[Bug 199016] Review Request: mxml - Miniature XML development library
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Jul 19 07:24:05 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: mxml - Miniature XML development library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199016
michael at knox.net.nz changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |michael at knox.net.nz
------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-07-19 03:15 EST -------
Hi. I will do the review for this.
Review for release 3:
* RPM name is OK
* Source mxml-2.2.2.tar.gz is the same as upstream
* This is the latest version
* Builds fine in mock
* rpmlint of mxml-devel looks OK
* rpmlint of mxml looks OK
* File list of mxml-devel looks OK
* File list of mxml looks OK
* INSERT RESULT OF RUN TEST
Needs work:
* Spec file: some paths are not replaced with RPM macros
(wiki: QAChecklist item 7)
Notes:
You need to use %{_datadir} not /usr/share
Fix this up and I can approve this package.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list