[Bug 192430] Review Request: python-kiwi - Framework for Python GUI applications

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Jul 11 02:19:50 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: python-kiwi - Framework for Python GUI applications


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192430


jpmahowald at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com  2006-07-10 22:11 EST -------
rpmlint of python-kiwi-gazpacho-1.9.8-0.4.fc6.noarch.rpm:
W: python-kiwi-gazpacho no-documentation
Ignore.

rpmlint of python-kiwi-1.9.8-0.4.fc6.noarch.rpm:E: python-kiwi
non-executable-script /etc/kiwi/setup.py 0644
E: python-kiwi non-executable-script
f/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/kiwi/i18n/msgfmt.py 0644
W: python-kiwi doc-file-dependency
/usr/share/doc/python-kiwi-1.9.8/examples/framework/diary/diary.py /usr/bin/env
W: python-kiwi doc-file-dependency
/usr/share/doc/python-kiwi-1.9.8/examples/framework/diary/diary2.py /usr/bin/env
Happens with python. Ignore.

- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- license (LGPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream
- package compiles on devel (x86_64)
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- locales handled
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file 

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list