[Bug 187282] Review Request: sax2
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Jun 5 15:01:58 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: sax2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187282
------- Additional Comments From marcus-schaefer at gmx.net 2006-06-05 10:54 EST -------
- In reply to comment #3. John, thanks for pointing out the mistakes I made
in the spec file. I will take care for the mentioned issues.
- But before I continue I think it is more important to discuss comment #4
Thorsten I can understand your concerns and maybe it makes no sense to have
more than one X11 config tool an a distribution. I started to make sax
working on fedora because there were enough questions :) I thought it would
be a good idea to have that config tool available as an extra package. As
far as I understand this will give people an option to use it. I really
don't want to come into conflict with system-config-display and if I did that
it happens accidently and I'm sorry for that. In this case I have no problems
to stop my efforts immediately.
sax touches only the xorg.conf file and creates a valid file which can be
read in using Xorg's libxf86config. If system-config-display has its own
library I agree this could lead to a problem when it tries to parse the sax
written file. I'm using fedora at the University and I'm using sax
to configure X there. If you want you can give it a try with the packages
I provide on:
ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/sax/head-build/i386/FC5
To see how it works it is the best to run sax2 from runlevel 3
If you think it is not useful, I will stop bothering you guys :)
Thanks
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list