[Bug 198881] Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-IRCD

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-IRCD


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198881





------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de  2006-07-18 23:10 EST -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> Ralf, honestly, please stop hammering on the packagers and get the Perl specfile
> template changed instead. 

Jason, honestly, this issue really p***** me off.

I would prefer you to stop blindly approving such sloppily and carelessly
packaged packages and you undermining what had been perl package packaging
practice almost ever since FE exists.

Almost no other packages but Chris submitted/Jason approved perl packages in FE
contain the OPTIMIZE/find *.bs.


(In reply to comment #5)
> It's a template, not a release-ready spec file.
Exactly. People are supposed to customize it.

(In reply to comment #5)
> But I'm not going to make Chris change all of his specs when:
You better should. To me Chris has sufficently demonstrated his resistance to
learning.

> 1) The extra bits aren't harmful.
As I've repeatedly said, you can not be sure about this.

> 2) They're in the template we tell people to use.
It's a template - not a form, nor is a review a government's agency's
bureaucratic act nor a mechanical act.

> Do I wish Chris would eliminate the unneeded bits?  Yes.
Then you should better teach him to do so. You wouldn't use the OPTIMIZE and the
find in non-perl *.specs? Using them in noarch packages are equally "useful."
 


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.