[Bug 194355] Review Request: imlib

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Jun 12 15:51:46 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: imlib


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194355





------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com  2006-06-12 11:43 EST -------
NEEDSWORK:
- Buildroot wrong
- Obsoletes: imlib-cfgeditor w/out a Provides: imlib-cfgeditor for upgrade paths
- in devel: Requires: imlib = %{epoch}:%{version} should be Requires: imlib =
%{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}
- Missing BR libtool (and possibly more)
- rpmlint not happy:

E: imlib explicit-lib-dependency libjpeg
E: imlib explicit-lib-dependency libtiff
W: imlib summary-ended-with-dot An image loading and rendering library for X11R6.
E: imlib obsolete-not-provided Imlib
E: imlib obsolete-not-provided imlib-cfgeditor
E: imlib invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libimlib-gif.so libimlib-gif.so
E: imlib invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libimlib-ps.so libimlib-ps.so
E: imlib invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libimlib-tiff.so libimlib-tiff.so
E: imlib invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libimlib-xpm.so libimlib-xpm.so
E: imlib invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libimlib-png.so libimlib-png.so
E: imlib invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libimlib-bmp.so libimlib-bmp.so
E: imlib invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libimlib-ppm.so libimlib-ppm.so
E: imlib invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libimlib-jpeg.so libimlib-jpeg.so
W: imlib conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/im_palette-small.pal
W: imlib conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/im_palette-tiny.pal
W: imlib conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/im_palette.pal
W: imlib conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/imrc
E: imlib zero-length /usr/share/doc/imlib-1.9.13/NEWS
W: imlib-devel summary-ended-with-dot Development tools for Imlib applications.
E: imlib-devel obsolete-not-provided Imlib

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list