! Did you kill it manually?" This should be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 15:49:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 11:49:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191200] Review Request: lvm2-cluster In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607131549.k6DFn8h1005475@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lvm2-cluster https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191200 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 15:50:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 11:50:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196393] Review Request: svrcore-devel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607131550.k6DFoJ0S005622@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: svrcore-devel Alias: svrcore-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196393 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-07-13 11:41 EST ------- Okay, first pass through, spec is NOT yet okay. :) 1) Per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/FullExceptionList, gawk, perl and sed shouldn't be in BuildRequires:, not sure why Parag had issues there, package builds okay in an FC6/x86_64 mock buildroot with them removed. 2) Provides: svrcore-devel is not necessary, its already named that and will auto-provide it. (rpmlint says "E: svrcore-devel useless-explicit-provides svrcore-devel") 3) You can make the spec cleaner using 'export VAR=value' all on one line. 4) The '%{__mkdir_p} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/pkgconfig' line should not be under %build, it should be in %install (rpmlint complains about this: "W: svrcore-devel rpm-buildroot-usage %build %{__mkdir_p} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/pkgconfig") 5) The first line in %install should be an rm -rf of the buildroot (rpmlint: "E: svrcore-devel no-cleaning-of-buildroot"). 6) You have extraneous slashes throughout the spec. (ex: $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir} should be just $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}, because %{_libdir} expands out to /usr/lib or /usr/lib64). 7) Source includes a LICENSE and README file, they should be installed as docs (rpmlint warns about lack of docs). 8) %defattr should generally be (-,root,root,-) Here's a spec diff that cleans up all of the above issues: ---------- --- svrcore-devel-orig.spec 2006-06-26 11:18:43.000000000 -0400 +++ svrcore-devel.spec 2006-07-13 11:45:08.000000000 -0400 @@ -13,11 +13,7 @@ BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildRequires: nspr-devel >= %{nspr_version} BuildRequires: nss-devel >= %{nss_version} -BuildRequires: gawk -BuildRequires: perl -BuildRequires: sed BuildRequires: pkgconfig -Provides: svrcore-devel Source0: ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/directory/svrcore/releases/4.0.2/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz @@ -33,28 +29,19 @@ %build # Enable compiler optimizations and disable debugging code -BUILD_OPT=1 -export BUILD_OPT +export BUILD_OPT=1 # Generate symbolic info for debuggers -XCFLAGS=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -export XCFLAGS +export XCFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" -PKG_CONFIG_ALLOW_SYSTEM_LIBS=1 -PKG_CONFIG_ALLOW_SYSTEM_CFLAGS=1 +export PKG_CONFIG_ALLOW_SYSTEM_LIBS=1 +export PKG_CONFIG_ALLOW_SYSTEM_CFLAGS=1 -export PKG_CONFIG_ALLOW_SYSTEM_LIBS -export PKG_CONFIG_ALLOW_SYSTEM_CFLAGS - -NSPR_INCLUDE_DIR=`/usr/bin/pkg-config --variable=includedir nspr` -export NSPR_INCLUDE_DIR - -NSS_INCLUDE_DIR=`/usr/bin/pkg-config --variable=includedir nss` -export NSS_INCLUDE_DIR +export NSPR_INCLUDE_DIR=`/usr/bin/pkg-config --variable=includedir nspr` +export NSS_INCLUDE_DIR=`/usr/bin/pkg-config --variable=includedir nss` %ifarch x86_64 ppc64 ia64 s390x -USE_64=1 -export USE_64 +export USE_64=1 %endif cd mozilla/security/svrcore @@ -63,35 +50,36 @@ # dependencies, etc. make EXPORTS="" RELEASE="" REQUIRES="" MODULE="" IMPORTS="" OBJDIR=. INSTALL=true +%install +%{__rm} -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + # Set up our package file -%{__mkdir_p} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/pkgconfig -%{__cat} svrcore.pc.in | sed -e "s,%%libdir%%,%{_libdir},g" \ +%{__mkdir_p} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/pkgconfig +%{__cat} mozilla/security/svrcore/svrcore.pc.in | sed -e "s,%%libdir%%,%{_libdir},g" \ -e "s,%%prefix%%,%{_prefix},g" \ -e "s,%%exec_prefix%%,%{_prefix},g" \ -e "s,%%includedir%%,%{_includedir},g" \ -e "s,%%NSPR_VERSION%%,%{nspr_version},g" \ -e "s,%%NSS_VERSION%%,%{nss_version},g" \ -e "s,%%SVRCORE_VERSION%%,%{version},g" > \ - $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/%{name}.pc - -%install + $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/%{name}.pc # There is no make install target so we'll do it ourselves. -%{__mkdir_p} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_includedir} -%{__mkdir_p} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir} +%{__mkdir_p} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_includedir} +%{__mkdir_p} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir} cd mozilla/security/svrcore # Copy the binary libraries we want for file in libsvrcore.a do - %{__install} -m 644 $file $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir} + %{__install} -m 644 $file $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir} done # Copy the include files for file in svrcore.h do - %{__install} -m 644 $file $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_includedir} + %{__install} -m 644 $file $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_includedir} done @@ -99,7 +87,8 @@ %{__rm} -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %files -%defattr(0644,root,root) +%defattr(-,root,root,-) +%doc mozilla/security/svrcore/LICENSE mozilla/security/svrcore/README %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/%{name}.pc %{_libdir}/libsvrcore.a %{_includedir}/svrcore.h ---------- With these changes, I have the rpmlint output down to: E: svrcore-devel-debuginfo empty-debuginfo-package Not quite sure yet why the debuginfo package is empty, will investigate more a bit later... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 15:51:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 11:51:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191200] Review Request: lvm2-cluster In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607131551.k6DFpFTq005755@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lvm2-cluster https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191200 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER OtherBugsDependingO|188268 |188267 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-13 11:42 EST ------- Please address Paul's comments and make the latest spec file viewable so this review can continue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 15:54:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 11:54:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194276] Review Request: kdeaccessibility: KDE accessibility tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607131554.k6DFseLk006071@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeaccessibility: KDE accessibility tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194276 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-07-13 11:46 EST ------- from /usr/share/applications/kde/ : I saw that the DocPath of these ksnapshot.desktop amarok.desktop kdevelop.desktop krdc.desktop are not prefixed by "X-" So, I am ignoring these errors. MUST Items: - MUST: rpmlint's output is clean - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name} - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed (GPL) with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. - MUST: the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - MUST: The spec file for the package is be legible. - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least i386. - MUST: All build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires. - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly. - MUST: If the package does not contain shared library files located in the dynamic linker's default paths - MUST: the package is not designed to be relocatable - MUST: the package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: There are no Large documentation files - MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - MUST: There are no Header files or static libraries - MUST: The package does not contain library files with a suffix - MUST: Package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives - MUST: Package containing GUI applications includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: The source package does include license text(s) as COPYING - SHOULD: mock builds succcessfully in i386. - SHOULD: The reviewer tested that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. - SHOULD: No scriptlets were used, those scriptlets must be sane. - SHOULD: No subpackages present. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 15:55:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 11:55:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194276] Review Request: kdeaccessibility: KDE accessibility tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607131555.k6DFts1u006143@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeaccessibility: KDE accessibility tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194276 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 15:56:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 11:56:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196393] Review Request: svrcore-devel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607131556.k6DFuigU006246@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: svrcore-devel Alias: svrcore-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196393 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2006-07-13 11:47 EST ------- Thanks. I'll get working on it. One question though, about export var=value - I thought that was a ksh/bash-ism, not a plain old posix bourne shell feature? I'd rather have the scripting parts be maximally portable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 16:18:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 12:18:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191200] Review Request: lvm2-cluster In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607131618.k6DGI6SI007285@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lvm2-cluster https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191200 mbroz at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pas37 at cornell.edu ------- Additional Comments From mbroz at redhat.com 2006-07-13 12:09 EST ------- *** Bug 198679 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 18:45:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 14:45:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196393] Review Request: svrcore-devel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607131845.k6DIjBPQ018963@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: svrcore-devel Alias: svrcore-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196393 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-07-13 14:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > One question though, about export var=value - I thought that was a ksh/bash-ism, > not a plain old posix bourne shell feature? I'd rather have the scripting parts > be maximally portable. True, it won't work on plain old bourne, but there's no plain old bourne on anything we ship or support anymore so I'm not sure what target platform you have in mind that it would be an issue on. Not a blocker though if you want to keep them split, I just like to keep things as short as possible. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 18:50:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 14:50:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196393] Review Request: svrcore-devel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607131850.k6DIovdR020037@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: svrcore-devel Alias: svrcore-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196393 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-07-13 14:42 EST ------- Er, actually, I'm not certain what we have on RHEL3 (or RHEL2.1, but I dunno if that's a platform we want people running the DS stuff on)... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 18:54:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 14:54:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194276] Review Request: kdeaccessibility: KDE accessibility tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607131854.k6DIs0OU020435@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeaccessibility: KDE accessibility tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194276 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-13 14:45 EST ------- Thanks, now we'll wait for fc6 to be released, and (hopefully) UnleashKDE start to happen. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 19:10:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 15:10:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198691] Review Request: steghide - A Steganography Program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607131910.k6DJAB5F021837@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: steghide - A Steganography Program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198691 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-13 15:01 EST ------- == Not an official review as I'm not yet sponsored == Mock build for development i386 is sucessfull with warnings CvrStgObject.h:40: warning: 'class CvrStgObject' has virtual functions but non-virtual destructor MCryptPPTest.cc: In member function 'bool MCryptPPTest::genericTestDecryption()': MCryptPPTest.cc:47: warning: control reaches end of non-void function MCryptPPTest.cc: In member function 'bool MCryptPPTest::genericTestEncryption()': MCryptPPTest.cc:43: warning: control reaches end of non-void function * MUST Items: - rpmlint shows no error. - dist tag is present. - The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - The spec file name matching the base package steghide, in the format steghide.spec. - This package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - The spec file for the package MUST be legible. - The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license GPL. - This package includes License file COPYING. - This source package includes the text of the license in its own file,and that file, containing the text of the license for the package is included in %doc. - The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. md5sum is correct (5be490e24807d921045780fd8cc446b3) - This package successfully compiled and built into binary rpms for i386 architecture. - This package did not containd any ExcludeArch. - This package handled locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Not used %{_datadir}/locale/*. - This package owns all directories that it creates. - This package did not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - This package have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. - This package used macros. - Document files are included like README. - Package did NOT contained any .la libtool archives. Also, * Source URL is present and working. * BuildRoot is correct BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) * BuildRequires is correct * Package is working fine on i386. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 19:51:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 15:51:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193156] Review Request: devallocator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607131951.k6DJpAWd024686@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: devallocator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193156 dwalsh at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(dwalsh at redhat.com)| ------- Additional Comments From dwalsh at redhat.com 2006-07-13 15:42 EST ------- Updated to latest upstream version, but I think we are going to pull this from Extras and just build it for RHEL5. Since it really is not for general use on non MLS Machines. Spec URL: ftp://people.redhat.com/dwalsh/SELinux/devallocator.spec SRPM URL: ftp://people.redhat.com/dwalsh/SELinux/devallocator-0.5.7-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 19:52:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 15:52:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193156] Review Request: devallocator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607131952.k6DJq7QN024772@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: devallocator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193156 dwalsh at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 19:57:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 15:57:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198691] Review Request: steghide - A Steganography Program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607131957.k6DJvcLK025147@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: steghide - A Steganography Program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198691 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NOTABUG | ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-13 15:48 EST ------- Bug appears to have been closed by mistake -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 19:57:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 15:57:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192311] Review Request: cobbler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607131957.k6DJvvCb025177@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cobbler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192311 ------- Additional Comments From mdehaan at redhat.com 2006-07-13 15:49 EST ------- Added kickstart templating support in cobbler using Cheetah. Kickstart templating works for PXE, Xen, and auto-kickstart re-provisioning alike. http://et.redhat.com/~mdehaan/software/cobbler/cobbler-0.1.1-3.src.rpm http://et.redhat.com/~mdehaan/software/cobbler/cobbler.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 19:59:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 15:59:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192313] Review Request: koan In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607131959.k6DJxDPs025295@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: koan https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192313 ------- Additional Comments From mdehaan at redhat.com 2006-07-13 15:50 EST ------- Koan has been updated to take advantage of cobbler's new templating features. http://et.redhat.com/~mdehaan/software/cobbler/koan-0.1.1-3.noarch.rpm http://et.redhat.com/~mdehaan/software/cobbler/koan.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 20:18:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 16:18:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196629] Review Request: perl-SVK - A Distributed Version Control System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607132018.k6DKI75G026344@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SVK - A Distributed Version Control System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196629 ianburrell at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From ianburrell at gmail.com 2006-07-13 16:09 EST ------- Built for FC-4, FC-5, and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 20:29:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 16:29:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198816] New: Review Request: gfs-utils - global file system userland utilities Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198816 Summary: Review Request: gfs-utils - global file system userland utilities Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: cfeist at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/cfeist/gfs-utils.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/cfeist/gfs-utils-0.1.0-0.fc6.0.src.rpm Description: This package provides the userland utilities for GFS (Global File System) version 1. mkfs, fsck, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 20:42:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 16:42:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197739] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Event-Recurrence In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607132042.k6DKgMrQ027929@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Event-Recurrence https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197739 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-07-13 16:33 EST ------- Imported into CVS, branches created, and builds requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 20:42:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 16:42:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197744] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Event-ICal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607132042.k6DKgNtU027942@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Event-ICal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197744 Bug 197744 depends on bug 197739, which changed state. Bug 197739 Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Event-Recurrence https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197739 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 20:43:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 16:43:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197744] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Event-ICal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607132043.k6DKhnbU028066@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Event-ICal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197744 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-07-13 16:35 EST ------- Imported into CVS, branches created, and builds requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 20:44:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 16:44:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197745] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-ICal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607132044.k6DKiLIN028125@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-ICal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197745 Bug 197745 depends on bug 197744, which changed state. Bug 197744 Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Event-ICal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197744 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 20:45:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 16:45:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197745] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-ICal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607132045.k6DKjMLs028231@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-ICal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197745 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-07-13 16:36 EST ------- Imported into CVS, branches created, and builds requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 20:46:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 16:46:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192577] Review Request: perl-OpenFrame In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607132046.k6DKkxJZ028424@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-OpenFrame https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192577 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-07-13 16:38 EST ------- Imported into CVS, branches created, and builds requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 21:04:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 17:04:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196401] Review Request: mozldap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607132104.k6DL4KdK029957@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mozldap Alias: mozldap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196401 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-07-13 16:55 EST ------- Initial feedback on first pass through the spec and some rpmlint'ing: 1) Should add %dist tag 2) Source0: should be a URL, if not, explain why 3) Remove useless Provides: 4) Requires: on sub-packages should be explicit %{name} = %{version}-%{release} instead of >= 5) Use %configure instead of ./configure 6) Should quote around "$RPM_OPT_FLAGS", I've seen issues if not done 7) %install is missing buildroot cleaning 8) don't create directories/files in the buildroot in %build, needs to be done in %install (since the first thing in %install is supposed to be a buildroot purging). 9) extraneous slashes in some path names (ex: $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}) 10) standard practice in Fedora is to symlink back to the actual .so rather than create a trail of symlinks 11) preferred ldconfig post/postun format is "%post -p /sbin/ldconfig" 12) %defattr should be (-,root,root,-) 13) lots of extra, unnecessary %dir lines in various %files sections 14) unversioned .so files must go in -devel package when there are also versioned .so's 15) rpmlint complains about invalid sonames, I presume this is a side-effect of renaming them: E: mozldap invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libssldap-5.0.so.5.17 libssldap50.so E: mozldap invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libprldap-5.0.so.5.17 libprldap50.so E: mozldap invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libldap-5.0.so.5.17 libldap50.so 16) the binaries all define rpaths, which is a big no-no The following spec diff should address all but 15 and 16: ---------- --- mozldap-orig.spec 2006-07-13 15:58:24.000000000 -0400 +++ mozldap.spec 2006-07-13 16:50:58.000000000 -0400 @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Summary: Mozilla LDAP C SDK Name: mozldap Version: %{major}.%{minor} -Release: 3 +Release: 3%{?dist} License: MPL/GPL/LGPL URL: http://www.mozilla.org/directory/csdk.html Group: System Environment/Libraries @@ -20,8 +20,8 @@ BuildRequires: %{nspr_name}-devel >= %{nspr_version} BuildRequires: %{nss_name}-devel >= %{nss_version} BuildRequires: %{svrcore_name} >= %{svrcore_version} -Provides: mozldap +# Only available from cvs, tag LDAPCSDK_5_1_7_RTM Source0: %{name}-%{version}.tar.gz %description @@ -35,11 +35,10 @@ %package tools Summary: Tools for the Mozilla LDAP C SDK Group: System Environment/Base -Requires: %{name} >= %{version}-%{release} +Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} BuildRequires: %{nspr_name}-devel >= %{nspr_version} BuildRequires: %{nss_name}-devel >= %{nss_version} BuildRequires: %{svrcore_name} >= %{svrcore_version} -Provides: %{name}-tools %description tools The mozldap-tools package provides the ldapsearch, @@ -50,10 +49,9 @@ %package devel Summary: Development libraries and examples for Mozilla LDAP C SDK Group: Development/Libraries -Requires: %{name} >= %{version}-%{release} +Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} Requires: %{nspr_name}-devel >= %{nspr_version} Requires: %{nss_name}-devel >= %{nss_version} -Provides: %{name}-devel %description devel Header and Library files for doing development with the Mozilla LDAP C SDK @@ -64,7 +62,8 @@ arg64="--enable-64bit" %endif cd mozilla/directory/c-sdk -./configure $arg64 --with-system-svrcore --enable-optimize --disable-debug +%configure $arg64 --with-system-svrcore --enable-optimize --disable-debug +#./configure $arg64 --with-system-svrcore --enable-optimize --disable-debug %build @@ -73,7 +72,7 @@ export BUILD_OPT # Generate symbolic info for debuggers -XCFLAGS=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS +XCFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" export XCFLAGS PKG_CONFIG_ALLOW_SYSTEM_LIBS=1 @@ -90,9 +89,12 @@ cd mozilla/directory/c-sdk make BUILDCLU=1 HAVE_SVRCORE=1 BUILD_OPT=1 +%install +%{__rm} -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + # Set up our package file -%{__mkdir_p} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/pkgconfig -%{__cat} %{name}.pc.in | sed -e "s,%%libdir%%,%{_libdir},g" \ +%{__mkdir_p} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/pkgconfig +%{__cat} mozilla/directory/c-sdk/%{name}.pc.in | sed -e "s,%%libdir%%,%{_libdir},g" \ -e "s,%%prefix%%,%{_prefix},g" \ -e "s,%%exec_prefix%%,%{_prefix},g" \ -e "s,%%includedir%%,%{_includedir}/%{name},g" \ @@ -100,69 +102,63 @@ -e "s,%%NSS_VERSION%%,%{nss_version},g" \ -e "s,%%SVRCORE_VERSION%%,%{svrcore_version},g" \ -e "s,%%MOZLDAP_VERSION%%,%{version},g" > \ - $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/%{name}.pc - -%install + $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/%{name}.pc # There is no make install target so we'll do it ourselves. -%{__mkdir_p} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_includedir}/%{name} -%{__mkdir_p} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir} -%{__mkdir_p} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/%{name} +%{__mkdir_p} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_includedir}/%{name} +%{__mkdir_p} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir} +%{__mkdir_p} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/%{name} # Copy the binary libraries we want for file in libssldap50.so libprldap50.so libldap50.so do - %{__install} -m 755 mozilla/dist/lib/$file $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir} + %{__install} -m 755 mozilla/dist/lib/$file $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir} done # Copy the binaries we want for file in ldapsearch ldapmodify ldapdelete ldapcmp ldapcompare do - %{__install} -m 755 mozilla/dist/bin/$file $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/%{name} + %{__install} -m 755 mozilla/dist/bin/$file $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/%{name} done # Copy the include files for file in mozilla/dist/public/ldap/*.h do - %{__install} -m 644 $file $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_includedir}/%{name} + %{__install} -m 644 $file $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_includedir}/%{name} done # Copy the developer files %{__mkdir_p} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/%{name} cp -r mozilla/directory/c-sdk/ldap/examples $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/%{name} -%{__mkdir_p} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/%{name}/etc +%{__mkdir_p} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}%{name}/etc %{__install} -m 644 mozilla/directory/c-sdk/ldap/examples/xmplflt.conf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/%{name}/etc %{__install} -m 644 mozilla/directory/c-sdk/ldap/libraries/libldap/ldaptemplates.conf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/%{name}/etc %{__install} -m 644 mozilla/directory/c-sdk/ldap/libraries/libldap/ldapfilter.conf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/%{name}/etc %{__install} -m 644 mozilla/directory/c-sdk/ldap/libraries/libldap/ldapsearchprefs.conf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/%{name}/etc # Rename the libraries and create the symlinks -cd $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir} +cd $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir} for file in libssldap50.so libprldap50.so libldap50.so do mv $file $file.%{major}.%{minor} ln -s $file.%{major}.%{minor} $file.%{major} - ln -s $file.%{major} $file + ln -s $file.%{major}.%{minor} $file done %clean %{__rm} -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -%post -/sbin/ldconfig >/dev/null 2>/dev/null +%post -p /sbin/ldconfig -%postun -/sbin/ldconfig >/dev/null 2>/dev/null +%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig %files -%defattr(0755,root,root) -%{_libdir}/libssldap50.so -%{_libdir}/libprldap50.so -%{_libdir}/libldap50.so +%defattr(-,root,root,-) +%doc mozilla/directory/c-sdk/README.rpm %{_libdir}/libssldap50.so.%{major} %{_libdir}/libprldap50.so.%{major} %{_libdir}/libldap50.so.%{major} @@ -171,8 +167,8 @@ %{_libdir}/libldap50.so.%{major}.%{minor} %files tools -%defattr(0755,root,root) -%attr(0755,root,root) %dir %{_libdir}/%{name} +%defattr(-,root,root,-) +%dir %{_libdir}/%{name} %{_libdir}/%{name}/ldapsearch %{_libdir}/%{name}/ldapmodify %{_libdir}/%{name}/ldapdelete @@ -180,13 +176,12 @@ %{_libdir}/%{name}/ldapcompare %files devel -%defattr(0644,root,root) +%defattr(-,root,root,-) +%{_libdir}/libssldap50.so +%{_libdir}/libprldap50.so +%{_libdir}/libldap50.so %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/%{name}.pc -%attr(0755,root,root) %dir %{_includedir}/%{name} %{_includedir}/%{name} -%attr(0755,root,root) %dir %{_datadir}/%{name} -%attr(0755,root,root) %dir %{_datadir}/%{name}/etc -%attr(0755,root,root) %dir %{_datadir}/%{name}/examples %{_datadir}/%{name} %changelog -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 21:07:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 17:07:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196401] Review Request: mozldap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607132107.k6DL7AAI030071@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mozldap Alias: mozldap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196401 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-07-13 16:58 EST ------- Forgot to add 14b: add "%doc mozilla/directory/c-sdk/README.rpm" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 22:33:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 18:33:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198827] New: Review Request: perl-Statistics-Descriptive - Perl module of basic descriptive statistical functions Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198827 Summary: Review Request: perl-Statistics-Descriptive - Perl module of basic descriptive statistical functions Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: pertusus at free.fr QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/perl-Statistics-Descriptive.spec SRPM URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/perl-Statistics-Descriptive-2.6-1.src.rpm Description: This module provides basic functions used in descriptive statistics. It has an object oriented design and supports two different types of data storage and calculation objects: sparse and full. With the sparse method, none of the data is stored and only a few statistical measures are available. Using the full method, the entire data set is retained and additional functions are available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 22:50:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 18:50:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198829] New: Review Request: wfmath - WorldForge math libraries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198829 Summary: Review Request: wfmath - WorldForge math libraries Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: wart at kobold.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/wfmath.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/wfmath-0.3.4-1.src.rpm Description: WFMath provides mathematical functions for WorldForge clients. The primary focus of WFMath is geometric objects. Thus, it includes several shapes (boxes, balls, lines), in addition to the basic math objects that are used to build these shapes (points, vectors, matricies). WFMath provides a means for other system compenents to pass geometric information around in a common format. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 22:53:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 18:53:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198830] New: Review Request: libmodelfile - library for accessing WorldForge model files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198830 Summary: Review Request: libmodelfile - library for accessing WorldForge model files Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: wart at kobold.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/libmodelfile.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/libmodelfile-0.1.92-1.src.rpm Description: This library is a collection of small clean C libraries for loading 3D models of various file formats. So far the range of model formats is limited to what is needed by WorldForge client applications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 22:56:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 18:56:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198831] New: Review Request: varconf - Configuration library used by WorldForge apps Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198831 Summary: Review Request: varconf - Configuration library used by WorldForge apps Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: wart at kobold.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/varconf.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/varconf-0.6.4-1.src.rpm Description: Varconf is a configuration library intended for all applications. It manages configuration data in files, command line arguments, and is used by most WorldForge components. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 22:58:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 18:58:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198832] New: Review Request: skstream - C++ I/O library for WorldForge apps Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198832 Summary: Review Request: skstream - C++ I/O library for WorldForge apps Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: wart at kobold.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/skstream.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/skstream-0.3.5-1.src.rpm Description: skstream is an isotream C++ socket library and is recommended for use as a transport for Atlas-C++. It is capable of creating iostream-based socket connections for both clients and servers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 23:01:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 19:01:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198833] New: Review Request: mercator - Terrain library for WorldForge client/server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198833 Summary: Review Request: mercator - Terrain library for WorldForge client/server Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: wart at kobold.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/mercator.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/mercator-0.2.4-1.src.rpm Description: Mercator is primarily aimed at terrain for multiplayer online games and forms one of the WorldForge core libraries. It is intended to be used as a terrain library on the client, while a subset of features are useful on the server. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 23:02:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 19:02:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198829] Review Request: wfmath - WorldForge math libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607132302.k6DN2CW2003567@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wfmath - WorldForge math libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198829 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |198833 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 23:03:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 19:03:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198834] New: Review Request: sage - OpenGL extensions library using SDL Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198834 Summary: Review Request: sage - OpenGL extensions library using SDL Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: wart at kobold.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/sage.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/sage-0.1.2-1.src.rpm Description: Sage is an OpenGL extensions library using SDL. It aims to simplify the use of checking for and loading OpenGL extensions in an application. This library is used by some WorldForge clients. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 23:05:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 19:05:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198835] New: Review Request: Atlas-C++ - WorldForge message protocol library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198835 Summary: Review Request: Atlas-C++ - WorldForge message protocol library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: wart at kobold.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/Atlas-C++.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/Atlas-C++-0.6.0-1.src.rpm Description: Atlas-C++ is the perhaps the most important library in the entire WorldForge project, since nearly every other module requires it. Atlas-C++ provides a native implementation of the entire Atlas specification including negotiation, message encode and decode and the overlying Objects layer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 23:06:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 19:06:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198836] New: Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198836 Summary: Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: besfahbo at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~behdad/fedora/freetype1/freetype1.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~behdad/fedora/freetype1/freetype1-1.4-0.1.pre.src.rpm Description: I removed FreeType 1.x stuff from the freetype package in core. That happened when going from freetype-2.1.10 to freetype-2.2.1. A few Extras packages depend on FreeType 1.x, hence this package. %description The FreeType engine is a free and portable TrueType font rendering engine, developed to provide TrueType support for a variety of platforms and environments. FreeType is a library which can open and manages font files as well as efficiently load, hint and render individual glyphs. FreeType is not a font server or a complete text-rendering library. The version 1.x of FreeType is obsolete. New applications should use the more advanced FreeType 2.x library packaged as freetype. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 23:07:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 19:07:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198837] New: Review Request: eris - Client-side session layer for Atlas-C++ Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198837 Summary: Review Request: eris - Client-side session layer for Atlas-C++ Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: wart at kobold.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/eris.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/eris-1.3.11-1.src.rpm Description: A client side session layer for WorldForge; Eris manages much of the generic work required to communicate with an Atlas server. Client developers can extend Eris in a number of ways to rapidly add game and client specific functions, and quickly tie game objects to whatever outpu representation they are using. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 23:09:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 19:09:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198835] Review Request: Atlas-C++ - WorldForge message protocol library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607132309.k6DN9URg003891@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Atlas-C++ - WorldForge message protocol library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198835 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |198837 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 23:09:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 19:09:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198832] Review Request: skstream - C++ I/O library for WorldForge apps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607132309.k6DN9fQq003905@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: skstream - C++ I/O library for WorldForge apps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198832 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |198837 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 23:09:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 19:09:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198829] Review Request: wfmath - WorldForge math libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607132309.k6DN9qla003927@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wfmath - WorldForge math libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198829 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |198837 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 23:12:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 19:12:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198839] New: Review Request: sear - WorldForge client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198839 Summary: Review Request: sear - WorldForge client Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: wart at kobold.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/sear.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/sear-0.6.2-1.src.rpm Description: Sear is a 3D client for the WorldForge roleplaying environment. WorldForge can be viewed as a MMORPG construction kit, providing a working 3D environment in which quests and full games can be built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 23:14:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 19:14:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198833] Review Request: mercator - Terrain library for WorldForge client/server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607132314.k6DNEEmj004060@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mercator - Terrain library for WorldForge client/server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198833 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |198839 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 23:14:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 19:14:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198830] Review Request: libmodelfile - library for accessing WorldForge model files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607132314.k6DNEZ7j004074@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmodelfile - library for accessing WorldForge model files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198830 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |198839 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 23:14:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 19:14:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198837] Review Request: eris - Client-side session layer for Atlas-C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607132314.k6DNEkh3004090@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eris - Client-side session layer for Atlas-C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198837 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |198839 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 23:14:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 19:14:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198831] Review Request: varconf - Configuration library used by WorldForge apps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607132314.k6DNEvub004102@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: varconf - Configuration library used by WorldForge apps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198831 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |198839 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 23:15:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 19:15:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198834] Review Request: sage - OpenGL extensions library using SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607132315.k6DNF89b004124@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sage - OpenGL extensions library using SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198834 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |198839 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 23:23:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 19:23:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196146] Review Request: mod_nss In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607132323.k6DNNwot004324@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_nss https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196146 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-07-13 19:15 EST ------- Based on my initial tour through the spec and rpmlint'ing: 1) Source: should be a URL if possible: http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/sources/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz 2) BuildRequires: for make and perl should both be removed, per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions 3) Please explain why "AutoReq: 0" is necessary 4) Quotes around $RPM_OPT_FLAGS are recommended 5) Use %configure instead of ./configure 6) Should be smp_mflags instead of smp_flags 7) I believe DESTDIR is only relevant for make install (rpmlint complains). 8) Use macros for things like /etc (%{_sysconfdir}), /usr/sbin (%{_sbindir}), etc. 9) Watch out for lib/lib64 issues, you have a hard-coded /usr/lib in there, *must* be %{_libdir} so that its properly set to /usr/lib64 on 64-bit platforms. 10) don't use install -s, let rpm do the stripping so we get a valid debuginfo package. 11) don't create directories in %post, create them in the package, or they aren't owned by the package, which violates FE packaging policy 12) the %ifarch stuff around copying libnssckbi.so should be removed, this is another case where %{_libdir} is your friend. However, copying a file into place in %post is also a no-no. Just duplicate it within the package if you absolutely must, otherwise the file isn't owned by the package. 13) Oy. Just realized the file being copied in %post is from another package. That's also a no-no. I think a relative symlink (while still ugly) is okay though, and at least it would be owned by the package. 14) secmod.db (and cert8.db, key3.db) can be created in the build and marked %config(noreplace) instead of creating unowned files in %post. Note that this does add a BuildRequires: on nss-tools though. Of course, it also means the buildhost name winds up in the file instead of the target host. This one may need some more thought... I suppose doing it the way you have it may be best, given that mod_ssl does essentially the same. Ah! Just had an idea... I think creating dummy files in the buildroot and including them in the package itself and then creating actual files in %post may be the sanest thing. 15) Need to add to %files some to account for the above (and switch to using macros) Okay, all of the above are addressed (I believe) by the following spec diff, including the tweak to let mod_nss own the .db files: ---------- --- mod_nss-orig.spec 2006-07-13 17:38:26.000000000 -0400 +++ mod_nss.spec 2006-07-13 19:12:45.000000000 -0400 @@ -1,13 +1,12 @@ Name: mod_nss Version: 1.0.3 -Release: 1 +Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: SSL/TLS module for the Apache HTTP server Group: System Environment/Daemons License: Apache Software License URL: http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/wiki/Mod_nss -Source: %{name}-%{version}.tar.gz +Source: http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/sources/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) -BuildRequires: make, perl BuildRequires: nspr-devel >= 4.6, nss-devel >= 3.11 BuildRequires: httpd-devel >= 0:2.0.52, apr-devel, apr-util-devel Requires: httpd >= 0:2.0.52 @@ -36,7 +35,7 @@ # regenerate configure scripts autoconf || exit 1 -CFLAGS=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS +CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" export CFLAGS NSPR_INCLUDE_DIR=`/usr/bin/pkg-config --variable=includedir nspr` @@ -47,24 +46,35 @@ NSS_BIN=`/usr/bin/pkg-config --variable=exec_prefix nss` -./configure --with-nss-lib=$NSS_LIB_DIR --with-nss-inc=$NSS_INCLUDE_DIR --with-nspr-lib=$NSPR_LIB_DIR --with-nspr-inc=$NSPR_INCLUDE_DIR --with-apr-config --enable-ecc +%configure \ + --with-nss-lib=$NSS_LIB_DIR \ + --with-nss-inc=$NSS_INCLUDE_DIR \ + --with-nspr-lib=$NSPR_LIB_DIR \ + --with-nspr-inc=$NSPR_INCLUDE_DIR \ + --with-apr-config --enable-ecc +#./configure --with-nss-lib=$NSS_LIB_DIR --with-nss-inc=$NSS_INCLUDE_DIR --with-nspr-lib=$NSPR_LIB_DIR --with-nspr-inc=$NSPR_INCLUDE_DIR --with-apr-config --enable-ecc make %{?_smp_flags} DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT all %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/httpd/conf -mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/httpd/conf.d -mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/lib/httpd/modules -mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/sbin - -install -m 644 nss.conf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/httpd/conf.d -install -s -m 755 .libs/libmodnss.so $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/lib/httpd/modules -install -s -m 755 nss_pcache $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/sbin -install -m 755 gencert $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/sbin +mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/httpd/conf +mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/httpd/conf.d +mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/httpd/modules +mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sbindir} +mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/httpd/alias + +install -m 644 nss.conf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/httpd/conf.d/ +install -m 755 .libs/libmodnss.so $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/httpd/modules/ +install -m 755 nss_pcache $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sbindir}/ +install -m 755 gencert $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sbindir}/ +ln -s ../../..%{_libdir}/libnssckbi.so $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/httpd/alias/ +echo "temporary file" > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/httpd/alias/secmod.db +echo "temporary file" > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/httpd/alias/cert8.db +echo "temporary file" > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/httpd/alias/key3.db -perl -pi -e "s:$NSS_LIB_DIR:$NSS_BIN:" $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/sbin/gencert +perl -pi -e "s:$NSS_LIB_DIR:$NSS_BIN:" $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sbindir}/gencert %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT @@ -72,36 +82,35 @@ %post umask 077 -if [ $1 -eq 1 ]; then - if [ ! -d /etc/httpd/alias ] ; then - mkdir /etc/httpd/alias - fi - - if [ ! -f /etc/httpd/alias/secmod.db ] ; then - /usr/sbin/gencert /etc/httpd/alias > /etc/httpd/alias/install.log 2>&1 - echo "" - echo "Certificate database generated." - echo "" - fi +if [ "$1" -eq 1 ] ; then + for file in %{_sysconfdir}/httpd/alias/{secmod,cert8,key3}.db + do + # Just to be safe... + if [ `grep -c "temporary file" $file` -eq 1 ]; then + rm -f $file + else + mv $file $file.rpmsave + echo "%{_sysconfdir}/httpd/alias/$file saved as %{_sysconfdir}/httpd/alias/$file.rpmsave" + fi + done + %{_sbindir}/gencert %{_sysconfdir}/httpd/alias > %{_sysconfdir}/httpd/alias/install.log 2>&1 + echo "" + echo "%{name} certificate database generated." + echo "" fi -# copy the root certificate library to our database location -%ifarch x86_64 -cp -p /usr/lib64/libnssckbi.so /etc/httpd/alias -%else -cp -p /usr/lib/libnssckbi.so /etc/httpd/alias -%endif - %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) - %doc README LICENSE docs/mod_nss.html - -%config(noreplace) /etc/httpd/conf.d/nss.conf - -/usr/lib/httpd/modules/libmodnss.so -/usr/sbin/nss_pcache -/usr/sbin/gencert +%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/httpd/conf.d/nss.conf +%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/httpd/alias/secmod.db +%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/httpd/alias/cert8.db +%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/httpd/alias/key3.db +%{_libdir}/httpd/modules/libmodnss.so +%dir %{_sysconfdir}/httpd/alias/ +%{_sysconfdir}/httpd/alias/libnssckbi.so +%{_sbindir}/nss_pcache +%{_sbindir}/gencert %changelog * Tue Jun 20 2006 Rob Crittenden 1.0.3-1 ---------- This leaves only two warnings from rpmlint: W: mod_nss dangling-relative-symlink /etc/httpd/alias/libnssckbi.so ../../../usr/lib64/libnssckbi.so W: mod_nss dangerous-command-in-%post rm I think we'll probably have to live with those though. However, I just now noticed that the Makefile actually contains an install target. Why isn't it being used here? Time to go home, more tomorrow, or after you finish digesting all this... :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 23:27:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 19:27:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195412] Review Request: obconf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607132327.k6DNR5ji004414@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: obconf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195412 ------- Additional Comments From jtorresh at gmail.com 2006-07-13 19:18 EST ------- Peter: Don't forget to report a bug upstream for the .desktop semicolon issue. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 23:30:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 19:30:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195412] Review Request: obconf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607132330.k6DNUCXc004497@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: obconf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195412 jtorresh at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 23:42:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 19:42:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189322] Review Request: rosegarden4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607132342.k6DNgJDo005197@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rosegarden4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189322 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |green at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 23:46:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 19:46:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189322] Review Request: rosegarden4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607132346.k6DNkjgG005539@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rosegarden4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189322 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|183912, 189892 | OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-07-13 19:38 EST ------- Ok, I'm in fedorabugs. This package is ACCEPTED! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 23:47:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 19:47:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189892] Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607132347.k6DNl76w005603@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189892 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|189322 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 13 23:47:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 19:47:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607132347.k6DNlJHp005647@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|189322 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 00:03:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 20:03:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193894] Review Request: ant-contrib - A collection of tasks for Ant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607140003.k6E03aES006377@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ant-contrib - A collection of tasks for Ant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193894 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |green at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-07-13 19:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Sorry for not responding for long, > > New files: > http://people.redhat.com/ifoox/extras/ant-contrib.spec > http://people.redhat.com/ifoox/extras/ant-contrib-1.0-0.1.b2.src.rpm Is this file corrupt? I get the following why I try to install.. error: unpacking of archive failed on file /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/ant-contrib-1.0b2-src.tar.gz;44b6deeb: cpio: read -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 00:08:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 20:08:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176697] Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-binutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607140008.k6E08ZA9006517@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-binutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176697 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-07-13 19:59 EST ------- I was thinking of contributing a cross toolchain for me treo. Rather than fill Extras with independent GNU ports, does it make sense to collaborate on a cross-(binutils|gcc|etc) SRPM that builds various binary toolchains from the single set of sources? I think that would be nice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 00:12:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 20:12:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198836] Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607140012.k6E0CvS3006706@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198836 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-13 20:04 EST ------- Where does freetype-1.4pre come from? The latest I can find is 1.3.1: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=3157&package_id=3068 I guess we would know how/where to find it, if you used a full URL in the Source: field. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 00:15:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 20:15:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198836] Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607140015.k6E0FG0h006761@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198836 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-13 20:06 EST ------- And you should omit static libs (%_libdir/lib*.a) and %{_libdir}/lib*.la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 01:14:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 21:14:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198829] Review Request: wfmath - WorldForge math libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607140114.k6E1EJQU008824@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wfmath - WorldForge math libraries Alias: wfmath https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198829 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |chris.stone at gmail.com Alias| |wfmath -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 01:45:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 21:45:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198829] Review Request: wfmath - WorldForge math libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607140145.k6E1jtwd010438@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wfmath - WorldForge math libraries Alias: wfmath https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198829 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-07-13 21:36 EST ------- - rpmlint output clean - package named according to package naming guidelines - spec filename matches base package %{name} - package meets packaging guidelines - package licensed with open source compatible license - license in spec file matches actual license - license contained in %doc - spec file written in American english - spec file legible - sources match upstream 6a14f7de9d467d7b72b37da5ca5f92c5 wfmath-0.3.4.tar.gz - package successfully compiles and builds on x86_64 FC-5 - All BuildRequires listed - no locales - ldconfig called in %post/%postun - package is not relocatable - package owns all directories it creates - package contains no duplicate files - file permissions set properly - contains proper %clean section - macro usage is consistant - package contains permissible content - no large documentation - %doc does not affect runtime of application - header files are in devel package - pkgconfig .pc file in devel - .so files w/o suffix in devel - devel package requires base package - package does not contain .la files - not a GUI app needing a .desktop file - package does not own files or directories owned by other packages ==== MUST ==== - Add Requires: pkgconfg to devel package - package does not contain a %check section - make check fails on 1 test, investigate why (FAIL: intstring_test) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 01:49:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 21:49:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198835] Review Request: Atlas-C++ - WorldForge message protocol library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607140149.k6E1n0AS010656@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Atlas-C++ - WorldForge message protocol library Alias: Atlas-C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198835 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |chris.stone at gmail.com Alias| |Atlas-C++ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 02:28:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 22:28:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198835] Review Request: Atlas-C++ - WorldForge message protocol library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607140228.k6E2SJ3o012328@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Atlas-C++ - WorldForge message protocol library Alias: Atlas-C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198835 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-07-13 22:19 EST ------- -rpmlint output: W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZNK5Atlas9Exception4whatEv W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZTIN5Atlas9ExceptionE W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZTVN5Atlas9ExceptionE W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas7Message11DecoderBase11streamBeginEv W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas7Message11DecoderBase13streamMessageEv W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas7Message11DecoderBase9streamEndEv W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas7Message11DecoderBase10mapMapItemERKSs W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas7Message11DecoderBase11mapListItemERKSs W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas7Message11DecoderBase10mapIntItemERKSsl W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas7Message11DecoderBase12mapFloatItemERKSsd W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas7Message11DecoderBase13mapStringItemERKSsS3_ W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas7Message11DecoderBase6mapEndEv W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas7Message11DecoderBase11listMapItemEv W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas7Message11DecoderBase12listListItemEv W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas7Message11DecoderBase11listIntItemEl W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas7Message11DecoderBase13listFloatItemEd W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas7Message11DecoderBase14listStringItemERKSs W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas7Message11DecoderBase7listEndEv W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZTIN5Atlas7Message11DecoderBaseE W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas7Message11DecoderBaseC2Ev W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas7Message7ElementC1ERKS1_ W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas7Message11DecoderBaseD2Ev W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas7Message7Element5clearENS1_4TypeE W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas7Message7Encoder14mapElementItemERKSsRKNS0_7ElementE W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas7Message7EncoderD1Ev W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas7Message7ElementaSERKS1_ W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas6Codecs3XMLC1ERSdRNS_6BridgeE W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas7Message7EncoderC1ERNS_6BridgeE W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas9ExceptionD2Ev W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasMessage-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZTIN5Atlas9ExceptionE W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasMessage-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZNK5Atlas9Exception4whatEv W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasMessage-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZTIN5Atlas6BridgeE W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasMessage-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZTVN5Atlas9ExceptionE W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasMessage-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas6BridgeD2Ev W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasMessage-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas9ExceptionD2Ev W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasNet-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZTIN5Atlas9NegotiateE W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasNet-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZTIN5Atlas6BridgeE W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasNet-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas9NegotiateD2Ev W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasNet-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas6Codecs6PackedC1ERSdRNS_6BridgeE W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasNet-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas6Codecs4BachC1ERSdRNS_6BridgeE W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasNet-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas6Codecs3XMLC1ERSdRNS_6BridgeE W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasNet-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas6BridgeD2Ev W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasCodecs-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZTIN5Atlas5CodecE W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasCodecs-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas5CodecD2Ev It looks like linking is not done proplerly, there are many undefined non-weak symbols in the .so files. These libraries need to be linked against libAtlas.so. - package named according to package naming guidelines - package could be named atlascpp as upstream doesnt seem to mind - spec file matches package %{name} - package meets packaging guidelines - package licensed with open source compatible license O license field does not match actual license - license contained in %doc - spec file written in American english - spec file is legible O Unable to download source pacakge: wget http://dl.sourceforge.net/worldforge/Atlas-C++-0.6.0.tar.gz --19:18:24-- http://dl.sourceforge.net/worldforge/Atlas-C++-0.6.0.tar.gz => `Atlas-C++-0.6.0.tar.gz' Resolving localhost... 127.0.0.1 Connecting to localhost|127.0.0.1|:3128... connected. Proxy request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found 19:18:24 ERROR 404: Not Found. - package successfully compiles and builds on x86_64 FC-5 - All build dependencies are in BuildRequires, but optional build dependencies are not listed (zlib and/or libbz2) - package does not contain locales - package properly calls ldconfig in %post/%postun - package is not relocatable - package owns all directories it creates - package does not contain duplicate files - package sets proper permissions on files - package contains proper %clean section - macro usage is consistant - package contains permissible content - package does not contain large documentation - files in %doc do not affect runtime - header files are contained in devel package - pkgconfig files in devel package - library files w/o suffix are in devel - devel package requires base package - package does not contain .la files - package is not a GUI needing a .desktop file - package does not own files or directories owned by other packages === MUST === - Add Requires: pkgconfig to devel package - Comments say test fails on FC6, but infact it is failing on all x86_64 arches because of an x86_64 warning. Patch the code to not use -Werror so that checks can be run - Fix linking of all the .so files, they should be linked with -lAtlas and libAtlas needs to be built first. - Explain why you do not build with optional zlib or libbz2 - README indicates that this package requires socket streams such as skstream, explain why this is not in the Requires - Why are man pages in doc/man not installed? - Should tutoral/ be installed? - Fix license to match actual license - Fix Source0 URL so that I can actually verify the upstream source is 0.6.0 actually out yet? - Why name Atlas-C++ instead of atlascpp? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 02:31:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 22:31:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198832] Review Request: skstream - C++ I/O library for WorldForge apps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607140231.k6E2VItQ012558@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: skstream - C++ I/O library for WorldForge apps Alias: skstream https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198832 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |chris.stone at gmail.com Alias| |skstream -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 02:31:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 22:31:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198829] Review Request: wfmath - WorldForge math libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607140231.k6E2Vjsl012620@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wfmath - WorldForge math libraries Alias: wfmath https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198829 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 02:32:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 22:32:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198835] Review Request: Atlas-C++ - WorldForge message protocol library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607140232.k6E2Wwjd012751@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Atlas-C++ - WorldForge message protocol library Alias: Atlas-C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198835 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 02:33:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 22:33:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195412] Review Request: obconf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607140233.k6E2XPfp012824@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: obconf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195412 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2006-07-13 22:24 EST ------- Built for Devel. Once it's been branched to FC-4 and FC-5, I'll build for those and close this as NEXTRELEASE. Jorge: I have contacted the author about it. Thanks for your review. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 02:33:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 22:33:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198832] Review Request: skstream - C++ I/O library for WorldForge apps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607140233.k6E2XhFB012863@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: skstream - C++ I/O library for WorldForge apps Alias: skstream https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198832 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 03:05:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 23:05:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198832] Review Request: skstream - C++ I/O library for WorldForge apps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607140305.k6E35eQY015907@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: skstream - C++ I/O library for WorldForge apps Alias: skstream https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198832 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-07-13 22:56 EST ------- - rpmlint output: W: skstream-devel no-documentation okay to ignore, I don't see any documentation which should go in devel - package is named according to package naming guidelines - spec filename matches package %{name} - package meets package naming guidelines - package licensed with open source compatible license - license field matches actual license - license included in %doc - spec file written in American english - spec file is legible - sources match upstream 0c5ec89551bc0900b2e708992f321794 skstream-0.3.5.tar.gz - package successfully compiles and builds on x86_64 FC-5 - All build dependencies listed in BuildRequires, optional dependencies not listed (zlib) - package does not contain locales - ldconfig properly called in %post/%postun - package is not relocatable - package owns all directories it creates - package does not contain any duplicate files - permissions on files is set properly - package contains proper %clean section - macro usage is consistant - package contains permissible content - package does not contain large documentation - files in %doc do not affect runtime - header files are contained in devel package - pkgconfig files are in devel package - library files w/o suffix are in devel - devel package requires base package - package does not contain .la files - package does not own files or directories owned by other packages ==== MUST ==== - Add Requires: pkgconfig to devel package - Explain why this is not compiled with optional zlib library - contact upstream about make docs error ==== NOTES ==== - make check has some failures, but these are okay, they require the echo service to be enabled or be run as root. I enabled echo on my system and ran make check as root and these tests pass. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 03:07:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 23:07:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198837] Review Request: eris - Client-side session layer for Atlas-C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607140307.k6E37I9g016023@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eris - Client-side session layer for Atlas-C++ Alias: eris https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198837 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |chris.stone at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | Alias| |eris -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 03:41:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 23:41:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193897] Review Request: mysql-connector-java - Official JDBC driver for MySQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607140341.k6E3f72E018680@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-connector-java - Official JDBC driver for MySQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193897 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |green at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-07-13 23:32 EST ------- Some initial feedback.... rpmlint output is: W: mysql-connector-java non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java We just use Development/Libraries in Fedora. Perhaps there's an argument to be made for Development/Libraries/Java, but let's use the standard for now. I'll send a note to fedora-devel W: mysql-connector-java wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/mysql-connector-java-3.1.12/docs/README.txt W: mysql-connector-java wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/mysql-connector-java-3.1.12/README.txt W: mysql-connector-java wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/mysql-connector-java-3.1.12/EXCEPTIONS-CONNECTOR-J Fix these with sed in the %prep section like so: %{__sed} -i 's/\r//' README.txt The spec file includes: # remove all binary libs find . \( -name "*.jar" -o -name "*.class" \) | xargs -t rm -f I would rather that we strip the .jar files from the tarball prior to packaging. This will ensure that we don't accidentally ship binaries sans sources or binaries with unfriendly licensing - even if they only show up in the SRPM. Can you explain this part of the spec file?.. Provides: mm.mysql Obsoletes: mm.mysql -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 04:18:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:18:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189886] Review Request: FluidSynth - Real-time software synthesizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607140418.k6E4I1F1020102@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FluidSynth - Real-time software synthesizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189886 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-07-14 00:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > 0 rpmlint output is: > E: fluidsynth obsolete-not-provided iiwusynth > E: libfluidsynth-devel obsolete-not-provided libiiwusynth-devel Fixed. > 0 License (LGPL) ok, but license file not included! Fixed. > 0 no %doc Fixed. > 0 .la files packaged, bad! Fixed. > * Alphanumeric parts of the version should be in the Release field, as per: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines > Then you can drop the "-n fluidsynth-1.0.7" to %setup too Fixed. > * Dont use %package -n lib%{name} thats very Debian afaik (allmost) all Fedora > package use %package libs same goes for the devel package. Fixed. > * The following rpmlint output: > E: fluidsynth obsolete-not-provided iiwusynth > E: libfluidsynth-devel obsolete-not-provided libiiwusynth-devel > * Don't package .la files, remove them under %install or %exclude them in %files > * Add a %doc including atleast COPYING, but mosty likely also other candidates Fixed, as above. Thanks for your effort. Sorry for the delay. Updates bits here: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/fluidsynth.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/fluidsynth-1.0.7-5.a.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 04:26:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:26:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198830] Review Request: libmodelfile - library for accessing WorldForge model files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607140426.k6E4QrVg020308@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmodelfile - library for accessing WorldForge model files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198830 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-14 00:18 EST ------- Some comments: *-devel is missing "Requires: pkgconfig" But ... I am having a problem with this package's licence. You spec says "GPL", the tarball contains a copy of the GPL's COPYING, but the sources say: * Permission is granted to anyone to use this software for any purpose, * including commercial applications, and to alter it and redistribute it * freely, subject to the following restrictions: * * 1. The origin of this software must not be misrepresented; you must not * claim that you wrote the original software. If you use this software * in a product, an acknowledgment in the product documentation would be * appreciated but is not required. * 2. Altered source versions must be plainly marked as such, and must not be * misrepresented as being the original software. * 3. This notice may not be removed or altered from any source distribution. In my understanding, ?1 and ?3 are non critical, but ?2 could be read a imposing additional constraits, i.e. as violation of the GPL, which would render shipping this package under the GPL impossible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 05:31:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 01:31:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198837] Review Request: eris - Client-side session layer for Atlas-C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607140531.k6E5VpVA022626@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eris - Client-side session layer for Atlas-C++ Alias: eris https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198837 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-07-14 01:23 EST ------- - rpmlint output: W: eris incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.3.11-0.1 1.3.11-1.fc5 Must fix changelog version number - package name meets package naming guidelines - spec file name matches package %{name} - package meets packaging guidelines - package is licensed with open source compatible license - license matches actual upstream license - license file included in %doc - spec file written in American english - spec file is legible - source file matches upstream 632bb5ad0e8cbcf59c8f26c50c320b7d eris-1.3.11.tar.gz - package successfully compiles and builds on x86_64 FC-5 O package does not list all build dependencies, configure checks for glib-2.0 which is not provided - package does not contain locales - package contains proper %post/%postun ldconfig calls - package is not relocatable - package owns all directories it creates - package does not contain duplicate files - file permissions are set properly - package contains proper %clean section - macro usage is consistent - package contains permissible content - package does not contain large documentation - files in %doc do not affect runtime - header files are in devel package - pkgconfig files are in devel - libraries w/o suffix are in devel - devel package requires base package - package does not contain any .la files - package is not a GUI needing a .desktop file - package does not own files or directories owned by other packages ==== MUST ==== - Remove pkgconfig from BuildRequries, this should be picked up by the devel packages - Fix changelog version number - "outpu" in description should be "output" - Why is glib-2.0 not added in BuildRequires? - Add a %check section - %doc in devel should be docs/html/* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 05:35:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 01:35:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198830] Review Request: libmodelfile - library for accessing WorldForge model files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607140535.k6E5ZMRY022744@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmodelfile - library for accessing WorldForge model files Alias: libmodelfile https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198830 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |chris.stone at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | Alias| |libmodelfile -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 07:07:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 03:07:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198830] Review Request: libmodelfile - library for accessing WorldForge model files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607140707.k6E77LCb026292@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmodelfile - library for accessing WorldForge model files Alias: libmodelfile https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198830 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-07-14 02:58 EST ------- - rpmlint output: W: libmodelfile-devel no-documentation okay to ignore, I dont see any docs that should go in devel - package named according to package naming guidelines - spec filename matches base package %{name} - package meets packaging guidelines - license tag in spec file is open source compatible - license matches upstream license - licnese included in %doc - spec file written in American english - spec file is legible - source matches upstream 53ded1963cc863d0fabba4f0fb4ef2db libmodelfile-0.1.92.tar.gz - package successfully compiles and builds on x86_64 FC-5 - All build dependencies listed in BuildRequires - package does not contain locales - package properly uses %post/%postun ldconfig - package is not relocatable - package owns all directories it creates - package does not contain duplicate files - file permissions are set properly - package has proper %clean section - macro usage is consistant - package contains permissible content - package does not contain large documentation - files in %doc do not affect runtime - header files are in devel package - pkgconfig files are in devel package - libraries w/o suffix are in devel - devel require base package - package does not contain .la files - package is not a GUI needing a .desktop file - package does not own files or directories owned by other packages ==== MUST ==== - Add Requires: pkgconfig to devel package - make check should have %{?_smp_mflags} - Why are you using find to remove .la files? Why not just specifically state which ones you are removing? And you dont BR findutils but you sholdnt anyway because you shouldnt be using find. - I could not get source package from Source URL, I had to use: http://dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/worldforge/libmodelfile-0.1.92.tar.gz (not sure why) But Source0 should be updated accordingly - Summary contains "acessing" which is not an english word - Why is group System Environment/Libraries instead of Development/Libraries? - Have you tested this in FC4? If you plan to support FC4 please test, BuildRequires might be different (might need xorg-x11-devel or something) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 07:08:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 03:08:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198831] Review Request: varconf - Configuration library used by WorldForge apps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607140708.k6E78U2Q026351@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: varconf - Configuration library used by WorldForge apps Alias: varconf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198831 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |chris.stone at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | Alias| |varconf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 07:10:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 03:10:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193898] Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607140710.k6E7A7ed026455@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-07-14 03:01 EST ------- Just some quick comments from looking at parts of the spec file.. - Summary is odd: "Java source interpreter" - Source lines should be URLs to sources - Remove Epoch - Change Group to Development/Libraries - Make BuildRoot standard - Remove these lines... Distribution: JPackage Vendor: JPackage Project That's it for now. Thanks for submitting this. If nobody picks this up, I'll do a formal review once the dependencies have been approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 07:27:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 03:27:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193898] Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607140727.k6E7RAT6027761@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-07-14 03:18 EST ------- BTW, I don't think we should be linking libreadline-java with jython since I believe the licenses are incompatible. See this thread for discussion and a potential solution: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=707283 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 07:30:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 03:30:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198831] Review Request: varconf - Configuration library used by WorldForge apps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607140730.k6E7UVnO028107@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: varconf - Configuration library used by WorldForge apps Alias: varconf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198831 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-07-14 03:21 EST ------- - rpmlint output: W: varconf-devel no-documentation okay to ignore, I dont see any documentation which should go in devel - package named according to package naming guidelines - spec file name matches package %{name} - package meets packaging guidelines - license in spec file is compatible with open source license O package does not match actual upstream license - license file included in %doc - spec file written in American english - spec file is legible - sources match upstream b8f30226a1fee727fd124f716d8eb72e varconf-0.6.4.tar.gz - package successfully compiles and builds on x86_64 FC-5 - all build dependencies are in BuildRequires - package does not contain locales - package properly uses %post/%postun ldconfig - package is not relocatable - package owns all directories it creates - package does not contain duplicate files - file permissions are set properly - package contains proper %clean section - macro usage is consistant - package contains permissible content - package does not contain large documentation - files in %doc do not affect runtime - header files are in devel - pkgconfig files are in devel - libraries w/o suffix are in devel - devel package requires base package - package does not contain .la files - package is not a GUI needing .desktop files - package does not own files or directories owned by other packages ==== MUST ==== - devel package should have Requires: pkgconfig - make check should use smp flags - make check should be patched to work, (not ||:) all you need to do is add #include once conftest is created, you need to: cd tests ; ./conftest < conf.cfg - fix license to match actual upstream license -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 07:31:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 03:31:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198833] Review Request: mercator - Terrain library for WorldForge client/server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607140731.k6E7Vgso028281@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mercator - Terrain library for WorldForge client/server Alias: mercator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198833 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |chris.stone at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | Alias| |mercator -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 07:51:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 03:51:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198833] Review Request: mercator - Terrain library for WorldForge client/server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607140751.k6E7pbVW030704@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mercator - Terrain library for WorldForge client/server Alias: mercator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198833 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-07-14 03:42 EST ------- - rpmlint output clean - package named according to package naming guidelines - spec filename matches package %{name} - package meets packaging guidelines - package licensed with open source compatible license - license matches upstream license - license included in %doc - spec file in American english - spec file is legible - sources match upstream 83debc1fbf1143efd1593c4357ba54dd mercator-0.2.4.tar.gz - package successfully compiles and builds on x86_64 FC-5 - all build dependencies listed in BuildRequires - package does not use locales - package properly uses %post/%postun ldconfig - package is not relocatable - package owns all directories it creates - package does not contain duplicate files - file permissions set properly - package contains proper %clean section - macro usage is consistent - package contains permissible content - package does not contain large documentation - files in %doc do not affect runtime - header files are in devel package - pkgconfig files are in devel - libraries files w/o suffix are in devel - devel package requires main package - package does not contain .la files - package is not a GUI app needing .desktop files - package does not own files or directories owned by other packages ==== MUST ==== - remove pkgconfig from BuildRequires, this should be picked up by devel package - make check should include smp flags - %doc in devel should be doc/html/* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 07:52:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 03:52:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198834] Review Request: sage - OpenGL extensions library using SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607140752.k6E7qKNJ030813@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sage - OpenGL extensions library using SDL Alias: sage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198834 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |chris.stone at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | Alias| |sage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 08:16:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 04:16:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198834] Review Request: sage - OpenGL extensions library using SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607140816.k6E8GC11032639@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sage - OpenGL extensions library using SDL Alias: sage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198834 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-07-14 04:07 EST ------- - rpmlint output clean - package name meets package naming guidelines - spec file name matches package %{name} - package meets packaging guidelines - package licensed with open source compatible license O license does not match upstream license - license included in %doc - spec file in American english - spec file is legible - sources match upstream 4eea72b30a88dbe5d512009913462fc3 sage-0.1.2.tar.gz - package successfully compiles and builds on x86_64 FC-5 - all dependencies are listed in BuildRequires - package properly containst %post/%postun ldconfig - package is not relocatable - package owns all directories it creates - package does not contain duplicate files - file permissions set properly - package contains proper %clean section - macro usage is consistent - package contains permissible content - package does not contain large documentation - files in %doc do not affect runtime - header files are in devel - pkgconfig files are in devel - libraries w/o suffix are in devel - devel package requires base package - package does not contain any .la files - package is not a GUI needing .desktop files - package does not own files or directories owned by other packages ==== MUST ==== - devel package should Requires: pkgconfig - use %{_mandir} instead of %{_datadir}/man - notify upstream about --disable-static failure - fix license to match upstream license - had to download source from: http://dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/worldforge/sage-0.1.2.tar.gz Source0 should be updated accordingly ==== SHOULD ===== - add a %check even though it doesnt do anything now, it may in future -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 08:18:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 04:18:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198839] Review Request: sear - WorldForge client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607140818.k6E8I9SS000328@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sear - WorldForge client Alias: sear https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198839 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |chris.stone at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | Alias| |sear -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 08:23:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 04:23:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198839] Review Request: sear - WorldForge client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607140823.k6E8NIAE000784@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sear - WorldForge client Alias: sear https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198839 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-07-14 04:14 EST ------- no time to do a full review yet, but some quick notes: dont include pkgconfig in BR, its picked up by devel packages use %{_desktopdir} instead of %{_datadir}/applications use %{_icondir} instead of %{_datadir}/icons I'm going to busy entertaining guests over Fri-Sun but will try to find some time to squeeze in a formal review for this package. If not, will do it on Monday. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 08:24:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 04:24:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198816] Review Request: gfs-utils - global file system userland utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607140824.k6E8OhPE000872@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-utils - global file system userland utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198816 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-14 04:16 EST ------- You spec contains this: if ["$1" = 0 ]; then This is invalid /bin/sh syntax. There must be a blank after the '['. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 08:34:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 04:34:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198839] Review Request: sear - WorldForge client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607140834.k6E8YfXX001419@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sear - WorldForge client Alias: sear https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198839 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-07-14 04:26 EST ------- Did a quick test and it's crashing on me :( will produce a debug backtrace when time permits. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 09:28:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 05:28:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198758] Review Request: gnome-phone-manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607140928.k6E9SR1I005378@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-phone-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198758 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-14 05:19 EST ------- == Not an official review as I'm not yet sponsored == Mock build for rawhide i386 is Failed. I need to add BuildReuires: perl-XML-Parser After that also i got errors as + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/find-lang.sh /var/tmp/gnome-phone-manager-0.7-1.fc6-root-mockbuild gnome-phone-manager No translations found for gnome-phone-manager in /var/tmp/gnome-phone-manager-0.7-1.fc6-root-mockbuild error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.77473 (%install) * MUST Items: - rpmlint shows no error. - dist tag is present. - The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - The spec file name matching the base package gnome-phone-manager, in the format gnome-phone-manager.spec. - This package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - The spec file for the package MUST be legible. - The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license GPL. - This package includes License file COPYING. - This source package includes the text of the license in its own file,and that file, containing the text of the license for the package is included in %doc. - The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. md5sum is correct (951471bf5d6fe93fe550c60b6bdf58f9) - This package did NOT successfully compiled and built into binary rpms for i386 architecture. - This package did not containd any ExcludeArch. - This package did NOT handled locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Not used %{_datadir}/locale/*. - This package have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. - This package used macros. - Document files are included like README, NEWS, COPYING, AUTHORS - Package did NOT contained any .la libtool archives. Also, * Source URL is present and working. * BuildRoot is correct BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) * BuildRequires is correct -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 09:54:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 05:54:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198758] Review Request: gnome-phone-manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607140954.k6E9sV9J007120@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-phone-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198758 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-14 05:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > == Not an official review as I'm not yet sponsored == > Mock build for rawhide i386 is Failed. I need to add > BuildReuires: perl-XML-Parser That should be: BuildReuires: perl(XML::Parser) > After that also i got errors as > + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/find-lang.sh > /var/tmp/gnome-phone-manager-0.7-1.fc6-root-mockbuild gnome-phone-manager > No translations found for gnome-phone-manager in > /var/tmp/gnome-phone-manager-0.7-1.fc6-root-mockbuild > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.77473 (%install) That's usually a sign of needing: BuildRequires: gettext > > * MUST Items: > - rpmlint shows no error. > - dist tag is present. > - The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. > - The spec file name matching the base package gnome-phone-manager, in the > format gnome-phone-manager.spec. > - This package meets the Packaging Guidelines. > - The spec file for the package MUST be legible. > - The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license GPL. > - This package includes License file COPYING. > - This source package includes the text of the license in its own file,and > that file, containing the text of the license for the package is included in %doc. > - The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, > as provided in the spec URL. md5sum is correct (951471bf5d6fe93fe550c60b6bdf58f9) > - This package did NOT successfully compiled and built into binary rpms > for i386 architecture. > - This package did not containd any ExcludeArch. > - This package did NOT handled locales properly. This is done by using the > %find_lang macro. Not used %{_datadir}/locale/*. It's a good idea to list things that need fixing separately from the rest of the review checklist as that's clearer and easier to read. > - This package used macros. But did it use them *consistently*? That's what the review guidelines are asking to be checked. > - Document files are included like README, NEWS, COPYING, AUTHORS Did you look to see if there are any other document files in the package that might be included, or whether any of the included files don't have anything useful to end users of the package? > - Package did NOT contained any .la libtool archives. > > Also, > * Source URL is present and working. > * BuildRoot is correct BuildRoot: > %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) > * BuildRequires is correct No, they're not. The package failed to build in mock because of the missing buildreqs of perl(XML::Parser) and gettext. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 10:07:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 06:07:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198758] Review Request: gnome-phone-manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607141007.k6EA7mqY007608@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-phone-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198758 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-14 05:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > == Not an official review as I'm not yet sponsored == > > Mock build for rawhide i386 is Failed. I need to add > > BuildReuires: perl-XML-Parser > > That should be: > > BuildReuires: perl(XML::Parser) > > > After that also i got errors as > > + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/find-lang.sh > > /var/tmp/gnome-phone-manager-0.7-1.fc6-root-mockbuild gnome-phone-manager > > No translations found for gnome-phone-manager in > > /var/tmp/gnome-phone-manager-0.7-1.fc6-root-mockbuild > > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.77473 (%install) > > That's usually a sign of needing: > > BuildRequires: gettext > > > > > * MUST Items: > > - rpmlint shows no error. > > - dist tag is present. > > - The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. > > - The spec file name matching the base package gnome-phone-manager, in the > > format gnome-phone-manager.spec. > > - This package meets the Packaging Guidelines. > > - The spec file for the package MUST be legible. > > - The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license GPL. > > - This package includes License file COPYING. > > - This source package includes the text of the license in its own file,and > > that file, containing the text of the license for the package is included in %doc. > > - The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, > > as provided in the spec URL. md5sum is correct (951471bf5d6fe93fe550c60b6bdf58f9) > > - This package did NOT successfully compiled and built into binary rpms > > for i386 architecture. > > - This package did not containd any ExcludeArch. > > - This package did NOT handled locales properly. This is done by using the > > %find_lang macro. Not used %{_datadir}/locale/*. > > It's a good idea to list things that need fixing separately from the rest of the > review checklist as that's clearer and easier to read. Will remember that. > > > - This package used macros. > > But did it use them *consistently*? That's what the review guidelines are asking > to be checked. Did i missed somthing to check in SPEC? > > > - Document files are included like README, NEWS, COPYING, AUTHORS > > Did you look to see if there are any other document files in the package that > might be included, or whether any of the included files don't have anything > useful to end users of the package? I didn't get you? > > > - Package did NOT contained any .la libtool archives. > > > > Also, > > * Source URL is present and working. > > * BuildRoot is correct BuildRoot: > > %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) > > * BuildRequires is correct > > No, they're not. The package failed to build in mock because of the missing > buildreqs of perl(XML::Parser) and gettext. > I forgot that i added perl(XML::Parser) not AUTHOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 10:53:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 06:53:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196262] Review Request: katapult In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607141053.k6EAr0Ur010686@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: katapult https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196262 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-07-14 06:44 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://beta.glwb.info/katapult/katapult.spec SRPM URL: http://beta.glwb.info/katapult/katapult-0.3.1.3-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 10:55:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 06:55:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198758] Review Request: gnome-phone-manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607141055.k6EAtmeY010906@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-phone-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198758 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-14 06:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > > - This package used macros. > > > > But did it use them *consistently*? That's what the review guidelines are asking > > to be checked. > Did i missed somthing to check in SPEC? I don't know; I haven't looked at the spec. The review guidelines ask you to check that macros are used consistently, not just that they are used. So you're looking for things like: * Using both $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot} - both expand to the same value; use one or the other but not both in the same spec file * Using %{__rm} but not %{__make} etc. - if the packager is using macros for some commands (e.g. %{__rm}), they should use them in all cases where a macro is available; alternatively, they could just use "rm" instead of "%{__rm}"; the key is consistency > > > - Document files are included like README, NEWS, COPYING, AUTHORS > > > > Did you look to see if there are any other document files in the package that > > might be included, or whether any of the included files don't have anything > > useful to end users of the package? > I didn't get you? Supposing the package contains docs: README, NEWS, COPYING, AUTHOR Did you check to see if there are any other useful documents in the tarball that might be useful to end users? There might be some other .txt files, a docs directory full of useful HTML files, perhaps a TODO file? A reviewer should be looking at a package in much the same way as they would do if they were packaging something themselves, looking to see what would be sensible to include. Also on the subject of documentation, sometimes the documentation provided in tarballs isn't very useful. So sometimes you may see a "NEWS" file that just says to look in the "ChangeLog" file. There is no point in including such a "NEWS" file in the package. That's something a reviewer should be looking at too. > > > * BuildRequires is correct > > > > No, they're not. The package failed to build in mock because of the missing > > buildreqs of perl(XML::Parser) and gettext. > > > I forgot that i added perl(XML::Parser) not AUTHOR. There's also the missing gettext buildreq that caused the package build to fail in mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 11:12:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 07:12:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198758] Review Request: gnome-phone-manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607141112.k6EBCGGB011835@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-phone-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198758 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-14 07:03 EST ------- Thnaks for your comment Paul. This Package requires todo following things 1) Add BuildRequires: perl(XML::Parser),gettext 2)Package is using mixed macros as explained by Paul in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198758#c4 Either use %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT 3)I think with README, NEWS, COPYING, AUTHOR these file TODO is also important so that let the user know what things AUTHOR is interested to implement in future versions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 11:24:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 07:24:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198878] New: Review Request: mutagen - Python module to handle audio metadata Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198878 Summary: Review Request: mutagen - Python module to handle audio metadata Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: mr.ecik at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ecik.zspswidwin.pl/mutagen/mutagen.spec SRPM URL: http://ecik.zspswidwin.pl/mutagen/mutagen-1.5.1-1.src.rpm Description: Hi! Recently, I was writing an application which uses mutagen to handle metadata. So I think that would be good if all packages needed by my app was in Extras! Mutagen supports reading ID3 (all versions), APEv2, FLAC, and Ogg Vorbis/FLAC/Theora. It can write ID3v1.1, ID3v2.4, APEv2, FLAC, and Ogg Vorbis/FLAC/Theora comments. It can also read MPEG audio and Xing headers, FLAC stream info blocks, and Ogg Vorbis/FLAC/Theora stream headers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 11:31:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 07:31:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198879] New: Review Request: kdnssd-avahi Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198879 Summary: Review Request: kdnssd-avahi Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: prockai at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/kdnssd-avahi.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/kdnssd-avahi-0.1.2-6.20060713svn.src.rpm Description: KDE zeroconf implementation based on avahi The default upstream-provided zeroconf support in KDE (kdnssd) depends on Apple mDNSresponder, which is covered by APSL. The currently shipped KDE in FC has no zeroconf support whatsoever. This package, together with some changes to kdelibs package should provide KDE with zeroconf functionality. Thanks go to Rex Dieter for working on this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 11:44:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 07:44:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198880] New: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-DNS Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198880 Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-DNS Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Component-Client-DNS.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Component-Client-DNS-0.99-0.fc5.src.rpm Description: POE::Component::Client::DNS provides a facility for non-blocking, concurrent DNS requests. Using POE, it allows other tasks to run while waiting for name servers to respond. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 11:50:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 07:50:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198881] New: Review Request: perl-perl-POE-Filter-IRCD Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198881 Summary: Review Request: perl-perl-POE-Filter-IRCD Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Filter-IRCD.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Filter-IRCD-1.7-0.fc5.src.rpm Description: POE::Filter::IRCD provides a convenient way of parsing and creating IRC protocol lines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 11:56:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 07:56:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198882] New: Review Request: perl-perl-POE-Component-IRC Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198882 Summary: Review Request: perl-perl-POE-Component-IRC Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Component-IRC.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Component-IRC-4.95-0.fc5.src.rpm Description: POE::Component::IRC is a POE component (who'd have guessed?) which acts as an easily controllable IRC client for your other POE components and sessions. You create an IRC component and tell it what events your session cares about and where to connect to, and it sends back interesting IRC events when they happen. You make the client do things by sending it events. That's all there is to it. Cool, no? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 11:56:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 07:56:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198880] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-DNS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607141156.k6EBu8J7013671@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-DNS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198880 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |198882 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 11:56:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 07:56:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198881] Review Request: perl-perl-POE-Filter-IRCD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607141156.k6EBu9bj013681@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-perl-POE-Filter-IRCD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198881 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |198882 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 12:15:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 08:15:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198884] New: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-Keepalive Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198884 Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-Keepalive Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Component-Client-Keepalive.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Component-Client-Keepalive-0.0801-0.fc5.src.rpm Description: POE::Component::Client::Keepalive creates and manages connections for other components. It maintains a cache of kept-alive connections for quick reuse. It is written specifically for clients that can benefit from kept-alive connections, such as HTTP clients. Using it for one-shot connections would probably be silly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 12:15:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 08:15:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198880] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-DNS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607141215.k6ECFbHo014520@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-DNS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198880 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |198884 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 12:36:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 08:36:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198885] New: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198885 Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP-0.76-0.fc5.src.rpm Description: POE::Component::Client::HTTP is an HTTP user-agent for POE. It lets other sessions run while HTTP transactions are being processed, and it lets several HTTP transactions be processed in parallel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 12:36:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 08:36:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198884] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-Keepalive In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607141236.k6ECalXN015150@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-Keepalive https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198884 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |198885 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 12:57:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 08:57:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198839] Review Request: sear - WorldForge client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607141257.k6ECvJBW016677@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sear - WorldForge client Alias: sear https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198839 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2006-07-14 08:48 EST ------- it wont start without having wfut installed and we also need a media package for offline usage (e.g. world building purposes) id recommend to start with the dependencies now and get those out so we can minimize the work that has to be done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 14:02:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 10:02:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198878] Review Request: mutagen - Python module to handle audio metadata In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607141402.k6EE2Zmb020059@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mutagen - Python module to handle audio metadata https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198878 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-14 09:53 EST ------- I forgot to write that this is my first package and I need a sponsor :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 14:05:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 10:05:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196748] Review Request: setroubleshoot - automatic diagnosis of SELinux problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607141405.k6EE5SvL020218@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setroubleshoot - automatic diagnosis of SELinux problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196748 ------- Additional Comments From jdennis at redhat.com 2006-07-14 09:56 EST ------- ping, is this in for FC6t2? I haven't heard anything explicit and the freeze date is approaching, just checking. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 14:21:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 10:21:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198878] Review Request: mutagen - Python module to handle audio metadata In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607141421.k6EELGVe020931@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mutagen - Python module to handle audio metadata https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198878 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 14:27:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 10:27:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198245] Review Request: gnome-libs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607141427.k6EERRhq021270@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-libs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198245 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |198897 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 14:31:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 10:31:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195363] Review Request: esc and esc-xulrunner-devel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607141431.k6EEVxKe021628@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esc and esc-xulrunner-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195363 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(jmagne at redhat.com) ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2006-07-14 10:23 EST ------- So the esc-xulrunner-devel package is sort of weird. First, we don't normally put -devel in the name of srpms. -devel is usually reserved for subpackages. Also, you install all header files, images, config files, stylesheets, binaries, etc into %{_libdir}. Normally we put header files in %{_includedir}, images in %{_datadir}, binaries in %{_bindir}, etc. On the other hand, esc-xulrunner-devel is only needed for building esc, yea? not for running esc? Why are we installing it as a separate package at all then? Can we just put the xulrunner tarball as an extra Source: line in the spec file and get rid of esc-xulrunner-devel entirely? Also, I tried to build the two packages and ran into problems. esc looks for something called nsinstall in wrong place. I had to create a symlink for the build to finish. After I got it built, it didn't work with our cert server. It gave me an error code 44 or something. This actually brings up another point. This tool only works with a closed source certificate server that most in the fedora community don't have access to. Maybe it would be better if we put this in extras instead of core? What do you think? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 14:32:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 10:32:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198836] Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607141432.k6EEWlfL021687@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198836 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-07-14 10:23 EST ------- > %package utils > Summary: A collection of FreeType 1.x utilities > Group: System Environment/Libraries > Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} > # Upgrade path > Provides: freetype-utils = 2.2.0-1 > Obsoletes: freetype-utils < 2.2.0-1 Very ugly. At the time this freetype-utils sub-package was introduced, it should have started at 1.x, not 2.x. You could still do that with a proper Epoch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 14:41:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 10:41:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198899] New: Review Request: exim Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198899 Summary: Review Request: exim Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: dwmw2 at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://david.woodhou.se/exim.spec SRPM URL: http://david.woodhou.se/exim-4.62-3.el5.src.rpm Description: The Exim MTA. Existing RHEL4 package, now in Extras, needs to be in RHEL5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 14:43:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 10:43:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198285] Review Request: python-simplejson - Simple, fast, extensible JSON encoder/decoder for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607141443.k6EEhuNN022639@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-simplejson - Simple, fast, extensible JSON encoder/decoder for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198285 lmacken at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |189338 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 14:44:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 10:44:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198289] Review Request: python-pastescript - A pluggable command-line frontend In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607141444.k6EEi81J022667@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pastescript - A pluggable command-line frontend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198289 lmacken at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |189338 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 14:44:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 10:44:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198288] Review Request: python-pastedeploy - Load, configure, and compose WSGI applications and servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607141444.k6EEiJC5022690@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pastedeploy - Load, configure, and compose WSGI applications and servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198288 lmacken at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |189338 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 14:44:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 10:44:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198287] Review Request: python-paste - Tools for using a Web Server Gateway Interface stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607141444.k6EEiUJe022712@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-paste - Tools for using a Web Server Gateway Interface stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198287 lmacken at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |189338 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 14:44:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 10:44:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198284] Review Request: python-configobj - Config file reading, writing, and validation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607141444.k6EEiVi5022725@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-configobj - Config file reading, writing, and validation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198284 lmacken at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |189338 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 15:12:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 11:12:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196146] Review Request: mod_nss In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607141512.k6EFCX0F024503@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_nss https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196146 ------- Additional Comments From rcritten at redhat.com 2006-07-14 11:03 EST ------- Thanks for the thorough review! The spec and SRPM files are updated. Here are specific responses: 1. Done, added source url 2. Removed extraneous BuildRequires (left over from the httpd spec file I initially used as a template) 3. AutoReq isn't needed, removed 4. Added quotes around $RPM_OPT_FLAGS 5. Using %configure over ./configure 6. Switched to smp_mflags 7. $DESTDIR removed fro make 8. Using appropriate macros 9. Yes, I was worried about the lib64 thing, macros make things much easier 10. Ok, removed -s from install. 11. Yes, better to have RPM own the alias dir 12. using macros instead to resolve issue 13. Using symlink as recommended 14. Keeping cert8.db, key3.db and secmod.db is desired when the RPM is removed. These files contain any certificates that were issued and any private key material. One should have to be very conscious when removing these files as certificates can be an expensive proposition. 15. Added %dir for alias directory The only warning I see now is the dangling symlink. Because this depends on the NSS package this file will always exist, so I think it's relatively safe. While it's true that mod_nss has an install target it is cleaner to do it by hand. We are only installing a couple of files anyway. If it really causes heartburn I can see about switching to that but most Apache modules are installed by hand this way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 15:55:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 11:55:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198816] Review Request: gfs-utils - global file system userland utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607141555.k6EFtpco027778@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-utils - global file system userland utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198816 ------- Additional Comments From cfeist at redhat.com 2006-07-14 11:46 EST ------- Thanks, this has been fixed. New files are here: http://people.redhat.com/cfeist/gfs-utils.spec http://people.redhat.com/cfeist/gfs-utils-0.1.0-0.fc6.1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 16:15:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 12:15:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198879] Review Request: kdnssd-avahi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607141615.k6EGFha1029037@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdnssd-avahi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198879 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-07-14 12:07 EST ------- Ok from a tech persepctive. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 16:55:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 12:55:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198835] Review Request: Atlas-C++ - WorldForge message protocol library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607141655.k6EGtHKU031362@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Atlas-C++ - WorldForge message protocol library Alias: Atlas-C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198835 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-14 12:46 EST ------- I'm concerned about the potential for conflict with the existing atlas package in Extras: The ATLAS (Automatically Tuned Linear Algebra Software) project is an ongoing research effort focusing on applying empirical techniques in order to provide portable performance. At present, it provides C and Fortran77 interfaces to a portably efficient BLAS implementation, as well as a few routines from LAPACK. The current naming makes this package look like it supplies C++ bindings for atlas. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 17:00:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 13:00:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198922] New: Review Request: dejavu-lgc-fonts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198922 Summary: Review Request: dejavu-lgc-fonts Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: besfahbo at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~behdad/fedora/dejavu-lgc-fonts/dejavu-lgc-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~behdad/fedora/dejavu-lgc-fonts/dejavu-lgc-fonts-2.7-1.src.rpm Description: The DejaVu LGC fonts are high-quality Latin/Greek/Cyrillic fonts based on Bitstream Vera fonts ((http://gnome.org/fonts/)). Its purpose is to provide a wider range of characters while maintaining the original look and feel. Discussion: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170218 Matthias Clasen and I decided to only push the Latin/Greek/Cyrillic version into core. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 17:02:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 13:02:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198922] Review Request: dejavu-lgc-fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607141702.k6EH2Rw0031738@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dejavu-lgc-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198922 ------- Additional Comments From besfahbo at redhat.com 2006-07-14 12:53 EST ------- Lacks fontconfig configuration right now. Working on it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 17:21:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 13:21:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195363] Review Request: esc and esc-xulrunner-devel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607141721.k6EHLX8U032744@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esc and esc-xulrunner-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195363 jmagne at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(jmagne at redhat.com)| ------- Additional Comments From jmagne at redhat.com 2006-07-14 13:12 EST ------- Thanks for the comments: Yes, esc-xulrunner-devel is only needed for esc to build against. Also ESC privately deploys the xulrunner directory which is output by the xulrunner build. It would be no big deal to simply build xulrunner as part of the ESC build. As for the nsinstall problem I have not seen that here. Have you any log snippets of that build failure? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 17:23:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 13:23:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198881] Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-IRCD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607141723.k6EHNJRq000344@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-IRCD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198881 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: perl-perl- |Review Request: perl-POE- |POE-Filter-IRCD |Filter-IRCD -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 17:23:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 13:23:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198882] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-IRC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607141723.k6EHNw2A000364@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-IRC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198882 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: perl-perl- |Review Request: perl-POE- |POE-Component-IRC |Component-IRC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 17:35:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 13:35:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195363] Review Request: esc and esc-xulrunner-devel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607141735.k6EHZNSk000801@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esc and esc-xulrunner-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195363 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2006-07-14 13:26 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=132450) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=132450&action=view) build log of failure It looks like it's assuming the esc-xulrunner-devel build dir is still around. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 17:42:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 13:42:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198829] Review Request: wfmath - WorldForge math libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607141742.k6EHgH4V001654@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wfmath - WorldForge math libraries Alias: wfmath https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198829 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-07-14 13:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > ==== MUST ==== > - Add Requires: pkgconfg to devel package > - package does not contain a %check section > - make check fails on 1 test, investigate why (FAIL: intstring_test) I'll contact upstream and see if they have a fix or explanation for this test failure. It seems to only fail on x86_64, not i386. I'll make a new package once the test failure is resolved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 17:57:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 13:57:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198247] Review Request: libpng10 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607141757.k6EHvK3J002660@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpng10 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198247 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |195858 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 18:00:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 14:00:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198835] Review Request: Atlas-C++ - WorldForge message protocol library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607141800.k6EI0G2s002743@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Atlas-C++ - WorldForge message protocol library Alias: Atlas-C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198835 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-07-14 13:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > -rpmlint output: > W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 > _ZNK5Atlas9Exception4whatEv ... rpmlint on FC4 x86_64 and FC5 i386 both missed this one. > === MUST === > - Add Requires: pkgconfig to devel package Done. > - Comments say test fails on FC6, but infact it is failing on all x86_64 arches > because of an x86_64 warning. Patch the code to not use -Werror so that checks > can be run I think it would be better just to fix the test code and keep the -Werror. This might get sent upstream. > - Fix linking of all the .so files, they should be linked with -lAtlas and > libAtlas needs to be built first. I wonder if this is a smp_mflags build > - Explain why you do not build with optional zlib or libbz2 Because I didn't notice the configure output? :) > - README indicates that this package requires socket streams such as skstream, > explain why this is not in the Requires It probably should be. But since the package that Requires: this one also Requires: skstream directly, I didn't catch this. > - Why are man pages in doc/man not installed? Oversight. I've added most of them. Others are not included as they contain the build root path in the man page name (probably some doxygen artifact) > - Should tutoral/ be installed? No. These are doxygen sources. The tutorial is included in %doc doc/html > - Fix license to match actual license Fixed. > - Fix Source0 URL so that I can actually verify the upstream source is 0.6.0 > actually out yet? Works for me? > - Why name Atlas-C++ instead of atlascpp? Because even though upstream uses both Atlas-C++ and atlas-cpp, the former best matches the actual tarball name. I'll post a new srpm once the tests have been fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 18:10:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 14:10:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196146] Review Request: mod_nss In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607141810.k6EIAIWt003073@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_nss https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196146 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-07-14 14:01 EST ------- Additional review, based on new spec and details in comment #13: 1) The switch to %configure actually eliminates the need to pass --libdir, --sbindir and --sysconfdir (which based on ./configure --help, should actually be /etc, not /etc/httpd/conf.d). The %configure macro sets those automatically. So those three lines after %configure should be removed. 2) Going back to item 14 in comment #12 and #13... The 'create dummy files then replace in %post' trick I threw together actually does leave the files around when the RPM is removed, %config(noreplace) makes that happen. They're renamed w/an appended .rpmsave if the package is removed. # rpm -e mod_nss warning: /etc/httpd/alias/secmod.db saved as /etc/httpd/alias/secmod.db.rpmsave warning: /etc/httpd/alias/key3.db saved as /etc/httpd/alias/key3.db.rpmsave warning: /etc/httpd/alias/cert8.db saved as /etc/httpd/alias/cert8.db.rpmsave So this route leaves us not deleting the files, addressing your (very valid) concern and also makes them owned by the package. Win-win, no? :) 3) For consistency, you shouldn't have spaces between lines within a single %files section, I'd cut the extra lines after %defattr and %doc. 4) I poked around at the Makefile a bit to see if using make install was feasible. The main issue appears to be that 'make install' uses apxs to put the module in place, but apxs tries to be too smart for its own good, and install and activate the module in the buildhost's httpd, rather than in the buildroot. Would require a bit of Makefile hacking to get a viable 'make install', so putting the bits in place by hand is understandable and acceptable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 18:19:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 14:19:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198839] Review Request: sear - WorldForge client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607141819.k6EIJEeC003800@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sear - WorldForge client Alias: sear https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198839 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-07-14 14:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > it wont start without having wfut installed and we also need a media package for > offline usage (e.g. world building purposes) Darn. I forgot about wfut. I have a package based on the cvs sources that you can use to test sear, but it's probably best to wait for upstream to release an official tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 18:35:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 14:35:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198835] Review Request: Atlas-C++ - WorldForge message protocol library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607141835.k6EIZYxb005291@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Atlas-C++ - WorldForge message protocol library Alias: Atlas-C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198835 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-07-14 14:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > -rpmlint output: > W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 Which dist and version of rpmlint (rpm -q rpmlint) are you running that produced this warning? I can't reproduce it on FC4-x86_64 or FC5-i386. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 18:39:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 14:39:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198835] Review Request: Atlas-C++ - WorldForge message protocol library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607141839.k6EId6at005823@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Atlas-C++ - WorldForge message protocol library Alias: Atlas-C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198835 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-07-14 14:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > I'm concerned about the potential for conflict with the existing atlas package > in Extras: ... > > The current naming makes this package look like it supplies C++ bindings for atlas. Upstream's name is unfortunate in this sense, but I think it's better to preserve upstream's naming than to change it to something different. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 19:04:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 15:04:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198834] Review Request: sage - OpenGL extensions library using SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607141904.k6EJ4kOn008472@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sage - OpenGL extensions library using SDL Alias: sage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198834 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-07-14 14:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > ==== MUST ==== > - devel package should Requires: pkgconfig Done. > - use %{_mandir} instead of %{_datadir}/man Done. > - notify upstream about --disable-static failure I don't think all configure scripts support --disable-static anyway. I'll just remove the flag and the comment. > - fix license to match upstream license Fixed. > - had to download source from: > http://dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/worldforge/sage-0.1.2.tar.gz > Source0 should be updated accordingly The current URL works for me? This might be caused by some SF mirror selection nonsense. It seems that some mirrors insert 'sourceforge/' into the download url paths. > ==== SHOULD ===== > - add a %check even though it doesnt do anything now, it may in future Done. http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/sage-0.1.2-2.src.rpm http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/sage.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 19:05:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 15:05:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197967] Review Request: gkrellm - Multiple stacked system monitors in one process In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607141905.k6EJ5xm6008564@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gkrellm - Multiple stacked system monitors in one process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197967 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-14 14:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > I'm a firm believer in that users/groups created by packages should *not* be > erased when the package is removed, and won't set myself as the reviewer because > of that. Let me know if you're willing to leave them behind when erasing > -daemon, and I'll take care of the review. > Sure, that sounds reasonable, how does one pick up the leftover user when the user decides to reinstall the package later? > Anyway, a couple of comments: > > The switch to lm_sensors means that ppc will need special treatment, as > lm_sensors is not (nor obviously -devel) available for it. ExcludeArch: ppc > would sound like a regression. > That patch was written in communicatiopn with upstream and is going to appear in the next upstream release. All the changes are wrapped in #ifdef HAVE_LIBSENSORS, hence the adding of -DHAVE_LIBSENSORS to CFLAGS. I'll make the adding off that conditionally with %ifarch, does that sound ok? > -daemon has grown a "Provides: gkrellm-server" for no apparent reason, and > -daemon has become self-obsoleting because of that, which may or may not cause > problems. I'd suggest removing it and adding a "< $some_known_version-$release" > to Obsoletes: gkrellm-server. > Erm rpmlint complains without it. I'll remove the Provides. Are you sure this makes a package self obsoleting? > There's a mismatch between %install and %files where the former uses various > hardcoded paths while the latter uses macros (at least /etc vs %{_sysconfdir}). I'll do a new version with %{_sysconfdir} everywhere + other fixes once I've got a reply to my above remarks / questions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 19:19:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 15:19:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198922] Review Request: dejavu-lgc-fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607141919.k6EJJdPX009304@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dejavu-lgc-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198922 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-07-14 15:10 EST ------- Tech ack. Are we not obsoleting Vera? Out of curiousity, what locales does this give us *new* coverage with, outside of Greek? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 19:20:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 15:20:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198835] Review Request: Atlas-C++ - WorldForge message protocol library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607141920.k6EJK1m6009333@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Atlas-C++ - WorldForge message protocol library Alias: Atlas-C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198835 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-07-14 15:11 EST ------- In order to get the rpmlint warnings, you must install the rpm first, then run "rpmlint Atlas-C++" As far as the name is concerned, all the configure files that check for this package use the name "atlascpp", as well the web page uses this term as well. Since this also conforms more with Fedora naming standards I think the package should be renamed to this. Whatever you decide to name it, you should have a provides with the other name to cover all bases. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 19:22:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 15:22:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198287] Review Request: python-paste - Tools for using a Web Server Gateway Interface stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607141922.k6EJMfDG009582@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-paste - Tools for using a Web Server Gateway Interface stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198287 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-14 15:13 EST ------- I had that for my Paste packaging attempt: # clean docs directory pushd docs rm StyleGuide.txt *.css */*.css rebuild doc.conf template.tmpl */*.js popd rpmlint has some errors that should certainly be fixed: E: python-paste non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/paste/util/scgiserver.py 0644 E: python-paste non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/paste/debug/doctest_webapp.py 0644 For scgiserver.py I believe it should be patched to have the shebang removed. For doctest_webapp.py it isn't obvious, maybe it can be run standalone, in that case the permissions should be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 19:29:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 15:29:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175047] Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607141929.k6EJTNWb010096@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175047 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-14 15:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #27) > Hans, are you going to sponsor this now? Tim, I'm not sponsering it (the package) but you. Packages get approved and any FE contributer can approve, sponsering is about giving a person access to the the CVS-server, buildsys etc. And I'm not sure about this yet. You seem to come and go you said you would be away untill the 20st of june and I said that wouldn't be a problem, it however got somewhat longer. Even though we are all volunteers we expect a certain amount of involvement from contributers, this starts with responding to communications in a timeley matter. Besides this there also is the issue that in order to get CVS and buildsys access you must first show a thorough understanding of the Fedora Extras guidelines and procedures. Usually just having one package in approvable state (it cannot be approved until you are sponsored) is not enough to show this understanding, possible ways of showing this understanding are: 1) reviewing other peoples packages (note add a note to the review that you aren't sponsored / a contributer yet and thus cannot do official reviews / approve. When you do this put me in the CC of the bug so I know that you're doing this 2) create a couple of more packages and let me know then I'll review this and the others and usually after 2 or 3 packages I'm satisfied that you know what you're doing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 19:33:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 15:33:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198928] New: Review Request:
Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198928 Summary: Review Request:
Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: coldwell at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/coldwell/lsscsi.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/coldwell/lsscsi-0.17-2.src.rpm Description: Uses information provided by the sysfs pseudo file system in Linux kernel 2.6 series to list SCSI devices or all SCSI hosts. Includes a "classic" option to mimic the output of "cat /proc/scsi/scsi" that has been widely used prior to the lk 2.6 series. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 19:34:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 15:34:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198928] Review Request: lsscsi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607141934.k6EJYqeg010432@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lsscsi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198928 coldwell at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 19:38:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 15:38:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197967] Review Request: gkrellm - Multiple stacked system monitors in one process In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607141938.k6EJca0f010807@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gkrellm - Multiple stacked system monitors in one process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197967 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-07-14 15:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Sure, that sounds reasonable, how does one pick up the leftover user when the > user decides to reinstall the package later? It already works that way due to "|| :" in the useradd/groupadd lines. > All the changes are wrapped in #ifdef > HAVE_LIBSENSORS, hence the adding of -DHAVE_LIBSENSORS to CFLAGS. I'll make > the adding off that conditionally with %ifarch, does that sound ok? Fine with me; I assume the sensors functionality wasn't available on PPC in earlier versions either. Someone who uses this on PPC, please correct if I'm wrong. Oh, and BR: lm_sensors-devel needs to be %ifarch'ed too. > Erm rpmlint complains without it. I'll remove the Provides. Actually, I think it's time for both Provides/Obsoletes: gkrellm-server to go. The obsoletes was added in a patch I submitted almost three years ago (see Oct 09 2003 in %changelog), it was added back then in order to provide clean upgrades from some 3rd party packages, but I no longer remember the details. > Are you sure this makes a package self obsoleting? It does obsolete something that it also provides, and I cannot come up with a reason why doing so would ever be desirable. Modern depsolvers probably won't choke on/ do odd things with that any more though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 20:01:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 16:01:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196146] Review Request: mod_nss In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607142001.k6EK1nND012661@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_nss https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196146 ------- Additional Comments From rcritten at redhat.com 2006-07-14 15:53 EST ------- The spec and SRPM files are updated. 1. Bah, my mistake. I was experimenting with using the make install target and accidentally left that in. Removed. 2. Ok, you've convinved me. I made a few minor changes though. When determining if we need to generate a database we only need to check one of the files. They do not stand alone but work together in concert, so if one is temporary it is safe to assume they all are. I switched to checking key3.db since that is the most important file. I also modified the deletion install test. I'm using if [ "$1" -eq 0 ] which from the RPM docs means "Remove last version of package". I tested it and it seems to work ok for me. 3. Removed the extra lines. Must be a style thing. 4. Great news. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 20:18:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 16:18:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197827] Review Request: perl-Net-SSLeay In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607142018.k6EKI4NQ013362@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SSLeay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197827 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO_REPORTER ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-14 16:09 EST ------- Warren, fix the changelog entry, remove the Provides lines that aren't needed any more (extras uses module names for deps), and fix the file permissions, then this can come in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 20:20:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 16:20:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197826] Review Request: perl-IO-Socket-SSL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607142020.k6EKKSkM013584@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Socket-SSL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197826 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|188267 |188268 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-14 16:11 EST ------- Looks good. approving. Adding to dist. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 20:30:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 16:30:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196146] Review Request: mod_nss In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607142030.k6EKUnrQ014412@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_nss https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196146 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-07-14 16:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > 2. Ok, you've convinved me. I made a few minor changes though. When determining > if we need to generate a database we only need to check one of the files. They > do not stand alone but work together in concert, so if one is temporary it is > safe to assume they all are. I switched to checking key3.db since that is the > most important file. > > I also modified the deletion install test. I'm using if [ "$1" -eq 0 ] which > from the RPM docs means "Remove last version of package". I tested it and it > seems to work ok for me. Heh, actually, no it doesn't. :) $1 being 0 isn't possible in the %post context, only %postun and %preun, see "Running scriptlets only in certain situations" at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines. RPM itself does the work that you're seeing, renaming them with .rpmsave. I added that extra little bit for the edge case where the user has no mod_nss rpm installed, but does have the .db files there, then installs the rpm, so they wouldn't be overwritten by %post. It probably makes more sense to do nothing at all in %post on install if we find .db files that don't have that temp string in them -- then we just end up with .rpmnew files and the existing .db files. Now that I ponder it, I think this makes the most sense for that section: umask 077 if [ "$1" -eq 1 ] ; then if [ `grep -c "temporary file" %{_sysconfdir}/httpd/alias/key3.db` -eq 1 ]; then rm -f %{_sysconfdir}/httpd/alias/{secmod,cert8,key3}.db %{_sbindir}/gencert %{_sysconfdir}/httpd/alias > %{_sysconfdir}/httpd/alias/install.log 2>&1 echo "" echo "%{name} certificate database generated." echo "" fi fi Results on install with this tweak: rpm -ivh /build/RPMS/x86_64/mod_nss-1.0.3-1.fc5.x86_64.rpm Preparing... ########################################### [100%] 1:mod_nss warning: /etc/httpd/alias/cert8.db created as /etc/httpd/alias/cert8.db.rpmnew warning: /etc/httpd/alias/key3.db created as /etc/httpd/alias/key3.db.rpmnew warning: /etc/httpd/alias/secmod.db created as /etc/httpd/alias/secmod.db.rpmnew ########################################### [100%] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 20:45:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 16:45:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198837] Review Request: eris - Client-side session layer for Atlas-C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607142045.k6EKjHNo015477@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eris - Client-side session layer for Atlas-C++ Alias: eris https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198837 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-07-14 16:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > ==== MUST ==== > - Remove pkgconfig from BuildRequries, this should be picked up by the devel > packages > - Fix changelog version number > - "outpu" in description should be "output" fixed, fixed, and fixed. > - Why is glib-2.0 not added in BuildRequires? I didn't see that it made any difference during the build, but I guess upstream has it there for a reason. Added. > - Add a %check section Added. The first time I ran this on FC4-x86_64 in mock, the tests hung. The next few times it was ok. I'll keep an eye on the build system and disable the tests if they cause problems. > - %doc in devel should be docs/html/* Fixed. http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/eris-1.3.11-2.src.rpm http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/eris.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 20:48:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 16:48:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198944] New: Review Request: compiz Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198944 Summary: Review Request: compiz Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: krh at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/krh/compiz/compiz.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/krh/compiz/compiz-0.0.13-5.1.fc6.src.rpm Description: compiz - open gl windows and compositing manager with patches to run on aiglx in fedora core. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 21:01:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 17:01:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196146] Review Request: mod_nss In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607142101.k6EL1gNp016532@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_nss https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196146 ------- Additional Comments From rcritten at redhat.com 2006-07-14 16:53 EST ------- Files updated. Ok, this method works for me. I think that the only time the rpmnew files would be if someone went in and created a database BEFORE installing mod_nss for the first time. I consider this fairly unlikely. And even so, there will be no data loss. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 21:09:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 17:09:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193894] Review Request: ant-contrib - A collection of tasks for Ant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607142109.k6EL9vUd016782@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ant-contrib - A collection of tasks for Ant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193894 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-14 17:01 EST ------- Your SRPM indeed seems corrupt, but thats no problem since all I need in this stage of the review is the spec. Everything looks good now. About the classpath in the .jar. I've followed the discusion on f-e-l and the java knowledge I once possesed is slowly coming back. I think that the classpath in this caseis completly useless. A classpath in a manifest is afaik to indicate that that jar needs other classes/jars loaded to function, so refering to yourself is useless. Could you try completly removing the classpath line from the jar and then see if things till works. Except for the classpath issue this package is approvable. I would like us to walk through the review of one other package before I sponsor you, which one would you like me to review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 21:35:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 17:35:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198831] Review Request: varconf - Configuration library used by WorldForge apps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607142135.k6ELZgcv018098@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: varconf - Configuration library used by WorldForge apps Alias: varconf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198831 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-07-14 17:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > ==== MUST ==== > - devel package should have Requires: pkgconfig > - make check should use smp flags > - make check should be patched to work, (not ||:) all you need to do is add > #include > once conftest is created, you need to: cd tests ; ./conftest < conf.cfg > - fix license to match actual upstream license All fixed: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/varconf-0.6.4-2.src.rpm http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/varconf.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 21:44:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 17:44:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189886] Review Request: FluidSynth - Real-time software synthesizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607142144.k6ELiNrV018985@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FluidSynth - Real-time software synthesizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189886 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-14 17:35 EST ------- Looks good, approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 21:48:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 17:48:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196591] Review Request: bitlbee In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607142148.k6ELm9p6019301@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitlbee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196591 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-14 17:39 EST ------- This (longish) message during ./configure worries me: --------------------------- No detection code exists for OpenSSL. Make sure that you have a complete install of OpenSSL (including devel/header files) before reporting compilation problems. Also, keep in mind that the OpenSSL is, according to some people, not completely GPL-compatible. Using GnuTLS or NSS is recommended and better supported by us. However, on many BSD machines, OpenSSL can be considered part of the operating system, which makes it GPL-compatible. For more info, see: http://www.openssl.org/support/faq.html#LEGAL2 http://www.gnome.org/~markmc/openssl-and-the-gpl.html Please note that distributing a BitlBee binary which links to OpenSSL is probably illegal. If you want to create and distribute a binary BitlBee package, you really should use GnuTLS or NSS instead. Also, the OpenSSL license requires us to say this: * "This product includes software developed by the OpenSSL Project * for use in the OpenSSL Toolkit. (http://www.openssl.org/)" --------------------------- The prototypical casual observer in me asks, "Wouldn't it be better to compile this against gnutls?" If there are compelling reasons to compile against openssl, I suspect FE-LEGAL should be blocked by this bug as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 21:50:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 17:50:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197981] Review Request: gkrellm-wifi - Wireless monitor plugin for the GNU Krell Monitors In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607142150.k6ELovU1019528@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gkrellm-wifi - Wireless monitor plugin for the GNU Krell Monitors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197981 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |197967 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 21:51:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 17:51:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197967] Review Request: gkrellm - Multiple stacked system monitors in one process In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607142151.k6ELpJfC019564@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gkrellm - Multiple stacked system monitors in one process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197967 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |197981 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 22:19:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 18:19:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196591] Review Request: bitlbee In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607142219.k6EMJuOg020626@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitlbee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196591 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2006-07-14 18:11 EST ------- IMHO neither GnuTLS nor NSS are providing the same like OpenSSL, otherwise we wouldn't ship OpenSSL within Core, right? What is the (possible) legal problem you are seeing? At least from my personal understanding any binary linking to OpenSSL could be illegal when the local law conflicts with encryption. For me this sounds similar like at the mp3 stuff... I'm building per default using OpenSSL, because every Fedora Core user has this package installed and it is used by many applications (rpm -e --test openssl). If possible, I want to cause less new dependencies and I also don't want to force FE users to install another package/library when the already available one does the same. Blocking FE-Legal now, waiting for official response because of the "probably illegal", even when I can't see any real reason. Somebody of the legal people has to remove this blocking when it's resolved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 22:40:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 18:40:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198832] Review Request: skstream - C++ I/O library for WorldForge apps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607142240.k6EMeSdu021635@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: skstream - C++ I/O library for WorldForge apps Alias: skstream https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198832 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-07-14 18:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > ==== MUST ==== > - Add Requires: pkgconfig to devel package Done. > - Explain why this is not compiled with optional zlib library I don't see that zlib is used anywhere? When I added BR: zlib-devel and compared the build logs, I didn't see any difference. Where did you see something that indicated that zlib could be used? > - contact upstream about make docs error Will do. > ==== NOTES ==== > - make check has some failures, but these are okay, they require the echo > service to be enabled or b> - rpmlint output: > W: skstream-devel no-documentation Updated files: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/skstream-0.3.5-2.src.rpm http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/skstream.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 14 22:54:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 18:54:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197827] Review Request: perl-Net-SSLeay In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607142254.k6EMsfwh022614@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SSLeay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197827 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|188267 |188268 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-14 18:45 EST ------- Warren reports the fixes are in CVS, approving package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 02:02:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 22:02:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198928] Review Request: lsscsi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607150202.k6F22KjI029434@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lsscsi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198928 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-14 21:53 EST ------- Are you sponsored into extras yet (as I'm not seeing you on the cvsextras page). If not, you should mark this bug as blocking FE-NEEDSPONSOR. A couple thoughts on the spec, off the top of my head: * The macros you have defined at the top are rather redundant, as you use them to then populate the Name:, Version:, Release: tags, all of which (when populated) define macros of the same names you're using containing the exact same information. * You're using both, e.g., $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot}. Either or is fine, but the packaging guidelines require us to be consistent within a specfile (this is a "MUST"). * In build, why not use "%configure"? Similarly, in install, why not "%makeinstall"? Both of those macros should take care of passing the information you're doing manually. (Also, it would quiet rpmlint about "E: lsscsi configure-without-libdir-spec".) * There may be comments on the test before "rm -rf ..." in %clean. I think it's ok, as it will always evaluate to true in the buildsys, but it could be nixed for brevity's sake. That being said, I've built and installed this package on my system. Works nicely for me, even against my SATA drives. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 02:33:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 22:33:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198944] Review Request: compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607150233.k6F2XrfC029861@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198944 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-14 22:25 EST ------- Note that there's an existing compiz review ticket pending for Extras. What should happen to it? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192432 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 03:00:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 23:00:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198834] Review Request: sage - OpenGL extensions library using SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607150300.k6F305A7031226@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sage - OpenGL extensions library using SDL Alias: sage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198834 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-14 22:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > > - notify upstream about --disable-static failure > > I don't think all configure scripts support --disable-static anyway. > I'll just remove the flag and the comment. 1. All autoconf-based packages must accept all --disable/enable flags. This package does. 2. This package supports --disable-static (==--enable-static=no) ./configure --help .. --enable-static[=PKGS] build static libraries [default=yes] .. 3. I do not see that --disable-static would not work for this package. BLOCKER: The package does not honor RPM_OPT_FLAGS correctly. It appends -O3 to CFLAGS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 03:16:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 23:16:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189886] Review Request: FluidSynth - Real-time software synthesizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607150316.k6F3GIa3031635@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FluidSynth - Real-time software synthesizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189886 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-07-14 23:07 EST ------- Thanks. AG. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 03:16:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 23:16:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191538] Review Request: qsynth - Qt based Fluidsynth GUI front end In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607150316.k6F3GqDU031684@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qsynth - Qt based Fluidsynth GUI front end https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191538 Bug 191538 depends on bug 189886, which changed state. Bug 189886 Summary: Review Request: FluidSynth - Real-time software synthesizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189886 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 05:10:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 01:10:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198878] Review Request: mutagen - Python module to handle audio metadata In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607150510.k6F5AOGi002579@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mutagen - Python module to handle audio metadata https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198878 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-15 01:01 EST ------- == Not an official review as I'm not yet sponsored == Mock build for rawhide i386 is sucessfull * MUST Items: - rpmlint shows errors as E: mutagen no-binary W: mutagen wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/mutagen-1.5.1/TUTORIAL E: mutagen non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/mutagen/__init__.py 0644 - dist tag is present. - The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - The spec file name matching the base package mutagen, in the format mutagen.spec. - This package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - The spec file for the package MUST be legible. - The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license GPL. - This package includes License file COPYING. - This source package includes the text of the license in its own file,and that file, containing the text of the license for the package is included in %doc. - The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. md5sum is correct (9ce5d5f14e02f2eabd919d6bdaebadbc) - This package successfully compiled and built into binary rpms for i386 architecture. - This package did not containd any ExcludeArch. - This package owns all directories that it creates. - This package did not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - This package have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. - This package used macros. - Document files are included like COPYING, NEWS, README, TUTORIAL. - Package did NOT contained any .la libtool archives. Also, * Source URL is present and working. * BuildRoot is correct BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) What you Need to Do:- I think you dont need following line if you are building for only fc5 Requires: python-abi = %(%{__python} -c "import sys ; print sys.version[:3]") BuildRequires: python-devel also try to clean %files section of SPEC as %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc COPYING NEWS README TUTORIAL %{_bindir}/* %{_mandir}/man*/*gz %dir %{python_sitelib}/mutagen %{python_sitelib}/mutagen/*.py %{python_sitelib}/mutagen/*.pyc %ghost %{python_sitelib}/mutagen/*.pyo I removes those above Requires and modified %files as shown above and package built without any problem. For rpmlint errors, E: mutagen no-binary There is no mutagen named binary when i did python setup.py build in Source W: mutagen wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/mutagen-1.5.1/TUTORIAL I check TUTORIAL file but did not understood what is the problem. E: mutagen non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/mutagen/__init__.py 0644 I found other python packages are also having same __init__.py 0644 permissions. so why rpmlint report problem i confuesd? can anyone comment on this issues? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 05:19:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 01:19:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194470] Review Request: php-magickwand In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607150519.k6F5JP4h002679@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-magickwand https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194470 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-15 01:10 EST ------- Closing since this has been build for Development, currently its showing up in: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/PackageStatus As needs cleanup, so I'm cleaning up :) BTW, did you verify this package matches the recent "released" php packaging guidelines? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 05:21:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 01:21:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185799] Review Request: nessus-plugins-GPL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607150521.k6F5L2ru002750@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nessus-plugins-GPL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185799 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-15 01:12 EST ------- Removing from FE-REVIEW blocker list, since its no longer under review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 05:22:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 01:22:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194470] Review Request: php-magickwand In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607150522.k6F5MCoU002791@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-magickwand https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194470 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 05:23:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 01:23:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191492] Review Request: unuran-0.7.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607150523.k6F5Nc80002827@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unuran-0.7.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191492 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-15 01:14 EST ------- Neal, ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 05:56:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 01:56:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190045] Review Request: caps - A set of audio plugins for LADSPA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607150556.k6F5u50R004029@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: caps - A set of audio plugins for LADSPA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190045 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-07-15 01:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Without running any special script on the rpm, three orphaned > directories can be spotted due to missing ownership or missing > dependencies: > > /usr/lib/ladspa/ > /usr/share/ladspa/ > /usr/share/ladspa/rdf/ So should ladspa own /usr/lib/ladspa, /usr/share/ladspa and liblrdf own /usr/share/ladspa/rdf? This package could require those packages. The only weird thing is that apart from these directories, there are no other runtime dependencies on those things. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 06:21:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 02:21:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197967] Review Request: gkrellm - Multiple stacked system monitors in one process In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607150621.k6F6L6CB004569@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gkrellm - Multiple stacked system monitors in one process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197967 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-15 02:12 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=132475) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=132475&action=view) New specfile fixing discussed issues Here is a new specfile, sorry no URL, because I don't have upload access from this PC. Changes: * Sat Jul 15 2006 Hans de Goede 2.2.9-5 - Remove Obsoletes/Provides gkrellm-server - Don't remove user on uninstall - Only build with lm_sensors support on x86 / x86_64 since lm_sensors is not available on other archs. - Use %%{_sysconfdir} instead of /etc in %%install -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 06:30:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 02:30:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198835] Review Request: Atlas-C++ - WorldForge message protocol library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607150630.k6F6Us1r004725@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Atlas-C++ - WorldForge message protocol library Alias: Atlas-C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198835 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-07-15 02:22 EST ------- Ok, I'll concede to use atlascpp for the package name. Here's an updated package that I believe fixes all of the MUSTFIX issues: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/atlascpp-0.6.0-2.src.rpm http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/atlascpp.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 06:40:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 02:40:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198834] Review Request: sage - OpenGL extensions library using SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607150640.k6F6ecMH005129@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sage - OpenGL extensions library using SDL Alias: sage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198834 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-07-15 02:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > > - notify upstream about --disable-static failure > > > > I don't think all configure scripts support --disable-static anyway. > > I'll just remove the flag and the comment. > 1. All autoconf-based packages must accept all --disable/enable flags. > This package does. If you want to be pendantic, then yes, they all support it. But not all of them are guaranteed to do anything useful with it. > 2. This package supports --disable-static (==--enable-static=no) > ./configure --help You're right. The 'rm -f *.a' at the end of %install was hiding this fact from me. I'll re-add --disable-static. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 07:02:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 03:02:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198816] Review Request: gfs-utils - global file system userland utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607150702.k6F72ceJ006005@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-utils - global file system userland utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198816 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-15 02:53 EST ------- Mock build failed for rawhide i386 main.c:29:26: error: libvolume_id.h: No such file or directory You Need to add libvolume_id-devel in BuildRequires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 08:15:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 04:15:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198835] Review Request: atlascpp - WorldForge message protocol library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607150815.k6F8FuYi010703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: atlascpp - WorldForge message protocol library Alias: Atlas-C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198835 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: Atlas-C++ - |Review Request: atlascpp - |WorldForge message protocol |WorldForge message protocol |library |library -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 08:20:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 04:20:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198827] Review Request: perl-Statistics-Descriptive - Perl module of basic descriptive statistical functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607150820.k6F8KFC2010953@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Statistics-Descriptive - Perl module of basic descriptive statistical functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198827 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |ville.skytta at iki.fi OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-07-15 04:11 EST ------- %{?dist} is missing from the release tag, perhaps by accident? Either way, I have nothing else to add, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 09:05:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 05:05:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190156] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607150905.k6F95AKI013785@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190156 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-07-15 04:56 EST ------- *** Bug 197561 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 09:16:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 05:16:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197967] Review Request: gkrellm - Multiple stacked system monitors in one process In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607150916.k6F9GQS3014224@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gkrellm - Multiple stacked system monitors in one process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197967 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |ville.skytta at iki.fi OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-07-15 05:07 EST ------- - "standard" BuildRoot not used - useradd/groupadd dependencies missing - chkconfig dependencies should be context marked, and chkconfig called consistently (with full path) - using a macro for %{flags} seems a bit odd, normal shell variables should work just fine - %{?_smp_mflags} missing - could use %{_initrddir} for the init script location - could use init script directly in %preun daemon - "SMP CPU" sounds odd in the description (gkrellm does UP CPU too), and it could be improved a bit otherwise too Will attach a patch for the above. Another random note (for upstream?): - gkrellm.pc doesn't look very useful at the moment. For plugin/theme packages it would be nice to have the lib and data dirs defined in it, for example by adding pkgdatadir=%{_datadir}/gkrellm2 and pkglibdir=%{_libdir}/gkrellm2 in it; then those could be queried like pkg-config gkrellm --variable=pkglibdir -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 09:18:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 05:18:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197967] Review Request: gkrellm - Multiple stacked system monitors in one process In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607150918.k6F9I0VZ014385@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gkrellm - Multiple stacked system monitors in one process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197967 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-07-15 05:09 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=132478) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=132478&action=view) Suggested patch for findings in comment 5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 09:22:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 05:22:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197967] Review Request: gkrellm - Multiple stacked system monitors in one process In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607150922.k6F9MAs4014595@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gkrellm - Multiple stacked system monitors in one process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197967 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-07-15 05:13 EST ------- Oh, and gkrellmd should be condrestarted on -daemon upgrades. I'd also add LSB action aliases to the init script (try-restart -> condrestart, force-reload -> restart). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 09:50:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 05:50:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198827] Review Request: perl-Statistics-Descriptive - Perl module of basic descriptive statistical functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607150950.k6F9oSVZ015720@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Statistics-Descriptive - Perl module of basic descriptive statistical functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198827 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-15 05:41 EST ------- Thanks, I indeed forgot the %{?dist} tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 09:52:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 05:52:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198198] Review Request: ooo2txt - Convert OpenOffice documents to simple text In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607150952.k6F9qdRB015823@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ooo2txt - Convert OpenOffice documents to simple text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198198 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-15 05:43 EST ------- Thanks, pushed and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 10:07:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 06:07:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198287] Review Request: python-paste - Tools for using a Web Server Gateway Interface stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607151007.k6FA7rfp016241@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-paste - Tools for using a Web Server Gateway Interface stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198287 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-15 05:59 EST ------- There is an inconsistent use of RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %buildroot (also in other Paste related python packages) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 10:16:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 06:16:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198878] Review Request: mutagen - Python module to handle audio metadata In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607151016.k6FAGGas016607@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mutagen - Python module to handle audio metadata https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198878 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-15 06:07 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=132479) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=132479&action=view) mutagen-1.5.1-2.spec New SPEC file version (1.5.1-2) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 10:17:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 06:17:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198878] Review Request: mutagen - Python module to handle audio metadata In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607151017.k6FAHVbN016666@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mutagen - Python module to handle audio metadata https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198878 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-15 06:08 EST ------- Thanks for review this package. The line: Requires: python-abi = %(%{__python} -c "import sys ; print sys.version[:3]" is from fedora-rpmdevtools template so I didn't change it and, as I see, other SPEC files also has this line so I don't delete it. W: mutagen wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/mutagen-1.5.1/TUTORIAL I checked it and I noticed that TUTORIAL file has Windows-style line endings, so there is \r\n instead of \n. In new SPEC this is fixed. E: mutagen non-executable-script ... The first line of file is #! /usr/bin/env python and for this reason rpmlint treat this file as executable but it shouldn't be executable. I think we can leave it alone. I've done new SPEC with your and my fixes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 10:20:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 06:20:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198878] Review Request: mutagen - Python module to handle audio metadata In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607151020.k6FAKDLd016768@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mutagen - Python module to handle audio metadata https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198878 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #132479|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 10:25:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 06:25:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194470] Review Request: php-magickwand In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607151025.k6FAPq0U017009@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-magickwand https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194470 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2006-07-15 06:17 EST ------- As per current status of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/PHP, PHP RPM packages like this aren't handled, yet. And of my understanding, any package not listed at http://pecl.php.net/, isn't a PHP PECL package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 11:10:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 07:10:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197967] Review Request: gkrellm - Multiple stacked system monitors in one process In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607151110.k6FBAURd019545@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gkrellm - Multiple stacked system monitors in one process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197967 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-15 07:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) Thanks for the patch, I've applied it, but I've undone this: > - could use init script directly in %preun daemon I agree, but for cases where a full example is given on the ScriptletSnippets wiki page, I always use the code from the wiki in the name of consistency across FE as a whole. And the ScriptletSnippets wiki page uses /sbin/service: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ScriptletSnippets Also the current code in the wiki doesn't use " || :", so neither does this version of gkrellm (for the service stuff), that can be fixed if you want though. > Another random note (for upstream?): > > - gkrellm.pc doesn't look very useful at the moment. For plugin/theme packages > it would be nice to have the lib and data dirs defined in it, for example by > adding pkgdatadir=%{_datadir}/gkrellm2 and pkglibdir=%{_libdir}/gkrellm2 in > it; then those could be queried like pkg-config gkrellm --variable=pkglibdir I'll send this upstream. (In reply to comment #7) > Oh, and gkrellmd should be condrestarted on -daemon upgrades. I'd also add LSB > action aliases to the init script (try-restart -> condrestart, force-reload -> > restart). Done and done. New version at: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/gkrellm.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/gkrellm-2.2.9-6.src.rpm Changes: * Sat Jul 15 2006 Hans de Goede 2.2.9-6 - Various specfile improvements by Ville Skytt? (ville.skytta at iki.fi) - Make the daemon package scripts match the ScriptletSnippets wiki page - Add LSB aliases (try-restart, force-reload) to the -daemon initscript - Add %%{?dist} to the release for consistency with other packages I maintain -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 13:50:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 09:50:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198928] Review Request: lsscsi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607151350.k6FDoatN027202@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lsscsi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198928 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-15 09:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > * In build, why not use "%configure"? Similarly, in install, why not > "%makeinstall"? %makeinstall is deprecated. See the "Macros" section of the Packaging Guidelines. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines > * There may be comments on the test before "rm -rf ..." in %clean. I think it's > ok, as it will always evaluate to true in the buildsys, but it could be nixed > for brevity's sake. Not only that but the tests are completely redundant since a buildroot is explicitly specified in the spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 13:59:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 09:59:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198878] Review Request: mutagen - Python module to handle audio metadata In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607151359.k6FDxIc3027570@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mutagen - Python module to handle audio metadata https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198878 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-15 09:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Thanks for review this package. > > The line: > Requires: python-abi = %(%{__python} -c "import sys ; print sys.version[:3]" > is from fedora-rpmdevtools template so I didn't change it and, as I see, other > SPEC files also has this line so I don't delete it. The python spec template will soon be fixed to get rid of this: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-July/msg00557.html If you check the "requires" of the built package on FC4 or later, you should find a dependency on "python(abi) = 2.4" automatically added by RPM, making the python-abi dependency in the spec file redundant. > E: mutagen non-executable-script ... > The first line of file is > #! /usr/bin/env python > and for this reason rpmlint treat this file as executable but it shouldn't be > executable. I think we can leave it alone. rpmlint knows it's not executable but thinks that it's a script (which it isn't) because of the "#! /usr/bin/env python" as you say. You can shut rpmlint up by editing the first line out of the affected files in the %prep stage of the spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 15:21:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 11:21:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174021] Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607151521.k6FFLgUE029955@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174021 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-15 11:12 EST ------- You're right about renaming the xemacs subpackage; the naming guidelines have changed since this review started. Unfortunately my testing infrastructure has changed as well, and I'm now doing a proper rpmlint on the installed package, which turns up an additional category of problems. Firstly there's this warning about the srpm which I don't really have a problem with: W: aplus-fsf setup-not-quiet It wants you to use "-q" on the %setup line. Then there's three no-documentation warnings, which are OK: W: fonts-truetype-apl no-documentation W: fonts-x11-apl no-documentation W: xemacs-aplus-fsf no-documentation And finally there are nearly 3800 undefined-non-weak-symbol warnings, of the form: W: aplus-fsf undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libesf-4.20.2.so P1 W: aplus-fsf undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libesf-4.20.2.so APL I will attach a full list, or you can just run "rpmlint aplus-fsf" with the package already installed. It looks like the libraries themselves are merely compiled but not linked against each other; the loading program has to be set up to link in all of the necessary libraries in the proper order. It seems this not allowed in Fedora, but I'm not sure how reasonable it is to fix it. I'm asking around to find how strong the prohibition is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 15:25:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 11:25:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174021] Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607151525.k6FFPGZ1030021@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174021 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-15 11:16 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=132489) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=132489&action=view) List of undefined-non-weak-symbol warnings -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 16:31:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 12:31:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198287] Review Request: python-paste - Tools for using a Web Server Gateway Interface stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607151631.k6FGVm3A032542@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-paste - Tools for using a Web Server Gateway Interface stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198287 ------- Additional Comments From lmacken at redhat.com 2006-07-15 12:23 EST ------- http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/python-paste.spec http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/python-paste-0.9.3-2.src.rpm * Sat Jul 15 2006 Luke Macken - 0.9.3-2 - Clean up docs directory - Remove shebang from from non-executable scripts - Use consistent build root variables -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 16:53:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 12:53:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198880] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-DNS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607151653.k6FGr5Uw001294@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-DNS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198880 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-15 12:44 EST ------- I have to tell you that the "0" release violates the naming guidelines; please make sure to bump this to "1" before you build. I enabled the test suite just to try it, but I don't think it works under mock due to an undefined network configuration. However, five of the tests did run properly. * source files match upstream: 17d8823b50185e4a2536ca8888d45410 POE-Component-Client-DNS-0.99.tar.gz O package meets naming and packaging guidelines (0 release should be 1) * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. O BuildRequires are proper (BR: perl is redundant) O No need to pass any compiler flags. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(POE::Component::Client::DNS) = 0.99 perl-POE-Component-Client-DNS = 0.99-0.fc6 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(Net::DNS) perl(POE) perl(Socket) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(vars) * noarch package; no debuginfo. * %check is present but necessarily disabled for mock. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 16:53:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 12:53:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198881] Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-IRCD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607151653.k6FGrj5n001376@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-IRCD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198881 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 17:28:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 13:28:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198878] Review Request: mutagen - Python module to handle audio metadata In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607151728.k6FHSHcV002137@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mutagen - Python module to handle audio metadata https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198878 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #132479|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-15 13:19 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=132496) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=132496&action=view) mutagen-1.5.1-3.spec Okay, I've made new SPEC file with deleted python-abi require and fix in %prep section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 17:51:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 13:51:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199016] New: Review Request: mxml - Miniature XML development library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199016 Summary: Review Request: mxml - Miniature XML development library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: green at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/~green/FE/FC5/mxml.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/~green/FE/FC5/mxml-2.2.2-2.src.rpm Description: Mini-XML is a small XML parsing library that you can use to read XML and XML-like data files in your application without requiring large non-standard libraries. mxml is required by zynaddsubfx, which I also plan to submit. This spec file is based on the PlanetCCRMA version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 18:33:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 14:33:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183438] Review Request: idioskopos (C++ Introspection Library) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607151833.k6FIXxCs004778@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: idioskopos (C++ Introspection Library) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183438 rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2006-07-15 14:25 EST ------- This library was submitted as a dependency for papyrus and conexus. Neither depend on this library anymore, so I'm withdrawing this submission. If there is other interest in this library, I'll resubmit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 18:35:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 14:35:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189400] Review Request: em8300(-kmod) - Hollywood+/DXR3 hardware MPEG decoder drivers and tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607151835.k6FIZVcC004919@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: em8300(-kmod) - Hollywood+/DXR3 hardware MPEG decoder drivers and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189400 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2006-07-15 14:26 EST ------- Review: == em8300 == rpmlint: SRPM: no output RPM: W: em8300-devel no-documentation -> can be ignored * download of Source0 doesn't work -- seems to be a sourceforge problem afaics * Open-Source-License (GPL) * Source matches upstream * package is named according to the guidelines * builds in mock on ix86-FC5 == em8300-kmod == rpmlint: SRPM: no output RPMS: W: kmod-em8300 summary-not-capitalized em8300 kernel module(s) -> This is probably the right thing in this case W: kmod-em8300 unstripped-binary-or-object /lib/modules/2.6.17-1.2139_FC5/extra/em8300/adv717x.ko W: kmod-em8300 unstripped-binary-or-object /lib/modules/2.6.17-1.2139_FC5/extra/em8300/bt865.ko W: kmod-em8300 unstripped-binary-or-object /lib/modules/2.6.17-1.2139_FC5/extra/em8300/em8300.ko -> they get stripped during build, we will ignore that W: kmod-em8300 no-documentation -> expected behaviour for kmod-packages Review: * package is named according to the guidelines * Open-Source-License (GPL) * Source matches upstream * builds in mock on ix86-FC5 * matches fedora kmod scheme == Summary == both nearly approved -- waiting for FESCo approval of kmod (we forgot to discuss those in the last meeting -- sorry) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 19:05:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 15:05:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183438] Review Request: idioskopos (C++ Introspection Library) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607151905.k6FJ5jN6007275@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: idioskopos (C++ Introspection Library) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183438 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 19:18:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 15:18:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198880] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-DNS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607151918.k6FJITpE007591@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-DNS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198880 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-15 15:09 EST ------- Given the recent thread on the list, I'll start submitting future packages with an initial release of 1. +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +devel build succeeds +Request branching (FC-4, FC-5) +Close bug Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 19:18:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 15:18:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198884] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-Keepalive In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607151918.k6FJIhO1007616@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-Keepalive https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198884 Bug 198884 depends on bug 198880, which changed state. Bug 198880 Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-DNS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198880 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 19:18:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 15:18:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198882] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-IRC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607151918.k6FJIibR007624@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-IRC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198882 Bug 198882 depends on bug 198880, which changed state. Bug 198880 Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-DNS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198880 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 19:18:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 15:18:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183322] Review Request: conexus (network and serial I/O library with Gtkmm widgets) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607151918.k6FJIs0R007645@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conexus (network and serial I/O library with Gtkmm widgets) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183322 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2006-07-15 15:10 EST ------- I've submitted another bug report for the conexusmm library which now has the Gtkmm widgets. The spec file for the conexusmm library is identical to this one with the exception of the dependencies and the inclusion of a conexusmm-demo application that is based on gtkdemo. All the issues of the previous review have been taken care of in the revised spec along with several other issues that came up in the bit library review. Here are the new files: Spec Name or Url: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/conexus.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/fedora/5/srpms/conexus-0.2.0-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 19:23:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 15:23:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199020] New: Review Request: conexusmm (Gtkmm widgets for the conexus network and serial I/O library) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199020 Summary: Review Request: conexusmm (Gtkmm widgets for the conexus network and serial I/O library) Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/conexusmm.spec SRPM URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/fedora/5/srpms/conexusmm-0.2.0-1.src.rpm Description: conexusmm provides Gtkmm widgets for the conexus library objects. These widgets include IPv4 and IPv6 address and host entry boxes (including validated IPv4 dotted decimal address), serial port configuration widgets, et. al. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 19:28:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 15:28:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199020] Review Request: conexusmm (Gtkmm widgets for the conexus network and serial I/O library) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607151928.k6FJSGoH008005@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conexusmm (Gtkmm widgets for the conexus network and serial I/O library) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199020 rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |183322 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 19:28:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 15:28:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183322] Review Request: conexus (network and serial I/O library with Gtkmm widgets) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607151928.k6FJSHi0008022@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conexus (network and serial I/O library with Gtkmm widgets) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183322 rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |199020 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 19:42:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 15:42:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183439] Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607151942.k6FJgEaD008659@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) Alias: papyrus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183439 rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |papyrus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 19:42:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 15:42:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192052] Review Request: bitgtkmm (Gtkmm widgets for the bit library) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607151942.k6FJguX6008706@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitgtkmm (Gtkmm widgets for the bit library) Alias: bitgtkmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192052 rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |bitgtkmm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 19:43:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 15:43:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199020] Review Request: conexusmm (Gtkmm widgets for the conexus network and serial I/O library) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607151943.k6FJhZLQ008751@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conexusmm (Gtkmm widgets for the conexus network and serial I/O library) Alias: conexusmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199020 rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |conexusmm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 20:19:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 16:19:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196748] Review Request: setroubleshoot - automatic diagnosis of SELinux problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607152019.k6FKJNsh009700@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setroubleshoot - automatic diagnosis of SELinux problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196748 ------- Additional Comments From stickster at gmail.com 2006-07-15 16:10 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=132498) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=132498&action=view) Cosmetic fix for setroubleshoot usage statement Trivial and cosmetic, but I'm just starting to learn Python. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 20:34:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 16:34:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199021] New: Review Request: zynaddsubfx - Real-time software synthesizer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199021 Summary: Review Request: zynaddsubfx - Real-time software synthesizer Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: green at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/~green/FE/FC5/zynaddsubfx.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/~green/FE/FC5/zynaddsubfx-2.2.1-5.src.rpm Description: ZynAddSubFX is a opensource software synthesizer capable of making a countless number of instruments, from some common heared from expensive hardware to interesting sounds that you'll boost to an amazing universe of sounds. This package was derived from the latest planetccrma package. It depends on mxml, which I've also submitted for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 20:35:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 16:35:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199021] Review Request: zynaddsubfx - Real-time software synthesizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607152035.k6FKZwgj010030@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zynaddsubfx - Real-time software synthesizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199021 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |199016 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 20:36:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 16:36:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199016] Review Request: mxml - Miniature XML development library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607152036.k6FKa9nG010051@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mxml - Miniature XML development library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199016 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |199021 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 15 21:40:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 17:40:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198944] Review Request: compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607152140.k6FLeaCo012318@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198944 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2006-07-15 17:31 EST ------- I'd propose to close it as obsolete once compiz shows up in core -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 16 00:49:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 20:49:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199028] New: Review Request: perl-eperl Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199028 Summary: Review Request: perl-eperl Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-eperl/perl-eperl.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-eperl-2.2.14-2.src.rpm Description: ePerl interprets an ASCII file bristled with Perl 5 program statements by evaluating the Perl 5 code while passing through the plain ASCII data. It can operate in various ways: As a stand-alone Unix filter or integrated Perl 5 module for general file generation tasks and as a powerful Webserver scripting language for dynamic HTML page programming. The documentation and latest release can be found on http://www.ossp.org/pkg/tool/eperl/ Note that this package does not include the Apache::ePerl module, which is designed for mod_perl 1.x. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 16 01:10:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 21:10:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199029] New: Review Request: jokosher Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 Summary: Review Request: jokosher Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: snecklifter at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.iammetal.co.uk/jokosher.spec SRPM URL: http://www.iammetal.co.uk/jokosher-0.1-1.src.rpm Description: Jokosher is a multi-track non-linear audio editor with a prime focus on usability. It is developed in Python and is Open Source. The main goals of Jokosher functionality are: * The ability to record from any ALSA sound card, including multi-input cards such as the M-Audio Delta 44. * Non-destructive editing. * Undo/Redo (at least to a reasonable limit, but preferably unlimited). * Be able to edit the volume curve in different parts of the track. * Resizable track views to easily zoom in and out of a waveform. * Support for effects plug-ins, most notably LADSPA. * Be able to apply effects to an entire track or a selected portion of a track. When applying effects, there should be the ability to preview the sound with the effect before it is applied. * It should be able to master to OGG, MP3 and WAV. * It should be able to import OGG, MP3 and WAV. * Most important, it should be easy and intuitive to use. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 16 02:27:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 22:27:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189322] Review Request: rosegarden4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607160227.k6G2RINT021385@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rosegarden4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189322 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |158728 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 16 02:55:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 22:55:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189322] Review Request: rosegarden4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607160255.k6G2tgdR022732@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rosegarden4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189322 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-07-15 22:47 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=132518) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=132518&action=view) Patch to look for DSSI plugins in lib64 directories Please apply this patch when you check rosegarden4 in. It tells rosegarden where to find DSSI plugins on x86-64 systems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 16 03:41:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 23:41:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198922] Review Request: dejavu-lgc-fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607160341.k6G3fgUu024358@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dejavu-lgc-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198922 ------- Additional Comments From besfahbo at redhat.com 2006-07-15 23:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Tech ack. Are we not obsoleting Vera? Not yet, as we are still evaluating it. Withdrawal is not quite out of question yet. > Out of curiousity, what locales does this give us *new* coverage with, outside > of Greek? I don't know. Most people just report whether DejaVu works for them, not LGC. So it's a bit hard to know. The langcover.txt in the tarball is empty. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 16 04:45:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 00:45:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198834] Review Request: sage - OpenGL extensions library using SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607160445.k6G4jYrQ027120@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sage - OpenGL extensions library using SDL Alias: sage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198834 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-07-16 00:36 EST ------- Updated package that includes --disable-static and removes -O3 from CFLAGS: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/sage-0.1.2-3.src.rpm http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/sage.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 16 04:57:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 00:57:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198836] Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607160457.k6G4vNHn027618@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198836 ------- Additional Comments From besfahbo at redhat.com 2006-07-16 00:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Where does freetype-1.4pre come from? The latest I can find is 1.3.1: > http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=3157&package_id=3068 Don't know. It probably is rolled by someone specifically for Red Hat Linux / Fedora. I just got it from freetype-2.1.10 SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 16 05:02:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 01:02:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198836] Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607160502.k6G52FRC027751@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198836 ------- Additional Comments From besfahbo at redhat.com 2006-07-16 00:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > > %package utils > > Summary: A collection of FreeType 1.x utilities > > Group: System Environment/Libraries > > Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} > > # Upgrade path > > Provides: freetype-utils = 2.2.0-1 > > Obsoletes: freetype-utils < 2.2.0-1 > > Very ugly. At the time this freetype-utils sub-package was > introduced, it should have started at 1.x, not 2.x. > > You could still do that with a proper Epoch. Right. So, should I use Epoch instead? Like: Provides: freetype-utils = 1:1.4-0.1.pre -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 16 05:03:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 01:03:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198836] Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607160503.k6G53Fcg027779@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198836 ------- Additional Comments From besfahbo at redhat.com 2006-07-16 00:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > And you should omit static libs (%_libdir/lib*.a) and %{_libdir}/lib*.la files. Correct. The freetype package in Core is not dropping those. Will fix both. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 16 05:27:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 01:27:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199016] Review Request: mxml - Miniature XML development library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607160527.k6G5RbH1028122@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mxml - Miniature XML development library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199016 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-07-16 01:18 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=132521) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=132521&action=view) Updated mxml spec file This updated spec file replaces a /usr/lib reference with %{_libdir} for x86-64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 16 10:00:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 06:00:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197814] Review Request: autogen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607161000.k6GA05Tp024865@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197814 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-16 05:51 EST ------- 5.8.5. sorts out the libopts problem, but not the rename. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 16 11:00:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 07:00:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165878] Review Request: kadu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607161100.k6GB0ZD8027673@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165878 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-16 06:51 EST ------- If I would like to take over this package, I should create new bug or continue it here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 16 13:31:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 09:31:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198836] Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607161331.k6GDV30u031009@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198836 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-16 09:22 EST ------- Re: comment #4 If there exists no upstream freetype-1.4pre1, then I suggest you change to a release that *does* exist. Re: comment #5, >So, should I use Epoch instead? Like: >Provides: freetype-utils = 1:1.4-0.1.pre imo, yes, this is better. (though epochs should usually be avoided when/if possible, I see no better alternative in this case to fix the previous hackage). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 16 14:36:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 10:36:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190156] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607161436.k6GEa9BS000974@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190156 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-07-16 10:27 EST ------- Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-HTTP.spec Release 1.4.0-4 pushed to CVS (use the new /etc/rpm/macros.pear) Waiting for PHP guidelines before running the build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 16 14:56:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 10:56:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198836] Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607161456.k6GEuJUI002036@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198836 ------- Additional Comments From besfahbo at redhat.com 2006-07-16 10:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Re: comment #4 > If there exists no upstream freetype-1.4pre1, then I suggest you change to a > release that *does* exist. I don't agree. This is about a compatibility library that was last developed (the 1.x series) in 2000. I strongly believe that we should just continue to ship the exact same thing that we have been shipping so far in core, instead of archeology. There's absolute no advantage in switching over. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 16 15:04:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 11:04:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197967] Review Request: gkrellm - Multiple stacked system monitors in one process In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607161504.k6GF4XqI002193@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gkrellm - Multiple stacked system monitors in one process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197967 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-07-16 10:55 EST ------- Yes, "|| :" should be added to condrestart. And IMO the snippets page should be fixed to use the scripts directly, I see no benefit from using /sbin/service instead of them. Some people have mentioned that *not* using it makes it easier to get rid of initscripts altogether and to use another init system. I don't know the details and that wouldn't work without other changes anyway, so it's not a blocker. Other issues: - Seems that there's no need to require the main package in -devel, nothing in it depends on anything in main, right? - Desktop file has been renamed from gnome-gkrellm.desktop to fedora-gkrellm.desktop, which will break eg. buttons added to the KDE panel from menus using the "add application to panel" function, and I believe there are other similar problems in other desktops if that's done, so I suggest reverting the rename. - Regression in desktop entry: StartupNotify=false prevents KDE's built-in startup notification from working. The key should be just removed. - The default gkrellmd.conf uses "proc" as the group to drop privs to. That group doesn't exist, should probably be gkrellmd instead. - groupadd should be done with the -r argument. - The switch from the builtin sensors stuff to libsensors appears to break existing sensors configs, my configured sensors just disappeared from gkrellm (but reconfiguring the sensors worked). Would there be a sane way to prevent this? If not, not a blocker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 16 15:15:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 11:15:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198836] Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607161515.k6GFFjmC002433@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198836 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-16 11:06 EST ------- (Justifications aside) my point is that *I*, as reviewer, won't approve of any package for which there exists no (verifiable) upstream source. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 16 15:26:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 11:26:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176253] Review Request: clement-2.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607161526.k6GFQtet002657@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clement-2.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176253 ------- Additional Comments From jmp at safe.ca 2006-07-16 11:18 EST ------- Version 2.1-176 SPECS file fine tuning to use /usr/share and /usr/lib insteed of /var/www and /var/lib. Spec Url: ftp://ftp.safe.ca/pub/clement-2.1/SPECS/clement-2.1-176.spec SRPM Url: ftp://ftp.safe.ca/pub/clement-2.1/SRPMS/clement-2.1-176.src.rpm :-}} About Release tag inflation, application is kept internally within RCS, developement has been done this last month and we prefere to sauve as many time as necessary to be safe. :-} Tag release number are just that... number, they just need to refer to a consistente and unique binary code. Thanks for support and advices. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 16 16:19:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 12:19:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198836] Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607161619.k6GGJH31004340@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198836 ------- Additional Comments From besfahbo at redhat.com 2006-07-16 12:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > (Justifications aside) my point is that *I*, as reviewer, won't approve of any > package for which there exists no (verifiable) upstream source. What do you suggest I do, given that changing source is not an option? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 16 17:12:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 13:12:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197754] Review Request: perl-Perl6-Bible In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607161712.k6GHCmNw006411@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Perl6-Bible https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197754 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-16 13:03 EST ------- This is an odd package; it's a Perl module, but it's really all documentation except for the tiny viewer script. I'm inclined to just treat it as any other perl module but it does seem a bit strange. More troubling is this: This Copyright applies only to the Perl6::Bible Perl software distribution, not the documents bundled within. and the documents within all seem to lack any kind of copyright information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 16 18:49:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 14:49:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197967] Review Request: gkrellm - Multiple stacked system monitors in one process In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607161849.k6GIntoG011444@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gkrellm - Multiple stacked system monitors in one process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197967 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-16 14:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > Yes, "|| :" should be added to condrestart. I agree, I've added all gkrellmd related scripts to use || : as is usual for scriptlets. Maybe we should update the wiki for this? > And IMO the snippets page should be > fixed to use the scripts directly, I see no benefit from using /sbin/service > instead of them. Some people have mentioned that *not* using it makes it easier > to get rid of initscripts altogether and to use another init system. I don't > know the details and that wouldn't work without other changes anyway, so it's > not a blocker. > I have no opinion on this, I guess this should be discussed on f-e-l. > Other issues: > > - Seems that there's no need to require the main package in -devel, nothing in > it depends on anything in main, right? > Agreed, fixed. > - Desktop file has been renamed from gnome-gkrellm.desktop to > fedora-gkrellm.desktop, which will break eg. buttons added to the KDE panel > from menus using the "add application to panel" function, and I believe > there are other similar problems in other desktops if that's done, so I > suggest reverting the rename. > Agreed, fixed. > - Regression in desktop entry: StartupNotify=false prevents KDE's built-in > startup notification from working. The key should be just removed. > Done. > - The default gkrellmd.conf uses "proc" as the group to drop privs to. That > group doesn't exist, should probably be gkrellmd instead. > Fixed. > - groupadd should be done with the -r argument. > Fixed. > - The switch from the builtin sensors stuff to libsensors appears to break > existing sensors configs, my configured sensors just disappeared from > gkrellm (but reconfiguring the sensors worked). Would there be a sane way > to prevent this? If not, not a blocker. I'm sorry but that would be very non-trivial to fix, it would probably require some kinda fuzzy logic and never work reliable in all cases -> EWONTFIX Here is a new version: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/gkrellm.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/gkrellm-2.2.9-7.src.rpm Changes: * Sun Jul 16 2006 Hans de Goede 2.2.9-7 - Add -r to groupadd - Add || : to the gkrellmd service related scripts (deviation from the wiki). - Don't make -devel package require the main one as it doesn't need it - Install .desktop file with --vendor gnome to not break existing kde panel buttons, etc. - Drop "StartupNotify=false" from .desktop to not interfere with kde's internal startup notification - use gkrellmd as group in default gkrellmd.conf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 16 20:02:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 16:02:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174021] Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607162002.k6GK2ZnC014452@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174021 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-07-16 15:53 EST ------- I asume, that is a 64 related problem. Unfortunately, I don't have a 64 bit system. It will be nice if anyone have a hint to solve the problem reported by Jason. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 16 20:07:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 16:07:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197967] Review Request: gkrellm - Multiple stacked system monitors in one process In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607162007.k6GK7XPU014622@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gkrellm - Multiple stacked system monitors in one process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197967 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |karsten at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-07-16 15:58 EST ------- I've added some '|| :'s to the service commands in the scriptlet snippets page, those are usual suspects for failing. 2.2.9-7 looks good, approved, also per discussion in the thread starting at http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2006-July/msg00012.html Karsten, FYI: gkrellm is ready to be imported to Extras, so it can be removed from Core devel soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 16 20:08:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 16:08:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197967] Review Request: gkrellm - Multiple stacked system monitors in one process In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607162008.k6GK86G1014643@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gkrellm - Multiple stacked system monitors in one process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197967 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 16 20:10:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 16:10:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197967] Review Request: gkrellm - Multiple stacked system monitors in one process In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607162010.k6GKAT1R014747@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gkrellm - Multiple stacked system monitors in one process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197967 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-16 16:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > I've added some '|| :'s to the service commands in the scriptlet snippets page, > those are usual suspects for failing. > Good! > 2.2.9-7 looks good, approved, also per discussion in the thread starting at > http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2006-July/msg00012.html > Thanks, I'll import it and request a build. > Karsten, FYI: gkrellm is ready to be imported to Extras, so it can be removed > from Core devel soon. Erm, hold on first gkrellm-wifi which is hiding in the same package in core must be approved too, see bug 197981. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 16 20:13:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 16:13:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197967] Review Request: gkrellm - Multiple stacked system monitors in one process In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607162013.k6GKDtcX014808@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gkrellm - Multiple stacked system monitors in one process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197967 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-16 16:05 EST ------- Erm, help gkrellm already is in CVS for RHL-8 and RHL-9, but no devel dir and the import script chokes because it already is in CVS. What now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 16 20:33:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 16:33:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197981] Review Request: gkrellm-wifi - Wireless monitor plugin for the GNU Krell Monitors In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607162033.k6GKXWM1015398@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gkrellm-wifi - Wireless monitor plugin for the GNU Krell Monitors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197981 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |ville.skytta at iki.fi OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-07-16 16:24 EST ------- Blockers: - Tarball is not upstream one, sha1sums: package: 52d13482f7ea71ca0f5613ac5209cbe7d8385f42 upstream: 45888e68822189bedb11e3d77e6d5e8eacb6d507 There are also substantial differences in their contents. - Missing dependency on gkrellm. Other notes/suggestions: - Add back "ExcludeArch: s390 s390x" like it was kind of in the FC package for benefit of folks who rebuild FE packages for example for RHEL. - A patch/sed one liner replacing unwanted stuff in CFLAGS with $RPM_OPT_FLAGS could be easier to maintain than copy-pasting all flags between Makefile and the specfile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 16 20:40:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 16:40:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197967] Review Request: gkrellm - Multiple stacked system monitors in one process In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607162040.k6GKetK5015816@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gkrellm - Multiple stacked system monitors in one process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197967 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wtogami at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-07-16 16:32 EST ------- Maybe ask for an empty devel branch in CVSSyncNeeded in Wiki, including a pointer to this report? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 16 23:19:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 19:19:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607162319.k6GNJnjV020615@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2006-07-16 19:11 EST ------- According to Yum, gnonlin is not in Core, Updates, or Extras, so this package - with regards to Extras - would not be self-supporting in that it would need a dependency external to the default repositories. Perhaps you'd also want to submit Gnonlin for inclusion into Extras as well? Also, you should not use the Packager: tag in your spec. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-c17fb8c1ce9be40da720a2b25d1e2a241062038f Thirdly, your package would probably break on 64-bit systems, as you hardcode /lib/ into the path of %_pythondir. Please use a macro for this instead, such as %{_lib} (or %{_libdir}, etc. as needed). Forth, you really should be using %{python_sitedir} and following the %files section correctly as mentioned in Packaging/Python on the Wiki. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python Lastly, in the %changelog, you simply have a user at host identifier. I'm not certain, but I believe that this is supposed to be a full and valid email address (such as "me at my-isp.com" or something similar). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 02:57:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 22:57:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174021] Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607170257.k6H2vPUC027324@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174021 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-16 22:48 EST ------- Well, I don't think there's anything specifically 64-bit related here. What does "rpmlint aplus-fsf" tell you with the package installed on an i386 machine? (rpmlint 0.77 running in my build setup.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 04:02:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 00:02:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194320] Review Request: im-chooser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607170402.k6H425s5029331@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: im-chooser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194320 tagoh at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |jkeating at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2006-07-16 23:53 EST ------- For new one, Spec URL: http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/rpms/im-chooser/devel/im-chooser.spec?root=extras&rev=1.2&view=auto SRPM URL: http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/development/SRPMS/im-chooser-0.2.2-1.fc6.src.rpm Jesse, can you review the package to import this into Core? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 04:55:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 00:55:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197445] Review Request: fuse-convmvfs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607170455.k6H4ttpT031015@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-convmvfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197445 ------- Additional Comments From hellwolf at seu.edu.cn 2006-07-17 00:47 EST ------- 0.2.1 was released: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/fuse-convmvfs/fuse-convmvfs-0.2.1.tar.gz?download -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 05:59:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 01:59:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198836] Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607170559.k6H5xQ7A000603@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198836 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-17 01:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > What do you suggest I do, given that changing source is not an option? There is an obvious solution: Use the latest official tarball as basis and provide a patch against it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 06:12:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 02:12:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193109] Review Request: plotmm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607170612.k6H6CgCn000827@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: plotmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193109 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-17 02:03 EST ------- Ha?kel, are you still interested in pushing this package into FE? Then I'd recommend you to proceed with processing this request as described on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors Shouldn't I hear from you within 14 days from now, I'll close this PR as FAILED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 07:29:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 03:29:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197967] Review Request: gkrellm - Multiple stacked system monitors in one process In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607170729.k6H7TRpQ003934@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gkrellm - Multiple stacked system monitors in one process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197967 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-17 03:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > Maybe ask for an empty devel branch in CVSSyncNeeded in Wiki, including a > pointer to this report? Done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 07:54:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 03:54:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607170754.k6H7s1wX006301@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From snecklifter at gmail.com 2006-07-17 03:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > According to Yum, gnonlin is not in Core, Updates, or Extras, so this package - > with regards to Extras - would not be self-supporting in that it would need a > dependency external to the default repositories. Perhaps you'd also want to > submit Gnonlin for inclusion into Extras as well? Gnonlin is indeed in extras. > > Also, you should not use the Packager: tag in your spec. See: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-c17fb8c1ce9be40da720a2b25d1e2a241062038f > > Thirdly, your package would probably break on 64-bit systems, as you hardcode > /lib/ into the path of %_pythondir. Please use a macro for this instead, such as > %{_lib} (or %{_libdir}, etc. as needed). > > Forth, you really should be using %{python_sitedir} and following the %files > section correctly as mentioned in Packaging/Python on the Wiki. See: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python > > Lastly, in the %changelog, you simply have a user at host identifier. I'm not > certain, but I believe that this is supposed to be a full and valid email > address (such as "me at my-isp.com" or something similar). Thank you for these. I shall update and resubmit. Regards Chris -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 10:04:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 06:04:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] New: gutenprint Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 Summary: gutenprint Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: panemade at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/gutenprint/gutenprint.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/gutenprint/gutenprint-5.0.0-rc3.1.fc5.src.rpm Description: Gutenprint is a package of high quality printer drivers for Linux, BSD,Solaris, IRIX, and other UNIX-alike operating systems. Gutenprint was formerly called Gimp-Print. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 10:07:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 06:07:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] gutenprint In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171007.k6HA7i1q015656@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gutenprint https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-17 05:58 EST ------- This is next release of gimp-print. As its not yet in FC6 core and extras and i found it useful with its support to number ofprinter drivers, i decided to see it in extras. This package has still some packaging problem for SOURCE as upstream has released with tag rc3, gutenprint-5.0.0-rc3 and i am not able to solve the problem as version string not accpets a hypen(-) so i can't make it as version: 5.0.0-rc3 so what i did is, i download source from upstream and rebuild tar.bz2 file with parent source tree directory name renamed to gutenprint-5.0.0 from gutenprint-5.0.0-rc3. Mock Build for rawhide i386 is successfull. rpmlint -v gutenprint-5.0.0-rc3.1.fc6.i386.rpm I: gutenprint checking W: gutenprint non-conffile-in-etc /etc/cups/command.types E: gutenprint postun-without-ldconfig /usr/lib/libgutenprint.so.2.0.0 E: gutenprint postun-without-ldconfig /usr/lib/libgutenprintui2.so.1.0.0 E: gutenprint postun-without-ldconfig /usr/lib/libgutenprintui.so.1.0.0 E: gutenprint non-empty-%postun /sbin/ldconfig how can i solve these errors? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 10:28:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 06:28:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165878] Review Request: kadu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171028.k6HASlsd016823@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165878 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 11:51:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 07:51:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] gutenprint In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171151.k6HBpTZZ021101@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gutenprint https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From twaugh at redhat.com 2006-07-17 07:42 EST ------- I think the way pre-releases are normally done is like '5.0.0-0.rc3.1'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 11:52:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 07:52:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197814] Review Request: autogen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171152.k6HBq5Zr021146@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197814 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-07-17 07:43 EST ------- > * AutoOpts licence is LGPL, not GPL! > > No, according to the autogen website, it's GPL Then please ask upstream to clarify this in the source tarball. autogen-5.8.4/autoopts/COPYING is the LGPL, C files contain the LGPL header (e.g. autoopts/tokenize.c), and so on. > /usr/bin/autogen.d/ I'm not aware of any package that creates a subdir in /usr/bin. I'd rather use /usr/libexec/autogen.d/ or ask the Packaging Committee about this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 11:59:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 07:59:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] gutenprint In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171159.k6HBxE5v021522@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gutenprint https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-17 07:50 EST ------- Thanks for your comment. But can you please give me solution of how to handle version string problem, otherwise i have to keep my own Source tarball link that have tarball created from gutenprint-5.0.0 directory and not from upstream gutenprint-5.0.0-rc3. Your comment also still saying that i have to use version: 5.0.0 Release: 0.rc3.1%{?dist} whereas i have used Version: 5.0.0 Release: rc3.1%{?dist} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 12:05:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 08:05:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165878] Review Request: kadu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171205.k6HC5rRC021796@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165878 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2006-07-17 07:56 EST ------- You should create a new request and close this one -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 12:07:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 08:07:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197981] Review Request: gkrellm-wifi - Wireless monitor plugin for the GNU Krell Monitors In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171207.k6HC7RI4021846@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gkrellm-wifi - Wireless monitor plugin for the GNU Krell Monitors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197981 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-17 07:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Blockers: > - Tarball is not upstream one, sha1sums: > package: 52d13482f7ea71ca0f5613ac5209cbe7d8385f42 > upstream: 45888e68822189bedb11e3d77e6d5e8eacb6d507 > There are also substantial differences in their contents. Your right, strange, I took the tarbal straight from the core SRPM, it seems the one in core is newer / completer then the upstream one. I've gone back to a pristine upstream tarbal, with the changes found in the core package in a patch. I've also mailed upstream for an explanation on the 2 different 0.9.12 versions. > - Missing dependency on gkrellm. > - Add back "ExcludeArch: s390 s390x" like it was kind of in the FC package > for benefit of folks who rebuild FE packages for example for RHEL. Both fixed > - A patch/sed one liner replacing unwanted stuff in CFLAGS with $RPM_OPT_FLAGS > could be easier to maintain than copy-pasting all flags between Makefile > and the specfile. I'm used to doing things like this for non autotooled packages, so I'm keeping it this way. New version here: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/gkrellm-wifi.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/gkrellm-wifi-0.9.12-2.src.rpm Changes: * Mon Jul 17 2006 Hans de Goede 0.9.12-2 - Use pristine upstream source and put changes found in the Core package tarbal in a patch - Require gkrellm >= 2.2, gkrellm < 3 - Add ExcludeArch: s390 s390x -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 12:32:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 08:32:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 170303] Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171232.k6HCW7nI022650@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170303 ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2006-07-17 08:23 EST ------- 0.8 Still coredump on FC5 (still OK on FC3...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 13:13:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 09:13:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199124] Review Request: Scribus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171313.k6HDD5W8025422@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Scribus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199124 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Core |Red Hat Enterprise Linux | |Beta Version|test3 |5.0.0 Component|Package Review |Package Review Group| |rhel_beta ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-17 09:04 EST ------- I'm going to assume that this is for RHEL5, not Core. You're also supposed to put a link to the spec file. I'll pull it from the srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 13:20:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 09:20:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] gutenprint In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171320.k6HDKIUL025821@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gutenprint https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-17 09:11 EST ------- As per your suggestion, i updated package as SPEC URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/gutenprint/gutenprint.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/gutenprint/gutenprint-5.0.0-0.rc3.1.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 13:22:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 09:22:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] gutenprint In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171322.k6HDMBQt025892@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gutenprint https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 13:25:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 09:25:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198711] Review Request: splint - An implementation of the lint program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171325.k6HDPOtn026040@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: splint - An implementation of the lint program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198711 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |jkeating at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|188271 |188272 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-17 09:16 EST ------- Package looks very clean, just a comment: You obsolete lclint, but don't provide lclint. Does this package not offer the functionality of lclint? When was the last time lclint was shipped? Do we even need to worry about obsoleting something we haven't shipped in a supported upgrade release? (IE RHEL4) RPMLINT output: E: splint-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/splint-3.1.1/src/llerror.c E: splint obsolete-not-provided lclint W: splint devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/splint/lib/bool.h W: splint devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/splint/lib/linux.h W: splint devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/splint/lib/posix.h W: splint devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/splint/lib/standard.h W: splint devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/splint/lib/stdio.h W: splint devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/splint/lib/stdlib.h W: splint devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/splint/lib/unix.h W: splint incoherent-version-in-changelog 3.1.1-15 3.1.1-15.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 13:29:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 09:29:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192420] Review Request: Bonfire - CD/DVD burning app for gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171329.k6HDTD7p026211@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Bonfire - CD/DVD burning app for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192420 rivanvx at fastmail.fm changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rivanvx at fastmail.fm ------- Additional Comments From rivanvx at fastmail.fm 2006-07-17 09:20 EST ------- Fantastic package. Kind of "must add" to FC6 Extras. I'm using 0.4.1 and it works just perfectly. I prefer it over GnomeBaker and graveman already. It's not as powerful as k3b, but it's going in it's own direction which I like. Thumbs up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 13:34:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 09:34:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] gutenprint In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171334.k6HDYolw026565@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gutenprint https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 jtorresh at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jtorresh at gmail.com 2006-07-17 09:26 EST ------- I think it should be '5.0.0-0.1.rc3'. The Naming Guidelines say "0.%{X}.%{alphatag}" is the release tag for pre-release packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 13:40:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 09:40:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] gutenprint In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171340.k6HDe1Bn027062@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gutenprint https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 jtorresh at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 13:42:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 09:42:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199124] Review Request: Scribus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171342.k6HDgDC1027351@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Scribus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199124 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER OtherBugsDependingO|188271 |188272 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-17 09:33 EST ------- Spec looks clean, although you'll need to start putting the v-r somewhere in the changelog, either the line including the email, or the first line of the changelog. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Changelog RPMLINT output: W: scribus-debuginfo no-version-in-last-changelog W: scribus-devel no-version-in-last-changelog These just need the version in changelog. W: scribus file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/pl/man1/scribus.1.gz Probably need to look closer at this. W: scribus mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs Somewhere in the spec there is spaces instead of tabs or vice/versa. W: scribus strange-permission scribus-1.3.3.2.tar.bz2 0666 W: scribus strange-permission scribus.desktop 0666 W: scribus strange-permission scribus.spec 0666 W: scribus strange-permission scribus.xml 0666 These should probably be fixed upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 13:47:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 09:47:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197353] Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171347.k6HDlaMd027798@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197353 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-07-17 09:38 EST ------- Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/man-pages-fr.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/man-pages-fr-2.17.0-1.src.rpm %changelog * Mon Jul 17 2006 Alain Portal 2.17.0-1 - Update to 2.17.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 13:54:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 09:54:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] gutenprint In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171354.k6HDs0BG028338@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gutenprint https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-17 09:45 EST ------- As per your suggestion, i updated package as SPEC URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/gutenprint/gutenprint.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/gutenprint/gutenprint-5.0.0-0.1.rc3.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 13:54:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 09:54:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198928] Review Request: lsscsi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171354.k6HDspsB028407@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lsscsi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198928 ------- Additional Comments From coldwell at redhat.com 2006-07-17 09:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Are you sponsored into extras yet (as I'm not seeing you on the cvsextras page). > If not, you should mark this bug as blocking FE-NEEDSPONSOR. > > A couple thoughts on the spec, off the top of my head: > > * The macros you have defined at the top are rather redundant, as you use them > to then populate the Name:, Version:, Release: tags, all of which (when > populated) define macros of the same names you're using containing the exact > same information. > > * You're using both, e.g., $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot}. Either or is fine, > but the packaging guidelines require us to be consistent within a specfile (this > is a "MUST"). > > * In build, why not use "%configure"? Similarly, in install, why not > "%makeinstall"? Both of those macros should take care of passing the > information you're doing manually. (Also, it would quiet rpmlint about "E: > lsscsi configure-without-libdir-spec".) > > * There may be comments on the test before "rm -rf ..." in %clean. I think it's > ok, as it will always evaluate to true in the buildsys, but it could be nixed > for brevity's sake. > > That being said, I've built and installed this package on my system. Works > nicely for me, even against my SATA drives. Good points, thanks. Just to clarify, the spec file comes from the project homepage; I just touched it up to silence some rpmlint complaints. However, it looks like it wasn't enough, so I'll incorporate your recommendations. lsscsi is a very desirable addition since /proc/scsi/scsi runs out of memory if there are a large number of LUNs (>512, I think), and any kernel patch submitted to fix this problem is rejected (/proc/scsi/scsi is deprecated) and the submitter is referred to lsscsi: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=111287017419578&w=2 Chip -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 13:56:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 09:56:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192420] Review Request: Bonfire - CD/DVD burning app for gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171356.k6HDuaEQ028510@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Bonfire - CD/DVD burning app for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192420 ------- Additional Comments From rouquier.p at wanadoo.fr 2006-07-17 09:47 EST ------- Thanks, that reminded me I needed to update for 0.4.1 et voil?... Spec URL: http://perso.orange.fr/bonfire/bonfire.spec SRPM URL: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/bonfire/bonfire-0.4.1-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 14:12:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 10:12:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198711] Review Request: splint - An implementation of the lint program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171412.k6HECJts029842@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: splint - An implementation of the lint program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198711 mitr at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From mitr at redhat.com 2006-07-17 10:03 EST ------- Although splint is a continuation of the lclint codebase, it doesn't provide /usr/bin/lclint and thus it is not a drop-in replacement of lclint. lclint was last shipped in RHL 7.2 and RHEL 2.1, all RH{E,}L and Fedora splint packages obsolete lclint. Keeping the obsoletes: should allow upgrades from RHEL2.1 to RHEL5 - although unsupported, I think we don't need to actively make them impossible. I don't feel strongly about it and wouldn't really mind removing the Obsoletes:, though. The rest of rpmlint output seems to be false positives. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 14:15:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 10:15:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] gutenprint In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171415.k6HEFAcY030043@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gutenprint https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-07-17 10:06 EST ------- also there is no need for you to make your own tarball you can use the -n switch to use the upstream tarball as for the rmplint errors i think the %find_lang should be in the %install section and you need to mark the config file as a config file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 14:19:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 10:19:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193894] Review Request: ant-contrib - A collection of tasks for Ant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171419.k6HEJPqD030231@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ant-contrib - A collection of tasks for Ant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193894 ------- Additional Comments From ifoox at redhat.com 2006-07-17 10:10 EST ------- Seems like my upload was not successful, I updated the file and it's working now. Hans, I agree that ant-contrib.jar referring to itself seems very useless, I'll try removing that later today and see how it flies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 14:22:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 10:22:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171422.k6HEMmVB030391@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2006-07-17 10:14 EST ------- There is a plan to introduce a new set of icons which follow the freedesktop icon spec in FC6. Details at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/BluecurveAndBeyond -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 14:36:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 10:36:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174021] Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171436.k6HEarZg031494@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174021 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-07-17 10:28 EST ------- Unfortunately, I can't reproduced the reported effect. I have make a local build on my maschine and done a rpmlint on the binary rpm using rpmlint-0.77. In Opposite of your results, I didn't get any complaints from rpmlint. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 14:42:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 10:42:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198928] Review Request: lsscsi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171442.k6HEg5ET032271@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lsscsi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198928 ------- Additional Comments From coldwell at redhat.com 2006-07-17 10:33 EST ------- I updated the spec file and src.rpm to incorporate your recommendations; they're still in the same place: http://people.redhat.com/coldwell/lsscsi.spec http://people.redhat.com/coldwell/lsscsi-0.17-2.src.rpm (don't know if I should have bumped the release number or not). Chip -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 14:45:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 10:45:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174021] Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171445.k6HEj6Jv032659@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174021 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-17 10:36 EST ------- Just to be completely, absolutely clear, what rpmlint command did you run? You say you ran it on the binary rpm, which seems to imply that you ran something like: rpmlint aplus-fsf-4.20.2-4.fc5.i386.rpm which is not what I'm talking about. I'm saying to install that package and its dependencies, and then to run rpmlint aplus-fsf which will check the installed package. This does a different set of checks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 15:04:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 11:04:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182254] Review Request: SS5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171504.k6HF4TuJ001856@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SS5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182254 ------- Additional Comments From matteo.ricchetti at libero.it 2006-07-17 10:55 EST ------- Ok, I upgraded plague-client to 0.4 and now client and server API match (100 = 100). I went into devel branch and I did the command "make build": Job ID: 12698 Now I have some questions: - how can I check build status? - how can I check if my package is into Extras (at the moment is part of "Packages not present in the development repo"? I need to specify other branch or in not necessary? Thank you very much! Bye -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 15:17:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 11:17:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196146] Review Request: mod_nss In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171517.k6HFH67u002816@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_nss https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196146 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-07-17 11:08 EST ------- Just moved on to trying to build in a mock chroot and got an error about autoconf not being found, so the addition of "BuildRequires: autoconf" looks to be necessary. Could have sworn that would always be present, but its not in the Exceptions list... Trivial addition though. One thing I forgot to mention that might be worth adding is a little documentation just after %install, explaining why 'make install' isn't used. I'll post the full details of a full review checklist once completed. Gimme one more rev, and I think we're golden. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 15:36:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 11:36:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196146] Review Request: mod_nss In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171536.k6HFaXTF003794@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_nss https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196146 ------- Additional Comments From rcritten at redhat.com 2006-07-17 11:27 EST ------- Files updated. Added BuildRequires: autoconf Added some notes about 'make install' and purpose of 'temporary file' text in key3.db, cert8.db and secmod.db -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 16:13:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 12:13:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199154] New: Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 Summary: Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: devrim at commandprompt.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://pgfoundry.org/frs/download.php/970/postgresql-slony1-engine.spec SRPM URL: http://pgfoundry.org/frs/download.php/969/postgresql-slony1-engine-1.1.5-2_PG8.1.4.src.rpm Description: Slony-I will be a "master to multiple slaves" replication system for PostgreSQL with cascading and failover. The big picture for the development of Slony-I is to build a master-slave system that includes all features and capabilities needed to replicate large databases to a reasonably limited number of slave systems. Slony-I is planned as a system for data centers and backup sites, where the normal mode of operation is that all nodes are available -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 16:21:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 12:21:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197353] Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171621.k6HGLjad006679@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197353 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-07-17 12:12 EST ------- Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/man-pages-fr.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/man-pages-fr-2.18.0-1.src.rpm %changelog * Mon Jul 17 2006 Alain Portal 2.18.0-1 - Update to 2.18.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 16:33:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 12:33:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196393] Review Request: svrcore-devel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171633.k6HGXa0N007091@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: svrcore-devel Alias: svrcore-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196393 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2006-07-17 12:24 EST ------- Thanks. Here are the updated packages/files: Spec URL: ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/directory/svrcore/releases/4.0.2/svrcore-devel.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/directory/svrcore/releases/4.0.2/svrcore-devel-4.0.2-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 16:48:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 12:48:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198882] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-IRC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171648.k6HGmvY4008367@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-IRC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198882 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-17 12:40 EST ------- Updated to just-released 4.96. Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Component-IRC.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Component-IRC-4.96-0.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 16:52:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 12:52:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196146] Review Request: mod_nss In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171652.k6HGqTi4008670@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_nss https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196146 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-07-17 12:43 EST ------- * package meets naming and packaging guidelines * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently * dist tag is present * build root is correct %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) * license field matches the actual license: Apache * license is open source-compatible, license text included in package * source files match upstream: feb2d314983a72318cc08e0650501fac mod_nss-1.0.3.tar.gz * latest version is being packaged * BuildRequires are proper: nspr-devel >= 4.6, nss-devel >= 3.11 httpd-devel >= 0:2.0.52, apr-devel, apr-util-devel autoconf Technically, the apr-devel BR could be left off, since apr-util-devel Requires: apr-devel. Similarly, nspr-devel could be left off, as nss-devel Requires: nspr-devel >= 4.6 already. Ah, one could get even cleaner: httpd-devel Requires: apr-devel and apr-util-devel. So you could reduce BuildRequires: down to just: nss-devel >= 3.11, httpd-devel >= 0:2.0.52, autoconf Up to you whether you want to do that or not though. * package builds in mock (FC6/x86_64). * rpmlint is (mostly) silent W: mod_nss dangling-relative-symlink /etc/httpd/alias/libnssckbi.so ../../../usr/lib64/libnssckbi.so -Not pretty, but better than copying the file over from another package, would be optimal to configure mod_nss to simply look for the .so in /usr/lib(64) W: mod_nss dangerous-command-in-%post rm -We're safeguarding that rather tightly, necessary for proper cert creation, no worries here * final provides and requires are sane: config(mod_nss) = 1.0.3-1.fc6 libmodnss.so()(64bit) mod_nss = 1.0.3-1.fc6 = config(mod_nss) = 1.0.3-1.fc6 httpd >= 0:2.0.52 libnspr4.so()(64bit) libnss3.so()(64bit) libnss3.so(NSS_3.10.2)(64bit) libnss3.so(NSS_3.2)(64bit) libnss3.so(NSS_3.3)(64bit) libnss3.so(NSS_3.4)(64bit) libnss3.so(NSS_3.5)(64bit) libnss3.so(NSS_3.6)(64bit) libplc4.so()(64bit) libplds4.so()(64bit) libsmime3.so()(64bit) libsoftokn3.so()(64bit) libssl3.so()(64bit) libssl3.so(NSS_3.2)(64bit) libssl3.so(NSS_3.4)(64bit) libssl3.so(NSS_3.7.4)(64bit) nspr >= 4.6 nss >= 3.11 nss-tools >= 3.11 * no shared libraries are present * package is not relocatable * owns the directories it creates * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't * no duplicates in %files * file permissions are appropriate * %clean is present * %check is present and all tests pass: n/a * scriptlets are sane * code, not content * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package * no headers * no pkgconfig files * no libtool .la files lingering about * not a GUI app * not a web app Package APPROVED, I'll ping someone about sponsorship... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 17:26:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 13:26:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] gutenprint In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171726.k6HHQYsF010824@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gutenprint https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-17 13:17 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=132558) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=132558&action=view) spec file addressing rpmlint, directory ownership, and other issues The README in the gutenprint package contains some tips on how to package it. Unless there is a good reason not to do so, I would follow that advice. You probably don't want to package escputil or its manual page because they would cause file conflicts with gimp-print-utils. The package as it stands has a dependency on perl(perlmenu); there is no package in FC5 or FE5 that satisfies this dependency. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 17:31:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 13:31:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198711] Review Request: splint - An implementation of the lint program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171731.k6HHV5l4011069@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: splint - An implementation of the lint program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198711 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO_REPORTER ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-17 13:22 EST ------- The script w/out shellbang is most likely due to executable bits set on it. Fix that issue and the rest are ignorable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 17:34:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 13:34:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196393] Review Request: svrcore-devel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171734.k6HHY3rk011195@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: svrcore-devel Alias: svrcore-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196393 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO_REPORTER ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-07-17 13:25 EST ------- Is there any reason why this *must* be a static-only library? Normally this is frowned upon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 17:41:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 13:41:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195363] Review Request: esc and esc-xulrunner-devel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171741.k6HHf2KK011606@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esc and esc-xulrunner-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195363 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO_REPORTER OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188267 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 17:41:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 13:41:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195659] Review Request: qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171741.k6HHfTT9011678@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195659 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-17 13:32 EST ------- Than, does this need to go into Core for FC6 or can it stay in Extras? You've got qt4 for RHEL, so I'm not sure whats going on here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 17:44:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 13:44:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196146] Review Request: mod_nss In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171744.k6HHi3ae011822@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_nss https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196146 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jwilson at redhat.com |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-17 13:35 EST ------- Rob, I'll sponsor you. Go ahead and apply for your cvsextras membership while I double-check the above review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 17:44:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 13:44:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199168] New: Review Request: CGAL Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199168 Summary: Review Request: CGAL Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.di.ens.fr/~rineau/Fedora/CGAL-3.2.1-13-fc5.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://www.di.ens.fr/~rineau/Fedora/CGAL.spec Description: Computational Geometry Algorithms Library CGAL is a collaborative effort of several sites in Europe and Israel. The goal is to make the most important of the solutions and methods developed in computational geometry available to users in industry and academia in a C++ library. The goal is to provide easy access to useful, reliable geometric algorithms. Homepage: http://www.cgal.org/ Packager notes: * With CGAL-3.2.1, the tarball has been pruned from documentation files with undecided license, in order to make packaging possible. * A Debian package has been submitted, and has been accepted http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=251885 * Whereas the Debian packager choose to extract the core++ library and put it in a separate package, I choose to ship libcore++.a in the CGAL package. It could be modified, if needed. * rpmlint shows several errors or warnings. Some of them come from the meta-package CGAL that requires all sub-packages. * The -devel sub-package ships several static library. It is because upstream developers do not want to maintain SOMAJOR numbers for them, now, for libcore++.a, and libCGALQt.a -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 17:46:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 13:46:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196393] Review Request: svrcore-devel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171746.k6HHkuVa012121@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: svrcore-devel Alias: svrcore-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196393 rmeggins at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2006-07-17 13:38 EST ------- I don't think so. We inherited this package from the Netscape acquisition - it was always a static lib there and here. It's only used by the Mozilla LDAP C SDK command line programs for secure SSL pin management, so it gets statically compiled into its ldapsearch, ldapmodify, etc. (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196401). It's hoped that once more apps begin using NSS for crypto, there will be more apps that could use it, at which point we could look at making it a shared lib. But really, the only thing we need it for now is so we can get mozldap into Fedora Extras. The only reason we haven't just put the code into mozldap is because we hope to have other apps use it in the future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 17:48:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 13:48:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165878] Review Request: kadu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171748.k6HHmXvE012321@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165878 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-17 13:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > You should create a new request and close this one Yes, but... I have no permissions to change status of this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 17:56:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 13:56:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198922] Review Request: dejavu-lgc-fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171756.k6HHujEj012782@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dejavu-lgc-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198922 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |jkeating at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188268 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-17 13:47 EST ------- NEEDSWORK: - buildroot is wrong RPMLINT just complains about the license, but you include the license so thats OK. Fix the buildroot and I approve. I've added to dist-fc6 owner besfahbo at redhat.com How should this go into Comps? How will it get installed on people's systems? Please close this report when you've built for rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 17:58:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 13:58:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198879] Review Request: kdnssd-avahi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171758.k6HHwNHP012991@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdnssd-avahi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198879 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |jkeating at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188267 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-17 13:49 EST ------- NEEDSWORK: - prerelease package release tags start with 0., as per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-d97a3f40b6dd9d2288206ac9bd8f1bf9b791b22a - description for -devel should mention that it is development stuff. - RPMLINT output W: kdnssd-avahi-devel no-documentation W: kdnssd-avahi strange-permission kdnssd-avahi-svn_checkout.sh 0755 First one is ignorable. Second one as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 18:06:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 14:06:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196401] Review Request: mozldap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171806.k6HI6cJI013503@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mozldap Alias: mozldap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196401 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2006-07-17 13:57 EST ------- > 10) standard practice in Fedora is to symlink back to the actual .so rather > than create a trail of symlinks I'm not sure what this means? > 14) unversioned .so files must go in -devel package when there are > also versioned .so's But then if someone links an app against libldap50.so (in the devel package), how does the app find libldap50.so at runtime when it doesn't exist on the system, only libldap50.so.5.17? > 15) rpmlint complains about invalid sonames, I presume this is a side-effect > of renaming them: > E: mozldap invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libssldap-5.0.so.5.17 libssldap50.so > E: mozldap invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libprldap-5.0.so.5.17 libprldap50.so > E: mozldap invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libldap-5.0.so.5.17 libldap50.so Where do /usr/lib64/libssldap-5.0.so.5.17 and the others come from? All of my lib names should begin with lib[ss,pr]ldap50 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 18:34:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 14:34:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196401] Review Request: mozldap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171834.k6HIYNcC017046@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mozldap Alias: mozldap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196401 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-07-17 14:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > > 10) standard practice in Fedora is to symlink back to the actual .so rather > > than create a trail of symlinks > > I'm not sure what this means? In this bit of the spec... for file in libssldap50.so libprldap50.so libldap50.so do mv $file $file.%{major}.%{minor} ln -s $file.%{major}.%{minor} $file.%{major} ln -s $file.%{major} $file done ...$file is a symlink to $file.major, which is a symlink to $file.major.minor. $file should just symlink up to $file.major.minor instead. > > 14) unversioned .so files must go in -devel package when there are > > also versioned .so's > > But then if someone links an app against libldap50.so (in the devel package), > how does the app find libldap50.so at runtime when it doesn't exist on the > system, only libldap50.so.5.17? I can't say I know the specifics of it, but I know it works. :) Its explicitly called out that way in the packaging guidelines, and does work for umpteen libraries already in Fedora Core and Extras. > > 15) rpmlint complains about invalid sonames, I presume this is a side-effect > > of renaming them: > > > E: mozldap invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libssldap-5.0.so.5.17 libssldap50.so > > E: mozldap invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libprldap-5.0.so.5.17 libprldap50.so > > E: mozldap invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libldap-5.0.so.5.17 libldap50.so > > Where do /usr/lib64/libssldap-5.0.so.5.17 and the others come from? All of my > lib names should begin with lib[ss,pr]ldap50 Bah, that was from me playing around a bit to see if it was just the file name it didn't like. The actual output to be concerned about is: E: mozldap invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libssldap50.so.5.17 libssldap50.so E: mozldap invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libprldap50.so.5.17 libprldap50.so E: mozldap invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libldap50.so.5.17 libldap50.so I believe the versioning should be encoded somewhere in the shared lib, but at build time, unversioned libs are being created. A 'strings /usr/lib(64)/lib' for any library with a versioning includes lib in the output, while lib*ldap50.so.* only includes lib*ldap50.so. That being the case, it looks like either something needs to be done at build time to put the right versioning info in there, or only the unversioned lib should be packaged. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 18:35:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 14:35:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198944] Review Request: compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171835.k6HIZWtC017278@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198944 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |jkeating at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188267 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-17 14:26 EST ------- How does this spec compare to the one in the Extras review? Does this one have the fixes and updates generated from that review? NEEDSWORK: - release string should be whole number unless it is a pre-release (snapshot). If it is a snapshot, as it looks like, you should use the prelease naming scheme: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-d97a3f40b6dd9d2288206ac9bd8f1bf9b791b22a - dist tag is %{?dist} not %{dist} - gconf stuff should follow the scriptletsnippits or have good reason not to: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ScriptletSnippets#head-ff64cd482595764f672082d5a3b83e1fc22962e8 - changelog shouldn't use dist tag as part of the version-release. - missing br gettext rpmlint output (once added gettext) W: compiz-debuginfo invalid-license X11/MIT/GPL W: compiz invalid-license X11/MIT/GPL W: compiz invalid-license X11/MIT/GPL Ignorable I suppose, but it would help if upstream included a LICENSE file. W: compiz macro-in-%changelog dist Leave out the macro. W: compiz mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs Ignorable W: compiz non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/compiz.schemas Should this be marked a conf file? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 18:37:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 14:37:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199173] New: Review Request: clusterssh Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199173 Summary: Review Request: clusterssh Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: duncan_j_ferguson at yahoo.co.uk QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://queeg.dyndns.org/clusterssh/clusterssh.spec SRPM URL: http://queeg.dyndns.org/clusterssh/clusterssh-3.18.2.10-1.src.rpm Description: Control multiple terminals open on different servers to perform administration tasks, for example multiple hosts requiring the same config within a cluster. Not limited to use with clusters, however. Note this is not the final version of the code, but a precusor to get all changes required for fedora in and accepted before being committed and publically released. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 18:37:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 14:37:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196401] Review Request: mozldap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171837.k6HIbGXF017670@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mozldap Alias: mozldap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196401 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-07-17 14:28 EST ------- Ah, and the versioning being encoded in the shared lib has something to do with how the linking against the devel package works when the devel package isn't installed at runtime. Or so I believe... :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 18:42:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 14:42:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193820] Review Request: libcm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171842.k6HIgb1N018937@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193820 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO_REPORTER ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-17 14:33 EST ------- I'm told we're not using metacity compisitor, rather using compiz. Does that mean this package request can go away? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 18:42:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 14:42:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198836] Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171842.k6HIgkxo018984@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198836 ------- Additional Comments From besfahbo at redhat.com 2006-07-17 14:34 EST ------- I refuse to fix something that is not broken. If you just want to verify the tarball, you can compare it to the one in freetype-2.1.10 core package. If the review cannot go through with the current tarball, I withdraw my request and let someone else package freetype1. A few Extras packages depend on it. Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 18:44:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 14:44:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198836] Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171844.k6HIiv0N019539@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198836 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2006-07-17 14:36 EST ------- As I said to Behdad, if you really care about 6 year old tarballs that much, do the work. Behdad did what you could expect from him by providing a package that picks up exactly the bits that he dropped from Core. Some Extras packages do depend on libttf, so either the maintainers of those packages will have to fight to get this reviewed, or have to port their packages away from libttf... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 19:02:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:02:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196146] Review Request: mod_nss In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171902.k6HJ2NBM022813@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_nss https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196146 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-17 14:53 EST ------- Just a couple of questions before I can ACK this: Rawhide is busted at the moment, but building on FC5 fails due to a missing BuildRequires: pkgconfig. This is probably a missing dependency in one of the -devel packages you require. For instance, nspr-devel has a .pc file but does not require pkgconfig, a clear bug. Anyway, to build on FC5 at least you'll need to add that BR. Why do you need to call autoconf? Generally this is avoided if possible. For grins I removed it from the spec and things still built OK, although there's always the possibility that something broke. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 19:03:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:03:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197754] Review Request: perl-Perl6-Bible In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171903.k6HJ3MAT022873@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Perl6-Bible https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197754 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-07-17 14:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > This is an odd package; it's a Perl module, but it's really all documentation > except for the tiny viewer script. I'm inclined to just treat it as any other > perl module but it does seem a bit strange. It seemed to make sense to work on getting this in along with parrot and pugs for anyone who wanted to work on Perl 6. > More troubling is this: > > This Copyright applies only to the Perl6::Bible Perl software distribution, not > the documents bundled within. > > and the documents within all seem to lack any kind of copyright information. I hadn't noticed that, but I'm sure that was just a clarification of the copyright on the package, not a statement about the license. Given that those documents are *the* formal specification and documentation for Perl 6, I'll be very surprised if they aren't covered by the usual GPL/Artistic dual license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 19:10:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:10:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197791] Review Request: stacaccli - Stateless Cached Client Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171910.k6HJAKnv023260@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stacaccli - Stateless Cached Client Tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197791 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-17 15:01 EST ------- rpmlint package does not have a sha-bang in the module files not designed to be executed directly. They really don't belong there. The complaint about a direct lib requirement is because rpm itself can most often figure out the package requirements on its own. Is this not the case if you remove the Requires: line? (This may not work for python module requirements) Getting more input on the rwtab issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 19:16:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:16:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197963] Review Request: bouncycastle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171916.k6HJGw4C023613@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouncycastle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197963 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO_REPORTER OtherBugsDependingO|188267 |188268 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-17 15:08 EST ------- No more rpmlint errors. Package approved. I assume that this will be marked as a dep of some other package, and it doesn't need to go into Comps right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 19:17:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:17:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197791] Review Request: stacaccli - Stateless Cached Client Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171917.k6HJHIAw023653@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stacaccli - Stateless Cached Client Tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197791 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO_REPORTER ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-17 15:08 EST ------- More info on rwtab. Since the rwtab file will be package version specific most likely, its not designed to be user editable right? And thus it can't be marked noreplace, so there is little value (other than rpmlint) in marking it as config. You can ignore if the above assumptions are true. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 19:19:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:19:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198284] Review Request: python-configobj - Config file reading, writing, and validation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171919.k6HJJoZi023807@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-configobj - Config file reading, writing, and validation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198284 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |gauret at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-07-17 15:10 EST ------- * typo in the url (it's dl.sf.net, not ds.sf.net) * add --single-version-externally-managed to the %install step, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python for more info -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 19:20:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:20:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198922] Review Request: dejavu-lgc-fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171920.k6HJK8uJ023861@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dejavu-lgc-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198922 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2006-07-17 15:11 EST ------- The proposal for test2 is to put dejavu in the default install in comps and add a fontconfig conf file that makes dejavu the default. That will allow us to see if people find serious issues with dejavu. I have imported the package into cvs now, and fixed the buildroot. I'm waiting for the mentioned fontconfig snipplet from Behdad, then I'll build it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 19:21:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:21:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198816] Review Request: gfs-utils - global file system userland utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171921.k6HJLIEW023954@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-utils - global file system userland utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198816 ------- Additional Comments From cfeist at redhat.com 2006-07-17 15:12 EST ------- Fixed that as well. (libvolume_id.h BuildRequire) New files are here: http://people.redhat.com/cfeist/gfs-utils.spec http://people.redhat.com/cfeist/gfs-utils-0.1.0-0.fc6.2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 19:33:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:33:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197981] Review Request: gkrellm-wifi - Wireless monitor plugin for the GNU Krell Monitors In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171933.k6HJXGma024533@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gkrellm-wifi - Wireless monitor plugin for the GNU Krell Monitors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197981 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-07-17 15:24 EST ------- 0.9.12-2 approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 19:33:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:33:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196748] Review Request: setroubleshoot - automatic diagnosis of SELinux problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171933.k6HJXWdw024608@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setroubleshoot - automatic diagnosis of SELinux problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196748 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo? ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-17 15:24 EST ------- Bill, do we have an Ack? John, where should this go in comps? or should it be made a dep of selinux userland stuff? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 19:34:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:34:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196229] Review Request: xkeyboard-config In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171934.k6HJYOf7024759@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xkeyboard-config https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196229 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-17 15:25 EST ------- Built into rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 19:35:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:35:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195311] Review Request: coolkey In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171935.k6HJZL4I024888@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coolkey https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195311 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-17 15:26 EST ------- Built into rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 19:36:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:36:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194551] Review Request: ifd-egate In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171936.k6HJaYbk025044@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ifd-egate https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194551 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-17 15:27 EST ------- Built into rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 19:37:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:37:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195311] Review Request: coolkey In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171937.k6HJb7w6025139@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coolkey https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195311 Bug 195311 depends on bug 194551, which changed state. Bug 194551 Summary: Review Request: ifd-egate https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194551 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 19:37:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:37:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193187] Review Request: pcsc-lite & ccid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171937.k6HJbSd6025196@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcsc-lite & ccid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193187 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-17 15:28 EST ------- Built into rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 19:37:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:37:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194551] Review Request: ifd-egate In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171937.k6HJbpvQ025272@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ifd-egate https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194551 Bug 194551 depends on bug 193187, which changed state. Bug 193187 Summary: Review Request: pcsc-lite & ccid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193187 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 19:38:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:38:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165899] Review Request: pam_pkcs11 : PKCS #11 PAM login module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171938.k6HJcKpZ025370@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_pkcs11 : PKCS #11 PAM login module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165899 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-17 15:29 EST ------- Built into rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 19:38:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:38:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195311] Review Request: coolkey In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171938.k6HJcPcW025411@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coolkey https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195311 Bug 195311 depends on bug 193187, which changed state. Bug 193187 Summary: Review Request: pcsc-lite & ccid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193187 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 19:40:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:40:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195942] Review Request: Veusz - a scientific plotting package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171940.k6HJeSoZ025733@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Veusz - a scientific plotting package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195942 jeremy at jeremysanders.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jeremy at jeremysanders.net 2006-07-17 15:31 EST ------- Appears to be in extras now. Closing. Thanks for the help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 19:41:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:41:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197963] Review Request: bouncycastle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171941.k6HJfmTF025929@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouncycastle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197963 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-07-17 15:33 EST ------- Is the intention of %{_javadir}/gcj-endorsed that only gcj (not other JVMs) should be using stuff from there? Other JVMs, eg. the Sun one, would have problems with the jar because it's not signed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 19:43:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:43:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196146] Review Request: mod_nss In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171943.k6HJhWlA026187@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_nss https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196146 ------- Additional Comments From rcritten at redhat.com 2006-07-17 15:34 EST ------- Files updated. Added pkgconfig Removed autoconf Autoconf was a leftover from the httpd spec file I used as a template. It seemed a bit paranoid but wasn't problematic. Should be fine, and build faster, without it. It's gone. I'll notify the nspr and nss maintainer(s) regarding pkgconfig. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 19:47:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:47:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193157] Review Request: system-config-selinux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171947.k6HJlJPp026564@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-selinux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193157 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|188268 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 19:48:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:48:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198708] Review Request: gnome-vfs2-monikers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171948.k6HJm4Cj026683@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-vfs2-monikers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198708 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-17 15:39 EST ------- Built in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 19:52:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:52:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196748] Review Request: setroubleshoot - automatic diagnosis of SELinux problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171952.k6HJqFMe027187@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setroubleshoot - automatic diagnosis of SELinux problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196748 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo? | ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-07-17 15:43 EST ------- Yeah. When I ran it it seemed somewhat overloaded with jargon, but that can be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 19:55:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:55:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197963] Review Request: bouncycastle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171955.k6HJtvRP027486@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouncycastle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197963 fitzsim at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2006-07-17 15:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Is the intention of %{_javadir}/gcj-endorsed that only gcj (not other JVMs) > should be using stuff from there? Other JVMs, eg. the Sun one, would have > problems with the jar because it's not signed. Yes, I'm not supporting non-GNU Classpath based JVMs with this RPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 19:59:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:59:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196748] Review Request: setroubleshoot - automatic diagnosis of SELinux problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607171959.k6HJxZij027690@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setroubleshoot - automatic diagnosis of SELinux problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196748 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-17 15:50 EST ------- added to dist-fc6, jdennis is owner. Still not sure where to put it in Comps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 20:04:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 16:04:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199183] New: Review Request: e2tools - Manipulate files in unmounted ext2/ext3 filesystems Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199183 Summary: Review Request: e2tools - Manipulate files in unmounted ext2/ext3 filesystems Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: andreas at bawue.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/e2tools/e2tools.spec SRPM URL: http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/e2tools/e2tools-0.0.16-4.src.rpm Description: A simple set of utilities to read, write, and manipulate files in an ext2/ext3 filesystem directly using the ext2fs library. This does not require any of - root access - the filesystem to be mounted - the kernel to support ext2 The utilities are: e2cp e2ln e2ls e2mkdir e2mv e2rm e2tail -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 20:09:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 16:09:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197963] Review Request: bouncycastle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607172009.k6HK91bL028344@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouncycastle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197963 ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2006-07-17 16:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > No more rpmlint errors. Package approved. > > I assume that this will be marked as a dep of some other package, and it doesn't > need to go into Comps right? For now let's leave it out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 20:19:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 16:19:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198944] Review Request: compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607172019.k6HKJ1ki028832@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198944 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2006-07-17 16:09 EST ------- - Can you please explain what version number you would like to see here ? compiz-0.0.13-5.1.fedora6 sounds like a perfectly fine n-v-r to me - The GConf invokations in %post an %preun look perfectly fine to me. This insistance on slavishly copying some snipplets from a wiki page is really the ugliest part of package review... The one thing that is wrong with the gconf invokations is the --shutdown I think that has no place there. - We never mark gconf schema files as conf files, why do we have to go thorough this again for every package review ? I'll fix the other issues -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 20:41:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 16:41:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198944] Review Request: compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607172041.k6HKfsHE030208@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198944 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2006-07-17 16:32 EST ------- Spec: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/review/compiz.spec SRPM: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/review/compiz-0.0.13-0.5.20070717git.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 20:43:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 16:43:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174021] Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607172043.k6HKhaNP030383@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174021 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-07-17 16:34 EST ------- I have try to solve the problem by reordering the libraries in src/Makefile.am. Unfortunately, the rpmlint will no been gone after installation of the new build version. It will be nice, if anyone have a hint for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 21:02:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 17:02:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199192] New: Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199192 Summary: Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: mr.ecik at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ecik.zspswidwin.pl/kadu/kadu.spec SRPM URL: http://ecik.zspswidwin.pl/kadu/kadu-0.5.0-1.20060716svn.src.rpm Description: Hi! This is one of my first packages so I need a sponsor. In bug 165878 there is another kadu review request but reporter has abondoned it and I have no permissions to close that bug. Kadu is Gadu-Gadu protocol client, which is very popular in Poland, probably it is the most popular instant messaging application in Poland. The last stable version is 0.4.3, but I think that 0.5.0 svn version is stable enough, so it can be placed in Extras. Few words about SPEC: 1. I have defined two macros: mod_files and mod_files2 to make easier creating %files section of subpackages. Files in subpackages are mostly very similar so I didn't want to write the same repeatedly. 2. I know the first lines of %prep section don't look professional but it is the simpliest way to unpack all archives. Otherwise I would have to write my own lines to unpack each one and SPEC file would look more complicated. The last %setup line simply does nothing - it is only to set kadu dir as sources dir. But if you say that %prep cannot look like that, I'll change it. 3. There is no %doc tag, because AUTHORS, README etc. files are used by Kadu in About window so they must be in proper directory. Well, I think that's all. SPEC is a little complex so I can explain each line in it, because everything is justified :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 21:29:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 17:29:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199192] Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607172129.k6HLTwJM032622@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199192 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 21:32:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 17:32:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165878] Review Request: kadu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607172132.k6HLWo7T000394@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165878 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-17 17:24 EST ------- Bug 199192 is new request for this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 22:00:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 18:00:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165878] Review Request: kadu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607172200.k6HM0m4U002417@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165878 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-17 17:51 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 199192 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 22:01:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 18:01:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199192] Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607172201.k6HM12VT002467@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199192 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gogers at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-17 17:52 EST ------- *** Bug 165878 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 22:04:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 18:04:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607172204.k6HM4BHC002651@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From snecklifter at gmail.com 2006-07-17 17:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Also, you should not use the Packager: tag in your spec. See: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-c17fb8c1ce9be40da720a2b25d1e2a241062038f > Removed. > Thirdly, your package would probably break on 64-bit systems, as you hardcode > /lib/ into the path of %_pythondir. Please use a macro for this instead, such as > %{_lib} (or %{_libdir}, etc. as needed). Added, see below. > > Forth, you really should be using %{python_sitedir} and following the %files > section correctly as mentioned in Packaging/Python on the Wiki. See: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python Done. This would appear to be one and the same with your third point. > > Lastly, in the %changelog, you simply have a user at host identifier. I'm not > certain, but I believe that this is supposed to be a full and valid email > address (such as "me at my-isp.com" or something similar). Done. Thanks again for the pointers. Could you please review again and let me know if there are any more blockers. Regards Chris -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 22:16:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 18:16:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198832] Review Request: skstream - C++ I/O library for WorldForge apps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607172216.k6HMGvCe003245@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: skstream - C++ I/O library for WorldForge apps Alias: skstream https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198832 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-07-17 18:08 EST ------- oh the configure file checks for zip for some reason, not zlib, sorry. AC_CHECK_PROG(SK_ZIP, zip, zip, no) Ill go ahead and approve this, but might be worth finding out why zip is checked. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 22:20:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 18:20:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198831] Review Request: varconf - Configuration library used by WorldForge apps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607172220.k6HMKUoY003577@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: varconf - Configuration library used by WorldForge apps Alias: varconf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198831 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-07-17 18:11 EST ------- > once conftest is created, you need to: cd tests ; ./conftest < conf.cfg ^^ This should be added to %check section -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 22:34:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 18:34:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] gutenprint In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607172234.k6HMY23W004342@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gutenprint https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 fedora at adslpipe.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at adslpipe.co.uk ------- Additional Comments From fedora at adslpipe.co.uk 2006-07-17 18:25 EST ------- I have built this on FC6/rawhide i386, and will give it a bit of a review in a while, before installing it, is it possible to give a measure of how "safe" is this to install on a box without nuking printing? Does gimp-print need to be removed first, or are there obsoletes to handle that? How do CUPS, gimp, and the new system-config-printer react to the changeover? I'm mainly interested to see if the printable CD media works on my Epson R300 which gutenprint's drivers claim to support ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 22:35:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 18:35:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198835] Review Request: atlascpp - WorldForge message protocol library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607172235.k6HMZaCf004424@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: atlascpp - WorldForge message protocol library Alias: Atlas-C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198835 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 22:39:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 18:39:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198832] Review Request: skstream - C++ I/O library for WorldForge apps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607172239.k6HMdSp2004791@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: skstream - C++ I/O library for WorldForge apps Alias: skstream https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198832 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-07-17 18:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > oh the configure file checks for zip for some reason, not zlib, sorry. > > AC_CHECK_PROG(SK_ZIP, zip, zip, no) > > Ill go ahead and approve this, but might be worth finding out why zip is checked. As best as I can tell from grepping and browsing the Makefiles, this is only used during a Windows build for the Windows installer. It doesn't seem to make any difference on linux. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 23:09:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 19:09:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198837] Review Request: eris - Client-side session layer for Atlas-C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607172309.k6HN9SwM006724@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eris - Client-side session layer for Atlas-C++ Alias: eris https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198837 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 23:16:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 19:16:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198835] Review Request: atlascpp - WorldForge message protocol library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607172316.k6HNGsK8007000@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: atlascpp - WorldForge message protocol library Alias: Atlas-C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198835 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-07-17 19:08 EST ------- Imported and built for rawhide. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 23:17:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 19:17:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198837] Review Request: eris - Client-side session layer for Atlas-C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607172317.k6HNHG3D007026@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eris - Client-side session layer for Atlas-C++ Alias: eris https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198837 Bug 198837 depends on bug 198835, which changed state. Bug 198835 Summary: Review Request: atlascpp - WorldForge message protocol library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198835 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 23:19:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 19:19:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198832] Review Request: skstream - C++ I/O library for WorldForge apps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607172319.k6HNJqTX007070@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: skstream - C++ I/O library for WorldForge apps Alias: skstream https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198832 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-07-17 19:11 EST ------- Imported and built for rawhide. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 23:20:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 19:20:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198837] Review Request: eris - Client-side session layer for Atlas-C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607172320.k6HNKEV6007111@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eris - Client-side session layer for Atlas-C++ Alias: eris https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198837 Bug 198837 depends on bug 198832, which changed state. Bug 198832 Summary: Review Request: skstream - C++ I/O library for WorldForge apps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198832 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 00:16:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 20:16:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607180016.k6I0G2x3009388@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2006-07-17 20:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Gnonlin is indeed in extras. Sorry about that. A `yum clean all` followed by a `yum info gnonlin` shows that it is indeed in Extras. On a related note, please bump the release whenever you significantly change the spec during the review or in CVS (once it's APPROVED). Is the resubmission located at the same URIs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 00:44:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 20:44:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196146] Review Request: mod_nss In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607180044.k6I0i7gS010378@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_nss https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196146 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-17 20:35 EST ------- How odd; I thought I had committed another comment to this ticket. Oh, well. The changes you made look good to me. I went approve your cvsextras membership but saw that Warren had already done it, which is odd since he hasn't made any comments on this ticket. I don't think it would be productive waiting for him to ACK this since that isn't likely to happen, so I say we're ready to go. By the way, in the future, please do bump the version on your package when you make changes. Otherwise it can be difficult for the reviewers to know if they have the most current version, and browser caching can make things even more difficult. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 00:55:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 20:55:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199212] New: Review Request: dbus-glib and dbus-python (split out from the dbus package) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199212 Summary: Review Request: dbus-glib and dbus-python (split out from the dbus package) Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: johnp at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com dbus-glib Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/johnp/files/dbus/dbus-glib.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/johnp/files/dbus/dbus-glib-0.70-1.src.rpm Description: D-Bus GLib bindings split out from the dbus package dbus-python Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/johnp/files/dbus/dbus-python.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/johnp/files/dbus/dbus-python-0.70-1.src.rpm Description: D-Bus Python bindings split out from the dbus package Note that both of these require the dbus-0.90 package to build. You can get the dbus-0.90 source RPM here http://people.redhat.com/johnp/files/dbus/dbus-0.90-1.src.rpm or check it out from package CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 02:07:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 22:07:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198944] Review Request: compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607180207.k6I27whW013725@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198944 krh at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From krh at redhat.com 2006-07-17 21:59 EST ------- Thanks for the review, Jesse, comments below. (In reply to comment #3) > How does this spec compare to the one in the Extras review? Does this one have > the fixes and updates generated from that review? To the extent that it makes sense, yes. > NEEDSWORK: > - release string should be whole number unless it is a pre-release (snapshot). > If it is a snapshot, as it looks like, you should use the prelease naming > scheme: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-d97a3f40b6dd9d2288206ac9bd8f1bf9b791b22a > - dist tag is %{?dist} not %{dist} > - gconf stuff should follow the scriptletsnippits or have good reason not to: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ScriptletSnippets#head-ff64cd482595764f672082d5a3b83e1fc22962e8 > - changelog shouldn't use dist tag as part of the version-release. > - missing br gettext Fixed (thanks, Matthias). > rpmlint output (once added gettext) > W: compiz-debuginfo invalid-license X11/MIT/GPL > W: compiz invalid-license X11/MIT/GPL > W: compiz invalid-license X11/MIT/GPL > > Ignorable I suppose, but it would help if upstream included a LICENSE file. Upstream doesn't include a license because different parts of the project are under different licenses. You need to check individual files for their license. > W: compiz macro-in-%changelog dist > > Leave out the macro. > > W: compiz mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs > > Ignorable > > W: compiz non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/compiz.schemas > > Should this be marked a conf file? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 02:09:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 22:09:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192432] Review Request: compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607180209.k6I29xwI013816@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192432 krh at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From krh at redhat.com 2006-07-17 22:01 EST ------- Closing as RAWHIDE, as per bug #198944 we're pulling it into Fedora Core. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 03:10:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 23:10:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198879] Review Request: kdnssd-avahi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607180310.k6I3AQYQ017466@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdnssd-avahi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198879 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-17 23:01 EST ------- > prerelease package release tags start with 0. It's not a pre-release, but a post-0.1.2-release svn checkout. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 03:11:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 23:11:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198879] Review Request: kdnssd-avahi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607180311.k6I3BE3F017581@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdnssd-avahi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198879 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 03:32:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 23:32:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] gutenprint In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607180332.k6I3WaOj019406@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gutenprint https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-17 23:23 EST ------- Thanks for all your comments. Paul, Thanks for correcting SPEC file. Will upload new SRPM,SPEC. But i have some questions. As gutenprint claims that its replacement to gimp-print and gimp-print-utils is a part of gimp-print then why not to make package to remove gimp-print,gimp-print-utils,gimp-print-plugins (add obsoletes to them)and install this new gutenprint package? I have those perl(Perlmenu) and perl-Curses RPMS from rpm.pbone.net. Should i add them also in Fedora Extras by repackaging them according to Fedora Extras guidlelines? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 04:07:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 00:07:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198284] Review Request: python-configobj - Config file reading, writing, and validation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607180407.k6I47h0P023611@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-configobj - Config file reading, writing, and validation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198284 ------- Additional Comments From lmacken at redhat.com 2006-07-17 23:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > * typo in the url (it's dl.sf.net, not ds.sf.net) fixed. > * add --single-version-externally-managed to the %install step, see > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python for more info Looks like the setup.py doesn't support the flag: error: option --single-version-externally-managed not recognized error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.90142 (%install) http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/python-configobj-4.3.2-2.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/python-configobj.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 05:14:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 01:14:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199028] Review Request: perl-eperl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607180514.k6I5EtZj026122@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-eperl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199028 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 05:31:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 01:31:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199028] Review Request: perl-eperl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607180531.k6I5VxZf026468@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-eperl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199028 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-18 01:23 EST ------- I struggled with the naming a bit, as eperl is more than just a perl module. However, it is indeed a module "and then some", which I believe makes it appropriate to prefix "perl-". The website and documentation also switch from "ePerl" to "eperl" fairly frequently, so I defer to the packager. + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) + license field matches the actual license. + license is open source-compatible. (GPL or Artistic) + License text included in package. + source files match upstream: 9af0f728e08ef8b3cf45f13782cc28da eperl_2.2.14-13.diff.gz 9af0f728e08ef8b3cf45f13782cc28da eperl_2.2.14-13.diff.gz.srpm 0213580b6711b5312d1873f9732ae8d6 eperl-2.2.14.tar.gz 0213580b6711b5312d1873f9732ae8d6 eperl-2.2.14.tar.gz.srpm + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. package builds in mock (devel/fc5 x86_64). + rpmlint is silent. + final provides and requires are sane: ePerl.so()(64bit) Perl(Parse::ePerl) = 2.2.14 perl-eperl = 2.2.14-2.fc5 = libdb-4.3.so()(64bit) libgdbm.so.2()(64bit) libperl.so()(64bit) perl >= 0:5.00325 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(AutoLoader) perl(Carp) perl(Cwd) perl(DynaLoader) perl(Exporter) perl(strict) perl(vars) + no shared libraries in the system dynamic paths are present. + package is not relocatable. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + %clean is present. + %check is present and all tests pass: t/01_load..........ok t/02_preprocess....ok t/03_translate.....ok t/04_precompile....ok t/05_evaluate......ok t/06_expand........ok t/07_delimiter.....ok All tests successful. Files=7, Tests=9, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.16 cusr + 0.11 csys = 0.27 CPU) + no scriptlets present. + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. + no headers. + no pkgconfig files. + no libtool .la droppings. + not a GUI app. + not a web app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 05:32:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 01:32:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199028] Review Request: perl-eperl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607180532.k6I5WEqH026483@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-eperl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199028 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 06:57:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 02:57:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] gutenprint In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607180657.k6I6vjFO030100@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gutenprint https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-18 02:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Thanks for all your comments. > Paul, > Thanks for correcting SPEC file. Will upload new SRPM,SPEC. > But i have some questions. As gutenprint claims that its replacement to > gimp-print and gimp-print-utils is a part of gimp-print then why not to make > package to remove gimp-print,gimp-print-utils,gimp-print-plugins (add obsoletes > to them)and install this new gutenprint package? Packages in Extras aren't supposed to obsolete packages in Core. I'm pretty sure about this but can't actually find where it's documented. It may be worth bringing up on fedora-extras-list. I believe that gutenprint will eventually make it into Core. At that point, gimp-print will go and it'll be safe to include the files that conflict with it. > I have those perl(Perlmenu) and perl-Curses RPMS from rpm.pbone.net. Should i > add them also in Fedora Extras by repackaging them according to Fedora Extras > guidlelines? perl-Curses is already in Extras. A module providing perl(perlmenu) [not perl(Perlmenu)] would need to be provided as a submission for Extras before gutenprint could be properly reviewed. It's possible that that module may itself have additional dependencies. Do you know which program in the gutenprint package is responsible for these dependencies? Another possible option might be to not package that particular program if it's not important. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 06:59:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 02:59:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198922] Review Request: dejavu-lgc-fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607180659.k6I6xJQB030154@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dejavu-lgc-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198922 paskalis at di.uoa.gr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paskalis at di.uoa.gr ------- Additional Comments From paskalis at di.uoa.gr 2006-07-18 02:50 EST ------- Could you please package the newer 2.8 version of dejavu-lgc? As far as I can see it has some fixes for cyrillic and hinting for greek among other things for the lgc variant. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 07:10:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 03:10:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] gutenprint In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607180710.k6I7ATBd030406@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gutenprint https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-18 03:01 EST ------- Paul, Will check perl thing in gutenprint package.I have already created package with Obsoletes and updates files are as SPEC file: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/gutenprint/gutenprint.spec SRPM file: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/gutenprint/gutenprint-5.0.0-0.2.rc3.fc5.src.rpm If its not allowed to obsolete core packages then i can revert back changes in SPEC. Also why not to package %{_libdir}/gimp/*/plug-ins/print under gutenprint? Why mock build did not give any dependency error for both perl packages but while installing final binary rpm it asked for perl-PerlMenu as well as perl-Curses ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 07:23:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 03:23:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] gutenprint In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607180723.k6I7N6gk031203@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gutenprint https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-18 03:14 EST ------- But i solved dependency problem using perl-PerlMenu package and you have asked me to add perl(perlmenu) module package? What is correct package then? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 07:33:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 03:33:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607180733.k6I7XGHI032144@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-07-18 03:24 EST ------- This is my first submission to Fedora Core and I need a sponsor for this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 07:35:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 03:35:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607180735.k6I7ZXeZ032300@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 08:03:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 04:03:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] gutenprint In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607180803.k6I83MpE002932@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gutenprint https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-18 03:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > Will check perl thing in gutenprint package.I have already created package > with Obsoletes and updates files are as > SPEC file: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/gutenprint/gutenprint.spec > SRPM file: > http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/gutenprint/gutenprint-5.0.0-0.2.rc3.fc5.src.rpm You're still not using the package split suggested in the upstream README file. Why not? > If its not allowed to obsolete core packages then i can revert back changes in > SPEC. Also why not to package > %{_libdir}/gimp/*/plug-ins/print > under gutenprint? I didn't include this file because you didn't include it in your original package. The reason you didn't include it is probably because you missed the buildreq of gimp-devel, so it didn't get built. I think it actually belongs in a separate subpackage. See the README file again. > Why mock build did not give any dependency error for both perl packages but > while installing final binary rpm it asked for perl-PerlMenu as well as > perl-Curses ? mock will help you to find build-time dependencies (BuildRequires). It doesn't help with runtime dependencies (Requires). The perl modules are only needed at runtime, not build-time. Did you find out where these dependencies are coming from? (In reply to comment #13) > But i solved dependency problem using perl-PerlMenu package and you have asked > me to add perl(perlmenu) module package? > What is correct package then? I believe it's using this: http://search.cpan.org/dist/perlmenu/ The upstream name for this is all lower case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 08:05:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 04:05:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607180805.k6I85ItT003080@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From snecklifter at gmail.com 2006-07-18 03:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Is the resubmission located at the same URIs? Yes, it is. Regards Chris -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 08:30:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 04:30:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199234] New: Suggestion: mod_bw for Apache for bandwidth limitation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199234 Summary: Suggestion: mod_bw for Apache for bandwidth limitation Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://bwmod.sourceforge.net OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: pb at bieringer.de QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Currently, Apache didn't support bandwidth limitation out-of-the-box. A small module exists which does the job, see URL for more. I have already a package built and in use for RHEL3 and RHEL4, first step to push this in future RHEL versions is afaik to get this into devel first. If one need the spec file, send a note. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 08:51:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 04:51:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] gutenprint In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607180851.k6I8pFB0006920@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gutenprint https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-18 04:42 EST ------- ok. I need some time to create gutenprint-extras, gutenprint-cups, gutenprint-foomatic packages as per given in README file of source tarball. will upload new SRPM once i finish its package building. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 08:57:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 04:57:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] gutenprint In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607180857.k6I8vCQu007438@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gutenprint https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-18 04:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > ok. I need some time to create gutenprint-extras, gutenprint-cups, > gutenprint-foomatic packages as per given in README file of source tarball. > will upload new SRPM once i finish its package building. Good. I forgot to ask: did you understand why I made each of the changes to the spec file in Comment #8? If there's anything you're unsure about, please ask. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 09:23:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 05:23:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] gutenprint In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607180923.k6I9NbNP008975@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gutenprint https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-18 05:14 EST ------- yes. I first understood all changes you made and then start working on SPEC. What i understood well is %files section, language handling, package naming with setup call must be with -n and package name like %setup -q -n %{name}-%{version}%{?beta:-%{beta}} and %configure call with --disable-static --disable-dependency-tracking But i dont understand --disable-dependency-tracking option to %configure Now i making changes to %configure call to add more options as per README suggests to %configure --disable-static --disable-dependency-tracking \ --with-foomatic --with-ghostscript \ --with-user-guide --with-samples \ --with-escputil -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 09:39:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 05:39:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] gutenprint In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607180939.k6I9dwcI009989@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gutenprint https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-18 05:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > i dont understand --disable-dependency-tracking option to %configure Here's a good explanation: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2005-July/msg00156.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 10:03:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 06:03:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199234] Suggestion: mod_bw for Apache for bandwidth limitation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181003.k6IA3usU010925@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Suggestion: mod_bw for Apache for bandwidth limitation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199234 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-18 05:55 EST ------- The procedure for new packages and contributors can be found here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors If you want to submit your package and be its maintainer in Fedora Extras, you'll need to follow the process described there and provide URLs for your spec file and SRPM here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 10:22:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 06:22:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199183] Review Request: e2tools - Manipulate files in unmounted ext2/ext3 filesystems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181022.k6IAMSfK011734@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: e2tools - Manipulate files in unmounted ext2/ext3 filesystems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199183 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mr.ecik at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-18 06:13 EST ------- Hi! I'm not yet sponsored so this is not official review. * MUST items: - rpmlint doesn't show anything - package is named according to Packaging Naming Guidelines - the spec file name is correct - package meets Packaging Guidelines - package is licensed with an open-source license - GPL, license field match actual license and package contains file with text of license in %doc - spec file is written in American English and is legible - package successfully compile on i386 - package doesn't contain duplicate files in %files section - %files section includes %defattr(...) line - spec file contains proper %clean section - macros is used proper in spec file and all others 'must' doesn't concern this package. I think you don't need CPPFLAGS="-Wall -Werror" in %build section, because the build server has his own CPPFLAGS (I think so) and could you explain what %%check section exaclty does? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 10:22:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 06:22:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199234] Suggestion: mod_bw for Apache for bandwidth limitation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181022.k6IAMi3b011760@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Suggestion: mod_bw for Apache for bandwidth limitation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199234 ------- Additional Comments From pb at bieringer.de 2006-07-18 06:13 EST ------- It was not my intention to become the maintainer of this package...it was only a suggestion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 10:27:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 06:27:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199234] Suggestion: mod_bw for Apache for bandwidth limitation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181027.k6IARASs012021@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Suggestion: mod_bw for Apache for bandwidth limitation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199234 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-18 06:18 EST ------- The package should probably be added here then: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/WishList and this bug closed NOTABUG since there is no package to review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 11:03:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 07:03:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198711] Review Request: splint - An implementation of the lint program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181103.k6IB3i0V014847@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: splint - An implementation of the lint program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198711 mitr at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From mitr at redhat.com 2006-07-18 06:54 EST ------- http://people.redhat.com/mitr/review/splint-3.1.1-16.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/mitr/review/splint.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 11:05:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 07:05:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198879] Review Request: kdnssd-avahi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181105.k6IB5u7G014989@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdnssd-avahi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198879 ------- Additional Comments From prockai at redhat.com 2006-07-18 06:56 EST ------- Rex, could you please update the -devel description? I think that's the only complaint now. I'd like to get this in before devel freeze tomorrow, too... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 11:12:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 07:12:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191036] Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181112.k6IBCY74015409@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191036 ------- Additional Comments From noa at resare.com 2006-07-18 07:03 EST ------- The effort was nonexistant until five minutes ago when I sent an email to the upstream maintainer. Thanks for the suggestion. I'll add any new info here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 11:43:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 07:43:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198879] Review Request: kdnssd-avahi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181143.k6IBh7lh016683@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdnssd-avahi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198879 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-18 07:34 EST ------- < - description for -devel should mention that it is development stuff. *Other* than saying (as it is now): Development files for kdnssd ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 11:56:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 07:56:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181156.k6IBuUXb017141@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 12:26:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 08:26:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198879] Review Request: kdnssd-avahi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181226.k6ICQauC018407@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdnssd-avahi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198879 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-18 08:17 EST ------- Er.. my bad. I saw %description as %{summary} and thought it was the summary from the main package, not from the devel package. And since it is a snapshot, it is considered a "pre" release of the next release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 12:27:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 08:27:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193109] Review Request: plotmm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181227.k6ICR6rU018452@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: plotmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193109 ------- Additional Comments From karlthered at gmail.com 2006-07-18 08:18 EST ------- I'm still interested to maintain this package. I have signed the CLA, and added myself to cvsextras and fedorabugs groups (step 4.a/b of the howto) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 13:38:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 09:38:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181338.k6IDcQNn023896@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 |163776 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-07-18 09:29 EST ------- Due to a file upload error; the Spec file URL changed to: http://pgfoundry.org/frs/download.php/971/postgresql-slony1-engine.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 13:40:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 09:40:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] gutenprint In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181340.k6IDeu9b024158@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gutenprint https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-18 09:31 EST ------- I added subpackages and now updated SPEC file: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/gutenprint/gutenprint.spec SRPM file: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/gutenprint/gutenprint-5.0.0-0.3.rc3.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 13:43:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 09:43:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199254] New: Review Request: perl-perlmenu Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199254 Summary: Review Request: perl-perlmenu Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: panemade at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/perl-perlmenu/perl-perlmenu.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/perl-perlmenu/perl-perlmenu-4.0-1.fc5.src.rpm Description: Perl library module for curses-based menus & data-entry templates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 13:47:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 09:47:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199254] Review Request: perl-perlmenu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181347.k6IDlEGk024771@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-perlmenu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199254 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-18 09:38 EST ------- When i ran rpmlint on Binary RPM i got E: perl-perlmenu no-binary W: perl-perlmenu siteperl-in-perl-module /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/menuutil.pl W: perl-perlmenu siteperl-in-perl-module /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/perlmenu.pm I am totally new to Perl packaging and when i checked perl packaging wiki page(http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl), it did not help me. This is my first perl package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 13:49:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 09:49:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] gutenprint In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181349.k6IDnVb7024998@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gutenprint https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-18 09:40 EST ------- Why did you add explicit dependencies on perl-Curses and perl-perlmenu? I noted earlier that the binary packages already have the correct perl dependencies, i.e. perl(Curses) and perl(perlmenu), auto-generated by RPM. There is no need to add any further dependencies, and in fact perl package name dependencies such as perl-Curses and perl-perlmenu should be avoided altogether, as per the discussion on perl(XML::Parser) in a different bugzilla ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 13:51:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 09:51:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199254] Review Request: perl-perlmenu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181351.k6IDp8WH025140@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-perlmenu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199254 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-18 09:42 EST ------- Use the perl template spec from fedora-rpmdevtools as a starting point instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 13:56:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 09:56:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198879] Review Request: kdnssd-avahi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181356.k6IDucnq025546@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdnssd-avahi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198879 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-18 09:47 EST ------- %changelog * Tue Jul 18 2006 Rex Dieter 0.1.3-0.1.20060713svn - since using snapshot, consider it a pre-release of next version Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/kdnssd-avahi.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/kdnssd-avahi-0.1.3-0.1.20060713svn.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 14:26:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 10:26:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197353] Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181426.k6IEQ5TD027500@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197353 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-07-18 10:16 EST ------- Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/man-pages-fr.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/man-pages-fr-2.20.0-1.src.rpm %changelog * Tue Jul 18 2006 Alain Portal 2.20.0-1 - Update to 2.20.0 * Tue Jul 18 2006 Alain Portal 2.19.0-1 - Update to 2.19.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 14:30:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 10:30:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198928] Review Request: lsscsi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181430.k6IEUKx1027801@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lsscsi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198928 coldwell at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 14:44:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 10:44:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192432] Review Request: compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181444.k6IEit3Q029199@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192432 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 15:01:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 11:01:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181501.k6IF131R030754@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-18 10:52 EST ------- This should block both FE-NEW and FE-NEEDSPONSOR. For some reason it kept getting changed from one to the other. Have you read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/HowToGetSponsored? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 15:09:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 11:09:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181509.k6IF93IH031644@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-07-18 11:00 EST ------- Sorry, it is my fault. Sure, I've read almost all guidelines before submitting this. However, I had some problems using Bugzilla system and so, that's why I made some mistakes. Now this blocks both FE-NEW and FE-NEEDSPONSOR. Thanks. Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 15:35:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 11:35:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195659] Review Request: qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181535.k6IFZh3C000687@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195659 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-18 11:26 EST ------- Given package is in Extras, not needed in core at this time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 15:37:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 11:37:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184331] Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181537.k6IFbqkD000936@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184331 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2006-07-18 11:29 EST ------- Did you see Fedora packages at http://www.planetsaphire.com/rpms/k3d/? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 15:38:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 11:38:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198881] Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-IRCD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181538.k6IFcuXk001079@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-IRCD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198881 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-18 11:30 EST ------- Updated to add licensing clarification. Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Filter-IRCD.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Filter-IRCD-1.7-0.1.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 15:39:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 11:39:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195659] Review Request: qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181539.k6IFdVgo001147@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195659 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|188265 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 15:40:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 11:40:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198944] Review Request: compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181540.k6IFeSVl001284@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198944 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO_REPORTER OtherBugsDependingO|188267 |188268 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-18 11:31 EST ------- Changes look good, rpmlint is fine (with ignores in place) Approving. Who wants to own this package in dist-fc6, and how will we put it in Comps? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 15:42:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 11:42:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198879] Review Request: kdnssd-avahi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181542.k6IFgPda001500@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdnssd-avahi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198879 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO_REPORTER OtherBugsDependingO|188267 |188268 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-18 11:33 EST ------- New version looks good. All other things look good. I assume that this will be a Requires of something else, and doesn't need its own comps entry, correct? Setting Peter to owner and adding to dist-fc6. Please close when built into rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 15:54:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 11:54:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198881] Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-IRCD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181554.k6IFsVe6002634@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-IRCD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198881 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-18 11:45 EST ------- BuildArch: noarch => These lines are superfluous - Remove them. %{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor OPTIMIZE="%{optflags}" find %{buildroot} -type f -name '*.bs' -a -size 0 -exec rm -f {} ';' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 15:56:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 11:56:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198881] Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-IRCD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181556.k6IFu1ms002719@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-IRCD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198881 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-18 11:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > BuildArch: noarch > > => These lines are superfluous Oops, too fast on the send button: The find line and the OPTIMIZES in the lines cited are superfluous - Remove them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 15:59:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 11:59:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199212] Review Request: dbus-glib and dbus-python (split out from the dbus package) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181559.k6IFxmSY002901@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbus-glib and dbus-python (split out from the dbus package) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199212 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188268 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-18 11:50 EST ------- dbus-glib: NEEDSWORK: - buildroot wrong - Can Source0 be a URL to the source? - Bring %post and %postun up to single line, %post -n /sbin/ldconfig... dbus-python: NEEDSWOR: - pyver define not actually used, nor needed. - can Source0 be a URL to the source? RPMLINT on the sourcerpm is clean for now, other than license which is ignorable. We'll have to rpmlint after imported. WHen importing can you fix the little issues I mentioned above? Otherwise approving. Set you to owner, in dist-fc6. Please close when built into dist-fc6 (and rpmlint passes on build packages) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 16:00:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 12:00:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198882] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-IRC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181600.k6IG0XCN003034@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-IRC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198882 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-18 11:51 EST ------- BuildArch: noarch => ... %{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor OPTIMIZE="%{optflags}" ... find %{buildroot} -type f -name '*.bs' -a -size 0 -exec rm -f {} ';' ... => remove this find and the OPTIMIZE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 16:12:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 12:12:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184331] Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181612.k6IGCbpx003745@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184331 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2006-07-18 12:03 EST ------- Will look at it. My development system is in a container in a boat in the middle of the atlantic, so I won't be able to work on this package for another month or so. K3D would take about 24 hours to compile on this old laptop :-( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 16:18:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 12:18:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198881] Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-IRCD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181618.k6IGI7Gs004045@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-IRCD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198881 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-18 12:09 EST ------- Ralf, honestly, please stop hammering on the packagers and get the Perl specfile template changed instead. Maybe make fedora-newrpmspec call into cpanspec instead, which will not generate the bits you object to for noarch packages. I'm not going to block on anything that's just following the template that we put in place for them to follow. Chris, thanks for clarifying the license issue after our discussion on IRC. Review: * source files match upstream: 30ab7c5504eb6d99c7d3da399933efac POE-Filter-IRCD-1.7.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * latest version is being packaged. O BuildRequires are proper (BR: perl is unnecessary) O Compiler flags are appropriate (no need to pass them to the makefile of a noarch package) * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * noarch package, no debuginfo. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(POE::Filter::IRCD) = 1.7 perl-POE-Filter-IRCD = 1.7-0.fc6 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=7, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 cusr + 0.01 csys = 0.03 CPU) * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 16:23:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 12:23:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198881] Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-IRCD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181623.k6IGNmVQ004315@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-IRCD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198881 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-18 12:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Ralf, honestly, please stop hammering on the packagers and get the Perl specfile > template changed instead. I'm with Ralf on this, as usual. The template is a starting point, and that's all. It needs customising for each package, which involves adding package-specific stuff and removing bits that aren't needed. It really isn't an onerous task to remove the bits that aren't needed and it sets a good example for other packagers, who often look at existing packages in the repository to find out out what "best practice" is. > Maybe make fedora-newrpmspec call into cpanspec > instead, which will not generate the bits you object to for noarch packages. That would be nice, but fedora-newrpmspec does not appear to have an interface for specifying whether a package is noarch or not. > I'm not going to block on anything that's just following the template that we > put in place for them to follow. It's a template, not a release-ready spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 16:29:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 12:29:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199173] Review Request: clusterssh In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181629.k6IGTPo9004492@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clusterssh https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199173 devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |devrim at commandprompt.com ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-07-18 12:20 EST ------- There is a problem with Version and URL. There is no such version at project page. What is on the project page is 3.18.1. So: Version: 3.8.1 Release: 1%{dist} should be better; so that it will reflect the upstream version. Also,the download URL should be: http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz BTW, rpmlint does not report any error. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 16:32:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 12:32:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198922] Review Request: dejavu-lgc-fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181632.k6IGWV8Z004620@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dejavu-lgc-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198922 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2006-07-18 12:23 EST ------- dejavu-lgc-fonts-2.8-1 should appear in rawhide tonight -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 16:36:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 12:36:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198944] Review Request: compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181636.k6IGadZM004891@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198944 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2006-07-18 12:27 EST ------- package owner will be krh, I'll handle the initial import and comps addition -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 16:47:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 12:47:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198879] Review Request: kdnssd-avahi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181647.k6IGlPXr005937@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdnssd-avahi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198879 prockai at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From prockai at redhat.com 2006-07-18 12:38 EST ------- Built. I'm test-building kdelibs which Require the new kdnssd-avahi package through Provides: libkdnssd, it should go into rawhide as soon as it builds and installs on my test machine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 16:48:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 12:48:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198881] Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-IRCD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181648.k6IGmqrk006113@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-IRCD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198881 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-18 12:40 EST ------- The point is that none of the issues raised are blockers. If you want to make them blockers, float a proposal in the packaging committee. I might even vote for it. But I'm not going to make Chris change all of his specs when: 1) The extra bits aren't harmful. 2) They're in the template we tell people to use. 3) He's stated that he wants to stick close to the template. Do I wish Chris would eliminate the unneeded bits? Yes. Are they blockers for his package? Not until the guidelines change to make them blockers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 16:59:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 12:59:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198944] Review Request: compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181659.k6IGxx8f006715@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198944 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-18 12:51 EST ------- package added to dist. Please close when built into rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 17:15:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 13:15:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197353] Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181715.k6IHFXJ8007294@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197353 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-07-18 13:06 EST ------- Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/man-pages-fr.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/man-pages-fr-2.21.0-1.src.rpm %changelog * Tue Jul 18 2006 Alain Portal 2.21.0-1 - Update to 2.21.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 17:16:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 13:16:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197826] Review Request: perl-IO-Socket-SSL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181716.k6IHGRwf007344@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Socket-SSL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197826 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-18 13:07 EST ------- Was built into rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 17:16:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 13:16:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197826] Review Request: perl-IO-Socket-SSL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181716.k6IHGhd3007411@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Socket-SSL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197826 Bug 197826 depends on bug 197827, which changed state. Bug 197827 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SSLeay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197827 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 17:16:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 13:16:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197827] Review Request: perl-Net-SSLeay In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181716.k6IHGe2w007377@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SSLeay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197827 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-18 13:07 EST ------- Was built into rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 17:16:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 13:16:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197827] Review Request: perl-Net-SSLeay In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181716.k6IHGmsl007443@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SSLeay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197827 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-18 13:07 EST ------- Was built into rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 17:16:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 13:16:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197963] Review Request: bouncycastle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181716.k6IHGqaO007460@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouncycastle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197963 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-18 13:07 EST ------- Was built into rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 17:17:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 13:17:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196748] Review Request: setroubleshoot - automatic diagnosis of SELinux problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181717.k6IHHEOq007525@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setroubleshoot - automatic diagnosis of SELinux problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196748 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO_REPORTER ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-18 13:08 EST ------- Please close this when the package is built into rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 17:44:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 13:44:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198711] Review Request: splint - An implementation of the lint program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181744.k6IHit9o008848@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: splint - An implementation of the lint program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198711 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jkeating at redhat.com |timp at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|188272 |188273 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-18 13:35 EST ------- Looks good now. Accepting. Tim, now in your hands. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 17:59:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 13:59:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197826] Review Request: perl-IO-Socket-SSL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181759.k6IHxkGr009879@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Socket-SSL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197826 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-07-18 13:50 EST ------- Warren, Could you update IO::Socket::SSL to version 0.991? http://search.cpan.org/dist/IO-Socket-SSL/ Tia, jpo PS - Still no Fedora Core bugzilla component. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 18:37:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 14:37:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199173] Review Request: clusterssh In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181837.k6IIbxCM013238@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clusterssh https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199173 ------- Additional Comments From duncan_j_ferguson at yahoo.co.uk 2006-07-18 14:29 EST ------- As mentioned in the initial request, I have raised this before commiting branch changes to the project source. After all issues with the spec file (and desktop file and icons isnall etc) are fixed (apart from the version matching the upstream version), then I will commit project code and release properly. I didnt want to field lots of problems with the project just after releasing a new version (the SRPM contains the correct tar.gz file). The Source0 download URL has been fixed, and new spec file and SRPM generated and are available as per the initial request. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 18:45:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 14:45:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198944] Review Request: compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181845.k6IIjYk5014507@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198944 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 18:51:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 14:51:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198711] Review Request: splint - An implementation of the lint program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181851.k6IIpNtc015300@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: splint - An implementation of the lint program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198711 timp at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO_REPORTER ------- Additional Comments From timp at redhat.com 2006-07-18 14:42 EST ------- Please import this into ist CVS and then I'll create the RHEL-5 branch, add it to comps, and set up brew. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 18:53:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 14:53:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197734] Review Request: xmoto - Challenging 2D Motocross Platform Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181853.k6IIrYWb015600@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmoto - Challenging 2D Motocross Platform Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197734 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-07-18 14:44 EST ------- Tried building in mock, this package needs libGLU-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 20:31:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 16:31:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199310] New: Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199310 Summary: Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/sturmbahnfahrer.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/sturmbahnfahrer-1.1-1.src.rpm Description: Sturmbahnfahrer... for expert drivers only. If you want to master the obstacle course, try to have the laws of physics work with you, not against you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 20:39:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 16:39:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186919] Review Request: eric: Python IDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607182039.k6IKdql4022244@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eric: Python IDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186919 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-18 16:30 EST ------- This failed to build for me in a rather odd way: + find /var/tmp/eric-3.9.0-3.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages -not -type d -name '*.pyo' + sed 's:/var/tmp/eric-3.9.0-3.fc6-root-mockbuild\(.*\):%ghost \1:' + '%{_python_sitedir}/eric3config.pyo' /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.51706: line 76: fg: no job control error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.51706 (%install) Perhaps remove the underscore from %{_python_sitedir}? I tried, and the build failed with: + /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/eric3config.pyo /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.74633: line 76: /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/eric3config.pyo: No such file or directory error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.74633 (%install) I changed those two lines in the %if "%{?fedora}" > "4" bit to echo the filenames into the files.list and things do build, but I don't think that's what you intended. Did you want to %ghost those two files? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 22:53:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 18:53:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198711] Review Request: splint - An implementation of the lint program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607182253.k6IMrdwr029348@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: splint - An implementation of the lint program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198711 mitr at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From mitr at redhat.com 2006-07-18 18:44 EST ------- Imported. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 23:25:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 19:25:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199310] Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607182325.k6INPAZv030157@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199310 gemi at bluewin.ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gemi at bluewin.ch ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-07-18 19:16 EST ------- Build fails in mock: BR alsa-lib-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 00:04:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 20:04:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607190004.k6J04XB9032034@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From snecklifter at gmail.com 2006-07-18 19:55 EST ------- I have now updated the files following the release of jokosher 0.1 These are at: http://www.iammetal.co.uk/jokosher.spec http://www.iammetal.co.uk/jokosher-0.1-2.src.rpm Regards Chris -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 00:08:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 20:08:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199254] Review Request: perl-perlmenu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607190008.k6J0892J032136@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-perlmenu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199254 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-07-18 19:59 EST ------- Or use cpanspec, which is in Extras. (Although wow, this thing is packaged *really* poorly. cpanspec dies fairly spectacularly on it.) Since that isn't going to work, here are some useful suggestions: > Source0: http://mirror.gnowledge.org/cpan/authors/id/S/SK/SKUNZ/perlmenu.v%{version}.tar.gz Don't hard-code a mirror. Use www.cpan.org. > install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT{%{perl_sitelib},%{_usrsrc}/examples/%{name}-%{version}} > install -m 644 perlmenu.pm menuutil.pl $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{perl_sitelib} > %{perl_sitelib}/* s/sitelib/vendorlib/g I don't think %{_usrsrc} is ever an appropriate place for anything. Try just including "%doc examples" in your %files section. If you "find examples -type f -exec chmod 644 {} \;" in %prep, rpm shouldn't pick up any dependencies from the example scripts either. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 00:11:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 20:11:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199234] Suggestion: mod_bw for Apache for bandwidth limitation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607190011.k6J0B0SV032188@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Suggestion: mod_bw for Apache for bandwidth limitation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199234 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 00:17:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 20:17:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607190017.k6J0HHOw032309@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 david at lovesunix.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |david at lovesunix.net ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2006-07-18 20:08 EST ------- When compiling the src.rpm on current Development I get the following error: gcc -shared .libs/libpulsecore_la-channelmap.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-error.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-mainloop.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-mainloop-api.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-mainloop-signal.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-sample.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-timeval.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-utf8.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-util.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-volume.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-xmalloc.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-autoload.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-cli-command.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-cli-text.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-client.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-conf-parser.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-core.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-core-scache.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-core-subscribe.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-core-util.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-dynarray.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-g711.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-hashmap.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-idxset.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-log.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-mcalign.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-memblock.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-memblockq.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-memchunk.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-modargs.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-modinfo.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-module.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-namereg.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-pid.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-pipe.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-play-memchunk.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-poll.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-props.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-queue.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-random.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-resampler.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-sample-util.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-sconv.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-sconv-s16be.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-sconv-s16le.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-sink .o .libs/libpulsecore_la-sink-input.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-sioman.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-sound-file.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-sound-file-stream.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-source.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-source-output.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-strbuf.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-tokenizer.o .libs/libpulsecore_la-core-error.o /usr/lib/libltdl.so -lsamplerate -lsndfile -loil-0.3 -lcap -ldl -lm -pthread -Wl,-soname -Wl,libpulsecore.so.0 -o .libs/libpulsecore.so.0.0.1 /usr/lib/libltdl.so: could not read symbols: File in wrong format collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [libpulsecore.la] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/pulseaudio-0.9.2/src' make[2]: *** [all] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/pulseaudio-0.9.2/src' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/pulseaudio-0.9.2' make: *** [all] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.26234 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 01:43:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 21:43:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199234] Suggestion: mod_bw for Apache for bandwidth limitation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607190143.k6J1hKbh003516@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Suggestion: mod_bw for Apache for bandwidth limitation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199234 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2006-07-18 21:34 EST ------- Hello, Peter. I've added this to the Extras/WishList for you (per your email to me) and I will close this as NOTABUG. Thanks for your suggestion though! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 03:19:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 23:19:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198881] Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-IRCD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607190319.k6J3Jh3h007264@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-IRCD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198881 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-18 23:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Ralf, honestly, please stop hammering on the packagers and get the Perl specfile > template changed instead. Jason, honestly, this issue really p***** me off. I would prefer you to stop blindly approving such sloppily and carelessly packaged packages and you undermining what had been perl package packaging practice almost ever since FE exists. Almost no other packages but Chris submitted/Jason approved perl packages in FE contain the OPTIMIZE/find *.bs. (In reply to comment #5) > It's a template, not a release-ready spec file. Exactly. People are supposed to customize it. (In reply to comment #5) > But I'm not going to make Chris change all of his specs when: You better should. To me Chris has sufficently demonstrated his resistance to learning. > 1) The extra bits aren't harmful. As I've repeatedly said, you can not be sure about this. > 2) They're in the template we tell people to use. It's a template - not a form, nor is a review a government's agency's bureaucratic act nor a mechanical act. > Do I wish Chris would eliminate the unneeded bits? Yes. Then you should better teach him to do so. You wouldn't use the OPTIMIZE and the find in non-perl *.specs? Using them in noarch packages are equally "useful." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 04:35:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 00:35:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197734] Review Request: xmoto - Challenging 2D Motocross Platform Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607190435.k6J4Z6oK010504@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmoto - Challenging 2D Motocross Platform Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197734 ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-07-19 00:26 EST ------- Package updated with fix from Comment #2: Spec URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/fextras/SPECS/xmoto.spec SRPM URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/fextras/SRPMS/xmoto-0.1.16-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 04:38:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 00:38:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199254] Review Request: perl-perlmenu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607190438.k6J4cpDk010775@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-perlmenu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199254 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-19 00:30 EST ------- as per your suggestions i added foolowing line with examples %doc FAQ MENUUTIL_DOC MENU_DOC README RELEASE_NOTES TO_DO COPYING examples but i got cp: cannot stat `examples': No such file or directory how can i solve this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 04:55:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 00:55:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198881] Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-IRCD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607190455.k6J4tZrp012005@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-IRCD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198881 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-19 00:46 EST ------- Ok, I think the rhetoric here is getting a touch out of hand, and making a very large issue out of a not-so-large one. Perl modules are fairly "special", in that basically the same specfile can handle all of them (with package specific description, etc, being adapted, of course). They're also special in that there's a LOT of them. For those two reasons, I try to hew as close to the specfile template as possible. --> The closer to the template a perl module spec is the more readily apparent errors are, especially when there's a _lot_ of them. <-- It's easy to scan a perl spec and almost instinctively know when something is missing, when as little deviation as necessary is made from it. Ralf, I do not do this "mindlessly", "without thinking", or "sloppily". I do check to ensure the extra lines (w.r.t. OPTIMIZE) doesn't adversely impact the building of the package. I'm not resistant to learning, and in fact find myself learning daily and seeking input. To date I haven't been provided with any reason why, in my judgement, it would be advantagous to abandon this practice. If you want, bring this issue before the packaging committee. If guidelines come down or new spec templates are issued recommending the dropping of those lines, I'll comply. Until then, can we not accept it as a legitimate choice a packager may make under the guidelines? Can we continue this discussion off bugzilla -- in any bug -- if we absolutely must? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 04:55:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 00:55:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198882] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-IRC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607190455.k6J4tlLE012041@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-IRC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198882 Bug 198882 depends on bug 198881, which changed state. Bug 198881 Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-IRCD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198881 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 05:07:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 01:07:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199254] Review Request: perl-perlmenu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607190507.k6J57bi7012344@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-perlmenu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199254 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-19 00:58 EST ------- I checked for above error, it will not work as source itself does not contain any examples directory. So i tried to overwirte docdir but it failed with error: magic_file(ms, "/var/tmp/perl-perlmenu-4.0-1.fc5-root-root/usr/share/doc/perl-perlmenu-4.0/examples") failed: mode 040755 cannot open `/var/tmp/perl-perlmenu-4.0-1.fc5-root-root/usr/share/doc/perl-perlmenu-4.0/examples' (No such file or directory) rpmbuild: rpmfc.c:1251: rpmfcClassify: Assertion `ftype != ((void *)0)' failed. Aborted My Updated files Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/perl-perlmenu/perl-perlmenu.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/perl-perlmenu/perl-perlmenu-4.0-1.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 05:19:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 01:19:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] gutenprint In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607190519.k6J5JYii012800@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gutenprint https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-19 01:10 EST ------- Updated version SPEC file: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/gutenprint/gutenprint.spec SRPM file: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/gutenprint/gutenprint-5.0.0-0.4.rc3.fc5.src.rpm ChangeLog for this new version * Wed Jul 19 2006 Parag Nemade - 5.0.0-0.4.rc3 - Removed Requires on perl-Curses and perl-perlmenu as both are automatically added on binary RPM - Commented Obsoletes and provides tag as Fedora Extras package can not Obsoletes Fedora Core Package. rpmlint on gutenprint-extras, gutenprint-cups, gutenprint-foomatic gives W: gutenprint-extras no-documentation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 05:48:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 01:48:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199386] New: Review Request: aspell-mi Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199386 Summary: Review Request: aspell-mi Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: michael at knox.net.nz QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~michael/aspell-mi.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~michael/aspell-mi-0.50-1.src.rpm Description: GNU Aspell Maori Dictionary Package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 05:51:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 01:51:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199386] Review Request: aspell-mi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607190551.k6J5pV6j014773@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-mi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199386 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-19 01:42 EST ------- Note that this package, like other aspell's language packs, does not come up cleanly through rpmlint, but with the following errors: E: aspell-mi no-binary E: aspell-mi only-non-binary-in-usr-lib This is because the package contains only data files which sit under /usr/lib. They have to stay there, as they are architecture-dependent (due to byte-ordering issues). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 06:11:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 02:11:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199310] Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607190611.k6J6B2rB015379@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199310 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-19 02:02 EST ------- == Not an official review as I'm not yet sponsored == Mock build for rawhide i386 is failed. I added some BR's alsa-lib-devel,libX11-devel,libXmu-devel,libXi-devel. I did it and again did mock build and its successfull. * MUST Items: - rpmlint shows no errors - dist tag is present. - The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - The spec file name matching the base package Sturmbahnfahrer, in the format Sturmbahnfahrer.spec. - This package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - The spec file for the package MUST be legible. - The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license GPL. - This package includes License file COPYING. - This source package includes the text of the license in its own file,and that file, containing the text of the license for the package is included in %doc. - The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. md5sum is correct (25d8907b234c9ebaa91c590c6fcbf9ba) - This package successfully compiled and built into binary rpms for i386 architecture. - This package did not containd any ExcludeArch. - This package owns all directories that it creates. - This package did not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - This package have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. - This package used macros. - Document files are included like JOYSTICKS LICENCE README TODO. - Package did NOT contained any .la libtool archives. - Desktop file installed correctly and its icon is also visible. Also, * Source URL is present and working. * BuildRoot is correct BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) * Package worked fine on i386. You need to add BRs as mentioned above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 06:27:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 02:27:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199183] Review Request: e2tools - Manipulate files in unmounted ext2/ext3 filesystems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607190627.k6J6RMcA015771@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: e2tools - Manipulate files in unmounted ext2/ext3 filesystems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199183 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-19 02:18 EST ------- == Not an official review as I'm not yet sponsored == Mock build for rawhide i386 is successfull. * MUST Items: - rpmlint shows no errors - dist tag is present. - The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - The spec file name matching the base package e2tools, in the format e2tools.spec. - This package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - The spec file for the package MUST be legible. - The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license GPL. - This package includes License file COPYING. - This source package includes the text of the license in its own file,and that file, containing the text of the license for the package is included in %doc. - The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. md5sum is correct (1829b2b261e0e0d07566066769b5b28b e2tools-0.0.16.tar.gz) - This package successfully compiled and built into binary rpms for i386 architecture. - This package did not containd any ExcludeArch. - This package owns all directories that it creates. - This package did not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - This package have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. - This package used macros. - Document files are included like README COPYING ChangeLog TODO AUTHORS. - Package did NOT contained any .la libtool archives. Also, * Source URL is present and working. * BuildRoot is correct BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) * I did not test package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 06:46:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 02:46:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199310] Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607190646.k6J6k1WT016886@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199310 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-19 02:37 EST ------- Thanks, New version which fixes the report mock problems here: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/sturmbahnfahrer.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/sturmbahnfahrer-1.1-2.src.rpm Changes: * Wed Jul 19 2006 Hans de Goede 1.1-2 - Add missing BR: alsa-lib-devel - Stop linking with the unused libs: -lXmu -lXi -lX11 (-lX11 is used indirectly, through other libs but not directly). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 07:02:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 03:02:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199310] Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607190702.k6J722VA017696@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199310 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-19 02:53 EST ------- But i got mock build errors for each of mentioned BR's And i added them one by one,not at same compile time. Whenever i got ld error i added that respective BR. You said its unused linking. ok. then how can i prevent mock to give errors in mock build? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 07:07:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 03:07:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199310] Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607190707.k6J77qwL017968@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199310 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-19 02:58 EST ------- Check Makefile. there you will find LIBS tag thats asking to include all those BR's. If u r sure -lXmu -lXi -lX11 then modify that Makefile and remove those libs. But i think you must require all those BR's. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 07:24:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 03:24:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199016] Review Request: mxml - Miniature XML development library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607190724.k6J7O53P018880@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mxml - Miniature XML development library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199016 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |michael at knox.net.nz ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-19 03:15 EST ------- Hi. I will do the review for this. Review for release 3: * RPM name is OK * Source mxml-2.2.2.tar.gz is the same as upstream * This is the latest version * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint of mxml-devel looks OK * rpmlint of mxml looks OK * File list of mxml-devel looks OK * File list of mxml looks OK * INSERT RESULT OF RUN TEST Needs work: * Spec file: some paths are not replaced with RPM macros (wiki: QAChecklist item 7) Notes: You need to use %{_datadir} not /usr/share Fix this up and I can approve this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 07:33:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 03:33:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199016] Review Request: mxml - Miniature XML development library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607190733.k6J7XkTW019966@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mxml - Miniature XML development library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199016 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-07-19 03:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Hi. I will do the review for this. Thanks. > * INSERT RESULT OF RUN TEST Testing library... ./testmxml test.xml >temp1.xml 2>temp1s.xml ./testmxml temp1.xml >temp2.xml 2>temp2s.xml Stdio file test passed! String test passed! File descriptor test passed! > Needs work: > * Spec file: some paths are not replaced with RPM macros > (wiki: QAChecklist item 7) Fixed. New bits here: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/~green/FE/FC5/mxml.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/~green/FE/FC5/mxml-2.2.2-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 07:39:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 03:39:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199310] Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607190739.k6J7d8OS020678@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199310 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-19 03:30 EST ------- I'm sure, I'm the packager of plib and for some reason the plib docs advice linking against -lXi and -lXmu, while both are not used ANYWHERE in plib. Now X11 is used, but the game does not call any X11 functions itself directly. Thus it should not link against it, if oneday the libs it uses start support direct GL rendering with xgl or something like that then X11 will no longer be needed. So removing those flags from the LIBS line is exactly what I've done in the new package linked to above. Having a package drag in unused libs through yum etc, is not what I would call a feature. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 07:44:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 03:44:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198284] Review Request: python-configobj - Config file reading, writing, and validation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607190744.k6J7ixR6021360@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-configobj - Config file reading, writing, and validation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198284 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-07-19 03:36 EST ------- Review for release 2: * RPM name is OK * Source configobj-4.3.2.zip is the same as upstream * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint looks OK * File list looks OK * Works fine * According to http://peak.telecommunity.com/DevCenter/setuptools#install-command the --single-version-externally-managed option is automatically switched on when the --root option is used, so the guidelines are probably wrong here (or maybe it's a new feature ?) Anyway, APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 07:47:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 03:47:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199016] Review Request: mxml - Miniature XML development library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607190747.k6J7leNm021664@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mxml - Miniature XML development library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199016 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-19 03:38 EST ------- Cool, looks great. APPROVED. Please be sure to close this bug report once inmported into CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 07:50:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 03:50:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198829] Review Request: wfmath - WorldForge math libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607190750.k6J7o6GM022043@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wfmath - WorldForge math libraries Alias: wfmath https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198829 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-19 03:41 EST ------- I saw the long list of review request for worldforge, so I thought I would give a hand. But as usual you guys (Chris this time) have beaten my to it. So I saw this 64bit problem and I thought I would/could give a hand. The test fails because of 2 problems 1) wfmath/MersenneTwister.h, line 77 says: typedef unsigned long uint32; // unsigned integer type, at least 32 bits Which is strange, because you would expect a uint32 to be 32 bits period, I've reviewed the rest of the code and it seems to assume 32bits everywhere/ never return random values larger then 32 bit, so I believe this should be changed to: typedef unsigned int uint32; This makes things work out as the name suggests and will also be faster since 32 bit values are faster then 64 bit (even on x86_64). 2) wfmath/intstring_test.cpp, second test uses a long to restore the unsigned long value of the random function. The idea here is to cause negative numbers for 2^31 unsigned long numbers to test negative conversion however > 2 ^ 31 will fit fine in the long on 64 bits, without becoming a negative number. Next this long is passed to IntToString, who correctly converts this to a string holding a large (> 2 ^ 31) positive number, after which the string gets passed to atoi. However atoi returns an int which cannot represent this bug a positive number > caboom! Fix use (unsigned) int 's in the test instead of long's. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 07:51:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 03:51:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199310] Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607190751.k6J7p9dg022171@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199310 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-07-19 03:42 EST ------- The new package builds fine in rpmlint. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 07:52:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 03:52:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199310] Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607190752.k6J7qELV022304@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199310 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-07-19 03:43 EST ------- Oops, the new package builds fine in mock and rpmlint does not produce any output. This was what I meant :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 08:01:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 04:01:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198830] Review Request: libmodelfile - library for accessing WorldForge model files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607190801.k6J81boO022998@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmodelfile - library for accessing WorldForge model files Alias: libmodelfile https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198830 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-19 03:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > But ... I am having a problem with this package's licence. > > You spec says "GPL", the tarball contains a copy of the GPL's COPYING, but the > sources say: > > * Permission is granted to anyone to use this software for any purpose, > * including commercial applications, and to alter it and redistribute it > * freely, subject to the following restrictions: > * > * 1. The origin of this software must not be misrepresented; you must not > * claim that you wrote the original software. If you use this software > * in a product, an acknowledgment in the product documentation would be > * appreciated but is not required. > * 2. Altered source versions must be plainly marked as such, and must not be > * misrepresented as being the original software. > * 3. This notice may not be removed or altered from any source distribution. > > In my understanding, ?1 and ?3 are non critical, but ?2 could be read a imposing > additional constraits, i.e. as violation of the GPL, which would render shipping > this package under the GPL impossible. Yes, all sources carry this copyright header, right above the quoted text they say: /* Copyright (C) 2004 Alistair Riddoch This goes for all sources, this is also the only name in the AUTHORS file, so luckily this seems a one man project. Ask him to make up his mind, or put a clear copyright notice somewhere that the code is dual licensed under both the GPL and the license in the code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 08:19:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 04:19:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199310] Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607190819.k6J8JTtn024589@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199310 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-19 04:10 EST ------- Yes. The updated package builds fine in mock. I have not looked in your new package when i replied in comment 4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 08:33:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 04:33:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199386] Review Request: aspell-mi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607190833.k6J8Xq35025619@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-mi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199386 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-19 04:24 EST ------- I just downloaded aspell-es package and rebuild it and when i ran rpmlint i got W: aspell-es summary-ended-with-dot Spanish dictionaries for Aspell. E: aspell-es no-binary E: aspell-es only-non-binary-in-usr-lib W: aspell-es no-documentation and rpmlint on your package gave E: aspell-mi no-binary E: aspell-mi only-non-binary-in-usr-lib so i think those errors are not that much important as aspell core packages are having same errors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 08:38:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 04:38:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197688] Review Request: inotify-tools - Command line utilities for inotify In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607190838.k6J8cLJH026024@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inotify-tools - Command line utilities for inotify https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197688 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |michael at knox.net.nz OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-19 04:29 EST ------- I will do the review for this submission. Review for release 2: * RPM name is OK * Source inotify-tools-2.2.tar.gz is the same as upstream * This is the latest version * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint looks OK * File list looks OK Notes: You should use http://download.sourceforge.com/ and not one of the mirrors. e.g. Source0: http://download.sourceforge.com/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz Fix that up and I can't see any reason for not approving this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 09:40:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 05:40:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197353] Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607190940.k6J9e66Q030237@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197353 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-07-19 05:30 EST ------- Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/man-pages-fr.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/man-pages-fr-2.22.0-1.src.rpm %changelog * Wed Jul 19 2006 Alain Portal 2.22.0-1 - Update to 2.22.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 09:46:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 05:46:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193867] Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607190946.k6J9kFei030596@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193867 ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2006-07-19 05:37 EST ------- Yes, I did. Can you describe step to step what you do? I can't reproduce this on my PC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 09:50:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 05:50:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197734] Review Request: xmoto - Challenging 2D Motocross Platform Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607190950.k6J9oqxb030888@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmoto - Challenging 2D Motocross Platform Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197734 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-19 05:42 EST ------- MUST: ===== * rpmlint output is clean * Package and spec file named appropriately * Packaged according to packaging guidelines * License (GPL) ok, license file included * spec file is legible and in Am. English. * Source matches upstream * Compiles and builds on devel-x86_64 * BR: ok (see below) * No locales * No shared libraries * Not relocatable * Package owns / or requires all dirs * No duplicate files & Permissions ok * %clean & macro usage OK * Contains code only * %doc does not affect runtime, and isn't large enough to warrent a sub package * no -devel package needed, no libs / .la files. * .desktop file as required and properly installed Should fix: =========== *Redundant BR: SDL-devel (already required through SDL_mixer-devel)requires and and zlib-devel (through libpng-devel), please remove those from the BR-s No blockers -> approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 10:57:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 06:57:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174021] Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607191057.k6JAvUO6003372@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174021 mharris at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mharris at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From mharris at redhat.com 2006-07-19 06:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > During the mock run, I have read > > http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2006-July/msg00126.html > > Now, I own /usr/share/X11/app-defaults in the current release. That is a bug, your package should _not_ own a system directory that is part of the X Window System. > But I agree with you, that /usr/share/X11/app-defaults should go into > xorg-x11-filesystem and all packages which put files into > /usr/share/X11/app-defaults should depend on it. libXt is the canonical owner of the app-defaults directory at the bottom of the app-defaults-user food chain. app-defaults ^ | libXt ^ ^ libXaw libXm This was a bug in the libXt package, in that because the libXt package build does not create the directory or put files in it, it was not owned by the package. Since libXt really is the canonical owner of the directory however, the package _should_ be owning this dir, and that has been fixed in the latest rawhide libXt package. When you discover packaging problems of this nature, it is a good idea to post questions to the Fedora development mailing lists, or if you suspect a given package or subsystem is missing something, to report it in bugzilla, rather than to put ad-hoc hacks into other packages. The xorg-x11-filesystem package is nothing more than an unfortunately necessary ugly hack to work around a bug in rpm (or misfeature if one prefers...). Currently the xorg-x11-filesystem package serves no other purpose, and after FC6/RHEL5 we no longer need the ugly hack, so the package can be removed from the OS. I definitely do not want to _add_ more junk to the packaging than is necessary. Generally speaking, I agree with jkeating - that every directory in the OS /should/ have a canonical owner. For the X Window System, there is a canonical owner for every directory, however if a given directory that should be owned by some component of Xorg is not owning it, file a bug report against the proper component if you know which one is to blame, or file a bug against xorg-x11 and we'll figure it out. There may be other issues of this nature yet undiscovered in the modular X packaging. Anyhoo... please remove ownership of the app-defaults dir from any spec files now after upgrading libXt. Hope this helps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 11:20:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 07:20:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197649] Review Request: gnustep-make - GNUstep makefile package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607191120.k6JBK1fo004181@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnustep-make - GNUstep makefile package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197649 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-07-19 07:11 EST ------- Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~athimm/fedorasubmit/gnustep-make/gnustep-make.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~athimm/fedorasubmit/gnustep-make/gnustep-make-1.12.0-4.at.src.rpm * Tue Jul 11 2006 Axel Thimm - 1.12.0-4 - Remove default -lobjc-fd2 switch. - Disable flat hierarchy to allow for different library combos. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 11:24:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 07:24:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199402] New: Review Request: chrpath - Modify rpath of compiled programs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199402 Summary: Review Request: chrpath - Modify rpath of compiled programs Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~athimm/fedorasubmit/chrpath/chrpath.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~athimm/fedorasubmit/chrpath/chrpath-0.13-1.at.src.rpm Description: chrpath allows you to modify the dynamic library load path (rpath) of compiled programs. Currently, only removing and modifying the rpath is supported. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 11:49:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 07:49:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] New: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~athimm/fedorasubmit/vtk/vtk.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~athimm/fedorasubmit/vtk/vtk-5.0.1-8.at.src.rpm Description: VTK is an open-source software system for image processing, 3D graphics, volume rendering and visualization. VTK includes many advanced algorithms (e.g., surface reconstruction, implicit modelling, decimation) and rendering techniques (e.g., hardware-accelerated volume rendering, LOD control). Expected rpmlint output: o E: vtk-* script-without-shellbang *.cmake I'm not sure why rpmlint detects cmake files as scripts. o E: * zero-length */hints That's inherited from the upstream sources. Maybe having an empty hints file is needed, but I will ask upstream. Keeping it for now. o E: vtk-testing.* script-without-shellbang .*tcl Is it worth fixing this? o W: vtk-devel unstripped-binary-or-object /*.so debuginfo processing missed this as these are place in non-standard folders. Manually strip and have only half a debuginfo worth of symbols, hack into debuginfo generation, or maybe simply allow these devel files to carry the symbols? o wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding on an windows file in the examples doc. The examples contain a couple of non-Linux parts, but I don't want to castrate them. Maybe someone will develop on several archs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 11:50:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 07:50:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199402] Review Request: chrpath - Modify rpath of compiled programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607191150.k6JBoA7O005750@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chrpath - Modify rpath of compiled programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199402 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |199405 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 11:50:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 07:50:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607191150.k6JBoAtg005760@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |199402 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 11:57:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 07:57:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199406] New: Review Request: vtkdata - Example data file for VTK Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199406 Summary: Review Request: vtkdata - Example data file for VTK Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~athimm/fedorasubmit/vtk/vtkdata.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~athimm/fedorasubmit/vtk/vtkdata-5.0.1-3.at.src.rpm Description: Example data file for VTK Expected rpmlint output: W: vtkdata no-documentation E: vtkdata script-without-shellbang /usr/share/vtkdata-5.0.1/Data/usa.vtk E: vtkdata wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/vtkdata-5.0.1/Data/usa.vtk E: vtkdata script-without-shellbang /usr/share/vtkdata-5.0.1/Data/cellsnd.ascii.inp E: vtkdata script-without-shellbang /usr/share/vtkdata-5.0.1/Data/thio3xx.xyz rpmlint detects some non-scripts as scripts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 12:03:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 08:03:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607191203.k6JC3p57006285@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |199406 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 12:03:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 08:03:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199406] Review Request: vtkdata - Example data file for VTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607191203.k6JC3qhC006293@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtkdata - Example data file for VTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199406 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |199405 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 12:07:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 08:07:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607191207.k6JC7MSA006409@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-19 07:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #0) > Expected rpmlint output: > > o E: vtk-* script-without-shellbang *.cmake > I'm not sure why rpmlint detects cmake files as scripts. Perhaps they are installed with exec bits set? > o E: vtk-testing.* script-without-shellbang .*tcl > Is it worth fixing this? Do they need to be installed executable? > o W: vtk-devel unstripped-binary-or-object /*.so > debuginfo processing missed this as these are place in non-standard folders. > Manually strip and have only half a debuginfo worth of symbols, hack into > debuginfo generation, or maybe simply allow these devel files to carry the > symbols? What permissions are they installed with? > o wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding on an windows file in the examples doc. > The examples contain a couple of non-Linux parts, but I don't want to castrate > them. Maybe someone will develop on several archs. Not a bad excuse, that one :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 12:10:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 08:10:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199402] Review Request: chrpath - Modify rpath of compiled programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607191210.k6JCAYih006535@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chrpath - Modify rpath of compiled programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199402 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2006-07-19 08:01 EST ------- You should add '-%(%{__id_u} -n)' at the end of BuildRoot definition. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 12:16:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 08:16:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199402] Review Request: chrpath - Modify rpath of compiled programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607191216.k6JCGRLW006739@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chrpath - Modify rpath of compiled programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199402 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |dan at danny.cz OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 12:33:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 08:33:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607191233.k6JCXDkW007360@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-07-19 08:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > (In reply to comment #0) > > Expected rpmlint output: > > > > o E: vtk-* script-without-shellbang *.cmake > > I'm not sure why rpmlint detects cmake files as scripts. > > Perhaps they are installed with exec bits set? Ah, yes, that makes sense. I'll kill all executable bits on non-scripts hoping that vtk doesn't really interprete them. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 12:35:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 08:35:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199402] Review Request: chrpath - Modify rpath of compiled programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607191235.k6JCZ6ki007421@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chrpath - Modify rpath of compiled programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199402 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-19 08:26 EST ------- I haven't been sponsored yet, so this is not official review. MUST items: * rpmlint doesn't show anything. * package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. * spec file is named correctly. * package is licensed with an open-source GPL license. * the License field in spec matches the actual license. * license file is included in %doc. * spec file is legible. * package succesfully compiles on i386. * there is no need to any build dependencies - package successfully compile on mock. * there is no locales. * there is no shared library files. * there is no duplicate files in %files section. * %files section includes %defattr line. * package has %clean section. * macros are used properly. * there is no need to -doc subpackage. * files in %doc don't affect the runtime of the application. * there is no GUI applications. COMMENTS: * I cannot check if sources match md5sum because I cannot connect to ftp.hungry.com server. * BuildRoot should be: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}- root-%(%{__id_u} -n) * why do you use 'make' instead of 'make %{?_smp_mflags}'? According to Parallel make chapter of Packaging Guidelines you should use the second option. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 12:35:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 08:35:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199406] Review Request: vtkdata - Example data file for VTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607191235.k6JCZPlY007441@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtkdata - Example data file for VTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199406 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-07-19 08:26 EST ------- Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~athimm/fedorasubmit/vtk/vtkdata.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~athimm/fedorasubmit/vtk/vtkdata-5.0.1-4.at.src.rpm * Wed Jul 19 2006 Axel Thimm - 5.0.1-4 - Fix some permissions. See bug 199405 comment 1, rpmlint is much cleaner now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 12:38:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 08:38:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607191238.k6JCcewZ007686@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-07-19 08:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > > o W: vtk-devel unstripped-binary-or-object /*.so > > debuginfo processing missed this as these are place in non-standard folders. > > Manually strip and have only half a debuginfo worth of symbols, hack into > > debuginfo generation, or maybe simply allow these devel files to carry the > > symbols? > > What permissions are they installed with? Only 644, seems this is why debuginfo didn't grab them. I'll fix that, too. Thanks, Paul! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 12:53:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 08:53:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199402] Review Request: chrpath - Modify rpath of compiled programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607191253.k6JCrgck008795@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chrpath - Modify rpath of compiled programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199402 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2006-07-19 08:44 EST ------- I agree with my pre-reviewer :-) Only the using of %{_smp_flags} is not much useful when compiling 4 small C files. Review: - no rpmlint output on any package - package name OK - spec file name OK, is in English and is legible - package meets the Packaging Guidelines - license OK (GPL) and is included - ?source matches upstream? - couldn't be checked due the problems of ftp.hungry.com - compiles and builds at least on i386 (FC4 and devel) - no BuildRequires needed - no localized files - has no shared lib - do not create any directory - no duplicates files, permissions are set properly, uses %defattr - has %clean section - consistent use of macros - contains code - no large docs, %doc is not required during runtime - no devel subpackage required, no pkgconfig file - no .la libtool archives - not a GUI application - it works APPROVED, when you fix the BuildRoot -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 12:54:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 08:54:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199402] Review Request: chrpath - Modify rpath of compiled programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607191254.k6JCs5Ip008828@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chrpath - Modify rpath of compiled programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199402 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 13:07:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 09:07:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193957] Review Request: nant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607191307.k6JD7QxA009303@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193957 moschny at ipd.uni-karlsruhe.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From moschny at ipd.uni-karlsruhe.de 2006-07-19 08:58 EST ------- A small problem with nant-0.85-5.src.rpm rebuilt on fc5: /usr/bin/nant tries to call /var/tmp/nant-0.85-5fc5-root-user/usr/lib/NAnt/bin/NAnt.exe. This small patch fixes it: --- nant.spec.orig 2006-07-09 02:06:41.000000000 +0200 +++ nant.spec 2006-07-19 14:57:55.000000000 +0200 @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ %install rm -rf %{buildroot} %makeinstall -sed -i -e "s#%buildroot##" %buildroot%_bindir/%name +sed -i -e "s#%{buildroot}##" %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/%{name} find examples -name \*.dll -o -name \*.exe|xargs rm -f rm -rf %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/NAnt/doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 13:26:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 09:26:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199402] Review Request: chrpath - Modify rpath of compiled programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607191326.k6JDQk5B010743@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chrpath - Modify rpath of compiled programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199402 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-07-19 09:17 EST ------- Michael, you don't need to be sponsored to review a package, you only need to open up an account on admin.fedora.redhat.com/accounts/ On the comments by both (thanks for the fast replies!): o ftp.hungry.com has been often bad for me, too. Have you tried accessing the file (not the folder) directly? o BuildRoot as quoted is the "preferred buildroot" which doesn't really make sense. I submitted a request to review the guidelines on this. But as a _preferred_ entry this is considered a SHOULD, not MUST. o %{?_smp_mflags} should be used IMO if one really knows the package builds as such. I have been bitten by too many Makefiles that didn't build in parallel. As the ordering is non-deterministic there is noooo way to find out other then reviewing the Makefiles themselves. That may make sense on large packages of the size of openoffice, but for a tiny package the review and risk of Makefile bugs isn't worth the few CPU cycles. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 14:04:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 10:04:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174021] Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607191404.k6JE4B3v013443@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174021 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-19 09:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > That is a bug, your package should _not_ own a system directory that > is part of the X Window System. Here's a list of all packages in FC5 which own that directory: xscreensaver-base xorg-x11-resutils xorg-x11-server-utils xorg-x11-utils xorg-x11-xsm xorg-x11-apps xorg-x11-xdm Mike, if you think these are buggy, I'll happily file bugs against them. Honestly, I think it's reasonable to see that list and conclude that it's expected behavior for a package that adds an app-defaults file to own /usr/share/X11/app-defaults. Jochen, do you think it would be reasonable to back out of this mess by just adding a dependency on xterm? That's what the app-defaults file is for, isn't it? In FC6, the xterm dependency will pull in libXt which will own this directory; in FC5 the directory will still be unowned in the dependency tree but at least that's not a bug in this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 14:52:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 10:52:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198691] Review Request: steghide - A Steganography Program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607191452.k6JEqjcl017493@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: steghide - A Steganography Program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198691 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 14:53:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 10:53:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199402] Review Request: chrpath - Modify rpath of compiled programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607191453.k6JEr41t017565@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chrpath - Modify rpath of compiled programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199402 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-19 10:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Michael, you don't need to be sponsored to review a package, you only need to > open up an account on admin.fedora.redhat.com/accounts/ I have written it to take note of I'm not sponsored ;-) maybe someone will have a look to one of my packages. > o ftp.hungry.com has been often bad for me, too. Have you tried accessing the file > (not the folder) directly? Yes, wget output: Resolving ftp.hungry.com... 199.181.107.40 Connecting to ftp.hungry.com|199.181.107.40|:21... connected. Logging in as anonymous ... Logged in! ==> SYST ... done. ==> PWD ... done. ==> TYPE I ... done. ==> CWD /pub/hungry/chrpath ... done. ==> PASV ... couldn't connect to 199.181.107.40 port 58316: No route to host -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 15:07:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 11:07:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186919] Review Request: eric: Python IDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607191507.k6JF7Dwg018739@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eric: Python IDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186919 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-19 10:56 EST ------- Not sure how/why it built previously fine for me in a fc5 buildroot. ??? Spec Name or Url: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/eric.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/eric-3.9.0-4.src.rpm %changelog * Wed Jul 19 2006 Rex Dieter 3.9.0-4 - fix fedora > 4 %%ghost'ing case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 15:10:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 11:10:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186919] Review Request: eric: Python IDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607191510.k6JFAI2E018859@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eric: Python IDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186919 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-19 10:56 EST ------- Not sure how/why it built previously fine for me in a fc5 buildroot. ??? Spec Name or Url: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/eric.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/eric-3.9.0-4.src.rpm %changelog * Wed Jul 19 2006 Rex Dieter 3.9.0-4 - fix fedora > 4 %%ghost'ing case. ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-19 10:59 EST ------- > Did you want to %ghost those two files? For the record, yes. (: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 15:17:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 11:17:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198284] Review Request: python-configobj - Config file reading, writing, and validation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607191517.k6JFHhTX019378@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-configobj - Config file reading, writing, and validation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198284 lmacken at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From lmacken at redhat.com 2006-07-19 11:08 EST ------- Imported into CVS, added to owners.list, requested FC5 branch, tagged and built for FC6. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 15:43:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 11:43:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199402] Review Request: chrpath - Modify rpath of compiled programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607191543.k6JFhlNE021629@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chrpath - Modify rpath of compiled programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199402 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2006-07-19 11:34 EST ------- I have tried both wget and ftp and I have the same problems. Also have played with passive/no passive. No success yet. Because the BuildRoot is only suggested, the package is APPROVED even when you disagree with me/us. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 15:50:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 11:50:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193957] Review Request: nant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607191550.k6JFoZ2d022628@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193957 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-07-19 11:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > A small problem with nant-0.85-5.src.rpm rebuilt on fc5: /usr/bin/nant tries > to call /var/tmp/nant-0.85-5fc5-root-user/usr/lib/NAnt/bin/NAnt.exe. That's not a small problem, it's an arbitrary command execution vulnerability. Please install fedora-rpmdevtools and add check-buildroot and friends to your ~/.rpmmacros (eg. using fedora-buildrpmtree), it catches errors like this: [...] + /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot /var/tmp/nant-0.85-5-buildroot-scop/usr/bin/nant:exec /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/../../bin/mono /var/tmp/nant-0.85-5-buildroot-scop/usr/lib64/NAnt/bin/NAnt.exe "$@" Found '/var/tmp/nant-0.85-5-buildroot-scop' in installed files; aborting error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.42428 (%install) The same problem is in the package released in devel. Filed as bug 199432. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 15:52:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 11:52:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607191552.k6JFq9Ap022860@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |199430 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-19 11:41 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/PyQt4.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/PyQt4-4.0.1-1.src.rpm %changelog * Sun Jul 16 2006 Rex Dieter 4.0.1-1 - PyQt-4.0.1 * Mon Jun 12 2006 Rex Dieter 4.0-1 - PyQt-4.0(final) - BR: sip-devel >= 4.4.4 (see bug #199430) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 15:57:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 11:57:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199310] Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607191557.k6JFvJ0c023391@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199310 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-19 11:46 EST ------- I ran sturmbahnfahrer and so far noticed 2 issues: 1. Something is broken with the keyboard mapping: The "Examine keyboard controls" page says: 'Steer left less than' 'Steer right greater than' I found "left/right" on "," rsp. ".". 2. Running it issues this error message: ... Your plib (version 1.8.4) has a bug in the 3ds loader. Workaround enabled. Underrrun! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 16:01:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 12:01:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193957] Review Request: nant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607191601.k6JG19EH023717@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193957 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-19 11:52 EST ------- How can I get check-buildroot to run within mock? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 16:05:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 12:05:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199406] Review Request: vtkdata - Example data file for VTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607191605.k6JG5Hg6024153@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtkdata - Example data file for VTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199406 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-19 11:54 EST ------- 2 issues: - Your buildroot. - Why are you installing to %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version} instead of %{_datadir}/vtk or %{_datadir}/vtkdata? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 16:15:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 12:15:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199183] Review Request: e2tools - Manipulate files in unmounted ext2/ext3 filesystems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607191615.k6JGFiBB024908@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: e2tools - Manipulate files in unmounted ext2/ext3 filesystems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199183 ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2006-07-19 12:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > I think you don't need CPPFLAGS="-Wall -Werror" in %build section, because > the build server has his own CPPFLAGS (I think so) and could you explain > what %%check section exaclty does? I wanted them explicitly. %check does a function test of the built binaries, making sure they do work. It's just another build-stage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 16:29:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 12:29:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198831] Review Request: varconf - Configuration library used by WorldForge apps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607191629.k6JGTRhB025614@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: varconf - Configuration library used by WorldForge apps Alias: varconf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198831 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-07-19 12:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > > once conftest is created, you need to: cd tests ; ./conftest < conf.cfg > > ^^ This should be added to %check section My bad. Here's the updated package: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/varconf.spec http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/varconf-0.6.4-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 16:37:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 12:37:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197754] Review Request: perl-Perl6-Bible In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607191637.k6JGb7cT026190@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Perl6-Bible https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197754 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-07-19 12:28 EST ------- So here's the answer that I got from the maintainer on #perl6: silug: as far as I know they are never really licensed and nominally I think TPF owns copyright, but I'm not sure I've sent email to the President of TPF to see if he has any suggestions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 16:39:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 12:39:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199016] Review Request: mxml - Miniature XML development library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607191639.k6JGdfGq026505@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mxml - Miniature XML development library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199016 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-07-19 12:30 EST ------- Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 16:39:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 12:39:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199021] Review Request: zynaddsubfx - Real-time software synthesizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607191639.k6JGdrK8026548@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zynaddsubfx - Real-time software synthesizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199021 Bug 199021 depends on bug 199016, which changed state. Bug 199016 Summary: Review Request: mxml - Miniature XML development library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199016 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 17:01:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 13:01:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198287] Review Request: python-paste - Tools for using a Web Server Gateway Interface stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607191701.k6JH1u2V028418@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-paste - Tools for using a Web Server Gateway Interface stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198287 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-19 12:52 EST ------- It seems to me that %doc would be better with %doc docs/* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 17:02:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 13:02:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199310] Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607191702.k6JH2kxm028469@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199310 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-19 11:46 EST ------- I ran sturmbahnfahrer and so far noticed 2 issues: 1. Something is broken with the keyboard mapping: The "Examine keyboard controls" page says: 'Steer left less than' 'Steer right greater than' I found "left/right" on "," rsp. ".". 2. Running it issues this error message: ... Your plib (version 1.8.4) has a bug in the 3ds loader. Workaround enabled. Underrrun! ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-19 12:53 EST ------- > ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-19 11:46 EST ------- > I ran sturmbahnfahrer and so far noticed 2 issues: > > 1. Something is broken with the keyboard mapping: > The "Examine keyboard controls" page says: > 'Steer left less than' > 'Steer right greater than' > > I found "left/right" on "," rsp. ".". > Which on a "normal" qwerty keyboard are the < > keys, I guess this is different on a German keyboard? > 2. Running it issues this error message: > ... > Your plib (version 1.8.4) has a bug in the 3ds loader. Workaround enabled. > Underrrun! > Hmm, besides that does it work? plib 1.8.4 is the latest release, I can get the fix for the 3ds loader from CVS, but since this message and the workaround are enabled based on a version check that won't help. The underrun message just means the soundbuffer got drained completly before it got a chance to fill it if that message doesn't happen often its harmless. Regards, Hans -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 17:03:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 13:03:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194320] Review Request: im-chooser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607191703.k6JH3tII028599@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: im-chooser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194320 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO_REPORTER OtherBugsDependingO| |188268 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-19 12:55 EST ------- Given it passed Extras review just shortly ago, approving for Core from a package quality standpoint. Adding with tagoh as owner. You'll need to coordinate having it removed from Extras. How should this be in Comps? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 17:13:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 13:13:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198829] Review Request: wfmath - WorldForge math libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607191713.k6JHDoiW029433@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wfmath - WorldForge math libraries Alias: wfmath https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198829 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-07-19 13:05 EST ------- Thanks for the test investigation, Hans! I built a patch to fix the test results. Here's the new package that includes the patch and the review MUSTFIX items: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/wfmath.spec http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/wfmath-0.3.4-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 17:30:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 13:30:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198833] Review Request: mercator - Terrain library for WorldForge client/server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607191730.k6JHUu6W030988@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mercator - Terrain library for WorldForge client/server Alias: mercator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198833 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-07-19 13:22 EST ------- Sorry for the delay in this one. I was waiting to resolve the issues with the wfmath dependency first. http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/mercator.spec http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/mercator-0.2.4-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 17:44:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 13:44:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199254] Review Request: perl-perlmenu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607191744.k6JHiWvT032251@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-perlmenu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199254 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-07-19 13:35 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=132698) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=132698&action=view) Proposed spec * Add BuildArch: noarch. * Create "examples" directory and move the examples to it. * Fix permissions, script interpreter on examples. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 17:47:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 13:47:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199254] Review Request: perl-perlmenu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607191747.k6JHlIPY032574@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-perlmenu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199254 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-07-19 13:38 EST ------- Oh, one other tip... Be sure to update Release and your changelog as you make changes during a review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 17:51:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 13:51:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198287] Review Request: python-paste - Tools for using a Web Server Gateway Interface stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607191751.k6JHp1mK000370@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-paste - Tools for using a Web Server Gateway Interface stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198287 ------- Additional Comments From lmacken at redhat.com 2006-07-19 13:42 EST ------- http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/python-paste.spec http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/python-paste-0.9.3-3.src.rpm * Wed Jul 19 2006 Luke Macken - 0.9.3-3 - Fix doc inclusion -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 17:52:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 13:52:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198711] Review Request: splint - An implementation of the lint program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607191752.k6JHqTnH000467@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: splint - An implementation of the lint program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198711 timp at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From timp at redhat.com 2006-07-19 13:43 EST ------- - RHEL-5 branch created - added to comps - brew configured Please build your package. I am closing this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 19:34:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 15:34:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198287] Review Request: python-paste - Tools for using a Web Server Gateway Interface stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607191934.k6JJYrUK012562@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-paste - Tools for using a Web Server Gateway Interface stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198287 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |pertusus at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-19 15:25 EST ------- I am not that comfortable with python packagin, but I have to start one day... As a first remark, the striping of shebangs with sed is not wrong, but prone to errors since even if the first lines of these files isn't a shebang anymore there won't be any error. * rpmlint output: E: python-paste zero-length /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Paste-0.9.3-py2.4.egg-info/not-zip-safe I guess it is a usefull file? * package rightly named * open source licence, licence not included but not in the upstream package * spec legible * source match upstream c1b8f08d0a7e9ccb97e6ee524b26d39f Paste-0.9.3.tar.gz * BuildRequires are clean * Owns the paste directory it creates * %files section right, using a python scriplet * doc is small and don't affect runtime * no gui no lib APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 19:39:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 15:39:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193957] Review Request: nant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607191939.k6JJdBRN012903@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193957 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-19 15:30 EST ------- Thanks. I'll check onto the cause and patch it up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 19:39:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 15:39:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193957] Review Request: nant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607191939.k6JJdRPK012964@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193957 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 19:39:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 15:39:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189092] Review Request: boo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607191939.k6JJdeaf013024@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189092 Bug 189092 depends on bug 193957, which changed state. Bug 193957 Summary: Review Request: nant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193957 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |NOTABUG Resolution|NOTABUG |NEXTRELEASE Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Status|CLOSED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 20:16:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 16:16:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199484] New: Review Request: notify-python - python bindings for libnotify Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199484 Summary: Review Request: notify-python - python bindings for libnotify Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: jdennis at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://people.redhat.com/jdennis/notify-python.spec SRPM URL: ftp://people.redhat.com/jdennis/notify-python-0.1.0-1.src.rpm Description: These are the python bindings for libnotify. Not much to say here, this is a pretty simple package. Perhaps two items of note: * The package name was set to match upstream, arguments could be made for either of the two following names: "python-notify" because that what the guildlines say, or "pynotify" because thats the python import name. I discussed this with Jeremy Katz and he felt making the package name match upstream was the best, sounds good to me too. * The only thing the package installs is the bindings, no doc. There are some test python files which could be used as examples. Perhaps they should go into /usr/share/doc/notify-python-*/examples? Jeremy thought it was fine not to install the test examples and because this is an expedient exercise, other packages in FC6 need the bindings, being minimal for an initial package sounds like the right approach. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 20:25:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 16:25:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198287] Review Request: python-paste - Tools for using a Web Server Gateway Interface stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607192025.k6JKPnA3017505@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-paste - Tools for using a Web Server Gateway Interface stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198287 lmacken at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From lmacken at redhat.com 2006-07-19 16:17 EST ------- I modified the shebang removal expression to be a bit smarter :) %{__sed} -i -e '/^#!.*/,1 d' paste/util/scgiserver.py paste/debug/doctest_webapp.py Imported into CVS, added to owners list, FC5 branch requested, tagged and built for FC6. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 20:28:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 16:28:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199484] Review Request: notify-python - python bindings for libnotify In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607192028.k6JKSwaJ018002@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: notify-python - python bindings for libnotify https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199484 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-07-19 16:19 EST ------- Tech ack. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 20:40:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 16:40:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607192040.k6JKeGXI019941@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 Bug 190189 depends on bug 199430, which changed state. Bug 199430 Summary: sip: upgrade to 4.4.4+ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199430 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 20:45:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 16:45:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186919] Review Request: eric: Python IDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607192045.k6JKjJid020691@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eric: Python IDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186919 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-19 10:56 EST ------- Not sure how/why it built previously fine for me in a fc5 buildroot. ??? Spec Name or Url: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/eric.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/eric-3.9.0-4.src.rpm %changelog * Wed Jul 19 2006 Rex Dieter 3.9.0-4 - fix fedora > 4 %%ghost'ing case. ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-19 10:59 EST ------- > Did you want to %ghost those two files? For the record, yes. (: ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-19 16:36 EST ------- Did you decide what to do about the non-executable-script errors that rpmlint is throwing? As far as I can see, all of them are OK except for /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/eric3/ThirdParty/brm/bike/parsing/fastparser.py. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 20:50:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 16:50:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199490] New: Review Request:
Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199490 Summary: Review Request:
Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: johnp at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/johnp/files/dbus/dbus-sharp.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/johnp/files/dbus/dbus-sharp-0.63-1.src.rpm Description: Mono bindings for dbus. The Source is not a full URL because the mono bindings are unmaintained and I just made a quick build enviornment in the git repo. Unfortunatly if we ship mono we need to include this or all the interesting apps won't build or install. I specificly did not do a release because I want the mono devs to fix the situation in the future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 20:51:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 16:51:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199491] New: Review Request: dbus-sharp Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199491 Summary: Review Request: dbus-sharp Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: johnp at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/johnp/files/dbus/dbus-sharp.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/johnp/files/dbus/dbus-sharp-0.63-1.src.rpm Description: Mono bindings for dbus. The Source is not a full URL because the mono bindings are unmaintained and I just made a quick build enviornment in the git repo. Unfortunatly if we ship mono we need to include this or all the interesting apps won't build or install. I specificly did not do a release because I want the mono devs to fix the situation in the future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 21:06:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 17:06:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199491] Review Request: dbus-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607192106.k6JL6PTA023559@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbus-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199491 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-19 16:57 EST ------- Okay, couple of comments on the install section of the spec file # dbus installs mono files in libdir, not in prefix/lib, fixup: perl -pi -e 's,/gacdir \$\(libdir\),/gacdir /usr/lib,g' mono/Makefile perl -pi -e "s,/root \\\$\\(DESTDIR\\)\\\$\(libdir\\),/root $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/lib,g" mono/Makefile perl -pi -e "s,/usr/lib64,/usr/lib,g" dbus-sharp.pc mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_prefix}/lib/mono make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT I'm not sure here. If the files are being installed in %_libdir rather than %{_prefix}/lib, why have you got the mkdir -p line? When you run the make install, the directories are created for you by the makefile (unless in this case, they're not of course!) The other problem is that the .pc file is going into %_libdir/pkgconfig. I've seen this on 64 bit architecture failing miserably, but not if it's in %_prefix/lib (yes, I am aware of the packaging guidelines!) The .pc file should be in a devel package by itself. Should the Source0 not point to a URL rather than on a local machine? You're missing the %{?dist} tag on the Release line Finally, is the define arch required? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 21:17:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 17:17:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198837] Review Request: eris - Client-side session layer for Atlas-C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607192117.k6JLHbTv024695@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eris - Client-side session layer for Atlas-C++ Alias: eris https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198837 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-07-19 17:08 EST ------- Thanks for the review! This has been imported, but can't be built until wfmath is approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 21:17:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 17:17:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199494] New: Review Request: gnu-getopt (RENAME ONLY) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199494 Summary: Review Request: gnu-getopt (RENAME ONLY) Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: fnasser at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: same spec as the current gnu.getopt SRPM URL: same SRPM as the current gnu.getopt Description: same as before This package has a '.' in the name so it is being renamed to use a '-'. P.S.: As we are rebuilding we may take the opportunity and do an upgrade at the same time if a new version is available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 21:24:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 17:24:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199491] Review Request: dbus-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607192124.k6JLOfw5025441@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbus-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199491 ------- Additional Comments From johnp at redhat.com 2006-07-19 17:15 EST ------- Paul, On the first point - this is just something I copied from the old dbus package. I assume on 64bit archs everything is still installed into /usr/lib but the pc file needs to be installed into /usr/lib64. I would ask Alex who packaged Mono but he is on vacation right now. On the second point %_libdir/pkgconfig is the correct place to put pc files. Third point (.pc in devel) I'll fix that. On the fourth point as I said in the initial comment, there is no URL because this package has not been released. It is a streight build from the git repo. If it were up to me wouldn't even be packaging this but mono apps need it for now. Fifth point (dist tag) I'll add it On the sixth point I just picked that up from the old spec file. Does that define all of our arch's? Not sure why it was still there. Fouth point (.pc in devel) I'll fix that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 21:27:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 17:27:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199491] Review Request: dbus-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607192127.k6JLRPaR025594@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbus-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199491 ------- Additional Comments From johnp at redhat.com 2006-07-19 17:18 EST ------- Oh wait, ppc64 isn't listed. There is most likely problems building mono on that arch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 21:33:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 17:33:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199491] Review Request: dbus-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607192133.k6JLXVG8026052@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbus-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199491 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-19 17:24 EST ------- On the forth point, could the tarball not have been uploaded to your redhat space and Source0 become Source1 with Source0 becoming a link to your webspace (or some comment made saying it's a grab from git). As it stands, I'm not sure it complies with the packaging guidelines. Second point : I know %_libdir/pkgconfig is the correct place for .pc files. However, from my experience of building monodevelop (and as a general rule for mono, any package relying on another mono lib), .pc files on 64 bit architectures tend not to be picked up when you run the configure file. There is an easy fix, just add %libdir/pkgconfig to the pkgconfig PATH variable. Sixth point : Again, when I've created packages for FE on mono, the buildarchs are not usually included in the spec file, so I'm not sure as to their value anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 21:37:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 17:37:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199491] Review Request: dbus-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607192137.k6JLb0aX026225@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbus-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199491 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-19 17:28 EST ------- Source doesn't always have to be a URL. Especially if its pre-release snapshotting. Also for RH projects, our "preferred" method of distribution is directly in srpms so there are many projects that don't have tarball releases, so the srpm referrs to itself. (I'll step out of the way of the rest of this review unless needed) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 21:38:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 17:38:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199491] Review Request: dbus-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607192138.k6JLcDmw026358@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbus-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199491 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-19 17:29 EST ------- Thanks for that clarification :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 21:41:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 17:41:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199490] Review Request:
In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607192141.k6JLfvWn026896@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199490 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
|package name here> Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2006-07-19 17:33 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 199491 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 21:42:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 17:42:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199491] Review Request: dbus-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607192142.k6JLg9vg026941@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbus-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199491 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2006-07-19 17:33 EST ------- *** Bug 199490 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 21:48:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 17:48:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199491] Review Request: dbus-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607192148.k6JLmOpb027889@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbus-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199491 ------- Additional Comments From johnp at redhat.com 2006-07-19 17:39 EST ------- new package and spec uploaded Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/johnp/files/dbus/dbus-sharp.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/johnp/files/dbus/dbus-sharp-0.63-2.src.rpm I kept the libdir the same just because this is how it has worked in the past and when alex gets back he can fix it up if need be. I need to drop an intern off at home. I'll check back later and build if it is approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 21:50:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 17:50:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198247] Review Request: libpng10 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607192150.k6JLoLmw028199@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpng10 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198247 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |michael at knox.net.nz OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-19 17:41 EST ------- Hi, I will review this one for you. Review for release 1: * RPM name is OK * Source libpng-1.0.20.tar.bz2 is the same as upstream * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint of libpng10 looks OK * rpmlint of libpng10-devel looks OK * File list of libpng10 looks OK * File list of libpng10-devel looks OK Notes: Looks good. I am happy, consider it APPROVED. Please remember to close the bug report once this has been imported into CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 21:56:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 17:56:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198247] Review Request: libpng10 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607192156.k6JLuvTT028856@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpng10 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198247 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 22:05:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 18:05:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197967] Review Request: gkrellm - Multiple stacked system monitors in one process In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607192205.k6JM5bot029684@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gkrellm - Multiple stacked system monitors in one process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197967 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-19 17:56 EST ------- Thanks! Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 22:05:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 18:05:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199491] Review Request: dbus-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607192205.k6JM5oCu029753@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbus-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199491 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-19 17:56 EST ------- That's the old spec file and the src rpm is giving a 404 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 22:05:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 18:05:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197981] Review Request: gkrellm-wifi - Wireless monitor plugin for the GNU Krell Monitors In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607192205.k6JM5kOW029727@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gkrellm-wifi - Wireless monitor plugin for the GNU Krell Monitors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197981 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 197981 depends on bug 197967, which changed state. Bug 197967 Summary: Review Request: gkrellm - Multiple stacked system monitors in one process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197967 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-19 17:56 EST ------- Thanks! Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 22:06:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 18:06:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199386] Review Request: aspell-mi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607192206.k6JM6iKv029853@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-mi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199386 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-19 17:57 EST ------- Yes, they are reasonable errors. the aspell-he package in extras has the same output, infact, thats where I got the information about them from. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 22:18:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 18:18:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199490] Review Request:
In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607192218.k6JMIEBW030773@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199490 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|188265 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 22:45:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 18:45:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189322] Review Request: rosegarden4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607192245.k6JMjC1o001045@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rosegarden4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189322 seg at haxxed.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2006-07-19 18:36 EST ------- Patched and built on devel and FC5! FC4 is missing liblrdf, liblo and dssi though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 23:00:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 19:00:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189322] Review Request: rosegarden4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607192300.k6JN0WfU002384@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rosegarden4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189322 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-07-19 18:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > Patched and built on devel and FC5! FC4 is missing liblrdf, liblo and dssi though. Great news! I wasn't planning on putting those packages in FC4, as I don't have an FC4 machine to test with. Is this still something you would really like? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 23:12:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 19:12:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174021] Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607192312.k6JNCkmw003625@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174021 ------- Additional Comments From mharris at redhat.com 2006-07-19 19:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20) > (In reply to comment #19) > > That is a bug, your package should _not_ own a system directory that > > is part of the X Window System. > > Here's a list of all packages in FC5 which own that directory: > > xscreensaver-base > xorg-x11-resutils > xorg-x11-server-utils > xorg-x11-utils > xorg-x11-xsm > xorg-x11-apps > xorg-x11-xdm > > Mike, if you think these are buggy, I'll happily file bugs against them. I fixed all the xorg-x11 packages, but please file one against xscreensaver. I looked at the spec file and it's list is autogenerated, so I'd rather if the package owner resolved that one... > Honestly, I think it's reasonable to see that list and conclude that it's > expected behavior for a package that adds an app-defaults file to own > /usr/share/X11/app-defaults. Technically, it wasn't a problem previously. In fact, it was considered by many people to be a sensible thing to do, at least in certain specific circumstances. However other people believe it is very wrong and never appropriate, and so it was made into official Fedora policy which we must now adhere to religiously. ;o) For Fedora Core at least, any case which would be a special exception to this rule, generally should have the "filesystem" package own the given directory to avoid issues. For packages outside of Core, the problem still exists and nobody claims to have an adequate solution. I believe it is considered to be a minor issue that people are expected to just live with, if they uninstall a group of packages all at once and there is no package which can be deemed to be the canonical owner of a directory. Some examples might be: - povray data files - video games which provide data files which can be shared by multiple games packaged by different people, which there's no really good way to choose an owner for the dir (ie: DOOM .wad files), and the other games which use the data, do not have a real dependency on the game (DOOM), nor any particular set of data files. - any other non-FHS type of data file which does not have a standardized location in the filesystem hierarchy. But for things that do have a canonical owner which can easily be determined, such as libXt in this case, the current Fedora policy makes sense. > Jochen, do you think it would be reasonable to back out of this mess by just > adding a dependency on xterm? No. With the latest libXt package, there is no problem anymore. If your package contains an app-defaults file, then it must also have software which links to libXm, libXaw, or libXt directly, the first two of which are linked also to libXt. As such, all software either directly or indirectly already depends on libXt, and one way or another, rpm will automatically pick up the proper library dependencies without needing to specify them. This will ensure that libXt is guaranteed to be installed either prior to these packages, or as part of the same transaction which installs these packages, thus guaranteeing that the app-defaults dir has a legitimate and canonical owner (libXt). Of course this only applies to current rawhide, not FC5, however it will get fixed in FC5 when we release 7.1 for FC5 also. > That's what the app-defaults file is for, isn't it? They are X resources for Xt apps. > In FC6, the xterm dependency will pull in libXt which will own this > directory; in FC5 the directory will still be unowned in the dependency tree but > at least that's not a bug in this package. Correct. Will be fixed in future FC5 update, so IMHO at least, 3rd party packagers should not own the dir, and shouldn't worry about it now. Thanks again for bringing up these issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 23:30:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 19:30:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199484] Review Request: notify-python - python bindings for libnotify In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607192330.k6JNUf5k005135@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: notify-python - python bindings for libnotify https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199484 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |jkeating at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188267 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-19 19:21 EST ------- NEEDSWORK: Compiled modules are arch specific, you need to use sitearch rather than sitelib. Thus, sitelib isn't used anywhere, why define it? Don't need the requires on python-abi, thats automagic now. Needed to add pkgconfig, libnotify-devel, pygtk2-devel, gtk2-devel, dbus-glib-devel, dbus-devel as buildreqs. No rpmlint errors or warnings to worry about. Please fix above issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 23:38:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 19:38:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199494] Review Request: gnu-getopt (RENAME ONLY) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607192338.k6JNc8qs005975@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnu-getopt (RENAME ONLY) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199494 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |jkeating at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188268 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-19 19:29 EST ------- You'll need to have an Obsoletes: gnu.getopt Provides: gnu.getopt for proper upgrade path. I'll have to change comps too. Approved with the above changes. (not looking too closely at existing spec, thats for another day...) Please let me know when you build it so that I can update comps (and close this bug) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 23:57:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 19:57:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174021] Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607192357.k6JNvrGs008433@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174021 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-19 19:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #21) > > Jochen, do you think it would be reasonable to back out of this mess by just > > adding a dependency on xterm? > > No. With the latest libXt package, there is no problem anymore. If your > package contains an app-defaults file, then it must also have software which > links to libXm, libXaw, or libXt directly, the first two of which are linked > also to libXt. This package does not have software which is linked to any of those libraries. It drops in an alternate app-default file that xterm can use to set up the proper APL key bindings, but it doesn't actually use the app-default file itself. This is why I suggested the dependency on xterm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 00:00:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 20:00:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197653] Review Request: x3270 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607200000.k6K00CCA008774@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: x3270 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197653 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-19 19:51 EST ------- Built into rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 00:07:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 20:07:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199491] Review Request: dbus-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607200007.k6K07nvj009598@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbus-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199491 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 00:09:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 20:09:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199491] Review Request: dbus-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607200009.k6K09TmK009784@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbus-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199491 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188267 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 03:04:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 23:04:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178901] Review Request: gtksourceview-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607200304.k6K34nZ9023212@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtksourceview-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178901 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-07-19 22:56 EST ------- That patch to autoconf and automake should go upstream if %(libdir) is the accepted place to drop this. - rpmlint checks return: W: gtksourceview-sharp strange-permission gtksourceview-sharp-libdir.patch 0666 W: gtksourceview-sharp strange-permission gtksourceview-sharp.spec 0666 Ignorable, I'm not scared of 666. W: gtksourceview-sharp incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.0-0.10-12 2.0-12.fc6 Confusion due to the 2.0-0.10 naming in the tarball. Should be fine as long as the release is always bumped if that extra version number is updated, to say 2.0-0.11. E: gtksourceview-sharp no-binary E: gtksourceview-sharp only-non-binary-in-usr-lib Expected for mono. W: gtksourceview-sharp-devel no-documentation Fine. - package meets naming guidelines Just watch out for that version. - package meets packaging guidelines BLOCKER - license is wrong, is LGPL. - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR (hopefully autoconf and automake will go away sometime) - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file - devel package ok - no .la files - post/postun ldconfig ok - devel requires base package n-v-r For mono specific stuff the build does call gacutil like the guidelines say. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 03:20:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 23:20:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199386] Review Request: aspell-mi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607200320.k6K3KawV023701@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-mi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199386 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-19 23:11 EST ------- aspell-he review, with interesting information including correspondence with the aspell author about the system-dependence of the dictionaries: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189157 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 03:39:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 23:39:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199386] Review Request: aspell-mi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607200339.k6K3dKfZ024220@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-mi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199386 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-19 23:30 EST ------- Would you like to see the info placed into the spec file in this package too ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 03:54:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 23:54:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199254] Review Request: perl-perlmenu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607200354.k6K3sLBR025072@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-perlmenu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199254 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-19 23:45 EST ------- Thnaks for helping for solving examples directory problem. I saw the SPEC file and understood that i have to do mkdir examples under %prep. Updates:- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/perl-perlmenu/perl-perlmenu.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/perl-perlmenu/perl-perlmenu-4.0-2.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 04:49:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 00:49:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198831] Review Request: varconf - Configuration library used by WorldForge apps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607200449.k6K4nGE3027223@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: varconf - Configuration library used by WorldForge apps Alias: varconf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198831 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 04:57:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 00:57:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198829] Review Request: wfmath - WorldForge math libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607200457.k6K4vPSF027684@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wfmath - WorldForge math libraries Alias: wfmath https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198829 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-07-20 00:48 EST ------- Only other comment is make check should use smpflags. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 05:00:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 01:00:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198833] Review Request: mercator - Terrain library for WorldForge client/server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607200500.k6K50Q2Z027791@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mercator - Terrain library for WorldForge client/server Alias: mercator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198833 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-07-20 00:51 EST ------- pkgconfig is not needed in BR for devel package and should not have been added, as wfmath-devel should pick it up. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 06:06:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 02:06:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198833] Review Request: mercator - Terrain library for WorldForge client/server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607200606.k6K66gQO030075@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mercator - Terrain library for WorldForge client/server Alias: mercator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198833 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-20 01:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > pkgconfig is not needed in BR for devel package and should not have been added, > as wfmath-devel should pick it up. BR: pkgconfig MUST be added to all packages providing a *.pc Cf. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/IRCLog20060706 and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/GuidelinesTodo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 06:24:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 02:24:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198833] Review Request: mercator - Terrain library for WorldForge client/server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607200624.k6K6OQgV030439@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mercator - Terrain library for WorldForge client/server Alias: mercator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198833 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-07-20 02:15 EST ------- Erm, pkgconfig is ALREADY included by the wfmath-devel package, therefore it is NOT required. We already have guidelines in place for this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 06:39:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 02:39:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198928] Review Request: lsscsi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607200639.k6K6dWvJ030991@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lsscsi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198928 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-20 02:30 EST ------- Spec file looks much cleaner, and builds in mock (5&devel/x86_64). And yes, always bump the release number :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 06:39:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 02:39:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198833] Review Request: mercator - Terrain library for WorldForge client/server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607200639.k6K6dc1O031006@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mercator - Terrain library for WorldForge client/server Alias: mercator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198833 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-20 02:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Erm, pkgconfig is ALREADY included by the wfmath-devel package, therefore it is > NOT required. It doesn't matter. Each package containing a *.pc depends on the directory /usr/*pkgconfig. It therefore must make sure this directory is present. Whether another package currently requires the package "pkgconfig" and thereby implicitly pulls in /usr/*pkgconfig doesn't matter. It is just a random accident. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 06:54:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 02:54:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198833] Review Request: mercator - Terrain library for WorldForge client/server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607200654.k6K6sB1l032004@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mercator - Terrain library for WorldForge client/server Alias: mercator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198833 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-07-20 02:45 EST ------- >> Whether another package currently requires the package "pkgconfig" and thereby implicitly pulls in /usr/*pkgconfig doesn't matter. It is just a random accident. What? I'm sorry I totally do not understand this. What accident is occuring? The package is redundant. End of story. What am I missing? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 07:58:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 03:58:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191239] Review Request: qjackctl - Qt based JACK control application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607200758.k6K7wrgH003728@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qjackctl - Qt based JACK control application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191239 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-20 03:49 EST ------- Ping? It has been 4 weeks since I approved this package and said I would sponsor you, all you have todo is create an account, get sponsored (just wait) and import this. Why the delay? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 07:59:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 03:59:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196865] Review Request: audacious - A GTK2 based media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607200759.k6K7xeaA003799@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious - A GTK2 based media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196865 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-20 03:50 EST ------- Closing as this has been imported and build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 08:05:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 04:05:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198833] Review Request: mercator - Terrain library for WorldForge client/server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607200805.k6K85qDn004643@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mercator - Terrain library for WorldForge client/server Alias: mercator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198833 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-20 03:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > pkgconfig is not needed in BR for devel package and should not have been added, > > as wfmath-devel should pick it up. > > BR: pkgconfig MUST be added to all packages providing a *.pc s/BR/R/ (In reply to comment #7) > >> Whether another package currently requires the package "pkgconfig" and thereby > implicitly pulls in /usr/*pkgconfig doesn't matter. It is just a random accident. > > What? I'm sorry I totally do not understand this. What accident is occuring? > The package is redundant. End of story. What am I missing? It's just about conceivable that wfmath-devel might someday not include a .pc file and hence not require pkgconfig itself. It's good practice that if your package requires something itself and not just via a dependency (as would be the case if this package didn't ship a .pc file) then the direct dependency should be added to your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 08:26:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 04:26:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196865] Review Request: audacious - A GTK2 based media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607200826.k6K8QZV8006057@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious - A GTK2 based media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196865 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at camperquake.de 2006-07-20 04:17 EST ------- Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 08:40:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 04:40:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199402] Review Request: chrpath - Modify rpath of compiled programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607200840.k6K8enIW007161@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chrpath - Modify rpath of compiled programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199402 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-07-20 04:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > Michael, you don't need to be sponsored to review a package, you only need > > > to open up an account on admin.fedora.redhat.com/accounts/ > > I have written it to take note of I'm not sponsored ;-) maybe someone will > have a look to one of my packages. OK, I understand now. I'd take a look, but I'm not a sponsor. :/ Ping me for the second package to get a review for. (In reply to comment #6) > Because the BuildRoot is only suggested, the package is APPROVED even when you > disagree with me/us. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 08:47:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 04:47:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199406] Review Request: vtkdata - Example data file for VTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607200847.k6K8lbmw007878@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtkdata - Example data file for VTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199406 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-07-20 04:38 EST ------- One of recent features of vtk was to allow for several concurrent vtkdata installs due to user demand and be able to switch back and forth. I don't intend to ever have a second package coinstall a different data set, but if the user wants to do so, I'd like to avoid any conflicts and be verbose on filesytem level about what is actually on the system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 08:59:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 04:59:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199406] Review Request: vtkdata - Example data file for VTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607200859.k6K8xRMI008877@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtkdata - Example data file for VTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199406 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-20 04:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > One of recent features of vtk was to allow for several concurrent vtkdata > installs due to user demand and be able to switch back and forth. A versioned data dir would be useful if there is a strong dependency between application and application data, and if the application is supposed to be installed in parallel. But I don't see how this applies here. > I don't intend to ever have a second package coinstall a different data set, but > if the user wants to do so, I'd like to avoid any conflicts and be verbose on > filesytem level about what is actually on the system. I regret having to say this, but I refuse to approve this package in its current shape. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 09:04:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 05:04:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199402] Review Request: chrpath - Modify rpath of compiled programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607200904.k6K940fo009140@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chrpath - Modify rpath of compiled programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199402 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-20 04:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > OK, I understand now. I'd take a look, but I'm not a sponsor. :/ > Ping me for the second package to get a review for. My packages are Bug 199192 and Bug 198878. More important to me is the first one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 09:17:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 05:17:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195666] Review Request: mod_fcgid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607200917.k6K9HF5E009814@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_fcgid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195666 mfleming+rpm at enlartenment.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mfleming+rpm at enlartenment.com 2006-07-20 05:08 EST ------- Sorry about the time taken to knock this one over, been ill or busy or both. - All the items I'd previously pointed out are well and truly fixed - The SELinux module is EXTREMELY cool and much appreciated, a fair bit of consideration has gone into it. Anything that encourages people to better consider system security (in a sane and non-onerous manner) is a Good Thing. Two thumbs up, APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 10:08:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 06:08:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198288] Review Request: python-pastedeploy - Load, configure, and compose WSGI applications and servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607201008.k6KA8i5P012680@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pastedeploy - Load, configure, and compose WSGI applications and servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198288 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-20 05:59 EST ------- The %doc section should better be %doc docs/* There is an inconsistent use of rpm macros. I don't know if the name should be python-paste-script or python-pastescript. The guidelines don't cover the case of python submodules. If it is "This makes a package name format of python-$NAME" it seems to be python-pastescript, but if one follow "use the name of the module that you type to import it in a script" it should be python-paste-script. The second naming convention is also consistent with perl modules naming. Maybe this deserves a message on fedora-extras-list? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 10:09:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 06:09:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198288] Review Request: python-pastedeploy - Load, configure, and compose WSGI applications and servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607201009.k6KA9nUo012731@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pastedeploy - Load, configure, and compose WSGI applications and servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198288 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-20 06:00 EST ------- The %doc section should better be %doc docs/* There is an inconsistent use of rpm macros. I don't know if the name should be python-paste-deploy or python-pastedeploy. The guidelines don't cover the case of python submodules. If it is "This makes a package name format of python-$NAME" it seems to be python-pastedeploy, but if one follow "use the name of the module that you type to import it in a script" it should be python-paste-deploy. The second naming convention is also consistent with perl modules naming. Maybe this deserves a message on fedora-extras-list? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 11:05:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 07:05:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199406] Review Request: vtkdata - Example data file for VTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607201105.k6KB5F2Z017112@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtkdata - Example data file for VTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199406 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-07-20 06:56 EST ------- > (In reply to comment #3) > > One of recent features of vtk was to allow for several concurrent vtkdata > > installs due to user demand and be able to switch back and forth. > A versioned data dir would be useful if there is a strong dependency between > application and application data, and if the application is supposed to be > installed in parallel. > > But I don't see how this applies here. How strongly the application and its data are tied varies in vtk's past. Currently it is quite high, as both got a simultaneous minor release. (In reply to comment #4) > > I don't intend to ever have a second package coinstall a different data set, > > but if the user wants to do so, I'd like to avoid any conflicts and be > > verbose on filesytem level about what is actually on the system. > > I regret having to say this, but I refuse to approve this package in its > current shape. Now I'm going to break out in tears ;) Ignoring actual user demand which is acknowledged by upstream development and even implemneted isn't really constructive. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 11:26:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 07:26:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607201126.k6KBQDni017852@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-07-20 07:17 EST ------- Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~athimm/fedorasubmit/vtk/vtk.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~athimm/fedorasubmit/vtk/vtk-5.0.1-9.at.src.rpm * Wed Jul 19 2006 Axel Thimm - Fix some permissions for rpmlint and debuginfo. Fixing the permissions removed 90% of rpmlint output (unstripped binaries, executable ASCII files which are no scripts). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 11:27:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 07:27:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199491] Review Request: dbus-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607201127.k6KBRWMn017936@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbus-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199491 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-20 07:18 EST ------- I've noticed that one of todays rawhide updates is relying on dbus-sharp. How many applications currently in core also rely on dbus-sharp? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 11:28:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 07:28:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186919] Review Request: eric: Python IDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607201128.k6KBSga3018030@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eric: Python IDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186919 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-20 07:19 EST ------- > Did you decide what to do about the non-executable-script errors As there's only 1 real problematic one (fastparser.py), I'll just patch that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 11:31:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 07:31:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199406] Review Request: vtkdata - Example data file for VTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607201131.k6KBV5O6018248@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtkdata - Example data file for VTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199406 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-20 07:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > > (In reply to comment #3) > How strongly the application and its data are tied varies in vtk's past. > Currently it is quite high, as both got a simultaneous minor release. Either data files are subpackages of an application, then they should go to below an application owned directory (data as internal implementation detail) or they are independent of the application, then they should go to outside of the applications directories. If they require a certain API, such data should go to API versioned directories. In none of these cases parallel installation of data files makes any sense. Also, upstream ships its data in an unversioned directory, which I read as a strong indication of them not wanting a versioned directory. > Ignoring actual user demand which is acknowledged by upstream development and > even implemneted isn't really constructive. 1. Show us an URL were upstream explicitly says so. I searched their web site and could not find any such statement. 2. User demand? Whose? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 12:10:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 08:10:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191208] Review Request: ipe - The Ipe extensible drawing editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607201210.k6KCAtbu020424@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ipe - The Ipe extensible drawing editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191208 Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: The Ipe |Review Request: ipe - The |extensible drawing editor |Ipe extensible drawing | |editor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 12:12:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 08:12:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198833] Review Request: mercator - Terrain library for WorldForge client/server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607201212.k6KCCuSV020536@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mercator - Terrain library for WorldForge client/server Alias: mercator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198833 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-20 08:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #4) > > (In reply to comment #3) > > > pkgconfig is not needed in BR for devel package and should not have been added, > > > as wfmath-devel should pick it up. > > > > BR: pkgconfig MUST be added to all packages providing a *.pc > > s/BR/R/ Ouch - Mea culpa, ugly typo that shouldn't have happened. > (In reply to comment #7) > > >> Whether another package currently requires the package "pkgconfig" and thereby > > implicitly pulls in /usr/*pkgconfig doesn't matter. It is just a random accident. > > > > What? I'm sorry I totally do not understand this. What accident is occuring? > > The package is redundant. Yes, atm it's redundant, but will it be in 2 weeks? >> What am I missing? The guidelines have changed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 12:57:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 08:57:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194320] Review Request: im-chooser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607201257.k6KCvrfo023387@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: im-chooser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194320 tagoh at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2006-07-20 08:49 EST ------- Well, ideally it should be installed by default regardless scim is installed or not, to allow all people to setup their preference. Warren and I talked about it a bit though, if someone enables IM on im-chooser without SCIM installed say, getting the package through pirut say and installing them sounds good idea to me. So I would push this to install by default for that purpose too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 14:18:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 10:18:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196146] Review Request: mod_nss In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607201418.k6KEIXNb031794@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_nss https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196146 rcritten at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rcritten at redhat.com 2006-07-20 10:09 EST ------- Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 14:40:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 10:40:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199484] Review Request: notify-python - python bindings for libnotify In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607201440.k6KEet4p001622@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: notify-python - python bindings for libnotify https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199484 jdennis at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED CC| |katzj at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From jdennis at redhat.com 2006-07-20 10:32 EST ------- Fixed above issues, except I could not find dbus-glib-devel in rawhide, so I omitted that package. Spec URL: ftp://people.redhat.com/jdennis/notify-python.spec SRPM URL: ftp://people.redhat.com/jdennis/notify-python-0.1.0-2.src.rpm Added Jeremy to CC, as he needs this as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 14:51:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 10:51:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199484] Review Request: notify-python - python bindings for libnotify In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607201451.k6KEp8i7003034@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: notify-python - python bindings for libnotify https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199484 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-20 10:42 EST ------- dbus-glib hit rawhide last night, I was testing in brew with the current dist-fc6 stuff, which included dbus-glib. Please add it back, this will not compile w/out it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 15:11:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 11:11:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199484] Review Request: notify-python - python bindings for libnotify In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607201511.k6KFBwb2005406@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: notify-python - python bindings for libnotify https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199484 ------- Additional Comments From jdennis at redhat.com 2006-07-20 11:02 EST ------- O.K. added dbus-glib-devel, but I can't test the build because I can't find this package. Normally I get my rawhide packages off of bigpapi (formerly qafiler), so I'm guessing the package wasn't there when the last sync occurred. Can you point me to another location (e.g. something off of /mnt/redhat?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 15:16:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 11:16:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199573] New: Review Request: BackupPC - high-performance backup system Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199573 Summary: Review Request: BackupPC - high-performance backup system Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: imlinux at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/BackupPC/BackupPC.spec SRPM: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/BackupPC/BackupPC-2.1.2-1.src.rpm Description: BackupPC is a high-performance, enterprise-grade system for backing up Linux and WinXX PCs and laptops to a server's disk. BackupPC is highly configurable and easy to install and maintain. And its Web Based! ------------ Couple of things. I've chosen to use the suidperl method for publishing this because I don't think most users will be expecing a second http instance. I might make an http sub package for those that would prefer not to use the suidperl method. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 15:36:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 11:36:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195666] Review Request: mod_fcgid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607201536.k6KFa3Qv007906@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_fcgid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195666 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-20 11:27 EST ------- Bug appears to have been closed by mistake. I have some tweaks I need to make here, as the selinux-policy package has been split into selinux-policy and selinux-policy-devel in rawhide. I'll upload a version that builds on rawhide shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 15:36:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 11:36:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195666] Review Request: mod_fcgid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607201536.k6KFairt008025@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_fcgid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195666 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 15:51:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 11:51:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198247] Review Request: libpng10 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607201551.k6KFppj2009286@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpng10 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198247 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-20 11:42 EST ------- I need some help with this. It's failing to build on x86_64: http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/12809-libpng10-1.0.20-2.fc6/x86_64/build.log At first I thought it was out-of-order building due to a broken Makefile and the use of %{?_smp_mflags}, but that wasn't it. I now suspect it may be to do with the use of assembly code. The strange thing is that it builds fine on x86_64 RHEL3 (the only x86_64 box I have access to). It could probably be fixed by using the configure script instead of the old Makefiles, but doing it that way I can't find any way to make it produce shared libraries with an soname (libpng.so.2.1.0.20) that lines up with what's in previous Fedora/Red Hat releases. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 15:54:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 11:54:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199491] Review Request: dbus-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607201554.k6KFsvKn009524@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbus-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199491 johnp at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From johnp at redhat.com 2006-07-20 11:45 EST ------- Woops, I uploaded them but forgot to move them to the webdir, moved now. Currently f-spot and tomboy use it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 15:56:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 11:56:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199494] Review Request: gnu-getopt (RENAME ONLY) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607201556.k6KFuTPB009643@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnu-getopt (RENAME ONLY) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199494 fnasser at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From fnasser at redhat.com 2006-07-20 11:47 EST ------- Just confirming, the new release will have: Provides: gnu.getopt = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: gnu.getopt <= 0:1.0.9 and Provides: gnu.getopt-javadoc = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: gnu.getopt-javadoc <= 0:1.0.9 So the javadoc part also gets replaced. Can you confirm if this is what is expected? Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 16:06:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 12:06:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192420] Review Request: Bonfire - CD/DVD burning app for gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607201606.k6KG6kjd010003@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Bonfire - CD/DVD burning app for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192420 ------- Additional Comments From rivanvx at fastmail.fm 2006-07-20 11:57 EST ------- I have a question. Currently this package depends on totem (and, of course, some other things). Can this dependancy on totem be avoided somehow, so people who use totem-xine (instead of totem, as they conflict each other) can also use bonfire? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 16:27:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 12:27:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199484] Review Request: notify-python - python bindings for libnotify In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607201627.k6KGRf9w010878@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: notify-python - python bindings for libnotify https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199484 ------- Additional Comments From jdennis at redhat.com 2006-07-20 12:18 EST ------- performed a brew scratch build on notify-python-0.1.0-2 with dbus-glib-devel added, everything seems o.k. Note URL's for spec file and src rpm in #3 updated as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 16:28:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 12:28:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192420] Review Request: Bonfire - CD/DVD burning app for gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607201628.k6KGSMeW010915@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Bonfire - CD/DVD burning app for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192420 ------- Additional Comments From rouquier.p at wanadoo.fr 2006-07-20 12:19 EST ------- It can. Now, bonfire would become unable to use and parse any playlist which is not a big deal if you don't often make audio CDs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 17:09:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 13:09:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199192] Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607201709.k6KH9kuo013420@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199192 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2006-07-20 13:00 EST ------- The release number for pre-releases should begin with 0 (as stated in NamingGuidelines), so in this case it would be 0.%{date}svn. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 17:10:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 13:10:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199592] New: Review Request: icu4j Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199592 Summary: Review Request: icu4j Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: bkonrath at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/bkonrath/eclipse/icu4j.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/bkonrath/eclipse/icu4j-3.4.4-1jpp_1fc.src.rpm Description: The International Component for Unicode for Java (ICU4J) is a library for Unicode support, software internationalization and globalization. Eclipse 3.2 uses this library for its internationalization support. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 17:22:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 13:22:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199592] Review Request: icu4j In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607201722.k6KHMA0D014180@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: icu4j https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199592 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |jkeating at redhat.com Flag| |needinfo? ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-20 13:13 EST ------- The versioning doesn't pass current naming guidelines. We've got an open discussion on jpp based packages and need input from more RH Java folks about the goals of the jpp naming so that we can work our guidelines to allow for an agreed upon scheme. Differring until this has been completed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 17:23:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 13:23:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199592] Review Request: icu4j In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607201723.k6KHN0Y9014268@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: icu4j https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199592 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188267 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 17:29:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 13:29:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199592] Review Request: icu4j In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607201729.k6KHTMaI015208@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: icu4j https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199592 bkonrath at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo? | ------- Additional Comments From bkonrath at redhat.com 2006-07-20 13:20 EST ------- The Eclipse packges in Fedora Core currently include a binary version of these libraries. The purpose of this package is to remove these binary jars. Given this, and the fact the Eclipse packages all currently use the jpp naming convention, I respectfully request review at this time instead of waiting for the jpp naming issue to be sorted out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 17:30:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 13:30:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198831] Review Request: varconf - Configuration library used by WorldForge apps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607201730.k6KHU9WX015249@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: varconf - Configuration library used by WorldForge apps Alias: varconf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198831 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-07-20 13:21 EST ------- Imported and built. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 17:30:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 13:30:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198839] Review Request: sear - WorldForge client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607201730.k6KHUBGn015265@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sear - WorldForge client Alias: sear https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198839 Bug 198839 depends on bug 198831, which changed state. Bug 198831 Summary: Review Request: varconf - Configuration library used by WorldForge apps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198831 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 17:31:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 13:31:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607201731.k6KHVs48015398@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 snecklifter at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From snecklifter at gmail.com 2006-07-20 13:22 EST ------- I have now read through all steps in the packaging guidelines on the Wiki. I would therefore be grateful if someone could sponsor this package as it is my first attempt at Packaging and Extras submission. Regards Chris -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 17:35:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 13:35:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198829] Review Request: wfmath - WorldForge math libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607201735.k6KHZaS1015598@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wfmath - WorldForge math libraries Alias: wfmath https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198829 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-07-20 13:26 EST ------- Imported, but the build failed on ppc due to a single test failure. I'll follow up with upstream on this. I'll defer closing this ticket until the test issue is resolved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 17:39:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 13:39:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199192] Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607201739.k6KHdcNf015869@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199192 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-20 13:30 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=132755) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=132755&action=view) kadu-0.5.0-0.20060716svn Okay, fixed it. But now, if I would like to make next pre-release, should I increase number before dot? For example, actual version is 0.20060716svn so next will be 0.20060720svn? I think official release won't be released quickly, so doing packages of new snapshots may be necessarily. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 17:40:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 13:40:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199491] Review Request: dbus-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607201740.k6KHewQA015978@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbus-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199491 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wtogami at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|188267 |188268 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-07-20 13:31 EST ------- Name: dbus-sharp Version: 0.63 Obsoletes: dbus-sharp < 0.63 I think this Obsoletes is unnecessary, am I wrong? Otherwise everything else looks OK. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 17:46:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 13:46:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199491] Review Request: dbus-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607201746.k6KHkAYW016293@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbus-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199491 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-07-20 13:37 EST ------- Note, things are not perfect here but good enough. I am pushing this through in order to fix rawhide a day sooner. Please submit more spec improvements here if you think it should be improved further. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 17:46:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 13:46:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199491] Review Request: dbus-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607201746.k6KHkcHq016323@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbus-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199491 ------- Additional Comments From johnp at redhat.com 2006-07-20 13:37 EST ------- The Obsoletes is a precaution since we are moving from a subpackage to an actuall package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 17:53:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 13:53:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199592] Review Request: icu4j In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607201753.k6KHrgxU016639@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: icu4j https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199592 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-20 13:44 EST ------- I'm trying very hard to get the naming scheme approved by the freeze. Is there upstream (jpp) packages of the icr4j stuff, or is this our local split out? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 17:57:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 13:57:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191239] Review Request: qjackctl - Qt based JACK control application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607201757.k6KHvjdT016756@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qjackctl - Qt based JACK control application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191239 ------- Additional Comments From nando at ccrma.stanford.edu 2006-07-20 13:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #21) > Ping? Pong... > It has been 4 weeks since I approved this package and said I would sponsor you, > all you have todo is create an account, get sponsored (just wait) and import > this. Why the delay? I've been terribly busy (still are)... I think I've done everything that's needed and should be "sponsorable" now. Thanks for your patience... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 18:06:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 14:06:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192420] Review Request: Bonfire - CD/DVD burning app for gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607201806.k6KI64dR017155@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Bonfire - CD/DVD burning app for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192420 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |peter at thecodergeek.com ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2006-07-20 13:57 EST ------- Vedran: As I understand it, when the binary RPM is built, it find the dependencies on the shared libraries that this package would link to. Hence, it would depend on things like libtotem-plparser.so.1 (or whatever the exact SO name is). Thus, simply replacing totem with totem-xine should be fine on the user's end, as they both (to my knowledge) provide the same shared libraries. The reason it actually depends on 'totem' when you attempt to install it after building it is that totem is the only RPM available in the default repositories which contains these libraries. Hope that helps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 18:09:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 14:09:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199484] Review Request: notify-python - python bindings for libnotify In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607201809.k6KI9KQJ017321@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: notify-python - python bindings for libnotify https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199484 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|188267 |188268 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-20 14:00 EST ------- Looks good now. Approving. Does this need to be in comps anywhere, or will it be pulled in through a dependancy of something else? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 18:46:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 14:46:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199192] Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607201846.k6KIkQ4w023119@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199192 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-07-20 14:37 EST ------- Is this a pre-release snapshot of 0.5.0? If so, there should be an additional dot and an integer between the leading "0" and the "20060716svn", like 0.1.20060716svn, see "Pre-release packages" at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 18:51:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 14:51:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193894] Review Request: ant-contrib - A collection of tasks for Ant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607201851.k6KIpf1G024075@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ant-contrib - A collection of tasks for Ant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193894 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-20 14:42 EST ------- Hans, h2html seems close: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193889 I think Igor is ready for sponsorship now, and I'll take care of it if you want. Either way is fine with me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 19:05:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 15:05:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193894] Review Request: ant-contrib - A collection of tasks for Ant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607201905.k6KJ5TB3026032@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ant-contrib - A collection of tasks for Ant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193894 ------- Additional Comments From ifoox at redhat.com 2006-07-20 14:56 EST ------- New files: http://people.redhat.com/ifoox/extras/ant-contrib-1.0-0.2.b2.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/ifoox/extras/ant-contrib.spec I removed the class-path from the manifest file and it seems to be fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 19:10:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 15:10:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199192] Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607201910.k6KJA1NN026595@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199192 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #132755|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-20 15:01 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=132763) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=132763&action=view) 0.5.0-0.1.20060716svn.spec Yes, you're right, I haven't read Packing Naming Guidelines carefully :/ So there is new spec file with correct release number. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 19:14:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 15:14:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177583] Review Request: zaptel-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607201914.k6KJEabr027158@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177583 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-20 15:05 EST ------- Just a note that according to http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/KernelModules reviews shouldn't even start until FESCo has a chance to approve the module, and before that happens, the statement from upstream is absolutely required. This package probably predates those guidelines, though. Anyway, any chance of getting that statement soon so I can sheperd this package through the committee? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 19:15:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 15:15:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199611] New: Review Request: monsterz - Puzzle game, similar to Bejeweled or Zookeeper Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199611 Summary: Review Request: monsterz - Puzzle game, similar to Bejeweled or Zookeeper Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: packages at amiga-hardware.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/monsterz.spec SRPM URL: http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/monsterz-0.7.0-4.src.rpm Description: Monsterz is a little arcade puzzle game, similar to the famous Bejeweled or Zookeeper. The goal of the game is to create rows of similar monsters, either horizontally or vertically. The only allowed move is the swap of two adjacent monsters, on the condition that it creates a row of three or more. When alignments are cleared, pieces fall from the top of the screen to fill the board again. Chain reactions earn you even more points. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 19:16:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 15:16:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199494] Review Request: gnu-getopt (RENAME ONLY) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607201916.k6KJGKfi027483@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnu-getopt (RENAME ONLY) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199494 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-20 15:07 EST ------- actually, you can drop the epoch business. If the epoch is 0, there is no need to list it (nor define it if you're doing that in the spec) Adding gnu-getopt to you as the owner. Please let me know when you've built it so that I can block gnu.getopt. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 19:16:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 15:16:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199491] Review Request: dbus-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607201916.k6KJGd2Z027530@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbus-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199491 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-07-20 15:07 EST ------- I'm pretty sure it doesn't work this way, and there is no actual problem here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 19:18:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 15:18:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191745] Review Request: sysprof-kmod - kernel module for the sysprof profiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607201918.k6KJIVVW027768@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sysprof-kmod - kernel module for the sysprof profiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191745 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-20 15:09 EST ------- According to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/KernelModules you will need to provide certain information to the Extras steering committee, in particular: A publishable explanation from the author(s) why the module is not merged with the mainline kernel yet and when it's planned to get merged. Could you please provide this information so that the committee can consider this module? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 19:19:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 15:19:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199212] Review Request: dbus-glib and dbus-python (split out from the dbus package) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607201919.k6KJJ7Go027862@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbus-glib and dbus-python (split out from the dbus package) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199212 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-20 15:10 EST ------- These have been built into rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 19:25:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 15:25:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193897] Review Request: mysql-connector-java - Official JDBC driver for MySQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607201925.k6KJPFwf028567@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-connector-java - Official JDBC driver for MySQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193897 ------- Additional Comments From ifoox at redhat.com 2006-07-20 15:16 EST ------- Hi Anthony, Thanks for the feedback, here are the new files: http://people.redhat.com/ifoox/extras/mysql-connector-java.spec http://people.redhat.com/ifoox/extras/mysql-connector-java-3.1.12-1jpp_2fc.src.rpm (In reply to comment #2) > rpmlint output is: > W: mysql-connector-java non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java > > We just use Development/Libraries in Fedora. Perhaps there's an argument to be > made for Development/Libraries/Java, but let's use the standard for now. I'll > send a note to fedora-devel I've changed it to Development/Libraries. > > W: mysql-connector-java wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding > /usr/share/doc/mysql-connector-java-3.1.12/docs/README.txt > W: mysql-connector-java wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding > /usr/share/doc/mysql-connector-java-3.1.12/README.txt > W: mysql-connector-java wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding > /usr/share/doc/mysql-connector-java-3.1.12/EXCEPTIONS-CONNECTOR-J > > Fix these with sed in the %prep section like so: > %{__sed} -i 's/\r//' README.txt Done. > The spec file includes: > # remove all binary libs > find . \( -name "*.jar" -o -name "*.class" \) | xargs -t rm -f > > I would rather that we strip the .jar files from the tarball prior to packaging. > This will ensure that we don't accidentally ship binaries sans sources or > binaries with unfriendly licensing - even if they only show up in the SRPM. I feel kind of uncomfortable with doing this before pacakging, because it will defeat the point of the pristine upstream source. I don't see how doing this before the packaging process is better than doing it at %prep time, I'd say it's less reproducable. > Can you explain this part of the spec file?.. > Provides: mm.mysql > Obsoletes: mm.mysql Hmm, no I don't know why these are there. This package is taken from JPackage, I'll try contacting the packager and ask if there is a reason for these to remain. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 19:38:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 15:38:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193894] Review Request: ant-contrib - A collection of tasks for Ant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607201938.k6KJcsPZ030302@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ant-contrib - A collection of tasks for Ant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193894 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-20 15:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Hans, h2html seems close: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193889 > > I think Igor is ready for sponsorship now, and I'll take care of it if you want. > Either way is fine with me. I'm rather busy with other FE stuff at the moment, so if you could sponsor Igor and help him with the other reviews that would be great! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 19:43:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 15:43:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199386] Review Request: aspell-mi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607201943.k6KJhFFL031013@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-mi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199386 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-20 15:34 EST ------- No need, just including it here for reference. I'll go ahead and work up a quick review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 19:58:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 15:58:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199491] Review Request: dbus-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607201958.k6KJwQPm000608@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbus-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199491 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-20 15:49 EST ------- Minor... Requires: %name = %{version}-%{release} Should this not be %{name}? Can the spec unify how it uses $RPM_BUILD_ROOT? It should be either entirely %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT but not a mix of the two. Also, why is the mkdir -p %{_prefix}/lib/mono in the install? The make install step creates it. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 20:03:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 16:03:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199386] Review Request: aspell-mi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607202003.k6KK3weu001077@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-mi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199386 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-20 15:55 EST ------- Odd that nobody else saw this, but rpmlint on the source package complains about: E: aspell-mi configure-without-libdir-spec The configure script isn't actually one generated by autoconf and doesn't accept --libdir, so this error is bogus. And, to reiterate, these errors: E: aspell-mi no-binary E: aspell-mi only-non-binary-in-usr-lib are also bogus as the aspell dictionaries are arch-dependent due to byte ordering. Note that the license is LGPL, not GPL. Since this is the only issue and it's just one letter, I'll approve this and you can fix it when you check in. Onto the review: * source files match upstream: 8b1a07032ee086662bfe44a2e0459db4 aspell-mi-0.50-0.tar.bz2 * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. X license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * Compiler flags are appropriate (nothing is compiled, so no need to pass them) * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). O rpmlint has only ignorable errors (see above). * debuginfo package necessarily disabled. * final provides and requires are sane: aspell-mi = 0.50-1.fc6 = aspell >= 12:0.60 * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED, just fix the license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 20:09:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 16:09:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185325] Review Request: sparse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607202009.k6KK9ioD001569@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sparse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185325 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-20 16:00 EST ------- Anything happening here? It's been two months. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 20:15:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 16:15:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194320] Review Request: im-chooser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607202015.k6KKF2Mg002001@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: im-chooser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194320 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-20 16:06 EST ------- Added to Gnome and KDE desktop groups as a default. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 20:22:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 16:22:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199192] Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607202022.k6KKMLIY002529@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199192 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2006-07-20 16:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Created an attachment (id=132763) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=132763&action=view) [edit] > 0.5.0-0.1.20060716svn.spec > > Yes, you're right, I haven't read Packing Naming Guidelines carefully :/ So > there is new spec file with correct release number. I have done it right in my not-yet-released package and here I give a wrong advice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 20:33:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 16:33:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199627] New: Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199627 Summary: Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: mr.ecik at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ecik.zspswidwin.pl/kooldock/kooldock.spec SRPM URL: http://ecik.zspswidwin.pl/kooldock/kooldock-0.3-1.20060720cvs.src.rpm Description: This is one of my first packages, and I'm looking for a sponsor. KoolDock is a KDE project that aims to have a cool dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements. Some of it features are: - Display quick launchers to your favourite apps - A builtin task bar - Pager and clock. (Not done yet) - Smooth zooming effect (like Apple's OS X dock) - Transparent Background. Comments: It uses my own cvs snapshot source, because kooldock site is down, and there is no option to download the source. Probably, CVS snapshot will never be updated (the last update is 2 years old) and package is probably dead but... I use it every day and it looks really cool ;) so I think it would be good if the latest version will turn up in Extras. Package should be easy to review, because rpmlint doesn't show anything and mock build completes successfully ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 20:33:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 16:33:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194320] Review Request: im-chooser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607202033.k6KKXOu0003024@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: im-chooser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194320 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-20 16:24 EST ------- This has been built into rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 20:34:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 16:34:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199627] Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607202034.k6KKYrOH003161@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199627 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 20:39:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 16:39:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199192] Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607202039.k6KKdEjU003495@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199192 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-20 16:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > I have done it right in my not-yet-released package and here I give a wrong advice. Never mind ;-) Well... maybe someone will decide to review this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 20:42:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 16:42:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191239] Review Request: qjackctl - Qt based JACK control application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607202042.k6KKgVJl003903@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qjackctl - Qt based JACK control application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191239 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-20 16:33 EST ------- Ok, you've been sponsored, so you should be able to import this shortly (donnu howlong the infrastructure takes to work through this). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 20:43:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 16:43:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199484] Review Request: notify-python - python bindings for libnotify In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607202043.k6KKhlSM004015@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: notify-python - python bindings for libnotify https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199484 ------- Additional Comments From jdennis at redhat.com 2006-07-20 16:34 EST ------- It will be a dependency of other packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 20:48:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 16:48:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199630] New: Review Request: ClanLib - Cross platform C++ game library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199630 Summary: Review Request: ClanLib - Cross platform C++ game library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ClanLib.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ClanLib-0.8.0-0.1.RC2.src.rpm Description: ClanLib is a cross platform C++ game library. --- What a PITA, it has cost me 2 days to get this and the older ClanLib-0.6 (which is still very widely used) packaged in such a way that the 2 clanlibs are parallel installable and some test apps compiled and tested. Tomorrow I'll start working on pingus (from the FE wishlist), clanbomber and auriferous (loderunner inspired game) packages. Notice the smallish HACK to the pkg-config files to stop this from conflicting with ClanLib06, which I'm also submitting for review it might be best to review these 2 together. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 20:50:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 16:50:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199632] New: Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199632 Summary: Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ClanLib06.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ClanLib06-0.6.5-1.src.rpm Description: Version 0.6 of this cross platform C++ game library, which is still used by many games. --- What a PITA, it has cost me 2 days to get this and the current ClanLib-0.8 packaged in such a way that the 2 clanlibs are parallel installable and some test apps compiled and tested. Tomorrow I'll start working on pingus (from the FE wishlist), clanbomber and auriferous (loderunner inspired game) packages. I'm also submitting the current ClanLib-0.8 for review it might be best to review these 2 together. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 20:58:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 16:58:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198878] Review Request: mutagen - Python module to handle audio metadata In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607202058.k6KKwIrZ005339@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mutagen - Python module to handle audio metadata https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198878 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-20 16:49 EST ------- Micha?, I'll sponsor you. A quick question before I start the review: why is this package arch-specific? It doesn't seem to contain any compiled code. This results in the following rpmlint warnings: E: mutagen no-binary E: mutagen-debuginfo empty-debuginfo-package which are correct since there are no binary executables and the debuginfo package ends up empty. Adding "BuildArch: noarch" seems to result in a proper package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 21:02:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 17:02:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192311] Review Request: cobbler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607202102.k6KL2Zr7005593@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cobbler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192311 ------- Additional Comments From mdehaan at redhat.com 2006-07-20 16:53 EST ------- I see no one has attempted to run the code yet :) Several of our development systems are tainted from having a yaml module installed on them that RHN uses, therefore I didn't detect that the load paths from the yaml module were not correct. These are corrected versions of cobber with relative imports: http://et.redhat.com/~mdehaan/software/cobbler/cobbler-0.1.1-4.src.rpm http://et.redhat.com/~mdehaan/software/cobbler/cobbler.spec For convience of anyone wanting to try this out, I also have uploaded noarch's. http://et.redhat.com/~mdehaan/software/cobbler/cobbler-0.1.1-4.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 21:03:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 17:03:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192313] Review Request: koan In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607202103.k6KL3XkQ005637@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: koan https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192313 ------- Additional Comments From mdehaan at redhat.com 2006-07-20 16:54 EST ------- Fixing a yaml import bug also present in cobbler: http://et.redhat.com/~mdehaan/software/cobbler/koan-0.1.1-4.src.rpm http://et.redhat.com/~mdehaan/software/cobbler/koan.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 21:11:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 17:11:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199632] Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607202111.k6KLBIgv006037@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199632 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-20 17:02 EST ------- The other CLanLib review is under bug 199630 . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 21:11:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 17:11:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199630] Review Request: ClanLib - Cross platform C++ game library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607202111.k6KLBQls006051@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ClanLib - Cross platform C++ game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199630 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-20 17:02 EST ------- The other CLanLib review is under bug 199632 . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 21:13:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 17:13:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198878] Review Request: mutagen - Python module to handle audio metadata In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607202113.k6KLDP3H006108@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mutagen - Python module to handle audio metadata https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198878 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #132496|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-20 17:04 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=132774) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=132774&action=view) mutagen-1.5.1-4.spec Thanks for advice and sponsorship. I noticed that python packages are mostly noarch and I forgot to add it to spec file. So, here is new spec file with no rpmlint errors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 21:15:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 17:15:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191745] Review Request: sysprof-kmod - kernel module for the sysprof profiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607202115.k6KLFuhP006237@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sysprof-kmod - kernel module for the sysprof profiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191745 ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2006-07-20 17:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > According to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/KernelModules you will need > to provide certain information to the Extras steering committee, in particular: > > A publishable explanation from the author(s) why the module is not merged with > the mainline kernel yet and when it's planned to get merged. > > Could you please provide this information so that the committee can consider > this module? OK, I asked the author to provide that info. My opinion is that this particular package does not really fall into the picture covered by the guidelines: this is not a driver, it's a (small) module which is exposing CPU sampling data for the GUI to show. Of course, it would be easier if I had only to package the GUI... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 21:34:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 17:34:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178901] Review Request: gtksourceview-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607202134.k6KLYVEw006898@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtksourceview-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178901 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-20 17:25 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/gtksourceview-sharp.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/gtksourceview-sharp-2.0-13.src.rpm Fixes licence -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 21:42:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 17:42:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199386] Review Request: aspell-mi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607202142.k6KLgcF3008048@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-mi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199386 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-20 17:33 EST ------- Fix the license. Imported. Thanks the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 21:43:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 17:43:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199592] Review Request: icu4j In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607202143.k6KLhrQT008168@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: icu4j https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199592 ------- Additional Comments From bkonrath at redhat.com 2006-07-20 17:34 EST ------- This is a local split. I had to update the sources from 3.2 to 3.4.4 and add a patch to work around a bug in the javadoc generation. Other than that the spec file is the same. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 21:43:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 17:43:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199632] Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607202143.k6KLhua6008183@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199632 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 21:44:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 17:44:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199630] Review Request: ClanLib - Cross platform C++ game library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607202144.k6KLinm6008240@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ClanLib - Cross platform C++ game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199630 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 21:47:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 17:47:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199028] Review Request: perl-eperl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607202147.k6KLlonL008514@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-eperl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199028 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-07-20 17:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > I struggled with the naming a bit, as eperl is more than just a perl module. > However, it is indeed a module "and then some", which I believe makes it > appropriate to prefix "perl-". The website and documentation also switch from > "ePerl" to "eperl" fairly frequently, so I defer to the packager. I was going for perl-$CPAN_name (even though is isn't on CPAN). It's as appropriate as anything... It's been imported into CVS, branches have been created, and builds have been requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 21:48:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 17:48:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199592] Review Request: icu4j In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607202148.k6KLmhOw008637@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: icu4j https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199592 bkonrath at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |199504 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 22:01:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 18:01:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199592] Review Request: icu4j In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607202201.k6KM19Cx009535@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: icu4j https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199592 ------- Additional Comments From david at jpackage.org 2006-07-20 17:51 EST ------- As stated in bug #199504, I wasn't able to build eclipse after replacing its binary jars with icu4j 3.4.4. I did not investigate further. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 22:04:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 18:04:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199592] Review Request: icu4j In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607202204.k6KM43rf009718@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: icu4j https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199592 ------- Additional Comments From fnasser at redhat.com 2006-07-20 17:54 EST ------- Don't forget to fix the version in you changelog entry -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 22:22:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 18:22:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198836] Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607202222.k6KMMkBj010345@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198836 ------- Additional Comments From besfahbo at redhat.com 2006-07-20 18:13 EST ------- I fail to find any official upstream releases of FreeType 1.x. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 22:29:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 18:29:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194278] Review Request: kdeadmin: Administrative tools for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607202229.k6KMTDQ8010565@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeadmin: Administrative tools for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194278 imlinux at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |imlinux at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2006-07-20 18:20 EST ------- * Missing dependancy on update-desktop-database for %post (package desktop-file-utils) * Missing dependancy on update-desktop-database for %postun (package desktop-file-utils) * The package contains libtool archive files (*.la) * Many of the desktop files don't follow the http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop packaging guidelines. Minor * Duplicate BuildRequires: bzip2-devel (by kdelibs-devel) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 22:51:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 18:51:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199630] Review Request: ClanLib - Cross platform C++ game library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607202251.k6KMpCQr011838@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ClanLib - Cross platform C++ game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199630 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-20 18:42 EST ------- Blocker : How does the ClanLib licence marry up to the LGPL? Nearest to it would be just "distributable" or better still, ClanLib. You will need to include the license in %docs You need BR zlib-devel for it to build in mock More to follow -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 23:10:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 19:10:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199592] Review Request: icu4j In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607202310.k6KNAkuL012525@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: icu4j https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199592 ------- Additional Comments From bkonrath at redhat.com 2006-07-20 19:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > As stated in bug #199504, I wasn't able to build eclipse after replacing its > binary jars with icu4j 3.4.4. I did not investigate further. Right, I'll make a patch on Monday. I'm at OLS right now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 23:11:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 19:11:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199632] Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607202311.k6KNBKUn012564@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199632 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-20 19:02 EST ------- Blocker : needs BR lua Possible fault. You haved defined ARCH_CONFIG_FLAGS in the %ifarch construct and passed to the configure line. On a non x86 machine, ARCH_CONFIG_FLAGS is undefined which may upset things somewhat! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 23:16:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 19:16:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199592] Review Request: icu4j In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607202316.k6KNGqa1012676@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: icu4j https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199592 ------- Additional Comments From bkonrath at redhat.com 2006-07-20 19:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Don't forget to fix the version in you changelog entry Fixed, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 23:22:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 19:22:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199630] Review Request: ClanLib - Cross platform C++ game library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607202322.k6KNMlHS012784@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ClanLib - Cross platform C++ game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199630 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-20 19:13 EST ------- rpmlint errors and warnings. main i386 package : clean devel : E : ClanLib-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib All of the warnings are the same (dangling-relative-symlink) - there are 13 in total W: ClanLib-devel dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/ClanLib-0.8/libclanNetwork.so ../libclanNetwork-0.8.so.1.0.0 W: ClanLib-devel dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/ClanLib-0.8/libclanGUIStyleSilver.so ../libclanGUIStyleSilver-0.8.so.1.0.0 W: ClanLib-devel dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/ClanLib-0.8/libclanGUI.so ../libclanGUI-0.8.so.1.0.0 W: ClanLib-devel dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/ClanLib-0.8/libclanGL.so ../libclanGL-0.8.so.1.0.0 W: ClanLib-devel dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/ClanLib-0.8/libclanMikMod.so ../libclanMikMod-0.8.so.1.0.0 W: ClanLib-devel dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/ClanLib-0.8/libclanCore.so ../libclanCore-0.8.so.1.0.0 W: ClanLib-devel dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/ClanLib-0.8/libclanSignals.so ../libclanSignals-0.8.so.1.0.0 W: ClanLib-devel dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/ClanLib-0.8/libclanApp.so ../libclanApp-0.8.so.1.0.0 W: ClanLib-devel dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/ClanLib-0.8/libclanDisplay.so ../libclanDisplay-0.8.so.1.0.0 W: ClanLib-devel dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/ClanLib-0.8/libclanSound.so ../libclanSound-0.8.so.1.0.0 W: ClanLib-devel file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/ClanLib-devel-0.8.0/html/Tutorial/TicTacToe/tictactoe.zip W: ClanLib-devel dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/ClanLib-0.8/libclanVorbis.so ../libclanVorbis-0.8.so.1.0.0 W: ClanLib-devel dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/ClanLib-0.8/libclanSDL.so ../libclanSDL-0.8.so.1.0.0 debuginfo : clean srpm : clean Fails to build in mock (see #2) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 23:41:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 19:41:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198878] Review Request: mutagen - Python module to handle audio metadata In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607202341.k6KNfGgt013519@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mutagen - Python module to handle audio metadata https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198878 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-20 19:32 EST ------- Note: it's nice to the reviewers if you generate a new src.rpm with each change you make to your spec. That way it's simple to just pull down the new package and build it. You seem to have tickled a new rpmlint warning: W: mutagen mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs This happened because you indented "noarch" with a tab. Not a big deal but that means it's easy to fix. More serious is the name of the package: according to the naming guidelines this package should be named python-mutagen. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#AddonPython There's no need to pass CFLAGS to setyp.py since this is a noarch package. This package seems to have a test suite, but you don't call it. You should consider adding a section like: %check %{__python} setup.py coverage Finally, note that if you disagree with me about the necessity of any of these issues I've raised, let me know why you think my reasoning is bogus and we'll discuss it. Review: * source files match upstream: 9ce5d5f14e02f2eabd919d6bdaebadbc mutagen-1.5.1.tar.gz X package meets naming and packaging guidelines (should be called python-mutagen). X specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. (looks good but should be named python-mutagen.spec). * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. X No need to pass compiler flags for noarch packages. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). X rpmlint is silent (spaces and tabs thing) * noarch package; no debuginfo. * final provides and requires are sane: mutagen = 1.5.1-4.fc6 = /usr/bin/python python(abi) = 2.4 X %check is not present but there is a test suite. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 23:59:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 19:59:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198833] Review Request: mercator - Terrain library for WorldForge client/server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607202359.k6KNxong014450@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mercator - Terrain library for WorldForge client/server Alias: mercator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198833 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-07-20 19:50 EST ------- The guidelines state that the package must require pkgconfig. This package brings in this requires with wfmath-devel. Therefore it does not need to be added. End of story. Wart: The package is already approved you can do whatever you want with the pkgconfig as this is a totally senseless and stupid discussion anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 00:21:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 20:21:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607210021.k6L0LZrI015327@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-20 20:12 EST ------- I had no problems building in rawhide, but rpmlint is very unhappy: Tons of rpath warnings: E: pulseaudio binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/pulse-0.9/modules/libprotocol-esound.so ['/usr/lib64/pulse-0.9/modules/', '/usr/lib64'] and 69 others. The usual libtool hack doesn't work. This looks like a script but isn't executable: E: pulseaudio non-executable-script /etc/pulse/default.pa 0644 Some setuid bits: E: pulseaudio setuid-binary /usr/bin/pulseaudio root 04755 E: pulseaudio non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/pulseaudio 04755 which will need to be discussed to make sure we're not getting into any security issues. Some no-documentation warnings: W: pulseaudio-devel no-documentation W: pulseaudio-lib-glib no-documentation W: pulseaudio-lib-zeroconf no-documentation W: pulseaudio-module-alsa no-documentation W: pulseaudio-module-x11 no-documentation W: pulseaudio-module-zeroconf no-documentation W: pulseaudio-utils no-documentation which are probably OK but I'll have to check. This is problematic: E: pulseaudio-utils invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libpulsedsp.so libpulsedsp.so but unfortunately I'm not entirely sure how to fix it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 00:30:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 20:30:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192420] Review Request: Bonfire - CD/DVD burning app for gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607210030.k6L0UOx1015695@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Bonfire - CD/DVD burning app for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192420 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-07-20 20:21 EST ------- Build failed on development x86_64: recorder-selection.c:870: error: 'NautilusBurnDrive' has no member named 'max_speed_write' recorder-selection.c: In function 'bonfire_recorder_selection_button_cb': recorder-selection.c:1100: error: 'NautilusBurnDrive' has no member named 'type'recorder-selection.c: In function 'bonfire_recorder_selection_get_drive': recorder-selection.c:1138: error: 'NautilusBurnDrive' has no member named 'type'recorder-selection.c:1144: error: 'NautilusBurnDrive' has no member named 'display_name' recorder-selection.c: In function 'bonfire_recorder_selection_select_default_drive': recorder-selection.c:1180: warning: implicit declaration of function 'nautilus_burn_drive_get_list' recorder-selection.c:1180: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast recorder-selection.c:1184: error: 'NautilusBurnDrive' has no member named 'type'make[2]: *** [recorder-selection.o] Error 1 And there's more has no member errors with NautilusBurnDrive. The magic fedora-qa script is here, along with some other tools to make an Extras packager's life easier: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/UsefulScripts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 00:37:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 20:37:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199647] New: Review Request: perl-File-RsyncP Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199647 Summary: Review Request: perl-File-RsyncP Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: imlinux at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/perl-File-RsyncP/perl-File-RsyncP.spec SRPM: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/perl-File-RsyncP/perl-File-RsyncP-0.52-1.src.rpm File::RsyncP is a perl implementation of an Rsync client. It is compatible with Rsync 2.5.5 - 2.6.3 (protocol versions 26-28). It can send or receive files, either by running rsync on the remote machine, or connecting to an rsyncd daemon on the remote machine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 00:39:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 20:39:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199573] Review Request: BackupPC - high-performance backup system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607210039.k6L0dx2X016081@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: BackupPC - high-performance backup system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199573 imlinux at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |199647 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 00:40:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 20:40:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199647] Review Request: perl-File-RsyncP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607210040.k6L0eAXh016111@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-RsyncP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199647 imlinux at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |199573 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 00:45:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 20:45:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199021] Review Request: zynaddsubfx - Real-time software synthesizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607210045.k6L0jOmH016463@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zynaddsubfx - Real-time software synthesizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199021 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-20 20:36 EST ------- Looks like there's the dreaded rpath problem: E: zynaddsubfx binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/controller ['/usr/lib64'] E: zynaddsubfx binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/zynaddsubfx ['/usr/lib64'] E: zynaddsubfx binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/spliter ['/usr/lib64'] Unfortunately I can't figure out where it's coming from. Also, the recommended Fedora compilation flags don't seem to be used at all; everything seems to be compiled with -O6. Unless I'm missing the flags that are coming out of the various -config programs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 01:15:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 21:15:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199183] Review Request: e2tools - Manipulate files in unmounted ext2/ext3 filesystems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607210115.k6L1FtDp017768@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: e2tools - Manipulate files in unmounted ext2/ext3 filesystems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199183 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-20 21:06 EST ------- Seems to have some 64-bit problems: cc1: warnings being treated as errors rm.c: In function 'e2rm': rm.c:248: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 01:22:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 21:22:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199021] Review Request: zynaddsubfx - Real-time software synthesizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607210122.k6L1MJJF018020@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zynaddsubfx - Real-time software synthesizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199021 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-07-20 21:13 EST ------- Thanks. I had a quick look and I can fix these tonight. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 01:34:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 21:34:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199647] Review Request: perl-File-RsyncP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607210134.k6L1Y9OT018288@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-RsyncP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199647 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 01:36:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 21:36:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195363] Review Request: esc and esc-xulrunner-devel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607210136.k6L1ar5P018448@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esc and esc-xulrunner-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195363 jmagne at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From jmagne at redhat.com 2006-07-20 21:27 EST ------- Thanks to the suggestions I have updated "esc.spec" and "esc-1.0.0-1.src.rpm. Now xulrunner gets built as part of the ess build process and the build glitches reported should be taken care of. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 01:37:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 21:37:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198247] Review Request: libpng10 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607210137.k6L1bnln018534@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpng10 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198247 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-20 21:28 EST ------- I have a x86-64 machine at work. I will try and load up FC5 on it and take a look. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 02:22:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 22:22:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198928] Review Request: lsscsi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607210222.k6L2MjuU020180@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lsscsi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198928 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-20 22:13 EST ------- Chip, I'll sponsor you, now that Chris has done all of the work. rpmnlint has one complaint about the spec: W: lsscsi mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs cat -T shows this coming from spaces after the colons in Summary:, Name:, Version:, and Release:. Terribly minor, I know, but there's no reason not to fix it. (You only see this if you run rpmlint against the src.rpm.) I guess it's pretty pointless for a package with one source file, but generally folks with multiprocessor machines appreciate it when you add %{?_smp_mflags} to your make line to build things in parallel. As long as it doesn't break the build, of course. (And if it does break the build, add a comment to indicate that fact.) The only other thing is the oddity of including the author information at the end of %description. Then again, it would be somewhat uncouth to grab his specfile and then cut his name out of it, so I'm not sure what to do. I'll leave it up to you. With only the space/tab thing to fix, I'll go ahead and approve this and you can fix it when you check in. Review: * source files match upstream: c05c1cc6e6c425d86bf41e2ab0f09172 lsscsi-0.17.tgz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * Compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). X rpmlint is silent (minor tabs/spaces thing) * debuginfo package looks complete. * final provides and requires are sane: lsscsi = 0.17-2 = libc.so.6()(64bit) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. (Technically the documentation is larger then the executable, but we're talking about 25K total here.) * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED Go ahead and request cvsextras and fedorabugs access and I'll approve you. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors#GetAFedoraAccount for details. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 02:57:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 22:57:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198816] Review Request: gfs-utils - global file system userland utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607210257.k6L2v0Uh021837@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-utils - global file system userland utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198816 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-20 22:47 EST ------- Chris, I don't see you in the cvsextras group. Do you require sponsorship? See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/HowToGetSponsored for more information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 02:57:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 22:57:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190367] Review Request: PyKDE: Python bindings for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607210257.k6L2vP5F021875@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyKDE: Python bindings for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190367 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |michael at knox.net.nz ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-20 22:48 EST ------- Seeing how this has been sitting for a bit, I will do the review. Review for release 0.4.20060422: * Source PyKDE-snapshot20060422.tar.gz is the same as upstream * This is the latest version * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint of PyKDE-devel looks OK * rpmlint of PyKDE looks OK * File list of PyKDE-devel looks OK * File list of PyKDE looks OK Needs work: * Package does not follow Fedora's package naming guildlines (wiki: PackageNamingGuidelines) I am not certain, but the package naming guidelines talk about the use of cvs in the snapshot version. I noticed this is an upstream snapshot, so I am not sure if this applies. * The package should contain the text of the license (wiki: Packaging/ReviewGuidelines) There is a COPYING in the tarball, it should be added to the %docs This package is also GPL not MIT. Minor: * Duplicate BuildRequires: python-devel (by sip-devel), sip-devel (by PyQt-devel) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 02:58:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 22:58:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190367] Review Request: PyKDE: Python bindings for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607210258.k6L2wKoE021911@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyKDE: Python bindings for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190367 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 03:10:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 23:10:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198882] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-IRC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607210310.k6L3Ad5T022184@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-IRC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198882 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-20 23:01 EST ------- Bits snipped to comply with the soon to release spec template. Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Component-IRC.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Component-IRC-4.96-1.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 03:14:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 23:14:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198884] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-Keepalive In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607210314.k6L3EVoV022312@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-Keepalive https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198884 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-20 23:05 EST ------- Bits snipped. Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Component-Client-Keepalive.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Component-Client-Keepalive-0.0801-1.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 03:18:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 23:18:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198885] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607210318.k6L3IUur022369@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198885 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-20 23:09 EST ------- Bits snipped. Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP-0.76-1.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 03:42:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 23:42:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182320] Review Request: gnome-build In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607210342.k6L3gdoh023122@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182320 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-07-20 23:33 EST ------- make LIBTOOL=/usr/bin/libtool contains a hardcoded /usr/bin and lacks SMP flags. And yup, the perl requires are still there. Source0 is not downloading for some reason. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 04:01:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 00:01:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197764] Review Request: hfsplus-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607210401.k6L41odG023961@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hfsplus-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197764 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-20 23:52 EST ------- rpmlint has this to say: W: hfsplus-tools no-documentation It looks like there are manpages in the tarball; any reason not to package them? These are from executable source files. Easily fixed with a quick chmod. E: hfsplus-tools-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/diskdev_cmds-332.11/fsck_hfs.tproj/dfalib/hfs_endian.h E: hfsplus-tools-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/diskdev_cmds-332.11/fsck_hfs.tproj/dfalib/hfs_endian.c E: hfsplus-tools-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/diskdev_cmds-332.11/fsck_hfs.tproj/dfalib/HardLinkCheck.c E: hfsplus-tools-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/diskdev_cmds-332.11/fsck_hfs.tproj/dfalib/SRebuildCatalogBTree.c E: hfsplus-tools-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/diskdev_cmds-332.11/fsck_hfs.tproj/dfalib/BTreeScanner.c E: hfsplus-tools-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/diskdev_cmds-332.11/fsck_hfs.tproj/dfalib/BTreeScanner.h While it's true that the source is all under the APSL and that this package doesn't actually include a copy, the APSL is sufficiently both different and uncommon that I do think it would be a good idea to include it in the package. I couldn't find it directly in text form, but you can snip it from http://www.opensource.apple.com/apsl/. It doesn't look as if the compiler is being called with the proper flags. The gentoo patch sets up its own set of CFLAGS which are not the ones used in Fedora. I wonder if it works to delete CFLAGS from the Makefiles and then pass them on the commandline. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 04:02:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 00:02:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198882] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-IRC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607210402.k6L42eFJ024025@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-IRC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198882 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 04:13:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 00:13:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198691] Review Request: steghide - A Steganography Program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607210413.k6L4DjpM024234@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: steghide - A Steganography Program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198691 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-21 00:04 EST ------- Parag: Good first pass at a review. Note that compiler warnings like that are generally disregarded for the purposes of review, unless it's something _serious_ or correctable on our end. But, that being said, when in doubt, note it. The MUSTs are good places to start for reviews, as you've discovered... I encourage you to look at the other templates people are using (or patently stealing, like me ). Keep it up, you're improving each time around. Jochen: I'd recommend addressing the rpmlint warning below as it's a lot of visual spam otherwise, but it's not a blocker. + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license field matches the actual license. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + source files match upstream: 5be490e24807d921045780fd8cc446b3 steghide-0.5.1.tar.gz 5be490e24807d921045780fd8cc446b3 steghide-0.5.1.tar.gz.srpm + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + package builds in mock (5+devel/x86_64). + rpmlint is silent on binary package O rpmlint issues warming on source package (ignorable) W: steghide setup-not-quiet + final provides and requires are sane: steghide-0.5.1-1.fc5.x86_64.rpm == provides steghide = 0.5.1-1.fc5 == requires libc.so.6()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libjpeg.so.62()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libmcrypt.so.4()(64bit) libmhash.so.2()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.1)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) + no shared libraries are present. + package is not relocatable. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + %clean is present. + %check is present and all tests pass: + no scriptlets present. + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. + no headers. + no pkgconfig files. + no libtool .la droppings. + not a GUI app. + not a web app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 04:22:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 00:22:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199592] Review Request: icu4j In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607210422.k6L4Mhcl024448@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: icu4j https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199592 bkonrath at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From bkonrath at redhat.com 2006-07-21 00:13 EST ------- I looked into this a little bit and it seems that the icu4j included with eclipse (icu4j 3.4.4.1) is different enough from this version (icu4j 3.4.4) that I think it is better to build 3.4.4.1. The only place to get the 3.4.4.1 source is from the Eclipse source and even though it doesn't have build files, I think it's best to hack the build of icu4j 3.4.4.1 into the Eclipse spec file. I consulted Andrew Overholt and he argees with this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 04:33:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 00:33:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198882] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-IRC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607210433.k6L4XItW024724@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-IRC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198882 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-21 00:24 EST ------- For some reason I had to remove the conditional bits from %check in order to get this to build or I'd get this: RPM build errors: /builddir/build/SPECS/perl-POE-Component-IRC.spec:58: parseExpressionBoolean returns -1 and the the entire file list would be ignored, causing the build to fail. Not sure what's up here; I thought your syntax was correct. Anyway, it's simple remove it to get through the buildsys, or investigate some way to make it work and it shouldn't hold up the package. Review: * source files match upstream: e57f2fbcce0aecf07062b8bf83b7bd96 POE-Component-IRC-4.96.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (BR: perl is unnecessary) * Compiler flags are appropriate (none for noarch package) * %clean is present. X package builds in mock (development, x86_64) (needs above fix) * rpmlint is silent. * noarch package; no debuginfo. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(POE::Component::IRC) = 4.96 perl(POE::Component::IRC::Common) = 4.86 perl(POE::Component::IRC::Constants) perl(POE::Component::IRC::Pipeline) = 0.01 perl(POE::Component::IRC::Plugin) = 0.08 perl(POE::Component::IRC::Plugin::BotAddressed) perl(POE::Component::IRC::Plugin::BotTraffic) perl(POE::Component::IRC::Plugin::CTCP) = 1.0 perl(POE::Component::IRC::Plugin::Connector) perl(POE::Component::IRC::Plugin::Console) perl(POE::Component::IRC::Plugin::ISupport) = 0.52 perl(POE::Component::IRC::Plugin::NickReclaim) = 1.0 perl(POE::Component::IRC::Plugin::PlugMan) perl(POE::Component::IRC::Plugin::Proxy) perl(POE::Component::IRC::Plugin::Whois) = 0.02 perl(POE::Component::IRC::Projects) = 0.01 perl(POE::Component::IRC::Qnet) = 1.3 perl(POE::Component::IRC::Qnet::State) = 1.5 perl(POE::Component::IRC::State) = 1.9 perl(POE::Component::IRC::Test::Harness) = 0.4 perl(POE::Component::IRC::Test::Plugin) perl(POE::Filter::CTCP) perl(POE::Filter::IRC) perl(POE::Filter::IRC::Compat) = 1.0 perl-POE-Component-IRC = 4.96-1.fc6 = perl >= 0:5.006 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(Exporter) perl(File::Basename) perl(POE) perl(POE::Component::IRC) >= 4.5 perl(POE::Component::IRC::Common) perl(POE::Component::IRC::Constants) perl(POE::Component::IRC::Pipeline) perl(POE::Component::IRC::Plugin) perl(POE::Component::IRC::Plugin::ISupport) perl(POE::Component::IRC::Plugin::Whois) perl(POE::Filter::CTCP) perl(POE::Filter::IRC) perl(POE::Filter::IRC::Compat) perl(POE::Filter::IRCD) perl(POSIX) perl(Socket) perl(Symbol) perl(base) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) * %check is present but tests are necessarily disabled. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 04:34:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 00:34:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198884] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-Keepalive In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607210434.k6L4Y5Em024788@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-Keepalive https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198884 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 04:40:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 00:40:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198246] Review Request: ORBit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607210440.k6L4ebHt025224@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ORBit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198246 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |michael at knox.net.nz OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-21 00:31 EST ------- Hey, I will review this puppy for you... ---------------------------------------- Review for release 18: * RPM name is OK * Source ORBit-0.5.17.tar.bz2 is the same as upstream * This is the latest version * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint of ORBit-devel looks OK * rpmlint of ORBit looks OK * File list of ORBit-devel looks OK * File list of ORBit looks OK Notes: Looks good, I see no reason why this can't be imported. Consider it APPROVED. Please remember to close this review once the package has been imported into CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 04:41:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 00:41:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198246] Review Request: ORBit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607210441.k6L4fJop025338@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ORBit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198246 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 04:46:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 00:46:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199647] Review Request: perl-File-RsyncP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607210446.k6L4krcH025731@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-RsyncP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199647 ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2006-07-21 00:38 EST ------- Spec: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/perl-File-RsyncP/perl-File-RsyncP.spec SRPM: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/perl-File-RsyncP/perl-File-RsyncP-0.62-1.src.rpm - Updated to 0.62 and applied two known patches -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 05:43:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 01:43:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199632] Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607210543.k6L5hWWf027423@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199632 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-21 01:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Blocker : needs BR lua > Actually that would be tolua++-devel, but indeed I forgot that one I'll addit together with other needed fixes once a full review has been done. > Possible fault. You haved defined ARCH_CONFIG_FLAGS in the %ifarch construct > and passed to the configure line. On a non x86 machine, ARCH_CONFIG_FLAGS is > undefined which may upset things somewhat! > > Being non-defined bash will expand it to an empty string, which is just waht we want. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 05:47:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 01:47:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197765] Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607210547.k6L5lqel027685@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197765 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |michael at knox.net.nz OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-21 01:39 EST ------- Hi.. I will review this package for you.. ---------------------------------------- Review for release 0.1.aurore: * Source libical-0.26-6.aurore.tar.bz2 is the same as upstream * This is the latest version * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint of libical-devel looks OK * rpmlint of libical looks OK * File list of libical-devel looks OK * File list of libical looks OK Needs work: * Package does not follow Fedora's package naming guildlines (wiki: PackageNamingGuidelines) I am not certain that the release tag is ok. So I will ask on fedora-packaging. * The package should contain the text of the license (wiki: Packaging/ReviewGuidelines) The tagball contains a COPYING file. You should add it to the %docs Notes: Looks good. Once I find out about the release tag and the COPYING is included, it should be all good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 05:52:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 01:52:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197765] Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607210552.k6L5qcq8028068@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197765 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-21 01:43 EST ------- Actually, I just reviewed an email I sent on a similar subject. I asked about non-numeric values in the release string and this was the response. " Not if you move the non-numerical bit to the least-significant place (= the very right). " So, I am satisfied with that. Fix up the COPYING file and I can approve the submission. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 05:56:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 01:56:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199630] Review Request: ClanLib - Cross platform C++ game library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607210556.k6L5uoAl028301@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ClanLib - Cross platform C++ game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199630 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-21 01:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Blocker : How does the ClanLib licence marry up to the LGPL? Nearest to it would > be just "distributable" or better still, ClanLib. Darn, I forgot about that, the clanlib homepage says that it is LGPL, but the sources seem to disagree I wanted to add a note to the review about this I agree this needs fixing. I've done some more investigating it turns out that 0.6 is LGPL and 0.8 is under the zlib License, which explains the homepage (they most likely forgot to update this), good. The license is the "zlib License" which is in rpmlints list of licenses. I'll fix this up together with other nescesarry fixes once a full review is done. > You will need to include the license in %docs > It already is: %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc COPYING CREDITS NEWS TODO-RSN > You need BR zlib-devel for it to build in mock > Erm: [hans at shalem ~]$ rpm -q --requires libpng-devel libpng-devel-1.2.10-6.x86_64 /bin/sh libpng = 2:1.2.10-6 libpng12.so.0()(64bit) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 zlib-devel So that should get dragged in by libpng-devel (In reply to comment #3) > rpmlint errors and warnings. > > devel : > E : ClanLib-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib > All of the warnings are the same (dangling-relative-symlink) - there are 13 in total > W: ClanLib-devel dangling-relative-symlink > /usr/lib/ClanLib-0.8/libclanNetwork.so ../libclanNetwork-0.8.so.1.0.0 > W: ClanLib-devel dangling-relative-symlink > /usr/lib/ClanLib-0.8/libclanGUIStyleSilver.so ../libclanGUIStyleSilver-0.8.so.1.0.0 > W: ClanLib-devel dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/ClanLib-0.8/libclanGUI.so > ../libclanGUI-0.8.so.1.0.0 > W: ClanLib-devel dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/ClanLib-0.8/libclanGL.so > ../libclanGL-0.8.so.1.0.0 > W: ClanLib-devel dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/ClanLib-0.8/libclanMikMod.so > ../libclanMikMod-0.8.so.1.0.0 > W: ClanLib-devel dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/ClanLib-0.8/libclanCore.so > ../libclanCore-0.8.so.1.0.0 > W: ClanLib-devel dangling-relative-symlink > /usr/lib/ClanLib-0.8/libclanSignals.so ../libclanSignals-0.8.so.1.0.0 > W: ClanLib-devel dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/ClanLib-0.8/libclanApp.so > ../libclanApp-0.8.so.1.0.0 > W: ClanLib-devel dangling-relative-symlink > /usr/lib/ClanLib-0.8/libclanDisplay.so ../libclanDisplay-0.8.so.1.0.0 > W: ClanLib-devel dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/ClanLib-0.8/libclanSound.so > ../libclanSound-0.8.so.1.0.0 > W: ClanLib-devel file-not-utf8 > /usr/share/doc/ClanLib-devel-0.8.0/html/Tutorial/TicTacToe/tictactoe.zip > W: ClanLib-devel dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/ClanLib-0.8/libclanVorbis.so > ../libclanVorbis-0.8.so.1.0.0 > W: ClanLib-devel dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/ClanLib-0.8/libclanSDL.so > ../libclanSDL-0.8.so.1.0.0 All of which can be ignored. Those links point to library files in the required main package. For some reason rpmlint only ignores broken symlinks in a -devel package directly under libdir and not under a subdir of libdir. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 06:12:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 02:12:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189783] Review Request: e17: The enlightenment DR17 window manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607210612.k6L6C9Uu028699@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: e17: The enlightenment DR17 window manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189783 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX OtherBugsDependingO|163779 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-21 02:03 EST ------- Due to the submitter going MIA. I am closing this review. I will resubmit the package for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 06:14:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 02:14:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191745] Review Request: sysprof-kmod - kernel module for the sysprof profiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607210614.k6L6E20i028782@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sysprof-kmod - kernel module for the sysprof profiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191745 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2006-07-21 02:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > My opinion is that this particular package does not really fall into the picture > covered by the guidelines: this is not a driver, it's a (small) module which is > exposing CPU sampling data for the GUI to show. The main reason for this extras-work is that we want to tell everyone: "Get your shit into the kernel soon, that the proper place for it. kmod are only a interim solution" (sorry, sounds a bit harsh, but I think these words describe the situation well). In the begining we even considered rules like "kmods are only allowed for 18 months in Extras -- that should be enough time to get stuff upstream (e.g. into the kernel)" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 06:30:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 02:30:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197764] Review Request: hfsplus-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607210630.k6L6UfEN029275@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hfsplus-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197764 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-21 02:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > rpmlint has this to say: > > W: hfsplus-tools no-documentation > It looks like there are manpages in the tarball; any reason not to package them? None whatsoever :) Corrected. I made only minimal changes to them, as evidenced in the new spec -- basically just changing the name of the util in the page so people wouldn't get wicked confused. > These are from executable source files. Easily fixed with a quick chmod. > E: hfsplus-tools-debuginfo script-without-shellbang > /usr/src/debug/diskdev_cmds-332.11/fsck_hfs.tproj/dfalib/hfs_endian.h [...] Fixed. > While it's true that the source is all under the APSL and that this package > doesn't actually include a copy, the APSL is sufficiently both different and > uncommon that I do think it would be a good idea to include it in the package. > I couldn't find it directly in text form, but you can snip it from > http://www.opensource.apple.com/apsl/. Done. > It doesn't look as if the compiler is being called with the proper flags. The > gentoo patch sets up its own set of CFLAGS which are not the ones used in > Fedora. I wonder if it works to delete CFLAGS from the Makefiles and then pass > them on the commandline. Gentoo specific bits now nixed; retained the flags that look like they're more specific to the code at hand. Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/hfsplus-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/hfsplus-tools-332.11-1.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 06:37:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 02:37:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199183] Review Request: e2tools - Manipulate files in unmounted ext2/ext3 filesystems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607210637.k6L6buq7029546@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: e2tools - Manipulate files in unmounted ext2/ext3 filesystems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199183 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-21 02:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Seems to have some 64-bit problems: > > cc1: warnings being treated as errors > rm.c: In function 'e2rm': > rm.c:248: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size Is this a problem? It should be, e.g., a 32-bit integer -> 64-bit pointer? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 06:45:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 02:45:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197732] Review Request: optipng - a PNG optimizer and converter - need a Sponsor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607210645.k6L6jTol030102@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: optipng - a PNG optimizer and converter - need a Sponsor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197732 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-21 02:36 EST ------- One note in your spec file that you'll get flagged on: you're mixing macro/variable styles (e.g. using $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{optimize}). See http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-f3d77b27a5d29dfc1f5600ef3fc836f2e317badf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 06:47:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 02:47:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197732] Review Request: optipng - a PNG optimizer and converter - need a Sponsor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607210647.k6L6l5kU030215@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: optipng - a PNG optimizer and converter - need a Sponsor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197732 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-21 02:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > One note in your spec file that you'll get flagged on: you're mixing > macro/variable styles (e.g. using $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{optimize}). ...make that %{optflags}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 06:53:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 02:53:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199630] Review Request: ClanLib - Cross platform C++ game library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607210653.k6L6rMEh030724@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ClanLib - Cross platform C++ game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199630 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-21 02:44 EST ------- rpmlint : not a problem on the warnings, but you can't ignore the error line mock fails to build : /usr/bin/ld : cannot find -lXmu collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [libClanDisplay.la] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory /builddir/build/BUILD/ClanLib-0.8.0-RC2/Sources/Display -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 06:53:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 02:53:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198247] Review Request: libpng10 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607210653.k6L6ridg030750@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpng10 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198247 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-21 02:44 EST ------- Thanks. I plan to replace my home machine with a 64-bit one next month but I'd like to sort this out sooner :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 06:59:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 02:59:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184582] Review Request: xchm - A GUI front-end to CHMlib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607210659.k6L6xc8U031144@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xchm - A GUI front-end to CHMlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184582 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |michael at knox.net.nz OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-21 02:50 EST ------- Hi, I will review this package. ---------------------------------------- Review for release 1: * RPM name is NO You need to have %{?dist} in the release tag. * This is the latest version * Builds fine in mock (rawhide) * rpmlint looks OK * File list looks OK Notes: Looks good. I am happy to APPROVE this submission, just fix up the release tag. Please close this report once you have imported the package into CVS. Just a note, in the future, if you can use the following example for submitting both srpms and spec, it will make it easier for people to quickly review your submissions: Spec URL: http://www.example.com/extras/foo.spec SRPM URL: http://www.example.com/extras/foo-1.2.3-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 07:02:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 03:02:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199021] Review Request: zynaddsubfx - Real-time software synthesizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607210702.k6L72GFN031268@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zynaddsubfx - Real-time software synthesizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199021 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-07-21 02:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Looks like there's the dreaded rpath problem: > E: zynaddsubfx binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/controller ['/usr/lib64'] > E: zynaddsubfx binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/zynaddsubfx ['/usr/lib64'] > E: zynaddsubfx binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/spliter ['/usr/lib64'] > > Unfortunately I can't figure out where it's coming from. This was a bug in "fltk-config --ldflags" output. > Also, the recommended Fedora compilation flags don't seem to be used at all; > everything seems to be compiled with -O6. Fixed. I found a "fltk-config --cflags" output as well. Two bugs were filed against fltk. Updated bits here: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/~green/FE/FC5/zynaddsubfx.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/~green/FE/FC5/zynaddsubfx-2.2.1-6.src.rpm Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 07:22:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 03:22:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192420] Review Request: Bonfire - CD/DVD burning app for gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607210722.k6L7MYTn032532@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Bonfire - CD/DVD burning app for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192420 ------- Additional Comments From rouquier.p at wanadoo.fr 2006-07-21 03:13 EST ------- John: that's because you must be using nautilus-cd-burner 2.15 which breaks backward compatibility. It should work fine with ncb-2.14 which is supported by fedora stable. Which brings me to the question: What should be the version of nautilus-cd-burner that bonfire should support 2.14 or 2.15? thanks for the script. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 08:16:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 04:16:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199630] Review Request: ClanLib - Cross platform C++ game library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607210816.k6L8Gbl2005172@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ClanLib - Cross platform C++ game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199630 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-21 04:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > rpmlint : not a problem on the warnings, but you can't ignore the error line > Sure I can, the only thing under %{_libdir} are .so links, which _do_ point to libs. So the error is bogus. This is just rpmlint being stupid (which is ok). > mock fails to build : > /usr/bin/ld : cannot find -lXmu > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > make[2]: *** [libClanDisplay.la] Error 1 > make[2]: Leaving directory /builddir/build/BUILD/ClanLib-0.8.0-RC2/Sources/Display > > Thanks, I've added libXmu-devel to the BR. New version here: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ClanLib.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ClanLib-0.8.0-0.2.RC2.src.rpm Changes: * Fri Jul 21 2006 Hans de Goede 0.8.0-0.2.RC2 - Change License: to "zlib License" as 0.8 is under the zlib License not the LGPL (0.6 is LGPL). - Add a patch from pingus contrib dir which adds support for the grave key - Add libXmu-devel to the BuildRequires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 08:25:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 04:25:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198882] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-IRC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607210825.k6L8PuFo008333@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-IRC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198882 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-21 04:17 EST ------- You guys might want to learn about rpmbuild's --with/--without options. This provides much easier means to enable conditional parts of a spec than using brute force hacks like this __with_network_tests. --- perl-POE-Component-IRC.spec 2006-07-21 05:08:25.000000000 +0200 +++ perl-POE-Component-IRC.spec.hacked 2006-07-21 10:25:01.000000000 +0200 @@ -1,8 +1,7 @@ # Note: The tests for this perl dist. are disabled by default, as they # require network access and would thus fail in the buildsys' mock # environments. To build locally while enabling tests, either: -# rpmbuild ... --define '__with_network_tests 1' ... -# define __with_network_tests 1 in your ~/.rpmmacros +# rpmbuild ... --with network_tests Name: perl-POE-Component-IRC Version: 4.96 @@ -55,9 +54,7 @@ %check # tests require network access, disabled by default -%if %{?__with_network_tests} -make test -%endif +%{?_with_network_tests:make test} %clean -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 08:57:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 04:57:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191130] Review Request: kmobiletools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607210857.k6L8vCae010872@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kmobiletools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191130 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |michael at knox.net.nz OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-21 04:48 EST ------- Hello.. I will review this package for you.. ---------------------------------------- Review for release 2: * RPM name is OK * Source kmobiletools-0.4.3.3.tar.bz2 is the same as upstream * This is the latest version * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint looks OK * File list looks OK Needs work: * Scriptlets: missing "gtk-update-icon-cache" in %post (wiki: ScriptletSnippets) * Scriptlets: missing "gtk-update-icon-cache" in %postun (wiki: ScriptletSnippets) Package looks pretty good. If you fix up the %post/%postun scriplets, I can approve this submission. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 09:01:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 05:01:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198878] Review Request: mutagen - Python module to handle audio metadata In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607210901.k6L91v33011256@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mutagen - Python module to handle audio metadata https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198878 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #132774|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-21 04:52 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=132784) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=132784&action=view) python-mutagen-1.5.1-5.spec (In reply to comment #9) > Note: it's nice to the reviewers if you generate a new src.rpm with each change > you make to your spec. That way it's simple to just pull down the new package > and build it. Yes, I know, but I have a slow connection shared on 5 computers in home, so sending even 296 kB file blocks it completely and I send such files as rarely as it possible... :/ > You seem to have tickled a new rpmlint warning: > W: mutagen mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs > This happened because you indented "noarch" with a tab. Not a big deal but that > means it's easy to fix. This is odd, because when I checked it in my rpmlint, it didn't show any errors, but I fixed it in new spec. > More serious is the name of the package: according to the naming guidelines this > package should be named python-mutagen. See > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#AddonPython I don't know how can I overlooked that :/ You're right and I fixed it. > There's no need to pass CFLAGS to setyp.py since this is a noarch package. Fixed. > This package seems to have a test suite, but you don't call it. You should > consider adding a section like: > > %check > %{__python} setup.py coverage I know, but check procedure looks broken. It shows errors that look like dependent to errors in check procedure, not in program. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 09:15:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 05:15:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191389] Review Request: oooqs2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607210915.k6L9F5jB011881@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: oooqs2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191389 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |michael at knox.net.nz OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-21 05:06 EST ------- Hey.. I will review this package.. ---------------------------------------- Review for release 1: * RPM name is OK * Source oooqs2-1.0.tar.gz is the same as upstream * Builds fine in mock * File list looks OK Needs work: * BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils is missing * rpmlint: need to fix symlink warnings * The package should contain the text of the license (wiki: Packaging/ReviewGuidelines) * Scriptlets: missing "gtk-update-icon-cache" in %post (wiki: ScriptletSnippets) * Scriptlets: missing "gtk-update-icon-cache" in %postun (wiki: ScriptletSnippets) Notes: You fix up the %post/%postun scriplets, the is a COPYING file and it should be included in the %docs rpmlint of oooqs2: W: oooqs2 dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/de/oooqs2/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/de/common W: oooqs2 symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/de/oooqs2/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/de/common W: oooqs2 dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/oooqs2/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common W: oooqs2 symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/oooqs2/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 09:15:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 05:15:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199491] Review Request: dbus-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607210915.k6L9FaT3011941@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbus-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199491 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-21 05:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > Requires: %name = %{version}-%{release} > > Should this not be %{name}? Not necessarily. It should not make a different. %{name} is the quoted version of %name. This is similar to ${var} vs. $var in /bin/sh. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 09:18:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 05:18:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195666] Review Request: mod_fcgid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607210918.k6L9I4n2012164@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_fcgid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195666 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-21 05:09 EST ------- Update to package so that it builds in rawhide, where the /etc/httpd/build symlink has gone, and selinux-policy-devel is required. Packages (1.10-3) available in usual place: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/mod_fcgid/ Could you just give this new package a try and re-approve, since this is what I'd be importing into CVS? As a ametter of interest, which application(s) have you tried this with? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 09:25:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 05:25:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192578] Review Request: metamonitor - A Simple program that watches log files and popup its changes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607210925.k6L9PcsQ012624@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: metamonitor - A Simple program that watches log files and popup its changes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192578 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-21 05:16 EST ------- Hey.. I will review this submission... ---------------------------------------- Review for release 2: * RPM name is OK * Source metamonitor-0.4.5.tar.bz2 is the same as upstream * Builds fine in mock * File list looks OK Needs work: * rpmlint: need to fix rpmlint warnings Minor: * Duplicate BuildRequires: arts-devel (by kdelibs-devel), qt-devel (by kdelibs-devel) Notes: rpmlint of metamonitor: W: metamonitor dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/metamonitor/common ../../en/common Package looks good, fixup the above and I will give it the green light. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 09:26:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 05:26:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192578] Review Request: metamonitor - A Simple program that watches log files and popup its changes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607210926.k6L9QM0w012695@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: metamonitor - A Simple program that watches log files and popup its changes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192578 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |michael at knox.net.nz OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 10:14:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 06:14:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199491] Review Request: dbus-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607211014.k6LAEefq014816@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbus-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199491 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-21 06:05 EST ------- Okay, thanks for that clarification. I was just making sure after the problem I had with NAnt recently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 10:16:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 06:16:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193957] Review Request: nant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607211016.k6LAGx8Q014945@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193957 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 10:17:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 06:17:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189092] Review Request: boo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607211017.k6LAHCZd014983@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189092 Bug 189092 depends on bug 193957, which changed state. Bug 193957 Summary: Review Request: nant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193957 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 10:50:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 06:50:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198878] Review Request: mutagen - Python module to handle audio metadata In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607211050.k6LAoXHE017561@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mutagen - Python module to handle audio metadata https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198878 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-21 06:41 EST ------- Huh, I found some time to send new SPEC and SRPM so it's here: Spec URL: http://ecik.zspswidwin.pl/mutagen/python-mutagen.spec SRPM URL: http://ecik.zspswidwin.pl/mutagen/python-mutagen-1.5.1-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 11:09:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 07:09:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607211109.k6LB9q9U018775@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 ------- Additional Comments From drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx 2006-07-21 07:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > I had no problems building in rawhide, but rpmlint is very unhappy: > > Tons of rpath warnings: > E: pulseaudio binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath > /usr/lib64/pulse-0.9/modules/libprotocol-esound.so > ['/usr/lib64/pulse-0.9/modules/', '/usr/lib64'] > and 69 others. The usual libtool hack doesn't work. This is a libtool/gcc misfeature. I talked to Ralf Wildenhues about it, but he didn't have any way of solving it (short of bastardising libtool). It's just the way things are on multi-arch for now. > > This looks like a script but isn't executable: > E: pulseaudio non-executable-script /etc/pulse/default.pa 0644 > The hash bang is mostly there to show that it can be used that way. As it is located in /etc, I think we should keep the execute bit off. > Some setuid bits: > E: pulseaudio setuid-binary /usr/bin/pulseaudio root 04755 > E: pulseaudio non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/pulseaudio 04755 > which will need to be discussed to make sure we're not getting into any security > issues. Sure. Pulse only uses its root privileges to change to realtime scheduling, then drops them. Access control is based on who is in the 'realtime' group. > > Some no-documentation warnings: > W: pulseaudio-devel no-documentation > W: pulseaudio-lib-glib no-documentation > W: pulseaudio-lib-zeroconf no-documentation > W: pulseaudio-module-alsa no-documentation > W: pulseaudio-module-x11 no-documentation > W: pulseaudio-module-zeroconf no-documentation > W: pulseaudio-utils no-documentation > which are probably OK but I'll have to check. > The docs are in the other packages. > This is problematic: > E: pulseaudio-utils invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libpulsedsp.so libpulsedsp.so > but unfortunately I'm not entirely sure how to fix it. It's not a "real" lib, so it has no use for versioning. It's the active part of an LD_PRELOAD hack to provide OSS emulation. As such, the error is incorrect and the lib is just fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 11:15:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 07:15:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184582] Review Request: xchm - A GUI front-end to CHMlib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607211115.k6LBFcim019159@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xchm - A GUI front-end to CHMlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184582 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-21 07:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > * RPM name is NO > > You need to have %{?dist} in the release tag. If I'm not wrong this is not an obligation. However I always use %{?dist}, it is just a mistake of mine. I'll change it right after importing to cvs. > > Looks good. I am happy to APPROVE this submission, just fix up the release tag. Thanks. > Just a note, in the future, if you can use the following example for submitting > both srpms and spec, it will make it easier for people to quickly review your > submissions: > > Spec URL: http://www.example.com/extras/foo.spec > SRPM URL: http://www.example.com/extras/foo-1.2.3-1.src.rpm Ok. I am lazy, but you are the second one making that request, so I'll change my bad habits ;-). Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 11:23:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 07:23:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191130] Review Request: kmobiletools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607211123.k6LBNIQS019579@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kmobiletools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191130 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-07-21 07:14 EST ------- I wont fix the %post/%postun there is no need to add gnome cruft to a kde package. and as has been stated in quite a few package reviews and there is a bug filed gtk-update-icon-cache should be run as a cron job not in packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 11:28:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 07:28:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199679] New: Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199679 Summary: Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: devrim at commandprompt.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://pgfoundry.org/frs/download.php/978/pgpool.spec SRPM URL: http://pgfoundry.org/frs/download.php/979/pgpool-3.1.0-1.src.rpm Description: pgpool is a connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL. pgpool runs between PostgreSQL's clients(front ends) and servers (backends). A PostgreSQL client can connect to pgpool as if it were a standard PostgreSQL server. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 11:30:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 07:30:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199679] Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607211130.k6LBU0cx020147@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199679 devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: pgpool - |Review Request: pgpool - |Connection |Connection |pooling/replication server |pooling/replication server |for PostgreSQL |for PostgreSQL OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 11:32:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 07:32:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191130] Review Request: kmobiletools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607211132.k6LBW1tr020317@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kmobiletools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191130 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-21 07:23 EST ------- Re: comment #5. I support Dennis' comment. The fdo icon spec only requires "touch"ing the affected icon dirs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 11:35:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 07:35:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190367] Review Request: PyKDE: Python bindings for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607211135.k6LBZU3J020585@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyKDE: Python bindings for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190367 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-21 07:26 EST ------- > * Package does not follow Fedora's package naming guildlines IMO, it does, since as you noted, this is an upstream snapshot. > * Duplicate BuildRequires: python-devel (by sip-devel), sip-devel (by > PyQt-devel) this package directly uses the items used in the BuildRequires, and it's not wise to rely upon implied dependancies of other pkgs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 11:41:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 07:41:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190367] Review Request: PyKDE: Python bindings for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607211141.k6LBfS3b020944@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyKDE: Python bindings for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190367 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-21 07:32 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/PyKDE.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/PyKDE-3.15.2-0.5.20060422.src.rpm %changelog * Fri Jul 21 2006 Rex Dieter 3.15.2-0.5.20060422 - %%doc AUTHORS COPYING - License: GPL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 11:48:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 07:48:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194278] Review Request: kdeadmin: Administrative tools for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607211148.k6LBmxxX021206@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeadmin: Administrative tools for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194278 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-21 07:39 EST ------- > * Missing dependancy on update-desktop-database for %postun (package > desktop-file-utils) Last I knew, ScriptletSnippets said not to add any (new) dependancies for this. > * The package contains libtool archive files (*.la) The ones included here are required. > Many of the desktop files don't follow the ... packaging guidelines I refer you to the comment in the specfile (: ------------- # FIXME/TODO: get dfi to shut-the-hell-up about KDE's *valid/legit* use of # Keywords= and use of invalid characters... bah. -- Rex > * Duplicate BuildRequires: bzip2-devel (by kdelibs-devel) kdeadmin *directly* uses/requires bzip2-devel(1), so relying upon implicit deps of other packages is bad/unwise. (1) OK, not directly, but is needed because rpm-devel currently lacks Requires: bzip2-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 11:50:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 07:50:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198836] Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607211150.k6LBoqED021290@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198836 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-21 07:41 EST ------- > I fail to find any official upstream releases of FreeType 1.x. Here? http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=3157&package_id=3068 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 11:56:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 07:56:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184582] Review Request: xchm - A GUI front-end to CHMlib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607211156.k6LBuHUd021518@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xchm - A GUI front-end to CHMlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184582 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-21 07:47 EST ------- Built in devel, branche requested in FC-5. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 11:59:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 07:59:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194375] Review Request: kdeutils: K Desktop Environment - Utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607211159.k6LBxB9j021626@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeutils: K Desktop Environment - Utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194375 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-21 07:50 EST ------- > - %config %{_datadir}/config*/* <- Why aren't these in /etc/? Because that's how kdelibs is currently configured, ie, the output from $ kde-config --path config > - need requires(pre,post) for update-desktop-database I disagree, but if that's a deal-breaker for you, I'll add it. > - python is provided by python-devel (non-blocker) I assume you mean that BuildRequires: python is extraneous, and it mostly is (now). I guess that's a remnant of my building kde for older/legacy releases where python-devel didn't Requires: python -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 12:14:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 08:14:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197353] Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607211214.k6LCE7OC022276@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197353 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-07-21 08:04 EST ------- Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/man-pages-fr.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/man-pages-fr-2.23.0-1.src.rpm %changelog * Fri Jul 21 2006 Alain Portal 2.23.0-1 - Update to 2.23.0 - New extra tarball * Thu Jul 20 2006 Alain Portal 2.22.0-2 - Remove 13 new pages that are own by the shadow-utils package - Remove man2html.1, nano.1, nanorc.5 that are owned by their upstream tarball - Add french description -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 12:16:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 08:16:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194278] Review Request: kdeadmin: Administrative tools for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607211216.k6LCGgVL022409@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeadmin: Administrative tools for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194278 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-21 08:07 EST ------- >> * Missing dependancy on update-desktop-database for %postun (package >> desktop-file-utils) > Last I knew, ScriptletSnippets said not to add any (new) dependancies for > this. Rechecked, and it's still there, even though it says *eventually* the dependancy shouldn't be required. I'll see if I can get that fixed for good. (: In the meantime, if you consider this a deal-breaker Review-wise, I can (temporarily at least) add the Requires(post,postun): desktop-file-utils -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 12:22:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 08:22:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] New: Review Request: slab Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 Summary: Review Request: slab Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: panemade at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/slab/slab.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/slab/slab-1.0-4.20060721cvs.fc5.src.rpm Description: Slab is a gnome menu panel. It contains control center for gnome and application browser for gnome menu panel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 12:23:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 08:23:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199682] New: Review Request: dbi-link - Partial implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199682 Summary: Review Request: dbi-link - Partial implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: devrim at commandprompt.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/dbi-link/dbi-link.spec SRPM URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/dbi-link/dbi-link-1.0.0-2.src.rpm Description: If you've ever wanted to join PostgreSQL tables from other data you can access via Perl's DBI, this is your project. You can add speed and accuracy to your ETL processes by treating any data source you can reach with DBI as a PostgreSQL table. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 12:24:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 08:24:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199682] Review Request: dbi-link - Partial implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607211224.k6LCOxwH023059@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbi-link - Partial implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199682 devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 12:25:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 08:25:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607211225.k6LCPAKb023099@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 13:07:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 09:07:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198246] Review Request: ORBit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607211307.k6LD7chu025950@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ORBit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198246 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-21 08:58 EST ------- Package imported and added to owners.list. 12853 (ORBit): Build on target fedora-development-extras succeeded. Build logs may be found at http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/12853-ORBit-0.5.17-18.fc6/ Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 13:08:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 09:08:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198245] Review Request: gnome-libs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607211308.k6LD8D2J025995@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-libs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198245 Bug 198245 depends on bug 198246, which changed state. Bug 198246 Summary: Review Request: ORBit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198246 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 13:13:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 09:13:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199688] New: Review Request: virt-manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199688 Summary: Review Request: virt-manager Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: berrange at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/berrange/review/virt-manager.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/berrange/yum/fedora/5/SRPMS/virt-manager-0.1.5-1.src.rpm Description: virt-manager provides a UI for administering Xen virtual machines. It uses PyGTK for its front end, and libvirt for its backend. It provides a ability to stop/suspend/resume/save/restore machines, live graphs of machine resource utilization and access the graphical VNC console. The gnome-applet-vm panel applet will also communicate with virt-manager over DBus to provide close integration between the two. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 13:50:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 09:50:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199183] Review Request: e2tools - Manipulate files in unmounted ext2/ext3 filesystems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607211350.k6LDoaSh028941@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: e2tools - Manipulate files in unmounted ext2/ext3 filesystems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199183 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-21 09:41 EST ------- It's obviously a problem in that it fails the build due to -Wall. Whether it woulc actually cause any problems in the running program, I can't say since it didn't build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 14:00:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 10:00:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198882] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-IRC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607211400.k6LE0so4029867@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-IRC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198882 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-21 09:51 EST ------- Seems quite reasonable to me, but I've not seen it before. Can you provide a reference to some documentation? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 14:09:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 10:09:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199688] Review Request: virt-manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607211409.k6LE9d3g030547@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: virt-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199688 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-07-21 10:00 EST ------- General tech ack. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 14:20:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 10:20:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199183] Review Request: e2tools - Manipulate files in unmounted ext2/ext3 filesystems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607211420.k6LEKgkp031225@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: e2tools - Manipulate files in unmounted ext2/ext3 filesystems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199183 rhbugs at n-dimensional.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rhbugs at n-dimensional.de ------- Additional Comments From rhbugs at n-dimensional.de 2006-07-21 10:11 EST ------- The expression in question is (void *) (verbose) ? &verbose : NULL That should almost certainly read (void *) ( (verbose) ? &verbose : NULL ) instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 15:01:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 11:01:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199630] Review Request: ClanLib - Cross platform C++ game library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607211501.k6LF1EVw002362@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ClanLib - Cross platform C++ game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199630 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-21 10:52 EST ------- Thanks - I'll give it a spin tonight and see what happens (got a dual processor box to install for my buildsys, so this and ClanLib06 may be delayed very slightly) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 15:25:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 11:25:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197353] Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607211525.k6LFPUYv004215@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197353 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-07-21 11:16 EST ------- Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/man-pages-fr.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/man-pages-fr-2.24.0-1.src.rpm %changelog * Fri Jul 21 2006 Alain Portal 2.24.0-1 - Update to 2.24.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 15:38:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 11:38:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199183] Review Request: e2tools - Manipulate files in unmounted ext2/ext3 filesystems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607211538.k6LFcYKa005055@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: e2tools - Manipulate files in unmounted ext2/ext3 filesystems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199183 ------- Additional Comments From rhbugs at n-dimensional.de 2006-07-21 11:29 EST ------- Andreas, all, this should fix the compile problem mentioned: http://n-dimensional.de/software/e2tools/e2tools-fedora-fixes.patch http://n-dimensional.de/software/e2tools/e2tools.spec http://n-dimensional.de/software/e2tools/e2tools-0.0.16-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 16:52:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 12:52:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607211652.k6LGqfXd010740@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-07-21 12:43 EST ------- License should be both GPL and LGPL. (See the LICENSE file for details) pkgconfig files won't do the right thing on x86_64. Will attach a patch for that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 16:53:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 12:53:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607211653.k6LGrwvG010962@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-07-21 12:44 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=132822) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=132822&action=view) Patch to correct pkgconfig files for libdir on x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 16:57:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 12:57:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197867] Review Request: iscsitarget (includes kernel module) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607211657.k6LGvVdd011487@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iscsitarget (includes kernel module) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197867 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2006-07-21 12:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > Okay, sorry, I didn't get that ;-) > Ohh, and we'll look at it during the next meeting on thursday and post results here Sorry, we forget to discuss it last week. But we discussed it yesterday in the FESCo-Meeting and allowed this kmod to enter Extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 17:28:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 13:28:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199732] New: Review Request: clanbomber - Bomberman-like multiplayer game that uses ClanLib Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199732 Summary: Review Request: clanbomber - Bomberman-like multiplayer game that uses ClanLib Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/clanbomber.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/clanbomber-1.05-1.src.rpm Description: ClanBomber is a free (GPL) Bomberman-like multiplayer game that uses ClanLib, a free multi platform C++ game SDK. First "ClanBomber" was only a working title for a small game started in September 1998, that has only been started to learn how to use ClanLib. But the ClanBomber project has grown into a real game. It is fully playable and features Computer controlled bombers, however, it is recommended to play ClanBomber with friends (3-8 players are really fun). --- Note this packages needs ClanLib06, review bug 199632 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 17:31:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 13:31:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199732] Review Request: clanbomber - Bomberman-like multiplayer game that uses ClanLib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607211731.k6LHVYUL014549@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clanbomber - Bomberman-like multiplayer game that uses ClanLib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199732 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |199632 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 17:31:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 13:31:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199632] Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607211731.k6LHVuHm014563@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199632 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |199732 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 17:48:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 13:48:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199592] Review Request: icu4j In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607211748.k6LHmrQR015479@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: icu4j https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199592 ------- Additional Comments From david at jpackage.org 2006-07-21 13:39 EST ------- Why not patch the upstream source against the source included with eclipse and keep the external package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 17:50:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 13:50:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183439] Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607211750.k6LHodBC015569@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) Alias: papyrus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183439 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2006-07-21 13:41 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/papyrus.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/fedora/5/srpms/papyrus-0.2.1-1.src.rpm Summary of changes: - New release - Added papyrus-demo and papyrusmm-demo to devel package - Remove rm -rf /usr/bin - Changed mv of docs to cp of docs (allows for consistent staged builds) - Changed sourceforge download location to download.sourceforge.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 17:53:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 13:53:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199632] Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607211753.k6LHr86C015727@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199632 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-21 13:44 EST ------- I just submitted clanbomber for review which uses this, might be handy for testing, see bug 199732 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 18:31:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 14:31:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199747] New: Review Request: pingus - Guide the penguins safely home before they drop of the cliff Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199747 Summary: Review Request: pingus - Guide the penguins safely home before they drop of the cliff Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/pingus.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/pingus-0.7.0-0.1.20060721.src.rpm Description: A game inspired by the game Lemmings. You take command in the game of a bunch of small penguins and have to guide them around in levels. Since the penguins walk on their own, the player can only influence them by giving them commands, like build a bridge, dig a hole or redirect all penguins in the other direction. The goal of each level is to reach the exit, for which multiple combination of commands are necessary. The game is presented in a 2D site view. --- Note this packages needs ClanLib, review bug 199630 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 18:32:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 14:32:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199747] Review Request: pingus - Guide the penguins safely home before they drop of the cliff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607211832.k6LIWYFN018986@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pingus - Guide the penguins safely home before they drop of the cliff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199747 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |199630 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 18:32:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 14:32:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199630] Review Request: ClanLib - Cross platform C++ game library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607211832.k6LIWjcj019009@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ClanLib - Cross platform C++ game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199630 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |199747 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 18:35:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 14:35:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199630] Review Request: ClanLib - Cross platform C++ game library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607211835.k6LIZ0nm019336@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ClanLib - Cross platform C++ game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199630 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-21 14:26 EST ------- I just submitted pingus for review which uses this, might be handy for testing, see bug 199747 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 18:35:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 14:35:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199173] Review Request: clusterssh In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607211835.k6LIZLZH019406@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clusterssh https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199173 ------- Additional Comments From duncan_j_ferguson at yahoo.co.uk 2006-07-21 14:26 EST ------- Spec URL: http://queeg.dyndns.org/clusterssh/clusterssh.spec SRPM URL: http://queeg.dyndns.org/clusterssh/clusterssh-3.18.2.10-2.src.rpm Should have reported the correct SRPM path before for the changes.... Any other stoppers before I commit projects changes? Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 18:56:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 14:56:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198288] Review Request: python-pastedeploy - Load, configure, and compose WSGI applications and servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607211856.k6LIu7pu022392@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pastedeploy - Load, configure, and compose WSGI applications and servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198288 ------- Additional Comments From lmacken at redhat.com 2006-07-21 14:47 EST ------- Good call. I fired a quick mail off to fedora-extras-list about this. We'll see what comes up. https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-July/msg00676.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 19:43:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 15:43:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199630] Review Request: ClanLib - Cross platform C++ game library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607211943.k6LJhWKG025989@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ClanLib - Cross platform C++ game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199630 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-21 15:34 EST ------- Okay, I'll add that to my list. I should be up to speed with the new test rig in a couple of hours (only just returned home - dinner time!) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 19:46:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 15:46:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192578] Review Request: metamonitor - A Simple program that watches log files and popup its changes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607211946.k6LJkc5S026330@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: metamonitor - A Simple program that watches log files and popup its changes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192578 ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-07-21 15:37 EST ------- Hi Michael, Searching about the dangling link says that it could (and should) be ignored, it's not a problem, even if rpmlint warns against it. Many KDE apps have this warning with symlinks on their help files, including the base ones. But I removed the BR as suggested. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 19:49:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 15:49:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199747] Review Request: pingus - Guide the penguins safely home before they drop of the cliff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607211949.k6LJn3jg026514@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pingus - Guide the penguins safely home before they drop of the cliff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199747 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-21 15:40 EST ------- Okay, from a very quick glance over... needs BR get-text I'll check it over more closely tonight -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 20:32:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 16:32:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185407] Review Request: pwgen - Automatic password generation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607212032.k6LKWaOg030226@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pwgen - Automatic password generation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185407 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-21 16:23 EST ------- This bug should be assigned to jpo, I believe. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 20:34:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 16:34:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165957] Review Request: esmtp. Relay only MTA. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607212034.k6LKYG8u030308@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esmtp. Relay only MTA. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165957 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-21 16:25 EST ------- Aurelien, you should assign that bug to yourself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 20:37:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 16:37:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197734] Review Request: xmoto - Challenging 2D Motocross Platform Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607212037.k6LKbwsm030532@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmoto - Challenging 2D Motocross Platform Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197734 hugo at devin.com.br changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-07-21 16:29 EST ------- Package imported and built! Closing. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 20:40:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 16:40:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191130] Review Request: kmobiletools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607212040.k6LKeMf5030793@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kmobiletools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191130 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-21 16:31 EST ------- OK then. I am just following the guidelines :-) However, I will APPROVE the submission as is. Please do not forget to close this review once its been imported into CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 20:44:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 16:44:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199747] Review Request: pingus - Guide the penguins safely home before they drop of the cliff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607212044.k6LKiYku031288@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pingus - Guide the penguins safely home before they drop of the cliff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199747 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-21 16:35 EST ------- Darn, I spend hours getting the gettext support to work and still forgot to add the BR. I will add that together with any other nescesarry changes once a full review is done, or if some other changes come up before that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 20:48:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 16:48:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173035] Review Request: chmlib - Library for dealing with ITSS/CHM format files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607212048.k6LKmQUL031658@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chmlib - Library for dealing with ITSS/CHM format files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173035 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-21 16:39 EST ------- John, you should assign that bug to yourself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 20:53:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 16:53:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607212053.k6LKrvge032130@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-07-21 16:44 EST ------- Is there a reason to ship static libraries with this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 20:58:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 16:58:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194278] Review Request: kdeadmin: Administrative tools for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607212058.k6LKw8m4032390@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeadmin: Administrative tools for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194278 ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2006-07-21 16:49 EST ------- Re comment #4: That sounds reasonable. From a practical point of view its not like this RPM isn't well tested. One more todo then consider this approved: - Please add a URL tag even if it is just to the kde.org main site -------------------------------------------- - Meets naming guidelines - Includes GPL license - Spec file is clean - Source matches upstream - Builds in mock against devel on i386 - Uses %findlang - Dir ownership for some of these dir's is a bit strange but matches current conventions. If someone wants to comment on this further go ahead. - %files section is sane - RPMLINT (See below) RPMLINT: W: kdeadmin no-url-tag E: kdeadmin file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config.kcfg/kuser.kcfg W: kdeadmin conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config.kcfg/kuser.kcfg E: kdeadmin file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config/kpackagerc W: kdeadmin conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config/kpackagerc E: kdeadmin file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config/ksysvrc W: kdeadmin conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config/ksysvrc E: kdeadmin file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config/kuserrc W: kdeadmin conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config/kuserrc W: kdeadmin devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/pkgconfig/system-tools-backends.pc W: kdeadmin dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kcron/common ../common W: kdeadmin dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/lilo-config/common ../common W: kdeadmin dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/knetworkconf/common ../common W: kdeadmin dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kpackage/common ../common W: kdeadmin dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kuser/common ../common W: kdeadmin dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kdat/common ../common W: kdeadmin dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/ksysv/common ../common -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 21:00:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 17:00:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199310] Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607212100.k6LL01ax032494@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199310 ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-07-21 16:50 EST ------- Now onto a formal re-review :-) Thanks to the other guys for submitting comments and reviewing it too! MUST OK: * rpmlint gives no warnings * Packaging is named according to Package Naming Guidelines * Spec filename ok and package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 21:02:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 17:02:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199627] Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607212102.k6LL22UM032654@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199627 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-07-21 16:53 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=132846) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=132846&action=view) Patch to fix rpmlint warning on the srpm. Patch fixes the following warning: W: kooldock mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 21:06:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 17:06:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199627] Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607212106.k6LL6c2r000453@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199627 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-07-21 16:57 EST ------- BTW, the package builds cleanly on FC5 and rpmlint gives no errors for the rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 21:12:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 17:12:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199627] Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607212112.k6LLCYAE001011@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199627 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-21 17:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > BTW, the package builds cleanly on FC5 and rpmlint gives no errors for the rpm. Now I know, why I haven't noticed mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs warning... Because I always use it to rpm, never to srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 21:14:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 17:14:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607212114.k6LLEMjm001158@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 ------- Additional Comments From drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx 2006-07-21 17:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20) > Is there a reason to ship static libraries with this package? Other than completeness, no. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 21:19:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 17:19:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199627] Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607212119.k6LLJHKC001698@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199627 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-21 17:10 EST ------- I've sent new inital release of SPEC and SRPM files: Spec URL: http://ecik.zspswidwin.pl/kooldock/kooldock.spec SRPM URL: http://ecik.zspswidwin.pl/kooldock/kooldock-0.3-1.20060720cvs.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 21:23:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 17:23:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199310] Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607212123.k6LLNXPu002127@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199310 hugo at devin.com.br changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |hugo at devin.com.br OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-07-21 17:14 EST ------- (Sorry about the last comment, access keys sometimes are annoying) Now onto a formal re-review :-) Thanks to the other guys for submitting comments and reviewing it too! MUST OK: * rpmlint gives no warnings * Packaging is named according to Package Naming Guidelines * Spec filename ok and package follows Packaging Guidelines * Package is licensed under GPL, license file included * Specfile in English and legible * Tarball in packages matches with upstream's checksum: 25d8907b234c9ebaa91c590c6fcbf9ba sturmbahnfahrer-1.1.tar.gz * Package builds fine * BuildRequires are fine * Package does not contain locale files * Package does not contain shared libraries * Package does not own other packages' directories * All files in %files are listed fine and not duplicated * Permissions on the specfile are fine * Clean section is used in the right way * Macros are used consistently * No need for a -doc sub-package * No need for development package * Package does not contain libtool archives * Package installs desktop file and icon SHOULD OK: * Package builds fine in mock * Package runs fine I see no blockers at all, package approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 21:28:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 17:28:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198330] Review Request: spca5xx-kmod-common In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607212128.k6LLSI7q002616@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spca5xx-kmod-common https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198330 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-07-21 17:19 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=132849) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=132849&action=view) Patch to fix rpmlint warning on the srpm. Attached patch fixes the trivial warning: W: spca5xx-kmod-common mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs There is no rpmlint error or warning on the rpm itself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 21:31:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 17:31:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190367] Review Request: PyKDE: Python bindings for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607212131.k6LLV1VG002801@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyKDE: Python bindings for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190367 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-21 17:22 EST ------- OK, thats what I thought re "cvs". As for the BR. I kinda disagree, as we rely on implied depends everwhere else. However, its not a blocker, so consider it APPROVED. Please remember to close this review once imported into CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 21:52:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 17:52:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607212152.k6LLqLPL004462@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 ------- Additional Comments From drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx 2006-07-21 17:43 EST ------- Spec URL: http://homes.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/pulseaudio/pulseaudio.spec SRPM URL: http://homes.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/pulseaudio/pulseaudio-0.9.3-1.src.rpm Updated with a new version. Also fixed the license and pc issue pointed out. (pc fix also committed upstream) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 21:55:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 17:55:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199780] New: Review Request: dstat Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199780 Summary: Review Request: dstat Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: scott at perturb.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.perturb.org/tmp/dstat-fedora.spec SRPM URL: http://www.perturb.org/tmp/dstat-0.6.3-2.src.rpm Description: Versatile resource statistics tool -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 21:56:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 17:56:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191130] Review Request: kmobiletools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607212156.k6LLuFcP004839@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kmobiletools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191130 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-07-21 17:47 EST ------- thanks for the review, branched and built will go out with next push -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 22:08:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 18:08:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199780] Review Request: dstat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607212208.k6LM8ufY005347@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dstat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199780 toshio at tiki-lounge.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |toshio at tiki-lounge.com ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-07-21 18:00 EST ------- Okay. To start, a few links: [1]_ General Guidelines the package must follow: http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines [2]_ Python Specific Packaging Hints: http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python [3]_ Fedora Extras CVS. Look for examples of how other people do things here: http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/rpms/?root=extras Some python applications you can look through there are qa-assistant, rpmlint, and gramps. The first thing that leaps out at me when I look at the spec is that the python files aren't bytecompiled. In addition to installing, you want to generate the .pyc and .pyo byte compiled files and install them. That way the package will know that it needs to remove the files as well. [1] and [3] should help you get through that. Looking over a spec or two from [3] and comparing to your rpm would be another good thing to do. (And now you can jump back on IRC and ask specific questions and we'll be better able to help ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 22:18:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 18:18:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199780] Review Request: dstat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607212218.k6LMIEnP005628@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dstat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199780 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-07-21 18:09 EST ------- The spec file should be dstat.spec, not dstat-fedora.spec. Also setup needs -q . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 22:46:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 18:46:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199630] Review Request: ClanLib - Cross platform C++ game library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607212246.k6LMkOkP006881@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ClanLib - Cross platform C++ game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199630 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 22:47:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 18:47:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199630] Review Request: ClanLib - Cross platform C++ game library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607212247.k6LMlFc0006950@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ClanLib - Cross platform C++ game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199630 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 22:48:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 18:48:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199632] Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607212248.k6LMmLan007018@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199632 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 22:49:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 18:49:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199780] Review Request: dstat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607212249.k6LMnTMG007100@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dstat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199780 ------- Additional Comments From scott at perturb.org 2006-07-21 18:40 EST ------- Added setup -q and renamed spec file to dstat.spec http://www.perturb.org/tmp/dstat.spec I will look into the python compiling to bytecode etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 22:51:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 18:51:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199732] Review Request: clanbomber - Bomberman-like multiplayer game that uses ClanLib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607212251.k6LMp3vF007228@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clanbomber - Bomberman-like multiplayer game that uses ClanLib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199732 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-21 18:42 EST ------- Can't spot anything obvious on the spec file... I'll download and test with ClanLib06 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 23:11:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 19:11:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199784] New: Review Request: psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL database adapter for Python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199784 Summary: Review Request: psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL database adapter for Python Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: devrim at commandprompt.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/psycopg2/psycopg2.spec SRPM URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/psycopg2/psycopg2-2.0.2-py2.4_1.src.rpm Description: psycopg is a PostgreSQL database adapter for the Python programming language (just like pygresql and popy.) It was written from scratch with the aim of being very small and fast, and stable as a rock. The main advantages of psycopg are that it supports the full Python DBAPI-2.0 and being thread safe at level 2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 23:12:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 19:12:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199784] Review Request: psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL database adapter for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607212312.k6LNCnen008071@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL database adapter for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199784 devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 23:38:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 19:38:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199780] Review Request: dstat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607212338.k6LNccc4008794@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dstat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199780 ------- Additional Comments From scott at perturb.org 2006-07-21 19:29 EST ------- Updated the spec and the src RPM to bytecode compile the python. Spec URL: http://www.perturb.org/tmp/dstat.spec SRPM URL: http://www.perturb.org/tmp/dstat-0.6.3-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 23:39:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 19:39:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199784] Review Request: psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL database adapter for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607212339.k6LNdQtv008870@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL database adapter for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199784 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-21 19:30 EST ------- I'm not experienced in reviewing packages and I'm not official reviewer, but first thing that came to my head is that you don't need to specify python version in release number. Packaging Naming Guidelines doesn't say anything about that. Also, python version will be assigned to package by python dependency. More important thing is wrong name of package. According to Package Naming Guidelines package' name should be python-psycopg2. Take a look on it: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines And the last thing: mock builds fail. It looks like adding dos2unix BuildRequires fixes this problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 23:42:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 19:42:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198878] Review Request: python-mutagen - Python module to handle audio metadata In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607212342.k6LNgEZa009101@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-mutagen - Python module to handle audio metadata https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198878 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: mutagen - |Review Request: python- |Python module to handle |mutagen - Python module to |audio metadata |handle audio metadata OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 177841 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-21 19:33 EST ------- Nice, thanks. Let's see: Package and specfile name fixed. Compiler flags not passed needlessly. rpmlint placated. Absence of %check section reasonably explained. I did run the checks and it seemed to work but I admit to not understanding the output, and in the end there wasn't anything that told me whether or not it actually found any problems. It would still be nice to work with upstream and get it enabled eventually; we want to have automated tests for as many packages as possible. So everything is fixed, and this package is APPROVED. Now you can deal with the CLA if you haven't already done so, and then request your cvsextras account. I'll sponsor you. You can also request fedorabugs access so that you can do your own reviews; I can approve you for that as well. Info for doing that is at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors#GetAFedoraAccount Once that's all done, you can check in your code, request your branches, start your builds and close this ticket. Just email me or catch me on IRC if you have questions. (My nick is "tibbs".) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 23:44:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 19:44:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199192] Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607212344.k6LNif7b009285@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199192 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-21 19:35 EST ------- Removing FE-NEEDSPONSOR as Micha? has been sponsored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 23:44:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 19:44:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199627] Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607212344.k6LNivAh009331@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199627 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-21 19:36 EST ------- Removing FE-NEEDSPONSOR as Micha? has been sponsored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 23:46:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 19:46:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607212346.k6LNkNBg009444@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-07-21 19:37 EST ------- * Should get rid of the static libraries as well. Comment #17: >> E: pulseaudio-utils invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libpulsedsp.so libpulsedsp.so >> but unfortunately I'm not entirely sure how to fix it. > > It's not a "real" lib, so it has no use for versioning. It's the active part of > an LD_PRELOAD hack to provide OSS emulation. As such, the error is incorrect > and the lib is just fine. libesddsp and libartsdsp are versioned:: $ objdump -p /usr/lib64/libartsdsp.so /usr/lib64/libesddsp.so.0|grep SONAME SONAME libartsdsp.so.0 SONAME libesddsp.so.0 I don't know how these libraries do their tricks, but is there any improbable case when you might want to have it versioned? The kernel upgrades what it expects to receive on /dev/dsp and you want to provide both the older interface and newer interface to programs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 23:53:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 19:53:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607212353.k6LNrHNK009978@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-07-21 19:44 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=132852) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=132852&action=view) patch spec to remove static libs and fix rpath breakage Here's a spec patch for two of the issues. It removes static libraries and fixes rpath. Note that some of the files in the modules directory, %{_libdir}/pulse-0.9/modules, need to have an rpath to that directory because they have dependencies on other shared objects in there. Before, they had a second rpath set on /usr/lib64 which was wrong. Also, some of the modules do not have dependencies on anything within that directory. Therefore, they should have no rpath set. This patch should make all of that happy (and rpmlint should no longer complain about rpaths.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 23:56:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 19:56:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607212356.k6LNuTkN010227@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 ------- Additional Comments From drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx 2006-07-21 19:47 EST ------- Why kill of the static libs? Although dynamic linking is preferred, I see no point in preventing those that want to do a static link. The versioning in lib*dsp is completely useless and can only be motivated by defeating warnings like those in rpmlint. The .so shouldn't be seen as a lib, more like a program. The reason it is a lib is because that's the way LD_PRELOAD works, not because you want the properties a shared library gives you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 00:02:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 20:02:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199630] Review Request: ClanLib - Cross platform C++ game library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607220002.k6M02CjP010525@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ClanLib - Cross platform C++ game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199630 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-21 19:53 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=132854) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=132854&action=view) clanlib warnings from the installed package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 00:03:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 20:03:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199780] Review Request: dstat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607220003.k6M039Xl010631@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dstat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199780 toshio at tiki-lounge.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |toshio at tiki-lounge.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778, 177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 00:03:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 20:03:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199630] Review Request: ClanLib - Cross platform C++ game library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607220003.k6M03UUG010677@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ClanLib - Cross platform C++ game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199630 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-21 19:54 EST ------- good : rpmlint comes up clean (other than #3) spec file seems okay bad : see #10 attachment -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 00:06:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 20:06:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198882] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-IRC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607220006.k6M06fQU010789@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-IRC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198882 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-21 19:57 EST ------- It's a nice idea, but doesn't seem to play nice with "make noarch" in the sandbox. Actually, it looks like the only way to get an additional flag in to rpm with the CVS makefile framework is to define it in one's ~/.rpmmacros. I'd be happy to be shown wrong on this one :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 00:12:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 20:12:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178901] Review Request: gtksourceview-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607220012.k6M0CTR3010997@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtksourceview-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178901 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|caillon at redhat.com |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-07-21 20:03 EST ------- OK as per comment 31. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 00:15:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 20:15:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199784] Review Request: psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL database adapter for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607220015.k6M0FgT5011179@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL database adapter for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199784 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-07-21 20:06 EST ------- Hi, First of all: Thanks for the comments: (In reply to comment #1) > I'm not experienced in reviewing packages and I'm not official reviewer, but > first thing that came to my head is that you don't need to specify python > version in release number. Packaging Naming Guidelines doesn't say anything > about that. Also, python version will be assigned to package by python > dependency. Hmm. Ok. I removed the relevant part. > More important thing is wrong name of package. According to Package Naming > Guidelines package' name should be python-psycopg2. Take a look on it: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines Great. That was a last-minute change I've applied before submitting. I reverted it. > And the last thing: mock builds fail. It looks like adding dos2unix > BuildRequires fixes this problem. Good catch. dos2unix was again a last-minute add to the spec. I've committed this change, too. I'll write URLS for the new SRPM and spec file link as a new comment. Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 00:17:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 20:17:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199784] Review Request: psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL database adapter for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607220017.k6M0H0t1011242@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL database adapter for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199784 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-07-21 20:08 EST ------- New spec per comment above: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/psycopg2/python-psycopg2.spec and new SRPM is: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/psycopg2/python-psycopg2-2.0.2-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 00:17:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 20:17:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607220017.k6M0HdpT011277@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-07-21 20:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #25) > Why kill of the static libs? Although dynamic linking is preferred, I see no > point in preventing those that want to do a static link. Policy.... http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-2302ec1e1f44202c9cc4bcce24cb711266557ad7 I don't know the full reasoning behind the policy (it would be nice if the guidelines came with a raionale document), but the obvious reason is easy enough to guess. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 00:26:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 20:26:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607220026.k6M0Qroo011476@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-07-21 20:17 EST ------- Static libs are security hole. If I link my program against the static versions of a library and a vulnerability is later fixed in the library I will still be carrying around vulnerable code until I recompile against the newer version. With dynamic libs, only the library packager needs to be on the ball about finding security holes and making updates. The consumers of the library get the hole closed after they update the library. Versioning: Bear with me. I'm trying to imagine if there's any reason that versioning could be useful so we know we're not introducing broken behaviour. Since arts and esd both do it they either have thought of some corner case where it's useful or they're both broken. The latter is very likely (they're broken in many other ways) but we want to make sure we actually are smarter than our predecessors rather than falling into a problem that they avoided. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 00:28:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 20:28:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607220028.k6M0SU74011530@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2006-07-21 20:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #24) > Created an attachment (id=132852) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=132852&action=view) [edit] > patch spec to remove static libs and fix rpath breakage > > Here's a spec patch for two of the issues. It removes static libraries and > fixes rpath. Note that some of the files in the modules directory, > %{_libdir}/pulse-0.9/modules, need to have an rpath to that directory because > they have dependencies on other shared objects in there. Before, they had a > second rpath set on /usr/lib64 which was wrong. Also, some of the modules do > not have dependencies on anything within that directory. Therefore, they > should have no rpath set. This patch should make all of that happy (and > rpmlint should no longer complain about rpaths.) The patch succesfully fixes the compile issue I pointed out earlier, thank you very much. Any hope of getting gst-pulse packaged as well so pulseaudio will be more useful on a default FC desktop? (http://0pointer.de/lennart/projects/gst-pulse/) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 01:47:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 21:47:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189092] Review Request: boo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607220147.k6M1lRRU014337@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189092 ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2006-07-21 21:38 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=132855) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=132855&action=view) patch to add BuildRequires: boo The following patch adds nant to BuildRequires, thus fixing the compile on my machine - is this ready to go in Extras? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 01:58:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 21:58:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178904] Review Request: Monodevelop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607220158.k6M1wqFS014864@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178904 ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2006-07-21 21:49 EST ------- When compiling -11 I get the following output when installing the resulting rpm on my x86_64 machine: /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.82507: line 1: 1: command not found which: no 2 in (/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin) and when running monodevelop in a terminal the output is: /usr/bin/monodevelop: line 51: cd: /usr/lib/monodevelop/bin: No such file or directory cannot open assembly ./MonoDevelop.exe -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 02:11:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 22:11:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189092] Review Request: boo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607220211.k6M2BP0T015113@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189092 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-07-21 22:02 EST ------- Redefining libdir is a no-no. You could do like alexl did in the mono package and define a monodir that = %{prefix}/lib if you want until mono-core moves. (And then change monodir to _libdir) I don't see a gacutils invocation. Is nant handling that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 02:29:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 22:29:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199647] Review Request: perl-File-RsyncP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607220229.k6M2TIfj015326@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-RsyncP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199647 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-21 22:20 EST ------- It seems that this package refuses to build on my system unless I remove the _smp_mflags bit from the make line. It's a 8-way box so it often shows up problems with poor makefiles. After fixing that bit everything builds fine. rpmlint has a minor complaint about the spec: W: perl-File-RsyncP mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs The Name:, URL: and Requires: fields have mixed spaces and tabs. A really minor complaint, I know. So the required changes are simple: a couple of whitespace cleanups and the removal of _smp_mflags. (Do add a comment as to why it's missing, though.) I'll go ahead and approve and you can fix these when you check in. * source files match upstream: 16dcbd537d20c7435e1affd09d65a5ce File-RsyncP-0.62.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * Compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). X rpmlint is silent (tabs-n-spaces issue) * debuginfo package looks complete. * final provides and requires are sane: Digest.so()(64bit) FileList.so()(64bit) perl(File::RsyncP) = 0.62 perl(File::RsyncP::Digest) = 0.62 perl(File::RsyncP::FileIO) = 0.62 perl(File::RsyncP::FileList) = 0.62 perl-File-RsyncP = 0.62-1.fc6 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(AutoLoader) perl(Config) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(DynaLoader) perl(Encode) perl(Exporter) perl(Fcntl) perl(File::Find) perl(File::Path) perl(File::RsyncP::Digest) perl(File::RsyncP::FileIO) perl(File::RsyncP::FileList) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(Socket) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(vars) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=1, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.06 cusr + 0.01 csys = 0.07 CPU) All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=20, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.03 cusr + 0.01 csys = 0.04 CPU) All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=24, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.04 cusr + 0.01 csys = 0.05 CPU) * shared libraries are present, but internal to Perl. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED, assuming you fix _smp_mflags and the whitespace issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 02:50:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 22:50:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198882] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-IRC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607220250.k6M2ohtW016248@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-IRC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198882 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-21 22:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > It's a nice idea, but doesn't seem to play nice with "make noarch" in the > sandbox. What doesn't work? This approach is being used by probably 100's of packages in FE and does work. > Actually, it looks like the only way to get an additional flag in to rpm with > the CVS makefile framework is to define it in one's ~/.rpmmacros. Are you trying set such per-package flags globally in ~/.rpmmacros? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 03:00:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 23:00:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198882] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-IRC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607220300.k6M30iP0016667@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-IRC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198882 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-21 22:51 EST ------- I think the point is that you can't specify --with arguments when doing testing from within a normal CVS checkout with "make build" or "make mockbuild". Which indeed seems to be correct, but not really something that troubles me. It should be possible to add a bit to the Makefile to have "make build" pass the flags to rpm; doing it in mock seems to be right out. Chris's solution allows you to edit your .rpmmacros to set the flags and still use "make build". Seems reasonably unsavory to me as well, especially since it broke my build. I'd be surprised if it makes it through the buildsystem. I realize I wasn't very clear at all when I reviewed the package; my intention was to ensure that you removed that bit or came up with an alternate that would actually work in mock before you checked it in. As it is, I don't think the package will make it through the buildsys. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 03:04:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 23:04:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198882] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-IRC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607220304.k6M34McP016735@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-IRC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198882 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-21 22:55 EST ------- Of course I meant "make noarch" or "make x86_64" or somesuch instead of "make build". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 03:33:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 23:33:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198882] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-IRC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607220333.k6M3X519017170@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-IRC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198882 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-21 23:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > I think the point is that you can't specify --with arguments when doing testing > from within a normal CVS checkout with "make build" or "make mockbuild". Which > indeed seems to be correct, but not really something that troubles me. It > should be possible to add a bit to the Makefile to have "make build" pass the > flags to rpm; doing it in mock seems to be right out. Yah. The intention was never to pass it into mock (or the buildsys for that matter), but just to make it easy on one's own box, without monkeying with the toolset. Also, setting it in ~/.rpmmacros didn't seem to be too bad a compromise to me, as there are a number of other packages that I maintain that could benefit from the same "conditional testing" -- and I'll almost always want to run those tests for local builds. > Chris's solution allows you to edit your .rpmmacros to set the flags and still > use "make build". Seems reasonably unsavory to me as well, especially since it > broke my build. I'd be surprised if it makes it through the buildsystem. I > realize I wasn't very clear at all when I reviewed the package; my intention was > to ensure that you removed that bit or came up with an alternate that would > actually work in mock before you checked it in. As it is, I don't think the > package will make it through the buildsys. Just to be clear, it was never going to be submitted to the buildsys as is. (Much as none have ever been submitted with a release of "0".) And, as it stands, a happy marriage of the two works... Leave __with_network_tests defined in ~/.rpmmacros or at the command line (or undefined, for that matter), and change the conditional test to: %check %{?__with_network_tests: make test} This allows the build to succeed, with or without __with_network_tests defined (the original intent, as it were). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 03:40:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 23:40:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198882] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-IRC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607220340.k6M3e3Kx017565@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-IRC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198882 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-21 23:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > And, as it stands, a happy marriage of the two works... Leave > __with_network_tests defined in ~/.rpmmacros or at the command line (or > undefined, for that matter), and change the conditional test to: > > %check > %{?__with_network_tests: make test} > > This allows the build to succeed, with or without __with_network_tests defined > (the original intent, as it were). I guess I need to be more direct: - Your approach renders building non-deterministic. - Your approach trashes ~/.rpmmacros, which can affect subsequent builts. - Your approach is an ugly hack. IMO, you are out-smarting yourself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 03:45:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 23:45:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198882] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-IRC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607220345.k6M3jogn017957@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-IRC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198882 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-21 23:36 EST ------- Now I'm really confused. He's currently using exactly what you told him to use (modulo one underscore, which is probably a typo) and you're still complaining. So what are you proposing that he use now? Surely you don't pretend to tell him what he's allowed to put in his personal .rpmmacros file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 04:17:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 00:17:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199630] Review Request: ClanLib - Cross platform C++ game library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607220417.k6M4Hlee018817@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ClanLib - Cross platform C++ game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199630 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-22 00:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > bad : see #10 attachment > Yes, some of the clanlib sublibraries depend on other clanlib sublibraries, but they are not explicity linked against each other, this gets sorted out by the package config files, which cause the application to also be linked against the nescesarry dependencies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 04:18:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 00:18:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199647] Review Request: perl-File-RsyncP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607220418.k6M4It01018833@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-RsyncP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199647 imlinux at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2006-07-22 00:10 EST ------- Fixed the above and is imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 04:19:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 00:19:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199573] Review Request: BackupPC - high-performance backup system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607220419.k6M4J60E018846@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: BackupPC - high-performance backup system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199573 Bug 199573 depends on bug 199647, which changed state. Bug 199647 Summary: Review Request: perl-File-RsyncP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199647 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 04:34:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 00:34:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199573] Review Request: BackupPC - high-performance backup system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607220434.k6M4YRd6019163@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: BackupPC - high-performance backup system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199573 ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2006-07-22 00:25 EST ------- SPEC: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/BackupPC/BackupPC.spec SRPM: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/BackupPC/BackupPC-2.1.2-1.src.rpm * Fri Jul 21 2006 Mike McGrath 2.1.2-2 - Added requires: perl(File::RsyncP) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 04:53:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 00:53:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198882] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-IRC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607220453.k6M4rbHY020224@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-IRC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198882 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-22 00:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > Now I'm really confused. He's currently using exactly what you told him to use Does he? It's not how I read https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198882#11 > (modulo one underscore, which is probably a typo) and you're still complaining. The "__" is what makes the difference. _with_xxx defines are automatically/implicitly set by --with xxx __with_xxx is a custom define. > So what are you proposing that he use now? MUST: _with_xxx This implies supporting --with and renders all the custom "--define '__with_xxx 1' superflous. May-be the problem is understanding the meaning of --with/--without. Basically all --with/--without does, is to implicitly %define _with_xxx 1 rsp. %define _without_xxx 1 i.e. the "_with" (one underscore) vs. "__with" (two underscores) is the essential point here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 05:01:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 01:01:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199310] Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607220501.k6M51IOp020460@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199310 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-22 00:52 EST ------- Thanks! Imported and build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 05:07:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 01:07:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199021] Review Request: zynaddsubfx - Real-time software synthesizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607220507.k6M57Hqo020590@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zynaddsubfx - Real-time software synthesizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199021 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-22 00:58 EST ------- Cool, looks good now and builds fine; rpmlint is silent. I note that you don't use a dist tag. It's not an absolute requirement but it does simplify your maintenance overhead a bit because it allows you to use the same spec for multiple distro releases. I just want to make sure you intended to leave it out. The %description leaves a bit to be desired in the grammar department, which is understandable given that the author is not a native speaker. Plus "that you'll boost to an amazing universe of sounds" does put a smile on my face. I'm not really sure what to suggest; how about just: ZynAddSubFX is an open source software synthesizer capable of making a countless number of instrument sounds. or somesuch. I'm not sure that anything you depend on owns /usr/share/icons or the directories under it. (At least in FC5.) Your scriptlets are slightly different from those in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ScriptletSnippets: You don't call touch with --no-create; you don't use "||:" on the touch line, and you use /usr/bin instead of %{_bindir}. I'm not sure what difference the first two make in practise. The latter is a stylistic issue; the macro is generally preferred over hardcoded paths, but the suggested scriptlets are not consistent in this. Review: * source files match upstream: fca8560e37d799bd20d17e22b11674d6 ZynAddSubFX-2.2.1.tar.bz2 * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. X dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * Compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: zynaddsubfx = 2.2.1-6 = /bin/sh desktop-file-utils fltk >= 1.1.3 jack-audio-connection-kit >= 0.101.1 libX11.so.6()(64bit) libXext.so.6()(64bit) libXft.so.2()(64bit) libXrender.so.1()(64bit) libasound.so.2()(64bit) libasound.so.2(ALSA_0.9)(64bit) libfftw3.so.3()(64bit) libfltk.so.1.1()(64bit) libfontconfig.so.1()(64bit) libfreetype.so.6()(64bit) libjack.so.0()(64bit) liblash.so.2()(64bit) libmxml.so.1()(64bit) libuuid.so.1()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) mxml >= 2.2 * %check is not present; no test suite upstream * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. X owns the directories it creates. (/usr/share/icons) * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. ? scriptlets present; differ from the suggested ones. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * GUI app; desktop file installed properly. No MIME types defined, so no need to update the desktop database. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 05:25:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 01:25:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198882] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-IRC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607220525.k6M5Po60020923@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-IRC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198882 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-22 01:16 EST ------- Then why on earth didn't you just say that? Comment 12 says nothing about underscores. You said "IMO, you are out-smarting yourself" when you could have simply said "I think you have an extra underscore in your macro definition". It's not at all obvious, given that: 1) It's often not easy to see the separation between successive underscores with certain fonts. Vera, at least, doesn't seem to show any space between them. 2) You hadn't responded to the request for a reference to any documentation (comment 6), so some of us were still in the dark until your helpful explanation in comment 14. It's unfortunate that this feature seems to be undocumented, expecially since you want to make it mandatory according to your recent addition to the packaging committee schedule. Hopefully you will consider adding your explanation to a wiki page somewhere. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 05:46:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 01:46:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199797] New: Review Request: auriferous - Game inspired by the classic Loderunner Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199797 Summary: Review Request: auriferous - Game inspired by the classic Loderunner Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/auriferous.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/auriferous-1.0.1-1.src.rpm Description: An arcade style like game. The goal is to fight out all gold from the caves and go into in the door. Sounds simple, but try it. :) The challenge: Because some bad blue Monks want prevent you from that, they bite of your head if the catch you. good luck :) Further the caves(levels) are often like mazes with dangers and traps, to pass them you need a lot of skill. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 05:51:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 01:51:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199797] Review Request: auriferous - Game inspired by the classic Loderunner In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607220551.k6M5pouQ021936@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: auriferous - Game inspired by the classic Loderunner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199797 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |199632 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-22 01:42 EST ------- Note this packages needs ClanLib06, review bug 199632 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 05:52:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 01:52:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199632] Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607220552.k6M5q1ZP021956@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199632 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |199797 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 09:15:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 05:15:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607220915.k6M9F9h9032047@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2006-07-22 05:06 EST ------- I am not sure whether reviewing functionality is a good thing to look at during package reviews. Anyway in FC5, the more applications menu doesnt show up. Help, Control center and install packages menu entries are not working either. Network status should probably call the configuration tool when clicked. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 11:06:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 07:06:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199784] Review Request: psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL database adapter for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607221106.k6MB6ZPb004309@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL database adapter for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199784 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-22 06:57 EST ------- You changed name of package, but you forgot to change name in subpackage doc. It is nice to use macros in it: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} Next thing of the doc subpackage is its group. According to Packaging Guidelines the Group name of doc subpackage should be Documentation, not Applications/Databases. >From the main package you can delete python dependency, because rpm automatically adds it (I forgot about it, yesterday). The last thing is about doc subpackage again. I think it should be noarch, but then package won't compile well. Maybe, someone more experienced in reviewing would give you a good advice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 12:23:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 08:23:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199484] Review Request: notify-python - python bindings for libnotify In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607221223.k6MCN8jU006151@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: notify-python - python bindings for libnotify https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199484 sundaram at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE CC| |sundaram at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2006-07-22 08:13 EST ------- Package showed up in rawhide today. Closing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 12:25:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 08:25:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196748] Review Request: setroubleshoot - automatic diagnosis of SELinux problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607221225.k6MCPsmN006255@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setroubleshoot - automatic diagnosis of SELinux problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196748 sundaram at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE CC| |sundaram at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2006-07-22 08:16 EST ------- Package is in rawhide now. closing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 12:57:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 08:57:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199784] Review Request: psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL database adapter for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607221257.k6MCvTt8008078@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL database adapter for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199784 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-07-22 08:48 EST ------- Hi, (In reply to comment #4) > You changed name of package, but you forgot to change name in subpackage doc. > It is nice to use macros in it: > Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} Thanks for the prompt. I've applied the change. > Next thing of the doc subpackage is its group. According to Packaging > Guidelines the Group name of doc subpackage should be Documentation, not > Applications/Databases. Thanks, change applied. > From the main package you can delete python dependency, because rpm > automatically adds it (I forgot about it, yesterday). Yeah, that's what I noticed yesterday after reading Python Guideline. Thanks again, I've deleted it. > The last thing is about doc subpackage again. I think it should be > noarch, but then package won't compile well. Maybe, someone more experienced > in reviewing would give you a good advice. Per recent discussing in the list, I'm ignoring this. Regards,Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 13:01:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 09:01:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199784] Review Request: psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL database adapter for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607221301.k6MD1o9F008219@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL database adapter for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199784 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-07-22 08:52 EST ------- The URL of spec did not change: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/psycopg2/python-psycopg2.spec ... and the new URL for the new SRPM: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/psycopg2/python-psycopg2-2.0.2-3.src.rpm Thanks. Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 13:47:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 09:47:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199784] Review Request: psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL database adapter for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607221347.k6MDlQrF009637@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL database adapter for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199784 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-22 09:38 EST ------- One more thing: using of dos2unix is unnecessarily. Better use sed, it don't make new dependencies. Take a look on last section of it: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/CommonRpmlintIssues When you fix it, I think your package will be ready. But it's your first package, so you need a sponsor. Review another packages according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines and try to make another packages, so you'll bring sponsors attention. Good luck! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 13:58:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 09:58:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175047] Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607221358.k6MDwcU4010221@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175047 byte at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |byte at fedoraproject.org ------- Additional Comments From byte at fedoraproject.org 2006-07-22 09:49 EST ------- Is there any way this can be expedited (its been in the queue for over 6 months), so someone should sponsor his upload, even if we don't give him Extras CVS access. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 14:54:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 10:54:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175047] Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607221454.k6MEs7KG012266@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175047 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-22 10:45 EST ------- There's no way to sponsor an upload. Either he maintains the package and has the access necessary to do so or not. We're trying to work out a better solution to this problem, but the issue is difficult as long as commit access to one package gives access to all of the others. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 15:08:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 11:08:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199784] Review Request: psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL database adapter for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607221508.k6MF8uCg012660@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL database adapter for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199784 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-07-22 11:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > One more thing: using of dos2unix is unnecessarily. Better use sed, it don't > make new dependencies. Take a look on last section of it: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/CommonRpmlintIssues That was good to learn. I need the same thing for pgadmin3 community rpm... Thanks, applied. I did not change the URL for the spec and the SRPM; just re-uploaded them. > Good luck! Thanks. Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 15:19:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 11:19:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199784] Review Request: psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL database adapter for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607221519.k6MFJLdb012908@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL database adapter for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199784 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-22 11:10 EST ------- I forgot about one another thing. You should add %{?dist} tag to Release number. It should look like: Release: 3%{?dist} For more information go here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 15:50:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 11:50:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199679] Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607221550.k6MFoPVX014066@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199679 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-22 11:41 EST ------- I have done quick review and I noticed a few things you have to do: * add %{?dist} tag to release number. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ DistTag * Source0 have to be URL, actually it is unable to check if archive in src.rpm and archive on .net checksums is matching. For more information read: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines#head- 2f03bba0a9f05b2ac0128eb1d70b1e3ce9f9dc40 * you should use %configure macro instead of hardcoding it * Packaging Guidelines suggest to use make %{?_smp_flags} instead of 'make' alone * in %install section you forgot to write $RPM_BUILD_ROOT before %{_mandir} * man file has wrong permissions (0744), you have to change it to 644 typing: %attr(0644, root, root) %{_mandir}/man8/* in %section -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 15:51:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 11:51:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199679] Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607221551.k6MFpUWx014132@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199679 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-22 11:42 EST ------- Obviously, not in %section, but in %files section ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 16:45:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 12:45:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199573] Review Request: BackupPC - high-performance backup system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607221645.k6MGjqcl015838@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: BackupPC - high-performance backup system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199573 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |dennis at ausil.us OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-07-22 12:36 EST ------- ok couple of quick things builds ok in mock looking through build log we probably want to default the backup server to localhost not the builders name in the config, and i think we should change in the config the default backup type from smb to rsync -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 19:14:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 15:14:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185359] Review Request: kchm - CHM file viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607221914.k6MJEoa0022599@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kchm - CHM file viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185359 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-07-22 15:05 EST ------- I agree that with duplicate functionality already in Extras we can hold of on this. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 19:31:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 15:31:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192420] Review Request: Bonfire - CD/DVD burning app for gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607221931.k6MJVsOu022992@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Bonfire - CD/DVD burning app for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192420 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-07-22 15:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > John: that's because you must be using nautilus-cd-burner 2.15 which breaks > backward compatibility. It should work fine with ncb-2.14 which is supported by > fedora stable. Which brings me to the question: > What should be the version of nautilus-cd-burner that bonfire should support > 2.14 or 2.15? I'd like to build against development, because that's where Fedora's headed. So 2.15. Backward compatability would be nice too, however. I filed a bug at SourceForge. http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1527046&group_id=156415&atid=799692 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 19:56:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 15:56:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192578] Review Request: metamonitor - A Simple program that watches log files and popup its changes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607221956.k6MJukCV024025@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: metamonitor - A Simple program that watches log files and popup its changes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192578 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-22 15:47 EST ------- OK, none of those are blockers, so cosider this APPROVED. Please remember to close this review once the package has been imported into CVS and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 20:00:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 16:00:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191389] Review Request: oooqs2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607222000.k6MK08iq024176@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: oooqs2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191389 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-22 15:51 EST ------- As commented in the kmobiletools review, you will not need to add the gtk cruff to your spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 20:09:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 16:09:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199784] Review Request: psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL database adapter for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607222009.k6MK93bp024355@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL database adapter for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199784 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-07-22 16:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > You should add %{?dist} tag to Release number. It should look like: > Release: 3%{?dist} Thanks, done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 21:32:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 17:32:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192578] Review Request: metamonitor - A Simple program that watches log files and popup its changes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607222132.k6MLWoDH026985@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: metamonitor - A Simple program that watches log files and popup its changes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192578 hugo at devin.com.br changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-07-22 17:23 EST ------- Imported and built! Closing. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 22:09:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 18:09:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196945] Review Request: python-smbpasswd - Python SMB Password Hash Generator Module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607222209.k6MM9miI028282@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-smbpasswd - Python SMB Password Hash Generator Module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196945 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-22 18:00 EST ------- I hope you're still interested in this package. It looks fine, only thing you have to do is remove python-api dependecy, because rpm do it automatically. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 22:39:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 18:39:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607222239.k6MMdtGx028941@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2006-07-22 18:30 EST ------- Here is my comments (aka review) on the spec file: Minor: * BRs: gcc-c++ and sbin/ldconfig should not be needed * Group: I think System/Libraries would be more appropriate * Install: I digged into the cmake build and found that you can simplify the install part adding: -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=%{buildroot} \ -DVTK_INSTALL_ROOT=%{_prefix} \ This will install stuff in the proper places w/o need for moving stuff around manually. * make %{?_smp_mflags} works for me w/o a hitch. I think it should be there Major: * non standard buildroot: I believe you asked for a revision on this rule. Anyway, I saw many other packages were forced to stick to current guidelines, so I think you have to fix that until the rule changes. * Duplicate libs: there are a number of libraries included in the package which we can replaced with system ones. This is done with the flags: -DVTK_USE_SYSTEM_EXPAT=ON \ -DVTK_USE_SYSTEM_FREETYPE=ON \ -DVTK_USE_SYSTEM_JPEG=ON \ -DVTK_USE_SYSTEM_PNG=ON \ -DVTK_USE_SYSTEM_TIFF=ON \ -DVTK_USE_SYSTEM_ZLIB=ON \ Of course this also adds up for more BRs... * There is a qt widget and designer plugin available. This is useful for building qt applications with vtk windows/widgets. To activate it, I added: -DVTK_USE_QVTK=ON \ -DVTK_INSTALL_QT_DIR=%{qt_plugins_prefix} \ where %{qt_plugins_prefix} is: %define qt_plugins_prefix %(qmake -query QT_INSTALL_PREFIX)/plugins/designer Moreover, I would appreciate some help understanding the purpose of some snippets which I am sure you (and many others) understand at first sight, but I don't. For example I think a comment before: grep -rl '\.\./\.\./\.\./\.\./VTKData' . | xargs perl -pi -e's,\.\./\.\./\.\./\.\./VTKData,%{_datadir}/vtkdata-%{version},g' would help a lot... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 22:43:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 18:43:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607222243.k6MMh7vH029167@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2006-07-22 18:34 EST ------- another quick Q. What's the purpose of the second "cmake ." at line 98 in the build section? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 00:11:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 20:11:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190040] Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607230011.k6N0BWEJ031769@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190040 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-07-22 20:02 EST ------- Updated bits... Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/hydrogen.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/hydrogen-0.9.3-6.src.rpm This just adds a patch for a crasher that I will submit upstream now as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 02:50:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 22:50:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199833] New: Review Request: vips - image processing library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199833 Summary: Review Request: vips - image processing library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: adam at spicenitz.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.spicenitz.org/fedora/vips.spec SRPM URL: http://www.spicenitz.org/fedora/vips-7.10.20-1.src.rpm Description: VIPS is an image processing library. It is good for very large images (even larger than the amount of RAM in your machine), and for working with color. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 02:55:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 22:55:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199834] New: Review Request: nip2 - interactive image processing system Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199834 Summary: Review Request: nip2 - interactive image processing system Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: adam at spicenitz.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.spicenitz.org/fedora/nip2.spec SRPM URL: http://www.spicenitz.org/fedora/nip2-7.10.20-1.src.rpm Description: nip2 is a graphical front end to the VIPS package. With nip2, rather than directly editing images, you build relationships between objects in a spreadsheet-like fashion. When you make a change somewhere, nip2 recalculates the objects affected by that change. Since it is demand-driven this update is very fast, even for very, very large images. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 02:56:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 22:56:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199834] Review Request: nip2 - interactive image processing system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607230256.k6N2usUv004059@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nip2 - interactive image processing system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199834 adam at spicenitz.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |199833 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 02:57:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 22:57:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199833] Review Request: vips - image processing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607230257.k6N2v4nd004077@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vips - image processing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199833 adam at spicenitz.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |199834 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 03:50:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 23:50:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189315] Review Request: ardour In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607230350.k6N3opqd005678@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ardour https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189315 seg at haxxed.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |seg at haxxed.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 04:28:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 00:28:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195412] Review Request: obconf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607230428.k6N4SSCF006441@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: obconf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195412 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE OtherBugsDependingO|163779 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2006-07-23 00:19 EST ------- Built successfully for FC-4 and FC-5 branches too. Thanks for your time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 07:40:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 03:40:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199632] Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607230740.k6N7eXeE012709@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199632 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-23 03:31 EST ------- I can't get this application to compile. When it runs through the configure script, it reports that it needs Hermes-1.3.0 or newer. You'll need to find and submit Hermes-1.3.0 (or newer) and add that (and tolua++-devel) to the BRs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 08:09:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 04:09:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199632] Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607230809.k6N89kHu015041@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199632 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-23 04:00 EST ------- ??? I could have sworn I added Hermes to the BuildRequires. But appearantly I forgot that one I'll add it (and tolua++) together with other needed fixes once a full review has been done. To get it for the review just do "yum install Hermes-devel", its already in Fe with a capatial H -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 08:50:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 04:50:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198878] Review Request: python-mutagen - Python module to handle audio metadata In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607230850.k6N8oseF002433@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-mutagen - Python module to handle audio metadata https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198878 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-23 04:41 EST ------- Package built successfully, so I can close this ticket -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 09:17:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 05:17:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199611] Review Request: monsterz - Puzzle game, similar to Bejeweled or Zookeeper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607230917.k6N9H6EH003539@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monsterz - Puzzle game, similar to Bejeweled or Zookeeper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199611 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |mr.ecik at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-23 05:08 EST ------- I'll review this package, but before doing it you have to do some small fixes in your SPEC file. * change License field from Freeware to WTFPL * you should include monsterz.score and monster.desktop as another sources, do not create it in SPEC file * please read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Games#head- 177dfd094f552a49a7b33ae4c65894ffac8f7853, according to it, you should change game directory from %{_datadir}/games/%{name} to %{_datadir}/%{name} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 09:55:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 05:55:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189400] Review Request: em8300(-kmod) - Hollywood+/DXR3 hardware MPEG decoder drivers and tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607230955.k6N9t861005175@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: em8300(-kmod) - Hollywood+/DXR3 hardware MPEG decoder drivers and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189400 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-07-23 05:46 EST ------- Was approved in the last FESCO meeting, and has been now imported and built for FC-5. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 10:03:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 06:03:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189400] Review Request: em8300(-kmod) - Hollywood+/DXR3 hardware MPEG decoder drivers and tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607231003.k6NA3sUp005592@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: em8300(-kmod) - Hollywood+/DXR3 hardware MPEG decoder drivers and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189400 dwmw2 at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |davej at redhat.com, | |dwmw2 at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2 at redhat.com 2006-07-23 05:54 EST ------- If the kernel module has a suitable licence for FC5, then it presumably has a suitable licence for being included directly in the kernel. Thus, the correct approach would be to get the support into the upstream kernel and therefore into our base kernel package, rather than having a separate kmod package for it. I strongly believe we should veto _all_ kmod packages in Core and Extras. The only reason for kernel support not being upstream is because it's not acceptable there.... which means it probably shouldn't be acceptable to us either. And if it _is_ acceptable to us but isn't upstream for some reason, then we can consider adding it to the kernel package properly. In certain exceptional cases. You should file a separate bug (with patch) for that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 10:14:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 06:14:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199679] Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607231014.k6NAEjeC005937@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199679 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-07-23 06:05 EST ------- I'll comment on this after we release pgpool 3.1.1 RSN. Regards. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 10:36:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 06:36:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199630] Review Request: ClanLib - Cross platform C++ game library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607231036.k6NAarMJ006803@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ClanLib - Cross platform C++ game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199630 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-23 06:27 EST ------- Fair enough. The package builds happily in mock on x86_64 and i386. rpmlint throws nothing of any real concern pingus (at least) links and runs happily against it I'm happy for this to be released into the wild. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 10:42:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 06:42:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199747] Review Request: pingus - Guide the penguins safely home before they drop of the cliff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607231042.k6NAgR7c007275@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pingus - Guide the penguins safely home before they drop of the cliff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199747 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-23 06:33 EST ------- Once I add the BR for get-text, everything is happy under mock and rpmlint comes up clean. The icon installs correctly under games. One concern is that the website only has version 0.6.0 as the stable release and not 0.7.0 as available here. I couldn't find it in the development area either. If you can make the BR and version number changes, this is good to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 10:49:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 06:49:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199747] Review Request: pingus - Guide the penguins safely home before they drop of the cliff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607231049.k6NAn1wF007718@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pingus - Guide the penguins safely home before they drop of the cliff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199747 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-23 06:40 EST ------- If you look at the first screen when you start pingus it will welcome you to pingus 0.7.0 . As you can see in the spec this is a svn snapshot, which is also reflected in the release: 0.1.20060721 . The current svn trunk is destined to become 0.7.0 some day (hopefully soon), so calling it 0.6.x is wrong, since it is not 0.6.x. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 10:56:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 06:56:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199632] Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607231056.k6NAuosw008272@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199632 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-23 06:47 EST ------- It'll now build and rpmlint is happy with all of the packages created. I've made the alterations to the spec file so both tolua++-devel and Hermes-devel are in the BRs and will get back to you on how it works under mock. Can you also make the BR alteration changes and upload the new spec file? One other thing. You have provides: clanlib06 = {version}-{release}. That's okay, but why is it clanlib06 and not ClanLib06 as the spec file and other references inside the spec file call it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 11:01:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 07:01:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199747] Review Request: pingus - Guide the penguins safely home before they drop of the cliff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607231101.k6NB1Th3008483@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pingus - Guide the penguins safely home before they drop of the cliff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199747 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-23 06:52 EST ------- Not a problem, it's just the BR and out the door it can go! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 11:07:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 07:07:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199402] Review Request: chrpath - Modify rpath of compiled programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607231107.k6NB7see008605@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chrpath - Modify rpath of compiled programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199402 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-07-23 06:59 EST ------- Thanks, packages for FC4-FC6 have been built and will appear soon. I saw you got sponsored on the second bug, so I can look into the first one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 11:08:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 07:08:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607231108.k6NB850b008613@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 Bug 199405 depends on bug 199402, which changed state. Bug 199402 Summary: Review Request: chrpath - Modify rpath of compiled programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199402 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 11:17:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 07:17:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199192] Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607231117.k6NBH73H008818@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199192 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-07-23 07:08 EST ------- Manus manum lavat, reviewing the bug in the next comments. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 11:27:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 07:27:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192420] Review Request: Bonfire - CD/DVD burning app for gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607231127.k6NBR6gA009147@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Bonfire - CD/DVD burning app for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192420 ------- Additional Comments From rivanvx at fastmail.fm 2006-07-23 07:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Vedran: As I understand it, when the binary RPM is built, it find the > dependencies on the shared libraries that this package would link to. Hence, it > would depend on things like libtotem-plparser.so.1 (or whatever the exact SO > name is). Thus, simply replacing totem with totem-xine should be fine on the > user's end, as they both (to my knowledge) provide the same shared libraries. > The reason it actually depends on 'totem' when you attempt to install it after > building it is that totem is the only RPM available in the default repositories > which contains these libraries. Hope that helps. I actually noticed that some time later, but simple "yum install totem-xine" after bonfire has been installed complains about unsatisfied dependancy, and "yum remove totem" triest to remove bonfire as well. But that's not an issue on bonfire side, since it can be made to work the way you mentioned. Thanks for clarification. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 12:25:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 08:25:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199192] Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607231225.k6NCPUYa010762@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199192 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-07-23 08:16 EST ------- MUST items ========== - rpmlint output (see below): not OK + package name: OK - (latest) spec file name (0.5.0-0.1.20060716svn.spec): not OK, please use kadu.spec again + license is open source: OK + license in sources (GPL2) and license in specfile (GPL) match: OK - license (COPYING) included, but not in %doc: not OK (?) o American English: OK (but there is a trivial typo: s/Develpoments/Development/ in %description devel and missing "by" at some "made by" in other descriptions) + specfile legible: OK (but see comments below) - sources match upstream: not OK http://www.kadu.net/download/snapshots/kadu-20060716.tar.bz2 doesn't exist anymore + compiles and build into binary rpms: OK on i386 + sane BRs: OK + locales: OK (doesn't use locale folder directly, installs in private location) + ldconfig usage: OK (none neccessary, no shared libs under %{_libdir}) + owns its directories: OK + %files duplicate: OK (none reported) - permissions: not OK (see below) + %clean section: OK + system macros: OK (used) + contains code: OK + doc subpackage: OK (not needed) + %doc contents do not influence runtime: OK + devel package (contents): OK + devel package (dependencies): OK + %{name}.desktop/desktop-file-install: OK rpmlint: ======== errors: E: kadu-debuginfo empty-debuginfo-package E: kadu explicit-lib-dependency libsndfile warnings: W: kadu-alsa_sound no-documentation W: kadu-alsa_sound unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/alsa_sound.so W: kadu-amarok no-documentation W: kadu-amarok unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/amarok.so W: kadu-arts_sound no-documentation W: kadu-arts_sound unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/arts_sound.so W: kadu-dcopexport no-documentation W: kadu-dcopexport unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/dcopexport.so W: kadu-devel no-documentation W: kadu-esd_sound no-documentation W: kadu-esd_sound unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/esd_sound.so W: kadu-exec_notify no-documentation W: kadu-exec_notify unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/exec_notify.so W: kadu-ext_info no-documentation W: kadu-ext_info unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/ext_info.so W: kadu-filedesc no-documentation W: kadu-filedesc unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/filedesc.so W: kadu-iwait4u no-documentation W: kadu-iwait4u unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/iwait4u.so W: kadu-led_notify no-documentation W: kadu-led_notify unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/led_notify.so W: kadu-miastoplusa_sms no-documentation W: kadu-miastoplusa_sms unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/miastoplusa_sms.so W: kadu mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs W: kadu no-documentation W: kadu setup-not-quiet W: kadu-spellchecker no-documentation W: kadu-spellchecker unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/spellchecker.so W: kadu-tabs no-documentation W: kadu-tabs unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/tabs.so W: kadu-theme-crystal16 no-documentation W: kadu-theme-crystal22 no-documentation W: kadu-theme-gg6_compatible no-documentation W: kadu-theme-glass16 no-documentation W: kadu-theme-glass22 no-documentation W: kadu-theme-nuvola16 no-documentation W: kadu-theme-nuvola22 no-documentation W: kadu unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/account_management.so W: kadu unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/arts_sound.so W: kadu unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/autoaway.so W: kadu unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/autoresponder.so W: kadu unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/config_wizard.so W: kadu unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/dcc.so W: kadu unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/default_sms.so W: kadu unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/dsp_sound.so W: kadu unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/encryption.so W: kadu unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/ext_sound.so W: kadu unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/hints.so W: kadu unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/migration.so W: kadu unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/sms.so W: kadu unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/voice.so W: kadu unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/window_notify.so W: kadu unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/x11_docking.so W: kadu-weather no-documentation W: kadu-weather unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/weather.so W: kadu-xmms no-documentation W: kadu-xmms unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/xmms.so comments: ========= - build should include debugging symbols, e.g. the buildlog has: > Compile with debug symbols: no Please compile with debug symbols and let rpm automagically extract them out into the debuginfo package. - permissions of shared libs should be executable to allow for debuginfo extraction - "Requires: libsndfile" is not neccessary (unless it needs something from %{_bindir}/sndfile-* at runtime - "mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs": Use emacs to tabbify/untabbify the specfile - "%setup -D -T -n kadu" is missing "-q" - "unstripped-binary-or-object": Fix by making the modules executable either with chmod at the end of %install of with %attr/%defattr - self-defined macros: In general I'm not against self-defined macros to make packages more flexible or legible. In this case some macros make the specfile harder to read than neccessary for example _kadudir being %{_datadir}/kadu. I wouldn't call this a blocker, but I would recommend to unwrap most of these macros to increase legibility. Please install rpmlint on your system and use it on the packages while developing the specfile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 12:32:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 08:32:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199679] Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607231232.k6NCWNAG010904@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199679 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-07-23 08:23 EST ------- H(In reply to comment #1) > I have done quick reviewi, and I noticed a few things you have to do: > > * add %{?dist} tag to release number. Done. > * Source0 have to be URL, actually it is unable to check if archive in src.rpm and archive on .net checksums is matching. Done. > * you should use %configure macro instead of hardcoding it Done. > * Packaging Guidelines suggest to use make %{?_smp_flags} instead of 'make' > alone Done. > * in %install section you forgot to write $RPM_BUILD_ROOT before %{_mandir} > * man file has wrong permissions (0744), you have to change it to 644 typing: > %attr(0644, root, root) %{_mandir}/man8/* in %section I solved this during %install. I'll post the URLs as another comment. Thanks a lot. Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 12:46:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 08:46:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165957] Review Request: esmtp. Relay only MTA. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607231246.k6NCkGqR011609@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esmtp. Relay only MTA. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165957 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 12:48:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 08:48:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165957] Review Request: esmtp. Relay only MTA. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607231248.k6NCmboY011782@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esmtp. Relay only MTA. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165957 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Keywords|Reopened | Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |gauret at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-07-23 08:39 EST ------- Done, thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 13:04:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 09:04:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199679] Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607231304.k6ND4PFF012284@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199679 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-07-23 08:55 EST ------- New spec file for 3.1.1: http://pgfoundry.org/frs/download.php/984/pgpool.spec New SRPM for 3.1.1: http://pgfoundry.org/frs/download.php/983/pgpool-3.1.1-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 13:16:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 09:16:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199192] Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607231316.k6NDGxiK012485@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199192 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-23 09:08 EST ------- First, thank for review! > o American English: OK (but there is a trivial typo: s/Develpoments/ Development/ > in %description devel and missing "by" at some "made by" in other > descriptions) Fixed. > - sources match upstream: not OK > http://www.kadu.net/download/snapshots/kadu-20060716.tar.bz2 doesn't exist > anymore Fixed; the address was changed. > comments: > ========= > > - build should include debugging symbols, e.g. the buildlog has: > > Compile with debug symbols: no > Please compile with debug symbols and let rpm automagically extract them out > into the debuginfo package. Fixed. > - permissions of shared libs should be executable to allow for debuginfo > extraction Fixed. > > - "Requires: libsndfile" is not neccessary (unless it needs something from > %{_bindir}/sndfile-* at runtime Require deleted. > - "mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs": Use emacs to tabbify/untabbify the specfile Now, it's OK. > - "%setup -D -T -n kadu" is missing "-q" Fixed. > - "unstripped-binary-or-object": Fix by making the modules executable either > with chmod at the end of %install of with %attr/%defattr Fixed. > - self-defined macros: In general I'm not against self-defined macros to make > packages more flexible or legible. In this case some macros make the specfile > harder to read than neccessary for example _kadudir being %{_datadir}/kadu. > I wouldn't call this a blocker, but I would recommend to unwrap most of these > macros to increase legibility. No, I won't unwrap these macros. This is still SVN pre-release, some things may change in future and macros make me easier to change path. > Please install rpmlint on your system and use it on the packages while > developing the specfile. I've already installed it, but most of your errors wasn't showed for me by rpmlint, do you use any arguments to it? I'll give new addresses for SRPM and SPEC in next comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 13:18:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 09:18:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199192] Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607231318.k6NDIOCh012520@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199192 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-23 09:09 EST ------- New files: Spec URL: http://ecik.zspswidwin.pl/kadu/kadu.spec SRPM URL: http://ecik.zspswidwin.pl/kadu/kadu-0.5.0-0.2.20060716svn.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 13:36:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 09:36:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199679] Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607231336.k6NDaZKS012952@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199679 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-23 09:27 EST ------- * You got an error in changelog entry. It starts with asterisk instead of hyphen. * The %{?smp_flags} should be after make in %build section, not in make install. * You should use %{_sysconfdir} macro in %configure instead of /etc hard-coding. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 13:42:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 09:42:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199732] Review Request: clanbomber - Bomberman-like multiplayer game that uses ClanLib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607231342.k6NDgAkn013340@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clanbomber - Bomberman-like multiplayer game that uses ClanLib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199732 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 13:43:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 09:43:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199747] Review Request: pingus - Guide the penguins safely home before they drop of the cliff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607231343.k6NDhFk5013410@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pingus - Guide the penguins safely home before they drop of the cliff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199747 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 13:45:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 09:45:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199632] Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607231345.k6NDjV1Q013571@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199632 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-23 09:36 EST ------- mock build fails : line 45 autoconf : command cannot be found -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 13:47:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 09:47:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178901] Review Request: gtksourceview-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607231347.k6NDlof0013688@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtksourceview-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178901 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 13:48:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 09:48:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178904] Review Request: Monodevelop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607231348.k6NDmCgt013712@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178904 Bug 178904 depends on bug 178901, which changed state. Bug 178901 Summary: Review Request: gtksourceview-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178901 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 14:03:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 10:03:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199679] Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607231403.k6NE3YS5014332@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199679 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-07-23 09:54 EST ------- Hi, (In reply to comment #6) > * You got an error in changelog entry. It starts with asterisk instead > of hyphen. > * The %{?smp_flags} should be after make in %build section, not in > make install. > * You should use %{_sysconfdir} macro in %configure instead of /etc > hard-coding. All done. Thanks for the contribution. Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 14:04:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 10:04:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199679] Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607231404.k6NE4EeD014352@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199679 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-07-23 09:55 EST ------- New spec: http://pgfoundry.org/frs/download.php/986/pgpool.spec New srpm: http://pgfoundry.org/frs/download.php/987/pgpool-3.1.1-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 14:07:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 10:07:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189092] Review Request: boo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607231407.k6NE7ioD014398@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189092 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-23 09:58 EST ------- #26 - nant does the gac invocation Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/boo.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/boo-0.7.6.2237-5.src.rpm Fixes #24, #26 #25 - how can boo require boo to build? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 14:19:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 10:19:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177512] Review Request: mysql-connector-net In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607231419.k6NEJ3vP014636@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-connector-net https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177512 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-23 10:09 EST ------- #19 - uploaded. sorry about that -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 14:55:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 10:55:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189400] Review Request: em8300(-kmod) - Hollywood+/DXR3 hardware MPEG decoder drivers and tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607231455.k6NEtaHa015967@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: em8300(-kmod) - Hollywood+/DXR3 hardware MPEG decoder drivers and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189400 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2006-07-23 10:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > If the kernel module has a suitable licence for FC5, then it > presumably has a suitable licence for being included directly in the > kernel. Agreed. > Thus, the correct approach would be to get the support into the > upstream kernel and therefore into our base kernel package, rather > than having a separate kmod package for it. Also agreed, and that's why we we plan to try our best to tell upstream maintainers "get your stuff merged". That why we require a statement when people plan to get their stuff merged (see comment #4). > I strongly believe we should veto _all_ kmod packages in Core and > Extras. This was discussed before when we started the development of the kmod-standard for Extras -- several people from Red Hat were involved in that discussion and we agreed to work on it nevertheless the political problems. Anyway, I can really understand your point. That why I suggested in the beginning that all kmods are only allowed for X months (X=12 or 18) in Extras before they get dropped again and that upstream shall work on getting its suff into the kernel in that timeframe. But that idea was not accepted by other involved in the discussion. Anyway, I don't think we should discuss this further here and probably won't reply again in this bug. fedora-devel-list probably is the better place for this sort of political discussions. Site note: It's IMHO more a "kernel" vs. "distributions" problem: I'm sure all those people currently listed in the CC of this bug agree that it's important and best to get all drivers into the kernel as fast as possible (as long as they are "clean" and even if they are far from feature complete ) and that external drivers have many pitfalls and should be avoided as much as possible. But it seems some open-source-driver-developers don't feel that way and prefer to maintain their drivers outside of the upstream kernel. They probably fear (for no good reason) getting "Christophed". That's a pity, but it's life in 2006. But some distributions include these external drivers. That creates pressure on those distributions that don't include external drivers because people run away. E.g.: "I like Fedora. But it doesn't include the external driver foo -- distribution bar has it already and thus is far easier to use for me because I need that driver. That's why I switched over to bar." So IMHO kernel developers and the kernel-maintainers of the most important distributions need to work together closely and create policies like "every distribution may only contain 10 kernel-drivers that are not yet merged into the upstream kernel". The pressure on driver developers to get their drivers merged into linus kernel would be a lot bigger then. Just my 2 cent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 15:04:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 11:04:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178904] Review Request: Monodevelop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607231504.k6NF4mYJ016286@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178904 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-23 10:55 EST ------- Looks like it's the ol' needs to be in %{_prefix}/lib problem again. I've fixed the which problem and will fix the other problem shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 15:14:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 11:14:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199192] Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607231514.k6NFE38X016457@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199192 ------- Additional Comments From joi at kadu.net 2006-07-23 11:04 EST ------- >- build should include debugging symbols, e.g. the buildlog has: >> Compile with debug symbols: no > Please compile with debug symbols and let rpm automagically extract them out > into the debuginfo package. note that --enable-debug compiles in very noisy console output (binary is ~8-10% bigger) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 15:48:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 11:48:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178904] Review Request: Monodevelop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607231548.k6NFmRoG017698@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178904 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-23 11:39 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/monodevelop.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/monodevelop-0.11-12.src.rpm Sorts out the lib problem and which problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 15:51:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 11:51:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182320] Review Request: gnome-build In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607231551.k6NFpIwX017883@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182320 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-23 11:42 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/gnome-build.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/gnome-build-0.1.3-5.src.rpm It still lacks the smp flags as my system doesn't always like smp flags. No idea why and have never been able to trace the fault (it won't, for example compile anjuta2 with smp flags on) libtool now fixed as is the perl issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 17:09:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 13:09:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199867] New: Review Request: fedora-release-notes Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199867 Summary: Review Request: fedora-release-notes Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: jkeating at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/jkeating/fedora-release-notes.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/jkeating/fedora-release-notes-5.91-2.src.rpm Description: These are the official Release Notes for Fedora Core 5.91, written and edited by the Fedora community. For more information on the Release Notes process or how you can contribute, refer to the Release Notes HOWTO located at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs/Beats/HowTo. This is a splitoff from the fedora-release package to be a standalone package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 17:48:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 13:48:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197353] Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607231748.k6NHmrfL021128@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197353 ------- Additional Comments From alain.portal at free.fr 2006-07-23 13:39 EST ------- Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/man-pages-fr.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/man-pages-fr-2.24.0-1.src.rpm %changelog * Sun Jul 23 2006 Alain Portal 2.25.0-1 - Update to 2.25.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 17:52:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 13:52:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197445] Review Request: fuse-convmvfs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607231752.k6NHqHDo021223@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-convmvfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197445 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-23 13:43 EST ------- Hi ZC! A couple quick notes: * Are you sponsored? If not, you need to block the bug FE-NEEDSPONSOR as well. * It's customary to post direct links to the srpm and spec file you're asking to be reviewed, not entries in CVS or tarball downloads. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 17:55:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 13:55:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199747] Review Request: pingus - Guide the penguins safely home before they drop of the cliff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607231755.k6NHtWd0021312@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pingus - Guide the penguins safely home before they drop of the cliff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199747 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-23 13:46 EST ------- New spec with fixed BR here: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/pingus.spec Notice I didn't upload a new SRPM as its huge and my uplink is quite slow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 17:56:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 13:56:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196945] Review Request: python-smbpasswd - Python SMB Password Hash Generator Module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607231756.k6NHucqa021356@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-smbpasswd - Python SMB Password Hash Generator Module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196945 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-07-23 13:47 EST ------- Next release: Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/python-smbpasswd/python-smbpasswd.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/python-smbpasswd/python-smbpasswd-1.0.1-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 18:01:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 14:01:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190956] Review Request: php-pear-Auth-SASL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607231801.k6NI1Rx7021499@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth-SASL Alias: php-pear-Auth-SASL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190956 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-07-23 13:52 EST ------- SPEC : http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Auth-SASL.spec SRPM : http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Auth-SASL-1.0.2-2.fc5.src.rpm Mock : http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Auth-SASL-build.log Changes : - use new macros from /etc/rpm/macros.pear - own /usr/share/pear/Auth -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 18:04:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 14:04:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199632] Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607231804.k6NI4jXF021561@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199632 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-23 13:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > One other thing. You have provides: clanlib06 = {version}-{release}. That's > okay, but why is it clanlib06 and not ClanLib06 as the spec file and other > references inside the spec file call it? Since it _is_ ClanLib06 it will automaticly provide CLanLib06, the lowercase provide is there exactly for what it is to provide a lowercase alternative to people who prefer all lowercase names. The guidelines have recently been updated saying that its ok to have names containing uppercase when upstream uses uppercase consistenly, but that a full lowercase provides should be present. The reasoning behind this was to stop problems like you where having with _H_ermes. About autoconf, missing BR. Sorry about all these missing BR's if I had a better internet conenction myself I would try things in mock myself :| Anyways here is a new version which hopefully will build in mock: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ClanLib06.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ClanLib06-0.6.5-2.src.rpm Changes: * Sun Jul 23 2006 Hans de Goede 0.6.5-2 - Add missing BRs: tolua++-devel, Hermes-devel and autoconf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 18:34:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 14:34:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196945] Review Request: python-smbpasswd - Python SMB Password Hash Generator Module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607231834.k6NIYf7w023276@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-smbpasswd - Python SMB Password Hash Generator Module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196945 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |mr.ecik at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-23 14:25 EST ------- Ok, I'll review your package. MUST items: * rpmlint message: E: python-smbpasswd-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/py- smbpasswd-1.0.1/smbpasswd.c - you should change permissions of this file to 644 in %prep section * the package is named well * spec file is named well * License field in package spec file match the actual license (GPL) * spec is written in American English and is legible * md5sums of source used to build the package and of upstream source are matching (0eab2c29588e32e77ce6e5d2faea7874) * package successfully compile on i386 * all build dependencies is good listed (mock builds successful) * there is no any locales * package doesn't contain shared library files * there is no duplicate files in %files listing * permissions aren't set properly (rpmlint error) * package has a good %clean section * there is no .la files * there is no GUI applications Thus, everything is good except for bad permissions of smbpasswd.c file. If you fix it, I'll approve this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 18:42:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 14:42:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199630] Review Request: ClanLib - Cross platform C++ game library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607231842.k6NIgdaX024124@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ClanLib - Cross platform C++ game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199630 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-23 14:33 EST ------- Thanks for the review! Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 18:43:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 14:43:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199747] Review Request: pingus - Guide the penguins safely home before they drop of the cliff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607231843.k6NIh2W1024190@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pingus - Guide the penguins safely home before they drop of the cliff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199747 Bug 199747 depends on bug 199630, which changed state. Bug 199630 Summary: Review Request: ClanLib - Cross platform C++ game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199630 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 18:54:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 14:54:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199573] Review Request: BackupPC - high-performance backup system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607231854.k6NIseSX025286@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: BackupPC - high-performance backup system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199573 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-07-23 14:45 EST ------- package meets naming and packaging guidelines. specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. build root is correct. %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) license field matches the actual license. license is open source-compatible. GPL License text included in package. source files match upstream: [dennis at daedalus SPECS]$ sha1sum BackupPC-2.1.2.tar.gz 9f99e201fbf6bbd016c19007e5fb4072d77312c7 BackupPC-2.1.2.tar.gz [dennis at daedalus SPECS]$ sha1sum ../SOURCES/BackupPC-2.1.2.tar.gz 9f99e201fbf6bbd016c19007e5fb4072d77312c7 ../SOURCES/BackupPC-2.1.2.tar.gz latest version is being packaged. BuildRequires are proper. package builds in mock ( ). rpmlint [dennis at daedalus SPECS]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/aurora-2-sparc-extras/result/BackupPC-2.1.2-2.noarch.rpm E: BackupPC non-executable-script /usr/share/BackupPC/lib/BackupPC/Lang/nl.pm 0444 E: BackupPC non-standard-uid /var/lib/BackupPC/cpool backuppc E: BackupPC non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/BackupPC/cpool 0750 E: BackupPC non-standard-uid /etc/BackupPC backuppc E: BackupPC non-standard-gid /etc/BackupPC backuppc E: BackupPC non-standard-dir-perm /etc/BackupPC 0750 E: BackupPC non-standard-uid /var/lib/BackupPC/pc backuppc E: BackupPC non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/BackupPC/pc 0750 E: BackupPC non-standard-uid /etc/BackupPC/hosts backuppc E: BackupPC non-standard-gid /etc/BackupPC/hosts backuppc E: BackupPC non-standard-uid /usr/share/BackupPC/sbin/BackupPC_Admin backuppc E: BackupPC non-standard-gid /usr/share/BackupPC/sbin/BackupPC_Admin apache E: BackupPC setuid-binary /usr/share/BackupPC/sbin/BackupPC_Admin backuppc 04750 E: BackupPC non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/BackupPC/sbin/BackupPC_Admin 04750 E: BackupPC non-standard-uid /var/lib/BackupPC/conf backuppc W: BackupPC dangling-symlink /var/lib/BackupPC/conf /etc/BackupPC/ E: BackupPC non-executable-script /usr/share/BackupPC/lib/BackupPC/Lang/es.pm 0444 E: BackupPC non-standard-uid /etc/BackupPC/config.pl backuppc E: BackupPC non-standard-gid /etc/BackupPC/config.pl backuppc E: BackupPC non-readable /etc/BackupPC/config.pl 0640 E: BackupPC non-executable-script /usr/share/BackupPC/lib/BackupPC/Lang/it.pm 0444 E: BackupPC non-executable-script /usr/share/BackupPC/lib/BackupPC/Lang/de.pm 0444 E: BackupPC non-standard-uid /var/lib/BackupPC/pool backuppc E: BackupPC non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/BackupPC/pool 0750 E: BackupPC non-executable-script /usr/share/BackupPC/lib/BackupPC/Lang/en.pm 0444 E: BackupPC non-standard-uid /var/lib/BackupPC/log backuppc E: BackupPC non-standard-uid /var/lib/BackupPC/trash backuppc E: BackupPC non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/BackupPC/trash 0750 E: BackupPC non-standard-uid /var/log/BackupPC backuppc E: BackupPC non-standard-gid /var/log/BackupPC backuppc E: BackupPC non-standard-uid /var/lib/BackupPC backuppc E: BackupPC non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/BackupPC 0750 E: BackupPC non-executable-script /usr/share/BackupPC/lib/BackupPC/Lang/fr.pm 0444 E: BackupPC incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/BackupPC backuppc W: BackupPC incoherent-init-script-name BackupPC final provides and requires are sane: [dennis at daedalus SPECS]$ rpm -q --requires BackupPC /bin/sh /bin/sh /bin/sh /bin/sh /bin/sh /sbin/chkconfig /sbin/chkconfig /sbin/service /sbin/service /sbin/service /usr/bin/perl /usr/sbin/useradd /usr/sbin/usermod config(BackupPC) = 2.1.2-2 httpd perl(Archive::Zip) perl(BackupPC::Attrib) perl(BackupPC::CGI::Lib) perl(BackupPC::FileZIO) perl(BackupPC::Lib) perl(BackupPC::PoolWrite) perl(BackupPC::View) perl(BackupPC::Xfer::Archive) perl(BackupPC::Xfer::Rsync) perl(BackupPC::Xfer::RsyncDigest) perl(BackupPC::Xfer::RsyncFileIO) perl(BackupPC::Xfer::Smb) perl(BackupPC::Xfer::Tar) perl(BackupPC::Zip::FileMember) perl(CGI) perl(CGI::Carp) perl(Carp) perl(Compress::Zlib) perl(Config) perl(Cwd) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(Digest::MD5) perl(DirHandle) perl(Exporter) perl(Fcntl) perl(File::Compare) perl(File::Copy) perl(File::Find) perl(File::Path) perl(File::RsyncP) perl(Getopt::Std) perl(IO::Handle) perl(POSIX) perl(Socket) perl(constant) perl(lib) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl-suidperl [dennis at daedalus SPECS]$ rpm -q --provides BackupPC config(BackupPC) = 2.1.2-2 perl(BackupPC::Attrib) perl(BackupPC::CGI::AdminOptions) perl(BackupPC::CGI::Archive) perl(BackupPC::CGI::ArchiveInfo) perl(BackupPC::CGI::Browse) perl(BackupPC::CGI::DirHistory) perl(BackupPC::CGI::EmailSummary) perl(BackupPC::CGI::GeneralInfo) perl(BackupPC::CGI::HostInfo) perl(BackupPC::CGI::LOGlist) perl(BackupPC::CGI::Lib) perl(BackupPC::CGI::Queue) perl(BackupPC::CGI::ReloadServer) perl(BackupPC::CGI::Restore) perl(BackupPC::CGI::RestoreFile) perl(BackupPC::CGI::RestoreInfo) perl(BackupPC::CGI::StartServer) perl(BackupPC::CGI::StartStopBackup) perl(BackupPC::CGI::StopServer) perl(BackupPC::CGI::Summary) perl(BackupPC::CGI::View) perl(BackupPC::FileZIO) perl(BackupPC::Lib) perl(BackupPC::PoolWrite) perl(BackupPC::View) perl(BackupPC::Xfer::Archive) perl(BackupPC::Xfer::Rsync) perl(BackupPC::Xfer::RsyncDigest) perl(BackupPC::Xfer::RsyncFileIO) perl(BackupPC::Xfer::Smb) perl(BackupPC::Xfer::Tar) perl(BackupPC::Zip::FileMember) BackupPC = 2.1.2-2 no shared libraries are present. package is not relocatable. owns the directories it creates. doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. no duplicates in %files. file permissions are appropriate. %clean is present. scriptlets present and correct code, not content. documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. no headers. no pkgconfig files. no libtool .la droppings. not a GUI app. Non Fatal errors dist tag is not present. as for the rpmlint warnings errors i think that due to the nature of this app they are needed to be as they are. It provides a layer of seperation from the backup app and the system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 19:05:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 15:05:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199192] Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607231905.k6NJ5l9C025621@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199192 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-07-23 14:56 EST ------- > > Please install rpmlint on your system and use it on the packages while > > developing the specfile. > > I've already installed it, but most of your errors wasn't showed for me by > rpmlint, do you use any arguments to it? No, just use it on the src.rpm as well as on the binary rpm. Maybe you only used it on the src.rpm? > note that --enable-debug compiles in very noisy console output (binary is > ~8-10% bigger) Isn't this removed when stripping off the symbols? rpm does that automatically and generates debuginfo packages with these symbols. So usually one installs the stripped binary w/o the extra space and when an issue comes up one can install the matching debuginfo rpm and run gdb on it. I wrote: > - "unstripped-binary-or-object": Fix by making the modules executable either > with chmod at the end of %install of with %attr/%defattr That was wrong. I rebuilt the latest src.rpm and the unstripped binaries are still around. You need to chmod then, %attr alone doesn't help as it is taken into account *after* the debuginfo creation. Sorry for the misleading information. Can you fix that and also %exclude %{_kadudir}/AUTHORS %{_kadudir}/ChangeLog %{_kadudir}/COPYING %{_kadudir}/HISTORY %{_kadudir}/README %{_kadudir}/THANKS and instead add them with %doc? All other points were checked and are OK. For reference: + spec file name: OK + sources match upstream: OK + American English: OK + permissions: OK (on manifest level) - license (COPYING) included, but not in %doc: not OK - rpmlint output: $ rpmlint *rpm | grep -v kadu-.*no-documentation W: kadu unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/voice.so W: kadu unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/autoaway.so W: kadu unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/config_wizard.so W: kadu unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/migration.so W: kadu unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/window_notify.so W: kadu unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/dcc.so W: kadu unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/account_management.so W: kadu unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/autoresponder.so W: kadu unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/arts_sound.so W: kadu unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/sms.so W: kadu unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/hints.so W: kadu unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/dsp_sound.so W: kadu unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/x11_docking.so W: kadu unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/default_sms.so W: kadu unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/ext_sound.so W: kadu unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/encryption.so W: kadu no-documentation W: kadu-alsa_sound unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/alsa_sound.so W: kadu-amarok unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/amarok.so W: kadu-arts_sound unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/arts_sound.so W: kadu-dcopexport unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/dcopexport.so W: kadu-esd_sound unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/esd_sound.so W: kadu-exec_notify unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/exec_notify.so W: kadu-ext_info unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/ext_info.so W: kadu-filedesc unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/filedesc.so W: kadu-iwait4u unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/iwait4u.so W: kadu-led_notify unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/led_notify.so W: kadu-miastoplusa_sms unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/miastoplusa_sms.so W: kadu-spellchecker unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/spellchecker.so W: kadu-tabs unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/tabs.so W: kadu-weather unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/weather.so W: kadu-xmms unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/kadu/modules/xmms.so If you fix the above two issues this output will vanish and the package approved :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 19:35:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 15:35:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199192] Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607231935.k6NJZgfl026320@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199192 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-23 15:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > I wrote: > > - "unstripped-binary-or-object": Fix by making the modules executable either > > with chmod at the end of %install of with %attr/%defattr > That was wrong. I rebuilt the latest src.rpm and the unstripped binaries are > still around. You need to chmod then, %attr alone doesn't help as it is taken > into account *after* the debuginfo creation. Sorry for the misleading information. I hope them is stripped good, now :-) > > Can you fix that and also %exclude > > %{_kadudir}/AUTHORS > %{_kadudir}/ChangeLog > %{_kadudir}/COPYING > %{_kadudir}/HISTORY > %{_kadudir}/README > %{_kadudir}/THANKS > > and instead add them with %doc? As I write in my first post I cannot do it, because Kadu uses these files in About window so they must be in proper directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 19:35:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 15:35:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199867] Review Request: fedora-release-notes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607231935.k6NJZpZv026329@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-release-notes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199867 ------- Additional Comments From katzj at redhat.com 2006-07-23 15:26 EST ------- >From a quick look, seems sane. Although didn't we decide to just have fedora-release require the release-notes and not the loop? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 19:36:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 15:36:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199192] Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607231936.k6NJaael026394@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199192 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-23 15:27 EST ------- New URLs: Spec URL: http://ecik.zspswidwin.pl/kadu/kadu.spec SRPM URL: http://ecik.zspswidwin.pl/kadu/kadu-0.5.0-0.3.20060716svn.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 19:38:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 15:38:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174021] Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607231938.k6NJcdx1026549@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174021 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-07-23 15:29 EST ------- Next release for review: Spec: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/aplus-fsf/aplus-fsf.spec SRPM: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/aplus-sfs/aplus-fsf-4.20.2-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 20:03:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 16:03:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199573] Review Request: BackupPC - high-performance backup system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607232003.k6NK3iDU027768@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: BackupPC - high-performance backup system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199573 ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2006-07-23 15:54 EST ------- Spec: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/BackupPC/BackupPC.spec SRPM: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/BackupPC/BackupPC-2.1.2-3.src.rpm - Changes to defaults in config.pl - Added Requires: rsync -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 20:10:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 16:10:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199688] Review Request: virt-manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607232010.k6NKAu9f027921@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: virt-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199688 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-07-23 16:01 EST ------- Some complaints: - %Source tag contains not a full qualified URL. - rpmlint virt-manager-0.1.5-1.src.rpm W: virt-manager strange-permission virt-manager.spec 0600 - *.pyo files don't prefix with %ghost. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 20:18:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 16:18:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199627] Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607232018.k6NKIHMZ028063@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199627 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-07-23 16:09 EST ------- A few more comments: * I think you should change Source0 to use %{name} instead of kooldock. * The same is valid for the line beginning with %setup * You should use cvs_date macro in Source0 * You should add %{?smp_flags} to make in %prep That is all I can see now. Per Review Guidelines, I tried to test everything except mock build. Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 20:19:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 16:19:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199867] Review Request: fedora-release-notes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607232019.k6NKJZq8028097@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-release-notes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199867 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-23 16:10 EST ------- Ah right, I'll fix that. Anything else, or am I good to import? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 20:24:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 16:24:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199834] Review Request: nip2 - interactive image processing system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607232024.k6NKOGrF028230@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nip2 - interactive image processing system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199834 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |Jochen at herr-schmitt.de ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-07-23 16:15 EST ------- Good: + Tar ball match with upstream source. Bad: - Can't find vips-devel as BR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 20:24:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 16:24:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199834] Review Request: nip2 - interactive image processing system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607232024.k6NKOkB4028241@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nip2 - interactive image processing system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199834 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 20:34:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 16:34:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199573] Review Request: BackupPC - high-performance backup system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607232034.k6NKYbqF028451@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: BackupPC - high-performance backup system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199573 ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2006-07-23 16:25 EST ------- Spec: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/BackupPC/BackupPC.spec SRPM: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/BackupPC/BackupPC-2.1.2-3.src.rpm - Properly marking config files as such -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 20:41:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 16:41:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199173] Review Request: clusterssh In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607232041.k6NKfQea028852@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clusterssh https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199173 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-07-23 16:32 EST ------- Hi again, There is an rpmlint warning from srpm: W: clusterssh strange-permission clusterssh.spec 0600 A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. I think you will need to repackage SRPM after changing the permission of spec file. Except rebuilding in mock that I did not test, per review guidelines, spec and srpm looks good. I built it on FC5 and used ;) Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 20:48:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 16:48:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199632] Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607232048.k6NKmDPq029253@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199632 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-23 16:39 EST ------- I've found a problem when running on i386-devel with default SELinux settings. Here is a new release which fixes this (in combination with a soon to be pushed new Hermes): Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ClanLib06.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ClanLib06-0.6.5-3.src.rpm Changes: * Sun Jul 23 2006 Hans de Goede 0.6.5-3 - Mark asm files as NOT needing execstack, making us OK with new default SELinux targeted policy settings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 20:51:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 16:51:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607232051.k6NKpTq0029456@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 ------- Additional Comments From drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx 2006-07-23 16:42 EST ------- Spec URL: http://homes.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/pulseaudio/pulseaudio.spec SRPM URL: http://homes.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/pulseaudio/pulseaudio-0.9.3-2.src.rpm Updated with Toshio's patch. About the versioning... The reason we have versions on libs is so that: a) We can have multiple versions of a lib on the system. b) If we break ABI, applications depending on this lib won't be able to load it as it will have a different ver. Now apply this to libpulsedsp.so and you'll see that neither matters. The primary reason being that the only "user" of the lib is the padsp script that needs to know the name when setting up the LD_PRELOAD variable. However, as the two are part of one package, there is no need for version handling. Adding it would be the equivalent of versioning glade files for every GTK application. If a valid case for versions presents itself, then I'll gladly support adding it. But if it is only to shut up an incorrect warning, then things should stay the way they are upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 21:12:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 17:12:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199192] Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607232112.k6NLCQ0J030098@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199192 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-23 17:03 EST ------- I noticed very stupid mistake in %changelog entry. 23 July is not Saturday as I wrote, but Sunday ;-) I sent corrected spec file, but I didn't change SRPM file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 21:15:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 17:15:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197353] Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607232115.k6NLF575030169@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197353 ------- Additional Comments From alain.portal at free.fr 2006-07-23 17:06 EST ------- Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/man-pages-fr.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/man-pages-fr-2.24.0-2.src.rpm %changelog * Sun Jul 23 2006 Alain Portal 2.25.0-2 - Fix a typo that let gespnam.3 and shadow.3 installed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 21:22:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 17:22:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199192] Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607232122.k6NLMQGg030291@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199192 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-07-23 17:13 EST ------- > As I write in my first post I cannot do it, because Kadu uses these files > in About window so they must be in proper directory. Would it be OK to have them at both locations? At least for the license it's important to have it under %doc, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 21:35:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 17:35:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185776] Review Request: gitweb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607232135.k6NLZWse030550@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gitweb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185776 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-23 17:26 EST ------- Could you please add the url to the spec file and the srpm in a bugzilla comment? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 21:37:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 17:37:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199192] Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607232137.k6NLb0m9030641@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199192 ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2006-07-23 17:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > As I write in my first post I cannot do it, because Kadu uses these files > in About window so they must be in proper directory. Maybe adding a small patch? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 21:45:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 17:45:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199192] Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607232145.k6NLjBKX031187@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199192 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-23 17:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > Maybe adding a small patch? I'm not convinced to it. Files in %doc should be unicode coded, but kadu doc files is iso8859-2 coded and if we change it, in About window characters could be wrong. The most reasonable solution to me is include in %doc only COPYING file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 21:56:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 17:56:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189662] Review Request: transconnect -- A function imposter to allow transparent connection over HTTPS proxies In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607232156.k6NLuabx031762@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: transconnect -- A function imposter to allow transparent connection over HTTPS proxies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189662 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-23 17:47 EST ------- You should follow the naming guidelines, even if there is never a l.3, there is no reason to use 1.3. Also I think you should drop the %release_func stuff and do things more simply. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 22:00:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 18:00:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199632] Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607232200.k6NM0gsC031862@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199632 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-23 17:51 EST ------- rpmlint is warning me the src.rpm is mod 0666 instead of 0664 for the spec file One thing I did notice during the build and that is debugging is turned off while building, yet a debuginfo package is available. Surely this should not occur. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 22:12:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 18:12:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188461] Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607232212.k6NMCZ8T032045@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188461 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-23 18:03 EST ------- Some remarks: * the buildroot is not the right one * although the %define xmms_inputdir with xmms-config isn't clearly wrong I think it should not be done that way, since xmms-config must then be present at spec file generation time. Simply having %define xmms_inputdir %{_libdir}/xmms/Input or even replacing %xmms_inputdir with %{_libdir}/xmms/Input would seem simpler and cleaner to me * %setup is missing a -q -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 22:15:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 18:15:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199834] Review Request: nip2 - interactive image processing system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607232215.k6NMFiUl032118@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nip2 - interactive image processing system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199834 ------- Additional Comments From adam at spicenitz.org 2006-07-23 18:06 EST ------- Check out bug #199833 for vips. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 22:24:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 18:24:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199867] Review Request: fedora-release-notes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607232224.k6NMO1Eo032251@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-release-notes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199867 ------- Additional Comments From katzj at redhat.com 2006-07-23 18:14 EST ------- * Is the license on the relnotes really distibutable or is OPL? * It'd probably be better to see if scrollkeeper/desktop-file-utils exists in the scriptlet and continue anyway. This will be part of the minimal package set and we don't really want to bloat that * The %{dist} tag is probably overkill since the version is the dist Otherwise, looks good to go -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 22:33:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 18:33:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192606] Review Request: yafc: yet another ftp client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607232233.k6NMXN2n032465@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yafc: yet another ftp client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192606 ------- Additional Comments From lists at forevermore.net 2006-07-23 18:24 EST ------- spec: http://rpm.forevermore.net/yafc/yafc.spec srpm: http://rpm.forevermore.net/yafc/yafc-1.1.1-3.src.rpm ok, patch, etc applied. Builds in mock, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 22:49:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 18:49:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199611] Review Request: monsterz - Puzzle game, similar to Bejeweled or Zookeeper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607232249.k6NMncw5000997@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monsterz - Puzzle game, similar to Bejeweled or Zookeeper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199611 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2006-07-23 18:40 EST ------- Spec URL: http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/monsterz.spec SRPM URL: http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/monsterz-0.7.0-5.src.rpm Thanks, this should fix those issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 22:57:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 18:57:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199173] Review Request: clusterssh In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607232257.k6NMv5rH001471@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clusterssh https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199173 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-07-23 18:48 EST ------- Ok, it builds cleanly in mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 23:03:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 19:03:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 180092] Review Request: NRPE - Monitoring agent for Nagios In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607232303.k6NN3xlY001725@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NRPE - Monitoring agent for Nagios https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180092 ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2006-07-23 18:55 EST ------- No more rpmlint errors: SPEC: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/nrpe/nrpe.spec SRPM: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/nrpe/nrpe-2.5.2-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 23:34:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 19:34:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199192] Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607232334.k6NNY672002342@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199192 ------- Additional Comments From joi at kadu.net 2006-07-23 19:25 EST ------- >> note that --enable-debug compiles in very noisy console output (binary is >> ~8-10% bigger) > >Isn't this removed when stripping off the symbols? no > rpm does that automatically and generates debuginfo packages with these > symbols. how would rpm know which (used in code) symbols to strip? how would it remove _kdebug_with_mask calls? how would it remove code between #ifdef DEBUG_ENABLED and #endif? you need to disable debug or make a patch for Kadu sources -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 23:45:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 19:45:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188461] Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607232345.k6NNjvnx003069@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188461 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-07-23 19:37 EST ------- > although the %define xmms_inputdir with xmms-config isn't clearly > wrong I think it should not be done that way, since xmms-config > must then be present at spec file generation time. No, it need not be present at src.rpm build-time. It must be present when building the binaries. Also notice the " || echo ..." which ensures that all this still works when xmms-config is not found. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 23:52:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 19:52:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199867] Review Request: fedora-release-notes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607232352.k6NNqSkx003416@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-release-notes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199867 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-23 19:43 EST ------- Ok, changes made, spec is the same url: http://people.redhat.com/jkeating/fedora-release-notes-5.91-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 23 23:55:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 19:55:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199867] Review Request: fedora-release-notes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607232355.k6NNtq0X003585@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-release-notes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199867 katzj at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |katzj at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188268 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From katzj at redhat.com 2006-07-23 19:46 EST ------- Looks good. Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 00:01:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 20:01:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189662] Review Request: transconnect -- A function imposter to allow transparent connection over HTTPS proxies In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607240001.k6O01vBF003848@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: transconnect -- A function imposter to allow transparent connection over HTTPS proxies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189662 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-07-23 19:52 EST ------- * Mon Jul 24 2006 Enrico Scholz - 1:1.3-0.1.Beta - follow Fedora naming guidelines strictly; increased epoch http://ensc.de/fedora/transconnect/ ==== > Also I think you should drop the %release_func stuff and do things > more simply. no; I like it this way -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 00:17:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 20:17:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189662] Review Request: transconnect -- A function imposter to allow transparent connection over HTTPS proxies In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607240017.k6O0HSjW004172@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: transconnect -- A function imposter to allow transparent connection over HTTPS proxies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189662 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-07-23 20:08 EST ------- * Mon Jul 24 2006 Enrico Scholz - 1:1.3-0.2.Beta - enhanced -fixup patch to put a optimization barrier after cleaning password data http://ensc.de/fedora/transconnect/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 00:29:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 20:29:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199573] Review Request: BackupPC - high-performance backup system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607240029.k6O0TscE004540@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: BackupPC - high-performance backup system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199573 ------- Additional Comments From mark.nospamplease at miksis.com 2006-07-23 20:21 EST ------- FWIW, a few comments: - The latest spec is for Release 4. The download area seems to contain a binary rpm for this release, but not a src rpm. - In order to set up ssh keys, the admin must (I think) change the backuppc user to have a shell, set up ssh, and then change back to /sbin/nologin. Not sure if there's a way around this, but you might want to document this. - You might want to include upstream patch BackupPC-2.1.2pl2.diff (which is needed to work with the latest versions of rsync). It also fixes other bugs. - perl-File-RsyncP-0.62-1.src.rpm wouldn't compile for me on an up-to-date x86_64 FC5. 0.52 is OK. HTH -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 02:31:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 22:31:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198833] Review Request: mercator - Terrain library for WorldForge client/server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607240231.k6O2VlqM009362@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mercator - Terrain library for WorldForge client/server Alias: mercator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198833 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-07-23 22:22 EST ------- Imported but not yet built until the wfmath test failure on ppc is dealt with. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 02:38:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 22:38:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199573] Review Request: BackupPC - high-performance backup system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607240238.k6O2clhk009643@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: BackupPC - high-performance backup system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199573 ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2006-07-23 22:29 EST ------- Spec: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/BackupPC/BackupPC.spec SRPM: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/BackupPC/BackupPC-2.1.2-4.src.rpm - Added upstream patch try using http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/perl-File-RsyncP/perl-File-RsyncP-0.62-2.src.rpm Its actually been approved and built. You should be able to yum it soon. SSH keys - I find it best not to tell admins how their security should be done. Especially since BackupPC supports so many different methods for backup. Having said that it might not be a bad idea to at least point them to the BackupPC documentation for setting up ssh keys. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 02:44:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 22:44:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199867] Review Request: fedora-release-notes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607240244.k6O2iMRf010120@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-release-notes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199867 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag| |needinfo? ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-23 22:35 EST ------- Built into rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 02:55:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 22:55:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199573] Review Request: BackupPC - high-performance backup system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607240255.k6O2tLAW010768@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: BackupPC - high-performance backup system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199573 ------- Additional Comments From mark.nospamplease at miksis.com 2006-07-23 22:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Spec: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/BackupPC/BackupPC.spec > SRPM: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/BackupPC/BackupPC-2.1.2-4.src.rpm Do you mean 2.1.2-5? > > - Added upstream patch Thanks :) > > try using > http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/perl-File-RsyncP/perl-File-RsyncP-0.62-2.src.rpm > Its actually been approved and built. You should be able to yum it soon. Builds for me :) > > SSH keys - I find it best not to tell admins how their security should be done. > Especially since BackupPC supports so many different methods for backup. > Having said that it might not be a bad idea to at least point them to the > BackupPC documentation for setting up ssh keys. Agreed. I guess my point is: - The package defaults to rsync over ssh. - The official BackupPC docs describe a procedure for setting up ssh that won't work if the backuppc user does not have a shell. Again, not really sure if you should do anything about this... Hopefully most users will figure it out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 03:46:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 23:46:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194320] Review Request: im-chooser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607240346.k6O3k3nP012325@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: im-chooser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194320 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2006-07-23 23:36 EST ------- BTW there is no component for im-chooser in bugzilla (I mean for Fedora Core). can you add it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 03:51:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 23:51:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198882] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-IRC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607240351.k6O3p5ub012583@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-IRC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198882 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-23 23:42 EST ------- At last, but not least... closure for this review :) +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +devel build succeeds +Request branching +Close bug Thanks again! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 04:33:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 00:33:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199632] Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607240433.k6O4Xwxb014060@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199632 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-24 00:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > rpmlint is warning me the src.rpm is mod 0666 instead of 0664 for the spec file > Strange I'll fix that before import. > One thing I did notice during the build and that is debugging is turned off > while building, yet a debuginfo package is available. Surely this should not occur. > This means that special debugging checks and printf have been turned off, even without these extra checks it is still usefull to have a package with the addresses of symbols and line number <-> asm offsets table, so that one can descently run it through a debugger, that is what debuginfo packages are for. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 06:07:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 02:07:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199632] Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607240607.k6O67Ps0018505@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199632 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-24 01:58 EST ------- mock built the package without a hiccup. As long as you fix the spec file, I'm happy for this to be released APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 06:11:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 02:11:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189315] Review Request: ardour In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607240611.k6O6Bdns018639@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ardour https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189315 ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2006-07-24 02:02 EST ------- Alright, lets see if we can get this in before FC4 goes into maintenance mode. rpmlint on the src.rpm says: W: ardour rpm-buildroot-usage %build rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/ardour/libardour* $RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be touched during %build or %prep stage, as it will break short circuiting. I'm really not sure what this command even accomplishes. Old cruft? Delete it. E: ardour tag-not-utf8 %changelog E: ardour non-utf8-spec-file ardour.spec The changelog is a mess. No blank lines between the older entries, etc. I'm thinking maybe you should just cut off all the old CCRMA entries, which would make the encoding errors moot. They seem to be mostly irrelevant to the current state of the package except for the explanation of the NOARCH and ARCH options which should be retained as a comment up in the %build section. W: ardour macro-in-%changelog find_lang W: ardour macro-in-%changelog _sysconfdir Remember you need to escape macros in the changelog, i.e. %%find_lang. Or just drop the % entirely. I see an %{__install} macro in there, which is inconsistent. There's also some %{name} macros in there I'd personally lose. I wouldn't bother packaging the README, it contains basically nothing of use. The following buildreqs do not seem to be necessary: bison, byacc, flex, linuxdoc-tools, curl-devel The %files section could use some cleanup. Put trailing slashes on the directories, and I'd recommend getting rid of the globbing. And get rid of the %{name} macro. During the build, RPM warns of files listed twice. Add %dir to %{_sysconfdir}/ardour to fix it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 06:23:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 02:23:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193109] Review Request: plotmm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607240623.k6O6NZka018957@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: plotmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193109 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-24 02:14 EST ------- Ha?kel, you have been sponsored, now you are supposed to import this package into CVS and build it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 06:45:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 02:45:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199173] Review Request: clusterssh In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607240645.k6O6jMZf020029@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clusterssh https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199173 ------- Additional Comments From duncan_j_ferguson at yahoo.co.uk 2006-07-24 02:36 EST ------- Thanks - I'll double check the perms and then start on project commits. Should have the "real" version of the rpm within a few days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 07:47:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 03:47:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199192] Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607240747.k6O7lQTO023981@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199192 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-07-24 03:38 EST ------- On debug symbols: rpm strips out all debugging symbols. E.g. everything that -g adds is removed again and placed into the debuginfo package. In case of a bug/core dump etc. You can install the debuginfo package and examine the issue with gdb. Of course if there are different code paths chosen with debuging enabled, that's another story. But we were discussing about enabling debug symbols, nothing more. On COPYING: Yes, please add another copy of COPYING to %doc. Don't make the application dependent on %doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 08:31:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 04:31:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189662] Review Request: transconnect -- A function imposter to allow transparent connection over HTTPS proxies In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607240831.k6O8V9ml027881@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: transconnect -- A function imposter to allow transparent connection over HTTPS proxies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189662 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-24 04:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > - follow Fedora naming guidelines strictly; increased epoch This package have never been released, you don't need to increase the epoch? > ==== > no; I like it this way Indeed, but if I'm not wrong %{!?release_func:%global release_func() %1%{?dist}} Release: %release_func 0.2.Beta leads to the much simpler Release: 0.2.Beta%{?dist} so why not use the simpler way? Of course you could have set release_func() somewhere, but this flexibility is not usefull in fedora extras, yet it adds some complexity to the spec file. Otherwise, I have some other comments: * I think it would be nice if you dropped a line somewhere (in README.fedora?) explaining that tconn-localres.so corresponds with the make localres case described in the INSTALL file, or something along those lines. * I also think that the file tconn.cat could be modified such that export LD_PRELOAD=$HOME/.tconn/tconn.so is replaced by export LD_PRELOAD=%{_libdir}/tconn.so * I know that some reviewer disagree on having modules to be dlopened directly in %_libdir and insist on having dlopened modules in subdirs of %_libdir. I tend to agree with that when the modules are 'internal modules' or backends to be used by an application or a library. The transconnect case is less clear in my opinion, however I still think that it would be cleaner if the *.so where in a %_libdir subdir, say %{_libdir}/transconnect this would imply some adjustments in the tconn script, and in tconn.cat there should then be export LD_PRELOAD=%{_libdir}/transconnect/tconn.so What do you think about that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 08:35:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 04:35:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199905] New: Review Request: gotmail Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199905 Summary: Review Request: gotmail Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: james at lovedthanlost.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gotmail.cvs.sourceforge.net/gotmail/gotmail/gotmail.spec.in?revision=1.3&view=markup SRPM URL: http://heanet.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/gotmail/gotmail-0.8.9-1.src.rpm Description: Gotmail is a perl script to download mail from hotmail.com without user interaction. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 08:38:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 04:38:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199905] Review Request: gotmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607240838.k6O8cWsM028480@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gotmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199905 ------- Additional Comments From james at lovedthanlost.net 2006-07-24 04:29 EST ------- Hi - first submission to Fedora Extras - sure I will make mistakes. Please let me know what I need to do - obviously not sure the spec file via CVS is appropriate. Thanks in advance for your response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 09:13:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 05:13:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199747] Review Request: pingus - Guide the penguins safely home before they drop of the cliff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607240913.k6O9DlO1031319@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pingus - Guide the penguins safely home before they drop of the cliff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199747 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-24 05:04 EST ------- I could get the original spec file version to compile happily under mock, but the current one gives me an error that clanlib-devel cannot be found. Is this an SELinux related problem? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 09:37:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 05:37:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175047] Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607240937.k6O9bFve000656@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175047 ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2006-07-24 05:28 EST ------- I had some RPMs before Fedora Extras came up (http://www.niemueller.de/projects/extrpms/) which I got space for on SunSITE Europe. To get this going I would suggest to package Asuka (IRC daemon) and Palantir (webcam streaming) for Fedora Extras. I'll give it a go and CC you (Hans) on the review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 09:52:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 05:52:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198613] Review Request: compat-libgda - gnome database access library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607240952.k6O9qR6l001991@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-libgda - gnome database access library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198613 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2006-07-24 05:43 EST ------- Fixed issue with compat-libgda configuration directory. Spec: http://www.poolshark.org/src/compat-libgda.spec SRPM: http://www.poolshark.org/src/compat-libgda-1.2.3-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 11:08:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 07:08:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199192] Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241108.k6OB8vjg007549@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199192 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-24 06:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #22) > On COPYING: > > Yes, please add another copy of COPYING to %doc. Don't make the application > dependent on %doc. Okay, done. URLs: Spec URL: http://ecik.zspswidwin.pl/kadu/kadu.spec SRPM URL: http://ecik.zspswidwin.pl/kadu/kadu-0.5.0-0.4.20060716svn.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 11:24:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 07:24:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199919] New: Review Request: Asuka Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199919 Summary: Review Request: Asuka Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: tim at niemueller.de QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.niemueller.de/projects/extrpms/packages/fedora-extras-5/asuka.spec SRPM URL: http://www.niemueller.de/projects/extrpms/packages/fedora-extras-5/asuka-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm Description: UnderNet IRCd with QuakeNet Asuka Patches -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 11:26:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 07:26:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199611] Review Request: monsterz - Puzzle game, similar to Bejeweled or Zookeeper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241126.k6OBQIk3008270@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monsterz - Puzzle game, similar to Bejeweled or Zookeeper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199611 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-24 07:17 EST ------- You have to do one more thing. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Games also says that data files should be packaged seperately of main package. Thus make new -data subpackage and include into it %{_datadir}/%{name} and, for the main package, make monsterz-data dependency. Take a look on http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/*checkout*/rpms/tong/FC-5/ tong.spec?root=extras if you would like to see how should it looks like. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 11:27:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 07:27:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199920] New: Review Request: Palantir Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199920 Summary: Review Request: Palantir Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: tim at niemueller.de QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.niemueller.de/projects/extrpms/packages/fedora-extras-5/palantir.spec SRPM URL: http://www.niemueller.de/projects/extrpms/packages/fedora-extras-5/palantir-2.6-1.i386.rpm Description: A multichannel interactive streaming solution. Allows for streaming webcam audio and video and receiving it with different clients, Java and Qt client are supplied with the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 11:29:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 07:29:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199920] Review Request: Palantir In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241129.k6OBTRSC008455@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Palantir https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199920 ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2006-07-24 07:20 EST ------- SRPM URL is http://www.niemueller.de/projects/extrpms/packages/fedora-extras-5/palantir-2.6-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 11:30:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 07:30:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199919] Review Request: Asuka In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241130.k6OBUVht008538@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Asuka https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199919 ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2006-07-24 07:21 EST ------- SRPM URL is http://www.niemueller.de/projects/extrpms/packages/fedora-extras-5/asuka-1.2.1-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 11:32:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 07:32:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175047] Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241132.k6OBW46Q008681@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175047 ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2006-07-24 07:22 EST ------- I have filed requests for the mentioned packages as #199919 and #199920. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 11:45:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 07:45:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199192] Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241145.k6OBjt7J009470@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199192 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-07-24 07:36 EST ------- Package approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 12:29:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 08:29:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199925] New: Review Request: xorg-sgml-doctools Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199925 Summary: Review Request: xorg-sgml-doctools Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: mharris at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://mharris.ca/fedora/core/xorg-sgml-doctools/xorg-sgml-doctools.spec SRPM URL: http://mharris.ca/fedora/core/xorg-sgml-doctools/xorg-sgml-doctools-1.1-1.src.rpm Description: Docbook ent file required for the generation of the X.Org X11 protocol and technical documentation. This package is a prerequisite to building the new 'xorg-x11-docs' package containing the X.Org protocol, etc. documentation which has been missing since the introduction of modular X in FC5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 12:33:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 08:33:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199927] New: Review Request: xorg-x11-docs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199927 Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-docs Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: mharris at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://mharris.ca/fedora/core/xorg-x11-docs/xorg-x11-docs.spec SRPM URL: http://mharris.ca/fedora/core/xorg-x11-docs/xorg-x11-docs-1.2-1.src.rpm Description: X.Org X11 protocol documentation and other technical documentation used by developers. This documentation was previously present in subpackages of monolithic XFree86 and X.Org as "XFree86-doc" and "xorg-x11-doc", but was missing from the Xorg X11R7.0 release. It was tarballed afterward, and made available for the Xorg 7.1 release. The package is 'noarch' now, which provides a huge disk space savings on our internal servers and mirrors as an added bonus. This package requires the new 'xorg-sgml-doctools' package, submitted as bug #199925 in order to build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 12:43:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 08:43:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199927] Review Request: xorg-x11-docs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241243.k6OCh4CI013004@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-docs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199927 mharris at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |199925 OtherBugsDependingO| |174738 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 12:43:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 08:43:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199925] Review Request: xorg-sgml-doctools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241243.k6OChQ1N013084@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-sgml-doctools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199925 mharris at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |199927 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 12:43:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 08:43:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199925] Review Request: xorg-sgml-doctools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241243.k6OChomS013145@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-sgml-doctools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199925 mharris at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |174738 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 12:44:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 08:44:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190367] Review Request: PyKDE: Python bindings for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241244.k6OCiUE0013241@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyKDE: Python bindings for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190367 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-24 08:35 EST ------- Thanks, importing... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 13:25:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 09:25:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188461] Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241325.k6ODPhUv016346@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188461 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-24 09:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > No, it need not be present at src.rpm build-time. It must be present > when building the binaries. Of course :/. Why did I made that wrong assumption??? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 13:27:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 09:27:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188461] Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241327.k6ODRASq016416@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188461 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-24 09:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > * although the %define xmms_inputdir with xmms-config isn't clearly > wrong I think it should not be done that way, Forget about that insane comment, but why isn't the package that provides xmms-config BuildRequired? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 13:35:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 09:35:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188461] Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241335.k6ODZrDf016804@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188461 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2006-07-24 09:26 EST ------- Because xmms-devel is build required already, and it requires xmms in turn. So xmms-config will be present and used inside the properly set up build environment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 13:45:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 09:45:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175047] Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241345.k6ODjsNK017825@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175047 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-24 09:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #34) > I had some RPMs before Fedora Extras came up > (http://www.niemueller.de/projects/extrpms/) which I got space for on SunSITE > Europe. To get this going I would suggest to package Asuka (IRC daemon) and > Palantir (webcam streaming) for Fedora Extras. I'll give it a go and CC you > (Hans) on the review request. Sounds good, I'll review this + the other 2 then and assuming you show a reasonable response time (if you need a number say within a week) during the review process and show some packaging skills I'll sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 14:00:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:00:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199688] Review Request: virt-manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241400.k6OE0cWA018743@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: virt-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199688 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |jkeating at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188267 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-24 09:51 EST ------- - What is the extra_release going to be? Our naming scheme only allows: %{?dist}. - Python requires are automatic, don't need to put it in. rpmlint is silent except for the above mentioned permission thing, which is ignorable. Please address the issues in comment #2 as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 14:04:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:04:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199747] Review Request: pingus - Guide the penguins safely home before they drop of the cliff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241404.k6OE4jvp018967@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pingus - Guide the penguins safely home before they drop of the cliff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199747 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-24 09:55 EST ------- ?? Are you sure, ClanLib has recently been build and hasn't hit the repo yet (atleast not my mirror) also clanlib is only available in the development repo (waiting for CVS branching). So I don't find it strange it doesn't build in mock, I do find it strange it once did build :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 14:10:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:10:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199925] Review Request: xorg-sgml-doctools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241410.k6OEA1IO019243@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-sgml-doctools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199925 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |jkeating at redhat.com CC| |notting at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188268 nThis| | Flag| |needinfo? ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-24 10:00 EST ------- Spec looks good, rpmlint only has warnings: W: xorg-sgml-doctools invalid-license MIT/X11 W: xorg-sgml-doctools no-documentation W: xorg-sgml-doctools invalid-license MIT/X11 W: xorg-sgml-doctools strange-permission xorg-sgml-doctools-1.1.tar.bz2 0660 W: xorg-sgml-doctools strange-permission xorg-sgml-doctools.spec 0660 which can be ignored. Package passes quality. Bill? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 14:20:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:20:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199927] Review Request: xorg-x11-docs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241420.k6OEKBbA019837@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-docs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199927 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-07-24 10:11 EST ------- Tech ack. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 14:20:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:20:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199925] Review Request: xorg-sgml-doctools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241420.k6OEKNYX019885@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-sgml-doctools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199925 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo? | ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-07-24 10:11 EST ------- Tech ack. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 14:20:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:20:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199747] Review Request: pingus - Guide the penguins safely home before they drop of the cliff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241420.k6OEKb2g019913@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pingus - Guide the penguins safely home before they drop of the cliff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199747 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-24 10:11 EST ------- I have a local repo for this sort of thing which is why it built originally. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 14:51:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:51:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199747] Review Request: pingus - Guide the penguins safely home before they drop of the cliff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241451.k6OEplal022519@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pingus - Guide the penguins safely home before they drop of the cliff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199747 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-24 10:42 EST ------- Is ClanLib still in this repo? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 14:52:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:52:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198928] Review Request: lsscsi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241452.k6OEq2wE022553@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lsscsi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198928 ------- Additional Comments From coldwell at redhat.com 2006-07-24 10:42 EST ------- OK, I replaced the tabs with spaces and added the SMP flags to the %make macro. The new spec/srpm are in the same place: http://people.redhat.com/coldwell/lsscsi.spec http://people.redhat.com/coldwell/lsscsi-0.17-2.src.rpm I also did the Fedora rigamarole -- username 'coldwell'. Thanks, Chip -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 14:53:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:53:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199632] Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241453.k6OEr3lS022646@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199632 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-24 10:43 EST ------- Thanks! Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 14:53:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:53:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199732] Review Request: clanbomber - Bomberman-like multiplayer game that uses ClanLib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241453.k6OErQO9022705@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clanbomber - Bomberman-like multiplayer game that uses ClanLib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199732 Bug 199732 depends on bug 199632, which changed state. Bug 199632 Summary: Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199632 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 14:53:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:53:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199797] Review Request: auriferous - Game inspired by the classic Loderunner In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241453.k6OErlur022742@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: auriferous - Game inspired by the classic Loderunner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199797 Bug 199797 depends on bug 199632, which changed state. Bug 199632 Summary: Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199632 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 15:00:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 11:00:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199941] New: Review Request: gnome-python2-gda Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199941 Summary: Review Request: gnome-python2-gda Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: denis at poolshark.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/gnome-python2-gda.spec SRPM URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/gnome-python2-gda-2.14.0-1.src.rpm Description: pyGNOME Python extension module for interacting with gda This module should be part of the gnome-python2-extras package, which is in Core. However since libgda (the Gnome database accesslib) is in Extras, the gda module is not enabled in Core. The goal of this package is to provide that missing gda module, which is needed by Glom. I do think the better solution would be for the stable tree of libgda to be part of Fedora Core, but one has to choose one's battles. You'll notice some devel-type files are present in the package, which rpmlint will complain about. The spec tries to be consistent with that of gnome-python2-extras in Core, and considering the small size of the package I don't think the devel split is worth the effort. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 15:00:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 11:00:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199927] Review Request: xorg-x11-docs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241500.k6OF0bnW023483@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-docs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199927 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |jkeating at redhat.com CC| |notting at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188268 nThis| | Flag| |needinfo? ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-24 10:51 EST ------- - Obsoletes: XFree86-doc, xorg-x11-doc; Do we provide those in this package? Other than that, the only rpmlint errors are ignorable. Approving (if you address the above issue) Bill? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 15:01:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 11:01:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199941] Review Request: gnome-python2-gda In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241501.k6OF1pac023695@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-python2-gda https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199941 denis at poolshark.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: gnome- |Review Request: gnome- |python2-gda |python2-gda BugsThisDependsOn| |198613 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 15:01:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 11:01:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198613] Review Request: compat-libgda - gnome database access library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241501.k6OF1qEZ023703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-libgda - gnome database access library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198613 denis at poolshark.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |199941 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 15:03:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 11:03:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199747] Review Request: pingus - Guide the penguins safely home before they drop of the cliff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241503.k6OF3ZYe023841@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pingus - Guide the penguins safely home before they drop of the cliff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199747 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-24 10:54 EST ------- >From memory, yes. I'll need to check though (it was last time I looked) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 15:09:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 11:09:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199192] Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241509.k6OF9Kd6024236@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199192 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-24 11:00 EST ------- Thanks a lot, package built successfully. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 15:11:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 11:11:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198613] Review Request: compat-libgda - gnome database access library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241511.k6OFB43l024442@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-libgda - gnome database access library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198613 denis at poolshark.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |199943 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 15:22:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 11:22:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198691] Review Request: steghide - A Steganography Program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241522.k6OFM61P025304@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: steghide - A Steganography Program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198691 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 15:20:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 11:20:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196945] Review Request: python-smbpasswd - Python SMB Password Hash Generator Module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241520.k6OFKljF025187@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-smbpasswd - Python SMB Password Hash Generator Module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196945 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-07-24 11:11 EST ------- Next release: Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/python-smbpasswd/python-smbpasswd.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/python-smbpasswd/python-smbpasswd-1.0.1-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 15:28:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 11:28:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196945] Review Request: python-smbpasswd - Python SMB Password Hash Generator Module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241528.k6OFSDVQ026070@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-smbpasswd - Python SMB Password Hash Generator Module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196945 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-24 11:19 EST ------- Okay, package approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 15:36:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 11:36:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198928] Review Request: lsscsi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241536.k6OFaPQT026607@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lsscsi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198928 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-24 11:27 EST ------- You should be all set up now; let me know if you have any trouble getting things imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 15:42:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 11:42:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199192] Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241542.k6OFgEkl027597@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199192 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-24 11:33 EST ------- A few comments: * Requires: qt is superfluous. * Since you used the macro: %define _themesdir %{_datadir}/%{name}/themes It appears that %{_datadir}/%{name} ends up being unowned. * -devel includes: %{_libdir}/libgadu.a The packaging guidelines mandate (recommend strongly?) that static libs be omitted. That is, unless you can make a (strong) case to justify its inclusion. * Personally, I'd say making that many subpkgs is nutty (and a maintainance nightmare), but that's just me. (: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 15:43:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 11:43:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199780] Review Request: dstat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241543.k6OFh0vo027704@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dstat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199780 ------- Additional Comments From scott at perturb.org 2006-07-24 11:34 EST ------- What's the next step in getting this reviewed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 15:48:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 11:48:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199780] Review Request: dstat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241548.k6OFmJLV028427@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dstat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199780 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-24 11:39 EST ------- Whoever is assigned to this bug reviews the fixes you've made, test builds, runs rpmlint over the packages created, compiles in mock, installs and runs rpmlint over the installed package to ensure nothing untoward happens. This isn't an instant process - some bugs can be open for ages! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 15:50:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 11:50:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198288] Review Request: python-pastedeploy - Load, configure, and compose WSGI applications and servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241550.k6OFo4Qo028655@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pastedeploy - Load, configure, and compose WSGI applications and servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198288 ------- Additional Comments From lmacken at redhat.com 2006-07-24 11:41 EST ------- http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/python-paste-deploy-0.5-2.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/python-paste-deploy.spec * Mon Jul 24 2006 Luke Macken - 0.5-2 - Rename package to python-paste-deploy - Fix docs inclusion - Fix inconsistent use of buildroots -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 15:54:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 11:54:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199780] Review Request: dstat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241554.k6OFsrif029151@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dstat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199780 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-24 11:45 EST ------- Looking at the spec file you've got there, I can't see anything which bytecode compiles the python. Remember a # before anything is just counted as a comment and rpmbuild skips past it as if it wasn't there. A couple of other niggles In the Source: you have .../dstat/dstat-%{version}... This can be substituted with .../%{name}/%{name}-%{version}. I know on packages I've had reviewed on, this has been brought up. The make install line can just be make DESTDIR=%{buildroot} install - you don't need the quotes around the buildroot Does the package come with any language translation files? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 15:59:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 11:59:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198928] Review Request: lsscsi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241559.k6OFxhcO029592@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lsscsi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198928 ------- Additional Comments From coldwell at redhat.com 2006-07-24 11:50 EST ------- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/NewPackageProcess step 9 is failing; the owners CVS module doesn't seem to exist CVSROOT is :gserver:cvs.devel.redhat.com:/cvs/dist Chip -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 16:03:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 12:03:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193889] Review Request: ht2html - The www.python.org Web site generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241603.k6OG3gCv029937@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ht2html - The www.python.org Web site generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193889 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-24 11:54 EST ------- Let's try to get things moving. Igor, I'll sponsor you. I'll work up a full review in a minute, but one thing that I can immediately see should be done is to take the mailing list correspondence and include it in the package so that there's some statement of the license there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 16:04:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 12:04:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199192] Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241604.k6OG4PS2029999@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199192 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-24 11:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #26) > * Requires: qt > is superfluous. In fact, many packages don't use it, I'll remove it soon. > * -devel includes: > %{_libdir}/libgadu.a > The packaging guidelines mandate (recommend strongly?) that static libs be > omitted. That is, unless you can make a (strong) case to justify its > inclusion. As I see, packaging guidelines says .la files should be omitted, not .a. And many packages include .a files in their -devel > * Personally, I'd say making that many subpkgs is nutty (and a maintainance > nightmare), but that's just me. (: Yes, but Polish Fedora Community should be happy with it ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 16:05:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 12:05:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199833] Review Request: vips - image processing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241605.k6OG5iTD030101@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vips - image processing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199833 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |Jochen at herr-schmitt.de OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-07-24 11:56 EST ------- Good: + Source tar ball match to upstream. + rpmlint on source rpm quite. + Local build works fine. + rpmlint on binary rpms quite. + Mock build works fine. Bad: - Duplicates BRs: pkgconfig (by lcms-devel), zlib-devel (by libpng-devel), libjpeg-devel (by ImageMagick-devel), lcms-devel (by ImageMagick-devel), libtiff-devel (by ImageMagick-devel), glib2-devel (by pango-devel) - rpmlint vips complaints weak refs: W: vips undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libvipsCC.so.10.8.4 g_thread_use_default_impl W: vips undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libvipsCC.so.10.8.4 g_threads_got_initialized W: vips undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libvipsCC.so.10.8.4 g_thread_functions_for_glib_use W: vips undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libvipsCC.so.10.8.4 im_matinv W: vips undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libvipsCC.so.10.8.4 im_log_imask W: vips undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libvipsCC.so.10.8.4 im_create_imask W: vips undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libvipsCC.so.10.8.4 im_rotate_dmask90 W: vips undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libvipsCC.so.10.8.4 im_matcat W: vips undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libvipsCC.so.10.8.4 im_read_imask W: vips undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libvipsCC.so.10.8.4 im_create_dmask W: vips undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libvipsCC.so.10.8.4 im_mask2vips W: vips undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libvipsCC.so.10.8.4 im_gauss_imask W: vips undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libvipsCC.so.10.8.4 im_gauss_dmask W: vips undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libvipsCC.so.10.8.4 im_free W: vips undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libvipsCC.so.10.8.4 im_matmul W: vips undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libvipsCC.so.10.8.4 im_printdesc W: vips undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libvipsCC.so.10.8.4 im_snprintf W: vips undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libvipsCC.so.10.8.4 im_col_make_tables_RGB W: vips undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libvipsCC.so.10.8.4 im_free_dmask W: vips undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libvipsCC.so.10.8.4 im_dup_dmask W: vips undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libvipsCC.so.10.8.4 im_allocate_vargv W: vips undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libvipsCC.so.10.8.4 im_initdesc W: vips undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libvipsCC.so.10.8.4 im_open W: vips undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libvipsCC.so.10.8.4 im_scale_dmask W: vips undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libvipsCC.so.10.8.4 im_read_dmask W: vips undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libvipsCC.so.10.8.4 im_col_display_name W: vips undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libvipsCC.so.10.8.4 im_image W: vips undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libvipsCC.so.10.8.4 im_dup_imask W: vips undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libvipsCC.so.10.8.4 im_close W: vips undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libvipsCC.so.10.8.4 im_incheck W: vips undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libvipsCC.so.10.8.4 im_rotate_dmask45 W: vips undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libvipsCC.so.10.8.4 im_free_imask W: vips undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libvipsCC.so.10.8.4 im_find_function W: vips undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libvipsCC.so.10.8.4 im_malloc W: vips undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libvipsCC.so.10.8.4 g_static_mutex_get_mutex_impl W: vips undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libvipsCC.so.10.8.4 im_error_clear W: vips undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libvipsCC.so.10.8.4 im_free_vargv W: vips undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libvipsCC.so.10.8.4 im_log_dmask W: vips undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libvipsCC.so.10.8.4 im_error_buffer W: vips undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libvipsCC.so.10.8.4 im_mattrn W: vips undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libvipsCC.so.10.8.4 im_col_displays W: vips undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libvipsCC.so.10.8.4 im_copy W: vips undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libvipsCC.so.10.8.4 im_rotate_imask90 W: vips undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libvipsCC.so.10.8.4 im_rotate_imask45 W: vips undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libvipsCC.so.10.8.4 im_setupout -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 16:06:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 12:06:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182254] Review Request: SS5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241606.k6OG696W030149@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SS5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182254 ------- Additional Comments From matteo.ricchetti at libero.it 2006-07-24 11:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > Using ss5-3.5.4-1.src.rpm > * Drop the entire Requires line, rpm can figure out this from the BuildRequires. > * some paths are not replaced with RPM macros > (wiki: QAChecklist item 7) > Use macros with all of the file paths in your %files listing. For example, > %{_mandir} instead of /usr/share/man/. See > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/RPMMacros > * Delete ss5 from the Summary tag, it is redundant (and fixes rpmlint > complaining about capitalizing it) > rpmlint and comments: > W: ss5 summary-not-capitalized ss5 Socks Server 5 > Will be fixed after remove ss5 > W: ss5 no-version-in-last-changelog > Put the version number - release at the end of the changelog line > W: ss5 conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/opt/ss5/ss5.conf > W: ss5 conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/opt/ss5/ss5.passwd > W: ss5 conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/pam.d/ss5 > W: ss5 conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/rc.d/init.d/ss5 > E: ss5 executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/ss5 > I would mark ss5.conf and ss5.passwd noreplace as they are configuration files > that likely will be edited. > E: ss5 non-standard-dir-perm /var/log/ss5 0644 > It's expecting something like 755. > W: ss5 log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/ss5 > Optional. > W: ss5 service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/ss5 > The service is enabled by default after "chkconfig --add"; for security > reasons, most services should not be. Use "-" as the default runlevel in the > init script's chkconfig line to fix this if appropriate for this service. > E: ss5 configure-without-libdir-spec > A configure script is run without specifying the libdir. configure > options must be augmented with something like --libdir=%{_libdir}. > E: ss5 hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/ss5/ > A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, > /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. > Thank you for your patience as we work through these tedious little details. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 16:12:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 12:12:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199192] Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241612.k6OGCS8c030553@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199192 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-24 12:03 EST ------- > As I see, packaging guidelines says .la files should be omitted, not .a. Look a little closer. (: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines item 15. Exclusion of Static libraries > And many packages include .a files in their -devel We're working on bringing pkgs into compliance... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 16:23:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 12:23:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199834] Review Request: nip2 - interactive image processing system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241623.k6OGNU2Y031145@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nip2 - interactive image processing system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199834 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-07-24 12:14 EST ------- Good: + rpmlint on source rpm is quite. + Local build works fine. + rpmlint on binary rpms is quite + rpmlint on installed rpm is quite. + Application have a desktop entry. + Applcation can start without crash. I may able to aprove your package after vips is aproved and I have done a mock build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 16:35:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 12:35:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199192] Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241635.k6OGZft0031691@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199192 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-24 12:26 EST ------- I'm still not convinced of that, but okay, I'll fix it in next release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 16:46:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 12:46:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199592] Review Request: icu4j In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241646.k6OGk6So032761@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: icu4j https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199592 ------- Additional Comments From bkonrath at redhat.com 2006-07-24 12:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Why not patch the upstream source against the source included with eclipse and > keep the external package? I don't want to patch becuase it seems that 3.4.4.1 is a significant change from 3.4.4.1. They removed a whole bunch of classes and I'm not really sure what there changes do. I'm going to file a bug upstream and see if I can figure out what's going on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 16:56:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 12:56:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241656.k6OGuH3C001141@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-07-24 12:47 EST ------- Thanks for the review: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~athimm/fedorasubmit/vtk/vtk.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~athimm/fedorasubmit/vtk/vtk-5.0.1-10.at.src.rpm * Sun Jul 23 2006 Axel Thimm - 5.0.1-10 - Embed feedback from bug 199405 comment 5. - Fix some Group entries. - Remove redundant dependencies. - Use system libs. - Comment specfile more. - Change buildroot handling with CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX. - Enable qt designer plugin. rpmlint is almost quiet now: E: vtk-examples zero-length /usr/share/doc/vtk-examples-5.0.1/Examples/Build/vtkMy/Wrapping/hints W: vtk-examples wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/vtk-examples-5.0.1/Examples/GUI/Win32/SampleMFC/Sample.rc E: vtk-examples zero-length /usr/share/doc/vtk-examples-5.0.1/Examples/Build/vtkLocal/hints W: vtk-python no-documentation W: vtk-tcl no-documentation W: vtk-tcl devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/vtk-5.0/tcl/vtktcl.c E: vtk-testing only-non-binary-in-usr-lib W: vtk-testing no-documentation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 17:03:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 13:03:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199192] Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241703.k6OH3qLd001578@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199192 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-24 12:54 EST ------- > I'm still not convinced of that The PackagingGuidelines, imo, are pretty clear. What about it are you not convinced (or do you disagree with the guideline)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 17:11:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 13:11:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198928] Review Request: lsscsi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241711.k6OHBAHU001925@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lsscsi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198928 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-07-24 13:02 EST ------- That CVSROOT is wrong for FE. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/UsingCvsFaq -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 17:11:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 13:11:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199925] Review Request: xorg-sgml-doctools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241711.k6OHBMBm001962@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-sgml-doctools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199925 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO_REPORTER ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-24 13:02 EST ------- added to dist-fc6. Mike should this go into Comps somewhere? Please close when built for rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 17:12:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 13:12:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199927] Review Request: xorg-x11-docs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241712.k6OHC9PS002007@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-docs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199927 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEEDINFO_REPORTER Flag|needinfo? | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-24 13:02 EST ------- Added to dist-fc6. Should this go into Comps somewhere? Please close when built into rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 17:15:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 13:15:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188461] Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241715.k6OHFpLS002192@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188461 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-07-24 13:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > Because xmms-devel is build required already, and it requires xmms in turn. Nope, it requires xmms-libs nowadays, but: > So xmms-config will be present Yep, it's in the xmms-devel package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 17:17:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 13:17:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199968] New: Review Request: xdg-utils - Basic desktop integration functions Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199968 Summary: Review Request: xdg-utils - Basic desktop integration functions Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: rdieter at math.unl.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/xdg-utils.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/xdg-utils-1.0-0.1.beta1.src.rpm Description: The xdg-utils package is a set of simple scripts that provide basic desktop integration functions for any Free Desktop, such as Linux. They are intended to provide a set of defacto standards. This means that: * Third party software developers can rely on these xdg-utils for all of their simple integration needs. * Developers of desktop environments can make sure that their environments are well supported * Distribution vendors can provide custom versions of these utilities The following scripts are provided at this time: * xdg-menu Place a menu into the users menu structure * xdg-mime Gather mime information about a file * xdg-open Open a URL in the user's preferred application that handles the respective URL or file type * xdg-email Open the users preferred email client, potentially with subject and other info filled in * xdg-copy Copy one URI to another * xdg-su Run a command as a different (usually root) user * xdg-screensaver Enable, disable, or suspend the screensaver -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 17:24:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 13:24:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199192] Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241724.k6OHOoBW002796@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadu - Gadu-Gadu client for online messaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199192 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-24 13:15 EST ------- Okay, I had to inquire about some things, now everything is clear. It'll be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 17:43:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 13:43:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193889] Review Request: ht2html - The www.python.org Web site generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241743.k6OHhZp4004056@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ht2html - The www.python.org Web site generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193889 ------- Additional Comments From ifoox at redhat.com 2006-07-24 13:34 EST ------- Hi Jason, Thanks again for looking at this. Here are the new files: New files: http://people.redhat.com/ifoox/extras/ht2html-2.0-2.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/ifoox/extras/ht2html.spec I just included a comment that references the ML thread above just above the License tag. Should I also include a %{?dist} tag in the release? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 17:51:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 13:51:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193897] Review Request: mysql-connector-java - Official JDBC driver for MySQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241751.k6OHpt0Q004636@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-connector-java - Official JDBC driver for MySQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193897 ------- Additional Comments From ifoox at redhat.com 2006-07-24 13:42 EST ------- It seems that the java connector for mysql used to be called MM.MySQL, and so old packages might depend on this name. It is now officially called Connector/J, and so the name mysql-connector-java better reflects this, but I think we need to keep the provides for mm.mysql in there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 18:01:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 14:01:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193889] Review Request: ht2html - The www.python.org Web site generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241801.k6OI1Qld005208@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ht2html - The www.python.org Web site generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193889 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-24 13:52 EST ------- Honestly I'd actually copy the relevant text of that message into a file that you include as %doc, and also include the URL of the original along with a bit of explanation. Someone with an installed package who wants to check the license won't have access to the specfile. I also don't think including a just URL is sufficient, especially given how difficult sourceforge can be to reach sometimes. I personally would always use the dist tag because of the amount of work it saves when maintaining identical packages across multiple distribution releases. But it's up to you. I note that the final package has no requirement on Python. I believe this is a blocker. Review: * source files match upstream: 925d359f7db48c44ed0bc3044cebd3f0 ht2html-2.0.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. X dist tag is present (not a blocker but you probably want to use it) * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. X license is open source-compatible. Statement of license should be included as %doc in the package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * noarch package; no debuginfo. * rpmlint is silent. X final provides and requires: missing python requirement. ht2html = 2.0-2 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/env * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 18:04:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 14:04:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199780] Review Request: dstat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241804.k6OI4IvR005389@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dstat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199780 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-07-24 13:55 EST ------- Quick note as I start reviewing: You should always bump the release number, even when you are making new spec files for review. This lets me easily reference the -2 release as having Problem A) and the -3 release fixed that but introduced problem B). It makes it easier to figure out what problems are still outstanding against a package and which have been fixed. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 18:13:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 14:13:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196393] Review Request: svrcore-devel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241813.k6OIDY1E006193@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: svrcore-devel Alias: svrcore-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196393 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2006-07-24 14:04 EST ------- Fedora Directory Server uses svrcore also. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 18:14:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 14:14:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199688] Review Request: virt-manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241814.k6OIEgUQ006389@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: virt-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199688 berrange at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From berrange at redhat.com 2006-07-24 14:05 EST ------- The %extra_release stuff is not intended to be used for formal release builds. We have a automated builder system which builds snapshots of the app from source 24x7, which defines %extra_release based on a timestamp to distinguish snapshot RPM builds, from formal Fedora releases. I can take it out of the spec file if desired, or put a comment in as to its intended use. Do the automatic python requires pick up any versioning information? If not then I think it could be desirable to leave in the requires lines for python libvirt & dbus packages, so that if people try to deploy the RPM they don't do so against an older version of libvirt / dbus, which are known not to work. The pygtk, gconf & ctypes deps could easily come out though because I don't believe that's any critical versioning info that would be lost. I'll produce an updated spec file with fixes for the .pyo %ghost & full URL for %source, in the next few days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 18:25:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 14:25:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199688] Review Request: virt-manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241825.k6OIPZPG007678@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: virt-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199688 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-24 14:16 EST ------- I was just referring to the Requires: python itself. Python based packages now get an automatic python ABI requirement. As far as the Extra stuff, you can leave it, just comment around it. Next few days may be too late with the freeze supposed to be happening today... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 18:26:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 14:26:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241826.k6OIQgmg007834@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-07-24 14:17 EST ------- It could be that neither matters but the reasoning is flawed. In LTSP thin client installations (where you need to have a networked audio server in order to get sound) it is common to set up the LD_PRELOAD variable to load the dsp redirecting library system wide. So the padsp script is never used in this case. I think the real question is whether the calls that libpulsedsp is overriding (AFAICT: _ioctl, _close, _open, _fopen, _open64, _fopen64, _fclose, _access ) will ever change their ABI. And if they do, will we need to provide for concurrent old and new versions or will the change be such that everything will have to upgrade with no backwards compat-possible. I don't usually work at this level, so feel free to correct any misconceptions I might have as to how libpulsedsp works and to tell me what will happen in the case above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 18:38:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 14:38:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199968] Review Request: xdg-utils - Basic desktop integration functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241838.k6OIccRX009158@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdg-utils - Basic desktop integration functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199968 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-24 14:29 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/xdg-utils.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/xdg-utils-1.0-0.3.20060721.src.rpm %changelog * Mon Jul 24 2006 Rex Dieter 1.0-0.3.20060721 - 20060721 snapshot - optgnome.patch * Mon Jul 24 2006 Rex Dieter 1.0-0.2.beta1 - Requires: desktop-file-utils -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 18:56:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 14:56:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193889] Review Request: ht2html - The www.python.org Web site generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241856.k6OIuRJT011675@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ht2html - The www.python.org Web site generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193889 ------- Additional Comments From ifoox at redhat.com 2006-07-24 14:47 EST ------- New files: http://people.redhat.com/ifoox/extras/ht2html-2.0-3.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/ifoox/extras/ht2html.spec I've created a LICENSE file that explains the situation and provides the actualy license, as well as quotes and references the ML post. I've added a Requires for Python and also a %{?dist} to the release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 18:57:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 14:57:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241857.k6OIvjCJ011794@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-07-24 14:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #30) > It could be that neither matters but the reasoning is flawed. In LTSP thin > client installations (where you need to have a networked audio server in order > to get sound) it is common to set up the LD_PRELOAD variable to load the dsp > redirecting library system wide. So the padsp script is never used in this case. Doesn't this result in disable prelinking system wide? > I think the real question is whether the calls that libpulsedsp is overriding > (AFAICT: _ioctl, _close, _open, _fopen, _open64, _fopen64, _fclose, _access ) > will ever change their ABI. Yes, symbol versioning is something to worry about. LD_PRELOAD is a neat trick but I've learned the hard way that it's basically a bad idea for anything other than debugging. I'm not all that familiar with pulseaudio yet, but isn't there some other way to get similar functionality? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 19:08:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 15:08:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241908.k6OJ8Kmn012417@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|gutenprint |Review Request: gutenprint: | |Printer Drivers Package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 19:10:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 15:10:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196262] Review Request: katapult In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241910.k6OJA8Yl012570@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: katapult https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196262 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |rdieter at math.unl.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-24 15:01 EST ------- Looks pretty good, I'll give it a once over... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 19:11:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 15:11:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196262] Review Request: katapult: Faster access to applications, bookmarks, and other items In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241911.k6OJBsoL012713@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: katapult: Faster access to applications, bookmarks, and other items https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196262 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: katapult |Review Request: katapult: | |Faster access to | |applications, bookmarks, and | |other items -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 19:13:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 15:13:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196378] Review Request: kdegraphics-extras: Extras, including kuickshow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241913.k6OJD03a012798@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdegraphics-extras: Extras, including kuickshow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196378 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-24 15:03 EST ------- Dennis, any more MUSTFIX items? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 19:25:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 15:25:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241925.k6OJP5Vr013662@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-07-24 15:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #31) > (In reply to comment #30) > > In LTSP thin client installations (where you need to have a networked audio > > server in order to get sound) it is common to set up the LD_PRELOAD variable > > to load the dsp redirecting library system wide. > > Doesn't this result in disable prelinking system wide? > I've never thought of that but it could. I'll mention this on the k12ltsp list and see what response comes back. > LD_PRELOAD is a neat trick but I've learned the hard way that it's basically a > bad idea for anything other than debugging. I'm not all that familiar with > pulseaudio yet, but isn't there some other way to get similar functionality? > Monty mentioned on IRC that he's working on fusd (Device files from userspace.) He thinks that will allow pulseaudio to create the device files rather than having to load a library that overrides calls to /dev/dsp with calls to pulseaudio instead. Without that I think all prior art is to use LD_PRELOAD in this manner. (Although thin client is the only place I'm aware of them doing it system-wide; most places use the {esd,arts,pa}dsp wrapper to target specific applications.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 19:52:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 15:52:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196262] Review Request: katapult: Faster access to applications, bookmarks, and other items In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607241952.k6OJqNFw016323@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: katapult: Faster access to applications, bookmarks, and other items https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196262 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-24 15:43 EST ------- Checks out OK, and for the record: $rpmlint katapult-0.3.1.3-4.fc6.i386.rpm W: katapult devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libkatapult.so W: katapult devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libkatapultdisplay.so W: katapult devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libkatapultcatalog.so (harmless, no biggie). APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 20:17:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 16:17:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199905] Review Request: gotmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607242017.k6OKHk9t018866@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gotmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199905 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul at city-fan.org OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-24 16:08 EST ------- The spec file in upstream CVS has a bunch of stuff for building CVS snapshot releases, and also groks the version number from elsewhere in the upstream release. For Fedora Extras, where you probably won't be releasing CVS snapshots at all and where the spec file is maintained in Fedora CVS away from all of the other upstream files, you won't need any of that. So I'd suggest removing all of that and hardcoding the version number in the Version: tag. Since that will then be a different spec file than the one in upstream CVS, you should provide a link to the modified spec file for Fedora Extras in this bugzilla ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 20:51:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 16:51:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195365] Review Request: etcnet - /etc/net network configuration system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607242051.k6OKpnd5023376@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: etcnet - /etc/net network configuration system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195365 Bug 195365 depends on bug 195353, which changed state. Bug 195353 Summary: Please build network scripts as a separate package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195353 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |WONTFIX Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 21:20:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 17:20:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188461] Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607242120.k6OLKpXI026514@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188461 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-24 17:11 EST ------- Still not right: - gcc-c++ should be omitted from buildrequires - %setup -q - buildroot is wrong In the %changelog, the lines are like * Wed May 3 2006 Matthias Saou 1.2-2.1 the strange thing in it is instead of a mail adress. Is it acceptable? * rpmlint gives W: xmms-musepack setup-not-quiet * follow naming and packaging guidelines * licence is BSD-like, included * spec legible * source match upstream ff7f5f9122d09ad63af9c564046086cf xmms-musepack-1.2.tar.bz2 * builds and works on devel * use macros consistently * don't own any directory * %files section right * no missing BuildRequires * only dlopened library, in the right directory for xmms If the above issues are solved I would approve that package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 21:29:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 17:29:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200024] New: Review Request: openib Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200024 Summary: Review Request: openib Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: dledford at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: already in cvs as openib/devel/openib.spec SRPM URL: can be found in beehive/comps/dist/4E-qu-candidate/openib Description: OpenIB rpm that brings in the OFED 1.0 distribution as released upstream -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 21:33:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 17:33:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200024] Review Request: openib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607242133.k6OLXDN7027132@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200024 ------- Additional Comments From dledford at redhat.com 2006-07-24 17:24 EST ------- Only applies to RHEL, not fc6. The openib package conflicts with other packages in fedora extras, so we aren't intending to release it in core in order to avoid those conflicts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 21:37:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 17:37:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200026] New: Review Request: ibutils Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200026 Summary: Review Request: ibutils Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: dledford at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: already in cvs as ibutils/devel/ibutils.spec SRPM URL: can be found in beehive/comps/dist/4E-qu-candidate/ibutils Description: OpenIB rpm that brings in the Mellanox contributed Infiniband fabric diagnostic tools -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 21:40:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 17:40:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200026] Review Request: ibutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607242140.k6OLeVQg027712@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ibutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200026 ------- Additional Comments From dledford at redhat.com 2006-07-24 17:31 EST ------- Just like the last one, bz#200024 - openib package review, this one is a rhel5 only issue. In order to build this into fc6, I would have to first have the openib package from bz#200024 in fc6, which would conflict with packages in extras, so neither of these are being requested for fc6, just rhel5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 21:47:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 17:47:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199968] Review Request: xdg-utils - Basic desktop integration functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607242147.k6OLleSs028445@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdg-utils - Basic desktop integration functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199968 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-07-24 17:38 EST ------- Hi, Here a review. Please note that this is not an official review; because I'm not yet sponsored. MUST items: * rpmlint check -- rpmlint gives a warning on srpm. You'll need to fix it: W: xdg-utils mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. * Per Naming Guidelines, you should rename the spec to xdg-utils.spec * dist tag is not present. You must add it. * The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. * The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license GPL. * This package includes License file LICENSE. * The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. md5sum is correct fde4bf35fc34c58faa562bfb96103eb5. * This package successfully compiled and built into binary rpms for i386 architecture. * This package did not containd any ExcludeArch. * This package owns all directories that it creates. * This package did not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. * Please use %{name} macro in Source0, and possibly in more places. * You must use make %{?smp_flags} instead of make in %build part. * This package have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT * Doc files are present: ChangeLog LICENSE README TODO * Package is not relocatable. * The permissions of installed files look correct. * There are no .la libtool archives in the package. * Source URL is correct. * BuildRoot line meets guidelines. Also, I think you should clean up the spec -- it looks messy. Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 21:51:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 17:51:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199732] Review Request: clanbomber - Bomberman-like multiplayer game that uses ClanLib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607242151.k6OLpOK4028807@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clanbomber - Bomberman-like multiplayer game that uses ClanLib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199732 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-24 17:42 EST ------- The build fails if you have the smp_flags on the makefile line (it fails on a race condition when building - not all scripts are happy using smp). When I remove the smp_flags from the make line, the package builds without a problem. rpmlint throws no complaints with the binary or source packages. My local repo and mock built it happily. As long as you remove the smp_flags, I'm happy for this to be released. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 21:52:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 17:52:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199747] Review Request: pingus - Guide the penguins safely home before they drop of the cliff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607242152.k6OLq8Zw028874@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pingus - Guide the penguins safely home before they drop of the cliff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199747 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-24 17:43 EST ------- D'oh, the cache was chomped. I'm happy for this to be released now. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 21:53:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 17:53:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199611] Review Request: monsterz - Puzzle game, similar to Bejeweled or Zookeeper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607242153.k6OLrjHW029033@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monsterz - Puzzle game, similar to Bejeweled or Zookeeper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199611 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wart at kobold.org ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-07-24 17:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > You have to do one more thing. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Games > also says that data files should be packaged seperately of main package. > Thus make new -data subpackage and include into it %{_datadir}/%{name} and, for > the main package, make monsterz-data dependency. Take a look on > http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/*checkout*/rpms/tong/FC-5/ > tong.spec?root=extras if you would like to see how should it looks like. It's more important to separate the two when upstream -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 22:08:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 18:08:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199968] Review Request: xdg-utils - Basic desktop integration functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607242208.k6OM8e7n029972@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdg-utils - Basic desktop integration functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199968 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-07-24 17:59 EST ------- Hi again, Please ignore my comment about the name of the spec file. Sorry. Regards, Devim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 22:09:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 18:09:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199611] Review Request: monsterz - Puzzle game, similar to Bejeweled or Zookeeper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607242209.k6OM9Hd0029996@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monsterz - Puzzle game, similar to Bejeweled or Zookeeper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199611 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-07-24 18:00 EST ------- Ignore my previous comment. I hit 'submit' too soon. Anyway, you might also want to use 'install -p' to preserve the timestamps on the source files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 22:25:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 18:25:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199611] Review Request: monsterz - Puzzle game, similar to Bejeweled or Zookeeper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607242225.k6OMPiNn030686@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monsterz - Puzzle game, similar to Bejeweled or Zookeeper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199611 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-07-24 18:16 EST ------- I'm also concerned about the setgid scoreboard handling. To my untrained eye, it looks secure. But there might be concurrency issues if multiple users try to write to the file at the same time. I don't see any sort of locking to ensure synchronized access, but then again, the section of code that actually writes to the file is pretty isolated and short-lived, so it might not be enough to worry about. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 23:16:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 19:16:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199592] Review Request: icu4j In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607242316.k6ONG0ri001672@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: icu4j https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199592 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|188267 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 23:17:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 19:17:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199688] Review Request: virt-manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607242317.k6ONHYI1001722@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: virt-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199688 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO_REPORTER -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 24 23:18:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 19:18:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195363] Review Request: esc and esc-xulrunner-devel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607242318.k6ONInXf001762@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esc and esc-xulrunner-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195363 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-24 19:09 EST ------- Ray, ping, can you continue this review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 00:07:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 20:07:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193889] Review Request: ht2html - The www.python.org Web site generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607250007.k6P07lJC003848@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ht2html - The www.python.org Web site generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193889 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 177841 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-24 19:58 EST ------- Unfortunately the Python requirement results in a package that won't install: Error: Missing Dependency: Python is needed by package ht2html The requirement should be for "python". Other than that one issue, everything looks good. The information you include in LICENSE is especially complete. Apart from changing the case of a single letter, I think this is ready to go, so I'll go ahead and approve and you can fix it when you check in. I see you've already done the CLA, so go ahead and request your cvsextras and fedorabugs memberships and I'll take care of them. Then you can check in and request your builds. Let me know if you have any problems. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 00:08:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 20:08:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193894] Review Request: ant-contrib - A collection of tasks for Ant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607250008.k6P08VOi003929@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ant-contrib - A collection of tasks for Ant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193894 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 00:08:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 20:08:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193897] Review Request: mysql-connector-java - Official JDBC driver for MySQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607250008.k6P08lZT003990@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-connector-java - Official JDBC driver for MySQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193897 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 00:08:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 20:08:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193896] Review Request: libreadline-java - Java wrapper for the GNU-readline library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607250008.k6P08c7G003966@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libreadline-java - Java wrapper for the GNU-readline library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193896 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 00:09:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 20:09:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193898] Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607250009.k6P0990X004064@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 00:09:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 20:09:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193898] Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607250009.k6P09CHR004085@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 00:26:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 20:26:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199927] Review Request: xorg-x11-docs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607250026.k6P0QXsu004724@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-docs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199927 mharris at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From mharris at redhat.com 2006-07-24 20:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > - Obsoletes: XFree86-doc, xorg-x11-doc; Do we provide those in this package? No, but nothing should depend on them either. The packages didn't even exist in FC5, so if anything depended on them we probably would have gotten a bug report by now. I can add Provides anyway though if you prefer, just for completeness. ;) > Other than that, the only rpmlint errors are ignorable. > > Approving (if you address the above issue) All the X packages have "License: MIT/X11", however technically speaking different parts of X are under slightly different licenses. Individual source files are sometimes under a different license. The majority of all of the licences are the MIT licence, or very close clone of it, or of the BSD no-ad-clause license. If there's a generic text that should be used instead of "MIT/X11" for quirks of this nature, I can change it though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 00:35:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 20:35:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199927] Review Request: xorg-x11-docs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607250035.k6P0Zdv4004986@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-docs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199927 ------- Additional Comments From mharris at redhat.com 2006-07-24 20:26 EST ------- Ok, I fixed the Groups field, and added the Provides suggested above, checked into CVS now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 00:37:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 20:37:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199925] Review Request: xorg-sgml-doctools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607250037.k6P0b9wx005093@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-sgml-doctools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199925 mharris at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From mharris at redhat.com 2006-07-24 20:27 EST ------- This one doesn't need to be in comps. I've updated the rpm Groups for this to match what sgml-common uses for the same files (Application/Text). Checked into CVS now, and built in rawhide. Thanks guys. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 00:37:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 20:37:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199927] Review Request: xorg-x11-docs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607250037.k6P0bfIx005160@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-docs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199927 Bug 199927 depends on bug 199925, which changed state. Bug 199925 Summary: Review Request: xorg-sgml-doctools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199925 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 01:04:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 21:04:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189092] Review Request: boo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607250104.k6P14Dls006656@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189092 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-07-24 20:55 EST ------- Isn't building, is expecting to be in %{_prefix}/lib. Needs fixing. After defining a %{monodir} to be %{_prefix}/lib, rpmlint found: Source RPM: E: boo hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib Workaround to make it build. Ignore at least for now. W: boo rpm-buildroot-usage %prep rm -rf %{buildroot} W: boo mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs Not important but easy to fix. W: boo patch-not-applied Patch0: build.patch Drop the patch. rpmlint of boo-devel: W: boo-devel no-documentation Ignore. rpmlint of boo: E: boo no-binary E: boo only-non-binary-in-usr-lib Expected for mono. E: boo-debuginfo empty-debuginfo-package Drop the debuginfo package. Missing a update-mime-database scriplet. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ScriptletSnippets Good stuff: - package meets naming guidelines - license (MIT) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent: defined %{monodir} - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file EXTRA STUFF FOR PACKAGES WITH DEVEL ====================================== - devel package ok - no .la files - post/postun ldconfig ok - devel requires base package n-v-r -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 01:10:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 21:10:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189092] Review Request: boo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607250110.k6P1ANVm006923@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189092 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-07-24 21:01 EST ------- Clarification: that %{_libdir} thing is for the lone file in the devel package: %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/boo.pc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 01:26:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 21:26:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189092] Review Request: boo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607250126.k6P1Qkpm007655@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189092 ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2006-07-24 21:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #27) > #25 - how can boo require boo to build? Actually the patch adds BR nant, I just spaced out when writing the post. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 01:27:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 21:27:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182254] Review Request: SS5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607250127.k6P1RETw007696@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SS5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182254 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-07-24 21:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #28) > - how can I check build status? > > - how can I check if my package is into Extras (at the moment is part > of "Packages not present in the development repo"? I need to specify other > branch or in not necessary? > In addition to using the plague-client, the web interface at http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/build-status/ shows build status. The system should also send you email. After a sucessful build packages are manually signed. They then appear in http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/ and on the mirrors. Your FC-5 build, for example, will be under 5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 01:41:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 21:41:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198098] Review Request: xarchiver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607250141.k6P1frxo008355@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xarchiver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198098 jtorresh at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jtorresh at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 01:48:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 21:48:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194279] Review Request: kdeartwork: Additional artwork (themes, sound themes, ...) for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607250148.k6P1m2tN008746@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeartwork: Additional artwork (themes, sound themes, ...) for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194279 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-24 21:38 EST ------- Is this under review? It's assigned, but still blocking FE-NEW. If someone is reviewing it, it should block FE-REVIEW instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 01:55:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 21:55:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607250155.k6P1tPFR009201@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 ------- Additional Comments From drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx 2006-07-24 21:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #30) > It could be that neither matters but the reasoning is flawed. The reasoning is sound, you just expect the versioning to do more magic than it does. > > I think the real question is whether the calls that libpulsedsp is overriding > (AFAICT: _ioctl, _close, _open, _fopen, _open64, _fopen64, _fclose, _access ) > will ever change their ABI. And if they do, will we need to provide for > concurrent old and new versions or will the change be such that everything will > have to upgrade with no backwards compat-possible. Versioning does not work on this level. If we assume that _open changed it's ABI, then libc.so.6 would become libc.so.7. Still, this would mean nothing to libpulsedsp.so as the only one who knows about it is padsp (or some other script setting the LD_PRELOAD variable). If we have a mix of applications needing libc.so.6 and libc.so.7 then versioning libpulse.so wouldn't solve our problem. We, as users, would need to provide info on which ABI is in place. There wouldn't be any need for two libpulse.so though, as it could be designed to handle both ABI:s, provided it gets information about which it should use. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 01:58:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 21:58:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198098] Review Request: xarchiver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607250158.k6P1wCLV009352@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xarchiver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198098 ------- Additional Comments From jtorresh at gmail.com 2006-07-24 21:49 EST ------- Damien: I'll make a formal review of your package soon, but please try to correct the issues I mentioned above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 02:11:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 22:11:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199927] Review Request: xorg-x11-docs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607250211.k6P2BFLE009713@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-docs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199927 mharris at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From mharris at redhat.com 2006-07-24 22:01 EST ------- Built in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 02:16:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 22:16:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176109] Review Request: pytraffic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607250216.k6P2GWkd009985@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pytraffic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176109 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO_REPORTER -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 02:22:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 22:22:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173724] Review Request: libyahoo2 - Library for the Yahoo! Messenger Protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607250222.k6P2MhqD010165@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libyahoo2 - Library for the Yahoo! Messenger Protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173724 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO_REPORTER -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 04:00:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 00:00:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199919] Review Request: Asuka In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607250400.k6P40uBU014824@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Asuka https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199919 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-24 23:51 EST ------- No SRPM found on given SRPM URL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 04:02:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 00:02:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199920] Review Request: Palantir In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607250402.k6P42saL015045@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Palantir https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199920 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-24 23:53 EST ------- Not able to download SRPM ERROR 404: Not Found -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 05:36:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 01:36:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200051] New: Review Request: libutempter Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200051 Summary: Review Request: libutempter Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: mharris at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/mharris/libutempter.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/mharris/libutempter-1.1.4-1.src.rpm Description: libutempter is a replacement for the Red Hat 'utempter' package which is itself originally a fork of Red Hat utempter which has had numerous security enhancments to the Red Hat code, but provides full backward compatibility. Additionally, the new package follows Fedora packaging guidelines more closely by providing standard libfoo and libfoo-devel package naming. Note: This package makes use of two groups, the first 'utmp' which is already allocated and present in the Red Hat 'utempter' package as GID==22, and the second group 'utempter' which is currently unallocated. Once this package has been approved as a replacment for utempter, and any changes implemented which are deemed necessary, a request will be filed to allocate a new GID for the utempter helper utility. Once the GID is allocated, the package will be updated prior to being built in rawhide. After that, the legacy Red Hat 'utempter' package can be deprecated and removed from brew. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 05:43:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 01:43:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195363] Review Request: esc and esc-xulrunner-devel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607250543.k6P5hhTJ020016@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esc and esc-xulrunner-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195363 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2006-07-25 01:34 EST ------- So I built this today. I've noticed a few things. Some packaging issues: - in general, packages almost always follow %{macro_name} format instead of %macro_name - you need to call gtk-update-icon-cache in %post for your icon to be visible in the menus, etc. - the vendor thing is a bit odd. Why do you rename the icon to have the vendor prefix? I think I would probably just drop the vendor stuff altogether and pass --vendor esc to desktop-file-install. - why do you install the LICENSE into libdir? - in general, if we put things in the menu in the default install we give them a generic name (e.g, "Text Editor" instead of "gEdit"). Maybe "Smart Card Manager" ? - you've got it in the wrong spot I think. It probably makes more sense to be in "Administration". - It needs a root password, yes? So you'll need to use consolehelper. install esc in /usr/sbin, create a symlink from /usr/bin/consolehelper to /usr/bin/esc and install a file called esc to /etc/pam.d with this in it: #%PAM-1.0 auth include config-util account include config-util session include config-util - If you want to start the monitoring bits at login, you'll need to install a desktop file (like the one you put in /usr/share/applications) into /etc/xdg/autostart . Note, the program will be run as a normal user, not as root, so you'll need to separate the management bits from the monitoring bits for it to work. - If you do start it at login, make sure you hide the icon until someone inserts a security token. cosmetic issues: 1) the icon in the notification area is different than the icon in the app. 2) the gradient is a bit ugly 3) the spacing in the side frame is weird 4) some of the text is wonky, could probably use some proof reading Some other things: - When it starts up it asks for a config uri. I gave the cseng one and it didn't work. It just gave me error code 28. At some point I switched to connecting to the mountain view vpn (from the westford one) and then it started working. I don't know if changing vpn's is what fixed it or if it only works sometimes. - If I click the test button on the config dialog it gives me another dialog telling me it's about to do the test I just asked for. that dialog isn't really a good idea. - It probably would be a good idea to disallow the token that was used for logging in from being able to be formatted. - why is the log file for esc in libdir? Note, I never actually got enrollment to work. It formatted my token fine, but after a few blinks during the enrolment step the token led just turns off and the client sits with two spinning throbbers indefinitely. It's just sitting in poll waiting for events I think. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 05:53:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 01:53:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195363] Review Request: esc and esc-xulrunner-devel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607250553.k6P5r4Sd020624@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esc and esc-xulrunner-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195363 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2006-07-25 01:43 EST ------- So I closed esc in the middle of the operation and it looks like it succeeded fine. Maybe the dialog just needs to change state when it's done. The plugged-in keys list doesn't know my name or the issuer, but i'm guessing that's a cert server configuration issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 06:17:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 02:17:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607250617.k6P6HF5Q021481@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-25 02:08 EST ------- Rahul, I don't think we have gnomesu command on Fedora systems. When i check Desktop files of main-menu from CVS repository, i found that its calling "gnomesu rug update unstable" command . Similarly, Ubuntu OS changed that command to "gnomesu gnome-app-install". So the problem of not able to use main-menu desktop file is that we don't have gnomesu and i need to know what will be the similar command i can use there instead to use gnomesu? If you see main-menu desktop file's description, you will find Desktop file for SuSE is [Desktop Entry] X-SuSE-translate=true _Name=Software Update Exec=gnomesu rug update unstable Icon=system-software-update Terminal=true Type=Application StartupNotify=true Encoding=UTF-8 NoDisplay=true and Desktop file for Ubuntu is [Desktop Entry] Version=1.0 Encoding=UTF-8 Name=No name X-SuSE-translate=true _Name=Software Update Exec=gnomesu gnome-app-install Icon=system-software-update Terminal=true Type=Application StartupNotify=true NoDisplay=true GenericName[en_US]= What should i change in that desktop file for Fedora OS? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 06:18:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 02:18:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200051] Review Request: libutempter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607250618.k6P6IENI021617@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libutempter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200051 mharris at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |193190 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 06:19:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 02:19:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200051] Review Request: libutempter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607250619.k6P6Jx0Y021685@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libutempter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200051 ------- Additional Comments From mharris at redhat.com 2006-07-25 02:10 EST ------- [Note to self] Once this is approved and package is built, close bug #193190 also. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 06:20:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 02:20:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200051] Review Request: libutempter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607250620.k6P6Ka0q021768@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libutempter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200051 mharris at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |150223 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 06:21:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 02:21:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607250621.k6P6Lmf6021904@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-25 02:12 EST ------- I am thinking to change the name of package from slab to gnome-main-menu and as per given in configure script changing version name to 0.6.2. Is that ok to have version from configure script and not as per packaged previously for CVS snapshots? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 08:03:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 04:03:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182254] Review Request: SS5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607250803.k6P83YrA030312@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SS5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182254 ------- Additional Comments From matteo.ricchetti at libero.it 2006-07-25 03:54 EST ------- Good! I found my package under "devel". I'm editing wiky page as you explained and adding FC4 and FC5. Thx -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 08:22:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 04:22:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188461] Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607250822.k6P8MLuJ031618@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188461 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2006-07-25 04:13 EST ------- Yes, gcc-c++ will be removed. But as for the others : - Nothing in the guideline forces to quiet the %setup step. - BuildRoot is fine, guidelines only hint a "preferred" value. I keep needing to repeat over and over that I find it plain silly to execute "id" in there, since we're building in a dedicated build system anyway, always as the same user. This is quite OT for the review, but IMHO both the quiet %setup and the BuildRoot should be things that should be configured with sane defaults outside of the spec files, for which repeating in each and every spec file should *not* be needed... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 08:24:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 04:24:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189092] Review Request: boo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607250824.k6P8O5DG031737@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189092 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-25 04:15 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/boo.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/boo-0.7.6.2237-6.src.rpm Fixed #28 and #29 rpmlint is much happier now :-) The only warning is that the devel package contains no documentation. I'm not overly concerned about this. Not sure what happened with the -5 spec file I uploaded as it wasn't the one I built the package with! #30 - not to worry mate, cold meds do that to you ;-p -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 08:33:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 04:33:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199920] Review Request: Palantir In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607250833.k6P8Xb8s032462@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Palantir https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199920 ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2006-07-25 04:24 EST ------- Please try again. It's there now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 08:33:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 04:33:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199919] Review Request: Asuka In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607250833.k6P8Xjw1032487@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Asuka https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199919 ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2006-07-25 04:24 EST ------- Please try again. It's there now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 09:19:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 05:19:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200064] New: Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200064 Summary: Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: bruno at postle.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://bugbear.blackfish.org.uk/~bruno/apt/SPECS/libpano12.spec SRPM URL: http://bugbear.blackfish.org.uk/~bruno/apt/fedora/linux/5/x86_64/SRPMS.panorama/libpano12-2.8.4-2.fc5.src.rpm Description: Helmut Dersch's Panorama Tools library. Provides very high quality manipulation, correction and stitching of panoramic photographs. Note 1: I've been maintaining this and other packages in a 3rd party repository which I'd like to migrate to Extras. This is the first package, so I need a sponsor. Note 2: IPIX Corporation have a history of enforcing a US software patent covering stitching two >180 degree fisheye video streams into a 360 degree movie. The version of libpano12 on sourceforge has been modified to prevent the use of fisheye images greater than 160 degrees - This is the version I'm submitting for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 09:21:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 05:21:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199919] Review Request: Asuka In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607250921.k6P9Lc23003920@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Asuka https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199919 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-25 05:12 EST ------- rpmlint gave errors on SRPM as W: asuka strange-permission asuka-init 0755 A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. ==> I dont know why rpmlint reported warning here. This is correct W: asuka hardcoded-packager-tag Tim The Packager tag is hardcoded in your spec file. It should be removed, so as to use rebuilder's own defaults. ==> No Packager tag is used in Fedoras SPECs. So remove it. W: asuka redundant-prefix-tag The Prefix tag is uselessly defined as %{_prefix} in your spec file. It should be removed, as it is redundant with rpm defaults. ==>Don't define again %{_prefix} as its standard macro. Remove Prefix: %{_prefix} line from SPEC E: asuka use-of-RPM_SOURCE_DIR You use $RPM_SOURCE_DIR or %{_sourcedir} in your spec file. If you have to use a directory for building, use $RPM_BUILD_ROOT instead. ==> Don't use macro $RPM_SOURCE_DIR instead use $RPM_BUILD_ROOT * Also, Change line from BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-root to BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) * Provide Source URL to download source tarball. * You don't need to have line mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT * You need to add dist tag to release * try to use macros You would like to see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guideline for more information on packaging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 09:22:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 05:22:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200064] Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607250922.k6P9MtSL003995@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200064 bruno at postle.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 09:25:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 05:25:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200064] Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607250925.k6P9Psoh004217@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200064 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-25 05:16 EST ------- Why has this been closed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 09:31:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 05:31:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199919] Review Request: Asuka In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607250931.k6P9VU8q004478@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Asuka https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199919 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-25 05:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > rpmlint gave errors on SRPM as > > W: asuka strange-permission asuka-init 0755 > A file that you listed to include in your package has strange > permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. > ==> I dont know why rpmlint reported warning here. This is correct Not really. The initscript is just a regular source file and does not need to be executable in the SRPM. It gets installed with the right permissions anyway during the %install part of the build. In addition to all of the other comments in Comment #4, I'd also suggest: * using "|| :" at the end of each command in the scriptlets (see the "Tips for new recipes" at the bottom of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ScriptletSnippets) * If there is any chance of the package leaving behind files owned by the userid created in this package (irc), don't remove the user and group when the package is erased. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 09:32:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 05:32:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200064] Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607250932.k6P9WgUB004582@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200064 bruno at postle.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NOTABUG | ------- Additional Comments From bruno at postle.net 2006-07-25 05:23 EST ------- I guess I closed it accidentally when I added FE-NEEDSPONSOR to the blocks list. I'll try and reopen it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 09:41:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 05:41:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188461] Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607250941.k6P9fY4P005229@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188461 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-25 05:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > - BuildRoot is fine, guidelines only hint a "preferred" value. A fact I consider to be a defect of the guidelines. > I keep needing to > repeat over and over that I find it plain silly to execute "id" in there, And I will repeat over and over again: Your buildroot is broken. It is not multi-user safe. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 09:47:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 05:47:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200064] Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607250947.k6P9lkFT005559@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200064 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-25 05:38 EST ------- Okay, let's look at the spec %define name_version %{name}-%{version} This isn't needed. Just wipe it BR gcc isn't needed Not sure on the obsoletes/provides. %configure --prefix - %configure is enough (unless the tarball decides to put it somewhere odd). If it is available as a configure option, include --disable-static %install the two strip lines aren't required. %package devel Requires : should be %{version}-%{release}. It helps keep the devel files in pace with the main package. %description devel The second paragraph isn't needed %files %{_bindir}/* - how many binaries does the package make? If they all start with PT, then %{_bindir}/PT* and then one for the other one is a much better idea. The same applies with the %{_libdir} Does libpano12 not create it's own directory in %{_includedir} or is it again just a couple of files? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 09:53:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 05:53:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188461] Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607250953.k6P9rZfb005806@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188461 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2006-07-25 05:44 EST ------- My BuildRoot is perfectly multi-user safe! Te only thing a user needs to do is add a line for %_tmppath to his ~/.rpmmacros. Or use mock/mach, which is what users should all be doing anyway. Repeat it over and over again as much as you like, but for me the default BuildRoot shoudn't be inside the spec file in the first place anyway. It's silly to have the exact same value in each and every spec file. Why does this have to happen for each and every review request I make? :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 10:09:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 06:09:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188461] Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251009.k6PA9f7N006551@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188461 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-25 06:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > Why does this have to happen for each and every review request I make? :-) It's also been discussed on fedora-packaging recently: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2006-July/msg00167.html It's also one of the items to be discussed by the packaging committee: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/GuidelinesTodo "Should a fixed %buildroot be made mandatory? The current FE "SHOULD" doesn't consider %arch. Axel's %buildroot is not multi-user capable." It doesn't seem to have a high priority on the agenda, so it probably needs someone to drive it forward on the mailing lists and establish a proposal that can be voted on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 10:14:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 06:14:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199919] Review Request: Asuka In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251014.k6PAEGrW006733@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Asuka https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199919 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-25 06:05 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=132969) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=132969&action=view) My version of SPEC file for asuka packaging Only use it for doing your own modification to asuka SPEC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 10:17:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 06:17:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188461] Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251017.k6PAHQBg006923@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188461 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-25 06:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > BuildRoot shoudn't be inside the spec file in the first place anyway. It's silly > to have the exact same value in each and every spec file. As long as it is in the spec file it should be the the same in the fedora extras spec files, and set to the most relevant value. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 10:19:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 06:19:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251019.k6PAJ9mF007011@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-25 06:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Rahul, > I don't think we have gnomesu command on Fedora systems. When i check Desktop > files of main-menu from CVS repository, i found that its calling "gnomesu rug > update unstable" command . Similarly, Ubuntu OS changed that command to "gnomesu > gnome-app-install". So the problem of not able to use main-menu desktop file is > that we don't have gnomesu and i need to know what will be the similar command i > can use there instead to use gnomesu? > If you see main-menu desktop file's description, you will find > Desktop file for SuSE is > [Desktop Entry] > X-SuSE-translate=true > _Name=Software Update > Exec=gnomesu rug update unstable > Icon=system-software-update > Terminal=true > Type=Application > StartupNotify=true > Encoding=UTF-8 > NoDisplay=true > > > and Desktop file for Ubuntu is > [Desktop Entry] > Version=1.0 > Encoding=UTF-8 > Name=No name > X-SuSE-translate=true > _Name=Software Update > Exec=gnomesu gnome-app-install > Icon=system-software-update > Terminal=true > Type=Application > StartupNotify=true > NoDisplay=true > GenericName[en_US]= > > What should i change in that desktop file for Fedora OS? Wouldn't that be "Package Updater" (pup)? See /usr/share/applications/pup.desktop from the pirut package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 10:22:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 06:22:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188461] Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251022.k6PAMqJ2007187@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188461 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-25 06:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > My BuildRoot is perfectly multi-user safe! Te only thing a user needs to do is > add a line for %_tmppath to his ~/.rpmmacros. This is complete nonsense. With a similar .rpmmacros you don't ever need to set BuildRoot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 10:24:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 06:24:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199919] Review Request: Asuka In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251024.k6PAOkXm007268@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Asuka https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199919 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-25 06:15 EST ------- *Remember above SPEC contains REAME in %doc tag *I dont know how to install README to REDME.mkpasswd with %doc under %files *Again Binary RPM reported some more rpmlint errors as W: asuka wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/asuka-1.2.1/snomask.html This file has wrong end-of-line encoding, usually caused by creation or modification on a non-Unix system. It could prevent it from being displayed correctly in some circumstances. ==> remove non-unix characters by saving file under Linux W: asuka wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/asuka-1.2.1/p10.txt This file has wrong end-of-line encoding, usually caused by creation or modification on a non-Unix system. It could prevent it from being displayed correctly in some circumstances. ==> remove non-unix characters by saving file under Linux E: asuka incoherent-logrotate-file /etc/logrotate.d/ircd Your logrotate file should be named /etc/logrotate.d/. ==>rpmlint suggests to use same logrotate filename as package name W: asuka non-conffile-in-etc /etc/logrotate.d/ircd A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. ==>you included %config %{_sysconfdir}/ircd chnage it to %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/ircd W: asuka dangerous-command-in-%post chown W: asuka dangerous-command-in-%postun userdel ==> Maybe Paul would like to comment here E: asuka no-chkconfig-line /etc/rc.d/init.d/ircd The init script doesn't contain a chkconfig line to specify the runlevels at which to start and stop it. ==>don't know why rpmlint gave error besides chkconfig is included in asuka-init W: asuka incoherent-init-script-name ircd The init script name should be the same as the package name in lower case. ==>as per rpmlint suggestions init-script-name must be same as package name in lower case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 10:26:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 06:26:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188461] Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251026.k6PAQSCu007347@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188461 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-25 06:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > - Nothing in the guideline forces to quiet the %setup step. It generates a rpmlint warning. And there is no reason to omit it, since the setup output, at least in that case isn't of interest. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 10:28:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 06:28:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200064] Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251028.k6PAS2aq007439@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200064 ------- Additional Comments From bruno at postle.net 2006-07-25 06:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) I've updated the files: Spec URL: http://bugbear.blackfish.org.uk/~bruno/apt/SPECS/libpano12.spec SRPM URL: http://bugbear.blackfish.org.uk/~bruno/apt/fedora/linux/5/x86_64/SRPMS.panorama/libpano12-2.8.4-3.src.rpm > %define name_version %{name}-%{version} > > This isn't needed. Just wipe it > BR gcc isn't needed Ok gone. > Not sure on the obsoletes/provides. This was for users migrating from rh9 to fc1, I guess it isn't needed any more ;-) > %configure --prefix - %configure is enough (unless the tarball decides to put it > somewhere odd). If it is available as a configure option, include --disable-static Ok done. --disable-static is an option, but I still have to rm the .la file > the two strip lines aren't required. Ok done. > %package devel > > Requires : should be %{version}-%{release}. It helps keep the devel files in > pace with the main package. > > %description devel > > The second paragraph isn't needed Fixed. > %files > > %{_bindir}/* - how many binaries does the package make? If they all start with > PT, then %{_bindir}/PT* and then one for the other one is a much better idea. > The same applies with the %{_libdir} Ok I've changed them to be more specific. > Does libpano12 not create it's own directory in %{_includedir} or is it again > just a couple of files? Yes it creates %{_includedir}/pano12. Fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 10:28:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 06:28:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188461] Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251028.k6PASVWp007483@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188461 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-25 06:19 EST ------- In reply to comment #16) > Or use mock/mach, which is what > users should all be doing anyway. Forgot to mention: mock isn't multiuser-capable as well: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198515 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 10:36:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 06:36:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251036.k6PAaoBF008015@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-25 06:27 EST ------- Paul, I followed http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/sysadmin-guide/s1-access-console-enable.html and created slab file instead foo given in above link. I only excluded last part given on that page og modifying /etc/pam.d/slab file. I just let it be as it is as its copy of /etc/pam.d/halt. Before adding to desktop file pup i just checked on console following command /usr/bin/slab /usr/bin/pup and it failed with error as Failed to find selected program. How can i solve this issue? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 10:46:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 06:46:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251046.k6PAkWxr008837@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-25 06:37 EST ------- Using consolehelper requires this arrangement: 1. The program to be run as root is installed into /usr/sbin or /sbin, and not /usr/bin, e.g. /usr/sbin/pup 2. A symlink is made from /usr/bin, e.g. /usr/bin/pup -> consolehelper So when a regular user types "pup", it invokes "consolehelper", which prompts for the root password, switches to root and then runs the appropriate program from /usr/sbin or /sbin, i.e. /usr/sbin/pup -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 11:01:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 07:01:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200064] Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251101.k6PB1e5a009983@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200064 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-25 06:52 EST ------- You seem to have no make line in there other than make install! The %setup, %build and %prep are incorrect. setup should be setup -q (dearchives the tarball) and application of any patches, %prep is the configure step and build has the make -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 11:03:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 07:03:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200064] Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251103.k6PB3lH1010131@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200064 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-25 06:54 EST ------- D'oh! %prep %setup -q %build %configure --disable-static make I need more coffee! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 11:16:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 07:16:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251116.k6PBG0Ex011029@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-25 07:06 EST ------- What i did is 1)cd /usr/sbin 2)ln -s /usr/bin/consolehelper slab 3)touch /etc/security/console.apps/slab 4)cp /etc/pam.d/halt /etc/pam.d/slab Then i added command /usr/sbin/slab /usr/bin/pup But when i reinstall package and then i click desktop icon under Application->Settings i got new console which even did not ask me for root password and nothing happened. What may go wrong? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 11:15:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 07:15:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199732] Review Request: clanbomber - Bomberman-like multiplayer game that uses ClanLib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251115.k6PBFrsk011023@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clanbomber - Bomberman-like multiplayer game that uses ClanLib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199732 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-25 07:06 EST ------- New version with smp_flags removed here: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/clanbomber.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/clanbomber-1.05-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 11:23:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 07:23:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199688] Review Request: virt-manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251123.k6PBN9RS011567@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: virt-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199688 berrange at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From berrange at redhat.com 2006-07-25 07:14 EST ------- Unfortunate bad timing on my part - I'm actually out of the country on vacation & only got sporadic internet access :-( Anyway I managed to get the requisite changes done, so updated SPEC is at: http://people.redhat.com/berrange/review/virt-manager-0.1.5-2.spec And updated SRPM is http://people.redhat.com/berrange/yum/fedora/5/SRPMS/virt-manager-0.1.5-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 11:23:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 07:23:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200064] Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251123.k6PBNtn1011708@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200064 ------- Additional Comments From bruno at postle.net 2006-07-25 07:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > > %prep > %setup -q > > %build > %configure --disable-static > make Ok done: http://bugbear.blackfish.org.uk/~bruno/apt/SPECS/libpano12.spec http://bugbear.blackfish.org.uk/~bruno/apt/fedora/linux/5/x86_64/SRPMS.panorama/libpano12-2.8.4-4.fc5.src.rpm There is a %build example without a make here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-8c605ebf8330f6d505f384e671986fa99a8f72ee -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 11:24:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 07:24:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251124.k6PBOjMt011791@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-25 07:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > What i did is > 1)cd /usr/sbin > 2)ln -s /usr/bin/consolehelper slab This creates a symlink /usr/sbin/slab -> /usr/bin/consolehelper This is not the arrangement I described in Comment #6 > 3)touch /etc/security/console.apps/slab > 4)cp /etc/pam.d/halt /etc/pam.d/slab > Then i added command > /usr/sbin/slab /usr/bin/pup > But when i reinstall package and then i click desktop icon under > Application->Settings i got new console which even did not ask me for root > password and nothing happened. > > What may go wrong? I am not familiar with slab; what is it *supposed* to do? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 11:27:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 07:27:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196378] Review Request: kdegraphics-extras: Extras, including kuickshow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251127.k6PBRESq011897@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdegraphics-extras: Extras, including kuickshow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196378 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-07-25 07:18 EST ------- I think it looks good APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 11:28:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 07:28:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251128.k6PBSOCW011996@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-25 07:19 EST ------- its just substitute to foo given under http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/sysadmin-guide/s1-access-console-enable.html Do i need to use pup instead foo given in above link? I used slab a new file name which is link to consolehelper -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 11:33:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 07:33:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200064] Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251133.k6PBXAVs012310@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200064 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-25 07:24 EST ------- That URL is purely as an example of using find_lang With the changes (which are the same as yours) the package builds fine outside of mock. rpmlint shows nothing for the main binary, a warning (no-documentation) for the -devel package, and nothing for the -debuginfo and -src.rpm. I'm test building it in mock now. Out of interest, how easy would it be for someone to build this and break the patent? It is really my only concern on this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 11:33:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 07:33:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251133.k6PBXUAk012324@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-25 07:24 EST ------- The actual program needs to be in /usr/sbin The symlink needs to be in /usr/bin Otherwise, it doesn't work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 11:36:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 07:36:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176253] Review Request: clement-2.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251136.k6PBakGF012448@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clement-2.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176253 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-25 07:27 EST ------- As promised here is a full review: MUST: ===== * rpmlint output is clean, good! * Package and spec file named appropriately * Packaged according to packaging guidelines * License (GPL) ok, license file included * spec file is legible and in Am. English. 0 Cannot verify if source matches upstream because of broken Source URL, this must be fixed! * Compiles and builds on devel-x86_64 * BR: ok * No locales * No shared libraries * Not relocatable 0 Package does NOT owns / or requires all dirs * No duplicate files & Permissions ok * %clean & macro usage OK * Contains code and permissible content * %doc does not affect runtime, and isn't large enough to warrent a sub package * no -devel package needed, no libs / .la files. * no gui -> no .desktop file required MUST fix: ========= * Proper downloadable Source URL * This is dead wrong: %attr(-,mail,mail) %{_usr}/share/%{name}-%{version}/logs/ Running software cannot shall not and must not write to /usr it could be on a readonly partition or or or .... Please make that: %attr(-,mail,mail) %{_var}/log%{name}-%{version}/ And adjust the software to write it logs there, or am I misinterpreting the dir name here? * Unowned dir %{_usr}/share/%{name}-%{version} Add: "%dir %{_usr}/share/%{name}-%{version}" to %files or better replace: %{_usr}/share/%{name}-%{version}/*.php %{_usr}/share/%{name}-%{version}/reg-icons %{_usr}/share/%{name}-%{version}/local %{_usr}/share/%{name}-%{version}/cgi-bin With just: %{_usr}/share/%{name}-%{version} Should fix: =========== * Spec contains: "#%postun" this will end up as the last line of the %preun line, harmless but it it would be cleaner to just remove it completly. * Replace all occurences of "%{_usr}/share" with "%{_datadir} So all in all its looking good! Once all the must fix items are taken care of I'll sponsor you and you can import this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 11:41:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 07:41:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199747] Review Request: pingus - Guide the penguins safely home before they drop of the cliff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251141.k6PBfZNO012732@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pingus - Guide the penguins safely home before they drop of the cliff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199747 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-25 07:32 EST ------- Thanks! Imported and Build, closing. p.s. For the next review, when you approve a package you should change the blocker bug from FE-REVIEW to FE-ACCEPT . I've done that for the 2 ClanLib's and I'll do it for this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 11:43:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 07:43:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200064] Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251143.k6PBhvSM012897@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200064 ------- Additional Comments From bruno at postle.net 2006-07-25 07:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Out of interest, how easy would it be for someone to build this and break the > patent? It is really my only concern on this package. It's a one-line change to a header file and a rebuild. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 11:48:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 07:48:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200064] Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251148.k6PBmF8Q013070@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200064 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-25 07:39 EST ------- Given the ease by which a patent can be broken, I'll carry on reviewing it, but will need to clarify the position higher up the food chain. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 12:09:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 08:09:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200064] Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251209.k6PC9U1B014151@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200064 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-25 08:00 EST ------- builds fine in mock. I've asked about #10 and will let you know when I have an answer. rpmlint on the installed packages is fine as well. All being fine with the legal bods, I can't see a problem with the amended spec and package, though the no-documentation warning in devel does need some attention. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 12:12:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 08:12:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199968] Review Request: xdg-utils - Basic desktop integration functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251212.k6PCC9l3014330@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdg-utils - Basic desktop integration functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199968 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-25 08:03 EST ------- > Also, I think you should clean up the spec -- it looks messy. How so? (It looks clean to me). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 12:20:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 08:20:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188138] Review Request: mod_auth_ntlm_winbind - NTLM authentication for the Apache web server using winbind daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251220.k6PCKNO9014653@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_auth_ntlm_winbind - NTLM authentication for the Apache web server using winbind daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188138 ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2006-07-25 08:11 EST ------- Maybe don't touch /var/cache/samba/winbindd_privileged at all now, and implement "usermod -a -G ..." just when samba/squid will implement the requested changes? I would prefer to not wait for FC6 for this... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 13:16:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 09:16:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251316.k6PDGldr018218@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From rmo at sunnmore.net 2006-07-25 09:07 EST ------- any chance for a update to 1.2.10 for asterisk? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 13:22:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 09:22:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189662] Review Request: transconnect -- A function imposter to allow transparent connection over HTTPS proxies In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251322.k6PDMZAQ018805@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: transconnect -- A function imposter to allow transparent connection over HTTPS proxies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189662 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-07-25 09:13 EST ------- * Tue Jul 25 2006 Enrico Scholz - 1:1.3-0.3.Beta - removed the %(id -u) from the buildroot; it adds unneeded clutter, is not required and you gain nothing with it - fixed paths in 'tconn.cat' - enhanced 'README.fedora' http://ensc.de/fedora/transconnect/ ====== > > - follow Fedora naming guidelines strictly; increased epoch > > This package have never been released, you don't need to increase > the epoch? Needed as upgrade path on my systems; you want to follow the guidelines strictly and these guidelines do not forbid epoch... > > no; I like it this way > > Indeed, but if I'm not wrong > %{!?release_func:%global release_func() %1%{?dist}} > Release: %release_func 0.2.Beta > > leads to the much simpler > Release: 0.2.Beta%{?dist} > > so why not use the simpler way? * I like it * it is used in all my other packages * it does not violate the guidelines > * I think it would be nice if you dropped a line somewhere (in > README.fedora?) explaining that tconn-localres.so corresponds > with the make localres case described in the INSTALL file, or > something along those lines. ok; added some lines > * I also think that the file tconn.cat could be modified such that > export LD_PRELOAD=$HOME/.tconn/tconn.so > is replaced by > export LD_PRELOAD=%{_libdir}/tconn.so ok; is now 'LD_PRELOAD=tconn.so' > * I know that some reviewer disagree on having modules to be > dlopened directly in %_libdir and insist on having dlopened > modules in subdirs of %_libdir. 'tconn.so' will not be dlopen()'ed but LD_PRELOAD'ed. Placing into the searchpath allows | LD_PRELOAD=tconn.so without specifying the full path. Therefore, I will keep it in %_libdir. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 13:48:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 09:48:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196378] Review Request: kdegraphics-extras: Extras, including kuickshow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251348.k6PDmpK2022224@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdegraphics-extras: Extras, including kuickshow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196378 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-25 09:39 EST ------- Thanks, importing... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 14:01:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 10:01:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200064] Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251401.k6PE1ZMO023381@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200064 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-25 09:52 EST ------- Okay, I've asked higher up the food chain and they can't see any problem as it stands. I can't sponsor you (currently) and have asked one of the existing sponsors to come have a look around. Some other points though... %doc AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING INSTALL NEWS README You don't need the INSTALL file. However, you do need the text files inside of doc to be added (probably best to add these to the devel package). You also need to include the README.linux file. In the changelogs, the format is %{version}-%{release} - you don't need the ?{%dist} tag on the end - infact, you shouldn't have it there full stop! For example Tue Jul 25 2006 Paul F. Johnson 0.7.6.2237-6 - fixed foo - removed bar - changed usr-lib to usr-lib-nuffle -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 14:12:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 10:12:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194279] Review Request: kdeartwork-extras: Extra KDE artwork (themes, sound themes, ...) for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251412.k6PECpte024572@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeartwork-extras: Extra KDE artwork (themes, sound themes, ...) for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194279 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: kdeartwork: |Review Request: kdeartwork- |Additional artwork (themes, |extras: Extra KDE artwork |sound themes, ...) for KDE |(themes, sound themes, ...) | |for KDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 14:46:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 10:46:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189662] Review Request: transconnect -- A function imposter to allow transparent connection over HTTPS proxies In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251446.k6PEkdWG027665@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: transconnect -- A function imposter to allow transparent connection over HTTPS proxies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189662 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-25 10:37 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > * Tue Jul 25 2006 Enrico Scholz - 1:1.3-0.3.Beta > - removed the %(id -u) from the buildroot; it adds unneeded clutter, > is not required and you gain nothing with it This issue should really be clarified. In the guidelines it is said "The preferred value for the BuildRoot tag is" so this looks like an almost must to me. I'll ask on the fedora-extras-list > - fixed paths in 'tconn.cat' > - enhanced 'README.fedora' Ok. > > This package have never been released, you don't need to increase > > the epoch? > > Needed as upgrade path on my systems; you want to follow the guidelines > strictly and these guidelines do not forbid epoch... I think it is better to follow the guidelines, because this is a case where they make sense, since there may be a 1.3 and there is no reason to make an exception for this package anyway. Adding an epoch is also bad. I also understand your local issue, but I think we should avoid as far as possible that local issue interfer with fedora extras packaging. Isn't there another solution for your upgrade path, like setting a Provide temporarily in your local repo? Otherwise I guess this issue should be submitted to the fedora-extras-list, since it is likely to be a situation that will happen again in the future. > * I like it > * it is used in all my other packages > * it does not violate the guidelines If you insist. But I think that it really complicates things needlessly. > 'tconn.so' will not be dlopen()'ed but LD_PRELOAD'ed. Placing into the > searchpath allows > > | LD_PRELOAD=tconn.so > > without specifying the full path. Therefore, I will keep it in %_libdir. Ok, makes sense. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 14:56:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 10:56:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199494] Review Request: gnu-getopt (RENAME ONLY) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251456.k6PEuwBe029079@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnu-getopt (RENAME ONLY) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199494 fnasser at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From fnasser at redhat.com 2006-07-25 10:47 EST ------- Built on dist-fc6 Thanks for your help! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 15:01:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 11:01:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251501.k6PF1Rnc029536@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2006-07-25 10:52 EST ------- gnome-main-menu would be a confusing name, given that we already have a "Gnome Main Menu" in the "Add to panel" dialog. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 15:02:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 11:02:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200106] New: Review Request: werken-xpath (RENAME ONLY) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200106 Summary: Review Request: werken-xpath (RENAME ONLY) Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: fnasser at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: same spec as the current gnu.getopt SRPM URL: same SRPM as the current gnu.getopt Description: same as before This package has a '.' in the name so it is being renamed to use a '-'. P.S.: As we are rebuilding we may take the opportunity and do an upgrade at the same time if a new version is available. We will add the versioned Provides/Obsoletes for the old name as required. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 15:03:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 11:03:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200064] Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251503.k6PF3CNA029839@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200064 ------- Additional Comments From bruno at postle.net 2006-07-25 10:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > You don't need the INSTALL file. However, you do need the text files inside of > doc to be added (probably best to add these to the devel package). You also need > to include the README.linux file. Done. The files in doc/ are end-user documentation, so I put them in the main package. I've taken the dist tag out of the changelogs. I seem to remember putting it in there quieten some version of rpmlint. http://bugbear.blackfish.org.uk/~bruno/apt/SPECS/libpano12.spec http://bugbear.blackfish.org.uk/~bruno/apt/fedora/linux/5/x86_64/SRPMS.panorama/libpano12-2.8.4-5.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 15:14:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 11:14:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198928] Review Request: lsscsi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251514.k6PFEDSF030636@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lsscsi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198928 ------- Additional Comments From coldwell at redhat.com 2006-07-25 11:05 EST ------- I was using CVS with the Fedora CVSROOT yesterday, but today I'm locked out: $ export CVSROOT=:ext:USERNAME at cvs.fedora.redhat.com:/cvs/extras $ export CVS_RSH=ssh $ cvs co lsscsi For more information on using the Fedora source code repositories, please visit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UsingCvs Permission denied (publickey,keyboard-interactive). cvs [checkout aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages if any) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 15:21:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 11:21:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198928] Review Request: lsscsi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251521.k6PFL9Ga031314@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lsscsi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198928 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-25 11:12 EST ------- Dumb question, I know, but can I assume that you're not actually using "USERNAME" there? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 15:23:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 11:23:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198928] Review Request: lsscsi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251523.k6PFNeIl031510@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lsscsi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198928 ------- Additional Comments From coldwell at redhat.com 2006-07-25 11:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > Dumb question, I know, but can I assume that you're not actually using > "USERNAME" there? Ooops. The hazards of copy/paste from the FAQ. Thanks. Chip -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 15:25:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 11:25:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198928] Review Request: lsscsi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251525.k6PFP81H031653@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lsscsi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198928 ------- Additional Comments From coldwell at redhat.com 2006-07-25 11:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #12) > > Dumb question, I know, but can I assume that you're not actually using > > "USERNAME" there? > > Ooops. The hazards of copy/paste from the FAQ. Thanks. I take it back: $ cvs co lsscsi For more information on using the Fedora source code repositories, please visit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UsingCvs Permission denied (publickey,keyboard-interactive). cvs [checkout aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages if any) $ set | grep CVS CVSROOT=:ext:coldwell at cvs.fedora.redhat.com:/cvs/extras CVS_RSH=ssh -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 16:10:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 12:10:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197137] Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251610.k6PGAXma003282@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197137 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jkeating at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-25 12:01 EST ------- Hrm, this doesn't seem to build anymore. There recently was a split out of dbus packages into seperate packages, dbus, dbus-glib, dbus-python, dbus-sharp. Each with a -devel component. Perhaps you need to alter your BuildRequires so that you're pulling in the correct dbus development parts? DBusController.cpp: In destructor 'virtual DBusController::~DBusController()': DBusController.cpp:110: error: 'dbus_connection_disconnect' was not declared in this scope -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 16:12:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 12:12:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197353] Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251612.k6PGCYr0003505@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197353 ------- Additional Comments From alain.portal at free.fr 2006-07-25 12:03 EST ------- Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/man-pages-fr.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/man-pages-fr-2.26.0-1.src.rpm %changelog * Tue Jul 25 2006 Alain Portal 2.26.0-1 - Update to 2.26.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 17:23:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 13:23:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198928] Review Request: lsscsi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251723.k6PHNk9P009305@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lsscsi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198928 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-25 13:14 EST ------- I don't know, honestly. Perhaps the public key on that machine doesn't match what you sent? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 17:46:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 13:46:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200139] New: Review Request: luma - A graphical tool for managing LDAP servers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200139 Summary: Review Request: luma - A graphical tool for managing LDAP servers Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: Jochen at herr-schmitt.de QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/luma/luma.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/luma/luma-2.3.0-1.src.rpm Luma - a graphical tool for accessing and managing LDAP server. It is written in Python, using PyQt and python-ldap. Plugin-support is included and useful widgets with LDAP- functionality for easy creation of plugins are delivered. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 17:51:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 13:51:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191239] Review Request: qjackctl - Qt based JACK control application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251751.k6PHph86011112@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qjackctl - Qt based JACK control application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191239 nando at ccrma.stanford.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 17:55:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 13:55:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193897] Review Request: mysql-connector-java - Official JDBC driver for MySQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251755.k6PHtT90011404@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-connector-java - Official JDBC driver for MySQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193897 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |green at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 18:09:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 14:09:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176580] Review Request: x11-ssh-askpass -- the cool brother of gnome-ssh-askpass In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251809.k6PI9dxl012275@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: x11-ssh-askpass -- the cool brother of gnome-ssh-askpass https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176580 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-07-25 14:00 EST ------- Source matches upstream. spec inspection is OK, rpmlint warnings are ignorable. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 18:16:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 14:16:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200051] Review Request: libutempter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251816.k6PIG2eD012955@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libutempter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200051 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |jkeating at redhat.com CC| |notting at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188268 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-25 14:06 EST ------- Spec looks pretty good, here is some rpmlint output: E: libutempter-debuginfo tag-not-utf8 %changelog E: libutempter-devel tag-not-utf8 %changelog Find the offending changelog entry E: libutempter non-standard-dir-perm /usr/libexec/utempter 0710 E: libutempter non-standard-executable-perm /usr/libexec/utempter/utempter 02711 E: libutempter non-standard-executable-perm /usr/libexec/utempter/utempter 02711 E: libutempter non-standard-gid /usr/libexec/utempter utempter E: libutempter non-standard-gid /usr/libexec/utempter/utempter utmp I'm assuming because this has to run as utmpter and this is ignorable. E: libutempter non-utf8-spec-file libutempter.spec Because of the changelog E: libutempter setgid-binary /usr/libexec/utempter/utempter utmp 02711 Again because of utempter, ignore. E: libutempter tag-not-utf8 %changelog E: libutempter tag-not-utf8 %changelog Changelog again. W: libutempter-devel no-documentation Ignorable W: libutempter macro-in-%changelog _libdir W: libutempter macro-in-%changelog _libdir W: libutempter macro-in-%changelog _sbindir These are probably ignorable as well. Everything else looks OK, so approving. Bill Ack? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 18:19:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 14:19:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251819.k6PIJjmX013428@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-07-25 14:10 EST ------- Thanks for explaining. If I understand correctly, if an ABI change occurs, pulseaudio will enhance the pulsedsp library to receive either the old or new ABI, convert the call properly based on some external information (config file, ENVVAR, etc), and then send it on to the daemon. If that's the pulseaudio team's plan for dealing with ABI changes, then I can't think of any other instances versioning would come in handy at the moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 18:20:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 14:20:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200106] Review Request: werken-xpath (RENAME ONLY) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251820.k6PIKk6Z013615@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: werken-xpath (RENAME ONLY) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200106 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |jkeating at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188268 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-25 14:11 EST ------- Heh, I assume this is for werken-xpath rather than gnu.getopt (: I approve this, adding the package. You're clear to build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 18:21:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 14:21:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193897] Review Request: mysql-connector-java - Official JDBC driver for MySQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251821.k6PILvNE013749@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-connector-java - Official JDBC driver for MySQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193897 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-07-25 14:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > > I would rather that we strip the .jar files from the tarball prior to packaging. > > This will ensure that we don't accidentally ship binaries sans sources or > > binaries with unfriendly licensing - even if they only show up in the SRPM. > > I feel kind of uncomfortable with doing this before pacakging, because it will > defeat the point of the pristine upstream source. I don't see how doing this > before the packaging process is better than doing it at %prep time, I'd say > it's less reproducable. I looked into the source tar ball and it contains .jar files distributed under the terms of the LGPL. Deleting the jar files in the %prep section doesn't make the fact that we've distributed these things go away. The .jar files don't come with source code and AFAICT there's no mention of where to get the source code. We really must delete these .jar files before they get packaged into the SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 18:29:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 14:29:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200051] Review Request: libutempter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251829.k6PITVf0014569@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libutempter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200051 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-07-25 14:20 EST ------- It's awfully late... aside from that, no complaints. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 18:32:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 14:32:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199173] Review Request: clusterssh In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251832.k6PIWH5l015397@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clusterssh https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199173 ------- Additional Comments From duncan_j_ferguson at yahoo.co.uk 2006-07-25 14:23 EST ------- Spec URL: http://queeg.dyndns.org/clusterssh/clusterssh.spec SRPM URL: http://queeg.dyndns.org/clusterssh/clusterssh-3.19.1-1.src.rpm This is the real version i would like to put into extras. There should (hopefully) be no errors or issues with it at all (famous last words...) Thanks Duncs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 18:51:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 14:51:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199611] Review Request: monsterz - Puzzle game, similar to Bejeweled or Zookeeper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251851.k6PIpIdv019849@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monsterz - Puzzle game, similar to Bejeweled or Zookeeper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199611 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2006-07-25 14:42 EST ------- Spec URL: http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/monsterz.spec SRPM URL: http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/monsterz-0.7.0-6.src.rpm Here's the latest version. It looks secure to me, but I'm also an untrained eye. I agree, there appears to be no file locking although the example on the wiki doesn't seem to imply this either. I think the possibility of corrupting the scoreboard file is extremely small but that's just IMHO. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 18:53:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 14:53:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200151] New: Review Request: perl-POE-Wheel-Null Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200151 Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Wheel-Null Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Wheel-Null.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Wheel-Null-0.01-0.fc5.src.rpm Description: POE::Wheel::Null creates a wheel which doesn't do anything upon put(), and doesn't send any events to the current session. Its function is the same as those pipes in the Enterprise's engine room marked "GNDN". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 18:55:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 14:55:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200152] New: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-LDAP-0.04-1.fc5.src.rpm Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200152 Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-LDAP-0.04- 1.fc5.src.rpm Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Component-Client-LDAP.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Component-Client-LDAP-0.04-1.fc5.src.rpm Description: POE::Component::Client::LDAP->new() starts up a new POE::Session and POE::Wheel to manage socket communications for an underlying Net::LDAP object, allowing it to be used in async mode properly within a POE program. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 18:55:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 14:55:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199732] Review Request: clanbomber - Bomberman-like multiplayer game that uses ClanLib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251855.k6PItd1a020551@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clanbomber - Bomberman-like multiplayer game that uses ClanLib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199732 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-25 14:46 EST ------- For some reason, rpmlint is complaining that the spec file's permission is 666. Alter this and it's good to go. Builds fine in mock, everything else seems in order as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 18:55:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 14:55:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200151] Review Request: perl-POE-Wheel-Null In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251855.k6PItedn020558@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Wheel-Null https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200151 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |200152 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 18:56:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 14:56:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200152] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-LDAP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251856.k6PIudqJ020759@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-LDAP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200152 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: perl-POE- |Review Request: perl-POE- |Component-Client-LDAP-0.04- |Component-Client-LDAP |1.fc5.src.rpm | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 19:06:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 15:06:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193897] Review Request: mysql-connector-java - Official JDBC driver for MySQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251906.k6PJ6WBx021700@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-connector-java - Official JDBC driver for MySQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193897 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-07-25 14:57 EST ------- Hi Igor. I went through the review list. Please see the lines with "X". MUST Items: - rpmlint output is clean - package name is fine for now (although debate continue on "jpp" usage) - The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec - The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - The package license is OK: (I think) GPL + headache inducing exception text. X- The License field says GPL, which I think it fair since I think you're allowed to ignore the exception. However, the license text (COPYING) has the old FSF address. Please update the address and file a bug upstream. - The license text is in %doc - The spec file is written in American English. X- The spec file for the package is legible, although it would be nice to line up field names and values in columns, rather than have them ragged. X- The guidelines say "The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task." however we need to remove jar binaries before packaging to comply with LGPL. X- Fails to build in in mock. Cannot find build req jta >= 0:1.0.1-0.a.1. Exiting. $ rpm -q --whatprovides jta geronimo-specs-compat-1.0-0.M2.2jpp_7fc I don't know what the right solution here is. Replace jta with geronimo-specs-compat? X- BuildRequires need adjusting. (see mock build failure, above) - Package is not relocatable. - Package owns all directories in creates. - No duplicate files in %files. - File permissions look good. - %clean section is good. X- macro use is fine apart from %{__sed}. Please use "sed". - package contains code (no "content") X- %doc section seems to contain equivalent README/README.txt files in top level and docs dir. Please clean this up. Also, what is with the "@MYSQL_CJ_VERSION@" in the README files? - %doc contents don't affect runtime - package does not own files/dirs owned by other packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 19:15:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 15:15:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191538] Review Request: qsynth - Qt based Fluidsynth GUI front end In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251915.k6PJF1gM022009@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qsynth - Qt based Fluidsynth GUI front end https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191538 nando at ccrma.stanford.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 19:22:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 15:22:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192606] Review Request: yafc: yet another ftp client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251922.k6PJM6F8022697@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yafc: yet another ftp client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192606 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-07-25 15:13 EST ------- rpmlint result: E: yafc zero-length /usr/share/doc/yafc-1.1.1/doc/yafc.info The package does indeed contain an empty compressed file yafc.info.gz. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 19:37:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 15:37:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199732] Review Request: clanbomber - Bomberman-like multiplayer game that uses ClanLib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251937.k6PJbT1N024107@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clanbomber - Bomberman-like multiplayer game that uses ClanLib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199732 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-25 15:28 EST ------- Strange, you said the same with ClanLib06 and I promised to fix it, which in the end I didn't as there was nothing to fix (the spec was 644 on my system and in the SRPM on my system, also rpmlint was happy over here). Seems something strange is going on on your side. Its the same for this package, the spec is 644 on my system and in the SRPM on my system, also rpmlint is happy with the SRPM as uploaded over here. Could you try running rpmlint directly on the downloaded srpm ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 19:44:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 15:44:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196529] Review Request: gtkdatabox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251944.k6PJi60n025415@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkdatabox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196529 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 19:46:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 15:46:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177583] Review Request: zaptel-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251946.k6PJk0Fp025657@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177583 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-07-25 15:37 EST ------- Yeah, I don't think the guidelines were explicit before that the FESCo approval needed to be "*before* you start packaging a kernel module for Fedora Extras". In any case Jeff: Are you still interested in this package? It's been a month or so since any asterisk package updates on your site. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 19:52:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 15:52:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175433] Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251952.k6PJq0vu026337@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175433 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|kevin at tummy.com |bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163776 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-07-25 15:42 EST ------- Sorry for sitting on this review for so long... I am going to set this back to FE_NEW and see if someone else would like to move it forward. (I thought I did this a while back, but it fell through the cracks. Sorry). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 19:56:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 15:56:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199780] Review Request: dstat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607251956.k6PJuxG3026712@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dstat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199780 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-07-25 15:47 EST ------- MD5sums: 72917aa5eed385464d70ec731bd6d2b1 dstat-0.6.3-2.src.rpm a2df5d7fecc0115f8eef84141a068e86 dstat-0.6.3.tar.bz2 Blocker: * Your patch adds #!/usr/bin/python to the modules files. Since the modules are not intended to be run from the command line, this is improper behaviour. You should make the files non-executable instead. * It's customary to put the defattr line first in the files section. I believe that rpm uses the defattr line even on lines that preceed it in the file listings but I don't know if that's documented behaviour. If that behaviour ever changes, then you could suddenly have files with incorrect ownership and permissions. * Remove the execute permissions from the scripts in the examples directory. * Package needs to own the dstat directory like this: %dir %{_datadir}/dstat Cosmetic: * It looks like you're patching out dos line endings for html files. This is okay if you're going to submit the change upstream. As a general rule (for instance, if upstream were to not accept the change and you had to continue to carry it around in the package) it's better to use sed or dos2unix to fix this. Otherwise your patch becomes filled with whole files where the only difference is the EOL character. * Some people still use the default rpm defined topdir, sourcedir, etc. When this is so, installing the source rpm places the files in the same directory as a multitude of other rpms. So your patch: patch-to-clean-for-fedora.patch should really have a less generic name. Something like dstat-eol.patch or dstat-eol-cleanup.pach. * I'd remove the commented out code as it doesn't add any value to the spec. * You don't need to Require: python; this is being picked up automatically. Good: * Source matches upstream. * Package Name follows the Naming Guidelines. * Spec file follows the %{name}.spec format. * License is GPL, matches the license field, and is included in the rpm. * Package built on x86_64 as a noarch package. * All BuildRequires not listed in the exceptions have been satisfied. * No locale files, so no need to use %find_lang. * No libraries or pkgconfig files. * Package is not relocatable. * No duplicate files. * Package has a proper %clean section. * Package uses proper macros from Packaging Guidelines. * Code, not content. * No large doc files. * Doc files do not affect the runtime behaviour. * Not a GUI application. * Does not own directories that belong to another package. * No scriptlets. * Package built in mock. After you fix the listed issues, I can run a last rpmlint check and make sure the program runs and then APPROVE the package. Since you need a sponsor, I need to know that you understand the guidelines before SPONSORing you. This package was a good indication of understanding on your part. If you do a review of someone else's package that continues to demonstrate your knowledge of the Fedora Guidelines in particular and rpm packaging in general, I'll sponsor you as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 20:03:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 16:03:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177583] Review Request: zaptel-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607252003.k6PK3rwU027183@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177583 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us 2006-07-25 15:54 EST ------- Yeah, I'm still interested in this package... hopefully we can get this thing through the process before Asterisk 1.4 has been released :). I've contacted someone at Digium to see if we can get a statement. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 20:07:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 16:07:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196177] Review Request: kdmtheme manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607252007.k6PK7QKc027475@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdmtheme manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196177 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |rdieter at math.unl.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-25 15:58 EST ------- I'll review this... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 20:07:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 16:07:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196177] Review Request: kdmtheme - Theme Manager for KDM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607252007.k6PK7wQJ027516@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdmtheme - Theme Manager for KDM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196177 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: kdmtheme |Review Request: kdmtheme - |manager |Theme Manager for KDM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 20:08:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 16:08:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199611] Review Request: monsterz - Puzzle game, similar to Bejeweled or Zookeeper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607252008.k6PK8mCt027584@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monsterz - Puzzle game, similar to Bejeweled or Zookeeper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199611 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-25 15:59 EST ------- MUST items: * rpmlint output: I: monsterz checking W: monsterz invalid-license WTFPL E: monsterz non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/monsterz 02755 I: monsterz-data checking W: monsterz-data invalid-license WTFPL W: monsterz-data no-documentation I: monsterz-debuginfo checking W: monsterz-debuginfo invalid-license WTFPL despite error, permissions of /usr/bin/monsterz are good * package is named good * spec file name is correct * package meets Packaging Guidelines * package is licensed with an open-source compatible license * License field in .spec file matches the actual license (WTFPL) * spec file is written in American English and is legible * md5sum of upstream source and provided in SRPM is matching (323d04d4a2a2905df91eab4ff17e537d) * package succesfully compile on i386 * dependencies are good * there are no locales * no need to /sbin/ldconfig * there is no duplicate files in %files * spec file hadnles macros properly * there is no need to -devel subpackage * package doesn't contatin any .la files * desktop file is created properly And the package compiles successfully on mock. > I think the possibility of corrupting the scoreboard file is extremely > small but that's just IMHO. :-) IMHO, too ;) Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 20:29:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 16:29:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196177] Review Request: kdmtheme - Theme Manager for KDM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607252029.k6PKTIHH029533@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdmtheme - Theme Manager for KDM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196177 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-25 16:20 EST ------- * Upstream SOURCE matches: 40bacda700e847aab7070babc15f67ca kdmtheme-1.1.2.tar.bz2 * builds/installs clean. 1. For URL, I'd recommend instead using http://beta.smileaf.org/projects/ or http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=22120 2. Don't omit the %{_libdir}/kde3/kcm*.la file. It's needed. (It doesn't work for me without it). 3. You ought to Requires: kdebase since this is a KControl module (and kcontrol is in kdebase). 4. (optional) configure optimization flags: %configure \ --enable-new-ldflags \ --disable-debug --disable-warnings \ --disable-dependancy-tracking --enable-final (probably not a big deal since this is just a small kcontrol module) Fix up 1-3, and I'll approve this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 20:30:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 16:30:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196177] Review Request: kdmtheme - Theme Manager for KDM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607252030.k6PKUsVB029710@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdmtheme - Theme Manager for KDM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196177 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-25 16:21 EST ------- And (almost forgot): 5. Include in %files %doc AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 20:31:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 16:31:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196177] Review Request: kdmtheme - Theme Manager for KDM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607252031.k6PKVfw3029861@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdmtheme - Theme Manager for KDM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196177 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-25 16:22 EST ------- Arg, and... 6. drop %post,%postun ldconfig scriptlets. There are no shared libs here, not needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 20:43:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 16:43:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200139] Review Request: luma - A graphical tool for managing LDAP servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607252043.k6PKhM6Z031743@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: luma - A graphical tool for managing LDAP servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200139 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-07-25 16:34 EST ------- For reference, here's my local package of this: http://cachalot.mine.nu/5/SRPMS/luma-2.3-0.1.src.rpm The above contains some improvements over your package but it is pretty much untested and known to be not quite complete, so approach with care. And I don't have use for luma at the moment, so I'm not doing a full review. But a quick peek into the specfile differences tells me that: - Possibly missing Requires on python-ldap, PyQt, maybe python-smbpasswd - Odd placement of icon and icon caches not updated (does the menu entry actually show an icon?), see my specfile for ideas for a more thorough implementation - Could %lang'ify translations, see my specfile - Specfile comment says "Desktop entry for nvidia-settings" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 20:46:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 16:46:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196177] Review Request: kdmtheme - Theme Manager for KDM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607252046.k6PKk10C032150@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdmtheme - Theme Manager for KDM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196177 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-07-25 16:37 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > --disable-dependancy-tracking s/dependancy/dependency/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 20:50:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 16:50:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196177] Review Request: kdmtheme - Theme Manager for KDM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607252050.k6PKoETs032657@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdmtheme - Theme Manager for KDM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196177 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-25 16:41 EST ------- > s/dependancy/dependency/ Damn! (: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 21:03:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 17:03:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196003] Review Request: Kmenu-gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607252103.k6PL3StO001448@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Kmenu-gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196003 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |rdieter at math.unl.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-25 16:54 EST ------- I'll see if I can bang this one out... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 21:24:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 17:24:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199573] Review Request: BackupPC - high-performance backup system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607252124.k6PLObqX002407@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: BackupPC - high-performance backup system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199573 ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2006-07-25 17:15 EST ------- Spec: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/BackupPC/BackupPC.spec SRPM: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/BackupPC/BackupPC-2.1.2-6.src.rpm - One more config change -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 21:27:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 17:27:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200172] New: Review Request: freeglut Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200172 Summary: Review Request: freeglut Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: michael at knox.net.nz QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~michael/freeglut.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~michael/freeglut-2.4.0-8.src.rpm Description: freeglut is a completely open source alternative to the OpenGL Utility Toolkit (GLUT) library with an OSI approved free software license. GLUT was originally written by Mark Kilgard to support the sample programs in the second edition OpenGL 'RedBook'. Since then, GLUT has been used in a wide variety of practical applications because it is simple, universally available and highly portable. freeglut allows the user to create and manage windows containing OpenGL contexts on a wide range of platforms and also read the mouse, keyboard and joystick functions. rpmlint output: [michael at leroy SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/i386/freeglut-2.4.0-8.i386.rpm [michael at leroy SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/i386/freeglut-devel-2.4.0-8.i386.rpm W: freeglut-devel no-documentation [michael at leroy SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/freeglut-2.4.0-8.src.rpm This is a Fedora Core package being moved to Fedora Extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 21:27:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 17:27:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196003] Review Request: Kmenu-gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607252127.k6PLRfAT002599@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Kmenu-gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196003 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-25 17:18 EST ------- * upstream source checks out: 9b36e22fc02f022e35fae3241ec9d622 31025-kmenu-gnome-0.6.tar.gz 1. missing %build section. Though this is mostly harmless... 2. drop the use of $RPM_BUILD_DIR. 3. rm -rf %{buildroot} should be at beginning of %install section, not %prep 4. scriptlets should (instead) be touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/Bluecurve ||: touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/crystalsvg ||: similarly, I'd recommend replacing %files %{_icondir}/*/*/*/* with %{_datadir}/icons/Bluecurve/*/*/* %{_datadir}/icons/crystalsvg/*/*/* 5. Due to ownership of stuff under %{_datadir}/icons/Bluecurve, to avoid possible unowned directory, you should Requires: redhat-artwork (yucky yes, but unowned dirs are even worse) 6. License. Should probably be License: GPL/LGPL since there are bits of both in this package. Fix (at least) 2-6, and I'll approve this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 21:27:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 17:27:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187609] Review Request: tre - POSIX compatible regexp library with approximate matching In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607252127.k6PLRk9B002640@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tre - POSIX compatible regexp library with approximate matching https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187609 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-07-25 17:18 EST ------- Hey Dominik. Any chance of an updated submission of tre? If you don't have time/interest, we can close this submission and see if someone else is able to submit/maintain it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 21:30:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 17:30:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200051] Review Request: libutempter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607252130.k6PLU6rd002858@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libutempter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200051 ------- Additional Comments From mharris at redhat.com 2006-07-25 17:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Spec looks pretty good, here is some rpmlint output: > > E: libutempter-debuginfo tag-not-utf8 %changelog > E: libutempter-devel tag-not-utf8 %changelog Bero's last name was in ISO8859-1 in a changelog entry. Worked around via anglicization. > Find the offending changelog entry > > E: libutempter non-standard-dir-perm /usr/libexec/utempter 0710 Dir restricted to group utempter access for security. > E: libutempter non-standard-executable-perm /usr/libexec/utempter/utempter 02711 > E: libutempter non-standard-executable-perm /usr/libexec/utempter/utempter 02711 Binary restricted to group utempter, with perms for SGID binaries. > E: libutempter non-standard-gid /usr/libexec/utempter utempter This needs to be created once the package is approved, which it sounds like now from above. ;o) > E: libutempter non-standard-gid /usr/libexec/utempter/utempter utmp setuid utmp executable. The GID should be allocated already, if not I'll have to do that, but I assume it is, since RH utempter uses the same GID. > I'm assuming because this has to run as utmpter and this is ignorable. yup > E: libutempter non-utf8-spec-file libutempter.spec > > Because of the changelog yup, fixed. > E: libutempter setgid-binary /usr/libexec/utempter/utempter utmp 02711 > > Again because of utempter, ignore. yup > E: libutempter tag-not-utf8 %changelog > E: libutempter tag-not-utf8 %changelog > > Changelog again. Wow, it reports the same problem 3 different errors for the same issue. > W: libutempter-devel no-documentation Correct, there is no documentation except the README and COPYING. The rpmlint developers are free to submit manpages however. ;o) > W: libutempter macro-in-%changelog _libdir > W: libutempter macro-in-%changelog _libdir > W: libutempter macro-in-%changelog _sbindir > > These are probably ignorable as well. Actually I just noticed them a half hour ago or so and fixed them. Theoretically %_libdir et al. should always expand to a path of some form, however it is also theoretical that they could expand to something else, and macros are illegal in the changelog, so fixed. > Everything else looks OK, so approving. Good beans. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 21:33:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 17:33:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199780] Review Request: dstat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607252133.k6PLXgPW003163@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dstat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199780 ------- Additional Comments From scott at perturb.org 2006-07-25 17:24 EST ------- Ok I bumped the release number to 3, and re-uploaded it. I removed my patch, and did the work in the spec file. Sed is used to convert the documentation line endings, and I chmoded the .py as requested. Moved defattr to the top, and added the %dir lines. Commented out code was removed as was the require python. rpmlint is only giving out warnings about the line endings as well as the a stale symlink. I've done my best to handle that in the .spec file (see the rm and sed lines) but it's just not working. I'm over my head. SPEC: http://www.perturb.org/tmp/dstat.spec SRC: http://www.perturb.org/tmp/dstat-0.6.3-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 21:40:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 17:40:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200172] Review Request: freeglut In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607252140.k6PLeDgP003963@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freeglut https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200172 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |rdieter at math.unl.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-25 17:31 EST ------- I can review this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 21:50:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 17:50:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197765] Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607252150.k6PLoQ0R005002@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197765 ------- Additional Comments From triad at df.lth.se 2006-07-25 17:41 EST ------- Gnokii 0.6.12 will use libical if present and useable. It picks up this package and uses it if present, seems to link and build fine. (No thorough stress/usage testing though!) When libical is built and released I will BuildRequires it and rebuilt gnokii packages. If you push upstream to put headers in a separate subdir I think gnokii will have to adopt to that before it can be used. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 21:52:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 17:52:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189662] Review Request: transconnect -- A function imposter to allow transparent connection over HTTPS proxies In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607252152.k6PLqK5Z005182@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: transconnect -- A function imposter to allow transparent connection over HTTPS proxies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189662 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-25 17:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > This issue should really be clarified. In the guidelines it is said > "The preferred value for the BuildRoot tag is" > so this looks like an almost must to me. I'll ask on the fedora-extras-list It has been clarified, so it is right as is. The only issue remaining is the release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 21:53:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 17:53:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200172] Review Request: freeglut In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607252153.k6PLra5V005251@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freeglut https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200172 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-25 17:44 EST ------- * upstream source checks out: 6d16873bd876fbf4980a927cfbc496a1 freeglut-2.4.0.tar.gz MUSTFIX items: 1. Drop BuildRequires: /sbin/ldconfig (it's pretty much already a given) Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig Requires(postun): /sbin/ldconfig (rpm automatically picks these up) 2. Drop the CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -Wall $(pkg-config --cflags glib) it's not needed. At some point in the past, freeglut may have had references to glib's header files, but it doesn't anymore (I checked). 3. omit static lib using %configure --disable-static and drop from %files %{_libdir}/lib*.a 4. Optional. Be careful about the Obsoletes/Provides. It seemingly Obsoletes itself using: Obsoletes: glut <= 3.7 Provides: glut = 3.7 maybe use something safer like: Obsoletes: glut < 3.7-%{release} Provides: glut = 3.7-%{release} (and likewise for the Ob/Pr for glut-devel) Or heck, drop the glut Obsoletes/Provides bits altogether, isn't glut pretty much ancient history anyway? (: Fix 1-3, and I'll approve this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 21:59:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 17:59:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199732] Review Request: clanbomber - Bomberman-like multiplayer game that uses ClanLib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607252159.k6PLx2v0005731@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clanbomber - Bomberman-like multiplayer game that uses ClanLib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199732 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-25 17:50 EST ------- Yeah, looks like my system is at fault on this one. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 21:59:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 17:59:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199732] Review Request: clanbomber - Bomberman-like multiplayer game that uses ClanLib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607252159.k6PLxxLh005821@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clanbomber - Bomberman-like multiplayer game that uses ClanLib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199732 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 22:10:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 18:10:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200172] Review Request: freeglut In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607252210.k6PMAuLc006848@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freeglut https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200172 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-25 18:01 EST ------- Fixed 1 - 3 Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~michael/freeglut.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~michael/freeglut-2.4.0-9.src.rpm CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" was still needed, otherwise the buidl failed, but dropped the glib cruff tho. As for item 4, I would like to hear what Mike Harris has to say, if nots not required, I would like to remove it from the spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 22:12:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 18:12:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200106] Review Request: werken-xpath (RENAME ONLY) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607252212.k6PMCSCM006919@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: werken-xpath (RENAME ONLY) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200106 fnasser at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED ------- Additional Comments From fnasser at redhat.com 2006-07-25 18:03 EST ------- Built on dist-fc6-HEAD -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 22:16:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 18:16:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198247] Review Request: libpng10 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607252216.k6PMGWit007230@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpng10 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198247 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-25 18:07 EST ------- argh... bab memory makes for very interesting errors not relating to libpng10. Hopefully be able to sort out this hardware by weeks end. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 22:26:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 18:26:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200172] Review Request: freeglut In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607252226.k6PMQg97007801@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freeglut https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200172 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-25 18:17 EST ------- > CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" was still needed, otherwise the buidl failed, but > dropped the glib cruff tho. ??? Really?? I just built it in a fedora-6 mock buildroot just fine without it. No biggie, either way, APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 22:40:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 18:40:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198247] Review Request: libpng10 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607252240.k6PMe2XU008464@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpng10 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198247 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-25 18:31 EST ------- Hey Paul, just curious as to why we don't use the configure script in this package? I added ./autogen.sh %configure to the spec and it builds on x86-64 now. Though there are files that are not listed in %files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 22:49:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 18:49:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195363] Review Request: esc and esc-xulrunner-devel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607252249.k6PMndUb009213@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esc and esc-xulrunner-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195363 ------- Additional Comments From jmagne at redhat.com 2006-07-25 18:40 EST ------- Thanks again for the great suggestions. I have completed as many as I could in the short time. My comments mixed with yours. Some packaging issues: - in general, packages almost always follow %{macro_name} format instead of %macro_name - you need to call gtk-update-icon-cache in %post for your icon to be visible in the menus, etc. - the vendor thing is a bit odd. Why do you rename the icon to have the vendor prefix? I think I would probably just drop the vendor stuff altogether and pass --vendor esc to desktop-file-install. All addressed. - why do you install the LICENSE into libdir? Not changed. - in general, if we put things in the menu in the default install we give them a generic name (e.g, "Text Editor" instead of "gEdit"). Maybe "Smart Card Manager" ? Done. - you've got it in the wrong spot I think. It probably makes more sense to be in "Administration". Done. - It needs a root password, yes? So you'll need to use consolehelper. install esc in /usr/sbin, create a symlink from /usr/bin/consolehelper to /usr/bin/esc and install a file called esc to /etc/pam.d with this in it: The app runs just fine as a regular user. - If you want to start the monitoring bits at login, you'll need to install a desktop file (like the one you put in /usr/share/applications) into /etc/xdg/autostart . Note, the program will be run as a normal user, not as root, so you'll need to separate the management bits from the monitoring bits for it to work. Done. - If you do start it at login, make sure you hide the icon until someone inserts a security token. This one I will have to figure out. cosmetic issues: 1) the icon in the notification area is different than the icon in the app. 2) the gradient is a bit ugly 3) the spacing in the side frame is weird 4) some of the text is wonky, could probably use some proof reading Work on the UI in general is ongoing including the above. Some other things: - When it starts up it asks for a config uri. I gave the cseng one and it didn't work. It just gave me error code 28. At some point I switched to connecting to the mountain view vpn (from the westford one) and then it started working. I don't know if changing vpn's is what fixed it or if it only works sometimes. The current latest esc app is designed to be able to call back to the server to get many quantities such as the TPS URL. Your server does not have this functionality as of yet. As a backup it still supports the "esc.tps.url" pref value in /usr/lib/esc-1.0.0/defaults/preferences/esc-prefs.js. This can be set manually. - If I click the test button on the config dialog it gives me another dialog telling me it's about to do the test I just asked for. that dialog isn't really a good idea. Done. - It probably would be a good idea to disallow the token that was used for logging in from being able to be formatted. Good idea. - why is the log file for esc in libdir? Now the file goes under the user's profile. Which on Linux is under: ~/.redhat/esc Note, I never actually got enrollment to work. It formatted my token fine, but after a few blinks during the enrolment step the token led just turns off and the client sits with two spinning throbbers indefinitely. It's just sitting in poll waiting for events I think. This was a simple Javascript glitch which has been addressed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 22:59:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 18:59:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192363] Review Request: GTS - Gnu Triangulated Surface Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607252259.k6PMxjsV009877@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GTS - Gnu Triangulated Surface Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192363 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-25 18:50 EST ------- Can you post up a new srpm and spec file? I can get down to reviewing it properly then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 23:02:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 19:02:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184331] Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607252302.k6PN2ONv010029@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184331 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-25 18:53 EST ------- Can you post the URLs of both the spec and srpm here so I can just download, test, review and we can get this one off into FE? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 23:10:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 19:10:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199780] Review Request: dstat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607252310.k6PNA69L010219@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dstat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199780 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-07-25 19:01 EST ------- * The files don't get moved into _docdir until after %install. So instead of operating on %{buildroot}/%{_docdir}/* you want to operate on the files in your source tree. * You've commented out the %clean section. You'll want to put that back. * There are other pieces of commented code that could be removed: #BuildRequires:.. #Requires:.... #/usr/lib/rpm/brp-python-bytecompile.... #%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/dstat.conf.... You can leave them in with explanations if you think they make the spec clearer and easier to understand (I see that you have commented on two of those listed already. The choice is yours.) * For every release bump, there must also be a changelog entry. So instead of just bumping the release number on the changelog line, add a whole new entry that tells what you've changed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 25 23:23:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 19:23:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187609] Review Request: tre - POSIX compatible regexp library with approximate matching In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607252323.k6PNNC7T010605@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tre - POSIX compatible regexp library with approximate matching https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187609 jima at beer.tclug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jima at beer.tclug.org ------- Additional Comments From jima at beer.tclug.org 2006-07-25 19:14 EST ------- Adding myself to CC list due to above-mentioned interest in crm114 (for a LUG colleague). It appears that tre 0.7.4 (released a couple months ago) may resolve the issues with x86_64 which caused the original delays with this package moving forward (which I learned of by discussing this package with Dominik on IRC). Alas, I lack access to an x86_64 buildhost (well, for scratch builds), so I can't verify this. If Dominik doesn't have the time to continue this (which was mentioned), I'd be happy to pick up the pieces he put together and maintain them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 00:33:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 20:33:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189092] Review Request: boo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607260033.k6Q0Xihm013365@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189092 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-07-25 20:24 EST ------- Release 6 builds and runs some of the fun things here: http://boo.codehaus.org/Recipes. APPROVED as per comment 28. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 02:38:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 22:38:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177211] Review Request: newsx - NNTP news exchange utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607260238.k6Q2cX0q019249@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: newsx - NNTP news exchange utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177211 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO_REPORTER ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-07-25 22:29 EST ------- Ping. Adding --without-history to %configure results in a build. What's this Provides: news-sucker line? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 02:44:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 22:44:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200172] Review Request: freeglut In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607260244.k6Q2i1qQ019625@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freeglut https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200172 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-25 22:35 EST ------- Cool, thanks for the review. All checked in and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 02:52:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 22:52:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182254] Review Request: SS5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607260252.k6Q2qKUL020173@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SS5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182254 imlinux at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |imlinux at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2006-07-25 22:43 EST ------- I could not actually find SS5 in repository for branching. I'll leave the branch request in the wiki but you should contact your sponsor to determine what happend during the import. http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/rpms/ If something 'funny' is going on let me know and I'll take a look. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 02:56:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 22:56:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182254] Review Request: SS5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607260256.k6Q2u9gb020577@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SS5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182254 ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2006-07-25 22:47 EST ------- sorry, false alarm. ss5, got it :-D. this should be branched now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 03:00:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 23:00:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195363] Review Request: esc and esc-xulrunner-devel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607260300.k6Q30PbY020845@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esc and esc-xulrunner-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195363 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2006-07-25 22:51 EST ------- It looks like the spec and package moved to http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/built/rpm_review/jmagne/ yea? Looking good. A few things: - The gtk-update-icon-cache stuff still isn't right. Have a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ScriptletSnippets for the right idiom. - you don't have to manually run tar for xulrunner, you can specify another %setup line, although I don't remember the right arguments to give it off hand. - Also, I don't think you should need %{_buildir} anywhere. rpm normally puts you in the right directories i think. - I think if you just put %doc esc/LICENSE in the filelist then it should get moved to the right place (/usr/share/doc/esc-1.0.0/LICENSE) automatically, but I could be wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 03:04:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 23:04:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199833] Review Request: vips - image processing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607260304.k6Q34pnd021053@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vips - image processing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199833 ------- Additional Comments From adam at spicenitz.org 2006-07-25 22:55 EST ------- New version: http://www.spicenitz.org/fedora/vips.spec http://www.spicenitz.org/fedora/vips-7.10.20-2.src.rpm Change: eliminate undefined symbols in libvipsCC. I have not yet removed the BuildRequires as you suggested. This is because vips independently requires each of those libraries to build-- for example, vips still needs glib2-devel to build independently of pango-devel. If pango-devel were ever to stop requiring glib2-devel (say it switched to glib3-devel), then vips would fail to have glib2-devel present for it to compile. Same with the other build requirements, vips independently uses libtiff, libjpeg, etc. along with ImageMagick. I can still remove these BuildRequires, since vips will correctly build today without them. But I'm worried that this could cause the build to fail in non-obvious ways in the future. For that reason, I request to leave them in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 03:05:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 23:05:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196434] Review Request: ren In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607260305.k6Q353F9021075@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ren https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196434 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |michael at knox.net.nz OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-25 22:56 EST ------- I can review this one. ---------------------------------------- Review for release 7: * RPM name is OK * This is the latest version * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint looks OK * File list looks OK Needs work: debuginfo package is not built correctly. I added CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" to the make line: make CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" %{?_smp_mflags} This builds a correct debuginfo package. Fix that up and I can approve this submission. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 03:12:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 23:12:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192363] Review Request: GTS - Gnu Triangulated Surface Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607260312.k6Q3C3ZZ021505@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GTS - Gnu Triangulated Surface Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192363 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-25 23:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > Can you post up a new srpm and spec file? I can get down to reviewing it > properly then. ... this package's review had been completed long ago. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 03:37:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 23:37:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196591] Review Request: bitlbee In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607260337.k6Q3bIDI023069@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitlbee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196591 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-25 23:28 EST ------- Is there a technical reason for selecting OpenSSL over gnutls ? Even the bitlbee developers recommend using gnutls (docs/README). Its seems a trival change and seems to be holding up a review for no good reason. IMHO. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 03:45:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 23:45:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196591] Review Request: bitlbee In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607260345.k6Q3j5dd023805@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitlbee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196591 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |michael at knox.net.nz OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-25 23:35 EST ------- I will do the review on this one. ---------------------------------------- Review for release 2: * RPM name is OK * Source bitlbee-1.0.3.tar.gz is the same as upstream * This is the latest version * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint looks OK * File list looks OK * Config files of bitlbee looks OK Notes: Once we have a resolve on the OpenSSL issue. This should be good to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 03:46:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 23:46:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169345] Review Request: SEC - Simple Event Correlator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607260346.k6Q3kIlU024003@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SEC - Simple Event Correlator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169345 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-07-25 23:37 EST ------- OK, release 4: rpmlint: W: sec non-conffile-in-etc /etc/sec/README W: sec non-conffile-in-etc /etc/sec/examples/pix-security.sec W: sec non-conffile-in-etc /etc/sec/examples/snortsam.sec W: sec non-conffile-in-etc /etc/sec/examples/syslog-ng.sec W: sec non-conffile-in-etc /etc/sec/examples/general.sec W: sec non-conffile-in-etc /etc/sec/examples/001_init.sec W: sec non-conffile-in-etc /etc/sec/examples/snort.sec W: sec non-conffile-in-etc /etc/sec/examples/pix-url.sec W: sec non-conffile-in-etc /etc/sec/examples/hp-openview.sec W: sec non-conffile-in-etc /etc/sec/examples/bsd-PHYSMOD.sec W: sec non-conffile-in-etc /etc/sec/examples/cvs.sec W: sec non-conffile-in-etc /etc/sec/examples/vtund.sec W: sec non-conffile-in-etc /etc/sec/examples/ssh.sec W: sec non-conffile-in-etc /etc/sec/examples/dameware.sec W: sec non-conffile-in-etc /etc/sec/examples/ssh-brute.sec W: sec non-conffile-in-etc /etc/sec/examples/clamav.sec W: sec non-conffile-in-etc /etc/sec/examples/labrea.sec W: sec non-conffile-in-etc /etc/sec/examples/mpd.sec W: sec non-conffile-in-etc /etc/sec/examples/bsd-MONITOR.sec W: sec non-conffile-in-etc /etc/sec/examples/bsd-USERACT.sec W: sec non-conffile-in-etc /etc/sec/examples/windows.sec W: sec non-conffile-in-etc /etc/sec/examples/dbi-example.sec W: sec non-conffile-in-etc /etc/sec/examples/amavisd.sec W: sec non-conffile-in-etc /etc/sec/examples/portscan.sec Non-executable files in your package are being installed in /etc, but is not marked %config. I'm inclined to ignore, they are samples. W: sec incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/sec $prog W: sec strange-permission sec.init 0755 W: sec mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs All minor. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream * However, you could have the URL point directly to the source: http://dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/simple-evcorr/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 03:52:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 23:52:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169169] Review Request: JACAL: an interactive symbolic mathematics program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607260352.k6Q3qrG6024641@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: JACAL: an interactive symbolic mathematics program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169169 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-07-25 23:43 EST ------- I have lost interest in maintaining this. Anyone who wants to base their spec off this feel free. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 03:55:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 23:55:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200172] Review Request: freeglut In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607260355.k6Q3t5bx024866@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freeglut https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200172 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-25 23:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > 4. Optional. Be careful about the Obsoletes/Provides. It seemingly Obsoletes > itself using: > Obsoletes: glut <= 3.7 > Provides: glut = 3.7 > maybe use something safer like: > Obsoletes: glut < 3.7-%{release} > Provides: glut = 3.7-%{release} > (and likewise for the Ob/Pr for glut-devel) > Or heck, drop the glut Obsoletes/Provides bits altogether, isn't glut pretty > much ancient history anyway? (: Nope, glut isn't ancient history. freeglut is an alternative to/replacement for glut. Therefore packages using GLut often Requires: glut-devel, because they depend on a package providing a Glut API and do not depend on freeglut/freeglut-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 04:32:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 00:32:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198884] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-Keepalive In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607260432.k6Q4WZ62026579@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-Keepalive https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198884 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-26 00:23 EST ------- The only thing I have to say about this is that the build sat around for about three minutes doing nothing, probably due to the test suite. Everything passed in the end so I don't see any problems. * source files match upstream: 79ea0242da708c7a8e190c00efdfccaf POE-Component-Client-Keepalive-0.0801.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (BR: perl is unnecessary) * Compiler flags are appropriate (noarch package so none passed) * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * noarch package, so no debuginfo. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(POE::Component::Client::Keepalive) = 0.0801 perl(POE::Component::Connection::Keepalive) = 60 perl-POE-Component-Client-Keepalive = 0.0801-1.fc6 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(Errno) perl(POE) perl(POE::Component::Client::DNS) perl(POE::Component::Connection::Keepalive) perl(POE::Wheel::ReadWrite) perl(POE::Wheel::SocketFactory) perl(bytes) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=15, Tests=88, 192 wallclock secs ( 2.58 cusr + 0.70 csys = 3.28 CPU) * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 04:33:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 00:33:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198885] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607260433.k6Q4X1s9026633@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198885 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 05:01:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 01:01:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195363] Review Request: esc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607260501.k6Q51g4V028473@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195363 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: esc and esc-|Review Request: esc |xulrunner-devel | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 05:03:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 01:03:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195363] Review Request: esc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607260503.k6Q53rMn028566@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195363 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2006-07-26 00:54 EST ------- oh also, I guess we're supposed to use the %{?dist} macro in packages now. just put that after the release number (with no space). It gets expanded to .fc6 on fedora and .el5 on rhel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 05:55:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 01:55:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192606] Review Request: yafc: yet another ftp client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607260555.k6Q5tJZq030685@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yafc: yet another ftp client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192606 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-26 01:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > rpmlint result: > E: yafc zero-length /usr/share/doc/yafc-1.1.1/doc/yafc.info > > The package does indeed contain an empty compressed file yafc.info.gz. The cause is building triggers regeneration of the *.info while "makeinfo" is missing. /builddir/build/BUILD/yafc-1.1.1/support/missing: line 46: makeinfo: command not found WARNING: `makeinfo' is missing on your system. You should only need it if you modified a `.texi' or `.texinfo' file, or any other file indirectly affecting the aspect of the manual. The spurious call might also be the consequence of using a buggy `make' (AIX, DU, IRIX). You might want to install the `Texinfo' package or the `GNU make' package. Grab either from any GNU archive site. => BR: /usr/sbin/makeinfo could be applied to work around this issue. But .. the actual cause is deeper: The tarball is not packaged properly. It contains a raw preconfigured CVS snapshot with all temporary files and broken timestamps inside. Due to this I strongly recommend to add a make distclean to %prep to assure the subsequent %configure doesn't "reconfigure" the source tree, but to configure it anew. Further issues: * You put *.texi's in %doc. These *.texi's are the sources of yafc.info. It doesn't make much sense to put them into %docdir * Related to the previous issue, the "prepare for %doc" block doesn't seem useful to me. The package ships and installs mans and infos, its Makefiles handle them correctly. There is no for any special treatment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 06:38:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 02:38:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199905] Review Request: gotmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607260638.k6Q6cET9032246@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gotmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199905 ------- Additional Comments From james at lovedthanlost.net 2006-07-26 02:29 EST ------- Updated spec file - http://svn.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.cgi/gotmail/gotmail/gotmail.spec?view=markup&rev=3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 07:05:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 03:05:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198247] Review Request: libpng10 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607260705.k6Q75Bo5001355@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpng10 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198247 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-26 02:56 EST ------- I'd love to use the configure script. However, I can't find any way to tweak it to get it to produce the right soname. For instance, the libpng10-1.0.18 package in FC5 has libpng.so.2.1.0.18; it follows that this libpng10-1.0.20 package should have libpng.so.2.1.0.20 for compatibility (which is the main reason for the existence of this package) but I can't get the configure script, or more exactly, libtool, to generate an object with that soname. I think the configure script output could be useful though, as it should produce the correct set of defines to be used when building the package using the older Makefiles. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 07:18:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 03:18:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182254] Review Request: SS5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607260718.k6Q7IrKP001913@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SS5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182254 ------- Additional Comments From matteo.ricchetti at libero.it 2006-07-26 03:09 EST ------- Ok, so when can I update my CVS with my FC 5 branch? This night? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 08:35:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 04:35:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189092] Review Request: boo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607260835.k6Q8ZcjM009263@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189092 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 08:36:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 04:36:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178904] Review Request: Monodevelop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607260836.k6Q8a1df009303@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178904 Bug 178904 depends on bug 189092, which changed state. Bug 189092 Summary: Review Request: boo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189092 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 08:42:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 04:42:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192420] Review Request: Bonfire - CD/DVD burning app for gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607260842.k6Q8gBUc010038@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Bonfire - CD/DVD burning app for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192420 ------- Additional Comments From rouquier.p at wanadoo.fr 2006-07-26 04:33 EST ------- We should postpone bonfire integration for two reasons: - due to trademarks on the name, I'll have to change the name - if you want ncb-2.15, I'll have to port bonfire which was planned for 0.4.91 I think backward compatibility will be hard but I'll make my best. As for the new name I'm not sure. I'm still thinking about it but should I open a new bug for reviewing and close this one? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 08:59:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 04:59:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200172] Review Request: freeglut In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607260859.k6Q8xE43011708@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freeglut https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200172 ------- Additional Comments From mharris at redhat.com 2006-07-26 04:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > * upstream source checks out: > 6d16873bd876fbf4980a927cfbc496a1 freeglut-2.4.0.tar.gz > > MUSTFIX items: > 1. Drop > BuildRequires: /sbin/ldconfig > (it's pretty much already a given) > Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig > Requires(postun): /sbin/ldconfig > (rpm automatically picks these up) There is nothing wrong with being explicit with these. > 2. Drop the > CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -Wall $(pkg-config --cflags glib) > it's not needed. At some point in the past, freeglut may have had references to > glib's header files, but it doesn't anymore (I checked). As long as it compiles ok without that now, and RPM_OPT_FLAGS can be confirmed in the build log, I agree. > 3. omit static lib using > %configure --disable-static > and drop from %files > %{_libdir}/lib*.a Definitely. I'm surprised that I did not notice that myself. > 4. Optional. Be careful about the Obsoletes/Provides. It seemingly Obsoletes > itself using: > Obsoletes: glut <= 3.7 > Provides: glut = 3.7 > maybe use something safer like: > Obsoletes: glut < 3.7-%{release} > Provides: glut = 3.7-%{release} > (and likewise for the Ob/Pr for glut-devel) The intent of this part, is to make absolutely sure that the old "glut" and "glut-devel" packages that used to exist in Red Hat Linux, RHEL, etc. are obsoleted and removed on upgrades. Also, that freeglut now provides this 100% compatible API and ABI, and to specify the version to match the old glut package. It seems to have worked for several OS releases so far, however if there is a real bug present, then it should be fixed while also retaining the original intent of the Provides and Obsoletes. Here is what we need in English: In the runtime package: Provides: <100% glut 3.7 compatible ABI> Obsoletes: In the devel package: Provides: <100% glut 3.7 compatible API> Obsoletes: > Or heck, drop the glut Obsoletes/Provides bits altogether, That would seriously break the package. freeglut is 2 things: 1) A 100% API and ABI compatible implementation of Mark J. Kilgard's GLUT 2) A new and improved alternative API/ABI which is a superset of GLUT. Applications which link against libglut get #1, and applications that link against libfreeglut get the new API. > isn't glut pretty much ancient history anyway? (: GLUT isn't ancient history by any far shot. There is quite a lot of software out there which uses the GLUT api. The official GLUT library contains a license which is not open source however, so when we discovered this, we had to drop the official GLUT from the distro. There was lots of software out there that uses GLUT however, and lots of users and customers who write software that uses GLUT, so we needed a GLUT alternative. I discovered the freeglut project, and at the time it wasn't 100% compatible, however the 2.2 version finally achieved reasonable compatibility with the official GLUT. We included freeglut in Fedora at that point to have a compatible implementation, both because things in the OS itself linked to libglut, but also because of the end user demand. There are alternative solutions out there to GLUT though, such as SDL and others, and personally I think new software should be written to a more modern API, however there's still tonnes of existing software out there that does use GLUT, so having freeglut available to Fedora users is still important. The main reason for moving it from Core to Extras, is that Core no longer contains any software which links to it. Another reason however, is that while the upstream freeglut project does still develop freeglut reasonably actively, they do not provide release-early/release-often style updates to their software. It's an open project, but they develop mainly in Win32, and aren't as savvy with open source project maintenance concepts. Since nothing in Core uses it anymore, it makes more sense to have it in Extras where things do link to it, and it makes a bit more sense to have someone who uses the library maintaining it, as they're more likely to give it more love. I fixed mesa to not require glut, and ajax is building a new package. Once it is ready, we'll be able to disable freeglut in core, so hopefully the Extras package will be built and ready then so Extras apps don't get broken. Make sure the "glut" and "glut-devel" deps are kept intact as to the original intention, so that applications which use the GLUT API or ABI can remain GLUT implementation agnostic. There are actually 3 GLUT implementations out there now - the original GLUT, freeglut, and a fork of freeglut named openglut (which is not 100% compatible per se.) Thanks for taking this on guys! You'll likely find that freeglut does not require much package maintenance. There's only one bug open on it right now, and it's probably trivial to pull the fix out of CVS: Bug #187642 Thanks again, TTYL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 09:43:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 05:43:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199732] Review Request: clanbomber - Bomberman-like multiplayer game that uses ClanLib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607260943.k6Q9h0fJ014177@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clanbomber - Bomberman-like multiplayer game that uses ClanLib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199732 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-26 05:34 EST ------- Thanks. Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 10:06:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 06:06:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199627] Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261006.k6QA6EAx015205@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199627 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-26 05:57 EST ------- New URLs: Spec URL: http://ecik.zspswidwin.pl/kooldock/kooldock.spec SRPM URL: http://ecik.zspswidwin.pl/kooldock/kooldock-0.3-2.20060720cvs.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 10:14:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 06:14:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189092] Review Request: boo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261014.k6QAEmcI015618@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189092 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-26 06:05 EST ------- Shouldn't this package own the %{monodir}/boo directory? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 12:12:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 08:12:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199627] Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261212.k6QCCPTl022117@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199627 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |rdieter at math.unl.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-26 08:03 EST ------- I can review this... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 12:15:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 08:15:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199627] Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261215.k6QCFIcv022276@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199627 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-26 08:06 EST ------- Grr. http://ktown.kde.cl/kooldock/ seems unreachable atm, I'll try again later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 12:18:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 08:18:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199627] Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261218.k6QCIEwg022447@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199627 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-26 08:09 EST ------- Well, I don't think this site will be available at any time. It looks dead for a long time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 12:28:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 08:28:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199627] Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261228.k6QCSUwe022860@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199627 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-26 08:19 EST ------- 1. %prep: the rm should come *after* the %setup, else, there's nothing there/unpackage yet to delete. 2. drop hard-coded Requires: kdelibs 3. If this is a cvs snapshot prerelease, Release tag should be prefixed with 0. so use something like this instead: Release: 0.2.%{cvs_date}cvs%{?dist} 4. The bit in %build export QTLIB... isn't needed anymore to workaround qt bug(s). The bugs have been fixed. 5. Drop %doc INSTALL no need for INSTALL instructions here. (: 6. Since you're installing icons, you should include scriptlets: %post touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/crystalsvg || : %postun touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/crystalsvg || : 7. You probably ought to change %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) to %defattr(-,root,root,-) then you won't need the %attr bits for: %attr(0755,root,root)%{_bindir}/* 8. Upstream source. If you're going to be using a cvs checkout, please provide a script to (re)generate said source tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 12:29:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 08:29:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199627] Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261229.k6QCTIC8022887@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199627 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-26 08:20 EST ------- >Well, I don't think this site will be available at any time. It looks dead for >a long time. Then I suggest you find a better/working site use for URL: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 12:42:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 08:42:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199627] Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261242.k6QCg5m3023788@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199627 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-26 08:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > 3. If this is a cvs snapshot prerelease, Release tag should be prefixed with > 0. so use something like this instead: > Release: 0.2.%{cvs_date}cvs%{?dist} This is POSTrelease. > 8. Upstream source. If you're going to be using a cvs checkout, please provide > a script to (re)generate said source tarball. Could you explain me what do you exactly mean? URLs: SPEC URL: http://ecik.zspswidwin.pl/kooldock/kooldock.spec SRPM URL: http://ecik.zspswidwin.pl/kooldock/kooldock-0.3-3.20060720cvs.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 12:46:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 08:46:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199627] Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261246.k6QCkHWx024216@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199627 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-26 08:37 EST ------- > This is POSTrelease. Then never mind, no need to use a 0. prefex. >> a script to (re)generate said source tarball. > Could you explain me what do you exactly mean? Include Source1: kooldock-cvs_checkout.sh that contains (something like): ---------------------------------- #!/bin/bash MODULE=$(basename $0 -cvs_checkout.sh) DATE=$(date +%Y%m%d) set -x rm -rf $MODULE cvs -z3 -d:pserver:anonymous@${MODULE}.cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/$MODULE co -P $MODULE tar cjf $MODULE-${DATE}cvs.tar.bz2 $MODULE rm -rf $MODULE -------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 12:50:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 08:50:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199627] Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261250.k6QCodHc024568@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199627 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-26 08:41 EST ------- There is no need to it. As I wrote in my first comment, project is dead and will never be continued. The last change in CVS is two years old. I have done one cvs snapshot on my server and this is enough. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 12:57:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 08:57:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199627] Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261257.k6QCvogF025117@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199627 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|rdieter at math.unl.edu |bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163776 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-26 08:48 EST ------- > As I wrote in my first comment, project is dead > and will never be continued. My bad for missing that, sorry. With upstream project being dead, it's ill-advised to bring this into Extras. I'm not willing to approve this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 12:59:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 08:59:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200151] Review Request: perl-POE-Wheel-Null In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261259.k6QCxGTY025274@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Wheel-Null https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200151 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 13:06:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:06:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198288] Review Request: python-pastedeploy - Load, configure, and compose WSGI applications and servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261306.k6QD6CKV025637@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pastedeploy - Load, configure, and compose WSGI applications and servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198288 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |pertusus at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-26 08:56 EST ------- I don't see any issue, so I'll wait for the final word on python subpackage naming issue before approving. I assign the bug to me since the review is almost done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 13:31:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:31:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199627] Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261331.k6QDVjVM027275@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199627 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-26 09:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > With upstream project being dead, it's ill-advised to bring this into Extras. > I'm not willing to approve this. I reported this package, because despite of its dead it still looks nice and works nice and, for me, it is the greatest docker for KDE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 13:36:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:36:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189092] Review Request: boo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261336.k6QDa1xO027660@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189092 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-07-26 09:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #33) > Shouldn't this package own the %{monodir}/boo directory? Good catch, yes it should. Add it before building. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 13:45:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:45:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193897] Review Request: mysql-connector-java - Official JDBC driver for MySQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261345.k6QDjOhg029086@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-connector-java - Official JDBC driver for MySQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193897 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-26 09:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > X- macro use is fine apart from %{__sed}. Please use "sed". What's wrong with using %{__sed}? I note that it was you (in Comment #2) that suggested the use of %{__sed} in the first place... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 13:45:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:45:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194279] Review Request: kdeartwork: Extra KDE artwork (themes, sound themes, ...) for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261345.k6QDjR23029095@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeartwork: Extra KDE artwork (themes, sound themes, ...) for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194279 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: kdeartwork- |Review Request: kdeartwork: |extras: Extra KDE artwork |Extra KDE artwork (themes, |(themes, sound themes, ...) |sound themes, ...) for KDE |for KDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 13:46:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:46:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199627] Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261346.k6QDkNxO029235@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199627 ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2006-07-26 09:37 EST ------- In reply to #17 >I reported this package, because despite of its dead it still looks nice and >works nice and, for me, it is the greatest docker for KDE. Then the solution is obvious, you should become the upstream source maintainer for this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 13:46:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:46:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189092] Review Request: boo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261346.k6QDkdhn029279@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189092 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-26 09:37 EST ------- Currently rebuilding and will upload later today -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 13:47:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:47:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194279] Review Request: kdeartwork: Extra KDE artwork (themes, sound themes, ...) for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261347.k6QDlLI7029456@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeartwork: Extra KDE artwork (themes, sound themes, ...) for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194279 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|195911 | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-26 09:38 EST ------- Mike said: > How often does upstream release packages that only have the icons changed? rarely (I won't say never), but the code portions of kdeartwork is periodically patched. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 13:48:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:48:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197847] Review Request: pymsnt - MSN Transport for Jabber Servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261348.k6QDmibo029645@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pymsnt - MSN Transport for Jabber Servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197847 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us 2006-07-26 09:39 EST ------- Updated Spec/SRPM: Spec URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/5/SRPMS/pymsnt-0.11.1-1.fc5.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/5/SRPMS/pymsnt-0.11.1-1.fc5.src.rpm * Wed Jul 12 2006 Jeffrey C. Ollie - 0.11.1-1 - Add (non-working) status option to init file. - Update to 0.11.1 - Own /var/spool/pymsnt I've added a status option to the init file, but it doesn't work... I'm not familiar enough with the init scripts to determine why it doesn't work, can anyone out there give me a clue? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 13:49:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:49:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194279] Review Request: kdeartwork: Extra KDE artwork (themes, sound themes, ...) for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261349.k6QDn7D3029686@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeartwork: Extra KDE artwork (themes, sound themes, ...) for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194279 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-26 09:40 EST ------- > Is this under review? It's assigned, but still blocking FE-NEW. I'll set it to FE-REVIEW. Mike's free to change that back (and remove assigment of this bug) if he feels otherwise. (: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 13:49:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:49:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199627] Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261349.k6QDnVP4029743@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199627 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-26 09:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > Then the solution is obvious, you should become the upstream source maintainer > for this package. I am. I've done my own cvs snapshot and this package uses it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 13:50:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:50:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194279] Review Request: kdeartwork: Extra KDE artwork (themes, sound themes, ...) for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261350.k6QDosxl029913@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeartwork: Extra KDE artwork (themes, sound themes, ...) for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194279 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-26 09:41 EST ------- FYI, if it wasn't already obvious, this pkg is targetted for fc7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 14:03:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 10:03:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200236] New: Review Request: kdeaddons: K Desktop Environment - Plugins Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200236 Summary: Review Request: kdeaddons: K Desktop Environment - Plugins Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: rdieter at math.unl.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/kdeaddons.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.testing/kdeaddons-3.5.4-1.src.rpm Description: Plugins for some KDE applications that extend the functionality of Konqueror (web browser and file manager), noatun (media player), Kate (text editor), Kicker, knewsticker. %changelog * Tue Jul 25 2006 Rex Dieter 3.5.4-1 - kde-3.5.4 * Wed Jun 07 2006 Rex Dieter 3.5.3-2 - cleanup for Extras - %%doc: README, app docs (README, TODO, etc...) - follow icon spec - BR: desktop-file-utils * Tue Jun 06 2006 Than Ngo 3.5.3-2 - BR on libtool, automake -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 14:11:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 10:11:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186919] Review Request: eric: Python IDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261411.k6QEBxqj031400@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eric: Python IDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186919 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-26 10:03 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/eric.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/eric-3.9.0-5.src.rpm %changelog * Wed Jul 26 2006 Rex Dieter 3.9.0-5 - make fastparser.py eXecutable - s/$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%%buildroot/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 14:35:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 10:35:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193897] Review Request: mysql-connector-java - Official JDBC driver for MySQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261435.k6QEZg8Y002133@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-connector-java - Official JDBC driver for MySQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193897 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-07-26 10:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > X- macro use is fine apart from %{__sed}. Please use "sed". > > What's wrong with using %{__sed}? I've been told not to use macros like %{__make}, %{__rm}, etc in reviews people have done for me. However, you're right, I don't see any ruling on this in the FE package guidelines. And, indeed, the %{__sed} magic I originally proposed was directly from the FE packaging guidelines. Ok, ignore this comment. %{__sed} is fine I guess. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 14:40:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 10:40:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200236] Review Request: kdeaddons: K Desktop Environment - Plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261440.k6QEe5Lk002599@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeaddons: K Desktop Environment - Plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200236 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-26 10:30 EST ------- This has a good chance of making FE/fc6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 14:40:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 10:40:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194373] Review Request: kdeedu: Educational/Edutainment applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261440.k6QEeDxS002621@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeedu: Educational/Edutainment applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194373 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-26 10:31 EST ------- This has a good chance of making FE/fc6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 14:40:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 10:40:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200236] Review Request: kdeaddons: K Desktop Environment - Plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261440.k6QEenTk002695@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeaddons: K Desktop Environment - Plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200236 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |194374 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 14:41:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 10:41:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194374] Review Request: kdegames: K Desktop Environment - Games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261441.k6QEf0CD002735@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdegames: K Desktop Environment - Games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194374 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |200236 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 14:41:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 10:41:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194374] Review Request: kdegames: K Desktop Environment - Games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261441.k6QEfP9G002838@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdegames: K Desktop Environment - Games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194374 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-26 10:32 EST ------- FYI, this has a good chance of making FE/fc6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 14:45:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 10:45:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200245] New: Review Request: scim-sinhala - SCIM IME for Sri Lanka Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200245 Summary: Review Request: scim-sinhala - SCIM IME for Sri Lanka Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: petersen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/petersen/extras/scim-sinhala.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/petersen/extras/scim-sinhala-0.1.0-2.src.rpm Description: scim-sinhala is an Input Method Engine for SCIM for the Sinhala (the official language of Sri Lanka). It is the most widely used input method for Sinhala these days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 14:49:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 10:49:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200245] Review Request: scim-sinhala - SCIM IME for Sri Lanka In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261449.k6QEn98M003824@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-sinhala - SCIM IME for Sri Lanka https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200245 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n CC| |swijerat at redhat.com, eng- | |i18n-bugs at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO| |142709 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 14:53:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 10:53:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200245] Review Request: scim-sinhala - SCIM IME for Sri Lanka In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261453.k6QErhTG004364@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-sinhala - SCIM IME for Sri Lanka https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200245 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-07-26 10:44 EST ------- General tech ack, if we're supporting this locale. How translated is it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 14:58:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 10:58:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200249] New: Review Request: cvs2svn Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200249 Summary: Review Request: cvs2svn Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: icon at fedoraproject.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://blues.mcgill.ca/~icon/fe/cvs2svn.spec SRPM URL: http://blues.mcgill.ca/~icon/fe/cvs2svn-1.4.0-0.1.rc1.src.rpm Description: cvs2svn is a Python script that converts a CVS repository to a Subversion repository. It is designed for one-time conversions, not for repeated synchronizations between CVS and Subversion. NB: License says "BSD" because it's the same license and subversion, and the core subversion package says the license is "BSD" (even though it's a modified BSD). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 15:02:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 11:02:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198928] Review Request: lsscsi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261502.k6QF2VaG005195@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lsscsi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198928 coldwell at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From coldwell at redhat.com 2006-07-26 10:53 EST ------- Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 10:55:06 -0400 (EDT) From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org To: coldwell at redhat.com Subject: Build Result: 13160 - lsscsi on fedora-development-extras 13160 (lsscsi): Build on target fedora-development-extras succeeded. Build logs may be found at http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/13160-lsscs i-0.17-2/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 15:03:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 11:03:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200249] Review Request: cvs2svn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261503.k6QF3X93005312@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cvs2svn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200249 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-26 10:54 EST ------- Okay... Should this not be Development/Tools rather than Languages? Could you also clarify if the licence for this software is modified BSD or straight BSD please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 15:09:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 11:09:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199920] Review Request: Palantir In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261509.k6QF9K3J005805@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Palantir https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199920 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-26 11:00 EST ------- Doesn't build for me as normal user, because it tries to chown installed files: if [ ! -d /var/tmp/palantir-root/usr/share/palantir ] ; then \ mkdir -p /var/tmp/palantir-root/usr/share/palantir ; \ chown root /var/tmp/palantir-root/usr/share/palantir ; \ fi chown: changing ownership of `/var/tmp/palantir-root/usr/share/palantir': Operation not permitted I guess this can be circumvented for the dir case by first doing an mkdir -p. Please post a new version with this fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 15:15:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 11:15:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200249] Review Request: cvs2svn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261515.k6QFFe7d006342@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cvs2svn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200249 ------- Additional Comments From icon at fedoraproject.org 2006-07-26 11:06 EST ------- Hey, Paul: You're right, I missed the Group bit -- will modify accordingly. I guess I could change the license to "Modified BSD", even though the modification is small: * 3. The end-user documentation included with the redistribution, if * any, must include the following acknowledgment: "This product includes * software developed by CollabNet (http://www.Collab.Net/)." * Alternately, this acknowledgment may appear in the software itself, if * and wherever such third-party acknowledgments normally appear. It's somewhere between the original BSD and current BSD -- the dreaded "advertise clause" is required, but only in documentation, so it's not a big deal. Like I said, the subversion package in core lists the license as "BSD", so I figure it's safe to leave it as just "BSD" for this one as well. Full license text: http://cvs2svn.tigris.org/project_license.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 15:18:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 11:18:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198884] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-Keepalive In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261518.k6QFIZeA006731@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-Keepalive https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198884 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-26 11:09 EST ------- +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +devel build succeeds +Request branching (FC-5) +Close bug Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 15:18:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 11:18:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200249] Review Request: cvs2svn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261518.k6QFIf4c006765@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cvs2svn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200249 ------- Additional Comments From icon at fedoraproject.org 2006-07-26 11:09 EST ------- Updated group: http://blues.mcgill.ca/~icon/fe/cvs2svn.spec http://blues.mcgill.ca/~icon/fe/cvs2svn-1.4.0-0.2.rc1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 15:18:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 11:18:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198885] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261518.k6QFIkjD006780@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198885 Bug 198885 depends on bug 198884, which changed state. Bug 198884 Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-Keepalive https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198884 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 15:31:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 11:31:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200245] Review Request: scim-sinhala - SCIM IME for Sri Lanka In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261531.k6QFV4s9008334@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-sinhala - SCIM IME for Sri Lanka https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200245 llch at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |jkeating at redhat.com CC| |notting at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From llch at redhat.com 2006-07-26 11:21 EST ------- Thanks Bill, reassigning this to Jesse. I hope this can be go into T2 for further native speakers testing as it is an individual IME and does not impact other languages (including English desktop environment) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 15:31:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 11:31:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194373] Review Request: kdeedu: Educational/Edutainment applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261531.k6QFVf8R008432@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeedu: Educational/Edutainment applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194373 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-26 11:22 EST ------- If by "good chance", I really meant very little chance, then I was about right. (: Let's play it safe and stick with fc7 target. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 15:31:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 11:31:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194374] Review Request: kdegames: K Desktop Environment - Games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261531.k6QFVl80008443@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdegames: K Desktop Environment - Games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194374 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-26 11:22 EST ------- If by "good chance", I really meant very little chance, then I was about right. (: Let's play it safe and stick with fc7 target. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 15:36:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 11:36:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194375] Review Request: kdeutils: K Desktop Environment - Utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261536.k6QFaDqq008744@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeutils: K Desktop Environment - Utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194375 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-26 11:27 EST ------- >> - need requires(pre,post) for update-desktop-database > I disagree, but if that's a deal-breaker for you, I'll add it. FYI, just recently updated the Scriptlets page clarifying that this Requires is no longer needed (for post-fc4 releases) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 15:39:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 11:39:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200249] Review Request: cvs2svn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261539.k6QFdpoW009193@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cvs2svn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200249 ------- Additional Comments From icon at fedoraproject.org 2006-07-26 11:30 EST ------- Added Requires: rcs http://blues.mcgill.ca/~icon/fe/cvs2svn.spec http://blues.mcgill.ca/~icon/fe/cvs2svn-1.4.0-0.3.rc1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 15:42:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 11:42:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200139] Review Request: luma - A graphical tool for managing LDAP servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261542.k6QFgNKW009572@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: luma - A graphical tool for managing LDAP servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200139 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-07-26 11:33 EST ------- Next release: Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/luma/luma.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/luma/luma-2.3.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 15:50:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 11:50:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193240] Review Request: XaraLX - Vector/general purpose graphics utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261550.k6QFoPDs010553@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: XaraLX - Vector/general purpose graphics utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193240 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-07-26 11:41 EST ------- The latest version 0.7 rev 1537 builds fine here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 16:18:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 12:18:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175047] Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261618.k6QGIhsQ012271@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175047 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-26 12:09 EST ------- Okay, here is a full review for this one, I'll do the other 2 you mentioned as time permits. MUST: ===== O rpmlint output is: E: NetworkManager-openvpn explicit-lib-dependency libglade2 E: NetworkManager-openvpn explicit-lib-dependency libgnomeui W: NetworkManager-openvpn no-url-tag W: NetworkManager-openvpn devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libnm-openvpn-properties.so W: NetworkManager-openvpn non-conffile-in-etc /etc/dbus-1/system.d/nm-openvpn-service.conf E: NetworkManager-openvpn zero-length /usr/share/doc/NetworkManager-openvpn-0.3.2/NEWS W: NetworkManager-openvpn non-conffile-in-etc /etc/NetworkManager/VPN/nm-openvpn-service.name W: NetworkManager-openvpn-debuginfo no-url-tag W: NetworkManager-openvpn no-url-tag W: NetworkManager-openvpn prereq-use %{_bindir}/update-desktop-database W: NetworkManager-openvpn prereq-use %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache See Must FIX list. * Package and spec file named appropriately * Packaged according to packaging guidelines O License (GPL) ok, but license file not included * spec file is legible and in Am. English. O Source matches upstream ?? (couldn't verify, but you are upstream right?) * Compiles and builds on devel-x86_64 * BR: ok (see below) * No locales * No shared libraries * Not relocatable * Package owns / or requires all dirs (with some strangeness see Must fix below) * No duplicate files & Permissions ok * %clean & macro usage OK * Contains code only * %doc does not affect runtime, and isn't large enough to warrent a sub package * no -devel package needed, no libs / .la files. * no gui -> no .desktop file required MUST fix: ========= * The followjng rpmlint output: E: NetworkManager-openvpn explicit-lib-dependency libglade2 E: NetworkManager-openvpn explicit-lib-dependency libgnomeui Why explicitly require these, explicit requires are ok if you want to force a certain version, but since these requires are versionless, the autodep rpm does on dso's should suffice or? W: NetworkManager-openvpn devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libnm-openvpn-properties.so Is this needed for dl-opening by NetWorkManager, if not, is this needed at all? W: NetworkManager-openvpn non-conffile-in-etc /etc/dbus-1/system.d/nm-openvpn-service.conf You must mark this %config (just put %config in front of the line) normally we always use %config(noreplace) in FE, bubt I don't know if thats appropiate here. E: NetworkManager-openvpn zero-length /usr/share/doc/NetworkManager-openvpn-0.3.2/NEWS Please don't package this empty file W: NetworkManager-openvpn non-conffile-in-etc /etc/NetworkManager/VPN/nm-openvpn-service.name You must mark this %config (just put %config in front of the line) normally we always use %config(noreplace) in FE, bubt I don't know if thats appropiate here. W: NetworkManager-openvpn prereq-use %{_bindir}/update-desktop-database W: NetworkManager-openvpn prereq-use %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache Do not use PreReq, it has issues. Instead use Requires(post): xxx and Requires(postun): xxx * Add a Requires(post) (and postun): /sbin/ldconfig * Why no %{?_smp_mflags} after make? either add a comment why tis admitted or add it. * %install must start with: "rm -fr %{buildroot}" * %makeinstall has issues (see f-e-l archives) instead use "make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}" Should fix: =========== * Do I understand correctly that you are upstream for this package? If so I'll assume that the included tarbal matches upstream. Still it would be nice to provide the tarbal for download from your site and use a full URL as Source0. (rpmlint: W: NetworkManager-openvpn no-url-tag) * You should include a COPYING in the tarbal and in %doc * "rm -f %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/lib*.a" why not just add --disable-static to %configure that reduces build time quite a bit. while you're add it also add --disable-dependency-tracking Questions: ========== * Why is this there? "## %find_lang %{name}" (similar for %files) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 16:20:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 12:20:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175047] Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261620.k6QGKVCj012426@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175047 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 16:32:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 12:32:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184331] Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261632.k6QGWhFD013132@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184331 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2006-07-26 12:23 EST ------- Spec: http://www.poolshark.org/src/k3d.spec SRPM: http://www.poolshark.org/src/k3d-0.5.15.0-1.src.rpm - Updated to latest version - I folded the devel package into the main package since there's not much sense in having the split (since otherwise the main package would have to Require it). - Added gts support -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 16:57:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 12:57:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195363] Review Request: esc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261657.k6QGvVG4015199@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195363 ------- Additional Comments From rrelyea at redhat.com 2006-07-26 12:48 EST ------- %{?dist} in Core packages now? I had removed them from those I moved from Extra's as per the package guidelines for CORE bob -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 17:01:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 13:01:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191592] Review Request: vorbisgain - Adds tags to Ogg Vorbis files to adjust the volume In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261701.k6QH1AOT015488@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vorbisgain - Adds tags to Ogg Vorbis files to adjust the volume https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191592 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-07-26 12:52 EST ------- This package still needs to be built for the devel branch. Refer to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200268 and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/PackageStatus#head-e3ffc07096e28c4a16bc8a8a0c088d4916fe0d21. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 17:05:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 13:05:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192876] Review Request: V2Strip ID3v2(Mp3 Files) tags remover In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261705.k6QH5Aqo015678@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: V2Strip ID3v2(Mp3 Files) tags remover https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192876 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-07-26 12:55 EST ------- Andrea if this is built, you need to close this bug. Refer to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/NewPackageProcess - step 14. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 17:08:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 13:08:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199968] Review Request: xdg-utils - Basic desktop integration functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261708.k6QH8d3r015869@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdg-utils - Basic desktop integration functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199968 laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |laurent.rineau__fedora_extra | |s at normalesup.org OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2006-07-26 12:59 EST ------- Here is a review. I have voluntarily not read the previous review. *MUST: rpmlint output on src.rpm is "W:?xdg-utils?mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs" There is one TAB in the "Name:" tag. *SHOULD: Naming and version are ok, but you should add the dist tag to the release number. *OK: spec file name *MUST: packaging guidelines -MUST: do not use %makeinstall, but DESTDIR instead (seems that the 20060721 tarball supports DESTDIR). *OK: license ok, license file in doc *OK: legible spec file. I do not understand either the remark of Devrim in comment #3 *OK: upstream sources have same md5sum: fde4bf35fc34c58faa562bfb96103eb5 *OK: noarch package *OK: no locales *OK: no shared libraries *OK: correct %files *OK: permissions *OK: %clean section *SHOULD: maybe add a %check section Summary: Rex, please correct the Name: tag, and the %install stuff, and this package will be accepted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 17:11:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 13:11:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199968] Review Request: xdg-utils - Basic desktop integration functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261711.k6QHB2Qh016098@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdg-utils - Basic desktop integration functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199968 laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |laurent.rineau__fedora_extra | |s at normalesup.org OtherBugsDependingO|163779 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2006-07-26 13:01 EST ------- Sorry. I go too fast. Revert to FE-REVIEW. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 17:18:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 13:18:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200139] Review Request: luma - A graphical tool for managing LDAP servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261718.k6QHIi99016646@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: luma - A graphical tool for managing LDAP servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200139 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jwilson at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-07-26 13:09 EST ------- Package build goes bonk on x86_64, install.py puts everything in /usr/lib/luma, while the spec is looking for /usr/lib64/luma. Also, why the %{ver} stuff? The upstream tarball is versioned simply 2.3, why are you turning that into 2.3.0? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 17:23:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 13:23:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199968] Review Request: xdg-utils - Basic desktop integration functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261723.k6QHN2Iu016902@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdg-utils - Basic desktop integration functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199968 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-26 13:13 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/xdg-utils.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/xdg-utils-1.0- 0.4.20060721.src.rpm %changelog * Wed Jul 26 2006 Rex Dieter 1.0-0.4.20060721 - specfile cosmetics, tabs -> spaces - %%makeinstall -> make install DESTDIR=... I'll add a %check section when the test suite actually works. (: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 17:37:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 13:37:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200139] Review Request: luma - A graphical tool for managing LDAP servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261737.k6QHbcEU017662@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: luma - A graphical tool for managing LDAP servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200139 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-07-26 13:28 EST ------- If you visit http://luma.sf.net you will see, that there was versions like luma-2.2.1. So the version 2.3 is the same as 2.3.0. Therefore I use a three qualified versioning schema to be sure that the updating will worked in the future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 17:50:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 13:50:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200139] Review Request: luma - A graphical tool for managing LDAP servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261750.k6QHoaXC018515@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: luma - A graphical tool for managing LDAP servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200139 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-07-26 13:41 EST ------- Version 2.3.1 will already be rpm-newer than 2.3, there is no need to make it into 2.3.0. Altering the upstream versioning is frowned upon, and altogether unnecessary in this case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 17:57:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 13:57:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198928] Review Request: lsscsi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261757.k6QHvSFN019111@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lsscsi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198928 coldwell at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From coldwell at redhat.com 2006-07-26 13:48 EST ------- http://brewweb.devel.redhat.com/brew/taskinfo?taskID=135258 emacs-21.4-15 built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 17:58:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 13:58:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198928] Review Request: lsscsi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261758.k6QHwY9B019182@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lsscsi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198928 coldwell at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From coldwell at redhat.com 2006-07-26 13:49 EST ------- Ooops, wrong bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 18:45:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:45:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198834] Review Request: sage - OpenGL extensions library using SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261845.k6QIjJZa023655@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sage - OpenGL extensions library using SDL Alias: sage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198834 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-07-26 14:36 EST ------- Please add "make {?_smp_mflags} check" to the %check. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 18:45:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:45:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198834] Review Request: sage - OpenGL extensions library using SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261845.k6QIjhoo023720@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sage - OpenGL extensions library using SDL Alias: sage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198834 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 18:53:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:53:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194375] Review Request: kdeutils: K Desktop Environment - Utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261853.k6QIrU0C024611@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeutils: K Desktop Environment - Utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194375 imlinux at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2006-07-26 14:44 EST ------- - Matches naming conventions - Source matches upstream - Spec file is logical and easily read - Matches packaging guidelines - License included - %find_lang is used - includes shared libs and properly runs ldconfig - buildroot gets cleaned - Builds successfully in mock - RPMLint: Most of the errors and warnings can be ignored - I believe the invalid-soname's are fine and can be ignored - add a URL tag and consider this package APPROVED ================= rpmlint: W: kdeutils no-url-tag E: kdeutils invalid-soname /usr/lib/libkdeinit_ark.so libkdeinit_ark.so E: kdeutils invalid-soname /usr/lib/libkdeinit_irkick.so libkdeinit_irkick.so E: kdeutils invalid-soname /usr/lib/libkdeinit_kedit.so libkdeinit_kedit.so E: kdeutils invalid-soname /usr/lib/libkdeinit_kcalc.so libkdeinit_kcalc.so E: kdeutils file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config.kcfg/ark.kcfg W: kdeutils conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config.kcfg/ark.kcfg E: kdeutils file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config.kcfg/kcalc.kcfg W: kdeutils conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config.kcfg/kcalc.kcfg E: kdeutils file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config.kcfg/kedit.kcfg W: kdeutils conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config.kcfg/kedit.kcfg E: kdeutils file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config.kcfg/kgpg.kcfg W: kdeutils conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config.kcfg/kgpg.kcfg E: kdeutils file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config.kcfg/kjots.kcfg W: kdeutils conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config.kcfg/kjots.kcfg E: kdeutils file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config/ksim_panelextensionrc W: kdeutils conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config/ksim_panelextensionrc W: kdeutils dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kinfocenter/blockdevices/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common W: kdeutils symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kinfocenter/blockdevices/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common W: kdeutils dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kwallet/common ../common W: kdeutils dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/ktimer/common ../common W: kdeutils dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kcharselect/common ../common W: kdeutils dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kfloppy/common ../common W: kdeutils dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kcontrol/laptop/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common W: kdeutils symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kcontrol/laptop/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common W: kdeutils dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kcontrol/kcmlowbatcrit/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common W: kdeutils symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kcontrol/kcmlowbatcrit/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common W: kdeutils dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kdf/common ../common W: kdeutils dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kcontrol/kcmlowbatwarn/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common W: kdeutils symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kcontrol/kcmlowbatwarn/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common W: kdeutils dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/superkaramba/common ../common W: kdeutils dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kcmlirc/common ../common W: kdeutils devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libkcmlaptop.so W: kdeutils dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kjots/common ../common W: kdeutils dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/KRegExpEditor/common ../common W: kdeutils dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kcontrol/powerctrl/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common W: kdeutils symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kcontrol/powerctrl/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common W: kdeutils dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kgpg/common ../common W: kdeutils dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/ark/common ../common W: kdeutils dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/ksim/common ../common W: kdeutils dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kedit/common ../common W: kdeutils dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kcalc/common ../common W: kdeutils dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/khexedit/common ../common W: kdeutils dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/irkick/common ../common -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 18:57:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:57:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200139] Review Request: luma - A graphical tool for managing LDAP servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261857.k6QIvDVc025073@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: luma - A graphical tool for managing LDAP servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200139 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-07-26 14:48 EST ------- Next release: Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/luma/luma.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/luma/luma-2.3-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 18:57:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:57:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194278] Review Request: kdeadmin: Administrative tools for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261857.k6QIvJln025095@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeadmin: Administrative tools for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194278 imlinux at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |imlinux at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2006-07-26 14:48 EST ------- I forgot to formally approve this package. Add URL tag and this one's ready. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 18:57:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:57:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194375] Review Request: kdeutils: K Desktop Environment - Utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261857.k6QIvwsL025231@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeutils: K Desktop Environment - Utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194375 imlinux at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |imlinux at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2006-07-26 14:48 EST ------- Forgot to assign this bug to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 19:24:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 15:24:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194375] Review Request: kdeutils: K Desktop Environment - Utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261924.k6QJOGex027819@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeutils: K Desktop Environment - Utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194375 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-26 15:15 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/kdeutils.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.unstable/kdeutils-3.5.4-1.src.rpm %changelog * Tue Jul 25 2006 Rex Dieter 6:3.5.4-1 - kde-3.5.4 - add missing URL tag -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 19:27:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 15:27:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197565] Review Request: buildbot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261927.k6QJRcWd027932@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: buildbot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197565 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-26 15:18 EST ------- It doesn't like Gianluca has the access necessary for doing reviews; I'll try to take a look at this today or tomorrow if I can find the time and if nobody gets to it before me. >From reading the above comments (as I haven't built the package), the rpmlint warnings stand out: W: buildbot wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/buildbot-0.7.3/contrib/windows/buildbot2.bat What's the point of including the windows bits at all? W: buildbot doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/buildbot-0.7.3/contrib/run_maxq.py /usr/bin/env W: buildbot doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/buildbot-0.7.3/contrib/svn_buildbot.py /usr/bin/env Documentation shouldn't be executable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 19:28:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 15:28:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196379] Review Request: kdeartwork-extras: Artwork Extras, including xscreensaver-based screensavers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261928.k6QJSXLw028075@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeartwork-extras: Artwork Extras, including xscreensaver-based screensavers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196379 ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2006-07-26 15:19 EST ------- WORKSFORME: and builds in mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 19:48:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 15:48:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191549] Review Request: hping3 - TCP/IP stack auditing and much more In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261948.k6QJmIap030114@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hping3 - TCP/IP stack auditing and much more https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191549 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |paul at cypherpunks.ca OtherBugsDependingO| |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-26 15:39 EST ------- I lost track of this bug, sorry about that. If you do still want to import it then go ahead. It seems to me reasonable that you could have just added a CC to your working address if you were concerned about not seeing message at your other accounts; I'll try to do that for you but I'm not sure if it will work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 19:53:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 15:53:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177117] Review Request: libtlen - Tlen.pl client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261953.k6QJrMvR030867@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtlen - Tlen.pl client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177117 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-26 15:44 EST ------- I will close this bug if there is no response soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 19:57:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 15:57:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195486] Review Request: kdenetwork: K Desktop Environment - Network Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607261957.k6QJv6rF031391@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdenetwork: K Desktop Environment - Network Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195486 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |michael at knox.net.nz OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-26 15:48 EST ------- I will review this one. Posting valid urls: Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/kdenetwork.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/kdenetwork-3.5.3-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 20:00:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 16:00:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200310] New: Review Request: pyicqt - ICQ transport for Jabber servers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200310 Summary: Review Request: pyicqt - ICQ transport for Jabber servers Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/5/SRPMS/pyicqt-0.7-1.fc5.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/5/SRPMS/pyicqt-0.7-1.fc5.src.rpm Description: The ICQ Transport provides a gateway which allows Jabber users to communicate with their contacts on the ICQ network. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 20:20:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 16:20:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197565] Review Request: buildbot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607262020.k6QKKjjT001736@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: buildbot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197565 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-26 16:11 EST ------- Hi Jason. I left the Windows batch script there, largely because I work with buildbot in a mixed eviroment. It was useful to me when I initially got buildbot working on Windows. I figured it might be useful to others. Is no big deal, I can nuke it. Will fix the permissions on the contribs. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 20:23:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 16:23:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200245] Review Request: scim-sinhala - SCIM IME for Sri Lanka In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607262023.k6QKNbL7002037@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-sinhala - SCIM IME for Sri Lanka https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200245 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188268 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-26 16:14 EST ------- Spec looks good. rpmlint is silent. Added to dist-fc6. Where does this go in Comps? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 20:26:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 16:26:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195363] Review Request: esc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607262026.k6QKQKqS002220@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195363 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-26 16:17 EST ------- Core can use %{?dist}. I updated the guidelines the other day. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 20:27:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 16:27:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191549] Review Request: hping3 - TCP/IP stack auditing and much more In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607262027.k6QKRDVF002273@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hping3 - TCP/IP stack auditing and much more https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191549 paul at xtdnet.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 20:30:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 16:30:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199688] Review Request: virt-manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607262030.k6QKULcT002404@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: virt-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199688 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO_REPORTER OtherBugsDependingO|188267 |188268 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-26 16:21 EST ------- Looks good, approving. I suppose add this as a default in the Xen group? Added to dist-fc6. Please close when built into -HEAD and I'll move it over for test2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 20:34:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 16:34:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199833] Review Request: vips - image processing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607262034.k6QKYEi2002697@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vips - image processing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199833 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-07-26 16:25 EST ------- It's looks good. Your package is APPROVED !!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 20:43:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 16:43:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199494] Review Request: gnu-getopt (RENAME ONLY) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607262043.k6QKhr8c003620@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnu-getopt (RENAME ONLY) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199494 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 20:53:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 16:53:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200106] Review Request: werken-xpath (RENAME ONLY) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607262053.k6QKrZkh004661@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: werken-xpath (RENAME ONLY) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200106 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 20:58:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 16:58:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195486] Review Request: kdenetwork: K Desktop Environment - Network Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607262058.k6QKwccI005219@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdenetwork: K Desktop Environment - Network Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195486 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-26 16:49 EST ------- Review for release 3: * RPM name is OK * Source kdenetwork-3.5.3.tar.bz2 is the same as upstream Needs work: * BuildRequires: gettext is missing (required to build the translations) * Build failed in mock Minor: * Duplicate BuildRequires: libidn-devel (by kdelibs-devel), openssl-devel (by kdelibs-devel), libxslt-devel (by kdelibs-devel), libxml2-devel (by libxslt-devel), automake (by libtool) Notes: fails in mock devel because its looking for libmeanwhile0-devel, but FC uses meanwhile-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 20:58:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 16:58:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198834] Review Request: sage - OpenGL extensions library using SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607262058.k6QKwf7L005235@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sage - OpenGL extensions library using SDL Alias: sage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198834 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-07-26 16:49 EST ------- Imported, added the 'make %{?_smp_mflags}', tagged, and built. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 20:58:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 16:58:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198839] Review Request: sear - WorldForge client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607262058.k6QKwq5R005287@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sear - WorldForge client Alias: sear https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198839 Bug 198839 depends on bug 198834, which changed state. Bug 198834 Summary: Review Request: sage - OpenGL extensions library using SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198834 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 21:01:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:01:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200064] Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607262101.k6QL17bY005634@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200064 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-26 16:52 EST ------- Okay, everything checks out happily on building, with rpmlint (though it does give a warning about no docs in the -devel package). The next stage is for you to get a sponsor. After that happens, I'm happy for this to be allowed in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 21:08:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:08:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200064] Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607262108.k6QL8DTP006677@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200064 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-07-26 16:59 EST ------- This needs at least a few more cleanups: * Separate the tools into a separate subpackage from the library. * This is something of a cosmetic change but all packages I know of in Fedora group the meta info at the top of the file. So I'd very strongly encourage putting the devel subpackage %package through %description info right after the main package's %description. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 21:13:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:13:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195486] Review Request: kdenetwork: K Desktop Environment - Network Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607262113.k6QLDMNm007539@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdenetwork: K Desktop Environment - Network Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195486 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-26 17:04 EST ------- Can we do away with the FC 4 support? If this move from core to extras is intended to happen post FC6 then FC4 support is irrelevent. Like wise with the: %if "%{?rhl}" == "7" %undefine _with_wifi %endif At the top.. no need for Red Hat 7 support. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 21:18:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:18:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188974] Review Request: libGLw In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607262118.k6QLIM0m007938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libGLw https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188974 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 21:18:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:18:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184331] Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607262118.k6QLIbkr007989@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184331 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-26 17:09 EST ------- Comments: %post /sbin/ldconfig You don't have ldconfig in the requires. You can get around this with %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %{_libdir}/*.so.* Not overly happy with this. If the package is generating some libs which all start with a common name (such a libfoo), then the libdir entry can be changed to libfoo*.so.* The same applies for the regex. Having %bindir/k3d* is enough (though you will need %exclude %{_bindir}/k3d-config I'm slightly confused by %{_libdir}/*.so.* %{_libdir}/k3d Is the application putting libraries into both libdir and libdir/k3d? In the -devel you have %{_libdir}/*.so As before, can you alter this to be a real name? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 21:22:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:22:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187326] Review Request: smokeping - Network latency grapher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607262122.k6QLM0CC008484@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smokeping - Network latency grapher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187326 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-26 17:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Since smokeping runs as a daemon, I guess the smokeping binary should be in > /usr/sbin instead of /usr/bin A daemon needs not be in /usr/sbin, what goes in /usr/sbin is what is exclusively run by root, in general because it requires some privilege. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 21:22:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:22:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187326] Review Request: smokeping - Network latency grapher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607262122.k6QLMVYr008686@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smokeping - Network latency grapher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187326 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 21:23:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:23:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187318] Review Request: mondo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607262123.k6QLNm5G008761@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mondo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187318 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 21:24:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:24:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185535] Review Request: lurker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607262124.k6QLOYT2008801@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lurker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185535 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 21:25:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:25:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177603] Review Request: libpri In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607262125.k6QLPcYd008899@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpri https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177603 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 21:26:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:26:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199968] Review Request: xdg-utils - Basic desktop integration functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607262126.k6QLQF2U008964@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdg-utils - Basic desktop integration functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199968 laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2006-07-26 17:17 EST ------- Well, this package seems a good candidate for Fedora Extras. FE-ACCEPT. Forget the %check section. I have eventually tried it, and it seems to be an interactive test suite. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 21:27:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:27:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188482] Review Request: scipy-0.4.8 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607262127.k6QLRAof009036@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scipy-0.4.8 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188482 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 21:28:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:28:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191473] Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607262128.k6QLS4rw009103@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 21:28:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:28:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200249] Review Request: cvs2svn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607262128.k6QLSZWK009169@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cvs2svn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200249 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-26 17:19 EST ------- Builds without a hitch. rpmlint is happy, mock is happy. The licence does seem correct as BSD. ACCEPTED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 21:28:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:28:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188997] Review Request: magic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607262128.k6QLSj6k009183@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: magic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188997 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 21:29:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:29:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 179040] Review Request: socat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607262129.k6QLTOsU009258@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: socat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179040 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 21:36:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:36:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187430] Review Request: elektra In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607262136.k6QLajbR009839@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elektra https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187430 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 21:41:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:41:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177584] Review Request: zaptel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607262141.k6QLfoZq010411@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177584 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 21:42:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:42:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187294] Review Request: gwyddion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607262142.k6QLgS8D010507@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwyddion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187294 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 21:44:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:44:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185325] Review Request: sparse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607262144.k6QLiLVG010692@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sparse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185325 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 21:49:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:49:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176253] Review Request: clement-2.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607262149.k6QLn4xl011549@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clement-2.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176253 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 21:50:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:50:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200064] Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607262150.k6QLo8B5011861@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200064 ------- Additional Comments From bruno at postle.net 2006-07-26 17:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) Ok, I've put the command-line tools and related docs into a separate -tools subpackage and moved the %package and %description texts to the top of the spec file: http://bugbear.blackfish.org.uk/~bruno/apt/SPECS/libpano12.spec http://bugbear.blackfish.org.uk/~bruno/apt/fedora/linux/5/x86_64/SRPMS.panorama/libpano12-2.8.4-6.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 21:50:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:50:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197565] Review Request: buildbot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607262150.k6QLoLPG011907@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: buildbot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197565 ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2006-07-26 17:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > It doesn't like Gianluca has the access necessary for doing reviews; Sorry for lurking on this. Rex is true: AFAIK official reviews leading to ACCEPTED status are meant to be made from any current package owner or SPONSORS (in case this is your first package). Unfortunately, I do not belong to either group :( > > From reading the above comments (as I haven't built the package), the rpmlint > warnings stand out: > > W: buildbot wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding > /usr/share/doc/buildbot-0.7.3/contrib/windows/buildbot2.bat > > What's the point of including the windows bits at all? > > W: buildbot doc-file-dependency > /usr/share/doc/buildbot-0.7.3/contrib/run_maxq.py /usr/bin/env > W: buildbot doc-file-dependency > /usr/share/doc/buildbot-0.7.3/contrib/svn_buildbot.py /usr/bin/env > > Documentation shouldn't be executable. maybe the whole "contrib" directory can go in /usr/share/buildbot (along the line of /usr/share/cvs/contrib/), since those are support scripts and not really documentation. One last remark: I can not recall where I read it, but I believe it is recommended to not repeat the name of the package in the Summary field. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 21:51:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:51:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193240] Review Request: XaraLX - Vector/general purpose graphics utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607262151.k6QLphYN012111@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: XaraLX - Vector/general purpose graphics utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193240 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-26 17:42 EST ------- #3 - have you got a spec file you can upload somewhere? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 21:51:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:51:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197565] Review Request: buildbot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607262151.k6QLpsaL012179@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: buildbot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197565 ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2006-07-26 17:42 EST ------- oops... s/Rex/Jason :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 22:11:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 18:11:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187294] Review Request: gwyddion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607262211.k6QMBPCV013585@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwyddion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187294 yeti at physics.muni.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From yeti at physics.muni.cz 2006-07-26 18:02 EST ------- What info is needed from me? OK, maybe this info is needed: I will update the package complying with the Fedora GNU GPL naming convention once Gwyddion 1.99.8 is released. I abandoned the idea to get Gwyddion to FE fast after the two+ months of no reaction to the initial submission (of the old stable version). I will not support any pre-2.0 version therefore I don't want them to actually appear in FE. And the closer the thing your review is to the real thing the better for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 22:26:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 18:26:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193240] Review Request: XaraLX - Vector/general purpose graphics utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607262226.k6QMQT87014192@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: XaraLX - Vector/general purpose graphics utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193240 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-07-26 18:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > #3 - have you got a spec file you can upload somewhere? I simply used the one from comment #1. I suspect that spot is not very interesting in this package anymore or is to busy with other things currently. Maybe someone else can step in? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 22:47:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 18:47:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187294] Review Request: gwyddion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607262247.k6QMlcjw015745@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwyddion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187294 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-26 18:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > What info is needed from me? No info is needed, but if I am not mistaken, NEEDINFO_REPORTER is set when waiting for something by the initial submitter, that's why I set it on that review (the aim is to help potential reviewers know what the status of the review is). > OK, maybe this info is needed: I will update the package complying with the > Fedora GNU GPL naming convention once Gwyddion 1.99.8 is released. > > I abandoned the idea to get Gwyddion to FE fast after the two+ months of no > reaction to the initial submission (of the old stable version). I will not > support any pre-2.0 version therefore I don't want them to actually appear in > FE. And the closer the thing your review is to the real thing the better for > the review. Thanks for the info. Anyway since at least one upstream release is required for things to move on, I think that setting the status to NEEDINFO_REPORTER is the right thing to do. But do it only if it seems relevant to you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 22:49:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 18:49:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196434] Review Request: ren In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607262249.k6QMnLWZ015865@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ren https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196434 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2006-07-26 18:40 EST ------- Thank you for the review, Michael. Spec file modified accordingly. The new versions are available at http://wdl.lug.ro/linux/rpms/ren/ren-1.0-8.src.rpm and http://wdl.lug.ro/linux/rpms/ren/ren.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 23:24:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 19:24:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200245] Review Request: scim-sinhala - SCIM IME for Sri Lanka In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607262324.k6QNOHJI017012@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-sinhala - SCIM IME for Sri Lanka https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200245 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-07-26 19:15 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=133119) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=133119&action=view) comps-fc6.xml-scim-sinhala.patch Thanks. Yes, please add this to comps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 26 23:25:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 19:25:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200245] Review Request: scim-sinhala - SCIM IME for Sri Lanka In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607262325.k6QNPoYi017111@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-sinhala - SCIM IME for Sri Lanka https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200245 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 00:04:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 20:04:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200151] Review Request: perl-POE-Wheel-Null In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607270004.k6R04sWH018830@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Wheel-Null https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200151 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-26 19:55 EST ------- Well, this is pretty simple. The only comment I have is that the extra bit in the description is pretty obscure (I'm not a Star Trek fan and had to look it up, geek cred--) and doesn't seem to come from the description in the package's documentation. Review: * source files match upstream: 8abee8da7a141aca6c0bff6517ca8497 POE-Wheel-Null-0.01.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (BR: perl is not necessary) * noarch package; no compiler flags are passed. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * noarch package; no debuginfo. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(POE::Wheel::Null) = 0.01 perl-POE-Wheel-Null = 0.01-0.fc6 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(POE) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(vars) * %check is present and all tests (test?) pass: All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=1, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 cusr + 0.01 csys = 0.02 CPU) * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. (Technically the documentation is twice the size of the code, but the whole package is only 5K.) * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 00:05:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 20:05:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200152] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-LDAP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607270005.k6R05wXG018895@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-LDAP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200152 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 00:10:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 20:10:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197764] Review Request: hfsplus-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607270010.k6R0AhgZ019107@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hfsplus-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197764 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-26 20:01 EST ------- Updated to latest posted version. Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/hfsplus-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/hfsplus-tools-332.14-1.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 00:25:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 20:25:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200245] Review Request: scim-sinhala - SCIM IME for Sri Lanka In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607270025.k6R0PPRT019561@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-sinhala - SCIM IME for Sri Lanka https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200245 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-07-26 20:16 EST ------- Imported into cvs and built for fc6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 01:41:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 21:41:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200348] New: Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200348 Summary: Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: raven at pmail.pl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://pmail.pl/~raven/libgadu.spec SRPM URL: http://pmail.pl/~raven/libgadu-20060726-1.src.rpm Description: Hi, it's my first package and I'm looking for review and sponsor. :) libgadu is intended to make it easy to add Gadu-Gadu communication support to your software. It's needed by gaim-gadugadu package, which provides support for Gadu-Gadu protocol in Gaim IM client. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 01:57:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 21:57:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200249] Review Request: cvs2svn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607270157.k6R1v5GT024689@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cvs2svn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200249 icon at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From icon at fedoraproject.org 2006-07-26 21:47 EST ------- Wow, this is the fastest package review I've had in my life. :) Thanks, Paul! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 02:03:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 22:03:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196945] Review Request: python-smbpasswd - Python SMB Password Hash Generator Module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607270203.k6R23Vw9025094@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-smbpasswd - Python SMB Password Hash Generator Module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196945 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-26 21:54 EST ------- Can this review request be closed now? Package is in CVS and out in the wild now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 02:06:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 22:06:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174021] Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607270206.k6R26xwa025182@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174021 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-26 21:57 EST ------- Hey, you managed to fix those undefined-non-weak-symbol errors. I see only two things: W: aplus-fsf incoherent-version-in-changelog 4.20-2.5 4.20.2-5.fc6 I think you meant to use "4.20.2-5" and not "4.20-2.5". You should probably change ":" to "-" in your initial changelog entry as well. You have "BuildRequires: xterm" when you should have "Requires: xterm". The point is to make sure that xterm is there when the package is installed, because that's what the Xterm-apl app-defaults file is for. So there's really nothing substantive wrong at this point. I'll go ahead and approve; if you agree with the above fixes then go ahead and make them and check in. APPROVED, provided you make the above changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 02:21:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 22:21:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200245] Review Request: scim-sinhala - SCIM IME for Sri Lanka In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607270221.k6R2LAJ0025660@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-sinhala - SCIM IME for Sri Lanka https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200245 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-26 22:11 EST ------- Adding to comps. Moving from -HEAD, closing bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 02:28:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 22:28:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189188] Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607270228.k6R2SxBW025884@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189188 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |michael at knox.net.nz OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-26 22:19 EST ------- I will review this one. ---------------------------------------- Review for release 2: * RPM name is OK * This is the latest version * Builds fine in mock (rawhide) * rpmlint failed * File list looks OK * Config files of sqlgrey looks OK Needs work: * Encoding should be UTF-8 Some of the changelog entries contain the name "?stein Viggen" which is tripping this rpmlint error. * there must be a proper %clean section (wiki: Packaging/ReviewGuidelines) You %clean section should look like: %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT not: %clean make clean * Spec file: some paths are not replaced with RPM macros (wiki: QAChecklist item 7) You should use "%{_initrddir}" instead of "%{_sysconfdir}/init.d/" * No downloadable source. Please give the full URL in the Source tag. You should use "http://download.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz * The BuildRoot must be cleaned at the beginning of %install You need to add "rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" before you run make install * The package should contain the text of the license (wiki: Packaging/ReviewGuidelines) There is a COPYING file in the tarball. Please add this to the %docs rpmlint of sqlgrey: W: sqlgrey non-conffile-in-etc /etc/sqlgrey/README This shouldn't be there? E: sqlgrey init-script-without-chkconfig-postin /etc/init.d/sqlgrey E: sqlgrey init-script-without-chkconfig-preun /etc/init.d/sqlgrey You should atleast use chkconfig to add the init script. W: sqlgrey no-reload-entry /etc/init.d/sqlgrey W: sqlgrey service-default-enabled /etc/init.d/sqlgrey E: sqlgrey subsys-not-used /etc/init.d/sqlgrey The init script is not very Fedora friendly. Perhaps a new one should be created and supplied? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 02:31:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 22:31:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198562] Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607270231.k6R2Vgx3025979@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198562 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-07-26 22:22 EST ------- Missing the usual chkconfig and /sbin/service Requires. fedora-qa script says: * Missing dependancy on service for %preun (package initscripts) * Missing dependancy on chkconfig for %post (package chkconfig) * Missing dependancy on chkconfig for %preun (package chkconfig) for both zabbix and zabbix-agent. Strange, rpmlint says objdump failed. x86_64 devel. W: zabbix-agent objdump-failed objdump: /tmp/zabbix-agent-1.1-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm.23260/usr/bin/zabbix_get: File format not recognized W: zabbix-agent objdump-failed objdump: /tmp/zabbix-agent-1.1-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm.23260/usr/bin/zabbix_sender: File format not recognized W: zabbix-agent objdump-failed objdump: /tmp/zabbix-agent-1.1-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm.23260/usr/bin/zabbix_agent: File format not recognized W: zabbix-agent objdump-failed objdump: /tmp/zabbix-agent-1.1-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm.23260/usr/bin/zabbix_agentd: File format not recognized -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 02:36:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 22:36:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196434] Review Request: ren In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607270236.k6R2aMW7026153@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ren https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196434 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-26 22:27 EST ------- Looks good. APPROVED. Please remember to close this review submission once imported into CVS and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 02:49:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 22:49:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197442] Review Request: fatsort - sort fat of FAT32/FAT16 on cheap mp3 players In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607270249.k6R2ns6P027041@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fatsort - sort fat of FAT32/FAT16 on cheap mp3 players https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197442 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-07-26 22:40 EST ------- Builds fine on devel x86_64, anyone have a FAT partition they want to mess up, I mean, test with this? ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 02:58:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 22:58:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198885] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607270258.k6R2wNqs027537@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198885 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-26 22:49 EST ------- This failed to build for me, due to errors in the %check section. I replaced it with: pushd t rm 01* 02* 09* 11* 50* 54* popd make test and everything built fine. Note that 0.77 is out (actually came out before your submission, I think), and I can't fetch 0.76 from cpan to compare. I don't see anything of issue with this package, but it's probably best if I review the current version. (Unless you're staying away from 0.77 for some reason.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 03:23:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 23:23:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195363] Review Request: esc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607270323.k6R3Nu4I028313@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195363 ------- Additional Comments From jmagne at redhat.com 2006-07-26 23:14 EST ------- Thanks for further suggestions. Updated version available of esc.spec and esc-1.0.0-1.src.rpm. http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/built/rpm_review/jmagne/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 03:35:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 23:35:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195363] Review Request: esc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607270335.k6R3ZJnd028624@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195363 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|188267 |188268 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2006-07-26 23:25 EST ------- looks good to me! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 03:41:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 23:41:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195363] Review Request: esc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607270341.k6R3f5Pa029072@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195363 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |timp at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2006-07-26 23:31 EST ------- well it's a little odd, that call you pwd in %install and rm -rf %{_libdir}/esc-1.0.0 in %postun Fix those and we should get it built quick. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 03:50:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 23:50:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195363] Review Request: esc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607270350.k6R3ovMq029664@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195363 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO_REPORTER AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |jkeating at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-26 23:41 EST ------- I've added esc to dist-fc6. Where might it go in comps? If you build it (into dist-fc6-HEAD) soon enough, I'll move it over to get it into the Test2 / Beta1 releases. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 03:59:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 23:59:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192420] Review Request: Bonfire - CD/DVD burning app for gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607270359.k6R3xpDT030088@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Bonfire - CD/DVD burning app for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192420 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-07-26 23:50 EST ------- It may be best to do the name change and the switch to later ncb at the same time. New name, new major release, new ncb requirements, might as well do it all at once. Opening a new bug would be a good idea, less confusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 04:09:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 00:09:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184331] Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607270409.k6R49Gae030319@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184331 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-27 00:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > - I folded the devel package into the main package since there's not much sense > in having the split (since otherwise the main package would have to Require it). Very bad move. Please revert this change and split into *-devel and *non-devel, again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 04:13:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 00:13:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186919] Review Request: eric: Python IDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607270413.k6R4D4Tw030450@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eric: Python IDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186919 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-27 00:04 EST ------- Everything's looking good now. Did you see the fix to gen_sip_api.py that came out July 11? You can probably remove the comment with the link to the PyQt-qscintilla review. I'm not sure about this; does PYTHONOPTIMIZE do the opposite of what I think it does? # generate .pyo files? No, for now, it's fast enough as-is. -- Rex PYTHONOPTIMIZE=1; export PYTHONOPTIMIZE rpmlint is complaining about spaces and tabs: W: eric mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs Seems to be on the Name, Group, URL and Source lines. Not an essential fix IMO, but should be simple to fix. * source files match upstream: 2d2c4f85787b34671c76dea1436da8ae eric-3.9.0.tar.gz fcea430a92e9d88089d91ce3099db282 gen_python_api_20050605.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * noarch package; no debuginfo. X rpmlint complains about mixed spaces and tabs, plus some ignorable warnings. * final provides and requires are sane: eric = 3.9.0-5.fc6 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/env PyQt = 3.16 PyQt-qscintilla python(abi) = 2.4 python-abi = 2.4 * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 04:16:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 00:16:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182320] Review Request: gnome-build In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607270416.k6R4G1Tu030573@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182320 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-07-27 00:07 EST ------- W: gnome-build mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs E: gnome-build shlib-with-non-pic-code /usr/lib64/libgbf-1.so.0.0.1 E: gnome-build shlib-with-non-pic-code /usr/lib64/libgbf-widgets-1.so.0.0.1 For some reason -fPIC isn't working on these libraries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 04:21:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 00:21:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200348] Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607270421.k6R4LwsH030733@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200348 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 04:38:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 00:38:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198586] Review Request: ip6sic - IPv6 Stack Integrity Checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607270438.k6R4cEOZ031418@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ip6sic - IPv6 Stack Integrity Checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198586 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 04:59:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 00:59:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198586] Review Request: ip6sic - IPv6 Stack Integrity Checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607270459.k6R4xSZT000326@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ip6sic - IPv6 Stack Integrity Checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198586 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-27 00:50 EST ------- My only concern is the description; I'm not sure it's really relevant to mention that the source will compile on OpenBSD, or to mention the isic URL when isic is already in extras. I'll leave it to you to decide what you want to do. Review: * source files match upstream: b545715256f9c362703754a894fe9093 ip6sic-0.1.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: ip6sic = 0.1-1.fc6 = libdnet >= 1.1.0 libdnet.so.1()(64bit) libpcap >= 0.4 libpcap.so.0.9.4()(64bit) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 05:00:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 01:00:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193161] Review Request: ruby-postgres In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607270500.k6R50Gtc000406@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-postgres https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193161 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 05:08:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 01:08:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196529] Review Request: gtkdatabox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607270508.k6R586Dq000699@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkdatabox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196529 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-27 00:59 EST ------- While the "no-docs" rpmlint warning is normally ignorable, given that there doesn't appear to be any other documentation available, please include examples/*.c in -devel under %doc. Also, given that there is a shared library in the system path in -devel, you need to put in place the %post/%postun scriptlets that are in place for the main package. + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license field matches the actual license. + license is open source-compatible. (LGPL) License text included in package. + source files match upstream: 847d59ea06ef92426b0911785a5f0c8c gtkdatabox-0.5.3.0.tar.gz 847d59ea06ef92426b0911785a5f0c8c gtkdatabox-0.5.3.0.tar.gz.srpm + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + package builds in mock (x86_64: fc5 & devel). X rpmlint is silent + Final provides/requires are sane. ** gtkdatabox-0.5.3.0-1.fc5.x86_64.rpm == rpmlint == provides libgtkdatabox-0.5.3.so.0()(64bit) gtkdatabox = 0.5.3.0-1.fc5 == requires /sbin/ldconfig /sbin/ldconfig libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libcairo.so.2()(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgmodule-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit) ** gtkdatabox-debuginfo-0.5.3.0-1.fc5.x86_64.rpm == rpmlint == provides libgtkdatabox-0.5.3.so.0.0.0.debug()(64bit) gtkdatabox-debuginfo = 0.5.3.0-1.fc5 == requires ** gtkdatabox-devel-0.5.3.0-1.fc5.x86_64.rpm == rpmlint W: gtkdatabox-devel no-documentation == provides gtkdatabox-devel = 0.5.3.0-1.fc5 == requires gtk2-devel gtkdatabox = 0.5.3.0-1.fc5 pkgconfig X shared libraries are present: proper %post/%postun in place for main package but not -devel. + package is not relocatable. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + %clean is present. O %check is not present; package has no tests suite X proper scriptlets present (%post/%postun for -devel). + code, not content. + documentation is (will be) small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. + no headers in main package. + no pkgconfig files in main package. + -devel properly requires main package. + no libtool .la droppings. + not a GUI app. + not a web app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 06:32:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 02:32:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193240] Review Request: XaraLX - Vector/general purpose graphics utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607270632.k6R6WapE004369@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: XaraLX - Vector/general purpose graphics utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193240 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-27 02:23 EST ------- #5 - someone has. me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 06:53:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 02:53:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188974] Review Request: libGLw In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607270653.k6R6rL80005990@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libGLw https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188974 ------- Additional Comments From mharris at redhat.com 2006-07-27 02:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Some quick comments after looking at the spec: > > * It would be better to have your real name on the bug report. > Not a big deal, it is in the spec anyway. Irrelevant. > * the Buildroot is no the right one > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-f196e7b2477c2f5dd97ef64e8eacddfb517f1aa1 It'd be nice if emacs et al defaulted to the official BuildRoot tag. > * no need to conditionalize openmotif support, it should always > be true in fedora extras There's no need to conditionalize the support for many of the things which Fedora Core and Fedora Extras packages already conditionalize. Conditionalizing features is itself a feature, which can be useful to rebuilders, and for a variety of other reasons. This is not a flaw in the package, and is IMHO orthagonal to inclusion of the package into Extras. > * the non free file shouldn't be distributed. I generally completely agree with that. In this case the file is not open-source, but it both unused, and is legally redistributable, so it is not a problem legally or practically for it to be in the package, however it would be nice if upstream removed it in the future. There's no real-world gain of removing it IMHO, and it has the cost of having to re-do that every time there is a new upstream release of Mesa which contains it. Also, our tarballs no longer match upstream's then, so can't be verified by MD5sum or whatever. > what I do in such > cases is provide with a script in SourceXX that unpack the upstream > tarball, remove the offending files and repack, such that a reviewer > can easily reproduce what you did in the SOURCES directory. An example > where I do that is grads (with the script grads-remove-files and the > list of files grads-removed-files-list) although you could do more simply > since you only have one file to remove. Sounds reasonable for files which are not legally redistributable, such as mp3 decoder software, and other things which are legally encumbered. In the case of this file, it is redistributable as-is, and is unused, so moot. (In reply to comment #2) > Another remark, maybe > BuildRequires: mesa-libGL-devel > should be > BuildRequires: libGL-devel > but I haven't really investigated if there is a need for the mesa > implementation or not. Yup, "BuildRequires: libGL-devel" should be used by anything needing libGL, unless a specific implementation of OpenGL is required. (In reply to comment #3) > 2 more comments: > > * You should add to %docs Mesa-6.5/src/glw/README > as it contains the licence. Sounds reasonable. > * I am not convinced that it is right to make a source package out of a > whole package by taking only bits of what is in the tarball while the > remaining is in another source package. May be worth asking on the extras > list. Couldn't the upstream project be convinced to split the tarball? Adam more or less _is_ the upstream person who is splitting the tarball essentially.(In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #1) > > * the non free file shouldn't be distributed. what I do in such > > cases is provide with a script in SourceXX that unpack the upstream > > tarball, remove the offending files and repack, such that a reviewer > > can easily reproduce what you did in the SOURCES directory. An example > > where I do that is grads (with the script grads-remove-files and the > > list of files grads-removed-files-list) although you could do more simply > > since you only have one file to remove. > > That feels like such overkill. I'll give it a shot though. Definite overkill, with no real-world gain, and no real-world risk of not doing it. > > * I am not convinced that it is right to make a source package out of a > > whole package by taking only bits of what is in the tarball while the > > remaining is in another source package. May be worth asking on the extras > > list. Couldn't the upstream project be convinced to split the tarball? > > No, they can't. This battle has been fought and lost before. We already slice > up the default build of Mesa, since we don't use its libglut for being non-free. Wrong. Brian Paul split Mesa's GLUT library out into MesaGLUT in the 6.4 release. Fedora doesn't remove the files, we just don't ship the MesaGLUT tarball. The Mesa source just seems to have some leftover glut related files still stuck in it. No idea if they're just files that were missed, or if they're needed for anything, but we don't ship them in the binary packages, so it doesn't much matter. > Other changes applied, along with some fixed %package statements to make the > binary rpm not be named libGLw-libGLw-*. New versions uploaded to the same URLs > as before. libGLw-libGLw-libGLw would be a cool package name. ;) (In reply to comment #6) > 2 remarks: > - The summary isn't quite correct: LibGLw provides Xt and Xm OpenGL widgets. > It doesn't provide Xaw widgets. > > - Instead of building a standalone libGLw from Mesa's tarball, wouldn't it be > easier to use SGI's original sources (I don't know if and where they still are > available as a separate tarball) and to patch them to Mesa's state, or even to > drop Mesa's libGLw in favor of SGI's? More importantly here I think, is which upstream do you think is more likely to fix bugs in libGLw and/or respond to developer inquiries and bug reports, etc? I would wager the Mesa project would be much more responsive than would SGI, and definitely Mesa project is more likely to provide bugfixed tarballs in an open-project style manner. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 07:19:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 03:19:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178904] Review Request: Monodevelop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607270719.k6R7Jjh6007298@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178904 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-07-27 03:10 EST ------- I built and installed -12 on my rawhide x86_64 box. After creating a symlink /usr/lib/monodevelop -> ../lib64/monodevelop to get the wrapper script to run, I get a backtrace dialogue listing missing addins it can't find (Monodevelop.SourceEditor.addin, CSharpBinding.addin, ...). Ignoring that and continuing startup finally it throws an exception: System.Reflection.TargetInvocationException: Exception has been thrown by the target of an invocation. ---> System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object at <0x00000> at (wrapper managed-to-native) System.Reflection.MonoCMethod:InternalInvoke (object,object[]) at System.Reflection.MonoCMethod.Invoke (System.Object obj, BindingFlags invokeAttr, System.Reflection.Binder binder, System.Object[] parameters, System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture) [0x00000] --- End of inner exception stack trace --- at System.Reflection.MonoCMethod.Invoke (System.Object obj, BindingFlags invokeAttr, System.Reflection.Binder binder, System.Object[] parameters, System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture) [0x00000] at System.Reflection.MonoCMethod.Invoke (BindingFlags invokeAttr, System.Reflection.Binder binder, System.Object[] parameters, System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture) [0x00000] at System.Reflection.ConstructorInfo.Invoke (System.Object[] parameters) [0x00000] at System.Activator.CreateInstance (System.Type type, Boolean nonPublic) [0x00000] at System.Activator.CreateInstance (System.Type type) [0x00000] at MonoDevelop.Core.AddIns.AddIn.CreateObject (System.String className) [0x00000] at MonoDevelop.Ide.Codons.PadCodon.CreatePad () [0x00000] at MonoDevelop.Ide.Codons.PadCodon.BuildItem (System.Object owner, System.Collections.ArrayList subItems, MonoDevelop.Core.AddIns.ConditionCollection conditions) [0x00000] at MonoDevelop.Core.AddIns.DefaultAddInTreeNode.BuildChildItems (System.Object caller) [0x00000] at MonoDevelop.Core.AddIns.AddInService.GetTreeItems (System.String path, System.Type itemType) [0x00000] at MonoDevelop.Ide.Gui.DefaultWorkbench.InitializeLayout (IWorkbenchLayout workbenchLayout) [0x00000] at MonoDevelop.Ide.Gui.Workbench.Initialize (IProgressMonitor monitor) [0x00000] at MonoDevelop.Ide.Gui.IdeApp.Initialize (IProgressMonitor monitor) [0x00000] at MonoDevelop.Ide.Gui.IdeStartup.Run (System.String[] args) [0x00000] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 07:40:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 03:40:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198885] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607270740.k6R7eo9v008759@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198885 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-27 03:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Note that 0.77 is out (actually came out before your submission, I think), and I > can't fetch 0.76 from cpan to compare. If you run: $ spectool --gf perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP.spec several times, you should eventually get a redirect to a CPAN mirror that has it, such as http://cpan.mirror.anlx.net/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 07:47:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 03:47:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184331] Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607270747.k6R7lXph009418@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184331 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-27 03:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #8) > > - I folded the devel package into the main package since there's not much sense > > in having the split (since otherwise the main package would have to Require it). > > Very bad move. Please revert this change and split into *-devel and *non-devel, > again. If the main package would have to require it, it sounds like the files in the devel package (at least some of them) aren't really devel files. What was in the devel package that's needed by the main package? Is there anything that was in the devel package that's *not* needed by the main package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 08:18:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 04:18:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188974] Review Request: libGLw In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607270818.k6R8IoL4012134@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libGLw https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188974 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-27 04:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #1) > > * It would be better to have your real name on the bug report. > > Not a big deal, it is in the spec anyway. > > Irrelevant. It is important to be able to identify the people behind fedora extras contributors. > > * no need to conditionalize openmotif support, it should always > > be true in fedora extras > > There's no need to conditionalize the support for many of the things > which Fedora Core and Fedora Extras packages already conditionalize. > Conditionalizing features is itself a feature, which can be useful > to rebuilders, and for a variety of other reasons. > > This is not a flaw in the package, and is IMHO orthagonal to inclusion > of the package into Extras. Not orthogonal, such conditionnal should be avoided unless they correspond with real needs. It's not a must or blocker, but simpler is better. For example if it is an old leftover that is not usefull anymore, it is usefull to point it out, if such comments are not done during the review they'll be never done. > > * the non free file shouldn't be distributed. > > I generally completely agree with that. In this case the file is > not open-source, but it both unused, and is legally redistributable, >From the comment in the spec file I wrongly assumed that the file was not redistributable. It is much better to distribute and remove it as it is done in the spec in that case. (I didn't had a look at the file). > Sounds reasonable for files which are not legally redistributable, such > as mp3 decoder software, and other things which are legally encumbered. > In the case of this file, it is redistributable as-is, and is unused, so > moot. Agreed. > Adam more or less _is_ the upstream person who is splitting the tarball > essentially.(In reply to comment #4) I don't understand. I went to the mesa home site and indeed the tarball is not split in Mesa and libGLw? > Definite overkill, with no real-world gain, and no real-world risk of > not doing it. Indeed, my comment was wrong. Maybe the comment in the spec file should be changed to # WARNING: The following files are copyright "Mark J. Kilgard" under the GLUT # license and are not free software (but redistributable), so we remove them. > More importantly here I think, is which upstream do you think is more > likely to fix bugs in libGLw and/or respond to developer > inquiries and bug reports, etc? I would wager the Mesa project would be > much more responsive than would SGI, and definitely Mesa project is more > likely to provide bugfixed tarballs in an open-project style manner. Indeed, but not a tarball for libGLw, a tarball for Mesa, so it's dubious to use the same source, Mesa-*.tar.bz2 for 2 distinct srpms. It is not explicitly forbidden but I consider it bad practice. Maybe another reviewer could accept that practice, or as I said above we could also ask on the fedora-extras-list for advice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 08:24:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 04:24:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196434] Review Request: ren In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607270824.k6R8OPUZ012567@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ren https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196434 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2006-07-27 04:15 EST ------- I am sorry, but as this is my first approved package, I am not sure about the next step... Does your approval mean that I am sponsored? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 08:27:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 04:27:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197198] Review Request: ntop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607270827.k6R8R60e012736@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197198 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-27 04:18 EST ------- OK, updated ntop. Dropped the effort to make it work with Glib2, this should fix what Ralf was seeing. Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~michael/ntop.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~michael/ntop-3.2-6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 08:28:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 04:28:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196434] Review Request: ren In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607270828.k6R8Sbjj012875@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ren https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196434 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-27 04:19 EST ------- Nope.. someone needs to sponsor you. You needed to have FE-NEEDSPONSOR blocking your review request. I can't sponsor anyone just yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 08:45:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 04:45:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196434] Review Request: ren In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607270845.k6R8jCcB014276@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ren https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196434 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 09:04:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 05:04:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200374] New: Review Request: qstat - Real-time Game Server Status for Quake servers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200374 Summary: Review Request: qstat - Real-time Game Server Status for Quake servers Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: andy at smile.org.ua QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://andriy.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/qstat.spec SRPM URL: ftp://andriy.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/qstat-2.10-2.src.rpm Description: QStat is a command-line program that gathers real-time statistics from Internet game servers. Most supported games are of the first person shooter variety (Quake, Half-Life, etc) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 11:26:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 07:26:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196003] Review Request: Kmenu-gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271126.k6RBQ4Wb023976@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Kmenu-gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196003 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 11:26:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 07:26:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196177] Review Request: kdmtheme - Theme Manager for KDM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271126.k6RBQFSo023997@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdmtheme - Theme Manager for KDM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196177 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 11:28:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 07:28:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187818] Review Request: ktorrent : KDE bittorrent client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271128.k6RBSai1024108@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ktorrent : KDE bittorrent client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187818 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-27 07:19 EST ------- Waiting to see a final update (per comment #32 and comment #33), then we can probably approve this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 11:29:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 07:29:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187818] Review Request: ktorrent : KDE bittorrent client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271129.k6RBTXFe024179@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ktorrent : KDE bittorrent client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187818 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(wolters.liste at gmx. | |net) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 11:29:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 07:29:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196177] Review Request: kdmtheme - Theme Manager for KDM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271129.k6RBTcBF024202@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdmtheme - Theme Manager for KDM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196177 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(cgoorah at yahoo.com. | |au) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 11:30:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 07:30:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196003] Review Request: Kmenu-gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271130.k6RBU2xS024264@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Kmenu-gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196003 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(cgoorah at yahoo.com. | |au) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 11:30:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 07:30:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200348] Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271130.k6RBU5l1024280@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200348 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-27 07:21 EST ------- Hi :) Thanks for packaging it, I wanted to do it, too :) I'm not a sponsor, but I can give you some advices: * as far as I know, license of libgadu is only LGPL * you should include COPYING file to %%doc, and also, include more docs in the main package, not in -devel * I don't think using of libgadu-current.tar.gz is good. This file changes every day and md5sum of upstream source won't match md5 of source included in SRPM * you should change doc files charset to utf8 (by iconv) * change version in changelog entry. According to changelog inital release is 20060717-1, but in fact it is 20060726-1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 11:30:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 07:30:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199919] Review Request: Asuka In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271130.k6RBUMHp024325@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Asuka https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199919 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-27 07:21 EST ------- Not a full review yet, first a few must fix items: * You're using a hardcoded UID, very very BAD! Instead try this in a %pre script groupadd -r irc || : useradd -r -g irc -d /etc/ircd -n -c "IRC Daemon" irc || : * Since this program will leave log files around after erase do not remove the user and group on uninstall otherwise we get files owned by a non existing user which is bad security wise * "irc" as username and /etc/ircd as dir are way to generic and likely to collide with other packages, try asuka as username and /etc/asuka as dir. * The same goes for the init and logrotate script names * You're manually creating a %doc, thats not nescesarry add this to %prep: cp tools/README doc/README.mkpasswd and add "%doc doc/*" to %files then the dir will get created and the files copied there by RPM. Please post a new version with this fixed and taking the comments above into account, then I'll do a full review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 11:31:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 07:31:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196262] Review Request: katapult: Faster access to applications, bookmarks, and other items In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271131.k6RBVgAu024443@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: katapult: Faster access to applications, bookmarks, and other items https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196262 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-27 07:22 EST ------- Don't forget to close this once the package has been imported into Extras' cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 11:41:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 07:41:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199968] Review Request: xdg-utils - Basic desktop integration functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271141.k6RBfWAl024871@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdg-utils - Basic desktop integration functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199968 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-27 07:32 EST ------- Thanks, importing... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 11:48:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 07:48:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199573] Review Request: BackupPC - high-performance backup system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271148.k6RBm093025188@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: BackupPC - high-performance backup system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199573 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-07-27 07:38 EST ------- looks good now APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 11:49:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 07:49:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186919] Review Request: eric: Python IDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271149.k6RBnxk8025286@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eric: Python IDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186919 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-27 07:41 EST ------- > I'm not sure about this; does PYTHONOPTIMIZE do the opposite of what I think > it does? I'm not so sure anymore, and I never intended to leave that line active (uncommented). I *think* eric doesn't actually use it one way or the other. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 11:52:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 07:52:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186919] Review Request: eric: Python IDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271152.k6RBq4Dj025405@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eric: Python IDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186919 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-27 07:43 EST ------- > Did you see the fix to gen_sip_api.py that came out July 11? No, I look into that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 12:00:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 08:00:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199919] Review Request: Asuka In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271200.k6RC0oIl025822@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Asuka https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199919 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl CC|j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl | OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 13:05:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 09:05:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193240] Review Request: XaraLX - Vector/general purpose graphics utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271305.k6RD5iSE029941@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: XaraLX - Vector/general purpose graphics utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193240 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-27 08:56 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/XaraLX.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/XaraLX-0.7-1.r1564.src.rpm - bump to new version - includes 64 bit fixes - Additional docs - fixed EOL for xaralx.htm - fixed multiple mode errors for header and source files - removed mixed use of spaces and tabs The package builds cleanly on x86_64 with rpmlint not giving a single complaint! I've not built it in mock yet (my testrig is not working happily today from a remote login). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 13:12:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 09:12:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198586] Review Request: ip6sic - IPv6 Stack Integrity Checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271312.k6RDCkDp030293@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ip6sic - IPv6 Stack Integrity Checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198586 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-07-27 09:03 EST ------- The description was basically a simple copy-n-paste off the project page, but yeah, I suppose we don't really give a rip that it builds on OpenBSD. I'm importing a -2 revision with a sanitized description. Building for devel as I type, branching for FC5 requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 13:36:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 09:36:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187818] Review Request: ktorrent : KDE bittorrent client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271336.k6RDa6KA031831@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ktorrent : KDE bittorrent client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187818 wolters.liste at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(wolters.liste at gmx.| |net) | ------- Additional Comments From wolters.liste at gmx.net 2006-07-27 09:27 EST ------- The actual version of the spec file was changed according to comment #33. The only errors I see are the rpmlint error because I do not create a devel package (see above). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 13:52:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 09:52:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198245] Review Request: gnome-libs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271352.k6RDq5cG001182@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-libs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198245 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |200399 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 14:23:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 10:23:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198562] Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271423.k6RENaaK003106@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198562 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-07-27 10:14 EST ------- Deps on chkconfig and service added, misc other little spec clean-ups. http://wilsonet.com/packages/zabbix/zabbix.spec http://wilsonet.com/packages/zabbix/zabbix-1.1-2.fc6.src.rpm As for those rpmlint objdump failures, you aren't by chance running on an FC5 box, building in an FC6 mock chroot, are you? I just ran into this today myself. FC5 builds analyzed on FC5 work fine, but not the FC6 ones. If I scp the mock-built FC6 packages over to an up-to-date rawhide box, rpmlint does its thing without a problem. I believe this is due to recent glibc hash function changes that rpmlint/objdump on FC5 doesn't understand. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 14:33:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 10:33:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187818] Review Request: ktorrent : KDE bittorrent client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271433.k6REX9Kc003642@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ktorrent : KDE bittorrent client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187818 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-27 10:24 EST ------- OK, looks good then, APPROVED/FE-ACCEPT. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 14:35:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 10:35:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196945] Review Request: python-smbpasswd - Python SMB Password Hash Generator Module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271435.k6REZD0x003767@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-smbpasswd - Python SMB Password Hash Generator Module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196945 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 14:50:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 10:50:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196003] Review Request: Kmenu-gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271450.k6REoI4p005256@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Kmenu-gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196003 ------- Additional Comments From ariszlo at gmail.com 2006-07-27 10:41 EST ------- > NEEDINFO requested of cgoorah at yahoo.com.au Chitlesh writes at clunixchit.blogspot.com that he will be on vacation until about the middle of August. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 14:54:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 10:54:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196003] Review Request: Kmenu-gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271454.k6REsaji005699@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Kmenu-gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196003 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-27 10:45 EST ------- OK, we can wait. (: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 15:06:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 11:06:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186919] Review Request: eric: Python IDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271506.k6RF68WL006615@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eric: Python IDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186919 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-27 10:57 EST ------- Arg... build is failing on the buildsys... I'm guessing due to an unstable ppc buildhost). python is crashing with "illegal instruction". -------------------------------------------------- Job failed on arch noarch Build logs may be found at http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/13203-eric-3.9.1-2.fc6/ ------------------------------------------------- _curses : importing ... modulename begins with _ _bsddb : importing ... modulename begins with _ dl : importing ... ok, processing ... ok, no source file resource : importing ... ok, processing ... ok, no source file _codecs_cn : importing ... modulename begins with _ _weakref : importing ... modulename begins with _ cStringIO : importing ... ok, processing ... ok, no source file rgbimg : importing ... ok, processing ... ok, no source file select : importing ... ok, processing ... ok, no source file _heapq : importing ... modulename begins with _ crypt : importing ... ok, processing ... ok, no source file _csv : importing ... modulename begins with _ syslog : importing ... ok, processing ... ok, no source file _locale : importing ... modulename begins with _ math : importing ... ok, processing ... ok, no source file regex : importing ... ok, processing ... ok, no source file _testcapi : importing ... modulename begins with _ mmap : importing ... ok, processing ... ok, no source file shm : importing ... ok, processing ... ok, no source file cPickle : importing ... ok, processing ... ok, no source file itertools : importing ... ok, processing ... ok, no source file gdbm : importing ... ok, processing ... ok, no source file binascii : importing ... ok, processing ... ok, no source file md5 : importing ... ok, processing ... ok, no source file _multibyt/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.26157: line 53: 11891 Illegal instruction /usr/bin/python gen_python_api.py /var/tmp/eric-3.9.1-2.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/share/eric/ error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.26157 (%install) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.26157 (%install) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 15:07:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 11:07:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186919] Review Request: eric: Python IDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271507.k6RF7PCD006682@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eric: Python IDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186919 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-27 10:58 EST ------- For the record, it builds fine for me in mock for fc6 on an i386 buildhost. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 15:08:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 11:08:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271508.k6RF8txS006758@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-27 10:59 EST ------- Bad : you need to define BuildArch : noarch rpmlint on the rpm gives E: script-without-shellbang /usr/share/doc/jokosher-0.1/userguide/jokosheruserguide.de.html rpmlint on the debuginfo gives E: empty-debuginfo-package I'm currently running mock over the package. You need to fix the above problems before you go any further as they're blockers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 15:11:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 11:11:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200348] Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271511.k6RFB2uY006884@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200348 ------- Additional Comments From raven at pmail.pl 2006-07-27 11:02 EST ------- Thanks for the advicies: >* as far as I know, license of libgadu is only LGPL See it's official site. :) >* you should include COPYING file to %%doc, and also, include more docs in the main package, not in -devel COPYING file is not included in upstream tarball, and more docs are not useful (it's related only to ekg program) >* I don't think using of libgadu-current.tar.gz is good. This file changes every day and md5sum of upstream source won't match md5 of source included in SRPM Have you any idea? >* you should change doc files charset to utf8 (by iconv) OK, I'll do it, but please help me, I'm new to RPM. >* change version in changelog entry. According to changelog inital release is 20060717-1, but in fact it is 20060726-1 Ops, my ommision, I will correct it in next release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 15:14:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 11:14:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200151] Review Request: perl-POE-Wheel-Null In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271514.k6RFE0fj007015@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Wheel-Null https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200151 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-27 11:04 EST ------- "D*mnit Jim, I'm a reviewing-machine, not a moon shuttle engineer!" :) +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +devel build succeeds +Request branching (FC-5) +Close bug Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 15:14:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 11:14:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200152] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-LDAP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271514.k6RFENXk007066@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-LDAP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200152 Bug 200152 depends on bug 200151, which changed state. Bug 200151 Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Wheel-Null https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200151 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 15:21:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 11:21:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271521.k6RFLAZo007445@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-27 11:12 EST ------- Fails to build in mock. The problem is in the Source line - you have %{name}-%{version}-%{release}.tar.gz %{release} gets expanded to -2.fc6 Typically, the source tarball (not the SRPM you've produced) will be along the lines of %{name}-%{version}.tar.gz (or sometimes with something after %{version} such as -rc2.tar.gz). This is what Source has to point to. If you've had to create a tarball from the SVN repository, the package name needs to reflect this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 15:26:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 11:26:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198885] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271526.k6RFQhWm007928@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198885 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-27 11:17 EST ------- Updated to 0.77... Fixed the issues in %check; now using the same _with_network_tests scheme as perl-POE-Component-IRC. Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP-0.77-1.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 15:32:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 11:32:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197847] Review Request: pymsnt - MSN Transport for Jabber Servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271532.k6RFWII0008362@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pymsnt - MSN Transport for Jabber Servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197847 pwb at sucs.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pwb at sucs.org ------- Additional Comments From pwb at sucs.org 2006-07-27 11:23 EST ------- The group should be Applications/Communications. The status option doesn't work because start() does not create a pid file. Instead of running PyMSNt.py directly, it should run a shell script that invokes twistd with a .tac file, as IIRC the official source tarball does (unfortunately that seems to be unavailable atm). twistd will create the pid file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 15:39:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 11:39:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271539.k6RFdaTR009050@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-27 11:30 EST ------- You're missing some requires as well - check http://www.jokosher.org/download for details. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 15:40:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 11:40:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271540.k6RFeu90009223@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-07-27 11:31 EST ------- Mid-air collision, so here are some additional comments: * I suggest that upstream do not modify/extend/sublicence the GPL with exceptions, but rather put their distribution licence terms into a separate file. * Run rpmlint on the binary rpm. From the two errors it reports, one is valid. * Directory /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/jokosher/ is not included. * Why is it arch-specific and not "BuildArch: noarch"? * Upstream recommends GStreamer 0.10.9 or above and prefers a CVS snapshot. Requires: gstreamer >= 0.10.8 does not reflect that. * Prefer "install -p" over "cp" to preserve time-stamps of files. * Run-time warning: Some functionality will not work correctly or at all. You must have the Python alsaaudio package installed. Please install python-alsaaudio or fetch from http://www.wilstrup.net/pyalsaaudio/. * Crashes reproducibly with below message. Steps to reproduce: 1) Start "jokosher" 2) Enter "Preferences". 3) Click "Close". 4) Click "Create a new project". Starting up /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/jokosher/Jokosher.py:1054: GtkDeprecationWarning: gtk.threads_init is deprecated, use gtk.gdk.threads_init instead gtk.threads_init() 6783: assertion failed "allocator->lock == mutex" file "dbus-dataslot.c" line 82 function _dbus_data_slot_allocator_alloc Aborted -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 15:48:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 11:48:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271548.k6RFmO3D009875@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-27 11:39 EST ------- The more I look into this package, the more odd it becomes. There is nothing (I can see) on the website as to the license Upstream recommending a cvs snapshot (moving target problems) Upstream not sticking totally to the GPL Sure, it looks a nice package, but as it stands, is it stable (upstream) enough to be in Extras? The functionality issues in #11 give me serious reasons to doubt it's inclusion at this time (though this could be down [again] to upstream or non-inclusion of R's on the rpm itself) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 16:13:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 12:13:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197847] Review Request: pymsnt - MSN Transport for Jabber Servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271613.k6RGDEWR011891@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pymsnt - MSN Transport for Jabber Servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197847 ------- Additional Comments From pwb at sucs.org 2006-07-27 12:04 EST ------- Sigh. Ignore the above comments - I was assuming pymsnt still used twistd, which for some reason appears not to be the case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 16:18:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 12:18:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200348] Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271618.k6RGIpao012304@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200348 ------- Additional Comments From raven at pmail.pl 2006-07-27 12:09 EST ------- Thanks for the advices. I've updated spec. Spec URL: http://pmail.pl/~raven/libgadu.spec SRPM URL: http://pmail.pl/~raven/libgadu-20060726-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 16:29:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 12:29:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199688] Review Request: virt-manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271629.k6RGTIJ6012806@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: virt-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199688 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-27 12:20 EST ------- This was built into rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 16:29:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 12:29:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200422] New: Review Request: international-time (first package, seeking sponsor) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200422 Summary: Review Request: international-time (first package, seeking sponsor) Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: twaugh at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://cyberelk.net/tim/data/international-time/international-time.spec SRPM URL: http://cyberelk.net/tim/data/international-time/international-time-0.0.1-1.src.rpm Description: This is a graphical tool for converting a local "wall-clock" time into UTC. This is useful for arranging conference calls where participants from other countries are expected. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 16:30:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 12:30:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200422] Review Request: international-time (first package, seeking sponsor) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271630.k6RGUiQA012966@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: international-time (first package, seeking sponsor) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200422 twaugh at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 16:37:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 12:37:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177583] Review Request: zaptel-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271637.k6RGbtdt013543@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177583 ------- Additional Comments From kpfleming at digium.com 2006-07-27 12:28 EST ------- There are two primary reasons why we distribute Zaptel separately from the kernel source trees (and have not even offered them for inclusion in the source trees): 1) Zaptel supports both 2.4 and 2.6 kernel series, and many users will run 2.4 kernels but want access to driver fixes and drivers for new hardware as it arrives. Since the 2.4 kernel tree is essentially closed for new features, it's not likely we could get Zaptel merged into the 2.4 kernel tree, and thus we'd need to continue distributing it separately even if it was merged into the 2.6 tree (thus creating extra work for us to keep them in sync). As we move to supporting more the 2.6 kernel's new features in Zaptel, it's likely that we will discontinue support for the 2.4 kernel in the reasonably near feature, and at that time we can look at this issue again if it makes sense to do so. 2) Zaptel is available under both the GPLv2 license and also non-open-source commercial licenses negotiated with Digium. This means that contributions to Zaptel must be licensed for Digium to use them in non-open-source distributions, and thus we must strictly control the changes that get merged into the Zaptel source trees. If the Zaptel source was merged into the 2.6 kernel, there would be no method to continue this process (changes merged by other kernel developers would be made directly in the 2.6 tree, bypassing our licensing process), and the 2.6 tree version would begin to diverge from our dual-licensed version, which is not a situation we wish to be the case. I'm happy to provide any additional information that is needed here; we'd like to see Asterisk and Zaptel in Fedora Extras as well, so we'll do anything that's within reason to help achieve that goal :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 16:38:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 12:38:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200348] Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271638.k6RGc7Pv013577@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200348 ------- Additional Comments From raven at pmail.pl 2006-07-27 12:29 EST ------- Sorry, I didn't remember to add changelog entry and bump release. Spec URL: http://pmail.pl/~raven/libgadu.spec SRPM URL: http://pmail.pl/~raven/libgadu-20060726-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 17:19:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 13:19:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271719.k6RHJbxX016786@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us 2006-07-27 13:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #48) > any chance for a update to 1.2.10 for asterisk? http://repo.ocjtech.us/asterisk-1.2/fedora/5/SRPMS/asterisk-1.2.10-1.fc5.spec http://repo.ocjtech.us/asterisk-1.2/fedora/5/SRPMS/asterisk-1.2.10-1.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 17:25:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 13:25:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195363] Review Request: esc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271725.k6RHPsCm017324@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195363 jmagne at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From jmagne at redhat.com 2006-07-27 13:16 EST ------- Thanks! The "pwd" is a mistake. As for removing the directory, Xulrunner leaves some stuff behind in the directory that does not get removed when the RPM is un-installed. I figured that we would not want to have the directory lying around. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 17:30:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 13:30:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200436] New: Review Request: gaim-gadugadu - Gadu-Gadu support in Gaim IM client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200436 Summary: Review Request: gaim-gadugadu - Gadu-Gadu support in Gaim IM client Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: raven at pmail.pl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://pmail.pl/~raven/gaim-gadugadu.spec SRPM URL: http://pmail.pl/~raven/gaim-gadgadu-2.0.0-0.7.beta3.src.rpm Description: Hi, it's one of my first packages and I'm looking for sponsor. :) gaim-gadugadu package allows you to use Gadu-Gadu protocol in Gaim instant messaging client. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 17:32:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 13:32:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200436] Review Request: gaim-gadugadu - Gadu-Gadu support in Gaim IM client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271732.k6RHWF80017847@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-gadugadu - Gadu-Gadu support in Gaim IM client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200436 raven at pmail.pl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |200348 OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 17:32:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 13:32:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200348] Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271732.k6RHWQU7017859@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200348 raven at pmail.pl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |200436 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 17:41:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 13:41:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200438] New: Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200438 Summary: Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: raven at pmail.pl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://pmail.pl/~raven/tango-icon-theme.spec SRPM URL: http://pmail.pl/~raven/tango-icon-theme-0.7.2-1.src.rpm Description: Hi, it's one of my first packages and I'm looking for sponsor. :) tango icon-theme package contains icons form Tango Project. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 17:42:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 13:42:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200438] Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271742.k6RHgQWQ018745@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200438 raven at pmail.pl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 18:03:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:03:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200310] Review Request: pyicqt - ICQ transport for Jabber servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271803.k6RI3Nae020600@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyicqt - ICQ transport for Jabber servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200310 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |Jochen at herr-schmitt.de OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-07-27 13:54 EST ------- Good: + Tar ball match with upstream. + Local build works fine. + No complaints for source rpm from rpmlint + No complaints for binaries rpm from rpmlint. + Mock build works fine. Bad: - Tar file has the name pyicq-t but the package is called pyicqt. - when I start /etc/init.d/pyicqtt start, I will got the following message: /etc/init.d/pyicqt start Starting ICQ transport: /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/twisted/words/__init__.py:21: UserWarning: twisted.words will be undergoing a rewrite at some point in the future. warnings.warn("twisted.words will be undergoing a rewrite at some point in the future.") -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 18:17:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:17:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200422] Review Request: international-time (first package, seeking sponsor) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271817.k6RIH3B3021525@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: international-time (first package, seeking sponsor) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200422 ------- Additional Comments From jtorresh at gmail.com 2006-07-27 14:08 EST ------- Hi Tim, A couple of comments: * The preferred value for the BuildRoot tag is "%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)". This is not a requirement for approval, though. * desktop-file-install is usually (always?) called using "--vendor fedora" and "--add-category X-Fedora". * rpmlint has a few complaints (none of them serious): W: international-time summary-ended-with-dot W: international-time no-url-tag W: international-time no-documentation * You can drop the 'pygtk2' requirement since 'pygtk2-libglade' already depends on it. Also, it seems rpm already adds a dependency on "/usr/bin/python" automatically so the 'python' requirement might be redundant... but I'm not really sure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 18:17:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:17:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271817.k6RIHFtu021552@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From snecklifter at gmail.com 2006-07-27 14:08 EST ------- Okay, here goes, First of all thanks for reviewing and for assigning yourself to this one Paul. Most comments understood and have been or are being acted upon. (In reply to comment #8) > Bad : you need to define BuildArch : noarch Done > rpmlint on the rpm gives > > E: script-without-shellbang > /usr/share/doc/jokosher-0.1/userguide/jokosheruserguide.de.html Fixed. > > rpmlint on the debuginfo gives > > E: empty-debuginfo-package Do noarch packages generate debuginfo packages? rpmbuild no longer produces these. Regards Chris -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 18:40:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:40:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200438] Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271840.k6RIeQZJ024218@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200438 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-27 14:31 EST ------- I can't sponsor you, but I'll give you something very review-like: 1. includes BuildRequires: icon-naming-utils >= 0.7.2 but that isn't in Core or Extras (yet). 2. scriptlets should be: %post touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/Tango 2> /dev/null ||: gtk-update-icon-cache -q %{_datadir}/icons/Tango 2> /dev/null ||: %postun touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/Tango 2> /dev/null ||: gtk-update-icon-cache -q %{_datadir}/icons/Tango 2> /dev/null ||: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 18:40:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:40:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198829] Review Request: wfmath - WorldForge math libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271840.k6RIeTfd024238@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wfmath - WorldForge math libraries Alias: wfmath https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198829 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-07-27 14:31 EST ------- I disabled 'make check' on ppc until upstream can provide a fix. Now that this has been imported and built on devel I'm closing the ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 18:40:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:40:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271840.k6RIeVGr024262@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-27 14:31 EST ------- noarch doesn't create a debuginfo package. Can you upload a new spec and src.rpm when you've fixed the other issues please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 18:40:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:40:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198833] Review Request: mercator - Terrain library for WorldForge client/server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271840.k6RIegul024297@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mercator - Terrain library for WorldForge client/server Alias: mercator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198833 Bug 198833 depends on bug 198829, which changed state. Bug 198829 Summary: Review Request: wfmath - WorldForge math libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198829 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 18:40:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:40:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198837] Review Request: eris - Client-side session layer for Atlas-C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271840.k6RIeuT1024359@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eris - Client-side session layer for Atlas-C++ Alias: eris https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198837 Bug 198837 depends on bug 198829, which changed state. Bug 198829 Summary: Review Request: wfmath - WorldForge math libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198829 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 18:51:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:51:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271851.k6RIpDb7025712@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From snecklifter at gmail.com 2006-07-27 14:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > %{name}-%{version}.tar.gz (or sometimes with something after %{version} such as > -rc2.tar.gz). This is what Source has to point to. Fixed. (In reply to comment #10) > You're missing some requires as well - check http://www.jokosher.org/download > for details. Fixed. Alsaaudio is not a strict requirement for the operation of jokosher and the next version will not require it at all. However I will consider packaging it if necessary. (In reply to comment #11) * I suggest that upstream do not modify/extend/sublicence the GPL with exceptions, but rather put their distribution licence terms into a separate file. I have mentioned this on the development list. * Run rpmlint on the binary rpm. From the two errors it reports, one is valid. Now fixed. * Directory /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/jokosher/ is not included. Please could you clarify. * Why is it arch-specific and not "BuildArch: noarch"? Now fixed. * Upstream recommends GStreamer 0.10.9 or above and prefers a CVS snapshot. Requires: gstreamer >= 0.10.8 does not reflect that. Now fixed. * Prefer "install -p" over "cp" to preserve time-stamps of files. Now fixed - yes this is much better, thanks. * Run-time warning: Some functionality will not work correctly or at all. You must have the Python alsaaudio package installed. Please install python-alsaaudio or fetch from http://www.wilstrup.net/pyalsaaudio/. See above. * Crashes reproducibly with below message. Steps to reproduce: 1) Start "jokosher" 2) Enter "Preferences". 3) Click "Close". 4) Click "Create a new project". Starting up /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/jokosher/Jokosher.py:1054: GtkDeprecationWarning: gtk.threads_init is deprecated, use gtk.gdk.threads_init instead gtk.threads_init() 6783: assertion failed "allocator->lock == mutex" file "dbus-dataslot.c" line 82 function _dbus_data_slot_allocator_alloc Aborted I cannot reproduce this however I am running the latest gstreamer and gnonlin releases although I fail to see how that would alter things. This has not been reported on the support forums or lists to my knowledge. Perhaps the latest spec file and requires fixes this. py-dbus maybe? (In reply to comment #12) > The more I look into this package, the more odd it becomes. > There is nothing (I can see) on the website as to the license > Upstream recommending a cvs snapshot (moving target problems) Gstreamer have now made a release so no longer dependent on cvs. Gnonlin also anticipated doing the same in the near future however again, current gnonlin will work, just not with full features. > Upstream not sticking totally to the GPL This has been mentioned to the devs. I would appreciate comments on how much of a showstopper this is and how to get around it of there is no altering the stance of how it is licensed upstream. > Sure, it looks a nice package, but as it stands, is it stable (upstream) enough > to be in Extras? I would say yes in the spirit of release early and often. This is not an admittance of buggy software - the two main issues users currently experience are due to current version of gstreamer and gnonlin, both of which Requires indicates. > The functionality issues in #11 give me serious reasons to doubt it's inclusion > at this time (though this could be down [again] to upstream or non-inclusion of > R's on the rpm itself) I hope the above gives you cause to re-think. I would be happy to see it wait until fc6 for inclusion. Thanks again for the advice. Regards Chris -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 18:52:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:52:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200438] Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271852.k6RIqTTT025932@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200438 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-27 14:43 EST ------- 3. Per http://tango.freedesktop.org/Frequently_Asked_Questions use License: Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 18:53:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:53:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195363] Review Request: esc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271853.k6RIr3Qf026039@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195363 ------- Additional Comments From rrelyea at redhat.com 2006-07-27 14:43 EST ------- comps should be group 'gnome-desktop' default. bob -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 18:56:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:56:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198833] Review Request: mercator - Terrain library for WorldForge client/server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271856.k6RIuCwM026523@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mercator - Terrain library for WorldForge client/server Alias: mercator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198833 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-07-27 14:47 EST ------- This has been built now that the wfmath issue has been temporarily resolved. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 18:56:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:56:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198839] Review Request: sear - WorldForge client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271856.k6RIuD4r026538@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sear - WorldForge client Alias: sear https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198839 Bug 198839 depends on bug 198833, which changed state. Bug 198833 Summary: Review Request: mercator - Terrain library for WorldForge client/server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198833 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 18:58:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:58:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198839] Review Request: sear - WorldForge client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271858.k6RIwOUg026812@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sear - WorldForge client Alias: sear https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198839 Bug 198839 depends on bug 198837, which changed state. Bug 198837 Summary: Review Request: eris - Client-side session layer for Atlas-C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198837 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 18:58:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:58:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198837] Review Request: eris - Client-side session layer for Atlas-C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271858.k6RIwNjj026798@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eris - Client-side session layer for Atlas-C++ Alias: eris https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198837 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-07-27 14:49 EST ------- This has been built now that wfmath is available. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 19:01:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 15:01:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200310] Review Request: pyicqt - ICQ transport for Jabber servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271901.k6RJ1WDS027237@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyicqt - ICQ transport for Jabber servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200310 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us 2006-07-27 14:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Good: > + Tar ball match with upstream. > + Local build works fine. > + No complaints for source rpm from rpmlint > + No complaints for binaries rpm from rpmlint. > + Mock build works fine. > > Bad: > - Tar file has the name pyicq-t but the package is called pyicqt. I'll change that in the next rev... > - when I start /etc/init.d/pyicqtt start, I will got the following message: > /etc/init.d/pyicqt start > Starting ICQ transport: > /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/twisted/words/__init__.py:21: UserWarning: > twisted.words will be undergoing a rewrite at some point in the future. > warnings.warn("twisted.words will be undergoing a rewrite at some point in the > future.") Yeah, I get that too. Until the pyicq-t authors update their code, I don't know what can be done, as this message is generated by twisted: [root at anim01 ~]# python Python 2.4.3 (#1, Jun 13 2006, 16:41:18) [GCC 4.0.2 20051125 (Red Hat 4.0.2-8)] on linux2 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> import twisted.words /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/twisted/words/__init__.py:21: UserWarning: twisted.words will be undergoing a rewrite at some point in the future. warnings.warn("twisted.words will be undergoing a rewrite at some point in the future.") -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 19:02:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 15:02:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200438] Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271902.k6RJ2CV9027290@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200438 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-27 14:53 EST ------- Re: icon-naming-utils It would probably be best if the same person maintained both icon-naming-utils and tango-icon-theme. You can use what I've got for a starting point there (if you don't have it already): http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/icon-naming-utils.spec (and for reference and pointers http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/tango-icon-theme.spec ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 19:08:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 15:08:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200438] Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271908.k6RJ88Sg027662@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200438 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-27 14:59 EST ------- icon-naming-utils is in core and rawhide sports version 0.7.3 http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/icon-naming-utils/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 19:13:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 15:13:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195363] Review Request: esc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271913.k6RJDI4s028107@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195363 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2006-07-27 15:03 EST ------- what kind of files? you can't just remove directories on users systems (what if they put something in it?). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 19:18:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 15:18:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200438] Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271918.k6RJIcWf028814@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200438 ------- Additional Comments From raven at pmail.pl 2006-07-27 15:09 EST ------- Comment #1: Thanks for the scriptlets. #2: [raven at host-86-63-147-192 SRPMS]$ rpmlint tango-icon-theme-0.7.2-1.src.rpm W: tango-icon-theme invalid-license Creative Commons Attribution Share-AlikeCan #3: Can someone add it to FC5 updates-released (or testing)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 19:26:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 15:26:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200438] Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271926.k6RJQ3i3029530@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200438 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-27 15:17 EST ------- > icon-naming-utils is in core and rawhide sports version 0.7.3 Coolness, how did I miss that? (: >[raven at host-86-63-147-192 SRPMS]$ rpmlint tango-icon-theme-0.7.2-1.src.rpm >W: tango-icon-theme invalid-license Creative Commons Attribution Share-AlikeCan Regardless, that *is* the license (and it is valid, regardless of rpmlint's whininess) >#3: Can someone add it to FC5 updates-released (or testing)? To what are you referring when you say "it"? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 19:33:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 15:33:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200438] Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271933.k6RJXHqN030109@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200438 ------- Additional Comments From raven at pmail.pl 2006-07-27 15:24 EST ------- >Regardless, that *is* the license (and it is valid, regardless of rpmlint's whininess) OK, you are right. >To what are you referring when you say "it"? icon-naming-utils, of course. Sorry for my poor English... New spec and SRPM: http://pmail.pl/~raven/tango-icon-theme.spec http://pmail.pl/~raven/tango-icon-theme-0.7.2-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 19:38:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 15:38:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200438] Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271938.k6RJcKwi030560@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200438 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-27 15:29 EST ------- >>To what are you referring when you say "it"? > icon-naming-utils, of course. Sorry for my poor English... Very little chance, new packages aren't (usually) added to the distro after it's been released. That doesn't preclude it's appearance in fc5/Extras. Back to the package, would you consider building with ./configure --enable-png-creation (it helps out kde users) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 19:52:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 15:52:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200438] Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271952.k6RJqkG8032170@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200438 ------- Additional Comments From raven at pmail.pl 2006-07-27 15:43 EST ------- >Very little chance, new packages aren't (usually) added to the distro after it's been released. That doesn't preclude it's appearance in fc5/Extras. Sorry for my English again. When I said "add to updates", I meant "update to 0.7.3", because this package is in FC5, but in old version (0.6.7). >Back to the package, would you consider building with >./configure --enable-png-creation >(it helps out kde users) No problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 19:59:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 15:59:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200438] Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607271959.k6RJxdr5000442@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200438 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-27 15:50 EST ------- > I meant "update to 0.7.3", because this package is in FC5, > but in old version (0.6.7). Open a bugzilla report, and request and update (and tell them why, you need it for tango-icon-theme on fc5/Extras) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 20:04:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 16:04:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200438] Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607272004.k6RK4Zdr000801@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200438 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-07-27 15:55 EST ------- Isn't the tango icons already in Rawhide? Why else would the icon-naming-utils be in Core? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 20:13:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 16:13:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607272013.k6RKDQng001455@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-27 16:04 EST ------- If the way the GPL is messed with adds restrictions, it causes major problems. If it removes restrictions, that's fine. My reading is it adds. The problem with release often and early is that you get releases which haven't had the time to mature and be debugged correctly. I've known of many security problems with that system. "* Directory /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/jokosher/ is not included. Please could you clarify." The application creates a directory (via the define) in the python/site-packages/ directory called jokosher. You need in your %files %{python_dir}/site-packages/jokosher "> You're missing some requires as well - check http://www.jokosher.org/download > for details. Fixed. Alsaaudio is not a strict requirement for the operation of jokosher and the next version will not require it at all. However I will consider packaging it if necessary." Depending on the timeframe of this packages possible acceptance into FE, I'd look into importing it. It won't harm. I can also replicate the dbus error on my 64 and 32 bit systems. This will need to be looked into. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 20:15:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 16:15:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191389] Review Request: oooqs2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607272015.k6RKFS4R001639@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: oooqs2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191389 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-07-27 16:06 EST ------- SPEC URL: http://ausil.us/packages/oooqs2.spec SRPM URL: http://ausil.us/packages/oooqs2-1.0-2.fc5.src.rpm added the COPYING File added the patch for Russian desktop file translation the dangling symlinks cant fix the files they point to are provided by kdelibs and the language packs this is extremely common in kde packages. the relative symlinks are fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 20:17:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 16:17:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200438] Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607272017.k6RKHDUD001749@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200438 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-27 16:08 EST ------- afaict, tango is not is rawhide. Dunno why icon-naming-utils is in Core, but it's been there since FC-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 20:35:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 16:35:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184331] Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607272035.k6RKZNHJ002982@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184331 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-27 16:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > (In reply to comment #8) > > > - I folded the devel package into the main package since there's not much sense > > > in having the split (since otherwise the main package would have to Require it). > > > > Very bad move. Please revert this change and split into *-devel and *non-devel, > > again. > > If the main package would have to require it, it sounds like the files in the > devel package (at least some of them) aren't really devel files. This package seems to contain shared libs, dll-modules/plugins and headers. > What was in the devel package that's needed by the main package? Is there > anything that was in the devel package that's *not* needed by the main > package? I presume the OP had mixed up *.so symlinks and dll-modules/plugins. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 20:53:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 16:53:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191017] Review Request: eclipse-subclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607272053.k6RKrB5J004469@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-subclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191017 ------- Additional Comments From bkonrath at redhat.com 2006-07-27 16:43 EST ------- It would be nice to get this pacakge reviewed with the patch in place. I'm still planning to track down the problem, but it is is a *very* complex GCJ problem. Also, I won't get time until mid August. Robert, are you ok with this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 20:59:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 16:59:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178904] Review Request: Monodevelop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607272059.k6RKxnlx004907@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178904 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-27 16:50 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/monodevelop.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/monodevelop-0.11-13.src.rpm *should* sort out the 64 bit problem in #52 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 21:17:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 17:17:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200374] Review Request: qstat - Real-time Game Server Status for Quake servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607272117.k6RLHCX4005967@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qstat - Real-time Game Server Status for Quake servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200374 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |wart at kobold.org OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-07-27 17:08 EST ------- A few small points before I get to a full review: You don't need the check for "/" when you clean the buildroot in %install and %clean. A simple rm -rf will suffice: rm -rf %{buildroot} The -n %{name}-%{version} is unnecessary. %setup already uses this as a default. The %attr statements for qstat.cfg and the qstat binary are also not necessary as these permissions/ownership are already used. qstat can be used for more than just quake servers, so remove 'quake' from the summary line. You could replace it with 'FPS game' instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 21:18:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 17:18:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200438] Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607272118.k6RLILFC006226@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200438 ------- Additional Comments From raven at pmail.pl 2006-07-27 17:09 EST ------- >Open a bugzilla report, and request and update (and tell them why, you need it for tango-icon-theme on fc5/Extras) Thanks for all your help. :) (bug 200457) >Back to the package, would you consider building with >./configure --enable-png-creation >(it helps out kde users) Done, new spec and SRPM: http://pmail.pl/~raven/tango-icon-theme.spec http://pmail.pl/~raven/tango-icon-theme-0.7.2-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 21:20:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 17:20:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200374] Review Request: qstat - Real-time Game Server Status for Quake servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607272120.k6RLKVta006413@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qstat - Real-time Game Server Status for Quake servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200374 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 21:28:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 17:28:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197565] Review Request: buildbot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607272128.k6RLSNIB007131@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: buildbot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197565 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-27 17:19 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~michael/buildbot.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~michael/buildbot-0.7.3-3.src.rpm Moved the contribs to /usr/share/buildbot/contribs Thanks for that suggestion! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 21:33:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 17:33:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195363] Review Request: esc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607272133.k6RLX8uP007632@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195363 ------- Additional Comments From jmagne at redhat.com 2006-07-27 17:23 EST ------- Excellent point. I will remove that entry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 21:48:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 17:48:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199611] Review Request: monsterz - Puzzle game, similar to Bejeweled or Zookeeper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607272148.k6RLmbWU009338@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monsterz - Puzzle game, similar to Bejeweled or Zookeeper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199611 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-27 17:39 EST ------- Ian, you have imported package on CVS, but why haven't you built it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 21:48:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 17:48:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191017] Review Request: eclipse-subclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607272148.k6RLmsx1009386@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-subclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191017 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-27 17:39 EST ------- Unfortunately that patch doesn't apply to the spec in http://www.marcanoonline.com/downloads/fedora/package_submissions/subclipse/eclipse-subclipse-1.0.3-2.src.rpm I don't think I botched it when I applied it manually. However, now there are dependency issues; ganymed-ssh2 and javasvn need rebuilds against libgcj.so.7. Is it reasonable to build against FC5 here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 21:54:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 17:54:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195363] Review Request: esc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607272154.k6RLs08u009923@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195363 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-27 17:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #27) > comps should be group 'gnome-desktop' default. > > bob Added to comps. Please close when package is built for rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 21:55:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 17:55:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193240] Review Request: XaraLX - Vector/general purpose graphics utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607272155.k6RLt643010005@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: XaraLX - Vector/general purpose graphics utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193240 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |michael at knox.net.nz OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-27 17:45 EST ------- I will review this one. ---------------------------------------- Review for release 1.r1564: * RPM name is OK * Source XaraLX-0.7r1564.tar.bz2 is the same as upstream Needs work: * BuildRequires: perl should not be included (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#Exceptions) * Build failed in mock autoreconf: failed to run autopoint: No such file or directory Minor: * Duplicate BuildRequires: automake (by libtool), autoconf (by libtool), perl (by automake), gtk2-devel (by wxGTK-devel) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 21:57:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 17:57:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191017] Review Request: eclipse-subclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607272157.k6RLvkqh010237@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-subclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191017 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-27 17:48 EST ------- Never mind; ganymed-ssh2 isn't build for FC5. So there's pretty much no way this can be reviewed right now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 22:04:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 18:04:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200438] Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607272204.k6RM4NxI010760@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200438 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-07-27 17:55 EST ------- You should be able to drop the BR on ImageMagick & librsvg2, since the respective devel packages sonames should pull these in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 22:08:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 18:08:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607272208.k6RM80RZ010879@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From snecklifter at gmail.com 2006-07-27 17:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > If the way the GPL is messed with adds restrictions, it causes major problems. > If it removes restrictions, that's fine. My reading is it adds. If the exceptions are placed into a separate file, would this resolve the matter? My reading is that it permits people to use non-GPL compatible plugins and therefore is not adding restrictions but IANAL. > > The problem with release often and early is that you get releases which haven't > had the time to mature and be debugged correctly. I've known of many security > problems with that system. The only comment I can make here is that this version has few known bugs and most of those are outside of its control. One reason the package is being pushed for inclusion in Extras is so that upstream can garner more feedback and improve Q.A. which will surely help with debugging. As for security problems I really cannot comment except to say this is an audio editor written in python using Gtk widgets, not say, a driver with kernel hooks. > > "* Directory /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/jokosher/ is not included. > > Please could you clarify." > > The application creates a directory (via the define) in the > python/site-packages/ directory called jokosher. You need in your %files > > %{python_dir}/site-packages/jokosher Fixed. > > "> You're missing some requires as well - check http://www.jokosher.org/download > > for details. > > Fixed. Alsaaudio is not a strict requirement for the operation of jokosher and > the next version will not require it at all. However I will consider packaging > it if necessary." > > Depending on the timeframe of this packages possible acceptance into FE, I'd > look into importing it. It won't harm. A small patch (which only just missed the 0.1 release deadline) has now removed this dependency on alsaaudio. http://jokosher.python-hosting.com/changeset/466 I have updated the package and spec file accordingly and bumped the version. > > I can also replicate the dbus error on my 64 and 32 bit systems. This will need > to be looked into. I have posted on this and will get back to you. Would you please in the meantime avail us of your dbus version which you can get with: $ python -c "import dbus; print dbus.version" Regards Chris -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 22:16:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 18:16:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200438] Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607272216.k6RMGR0N011351@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200438 ------- Additional Comments From raven at pmail.pl 2006-07-27 18:07 EST ------- Thanks, new spec and SRPM: http://pmail.pl/~raven/tango-icon-theme.spec http://pmail.pl/~raven/tango-icon-theme-0.7.2-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 22:46:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 18:46:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199611] Review Request: monsterz - Puzzle game, similar to Bejeweled or Zookeeper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607272246.k6RMk6tQ012929@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monsterz - Puzzle game, similar to Bejeweled or Zookeeper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199611 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2006-07-27 18:36 EST ------- I was waiting for the additional branches :-) It's building now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 22:47:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 18:47:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200472] New: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-SNMP Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200472 Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-SNMP Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Component-SNMP.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Component-SNMP-1.05-1.fc5.src.rpm Description: POE::Component::SNMP is a POE-ized wrapper around the the Net::SNMP module. Most of its arguments aren't even evaluated by POE, except for -alias and -callback_args, as described in the manpage. If you want to make non-blocking calls with Net::SNMP in a POE application, this is the module to do it with. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 22:49:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 18:49:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194566] Review Request: 915resolution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607272249.k6RMn64m013182@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: 915resolution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194566 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-27 18:40 EST ------- Let's make a start "# will be set to -1 on build/release Release: 0%{?dist}" The release should reflect the release (in other words, the build number). It goes up, not down %description ends in a . I can't see how this package would be instantated by the host machine. Is it supposed to be called directly, as a service or needing integration into xorg.conf (or similar)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 22:52:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 18:52:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607272252.k6RMqdbB013425@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-27 18:43 EST ------- Change the license to GPL with exceptions The dbus version comes back with (0, 51, 0) Can you please upload a new spec and src rpm for review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 23:00:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 19:00:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194566] Review Request: 915resolution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607272300.k6RN0rL2013815@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: 915resolution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194566 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-27 18:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Let's make a start > > "# will be set to -1 on build/release > Release: 0%{?dist}" > > The release should reflect the release (in other words, the build number). It > goes up, not down Sorry, that could have been more clearly expressed... It'll go to one. > %description ends in a . Isn't this only %summary which shouldn't end in a period? > I can't see how this package would be instantated by the host machine. Is it > supposed to be called directly, as a service or needing integration into > xorg.conf (or similar)? Right now, it's up to the user to configure. I call it with the correct resolution values at boot in /etc/rc.local, for instance. It would certainly be possible to wrap the entire thing in a service, but 1) that would still require user configuration as to which video modes to override, and 2) it's not worth that effort given the xorg driver has been in a state of not needing this "real soon now" for the last several months. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 23:01:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 19:01:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199611] Review Request: monsterz - Puzzle game, similar to Bejeweled or Zookeeper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607272301.k6RN1bQt013849@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monsterz - Puzzle game, similar to Bejeweled or Zookeeper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199611 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 23:04:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 19:04:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194566] Review Request: 915resolution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607272304.k6RN45bP013953@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: 915resolution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194566 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-27 18:55 EST ------- The release should already be one as soon as you package the original version. Not sure about the user to configure bit. Personally, I'd wrap it in a service and install a set of "default" modes (they can all be commented out). At least everything is in place when the xorg driver gets out of the stable and into the big, bad world. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 23:18:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 19:18:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607272318.k6RNI758014344@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From snecklifter at gmail.com 2006-07-27 19:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) Hello Paul, > Change the license to GPL with exceptions Done! > > The dbus version comes back with > > (0, 51, 0) Hmmm, same here. Can you give the output from rpm -qa | grep -i python - we are continuing to investigate. > > Can you please upload a new spec and src rpm for review? Okay, its at: http://www.iammetal.co.uk/jokosher.spec http://www.iammetal.co.uk/jokosher-0.1-4.src.rpm Regards Chris -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 23:21:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 19:21:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607272321.k6RNLGd6014504@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-27 19:12 EST ------- the grep python gives you a list of everything with the word python in it! I have python 2.4.3-8.FC5 installed. As there seems to be (currently) a need for pydbus, I'd add it as a Requires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 23:22:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 19:22:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194566] Review Request: 915resolution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607272322.k6RNMVEv014570@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: 915resolution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194566 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-27 19:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > The release should already be one as soon as you package the original version. Bumped. > Not sure about the user to configure bit. > > Personally, I'd wrap it in a service and install a set of "default" modes (they > can all be commented out). At least everything is in place when the xorg driver > gets out of the stable and into the big, bad world. For a temporary (alebit turning into a long-term) fix, I still don't think it's worth that effort -- as soon as the xorg update is released in core, this program's function is obviated. If someone is installing this package, they're going to need to know what to do with it regardless of if there's a service wrapper or not. I did, however, stick a README.fedora in this release, with a brief "here's how to get it going on boot" synopsis... Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/915resolution.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/915resolution-0.5.2-1.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 23:29:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 19:29:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200438] Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607272329.k6RNT2sF014853@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200438 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2006-07-27 19:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > Isn't the tango icons already in Rawhide? Why else would the icon-naming-utils > be in Core? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/BluecurveAndBeyond/Gallery The new theme has adopted the specification, naming etc from Tango for consistency. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 23:31:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 19:31:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607272331.k6RNVbUb014980@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-27 19:22 EST ------- Source: %{tmppath}/SOURCE/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}.tar.gz No! Source: %{name}-%{version}.tar.gz or the URL link from the website (eg http://www.foo.org/package/download/com-1.1.1.tar.gz) remember, the source is the source you've downloaded from the website the package came from (unless you've built the archive yourself, which is not that good an idea, especially if you have patches. You should keep the source unpatched and provide patches which are incorporated via the spec file) Please package again. The src rpm will include the patches, the spec file will apply them in %prep - I can't accept it as is. Can you put the defines right at the start? - it makes things much simpler to follow. Given the specs, it's unlikely this will work in FC5 (unless things are updated in FC5). I'd drop the versions from the Requires. mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{python_sitelib}/jokosher mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{python_sitelib}/jokosher/images mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{python_sitelib}/jokosher/Instruments mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{python_sitelib}/jokosher/Instruments/images You only need the final line and the images line. -p creates the path requested --mode=644, much easier just to have -m 0644 install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{python_sitelib}/jokosher/images Not sure these are required as you've already created the directories install -p jokosher $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/jokosher chmod 755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/jokosher can be written install -p -m 0755 jokosher $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/jokosher Why have you got BR desktop-file-utils, but never use them. What are they for? Still a way to go, but keep on in there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 23:40:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 19:40:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194566] Review Request: 915resolution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607272340.k6RNejGp015546@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: 915resolution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194566 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-27 19:31 EST ------- Is the .fc5 at the end of the src.rpm your own rename? if it is, please don't. src rpms are release agnostic. The spec file still has the release as 0?{%dist}. This should be 2 as it's the 2nd release made. Remove the 0/-1 comment, it's wrong! You don't need the make clean (unless the source tarball has a pre-made configure with pre-made bits and pieces) in %build I'd prefer install -m 755 for the package into %{_sbindir}. Also, as it's only one program going into %{_sbindir}, give it the name in %files The changelog hasn't altered. Each time you change something, it gets documented, so it should read %changelog * Mon 25 Dec 2006 Paul F. Johnson 0.5-2 - fixed silly mistake in the spec file - added ia64 and sparcx86 patches * Sun 24 Dec 2006 Paul F. Johnson 0.5-1 - added BR foo - removed R bar - added a b c and d into docs - chmod 0755 sbindir-foobar - bumped to new version * Sun 17 Dec 2006 Paul F. Johnson 0.4-11 (you get the idea) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 23:41:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 19:41:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193240] Review Request: XaraLX - Vector/general purpose graphics utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607272341.k6RNf5wl015581@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: XaraLX - Vector/general purpose graphics utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193240 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-27 19:31 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/XaraLX.spec (I've not uploaded a new src.rpm by agreement with the reviewer) - changed group to Applications/Publishing - fixed autoreconf problem (BR gettext-devel) - removed dupes in BR - removed BR perl - added mime-info - added examples -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 23:48:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 19:48:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200438] Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607272348.k6RNmnX2016116@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200438 david at lovesunix.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |david at lovesunix.net ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2006-07-27 19:39 EST ------- This bombs out on Development (x86_64) (cd /var/tmp/tango-icon-theme-0.7.2-4-root-root/usr/share/icons/Tango && \ for icon in address-book-new.png appointment-new.png bookmark-new.png contact-new.png document-new.png document-open.png document-print.png document-print-preview.png document-properties.png document-save.png document-save-as.png edit-clear.png edit-copy.png edit-cut.png edit-delete.png edit-find.png edit-find-replace.png edit-paste.png edit-redo.png edit-select-all.png edit-undo.png folder-new.png format-indent-less.png format-indent-more.png format-justify-center.png format-justify-fill.png format-justify-left.png format-justify-right.png format-text-bold.png format-text-italic.png format-text-strikethrough.png format-text-underline.png go-bottom.png go-down.png go-first.png go-home.png go-jump.png go-last.png go-next.png go-previous.png go-top.png go-up.png list-add.png list-remove.png mail-forward.png mail-message-new.png mail-mark-junk.png mail-mark-not-junk.png mail-reply-all.png mail-reply-sender.png mail-send-receive.png media-eject.png media-playback-pause.png media-playback-start.png media-playback-stop.png media-record.png media-seek-backward.png media-seek-forward.png media-skip-backward.png media-skip-forward.png process-stop.png system-lock-screen.png system-log-out.png system-search.png system-shutdown.png tab-new.png view-fullscreen.png view-refresh.png window-new.png ; do \ /usr/bin/convert -bordercolor Transparent -border 1x1 22x22/actions/$icon 24x24/actions/$icon; \ done) /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: png_get_asm_flags make[3]: *** [install-data-local] Fejl 127 make[3]: Forlader katalog '/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/tango-icon-theme-0.7.2/22x22/actions' make[2]: *** [install-am] Fejl 2 make[2]: Forlader katalog '/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/tango-icon-theme-0.7.2/22x22/actions' make[1]: *** [install-recursive] Fejl 1 make[1]: Forlader katalog '/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/tango-icon-theme-0.7.2/22x22' make: *** [install-recursive] Fejl 1 fejl: Fejl-afslutningsstatus fra /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.11591 (%install) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 23:52:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 19:52:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200438] Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607272352.k6RNqwxj016425@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200438 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-27 19:43 EST ------- /usr/bin/convert: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.2.8/modules-Q16/coders/png.so: undefined symbol: This is an ImageMagick bug and needs reporting in bugzilla. It isn't anything to do with the package (by the looks of it) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 27 23:54:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 19:54:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194566] Review Request: 915resolution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607272354.k6RNsHIl016530@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: 915resolution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194566 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-27 19:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Is the .fc5 at the end of the src.rpm your own rename? if it is, please don't. > src rpms are release agnostic. I define %dist in my ~/.rpmmacros file, for my own sanity when building packages... It's not a rename. > The spec file still has the release as 0?{%dist}. This should be 2 as it's the > 2nd release made. Remove the 0/-1 comment, it's wrong! Hit reload on your browser, it's out there at 1 :) > You don't need the make clean (unless the source tarball has a pre-made > configure with pre-made bits and pieces) in %build It does :) > I'd prefer install -m 755 for the package into %{_sbindir}. Also, as it's only > one program going into %{_sbindir}, give it the name in %files Are these personal preferences, or do you consider them blockers? > The changelog hasn't altered. Each time you change something, it gets > documented, so it should read [...snip...] > (you get the idea) Again, hit reload... :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 00:00:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 20:00:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194566] Review Request: 915resolution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607280000.k6S0003m016763@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: 915resolution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194566 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-27 19:50 EST ------- As it stands, I've not built it yet (will do on the laptop - I can then give it a try). However, I would consider the install -m 0755 to be essential. The file going into %{_sbindir}, it makes life easier for us mere reviewers (plus, it's only one file, so makes things clear to others wanting to package) Hitting reload worked, though the release should be 2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 00:06:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 20:06:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200438] Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607280006.k6S06NrN016984@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200438 ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2006-07-27 19:57 EST ------- Turns out to be a libpng bug, it's already fixed: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196580 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 00:18:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 20:18:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198885] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607280018.k6S0IYUP017234@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198885 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-27 20:09 EST ------- I did try via spectool to fetch the 0.76 source about ten times but never succeeded in hitting a mirror that had it. Now that this package is updated to 0.77 there are no worries. Anyway, this builds, installs and checks out fine. * source files match upstream: bca2c306d8c63535845b760883a13644 POE-Component-Client-HTTP-0.77.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (BR: perl is redundant). * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * noarch package; no debuginfo. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(POE::Component::Client::HTTP) = 0.77 perl(POE::Component::Client::HTTP::Request) perl(POE::Component::Client::HTTP::RequestFactory) = 0.01 perl(POE::Filter::HTTPChunk) perl(POE::Filter::HTTPHead) = 0.01 perl(POE::Filter::HTTPHead_Line) perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP = 0.77-1.fc6 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(HTTP::Response) perl(HTTP::Status) perl(POE) perl(POE::Component::Client::HTTP) perl(POE::Component::Client::HTTP::Request) perl(POE::Component::Client::HTTP::RequestFactory) perl(POE::Filter::Line) perl(base) perl(bytes) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=12, Tests=76, 5 wallclock secs ( 2.12 cusr + 0.66 csys = 2.78 CPU) * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 00:20:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 20:20:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189184] Review Request: perl-Email-Valid - check validity of email addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607280020.k6S0KUHj017307@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Valid - check validity of email addresses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189184 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(chrisw at redhat.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 00:21:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 20:21:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193493] Review Request: iksemel - An XML parser library designed for Jabber applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607280021.k6S0LaeH017358@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iksemel - An XML parser library designed for Jabber applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193493 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(jeff at ollie.clive.i | |a.us) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 00:22:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 20:22:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197754] Review Request: perl-Perl6-Bible In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607280022.k6S0MX9u017402@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Perl6-Bible https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197754 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 00:58:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 20:58:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195363] Review Request: esc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607280058.k6S0w56J019316@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195363 jmagne at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From jmagne at redhat.com 2006-07-27 20:48 EST ------- Successfully built on relevant platforms except ppc64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 01:17:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 21:17:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200152] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-LDAP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607280117.k6S1HGbM020149@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-LDAP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200152 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-27 21:08 EST ------- Not much to say here either; builds and installs fine and rpmlint is quiet. * source files match upstream: 5a52805b889af864622158d761b72f82 POE-Component-Client-LDAP-0.04.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (BR: perl is unnecessary) * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(POE::Component::Client::LDAP) = 0.04 perl(POE::Filter::ASN1) = 0.01 perl-POE-Component-Client-LDAP = 0.04-1.fc6 = perl >= 0:5.006 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(Convert::ASN1) perl(Net::LDAP::ASN) perl(Net::LDAP::Constant) perl(POE) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests (test?) pass: All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=1, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.14 cusr + 0.05 csys = 0.19 CPU) * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 01:19:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 21:19:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200472] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-SNMP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607280119.k6S1JsFE020274@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-SNMP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200472 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 02:23:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 22:23:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199833] Review Request: vips - image processing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607280223.k6S2NPJv022951@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vips - image processing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199833 adam at spicenitz.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From adam at spicenitz.org 2006-07-27 22:14 EST ------- Built successfully on devel and FC-5. Still working on building for FC-4, but closing this bug since it's building on FC-5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 02:23:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 22:23:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199834] Review Request: nip2 - interactive image processing system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607280223.k6S2NbGV022985@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nip2 - interactive image processing system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199834 Bug 199834 depends on bug 199833, which changed state. Bug 199833 Summary: Review Request: vips - image processing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199833 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 02:29:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 22:29:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 154392] HelixPlayer should be removed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607280229.k6S2TvLn023207@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: HelixPlayer should be removed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=154392 alexl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From alexl at redhat.com 2006-07-27 22:20 EST ------- Removed in rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 02:57:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 22:57:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193493] Review Request: iksemel - An XML parser library designed for Jabber applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607280257.k6S2vdGP024831@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iksemel - An XML parser library designed for Jabber applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193493 jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(jeff at ollie.clive.i| |a.us) | ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us 2006-07-27 22:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > Any movement here? This package just needs a couple of things: documentation > about the partial x86_64 brokenness, and at least an attempt to build on PPC. I have no access at all to a PPC system so I don't know how I can test building there... I'll get a readme typed up quick and gew a new package put together... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 03:23:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 23:23:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200472] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-SNMP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607280323.k6S3NkM7025914@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-SNMP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200472 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-27 23:14 EST ------- Something's odd with the test suite: t/10_snmp_get.........POE::Kernel's run() method was never called. skipped all skipped: No SNMP data specified. Looking deeper, all of the skipped tests require not only network access, but a running SNMP server to talk to and write to that gets configured when Makefile.PL is run. So I guess everything's working as intended. * source files match upstream: d13446b20b21e24c15fd6be406006bec POE-Component-SNMP-1.05.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (BR: perl is unnecessary) * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(POE::Component::SNMP) perl(POE::Component::SNMP::Dispatcher) = 1.27 perl(POE::Net::SNMP) perl-POE-Component-SNMP = 1.05-1.fc6 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(POE::Component::SNMP::Dispatcher) perl(POE::Kernel) perl(POE::Session) perl(Time::HiRes) perl(base) perl(constant) * %check is present; the test suite doesn't seem to run well but what can run passes: All tests successful, 10 tests skipped. Files=11, Tests=4, 2 wallclock secs ( 1.44 cusr + 0.50 csys = 1.94 CPU) * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 03:27:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 23:27:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173724] Review Request: libyahoo2 - Library for the Yahoo! Messenger Protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607280327.k6S3RKAt026070@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libyahoo2 - Library for the Yahoo! Messenger Protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173724 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-07-27 23:18 EST ------- Ping. Got a 500 on the SRPM. Closing soon if no response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 04:01:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 00:01:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193493] Review Request: iksemel - An XML parser library designed for Jabber applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607280401.k6S41WaC027967@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iksemel - An XML parser library designed for Jabber applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193493 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-27 23:52 EST ------- Perhaps I wasn't sufficiently clear earlier. My point is that you've prevented building on PPC when you have no evidence that it fails to work. Why not just leave it enabled and let the buildsystem go ahead and build it? If it fails there then you can mask it out. Few of us have PPC machines to test on but we still let our packages build there and then investigate if the build fails or bugs are reported. If we enabled PPC building only when we had actual PPC machines to test on then most packages would be disabled on PPC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 04:07:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 00:07:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 172869] Review Request: nss-mdns In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607280407.k6S47ELW028144@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nss-mdns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172869 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-07-27 23:58 EST ------- rpmlint: W: nss-mdns summary-not-capitalized glibc plugin for .local name resolution W: nss-mdns summary-not-capitalized glibc plugin for .local name resolution Ignore, keep glibc. E: nss-mdns shlib-with-non-pic-code /lib64/libnss_mdns.so.2 E: nss-mdns shlib-with-non-pic-code /lib64/libnss_mdns6_minimal.so.2 E: nss-mdns shlib-with-non-pic-code /lib64/libnss_mdns6.so.2 E: nss-mdns shlib-with-non-pic-code /lib64/libnss_mdns4_minimal.so.2 E: nss-mdns shlib-with-non-pic-code /lib64/libnss_mdns4.so.2 E: nss-mdns shlib-with-non-pic-code /lib64/libnss_mdns_minimal.so.2 I don't know enough linker-fu to fix this. E: nss-mdns non-executable-script /usr/libexec/nss-mdns-set.pl 0644 chmod +x W: nss-mdns percent-in-%post W: nss-mdns percent-in-%preun Eh? Probably the %{_libexec} W: nss-mdns dangerous-command-in-%post mv W: nss-mdns dangerous-command-in-%preun mv W: nss-mdns one-line-command-in-%postun /sbin/ldconfig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 04:10:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 00:10:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198885] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607280410.k6S4AAVO028228@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198885 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-28 00:01 EST ------- +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +devel build succeeds +Request branching (FC-5) +Close bug Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 04:21:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 00:21:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200472] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-SNMP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607280421.k6S4LIOn028552@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-SNMP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200472 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-28 00:12 EST ------- +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +devel build succeeds +Request branching (FC-5) +Close bug Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 04:27:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 00:27:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193493] Review Request: iksemel - An XML parser library designed for Jabber applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607280427.k6S4RdD1028689@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iksemel - An XML parser library designed for Jabber applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193493 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us 2006-07-28 00:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > Perhaps I wasn't sufficiently clear earlier. My point is that you've prevented > building on PPC when you have no evidence that it fails to work. Why not just > leave it enabled and let the buildsystem go ahead and build it? If it fails > there then you can mask it out. Few of us have PPC machines to test on but we > still let our packages build there and then investigate if the build fails or > bugs are reported. If we enabled PPC building only when we had actual PPC > machines to test on then most packages would be disabled on PPC. Are we looking at the same spec file here? I fail to see where I prevented building on PPC. The only special casing of architecture is in the %check section. I don't understand how using "%ifarch i386" in the %check section would prevent building of the whole package on PPC. If not running "make check" on PPC is what you're objecting to here, no problem... I'll fix that in my next build. If it's something else, perhaps there's some aspect to the %check section that I'm not grokking that would prevent the package as a whole from building on PPC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 04:28:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 00:28:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169210] Review Request: xnee: recorder and player of X actions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607280428.k6S4SFWM028743@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xnee: recorder and player of X actions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169210 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-07-28 00:18 EST ------- Abandoned. Mostly because it would end up looking a lot like rpmforge's. :P http://svn.rpmforge.net/svn/trunk/rpms/xnee/xnee.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 04:29:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 00:29:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200152] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-LDAP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607280429.k6S4TrJD028837@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-LDAP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200152 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-28 00:20 EST ------- +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +devel build succeeds +Request branching (FC-5) +Close bug Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 04:32:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 00:32:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193493] Review Request: iksemel - An XML parser library designed for Jabber applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607280432.k6S4WE4U028970@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iksemel - An XML parser library designed for Jabber applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193493 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-28 00:23 EST ------- Sorry, you're right. In the month that this bug sat inactive the defaults faded from my memory. My original issue is that you should let the test suite run on PPC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 04:40:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 00:40:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169704] Review Request: mosml - Moscow ML In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607280440.k6S4eRwk029378@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mosml - Moscow ML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169704 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-07-28 00:31 EST ------- Been a while, sorry about that. Builds on x86_64! But rpmlint doesn't link the lack of a soname version: E: mosml invalid-soname /usr/lib64/mosml/lib/libmregex.so libmregex.so E: mosml invalid-soname /usr/lib64/mosml/lib/libmunix.so libmunix.so E: mosml invalid-soname /usr/lib64/mosml/lib/libmgmp.so libmgmp.so And symlinks are broken, looks like lib64 problems. W: mosml dangling-relative-symlink /usr/bin/mosmlyac ../lib/mosml/bin/mosmlyac W: mosml dangling-relative-symlink /usr/bin/mosmllex ../lib/mosml/bin/mosmllex W: mosml dangling-relative-symlink /usr/bin/camlrunm ../lib/mosml/bin/camlrunm W: mosml dangling-relative-symlink /usr/bin/mosmlc ../lib/mosml/bin/mosmlc W: mosml dangling-relative-symlink /usr/bin/mosml ../lib/mosml/bin/mosml -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 04:43:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 00:43:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200348] Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607280443.k6S4hAoq029597@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200348 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-28 00:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > >* I don't think using of libgadu-current.tar.gz is good. This file changes > every day and md5sum of upstream source won't match md5 of source included > in SRPM > > Have you any idea? I tried looking for versioned downloads -- if I spoke any Polish I suspect I might have had better luck. But Micha? is right; this poses a "challenge" for the review. > >* you should change doc files charset to utf8 (by iconv) > > OK, I'll do it, but please help me, I'm new to RPM. You can use a tool called iconv. See, e.g., "file-not-utf8" at http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingTips/Perl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 05:23:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 01:23:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200492] New: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Sexy Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200492 Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Sexy Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Gtk2-Sexy.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Gtk2-Sexy-0.02-1.fc5.src.rpm Description: This module allows a perl developer to access the widgets of the sexy widget collection. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 05:53:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 01:53:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192049] Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607280553.k6S5rmRJ000544@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michael at knox.net.nz ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-28 01:44 EST ------- This fails to build in mock. You need to add: BuildRequires: autoconf, automake, libtool -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 06:08:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 02:08:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193493] Review Request: iksemel - An XML parser library designed for Jabber applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607280608.k6S68ZQJ001096@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iksemel - An XML parser library designed for Jabber applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193493 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us 2006-07-28 01:59 EST ------- Well... Instead of writing a README explaining why iksemel was broken on x86_64, I just went ahead and fixed it. Once I get some sleep I'll submit the patch upstream. Spec: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/5/SRPMS/iksemel-1.2-5.fc5.spec SRPM: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/5/SRPMS/iksemel-1.2-5.fc5.src.rpm * Thu Jul 27 2006 Jeffrey C. Ollie - 1.2-5 - Patch to use SHA1 hashing routines from libgcrypt rather than broken internal code. This means that we need to BR autoools to regenerate configure script and makefiles. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 06:31:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 02:31:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177583] Review Request: zaptel-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607280631.k6S6VdoK001678@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177583 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2006-07-28 02:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #41) > There are two primary reasons why we distribute Zaptel separately from the > kernel source trees [...] Both reasons seem wrong to me (especially reason 2) and your strategy counter-productive for the open-source world in general and the kernel-development-process in special. I'll forward the request for inclusion of this kernel-module to FESCo for approval, but I will do my best to prevent that this module get's into Extras as long as the plans says "we don't want to get the driver merged upstream" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 07:57:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 03:57:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200498] New: Review Request: Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200498 Summary: Review Request: Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: fedora-devel at mx-solutions.de QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://daniel.rindt.name/fileadmin/download/fedora/SPECS/btsco-kmod.spec SRPM URL: http://daniel.rindt.name/fileadmin/download/fedora/SRPMS/btsco-kmod-0.42-1.2.6.17_1.2157_FC5.src.rpm Description: This RPM contains a binary Linux kernel module build for %{kernel}. It provides a way to use a bluetooth headset with Linux. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 08:00:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 04:00:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200499] New: Review Request: Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200499 Summary: Review Request: Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: fedora-devel at mx-solutions.de QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://daniel.rindt.name/fileadmin/download/fedora/SPECS/btsco-kmod-common.spec SRPM URL: http://daniel.rindt.name/fileadmin/download/fedora/SRPMS/btsco-kmod-common-0.42-1.src.rpm Description: This RPM contains the common parts belonging to the btsco kernel module. It provides a way to use a bluetooth headset with Linux. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 08:10:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 04:10:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200498] Review Request: btsco-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607280810.k6S8AkxL009016@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: btsco-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200498 fedora at leemhuis.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: btsco-kmod BugsThisDependsOn| |200499 OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 08:10:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 04:10:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200499] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607280810.k6S8AlNo009029@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200499 fedora at leemhuis.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |200498 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 08:14:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 04:14:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200499] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607280814.k6S8Eno5009275@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200499 fedora at leemhuis.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |common> OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 08:24:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 04:24:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607280824.k6S8OEcs009865@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-28 04:15 EST ------- "Why have you got BR desktop-file-utils, but never use them. What are they for?" D'oh! I was having a bad time when I wrote that. Apologies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 08:35:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 04:35:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607280835.k6S8Zm6u013442@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From snecklifter at gmail.com 2006-07-28 04:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20) > the grep python gives you a list of everything with the word python in it! Err, yep. That was the idea. > As there seems to be (currently) a need for pydbus, I'd add it as a Requires Okay, will do.(In reply to comment #22) > "Why have you got BR desktop-file-utils, but never use them. What are they for?" > > D'oh! I was having a bad time when I wrote that. Apologies. Ah well, one less thing for me to adjust. No problem. I will make the necessary changes and re-submit later today. Regards Chris -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 09:14:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 05:14:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192049] Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607280914.k6S9EBxG016266@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-07-28 05:04 EST ------- Thanks. Should be fixed in: http://people.redhat.com/petersen/extras/gnash.spec http://people.redhat.com/petersen/extras/gnash-0.7.1-4.src.rpm I think the only remaining issue is Patrice's concerns about a potential tmp file vulnerability in the mozilla plugin (it just downloads .swf files straight to /tmp), though that is really an upstream issue. I'm not sure how the current behaviour compares with other plugins but probably a reasonable soltion is to use mkdtemp in /tmp. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 09:23:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 05:23:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192049] Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607280923.k6S9Ne4R016860@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-07-28 05:14 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=133223) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=133223&action=view) plugin-tempfile-dir.patch untested patch to use mkdtemp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 09:38:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 05:38:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194566] Review Request: 915resolution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607280938.k6S9cw1w017534@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: 915resolution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194566 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-28 05:29 EST ------- Good ---- rpmlint is clean for the binary, debuginfo and src rpms requires list is fine permissions correctly set builds cleanly in mock (x86) README.fedora added to the package tarball version matches upstream Bad --- It really does need to be enclosed in a wrapper with an example script for use in %{_sysconfdir} - as it stands, it's one of those applications that you install and wonder why you did - at least with something in %{_sysconfdir} users will know what to do (or where to look!) Minor ----- release version is one off - this one should be 2 (there is no release 0!) "public domain" as a license is fine for FE, but has caused issues in Germany. This is not just FC, but lots of others. As it stands, FC is fine with it as a license. Fix the issue in BAD and I'm happy to approve it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 10:17:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 06:17:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200310] Review Request: pyicqt - ICQ transport for Jabber servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607281017.k6SAHr2m019081@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyicqt - ICQ transport for Jabber servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200310 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-28 06:08 EST ------- Updated twisted packages will be going into FE devel at some point; see Bug #171543 where you can find some release candidate packages to try. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 10:45:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 06:45:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200348] Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607281045.k6SAjE6g020622@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200348 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-28 06:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > I tried looking for versioned downloads -- if I spoke any Polish I suspect I > might have had better luck. But Micha? is right; this poses a "challenge" for > the review. I speak Polish very well (much better than English ;)) but it looks bad. Official site doesn't include versioned downloads. Maybe, he should copy tarball to his own server? > You can use a tool called iconv. See, e.g., "file-not-utf8" at > http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingTips/Perl It has already done in new spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 11:37:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 07:37:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200436] Review Request: gaim-gadugadu - Gadu-Gadu support in Gaim IM client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607281137.k6SBb5ib023982@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-gadugadu - Gadu-Gadu support in Gaim IM client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200436 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-28 07:27 EST ------- I think you should try to make spec file less complicated. The only thing we need to compile is gg protocol, so we don't need to compile any other things. After configure, you can go to src/protocols/gg and make build only in this directory. Think about it :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 13:01:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 09:01:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191200] Review Request: lvm2-cluster In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607281301.k6SD11oA027091@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lvm2-cluster https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191200 rkenna at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rkenna at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From rkenna at redhat.com 2006-07-28 08:51 EST ------- Chris - There have been some recent requests. Is this going to happen? thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 13:03:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 09:03:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197442] Review Request: fatsort - sort fat of FAT32/FAT16 on cheap mp3 players In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607281303.k6SD3N5j027213@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fatsort - sort fat of FAT32/FAT16 on cheap mp3 players https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197442 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2006-07-28 08:54 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www-users.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de/~tmaas/fedora/fatsort.spec SRPM URL: http://www-users.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de/~tmaas/fedora/repo/fatsort-0.9.6.1-3.fc5.src.rpm I use $RPM_OPT_FLAGS instead of %{optflags} now. Using mount -o loop and mkfs.vfat you can make a FAT partition in an file to test this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 13:05:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 09:05:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197732] Review Request: optipng - a PNG optimizer and converter - need a Sponsor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607281305.k6SD5RL3027280@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: optipng - a PNG optimizer and converter - need a Sponsor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197732 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2006-07-28 08:56 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www-users.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de/~tmaas/fedora/optipng.spec SRPM URL: http://www-users.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de/~tmaas/fedora/repo/optipng-0.5.3-1.fc5.src.rpm * Sa Jul 29 2006 Till Maas - 0.5.3-1 - version bump - Changed license tag back to zlib/libpng (#198616 rpmlint) - use $RPM_OPT_FLAGS instead of %{optflags} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 13:22:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 09:22:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198586] Review Request: ip6sic - IPv6 Stack Integrity Checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607281322.k6SDMSA8028022@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ip6sic - IPv6 Stack Integrity Checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198586 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE OtherBugsDependingO|163779 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-07-28 09:13 EST ------- Built for FC5, closing ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 13:23:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 09:23:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200374] Review Request: qstat - Real-time Game Server Status for Quake servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607281323.k6SDNn5Q028096@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qstat - Real-time Game Server Status for Quake servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200374 ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2006-07-28 09:14 EST ------- Updated package here: ftp://andriy.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/qstat-2.10-3.src.rpm * Fri Jul 28 2006 Andy Shevchenko 2.10-3 - drop check for "/" in install and clean sections - drop -n for setup macro - do not use attr macro in files section - qstat can be used not only for Quake, so change Summary -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 13:24:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 09:24:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192049] Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607281324.k6SDORn9028129@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #133223|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-07-28 09:15 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=133235) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=133235&action=view) plugin-tempfile-dir.patch better patch still untested -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 14:13:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 10:13:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199834] Review Request: nip2 - interactive image processing system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607281413.k6SEDT6h031273@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nip2 - interactive image processing system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199834 ------- Additional Comments From adam at spicenitz.org 2006-07-28 10:04 EST ------- vips is now in extras and builds successfully on all releases and platforms. What's left to do for nip2? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 15:02:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 11:02:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193493] Review Request: iksemel - An XML parser library designed for Jabber applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607281502.k6SF2kjF002088@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iksemel - An XML parser library designed for Jabber applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193493 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-28 10:53 EST ------- Yes, that's very smart. Unfortunately it failed to build for me on x86_64: make[1]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/iksemel-1.2/test' make check-TESTS make[2]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/iksemel-1.2/test' PASS: tst-ikstack PASS: tst-iks /bin/sh: line 4: 12917 Segmentation fault ${dir}$tst FAIL: tst-sax PASS: tst-dom PASS: tst-sha PASS: tst-md5 PASS: tst-filter PASS: tst-jid =================== 1 of 8 tests failed =================== make[2]: *** [check-TESTS] Error 1 Any ideas? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 15:28:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 11:28:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200348] Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607281528.k6SFSeuT003350@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200348 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-28 11:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > I tried looking for versioned downloads -- if I spoke any Polish I suspect I > > might have had better luck. But Micha? is right; this poses a "challenge" for > > the review. > > I speak Polish very well (much better than English ;)) but it looks bad. > Official site doesn't include versioned downloads. Maybe, he should copy > tarball to his own server? Hrm. Well, one thing to try would be to email upstream and ask if they could start keeping versioned packages somewhere. The viability of that depends on how often the "current" tarball changes, I suspect. But it is critical to be able to point somewhere and say "this package is version foo" authoritatively. If they don't respond, well, then we figure out Plan B :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 15:38:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 11:38:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195666] Review Request: mod_fcgid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607281538.k6SFc0Dg003962@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_fcgid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195666 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-28 11:28 EST ------- Update to package, moving SELinux policy modules from /usr/share/selinux/packages/POLICYNAME to /usr/share/selinux/POLICYNAME now that the Core selinux-policy (in rawhide, should be updated in FC5 with the next update) no longer automatically tries to link all modules in this directory, and includes the correct directory ownership. This package version also hardlinks the policy module packages together if they're identical, thius avoiding duplicate files. Packages (1.10-4) available in usual place: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/mod_fcgid/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 15:42:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 11:42:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193493] Review Request: iksemel - An XML parser library designed for Jabber applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607281542.k6SFgLHa004363@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iksemel - An XML parser library designed for Jabber applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193493 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us 2006-07-28 11:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > Unfortunately it failed to build for me on x86_64: Is that a build on development? I've only tested FC5 (i386 & x86_64) builds so far. I kicked off a development/i386 build but that'll take a bit since I don't have any of the packages cached locally. I'll try development/x86_64 once that completes... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 16:22:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 12:22:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193493] Review Request: iksemel - An XML parser library designed for Jabber applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607281622.k6SGM5MN006894@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iksemel - An XML parser library designed for Jabber applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193493 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us 2006-07-28 12:12 EST ------- The build on development/i386 went fine, however the development/x86_64 build failed for me too.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 16:28:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 12:28:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193493] Review Request: iksemel - An XML parser library designed for Jabber applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607281628.k6SGS7Dc007253@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iksemel - An XML parser library designed for Jabber applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193493 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-28 12:18 EST ------- My build was on development. I did a build on FC5 and it did indeed pass: make check-TESTS make[2]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/iksemel-1.2/test' PASS: tst-ikstack PASS: tst-iks PASS: tst-sax PASS: tst-dom PASS: tst-sha PASS: tst-md5 PASS: tst-filter PASS: tst-jid ================== All 8 tests passed ================== At this point I have no remaining objections; things build on a supported release, and looking at the patches I agree with the necessity of re-autotooling things although I hope that it won't be necessary if your patch makes it upstream. So I'll approve now, but do keep in mind that as is you can't build on the development branch. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 16:43:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 12:43:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200551] New: Review Request: cachefilesd Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200551 Summary: Review Request: cachefilesd Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: steved at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/steved/fscache/cachefilesd/0.3-2/cachefilesd.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/steved/fscache/cachefilesd/0.3-2/cachefilesd-0.3-2.src.rpm Description: The cachefilesd daemon manages the caching files and directory that are that are used by network filesystems such a AFS and NFS to do persistent caching to the local disk. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 16:58:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 12:58:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177117] Review Request: libtlen - Tlen.pl client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607281658.k6SGw96b009805@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtlen - Tlen.pl client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177117 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-07-28 12:48 EST ------- Is there anything wrong with the current submission? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 16:58:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 12:58:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200551] Review Request: cachefilesd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607281658.k6SGwb4R009891@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cachefilesd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200551 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |jkeating at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188267 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-28 12:49 EST ------- NEEDSWORK: - no URL tag - Source0 should be a full URL if possible - Missing BuildRequires, at least automake - Requires(post): /usr/bin/chkconfig - Requires(preun): /usr/bin/chkconfig - Init scripts aren't often marked as config files... Please fix up the missing build requires (test by 'brew build --scratch --arch-override x86_64 dist-5E cachefilesd-0.3-2.src.rpm' and 'brew watch-logs ) and I'll build and run rpmlint on it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 17:04:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 13:04:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177117] Review Request: libtlen - Tlen.pl client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607281704.k6SH4s6o010287@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtlen - Tlen.pl client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177117 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-28 12:55 EST ------- I haven't reviewed it yet. I just wanted to make sure that my time wouldn't be wasted, given that it had been six weeks since my original review offer with no response. I'll go ahead and review it now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 17:07:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 13:07:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200555] New: Review Request: libsynaptics - Synaptics touchpad driver library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200555 Summary: Review Request: libsynaptics - Synaptics touchpad driver library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: orion at cora.nwra.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/libsynaptics.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/libsynaptics-0.14.6b-1.fc5.src.rpm Description: A small C++ library usable by the synaptics driver. The version numbering will follow any driver releases, the appended letter marks releases due to bug fixing. This is needed by ksynaptics -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 17:25:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 13:25:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197353] Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607281725.k6SHPD95011238@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197353 ------- Additional Comments From alain.portal at free.fr 2006-07-28 13:16 EST ------- Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/man-pages-fr.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/man-pages-fr-2.26.0-1.src.rpm %changelog * Fri Jul 28 2006 Alain Portal 2.27.0-1 - Update to 2.27.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 17:28:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 13:28:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200436] Review Request: gaim-gadugadu - Gadu-Gadu support in Gaim IM client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607281728.k6SHSSpf011493@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-gadugadu - Gadu-Gadu support in Gaim IM client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200436 ------- Additional Comments From raven at pmail.pl 2006-07-28 13:19 EST ------- Thanks, new spec and SRPM: Spec URL: http://pmail.pl/~raven/gaim-gadugadu.spec SRPM URL: http://pmail.pl/~raven/gaim-gadgadu-2.0.0-0.8.beta3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 17:35:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 13:35:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200436] Review Request: gaim-gadugadu - Gadu-Gadu support in Gaim IM client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607281735.k6SHZMZS012072@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-gadugadu - Gadu-Gadu support in Gaim IM client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200436 ------- Additional Comments From raven at pmail.pl 2006-07-28 13:26 EST ------- Sorry, bad SRPM name, it shoud be: http://pmail.pl/~raven/gaim-gadugadu-2.0.0-0.8.beta3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 17:57:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 13:57:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177211] Review Request: newsx - NNTP news exchange utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607281757.k6SHvrs2013725@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: newsx - NNTP news exchange utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177211 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-07-28 13:48 EST ------- I can't reproduce that failure on FC5 box. I've dropped that Provides: line, but I think Requires: inn should be kept, because newsx doesn't depend on any inn libs directly. http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/newsx.spec http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/newsx-1.6-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 18:00:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 14:00:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200565] New: Review Request: ksynaptics - KDE configuration for synaptics module Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200565 Summary: Review Request: ksynaptics - KDE configuration for synaptics module Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: orion at cora.nwra.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/ksynaptics.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/ksynaptics-0.3.1-1.fc5.src.rpm Description: KSynaptics (previously QSynaptics) is a Qt/KDE based configuration utility for the synaptics touchpad drivers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 18:00:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 14:00:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200555] Review Request: libsynaptics - Synaptics touchpad driver library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607281800.k6SI0vRq013923@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsynaptics - Synaptics touchpad driver library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200555 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |200565 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 18:15:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 14:15:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177117] Review Request: libtlen - Tlen.pl client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607281815.k6SIFTLi014858@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtlen - Tlen.pl client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177117 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-28 14:06 EST ------- You've said on IRC that you'll add the dist tag, so no worries there. The major issue I see is with the license. The only file I see that actually has a license statement is lib/asciitab.h which is GPL/MPL. The only thing that says LGPL is the sourceforge page, which unfortunately really isn't sufficient. Perhaps I'm just not looking in the proper place, though; am I missing a license statement somewhere? * source files match upstream: b77c0a3234a21d1b79df8a8b9a9b9534 libtlen-20041113.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * Prerelease snapshot naming is correct: 0-0.1.20041113 * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. X dist tag is not present. * build root is correct. ? license field matches the actual license. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: libtlen-0-0.1.20041113.x86_64.rpm libtlen.so.1()(64bit) libtlen = 0-0.1.20041113 = /sbin/ldconfig libtlen.so.1()(64bit) libtlen-devel-0-0.1.20041113.x86_64.rpm libtlen-devel = 0-0.1.20041113 = libtlen = 0-0.1.20041113 libtlen.so.1()(64bit) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * shared libraries are present; ldconfig is called as necessary and unversioned .so links are in the -devel package. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers are in the -devel package. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 18:19:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 14:19:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177117] Review Request: libtlen - Tlen.pl client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607281819.k6SIJ2Rc015208@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtlen - Tlen.pl client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177117 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-07-28 14:09 EST ------- http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/libtlen.spec http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/libtlen-0-0.2.20041113.src.rpm added dist tag and a patch to fix 64bit builds -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 18:19:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 14:19:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169704] Review Request: mosml - Moscow ML In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607281819.k6SIJhhZ015286@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mosml - Moscow ML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169704 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-07-28 14:10 EST ------- For the links I use %{_lib} now. This should take care of that issue: http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/5/i386/SRPMS.gemi/mosml-2.01-9.src.rpm I don't think there is anything to done about the soname problem. The classification of this problem as an error is wrong IMHO. There are many packages that use plugin type .so files with either no soname or an unversioned one, like here (see for example gaim or many python packages). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 18:19:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 14:19:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177117] Review Request: libtlen - Tlen.pl client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607281819.k6SIJoOI015322@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtlen - Tlen.pl client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177117 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-07-28 14:10 EST ------- or was it to fix 32bit build on 64bit fedora... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 18:24:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 14:24:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200565] Review Request: ksynaptics - KDE configuration for synaptics module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607281824.k6SIOeQs015962@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksynaptics - KDE configuration for synaptics module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200565 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |rdieter at math.unl.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-28 14:15 EST ------- upstream source checks out. c9c124ba59bbb898bfc73f2ab00e8006 ksynaptics-0.3.1.tar.bz2 A few initial comments: 1. Icons need scriptlets (See http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/ScriptletSnippets), something like: %post touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || : gtk-update-icon-cache -q %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor 2>/dev/null ||: %postun 2. You don't really need: export QTLIB=${QTDIR}/lib QTINC=${QTDIR}/include anymore, the qt bug that this worked around is now fixed. touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || : gtk-update-icon-cache -q %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor 2>/dev/null ||: Otherwise it looks good! Now, I'll try building and see how it works... (: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 18:27:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 14:27:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200565] Review Request: ksynaptics - KDE configuration for synaptics module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607281827.k6SIRPx0016296@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksynaptics - KDE configuration for synaptics module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200565 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-28 14:18 EST ------- oops, left %postun blank, it should have been the same: %post touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || : gtk-update-icon-cache -q %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor 2>/dev/null ||: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 18:30:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 14:30:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200555] Review Request: libsynaptics - Synaptics touchpad driver library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607281830.k6SIUF0m016569@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsynaptics - Synaptics touchpad driver library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200555 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |rdieter at math.unl.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-28 14:21 EST ------- Guess I need to review this one too... (: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 18:35:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 14:35:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200555] Review Request: libsynaptics - Synaptics touchpad driver library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607281835.k6SIZQdV017102@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsynaptics - Synaptics touchpad driver library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200555 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-28 14:26 EST ------- First, Version should not contain non-numerics, (see http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuide) You should use (something like): Version: 0.14.6 Release: 1.b%{?dist} The easiest way to deal with this is to use some macro, say %beta %define beta b Then use: Release: 1.%{beta} Because of the munging of Version, you'll need to modify other bits to be (again, something like): Source0: http://qsynaptics.sourceforge.net/libsynaptics-%{version}%{?beta}.tar.bz2 ... %setup -q -n %{name}-%{version}%{?beta} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 18:49:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 14:49:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200565] Review Request: ksynaptics - KDE configuration for synaptics module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607281849.k6SInLvr018878@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksynaptics - KDE configuration for synaptics module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200565 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-28 14:40 EST ------- I'd suggest replacing: desktop-file-install --vendor=fedora \ --add-category=Qt \ --add-category=KDE \ --add-category=Utility \ --add-category=X-Fedora \ --delete-original --dir %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/applications/kde/%{name}.desktop with simply: desktop-file-install \ --vendor="" --add-category=X-Fedora \ --dir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications/kde \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications/kde/*.desktop The vendor is clear already here (kde), and this is simply a KControl module, so there's no need to add those Categories. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 18:57:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 14:57:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200555] Review Request: libsynaptics - Synaptics touchpad driver library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607281857.k6SIvSet019813@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsynaptics - Synaptics touchpad driver library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200555 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-28 14:48 EST ------- upstream source checks: 6ea2b72829df76138a9a1f03faeda438 libsynaptics-0.14.6b.tar.bz2 This one is pretty simple and straightforward. Make the recommended Version/Release modification, and I'll approve this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 19:05:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 15:05:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177117] Review Request: libtlen - Tlen.pl client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607281905.k6SJ5ITn020323@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtlen - Tlen.pl client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177117 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-07-28 14:56 EST ------- Yes, that was it. In the meantime I've found a newer release on http://tleenx.sf.net/ and updated once again. ;) Also, I sent an e-mail to the developers about the license. http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/libtlen.spec http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/libtlen-0-0.3.20060309.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 19:15:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 15:15:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187609] Review Request: tre - POSIX compatible regexp library with approximate matching In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607281915.k6SJFBJB020876@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tre - POSIX compatible regexp library with approximate matching https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187609 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-07-28 15:06 EST ------- http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/tre.spec http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/tre-0.7.4-1.src.rpm But I'm afraid the 64bit issues are still there, i.e. it still crashes on me. Also, the license changed to LGPL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 19:19:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 15:19:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193493] Review Request: iksemel - An XML parser library designed for Jabber applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607281919.k6SJJp3K021568@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iksemel - An XML parser library designed for Jabber applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193493 jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us 2006-07-28 15:10 EST ------- I've entered bug #200579 to track the problem with building on devel/x86_64. Otherwise, the package has been imported and branches for FC-4 and FC-5 requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 19:21:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 15:21:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177134] Review Request: mkvtoolnix - Matroska container utilites In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607281921.k6SJLDVk021753@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mkvtoolnix - Matroska container utilites https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177134 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-07-28 15:12 EST ------- Everything enabled, updated to 1.7.0. http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/mkvtoolnix-1.7.0-1.src.rpm http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/mkvtoolnix.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 19:22:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 15:22:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177134] Review Request: mkvtoolnix - Matroska container utilites In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607281922.k6SJMeJT021897@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mkvtoolnix - Matroska container utilites https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177134 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-07-28 15:13 EST ------- Also, any word from legal yet? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 19:30:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 15:30:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177232] Review Request: regionset - reads/sets the region code of DVD drives In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607281930.k6SJUEgQ022295@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: regionset - reads/sets the region code of DVD drives https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177232 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-07-28 15:21 EST ------- Fixed those macros. http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/regionset.spec http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/regionset-0.1-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 19:32:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 15:32:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200551] Review Request: cachefilesd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607281932.k6SJWDn5022444@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cachefilesd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200551 steved at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From steved at redhat.com 2006-07-28 15:23 EST ------- - no URL tag - Source0 should be a full URL if possible There is no upstream at this point so there is URL at the moment. I guess I could through things it on my people pages if that would be ok... - Missing BuildRequires, at least automake - Requires(post): /usr/bin/chkconfig - Requires(preun): /usr/bin/chkconfig Done. - Init scripts aren't often marked as config files... The init script is in the tarball. So do I need to break it out and create a file called cachefiles.init? Please fix up the missing build requires (test by 'brew build --scratch --arch-override x86_64 dist-5E cachefilesd-0.3-2.src.rpm' and 'brew watch-logs ) Done... see taskID 138115 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 19:34:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 15:34:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177860] Review Request: libXvMCW - A Wrapper for run-time loading of XvMC libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607281934.k6SJY1LF022514@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libXvMCW - A Wrapper for run-time loading of XvMC libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177860 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-07-28 15:24 EST ------- Since FC4 is already in legacy mode, I guess there's no point in trying to get this through or is there? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 19:45:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 15:45:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184331] Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607281945.k6SJjrAT023463@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184331 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-28 15:36 EST ------- Apologies for the delay - my buildsys is somewhat elderly! It built fine in mock (x86). I'll go over everything else tonight. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 19:49:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 15:49:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200051] Review Request: libutempter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607281949.k6SJn0fv023805@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libutempter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200051 mharris at mharris.ca changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From mharris at mharris.ca 2006-07-28 15:39 EST ------- Committed to rawhide now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 19:57:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 15:57:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191017] Review Request: eclipse-subclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607281957.k6SJvlSS024452@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-subclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191017 ------- Additional Comments From bkonrath at redhat.com 2006-07-28 15:48 EST ------- Here's an updated patch: http://people.redhat.com/bkonrath/eclipse/eclipse-subclipse.spec.patch Robert just rebuilt ganymed-ssh2 and javasvn to pick up the changes in rawhide GCJ so it should be ready to go now. Robert, it would be nice if you could apply this patch and if you have time update to the latest version (1.1.4). Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 20:03:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 16:03:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177134] Review Request: mkvtoolnix - Matroska container utilites In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607282003.k6SK3a3J024879@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mkvtoolnix - Matroska container utilites https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177134 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-07-28 15:54 EST ------- Nope :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 20:04:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 16:04:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200555] Review Request: libsynaptics - Synaptics touchpad driver library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607282004.k6SK4ri0024959@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsynaptics - Synaptics touchpad driver library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200555 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2006-07-28 15:55 EST ------- Just FYI (don't know if relevant to this package or ksynaptics): devel-PPC currently is missing synaptics; see Bug 199864 for details -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 20:23:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 16:23:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200555] Review Request: libsynaptics - Synaptics touchpad driver library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607282023.k6SKN0BU025940@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsynaptics - Synaptics touchpad driver library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200555 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-07-28 16:13 EST ------- This is a post-release non-numeric version. It will be followed by 0.14.6c or 0.14.7, so, according to the guidelines: Post-release packages: Packages released after a "final" version. This usually is due to a quick bugfix release, such as openssl-0.9.6b or gkrellm-2.1.7a. In this case, the non-numeric characters are permitted in the Version: field. See http://qsynaptics.sourceforge.net/dl.html for historical version numbers. Thanks for the heads up on PPC. I'll do an ExcludeArch if needed. If I can avoid it I will, though we might end up with a package for ppc that just won't work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 20:26:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 16:26:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184331] Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607282026.k6SKQcfY026095@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184331 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-28 16:17 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=133264) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=133264&action=view) rpmlint output once installed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 20:27:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 16:27:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184331] Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607282027.k6SKRd0R026146@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184331 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-28 16:18 EST ------- You need to fix the problems highlighted in #14 before the review goes any further -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 20:39:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 16:39:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200492] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Sexy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607282039.k6SKd8M9026801@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Sexy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200492 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-28 16:30 EST ------- Updated with an additional buildrequires. Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Gtk2-Sexy.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Gtk2-Sexy-0.02-2.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 20:48:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 16:48:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200565] Review Request: ksynaptics - KDE configuration for synaptics module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607282048.k6SKmOc8027658@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksynaptics - KDE configuration for synaptics module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200565 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-07-28 16:39 EST ------- spec and src.rpm updated. New srpm: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/ksynaptics-0.3.1-1.fc5.src.rpm though you really only need the new spe. - Add icon post/postun scripts - Add Requires: hicolor-icon-theme - Remove old QTDIR hack - Cleanup desktop file Not sure if the hicolor-icon-theme requires is necessary, but I would think so since it installs into %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/... Thanks for the reviews Rex! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 20:52:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 16:52:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193059] Review Request: ibmasm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607282052.k6SKqaon028012@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ibmasm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193059 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 21:04:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 17:04:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192049] Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607282104.k6SL4Ldf028921@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-28 16:55 EST ------- I'll test the patch but it would benefit from a bit of error code testing ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 21:11:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 17:11:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193059] Review Request: ibmasm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607282111.k6SLBFvD029184@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ibmasm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193059 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-28 17:02 EST ------- Please, when you provide a SRPM URL, you give the full URL. I do a heck of a lot of tests via ssh and download srpms using wget. I'm not bothered which mirror you use, but in future, give the full URL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 21:27:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 17:27:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193059] Review Request: ibmasm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607282127.k6SLRs8q029772@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ibmasm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193059 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-28 17:18 EST ------- rpmlint on the binary has shown problems which need addressing before you progress W no-soname /lib/libsysSP.so E shlib-with-non-pic-code /lib/libsysSp.so E shared-lib-without-dependency-information /lib/libsysSp.so E non-standard-executable-perm /usr/sbin/ibmspup 0744 E non-readable /usr/sbin/ibmsphalt 0700 E non-standard-executable-perm /usr/sbin/ibmsphalt 0700 W no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/ibmasm E incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/ibmasm ibmsphalt Other notes You need to put a blocker on this for x86_64 and explain why You should be consistent on how you use $RPM_BUILD_ROOT - have everything as ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT (or better still, %{buildroot}) but not a mixture mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/bin should be $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sbindir} You don't seem to have added anywhere the runlevels this should run at The %doc can be on one line You need either to change the /sbin/ldconfig to read %post -p /sbin/ldconfig or add BR ldconfig Similarly, you need chkconfig adding as a BR As I said in #12, please remember to post the full URL of the updated SRPM and spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 21:44:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 17:44:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200597] New: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-TrayIcon Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200597 Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-TrayIcon Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Gtk2-TrayIcon.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Gtk2-TrayIcon-0.03-1.fc5.src.rpm Description: This module allows a Perl developer to embed an arbitrary widget in a System Tray like the Gnome notification area. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 22:07:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 18:07:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193059] Review Request: ibmasm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607282207.k6SM7jaf032062@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ibmasm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193059 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-28 17:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > You need to put a blocker on this for x86_64 and explain why +1 on the explanation; as far as I can see this restriction makes sense as i386 kernels do have ibmasm.ko whereas, e.g., x86_64 kernels don't. (and this package depends on that kmod.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 22:08:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 18:08:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192049] Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607282208.k6SM8uIW032115@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-07-28 17:59 EST ------- It segfaults with this patch. My wild guesses: the template is constant, although, quoting the manpage: "Since it will be modified, template must not be a string constant, but should be declared as a character array." The other possibility I see is that something is needed to convert the resulting char* to string. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 22:21:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 18:21:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200600] New: Review Request: phpPgAdmin - web based PostgreSQL administration Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200600 Summary: Review Request: phpPgAdmin - web based PostgreSQL administration Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: devrim at commandprompt.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/phpPgAdmin/phpPgAdmin.spec SRPM URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/phpPgAdmin/phpPgAdmin-4.0.1-2.src.rpm Description: phpPgAdmin is a fully functional web-based administration utility for a PostgreSQL database server. It handles all the basic functionality as well as some advanced features such as triggers, views and functions (stored procedures). It also has Slony-I support. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 22:22:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 18:22:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200600] Review Request: phpPgAdmin - web based PostgreSQL administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607282222.k6SMMSMh032629@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpPgAdmin - web based PostgreSQL administration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200600 devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 22:26:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 18:26:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199679] Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607282226.k6SMQodd000384@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199679 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-28 18:17 EST ------- A couple thoughts: * With the usage of %configure in %build, you can drop "--bindir=%{_bindir} ..." from that line (%configure includes them) * I'm not sure of the best practice in this area myself, but it would seem to make sense to put a .conf.sample file in %doc, rather than %{_sysconfdir}; maybe either placing a default config in there (minus the .sample) or %ghost'ing %{_sysconfdir}/pgpool.conf. (/me invites comments) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 22:33:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 18:33:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192049] Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607282233.k6SMXLTv000662@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rpm at greysector.net ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-07-28 18:24 EST ------- Same problem with QT on my amd64 box, too. Sourcing /etc/profile.d/qt.sh and adding --with-qtdir=$QTDIR to %configure helps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 22:37:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 18:37:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200555] Review Request: libsynaptics - Synaptics touchpad driver library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607282237.k6SMb6KE000922@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsynaptics - Synaptics touchpad driver library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200555 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-28 18:28 EST ------- >Post-release packages: Packages released after a "final" version Well, I'll be, didn't know about that exception, ya learn something new every day. Looks good then, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 22:38:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 18:38:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200565] Review Request: ksynaptics - KDE configuration for synaptics module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607282238.k6SMccTE001074@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksynaptics - KDE configuration for synaptics module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200565 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-28 18:29 EST ------- The Requires: hicolo-icon-theme probably isn't absolutely required, but I guess it doesn't hurt either. approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 23:26:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 19:26:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178904] Review Request: Monodevelop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607282326.k6SNQgMa003216@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178904 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-07-28 19:17 EST ------- Certain Requires are not being picked up automatically, including at least: gtksourceview-sharp, gecko-sharp2, mono-data-oracle, mono-data-sybase, mono-data-postgresql, bytefx-data-mysql This results in monodevelop complaining on startup about addins as mentioned. With these installed I do get a workbench, but creating a new project results in a SIGSEGV on i386, apparently somewhere in the gecko or glib bindings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 28 23:28:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 19:28:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178904] Review Request: Monodevelop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607282328.k6SNSqoF003302@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178904 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-07-28 19:19 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=133273) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=133273&action=view) stack trace when creating new project -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 29 00:13:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 20:13:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200600] Review Request: phpPgAdmin - web based PostgreSQL administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607290013.k6T0DD9D005445@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpPgAdmin - web based PostgreSQL administration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200600 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-28 20:03 EST ------- Devrim, I suspect you should block FE-GUIDELINES as well, given that the php guidelines haven't been formally announced yet... (but should be shortly.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 29 00:26:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 20:26:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200600] Review Request: phpPgAdmin - web based PostgreSQL administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607290026.k6T0QJdj005821@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpPgAdmin - web based PostgreSQL administration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200600 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-07-28 20:17 EST ------- I am 98% positive that the php guidelines are only needed for extensions to php. Web applications need to follow the web application sections of the guidelines but otherwise are fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 29 00:50:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 20:50:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200600] Review Request: phpPgAdmin - web based PostgreSQL administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607290050.k6T0ok3e006923@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpPgAdmin - web based PostgreSQL administration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200600 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-28 20:41 EST ------- I am 100% positive that there is no need for this package to wait on any guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 29 00:58:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 20:58:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200600] Review Request: phpPgAdmin - web based PostgreSQL administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607290058.k6T0wC4H007276@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpPgAdmin - web based PostgreSQL administration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200600 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-28 20:48 EST ------- My bad -- for some reason my little brain keeps on broadening the scope of the php guidelines... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 29 07:21:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 03:21:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197445] Review Request: fuse-convmvfs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607290721.k6T7LOOS021749@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-convmvfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197445 hellwolf at seu.edu.cn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |177841 BugsThisDependsOn|177841 | OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 29 07:24:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 03:24:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197445] Review Request: fuse-convmvfs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607290724.k6T7Otpj021950@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-convmvfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197445 hellwolf at seu.edu.cn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |177841 BugsThisDependsOn|177841 | OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From hellwolf at seu.edu.cn 2006-07-29 03:15 EST ------- Hi, Chris Wey, thanks for your notes. SPEC: ftp://ftp.fedora.cn/pub/fedora-cn/yportage/FC-5/sys-fs/fuse-convmvfs/fuse-convmvfs.specin SRPM: ftp://ftp.fedora.cn/pub/fedora-cn/fe-review/fuse-convmvfs/fuse-convmvfs-0.2.2-1.fc5.x1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 29 09:32:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 05:32:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195666] Review Request: mod_fcgid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607290932.k6T9WDkB029311@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_fcgid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195666 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-29 05:23 EST ------- Another update. I've split the SELinux policy module off into a subpackage. This has the benefit for people not using SELinux that the main package has no dependency on selinux-policy, and installation time is reduced as there are no scriptlets to run. Packages (1.10-5) available in usual place: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/mod_fcgid/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 29 10:47:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 06:47:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200630] New: Review Request: postgresql_autodoc - PostgreSQL AutoDoc Utility Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200630 Summary: Review Request: postgresql_autodoc - PostgreSQL AutoDoc Utility Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: devrim at commandprompt.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/postgresql_autodoc/postgresql_autodoc.spec SRPM URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/postgresql_autodoc/postgresql_autodoc-1.25-2.src.rpm Description: This is a utility which will run through PostgreSQL system tables and returns HTML, Dot, Dia and DocBook XML which describes the database. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 29 10:50:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 06:50:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200630] Review Request: postgresql_autodoc - PostgreSQL AutoDoc Utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607291050.k6TAoAd0000926@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql_autodoc - PostgreSQL AutoDoc Utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200630 devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 29 10:51:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 06:51:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200630] Review Request: postgresql_autodoc - PostgreSQL AutoDoc Utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607291051.k6TApOkR001041@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql_autodoc - PostgreSQL AutoDoc Utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200630 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-07-29 06:42 EST ------- Please ignore the rpmlint warning about the missing documentation; because there is no document inside tarball, even the license, todo, install, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 29 12:54:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 08:54:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197445] Review Request: fuse-convmvfs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607291254.k6TCsj5W005394@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-convmvfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197445 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NOTABUG | OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-29 08:45 EST ------- Reopened bug, which appears to have been closed by mistake. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 29 13:34:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 09:34:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178904] Review Request: Monodevelop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607291334.k6TDYiR6006409@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178904 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-29 09:25 EST ------- #54 I know they're needed to build, but at least on my test rig, they're not needed to run. I can certainly add them as R:s I'll report the throwback to the main mono package on the FC BZ for advice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 29 13:41:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 09:41:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197353] Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607291341.k6TDfjoT006870@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197353 ------- Additional Comments From alain.portal at free.fr 2006-07-29 09:32 EST ------- Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/man-pages-fr.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/man-pages-fr-2.28.0-1.src.rpm %changelog * Sat Jul 29 2006 Alain Portal 2.28.0-1 - Update to 2.28.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 29 16:28:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 12:28:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177583] Review Request: zaptel-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607291628.k6TGStRl012842@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177583 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-07-29 12:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #42) > I'll forward the request for inclusion of this kernel-module to FESCo for > approval, but I will do my best to prevent that this module get's into Extras as > long as the plans says "we don't want to get the driver merged upstream" Which you realize would mean that we can't get a fully functioning asterisk (for people with zaptel hardware, which includes me) in Extras until somebody forks the kernel module development. I agree that Digium's development model leaves a bit to be desired (who needs to change the license of the kernel module anyway, and is that even legal?), but the fact is that zaptel is GPL, so is this really the right place to draw the proverbial line in the sand? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 29 16:32:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 12:32:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178904] Review Request: Monodevelop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607291632.k6TGW5Uw012980@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178904 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |200639 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-29 12:22 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/monodevelop.spec I've only updated the spec file as nothing in the srpm has changed! This sorts out the problems in #54. The geckosharp issue has been reported : #200639 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 29 16:56:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 12:56:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177583] Review Request: zaptel-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607291656.k6TGuZCP014358@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177583 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2006-07-29 12:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #43) > (In reply to comment #42) > Which you realize would mean [...] Yes, I realized that. But there are 3rd party Fedora {Core|Extras} add-on repos out there that have different requirements for kmods -- one could submitt it there. > I agree that Digium's development model leaves a bit to be desired (who needs to > change the license of the kernel module anyway, and is that even legal?), The dual-licensing is not the problem afaics and afaik the details. For me it's only the "we don't want it upstream" mentality. I think every module should be in the kernel (see also http://www.kroah.com/log/linux/ols_2006_keynote.html ) and kmod in Extras are an interim solution to fill the timeframe until they get upstream (and in an ideal world people would get their drivers merged into the kernel as soon as they basically work) . > but > the fact is that zaptel is GPL, so is this really the right place to draw the > proverbial line in the sand? Well, one kernel-developer is hightly respect thinks the line should be drawn even earlier -- see Bug 189400 comment 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 29 18:12:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 14:12:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199784] Review Request: psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL database adapter for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607291812.k6TICTGH016427@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL database adapter for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199784 toshio at tiki-lounge.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |toshio at tiki-lounge.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-07-29 14:03 EST ------- NEEDSWORK If you need some explanation of some of the blocker items, leave me a note here. I'll be back online tonight (~8 hours) MD5Sums: f7806d7141403b062a7353341bb393b5 python-psycopg2-2.0.2-3.src.rpm 6c056b261782c51f53ceccbf86c08749 psycopg2-2.0.2.tar.gz Blockers: * Source must have a full URL. * Package is licensed as GPL but should be GPL with exceptions (to allow OpenSSL and libpq [postgreSQL] linkage). * Why are you only installing the _psycopg.so file instead of the whole distribution? * The source package includes a Zope database adapter. Why not include it as a subpackage? * Package does not build on x86_64. The %install hardcodes the directory: lib.linux-i686-%{pyver} Why not use setup.py install? Cosmetic: * Since you already used "python" to extract the %{pyver} macro, there's no need to use %{pyver} in this line: python%{pyver} setup.py build Good: * Package is named according to the naming guidelines for python modules. * Spec name matches the package name. * Package includes a copy of the license. * The package is licensed with an Open source license. * Source matches upstream. * Source matches upstream GPG signature for: "Federico Di Gregorio " 06468DEB. * No locale files, therefore no need to run %find_lang. * No shared libraries for the dynamic linker to find so no ldconfig run necessary. * Package is not relocatable. * Package owns all directories it creates. * Permissions set correctly. * Package has a proper %clean. * Uses macros consistenly except for python%{pyver} note above. * Contains code, not content. * %doc files do not affect runtime. * No headers, pkgconfig files, or shared libraries so no -devel package. * Subpackages require the exact NEVR of the base package. * No .la files. * Not a GUI app so no desktop file. * Package builds on x86_64 Not yet checked: * rpmlint * Packaging Guidelines * Buildrequires * Requires * doc subpackage * Directory ownership. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 29 18:27:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 14:27:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607291827.k6TIRZMa017473@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |199254 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 29 18:27:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 14:27:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199254] Review Request: perl-perlmenu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607291827.k6TIRwDm017516@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-perlmenu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199254 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |199108 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 29 18:31:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 14:31:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199254] Review Request: perl-perlmenu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607291831.k6TIViv6017800@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-perlmenu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199254 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 29 19:56:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 15:56:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200374] Review Request: qstat - Real-time Game Server Status for Quake servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607291956.k6TJuihO022631@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qstat - Real-time Game Server Status for Quake servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200374 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-07-29 15:47 EST ------- GOOD ==== * rpmlint output clean * Package and spec file name named appropriately * Artistic license ok, license file included * File matches upstream: ac3ce3dbed5248bd5738a4968460880e qstat-2.10.tar.gz * Spec file legible and in Am. English * Builds and packages in mock on FC4, FC5, and FC5, both i386 and x86_64 * Package provides list is sane * No BR: necessary * No locales * No shared libs * Not relocatable * Does not create any directories that it should own * No duplicate %files * File permissions ok * build root cleaned in %install and %clean as necessary * Contains code, not content * No need for -doc or -devel subpackages * No .la files created * Not a gui app; no .desktop file needed MUSTFIX ======= * %doc contains some unnecessary files that should be removed: COMPILE.txt Makefile* template/Makefile* NOTES ===== * There are a number of compiler warnings about pointer signedness that appear harmless. If you feel inclined, you could report these upstream. qstat.c:2912: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 6 of 'recvfrom' differ in signedness -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 29 22:11:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 18:11:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183439] Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607292211.k6TMBwW3027403@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) Alias: papyrus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183439 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 29 22:12:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 18:12:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607292212.k6TMCiU0027477@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-07-29 18:03 EST ------- Not building on x86_64: + /usr/bin/python configure.py -q /usr/bin/qmake4 Error: /usr/bin/qmake4 failed to create a makefile. Make sure you have a working Qt v4 qmake on your PATH or use the -q argument to explicitly specify a working Qt v4 qmake. Determining the layout of your Qt installation... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 29 22:22:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 18:22:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183439] Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607292222.k6TMMUgV027651@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) Alias: papyrus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183439 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-29 18:13 EST ------- Group: System Environment/Libraries Would this be not better suited to Development/Libraries? System Environment/Libs are really for the likes of glibc et al. Need R: cairomm %package devel Requires: gtkmm24-devel >= 2.8.0 cairomm-devel >= 0.6.0 pkgconfig doxygen graphviz Once installed, do rpm -qa --requires . This will give you the requires for main and devel packages to run correctly. I seriously doubt it will need anything past cairomm-devel %install %{__cp} -arv docs/reference . %{__cp} -arv docs/gallery . Should these not be included in the %docs part of %files? If they're not, where are they supposed to be getting copied to? Are the permissions being kept correctly? %files %{_libdir}/lib*.so.* Niggle. How many libraries are being installed? If it's one, just expand it. This makes reading the spec for us poor reviewers much simpler. If it's a pile which can be globbed together, then %{_libdir}/libpap*.so.* is also okay. %files devel %{_bindir}/*-demo I'd strongly recommend naming this %doc ChangeLog reference gallery This is confusing me. You've already copied reference and gallary somewhere - why have you got this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 29 22:24:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 18:24:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192052] Review Request: bitgtkmm (Gtkmm widgets for the bit library) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607292224.k6TMOqkr027738@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitgtkmm (Gtkmm widgets for the bit library) Alias: bitgtkmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192052 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-29 18:15 EST ------- %build %configure --enable-static=no %{__make} %{?_smp_mflags} %install %{__rm} -rf %{buildroot} make DESTDIR=%{buildroot} install You need to be consistant with using macros. Either constantly use %{__make} or just plain make I'll look some more later -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 29 23:02:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 19:02:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183439] Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607292302.k6TN2894029270@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) Alias: papyrus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183439 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2006-07-29 18:52 EST ------- > Would this be not better suited to Development/Libraries? I'm not sure. Most of the other libraries, similar to papyrus (gtkmm24, libglademm26, libxml++, libgnomemm, et. al.) are under System Environment/ Libraries. Maybe they're behind and need to be changed? > Need R: cairomm The cairomm requires gets picked up by rpmbuild as a library requires. > I seriously doubt it will need anything past cairomm-devel The papyrusgtk stuff will need gtkmm, and theres no dependency chain between cairomm and gtkmm. pkgconfig is there since the autoconf configure requires it to find gtkmm and cairomm. > %{__cp} -arv docs/reference . > %{__cp} -arv docs/gallery . > > Should these not be included in the %docs part of %files? > %doc ChangeLog reference gallery > > This is confusing me. You've already copied reference and gallary somewhere - > why have you got this? This is done to move them into position so they appear in a better position for the rpm. In the dist they're in: docs/www/reference/ If I include them in the rpm without cp'ing they'd install as: /usr/share/doc/papyrus-0.2.0-devel/docs/www/reference/ Doing it this way they install as: /usr/share/doc/papyrus-0.2.0-devel/reference/ > %files > %{_libdir}/lib*.so.* > %files devel > %{_bindir}/*-demo The main reason I've done these is because I'm upstream on several libraries and I've tried to generalize the templates a bit to make them maintainable by autoconf (autoconf actually generates the specs). I know it's a little general, but it allows me to apply one correction to all the specs related to the libraries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 29 23:05:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 19:05:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192052] Review Request: bitgtkmm (Gtkmm widgets for the bit library) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607292305.k6TN5snK029526@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitgtkmm (Gtkmm widgets for the bit library) Alias: bitgtkmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192052 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2006-07-29 18:56 EST ------- Ahh, good catch. %{__make} is probably better. I'll change it in papyrus too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 29 23:06:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 19:06:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183439] Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607292306.k6TN6WdW029555@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) Alias: papyrus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183439 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-29 18:57 EST ------- BR = required to build R = required to run (once installed) Will a package really need pkgconfig to run once it's installed? As to the %{_bindir}, I'd still rather have the name. I have no problem with a generic spec file as such, but remember, others read these spec files to see how best write things. Can you place a comment in the spec file which says why you're doing the cp please? It will help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 29 23:13:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 19:13:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182320] Review Request: gnome-build In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607292313.k6TNDYaM029780@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182320 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-29 19:04 EST ------- Strange. I can't replicate this problem on either x86 or x86_64. I've fixed the space and tabs problem though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 29 23:18:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 19:18:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191745] Review Request: sysprof-kmod - kernel module for the sysprof profiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607292318.k6TNIfcg029914@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sysprof-kmod - kernel module for the sysprof profiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191745 ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2006-07-29 19:09 EST ------- This is the response I got from the author which is, BTW, a Red Hat employee (though sysprof is not a Red Hat project): The reason I didn't reply is that the issue with the sysprof kernel module is a little tricky. Basically, the kernel developers I have talked to are saying that sysprof overlaps with the oprofile module, so I haven't attempted getting it upstream. One possibility is that I port sysprof to use the oprofile module, but there are some issues with that as well. Moreover, I was told it already exists a proof of concept of the latter solution (using the oprofile module), so chances are the kmod could go away in a reasonable timeframe. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 29 23:23:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 19:23:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183322] Review Request: conexus (network and serial I/O library with Gtkmm widgets) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607292323.k6TNNvdp030034@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conexus (network and serial I/O library with Gtkmm widgets) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183322 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2006-07-29 19:14 EST ------- New release. Here are the new files: Spec Name or Url: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/conexus.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/fedora/5/srpms/conexus-0.2.1-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 29 23:28:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 19:28:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183439] Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607292328.k6TNSDJu030114@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) Alias: papyrus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183439 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2006-07-29 19:19 EST ------- > > Would this be not better suited to Development/Libraries? > > I'm not sure. Most of the other libraries, similar to papyrus (gtkmm24, > libglademm26, libxml++, libgnomemm, et. al.) are under System Environment/ > Libraries. I remember now... System Environment/Libraries is for the runtime stuff. Development/Libraries are for the devel packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 29 23:33:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 19:33:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183439] Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607292333.k6TNXeXO030264@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) Alias: papyrus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183439 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2006-07-29 19:24 EST ------- > Will a package really need pkgconfig to run once it's installed? Ahhh, I see. It's in the Requires for the devel package. I'll remove it and the doxygen and graphviz depends. Now that the docs are in the dist, doxygen and graphviz aren't even build requires anymore. > Can you place a comment in the spec file which says why you're doing the cp > please? It will help. Good idea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 29 23:36:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 19:36:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183439] Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607292336.k6TNaOuJ030367@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) Alias: papyrus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183439 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-29 19:27 EST ------- rpmlint shows no problems anywhere mock fails to build (x86) mkdir .libs g++ (...) .libs/simple_main.o simple.o (...) /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.1/../../../libcairomm-1.0.so: undefined reference to `cairo_ps_surface_set_dpi' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 29 23:40:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 19:40:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183322] Review Request: conexus (network and serial I/O library with Gtkmm widgets) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607292340.k6TNeLDs030623@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conexus (network and serial I/O library with Gtkmm widgets) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183322 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-29 19:31 EST ------- make DESTDIR=%{buildroot} install Again, be consistent with your macros %{__rm} -rf %{buildroot}%{_bindir} Why? %{__cp} -arv docs/reference/html . As with papyrus, can you include a comment on this %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/* No. For pkgconfig please use the name of the spec. I know you're using generic templates for these, but where possible, include the names of libraries, binaries and spec files. %configure --enable-static=no (niggle) %configure --disable-static not permitted (usually is) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 29 23:51:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 19:51:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192052] Review Request: bitgtkmm (Gtkmm widgets for the bit library) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607292351.k6TNps6W031202@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitgtkmm (Gtkmm widgets for the bit library) Alias: bitgtkmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192052 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-29 19:42 EST ------- Builds fine in mock. However. Blocker : For the devel, you need to add bitgtkmm to the Requires list Blocker : run rpm -qa --requires on the installed bitgtkmm. Quite a lot of the output are for standard libs, but you cannot rely on people having gtkmm installed (or a few of the others) Fix these and we should be good to go (more or less!) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 30 00:06:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 20:06:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192052] Review Request: bitgtkmm (Gtkmm widgets for the bit library) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607300006.k6U06crR031698@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitgtkmm (Gtkmm widgets for the bit library) Alias: bitgtkmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192052 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2006-07-29 19:57 EST ------- > Blocker : For the devel, you need to add bitgtkmm to the Requires list It's there. It's in the standard devel line, right above the specific requires that I add for bitgtkmm: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} Puts a specific dependency on the main package and the specific version and release that the headers belong to. How about if I change it to: Requires: bitgtkmm = %{version}-%{release} > Blocker : run rpm -qa --requires on the installed bitgtkmm. Quite a lot of the > output are for standard libs, but you cannot rely on people having gtkmm > installed (or a few of the others) Those are all added by rpmbuild. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 30 00:16:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 20:16:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192052] Review Request: bitgtkmm (Gtkmm widgets for the bit library) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607300016.k6U0GtSC031885@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitgtkmm (Gtkmm widgets for the bit library) Alias: bitgtkmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192052 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-29 20:07 EST ------- 8--> It's there. It's in the standard devel line, right above the specific requires that I add for bitgtkmm: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} <--8 D'oh! 8--> > Blocker : run rpm -qa --requires on the installed bitgtkmm. Quite a lot of the > output are for standard libs, but you cannot rely on people having gtkmm > installed (or a few of the others) Those are all added by rpmbuild. <--8 No. These are packages required to run. Say I didn't have atkmm on my machine (just as an example). Without the R atkmm being explictly states in the spec file, the package would know no better until it gets to a point that atkmm is needed and then it falls over dead. I had a similar problem with Anjuta-1.2.4a a while back in that gtkmm was not in as an explicit R. However, when you came to try and create a gtkmm package, the software complained like crazy. Add the R line for gtkmm and everything was happy again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 30 01:17:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 21:17:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192052] Review Request: bitgtkmm (Gtkmm widgets for the bit library) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607300117.k6U1HxE9001459@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitgtkmm (Gtkmm widgets for the bit library) Alias: bitgtkmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192052 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2006-07-29 21:08 EST ------- > No. These are packages required to run. Say I didn't have atkmm on my machine > (just as an example). Without the R atkmm being explictly states in the spec > file, the package would know no better until it gets to a point that atkmm is > needed and then it falls over dead. Check out: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Requires rpmbuild adds the requires, such as (continuing with the atkmm example): libatkmm-1.6.so.1()(64bit) If you try and install bitgtkmm, rpm will complain that libatkmm-1.6.so.1 is required. If you're using yum, it will look up libatkmm-1.6.so.1 as a library in atkmm and add atkmm to the dependency installs. The situation you ran into with Anjuta was a little different. The reason why you had to explicitly add it was that the Anjuta runtime didn't have a dependency on the gtkmm runtime libraries, so rpmbuild didn't add it to the rpm requires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 30 08:00:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 04:00:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198758] Review Request: gnome-phone-manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607300800.k6U800GD015487@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-phone-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198758 ------- Additional Comments From triad at df.lth.se 2006-07-30 03:50 EST ------- OK issues adressed: Spec URL: http://www.df.lth.se/~triad/krad/fc/gnome-phone-manager.spec SRPM URL: http://www.df.lth.se/~triad/krad/fc/gnome-phone-manager-0.7-2.src.rpm As for macro consistency, I think that was all OK from the beginning... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 30 08:14:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 04:14:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200662] New: Review Request: lostirc Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200662 Summary: Review Request: lostirc Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: michael at knox.net.nz QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~michael/lostirc.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~michael/lostirc-0.4.6-1.src.rpm Description: LostIRC is a simple, keyboard controlled IRC client. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 30 08:31:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 04:31:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200662] Review Request: lostirc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607300831.k6U8VVnv002299@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lostirc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200662 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-30 04:22 EST ------- Install desktop file correctly Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~michael/lostirc.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~michael/lostirc-0.4.6-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 30 09:04:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 05:04:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200664] New: Review Request: soundtouch - Audio Processing library for changing Tempo, Pitch and Playback Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200664 Summary: Review Request: soundtouch - Audio Processing library for changing Tempo, Pitch and Playback Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/soundtouch.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/soundtouch-1.3.1-1.src.rpm Description: SoundTouch is a LGPL-licensed open-source audio processing library for changing the Tempo, Pitch and Playback Rates of audio streams or files. The SoundTouch library is suited for application developers writing sound processing tools that require tempo/pitch control functionality, or just for playing around with the sound effects. The SoundTouch library source kit includes an example utility SoundStretch which allows processing .wav audio files from a command-line interface. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 30 09:21:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 05:21:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200665] New: Review Request: ltris Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200665 Summary: Review Request: ltris Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: michael at knox.net.nz QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~michael/ltris.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~michael/ltris-1.0.11-1.src.rpm Description: LTris is a clone of the tetris game for Linux. It uses a SDL library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 30 09:44:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 05:44:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189400] Review Request: em8300(-kmod) - Hollywood+/DXR3 hardware MPEG decoder drivers and tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607300944.k6U9ilE5006444@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: em8300(-kmod) - Hollywood+/DXR3 hardware MPEG decoder drivers and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189400 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-07-30 05:35 EST ------- I saw a referecne to this bug about David's comment #9. I'd like to point out that one of the oldest kernel modules packages in Fedora are Cluster/GFS bits. Following this kind of veto, we wouldn't have GFS in Fedora. And there isn't really a difference between externally built kernel modules and patched in pieces that haven't been accepted upstream like for example xen. So at the very end the xen/gfs deviation from upstream really justify most of the external kernel module projects (keeping binary code out of the discussion, that's very different and much uglier). Don't get me wrong, I'm very happy with gfs/xen! And I'm also very happy with some external kernel modules. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 30 09:51:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 05:51:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191389] Review Request: oooqs2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607300951.k6U9pq8i006878@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: oooqs2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191389 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-30 05:42 EST ------- Looks good. APPROVED. Please remember to close this review request once inmported into CVS and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 30 10:05:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 06:05:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189400] Review Request: em8300(-kmod) - Hollywood+/DXR3 hardware MPEG decoder drivers and tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607301005.k6UA5iDm007522@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: em8300(-kmod) - Hollywood+/DXR3 hardware MPEG decoder drivers and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189400 ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2 at redhat.com 2006-07-30 05:56 EST ------- Xen and GFS2 are in the main kernel package in rawhide/FC6. They're not in separate packages any more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 30 10:16:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 06:16:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200666] New: Review Request: theora-exp - Experimental theora decoder Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200666 Summary: Review Request: theora-exp - Experimental theora decoder Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/theora-exp.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/theora-exp-0.0-0.1.20060730.src.rpm Description: Experimental theora decoder with full support for the complete theora specification (libtheora only supports a subset). --- Note this can be installed in parallel with libtheora without any problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 30 10:18:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 06:18:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189400] Review Request: em8300(-kmod) - Hollywood+/DXR3 hardware MPEG decoder drivers and tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607301018.k6UAIm8x008011@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: em8300(-kmod) - Hollywood+/DXR3 hardware MPEG decoder drivers and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189400 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-07-30 06:09 EST ------- Please take this discussion to an appropriate mailing list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 30 10:29:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 06:29:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189400] Review Request: em8300(-kmod) - Hollywood+/DXR3 hardware MPEG decoder drivers and tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607301029.k6UATnJs008395@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: em8300(-kmod) - Hollywood+/DXR3 hardware MPEG decoder drivers and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189400 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2006-07-30 06:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > Please take this discussion to an appropriate mailing list. +1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 30 14:54:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 10:54:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197353] Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607301454.k6UEsdWg017651@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197353 ------- Additional Comments From alain.portal at free.fr 2006-07-30 10:45 EST ------- Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/man-pages-fr.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/man-pages-fr-2.29.0-1.src.rpm %changelog * Sun Jul 30 2006 Alain Portal 2.29.0-1 - Update to 2.29.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 30 16:00:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 12:00:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200665] Review Request: ltris In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607301600.k6UG0gNS019773@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltris https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200665 jtorresh at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jtorresh at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From jtorresh at gmail.com 2006-07-30 11:51 EST ------- Hi Michael, I haven't tried your package, but are you sure you need to run the 'gtk-update-icon-cache' scriptlet? LTris doesn't install icons into %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor. Please correct me if I'm mistaken ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 30 16:33:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 12:33:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200664] Review Request: soundtouch - Audio Processing library for changing Tempo, Pitch and Playback In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607301633.k6UGXakO020669@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: soundtouch - Audio Processing library for changing Tempo, Pitch and Playback https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200664 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 30 18:22:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 14:22:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607301822.k6UIMRBL024372@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-30 14:13 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/PyQt4.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/PyQt4-4.0.1-2.src.rpm %changelog * Sat Jul 29 2006 Rex Dieter 4.0.1-2 - fix reference(s) to qmake(4) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 30 18:58:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 14:58:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177235] Review Request: sysconftool - Macros for aclocal to install configuration files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607301858.k6UIwTbv027556@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sysconftool - Macros for aclocal to install configuration files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177235 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-07-30 14:49 EST ------- Source checked in, devel build requested and succeeded, waiting for fc5 and fc4 branches to be created. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 30 19:44:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 15:44:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200665] Review Request: ltris In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607301944.k6UJi0c3029012@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltris https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200665 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-30 15:34 EST ------- no, you are quiet right. fixed Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~michael/ltris.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~michael/ltris-1.0.11-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 30 19:55:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 15:55:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200665] Review Request: ltris In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607301955.k6UJtrXv029576@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltris https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200665 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-30 15:46 EST ------- According to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Games you should package data files and game files separately. Please read whole site and make necessary changes required by Games Packaging Guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 30 20:07:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 16:07:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198758] Review Request: gnome-phone-manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607302007.k6UK7Rcs029915@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-phone-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198758 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 30 20:15:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 16:15:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200665] Review Request: ltris In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607302015.k6UKFbMN030225@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltris https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200665 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-30 16:06 EST ------- The SIG guide states "if possible" not "must". ltris is less than half a meg in total size. The idea behind splitting the packages, to reduce size, is not really a concern here IMHO. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 30 21:00:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 17:00:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200665] Review Request: ltris In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607302100.k6UL0ve8032365@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltris https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200665 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-07-30 16:51 EST ------- SIG guide also states that this "should be done even if upstream uses one tarball for game source and data". But for ltris you're probably right. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 30 22:04:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 18:04:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193109] Review Request: plotmm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607302204.k6UM4EHh002137@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: plotmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193109 karlthered at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From karlthered at gmail.com 2006-07-30 17:54 EST ------- The build has succeeded for both FC5 and developpement tree. Thanks for everything guys ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 30 22:18:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 18:18:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200064] Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607302218.k6UMIZ86002515@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200064 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-30 18:09 EST ------- Can you include something to the effect that this is the modified version - altered in order to not break the patent? Builds fine under mock (x86) rpmlint clean for all (-devel does give a no documentation warning) rpm -qa --requires all met I can't see any other problems with this package. The software runs fine on my test rig APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 30 22:27:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 18:27:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183439] Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607302227.k6UMRwIn002739@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) Alias: papyrus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183439 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2006-07-30 18:18 EST ------- Unfortunately it succeeds on x86_64... $ mock papyrus-0.2.1-2.src.rpm init clean prep This may take a while setup build ending done Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/mock/fedora-5-x86_64-core/result $ Perhaps we can get someone else with an x86 to confirm. It looks like the problem is a cairo/cairomm disconnect. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 30 22:32:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 18:32:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192052] Review Request: bitgtkmm (Gtkmm widgets for the bit library) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607302232.k6UMWP56002833@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitgtkmm (Gtkmm widgets for the bit library) Alias: bitgtkmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192052 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-30 18:23 EST ------- Yep. You're right. Okay - let's get on with this! Good ---- Builds fine in mock (x86) Spec file checks out fine - no dupes, no problems with permissions, documentation included in subpackages, consistent use of macros, no BR problems Package installs fine, rpmlint shows nothing of importance on the packages (installed or as rpms) Niggles ------- Unhappy with the *.so things in the %files and %files devel, but this is down to me and nothing that can be blocked. I can't see any other problems with this. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 30 22:32:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 18:32:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192052] Review Request: bitgtkmm (Gtkmm widgets for the bit library) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607302232.k6UMWm2P002870@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitgtkmm (Gtkmm widgets for the bit library) Alias: bitgtkmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192052 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 30 22:34:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 18:34:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200064] Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607302234.k6UMYTXD002947@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200064 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 30 22:43:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 18:43:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199020] Review Request: conexusmm (Gtkmm widgets for the conexus network and serial I/O library) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607302243.k6UMhk92003485@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conexusmm (Gtkmm widgets for the conexus network and serial I/O library) Alias: conexusmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199020 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2006-07-30 18:34 EST ------- Spec URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/conexusmm.spec SRPM URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/fedora/5/srpms/conexusmm-0.2.0- 2.src.rpm * Sat Jul 29 2006 Rick L Vinyard Jr - 0.2.0-2 - Changed make to %%{__make} - Changed %%{name} to autoconf subst that puts specific name in devel requires - Added comment regarding why cp occurs for docs - Removed doxygen, graphviz and pkgconfig from devel requires - Added package name to globs in so libs, .pc and demos -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 30 22:46:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 18:46:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199020] Review Request: conexusmm (Gtkmm widgets for the conexus network and serial I/O library) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607302246.k6UMkckS003636@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conexusmm (Gtkmm widgets for the conexus network and serial I/O library) Alias: conexusmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199020 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2006-07-30 18:37 EST ------- Let's try the SRPM again: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/fedora/5/srpms/conexusmm-0.2.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 30 22:49:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 18:49:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183439] Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607302249.k6UMn1S4003749@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) Alias: papyrus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183439 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2006-07-30 18:39 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/papyrus.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/fedora/5/srpms/papyrus-0.2.1-2.src.rpm * Sat Jul 29 2006 Rick L Vinyard Jr - 0.2.1-2 - Changed make to %%{__make} - Changed %%{name} to autoconf subst that puts specific name in devel requires - Added comment regarding why cp occurs for docs - Removed doxygen, graphviz and pkgconfig from devel requires - Added package name to globs in so libs, .pc and demos -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 30 22:51:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 18:51:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200664] Review Request: soundtouch - Audio Processing library for changing Tempo, Pitch and Playback In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607302251.k6UMpbns003918@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: soundtouch - Audio Processing library for changing Tempo, Pitch and Playback https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200664 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-30 18:42 EST ------- Unable to build in mock (x86) - see attachment Builds fine outside of mock and rpmlint is clean (other no documentation warning for the -devel package) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 30 22:51:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 18:51:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183322] Review Request: conexus (network and serial I/O library with Gtkmm widgets) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607302251.k6UMph9d003939@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conexus (network and serial I/O library with Gtkmm widgets) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183322 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2006-07-30 18:42 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/conexus.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/fedora/5/srpms/conexus-0.2.1-2.src.rpm * Sun Jul 30 2006 Rick L Vinyard Jr - 0.2.1-2 - Added cppunit-devel to BuildRequires - Changed make to %%{__make} - Changed %%{name} to autoconf subst that puts specific name in devel requires - Added comment regarding why cp occurs for docs - Added package name to globs in so libs, .pc and demos -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 30 22:56:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 18:56:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200664] Review Request: soundtouch - Audio Processing library for changing Tempo, Pitch and Playback In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607302256.k6UMuG7J004185@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: soundtouch - Audio Processing library for changing Tempo, Pitch and Playback https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200664 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-30 18:47 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=133296) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=133296&action=view) Build log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 30 23:57:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 19:57:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193240] Review Request: XaraLX - Vector/general purpose graphics utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607302357.k6UNvMvK006198@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: XaraLX - Vector/general purpose graphics utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193240 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-30 19:48 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/XaraLX.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/XaraLX-0.7-1.r1614.src.rpm - bump to newer tarball - Removed the examples from the main package - Created examples subpackage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 00:05:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 20:05:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199797] Review Request: auriferous - Game inspired by the classic Loderunner In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607310005.k6V05iBj006475@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: auriferous - Game inspired by the classic Loderunner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199797 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |wart at kobold.org OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 00:29:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 20:29:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199797] Review Request: auriferous - Game inspired by the classic Loderunner In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607310029.k6V0Tmc4006984@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: auriferous - Game inspired by the classic Loderunner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199797 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-07-30 20:20 EST ------- GOOD ==== * rpmlint output clean * package and spec file named appropriately * spec file legible and in Am. English * GPL license ok, license file included * Compiles in mock on FC5-i386, FC5-x86_64, * No extra BR: * Source matches upstream: 660447c44af5cee7543de57cc9dcafc6 auriferous-1.0.1.tar.bz2 * No locales * No shared libaries * Not relocatable * RPM_BUILD_ROOT cleaned where necessary * macro usage consistent * Contains code and permissible content (game data) * No need for -doc subpackage * No need for -devel subpackage * .desktop file installed correctly * Does not own directories that it should not. * Runs on FC5-i386 MUSTFIX ======= * Missing BR: libpng-devel, or is this supposed to be pulled in automatically by ClanLib06-devel? SHOULD ====== * Too many smileys in the %description. * Consider moving %{_datadir}/auriferous to a -data subpackage NOTES ===== * The display size is slightly larger than my 800x600 setup, making it somewhat awkward. I didn't see any in-game options to change the display size, is that possible? * What's the difference between playerr.png in the tarball and your modified playerr.png? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 01:01:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 21:01:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193161] Review Request: ruby-postgres In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607310101.k6V11HMM008577@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-postgres https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193161 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-30 20:51 EST ------- I note you use a buildroot of %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-root instead of the usual %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n). This isn't a blocker and in fact is under some discussion but I did want to bring attention to it in case it was unintentional. I note that you export CFLAGS, but the generated makefile doesn't seem to make use of it and the compiler is called with a different set of flags that, as a side effect, lead to a busted debuginfo package. Nothing this package depends on seems to own /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/x86_64-linux/ (or whatever that is for each arch). Other owners are ruby-sqlite4 and kdebindings. I think this package needs to own it as well. (Or that the base ruby package should, which is I suppose is a matter for another bugzilla ticket.) * source files match upstream: 8ef67b3f4b089248f0420baeb0e3b3c8 ruby-postgres-0.7.1.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. ? build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * BuildRequires are proper. X compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). X debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: postgres.so()(64bit) ruby(postgres) = 0.7.1 ruby-postgres = 0.7.1-3.fc6 = libpq.so.4()(64bit) libruby.so.1.8()(64bit) ruby >= 1.3 ruby(abi) = 1.8 * %check is not present; no callable test suite upstream. * shared libraries are present, but internal to ruby. * package is not relocatable. X owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 01:23:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 21:23:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197353] Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607310123.k6V1NA93009404@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197353 ------- Additional Comments From alain.portal at free.fr 2006-07-30 21:13 EST ------- Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/man-pages-fr.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/man-pages-fr-2.30.0-1.src.rpm %changelog * Mon Jul 31 2006 Alain Portal 2.30.0-1 - Update to 2.30.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 02:43:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 22:43:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200492] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Sexy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607310243.k6V2hOWF012968@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Sexy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200492 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 03:28:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 23:28:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200310] Review Request: pyicqt - ICQ transport for Jabber servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607310328.k6V3SYwa014516@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyicqt - ICQ transport for Jabber servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200310 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us 2006-07-30 23:19 EST ------- Spec: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/5/SRPMS/pyicq-t-0.7-2.fc5.spec SRPM: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/5/SRPMS/pyicq-t-0.7-2.fc5.src.rpm %changelog * Sun Jul 30 2006 Jeffrey C. Ollie - 0.7-2 - Rename to pyicq-t - Change Group tag -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 04:18:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 00:18:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200700] New: Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200700 Summary: Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/clipsmm.spec SRPM URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/fedora/5/srpms/clipsmm-0.0.4 2.src.rpm Description: clipsmm is a C++ interface to the CLIPS library. The API is already fairly stable and an almost complete wrapper for CLIPS rule-based constructs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 04:21:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 00:21:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200700] Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607310421.k6V4L3f3016797@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200700 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2006-07-31 00:11 EST ------- SRPM URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/fedora/5/srpms/clipsmm-0.0.4-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 04:21:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 00:21:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200700] Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607310421.k6V4Lcic016822@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library Alias: clipsmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200700 rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |clipsmm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 04:46:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 00:46:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199254] Review Request: perl-perlmenu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607310446.k6V4kGAt017562@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-perlmenu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199254 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-31 00:37 EST ------- I need review of this package so that in case if something is remaining in this package i can correct/add it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 04:48:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 00:48:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200700] Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607310448.k6V4mP35017603@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library Alias: clipsmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200700 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-31 00:39 EST ------- NEEDSWORK: - Bogus BR. "BR: clips-devel" is required instead of "BR: clips-libs", otherwise the pkgconfig fails. - Building trips over a severe bug in clips: ... g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../. -I/usr/include/clips -I/usr/include/sigc++-2.0 -I/usr/lib/sigc++-2.0/include -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -MT factory.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/factory.Tpo -c factory.cpp -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/factory.o In file included from ../clipsmm/object.h:25, from ../clipsmm/environmentobject.h:23, from template.h:25, from template.cpp:24: ../clipsmm/config.h:35:1: warning: "PACKAGE" redefined In file included from /usr/include/clips/usrsetup.h:31, from /usr/include/clips/setup.h:446, from /usr/include/clips/clips.h:31, from template.cpp:21: /usr/include/clips/config.h:38:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition This is a critical bug in clips. It bogusly exports an autoheader generated file, which conflicts with clipsmm's config.h. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 05:05:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 01:05:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195420] Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607310505.k6V55Rlf018032@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195420 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-31 00:56 EST ------- This package ships an autoheader generated header (/usr/include/clips/config.h). This is an abuse of the autotools and will render this package unusable for any package using autoconf-based configurations. IMO, this package should not have been approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 05:28:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 01:28:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199254] Review Request: perl-perlmenu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607310528.k6V5Sh6P018827@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-perlmenu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199254 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-31 01:19 EST ------- Some comments: - IMO, menuutil.pl should not be installed to %{perl_vendorlib} It's not a perl module, it's not being used by perlmenu.pm, so I don't see much reason to install it. The examples use it as 'require "./menuutil.pl";' so might make some sense to install it to .../examples. - create_menu.pl doesn't use VENDORDIR nor OPTIMIZE. Passing them to create_menu.pl is meaningless. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 05:36:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 01:36:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200665] Review Request: ltris In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607310536.k6V5acMo019060@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltris https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200665 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wart at kobold.org ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-07-31 01:27 EST ------- Requires: SDL_mixer can be dropped. The package already requires libSDL_mixer-1.2.so.0()(64bit), which is provided by SDL_mixer. ltris.png is a 48x48 color icon. Why not put it in the $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/ directory? I've seem packages use both, and I'm not sure which is the preferred location for desktop icons. You define _localstatedir, but never use it. Drop the %define. World writable scoreboard files are bad. I would suggest either of the following: 1) Make the game setgid 'games' and make the scoreboard file 'games' group writable. Be sure to audit and modify the code to make sure that it's setgid safe. 2) Move the scoreboard file to $HOME so that it's private for each user. This removes the need to use a setgid binary, but also disables having a shared scoreboard file. Package creates but doesn't own '/var/games/%{name}'. Since there's only one file in this directory, it's acceptable (but not required) to put the scoreboard file directly in /var/games without the %{name} subdirectory. I'll update the Games packaging guidelines to reflect this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 05:42:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 01:42:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199254] Review Request: perl-perlmenu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607310542.k6V5gqWV019501@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-perlmenu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199254 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-31 01:33 EST ------- ok will change the menuutil.pm installation path to examples directory and remove VENDORDIR and OPTIMIZE parameteres to create_menu.pl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 05:43:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 01:43:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189315] Review Request: ardour In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607310543.k6V5h07Z019525@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ardour https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189315 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-07-31 01:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > Alright, lets see if we can get this in before FC4 goes into maintenance mode. I fixed everything you pointed out. Updated bits here: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/ardour.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/ardour-0.99.3-3.src.rpm Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 05:47:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 01:47:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200665] Review Request: ltris In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607310547.k6V5lrT4019832@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltris https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200665 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-31 01:38 EST ------- _localstatedir defines where the scoreboard gets put. I will see how much work is need to make the scoreboard private to each user. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 05:51:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 01:51:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199254] Review Request: perl-perlmenu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607310551.k6V5ph7n020026@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-perlmenu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199254 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-31 01:42 EST ------- I updated package and new package have following links Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/perl-perlmenu/perl-perlmenu.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/perl-perlmenu/perl-perlmenu-4.0-3.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 06:07:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 02:07:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200664] Review Request: soundtouch - Audio Processing library for changing Tempo, Pitch and Playback In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607310607.k6V67l91020697@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: soundtouch - Audio Processing library for changing Tempo, Pitch and Playback https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200664 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-31 01:58 EST ------- Hmm, nasty it turns out that soundtouch uses symlinks to instead of copies of some needed automake files. I've fixed this by adding a BR: automake New version here: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/soundtouch.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/soundtouch-1.3.1-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 06:10:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 02:10:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200665] Review Request: ltris In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607310610.k6V6Ak8P020783@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltris https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200665 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-07-31 02:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > _localstatedir defines where the scoreboard gets put. I see. Instead of redefining _localstatedir, it would be better just to add --localstatedir /var/games/%{name} at the end of %configure, instead of redefining a standard rpm variable which might have unforseen side effects (though it doesn't seem to in this case). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 06:41:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 02:41:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199797] Review Request: auriferous - Game inspired by the classic Loderunner In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607310641.k6V6fgO8021756@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: auriferous - Game inspired by the classic Loderunner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199797 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-31 02:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > MUSTFIX > ======= > * Missing BR: libpng-devel, or is this supposed to be pulled in > automatically by ClanLib06-devel? > Yes that is a missing Requires in ClanLib06-devel, I've fixed this and the new ClanLib06 is building on the buildsys as I type. Sigh, I manually checked all the ClanLib06 headers for things like this, but appereantly I've read over the #include . > SHOULD > ====== > * Too many smileys in the %description. You're right I've copy and pasted that from the homepage. I've removed the smileys. > * Consider moving %{_datadir}/auriferous to a -data subpackage Unless upstream has the data in a seperate package too that is a useless exercise, since any bugfixes to the engine part will require a rebuild of the SRPM and thus will result in a new data subpackage packages too, so a user doing a yum update will still download all the unchanged data files along with the bugfixed engine. I wouldn't mind a solution for this, but as is creating a data subpackage and then Requiring it from the main package has no advantages. > > NOTES > ===== > * The display size is slightly larger than my 800x600 setup, making it > somewhat awkward. I didn't see any in-game options to change the display > size, is that possible? I've taken a look and everything is hardcoded to 1024x768 using pixel coordinates, so I'm afraid I cannot (with reasonable effort) fix this. > * What's the difference between playerr.png in the tarball and your > modified playerr.png? My version adds one additional column of transparant pixels to the right (gimp), upstream it is one column to small causing memory curruption (clanlib really should complain, but instead it accesses random memory). It took me quite a bit of time to hunt this down. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 06:45:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 02:45:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200700] Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607310645.k6V6juYc022034@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library Alias: clipsmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200700 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-31 02:36 EST ------- == Not an official review as I'm not yet sponsored == Mock build for rawhide i386 is failed with No package 'clips-6' found is clips-6 is in extras? I found only clips package but not clips-6 in extras * MUST Items: - dist tag is present. - The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - The spec file name matching the base package clipsmm, in the format clipsmm.spec. - This package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - The spec file for the package is legible. - The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license GPL. - This package includes License file COPYING. - This source package includes the text of the license in its own file,and that file, containing the text of the license for the package is included in %doc. - The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. md5sum is correct (275cc041b5c0a28903ccace1d896fc33 clipsmm-0.0.4.tar.bz2) - This package did not containd any ExcludeArch. - This package have a correct %clean section. - This package used macros. - Document files are included. - Package did NOT contained any .la libtool archives. Also, * Source URL is present and working. * BuildRoot is correct BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) * I did not test package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 06:59:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 02:59:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199797] Review Request: auriferous - Game inspired by the classic Loderunner In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607310659.k6V6xJgr022708@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: auriferous - Game inspired by the classic Loderunner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199797 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-07-31 02:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > * Consider moving %{_datadir}/auriferous to a -data subpackage > Unless upstream has the data in a seperate package too that is a useless > exercise, since any bugfixes to the engine part will require a rebuild of the > SRPM and thus will result in a new data subpackage packages too, so a user doing > a yum update will still download all the unchanged data files along with the > bugfixed engine. I wouldn't mind a solution for this, but as is creating a data > subpackage and then Requiring it from the main package has no advantages. You could package them with two different spec files that share the same tarball. In theory this should work, but I haven't tried it out myself yet. In any case, this isn't a blocker. > > NOTES > > ===== > > * The display size is slightly larger than my 800x600 setup, making it > > somewhat awkward. I didn't see any in-game options to change the display > > size, is that possible? > I've taken a look and everything is hardcoded to 1024x768 using pixel > coordinates, so I'm afraid I cannot (with reasonable effort) fix this. It might be good to document this somewhere, either in %description, %doc, or with an in-game warning. > > * What's the difference between playerr.png in the tarball and your > > modified playerr.png? > My version adds one additional column of transparant pixels to the right (gimp), > upstream it is one column to small causing memory curruption (clanlib really > should complain, but instead it accesses random memory). It took me quite a bit > of time to hunt this down. Ouch. Perhaps you could add a short comment above Source1: in the spec about this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 07:14:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 03:14:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199797] Review Request: auriferous - Game inspired by the classic Loderunner In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607310714.k6V7EOKX023589@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: auriferous - Game inspired by the classic Loderunner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199797 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-31 03:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > (In reply to comment #2) > > > * Consider moving %{_datadir}/auriferous to a -data subpackage > > Unless upstream has the data in a seperate package too that is a useless > > exercise, since any bugfixes to the engine part will require a rebuild of the > > SRPM and thus will result in a new data subpackage packages too, so a user doing > > a yum update will still download all the unchanged data files along with the > > bugfixed engine. I wouldn't mind a solution for this, but as is creating a data > > subpackage and then Requiring it from the main package has no advantages. > > You could package them with two different spec files that share the same > tarball. In theory this should work, but I haven't tried it out myself yet. In > any case, this isn't a blocker. > Some time ago I've discussed this on f-e-l. The advice then was to create 2 different tarbal's from the upstream one myself, I concider this to much of a long term maintainance burden. Your approach was rejected because it would make the diskspace requirements for SRPMs for the involved packages double. So lets just leave things as they are (this is not the only package affected by this). > > > NOTES > > > ===== > > > * The display size is slightly larger than my 800x600 setup, making it > > > somewhat awkward. I didn't see any in-game options to change the display > > > size, is that possible? > > I've taken a look and everything is hardcoded to 1024x768 using pixel > > coordinates, so I'm afraid I cannot (with reasonable effort) fix this. > > It might be good to document this somewhere, either in %description, %doc, or > with an in-game warning. > Good idea, I've added a note to the description. > > > * What's the difference between playerr.png in the tarball and your > > > modified playerr.png? > > My version adds one additional column of transparant pixels to the right (gimp), > > upstream it is one column to small causing memory curruption (clanlib really > > should complain, but instead it accesses random memory). It took me quite a bit > > of time to hunt this down. > > Ouch. Perhaps you could add a short comment above Source1: in the spec about this. Another good idea, I've added a comment about this. New version here: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/auriferous.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/auriferous-1.0.1-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 08:31:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 04:31:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200374] Review Request: qstat - Real-time Game Server Status for Quake servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607310831.k6V8VmZK029611@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qstat - Real-time Game Server Status for Quake servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200374 ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2006-07-31 04:22 EST ------- Updated package here: ftp://andriy.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/qstat-2.10-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 11:20:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 07:20:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199784] Review Request: psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL database adapter for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311120.k6VBKEj3009269@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL database adapter for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199784 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-07-31 07:11 EST ------- Hi, (In reply to comment #11) > Blockers: > * Source must have a full URL. Fixed. > * Package is licensed as GPL but should be GPL with exceptions (to allow > OpenSSL and libpq [postgreSQL] linkage). I've changed it to LGPL. Is that ok? > * Why are you only installing the _psycopg.so file instead of the whole > distribution? My bad. Just a copy-paste error. I've highly modified spec file for this. > * The source package includes a Zope database adapter. Why not include it as > a subpackage? http://www.initd.org/tracker/psycopg/wiki/PsycopgTwoInstall This tells a little about the installation of Zope adapter; however I don't know where the "my_zope_instance" directory is > * Package does not build on x86_64. The %install hardcodes the directory: > lib.linux-i686-%{pyver} > Why not use setup.py install? Fixed per modifying the spec, as I wrote above. > Cosmetic: > * Since you already used "python" to extract the %{pyver} macro, there's no > need to use %{pyver} in this line: > python%{pyver} setup.py build Ok, done. > Good: > Not yet checked: > * rpmlint I checked now, and it is clean. > * Packaging Guidelines > * Buildrequires I've removed mx and python-setuptools. mx is not needed in psycopg2. > * Requires I've removed mx from here, too. > * doc subpackage > * Directory ownership. I'll submit a new spec and srpm shortly. Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 11:22:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 07:22:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199183] Review Request: e2tools - Manipulate files in unmounted ext2/ext3 filesystems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311122.k6VBMU4X009461@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: e2tools - Manipulate files in unmounted ext2/ext3 filesystems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199183 ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2006-07-31 07:13 EST ------- Okay, new upload at http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/e2tools/e2tools.spec fixing the x86_64 build issue and incorporating Uli's fixes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 11:25:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 07:25:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199784] Review Request: psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL database adapter for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311125.k6VBPbhT009689@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL database adapter for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199784 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-07-31 07:16 EST ------- Today psycopg2 2.0.3 was released, and here is a new spec and srpm with including new release and the fixes mentioned above: SPEC: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/psycopg2/python-psycopg2.spec SRPM: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/psycopg2/python-psycopg2-2.0.3-1.src.rpm Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 11:28:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 07:28:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200722] New: Review Request: GraphicsMagick Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200722 Summary: Review Request: GraphicsMagick Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: andreas at bawue.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/GraphicsMagick/GraphicsMagick.spec SRPM URL: http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/GraphicsMagick/GraphicsMagick-1.1.7-1.src.rpm Description: GraphicsMagick is a comprehensive image processing package which is initially based on ImageMagick 5.5.2, but which has undergone significant re-work by the GraphicsMagick Group to significantly improve the quality and performance of the software. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 11:34:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 07:34:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192052] Review Request: bitgtkmm (Gtkmm widgets for the bit library) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311134.k6VBYdBu010210@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitgtkmm (Gtkmm widgets for the bit library) Alias: bitgtkmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192052 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-31 07:25 EST ------- The -devel package includes a .pc file, which is useless without pkgconfig, ergo the -devel package should Require: pkgconfig See also: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/IRCLog20060706 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 11:36:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 07:36:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199679] Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311136.k6VBa5vG010273@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199679 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-07-31 07:26 EST ------- Sorry for the late response. I've removed --bindir part. Thanks. I am also not sure about your second review. Is there anything strict in the guidelines? Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 11:44:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 07:44:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183439] Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311144.k6VBiHjV010806@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) Alias: papyrus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183439 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-07-31 07:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > Unfortunately it succeeds on x86_64... > > $ mock papyrus-0.2.1-2.src.rpm > init > clean > prep > This may take a while > setup > build > ending > done > Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/mock/fedora-5-x86_64-core/result > $ > > Perhaps we can get someone else with an x86 to confirm. It looks like the > problem is a cairo/cairomm disconnect. I can reproduce this, and I think your diagnsis may be correct. (In reply to comment #18) > Spec Name or Url: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/papyrus.spec > > SRPM Name or Url: > http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/fedora/5/srpms/papyrus-0.2.1-2.src.rpm > > * Sat Jul 29 2006 Rick L Vinyard Jr - 0.2.1-2 > - Changed make to %%{__make} > - Changed %%{name} to autoconf subst that puts specific name in devel requires > - Added comment regarding why cp occurs for docs > - Removed doxygen, graphviz and pkgconfig from devel requires > - Added package name to globs in so libs, .pc and demos Removing pkgconfig as a dependency of the devel package is wrong; it includes a .pc file and should therefore require pkgconfig. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 11:53:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 07:53:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183439] Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311153.k6VBr356011212@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) Alias: papyrus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183439 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-31 07:43 EST ------- It certainly does look like an x86 problem. I've getting the same results on my laptop as I do at home. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 11:54:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 07:54:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200722] Review Request: GraphicsMagick In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311154.k6VBsp2u011264@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GraphicsMagick https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200722 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-31 07:45 EST ------- Offhand, 1. it appears %{_includedir}/GraphicsMagick dir is unowned. 2. in c++-devel subpkg: Requires: %{name}-c++ = %{version} Requires: %{name}-devel = %{version} should be: Requires: %{name}-c++ = %{version}-%{release} Requires: %{name}-devel = %{version}-%{release} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 12:54:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 08:54:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311254.k6VCsEHG014992@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 chabotc at xs4all.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chabotc at xs4all.nl ------- Additional Comments From chabotc at xs4all.nl 2006-07-31 08:45 EST ------- Some initial investigation into slab intergration: The control center is still an old gnome 2.12.3 call, and got changed in 2.14, this patch (to slab) should solve this problem: --- control-center/src/control-center.c +++ control-center/src/control-center.c @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ } AppShellData *app_data = - appshelldata_new ("preferences.menu", NULL, + appshelldata_new ("settings.menu", NULL, CONTROL_CENTER_PREFIX, GTK_ICON_SIZE_DIALOG); generate_categories (app_data); Second problem is the non working updater, enough discussion already in this thread about this, so no need to cover that again, short is that it has to be changed to use pup :-) Next 'big' problem is the recently used applications, there's 2 ways of dealing with this that i can think of. The ubuntu way: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Slab?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=places.patch It replaces the recently used applications functionality with 'places' functionality .. not a horrible way to go, but not as fancy as true 'recently used apps' though :-) The second option, which i think is the argually 'better way' is to intergrate the developed patches for the gnome panel and gnome desktop into fedora's .. and have an actual working 'recent applications' :-) Patches can be viewed here: http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/slab/patch/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 13:00:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 09:00:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311300.k6VD0erH015448@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-31 08:51 EST ------- The major problem i am facing is not updater but i wonder how can using that main-menu-rug.desktop icon which is given task to execute updater will display main-menu window as given in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Slab ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 13:25:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 09:25:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191200] Review Request: lvm2-cluster In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311325.k6VDPDMw016740@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lvm2-cluster https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191200 mbroz at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(jkeating at redhat.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From mbroz at redhat.com 2006-07-31 09:15 EST ------- spec file changed according requests and commited to internal CVS http://cvs.devel.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/rpms/lvm2-cluster/devel/lvm2-cluster.spec Please continue with review, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 13:55:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 09:55:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191200] Review Request: lvm2-cluster In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311355.k6VDtdZt019554@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lvm2-cluster https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191200 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEEDINFO_REPORTER Flag|needinfo?(jkeating at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-31 09:46 EST ------- There are still some rpmlint issues: E: lvm2-cluster non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/liblvm2clusterlock.so.2.02 0555 E: lvm2-cluster non-standard-executable-perm /usr/sbin/clvmd 0555 These are suposed to be 0755 E: lvm2-cluster shlib-with-non-pic-code /usr/lib64/liblvm2clusterlock.so.2.02 shlib-with-non-pic-code : The listed shared libraries contain object code that was compiled without -fPIC. All object code in shared libraries should be recompiled separately from the static libraries with the -fPIC option. Another common mistake that causes this problem is linking with ``gcc -Wl,-shared'' instead of ``gcc -shared''. W: lvm2-cluster macro-in-%changelog _libdir This warning is because some macros could cause problems as rpm will expand them no matter where they are. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 14:16:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 10:16:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200722] Review Request: GraphicsMagick In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311416.k6VEGm9x021275@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GraphicsMagick https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200722 ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2006-07-31 10:07 EST ------- thx, changes are incorporated at the original location -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 14:17:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 10:17:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311417.k6VEHeIV021356@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From chabotc at xs4all.nl 2006-07-31 10:08 EST ------- I've done some work creating some patches inspired by, or straightly ported from Ubuntu's work on slab, i've put the result of the work so far (definatly not completed yet) here: http://develop.intermax.nl/slab/slab.spec http://develop.intermax.nl/slab/slab-1.0-5.20060721cvs.src.rpm Patch list is growing nicely, but its not complete yet, still missing some icons, and not all buttons are perfect yet.. to be continued tomorrow i think (depending on how my full time job will demand my time :-)) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 14:20:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 10:20:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200722] Review Request: GraphicsMagick In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311420.k6VEKWK5021627@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GraphicsMagick https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200722 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-31 10:11 EST ------- FYI, whenever you make a change to the package, you ought to increment the Release tag and add a changelog entry accordingly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 14:21:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 10:21:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186919] Review Request: eric: Python IDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311421.k6VELJOb021688@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eric: Python IDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186919 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-31 10:12 EST ------- OK, problems went away after ppc buildhosts were upgraded fc3->fc5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 14:25:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 10:25:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200722] Review Request: GraphicsMagick In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311425.k6VEPItM022097@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GraphicsMagick https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200722 ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2006-07-31 10:16 EST ------- Ahhhhrgl. I thought we went over that topic often enough? Wasn't the consensus that bumping release numbers and changelogs during review is purely optional? It really doesn't serve as far as I can see, as the bugzilla entry contains more information then the changelog ever will. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 14:30:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 10:30:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200722] Review Request: GraphicsMagick In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311430.k6VEUiAD022442@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GraphicsMagick https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200722 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-07-31 10:21 EST ------- I don't know who you're referring to as "we", but IMO, the same rules that apply toward Fedora (Core/Extras) releases should be applied during reviews too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 15:12:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 11:12:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200760] New: Review Request: dogtail Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200760 Summary: Review Request: dogtail Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: ezannoni at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/zcerza/dogtail/ This is a request to move Dogtail from Extras to Core. The review for inclusion into Extras was done here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182306 Reason: Dogtail is needed by the frysk testsuite, and it run in headless mode at Frysk buildtime. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 15:16:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 11:16:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200760] Review Request: dogtail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311516.k6VFGNTP027789@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dogtail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200760 ezannoni at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |198806 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 15:20:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 11:20:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200760] Review Request: dogtail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311520.k6VFK229028089@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dogtail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200760 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |jkeating at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188267 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-31 11:10 EST ------- Er, can I get a direct link to the spec and to a srpm build from said spec? That'll speed up the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 15:22:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 11:22:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191005] Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311522.k6VFM88x028311@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191005 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bdpepple at ameritech.net |bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163776 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-07-31 11:12 EST ------- Switching back to FE-NEW, so that when Nikolai uploads his new package it can be reviewed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 15:23:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 11:23:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200760] Review Request: dogtail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311523.k6VFNPuC028450@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dogtail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200760 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-31 11:14 EST ------- This will require pyspi to be in Core as well. Please open up a review to move this from Extras to Core and have it block this bug. We'll focus on pyspi first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 15:36:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 11:36:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197137] Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311536.k6VFaQ1f029668@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197137 ------- Additional Comments From kupcevic at redhat.com 2006-07-31 11:27 EST ------- 'dbus_connection_disconnect' has been renamed to 'dbus_connection_close' in the latest update of dbus packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 15:56:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 11:56:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200772] New: Review Request: pyspi: Move from Extras to Core Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200772 Summary: Review Request: pyspi: Move from Extras to Core Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: ezannoni at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/zcerza/dogtail/releases/FE/pyspi-0.5.4-2.src.rpm Description: Or: http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/development/SRPMS/ pyspi-0.5.4-3.fc6.src.rpm Older spec file is here: http://people.redhat.com/zcerza/dogtail/releases/FE/pyspi.spec Required by Dogtail, as we want to move it to Core as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 15:56:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 11:56:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200772] Review Request: pyspi: Move from Extras to Core In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311556.k6VFuxgd032020@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyspi: Move from Extras to Core https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200772 ezannoni at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |200760 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 15:57:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 11:57:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200760] Review Request: dogtail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311557.k6VFvARb032044@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dogtail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200760 ezannoni at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |200772 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 15:58:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 11:58:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200760] Review Request: dogtail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311558.k6VFweT9032173@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dogtail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200760 ------- Additional Comments From ezannoni at redhat.com 2006-07-31 11:49 EST ------- I can find these: http://people.redhat.com/zcerza/dogtail/releases/ but I wonder if there is anything newer. http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/development/SRPMS/dogtail-0.5.1-4.fc6.src.rpm seems to be the most recent build. Please also see the old review for extras inclusion (bug 182306). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 16:10:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 12:10:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193059] Review Request: ibmasm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311610.k6VGAD98000616@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ibmasm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193059 ------- Additional Comments From konradr at redhat.com 2006-07-31 12:01 EST ------- Paul, I better upgrade rpmlint. Mine shows no problems. I will fix the problems you have and get back to you in a week timeframe with the updated URL that will contain fixes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 16:23:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 12:23:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196529] Review Request: gtkdatabox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311623.k6VGNupr001566@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkdatabox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196529 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO_REPORTER -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 16:34:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 12:34:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200555] Review Request: libsynaptics - Synaptics touchpad driver library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311634.k6VGYmch002210@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsynaptics - Synaptics touchpad driver library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200555 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-07-31 12:25 EST ------- Imported, built on devel, and added to owners.list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 16:35:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 12:35:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200565] Review Request: ksynaptics - KDE configuration for synaptics module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311635.k6VGZ9Sf002243@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksynaptics - KDE configuration for synaptics module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200565 Bug 200565 depends on bug 200555, which changed state. Bug 200555 Summary: Review Request: libsynaptics - Synaptics touchpad driver library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200555 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 16:35:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 12:35:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200565] Review Request: ksynaptics - KDE configuration for synaptics module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311635.k6VGZ588002237@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksynaptics - KDE configuration for synaptics module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200565 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 200565 depends on bug 200555, which changed state. Bug 200555 Summary: Review Request: libsynaptics - Synaptics touchpad driver library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200555 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-07-31 12:25 EST ------- Imported, built on devel, and added to owners.list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 16:42:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 12:42:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199797] Review Request: auriferous - Game inspired by the classic Loderunner In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311642.k6VGgm76002910@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: auriferous - Game inspired by the classic Loderunner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199797 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-07-31 12:33 EST ------- The new ClanLib06 package fixes the libpng-devel requirement. All other changes look good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 16:46:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 12:46:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200374] Review Request: qstat - Real-time Game Server Status for Quake servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311646.k6VGkKiM003245@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qstat - Real-time Game Server Status for Quake servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200374 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-07-31 12:37 EST ------- All MUSTFIX items fixed. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 16:56:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 12:56:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193059] Review Request: ibmasm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311656.k6VGuAlL004069@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ibmasm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193059 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-31 12:47 EST ------- Thanks. While fixing rpmlint, any chance of making it complain if a file doesn't exist (such as typing rpmlint rpmbuild/i386/foo.i386.rpm when it should be rpmbuild/rpms/i386/foo.i386.rpm)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 17:27:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 13:27:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177235] Review Request: sysconftool - Macros for aclocal to install configuration files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311727.k6VHRU4w006452@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sysconftool - Macros for aclocal to install configuration files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177235 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-07-31 13:18 EST ------- FC-4 and FC-5 created and built successfully, closing as NEXTRELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 17:28:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 13:28:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199780] Review Request: dstat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311728.k6VHSCYn006514@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dstat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199780 ------- Additional Comments From scott at perturb.org 2006-07-31 13:19 EST ------- Oh lame... I posted last week and it didn't make it. Spec: http://www.perturb.org/tmp/dstat.spec SRPM: http://www.perturb.org/tmp/dstat-0.6.3-4.src.rpm - Removed some commeted lines in the .spec file that weren't needed - Changed the permissions on the examples/* scripts - Converted the HTML documentation to unix line endings - Removed the erroneous commenting of the %clean section -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 17:46:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 13:46:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199784] Review Request: psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL database adapter for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311746.k6VHkLxj007874@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL database adapter for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199784 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-07-31 13:36 EST ------- Fixed: * Source must have a full URL. * Now using setup.py install to install the whole module. Regressions: * The package is not licensed under the LGPL. The details are in the LICENSE file. The package is GPL with exceptions only for libpq and openssl. * The build is now broken on x86_64 because you've switched from the sitearch macro to the sitelib macro. Since psycopg builds and installs a compiled, shared object, not just python scripts and bytecode, the whole thing will install into the sitearch directory (/usr/lib64/ on x86_64). Reverting to the python_sitearch macro will solve this. Unresolved: * Zope database adapter. The Zope package in Extras creates the Products directory as: /var/lib/zope/Products Does that help? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 18:08:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 14:08:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191005] Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311808.k6VI8CwA009324@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191005 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-31 13:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #25) > Switching back to FE-NEW, so that when Nikolai uploads his new package it can be > reviewed. ?? This has been reviewed and is basicly approved, the only reason I didn't move it to FE-ACCEPT is because I'm not ready to sponsor Nikolai. Nikolai speaking of which you were going to submit a few other packages for review to show your packaging skills, I'm still waiting for those. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 18:17:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 14:17:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191005] Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311817.k6VIHMRA010030@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191005 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-07-31 14:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #26) > (In reply to comment #25) > > Switching back to FE-NEW, so that when Nikolai uploads his new package it can be > > reviewed. > > ?? This has been reviewed and is basicly approved, the only reason I didn't move > it to FE-ACCEPT is because I'm not ready to sponsor Nikolai. > Then maybe you should assign the bug to yourself if you are reviewing it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 18:28:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 14:28:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197740] Review Request: dircproxy - IRC proxy server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311828.k6VIS6Of011157@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dircproxy - IRC proxy server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197740 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-07-31 14:18 EST ------- Anyone want to pick up this review?... Please?... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 18:30:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 14:30:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200772] Review Request: pyspi: Move from Extras to Core In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311830.k6VIUecb011407@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyspi: Move from Extras to Core https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200772 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |jkeating at redhat.com CC| |notting at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188268 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-31 14:21 EST ------- Package looks clean, rpmlint output is all ignorable. Approving. Just need a tech ack from Bill. Who should own this package in Core (and RHEL)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 18:47:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 14:47:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200760] Review Request: dogtail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311847.k6VIl7uj013467@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dogtail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200760 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER OtherBugsDependingO|188267 |188268 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-31 14:37 EST ------- Package looks good, rpmlint only has this to say: E: dogtail non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/dogtail/config.py 0644 E: dogtail non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/dogtail/tree.py 0644 These are due to #! being in these files. Are these files executable on their own, do they actually do anything? If not, remove the sha-bang. If so, than ignore this. W: dogtail macro-in-%changelog post Macros in changelog are usually unsafe as they'll get expanded. Other than that looks good, approving. Bill already gave tech ack, so who gets to own this? (and who will coordinate its removal from Extras) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 18:48:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 14:48:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193059] Review Request: ibmasm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311848.k6VImRJ5013709@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ibmasm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193059 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-07-31 14:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > While fixing rpmlint, any chance of making it complain if a file doesn't > exist (such as typing rpmlint rpmbuild/i386/foo.i386.rpm when it should be > rpmbuild/rpms/i386/foo.i386.rpm)? Not sure why this was requested in this particular bug report, but since I happened to notice it: see bug 198707 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 18:51:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 14:51:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200551] Review Request: cachefilesd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311851.k6VIpQ1j014028@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cachefilesd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200551 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO_REPORTER ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-31 14:42 EST ------- er, the init script thing, just don't mark it as %config in the spec file. Pointing to your people page is fine, or even just www.redhat.com since this is a Red Hat project. I'll await an updates .spec and .srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 19:02:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 15:02:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200760] Review Request: dogtail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311902.k6VJ2Y0q015436@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dogtail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200760 ezannoni at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From ezannoni at redhat.com 2006-07-31 14:53 EST ------- Zack is the owner. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 19:03:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 15:03:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200772] Review Request: pyspi: Move from Extras to Core In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311903.k6VJ3t90015590@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyspi: Move from Extras to Core https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200772 ezannoni at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From ezannoni at redhat.com 2006-07-31 14:54 EST ------- Zack -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 19:13:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 15:13:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199797] Review Request: auriferous - Game inspired by the classic Loderunner In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311913.k6VJD6RD016149@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: auriferous - Game inspired by the classic Loderunner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199797 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-31 15:03 EST ------- Thanks! Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 19:15:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 15:15:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191005] Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311915.k6VJFvgg016347@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191005 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-31 15:06 EST ------- Seems I forgot that yes, thats still no reason to reset it to FE-NEW though, which you could have known if you would have read the comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 19:24:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 15:24:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311924.k6VJOjJU016864@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From chabotc at xs4all.nl 2006-07-31 15:15 EST ------- Worked on it a littlebit more and its getting damned close to being truely 'usable', its even made my own panel perminently now :-) All the buttons work as expected now, recent documents, places, application browser, control-center, help, add&remove programs, etc ... Changes and patches (8 now so far, but not done yet :-)) * Mon Jul 31 2006 Chris Chabot - 1.0-5.20060721cvs - Shortend .desktop install a bit - Fixed (build)requires, gtk1 isn't required - s/recent apps/places patch - Patched menu names (s/install software/add&remove/, s/logout/exit/). - Patched menu logo to distributer's logo. - Patched menu name to "Slab main menu" (temporary to avoid confusion) - Patched control-center.c to use settings.menu instead of preferences.menu - Patched schema to use fedora's apps for actions - Patched application browser context menu to hide unused actions To be honest i wouldn't mind taking over this package, or co-maintaining it with you Parag, i love trying to make Fedora more user friendly, and this seems like a worthwhile endevour to help to work on this, plus i'm starting to feel quite 'familiar' with its inner workings after so much patching :-) Anyhow let me know how you feel about this please, i would hate to step on anyone's toe's, but i'd also love to give my best to make sure slab in fedora becomes a very usable tool :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 19:30:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 15:30:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311930.k6VJUvdl017239@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2006-07-31 15:21 EST ------- You havent submitted the new srpm and spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 19:36:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 15:36:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311936.k6VJa92l017515@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From chabotc at xs4all.nl 2006-07-31 15:26 EST ------- *midair collision* Original post read (awnsering your question :-)) ps spec and src.rpm are available at the same location as before: http://develop.intermax.nl/slab/slab.spec http://develop.intermax.nl/slab/slab-1.0-5.20060721cvs.src.rpm Todo is to hack the application-browser context menu too (so far i've only hacked out the un-usable menu options out of the main menu), fix the computer logo to be the fedora logo and some other minor spit and polish (requires to include all defaut apps, use system-config-network instead of gnome-network-settings, some minor rpmlint errors, and an invalid en_* translation location..) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 19:36:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 15:36:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183439] Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311936.k6VJavrn017611@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) Alias: papyrus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183439 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 19:37:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 15:37:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193059] Review Request: ibmasm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311937.k6VJbkDY017755@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ibmasm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193059 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 19:38:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 15:38:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311938.k6VJcZGD017857@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From chabotc at xs4all.nl 2006-07-31 15:29 EST ------- Also considering changing slab to have 'update software' in the main right colom (calling pup), else end users might never find it.. and pirut doestn't update yet does it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 19:39:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 15:39:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197688] Review Request: inotify-tools - Command line utilities for inotify In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311939.k6VJdhQE017972@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inotify-tools - Command line utilities for inotify https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197688 ------- Additional Comments From gajownik at gmail.com 2006-07-31 15:30 EST ------- Sorry for the delay - I was on a vacation. I chose mirror because there are sometimes problems with connecting to download.sourceforge.net. * Mon Jul 31 2006 Dawid Gajownik - 2.2-3 - Fix URL http://gajownik.zspswidwin.pl/inotify-tools.spec http://gajownik.zspswidwin.pl/inotify-tools-2.2-3.src.rpm Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 19:44:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 15:44:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311944.k6VJiJKu018483@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2006-07-31 15:35 EST ------- Yes, Pup is the software updater and Pirut is the package manager. They use the same source package and share the code base so there is no point is Pirut doing updates too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 19:54:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 15:54:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200664] Review Request: soundtouch - Audio Processing library for changing Tempo, Pitch and Playback In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311954.k6VJs39g019366@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: soundtouch - Audio Processing library for changing Tempo, Pitch and Playback https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200664 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-31 15:44 EST ------- Still not building in mock +sed -i 's|^hardcode_libdir_flag_spec.*|hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=""|g' libtool sed: can't read libtool: No such file or directory -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 19:56:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 15:56:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200664] Review Request: soundtouch - Audio Processing library for changing Tempo, Pitch and Playback In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311956.k6VJuD35019583@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: soundtouch - Audio Processing library for changing Tempo, Pitch and Playback https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200664 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-31 15:47 EST ------- HMM, could you try changing that BR: automake I added to BR: libtool and see if it builds then. I don't mock because of my sucky internet access. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 19:59:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 15:59:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607311959.k6VJxapL019872@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From tjb at unh.edu 2006-07-31 15:50 EST ------- Looking good. How do you choose which hard drive to display? It probably makes sense to display the partition of the users home directory. (It looks like it may be defaulting to the first ext2 partition which is my /boot partition. Or maybe it's defaulting to that because my home dir is nfs mounted?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 20:23:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 16:23:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193240] Review Request: XaraLX - Vector/general purpose graphics utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607312023.k6VKNTJA021636@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: XaraLX - Vector/general purpose graphics utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193240 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-31 16:14 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/XaraLX.spec Patch URL : Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/xaralx.desktop.patch - updated spec - fixed desktop file - removed unused (and empty) directory -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 20:49:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 16:49:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607312049.k6VKnZwF024483@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From chabotc at xs4all.nl 2006-07-31 16:40 EST ------- >From what i understand it -should- show the disk stats for your home dir ... would make sense to from usability perspective .. I'll dig into that if thats indeed the behaviour or no tomorrow (and if not, if we can change it) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 21:23:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 17:23:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200664] Review Request: soundtouch - Audio Processing library for changing Tempo, Pitch and Playback In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607312123.k6VLNuP3028088@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: soundtouch - Audio Processing library for changing Tempo, Pitch and Playback https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200664 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-31 17:14 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=133358) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=133358&action=view) Altered spec file Yep. Altering the BR fixed it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 21:38:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 17:38:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200664] Review Request: soundtouch - Audio Processing library for changing Tempo, Pitch and Playback In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607312138.k6VLctSB029415@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: soundtouch - Audio Processing library for changing Tempo, Pitch and Playback https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200664 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-31 17:29 EST ------- Review Spec file : (based on my modifiction) Good - consistant use of macros, upstream md5 is the same as the tarball, no dupes in the BRs. rpmlint reports clean for all packages (does give no docs in -devel, this can be ignored, not an error). rpm -qa --requires comes up clean (nothing missing) Needs work/Niggle rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_prefix}/doc/%{name} - why is this going to /usr/doc instead of %{_docdir}? Question sed -i 's|\r||' README.html COPYING.TXT - is this to remove the incorrect termination of the files? I tend to use 's/\r//' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 21:40:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 17:40:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191005] Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607312140.k6VLewcQ029607@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191005 ------- Additional Comments From brkamikaze at gmail.com 2006-07-31 17:31 EST ------- Sorry for the delay, I've been busy for a while. By the end of this week I should have uploaded the game. I have one question tough: The game has optional support for a library that isn't on extras or core (libggz) for online gaming, but it still doesn't support online gaming. Should I include the library now, or should I include it only when the game supports online gaming? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 21:44:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 17:44:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607312144.k6VLiEMY029978@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2006-07-31 17:34 EST ------- slab menu doesnt show fedora logo No search functionality in the slab menu (use beagle) Recently used has been replaced with places. We probably need to provide them both as options. Help option doesnt work (use yelp) Application browser context menu doesnt offer to uninstall (call pirut) or upgrade (call pup) the application and help is unavailable in the context menu in all of the application listed in the application browser. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 21:48:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 17:48:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200848] New: Review Request: ngircd - Fast and secure IRC-server written from scratch Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200848 Summary: Review Request: ngircd - Fast and secure IRC-server written from scratch Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: mc at it42.de QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ngircd.barton.de SRPM URL: http://ngircd.barton.de Description: ngIRCd is a free open source daemon for Internet Relay Chat (IRC), developed under the GNU General Public License (GPL). It's written from scratch and is not based upon the original IRCd like many others. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 21:50:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 17:50:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200848] Review Request: ngircd - Fast and secure IRC-server written from scratch In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607312150.k6VLoG75030543@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ngircd - Fast and secure IRC-server written from scratch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200848 mc at it42.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://ngircd.barton.de/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 21:54:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 17:54:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200848] Review Request: ngircd - Fast and secure IRC-server written from scratch In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607312154.k6VLsLjH030816@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ngircd - Fast and secure IRC-server written from scratch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200848 mc at it42.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From mc at it42.de 2006-07-31 17:45 EST ------- This is a feature request, not a review request, as there is no srpm. :-/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 22:03:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 18:03:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192052] Review Request: bitgtkmm (Gtkmm widgets for the bit library) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607312203.k6VM3oTj031558@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitgtkmm (Gtkmm widgets for the bit library) Alias: bitgtkmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192052 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-31 17:54 EST ------- Thanks - rpm -qa --provides though didn't show this. I'll remember this for future spec files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 22:14:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 18:14:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199784] Review Request: psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL database adapter for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607312214.k6VME1ub032033@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL database adapter for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199784 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-07-31 18:04 EST ------- Hi, (In reply to comment #14) > Regressions: > * The package is not licensed under the LGPL. The details are in the > LICENSE file. The package is GPL with exceptions only for libpq and openssl. Done. Please ignore the rpmlint warning about license. > * The build is now broken on x86_64 because you've switched from the sitearch > macro to the sitelib macro. Since psycopg builds and installs a compiled, > shared object, not just python scripts and bytecode, the whole thing will > install into the sitearch directory (/usr/lib64/ on x86_64). Reverting to > the python_sitearch macro will solve this. Ok. Could you please re-check it now? > Unresolved: > * Zope database adapter. The Zope package in Extras creates the Products > directory as: /var/lib/zope/Products Does that help? A lot. It now has a -zope package. I'll post spec and srpm URL as another comment... Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 22:15:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 18:15:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199784] Review Request: psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL database adapter for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607312215.k6VMFfUi032151@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL database adapter for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199784 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-07-31 18:06 EST ------- New spec: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/psycopg2/python-psycopg2.spec New srpm: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/psycopg2/python-psycopg2-2.0.3-2.src.rpm Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 22:22:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 18:22:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200760] Review Request: dogtail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607312222.k6VMMNms032478@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dogtail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200760 ------- Additional Comments From zcerza at redhat.com 2006-07-31 18:12 EST ------- tree.py and config.py don't really need to have the shebang line; I just removed them upstream. I didn't realize putting '%post' in the changelog would be a problem; I'll obscure that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 23:16:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 19:16:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607312316.k6VNG1Jh002255@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From chabotc at xs4all.nl 2006-07-31 19:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #22) > slab menu doesnt show fedora logo WIP > No search functionality in the slab menu (use beagle) Under investigation > Recently used has been replaced with places. We probably need to provide them > both as options. This would require 2 patches to the gnome-{desktop,panel} packages, for which i'm in no position to decide if thats something that fedora (core) wishes to do or not .. i'd prefer that too, but it is a core decision, and not extras.. If you wish to lobby to the core commity / maintainer of panel/desktop to include these patches, please do :-) > Help option doesnt work (use yelp) its already patches to use gnome-yelp.desktop, maybe you don't have it installed? Its not in the requires yet (WIP), will investigate more tomorrow > Application browser context menu doesnt offer to uninstall (call pirut) or > upgrade (call pup) the application Whats the pirut call for removing a package? --help gave me no sugestions, nor is there a man page .. Same with pup .. please advice what command line calls you'd like to see there > and help is unavailable in the context menu > in all of the application listed in the application browser. Still under investigation .. i need sleep and have a full time job to you know :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 23:18:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 19:18:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607312318.k6VNIv2s002311@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From chabotc at xs4all.nl 2006-07-31 19:09 EST ------- suse's patches to gnome panel/desktop can be found in: http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/slab/patch/ btw, as i memtioned before in comment #13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 23:19:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 19:19:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607312319.k6VNJ8dR002337@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From chabotc at xs4all.nl 2006-07-31 19:10 EST ------- suse's patches to gnome panel/desktop can be found in: http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/slab/patch/ btw, as i memtioned before in comment #12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 23:36:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 19:36:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607312336.k6VNalOr002947@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2006-07-31 19:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #23) > > Recently used has been replaced with places. We probably need to provide them > > both as options. > > This would require 2 patches to the gnome-{desktop,panel} packages, for which > i'm in no position to decide if thats something that fedora (core) wishes to do > or not .. i'd prefer that too, but it is a core decision, and not extras.. If > you wish to lobby to the core commity / maintainer of panel/desktop to include > these patches, please do :-) It just requires you to file RFE's against the relevant packages preferably with spec patches and a brief explanation. If its not too intrusive it would probably be accepted. > > > Help option doesnt work (use yelp) > its already patches to use gnome-yelp.desktop, maybe you don't have it > installed? Its not in the requires yet (WIP), will investigate more tomorrow Installing yelp didnt make a difference. > > > Application browser context menu doesnt offer to uninstall (call pirut) or > > upgrade (call pup) the application > > Whats the pirut call for removing a package? --help gave me no sugestions, nor > is there a man page .. Same with pup .. please advice what command line calls > you'd like to see there There is some docs in %docs but not sure whether it is documented or even possible currently. Jeremy Katz katzj at redhat.com, jeremy on fedora-devel irc is the developer and maintainer of both these packages for contact. > > > and help is unavailable in the context menu > > in all of the application listed in the application browser. > > Still under investigation .. i need sleep and have a full time job to you know :-) I am just a volunteer from the Fedora perspective so take your time. Just reviewing the functionality. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 23:51:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 19:51:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199784] Review Request: psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL database adapter for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607312351.k6VNpEA9004167@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL database adapter for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199784 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-07-31 19:42 EST ------- I've modified the spec a bit but did not bump of the version number. I just added a macro for zope adapter. The srpm and spec url is the same. Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 31 23:56:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 19:56:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607312356.k6VNun2h004450@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2006-07-31 19:47 EST ------- The Yelp problem was fixed by removing and adding back the applet after installing yelp. Apparently its not dynamic. You can just provide a BR and fix this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.