[Bug 199016] Review Request: mxml - Miniature XML development library

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Jul 19 07:24:05 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mxml - Miniature XML development library


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199016


michael at knox.net.nz changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |michael at knox.net.nz




------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz  2006-07-19 03:15 EST -------
Hi. I will do the review for this. 

Review for release 3:

* RPM name is OK
* Source mxml-2.2.2.tar.gz is the same as upstream
* This is the latest version
* Builds fine in mock
* rpmlint of mxml-devel looks OK
* rpmlint of mxml looks OK
* File list of mxml-devel looks OK
* File list of mxml looks OK
* INSERT RESULT OF RUN TEST

Needs work:
* Spec file: some paths are not replaced with RPM macros
  (wiki: QAChecklist item 7)


Notes:

You need to use %{_datadir} not /usr/share

Fix this up and I can approve this package. 

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list