[Bug 193933] Review Request: freepops - free webmails to pop3 daemon

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: freepops - free webmails to pop3 daemon


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193933





------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl  2006-06-10 15:06 EST -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> Thanks for the feedback.
> I can clean up the specfile further.
> Maybe I am not understanding the concept of being sponsored.
> I assume from comments that "people" want sponsorship so they get access to cvs.
> i.e. the lastest and greatest.
> I could care less about that.

No, everyone (iow the whole world) has read access to the CVS, were talking
about write access to CVS.

> I just wanted to "contibute" them to Fedora
> I am not looking for a third or forth fulltime job with FE project. With
> that in mind, would it be your opinion that submitting these packages to the FE
> project is not the best way to contribute these packages?
> 

We do not have packages _submitted_ we have people becoming a contributer and
_maintaining_ packages, iow respond to bugreports, fix (packaging) bugs, bring
out new version when upstream comes with a new version, etc. This is no where
nere another fulltime job if all you maintain is a handfull of packges.

If you're not willing to commit yourself to truely maintaining any packages you
submit, then this is indeed not the best way to contribute these packages.

In this not committing scenario the best you can do is post a description of
your packages and link to them to the fedora-extras mailinglist with a note that
maybe someone who is already a contributer can pick them up. When you do this
also please close the Review Request with a resolution of wontfix.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.