[Bug 196945] Review Request: python-smbpasswd - Python SMB Password Hash Generator Module

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: python-smbpasswd - Python SMB Password Hash Generator Module


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196945


mr.ecik at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |mr.ecik at gmail.com
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com  2006-07-23 14:25 EST -------
Ok, I'll review your package.

MUST items:
 * rpmlint message:
E: python-smbpasswd-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/py-
smbpasswd-1.0.1/smbpasswd.c
   - you should change permissions of this file to 644 in %prep section
 * the package is named well
 * spec file is named well
 * License field in package spec file match the actual license (GPL)
 * spec is written in American English and is legible
 * md5sums of source used to build the package and of upstream source are
matching (0eab2c29588e32e77ce6e5d2faea7874)
 * package successfully compile on i386
 * all build dependencies is good listed (mock builds successful)
 * there is no any locales
 * package doesn't contain shared library files
 * there is no duplicate files in %files listing
 * permissions aren't set properly (rpmlint error)
 * package has a good %clean section
 * there is no .la files
 * there is no GUI applications

Thus, everything is good except for bad permissions of smbpasswd.c file.
If you fix it, I'll approve this package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.