[Bug 200152] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-LDAP
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Jul 28 01:17:16 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-LDAP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200152
tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-27 21:08 EST -------
Not much to say here either; builds and installs fine and rpmlint is quiet.
* source files match upstream:
5a52805b889af864622158d761b72f82 POE-Component-Client-LDAP-0.04.tar.gz
* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is correct.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible. License text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper (BR: perl is unnecessary)
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (development, x86_64).
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
perl(POE::Component::Client::LDAP) = 0.04
perl(POE::Filter::ASN1) = 0.01
perl-POE-Component-Client-LDAP = 0.04-1.fc6
=
perl >= 0:5.006
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8)
perl(Carp)
perl(Convert::ASN1)
perl(Net::LDAP::ASN)
perl(Net::LDAP::Constant)
perl(POE)
perl(base)
perl(strict)
perl(warnings)
* %check is present and all tests (test?) pass:
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=1, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.14 cusr + 0.05 csys = 0.19 CPU)
* no shared libraries are present.
* package is not relocatable.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no libtool .la droppings.
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list