[Bug 194594] Review Request: wireshark

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: wireshark


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194594





------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com  2006-06-12 11:18 EST -------
Question:
- In Summary, why are we listing "Red Hat Desktop" integration?  Surely we
aren't talking about the Desktop product we sell?  Is this not GENERIC gnome
frontend?  Why can't we just say 'Gnome integration' ?  Think of the trademark
problems.

Needswork:
- Missing BuildRequires on desktop-file-utils, automake, libtool

rpmlint output:
E: wireshark invalid-version 0.99.1pre1
W: wireshark incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.99.1pre1-1 0.99.1pre1-1.2
W: wireshark conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/pam.d/wireshark
W: wireshark conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/security/console.apps/wireshark
E: wireshark zero-length /usr/sbin/idl2wrs
E: wireshark script-without-shellbang /usr/sbin/idl2wrs
W: wireshark devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libwiretap.so
W: wireshark devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libwireshark.so
W: wireshark symlink-should-be-relative /usr/sbin/tethereal /usr/sbin/tshark
W: wireshark doc-file-dependency
/usr/share/doc/wireshark-0.99.1pre1/doc/dfilter2pod.pl /usr/bin/perl

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.