[Bug 194470] Review Request: php-magickwand

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Jun 11 06:14:33 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: php-magickwand


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194470


j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl  2006-06-11 02:06 EST -------
MUST:
=====
* rpmlint output is:
E: php-magickwand binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib64/php/modules/magickwand.so ['/usr/lib64']
W: php-magickwand non-conffile-in-etc /etc/php.d/magickwand.ini
W: php-magickwand wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/php-magickwand-0.1.8/README
All 3 these messages must be fixed.
* Package and spec file named appropriately
* Packaged according to packaging guidelines
* License ok, license file included
* spec file is legible and in Am. English.
* Source matches upstream
* Compiles and builds on devel-x86_64
* BR: ok
* No locales
* No shared libraries (its a plugin)
* Not relocatable
* Package owns / or requires all dirs
* No duplicate files & Permissions ok
* %clean & macro usage OK
* Contains code only
* %doc does not affect runtime, and isn't large enough to warrent a sub package
* no -devel package needed, no libs / .la files.
* no gui -> no .desktop file required

MUST fix:
=========
* all 3 rpmlint complaints let me know if you need help with any of them


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list