[Bug 189892] Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Jun 4 23:18:05 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189892


seg at haxxed.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|191590                      |
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com  2006-06-04 19:10 EST -------
MUST items:

- rpmlint: Ok

$ rpmlint dssi-examples-0.9.1-6.fc5.i386.rpm
W: dssi-examples no-documentation

Ignorable.

W: dssi-examples dangling-relative-symlink /usr/bin/less_trivial_synth
jack-dssi-host
W: dssi-examples dangling-relative-symlink /usr/bin/trivial_sampler jack-dssi-host
W: dssi-examples dangling-relative-symlink /usr/bin/trivial_synth jack-dssi-host

Intentional. Main package supplies jack-dssi-host.

- Package name: Ok
- Spec name: Ok
- Meets packaging guidelines: Ok
- License: Ok
- Spec in American English: Ok
- Spec legible: Ok
- Sources match upstream: Ok
- Builds: Ok
- BuildRequires: Ok
- Locales: Ok
- ldconfig: Ok
- Relocation: Ok
- Directory ownership: Ok
- %files: Ok
- %clean: Ok
- Macros: Ok
- Code vs. Content: Ok
- Documentation: Ok
- devel package: Ok
- .desktop file: Ok

SHOULD:

- Includes license text: Ok
- Mock build: Ok
- Builds on all archs: Built on i386, x86_64
- Package functional: Tested on i386, x86_64
- Scriptlets: Ok
- Subpackages: Ok

NEEDSWORK:

Source0: needs to be [...]sf.net/sourceforge/dssi/[...] or else I get a 404.
(Did SF rearrange their URLs recently?)

Fix the URL before import, and this is APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list