[Bug 199168] New: Review Request: CGAL
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Jul 17 17:44:57 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199168
Summary: Review Request: CGAL
Product: Fedora Extras
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info
ReportedBy: laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org
QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
Spec URL: http://www.di.ens.fr/~rineau/Fedora/CGAL-3.2.1-13-fc5.src.rpm
SRPM URL: http://www.di.ens.fr/~rineau/Fedora/CGAL.spec
Description: Computational Geometry Algorithms Library
CGAL is a collaborative effort of several sites in Europe and
Israel. The goal is to make the most important of the solutions and
methods developed in computational geometry available to users in
industry and academia in a C++ library. The goal is to provide easy
access to useful, reliable geometric algorithms.
Homepage: http://www.cgal.org/
Packager notes:
* With CGAL-3.2.1, the tarball has been pruned from documentation files with undecided license, in order to make packaging possible.
* A Debian package has been submitted, and has been accepted http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=251885
* Whereas the Debian packager choose to extract the core++ library and put it in a separate package, I choose to ship libcore++.a in the CGAL package. It could be modified, if needed.
* rpmlint shows several errors or warnings. Some of them come from the meta-package CGAL that requires all sub-packages.
* The -devel sub-package ships several static library. It is because upstream developers do not want to maintain SOMAJOR numbers for them, now, for libcore++.a, and libCGALQt.a
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list