Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: scite - Scintilla based text editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193787
tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu
OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841 |163778
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-06-03 20:30 EST -------
I was not aware of your community involvement. I think folks who need sponsors
should be encouraged to tell us these kinds of things. I will be happy to
sponsor you; go ahead and request cvsextras membership.
Note: desktop-file-install logs the following warning:
/var/tmp/scite-1.69-2.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/share/applications/fedora-SciTE.desktop:
warning: non-standard key "MultipleArgs" lacks the "X-" prefix
I believe this should be removed. It seems to be something that was in use some
time ago but no longer.
Review:
* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is correct.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible. License text included in package.
* source files match upstream:
3f84986922ccf9c21a1481ba85153be6 scite169.tgz
3f84986922ccf9c21a1481ba85153be6 scite169.tgz-srpm
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* package builds in mock (development, x86_64).
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
scite = 1.69-2.fc6
-
libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
libcairo.so.2()(64bit)
libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libgmodule-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libgthread-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
* no shared libraries are present.
* package is not relocatable.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* %check is not present; no test suite upstream.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no libtool .la droppings.
X GUI app, with desktop file. But desktop-file-install complains as above.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.