[Bug 200051] Review Request: libutempter
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Jul 25 18:16:02 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libutempter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200051
jkeating at redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |jkeating at redhat.com
CC| |notting at redhat.com
OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188268
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-07-25 14:06 EST -------
Spec looks pretty good, here is some rpmlint output:
E: libutempter-debuginfo tag-not-utf8 %changelog
E: libutempter-devel tag-not-utf8 %changelog
Find the offending changelog entry
E: libutempter non-standard-dir-perm /usr/libexec/utempter 0710
E: libutempter non-standard-executable-perm /usr/libexec/utempter/utempter 02711
E: libutempter non-standard-executable-perm /usr/libexec/utempter/utempter 02711
E: libutempter non-standard-gid /usr/libexec/utempter utempter
E: libutempter non-standard-gid /usr/libexec/utempter/utempter utmp
I'm assuming because this has to run as utmpter and this is ignorable.
E: libutempter non-utf8-spec-file libutempter.spec
Because of the changelog
E: libutempter setgid-binary /usr/libexec/utempter/utempter utmp 02711
Again because of utempter, ignore.
E: libutempter tag-not-utf8 %changelog
E: libutempter tag-not-utf8 %changelog
Changelog again.
W: libutempter-devel no-documentation
Ignorable
W: libutempter macro-in-%changelog _libdir
W: libutempter macro-in-%changelog _libdir
W: libutempter macro-in-%changelog _sbindir
These are probably ignorable as well.
Everything else looks OK, so approving.
Bill Ack?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list