[Bug 193187] Review Request: pcsc-lite & ccid

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pcsc-lite & ccid


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193187





------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi  2006-06-10 02:24 EST -------
> strange-permission warnings

All these come from rpmlinting the source package.  I think this doesn't matter
because the source file perms will change anyway when they get added to CVS and
later pulled from there to create the actual SRPM (assuming the Core build
system works roughly the same way as the Extras one).

> pcsc-lite conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/reader.conf
> pcsc-lite non-conffile-in-etc /etc/reader.conf.d/README

Intentional, see earlier comments in this review.

> pcsc-lite service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/pcscd

Up for debate.  IMHO there's no harm in leaving it enabled by default.

> pcsc-lite incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/pcscd $prog

rpmlint bug.

> pcsc-lite incoherent-init-script-name pcscd

Noise which I'm planning to filter in future rpmlint revisions.

> pcsc-lite-devel no-dependency-on pcsc-lite

rpmlint bug/limitation; this is intended (-devel has a dependency on -libs).

> pcsc-lite-devel no-documentation

This is ok.

> pcsc-lite-libs no-documentation

Right.  Because pcsc-lite-libs can be installed without pcsc-lite, at least
COPYING should be included in -libs too.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.