[Bug 196591] Review Request: bitlbee
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Jul 14 21:48:09 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: bitlbee
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196591
cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu
------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-14 17:39 EST -------
This (longish) message during ./configure worries me:
---------------------------
No detection code exists for OpenSSL. Make sure that you have a complete
install of OpenSSL (including devel/header files) before reporting
compilation problems.
Also, keep in mind that the OpenSSL is, according to some people, not
completely GPL-compatible. Using GnuTLS or NSS is recommended and better
supported by us. However, on many BSD machines, OpenSSL can be considered
part of the operating system, which makes it GPL-compatible.
For more info, see: http://www.openssl.org/support/faq.html#LEGAL2
http://www.gnome.org/~markmc/openssl-and-the-gpl.html
Please note that distributing a BitlBee binary which links to OpenSSL is
probably illegal. If you want to create and distribute a binary BitlBee
package, you really should use GnuTLS or NSS instead.
Also, the OpenSSL license requires us to say this:
* "This product includes software developed by the OpenSSL Project
* for use in the OpenSSL Toolkit. (http://www.openssl.org/)"
---------------------------
The prototypical casual observer in me asks, "Wouldn't it be better to compile
this against gnutls?" If there are compelling reasons to compile against
openssl, I suspect FE-LEGAL should be blocked by this bug as well.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list