[Bug 197740] Review Request: dircproxy - IRC proxy server
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Jul 6 04:12:15 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dircproxy - IRC proxy server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197740
panemade at gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |panemade at gmail.com
------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-06 00:03 EST -------
Not an official review as I'm not yet sponsored
Mock build for development i386 is sucessfull
MUST Items:
- MUST: rpmlint shows no error.
- MUST: dist tag is present.
- MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
- MUST: The spec file name matching the base package dircproxy, in the
format dircproxy.spec.
- MUST: This package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
- MUST: The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license GPL.
- MUST: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. md5sum is correct (bd6abe933f90d80fbc71a00563f9c7de)
- MUST: This package owns all directories that it creates.
- MUST: This package did not contain any duplicate files in the %files
listing.
- MUST: This package have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
- MUST: This package used macros.
- MUST: Document files are included like INSTALL README, RFCs, SPEC, PROTOCOL.
- MUST: Package did NOT contained any .la libtool archives.
* Source URL is present and working.
* BuildRoot is correct BuildRoot:
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
* BuildRequires is correct
* preun and postun installing service correctly.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list