[Bug 193632] Review Request: tkdnd
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Jun 8 15:08:00 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: tkdnd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193632
------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-06-08 11:00 EST -------
Looks good! Only two (nitpicking) minor issues:
MUST
====
* Source matches upstream:
43c91da595aade4978e2e5e820ab0fc9 tkdnd-1.0a2.tar.gz
* rpmlint output clean
* Spec file legible and in Am. English
* No excessive BuildRequires:
* BSD license ok, license file included
* No .desktop file needed
* No -devel subpackage needed
* No need for -docs subpackage
* No duplicate %files
* Permissions look ok
MUSTFIX
=======
* Remove the extra directory in %doc by adding a wildcard:
%doc doc/*
* Move the "rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" to the very first line in %install
SHOULD
======
* You need BuildRequires: xorg-x11-devel if you plan to build on FC4. You
can do this by either forking the spec files in CVS, or adding the following
to the current spec file:
%if "%fedora" <= "4"
BuildRequires: xorg-x11-devel
%else
BuildRequires: libXext-devel
%endif
* An alpha release of version 2.0 is available. Have you considered upgrading,
or is the alpha version not stable enough?
* Notify upstream about the 64-bit build issues and send them the patch.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list