[Bug 174021] Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174021





------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2006-07-19 19:48 EST -------
(In reply to comment #21)
> > Jochen, do you think it would be reasonable to back out of this mess by just
> > adding a dependency on xterm?
> 
> No.  With the latest libXt package, there is no problem anymore.  If your
> package contains an app-defaults file, then it must also have software which
> links to libXm, libXaw, or libXt directly, the first two of which are linked
> also to libXt.

This package does not have software which is linked to any of those libraries. 
It drops in an alternate app-default file that xterm can use to set up the
proper APL key bindings, but it doesn't actually use the app-default file
itself.  This is why I suggested the dependency on xterm.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.