[Bug 192889] Review Request: openais standards based cluster framework

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Jun 13 15:38:44 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: openais standards based cluster framework


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192889


sdake at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER           |ASSIGNED




------- Additional Comments From sdake at redhat.com  2006-06-13 11:30 EST -------
(In reply to comment #50)
> Review
> ======
> 
> rpmlint output:
> 
> E: openais non-readable /usr/sbin/ais-keygen 0700
> E: openais non-standard-executable-perm /usr/sbin/ais-keygen 0700
> (required permissions)
> 
> W: openais non-standard-dir-in-usr libexec
> (not *that* non-standard)
> 
> W: openais incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/openais $prog
> (daemon and package name are incoherent upstream)
> 
> W: openais-devel conffile-without-noreplace-flag
/etc/ld.so.conf.d/openais-i686.conf
> (is anyone *really* going to edit this file anyway?)
> 
> I don't believe any of these are blockers, or even need fixing.
> 
> - package and spec file naming OK
> - package meets guidelines
> - license is BSD, matches spec, text included
> - spec file written in ENglish and is legible
> - sources match upstream
> - builds OK in mock for rawhide (i386)
> - buildreqs OK
> - no locale-specific data
> - shared libraries present in -devel package (only needed for devel)
>   ldconfig is properly called in %post and %postun for the devel package
> - not relocatable
> - no directory ownership or permissions issues
> - no duplicate files
> - %clean section present and correct
> - macro usage is consistent
> - code, not content
> - documentation volume not excessive
> - docs don't affect runtime
> - header files properly located in -devel package
> - static libraries disabled
> - no pkgconfig file
> - -devel package has fully-versioned dependency on main package
> - no libtool archives included
> - not a GUI application, so no desktop file needed
> - scriptlets are sane
> 
> Issues
> ======
> 
> - package is ExclusiveArch: i386 ppc x86_64 ppc64
>   Since this covers all current Fedora Core architectures, why is it present?
> 
> - please correct confusing 0.76-1.6 changelog entry (Comment #48)
> 
> Once these are addressed, I'll be in a position where I'd be happy to approve
> this package if it was for Fedora Extras, However, I cannot approve Core
> packages, so someone else will need to do that.

Paul
Thank you for your review.  I've updated the package as follows:

* Tue Jun 13 2006 Steven Dake <sdake at redhat.com> - 0.76-1.7
- Remove ExclusiveArch since all Fedora Core 6 arches have been tested.

* Fri Jun 9 2006 Steven Dake <sdake at redhat.com> - 0.76-1.6
- Move condrestart to %%postun instead of %%post.
- Call initscript directly as suggested by Jesse.

The new SRPM and specfile can be downloaded from:
Spec URL: http://developer.osdl.org/dev/openais/SRPM/openais.spec
SRPM URL: http://developer.osdl.org/dev/openais/SRPM/openais-0.76-1.7.src.rpm
> 



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list